CORRESPONDENCE
~_.
7Al
BOYNTON SEACREST
(fka Cedar Grove)
MASTER PLAN
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-100
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
~~
THRU: Christopher cutro
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden
Senior Planner
DATE: May 5, 1993
SUBJECT: Boynton Seacrest (f.k.a. - Cedar Grove)
Master Plan (subdivision) - File No. 697
At the February 9, 1993 Planning and Development Board meeting, the
action taken by the Planning and Development Board with respect to
the above-referenced request was to remand the request to the
Technical Review Committee due to extensive number of serious,
unresol ved issues. The applicant came to this meeting with a
revised master plan that had not yet been submitted and reviewed by
the Technical Review Committee. Therefore, remanding the request
required the applicant to submit revised master plans to the
Technical Review Committee. Since the February Planning and
Development Board, the applicant has submitted two revisions to
staff. The latest revision, reviewed by staff for concurrency
certification and compliance with unresolved subdivision master
plan requirements, is being forwarded to you for action.
with respect to concurrency, Chapter 19, Section 19-85 of the Code
of ordinances states that "no development order shall be approved,
unless public facilities are or will be available to serve the
development project, such that the minimum levels of service set
forth in section 19-84 are maintained, concurrent with the impacts
of the development project". Approval shall include simultaneous
issuance of a concurrency exemption determination, certification of
concurrency, or conditional certification of concurrency for each
public facility. Subdivision master plans are defined by Section
19-83(b)(3) as a category C3 development order. In reviewing this
category of development orders to determine adequacy of public
facilities, roads, drainage and neighborhood parks facilities must
be certified or conditionally certified for concurrency with the
adopted levels of service, consistent with Section 19-88(c)d.3 and
5 and Section 19-85(c).
As documented in Exhibit "A" (statements from City department and
service provider concurrency review) certification of concurrency
can be issued for roads and drainage. It shall be noted however,
that since the latest master plan does not support the number and
type of units stated in the March 24, 1993 traffic concurrency
certification letter from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division,
this development order shall be certified for a maximum of 142
single family units and 82 dupluxes; a total of 224 dwelling units
as shown on the latest master plan. This number will be reduced
further if the applicant agrees to the staff recommended conditions
of approval relative to preservation of environmentally sensitive
land (see discussion below).
Conditional certification of concurrency can be issued for
neighborhood parks, consistent with Section 19-88(d)(5)c and d,
simultaneously with approval of this development order if subject
to the proviso contained in Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 93-094, item #2 (see exhibit "B" - staff recommended
conditions of approval). Item #2 states that no building permits
shall be issued for the final 50% of the total number of units
within the subdivision until construction of either Girl Scout Park
or the minimum 4.032 acre dedicated park site commences.
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
May 5, 1993
With regard to compliance of the master plan with Appendix C -
"Subdivisions, Platting" of the Code of Ordinances, exhibit II B"
contains a recommendation from Richard Staudinger, City Engineer
and coordinator of the subdivision master plan review process, as
well as staff recommended conditions of approval. Mr. staudinger
recommends that this request be approved, subject to staff
comments. Staff comments will be addressed at the next step in the
subdivision process; submittal of a preliminary plat. However, due
to the impact resolution of the environmental comments will have on
the current master plan design, Mr. staudinger is further
recommending that the applicant submit a new master plan sketch
prior to preparation of a preliminary plat to verify that the
environmental comments have been satisfactorily addressed.
r f4
~n~' ' ct;:-/C'
Tambri J. H~en ,
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:BoySeaPD
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY DEPARTMENT
AND
SERVICE PROVIDER
CONCURRENCY REVIEW STATEMENTS
-:L -
Soard of: County Commissioners
Mary McCarty, Chair
Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Burt Aaronson
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Deparbnent of Engineering
and Public Works
March 24, 1993
Ms. Tambri Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: BOYNTON SEACREST (AKA CEDAR GROVES) - FILE NO. 697
Dear Ms. Heyden:
The Palm Beach County Traffi c Di vi s i on has revi ewed the Addendum No. 2 for
traffic impact study for the project entitled Boynton Seacrest (aka Cedar Groves)
pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) in Article 7.9 of the Palm
Beach County Land Development Code. The addendum addresses Alternate Test 1 for
Woolbright Road as was r~q.~ired in the review of th~~e~arlier traffic study. The
project consists of .146 s'ingle-family units and 81 multi-family units. The
build-out of the projectiis proposed for 1995.
" .;.';.</.
The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding
this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
a.:Jv4
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
DW:CRW
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn11d
-, '~rEIVED
l:'.l~ ~ .
,vlAR 3 ;)
PLANNli~G DEPT.
...
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
n
GEE & JENSON MEMORANDUM
RE:
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director Jt'
~ 67 /:--
W. Richard Staudinger, City Enginea1'( VI.f'7"
Boynton Seacrest (F.K.A. Cedar Grove)
Subdivision Master Plan
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
May 5, 1993
****************************************************************************************************
Attached are the comments from the TRC members on the referenced development. All
of the subdivision master plan major comments have been addressed except those noted
by the Planning & Zoning Department and the Forester/Environmentalist as discussed at
the TRC meeting of April 27, 1993.
I recommend this subdivision master plan be forwarded to the Planning & Development
Board with a recommendation for approval, subject to the applicants acknowledgement
that the environmental comments by the Planning & Zoning Department and
Forester/Environmentalist will be addressed at the preliminary plat stage. This may
require the applicant to submit a new master plan sketch prior to a preliminary plat to
verify the environmental comments have been addressed. I also recommend the City
consider waiving any fees for this sketch submittal as the costs of review would be
covered by preliminary plat submission fees.
92025/200
RECEIVED
tMY" ,
"
PLANNING DEPT.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner
DATE: April 13, 1993
SUBJECT: BOYNTON SEACREST - Concurrency Analysis for Neighborhood
Parks
This concurrency analysis on the proposed development is being
performed pursuant to Chapter 19, Article VI. Concurrency
Requirements (Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances).
Boynton Seacrest is located within Park Planning Area #17.
According to Table 2, Neighborhood Park Needs Analysis (Recreation
and Open Space Support Document, 1989 Comprehensive Plan), and the
attached analysis for Planning Area #17, the current (1987) levels
of service for Area #17 is 1.2 acres of park space per 1,000
persons, and a 1 mile walking distance. The acreage level of
service will then change to 2.6 acres per 1,000 persons in 1995, as
a result of the completion of Girl Scout Park. By the Year 2000
the acreage level of service is to change again to reflect the
addition of the required park dedication in connection with the
development of the S. Seacrest Boulevard Site.
Boynton Seacrest consists of 224 dwelling units. By applying the
persons per dwelling unit factor estimated by the Bureau of
Economic and Business Research (BEBR)--2.248--a population of 513
persons is proj ected. As the attached analysis indicates, this
development, when built-out, would lower the adopted acreage level
of service to 1.00 acre per 1,000 persons. The walking distance
level of service would not be affected by this development.
The impacts from additional development within Neighborhood Park
Planning Area #17 upon adopted levels of service were anticipated,
and in part, formed the basis on which these levels of service
issues were resolved within this planning area. Included within
the city's Comprehensive Plan are the following two policies that
address directly, or indirectly, the level of service condition
within Neighborhood Park Planning Area #17:
Policy 5.5.1 - Subsequent to Plan adoption. .all residential
developments that exceed 100 dwelling units provide a
private recreation area, unless however, public parks are
located within one-half mile from the project. .
Policy 5.5.4 - Subsequent to Plan adoption the City shall
require the dedication of sufficient land for a neighborhood
park site at the time that the following properties are
rezoned or platted for residential use:..., S. Seacrest
Boulevard, ...
Policy 5.5.1 does not apply to the S. Seacrest Site, as this site
is located within approximately one-half mile from the planned Girl
Scout Park. with respect to the dedication of public park space,
which is required by Policy 5.5.4, Boynton Seacrest is consistent
with this Comprehensive Plan policy as the master plan indicates
that 4.2 acres of the site is to be dedicated to the City for
eventual neighborhood park development (4.032 is the minimum
acreage required by code based on the number and type of units
proposed. This site would be acquired according to the
requirements of Appendix C. Subdivisions and Platting (Boynton
Beach Code of Ordinances).
The dedicated park site satisfies the specific requirement within
Policy 5.5.4 of the Comprehensive Plan, however, to ensure that the
adopted levels of service are met, either the Girl Scout Park or
cont. Concurrency Analysis
the dedicated park should be completed prior to the completion of
the proposed development and, the other must be constructed prior
to the Year 2000.
Attachments
~:CBD~RG'2
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ANALYSIS: PLANNING AREA 117
concurrency Analysis For CEDAR GROVI Alt. 12 - Public Recreation Provided,
Proposed No. of Units... 228 - No Private Recreation
Projected population.... 513
Analysis of
Level of Service: 1987 11/1/92 1995 2000 2010
Population 4,983 5,496 6,224 6,261 6,289
population Served by
Private Recreation Facilities 1,853 1,853 2,890 2,890 2,890
Population served only by
Public Parks and Facilities 3,130 3,643 3,334 3,371 3,399
Neighborhood Park
Acreage (PublicI 3.10 3.10 8.10 12.90 12.90
LOS for Acres/1000 2.50 2.50
Population 1.20 1. 00 2.60 3.80 )( 3.80
LOS for Haxillul
Walking Distance (Iiles) 1. 00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50
Ixisting and Future
Public Parks and Facilities:
Forest Hills 3.1
Girl Scout 5.0
Little League IDistrict)
11 acres
S. Seacrest Blvd. Site 4.2
Total Neighborhood Park Acres
3.1 3.1 8.7
(unchanged)
12.9
12.9
1980 Population
Onder Age 18, and
Percent of Total( I:
697 (17)
ROTE:
-lor current population, the 1981 population vas used since the 1990 Census includes only year>>round residents. In additiom
no residential developllent has occurred in this planning area that vould significantly change the 1987 population.
-The population for Cedar Grove vas estllated using BIBR's ppdu of 2.248.
-~ .-
J
...
....
o 8
o
:r
,. ,..
.... 8~8~~
.;.~~oo
::: ....
~
.
...
0-
...
..
...
~
II'
\ \
f
.\ .,
...
t \
\ \
~
..
...
...
...
~
~
,...
8
o
~
..
...
~
.:-.
..
G-
..
~
..
<<.;
..
..
~
..
III
...
..
8
o
o
~
...
8.
o
g
ci
?
.0
g
o
f,
0-
...
000
"'"....
....;..;
... -
...
,
8
ci
$
~
o
o
...
OJ
...
III
..
...
...
...
:\
... ...
-:,i
g
o
9-
...
o
0-
o
..
~
...
..
'1
..
.
..
....
er-
...
~
o 8
o
,...
". 8~9- 8.
;. ,.... ~ -
~
..
~
\
~\
....
888
ci 0 0
~ ~ ~.
.D ... ,.
8
ci
...
s.
'8 g B,
00:1
'"
0-
ci
...
..
...
..
? 5 c
.0 .:. c:i
8.
o
8
o
c
$
888
c:i 0 ci
,.
...
0-
C
...
g.~~ ~
..:~.. c:i
...
...
'C
o
"J. '8 g
~ 0 0
g
c:i
".
0-
ci
~ ~ ~
'4 .; ~
'i
.:.
~
.:.
08'
c:i
8
ci
08'
o
g
o
.D
'"
oj,
..
~
'"
!
011
~
8 8.
o 0
".
...
o
..
..
...
g
o
g
o
'"
...
o
,...
....
-
...
89.9. ~
.i-~~ pi>
-
...
g9.~ g
.;....:.~ ..
o
...
.:.
~
""
g
.:.
o
..
.:.
~
...
i
g
.:.
,...
"
.,
...
...
~9.9. 9.
_~;. 0
... ....
..
';:.
...
~9-g
..- ~..i
...
9-
o
8
o
",
",
",
'8
ci
i
'8
o
8 8.
ci 0
~.
It'
,...
'"
..
..
..
"
"!.
..
~
.;.
9, 9. 'A
~oo
...
III
$
'88'8
o 0 ci
,... ,...
i9-?~~
;.J;oo
... ..... -'
>II
$
'88'8
ci 0 0
...
...
...
..
,.. ,...
,...
..
~
i9.~~~
~..;.oo
.. ~...." ....;
1-
...
..
g g
c:i 0
,...
<<j9.i
..;...~
... -
!:
c:i
1-
...
..
'8 g
ci c:i
,...
<<j9-~
.:....:.
... ...
".
..
c:i
9-
o
~
po
.
....
~
...
'"
;!
..
-
~
9-
.:.
~ g g
~ 0 0
o
o g ·
ci
9-
.:.
8.
...
~
o
..
'8 5
.;. ..:
~
c:i
i
..
'8
o
g
o
'8
.:.
~ 8 8
!. 0 c:i
,...
9.9.9,
o~c:i
-
;
..
~~~
~
o
9.
o
'3
o
~
o
f,
g
o
~
o
'8
o
o
8
o
...
~ ~9-~ ~
~ -i~;' .".
-
o
'8
o
o
~
o
~
...
'8
o
g
o
~
.\
...
..
~\ '.
-;\ .."i" \ \
.'9.;..!'.:i.
~~~~~~~g
:at,.sa...w;''''
t ." 1. ~ 0 " 0 ~
o . s:.. .. .......
.t"" ql"
..... "~'ll 'd '6 'd '4
,:.",:&..-::\...':!:II
..
g
o
,...
i
..
..
o
'"
c:i
g g g
000
"
,.
.0
".
g g
o 0
g
o
... g g 'A
~ 0 <> ...
...
"..
....
g 8
o 0
".
~
...
011 <<j9.5 9.
~ .",.... 0
,...
-:. 59-8 8.
:. 4"'~ --
-
J'O g <<j
~ .;. .:.
.,.
...
o
o g.'
o
'8
o
...
o
...
g ~
o 0
.-
~9-g
-j"~
9-
ci
... g 8 8
~ 0 0 0
~
J'O
...
,...
c
o
~
...
g5'-~
0....0
..
.. ~ ,t..l\
i ~~ , i \ i ~
"~1 i~~'t!!
~ i. "q ..
%i~li~~~'i
\...
-'
~ ii
-; .'l"\!
i~l':l\ii
..~ .. .. i .. r
\"Z~:l:":'"
.tia.. q'd~
i:.",l:~~~J
..
9
-0;--
g g
ci c:i
...,
\ 00
~~~
;..l
~ ;;
!. ..-;.,\\
i ~l , i \ i'~
..a....oi..\..,
.i1\:' :~
~t.t...~'d%~"
1:.~1:',':!'" :II
to
,;,
~
..
~
..
~
(.
...
~
o
,
9,9-~
..00
-'
~
...
..
....
...
o
9-
o
g ~
c:i 0
~
...
g .
ci
~
...
o
...
".
..
8 '3.
.;. ...
, ,...
5\, ~ ~
~......
...
,
c:i
~
c:i
..
".
~
o
g
o
0;. 8 '8
... 0 0
,...
.. 'i9.'i
~ ,;J.iJ
...
~
...
g
.;.
...
~
~
..
~
.."
<<j
.:.
~
..
'i
.
..
-
.
~
...
..
o
~
...
'l
..
..
.l.
,~
~..
~ii
.."
j,...
sa.:.
1\
!
. c~
........
...,~
......~
f't
. le
\\~,
...,.3
i"S"
~l I
: f. 5....
!l~~
"1!1
\5!.~
i \~\~
",,"jf.
~ l \ l~
'; ,,5 \ &
...\-..
"..'i".
....., ,
%!~i~
!. i1l .....
\i!.! 1.
"'tIl...."
i'it~'i
i.~'&~
....tell ....
,.so.J
,\'i~S'
"'....t
"..... '1
l~\:\
\ \~ i~
... ~ t...!.
o.~-; !c
...,......,iD
..-:It"!.
,;'i!!
~!,:~
~\~ \1
.~..... '
lt~t
~..!.
.. \~i
\~'iJ
\;1\
.. i!
~-,1.
~""
ti
. .
~
...
~
~
""
'.S.
...
(.
...
!.
...
'8
ci
~
...
o
.,.
~
...
~
.;.
9-
c:i
~
;
!:
c:i
~
~
o
~
9-
o
..
~ .
~l
'"&~
., tool ..
i."
i i ..~
EXHIBIT liB"
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
AND
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
05. 06, 93
12:00 PM
""GEE &. .,JENSON
POl
n
GEE 81 JENSON MEMORANDUM
RE:
Christopher Clltro, Planning & Zoning Director ;)t' .
~cO J~
W. Richard Staudinger, City Englnett1( V'I""""
Boynton Se9crest (F.K.A. Cedar Grove)
Subdivision Master Plan
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
May 5, 1993
...........*....*******..***..**..*********.**********......***************.***.*************....*..
Attached are the comments from the TRC member$ on the referenced development. All
of the subdIvision master plan major comments have been addressed except those noted
by the Planning & Zoning Department and the Forester/Environmentalist as discussed at
the TRC meeting of April 27, 1993.
t recommend this subdivision master plan be fOlWarded to the Planning & Development
Board with a recommendation for approval, subject to the applicants acknowledgement
that the environmental comments by the Planning & Zoning Department and
Forester/Environmentalist will be addressed at the preliminary plat stage. This may
require the applicant to submit a naw master plan sketch prior to a preliminary plat to
verify the environmental comments have been eddressed. I also reoommend the City
consider waiving any fees for thIs sketch submittal as the costs of review would be
covered by preliminary plat submission fees.
92026/200
I" .......
RECEIVED
MAY . ' .....;
...
PlANNING DEPT~
"\
n
GEE & JENSON
LI1Qlneers-Arelliteets-Planners Ine
April 12, 1993
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beactl, FL 33409
Te:eonone (407) 683-3301
Fax (407) 686-74.'.6
Jill A. Jarkesy I Esq.
Perry, Shapiro, Miller & Jarkesy, PA
1645 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
Suite 600
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Boynton Seacrest Subdivision Master Plan
Environmental Impact Statement
Dear Ms. Jarkesy:
This letter is sent to confirm your verbal directive at the Boynton Beach Technical Review
Committee (TRC) meeting of Thursday, April 8, 1993. At the TRC meeting you directed City Staff
to utilize the environmental study previously submitted for the Cedar Grove PUD rezoning as the
necessary environmental impact statement required by Chapter 7, Article IV; Section 7.5-59 of
the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances (page 628 supplement No.45). No previous
environmental data had been submitted for the Subdivision Master Plan for Boynton Seacrest
(Cedar Grove Tract), therefore no review as noted in 7.5-59 through 63 had been possible.
The Planning & Zoning Department of the City of Boynton Beach and the City Forester will be
reviewing the impact statement and generating appropriate comments to my attention in
accordance with the schedule outlined in the Code of Ordinances.
Please call if you have any questions, or if the contents of this letter do not accurately reflect the
discussion and actions of the April 8, 1993 TRC meeting with respect to environmental issues.
Very truly yours,
Gee & Jenson
Engineer ;;:::I~~
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
WRS/bf
92-0255/200
cc: J. Scott Miller
Chris Cutro
James Cherof
Tambri Heyden
.
RECEIVED
.13
p~NN\NG DE-PT.
--
-
F, MARTIN PERRY
ROBERT LEE SHAPIRO
JORDAN R. MIllER.
JIll A. JARKESY
5&-~
~~,~,~g~,~d
~o43 .9a/m. $W~ ~ $WkI.
.9'~ o()(J
1f't.9a/m. ~, 5~ J..uot
TELEPHONE (407) 684-4500
FAX (407) 684-1008
. ADMIDED IN FWRlDA
AND DlSTRlCf OF COLUMBIA
f f~ ~~' ~_ "<;:':~i'
[ (1.,;11 (3 It ~. "
,iff: ~'!:..t ...:~
tr'-~ '
APR 1 6 1993
1" r- ,.'." '''''1' . ," -., - .
yC't('"" A. ~;.- 'i.~''''''~ ~;i{'
'4 ........ 't"\ ~....' ~._ '-4 ...)J'tJ' i ~
April 12, 1993
Mr. W. Richard staudinger, P.E.
city Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
Gee & Jenson
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923
RE: Cedar Grove Investors,
Subdivision Plan
Our File No. 3197.01
N.V./Boynton Sea crest Master
Dear Mr. Staudinger:
This correspondence serves to confirm my statement at the City of
Boynton Beach Technical Review Committee Meeting which was held on
April 8, 1993 relative to the environmental study submitted by
Cedar Grove as part of their Planned unit Development submittal in
early 1992. I hereby authorize you on behalf of Cedar Grove
Investments to consider the Environmental Study prepared by Donald
Richardson Ph.D. of Ecological Consultants, Inc. as part of the
Boyntcn Scacrest Master. Subdi vi sicn Pla:1 su;:,nd.ttal.
Thank you very much for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely yours,
l:.~~
JAJ:psp
/
L,____~_~___
',:)NI'S::JtHd~t:toat:td3t:i ,
0.' ..-... .~ ~ ...,WI"\..uU'\!'\ LOS &.
a I _h._ tAWr
VlJ~fo/"'l. I
({rI~ { ~t/~ C-ernre- c/12?~3
R-l-AA ZONtNG
SKY RANCH ESTATES
(p.eo, 26, PAGE j4)
I
f
I
i -.--
I
I
I \b
I
\~
e,
Q
Cl
I
, ~
11903076' f
t-~ t: :
I BL09K ONE
I
J
,
1~ ~
50' R/W
Q
\1..
\\,)
\ \
\p.
"Ji(""l" 0
..:\, I .
1~
. ,'".': ~ . .
, .' .".\'~~'~\
,.
-:.~~~MteAl CQMMlnEE
-'::1 SITe: PLAN It:t~~J;.~
.. :3Jd;J. De
Date 4fi- ire;?
~::1'4t/~~~~
~.te ~~~ A
Cat~ ,2=.2...~ ",,' ~
Cate . ~ - N" C().~~~if
P. 'N. Dt.,'C. /
- II c.-te4- :-/ .:E r>"1e':r17 ()
~::t.} PIa ~r ~
"cC. a" ((: ~~ ~:::!~ ~;~u :~c.:
;:Gr~ster
APR
-- -
Fire 'Oep.
Eng. Dept.
Utit. Der;t.
Police D,~Dt.
I
I
/.
-=f
I 1D
1__-
.5 ' Lt./,QLL. €~S~M6J(../ T I
MA/I.I(: 6Y ~.~A.
I I I f I
I I -I r- 50'IR/W
I I I I I I
I
1}3-
I
I'
~
'J.\
'J."J
f;
Q
~(JJI
; II
II fA
--- I
I
~11t
j. ~ll:
~';I
"
II
:...
,I
I,
-- 1 ~ '
.1 I L-J
~~_l~,
\J
:.. ""' {... ": - "
/
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-185
TO:
Vincent A. Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
J<>>/f
RE:
Master Plan Comment Reconciliation Submission
Modification Of TRC Meeting Agenda
Boynton Seacrest (FKA Cedar Grove)
DATE:
April 27, 1993
My comments as submitted at the previous TRC (Memo. #93-166) have
not been addressed by the applicant.
KH:ad
The applicant has verbally requested that the report:
ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED SEACREST BOULEVARD
SCRUB, (CEDAR GROVE SITE) BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
09 JANUARY 1992 prepared by Donald Richardson, PHD Ecological
Consultants, Inc. be submitted in total for the project FKA
Cedar Grove. This is to meet the requirements of Article IV,
~V- environmentally sensitive lands, section 7.5-59 through 7.5-63
~~aI ( (pages 628-631). This report does comply with section 7.5-59
M\ lJ. ~OJ through 7 .5-61(b). The applicant must also submit written
"'n\i:(Ir..}. ~ documentation to comply with sections 7.5-61 c, d through
f l~ section 7.5-63 (pages 630-631).
" ,..l
. In accordance with the City Comprehensive Plan Ordinance #89-
38, adopted November 7, 1989 policy 4.3.5 page 67, the
applicant is required to designate a minimum of 25% of the
native plant community as a preservation area. The ecological
assessment document (#2 above) and the site data sheet
(revised 2-20-92) indicated the proposed location of the
Preserve 11.5 acres maintained by Cedar Grove H.O.A. will be
overlayed on the Boynton Seacrest MasterPlan resubmittal. The
. purpose is.to apply the comment made by the applicant at the
T.R.C. meeting on April 8, 1993 (see attached memo from Chris
Cutro, April ~, 1993 paragraph one) towards the location of
the preserve area in conjunction with the proposed blocks,
lots, and R.O.W. easements.
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
1.
~
1r-1~~
l}~
2.
,')
)
~
~,
~tFJ
r .
~
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-166
Vincent Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist 1<:~J1L-
Boynton Seacrest Master Plan Resubmittal (2nd Review)
(FKA Cedar Grove Subdivision MasterPlan
A Planned Residential Community)
April 12, 1993
The applicant will be required to meet the Environmental
Regulation Article I, Tree Preservation Sections 7.5-1 through
7.5-27 (pages 593-606). Specifically, the applicant must
fulfill the requirements of section 7.5-22, page 603, natural
growth to be preserved. This site has been determined to be
an environmentally valuable, nearly extinct ecosystem in South
Florida. Meeting these sections may affect the master plan
design resubmittal, as approved by the City.
'..
T:;'~~~J~{;~"'--'_.==:::----'..
<-,.}"
; . . ~t::::~I;
'. "',."
" < '. .
. "",'.', . r~'"
. ....:.,~1
.'
The following areas as shown on the Boynton Seacrest
MasterPlan resubmittal could not be preserved as indicated
under a tree managemept plan while simultaneously developed as
housing locations. The areas are: Block #1 lots 30,31,32;
Block #7 lots #1-24 inclusive; Block #8 lots #1-22 inclusive;
Block #9 lots #1-15 inclusive; Block #10 lots #1-6 inclusive;
50' R.O.W. easement between block seven and block eight to
north/south property line; 50' R.O.W. easement between block
eight and block nine to north/south property line; 10' non-
access and landscape/screening easement to north/south
property line.
KH:ad
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-094
TO:
Richard Staudinger
City Engineer
~h~tro
Planning and Zoning Director
THRU:
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden
Senior Planner
DATE: April 29, 1993
SUBJECT: Boynton Seacrest (f.k.a. Cedar Grove) - File No. 697
Master Plan (subdivision) - final comments
Based on review of the final revised master plan received April 23,
1993 for the above-referenced request, the following is a list of
comments to be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for
their consideration. If the Planning and Development Board moves
to approve this master plan, it is recommended that approval be
subject to this list of conditions which the applicant will
incorporate within their preliminary plat submittal; the next step
in the subdivision process.
1. At the time of platting, money shall be put in escrow for a
traffic light at the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard and
Mission Hill Road, until project building or until the light
is warranted, whichever comes first. Comprehensive Plan
Policy 1.3.1. and 1.3.7.
2. No building permits shall be issued for the final 50% of the
total number of units within the subdivision until
commencement of construction of either Girl Scout Park or the
park site (minimum 4.032 acres) dedicated to the city by the
Boynton Seacrest property owner. Chapter 19, Article VI,
section 19 -88 (d) ( 5) c and d of the Code of Ordinances and
Comprehensive Plan Objective 9C.2 and Policies 9C.2.3, 9D.2.3
and 5.2.3. and recreation concurrency analysis dated April 13,
1993, from Michael Rumpf to Tambri Heyden.
3. No residential building permits may be issued until the
developer and the School Board approve in writing an agreement
which assures that public school student membership generated
by the development will achieve School Board racial balance
goals. Appendix C of the Code of Ordinances, Article VIII,
Section 4.G and comprehensive Plan Policy 8.22.1.
4. The conflict between the fire hydrant locations and the four
foot portion (located on private lots within a bike path
easement) of the 8 foot wide bike path system shall be
resolved by relocating one or the other and dedicating
easements if appropriate. Appendix C Subdivisions,
Platting, Article VIII, Section 4.C.10.
5. Block 6, Lot 1 shall require front setbacks on both street
frontages. Appendix C - Subdivision, Platting, Article VIII,
section 4.C.10 and Appendix A - Zoning, section 5.C.2.b.
6. To resolve the conflict on the master plan, utility plan and
the drainage plan, the lift station shall be located within a
dedicated tract separate from the property boundaries of Block
6, Lot 11/ rather than within an easement encumbering said
lot. Appendix C - Subdivisions, platting, Article VIII,
Section 4.C.I0.
7. The subject property is delineated on the Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Map as a "Conservation Overlay District" due
to an "A" (high quality) rating of the native, Florida Scrub
ecosystem on the parcel. The use and development of
properties delineated as a "Conservation overlay District" are
/
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-186
TO:
Vincent Finizio, Deputy City Enginee
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Reconciliation
RE:
Boynton Seacrest MasterPlan
(FKA Cedar Grove) - Revised
DATE:
April 29, 1993
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the latest MasterPlan
submittal for Boynton Seacrest. The following comment is
appropriate:
At the TRC meeting of April 27, 1993, the applicant agreed to
provide a 6' minimum paved pedestrian entrance to the public park
site through the private open space tract as a condition of
approval.
JW:ad
CC: Charles C. Frederick, Director
Recreation & Park Department
Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
-~--..
r--:- 1"~
o S?
~ ';,
:P ~ ~
"'. "Jo. i:n
:P "'
~ )> ~
o II
.... ...
It '"
". '"
o It
~
~ j;
~ Th
;0 II
~ t
o ~
OJ
~
~ ~ i1
:::. :;... (n
c '6 <0
; ~ )>
~ (J' ~
E; m
7f,
~
~
-<
1
~
"j;~ ~V
~~!~ ~ ~
~ \~ \~ il
t \.:.:1<4
"," Q~i 1 .. 1;
i ~ f') ~.."",
,.i~ ~~;
i\ii%ii
~!~t l~~
\ '1 ~:; i .. i
;\';; ~~~
~~ :: :~6
:t :;. 1 B
~~ . " ::
t ~ ~;
i ~ & ~
. \ 10
l/
~
9.
III
9.
~
;0
%
__.........c: "
::E f~ ;l)
~ 0 '2.
~ ~ % ~
~ (J' '-I l?,
'6 ~ III <:.
ffi'?l ~ 5
~ ~ -::. ~
~ 0 ~ 0
". '-I 0 :l
\!!~
'" -
'-I
o
~
'"
-\I.
i"
~\
."
sa
~n
;~
H
~.
;!! ~ ~ :~
~~$lb
III ;: (J' ""
h,Oll"'jI
~!~%
% (j) '"
G'l ~ Z
o a> ~
~ ~ n
<! 9 5
o 0 (J'
.... ~ 'i
III
'-I
o
~
..
J
~
~
%
III
-
i
i~ ....
~. ~
H..
" ....
1. ~
i: i
.~ ~ "
;a
i
;
;
i
\
. ~-to
..,> '. '!r,,-
.
i
o
11
l
\
\
\
--- 'A
...
. J ~~
-- ; J..
. s'
:---\\l
~ ~
.
a
"
1
\
---
"
1ft
~
~
..
~
,,~ >>
. 0 ~
" ... .
'i ~ \
= ~
. "
1ft
~
~
!4
m
!"
;!
!4
~
w \: i
\
\ \.
~ \ .. \~. .. \ <>
-0
\II
t ..;.
.\ · l ~
.,. ---';:~;
h\
---; ~
1/1
...,
..._-:~l~ii
\ ;R~'~ i i ~ ~ ~~~~\
~~' , . \.'~~ll
f"\ \ \ '... \. ':l ~ i ~ 7.~
z t ~ 1 ~; ,~~i ~i"
'i?::...::t::.~....~~
\J?"7.......~""t~ ~, ~
\tf~\~ .~
;~~~t ,
5 ii ~ ~ !>~ ~:::n
::: ~~ ~ ~ 0 'l-
I ~~--:-. ;.:: -<. z:.
.~~ 3:;);'-z:.
't \ ~ -
~~~z:.z..
!:~. ~ ~ U)
t~. ~n\~
"",. <:
-1>>..'-"" t' ~
~~.
.~
r. H SI ,Clf~ I....
- f ~
~ t. ~
$
~
~
l
: ~ !
;::. ~ -j,.
\ ~ \
~ ;
;!
