REVIEW COMMENTS
CHECKLIST
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure
that the submlttal of amended plans and documents is substantlally complete
for review. Turning in the list and the appropriate plans and documents
will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted
by the Slte Development Division of the Plannlng and Zoning Department.
Community Deliverance Church
Project Name:
1. submit an amended Site Plan ReVlew application form that reflects the
changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents
to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review
Commlttee comments. A copy of the orlginal form with a distlnguishable
symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new
form wlth the changes identified. It is the agent of the owners
responsibility to notify the owner(s) of changes. If there are no
changes required to be documented on the application form, a letter
from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended
submittal.
2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents
that show compliance with the Code of ordinances and comments made by
the Technical Review committee. Two (2) of the sets shall have the
appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer
responslble for the drawing(s). Plans and documents shall be assembled
in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the
project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically
numbered such as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3.
3. Submit a locator map that identifles the location of the site and the
surroundlng roadways and zoning districts. (Refer to directions on the
attached sheet titled submittal requirements)
4. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to
remain in their existing condltion and photos of eXisting buildings on
sites that abut the subject property. (Refer to directions on the
attached sheet titled submittal requirements)
5. Submit a legible 8 1/2/1 by 11/1 transparency of the landscape site plan
drawing. (Refer to direct10ns on the attached sheet titled submittal
requlrements)
Submlt colored elevation view drawlngs - Duplicate drawings of the
drawings submitted for site plan review that have been colored.
(Not mounted - Refer to directions on the attached sheet titled
submittal requirements)
7. Submlt color samples of the proposed color(s). (Refer to directions on
the attached sheet tltled submittal requirements)
~6~ CZ)/),,/'l-'Je....,r AI,,_ I ON T1J~ /J?6"1D
F/2.01h fr1'("HAt;.l.. c.. f-j~Ab TO CrlRlsro"Ht.~e.
OPi~O ;:r(}f.)C BJ Iq"l~. 'IF" tlt..L c..').1l:.~\DR
c
F'NI!I:~) Mt\iCQ.IAL-S1' L~oe.!o. FH!f: c:.A.I~II^I~ C0LDR
It R.c: No r k\~f~~(.~e.t:), .~...._.._____
C.l..€VAIION oR4W,f\Ji-S.
SUBMITTAL REOUIREMENTS
The following shall be incorporated as part of the submittal of
amended plans and/or documents for review
1. Submit a scaled locator map that identifies the locatlon and
perimeter boundary of the site and the surrounding roads and
current zoning distrlcts including the distrlct of the
subject property. The map shall show and identify by name
the roads surrounding the site and the roadway path that
links the site to the closest arterial road with the names
of the roads and arterial road(s) identified. The map shall
show the zoning district line and the title of the zoning
districts that abut the perimeter of the zoning district
where the subJect property is located. The map shall have
the North compass direction and scale identified. Maximum
size of locator map is 8 1/2" by 14".
2. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that
are to remain In their existing condition and photos of
eXlstlng buildings that are located on the sites that abut
the perimeter of the subject property. The minimum size is
8" by 10". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the
locatlon of the eXlsting structures with respect to the
location of the proposed project.
3. Submit a 8-1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site
plan drawing to be used on an overhead projector at board
meetings.
4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored dupllcate
copy of all drawings of the elevation views of each side of
all buildings and signage associated with the project. The
colored elevation views shall match the elevations shown in
the documents that where submitted for site plan review. The
applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be
colored with the color name and associated color reference
number identified. The type of exterior surface material
shall be identified next to the associated color. The
colored elevatlon drawings shall have compass direction or
title of the side of the building identified. The title
block of the original drawing shall be shown. The maximum
size is 24" by 36". Do no submit on board of any kind.
5. Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors.
Each sample shall have attached a label that identifies the
color by name and numerical/letter code from an established
color chart.