!4
~
---~
\ h
\ t~
--~1
1\ \. ~
___t\
I _.:.
-l
-}-
i
;
.
i
o
.0
,
i
Oceon
_1.
11/lllIlllIlllI!
F.E-C.
I I I I , I I' I I ,
RALAOAD
II I I I I I I
100'RIW
OlD
OIXE
HIGHWAY
80RIW
I -i
\ C:.4lONItoIG \
\ \
\
I C.J ZOt*HG
\ \
_~TMn~~ -
,~~
C.'lo-G
COUlon
C~.,y
C llOWtG
I
\ COUlll''r
I
b
IS
C
7B1
BOYNTON SEACREST
(f.k.a. Cedar Grove)
MASTER PLAN
(Subdivision)
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-019
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
~~
THRU: Christopher cutro
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden
Senior Planner
DATE: February 4, 1993
SUBJECT: Boynton Seacrest (f.k.a. - Cedar Grove)
Master Plan (subdivision) - File No. 697
Chapter 19, Section 19-85 of the code of Ordinances states that "no
development order shall be approved, unless public facilities are
or will be available to serve the development project, such that
the minimum levels of service set forth in section 19-84 are
maintained, concurrent with the impacts of the development
proj ect.. . Approval shall include simultaneous issuance of a
concurrency exemption determination, certification of concurrency,
or conditional certification of concurrency for each public
facility. Subdivision master plans are defined by section 19-
83(b)(3) as a category C3 development order. In reviewing this
category of development orders to determine adequacy of public
facilities, roads, drainage and neighborhood parks facilities must
be certified or conditionally certified for concurrency with the
adopted levels of service, consistent with section 19-88(c)d.3 and
5 and Section 19-85(c).
Although the Boynton Seacrest application is complete with respect
to chapter 19, Article VI, "Concurrency Requirements", based on the
statements from the Palm Beach county Engineering Department, the
City's Engineering Department and the Planning and Zoning
Department, certification nor conditional certification for roads
and drainage can be issued until the areas of noncompliance are
satisfactorily addressed (see exhibit "A" - statements from City
department and service provider concurrency review). With respect
to neighborhood parks, conditional certification of concurrency
could be issued, consistent with Section 19-88(d) (5)c and d,
simultaneously with approval of this development order if subject
to the proviso contained in Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 93-013, item #9 (see exhibit "B" staff
recommendation and comments listing submittal deficiencies). Item
#9 states that no building permits shall be issued for the final
50% of the total number of units within the subdivision until
construction of either Girl Scout Park or the 4.2 acre dedicated
park site commences.
With regard to compliance of the master plan with Appendix C -
"Subdivisions, Platting" of the Code of Ordinances, exhibit " B"
contains a recommendation from Richard Staudinger, City Engineer
and coordinator of the subdivision master plan review process, as
well as staff comments listing the deficiencies of the submittal.
Due to the extensive number of serious comments, it is recommended
that the Boynton Seacrest subdivision master plan request be
denied.
..J~!l~kJ
Tambri J. Hey~n .
tjh
Attachments
xc: central File
A:BoySeaCL
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY DEPARTMENT
AND
SERVICE PROVIDER
CONCURRENCY REVIEW STATEMENTS
Board of County Commissioners
Mary McCarty, Chair
Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Burt Aaronson
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
~-----
Robert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
January 25, 1993
Ms. Tambri Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: BOYNTON SEACREST (AKA CEDAR GROVES) - FILE NO. 697
Dear Ms. Heyden:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study for
the project entitled Boynton Seacrest (aka Cedar Groves) pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards (TPS) in Art i c 1 e 7.9 of the Pal m Beach County Land
Development Code. The project consists of 146 single-family units and 81 multi-
family units. The build-out of the project is proposed for 1995.
There is one problem with this traffic study. Woolbright Road between 1-95 and
Seacrest Boulevard is projected to have a traffic volume that exceeds the Level
of Service D volume. In order to meet the standards in TPS, the project traffic
must be reduced to less than 302 trips on Woolbright Road, a 7% reduction in
traffic. This would require a reduction in total project traffic from 2034 trips
to 1890 trips. The reduction in trips could be accomplished by reducing the
number of single-family units to 136, or reducing the number of multi-family
units to 61, or some combination. It may be possible that the entire project can
be approved by an Alternate Test 1 analysis of Woolbright Road.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact Dan
Weisberg at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
cfr~ ~~ FiJI<.
Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E.
Director - Traffic Division
RECEIVED
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
JAM 27
PLANNING DEPT.
CRW:DW
h:\traffic\diw\boyn11c
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on ,ecycted paper
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
LOC~ 1\ON M~P
ao"N"O~ ,,?~~~~t;S!v · ~\\\'\I\\\~ I-~
\ \ l\\~ . 0; 11 \ ,dr;;,,~~~' \ II' , ' ~~ L~~'CA ~
\\ pu,~ ~~:l1-\ ,II \ ir : \
~ ~:=-n ~ "
~C"'" ,~ ",1..' I " \.: ~. i\ II \' \ U: .. \'
, ~ ,,1 ,-'rl.H' "~ '" , ' " ~
~ ~ ~a. ,,:1 '" ,- \ I ,Jl ~~~
I ,-,-1 ~\--l ,V r'" '. : -
~ /) H' Jt5> · : ·
~ __ ~-"if'l pO ~ : \ 'GS-
:' ,~ ' /_ p6C, _ 1 \\ II - ~/
C3 ! ' f l - ,\ · ;\U-"" " -
j L .- .~~J:'e L " "
L-';' '[. . suJ ' :: 1 ~.-
: \ --.0 if!' ... : ·
: "'___ 1:.\- . _.; c:
- --: ' ./ \ ',__ II" ---' '
== 1 .------ .~. _;<,~,1t--JJ.'~ ~; J:
.~: p J =- T ....'~ .:- ~r ~
~: #, . ..:_ ~ , ',-I: r' \' -<\ rl
~j l# I'T f ::;ccr/'~;':=- ' --
'r; '1/ . lJ/ ~"b L ~ ~(jj ft ' ~~~; if 1':'\ L~;~ 1
I~ {._..I II)!!) _ ~ 'J.~r - " ,eB III'. :\\-
\ ......? ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ;"AJ" \I lJ' l .
~ '/' A "Yc-Q./)I .\ ~~\\ . .--
: 1/." , '1 \::rJ .:::: II:-=-. 1 ,_ p' r ~ : l ---1V l--
; 'l J '- ;-,--,_- " 'r' \ \,f:\ :c ~
':l! 'J,'H ,\~::-_IJ,j!~r 1 ,\\\'\ \, ".":3 i:=l6
"J I I=' :, ~>- rA~ I" ( '~ 1\ A~ - (:'
: e ~ ~ \ \ \ . \.;\ ~ :~ I
~ . 'cD:l~~~~..i6--~1I ,~\~~~ \'C=,,".,,-~' ~
'(, I J:f~1 ".- I' \ d1\:...-..J-' I ".J:
HOT \.' 1 __ . I~ ,I' '
I I H{'\'\\:.' 1f[T \ \~~) -- T$\.L/ ,.... "",: 7i
f II,-J{TT' L Cn - r, -- ,"' I;c: I
I ::;0;" \ ~\ ,\U l-l- - .J. j, III ,: "
111l-' _\ '\ 1 ..\ _, ~ ~"(:..\.- - ftUl \ "\ ( n\ I <ll
/' , ~ ' 1. U u...;' u-:.. _ ' {\ L I.,,!.- L"-' \.... " T ~ -- .
. ,'" ~( " '\ 1\ \'J:: F 0' I ,', :T'\'" ,. " i:t: -
:-'\. 1 ~ f' ' T >1"'" 1 - ' I ,<Ill ,,~,......
4' ' .- . l- ~rl-- ("'" \ .....;.~ 1 ., -
"V"..... ~ ' \).
__ ,~. _ "c-I ,'\' -- ' ...: ""
~" \i:l. ,_ ':.. -:::L- \ '- - ~ \" l' 1(\ i [I
IS ,..rr..'!L::'I...[,. \ l-I-- '"' -'-." .,,: ,.,., ~I
_,.-\ ~ '::J- ~I::::' r'~ ( lJMl
_ J;~f--1-n \ . -';:~:: r.c
....::\~t-f-T \ 1 \) / ~
:.-' -'_~ ' '\ __ 8:J
~.. '-I;::' -:::: \ _ . ~ ':i~
~ ~~ C \ 1_ -~~.~' ~::~
. '0' c.... - f l' '\ ' '\ 1 ' ' - -c::: '
. ,., , 1 \ '\ '- Ill:: C1! . "
,......,;,."__"1III:IOiI. ~ "'" ,.- .- \
. ---~ --.
.' "~ ~ .._.- ..--a'E n' T .\'<'-' '-' 'J ~ - ,,1 ~ """'.-~ <,::A,
" '.: \' '\"\ ._\~' C!' \ r-\' ,,--,':i~ ~ ~- ~,;. l/~I
.. "..,..' ~ 1 ..:...J \ -=.l. :::::-.\ _.~ - 1 \ \ ill
!)'}-' \ \ ~:::..\. ::I 'i-I
';:r'f L
. \, ...... . ~ , . . . ::: l' l:li c.
. \. '\ \ I -~ --
\II 1.:
'" ._~ \. ,C ';::',.;, LA _'36-: I P ~ L ~
"l. , ,......
.....
/- 'L'
1
.--
TO: Richard staudinger
-2-
April 29, 1993
( con t rd. )
7. subject to the recommendations contained in the Conservation
and Coastal Management Elements of the City's 1989
Comprehensive Plan. Since no preservation is shown, the
subject master plan is inconsistent with Comprehensive Plan
Policy 4.3.5 which requires preservation of a minimum 25% of
the total scrub habitat of 45.69 acres (i.e. - 11.43 acres).
Operating under the same conclusions drawn in 1992 by staff
and Donald Richardson, the applicant's ecologist and preparer
of the January 9, 1992 ecological assessment rereviewed and
applied to the current request, at minimum, the following lots
(and street access to them) shall be deleted and the land area
set aside for preservation. This determination was made be
overlaying the vegetation mapping required in Section 7.5-
61(b)1 of the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance:
a) Block 7 , Lots 1 and 13-24; inclusive
b) Block 8, Lots 1-22; inclusive
c) Block 9, Lots 1-15; inclusive
d) Block 10, Lots 1-6; inclusive
e) Block 1, Lots 30-32; inclusive
8. This request does not meet the submittal requirements of
Chapter 7.5, Article IV. Environmentally Sensi ti ve Lands,
Section 7.5-61 Review procedures for proposed land
alterations, section 7.5-61(c) "project operation" and Section
7.5-61(d) "Project alternatives". Therefore, it is not known
how loss of habitat and development impact on the endangered,
threatened and rare animal and plant species and species of
special concern that have been identified on the property,
will be mitigated.
The management plan to be submitted shall address
establishment and maintenance of the preserve area and any
other common areas, including as much existing vegetation as
possible, employing preservation and relocation, rather than
"cut and replace" techniques, outside the preserve area. It is
also recommended that a transition buffer be designated as
another mitigation measure. The transition buffer would be a
restricted development zone to prevent significant adverse
effects on the protected environmentally sensitive zone and
would ensure that any portion of the transition buffer that is
damaged during construction, is restored and operating within
a reasonable amount of time. Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.4.2
and Chapter 7.5, Article IV, Section 7.5-61(d) of the Code of
Ordinances.
~ ~
~/~A Q ~
Tambri J. Heydafi'
tjh
A:BoynSeaFC
xc: Central File
GEE & JENSON
Engineers-Architects-Planners.lnc-
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Telephone (407) 683-3301
Fax (407) 686-7446
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Mr. Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer
January 21, 1993
Boynton Seacrest (formerly Cedar Grove)
Subdivision Master Plan Resubmittal
TRC Comments
The TRC has reviewed the revised subdivision Master Plan submission. This memo is to inform
you that the Master Plan will be going forward to the Planning and Development Board's
February 9, 1993 meeting with negative comments concerning approval, because of the
extensive number of serious comments by Staff still not addressed, including the sections of
Chapter 7 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances (Environmentally Sensitive Lands). We
have informed the applicant by separate letter.
Please be advised of the following Engineering Department comments concerning the Boynton
Seacrest submission. These comments are sent to you for your files.
With respect to Appendix C, Article VIII, Section 4 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances,
the following comments are noted:
(C)
(D)
~
1 thru 7 - No comments or corrected as requested
8 - No roadway widths given for adjacent streets
9 - Survey & site has not been abstracted. Provide proper documentation with
resubmittal.
10 - Entrance right-of-way and Mission Hill Rd. dimensions to property line to be
added.
11 thru 16 - No comments or corrected as requested
17 - Utilities availability not addressed by applicant. Provide documentation as
required by this item.
18 & 19 - No comments
TIA submitted to Palm Beach County - No comments
Master Stormwater Management Plan is still not acceptable, although additional
information has been included. How will the drainage system be maintained?
In addition, the volume calculations submitted for the exfiltration trenches cannot be fully
credited for runoff storage by SFWMD criteria. This matter has not been ;addressed to
my satisfaction.
Article X, Section 1, Access:
Access to Lots 1 & 2 (Block One) and Lots 2526 (Block Ten) violates the above section as they
are less than 180 feet from Seacrest Blvd., a collector street. Modify entrance configuration to
comply with this design requirement. The modifications shown do not, in my opinion, meet the
requirements of' ction of the Code.
IC~
w. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
City Engineer
WRS/bf
92-049
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ANALYSIS: PLANNING AREA 117
Concurrency Analysis por C!DAR GROV! Alt. 12 . Public Recreation Provided,
Proposed No. of Units... 228 >> Ho Private Recreation
Projected population.... 513
Analysis of
Level of Service: 1987 11/1/92 1995 2000 2010
Population .,983 5,(96 6,22t 6,261 6,289
Population Served by
Private Recreation Facilities 1,853 1,853 2,890 2,890 2,890
Population served only by
Public Parks and Facilities 3,130 3,6(3 3,334 3,311 3,399
Neighborhood Park
Acreage (PublicI 3.70 3.70 8.70 12.90 12.90
LOS for Acres/l000 2.50 2.50
Population 1.20 1. 00 2.60 3.80 II 3.80
LOS for HaxiDul
Walking Distance (Iiles) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50
Existing and Future
Public Parks and Facilities:
lorest Hills 3.7
Girl Scout 5.0
Little League IDistrict)
11 acres
S. Seacrest Blvd. Site (,2
Total Neighborhood Park Acres
3.7 3.7 8.1
(unchangedl
12 .9
12.9
1980 Population
Under Age 18, and
Percent of Total( I:
697 (17)
HOU:
-lor current ropulation, the 1987 population vas used since the 1990 Census includes only year-round residents. In addition
no residentia development has occurred in this Planning area that vould significantly change the 1987 population.
-The population for Cedar Grove was estimated using BBBRls ppdu of 2.2(8.
'"
...
i
.~
~
I
i
'::1
. ..
:; 'E
~IC
j
p
"i
&:
I
.8
~
j
~
o
...
o
N
~
~
...
..
...
..
'"
..
..
..
...
..
N
..
..
..
o
..
...
.
...
..
'"
~
...
...
..
,.,
~
-'
...
o
'"
i
...
o
...
...
...
~
.,.
...
~
...
..
.,
...
N
..
...
i
.,.
.,..
~
CI
o
..
N
...
..
~
...
..
...
..
o
..
-
~
8
o
- -
8~g~~
.,; ,.; ~ 0 0
~ ....
8 g 8
o CI 0
CI
..
..;
8
o
2
.0
8
CI
-
~ ~ ~
::""-1
8
o
::!
2
8
c:i
8
c:i
8
o
~
o
8
o
8
c:i
o
..
...
g
CI
Sl
..;
g
CI
-
g
CI
i
...
g
CI
~
CI
~
CI
-
~ ~~~ ~
~ ..; N ~ ....
CI
CI
...
~
8
ci
8
o
8
CI
-
~
CI
~ .
~I ..... = ~
..:"i~1I"~"1-.
o."! uo -
z ....c. .:.. c
... '""... ...
. .u.......
C:1.6<0",0c:
o .&. .. 11....
.>..... 2 ...
~ ~ .. -. :a 5Q ~ ltl ...
~ L ~ ~ L ~ ... ~ ~
]
..
.
L
!'
'i
&:
8
8
c:i
on
...
o
8
c:i
~
c:i
~
c:i
'"
N
..
~
..
o
....
o
~
o
~
CI
....
e-
...
CI 8
o
....
...
.,
Cl
~I
...
i
...
~
~
Cl
...
...
...
...
Cl
...
'J.
...
-
'"
~
...
CI
CI
..
...
~
i
~
...
...
...
'"
...
~
~
CI
o
...
i
".
...
~
'"
~~~
"'''''~
g
CI
~
.;
g
CI
2
.0
8
CI
000
":"":"":
::N4
8
o
~
.,
8
c:i
8
o
8
CI
.-.
Sl~~
ONO
...
8 8
o 0
~ ~
o 0
~~~
.,...'"
8
o
8
o
gSlSl
2N.
...
8
o
~
N
8
o
s
..
8
CI
8
o
Sl
..:
~
CI
~
o
~ .
; ."i..J3
..>lid::l!l.
j;t€~~~i!Q
~1.a~:; 1:; r
s 'i ... ..""
,^..t._~ltl~5Q~
!:~.2L:::S-:::S.i
8
..;
8
c:
~
3
::>
!:
o
8
ci
""
-
o
~
ci
.,..
...
..
8
..
CI
....
o
8
o
'"
...
..:
8
8
o
t::
ci
~
~
~
...
...
~ ~
..
-
-
...
...
'"
:
..
~
..,
"II
...
.
~
-J,
...
..
.,..
...
;;
...
...
...
..
o
~
o
N
o
..
on
-
..
'"'
...
^
...
~
!
8 8
o c:i
~~~
.",...~
~Sl8
::.......
8 8 ~
o ci 0
~ ~~:c
.;. ..00
888
c:i ci 0
~~2~~
"''''''00
N
8
o
....
SSl~ Sl
........ 0
...
~
o
8
c:i
~
....
~~~
8 8
o 0
~ ~
o 0
2
..;
'.... ...
8
ci
8
o
S
...
~ SSlS Sl
~ *CI" N"; 0
~ ~
... '"
~ ~
o
i
^
..
..,
~Sl~
:;1"~
-'
s
...
8
o
.E- ·
~ ~!..J~
i -E 1 ~ ~ ! i ;
a. -!.. ..
Jll~~l:J
2Ct-~l!!~5Q~
l!SZJ:lL:::S"::S='
...
9
.,..
...
ci
8
8
~
o
...
...
o
~
..;
Sl
..;
o
."
o
~
o
8
o
....
...
...
...
..
o
~
o
Sl
o
~
'"
...
":
~
~ ~
,0
8
ci
~ ~~~
Ill"l N ~
li!
8
...
2
..;
E ~ ~ ~ sr:
P"I = N "" 0
...
0-
'"
8 8 8
000
.,..
...
..
.,
SlSl~
NO';
~
.
..
'"
...
~ 8 8
000
...
N
...
~
~Sl2~:C
.... ..... '" to 0
N .... ....
~ ~ 8
... 0 0
'"
~
~
....
~~i Sl
.......; 0
N ....
~ ~
N 0
8
o
o 8
o
8 ~
N '"
o
..
...
....
~ SfS:~
- .,-J,..",
....
...
...
8
o
8
o
...
~
8
o
~
o
....
~ s~s ~
~ 0......4 ci
....
~ ~ S ~
"" '" " 0
~ ~ ~
i
'^
..,
~~~ ~
;I"'~ 0
....l
;: .
~ .. ';i .. J 3
~~liili~
w ..~~ i"
6~1.8~:; :;~
10 'i a. ...-
~:t..t~~lQ::
j ! ~ l : ~ ... ~ ~
'"
N
ci
8
...
8
-
....
..
o
o
'^
...
~
-
o
ot'l
o
~
ci
8
o
."
N
..:
~
o
..
i ·
~J
'O!
tJ .., ..
i · CD
11i
!
..
..
I:
.;
~
~
J
~
..
...
-
-
~
...
..
o
e
i
.
..
.x.
I~
~..
f!
.. V
j."
'i...
i~
!~
. c...
.......
=S~
J~i
! pI z:
I!"'~ i
~!IJ
iL
~l~a
!.s;=
~~:s >>
li~]
;c..~
~"''''.s
....:1
iJ!!J
... g .l~
.- ~
iW I g
... t ...
S 8.S ! &
-;i!....
.. >>.
..... g
5..J'"
~..... ...
-=&".~
g:':Ji
u:!.-&.
-u.
:5......
~ e'S I ~
a.o .1= 'e
31'0.]
~s-u
i;:....t
.._ . t
8..-:]
l~j~e
18.....
e;!~
-~!'-':
Q,%.. !
"I~":
.:lJV~
'0 S 0" ~
..:I..
~!'I.':I
li~i'2
~8c:1.!
:V-":!
. .., eo c:
...z:.I:-
'.i.:1
:II! · J
.0.:1'
I:l:lg
u ~.
:;eli~
.!.....~=
~g.8..
-::f.':='O
, . - .
1-2.-
~!.!~j
I I . . .
t!
-
,
~
...
-
41
...
..-
~
...
41
...
-
,
ill
....
...
~
...
ill
N
'"
ill
...
...
~
...
,;
~
.,;
~
.;
N
~
'"
g
N
EXHIBIT "B"
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
AND
SUBMITTAL DEFICIENCY COMMENTS
n
GEE & JENSON
Engineers-Architects-Planners, Inc.
MEMORANDUM
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Telephone (407) 683-3301
Fax (407) 686-7446
TO:
Mr. Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer
DATE:
January 21, 1993
RE:
Boynton Seacrest (formerly Cedar Grove)
Subdivision Master Plan Resubmittal
TRC Comments
The TRC has reviewed the revised subdivision Master Plan submission. This memo is to inform
you that the Master Plan will be going forward to the Planning and Development Board's
February 9, 1993 meeting with negative comments concerning approval, because of the
extensive number of serious comments by Staff still not addressed, including the sections of
Chapter 7 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances (Environmentally Sensitive Lands). We
have informed the applicant by separate letter.
Please be advised of the following Engineering Department comments concerning the Boynton
Seacrest submission. These comments are sent to you for your files.
With respect to Appendix C, Article VIII, Section 4 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances,
the following comments are noted:
(C) 1 thru 7 - No comments or corrected as requested
8 - No roadway widths given for adjacent streets
9 - Survey & site has not been abstracted. Provide proper documentation with
resubmittal.
10 - Entrance right-of-way and Mission Hill Rd. dimensions to property line to be
added.
11 thru 16 - No comments or corrected as requested
17 - Utilities availability not addressed by applicant. Provide documentation as
required by this item.
18 & 19 - No comments
(D) TIA submitted to Palm Beach County - No comments
(E) Master Stormwater Management Plan is still not acceptable, although additional
information has been included. How will the drainage system be maintained?
In addition, the volume calculations submitted for the exfiltration trenches cannot be fully
credited for runoff storage by SFWMD criteria. This matter has not bee~~ or
my satisfaction. -L-I'-.J-Cl vEn
JAN 27
PLAt-i f-i' '-, --p
A,,,~ U4:,.' T.
_ . ~"""'>':i.
--
n
Article X, Section 1, Access:
Access to Lots 1 & 2 (Block One) and Lots 2526 (Block Ten) violates the above section as they
are less than 180 feet from Seacrest Blvd., a collector street. Modify entrance configuration to
comply with this design requirement. The modifications shown do not, in my opinion, meet the
requirements of' ction of the Code.
~~
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
City Engineer
WRS /bf
92-049
n
GEE & JENSON
Engineers-Architects-Planners, Inc_
January 22, 1993
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Telephone (407) 683-3301
Fax (407)686-7446
Julian T. Bryan III
Julian Bryan Associates
3191 Leewood Terrace L 136
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Re: Boynton Seacrest (formerly Cedar Grove)
Technical Review Committee Comments
Revised Subdivision Master Plan
Dear Mr. Bryan:
The Technical Review Committee (TRC) of the City of Boynton Beach met on January 14,
1993 to discuss the revised subdivision Master Plan for Boynton Seacrest. The revised
Master Plan was to address comments from the TRC meeting of October 27, 1992
concerning the original subdivision Master Plan submittal. Attached, please find the
original staff comments from October and the recent staff comments on the resubmittal
from the following departments:
1. Planning & Zoning
. 2. Police
3. Fire
4. Building
5. Recreation & Parks
6. City Forester/Environmentalist
7. Engineering
8. Utilities
Based on the extent of comments not addressed in this revised submission, I cannot
forward this Master Plan to the Planning & Development Board with a recommendation
to approve the plan as submitted and revised. The Code is unclear as to whether this
matter can move forward with negative findings. After discussing the matter with the City
Attorney, we are moving the matter forward to the Planning & Development Board, who
should address these negative findings in their discussions.
-----
n
Julian T. Bryan, III
Julian Bryan Associates
January 22, 1993 - Page 2
This subdivision Master Plan will be on the agenda of the Planning & Development Board
meeting ot February 9, 1993.
Very truly yours,
Gee & Jenson
Engineers-Arc .
-Planners, Inc.
WRS /bt
Enc/.
92-049
cc: Vince Finizio w / encl.
Jim Cherat w / encl.
Chris Cutro w / encl.
J. Scott Miller w/encl.
TRC Members
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-013
chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
c~r~o
Planning and Zoning Director
Tambri J. Heyden
Senior Planner
January 21, 1993
SUBJECT:
Boynton Seacrest (f.k.a. Cedar Grove) - File No. 697
Master plan (subdivision) - resubmittal
Please be advised of the following list of comments which itemizes
the planning and zoning deficiencies of the above-referenced
submittal. Based on the extent and impact of these deficiencies,
it is recommended that this request be denied by the Planning and
Development Board:
01..
:"1'.\
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
):
Add a note which references the Zoning Code, "Building and
Site Regulations" for the R-1AA and R-2 zoning districts.
provisions. Appendix A - Zoning, Section 5.C and 5.F.
Indicate the width of the required limited access easement on
Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 26, Block 10 along Seacrest Boulevard
Buffering (screening) required within this easement shall be
addressed on the preliminary plat plans. Appendix C of the
Code of Ordinances, Article VIII, Section 4.C.10 and Article
IX, Section 3 and Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.3.6.
Show the location and width of a wall maintenance easement for
the retaining wall indicated along the north boundary of Block
1, Lots 20 - 26 and along the west boundary of Block 10, Lots
17 - 10 of the master stormwater management plan. Provide
information regarding ownership and maintenance responsibility
of the wall and associated easement. Appendix C
Subdivisions, Platting, Article VIII, Section 4.C.10.
Palm Beach County's comments regarding the revised traffic
study are expected to be received no later than February 2,
1993. Therefore, comments on the traffic study and
concurrency certification for traffic levels of service will
be forthcoming. It is noted however, that page 8 of the
study, "Project Access", last sentence, does not mention the
third access to the development, added on the revised master
plan, which provides an additional connection to the
surrounding street network via a link to S.E. 4th Street and
indirectly to Gulfstream Boulevard. Chapter 19, Article VI,
Concurrency Requirements, Section 19-87(e) and 84(e).
,Ci
Add a note which references, or a detail which is consistent
with, the language on page 8 of the traffic study regarding
the primary access to the development from Seacrest Boulevard
as a three lane, undivided section tapering to a two lane
undi vided section. Appendix C of the Code of Ordinances,
Article VIII, Section 4.C.10 and Comprehensive Plan Policy
1.3.1 and Objective 2.4 and 2.5.
"
It is recommended that money be put into escrow at the time of
platting for a traffic light at the intersection on Seacrest
Boulevard and Mission Hill Road, until project buildout or
until the light is warranted, whichever comes first.
Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.3.1 and 1.3.7.
Due to the length of Block 1, 3, 7, 8 and 9 (900 feet in
length or over), locate an eight feet wide crosswalk/
pedestrian path between streets (traversing lots within
blocks) linking the proposed pedestrian system shown to the
P & Z Memo No. 93-013
-2-
January 21, 1993
(cont' d. )
7. public park site. Include information regarding dedication
and maintenance of these crosswalks/pedestrian paths.
Appendix C of the Code of Ordinances, Article X, Section
3.D.2; Article IX, section 11 and Article VIII, Section 4.C.10
and Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.11.9 and 2.4.4.
8.
,
"
t; I
9.
10.
);
11.
\
"
12.
"
J
Since there is an existing bike system on Seacrest Boulevard,
it is recommended that there be designated on one side of the
proposed outer-looping, local streets, a bike path connecting
the Seacrest Boulevard system to S.E. 2nd Street to the north
and to S.E. 4th Street to the south to further the intent of
Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.11.9 and 2.4.4 and Appendix C of
the Code of ordinances, Article IX, Section 11.
"'
"
In order to ensure that there are adequate recreational
facilities available to serve the proposed subdivision,
concurrent with the impacts of the development, certification
of concurrency for neighborhood park facilities shall be
issued conditioned upon no building permits being issued for
the final 50% of the total number of units within the
subdivision until construction of either Girl Scout Park or
the 4.2 acre dedicated park site commences. Chapter 19,
Article VI, Section 19-88(d)(5)c and d of the Code of
Ordinances and Comprehensive Plan Objective 9C.2 and Policies
9C.2.3, 9D.2.3 and 5.2.3. and recreation concurrency analysis
dated January 21, 1993, from Michael Rumpf to Tambri Heyden.
Add a note, as recommended by the Palm Beach County School
Board, to the master plan which states that no residential
building permits may be issued until the developer and the
school Board approve in writing an agreement which assures
that public school student membership generated by the
development will achieve school Board racial balance goals.
Appendix C of the code of Ordinances, Article VIII, Section
4.G and Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.22.1.
The subject parcel is delineated on the Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Map as a "Conservation Overlay District" due
to an "A" (high quality) rating of the native, Florida Scrub
ecosystem on the parcel. The use and development of
properties delineated as a "Conservation Overlay District" are
subject to the recommendations contained in the conservation
and Coastal Management Elements of the comprehensive Plan. In
addition, applications for subdivision approval involving
proposed alterations of ecosites representing high quality
native Florida ecosystems must meet the requirements of
Chapter 7.5, Article IV of the Code of Ordinances
Environmentally Sensitive Lands.
The Boynton Seacrest application does not meet the submittal
requirements of the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance,
nor does it address detailed mitigation considerations for
loss of habitat and impact on endangered, threatened and rare
animal and plant species and species of special concern that
are known to exist on the parcel. Also, the application
submitted is not consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy
4.3.5 in that preservation of a minimum 25% of the total scrub
habitat of 45.69 acres (i.e. - 11.43 acres) is not reflected
on the master plan. Include a note on the master plan that
the preserve area shall be privately maintained.
At the time of applying for preliminary plat approval, a
management plan shall be submitted for the preserve area and
any other common areas, including as much existing vegetation
outside the preserve as possible, which employs preservation
and relocation, rather than "cut and replace" techniques.
Designation of a transition buffer is recommended as a
restricted development zone to prevent significant adverse
P & Z Memo No. 93-013
-3-
January 21, 1993
(cont' d. )
12. effects on the protected environmentally sensitive zone. This
should be included in the management plan to ensure that any
portion of this buffer that is damaged during construction, is
restored and operating within a reasonable amount of time.
Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.4.2.
~~:.ler4Jt4/
tjh
Attachments
A:BoynSea
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner~
TO:
DATE:
January 21, 1993
SUBJECT:
BOYNTON SEACREST - Concurrency Analysis for Neighborhood
Parks
This concurrency analysis on the proposed development is being
performed pursuant to Chapter 19, Article VI. Concurrency
Requirements (Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances).
Boynton Seacrest is located within Park Planning Area #17.
According to Table 2, Neighborhood Park Needs Analysis (Recreation
and Open Space Support Document, 1989 Comprehensive Plan), and the
attached analysis for Planning Area #17, the current (1987) levels
of service for Area #17 is 1.2 acres of park space per 1,000
persons, and a 1 mile walking distance. The acreage level of
service will then change to 2.6 acres per 1,000 persons in 1995, as
a result of the completion of Girl Scout Park. By the Year 2000
the acreage level of service is to change again to reflect the
addition of the required park dedication in connection with the
development of the S. Seacrest Boulevard Site.