6. Where a specific exterior surface is not applicable to the
proJect, slgnlfy by placing a "N/A" on the appropriate line.
7. Submit a copy of the legal description of the subject
property on an 8 1/2" by II" sheet of paper.
C:AESTH.REV
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 92-128
June II, 1992
FROM:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
~h' -~ I' d '
C ristopher Cutro, P annlng an Zonlng Director
TO:
RE:
Site Plan Fee Waiver - James Bouie
We have received the attached letter from Reverend James Bouie,
Pastor of the Community Deliverance Church, requesting a waiver
of site plan review fees.
The church has filed a site plan for the property located at
414 Northwest lOth Avenue. The property is known as the Cavalier
Club.
I have advised Reverend Bouie that his request must be approved
by the City Commission and would be considered on June 16, 1992.
If you should have any questlons, please feel free to call me.
CC:ald
C:J-BOUIE.ALD
M E M 0 RAN DUM
June 8, 1992
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development Adm~nistrator
RE: Site Plan Review - Site Plan Modification
Project Church - Reverend James Bouie
(Formerly Cavalier Club)
Location 414 N.W. lOth Avenue
Applicant - Reverend James Bouie
The following comments are in response to the submittal of the
site plan for the above referenced project. The comments for the
project w~ll be discussed at the June 11, 1992, Technical Review
committee meeting. The site plan modification was reviewed for
consistency with the review standards speclfied in section 8 of
Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Part III, Land Development
Regulations of the Code of Ordinances. The applicant shall amend
the drawlngs and documents to show compliance with the following
comments:
1. Speclfy on the elevatlon view drawings with a note whether
the corner quoins, white stucco and gray roof shingles are
the existing exterior finish materials or the proposed new
materlals and colors. If the material and colors are new
construction, provide color elevation view drawings for all
sides of the building with the colors specified.
2. SpeCify on the plan the size, use and whether the
rectangular area shown at the rear of the building is
covered. If the area is covered, identify the setback
distance from the rear and east property line to the
structure and incorporate the elevation view of same into
the elevat~on view draWings of the building.
3. The reproduction of the symbol used for the hedge material
is not clear to distinguish the location and extent of the
hedge material. Amend the plans to clarify same. The hedge
materlal ~s required to be continuous and located in a
manner to screen the on-site vehicle use area from the
properties that abut the east, south and west sides of the
subject property. A continuous hedge is also required along
the north slde of the property that is adjacent to the
Northwest lOth Avenue public right-of-way.
4. Show on the site plan with a distinguishable symbol the
location and perimeter outline of the lawn grass and speCify
the specie and form of installation.
5. Relocate the line-of-sight triangles to the edge of the
property line and ingress/egress accessway and specify that
the space within the trlangle area between thirty-six (36)
inches and six (6) feet above grade is clear of limbs,
foliage and hedge material.
6. Identify on the plan the grade and installation
specifications for the proposed landscape material. The
specifications shall be consistent with the requirements
stated in the Landscape Code.
7. Specify on the plan the overall height after planting of the
proposed Live Oak trees. The minimum tree height specified
~n the Landscape Code is eight (8) feet.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 92-142
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Kazunas /W ~ ~.
City Engineer CJ
DATE: May 28, 1992
RE: Church - Reverend James Bouie (fka Cavalier Club)
Site Plan Modification
We have reviewed the above project plan submission and offer the
following comments:
1) Entrance width shall be dimensioned on plans. Entrance pavement
and sidewalk shall be constructed to City standards or if existing,
shall be inspected by the Engineering Inspector to assure com-
pliance with City standards.
2) Curbs shall be installed along north and south parking lot edge
to protect landscaping.
3) The first 2t" of storm runoff from the parking lot must be
pretreated. The applicant is advised to meet with the City
Engineer to discuss this and other drainage requirements.
4) Parking lot lighting must be shown on the plan. Compliance with
City code will be verified at time of building permit.
5) Stop sign and stop bar is shown in the wrong location. Relocate
to back of sidewalk.
6) Plans shall reflect pavement thickness of 1" Type II asphalt over
6" compacted shell or lime rock per City standards.
MEK/ck
RECEIVED
MAY 2 9 1992
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To:
Christopher Cutro
Planning Director
Nay
r::'Q
....- " ~
1992
From: Vincent A. Finizio, Admin. Coord. Engr.
Re: Reverend James Bouie's - Church Site Plan
1. Pur--suant. to Section 8. "Revie~".j Standanjs", :::lUbsectIon B.:5.2,
the applicant shall revise the site plan to depict an
ingress/egress driveway (access point) with the required 25 ft.
r-adi U~5.
2. Required drainage calculations and
submitted to the City Engineer as none
dr-ainaqe plan
~'Jet-e pruovi ded.
should be
~. It appears that the Stop Sign and associated stop bar may be
situated a little too far from the edge of pavement. Although
the subject distance is within permissible limits, I recommend
that the Stop Sign be located at or near the back of sidewalk to
improve pedestrian safety (this comment meets with the approval
of the City Engineer).
Note: This plan does not contain
required by code and/or depicts
in a state of non-compliance with
a~s follcn-Js:
many construction improvements
construction elements which are
City Codes. A partial list is
A. The depict.ed Handicap Parking Stall construction detail does
not comply with the Department on Community Affairs Accessibility
Manual. A copy of same can be obtained from this office.
B. The plan does not depict the
curbing pursuant to City Codes, Chapter
Rai sed Cont. i nuous Concrf2t.e Cur-obi nq il.
required raised continuous
:=i, (~r-ticle X, "F~equin~?d
C. ThE' PI ,,:In deff:',,; r-Iot_ d(?J:::' :i_ ct a II ,,5:i_ ti~\ Ii qht i nCj ~:;\/<:;tE~m "
I~ required by the Parking Lot Ordinance.
1:::':1. ":in ~'Jh i ch
D. The
~".jithin
plan cioes
the F<.O.~AJ.
not depict the construction
of N.W. 10th Avenue.
clf
i::\ qrasseci
swale
Items #1, #2, and #3 shall be complied with prIor to sign-off.
Items A., B., C., and D. are being provided to the applicant so
that he may be made aware that extensive plan revisions will be
required prior to issuance of a Building Permit to construct this
SIte. End of Memo.
'- )&' ~ ~~+ 4.~ .
ce: Mike kazunas U
RECEIVED
MAY 2 9 1992
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 92-132
May 22, 1992
FROM:
Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
Don Jaeger ~. _
Building Of~r
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
TO:
THRU:
RE:
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
CHURCH - REVEREND JAMES BOUIE
414 N.W. 10th AVENUE
The Building Department has no comments on the above referenced
project at this time; however, all signs must have site approval
and comply with the Sign Code before a permit can be issued.
.' ,.
/'
.~
738-7480
AN: bh
RECEIVED
YAY 26
PLANNING DEPT.
CHURCH. DOC
..
~
TO:
FROI'1 :
DATE:
RE::
YIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 92-23i WDC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMEN'l'
HA Y :~ ':J: III 9 2
CHURCH - REVEREND JAMES BOUIE
414 NW 10TH AVENUE
THERE ARE NO OBJECTIONS TO THIS PLAN AT THIS TIME.
chUl"ch.wdc
pg
,
& ' 7& (
J:L1,7ci1AU::"~~~ .
FIRE DEPARTMENT RE?RESENTATIVE
RECEIVED
MAY 2 2 \992
tB<<IWtIlI(
U'l'ILITIES DEPAR'lHE!ft' NO. 92 - 197
TO: Christopher cutro, Planning and zoni
FRat: John A. Guidry, utilities Director
DATE: May 20, 1992
SOBJ!rr: Site Plan review - Church for Reverend Janes Boule
We can approve this project subject to the following condition:
1) All water and sewer utilities to be owned and operated by the city shall
be constructed in accordance with city standards. (Sect. 26-33(b))
We have no objection to this item being forwarded for approval. Our sole
ccmnent will be addressed at time of building peI11lit, Please refer any
questions on this natter to Peter Mazzella of this office.