Boynton Seacrest consists of 228 dwelling units. By applying the
persons per dwelling unit factor estimated by the Bureau of
Economic and Business Research (BEBR)--2.248--a population of 513
persons is projected. As the attached analysis indicates, this
development, when built-out, would lower the adopted acreage level
of service to 1.00 acre per 1,000 persons. The walking distance
level of service would not be affected by this development.
The impacts from additional development within Neighborhood Park
Planning Area #17 upon adopted levels of service were anticipated,
and in part, formed the basis on which these levels of service
issues were resolved within this planning area. Included within
the City's Comprehensive Plan are the following two policies that
address directly, or indirectly, the level of service condition
within Neighborhood Park Planning Area #17:
Policy 5.5.1 - Subsequent to Plan adoption. .all residential
developments that exceed 100 dwelling units provide a
private recreation area, unless however, public parks are
located within one-half mile from the project..
Policy 5.5.4 - Subsequent to Plan adoption the City shall
require the dedication of sufficient land for a neighborhood
park site at the time that the following properties are
rezoned or platted for residential use:. .., S. Seacrest
Boulevard,
Policy 5.5.1 does not apply to the S. Seacrest Site, as this site
is located within approximately one-half mile from the planned Girl
Scout Park. With respect to the dedication of public park space,
which is required by Policy 5.5.4, Boynton Seacrestis consistent
with this Comprehensive Plan policy as the master plan indicates
that 4.2 acres of the site is to be dedicated to the City for
eventual neighborhood park development. This site would be
acquired according to the requirements of Appendix C. Subdivisions
and Platting (Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances).
The dedicated park site satisfies the specific requirement within
Policy 5.5.4 of the Comprehensive Plan, however, to ensure that the
adopted levels of service are met, either the Girl Scout Park or
cont. Concurrency Analysis
the dedicated park should be completed prior to the completion of
the proposed development and, the other must be constructed prior
to the Year 2000.
Attachments
A:CBDARGt2
le##~o~l-;t'32 l6124
FRON ~ROWIH NAHAOENfHT CEHTER
1 U ';l i' J l;j? -4 5 ';l
t. . u ~
THE SCHOOL BOARD
OF PALM "eACH COUNTY, fLORIDA
PLANNING. CONSTRUCTION a. REAl. ESTATE
3320 FOREST HILL BOUlEVARD
WEST PALM BEACH, fL 33406-5813
(407) 434-e020 FAA (407) 434-8187
DR. C. MONICA UHLHORN
SVI'!:PIJt{TI!NMHT
Of 6CHOOl8
October 26, 1992
Rea Impact Analysis - Cedar Grove PUD, Boynton Bea
ThIs statement iI. provided In fulfillment of Chapter 235. 93, Section 2, Florida Statut9~ to
ensure that publio 9ducatlon facilities are coordinated wi plans for residential development.
It addresses the concerns of the palm Beach County Soh 1 Board as they specifically relate
to the antioipa.ted impact of the construction of 228 50' Ie family dwelling units located
within the Cedar Crove PUD eas;t of Seacrest Bouleva and iOUth of S.E. 31Et Avenue in
Boynton Beach.
A study waG conducted utilizing demographic multipliers or Palm Beach CoWlty to eGtimate
the number of students which would be generated from thi type of development. Information
was not received regarding the number of bedrooms fo in th~e types of dwelling units,
For the purpose of this analySis it is assumed that th9 22 c1nglo family units will consist of
3~ bedrooms. Planning, c.onstruction and Real Bstate est. tes 92 elementary, 39 middle and
35 high school students will be generated by the project.
The geographic ares in which these propoeed dwelllog un! will be located is presently served
by S.D. Spady Elementary, Carver Middle, and Atlantic H gh School (see note 1). Following
is a breakdown for each school's current membership fo school yeof 1992-93 ond current
penn61lent Cl1paclty.
S.D. Spady
Elementary
Carver
iddle School
Atlantic
f!1gh School
Current MembershIp
Current Perm.onent Qlpaclty
593
667
841
1,283
2,065
1,615
Students generated from this development will further ov Icrowd the assigned high school1n
the area.
The SChool Board places Its construction priorIties In ar as that 1acll1tate the Bch1evement
of racIal balance In publlc schools.
The School Boora. requests that the developer provide stra egles withIn the cedar Grove PUD
to assIst 111 aChieving School BOard facial balance goals. 1 he School Boon1 w11l work with the
developer to accompllSll an agreement conWlnlng strate s and steps to be taken to ensure
H~ \cht3\wp50\do.:!\dte\ctdrW02.pud
! U _.J' 1 '.' .... 1 f.J . ~ ~ t r, u II <.l 1< IJ l~ I t1 II H II t1 U l.. II L t I I I... L II I L I',
I J ). J r: .' .. ~ j
r' . .J J
Impact Analysis
Cedbr Grove PUD
Revised - October 26. 1992
Page Two
that the occupantlJ of thl3 de..-elopDlent will be rac1ally
pltllce at this tlme with the devolQpeI, we request that
a condition of approval:
1. No residential bulldJng permits may be issued Wltll e developer and the School Board
approve in wdtlng an agreement WhiCh assures tha publ1c school student membership
generated by the development will ach1eve Schoo Board racial balance goals.
ed, SInce an agreement is not in
following condition be placed as
The School Board will contInue to activelY pursue a po cy of provIding adequate schooi
fo.clUtles for all the children oC Palm Beacl1 COunty.
Note 1 Attendance ooWldaries are rev1ew~ annually and are modified to accoIl1IIlodate the
openIng of new schools and/or School Board policie dealing with overcrowding and/or
rac1a1 balance.
cc: CIty of Boynton Beacb
J. Scott Miller, CIty Manager I
Christopher Cutro, Director, PJsmning & Zoning
Vincent A. Flntzio, A"mintstratlve Coordinator of ~uglneering
W. RIChard Staudinger, r.E., Gee & Jenson
David H. wtlltAms
P"Ue
H;\data\wpSO\doc\dI~\~.pud
TOTAL P.Q3
'\
SENT BY:
~----_.~-- -
1-21-93 :10:49AM
Boynton Bch fax~
407 686 7446:# 4
FIRE DE~ARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-202 WDC
TO:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FROM:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
JANUARY 21, 1993
RE:
CEDAR GROVE (BOYNTON SEACREST)
~S7
FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS FROM MEMO 92~ SHALL REMAIN UNTIL
SATISFIED DURING THE PROCESS. THEY MAY NOT BE TIMED CORRECTLY BUT,
THEY ARE OUR CONCERNS AND SHOULD NOT BE FORGOTTEN. THE PEAK HOUR
TRAFFIC COMMENT MAY BE DROPPED.
...
~yJ~~
WILLIAM D CAVANAUGH, FPO I '
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
wdc/pg
~ ----~,---'"-_._._--
"
"
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE: ,
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 92-257 WDC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT - WILLIAM D. CAVANAUGH
OCTOBER 28, 1992
TRC - CEDAR GROVE MASTER PLAN
IN ORDER TO FULLY EVALUATE THE PROJECT, THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION IS REQUIRED:
STREET NAMES AND HOUSE NUMBERS SHOULD BE SHOWN.
WITHOUT A WATER MAIN PLAN FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS CANNOT BE
PLO'l''l'ED.
THIS DEPARTMENT STILL HAS CONCERNS WITH SEACREST TRAFFIC AT
PEAK HOURS.
/tCf~td~tf~(
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-011
January 15, 1993
FROM:
Chris Cutro
Planning D~'r ctor
Don Jaeger
Building 0 f cial
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
TO:
THRU:
RE:
TRC COMMENTS
RESUBMISSION OF BOYNTON SEACREST MASTER PLAN,
FORMERLY KNOWN AS CEDAR GROVE
Per your January 7, 1993 TRC memorandum, attached are the plans
for the above referenced project. The Building Department made a
comment at the January 14, 1993 TRC meeting that, due to the
setback requirement of the Zoning Code, some lots may not be
buildable. This statement should be noted and passed on to the
applicant.
AN : bh
m~;-fj// /1
Ar;;;,-;tr';#Y
(
RECEIVED
JAN 1 5 1993
SEACREST
5ENl BY:
l-',l-~J ; lu.~(JMi:1 ,
UlJylli;ul1 llcn tax'"
4UI lJulJ '....VI.. J
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-40
FROM:
RE:
Richard staudinger, City Engineer
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~
Boynton Seacrest Master Plan Resubm~:ion
(Formerly known as Cedar Grove)
TO:
DATE:
January 21, 1993
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the MasterPlan
resubmission for Boynton Seacreat, The comments listed in
Recreation and Park Memorandum #92-951 (attached) remain in effect
with the following additiona~
1, Recteation Dedication Based on 228 D. U, the 4.:2 acre
recreation dedication is acceptable.
2. Location & Configuration - According to section 8, paragraph
E of the sub-division regulations, the City determines land
dedication or payment of fee based on:
"A. Topography, geology, access and location of land in the
subdivieion available for dedication;
B. Size and shape of the subdivision and land available for
dedication;
C. The feasibility of dedication;
D. Availability of previously acquired park property;
E. In conformance with the recreation land uss plan.1I
While the location of dedication remains acceptable, the
configuration (approximately 300'x600') is not suitable for use as
an open playfield, We continue to require a squarer configuration
with an approximately 400' width. This will allow for fhe use as
a youth softball field, etc., with sufficient buffering from both
residences and traffic.
3. Entrance The plan still needs to show dietances from
adjacent roadways off Seacrest Boulevard. By showing these
distances I we can determine the feasibility of a vehicle
entrance from Seacrest Boulevard.
The revised plan shows easements from two adjacent lots as an
internal pedestrian access to the Park site. This is unacceptable.
Homeowners are not likely to want pedestrians walking through their
property to get to the park. The developer has indicated that lot
'lines on property east of the park can be shifted so that a
dedicated pedestrian entrance could be provided. This would allow
an appropriate pedestrian entrance.
;KH : ad
CC: Charles C. Frederick
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #92-351
TO:
Richard Staudinger, City Engineer
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
RE:
Charles C. Frederick, Director/~ ~~
Recreation & Park Department ~ C~
Sub-Division Master Plan: Cedar Grove :i1J'
October 29, 1992 rf -
THROUGH:
DATE:
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the latest revision
of the Cedar Grove Master Plan. The following Recreation related
comments are submitted:
1. Recreation Dedication - Based on 228 dwelling units
228 dwelling units X 0.0180 average acre req./D.U.
= 4.104 acres.
In accordance with the comprehensive masterplan intention for
a neighborhood park in this area, we recommend the entire
dedication be in land. The developer shows 4.2 acres on the
plan which is acceptable.
2. Location and Configuration - The location of the dedication
along Seacrest Boulevard is acceptable, however, the
dimensions of the parcel (approximately 300' X 600') is not
suitable for use as an open play field (youth softball, etc.).
In order to allow for adequate buffering from residences and
traffic on Seacrest Boulevard, we recommend a squarer
configuration with an approximately 400' width.
3. ENTRANCE Discussions with the Engineering Department
indicate that a park entrance off Seacrest Boulevard may not
be possible due to distances from other roadways. In order to
determine this, the plan should reflect adjacent roads
entering Seacrest Boulevard and distances from the proposed
park property.
From a recreation standpoint, we would recommend a vehicular
and pedestrian entrance on the main sub-division road
relatively close to Seacrest Boulevard. This would allow for
a small four to eight stall parking lot for park patrons
outside the sub-division and for sub-division residents to
walk into the park.
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LAND - Preservation issues are being
addressed by a separate memorandum from the City
Forester/Environmentalist.
JW: ad
CC: Chris Cutro, Planning Director ~
4.
-c ~ r17T~vED
X~;"'" ~..ul.
0~r 3CJ
...." f') :-.-_~, T.
,........' " ~ , : "; t ~ t . ~
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-36
FROM:
Chris Cutro, Planning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist \l~tr
Boynton Seacrest (AKA Cedar Grove)
Master Plan - Resubmission
TO:
RE:
DATE:
January 20, 1993
My previous comments have not been addressed by the applicant and
must be addressed.
KH:ad
~
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM N92-349
TO:
Richard Staudinger, Engineer
Gee & Jensen Consulting Engineers
~
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
RE: Cedar Grove - Subdivision Masterplan
A Planned Residential Community
DATE: October 29, 1992
1. The applicant will be required to meet the Environmental
Regulation Article I, Tree Preservation Sections 7.5-1 through
7.5-27 (pages 593-606). Specifically, the applicant must
fulfill the requirements of section 7.5-22, page 603, natural
growth to be preserved. This site has been determined to be
an environmentally valuable, nearly extinct ecosystem in South
Florida. Meeting these sections may effect the master plan
design as approved by the City.
2. the applicant will be required to meet the entirety of Article
IV, environmentally sensitive lands, section 7.5-59. through
7.5-63 (pages 628-631). Meeting these sections may
dramatically effect the master plan design as approved by the
City.
3. In accordance with the City Comprehensive Plan Ordinance 189-
38, adopted November 7, 1989 policy 4.3.5 page 67, the
applicant is required to designate a minimum of 25% of the
native plant community as a preservation area. The applicant
does not indicate on the master plan the location of this
area. ,
KH:ad
Time: Forester/Environmentalist:
Secretary:
1/2 hour
15 minutes
MEMORANDUM
Utilities No. 93-015
~[si)IE~ ~ rr~l[:rr).
~ I.... l~IIH
I~ ~ I
JAN 2 1 iq93
Gr."" & .,~. 'SON
' t: t.: . _: i:. !"~
TO:
Richard staudinger,
City Engineer
,
John A. Guidry,
Utilities Director
FROM:
DATE: January 14, 1993
SUBJECT: Boynton Seacrest, AKA Cedar Grove
Master Plan (Revised) - Comments TRC Meeting
January 14, 1993
Utility Memorandum No. 94-409 dated October 28, 1992 listed two
comments related to the initial master plan review. See copy
attached.
These two comments have not been addressed or rectified.
Contact Mr. Mike Kazunas at 738-7465 if you need further
clarification.
/bks
xc: Mike Kazunas
Peter Mazzella
File
,
Utility Engineer
Administrative Assistant
3 hours
.5 hours
.
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #92-409
TO:
Chris Cut.ro,
Planning Director
John A. Guidry, ~~.
Dicectac af UtilitieSI\~
Oct.ober 28, 1992 U
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: ' Cedar Grove Mast.er Plan - Comments
R.R.C. Meet.ing Oct.ober 27, 1992
We have reviewed the plan and, in lieu of approval, offer t.he
following comment.s:
1. Locat.ion, purpose and widt.h of water and
sanitary sewer easements must be shown on the
Master Plan (App. C, Art. VIII, Sec. 4.C.I0).
2. The developer is required to coordinate with
this utility regarding availability of both
water and sewer (App. C, Art. VIII, Sec.
4.C.17). Instrumental to this coordination
is the revised water, sewer, and fire
protection demands of the development.
,
Contact Mr. Mike Kazunas at 738-7465 to discuss this matter
further.
19b
xc :"iJ:~M.fke'~' Ka z\in~.
Peter Mazzella
File
Utility Engineer -
Adm. Assistant
3 hrs.
.5 hrs.
C1rn~\\i:,n &. I\SSOciatoS. InC.
~
: \ i
\~ ~ \\ \
~,,! i\~
pt;! ~~~
\'t\ \\16
.'6" .~~
';.'i ~.,.
to; 'i
~ ~
~ \
\
~
~
~
;. \ ~
~ '" II'
" ~ \
~ ~
1
!.
..
"
-\"i- ~ CI
"l ll: i rn
\~~ ~
,~ m
~ 0
~
"T\
~
-I
~
~
\
- ~ >>
; ~ t
II
t ~ \
;;
III
~
III
~
~
;1
~
..
...
___ _J.
5.E. 2ncI. STREET
-----r ~.. ·
\. \, ~ 9. .,;,_. \.
-- . ~ .. 'i ~ p.' ""'
6 \ e ': 0 \ ~ I i ~ -t:ciJ
\ 1 ~~ . ltfl ,~~
.-1. . '-'0 ;:.... ~ i~
- ~ '" ,=,a;s\~rJJ\ r,'l
I I I I I J I I I % . -c:.. ~..,
I I I I I I , I I I f'" '. "..._
100'RIW__ =l'ft~
-111----"'--
v0(15(Jlling \..-ngi{1CCrc-~~n~
ur
.n en '
.., V' ::i
~t,~\;"'
N~~~"'6U)O
%~~~;~"l;~
~u 2~!e(J)~}>
. ~~j,))P m
:ll~Cl>Il)p~ (j)
~;(OoPrn
1I)pf)o. CI
~ II ',. ~
'.. ~ p ~
\+ (,> -<
f) \+
. ~
.,
~ ... ...
. .~. ~ .,
1- ~ .~
, '
~ :
. \
. ,
~l ~~ '. ',.
~
~~~
~~ ~
t\
J"il
\\~\\\t~ltl ;
i\ \ \~ \ \ \~i
\m~\h
,
l!
.
"Q
@-;l;!
~~ ~ ~
!~ m ~
% ~ ~ ~
rn. .., ~
~ \II -;;, roo
\1'1 ~
~ ~ 0 2
~~ ~ ~
-I -<1
o -;::,.
~ S W.
r1'I
.".
% ~ F
\~ 0 .., (J)
\1'1 ~ ~ ~
~O~~ ~Wst~
5~~%~~~"$
~t(J)~"'-Im~~
... -I \lO ~ '1l (J) (J) Z
\1'IO(J)~,. -I"%i'6
N?:.n~~ OG)Q
i2?i\-I~ ~ so.
'w.~ c;l ~ i%
.-l (J) 0 0
2 !l) ~ ~ ,. ~
~ t; 2 ~ ~
;!! ';1< 0 (J)
~ ~ ~
m
.-l
o
-~.
U
;\
ta
~\
H
\1
, \
\ \ \ !
\ ~ \ \
\ ~ \
-
'to \ ~~ ~ ..:
,. '.
--- ~
....
'i , >>
y l~
-- . ~ ~
'\ S\
--1 ~
j lI>
!.. .- -
--
---j\\
\ ~\t
---\I\
--;,
lI>
~
i
__i_
s:;' 4th. STREET
---\---
so
'"
\
/
I I I I I I
,. .
:~..; '..-
";>~
~
80' RIW
OIXE
HIGHWAY
\
\
\
\ -i
\ c...4 lOtUNG \
\ \
I
I
\
\ c., zoo",.
\
\ c""".v
\
COUNl"l'
COUNTY
C-)20.....0
c.~ ZONING
lbllit: "
teaS
market:
LOC" -noN t.A"p
6o~tr{9~ ,,~~g~~~}v ; f3\\\l\~ ~
\ \ .\' . ,~..- ,\ ,-\' -- ,. \\ ~ ~...~ ~
\' pu (' ~ ' ,,'. \' ,II · 1 \ · t
\ [ ~ _ ....rJJJ!. IT " ' ·
ll: '\ \\~E:-- ". ,-,\UllI.. \. -
'\,.......\llic=-\.\ \\1U'... .'1n&:'" · ':~ \
\\ \ ' c.-' ... \ i'--r '\ \'. ' , --'
;... . ,
6 l:S ~1 c"
~ ' ~.. -;.oC"ft?71 pu ~ \ 1 . G3-
:,~ r/_ ~6C _ I l.ln----
C3! '[ ',... 11 li~ai~~ \\ ',-
I i r \\---=" . c~l \ L : ·
: I _ l,r ~ 1;..,-'.. i "'i
~ 1 _ /' ,/L-- _ ,;"}.::l'" -- ~t ""- -Jl':' c;,
~! _=- T ' ...." ,:- ~ ,!'.J
~: _7 -,.:";-11'" L. ~ ','"~ n
~j r;; If' ..!: ~';" ^ 1f~ ~ !- - :,-1 1
__ _: r A' ,'"14 j,~;;-q/ 'i'C \.- ,;- - y:'"jli:-!-
\ 1! ,;// J '-' _ l 11\ , , ~. r ~ ' 1-: : - ... .' -- I
(.:; J ',"' '" I V//J /' "F.1~~f · \ ' \ e' ~ ," \ '. ,,'.' . 1::.!
\ 1. :;>-0 ~~" __ t::\ffi(~'\t~, .,,:r;iU ,\. ,-.:; U;~' "'"'iif
7': '/// J fIJ. j_ . \" ~ "11"- : '.;.,.-" n- I \'
~ I: 11-1 ":._ ...) ,r- I \ I -\fl'.' ....-
! J'(I; .' "'1 ~ -;:.... /;=-.1(' 1 i f 'R ' \ I --lV '--
.. ! ~'t.h .- \ t}.~' 7J ;.,/ 'f!iJi:::j'f '\, \t ,\ ,ie, -...~ ~ 6 t
"'.: '" ....--1--- ~~~F1,1 ' 'I~- 3
~ : I'lL ': ~ ---r . ... PI ~\- ,/[1 I 1\"\ ,n ;::'I~/~'.~\' -
~ 'JII~ .:~ " ~"" I I 1 '\ II ': j
~ rlllt"[c~<,);~ _ ~f ,,'I 11\\\t:~ '\~.. - ~
T, 'II Rl' 1 f::h \~ -, .1f;s:::J' ,,-Y +
, ,I -{~,~ 'iii \ \ L. _;:. ~ Li'iJ, t,.; ,'\ I: -:/i ):1\':;;;:';
~." \ ,11-- .._::: '~"'r '(l , 1: 'r-:
I ~Irf ",<., r\ \\ \ ~\ -- <. , I >i '
I ,'-I"" .~\ ,r r _ rn r '-11' l ~ '- ..-
,/ -n " ' " u L>- C..... -- cD c, ... "",J.....D r T" 'l1 '
'\ "_,:;", , ' \ , \ ,J L-- ~1~ \ I \ \ ' , :-T-, r ' ~ -
PI 1 \r ",' ,'" , " '\ <<, 7"'--
r1" c-;" -., '- )--1 (1' I' _.1 .. -~: -
, '" \y~-"\"'" ' '- L- .J nT' ' ..: ,~".....
F' ---<: : '\ r ~ \.- ~ ,::::;:/ \ :;..: ~ 10 "-; ., ," ~
~)~~l ;_r \ ~........ L-, \. ",1:, mE
c:. ~'~(..:(1j:I6-n' ~\ Jtf. ~ ~
. ~--1 ') 1-->-\ \ V ___ '. 1 ~ i .rt1"I1J
, \ \ ,~'
\\ FJ"":::~ ~ I, ~~. . ~ : ~vi~
t"rr\"'~ 'O...t.... _ __" '\ 1 1\ -.J 7,
-",:. "[ ,\ \ ,f.ll __ _ ,C>;I! , C.
:::'. .... ~\ "" ~. ~ ~"" .:-r-c. -r "' ~ \. - rl ::::::.-~r::
\ F'-'\~ ~,\\ t;;. U\ Ht;,:ii:--~::ci ,,; 0~
'., ~,..:..-r' \~; i'''' ~:...- ~ -~:.- ~~ ~ ,'i.-.
. c\. r: I--- ---' .. ,'::I ... 0'" : ..... .... j
" ':\ '\ \ \ . L ~fll
. ......... 'r~T \ I. _ ~,~\ ~~ t:il\~ iC \.'\"f"',:. .,.~\\\\\"\J\8\ .,,^\L~.
~\ ;~~\Z. ~,<,1 ~ _:, :~6 \ ,I ~ik~TC~~~"~
:i~ _' " ' :h r-' - J t- --UY""
t""\ fLU \\ \
I
led
I
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR
BOYNTON SEACREST
(F.K.A. CEDAR GROVE)
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
REVISIONS
NO.
DATE
u,~~~
WAEL . MAJDALAWI, P. E .
FLORIDA REG. NO. 42646
1?/23/q7-
1
2
3
4
5
NOVEMBER 11, 1991
JANUARY 9, 1992
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
SEPTEMBER 20, 1992
NOVEMBER 9, 1992
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
INTRODUCTION 1
STUDY OBJECTIVE 1
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS 3
STUDY AREA 3
EXISTING CONDITIONS 3
TRANSPORTATION.SYSTEM 6
FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 6
PROJECT ACCESS 8
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 9
PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION 9
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
AND ASSIGNMENT 12
FUTURE TRAFFIC 12
LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 15
- TEST 1 (LINK/BUILDOUT TEST) 15
- TEST 2 (MODEL TEST) 17
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18
-i-
LIST OF TABLES
NUMBER
TABLE
PAGE
1
VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION
11
2
TEST 1 ANALYSIS
16
LIST OF FIGURES
NUMBER FIGURE PAGE
1 LOCATION MAP 2
2 STUDY AREA 4
(RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE)
I
3 EXISTING TRAFFIC 5
4 EXISTING LANE GEOMETRY 7
5 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 10
6 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 13
7 TOTAL TRAFFIC 14
-ii-
lNTRODUCI10N
Michael Rubin, P.A. retained Carnahan and
evaluate the traffic impact associated with
residential development of Cedar Grove.
The 50 Acre site is located on the east side of Seacrest
Boulevard north of N.E. 8th street, east of Mission Hill Road and
south of S.E. 23rd Avenue in Boynton Beach, Florida. The location
map is shown in Figure 1. '
Associates to
the proposed
The proposed residential development will consist of 146
dwelling units of detached single family and 41 duplexes (82
attached housing units) for a total dwelling units of 228.
The proj ect' s access will be on Seacrest Boulevard via a
proposed entrance and a proposed connection to S. E. 2nd street
adjacent to F.E.C. Railroad, west of Old Dixie Highway. The
project will not have a~y proposed entrances to Old Dixie Highway
across the railroad tracks, and all roadways along the northern and
southern limits of the site will remain as dead end streets.
Cedar Grove is proposed to be completed by 1995 based on an
estimated buildout period of 3 years.
STUDY OBJECTIVE
This traffic impact study will be prepared in accordance with
Section 7.9 (Traffic Performance Standards) which ammends the
previously adopted 1990 Countywide Traffic Performance Standards
Code (Ordinance 90-40). The conformance with the Standards
consists of meeting both Test 1 (LinkjBuildout test) and Test 2
(Model test) as outlined in section 7.9 (I) (D) of the Standards.
The following analysis is presented as outlined in Section 7.9
(I) (E) (Traffic Impact Studies) of the Standards.
The traffic impact study will evaluate all roadway links or
intersections within the Radius of Development Influence and Model
Radius of Development I~fluence of the proposed project.
The traffic impact study is also referenced as the "Level of
Service Impact statement" in the Traffic Circulation Element Plan
of Palm Beach County.
1
90't~1ON BEl'C,", 9\-'lO
5. E. Z3f\O A'lE
ui
~
~
~
~
o
'3
lSl
~
We
%
U)
,..
!
i
fA
u.
S11E.
,..
ul ~
ul ~ w
~ ....
x
e ~ ....
0
'i. ui ~
....
" i
~
~.E. 41,", 51
A1~lC A'lE
ul
~
~
';.
ul
~
~
';
ui ui
i i
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
I I I I
I I I I
I" ,
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
IIII
I I I ,
I , , ,
IIII
IIII
""
I I I I
'1'1 Z
I , , I
"" <I:
III' W
"'l
Itlt U
"" 0
o ""
> ""
c6 1111
111\
i \\\\,...
~ '''' \..J
o "".......
"" L-
I'" I
1111 Z
I" I /r
"" ""-L
1111 -1
1111 L-
I" I ~
"" ""-L
I I I I
, " I
'" I
I , I I
\ " \
, I I I
IIII
1111
IIII
IIII
IIII
, I , I
, , I ,
, I I I
I I I I
',I,
I , , \
\ \ , \
\ .
fIGURE
\..OCAi10~ t'\AP
1
C~~AH~ A~ ASSOC\AiES, \~C.
C~SUL i\~G EtlG:~~~~ ----
----~ ~
tI,L1'.S.
TRANSPORTA.TION ANALYSIS
Study A.rea
The study area is based on the radius of development influence
for Test 1 and Test 2, which is outlined in Table 2A of the Traffic
Performance Standards. Table 2A relates the maximum radius of
development influence distance to the net trips generated by the
site. The net trip generation from the site, as outlined in Project
Trip Generation section of this traffic study, is estimated to be
2034 daily trips. As outlined in Table 2A, the radius of
development influence distance for 2034 net daily trips will be 2
miles. The 2 miles distance will be measured in road miles, not in
geometric radius, beginning at the site I s access on Seacrest
Boulevard, and terminatlng at the adjacent roadway links 2 miles
away from the site.
Based on the above the 2 mile radius of development influence
distance was measured along the adjacent roadway network and the
study area is shown in Figure 2.
Existing Conditions
Existing traffic counts for all the roadway links within the
study area were obtained from the latest traffic volume counts
conducted by Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning organization.
Figure 3 shows the existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) for
the available 1991/1992 Traffic Volumes.
3
--.~._.. -
-~"'."""''''~
~....
I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I ,
, , I ,
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
/ / / /
I / / I
, , , I
I I , I
/ I / /
/ I / /
I / / ,
, I , ,
, I I ,
I I I I
I I I I
I / / /
/ I I I
I I I I
I I , I
, I I I
/ / / /
I / I I
, ( , \
\ \ \ ,
/ I I I
1/1/ ~
1//1 ~
I I / / "'l::
I I I I I.:
1111 ~
I I I I :::--.J
1111 c:::s
I I I I
, I I ,
, I I ,
I I I I
//// { ~
I I / / "--..J
'(I, ~
I I I I '---
1111 ~
II II ~
1/// ~
//// "'-
I I I I ---...J
I I I I r-:::::.
I I , ,
"'1 ~
, I I I
/ / / /
/ / / /
( \ \ I
~ I \ ,
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
OCEAN AVE
o
>
~
.
UJ
>
4:
en
i
u
N.E. 4TH ST
ATLANTIC AVE
LEGENDz
UJ
>
4:
X
I-
10
UJ
>
4:
::z:
l-
tS)
EFFECTED ROADWAY LINK
V /I STUDY AREA
.
UJ
.
Z
.
UJ
.
Z
STUDY AREA
(RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE)
CARNAHAN AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
N.T.S.
FIGURE
2
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
t 0
> t
I i6 I
... ..
0 (/) ~
!! ~ =
. to ..
UI J ~ ~
~ ... 2,,645" UI J I
(/)
(/) .. 26,500 .. VOOLBR I GHT ROAD
(/)
UI
I ~t
u >-
"",420 .. ~
...J
S.E. 23RD AVE .. I
~
OCEAN AVE
t~
II) 0
. Z
t- ('II
. .
Ji
1
"
~'
t\i
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I , I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I , I
I I I I
I I I I
/ / / /
I I I ,
/ I \ \
\ \ \ I
I I I I
1111 ~
1111 ~
1111 ~
I I " J.:
, , " ;:-'-;!
"" ~
"" c:::s
, , , ,
, I , ,
, I , I
, , , ,
//// r ..
/ / / / '-.....;J
, I I I '--.:.,
I I I I '---
"" ~
"" ~
"'l ~
1111 ~
I I " ---..J
, , I I J..-:::::.
, I , I
"" ~
, J J I
I I I I
I I , I
, \ , \
" I \ ,
U1t
~
5~
......
z -
.......
~,
SITEI
~
... 6,176 ...
N.E. 4TH ST
... -1'3,782 ...
!t
N.E. 8TH ST
!t
ATLANTIC AVE
LEGENDI
"'13.382'"
EXISTING AADT TRAFFIC
UI UI
> >
<t <t
:t: :t:
... ...
10 (D
.
UJ UI
. .
z z
EXISTING TRAFFIC
FIGURE
N.T.S.
CARNAHAN AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3
Transportation System
Existing lane geometry for all effected roadway links within
the study area were field investigated to verify existing
conditions.
Seacrest Boulevard currently exists as a two lane undivided
section adjacent to the site then expands to four lane undivided
section north of S.E. 28th Avenue.
S.E. 23rd Avenue exists as a two lane undivided section from
Federal Highway (US 1) to Congress Avenue. Woolbright is a four
lane divided section from Federal Highway (US 1) to Congress
Avenue. Federal Highway (UB 1) exists as a four lane divided
section. N.E. 4th street and N.E. 8th street are also two lane
undivided sections.
Figure 4 outlines the existing lane geometry within the study
area.
Future Roadway ImDrovements
Palm Beach County "Five Year Road Program" and Florida
Department of Transportation "Transportation Improvement Program"
were consulted to obtain the funded roadway improvements
anticipated to be completed by proj ect' s buildout year. The
following outlines the status on the adjacent roadway network
within the study area:
Sea crest Boulevard from Woolbright Road to Boynton Canal
is listed on the six Year Program of Palm Beach County
for right of way acquisistion during the fiscal year
1991/1992 with no scheduled construction improvements.
Therefore no future improvements are anticipated on
Seacrest Boulevard by the project's buildout year.
S.E. 23rd Avenue is also not listed on the Palm Beach
County Five Year Road Program and therefore will remain
as existing two lane undivided section.
Woolbright Road is also not scheduled for construction
improvements during the buildout year of the project.
Federal Highway (US 1) is not listed on the Florida
Department of Transportation Five Year Road Program
within the project's area of influence and therefore no
future improvements are anticipated during the project's
buildout period. The scheduled improvements to Federal
Highway are from Glades Road to Linton Boulevard during
the fiscal year 1992/1993.
6
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
~
0 ~
..J I- 0
CD CI) ::J
5 ..J
. ..,.
UJ
> ~
oCt
U) 4LO 4LD
U) liOOLBR IGHT ROAD
UJ
13
~
u
S.E. 23RD AVE 2LUD 2LUD
OCEAN AVE
2LUD
2LUD
2LUD
I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
2LUD I I I I
I I I ,
, , , I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
III.J
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I r
I I I I
I r I I
I I r I
I I / I
I I I I
I , , I
I I I I
I I I I
" " " "
I I I ,
I , \ I
I \ \ I
I I I I
1/11 ~
1/// :::::::::....
JIll ~
/111/;---:
I I I I r:-':!
I I I I ::::--J
I I I I c::::s
I I I ,
, , r ,
I I , ,
, I , I
I"" l ~
IIII '--J
"'1 ~
I I I I L
1I11 ~
I / I I :s:::..
/111 ~
I111 "-
I I I I ---..J
I I I I f....:::::.
I I , I
"" ~
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
, I I I
~ I I \
0
::J
u.I ..J u.I
> N >
4- 4-
Z 0
0 0 Z
I- ::J N
Z
- ..J .
::a N UJ
U) .
z
z
N.E. 4TH ST
. N.E. 8TH ST
...J
,.,
0
..J
..,.
UJ UJ
> >
oCt oCt
:J: :J:
l- I-
In CD
.
UJ UJ
. .
Z Z
ATLANTIC AVE
LEGENDI
2LUD-2 LANE UNDIVIDED
4LD-4 LANE DIVIDED
EXISTING LANE GEOMERTY
FIGURE
N.T.S.
CARNAHAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
4
Future Roadwqy Improvements(conlinued)
I-95 is currently listed on the Florida Department of
Transportation (FOOT) Adopted Work Program and
anticipated to be constructed by 95/96 Fiscal Year. FOOT
is currently proceeding with the design plans and is
anticipated to be completed by 1992. The improvements
consist of adding 2 HOV lanes, which will make the
facility eight-lane expressway.
All other roadways within the project's area of influence
are not listed for future improvements on the Palm Beach
County Five Year Road Program or the Florida Department
of Transportation Transportation Improvements Program.
Based on the above determination, future roadway improvements
are not anticipated within the project's area of influence with the
exception of I-95 interstate improvements.
Proiect Access
The primary access to Cedar Grove will be via an access
roadway on Seacrest Boulevard consisting of three lanes undivided
section tapering to two lanes undivided section. The three lanes
will consist of one through lane for inbound traffic and two left
plus through and right lanes for outbound traffic.
The proposed access will align with the existing Mission Hill
Road on the west side of Seacrest Boulevard. Mission Hill Road
currently joins North Swinton Avenue.
The back of the development can access Seacrest Road via the
connection to S.E. 2nd street which eventually reaches Seacrest
Boulevard through the adjacent development.
8
Background TrqfJic
An investigation of background traffic growth was conducted
within the study area utilizing the "Compound Growth Rate - Traffic
Performance Standard (1986-1990)" as provided by Palm Beach County.
the Compound Growth Rates are estimated utilizing the
increase/decrease of average daily traffic over the most recent
three-year period. Palm Beach County requires that Engineering
judgement be exercised in the utilization of the historical growth
rates. This study considersl such evaluation in determining the
background traffic.
In addition to the compound growth rates, the study includes
all major projects that could have impact on the roadway network
within the study area. Palm Beach County "Major Projects Map" was
consulted to determine the location of such projects. The major
projects are:
(1) (Residential)
Quail Lake West -
located at the northwest corner
of S. W. 23rd Avenue and Congress
Avenue.
(2) (Residential & Commercial)
Woolbright Place - located at the northwest corner
of Woolbright Road and I-95.
The impact from such developments was incorporated in the
background traffic estimation.
Figure 5 outlines the total background traffic within the
study area.
Pro;ect Trip Generation
Trips were generated for the project under morning peak hours,
afternoon peak hour and daily conditions. Trip generation
characteri'stics were obtained for detached single family
residential and attached residential for daily conditions using the
trip generation rates presented in Table 10.8-1 (Fair Share Road
Impact Fee Schedule) of Article 10 (Impact Fees). The morning and
afternoon peak hours were estimated using the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Fifth
Edition.
9
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
t ~ t ,
~
l- ID
. (/) ~
!! ~ ~
. J ~ ..
UI ~
>
~ .... 30.0'2." UI J I
.... H.71l2 .. (/)
(/) WOOl.8RI0I-I1 ROAD
(/)
~
~ ~t
u >-
.... ".,&os .. Ii ~
:r
..J
<[
S.E. 23RD AVE f5
fB
I.i.
1
~'?
0 SITEI
..'
~
, ,
U1t t UI
~ > ,:
~ ..
~'
ZII) . 0 tJi
011) N Z '"
1-. ~ N
zJti 2
.... .
:, - UI
.
Z
~
--
N.E. 4TH ST
.... 13,959 ..
~t
~.
.. ~240'"
l~ N. E. 8TH ST
51
ATLANTIC AVE
LEGEND-
"'15.2~"
TOTAL BACKGROUND TRAFFIC (ADT)
UI UI
> >
~ ~
:I: :I:
l- I-
It) UI
.
UI UI
.
Z Z
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
CARNAHAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
N.T.S.
OCEAN AVE
I
/ /
I I
/ /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / I
I / I /
I / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
I I I I
I I I I
/ / I /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / I (
I I I I
I I I I
I I / I
/ I / /
( / / (
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
, I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
/ / / /
/ / I I
, I I \
\ \ I I
/ / / (
Jill ~
Jill ~
/1// ~
( I , I 1.-:
/11/ ~
( I (( :::::--J
(III c:::s
I I ( /
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
//// { ...
///1 ---.J
, I I I '--.:,
I I I I '--
1111 ~
1111 ~
/11/ ~
/ I I I ""'-
1/// ---.J
I I I I J-:::::.
, I I ,
"I, ~
I I I (
/ / I /
I I / I
I I I I
I, \ \ \
FIGURE
5
The following peak hour trip generation rates were obtained
from the ITE Trip Generation Manual:
Single Family Detached Housing (ITE Code 210)
(Peak hour at adjacent street)
AM Peak : In(T) =
PM Peak : In(T) =
0.867ln (x) + 0.398
0.9021n (x) + 0.528
Attached Housing (Residential Planned Unit
Development - ITE Code 270) (Peak hour of
adjacent Street) I
AM Peak
PM Peak
In(T) =
In(T) =
0.942ln (x) - 0.308
0.893ln (x) + 0.280
T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends
X = Number of Dwelling Units
The daily trip generation rate based on Table 10.8-1 is 10
trips/DU for single family and 7 trips/DU for attached housing.
Where :
The above trip generation rates were applied to the units and
the projected total trip volumes were tabulated on Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION
TOTAL TRIPS
AM PEAK PM PEAK DAILY
LAND USE SIZE IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
SINGLE 146 DU 29 83 112 112 40 152 730 730 1460
FAMILY
ATTACHED 82 DU 10 37 47 45 23 68 287 287 574
HOUSING 101709
TOTAL = 39 120 159 157 63 220 1017
. 11
Project TriP Distribution and Assignment
Distribution of new project trips was based on a review of
Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization socioeconomic
data and engineering knowledge of the area. The socioeconomic data
are available through the attractions "ZDATA2 files" of the Florida
Urban Transportation Model structure (FSUTMS) for all zones within
the transportation study area. The attraction files include all
commercial, industrial and service employment within the study
area. Based on the available data, the following distribution was
obtained:
TRIPS DISTRIBUTION
DIRECTION
PERCENTAGE
North
East
South
West
27%
38%
10%
25%
TOTAL: 100%
The distribution rates were based on the premise that the
percent of site traffic produced is directly proportional to the
attraction size and inversely proportional to the square of the
distance from the site to the attraction.
The assignment of site traffic was performed assuming the
shortest and fastest path that drivers would more frequently favor
in their intended movement. By applying the distribution and
assignment characteristics to the roadway network, the anticipated
assignment rates were depicted in Figure 6.
Future Trqffic
The total 1995 traffic volumes for the residential development
are illustrated in Figure 7. The total traffic volumes are the
summation of the assigned project traffic, the projected 1995
background traffic growth and the existing 1991 traffic volumes.
The future traffic volumes will be the basis for determining
level of service compliance.
12
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
28"1. t
ATLANTIC AVE "'11,.1."
... ex ..
OCEAN AVE
N.E. 8TH ST
I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
, I , I
I I I ,
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I , I
I I I I
I I I I
I ( I I
I I , I
I , I ,
, I I I
I , , I
I I I I
I I I I
, I I ,
I I I I
I , , ,
~ ~ ~ /
I I , ,
I I \ \
\ \ \ I
I I I I
I I I I ~
I I I I -=::::::::..
I111 ~
I I I I I ,--:
I1II ~
IIII ~
II11 c::s
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
, I I ,
~~/~ r ...
~~~I ---.;
, I 'I '--.:,
111'1----
I J I J ~
I111 ~
1111 ~
111I '"'-
IIII --.J
I I I I J..-..:::.
I , , ,
"" ~
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I \ \ ,
'. ' , ,
.
l.LI
>
4:
en
i
... 3X ...
t 0
> t
a:
N
~ ~
.. en
J l.LI
a: J
u
4:
... 16""'" l.LI
en
WOOLBR J GHT ROAD
...'" ..
~'"
~
,
S.E. 23RD AVE
uJt tLLl
~ ~
a~ 0
& :t: ~
~... (')
(')
... .
~, ~i
... 2"1. ..
N.E. 4TH ST "'5""
... 2"1. ..
LEGEND I . ~t
... 5" ..
PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Ul
~
:t:
....
\0
Ul
>
4:
:t:
....
U)
LLI
.
z
uJ
Z
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE
N.T.S.
CARNAHAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
6
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
t ~ t
-'
II) m I
I"-
0 .... ~
g en ~
UJ
. 5 ,.: (0
UJ , !Jo"
> ~ iii
~ "'30,337_ UJ J I
.. 28.,843_ en
en VOOLBR I GHT ROAD
en
~
~ ~t ~
.. 9,741 _ ~
..J
5.E. 23RO AVE ~
w
fH
l&.
OCEAN AVE
SITE I
~1
~
~..
I\i
,
I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I / I
I / I I
I I I I
I I I /
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I (
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
( I / I
J I I I
J J I I
I I I I
I I J I
I I J I
I I I /
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
/ I I I
( I \ \
I I I I
/ / / /
/1// ~
JIll 'S:.
JIll ~
I I I I I.""""""":
I I I I ~
I I I I ::::::--..J
1111 c::s
I I I I
J I I I
I I I J
J I I I
1111 r ~
1111 '--.J
I I I I "-....:;
I I 'I '---
1111 ~
1111 ~
/111 ""
"// "'-
//1/ ---.J
I I I / J..-:::..
( I I I
I I I J "'J:::
I I I I
/ / I /
/ I / /
I I I I
I, I I I
~
UJt
~
"ZCI)
01/')
....-
"Z -
....v
~,
t~
c
I/') Z
co N
-
J~
N.E. 4TH 5T
"'14,061 ..
"S.Z31 ..
sf t~ N.E. 8TH 5T
~t
ATLANTIC AVE
LEGENDI
.. 14.061"
TOTAL PROJECTED TRAFFIC (ADT)
UJ UJ
> >
~ ~
x x
.... ....
It) UJ
. .
UJ UJ
. .
z z
TOTAL TRAFFIC
FIGURE
N.T.S.
CARNAHAN AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
7
Level Q( Service Analysis
This traffic analysis must demonstrate compliance with the
standards contained in section 7.9 of the Palm Beach Traffic
Performance Standards. The Standards consist of complying with the
adapted level of service for two tests: Test 1 (Link/Buildout
Test) or Alternate Test 1 (Peak Hour Test) and Test 2 (Model Test) .
The following outlines the analysis for each test:
Test 1 fLink/Buildout Test)
\ .
The analysis consists of projecting the project's new trips on
the major thoroughfare links within the project's radius of
development influence and evaluating the level of service for the
total traffic. The total traffic consists of projects traffic,
existing traffic, background traffic and approved projects as of
the buildout period. The standards state that the level of service
may be exceeded by a total of (5%) five percent of level of service
D. This (5%) five percent consists of the cumulative traffic from
all projects permitted after February 1, 1990. Provided that no
one project may use more than on-fifth of the five percent or one
percent of the total available on any link within the project's
radius of development influence.
From Table 2A (Maximum Radius of Development Influence for
Test 1) of the code, the net trip generation is 2034 trips/day.
Therefore, the maximum radius of development influence is 2 miles
and all the roadway links within the 2 miles distance must meet
Test 1. Meeting Test 1 consists of relating the projected total
traffic to the Level of Service D average daily traffic. This
could be accomplished by evaluating the projected total traffic, as
shown in Figure 7, and the average daily traffic for Level of
Service D as tabulated in Table 1A of the Palm Beach Traffic
Performance Standards. Table lA of the Standards relates the Level
of Service D to the facility type as obtained from the FDOT Manual
for group D. The comparison is outlined in Table 2 as Test 1
Analysis.
Table 2 outlines that N.E. 4th Street exceeds the allowable
Level of Service. The v/c ratio does not exceed 1.05 and therefore
the level of service is not exceeded by the allowable 5%. However,
the project's traffic of 102 vehicles per day does not exceed the
allowble 1/5 of 5% tolerance, which is 137 vehicles per day and
N.E. 4th Street is not a directly access link to the site.
15
TABLE 2
TEST I ANALYSIS
-----------------
ROADWAY FROM TO EXIST BACKGROUNO PROJECT TOTAL EXIST PROJ.
ADT GROWTH SUB-TOTAL TRAFF I C TRAFFIC LOS 0 V/C
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEACREST BLVD. N.E. 8 STREET S. E. 23 AVENUE i 8795 1231 10026 1159 11185 13700 .82
SEACREST BLVD. S.E. 23 AVENUE WOOLBRIGHT 17652 2560 20212 509 20721 24160 .86
SEACREST BLVD. WDLLBRIGHT OCEAN AVENUE 15824 1224 17048 102 17150 24160 .71
N.SWINTON AVE. A TLANTI C AVENUE N.E. 4 STREET 13329 476 13805 570 14375 14400 1.00
N.SWINTON AVE. N.E. 4 STREET N.E. 2 AVENUE 3557 398 3955 203 4158 13700 .30
US I (ONE WAY) N. E. 4 STREET N.E. 8 STREET 11867 1253 13120 81 13201 16900 .78
US 1 N. E. 8 STREET S.E. 23 AVENUE 23366 2268 25634 264 25898 30200 .86
- US 1 S.E. 23 AVENUE WOOL8RIGHT 26549 2554 29103 244 29347 30200 .97
US I WOOLBRIGHT OCEAN AVENUE 25842 2634 28476 142 28618 30200 .95
1-95 A TLANTI C AVENUE WOOLBRIGHT 113647 10386 124033 81 124114 110700 1.12
1-95 WOOLBRIGHT BOYNTON BEACH 120000 9892 129892 183 130075 110700 1.18
OLD DIXIE N.E. 4 STREET N.E. 8 STREET 10969 1180 12149 81 12230 16900 .72
lONE WAY)
OLD DIXIE N.E. 8 STREET US 1 1558 421 1979 0 1979 13700 .14
WOOLBRIGHT CONGRESS AVENUE 1-95 26500 2282 28782 61 28843 30200 .96
WOOLBRIGHT 1-95 SEACREST BLVD. 29645 367 30012 325 30337 30200 1.00
WOOLBRIGHT SEACREST BLVD. OCEAN BLVD. 9304 231 9535 81 9616 13700 .70
S.E. 23 AVENUE CONGRESS AVENUE 1-95 9420 185 9605 142 9747 13700 .71
S. E. 23 AVENUE [-95 SEACREST BLVD. 10522 41 10563 142 10705 13700 .78
S.E. 23 AVENUE SEACREST BLVD. US I 7536 63 7599 509 8108 13700 .59
N.E. 8 STREET SWINTON BLVD. OCEAN BlVO. bllb b4 6240 41 6281 13700 .46
ILE. 4 STREET 1-95 SWINTON BLVO. 13782 177 13959 102 14061 13700 1.03
Test 1 fLink/Buildout Test)(continued)
1-95 is currently exceeding the allowable level of service.
However, the project will place a maximum 183 vehicles per day of
the allowable 1107 vehicles per day or 1% of level of service D.
Therefore, according to the code this project will not be required
to address the subject link of 1-95.
I
Therefore, based on the above determination the project
complies with Test 1 requirements.
Test 2 (Model Test)
\
The analysis consists of obtaining the project's net trips as
projected in Test 1, determining the model radius of development
influence from Table 2B (Maximum Radius of Development Influence
for Test 2) of the code, and evaluating the level of service for
the total traffic. The total traffic differs from Test 1 buildout
traffic and is defined as model traffic. Model traffic consists of
anticipated traffic as assigned by the FSUTMS model on the future
2010 roadway network resulting from all approved (both built and
unbuilt) projects. Similar to Test 1, the standard allows the
level of service to be exceeded by 5% of Level of Service D pending
no one project can utilize more than 1% of this 5%. In addition,
Test 2 requires all projects that generate more than 7,000 net
trips/day to utilize the model. for traffic assignment and Level of
Service determination.
Based on Table 2B of the code, the maximum radius of
development influence for the generated 2034 vehicles per day is 1
mile. Therefore all roadway segments within 1 mile from the site
needs to not exceed Test 2 capacity. The Palm Beach County Table
(Test 5 - Projected Network Deficiencies (Model Plan) was consulted
to discover that none of the roadway links within 1 mile from the
site was on the list.
Based on the above determination, the project complies with
Test 2 requirements.
17
l
('
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the transportation analysis for Test 1 and Test 2,
the proposed residential development of Cedar Grove conforms with
the established Traffic Performance Standards. It is acknowledged
that the proposed development will utilize a portion of the 1/5 of
5% allocated on future constrained roadway segments. According to
the palm Beach County Traffic'ordinance, the available capacity can
be allocated for this development prior to future background
developments growth based on the assumption of first-come-first-
served application filed basis.
In addition to compliance, the development must address the
directly access link on.Seacrest Boulevard. According to the trip
generation section of this study the PM peak hour entering the site
is estimated to be 157 vehicles per hour. According to Figure 6
(traffic assignment) 57% of the traffic will access the site from
the north and 33% will access the site from the south. Therefore,
it is estimated that 89 vehicles per hour will be turning left into
the site and 52 vehicles per hour will be turning right into the
site.
Therefore, the development will be required to provide a
southbound left turn lane on Sea crest Boulevard to accommodate the
left turning traffic.
Based on the above compliance and the construction of the turn
lane, Carnahan and Associates recommends that a transportation
concurrency compliance be granted for the Cedar Grove residential
development.
18
j
"
..
---,-,_._-_._-_.--~._-~------ ~
~, !
~~~J)
CITY OP BOYNTON BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
Date
11/3/92
Arline Weiner, Mayor
Lynne Matson, Vice Mayor
Edward Harmening, Commissioner
Jose Aguila, Commissioner
Robert Walshak, Commissioner
AS REQUESTED
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
xxx x
REMARKS: Cedar Grove
Attached hereto please find a copy of a letter dated October 29, 1992 from
Richard Staudinger, City Engineer, to Mr. Julian T. Bryan, regarding the
recent Master Plan submitted by Julian Bryan and Associates for the pro-
posed Cedar Grove Subdivision. Please recall, the Cedar Grove tract of
land is commonly referred to as the Seacrest Scrub.
As you are aware the proposed rezoning on this tract of land was denied by
the City approximately six months ago, and they recently within the last
three weeks submitted a subdivision Master Plan for this land area under
the City's current zoning designation. According to the City Engineer this
proposed subdivision MasterPlan submittal did not address the City's code
relating to environmentally sensitive lands; therefore, said plans will not
be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for their review and
comment.
This letter is being forwarded to you for informational purposes only,
however, should you have any questions relative to its content, please feel
free to contact Chris Cutro or myself.
~
~ott Mi
'ty Manager
RECEIVED
JSM:cd
cc: Chris Cutro, P~nning Director
Central File
NOV 4 .......
PLANNING DEPT~
\
r
GEE & JENSON
Engl neer s. Archilects-
PlannerS,lnc.
October 29, 1992
Mr. Julian T. Bryan, III
Julian Bryan & Associates
3191 Leewood Terrace, L 136
Boca Raton, FI33431
RECEIVED
Re: Cedar Grove
Subdivision Master Plan Submittal
OCT 29 1992
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
Dear Mr. Bryan:
of'
On October 27,1992, the Technical Review Committee of the City of Boynton Beach met
to discuss the Master Plan submission by your firm of the proposed Cedar Grove
Subdivision. Staff comments were made concerning code requirements in Appendix C,
Article VIII, Section 4. These comments will be transmitted to you in writing on or before
November 3,1992. Comments will be forthcoming from the Utilities Dept., Building Dept.,
Parks & Recreation Dept., Police Dept., Fire Dept., Planning & Zoning Dept., and
Engineering Dept. based on Tuesday's discussions.
Also, during the meeting, Chapter 7, Article IV, Section 7.5-59 through 7.5-63, of the Code
of Ordinances which covers environmentally sensitive lands was discussed. Your Master
Plan submittal did not address this section of the code at all. I do not believe it is in your
best interests or the City's to forward this Master Plan submission to the Planning &
Development Board when the environmentally sensitive lands ordinance has not been
addressed. ---
You will still be receiving our written comments and those of the above listed departments
on the Master Plan submittal. However, I will not be recommending this subdivision
Master Plan be transmitted to the Planning and Development Board. You should resubmit
the Master Plan to the Engineering Dept. after you have made appropriate corrections or
One Harvard Circle. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409-1923.407/683-3301 . FAX 407/686-7446
05. 27. 93
08:50 AM
>t<GEE 8w JENSON
P02
n
GEE. JENSON
EnglnIlQfS-Archllocts.Plsnnt;lrs, Inc,
OM Harvllld Circle
West Palm Belch, F~ 33409
Telephone (407) 1583-3301
F.~ (<407) 6&6-7'1..
May ~~7, 1993
Mr. J, Scott Milfer
City Manager
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. EJox 310
Boyntl:m Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Boynton Seacrest Subdivision Master Plan
EnvironmG)ntal Appeal of Planning Development Board Deolslon
Dear Scott,
Attached 19 the complete packet of information including staff recommendation and staff
comments on the Boynton Seaerest (F.N.A. Cedar Grove) Subdivision Master Plan
subml1ttal. A chronology of the pn::lcess Is detailed in the Planning and Zoning Directors'
memo of May 05, 1993 which Is Included In the paCket of materials.
Atthe May 11, 1993 Planning and Development Board Meeting. the applicant's request
for Subdivision Master Plan approval was u"anlmously denied by the Board. In
accordance wlth Section 7,5 . 63 of the Code, the applicant has appealed the PlannIng
and Dl9velopment Board decision to the City Commission for revIew at It's June 01, '993
meeting. The applicant will be In attendance to present an overview of their basis for
appeal on the preservation issue.
VGryt:IY~ .
it; u~-..~c--
w. Rlclhard Staudinger, P.E,
WRSlJer
attachment
Q2025/200
00: Chris Cutro
Vince Finizio
Bill Archdeacon, PEr PLS . City Engineer
James Cherof
MAY 21 '93 11: 14AM PSM&J
P.2
~..ARr:;>,' I'i.'RRY
,BERT LEE SH.\i'l~()
id)Al\ R. MILLE~'
:.L A. J/I RKESY
~~
gu~~ ~I J'!.i/k, c1 ~1 .9.S4I
rt4.5'? ~ ~ .~
.9....:4 G'(JC
rIW.9'.... ~ ~ ~
HUi'HONl! (407) 6M-4~OO
FAX (407) 6!J.(-100s
,:'MlTrED J:-l PWR1DA
,0 D:sr~jcr OFCOI.\!MlllA
VIA FA!~SIHILE
May :n, 1993
W. Richard Staudinqer, P. E.
ci.t.y Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beaoh, FIQrida 33425-0310
Re; C,edar Grove Investors, N. V . \Rez;onins
6'oynton Seacrest Subdivision Master Plan
Our Pile No.: 3197.01
Dnar Mr, staud.inger:
III acc.ordance with the Boynton Beach code of orClinances Chapter 7 I
sE~ctlon 7.5-63 JlAppeals process", this correspondence serves to
request an A~m1n1strative Appeal trom the Planning and Development
Board's denial ot the Boynton seacrest SUbdivision Master plan by
u~lanimous vote at the May 11, 1993 Planning and Development Board
~eeting. We hereby request that this action be reviewed by the
City <:If Boynton Beach City Commission at the next regularly
scheduled City Commission meeting.
Thank you very much for your consideration of this matter.
Since.rely yours,
f'"
:jl:(t. [~ y~~x~
Jill A. Jarkesy
JAJ:psp
cc: James Cherof
J. Scott Miller
Christopher Cutro
JUlian Bryan
c,\wp51\.aio\cedQ~a~Q\8tau~ina.ltr
~,,'.~,
1', lrt^ l\'l"(N 1'1;!l.llY
~ilEil.T LEB SHAPI1l.O
JORDAN R MILLlR'
JILL A. JARKESY
$- tJf1-
g~~ ~j ~g~/.9.s/
rN'4S .9...... !I-.J. ~ !!IkJ
.9'""", t<<JP
~ ~ ~,'..n.....J.HIIf
TELEPHONE (4Cf7J 684-'1:100
P...." (4el7) 684-100$
- .\DMrrr~ IN f'I.C>.IDA
AND pl$'ralCT OF COLu.t1l1lo
February 8, 199J
w. Richard s~au~1nger, p.E.
City at Boynton Beach Engineer
Gee & Jensen
One Harvard Circle
West Palm BeaCh, Flor1aa JJ409
RE: Cedar Grove Investments, N.V.
our File No. 3197.01
Dear Mr. staudinger:
On January 27, 1993, we received Comments from tne Technical
Review Committee of the city of Boynton Beach which met on January
12, 1993. On that date, the Technical Review Committee met to
discuss the Master Plan submission for the proposed Boynton
Seacrest SUbdivision. Please be advised that neither this firm nor
any of the consulting planners or engineers for this project were
notified that the Technical Review Committee would be meeting to
discuss this Master Plan submission. Furthermore, the city of
Boynton Beach Code of ordinances specifically requires that written
comments for 'the Technical Review Committee be received by the
developer within seven days of the date of the ~eeting. Appendix
C Article VIll, Section 4.H.l, Boynton Beach Code. comments were
not ,received until fifteen days after the TRC meeting. In any
e.vent, we have revised the subdivision Master Plan for Boynton
Seacrest in order to address and comply with comments set forth in
mG~oranda submitted by the staff members on the Technical Review
Committo.. Wa are herein enclosing seventeen complete sets of this
rGvi~ad M.atGr Plan submittal.
In respon.e to your memorandum to Mr. Chris Cutro, Planning-
and Zoning Direotor I dat.ed 3anuary 21, 1993, you indicate with
reuspect to Appendix a, Article VIII, Sect-ion 4.C.S of thQ Boynton
Beach Code of Ordinanoes that cur submittal does not show roadway
widths for adjaoent streQ~~. P1~a$e be advised that ~he
subdivision M~ster Plan specifioally ~how& t.he ri~ht~ of way widths
for ~ll ~djnoonb D~rO..8. .n .aQ~~~vn. .beet Qn9-Qf-Q~~ n~ r~p-
Doynton De.Qcrcl3t Ma.c-cor S'bOt'1l'l Man.CJQ.$n~ P;&'an .p.~,j.f.1.t;""ll,y .h~w!ll
Z'd
f~WSd W~60:11 E6, 60 H3j
I I
w. Richard Staudinqer, P,E.
February 8, 1~9J
Paglil 2
the wi<1th of asphalt for each adjacent riqht-of-way. Sheet one-clf-
one of the Topoqr~pbyMap of Boynton Seacre.t a150 sho~e the right-
at-way widths for all adjacent streets.
Your memo also state5 that the $urvey ana site ha3 not been
abstracted. Your code reference 15 to Appendix C Art.icle. VIJ:I,
Section 4.C.9. our submittal has specifically shown all existJ.ng
property lines I easements and rights-Of-way, their purpose, emd
their street on the property to be SUbdivided, and therefore, we
have satisfied SUbsection 9 ot Article VIII, Section 4.C. We do
not. see any reterence in the Boynton !leach code to "abstracted"
survey. Please state specifically in writing what you are
requiring us to submit and why we have not satistied the reterenc:ed
code section.
We have revised our Master Plan submission to reflect .the
entrance right-af-way and Mission Hill Road dimensions to the
sub~ect property line as requested. It you teel this is not
sat~sfactory, please advise immediately as well as specifics as to
what you desire.
Article VIII, Section 4.C, Subparagraph 17 specifically
requires that the Master Plan shall contain a statement that elll
utilities are available and have been ooordinated with all required
utili ties. Please note that sheet one-ot-ane of the Boynton
Seacrest Master storm Management Plan specifically states, "WatE~r,
sewer, electric, cable TV and telephone service are all available
adjacent to the site. Appropriate construction plans for thE~se
services will be submitted at the appropriate time." We have,
thus, complied with this section of the Code, and if you feel that
we have not complied with it, please immediately notifY us and
state in writinq specifically what the city will reQUire for
compliance.
Your 1t\$1nOirandum also s'Cat... t.ha'C the Mast.er storm Mana9'antf~nt:.
Plan illil still. not acoeptablo and that ~h. drainage sYlitean has not
bean addrQssed to your lIiIatillilfaction. Please ~tatQ specifically
what. is not. acceptable and what you delidra. WQ are making QV'llry
effort to ro.ee~ the city's criteria for drainage, What: we h2lve
proposed will work, and it: has been reviewed and conoeptually
approved by the Sout.h Florida Water Manaqement. Dist.rict:. ~L'h$
enclosed reeubmittal epecifically addre.,6es volume oaloulat.ions j:or
exfiltrat:ion t.ronchee in mor:e detail. ~our memorandum poaes 1;he
question '.how will t.he drainage system be maintained?", Sheet one-
of-one of the. Boynton Seaorest Master storm ManCl.goment l? lan
specifically states that "Drainage oulverts and exfil~rD:t;ion 't;rencn
..9...,. ~ ~ 6 ~~.Ptf'
E'd
r~WSd W~01:TT S6, 60 H3j
,
f
W. Richard Stftudin9Sr, ~.E.
Pebru~ry 8, 1~93
Page 3
systems sh<<ll he loc~ted within appropriatQ width easemanta that
are dedicated ~nd maintained by legal assignment to a Homaown~rs
Association."
At this point, X would also like to note ~h.~ the drainage
system wh1ch we are proposing is sub:atantially sUPQrior to any
Oralnage in the adjacent area. If you 81::ill are not satisfied with
ene Master Storm Management P1an, please state 6peoifica11y wha~
!urtner intormation you will require.