JNJ/PVM
be: Peter Mazzella
xc: File
TIME: Asst. to the Director - 15 minutes
RECEIVED
MAY 2 1 1992
M E M 0 RAN DUM
#92-103
TO: Chris Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Lt. Donald I, Thrasher
Police Department
DATE: 20 May 1992
SUBJECT: Site plan modification
Church-414 NW 10 Avenue
I've reviewed the site plan modification at 414 NW 10 Avenue and
make the following recommendation.
1). Detail of parking lot lights and activation system
(Public Safety).
DIT/dmj
RECEIVED
MAY 2 0 1992
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM *92-199
FROM:
Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent .~
Site Plan Modification I'
Project - Church - Rev. James Bouie
File No. 678
TO:
RE:
DATE:
May 21, 1992
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the site plans for
the above named project.
There are no recreation-related issues on this project. We will
not need to review these plans again unless major changes in the
scope of the project involves residential development.
JW:ad
Processing time:
Parks Superintendent:
Secretary:
.25 hrs.
.25 hrs.
RECEIVED
MAY 2 2 1992
To: Chr~stopher Cutro
Re: Church - Reverend Bouie
Page Two of Two
8. Shown on the plans a minimum of fifty (50) percent of the
total number of hedges required to screen the vehicle use
area specified as a native specie. The Podocarpus hedge
material specified on the plan is not native. Identify the
variety of Podocarpus.
9. Previous discussion with the applicant lead staff to
believe that the applicant would like to phase construction
of the project. If the applicant requests phasing
construction of the project, show on the plan with a
distinguishable symbol the location of the proposed phase
line.
C:BOUIE.ALD
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM *92-213
TO: Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
V \\, H-
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist )~
RE:
Church - Rev. James Bouie
DATE:
June 3, 1992
No comments.
KH:ad
Processing time:
Forester/Environmentalist: 15 minutes
Secretary II: 15 minutes
RECEIVED
JUN ~ .-
PLANNiNG DEPT.
~
J
1.
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Pete Mazzella, Asst. to Utilities Director
Lt. Don Thrasher, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Mike Kazunas, City Engineer
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer
DATE:
June 2, 1992
RE:
Technical Review CaIIIlittee Meeting
Thursday. June 11, 1992
~v~ .:F~
~-JL
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet
on Thursday, June 11, 1992, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "c"
(West Wing) to discuss the following:
PRELIMINARY PLAT - Replat
Lawrence Groves, Plat *1
NOTE: See attached Memorandum No. 92-147 from the Engineering
Department. Questions regarding the replat shall be directed to
the Engineering Department.
SIDEWALK VARIANCE
Location:
Applicant:
655 Lakeside Harbor
Glenn Guthrie
NOTE: See attached Sidewalk Waiver Form. Questions regarding
the variance shall be directed to the Building Department.
"
Technical Review Committee
Page 2
REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMENTS
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
PROJECT:
Church - Reverend James Bouie
(Formerly Cavalier Club)
414 N.W. 10th Avenue
Reverend James Bouie
678
LOCATION:
APPLICANT
FILE NUMBER:
~A<-.~ )
Dorothy Moore
DM/jm
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Edward Hillery, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Central File
City Commission (5)
Project File
Chronological File
A: TRCAGDA.JM
ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN~ MEMORANDUM NO. 92-147
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director ~
All Technical Review Committee Members
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
DATE: June 2, 1992
RE: Preliminary Plat Submittal
A Replat of Lawrence Groves, Plat #1
Transmitted herewith is the preliminary plat submittal for a replat
of Lawrence Groves, Plat #1. Please place on the next available
Technical Review Committee agenda.