The last paragraph ot your memorandum references t.hat aooesses
to Lots 1 ana 2, BlOCK 1, an~ Lots 25 and 26, Block 10 violates
Article, Section 1 because the access is le~s than 180 feet from
Seacrest BOUlevard, a collector street. This aection of the Code
requires that points ot access to lots developed wi t.hin t.he
subdivision shall be located a m1nimum ot 30 ~eet from intersecting
\ right-ot-way lines on local streets and 180 teet rrcm intersecting
I~O right-ot-way lines on all other streets o~ higher clas5Iificaticm.
The Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances states that collector streets
,~ are 80 feet in width whereas local streets are 60 teet in width or
,~- 50 feet if they are curbed. Mission Hill Road which crOl':;lr'.es
\~ ~ Seacrest at the entrance to the Boynton seacreat Subdivision is
only 60 feat, in width and therefore 1s classified as a loc':al
,street. By !eiinitioJ1.,~~~re req\!1X'eq_~_E!a~e points...Qt ~~m:5s
to lO~ a ~~-.of- ){)-- feat --from__the .lntersect1on 9! a.eacrest--.. h. t.._ .
-'BoulA J;4.-an4 KiliSion--H~9ad. The subdivision Master Plan lror ~~- ~
Boynton Sea crest specifically complies with this design ~~
re""uire1l'lent.
.. r <; t^-
Doif.ru::dl
We have reviewed Tal'l'lbry J. Hayden I s Planning and Zon'Lng
it Department memorandum No. 93-013 which lists deficiencies for
Lrr....;/' Boynton Seacrest Subdivision. Many of these comments are appear.inq
. "<.' v-~ for, the first time and were neither referenced in the previlJus
K Planninq and Zoninq Department memorandum nor discussed at either
Y'JJ c#' of the Technical Review Committee meetings. Nevertheless, we have
~ ~ made every 8~fort to address each item in order to satisfy all
tJ,~ ordinances; and Codas of the city of Boynton Beach. The subdivision ,
. 5 ,,1 j t loIa.tar Plan aubmi tted to the city of Boynton Beach on December 22, W'"
t \~?-Jr ~. 1992, Qpecificall;y noted, !I~!::backs as: r~quire...clPXJ!=.2_.a.mt R-:l-:-~U ~
. ~ \)oJ t;~.. ,M.. zon!pqw. 'I'h1.SI languaqQ was previously requested at the TRC d cfl FuJ.
\ c~~~ mee~inq of October 47, 1992. The city has now requested that we .~
~'1 )(11- add a note whioh referGnc8a t.he zoning code "building and site tJJ.Jie');
o.-K regulatione" for the R-l AA and R-2 zoning- distr iot.s. We have . .
revil!!led eh. SUbdivision MaateX' Plan to show this languaqe. If this lM-v\
is insufficient, plea.se state in writing speoifically what l{Ou (~_ _ _J
would liKe u. ~o place on the plan. ;' ~"'~
( ,dd--,f.~
COnt~'t1
06- 5 ~ 1Ju~ ~
9~~~d~.?SJI'
t;-'d
-
r~WSd W~0f:ff E6, 60 a3J
.l\ (
0)\
~
~J!~
~
r
4}J
~R)
~
I, I
W. R~chard stauainger, P.E.
February 8, 1993
pa.ge 4
Our professional land planner, Julian BTYan, has speoifically
addressed Item Two of the Hayden memox-andum by indioating the width
of the required limited access easement on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lo~
26, Block 10 along Seaccrest Bouleva~d. Our enqineera, Carnahan,
Proctor and Assoc1ates have specirically addreesed Item three by
indicating a location and width or a wall m~intenanoe eaeement for
the retaining wall indicated along the north boundl:lry of alock 1,
Lots 20 throuqh 26, and along the west boundax-y of Blook 10, Lot.Ai:
10 through 17 on the Master Storm Management Flcn.
Items Four and Five of the Hayden memorandum deal with the
Traffic Impact Analysis which has been subm1tteO to the Palm Beach
County Enqineerinq Department for 1ts approval. we are ~ddressinq
these comments directly with the Palm Beaoh county Engineering
Department and hope to have their final approval prior to the
FQbruary 9, 1993 Planning and Development Board Hearing. Ple~se
nota that our enqineers have included in the submittal a detail of
tha primary access to the development from Seacrest Boulevard as a
three lane, undivided section tapering off to a two lane undivided
..ction.
ItQm six X'Qcommends that money be put into escrow at the time
of pla~tin9 for a traffic liqht at the intersection of Seacrest
Boulovard and Mission Hill Road, until project buildout or until
the light is warranted, whichever comes first. Palm Beach County
haa indioateQ that a traffic li9ht is not warranted now nor will be
warranted eV$n at the time of total project buildout. Therefore,
t.he Boynton Saaorest Subdivision should not be required to put
moniec into eSQrow for a. i::raffic liqht if the proposed proj ect dc,es
no~ warrcnt the traffic ligh~.
In reference to paragraph seVen of Hayden's memorandum, the
SUbdivision Master Plan prQviously submitted to the City of Boynton
Beach does show pedestrian oros~walks, B feet in width, between
streets which: elccommoda'te the proposed peds.strian system to the
pUblic park sit.e. Tbe Mast$t" Plan also specificallY shows a
pedestrian crolSswe.lk and path CJoing directly t.o the pUblic park
between Lots 9 and 10 of Bloak 1. These p$dest.rian crosswalks wIll
be in the publicly dodicD.t.ed rightli-of-way. The appropriate
siqnaqe and. crosswalk s't:ripinq "Will be inst.allQd within the right-
of-way at the time the dedicelted streets ar:e oonstructed and pav4;ld.
ArtiCle Xt section 3.D. t~tes thD.t in blooka 900 feat in len~Jth
or over, crosswalks tw streets not less than g feet wide may
be required or deems ntiQl to provide oirculation or aCOQSS to
schools, playgrounds ete. There is no referenoe whatsoaver in tha
Code to the requlrQ~;::;;; f- _ ~,11'~~' I . l _
~
06. 06. 93
09:61 AM
>t<GEE &.. ..JENSON
POl
,......
,~ .
n
GEE . JENSO~ MEMORANDUM
RE:
Christopher Outre, Planning & ZOni~g ~ . CI
W. Riohard Staudinger, City Engl~kI'(~
Boynton Seacrest (F.K.A. Cedar Grove)
. Drainage Certification of Concurrency
TO:
FROM;
DATE:
May 5, 1993
l'he referenced subdivision meets the City of Boynton Beach concurrency requirements
for drainage as represented by the master drainage plan submitted as a part of the
subdivision master plan for the Boynton SeBcrest Subdivi$ion. The matter drainage plan
meets the concurrency levels of service as required in Articles 19-88 and 19-84(d)
Drainage of the City of Boynton Beach, Code of Ordinances. To comply with the drainage
level of service reQuirements of the City of Boynton Beach, the entire master drainage
plan must be constructed prior to initiation of any home conlltruclion. In addition each
subdivision lot building permit must oontaln an Individual grading plan which compiles with
the master drainage plan. No fenoes of any kind wiD bo allowed in the drainage 8walea
located in the back yards Of residences. All swales will be maintained by a Master
Association as noted on the subdivision master plan.
92025/200
RECEIVED
MAY 6 1993
fl -? 'J
~ :V'
Il , \
\ . '.
, ~
~ ,~~
'<.4
06. 06. 93 12: 00 PM *GEE &. JENSON
:::IN...OtH.....OQ.....c ·
paz
: , ""W'I 'UI"I .......n.,.J.Mn!'\ lOS"
8P ~ ~r
(1'..1) (' b.;..e C;,e #lI"C. 1/ ./
'f[' IT). ;. - "1IZ7,a
"-~""
,,~\?,-, '
,. .1,',:,
I:' .
. ., \ ". _",.,.tot:" ~
. ~ ~
_. -
';';:~~ll eQMMrmE
'.:.~ ~I TE PL'N "E'.I1~:.v
. Dat!.wtt~
Date '4'/i:ri'1
- 001"1&# - ~
OatG..- t f!i.J_t!,JeIJ;tt--
~Gte 4.. 'J AJ
jlJ... ~ '" ~
. ~ - tl~ eo~"'~n '
.If
:'!
..,. C
;,1':'1- ~
.j
Fire 'De~r,
Eng. De 1",
Util. De~t.
Police D I~!)r.
P. \lv. 0(.1 ~..
c>.. ~l~
:": ~:C~ ai,
r(..lr~sti:1
R.1.A A ZONING
iKY RANCH ESTATES
(P.B./26. PAGE j4)
, I I
I /'$03.70' ,
! ,,- "'" ,~- --,. .J__~.
! I 1
, . .
\~ I (\ ~;
I
I
\t?
t
1
I " I'
T" -=.. T
'1- . ---I
i ~
~ ! \r.1
I
BLOdK ONE
I
r-- .:s ' (.{.lAt..t.. E~5eMt:iU 7 ,
, I tW"AIJ..I~ 4Y "'.0.4.
I . I I I
I f -I r- 50',RiW
I r I 'f I
--~- -
~-:--"""""- --
1D
,.\
I
l 1J,.'
I
/'
).~
'JP
. t' f
-..L
II
1.Y:
II
--I q'j
b i "i,
, I
! I
, I
-- &- .. -"-1
50' A/W
--
~
o
<)
It
\'J c>
v
~J
~
II
II
I I A
: I ...
I
~ It -.
~I r.--'"
<'I!
'1
.
"'"
~
~
1\
\JJt.
,.
" ~.. \'
t fv
r)J) ~
./
05. 06. 93
12:00 PM
*GEE &.. ..JENSON
P03
RECREATION ~ PARK MEMORANDUM *93-166
RE:
v1ncene rln1z1o, Deputy city Enqlneer
Kevin J. ~alla~an, Fora5t~r/Environment~list, I~~,~
Boynton seacrest Master plan Re~ubmi~tal (2nd Review)
(FKA Cedar Grove Sunalv1sion M~sterPlon
A planned Reslden~1al community)
DATE:
April 12, 1993
1. The applicant will be required to meet the EnviL"onrnent~l
Regulat10n Article I, Tree preservation Sections 7.5-1 thI;"ough
. .~ 7.5,,27 (pages 593-606). specifically, the applicant mul$t
~~ fulfill the requirements or section 7.'-22, page ~03, natuI;"al
~Vfl growth to be preserved. ThiS s1~e has been determined to be
If.r'' an environmentally valuable, nearly extlnct ecosyst.em ln South
Florida. Meeting these sections may affect the master plan
design resubrnittal, as approved by ~he City.
. ~~J' J
~/"
The applicant has verbally requested that the report:
ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED SEACREST BOULEVARD
SCRUB, (CEDAR GROVE SITE) BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
09 JANUARY 1992 prepared by Donald Richardson, PHD Ecological
consultants, Inc. be submitted in total for the project FKA
Cedar Grove. This is to meet the requirements of Article IV,
V environmentally sensitive lands, section 7.5-59 through 7.5-63
"\qf ( (pages 628-631). This report does comply with section 7 .5-59
M.l~~~O through 7.S-61(b). The applicant must also submit written
'1'ol"A documentation to comply with sections 1.5-61 c,d through
~~. section 7.5-63 (pages 630-631).
. ,,.I"
. In accordance with the. City ComprehenSive Plan Ordinance #89-
38, adopted November 7, 1989 policy 4,3,5 page 67, the
applicant is required to desiqnate a minimum of 25\ of the
nativQ plant community as a preservation area. The ecological
assessment document (J2 above) and the site data sheet
(revised' 2'-20-92) indicatQd the proposed location of the
Preserve 11.5 acres maintained b Cedar Grove H.Q.A. will be
ove Jiayed on the Boynt.on SQ.acrest MasterPlan resubmittal. The
. purpose ilil,to apply th.e comment made by thQ applicant at the
T.R.C. ffigeting on April 9, 1~93 (see attachQo memo from Chris
Cutro, April', 1993 p.~a9raph one) tow8rd~ the location of
the preserve area in cqnjunction with the proposed blocks,
lots; and R.O.W. eaeements.
2.
...
I~-
{Ivf
06. 06. 93
12 00 PM
>t<GEE &. JENSON
P04
.lr,u~'~,.IA~,,'''''', "" ',., I.. "'" "'. ".'
The following areas as shown on the Boynton Seacrest
MasterPlan resubll\ittal could not be preserved as indicated
under .a tree managemep.t l>lan wh11e simultaneously developed as
housing locations, The areas arQ: Slock 11 lots 30,31132;
Block .7 lots Il-24 inclusive1 Block #8 lots '1-~2 inclusive;
Block *9 lote 11-15 inclusive; Block #10 lots tl-6 inclusive;
SO' R.O.W. easement between block seven and block Qiqht to
north/8ou~h property line; 501 R.O.W, easement bQtw..n block
ei9ht and block nine to north/south property linQj 10' non-
access and land~cape/~creening easement to north/south
property line,
Kf{;ad
Vi...... ."r....;,
i . , '
I '
'I r .
\,) .
'"..
'.
05. 06. 93
12 00 PM
*GEE &.. .,JENSON
P05
f~~K DEPARTMENT MEMaRAHP~ ~~ g3.2~~
TO:
~NGIN~ERING DEPARTMENT
P'ROM~
FIRE DEPARTMENT
OATE:
MARCH :1.'1, :I. 99:j
RE;
MASTER PLAN RE9UBM~SSION
BDYNTON 5EACREST
5 SEACREST BOULBVARD
(PLANNING OEPT. FiLE ~69?)
'l'H1;f\! ARIl: NO OBJI!:CTiON3 AT '1'1115 TIM!!:.
4j4P--'~a~
WILLIAM D CAVANAUGH, FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
,...
PO'
fl,,""'") .
/'t. X .(V
"f"
, ,.
t/J
06. 06. 93
12:00 PM
*GEE &.. .,JENSON
P06
n
. GEE & JeNSON
/, '~;i "::";'~ .ArOMSCis.PlilMerS 111C.
April 12. '9~3
Ol'l\! l'Iarv810 CII'I;:II;I
,\I~.t j;l.In1 ElIn.e!l I=L 33040<;1
1 (!IOQllol'e (4071 653.330\
r-a~(40716ee.74~a
Jill A. Jarkesy, ESQ. .
Perry. Shapiro. Miller & Jarkesy, PA
1645 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
Suite 600
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Boynton Seacreet Subdivision Ma.ster Plan
Environmental Impact Statement
Dear Ms, Jarkesy:
This latter Is sent to confirm your verbal directive at the Boynton Beach Technical Review
Committee (TRC) meeting of Thursday. April 8, 1993. At the TRC meeting you directed City Staff
to utiiize the environmental studY previously submitted for the Cedar Grove PUD rezoning as the
noeessary onvlronm8ntal impact statement required by Chapter 7. Article IV; Section 7.5-59 of
tho Boynton SQach Code of Ordinances (page 628 supplement No.45). No previous
environmental data had been submitted for the Subdivision Master Plan for Boynton Seacrest
(Cedar Grove Traot), therefore no review as noted in 7.5-59 through 63 had baG" possible.
The Planning & Zoning Department of the City of Boynton Beach and the City Forester will be
reviewing the impact statement and generatlng approprIate comments to my attention in
accordance with the schedule outlined in the Code of Ordinances.
Please call if you hava any Questions, or If the contents of this letter do not accurately refleot the
dlscuQsion and actions ot the April a. 1993 TRC meeting with respect to environmental issues,
Very truly yours,
Gee &. Jenson
~3t~
W. Richard Staudinger. P.E.
WRS/bf
92-02551200
cc; J. Scott Miller
Chris Cutro
James Cnerot
Tambri Heyden
.
'~
~4"
05. 06. 93
12:00 PM
*GEE &. .,JENSON
PO?
PtJaLIC WORKS OEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM *g3-089
TO: v1ncen~ A. Finiz1o, Deputy city Engineer
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Direotor
SUBJ: Boynton seacrest Master Plan Resubmittal (2nd Review)
DATE: April 6, 1993
The Public Works Department has no p~oblems with the amended mast~r
plan for seoond review as reterenced above.
~~
Pu~11c WorKs Director
REIer
,"
i
rfwf.
~
....
OS. 06. 93
12 00 PM
*GEE 6.. ..JENSON
poe
P. MARonN FlZRRY
ROBEIl.T L!I! SHAPIRO
JOROAN It MIll.ER'
JILL A, JARKESY
$,.. c11t-
!?~I ~1 JI.i&. c1 ~. !?d
~u ~ JI...4 ~ .!IIwI.
$PUll(, fif)() .
~.9.J.. ~ ~.>>HI
TEI..EPHONIi (407) ~..4SOO
fAX (407) ~84.1 0<:8
. ..OMITTED IN FLOII10,l
AND DIS"[i\1C!' 0' GOLUM&lA
Th, . '{"'I!" ~'.;., ,
!. ~"J(f: ~:-," (, ~.' ~, .:: ~
I- 1":1 ",..If . "., ,;, ,:," ,,: ,::,:' '.' :-':'.\,
tt ,~. ..
n.......lr , .i,t ,,: IJi
;.'
APR 1 6 1993
.-"' ;.. ~....... 1 .' "I' , ,~, " .
'-~I-:.f,:" r.~\ ,}~:: '..~:'~~}:'.l
April 12, 1993
Mr. W. RiohDrd Staudinger, P.E.
City Eng'ineer
city of Boynton Beaoh
Gee & Jenson
One Harvard Circle
west Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923
RE: cedar Grove Inves~or., N.V./Boynton Seac~Q~t Mae~er
Subdivision Plan
O~. File No. 3197.01
Dear Mr~ sta~ainger;
This correspondence servee to confirm my Bt~tement at the Ci~y of
Boynton BeaCn Technical Review Committee Meetinq whioh was hQld on
April 8, 199J relative to the environmentcl study submittac1 by
Cedar Grove as part or their Planned Unit Development submit~al in
early 1992. I hereby author1~e you on behalf of Cedar c;rove
Investments to consider tne Environmental S~udy prepcred by Donald
Riohardson Ph.D. of Ecological consultant5, Inc. a~ pa~~ of the
BOz'r:.t.cn Soacrest Master. SUl:JdivJ s10n Pll\:'1 subrnlttal.
Thank you very much for your consideration or thi~ matter.
Sincerely yours,
9w-'c~~i-
Jill A. Jarktsy
JAJ:psp
'."
/
t I"") //
I i./'
/,' .1~! /t/
U'
05. 06. 93
12:00 PM
*GEE &. .JENSON
P09
, h.JA..IIe. A ~'~r"'~~--~"
G
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-105
TO: ALL TECHNICAL REVIEM C~l'rrEE MEMBERS (hand-delivered)
FROM: VINCENT A.. FINIZIO
DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER
DATE: APRIL 22, 1993
RE: MASTER PLAN COMMBH RECONCILIATION SUBMISSION
MODIFICATION OF TRC MEETING AGENDA
BOYNTON SEACREST (FRA CEDAR GROVE)
Provided your offices herein, plea$9 find a full 6et of MaSt9r Plans
oonaidered by the City EnqinQQr as a set of plana aubrnitted by thQ
applicant for the purpose of raconcilinq staff comments prior to the
P & D aoard's consideration at their next monthly meeting.
Ple~~e he fully prepared to discu~$ these plan~ after c~reful1y
performing a comp~rative analysis against your most recent comments.
By ~QPY of this roemo~andum to both Dorothy Moore and Attorney Jill
Jarkesy, I am providing notice that the agenda i~ amended to inclUde
6.iscussion reference compliance with sta,ff comments on April 27, 1993
at 9:00 a.m. at the west w1nq conference Room, 2nd Floor, west wing
or c~ty Hall. Thank you.
~~ , ~':'
,,;. >C".....- (A, ,_ ~ \JJ--"f-"~ -,,",
,-\'...)... I ~o::;:.C...el.~ ,
v~; .....n" ~A ~"".:", t13 ~ \ \\....'
\
\ t'.'
u~~b ~~J
; (
cc: Attorney Jill Jarkesy via FAX TRANSMISSION
J. Scott Miller, City Manager .
James A. Cherof, City Attorney
W. Richard Staudinqer, P.E. (as directed)
.. " , ,..-'
",:,~1"\..1_ "~" .,. ,I..:. ~
. .-,
f:1'~,~,,-1o.J >.. f~' (. '..J;~ .;..J::;:; - \" ~
lv;~.
.L 7. 3- C(~, ~
....
A\ \ ~10y'
(~~i
\
05. 06. 93
12:00 PM
*GEE &. .,JENSON
P10
PLANNINC ANO ZONING OE:PARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO:
R~ch~~a etAuQinge~
city Eng.1.nf:el.'
~~.~-
Chrietopller cut1."O
Planning and zoning Di~Qctor
TtlRt1 :
fROM: Tambri J. Heyden
:senio~" Plarmel."
DAT~: Ap~il 26, 1993
SUBJECT: Boynton Seacre~t (f.k,a. Decar a~OvQ) - F11Q No. 697
Master Plan (subdivision) - Eoologia~l comments
Tll111 folloWil'lQ list of comment15 are those ref.r'Qt'1ced in r=omm6lnt #9
and #9 of my prevlous memorandum dated April 13/ 1993 addressed to
you and are gene~atea by rereview1ng and applyi~g the 1992
ecolbg1cal 40curnentatlon submitted for the cedar Grove PUD rezQnin~
to the eUl"rent request (r-e:!vised lll~elter plan l"eceivQd March .3C I
1993) in order to comply with the city's Environmentally SQnsitiv~
lands ordinance:
1, None of the dQcumeut.ation ri.ubm1tted to meet the s1.tbmittal
requirements of Chapter 7.5, Art1cle IV. Envi~onmentally
Sans1tive Lands, Sect10n 7.~-61. Review proc~dures for
proposed land altel-atlons, addl"eSseS ~ection 7.5-61(0)
ttproject opel;ationlt a:1(~, sect10n 1.5"61 (d) "project
alternativesll, Therefore, with no preservation !hown on the
sUbJect master plan, it is net known now 10S5 of habitat and
development illlP~.ict or. the enaallqu'ed, tlll"eatened and r&re
animal and plant species and speCIes Of speclal concern that
have ~een 1d~ntif1ed on the property, will b& mltig~ted.
3.
2. The subject prQPtn"ty i::; d.elineated on tl1e comptehens1v~ Pl~ll
Futul-e Land Use. Nap as a HCot1serva t ion Overlay' DiS tr.:Lct" 'd'.ll:
to an "P." (hi~h q'lla11ty) rating of the natlve, Fll."C1d.a Scn.to
ecosustem on the parcel. The use and development of
proplill"ti.es delineated as a nconsel"vation Overlay Districti. are
~ubject at the recommendatlons contained in the conservation
and coutal Manac;tement Elements of the C1ty'S 1985l
CornprQh~n.so1vE!. Plan. Since 110 preservation is shown} th€
subject ma,ter plan is incons1sitent with Comprehensive Plan
policy 4,3.5 which requires p~eservat1on of a minimum 2S~ of
the total scrub habitat of 45.69 acres (i.e. - 11.43 acres).
Opel."atl1i.9 '\1l1d"l' thlii sami'. conclusions drawn in 1992 by staff
~nd Donald Richa~dson, the applicant's ecologist and preparer
of the ~anuary 9, 1~92 ~cological ass~ssment ~ereviewed and
appli~d to the curr~nt rQqu~st. at minimum, the fol1ow1nq lots
(ana atreet accee5 to thQm) will need to be deleted from the
subject maste~ plan. This determination was made be
ovel-laying the vegetation mapping t"e,ql.lired in section 7.5-
61(b)1 of the Environmentally sensitive L~nds Ordinance:
,,,
a) ~lock 1, Let! 1 ~~cl 13-24; inclusivQ
b) Hlock 6, Lots 1-22; inclu~ive
cl Slock 9, ~ots ~-l~; inclusive
dl :Elock 10, ~ots 1-6; inclu5ive
4. The applicant s1jO~11d }.eep 1n mincl when addressing the abClve-
referenced comments tha~ al~hough at time of p~eliminary plat
apprdval a management plan shall be submitted fo~ the prQ~~~ve
area and any other ocmmon areas, ~~ ~uch eXl$ting vegetation
as possible I employing preservation. 6.nd l'elocation I rathel--
than llC\lt and replace" teclU'liq1.leS, \')utside the pl"eeerVe arail
shall be saved. D~s:i.qnatlon of a transition buffet' on th,..
master plan and management plan is recommended a~ a reet~ict~d
develClpment ::=.on.e to pl'6<Vent siglllf1cant adverlSe effects on the
protected enVironmentallY sens1tive zone. Thia type of
~.
05. 06. 93
12 00 PM
*GEE &.. ..JENSON
P 1 1
TO: Richard staudinqa~
...2..
April 26, 1993
( con t ' d. )
4. miti~atiQn consid~ration would ~nsu~e that any portion of th&
t~'anf;,iti':ll'l bufEeJ.- that is dG\mC\~..d dm.-in~ (,ol1.struction, is
~esto~Qd and op~~ating within a ~~a~onabl~ amount of time_
c:ompl","hen.siv~ plan p',:Jlioy 4.4,~ and Chaptel- 7,:', ~,.l:ticl!il IV.
section 7,S-Slld) of the Cod~ of O~dinance..
...
J~y.iL;dt-/ .
tjh
A;~oysel:lER
A~
\1'
,..
a 5. 06. 93
12:00 PM
*GEE &. .,JENSON
P12
/
RECREATION , 'ARK MEMORANDUM '93-185
DATE:
Vincent A. Fin1z1o, Deputy City Engineer J /
KevinJ. ~llahan, Fore.~er/Environmen~ali.t ~~
Master Plan comment Reconciliation Submission
Modification Ot TRC Meeting Agenda
Boynton seacrest (FKA Cedar Grove)
April 27, 1993
TO:
FROM:
RE:
My comments as submitted at the previous TRC (Memo. *93-166) have
not been addressed by the applicant.
KH1ad
.. .
.
:-
'/
8}lf
05. 06. 93
12:00 PM
*GEE &.. JENSON
P13
/
RECREATION , PA~ MEMORANDUM #93-1Se
RE:
V1ncene Flniz1o, Depuey c1ey !ngl~ee
John W11dner, parks sup~r1ntendent ~ '
Boynton seacrest MasterPlan comme Reconciliat1on
(FKA Cedar Grove) - Revi5ed
April 29, 1993
TO:
FROMl
DATE:
The Recreation & Park Department has rev1ewed the latest Mas~erplan
submittal for Boynton Seacrest. The following commen~ 1s
appropriate:
At the TRC meeting of April 27, 1993, the appl1cant agreed to
provide a 6' minimum paved ~edestrian entrance to the public park
site through the prIVate open space tract as a condition of
approval.
JW:ad
CC: Charles C. Frederick, Director
Recreation & Park Department
Chris Cutro, Planning , Zoning Director
""
~
OS. 06. 93
12:00 PM
*GEE &.. .,JENSON
P14
/+-K/., .
. i ')
... .~. \"p..,-.."I
t/
\ , ~ J) .
t -';.....1Q.r........~-r.. ./
ENGINImJUNG DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM. NO. 93-105
TO~ ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE J!ltEMBERS (hand-delivered)
FROM.: VINCENT ~. FINIZIO ..
DEPUTY CITY ENGIHEER
DATE ~ APRIL 22. 1993
RE: MASTER PLAN COMMENT RECONCILIATION SUBMISSION
MODIFICATION OF TRC MEETING AGENDA
BOYNTON SEACRBST (FKA CEDAR GROVE~
Provided your offices herein. please find a full set of Master Plans
considered by the City Enqineer as a set of plans submitted by the
applicant for the purpose of reconciling 5~aff oomments prior to the
P & D Board's consideration at their next monthly mee~inq.
Please be fully prepared to discuss these plans after carefully
perfo~inq a comparative analysis against your most recent comments.
By copy of ~his memorandum to both Dorothy Moore and Attorney Jill
Jarke~y, I am providing notioe ~hat the agenda is amended to include
discussion reference oomplianoe with a~aff comments on April 27, 1993
at 9_00 a.m. at the West Win~ Conferenoe Room. 2nd Bloor, Wast Wing
of City Ball. Thank you.
\ 1'"
'-L-~ A ~1:>zr--
j , (
co: Attorney Jill Jarkesy via FAX TRANSMISSION
J. S~ptt Miller, City Manager
James A. Cherof, City Attorney
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E. (as 'directed)
4
L"
~-L)Y_I~j,/
I ' '. j
. .
I -~
(.,)
I
w. Richard StaUdinger, P.E.
February 8, 1993
Page !5
Paragraph Eight recommends that there be designated at one
side of the proposed outer loopinq, local streets, a Dike p~th
connectinq the Seacrest Boulevard system to southeast Second street
to the north and to Southeast Fourth Street to the south. The
submittal refleots this designation in accordanoe with Appendix c,
Article IX, Section 11. Please advise immed~ately it this is not
acceptable to you.
We have no objeotion to paragraph Nine and Will specirically
agree herein that certification of concurrency tor neiqhborhclod
park facilities shall be issued conditioned upon no buildlnq
permits being issued for the final fifty percent of the tot;al
number of units within the subdivision until construction ot eitller
the Girl Scout Park or the 4.2 acre dedicated park si te COl'l\m8nCE~S.
In reference to paragraph 10, we have added a note to t:he
Subdivision Master Plan that states that "No residential building
permits may be issued until the developer and the School Board
approve in writinq an aqreement which assures that public sch()ol
student: membership generated by the development will achieve School
Board racial balance goals."
John R.. Guidry, Director of utilities, stated in his
mGmorandum that we have not oomplied with two comments in his
memorandum datQd October 28, 1992. Please be advised that in
accordanoG with APP8ndi~ C, Article VIII, Section 4.C.l0, Boynton
Seacrest has ehown on its submittal the location and right-of-way
width of all proposed streets, alleys, rights-of-way, easements and
'their purpose along with the proposed layouts of the lots and
blocks. Ple~se be fu)::"ther advised that all water and sanitary
sewer ea8em.n~s will be looated within the dedicated public rights-
of-wa.y. Water and aewer is available to the s;.ite and the necessary
conGtruoeion plans shall be SUbmitted in acoordance with Appendix
C, Article XIII, Seotion 5 of the City of Boynton Beaoh Code. As
previously stDted, eheet one of the Haat.r Storm Manag.m~nt Plan
containti the following note: "Wate:t", sewer, QIQotric, cable TV ;and
telephone servioe are all ~vailable adjaoent to the sitQ. Appro-
pr1aee construction plans for these services will ba submitted at
the appropriate time."
The developers or Boynton Seacrest, their attorneys, engineers and
planner, have made every effort to comply with ~he requirements set
forth in the COdes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Be~ch. We
feel that this Master Plan resubmittal ~dequately addresses the
comments of the TeChnical Review committee and complies with All
applicable City Code. ana ord1nances. Wit look forwi:l~d t.o t.he
~ ~. ..AMI. 4 ~.!PJ
9'd
[~WSd W~2!:rT 26, 60 ff3J
.
I
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
February 8, 1~g3
Paqe 6
upcoming Planninq and Development Boar" hearinq scheduled ;f4;)r
February 9, 1993.
:e~
FMP: 1m
001 Jama& Charof
ce: ChriGtopher cutro
0.4.r'r....1r.
.9'....". ~. ~ A' ~ 9!.JiL'
L"d
.... .. ...."... ." ..'.."...,. .,.._--,~_..._,-..l:l!k!~~~J~l.l I='~, 60 !3:3..:l
~"""~4,1 v
sE:~~-JJ~qrfl: IJ !,~ PNSM 7~llN~Hl; ~~~Jc l:A}li 03
-l
~oynton Ben fax:# 2
POc2
, "
,'.. . I' _.'''''. . ".' ...,,".....,.."W...I"~. , .,'
; I ~
i CARNAHAN · PROCTOR AND ASSOCIATES tNC.
,ONuttlnO &n91"..11 ' S\Jrv.YOfl ' Plonners . Land evelopment Consultants
\
ADDBND'UM
RECEIVED
FEB 8 1993
-
BOYlft'ON DACUSI'
(AKA eDU GROVE)
DAme mJDY
i
!nnVARY I, 1B3
I
1
Due ~o oonQerns expr..._~ ~y Mr. Din W.isberq~ P.I. of Palm
D.a.ah county 'rr.t~1o zng1neering N;a:rclin; projected traffic volume
.K~eedin9 \the allowable ~rattio volume on the roadway ..9Dent of
WoolbriCJh~ Roadbetw8en 1-95 and a..cr.st Boulevard,. a project:
phaeing Pl-n h.. been 4eveloped.
The phllsin; will J:). baled on cond.uctin; tut.ura 1111 tiq.tion
alternati~(.) to allOW the develoPment of the .nti~. .i~.. Th~
con.truQ~lbn phaalnq will ~. .. tollow.:
I
DJ!l8CUP'l'IQJI
~46 SINGLE FAMILY I
\ 60 .MOlil'I-PAXILY
~2 Il11LTI~rAIIILY UNITS'
23 DWELLING UNITS ·
I
I
Ht DUZ.Y no.7.OIl'
IROUBCT .,'UtlrC _ l'!tlIIbIJI!)fCmK~
PImtlB
TOTAL ·
1810 'lID
154 '1'/D
2034 'rID
ROW
II,
...
- The m~1~i-fam11y unit., .. provld8d in tha .ttaohe~ .it. plan,
are the III lot. adjacent to FEe Railr~ad.
\
** Th8 co~nc...nt of Pb... II will ~ .tt.~ r.oe1vini approval
for a mi~i9.tion alternative to~ &ooo.ao4a~ing the additional
proj 8et ~.t'.tf1o of 154 T/D (o%' 21 ':/'D on the oon.t.r.lne4 roadway
..gment tt WOOlbriQht Road betw..n :1:-95 and eeagre.t aoulevard).
B...d n tbe above outlin~ ph..inq, we are r.oommandin9 the
approval oflthe Jlaster sit. plan of aoyni:.~ ...cJ:'e.t.
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I'
~,
I
619t Welt Adsnt\c\B1vd. . P.O. ~ 4J99 ' Mari'll,>!. fL .H(163 . (305) 972.l9~9 . FAX (305) 9'72-4118
I DuJe (30;) 949-(lltl6 . PAlm Bt~Il<:l\ (4U7~ :J64.068'
~ .
~
~
T 6v'X Te'ecopier 7020 ; 2- 6-93 ; '~:03
SE~l-Ud~~jrr1:4~ PN\ ~~UM CA~NAHAN ASSOCIA1~S
i
I
i
I
-+
. .\
BOYNTON SEACREST TRAme STUDY
4DDENDtJM
ACCEPrAt~CE SHEET
PREPARED FOR
MICHAEL RUBIN. P.A.
PltBPAllED IY
CARNAHAN-PROCTOR It ASSOCIATES. INC.
ev~"-" ~ ~
Wael l'Maj" .._j4.18.,,1, P.Ii.
proj8ot. Man-qat'
I
Z/IJI/93
Dat.
ACCEPJiED IiI
Mr. Dan'w.~.b.rqf P.I. oat.
~alft Beach ,Count1 Traff1e Engln..r1nq
I
I
i
\
APPROV20 BY\;
I
I
is. Tambri ~.Y4en
01 t:y of BOy ton Beach
\
l~/BY~SECa'T/PRC
!
DAta
Boynton Bch tax;# 3
P003
~
05. 06. 93
12:00 PM
*GEE &. .,JENSON
P15
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-242 WDC
/
TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
,..
FROM:
W. D. CAVANAUGH, FPO I
FIRE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
APRIL 30, 1993
RE:
BOYNTON SEACREST
WE 'FIND THAT ALL THE ORIGINAL FIRE DEPA~TMENT REQUIREMENTS
HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS AT THIS TIME.
/d1ft/dk .
. D. CAVANAUGH, FPO I
SOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
P9
".
...--__;--"71'
7~
n
GEE & JENSON
Engineers-Architects-Planners, Inc
One Harvard-Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Telephone (407) 683-3301
Fax (407) 686-7446
May 12, 1993
Ms. Jill Jarkesy
Perry, Shapiro, Miller & Jarkesy PA
1645 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
Suite 600
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Boynton Seacrest (FNA Cedar Grove)
Subdivision Master Plan
Dear Ms. Jarkesy:
At the May 11, 1993 Planning & Development Board Meeting of the City of Boynton Beach, the
Boynton Seacrest Subdivision Master Plan was denied by a unanimous vote of the Planning and
Development Board. The failure of the applicant to agree to the staff comments and conditions
related to environmental regulations was cited as the basis for denial.
Under Chapter 7, Section 7.5 - 63 "Appeals Process" you may appeal the Planning and
Development Board decision to the City Commission by stating such intent in writing to the City
Manager within ten (10) days of the date of this letter. I have enclosed a copy of this section of
the Code of Ordinances for your information.
If you choose not to use your administrative appeal as outlined in Section 7.5 - 63, within the
time period specified, the decision of the Planning and Development Board will stand, and the
Master Plan will be considered denied. Any further action on this subdivision will require the
submittal of a new Master Plan, in accordance with Appendix C, Article VIII, Section 4 of the
Code of Ordinances for the City of Boynton Beach.
lUlCElVED
MAY 14
PLANNING DEPr.
---------:
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E
City Engineer
92025/200
W~S/jer
cc:
Julian Bryan
Christopher Cutro
James Cherof
J. Scott Miller
~1~
C'"J
cD
o
....
,g.
:z.
o
~
<
....
o
c
~
~
~
~
'$
:z.
o
~
::>-
:z.
~
d>~
g-tO'
~ ~
atD
~~
.- en
p.ct)
-0 .
a 0
~';Z.
- '
~-o
.s-a
a'-'"
~ .
a
Q) ~
~ ev
~ u
~ a
~ 0
o u
-o~
ev ....
a u
ev Q)
~p.
~ <Il
Q).....
~ 0
-Srg
~ ....
"'Cl u
ev ev
~ 0.
ev!Jir-
tlll~en
a oct)
~ -.n
"'Cl<ll.
a .~ ~
Q)<.l--'
t.
Q)'O ~ ~ ~ ~-d'O ~ fu
-S <Il.e ~ ~ 0 ~ a .... ~
';>-. a 0. ~''::; 0 0 a ev
}; ~.... d a::a.o'';z a "'Cl
-oQ)BQ)atlll~~Q)
-0 r- b u A 0 a .S p.-:S
e 0 .p 0 ~ u.... d Q)
.... cQ ~ ~.- tlll a ~ ..s::
-;j-" Q)~;':: a ~ t E-' ~
0' ';>-. A u ~ .... "'Cl ~ ~ r-
e~;::2~ e c.~ tlll~gs
Q) ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) .S ~ .n
.0 ~ ~ c.E-' a 'o.D~ ~ Q) ~
o a 0..... Q) 0 ,S ~ % a --'
..., ,~'Qi tfl ~ U C. ~ e ~...s
~ ~ ~ ~ E-'. g ~.~ "'Cl . ~
a ~ ~ "'Cl tn.... _ ';> Q) "'Cl to'
,... a r- ..., ~ 0. Q) .- a -
et:O og ~ C. Q);: ~ evtD
li ~ ~-;, 'g"a ~.. 1\ ~ ;J',
Q) . ..., .... ~ ...,.s;;; <.l ~ ct)
-oeva~_~"""'Cl<J)O .
~o:a~Q)a ';>-....,0
g ..., ''::; ..., ~ -0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Z
..::;';>-.~Q)Q)<Il~O ~o.-d
~.o e ~ e ~ 0..0 -; u ~
e-o ~~ a Q),S tlll tlllroo
~Q).e o~evc.<1)-'-'"
]l~:H n% ;~~
_ 0' S <Il Q).s ~-o ~-oE-'
~Q).o~"'" .....c....~
a~~(:t.O<ll~~tfl~~
.~ Q) ev E-' a ~ '0 tlll ~ .3 ~
...,.oA o-o.....a.... '-'
::a .... ..., ~ ''::; r- ~'-a ~ ~ 0
~ ~ '0 ...,. ~ g s c. ~.... g
e ..., a ~ '-'" ~ ~ ~ g..;:;
~ ..r. .S'.S ~ t' go. 0. E-' ~ ~
...._ ev ~ ~ ~ .... ev "'Cl'"
-. ~ u ~ to'... ..... ..s:: Q) a....
';E-' e e~-S,op.-S ~ e
::;l
-
';)
-e
~
,:::.
Q
<IJ
~
::;l
....
';>
a
~
tD
.q
t-
Q
!h
.~
-_.._..~".__...__.,._...~"-
m
m
<1l
<.)
o
~
p.
m
--a
Q)
p.
~
~
tD
,
~
t:-
o
(h
~;; ~ ~
C. 0..... "'Cl
<ll <Il '> a
(f.l Q) ro
~ ev .-
~~~@
~ -0 ~ "'Cl
~ ~~ S
<ll U W
e-o ur-
c.Q~<)
a 0
e,evc.tD
'S; ~ .... .n
c. ev C. .
<1) ~ ~ t-
a.s~~
~ . c. '0
(f.l~ 8''::;
.~ So-! (.)
t' ~~ 'tA
'c> c. '<) a
0. ~ Q) ....
0-00....
... C. (f.l ~
p.Q)...... ~
..., mOO
u C. (f.l......
Q).... Q) ...,
;o,~.<)'tA
-;j c. ev <Il
tflop.a
Q)utno
.s ~ 'O.~
...-o;a c.
Q)c.a~
-S~~~
ev .- 'V
~~'SQ)
~ '.::; .n -S
i: ~ .s p. ~ ..ci
p.~ ';>-. e ~ ~
~c.~p......Q)
..., 0 tn .... tI). p:l.
c.~'S~-Sc.
Q) Cl u'~ _ 0
e~Q)~~~
p.Cla(/}Q)C.
o~tn .cS'
~~~.%.%p:l.
';> "'Cl ''::; ..., ..., .....
~~uc.""o
~ 0 U
Q)o~p.S~
~.o 0. -;j 0....
~ tlll~ ~o
aa~~p.Cl
o'-a c. ~ .s A
"'ClOClp. ....
Q)~edt.....
u_a~...-oo-::;:::
~'v O' $-< tI)"'"
_a~_Oc.C9
0. ~ '-;.B c. Cl l!?
(/) tlll a e .... .~ ~
g .S Cl ~ ~ ~ --'
..;:; a "'Cl o:l ~ u ~
~ac..c(/}Cl
...., o:l -;j (/}...-
c._o~~~ ~
o p.tn.P Cl......<O
u ~.... c. 0 .q<
Q) (l) a <Il .
A-S(l)~(l)Q)gs
..., 'Sp.~~.
~};~Q)--O<;:::C
.%...~~c.~',Z
..., ... ~ tlll ~ ..
Q) .~ "'Cl''::; ';>> --0 .,
~ ~ a.... 't: c. (
~u~eQ)~'
8.
~ ~ ~ -d d> .S .s "C
~ ..., .... ~ ~ .c .~ ~
.......~ ~ 0 Q) ~ ,~
o~,S.o.o~~p.
c. ~ "0 tlll~ tlll a 0.
o ';>-....... a ~ -c. o:l ~
.... .0 tfl.... ~ .... -0 Q)
..., ';>-.a <f)~ ~~
~c.o:lo Q)O...,
.S 0 -0 ~ g ~ ~ ';>-.
e ';n r- -0.... ~ o:l.o
~ .~ ';? a ~ -0 a-o
(l) d '-'" o:l.... Q).... Q)
~eatlll~-;~'th
--0 0 2S .S ~ ~ Q) e
Q) U c. c. 8 ~ &-0
~ .... a t) Q)-O
~ ~~ o:l ';>> tfl ~ o:l
_ .<) ~ 'P.~ ';>-.- Q)
~ 3 t)'\:~.o
0. Q) ~ Q) Q) ~ p.~
p.-S Q)-S~-; p.~
~ ~......"" tlllo:l~
';>-..sc.o.s<ll~~
o:l ~c. ~~U
e -0 e 0 -0 o:l..........
~ ..;:; 2S ~ 0 ~
C.o~o:l~o:l~~
~ .0 'u .S e c..S' ~ ~
~tlll<1)d.oO~...<f)
<ll a A ~ ? ';n Q) ~ Q)
0..... ~ Q) <f) tfl I-< -0 -;j
C. ~..., .... '-' a 0'
:?.o....lll~eo~Q)
_ t-l '... -0 Cll d <Il ..., I-<
~-o ~ Cll p.~ ';>-.<f) a
.... a "'Cl ~ 0. 8 ~ tlll <1)
tin ~ Q) ..., o:l -o.c. ~
tlll _......... ';>-. r- ,; ....
o:l tlll~ 0'0.0 0 .. ...
.c. ~ .... ? -0 ~,S '>
';>-. -a Cll 0. <f) III ';>-."0 <f)
a a -;j'Qi ';>-. '> to ...... ,...
...( ~ 0' U a Ill.... Cll ~
P. e e -< 'S;.-S -S .S
~
-"
.....-------'-' --"-
PL!\NNING AND ZONING DEPARTHENT MEMORANDUM
To:
Richard Staud~nger, City Eng1neer
~(l#"J~ ~- &eu.;:bnk..~
Chr1s~o~er~~, ~[a~i~a Zoning D1rector
From:
Dat,= :
April 8, 1993
Subject:
Appllcant's request for Special Planning & Development
Boara. Heeting or.. April 27, 1993 Boynton Seac:.-est
(Subdivision Master Plan) File No. 697
We have located the ecologlcal assessment (dated January 9, 1992)
submi tted by the applicant tor the Cedar Grove P'JD rez.:mlng
applicatlon. Pursuant to tne statement made by the applicant's
attorr..ey, Jill JarKesy, at today I s Technical Review Committee
meeting, directing statt to re-review the 1992 docurnenta~ion and
apply it to the above-referenced applicat10n in an attempt to meet
the submlttal requirements of the City's Env1ronrnen~ally Sensitlve
Lands Crdinanc= (Chapter 7.5, Article IV), this department and
1':ev1n Hallailal1, the City Forester, HL...l be amending preV10US
cornnents made relative to mi tigation ar~d scrub hani tat
preservat~on.
Due to the rev~ew schedule established wlthin Section 7.5-62 of tne
Env1ronmenta~ly Sensitlve Lands Ordlnance, wh~ch provides ~he
Technlcal Rev1ew Board 30 days upon recelpt of the above
intormation wi thin whici1 to complete i ts evaluat~on 0:::
environmental impacts, we respectfully request that the applican~'s
request tor a speclal meet1ng ot the Planning & Development Board
be denied. Ai though we anticipate being able to transmit sald
comments to you pr10r to May 7, 1993 (30 days trom today), more
than the 7 days gl ven for "non-envlrcmmental" comments to be
su~mitted to yeu is needec.
ThlS ad.ditJ.onal reVlew tJ.me wlll net effect placemem: 0:: thlS
reques t cn the next regular.:...y scheduled Planning & Development:
Board meeting G~ ~ay 11, 1993. Please adV1se whether or not this
schedule 1S acceptable tc both parties and whether you recelved
Jill Jarkesy's letter contirming stat:ements made at tne Technlca~
R~Vlew Commlttee rneetlng regarding this issue.
c:c/ th
cc: ~e\.1n Hall~han
A: ~:;tau097
4 Wd LO:tO E690tO
11)"1\1,-:,1
'-
-,
~~
g~, ~, JWk c'J~' !Jl!d
1'~4J '?.,k ..13'~ ~ ,~u
,9.;.0{, 6(1() ,
'!I;t.9'_ ~ ~ JJ<<J1'
TEWf>BONI~ (-107) (,81.4')00
F~(-1Q7) 6&\-100&
:'. MART!1'i l:'l~R!tY
,OUEH't 1.F.f. SHAPIRO
\)I{l)AN R. ~I1U,ER"
ilL ^ ]ARKESY
Al.l:.ll'ITI!D IN fLORiD^
..I:; DISTRI("T Of COLL)MlI~^
~
. ''7
c~{
jJ
-fP
C}.IA.
April 6, 1993
Mr. W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
city Engineer
city of Boynton Beach
Gee & Jenson
One Harvard circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923
RE: Cedar Grove Investors, N.V./Rezoning
Our File No. 3197.01
Dear Mr. staudinger:
Pursuant to our telephone conversation of today, we hereby request
on behalf of Cedar Grove Investors, N.V. th~t the city of Boynton
Beach specially set a Planning and Development Board hearing on
April 27, 1993 to review the Subdivision Master Plan for Boynton
Seacrest. This project will be reviewed by the Technical Review
Committee on Thursday, April 8, 1993. This would not give staff
sufficient time to prepare the necessary Staff Reports for the
Planning and Development Board hearing scheduled for April 13,
1993.
I appreciate your assistance in this matter.
hearing from you.
I look forward to
Sincerely yours,
7f (,{' n 'Jo.J>..!C"7~
Jill A. Jarkesy
JAJ:psp
.
n
GEE & JENSON
Englneers,Archilects-Planners. Inc.
April 13, 1993
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach FL 33409
Telephone (407\ 683-3301
Fax (407)686-7446
.
Mr. J. Scott Miller, City Manager
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FI 33425-0310
Re: Boynton Seacrest
Special Planning & Development Board Meeting Request
Dear Scott:
Attached is a memorandum from the Planning Department outlining their timing problems
with reviewing the environmental impact statement from the Boynton Seacrest project,
prior to this Thursday, April 15th. Because I will not be obtaining all ot the environmental
comments from Planning or from the City Forester, I recommend you reconsider the
appropriateness of a special meeting on April 27, 1993. I anticipate all comments can
be obtained and transmitted to the applicant in time to meet the schedule of the May 11 th
regular Planning & Development Board meeting.
Very truly Yours,
Gee & Jenson
Engineer. - . ects-Pla~nners Inc.
., "
;; (Cr--Az--:J' ./~
W. Richard Staudinger, PE
City Engineer
WRS/bt
Enc/.
cc: Chris Cutro
Kevin Hallihan
T ambri Heyden
Jim Cherot
RBCB1Vf,D
~ l'
p\J\\'n~\~G Dt.Pl.
~
%e City of
'Boynton 'Beach
t
G-.-J
.~ Ct..,.i1rlJ.....
\:J (I) ,l
C'Ol ',j
100 'E. 13oynton 13eadr. 130uUvara
P.o. 13o~310
13oynton 13eadr., :rforUfa 33425.0310
City 9fa[[: (407) 734-8111
:r.u: (407) 738.7459
March 31, 1993
John Pescatell 0
South Florida Director
Nature Conservancy
319 Clematis Street
Suite 611
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Dear Mr. Pescate110:
The State of Florida, Palm Beach County and the Nature Conservancy have
joined together in a worthwhile partnership to purchase and preserve tracts
of environmentally sensitive land. One of these tracts, the Seacrest Scrub,
lies within the City limits of Boynton Beach. This particular tract ranked
very high on the pri~rity list for purchase under the Environmentally
Sensitive Lands Program.
I would draw your attention to the enclosed newspaper article from The News
on this property. I realize your staff is working on the acquisition of
this property and I would strongly urge you to move as quickly as possible
to consummate this transaction.
If you have any particular questions as to the various proposals submitted
to the City by the developer, please contact our Planning Director Chris
Cutro at 738-7490. Thank you for the leadership role the Nature
Conservancy is taking on these projects.
Sincerely,
"
Mayor
EH: j b
Enc.
cc:
Chairperson Mary McCarty
Palm Beach County Commissioners
DERM
Mayor & City Commission
J. Scott Miller, City Manager /.
Chris Cutro, Planning Director
5lmeTUa s gateway to tfie gulfstream
RECEIVED
MAR 3 1 1993
..
tit
(')
~
c>
s:
<.)
(G
~
~
'0
II>
Q)
:l
I-
vi
~
Q)
z
~
I-
~~..c:g~~~ d~<g~=~a~ ~
~ ~ ~ U ~ J:: U .l:le ~ .l:l ~.; ~ - ~
Clu ....c:: ~ '" <U ~ e ~ 00 . '" ,,,,\
~ ~(';14).t::"" d.\V .:::,;;- _x.\+o<
u <U J::~. ,.,.~ ""o.::::::::::.'::l ~ ~ u"O
c,' 6' 6..,,S.,;Q ~<l\.3,;.s~6'o ,.~1!
U -;) d g c: ::: ~ N 5 ~ I:t U <u,s ~ et:I
.~ ~ ~ ciS ~ ~ .::: .g .~ ~ ~ ~ -;z ... -5 .~^ ~ ~
. ~ "'" ~ ._ _ <u ... et:I 0 ...... c:
1il"Q>' a <u ::: ~ ~ <U rd.s go 3: 8 -5.... ~ c: 0 <U
U ~ -5 B.e et:I e ~ ~ <u 00 <U ..;;; ~j:: o:s.e
~ ._ :::: ?; '" > c: ~ ...;e. - ~ .-
rd ~ ~ ~....,.g 0::' ~ 'a .;. e ~ ,g .c::
~ la:s;!",:g'1J0';,~ e il:s~.>g.~" 9 ~
_~.:::;~ Po ~ u_""<Uo iiPotO'Ooo S
<>> ",_ ~ ~ ...,.., _'" Po c: c:~-
'" Po~...~~'S~et:I~ Ic:"'s~e~
<<ue'O~ u&w ~<UtO~.!c:-....cr.;
..... -588-0 g...e ~~ 6 e go; 838-
.... 11 "11 j, .!. ll.'" " 9 :!!.. ~ '"
UUU~ tO~<u~ oa~c:
a ~ e ~ _''''' u ::;-:> u ~ cO
U OUC: ._~i7l
:: ~:r.o "c: cO"" u. ~
.u ~o ~ sc:"~~
_ u ~ . <u - ....- U
~ 0. ~ 00 cO cO '0 :::: .e.~ to u
._ .sa '" c: u .c: ... u - ~ u ::l
~ l!" .~,s .!!;.- ~ ~ .ll8.~ e ~ 00
U .g U _ ;s n ",..c: U -cO <U S cO
._ e ~ 0 ~.:.Il '0 ~ .::: ~.::: c::c >
'aueo:: fI'I ""c:'" >>~o""
~ .e.::: c: <U ~ 8. cO s 0 0 to <U'~ 0
w__ <Ilw '""lc:C::~~"'> ::
en 8_a"~",iu 0 w::lC:: >>'
C .- <U ~ u~ .... au ?':'.!!- i u~_ ;
~o "":'- <U -0 ._"""l "'" .P ,'" c: U 0
_ c:: ~ ~ "" =' .:::: cO...... ~cO ::l
... u"" 0. fA ~>>ouu ~-eoo
~~~~.gc: I i<Ue~-a'O;'O<u ~
~ ~'& 8.3... g,s Ii-a 8 a~; II
_ ftI 5g~ 0:s g-s~]~ g e 5'~.s~ ~.~!
"" ...~.~._ 0 e'" 0 ...~.
c::t. tl rd u.2. rd ~ ..... .~ a ~ oo'~ cO ~ u 'i ~.:::
._ ?;.e u...c:: u t Po~'; s ....,~ c: .... u >>.~
c: ...., >'p~U~ . U u~--':::
3~~.Pj~~::l:g g~ t~~l?;
~<u-5"'acO~u .Du .!!!Po~~u~tO~u
fI) ~ ~.;:,.:: >>~~ c: 0 c: =3 Po U S 2 .e ~ e ~
a"cOiiP-~ _~~tO- .:::"'~ -c:tO
U u._>> '0- ~ >-.~ cO ..: ~ 0 c:
n,g~&u=e",c:PocO~c:~n~~-
~ > !!! '" u g 0 u to ~ cO .- ::l :::: > '0
.c.;.. 'O..c: c:..;::.!:: - n e.::: S bO 2 ~ c: ~
et:I 0 0 ~ <U ::l- ~ et:I 00C: ~... ~ u
~ ~.":: ~ ._ a 8 a" 0 to ::l'- U to U '"
~,sl~6ael:EJ~i~J"ll
~u.g",::l~S~-~~~"'u'O~~u-
c: !l"H~H-ge~8~<~~~nH
CD
- -
- -
ftI'
-5
~.".'
~
C
u
(I)
!
.2:
:a
C,,)
9
~U...b~~O~~'O -odAbl"'~~
u ~~~o"'- otoUUcOu
~ ~ gU-5 ,.;:8;2l :!~h~~ ~ ~
z ~c:.c::.u-ool~~ucOU
1 ].e~~~~~~~ ~5eo~
~ u ::l'- ... 0 .... ~ - c: 0 e'"
.c:: '0 ~ 0 ~ ~ to.c >>,1:).... u.. U .c: 0 ... 0
'O~<u -- zu"'~ c:.......
c: .a "'~u ...c:5nu.c05 .~.,;
to~~~~ .e!lgr.ll~tg~e!~~
>> u 0 U ~_ _ u ~ '" .... u I:: u ~ -
'" ;;'''''il ~ ~" - .l\ '" ll'" '" '" '" ~.l! 1!
,U'c 'C",;: t '" Oc-- g ~ g:g e..... c: >. ~
<U1::C:oo~~<u ~-to otO~'O
.c:: 0 et:I OIl! o,~ ';:! >.~.~.g '" ~ ~ ~to e "" "E
~u~u .........~uto~."" -...", cOcO
c: <U C:.S Po....o g~ ~ ~.;t~ a 8~o t t
<u""~ .::: '0 u- "",-~'" --
<uuoc:~uc:~~~c--otO~""::l~==
?; Po ._ ._ .::: .JA.Q <u co ?; u..... ~ 0 0 0
.... 0 u 00 ~ ~ -.._ rn .... ~ ~ 0 Po :7l'~ ~ ~
s
>>..:1"2 ~ g b ~
.Q u ~ to > d '0 .-
0. ><.- u
'0.2. c: u ~
~ ~ 0'S'O-g"g e
.-u O""OcO~
e '0 ,t:) ~ ~ I:t u::l
,I:)'O::l~ '"
a<ubn~:iSu
~",...<uooe.~ .
". u....- 0 "" ""
=..c:r u ~~~.c::.c:: 0
-a:a oS ~ ~ '8 u ~
to . _ 0 ~'O.!::
._ 0. 0 r.Il a: .- .- '0
"5~.sau 'O~~oo
~~~:g~c'-.-""
,~ '.;1 .~. ~ .:;., o..i ~
_.;_~ Oh~~
6)0 ~.....gc:u~
-5 u g u ~ c=';; 'P$.
'0 U I """" rn '" \
g-= ~.8N~~
_ ~ t e o.s 0
>-..... ~ u ~ 'C U
c:iiP > u
cOt08ig-~fc' \
trd'" -~g
~ .;~e~ e~ .
~:g'n e~ e<
~au-n.p .
rn~.c: "::~U
.- u ~ ~ '" ....
uQ) .~::l::lS
~ ~,'Co. =. '"
.:'. r-'\ t ;;.a::n ~ ~
,~ ..;;. ~ a- ~ =
<rdugoo""~
..c: Q.. 'C ~ 8. c::
i
I
.
?-
'.'i]i
l
",-,~I_~<U' ,...
o ':;" ~- ;;;O'..c: .... u:::_'" ~
~ "'; in ~'n ~ n 0 .'=
c= ~ ~ oo~ ~ cO
aU e.c:: = .s .s - 011 f
y cO '0 cO u .e
% c:: ~-5 c:: 00;>: a'Oc::
"4> 8 I:Q ~ cO e cO
... ..... 00 <U ,.., - U
U ~ C:,S '0 to...... Po e
'0 u 0 J CIl::g~ ~ e
'0 ~ ... 0.'0 ~o
gu~~~ u<u -a~
C::""I:Q,I:)gg ""
cO ~ e - .- ~ ::l -
'ath <U q o.~ ~ ~d
u "" .?; r.Il ::;- ~ % ~ ?;
~ u ~~'n ~l ~5.!l.
~1A5~s~e .~
i
1:
i~
9.1
l
...
~
U';)
~~
~~""O
s;:l.o~
(J)~e
So~
U';).~ ~
?')..= s;:l.
~~
.~ ~
U "0"...0
I",
;::
~
==
s~
i~
..:
5fn
\
-
'~
~
.~"
'.
\
~
,.':
t:
\1:
..~
i
"j,c '
-'
~ qpa.
!?euy, ~, ~ g~' !?d
'64.5 .9ak ~--' ~ !:W1wt.
, .9'~ 600 TELEPHONE (407) 684.4500
'7IW.9. ~. 5~ ~ FAX (407) 684-1008
F, MARTI:-': PERRY
\~OBERT LEE SHAPIRO
ORDAN R. MILLER.
111. A, JARKESY
. ADMmED 1:'oJ flORIDA
~NO DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
March 26, 1993
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
Gee & Jenson
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923
RE: Cedar Grove Investors, N.V./
Resubmittal of Sub Division Master Plan
Our File No.: 3197.01
Dear Mr. Staudinger:
After reviewing the Technical Review Committee comments submitted
to Cedar Grove Investors, N.V., on March 18, 1993, our project
engineers and planner have revised the Subdivision Master Plan for
Boynton Seacrest in accordance with the comments set forth in the
memoranda submitted by various staff members on the Technical
Review Committee. We are herein enClosing 17 complete sets of this
revised Master Plan and request that this item be reviewed by the
Technical Review Committee on April 8, 1993.
Project engineers, Carnahan, Proctor & Associates and our planner,
Mr. Julian Bryan have addresses comments in the Planning & Zoning
Memorandum from Tambri J. Heyden through Christopher cutro to you
dated March 16, 1993. First of all, comment number 3 has been
addressed by placing the following language on the Master Plan and
the Master Storm Management Plan: Retaining wall system located
within the 5 foot wall easements and 5 foot wall easements shall be
deicated and maintained by legal assignment to a homeowners
association. In addition, our engin~ers have shown the width of the
proposed drainage easements on all relevant engineering plans.
In reference to comment number 4, I am enclosing correspondence
dated March 24, 1993, from Dan Weisburg, P.E., Office of the County
Engineer. This correspondence states that the Traffic Division has
determined that the Boynton Seacrest Project meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
As previously stated in my correspondence to you on February 8,
1993, Palm Beach County has determined that a traffic light at the
intersection of Seacrest Boulevard and Mission Hill Road is not
warranted now nor will be warranted even at the time of total
.-....~
RECEIVED
MAR 2 6 1993
.\'
W. Richard staudinger, P.E.
March 26, 1993
Page 2
buildout of the Boynton Seacrest Project. Nevertheless, in the
spirit of cooperation, we hereby agree to the placing of a
condition of approval on the Boynton Seacrest Master Plan which
would require us to post money for a traffic light in an escrow
account at the time of platting.
In reference to Paragraph number 7 of Heyden's memorandum, as
previously stated in my February 8, 1993 correspondence to you, the
Subdivision Master Plan previously submitted to the City of Boynton
Beach does show a pedestrian crosswalk, 8 feet in width, between
streets which accommodate the proposed pedestrian system to the
public park site. After meeting with the Park's Superintendent,
John Wildner, we have amended our Master Plan specifically to show
a pedestrian crosswalk and path going directly to the pUblic park
between a common open space area which was previously Lots 1 and 2
of Block 1. This access tract will be dedicated to the City of
Boynton Beach at the time of dedication of the park. The
pedestrian crosswalks will be in the publicly dedicated right of
way. The appropriate signage and crosswalk striping will be
installed within the right of way at the time the dedicated streets
are constructed and paved. Article X, section 3.0.2 states that in
blocks 900 feet in length or over, crosswalks between streets not
less than 8 feet wide may be required or deemed essential to
provide circulation or access to schools, play grounds, etc. There
is no reference whatsoever in the Code to the requirement of
pedestrian paths. In addition, the Parks Department is completely
satisfied with the dedication of the access tract as referenced on
the Master Plan.
Our engineers and planner have amended the Master Plan and
Engineering Plan~_to.show bike paths with a minimum width of 8 feet
as referenced in the Code. Julian Bryan"'has"'also provided you with
two typical road sections, one detailing a 4 foot wide sidewalk on
both street sides and one detailing a 4 foot wide sidewalk on one
side of the street and an 8 foot wide bike path on the other side
of the street. Our engineers have also shown the location and
width of the easement for the additional 4 feet of the bike path.