Plans have been sent to other City departments.
l). T ~.~~ (j-
Vincent A. Finizio
VAF/ck
attachment
~ ,\Sc..it- ~'lc.. lP/.../q"\,
Note: Fire Department & Police Department to visit Engineering
Department office to review plans.
~.tv ~~ w~.
.
G) ?U:J ~ ~
@'~A~~~'
G) & ~ ;ti ~ - ~.~ a{ ~-
. .
q;. dU a.- ~ ,uae/
~
~.~
"
,-
June 1, 1992
TO: Mr. Christopher Cutro
Planning Director
FROM: Reverend James Bouie, Pastor
Community Deliverance Church
TOPIC: Request for a Waiver of the Application Fee
Please be advised that I am requesting the fee that
is to accompany my application be waived. At this
time my congregation and I have a limited fund source
and will need what funds we have to complete the con-
struction and renovation part of our project if it is
approved by the City Commission.
If you have any additional questions about this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact me at (407) 734-3275.
JB/jc
RECEIVED
JUN 3
PLANNING DEPT.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 92-104
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, public Works Director
Mike Kazunas, City Eng~neer
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Flre Prevention Officer
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utility Director
Lt. Don Thrasher, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevj.P Hall~h n, FOreS}er-*vlronmen~alis~ .
'<~~~ ~. J<Ih. ~ ~~- a.~Jj., A LLft:r
Christopher rO,'plannlng & zon~g~irector~~-
TO:
DATE:
May 18, 1992
RE:
REVIEW PROCEDURES
Moditicatlon
- Church - Reverend James BOUle
(Formerly Cavaller Club)
Locatlon - 414 N.W. lO~h Avenue
Applicant - Reverend James BOUle
F~le No. 678
SITE PLAN
Slte Plan
ProJect
Flnd at~ached for your rev~ew the plans and exhiblts for the
above referenced proJect. Site Plan ReVlew approval for thlS
proJect wlll be granted by the Clty CommlSS10n. To ensure tha~
the proJect stays on line with the review time frame, I request
that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal comments
transmitted to the Site Development Dlvision of the plannlng and
Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on June 2, 1992.
Adhering to the following review guidellnes will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently
obtain Technical Review committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulatlons, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review,
Section 8 to review and formulate comments. (see Planning
& Zoning Department memo #92-020)
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to
be substantially complete based on the submittal
requlrements identified in Sectlon 7 of the Site plan ReVlew
Ordinance. However, if the data provlded to meet the
submittal requlrements is insufflcient to properly evaluate
and process the proJect based on the review standards,
additional data snould be requested by the reviewer through
the Planning and Zoning Department.
To: TRC Members
Re: Planning & Zoning Memo, 92-104
Page Two of Two
3. Each comment shall reference the code section and include
the language of the subm~ttal requirements and review
standards that require the data to be submitted for rev~ew.
4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their
comments when the plans depict or when the location and
installation of their departmental required improvements may
conflict with other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member flnds a code deficiency that is outside of
hls/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific
code section may be included in their rev~ew comments with
the name of the appropriate TRC Member thaL is responsible
for the review specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall
forward the plans and a memo, within the time frame stated
above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the
plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the
plans submitted for review.
All comments shall be typed and addressed to the Planning and
Zoning Director and transmitted to the Site Development Division
for distribution to the appl~cant. Please include the name and
phone number of the reviewer on this memo. Mike Haag will be the
Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the
review of the project.
The Site Development Division will send to the applicant a cover
letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the
plans to comply with the comments and submit to the Site
Development Dlvision within 90 days twelve (12) sets of amended
plans for review. When the Site Development Div~slon receives the
amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo
to all TRC Members for review and approval.
Attachment
xc: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Parks & Recreation Director
Edward Hillery, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Project File
Chronological File
TRCFULL.SDD