Comments number 9 and 10 have been previously addressed in my
correspondence to you on February 8, 1993. As previously stated,
we have no objection to these two comments and will agree to
appropriate conditions being placed on the Master Plan Approval.
For your convenience, I'm enclosing a copy of my February 8, 1993
correspondence to you.
.9'-,y. ~. JIdk c1~' !?.if
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
March 26, 1993
Page 3
-
In reference to the Bui'ldirig---Oepartment memorandum number 93-057
from Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official, we acknowledge that the
lots referenced in his memorandum require two 25 foot front set
backs.
Please be advised that on March 18, 1993, Julian Bryan and I met
with John Wildner, Parks Superintendent, and Charles C. Fredrick to
discuss the location and configuration of the park dedication. Mr.
Wildner agreed that he would accep~ a park dedication at least 325
feet in width. We have, thus, revised our Master Plan accordingly,
and the park site now has an east-west width of 330 feet. All other
comments relative to the park dedication have been satisfied.
In your memorandum dated March 18, 1993, Comment (C) 9 references
that the survey of the site has not been abstracted and that there
is no way to verify all easements without a title search. Enclosed
please find title work on the subject property as well as
Ownership and Encumbrance Searches which certify that there are no
easements of record relative to the Boynton Seacrest property.
Press Tompkins of Carnahan, Proctor & Associates has met with the
City of Boynton Beach utility Department to coordinate the
availability of utilities to the subject site. Enclosed please
find memorandum utilities Number 93-116 from John A. Guidry,
Director of utilities, stating that the developer has met with
utilities staff and has provided the requested information and
drawings. This memorandum confirms water and sewer availability to
the site. I addition, I am enclosing correspondence from Bell
South Telecommunications as well as Florida Power and Light
confirming the availability of telephone facilities and electric
service.
Comment (D) has been previously addressed in this correspondence.
In reference to Comment (E), I hereby acknowledge that the
applicant has not obtained a conceptual permit from the South
Florida Water Management District. The master planning stage is
entirely too early in the process to begin permitting requirements
with South Florida Water Management District. Nevertheless, our
engineers have met with engineers in your firm to discuss the
drainage for this site. Moreover, the District has agreed to
perform a courtesy review of our conceptual master drainage plan.
Our engineers have submitted a conceptual master drainage plan as
well as storage and drainage calculations and an aerial photograph
to Carlos de Rojas, Supervising Professional, at the South Florida
Water Management District. We will update you relative to this
matter upon hearing from the District.
~.wy,~, ~ c'!~,.9d
,ENT BY:Xerox Tel.copier 7020 3-25-83 17:07
..
1305872.118i. 2
tel 01 County Comml..lon~...
y McCarty. ChAir
L Poster. Vice Chairman
an T. Mareu.
01 A. Roberta
:ten H. N.w~U
; ^aronson
.1de Pord t.N
. CoURty AdmlRlalrator
Itobert Wellman
Departlntenl of Ensfneertn.
..... Public Worb
";arch 24, 1"3
MI. Ta~brt Heydtn
Ctty of Boynton S.ach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box :UO
Boynton B.ach, fL 33425-0310
REI 10YNTON SEACREST (AKA CEDAR IROVES) - FILE NO. 117
D.lr HI. Heyden:
Th. Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the Add.ndUM No. 2 for
traffic illlpact study for the project entitled Borntoi sAai....t lak.L..CaUL.CrpYt,)
pursuant to the Traffic Perfor.ance Standards TPS in rt1cle 7.J~e 'alM
Belch County Land D.v.lop~.nt Code. The addenduM a dresses Alternate Te.t 1 for
Woolbright Road a. WI. required in the review of the earlier trafftc ItUdy, Th.
project conshts of 146 linole-faMily units and 81 multt-f..ily unita. The
build-out of the project i. proposed for 1995.
The Traffic Division has det.~1ned that the project ...ta the Traffic
P.~'o~anc. $ta"da~d. of Palm Beach County. If you have any que.tteR. ~.ga~dtng
this determination, ple... contlct me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
a-::>>~
Din Wlisberg. P.[.
Sentor Reg1lt.red Civil Engineer
DW:CRW
Fill: TPS. Hun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traff1c\dtW\boynl1d
--.>::.::::,
_M~""
-An iqual Opportunity. Affirmative ActJon Employer-
~
... IUB Welt Pllm Bel&:h, Floriela U416-12Zt (407) Me fOOO
n'>. .. "1\.. ,~ '; fill,: 110:, I'M r. t'I;,:,
certificate No. ~8,234
"__'_... --...c;~,
OWNERSHIP & ENCUMBRANCE SEARCH
",
SECURITY ABSTRACT & INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation,
d/b/a Stewart Title of Palm Beach County, does hereby certify
that it has caused a search to be made of the records in the
Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach
County, Florida, on the following described property:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
for a period of 20 years prior to the date of this Certificate
and find the last record owner or owners to be:
CEDAR GROVE INVESTMENTS N.V.,
a Netherlands Antilles corporation
and also find that there are no unsatisfied or unreleased
Mortgages, Encumbrances, Federal Tax Liens, Judgments or Claims
of Liens affecting said property, other than the following:
(Copies Attached)
- NONE -
NOTE: NO EASEMENTS ARE FOUND.
We also certify that we have searched the records of the Tax
Collector of Palm Beach County (only) and find that the taxes
are paid through the year 1990. (No search has been made for any
unpaid taxes or assessments made by any municipality, other
than those collected by Palm Beach County).
THIS Company, in issuing this Search, assumes no liability on
account of any instrument or proceedings constituting the chain
of. title herein certified to contain such defects that would
render such instrument or proceedings null and void or
defective, herein assuming that all instruments in the chain of
title to said property are good and valid.
LIABILITY for this Search is limited to the price paid the
Company for this Search. Maximum liability is limited to the'
customer who placed this Order with us. No one else may rely on
this Search. Customer, by accepting this Search, agrees to
indemnify and hold Company harmless from any Claims or Losses in
excess of the amount paid for this Search. There is no express
or implied warranties that this Search is reliable for title
information, and, therefore, should be verified by a commitment
for title insurance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said SECURITY ABSTRACT & INSURANCE
COMPANY, d/b/a STEWART TITLE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, has caused
these presents to be signed in its name at West Palm Beach,
Florida, this 8th day of March, A.D. 1993, at 8:00 A.M.
. '., ", :1:
'I, ,1" (I.
. .
,y ..'
. ~.- ....
<. .\.."
'. '
~ 'l.. ('
. J "::: ~
r.
~t.:""
."
.,.~
:" :
... ~ ....... ,
... .." I
,,.
:. ~ ..
. _.~ ~.
- . -
.r.':.~ :
'.
.:. . ....' : .
't - ~_ ~.~) ";,!.: ....
'..\ \ ~. .:~ .,." .~... ,
fl. ..;:! ... w..."" . l~':'" .,.
/. .... .... \
( I '.. ... I'" ~. "
. .. I >1 ,'1:; ~ 0;
WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE, Made, this ] 'If).. day of ~
V')
ex;) A.D., 1980,
....
~ BETWEEN GALLEN ENTERPRISES, INC., a Panamian corporation,
....
party of the first paLt, and CEDAR G.'OVE INVESTMI:NTS N.V., a
~
co
NetherlanJs Antilles corporation, having an office at 420 Zouth
Dixie Highway, Suite 4B, Coral Gables, Florid" 33146, party of thf!
second part,
\-HTNESSETIl:
That the ~\,i(l i);trt.y ("l f t.~.'\ f i !'~; t pl,rt, tor
L."
. i"J :
ill,d in consideration of the SLlIR of '1'1::: ;,::!:.' ::0/l:..C (;::0.01>) (,o(Jr.:,;..!';.,
~
lu it in h.:.;,d [~..1i(! b:' tl:c. ~':1i{~ :'Llrt'~. c:" ~~:~:
f '.!: l~ ;. ,l r t. t' II . :- I (".~. i ; 1 ~
re>
I v)
\.,:hCLC'()f is hL'rL't,'( c:ickno.....lecgc<.!, has l"j":;::'~...:d, L~'r'jdi:.....(: tl:it! :.ul.! t/;
. r"_ I
. "I_
. ......
.!
:' ..:. ~ ! I '; f f
L !;'.' ~~,~ i l~ !'
i'
I.' f
t ! 1 e ~~ ,- ...... c.: J ..! i':I:"~.,
C\"\':", t~I'::' ~,""'l'J'\'!:II':J t:'"'~;crib._~d l;i:)(1 ~~i~~:;t.
:',. it 1" in f ~;.,
('-..
Coullty of ",,1m Beach and State of f'lori';,l, \.
. ~
':' ~~ ! "~-': cf th.~ Soutt......,.,.... : .;~.:.~Il
L.'t 2 l':'i;~'; \-lcst o~ th~ l le:..: ; : i Jl,,:.f','
::i'jllt-of-way, together ~'iUI ':" .,;'
COVCl'1Ullent L<"lt 3, the S(Hllh"d: t. 1: i~l'\'c'rll!:l' nt
Lot 4, that part of the ;101 th '.~l:.\: '_~;L' ~;o~ltl''''l!st
qU<trter of the Northeast qU.ll't<,C c: :;..,:' ;,':1 .1; 1yi:.g
\-lest cf the Florida Eas~ Co;:st 1'."1',,...,'.. r:"",t-o(-way:
and the North quarter of the SOllti1,~.'SL (iL:~rter of the
Northwest quarter of Section 4,'a11 lying in Section
4, Township 46 South, R''l':le 43 East, Palm Bebch
County, Florida: EXCEPTING THEREFROM that part of
Government Lot 4 lying within an 80-f?ot road right-
of-way as conveyed to the County of Palm Beach in
Deed Book 901, Page 234; together with the improvements,
if any, now situated thereon and the reversionary
interest, if any, of Sellers in and to the roads and
streets, if any, and other areas and/or places, if
any, dedicatea to the use of the public, contiguous to
and/or within the boundaries thereof.
~
'-\ ~c0 r
-1'<9'~
V.o~'
SUBJECT TO taxes for ~he year 1980 and subseGuent years.
SUBJECT TO conditions, restrictions, and reservations
of record, if ,.ny.
And the said party of the fir&t part does hereby fully warrant
the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
\'"
INSTRUMENT PREPARED ilY~ICHAEL A. RUBIN, P. A.
20 South Dixie Highway, Suite 48
Coral Gables, Florid~ 33146
- -;:;'1:-
~~
i\: ,:~';;:;, ,;:'2r~:;;.~:j ~ :::
r'<"'.I.'. ,~f..,~:ll,~(.,~,......,_. ..
VT\,r":7/:;\i::L.c'" .
'." ~
;
[
r
'T.::1'(,::
... ~.",' '" ! . r .:, .. ~
:-.'Lrjr,. :'):.
~ Ii. ^' ,
':t.
"
I .; ........
;\: :,j....
ii G l. (I (I
r' ('
_1_ _ ____, :_. . c---- .___
t . r-: :~',-- ':- l~
. . . t::~ ~. : ! f .,.'
~ :/.!,,' 1- t..'
,.
,
'"" ...: ~. ,:'.
----,..e:':;)
~:; i"' /;' 1 I- , .' ~: ,'-r- '. '- ,., .' ,
tH")t ~'!.'\i -(i:.;. I "-:rJ r (I --'''' ,
!'i.... :, f-!..l':t (.,':',~ ,/~~:-"<,I. .~. :
~~I' "'.':L~"~.:r.....;:,: ;j\jD.IJOI
'. -'~
-, -,-_..-._- ,,- - - -- - ______ _.. _ , I
.'.
ir~
:~ C.. t..;!
~~ T!' ".' I I:.'
~. ....
?J17~i-Eu;:.-f_'_T=_c';, I L ..
Deed'" ['.11' ~ J, . ~ l,..,'\'" ',. ~
'! ":':.'~ ,t....t:':..;) :~:',-~;-~: r, ;, .
(','; r,~ : :,1 ...,
, : ~ lito. I" ; I. ~
-:1;
--- --.--. .- "-- - .-.-
;1 r; 0.00
.,. ... r'-~
.J . I ~ . '_'
: t;"..; II. r.... (- -, I
f -.- '- ~ -: F': I ~_I ; '.
'.. ~., ," , ~,
~.:,"~ '~;~,~~~I\,Y?~ ~.~~~~ ~;
-;: ;~ ,;"
-7'" p
, t: .
, ~ . .. ... I ;
c
t~ ~.
"
.,1
., .
-:.1 r ~.~,l: , .'
.. ;; il
~ tj ~. G':
j.....':: ,..
,. t. ; f .'
C~I.7- FL(_f~..;: ~..1 ,:\
~(.~'...... .:: :?'.f:..~'-"'--~. .~. t. ,
I .) I ~.> ~ G ('j r.. l)
. \.~. '~~.'~.'''' J.
.-:.-- '---..--- ...-.
-';'-, ,";', [. J' "
. ~:~..' . ~ ,
L";,";:-'o":,I
I ,.t.
':'Err'~: L :,.
~.~r\.I.',! ; r..1
: ~ 0 Q r. rJ
~.-:7 --r:, L. 9 ~~I! , "
"':' ..~.'
. ~. "~"':'C 0 0 0 rJ '
,,,.~ \< ';j.", OJ . I
__... ....-.:.:..~_ ____ .1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the sai~ party of the first IMIl har;
,.-."";1
caused these presents to be signed in i ls name by its pro!."r of f ice rs,
and its corporate seal to be affixed, attested by its Secretary,
the day and ye5r above written.
~~~~
ATTE'iT:
SECRETARY
DELIVERED
51'.';'E OF FLOllID^
COUNTY ('I' O.A!
55.
I IIEIU;rlY CERTIfY th..t 011 lhi" ],1 ~ doli' '" ).'1''''/-'
A.D., 1980, before me personilll)' "Pi!':.ll'(":\ I~tj/,.t {:,..'J,.Jlt ~I )I"$i
I r- / ...".'
and l- ft>v ~t, '( ;:;., h , 1,I'res iden t and Secretary respecti ve ly
of GALLEN ENTERPRISES, INC., a P<II1,'''Il;",i~ln corporation, to me known
to be the persons who signed the foregoing lnstrumcnt as such officers
and severally acknowledged the execution th~reof to be their free
act and deed as such officers for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned and that they affixed thereto the official sea! of said
corporation, and that the said instrument is the act and deed of
said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal at
&:111..-( "",;)J~
P/Vt'1I.1~
County of O~
and State of
the day and year last aforesaid.
"'1 .J'
~ ~:: :'l1!~'Y'"
'- .,.."f" . ,.'.~;~~;.
If ;, , : " S~~..l,>X~'\,
~ ~ . .:f~~ :~.:~. .' .":: :~:~:t~. 'it'.
"..-...c 1- '/ J'$'(I ,'4,).,.",. .,~ f.-o,..:."
;t)~1~~IV
-2-
R[CORO VfAlntD
PALM BEACH CQ'JII:TY. Fl4
JOHN > !JU~;K IE
CLERK ell CUlT COUR~
I.
........
... ....
SIO~,VSOO . d
8OOtH39
. .'" i:j..~...r:{~..,~:/;~~.;,.f...r:I.,.:~.... :~;~,"'l::~ ..~. ::;.'~' ~".'" ;~~..." . -,,' .
, .. "'1"'" 1'r.!I""~"~~ ,~, ~,'. ,;J ,~..t'''l: : ..'"
,,:.' . :>.' , .~. ..: )1'" :.~..~~.,... ..>.::~. .,"::. ~~);f ~J' fi-: 1:~ ~',;l~ ".,~*t.:'i'~~-\:"'~~~::':'i1;::;J''' :7; ~~.~.~ 't;;.?;.,. . ':. t .....~ .: '/.t.'... ,'.
.~...L.....(......~. "". $.,,., ...,....,. ;.'!.; '" It.~...J,..".",.&.#'""....~t...,- '. ...r......
..~.1..... .......... ...'~ f "~ ~;l.~,..~.t 'J,"'};'" .. ""'~'::""":' I'
..:.....~::...f'~""".. ..... .:.c~" ".,'1~&......:".,.~,.r....'..,~.......- "oJ" ",,:,'~-"".
.~: "~:~~""~~~~~1'.." .' :'~..' ~:;:" ;Jt;:,,;;';~.~'f/: ~~, \;~\.:~.. .. ~.,;. \;~~ :'~~~ ~ ~~:~'.:~~',:.;r~'::
"'-~".t:; "K"r:~'.:; 'i 'f.j 1!'Y:~>;Il.;:~l>.jO"'; pJ .,'<,'.......";1./, '..'''''' ~~.
,r::,:,_,~:::,~~:.:.,~,~\t~':,~~\~t~~C~(., /' ~ .: : ' .,:,..,!,:".:,~'., ,:,',:.~~:~.;::;~~-~~~~-:-. ':: .i,':~~:~~:~~r\
'_' . -"",,-,(, "~..,.',r...~~..i(,p'l~"'.l ,'It ,~ . ....,'....... - ,. .....' /, . ~ ~ .1....,. '.' .
lr--'........z..,...;..:.... -\.~~'f..f%..::.t'!.~..JH~~'....~'f:: q:' ~ "i""', ,..;,:. ~.". ~:::.. ..,' , :,#1....'.' .. ..... ,\... .....\:.-0....;
:..', ';;""::;":!"::;':<:'~;', .~;:~.' ':;'./{O 'ih\t ;'f)l1" l..niIlt'_~f"VDWl'VI\t" . ': ,',., ';. " ...... ':': : :-;, <
. ',: ";~":":~':~.;- .:;:~.;'::~::~~.::~~~'~~.~'t::~~~~~'i~~~?)l. I.l' ~"l" ~~C-'!i~..:!} " ~ l' .. ...... ..... '" . :',. ",~:
"-:~.'t1aii~... " "I__"J"'~~~\""'9' .,,~ ,'~"~ :'~':!:"~~;-.u..":_'-____:'r4.D.~'!.
'. '-A '. 1 . . ,..- .J" ,.....,....................___.... _.............
',: ....;..:.;,;.'. " ':: .I,'.,:....~'~,. '''''_..'''~>~ ",,,':' ..,:-;:>,' .' .._.' . - "':'~__.~."
, . . _.. 11M ....-..... ... ..... .........~~ ~ ..... 7::JI,iUL=-~.:t:-
"......~..,......"'...atF".l'J.,~- .....__ ~...WJL."-r_.
. ..', . . ';": __ ".::s!.l.Uf:.;;;';.~""" ..:t:1~~:................ COVJftT or r.... AACII. lit
:..:.,DiI~AD.""lil;j',.cr'~'.~I~~:' " ,..,: :.'
~. ,,'. .... '.#'"""""'''''''''''''':''X'f,t':t,,4' .............".:. "
".' .n~~~di.l..:....ii...;tW"'_M"""lJlIld~'""",,,,_,,'o.., '.:'. _
" . ..:',......:........,......:. '1 'fl '>>iN:......,...................... _f b L......:' . \~.i' :.:,
, ,:.' '..'~.~J .....-.; .......'....."_~................ .......- .,'..... ..... .. lUll .." !. ,h:::....,:
:" ..........,.,... ...'........~....... ......'.....-.-.,........... c..., .,...... ..' r ."..,':
-...-. 1Ia" fill .......... -.ttt-.. -', '" ': ..,.." .- ",
!INt., ....,... .,.
at ... 'n~ s.,', .. .... ., _. .. -., .... 4S ..,
l~' wt.." 40 n. .. .1.... ,sa .t .. hlhwbl ......1.....
.... "IIInlsal. 'lord" .I'na ta. a14.,.ta, .t .. ....0 liH .t
-... "? ,... 6 ... MO.M "I. If. 1 .... M .sa. 00 .e. .... te ..
hlllt .t o.:n., ..... nil 110.... n. III .. .n....1I' .. .~.
...1eI'~ .......,... al.... .. ..... .t .. ~ ......'we _ ... ...u.-
.......I, .... ...?~ . ...... .t :aal..A 't.. .. .. ..,lat ... .
....CIa 1)..M ... _u. .... .P. _SA pe", hUe 81.... n. a. . ....
a. .... " .... ... ~ .... ... "rNl' .t ..i& .... .
.'
......
. .
,
. f .
, , .. .'-;} .~ ;
....~~.~: ,''\:
" ".
:.. . ..,
1.':'~;' ":..,. '.,.
~ . :'~."; ..~. "':,: :.,~ ",-:"., '.
" .
. "
01
31111 1C11:lM31S
WO~~ 61:S1 (66t-91-~
900/900 . d
.- \ ;":io.
..... t ".
'. ,
....
COOVOIlATK MAL,
."
.-rAft Gr.___u!~~...__:..___, , ..
00UIfTT ~....~~.~....~.;....:"---"-'_.'
.," -r.
.', .
~~... ...~.. ..,..".........r~~__.________._._......_...._.._.......
......U.U...h._..._.__........._.""'t.~_..u..uu____-<l..... .... ~.....
a-.. .. - .. .. ....._..-1\!!.._...ftwI...... ____J.!'.....lrtut.....u_..........,
...,....A,). ., ....._.:....DX':Iwr- ~<lt...._......_....___.._.......____...
.... .-..-..... -1MI hi ... ....aw.. ~... ___., _.. ...... """"".e..._,
ern..n., .... _............ ....m.11!i11....., _............ De .....ltI'l.b......... 'h_
_..............__u....._.__.... ...~:...__...AttJ...~t.-.-.--.---.....
......... ........ - .... ... ......-..1l,.... _lid 8M ... " .... _m...... h" IIlIIl .
,-".....U...OI). .........__..._...'~... -..J ...,.......... ~... '
MtMW .. "'-Jl'fl.." ...........'...._:7..........mN~ .. .... ..........,....]IlMc.' ")",' .'
.. ....... ~ ~......,.,... ..'.,..,~ '. . ~~;;-.~..,.:.
"UlllM.. ..... 1M ~.... Ud...~,., -,--h.l.-.-.,......_...f4~y.,.Ia.c~ ,~\
. . ; ...~~,~~p
. ",' .' '.. .....11.,........ 1J'~;tt. of,
,: . " . ,'. ., ... \',nhi. ,......: . . "- . .
-.~~..;..~:::~'.:~>::'~~~~;;rlfI~~t.,~i~'..;'(/~~~))::.:~..'~, : I .......
-... i ~~' j ,-:'r-:..,.,.. V7:.' '~.~I.;.";,.: '7'''7 .~:;: .-. '; '. ".:
~ ~ ~ . 'r r',:,~:.::: .:;': ':.),:!':~ .{'....".'. :~.,'.... ", '
~ ,i ~,~I.'!..~:~ J...~:~. ..i::...'~ i
tf. 1 ;..~~ , '", ':1' ::
lL ~ r: I t"1'lll' ~z;.~. .;
fir. p .11 I :
r I .. I".:.:~, ':, >" .'
l.r '.,;." f. 'iJJ~':, :-..;.~ ~}~r;:'"' ' ;'" "
. u. . .<"":p. "':'~~:~J...~ ,..:,~". ;~"t.. ,
~
~
$i
~
~
'='
&
.'IL I
I'
;r"
800lt89
01
3,11 1 1~31S
WO~~ 0c:~l (66l-9l-~.1
w j' (. 't J j U 0 ' I I 1\)/' i ,. v "i V [I h 11/\ u/W /I, \) .J U I.J! 1\ 1 !:. \J
nut.
MEMORANDUM
Utl11tl.s #93-116
FROM:
Richard Staudlnge~,
City Enqineer rd7~
John A. Guidry, &.
Director of Utl11tl.S~ ~
~
;-b
TO:
OATE~ March 18, 1993
SUBJECT: Boynton 59.crest - AKA Cedar Grove
Master tlan Revised
A.ended Co.-.nts - March 8. 1'93
January 14, 1992 and Oetober 21, 1992
The developer has met with Utility staff and has provided the
requt$ted inform_tion. drawinqs dated March 15, 1993, This
reetifies our previous comments originally made in UtilIty MeMO
#92-409 d&~ed September 27, 1992. Based on the inforMation
p~ovided. w. are able to confirm W4t~r and sewer avallabllity ~o
the site.
This department hat no object1on to this project Movlnq forward
~hrouCJh the revlew--proce... '--_ ,""""
Iqb
XC: Hike Kazuna.
Peter M&z2:.11.
Chris Cutro
File
.' --
.. - --- -
__~_... ",4', _ ~.a.... __.. "'.''''''''''''''1'1'''1'1''''''''
'-''''';'C)
n"l, I~ "1 n.t'Oll ru
I'IHI:
02. 08. 93
03 : 1 7 PM
*GEE &.. ..JENSON
POl
CARNAHAN-PROCTOR AND ASSOCIATES INC.
Consultlnl;l englne.rl . Surveyors ' Planners ' Land CevelOpmer'1t Consultants
lI'ebruary 3,
1993
1 P)lf.~C i il"~lrF ~'IT\
a.., ~.. ~UJJ
FEB 0 g 1993
Cee .. Jenson
One Harvard Circle
West PAlm Beach, Florida 33409
A~tn; R. staudinger, P.E.
Rs. ~oyntcn Seaorest
C-P&A No. 910BO,
RECE\VED
fEB 8 \993
f;.r:. ~.: ~ l(;;'''",SON
Dear Mr. staud1nqer:
The purpose or this letter is to cont1rrn our telephone
conversation ot Yebruary 2, 1993, concerning the referenced
projeot. '
Xn particular our conversation centered on your memorandum of
January 21, 1983, comment E. I explained to you that the volume
subm1ttea to you for the exfiltratlon trenoh design was a one-hour
value as required by South Florida Water Management Distriot
criteria and that no attempt was made to extrapolate that volume
tor a longer period of t1ma. You agreed to re-review these
calculations and adjust your comment aocordingly.
Additionally, you stated that your comments on water
management and the computations submitted are not of a nature to
delay the processinq ot the sUbdivision master plan through the
city of Boynton Beach.
Should I have misunderstood any part or our conversation, or
inadvertently omitted any relative part. 'thsrsof, please lat me know
immediatelY.
PFW/prc
co: Jill A. 3ark88Y, EQq.
JUlian Brya.n
I
20/BOYNPJ:lNSEA/PRC
6191 West Atlantic Blvd. . P.O. Box 4399 . Margare. FL 33063 . (305) 972.3959 ' FAX (305) 972.4178
Dade (305) 949,6826 . Palm Beach (407) 364-0687
rrFie City oj-
t:Boynton 'Beacli
Pfanning & Zcning 1Jepartment
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Becu!i. 'Boukvara
P.O. 'lJo:{.31O
'Boynton 'Becu!i., :Jforidiz 33425.0310
(407) 738.7490, :J.'U: (407) 738.7459
January 5, 1993
MF. Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer
Palm Beach County Engineer's office
Traffic Division
160 Australian Avenue: Suite 103
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
RE: Revised Traffic Impact Study
Boynton Seacrest (fka - Cedar Grove) - File No. 697
Master Plan (resubmittal)
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
Attached you will find a traffic impact study for the subdivision
of the R1AA/R-2 zoned, 53.69 acre parcel of land located on the
east side of South Seacrest Boulevard, approximately :,200 feet
north of Gulfstream Boulevard (S.E. 36th Avenue) to allow for the
development of 146 single-family units and 82 duplex units (41
lots) for a total of 228 dwell'ing units. This study has been
revised to address the comments discussed in your Novernter 6, 1992
letter to me. Please note that the project, formerly known as
Cedar Grove, has been renamed to Boynton Seacrest.
since this residential project will generate over 1,000 qross trips
per day, requiring submittal of a traffic study to Palm Beach
county, please review this project for compliance with Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance standards Ordinance No. 90-40. This
revised subdivision master plan request is planned for ~eview by
the Planning and Development Board on February 9, 1993. It would
be greatly appreciated if you could fax or mail your com8ents to me
no later than February 2, 1993 for inclusion in the agenda
materials delivered to the planning and Development Eocrd members
on February 3, 1993.
If you have any questions concerning the above, ple3.se do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
;[~q~~~
Senior Plc:1ner
tjh
Encl.
A:BoySeaMP
.Cf.mcn'ca _,' gatea-a/} to tfie cju((stream
F, MARTIN PERRY
ROBERT LEE SHAPIRO
JORDAN R. MILLER"
JILL A, JARKESY
5&- t'Y/tf-
~~~ ~~ ~ g ~~ !?d
~6'4.5 .91. ~~ ~ ~
.9'~ 6'(}()
~gs.~y~~
TELEPHONE (407) 684-4500
FAX (407) 684-1008
. ADMITTED IN FLORIDA
AND DlSTRlcr OF COLUMBIA
December 22, 1992
...."'-;~
':,.\,": ~ ~
, " " <::>~ ~OYN70.t
I "/ "' "~
i '...'.;!::: ReceIved ~
,.., (.) ~
:. ,': DEe 2 3 1992 ~
--.\
I..' ~ ~./
\ '",' ..L1_ CITY ENGINEER i!' ..
\:" "'0 ~o ~ -~ "
\<' I\t aEAC~'~,':/'
, . ,.---n '"" '/
, : \,:.:/
W. Richard staudinger, P.E.
city Engineer
city of Boynton Beach
Gee & Jensen
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409-1923
RE: Cedar Grove Investments,
Master Plan
Our File No. 3197.01
N. V ./Resubmittal of Subdivision
Dear Mr. Staudinger:
"
.
After reviewing the Technical Review Committee Comments submitted
to Cedar Grove Investments, N.V. on November 4, 1992, our Project
Engineers and Planner have revised the Subdivision Master Plan for
Cedar Grove in accordance with the comments set forth in memoranda
submitted by various staff members on the Technical Review
Commi ttee. We are herein enclosing seventeen complete sets of this
revised Master Plan.
Project Engineers, Carnahan, Proctor & Associates, have addressed
all the comments listed in your memorandum to Mr. Chris Cutro,
Planning & Zoning Director, dated November 3, 1992. As requested,
we have changed the name of the project to avoid any confusion with
similarly named subdivisions in Palm Beach county. The new name
for this project will be Boynton Seacrest.
Cedar Grove has also revised its Master Plan to comply with
comments number 1 and 2 on utilities Memorandum 92-409. Please
note that the Water and sanitary Sewer Easements are shown within
the rights-of-way on the Master-Plan:' --Furthermore, in -accordance
with Appendix C, A.rticle "XIII, section 5 of the city of Boynton
Beach Code, upon approval of the Master Plan by the Technical
Review Committee, Cedar Grove shall submit all required
construction plans, including those for water and sewerage systems.
W. Richard staudinger, P.E.
December 22, 1992
Page 2
Our consultants have also addressed items 2 and 5 of Memorandum 92-
204 from Lt. Donald Thrasher, Community Relations Division, Police
Department. Item No. 1 recommends that we show stop bars, stop
signs and turn lanes on the proposed plans in accordance with city
Ordinance 5-142. This Ordinance, a portion of Article X, Parking
Lots, is in the Building Code and is not required as part of a
Master Plan submittal. These items will be addressed after the
Master Plan has been approved by the TRC, at the time of submittal
of constructions plans. Item No. 4 is specifically addressed by
the Traffic Analysis prepared by Carnahan and Associates and
submitted to the City of Boynton Beach as well as to the Palm Beach
County Engineering Department. Please be advised that Palm Beach
County has reviewed and aEProv~d this lraffic Analysis.
. '---- AI 0
"
We have addressed the comments referenced in Building Department
Memorandum No. 92-221 from Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official, to
Chris Cutro, Planning Director. Julian Bryan has placed a note on
the Master Plan Resubmittal stating that each and every lot must
comply with the Property Development Regulations for the applicable
Zoning District.
Fire Department Memorandum No. ;92-57 from William D. cavanaugh
states the following:
"In order to fully evaluate the project, the following
information is required:
street names and house numbers should be shown.
without a water main plan, fire hydrant locations cannot be
plotted.
This Department still has concerns with Seacrest traffic at
peak hours."
Mr. cavanaugh's memorandum addresses matters which fall completely
out of the purview of the Master Plan submittal requirements.
First of all, the street names and house numbers are not required
as part of the Master Plan Submittal. Appendix C, Article 8,
section 4 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. street names
and house numbers need not be shown until submittal of the Final
Plat. See Appendix C, Article 8, section 6(7). Secondly,
construction plans for water systems are also not required until
the time for submittal of the Preliminary Plat. See Appendix C,
Article 8, section 5(b). Third, the Fire Department's concerns
relative to Seacrest traffic at peak hours has been addressed
specifically by our Traffic Analysis. The Palm Beach County
~tJoJ'
.9~,~, ~g~,!?M f)
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
December 22, 1992
Page 3
~~
Engineering Department has reviewed and aeee~ our Traff ie
Analysis and has granted Concurrency to the Cedar Grove Project,
thus satisfying the requirements of the Palm Beach County
Performance Standards Ordinance.
Cedar Grove's Planning and Engineering consultants also have
revised the Master Plan to bring it into compliance with comments
referenced in Engineering Department Memorandum No. 92-302 and
Planning & Zoning Department Memorandum No. 92-212. As requested
in Item No. 20 of Tambri Heyden's Planning & Zoning Department
Memorandum, enclosed please find a check payable to the city of
Boynton Beach in the amount of $343.26 for processing previous
Cedar Grove applications.
This Master Plan resubmittal complies with all applicable codes and
ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. We look forward to the
Technical Review Committee's review of this submittal and its
recommendation forwarding the Master Plan on to the Planning and
Zoning Board.
:'
Very truly yours,
"
,
9tu ()-9~
JILL A. JARKESY
JAJ: 1m
cc: James Cherof
cc: Mr. Michael Rubin
Enclosure
.9~.~. ~c1~.!?d
Board of County Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus, Chair
Carole Phillips, Vice Chair
Carol A. Roberts
Carol J. Elmquist
Mary McCarty
Ken L. Foster
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Pub lie Works
November 6, 1992
Ms. Tambri Heyden
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.o. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: CEDAR GROVE - FILE N. 697
Dear Ms. Heyden:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division received the traffic impact study for the
project entitled Cedar Grove, dated September 1992. This study addresses 187
single-family dwelling units. It is my understanding, based on your cover
letter, that the proposed project will consist of 146 single-family dwelling
units and 82 duplex units.
The study will have to be modified to address all of the proposed units. The
traffic consultant, Carnahan and Associates, Inc. has been contacted regarding
this issue.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
09-~ :Jv~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn11b
RECEIVED
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
Oil '.
p\.ANNH'~(i Dt~f,
--
@ printed on recycled paper
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
U..; J.~ ...:..; J.,",'Ul ..1.. .~."".l. _4\.'~\'~~..\~' J\\J\Jvv.4i\.lL~
! U U (.
03. 16.93
0359 '1-'fM'
*W--PALM-~CH' ENGINEERS POl
BELLSOUTH
~IIU"ICA'IJOII. 0
..lIeouth 'nl1-.commulllc_t1on.
"oom 101
.1. ,..... ~.
w.., ~I", ....". 'L 3t.0 1
March 16, 1993
pile 'I 240.0900
Mr. pr... Tompkine
Carnahan, Proc~o~ , A..ociate.
6191 W. Atlantio Boulevard
M.rq.~e, Plorid. 3306'
RB t BOYH'l'OM 8BACRBS~ LOCA"l'P.D AT SEACREST DOULEVAJU) SOUTJI OF
WOOL8R:IGH'l'
near Mr. Tompkins I
%n ra8po~.. to your r.qu..t, ~hi8 will co~fi~ that Southern
Bell i. the .aurce of supplY for ~olephon. .e~"ina to the
above reterenced project. T.1.phone faciliti.. wi~h adequate
oapaoity can b. provided tor this projeot. It ahoulCi be
nC'lted, however, that the owner will be requir.d' to provide
8outh.rn Mall with reco1"'dad ea..ments or oondu1t. Xn
add.ition Sout.hern B.11 may require e)CC:~U5ive eas..enta ror
structur.. that hou.. .leotronio .witching equipment (tU,.C-96
or .ub.~anti.l1y .i.ilar equipmeni:.). The recorCSed ......ent..
will ba without r..t:ric~iv. condi'tion. and ahall incur no
00.1:. 'to t.he Sout.h.rn B.l1 Company. 'l'he ability ot Southern
Rell to provide racilU:ies ror this project will be contingdlnt
on the conditions noted above.
Your und.r.tan~ing in this matt~r 1. 9reatly appreciated. If
you have any quest.t.ons please call William Sowers (407)
t 837-6306.
Yours truly,
v'~
v. Boraani.
Manaqer-En9ineerint
WESln
~-,..~
n'l. 1 fo\ ", n.t. n tI fJ.f
l'fHI:
_ _.,_..._.,"~- ...... - -. .... __.. WP........'I"..Yrwn,..
rzhe City of
'Boynton $eacli
...
~~
PUznning & Z.oning 'Dtpartrrunt
100 'E. 'Boynton 'BttUli 'BouUvara
P.O. 'Bo:t.31O
'Boynton 'BetUli, 'Jforitfa 33425.0310
(407) 738-7490, 'J.U: (407) 738-7459
October 26, 1992
Mr. Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer
Palm Beach County Engineer's Office
Traffic Division
160 Australian Avenue, Suite 303
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Re: Traffic Impact Study
Cedar Grove - File No. 697
Master Plan
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
Attached you will find a traffic impact study for the subdivision
of the R1AA/R-2 zoned, 53.69 acre parcel of land located on the
east side of South Seacrest Boulevard, approximately 1,200 feet
north of Gulfstream Boulevard (S.E. 36th Avenue) to allow for the
development of 146 single-family units and 82 duplex units (41
lots) for a total of 228 dwelling units.
Since this residential project will generate over 1,000 gross
trips per day, requiring submittal of a traffic study to Palm
Beach County, please review this project for compliance with Palm
Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance No. 90-40.
This subdivision master plan request will be reviewed by the
Planning and Development Board on November 10, 1992. Due to the
delay in transmitting this study to your office for review, it
would be greatly appreciated if you could fax your comments to me
by November 5, 1992 for inclusion in the agenda materials
delivered to the Planning and Development members on November 6,
1992.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
J~0A' fJ. Jiw~'
Tambri J. ~denj1
Senior Planner
TJH/jm
Encl.
,1 me rica .~ <;Iltt:way to tlie <;lJ~{stream
'l1ie City of
'Boynton 'Beacn
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Buu:h 'Boukvara
P.O. 'Bo:t310
'Boynton 'Beam, '.Fforilfa 33435-0310
City:Jfa{[: (407) 734-8111
:J.f1IX: (407) 738-7459
OF THE CITY ENGINEER
October 23, 1992
Palm Beach County School Board
Planning Department
(In person pick-up)
Attention: Mr. Larry Zabik
Re: Cedar Grove Master Plan, Boynton Beach, Florida '
Notification of Technical Review Committee Meeting, Tues. 10/27/92
Dear Mr. Zabik:
In accordance with the City of Boynton Beach, Florida Code of
Ordinances, specifically Appendix "C", Subdivision & Platting Regula-
tions, Article VIII, Section 4. "Master Plan", Subsection 4G, the
Engineering Department herein presents the master plan for the proposed
Cedar Grove Subdivision situated on S. Seacrest Blvd., immediately
east of Mission Hill Rd. in Boynton Beach, Florida,
The City has scheduled a Technical Review Committee Meeting for
Tuesday, October 27, 1992 at 9 a.m. in Conference Room "C" (West Wing,
second floor) to discuss the proposed subdivision. Please submit your
impact statement to my attention no later than Thursday, October 29, 1992,
Thank you in advance of your anticipated cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
l. \. ~
_ J .... 4-......
Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
p r .r"T'~ T7~~
.: ,. ' ,,1 _/ ..i..~':J
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Gee & Jenson
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
.
r-~~.";.;~'I\:--;
ncp""
-, ".,~ S {
~\
~'
~merica's gateway to the gulfstream
.. -.
o;(~
-----
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-50
May 18, 1993
TO:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
FROM:
RE:
Cedar Grove Investments, N.V./Boynton Seacrest
Attached is a letter I received from Jill Jarkesy regarding
the Cedar Grove appeals process. This item was placed on the City
Commission agenda with the anticipation that Cedar Grove would
appeal the Planning & Development Board's denial of their master
sub-division plan. At the time it was placed on the agenda, it was
not known whether or not Cedar Grove would take an appeal. The
matter was moved forward so that the public would have notice if an
appeal was filed prior to the Commission meeting. It now appears
that if an appeal is taken, that it will not be taken prior to May
22, 1993. Accordingly, the City Commission's jurisdiction in this
matter has not been invoked by the applicant. The matter should be
removed from the agenda.
For your information, I am enclosing a copy of section of 7.5-
63 of the City Code which sets forth the appeals process.
By copy of this Memo I am advising Jill Jarkesy that the
matter will not be considered by the City Commission tonight.
cc: Jill Jarkesy, Esq.
Richard Staudinger, City Engineer
Chris Cutro, City Planner
, -CD
R"Bct~l'l ).:4
~~, ~~
, l'I.NN\NG Ot.?\.
.::-----
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
~ 7.5-63
endangered, threatened or rare animal and plant spe-
cies, or species of special concern. (Ord. No. 89-46, ~ 1,
12-5-89)
Sec. 7.5-62. Review schedule.
Any additional information determined to be required by the
TRB must be requested by the TRB within thirty (30) days of
receipt of the above information, Upon receipt of the above infor-
mation, the TRB shall have thirty (30) days in which to complete
its evaluation of environmental impacts. The TRB will then have
thirty (30) days to make its determination concerning conditions
of approval for the development to the planning and zoning board.
The planning and zoning board shall review the determination of
the TRB at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The planning
and zoning board shall accept or amend, as necessary, the deter-
mination of the TRB. (Ord. No. 89-46, ~ 1, 12-5-89)
Sec. 7.5-63. Appeals process.
Any aggrieved person may appeal the determination of the
planning and zoning board to the city commission by written
request filed with the city manager within ten (10) days following
receipt of the determination of the planning and zoning board.
Any such appeal submitted to the city commission shall be re-
viewed by commission at a regularly scheduled meeting within
thirty (30) days of receipt ofthe appeal request in accordance with
the following standards which shall be addressed by the applicant
in his written request:
(a) Whether the subject property is an environmentally sensi-
tive land or contains endangered, threatened and rare spe-
cies and/or species of special concern in accordance with
the definitions set forth in sections 7,5-60(c) and (d); and
(b) Whether the conditions placed on the development appli-
cation by the planning and zoning board are reasonable
and represent sound environmental practices necessary to
mitigate possible harmful impacts upon the subject prop-
erty and are necessary in order to protect the health, safety
and welfare of the citizens of the City of Boynton Beach.
(Ord. No. 89-46, ~ 1, 12-5-89)
Supp, No. 46
631
f
/
.//
MAY 17 '93 03:57PM PSM&J
P.2
~.
5Sw cp.
g~, ~, J(;&. c1 ~, !?sL
tfSfJ 9'. ~ ~ ~
.9'.. Ql(J TELEPHONE (407i tl84-4500
~.9... ~ ~ >><<'I FAX (-407) 6&4-100l
F, MARTIN PERRY
ROBERT LEE SHAPIltO
J01ID^l'i JI" Mluza'
Jt1.L ^. J^ itKi<:sY
^DMITUO Il"/ ~LOllf!:M
\ND tll5T~It'T O~ COL1..'I'IMA
..
YIA FACa:IMtLB
May 17, 1993
M:r: . James Cherof
ci ty JIl.ttorney
Ci ty elf Boynton Beach
P. O. Box 310
Boyntcm Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: C:edar Grove Investments, N.V./Boynton Seacrest
Master subdivision
Our File No.: 3197.01
Dear !I[r. Cherof:
'.~
It has corne to my attention that. the Boynton seacrest Master
SUbdivision plan approval is scheduled for the City of Boynton
Beach city commission Meeting tomorrow, May 18, 1993. The city of
Boynton Beach Code, Article VIII, section 4H2 requires the Planning
and Zoning Board to review the Master Plan once it is approved by
thQ TQchnical Review Committee. There is no reference to the
Master Plan bein9 submitted to the City Commission for its review
until the preliminary plat staQ8.
Furthermore, on May 12, 1993, I received correspondence from W.
RiOhard Staudinger, P_~., City Engineer, informinq me that under
ChaptQr 7, Section 7.5-63 "AppealS: Process", Cedar Crave has ten
(10) daya from the dat.e of Mr. Studinqer's letter to appeal the
Planning- and Development Board deciQion to the city Commission.
CGdar Crovo d.OOQ plan to appeal the Planninq and Development
Board If. denial of their M~ulter Subdivision Plan prior t.o May 22,
1993,
In lil;:rht. of t.he forlilCJoin9, I do not undarat.and why t.hiSl i t9'm is
sQhQd\11ed for tomorrow's city Conl.1nission hoaring_ I would
apprec:::iate you faxing me the relevant poX'tions of the cit.y of
Boynt.c)n Beach Codo whioh requires us to 90 bofore the cit:y
Commission in the absenoe of filin9 an Administrative Appeal. In
~ny event, in ol'."der to avoid burdening our olient with additional
",1'"
P~-<Yr ~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-115
FROM:
J. Scott Miller
city Manager
~ ~ ~Jv.,...J"""
Christopher cutro
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
May 13, 1993
RE:
Boynton Seacrest (Cedar Grove)
Julian Bryan has submitted a master plan for platting the
property located on Seacrest Boulevard just south of S.E. 31st
Avenue. This site is known as the Boynton Seacrest scrub.
The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the master plan and
found it to be in compliance with the Appendix "C" of the code of
ordinances. The master plan, however, does not comply with
either the Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan or the
Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance (Chapter 7.5 Article
iv) .
Due to the fact that this master plan has been reviewed by the
Technical Review Committee four times, staff created a series of
conditions that would bring the master plan into compliance as
part of the preliminary platting process.
The Planning and Development Board reviewed this master plan at
its meeting of May 11, 1993 and forwarded the master plan to the
City Commission with a recommendation for denial.
This item has been scheduled for City Commission review and final
determination on May 18, 1993.
CC/jrn
A:BOYSEA.JM
t/J~ ;\~~L-/
U
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-105
TO: ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS (hand-delivered)
FROM: VINCENT A. FINIZIO
DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER
DATE: APRIL 22, 1993
RE: MASTER PLAN COMMENT RECONCILIATION SUBMISSION
MODIFICATION OF TRC MEETING AGENDA
BOYNTON SEACREST (FKA CEDAR GROVE)
Provided your offices herein, please find a full set of Master Plans
considered by the City Engineer as a set of plans submitted by the
applicant for the purpose of reconciling staff comments prior to the
P & D Board's consideration at their next monthly meeting.
Please be fully prepared to discuss these plans after carefully
performing a comparative analysis against your most recent comments.
By copy of this memorandum to both Dorothy Moore and Attorney Jill
Jarkesy, I am providing notice that the agenda is amended to include
discussion reference compliance with staff comments on April 27, 1993
at 9:00 a.m. at the West Wing Conference Room, 2nd Floor, West Wing
of City Hall. Thank you.
1>../- <e--
I Vl(,.,)_~ I
(2~ce:t,5' ~l.l\ Qt->-t::::.
t.A 'cl--J...C; <1 '2, - i \ G
,
UIi ''--\~
j ~,
~~A~O
ST\U~ )'+~G.~
-;--r r') h _. \ "-'
-I-1....L"-0 ~ ~-I ,.Ji2l'-'~ ~ -
~A ~tL,
4 -' Z '3 ~- Ci '3
cc: Attorney Jill Jarkesy via FAX TRANSMISSION
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
James A. Cherof, City Attorney
w. Richard Staudinger, P.E. (as directed)
:;
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Richard Staud~ng2r, City Eng1neer
~ ~h'-' . :(1 ~L_!A_ ~-p&1~1~bnk.~ D' ,
~rom: ~ r1s~o~~, ~ ~~ ~~Q ~on1ng 1rec~or
Date: April 8, 1993
Subject: Appl1cant's request for Special Planning & Development
Board Heeting or... April 27, 1993 Boynton Seacrest
(Subdivision Master Plan) File No. 697
-------------------------------------------------------------------
We have located tne ecolog1cal assessment (dated January 9, 1992)
submi tted by the applicant :tor the Cedar Grove PUD rezon1ng
appl~cat1on. Pursuant to tne statement made by the applicant's
attorney, Jill JarKesy, at today I s Technical Review Committee
meeting, directing statt to re-review the 1992 documenta~ion and
apply it to the above-referenced application in an attempt to meet
the subn1ttal requirements ot the City's Environmentally Sensitive
Lands Crdinanc3 (Chapter 7.5, Article IV), this department and
Kevin Hallai1an, the City Forester, wLll be amending previous
comments made relat1ve to mitigation and scrub habitat
preservatlon.
Due to the reVlew schedule established within Section 7.5-62 of the
Envlronmenta~ly Sensitive Lands ord1nance, which provides ~he
Techn1cal Review Board 30 days upon receipt of the above
intormatlon wi th111 whic11 to complete its evaluation 0:::
environmental impacts, we respectfully request that the applicant's
request tor a speclal meet1ng of the Planning & Development Board
be denied. Although we anticipate being able to transmit sald
comments to you prlor to May 7, 1993 (30 days trom today), more
than the 7 days gl ven tor lnon-env1ronmental" comments to be
su~mlttec to you is needed.
ThlS actdi tlonal reV1ew tlme wlll net effect placemem: of this
request en the next regularl.Y scheduled Planning & Developmem:
Board meeting ot May 11, 1993. Please advise whether or not this
schedule 1S acceptable to both parties and whether you recelved
Jill Jarkesy's letter confirming statements made at the Technlcal
R3view Committee meetlng regarding this issue.
CC/th
cc: Kev1D Hallahan
A: 3t,auG97
p~_:;c -r ~
REVISED
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newb01o, Deputy Building official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Mike Kazunas, utilities Engineer
Vincent Finizio, Engineering Department
Richard Staudinger, Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, Zoning & site Plan Reviewer
DATE:
April 5, 1993
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Thursday, April 8, 1993
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
Thursday, April 8, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "A" (City
clerk's Office) to discuss the following:
MASTER PLAN - RESUBMISSION
Boynton Seacrest Master plan Resubmittal (2nd Review)
Establishment of Technical Review Committee Meeting Date
Formal comments shall be transmitted to the Engineering Department,
to the attention of Vincent A. Finizio, Deputy City Engineer and be
received no later than 5 p.m. on April 12, 1993.
plans with your staff comments.
DM/jm
Att.
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
City commission (5)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Acting Police Chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Central File
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Mike Haag, Zoning and site Development Administrator
Project File
Chronological File A:REVTRCTH.0M
!~ 2e~
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMI'rrEE MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Lt. Don Thrasher, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Mike Kazunas, Utilities Engineer
Vincent Finizio, Engineering Department
Richard staudinger, Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer
DATE:
March 2, 1993
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Thursday, March 11, 1993
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet or.
Thursday, March 11, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "C" (West
Wing) to discuss the following:
MASTER PLAN - RESUBMISSION
PROJECT NAME: Boynton Seacrest (f.k.a. Cedar Grove)
A Planned Residential Community
LOCATION: South Seacrest Boulevard
APPLICATION: Julian Bryan III
FILE NO. Planning Department File #697
NOTE:
Please return all comments and plans
distributed for this resubmissidn
ENGINEERING DEPAR'l'MENT no later than
Tuesday, March 16, 1993.
previousl~
to thE
5:00 p.m
Technical Review Committee
Page 2
WAIVER - SIDEWALK
PROJECT:
Clifton Homes, Inc.
LOCATION:
905 S.E. 3rd Street
APPLICANT:
Philip A. Binns
FILE NO.:
Planning Department File #728
DESCRIPTION:
Requesting a waiver of a requirement for a sidewalk
at this location.
NOTE:
Please coordinate review of plans and submission of
written comments with BUILDING DEPARTMENT c/o Al
Newbold.
DISCUSSION
1. Review of the following site plans for inter-departmental
conflicts:
a. Lighthouse Grille Restaurant
b. Red Lobster Restaurant
c. 610 Industrial Avenue
Do~~ -:
DM/jm
Att.
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
City Commission (5)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Edward Hillery, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Central File
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
Project File
Chronological File
A: TRCAGDA.JM
F, MARTIN PERRY
ROBERT LEE SHAPIRO
JORDAN R, MIllER.
JILL A. JARKESY
~~
~~,~,~g~,g!~
f6'M ..9. ~"'""" ~ ~
.9'~ 6'()()
mJ..9.~. ~~
TELEPHONE (407) 684-4500
FAX (407) 684-1008
. ADMmED IN FLORIDA
AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
February 25, 1993
Mr. vincent A. Finizio
Assistant City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
RE: Cedar Grove Investments, N.V.
Boynton Sea crest Master Plan
Our file No.: 3197.01
~~o
<(\y;'O"e tJoJ~
~~<o t CO
Dear Mr. Finizio:
I have been informed by Jill Jarkesy ,in my law firm, of two
conversations which you had with her this ~fternoon, following our
transmi ttal by courier of my letter bearing todays date. My letter
covered our client's check for $1,500.00, which was being paid
under protest.
It is my understanding from Ms. Jarkesy that you stated twice that
you were refusing to accept the tendered check because of the
language contained in my letter, which requested confirmation of my
assumption that this matter will be scheduled for the TRC meeting
on March 11, 1993. You then stated that you do not know anything
about the agenda or the sCheduling of TRC meetings.
I find your statement particularly interesting in light of the fact
that pursuant to the city code, as set forth in Appendix C, Article
V, at Page 2091, under the definition of Technical Review Board, it
clearly states: "The ci tv enaineer, who shall be chairman for
subdivision items, . .. ." (emphasis furnished).
Secondly, I take great exception to the following two questions
which you asked of Ms. Jarkesy: "Are you an attorney?" "Are you a
member of the Florida Bar?"
Mr. vincent A. Finizio
February 25, 1993
Page 2
Please note that Ms. Jarkesy is listed as a name partner in this
law firm. She has been practicing with this law firm for more than
four years. She has represented clients in conjunction with the
City of Boynton Beach during that period. From time to time,
during all of those four years, she has dealt directly with you in
this capacity on more than one occasion. You are well aware of the
'f:~ct that .Sthe if:. ;'1 !a.r.ter.
I do not know whether your remarks were sexist, intended to be
humorous, intended to be offensive, an indication of the prejudice
which you hold toward either my client or my law firm or just
generally in bad taste. In any event_Ms. Jarkesy and I find them
particularly offensive. I demand an apology on behalf of Ms.
Jarkesy and my law firm. By copy of this letter to the Mayor and
council, I am demanding that you be reprimanded for this incident.
In any event, I expect either you or the Office of The City
Engineer to take immediate action in terms of accepting our tender
of this filing fee in accordance with discussions which I have had
with the city attorney as well as in accordance appropriate
practice in these matters.
We have responded to your letter of February 17th addressed to
Julian T. Bryan III, which specifically states in its last
paragraph:
"Should the office of the city Engineer not
receive the $1,500.00 submittal fee from you
within ten (10) days. "
r~S..J€.O
~~'~..f ~~~
~~~ t \
.9~,~, ~c1~..9d
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-061
r~
~
~
~
TO: James Cherof, City Attorney
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
DATE: February 26, 1993
RE: ATTORNEY MARTIN PERRY'S LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 25, 1993
I am in receipt of the above referenced letter (attached herein
for your review and consideration).
Please be advised that all of the allegations set forth in Attorney
Perry's letter are misrepresentations of the facts and therefore
do not merit either an apology or a defense from this office.
This office has at all time$ and shall continue to, perform in
accordance with our City's Code of Ordinances and standard City
policies.
Should you wish to discuss this matter in detail, please do not
hesitate to contact me at (407) 738-7487.
J. ..:r..--+.A-L .
Vincent A. FinizB
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
attachment: Attorney Perry's Letter dated February 25, 1993
~\'\J€.O
~EC \~~~
~~, 'L b
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-051
".LL
1~
7~~
fA--~
'~rtrC~
TO: W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
City Engineer
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE: February 24, 1993
RE: Boynton Seacrest (f.k.a. Cedar Grove)
Submission of Master Plan Without Benefit of Submission Fee
Status Report
Please be advised that on February 17, 1993, this office transmitted
a Certified, Return Receipt Requested letter dated February 17, 1993,
to Julian Bryan, Agent for the above referenced project, regarding the
master plan submission Mr. Bryan deposited at the City without
benefit of him paying the required submission fee pursuant to City
Ordinance(s) .
The receipt was returned to this office with the received date listed
as February 19, 1993. To date, neither Mr. Bryan nor his legal counsel
has contacted this office in order to provide formal direction to
staff, reference this master plan submission provided to the City
subsequent to the two full reviews performed by the Technical Review
Committee during their most recent review(s) .
At your earliest convenience, please advise this office as to how we
should proceed in this matter.
VAF/ck
xc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
RECEIVED
~E8 24
PLANNING DEPT.
~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-053
TO: ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE: February 25, 1993
RE: Boynton Seacrest (f.k.a. Cedar Grove)
Master Plan Submission of February 24, 1993
The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
is in receipt of the above referenced master plan submission and
associated filing fee which was received on February 24, 1993.
The master plan shall be discussed turning the Technical Review
Committee meeting of March 11, 1993 (meeting start time 9 a.m.,
Conference Room C, 2nd Floor of West Wing) .
L~ ;. .....:!- A~; "':'($
Vincent A. Finlzio
VAF/ck
xc: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director (for placement on
agenda)
Julian Bryan, c/o Martin Perry, Esq. via FAX
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer
James Cherof, City Attorney
f?tz ~,
RECEIVED
FED 1J= 1993
r~ ~Ll>~-
(~ <~ 4>-. jJ.)U-,;rt \
tu < -+ "J!,.
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Lt. Don Thrasher, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Mike Kazunas, utilities Engineer
Vincent Finizio, Administrative Coordinator
of Engineering
Richard Staudinger, Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, zoning & Site Plan Reviewer
DATE:
January 7, 1993
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Thursday, January 14, 1993
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
Thursday, January 14, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "c"
(West Wing) to discuss the following:
MASTER PLAN
Boynton Seacrest formerly known as Cedar Grove. Resubmission.
NOTE:
Return plans for the master plan resubmission to
the Director of Planning & Zoning Department by
Tuesday, January 19, 1993. Return all written
staff comments wi thin same time to W. Richard
Staudinger, Gee & Jenson Consulting
Engineers/Vincent A. Finizio, Administrative
Coordinator of Engineering, c/o Engineering
Department.
CONDITIONAL USE
To allow Motorola to lease 7,111 square feet at the Boynton
Promenade, 1101 N. Congress Avenue, for an office/training
facility. (See attached application.)
NOTE:
Site plans are available for review in the Planning
& Zoning Department, c/o Mike Haag or Dotty Moore.
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
Page 2
PARKING LOT VARIANCE
Saint Mark Catholic school and church, 624 N. E. 6th Avenue,
requests relief from Article X, Parking Lots, Section 5-142
required improvements. Subsection (d) Landscaping and (f) Drainage
(see attached application). The site plan for the project is
available for review in the Planning and Zoning Department.
NOTE:
Parking Lot Variance is in conjunction with
required upgrade of the site due to the submittal
of a conditional use site plan application for a
day care building to be constructed at the
northwest corner of the project.
Return all written staff comments to the Director of Planning and
Zoning by 5:00 p.m. Wednesday, January 20, 1993.
~~~/u~
Dorothy Moore
DM/jm
Atts.
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
City Commission (5)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Edward Hillery, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Central File
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
Project File
Chronological File
A: TRCAGDA.JM
~~
1'- -
'~_ ,~u.\_
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 92-311
J. -1
h...).~
TO: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
DATE: November 3, 1992
RE: Cedar Grove Master Plan Submission
Technical Review Committee Master Plan Conference of 10/27/92
Please be advised that during the above referenced meeting, the
applicant was represented by Attorney Martin Perry and Attorney
Jill Jarkesy, at which time a Court Reporter transcribed the Master
Plan Conference discussions.
For your review and consideration, I have attached an attendance
sheet and herein advise you that the Court Reporter was Mr. Larry J.
Gluck, 319 Clematis Street, West Palm Beach, Fl, (407) 659-4155.
VAF/ck
cc: James Cherof, City Attorney
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
attachment: City of Boynton Beach Master Plan Conference Attendance
Sheet for the Technical Review Committee Meeting of 10/27/92
- -
-, ,
RECElV1?n
NOV :J
PLAN N I ,'~ G DEPT.
-.:.
--
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~, E.-
~d. b~
CHECK OFF LIST
FOR
-
~~~JtXOOXxot~1XX
Master Plan Conference
Technical Review Committee
-
Meeting Location Conference Room "C" DateIO/27/92 Time 9 a.m.
Project
Cedar Grove
Design Engineer Carnahan & Associates
Contractor(s)
~=f;;~""C #?~~~~:~:~;:~
. ~A~
01~1 r ~J..) 1 RYAt) ~ou,,) ~A~-iA~C.- <=:~\J6 AO]-~~Jl..lll9S
:f".'., A ..Ta.r~~ Jl-~I c,eda.~YOUC ::X:nUCSIP,. ('-l-o'f-) f&Jfs-L/-L/6lJo
CI;::J'-b~~ ~ f.:-S.~b""', l~~. ~Cf5 - ~, z.... ~~"E;~
C"" J?ila'N'Jtw IJ~~~II Yl7 . 7J~" 7~ry
(;7 ",.,4 ~~ ~ ~7-a6f..;.?ao
(,'rId! (3oVtV10\)f3!~({i vrr.cf fA)-r ~il,r 7'~7'--'7'36c'7"iLIS
I )
-StftJ. r/tl~,J .6li4. '- ";d1 .. 8?J7- 90 ~7
5aL.' 1/'0'1"" Be/I 7'C'7- 8-"1-6 ~7G
0G~ L;JErl]t'JN 6f3~o I
Lff f2-(2y T. (5( u cK
@(')L{ t2-r !Z~ to;2 Tef!) lect Manager
(3-107)(;,::;::;-4/ s-s] ,rintendent
3/e; c I~/J'l/l /ls.sIr :ess and phone no.
CU~5r /J1U/l i2e&:~I74, _
PERSONS ATTENOiNG: -
N arne
Organization
Telephone No.
. /1
i../ 77(..171(;:-'1 DJI/:vh)J /~4
/
~ ~ kJ t--l I io.J Co ~ 2c.T]o..j I J..JG
-
/7/2.c J>tfJ (
,r /?{/ C.
~ /?u. e.
l3?f/!J,f/~ Aw,
(l ;7Y !(A-NNINA.1Zc/0i M 0'
?uJ.
7.~8 7dL?5
7:38 -7'/8"-' X Z"r"l
7-:> - ...,')
:) ...) - d 2.., / L-_
r .--- 1':- I -, ~--~
t. ) <-
I'~J? - /756
J J~ .. 7Y~/>
7i$'~- 7~/1l)
7 3/3 ~7 ~-<. c.J
,stration
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
FROM:
w. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
~pp ~ Jens~lting Engineers
~
Chrlstopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
October 6, 1992
RE:
Cedar Grove Investments
53.69 Acres, East Side Seacrest Boulevard
This is to inform you that the Cedar Grove Master Plan will be
reviewed by the Technical Review Committee at its meeting of
October 27, 1992.
CC/jm
cc: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator
of Engineering
Tambri J. Heyden
Senior Planner
A:CEDARGR.JM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
REQUEST FOR CONCURRENCY REVIEW
Vincent Finizio, Adm. Coordinator of Engineering
W. Richard staudinger, City Engineer
~~ . t
Christopher Cutro, Planning Dlrec or
October 21, 199.1 Ah_J--.. .~~ 4f
Cedar Grove Put~~~for Concurrency Review of
Drainage Level of Service Standard
Pursuant to Section 19-88{d){4) of the City of Boynton Beach
Concurrency Management Ordinance COrd. No. 90-18), please review
the proposed Cedar Grove PUD request for compliance with the
adopted level of service standard for drainage and reply to our
office in memorandum form (separate from the regular Engineering
Department staff comments memorandum). To help facilitate the
review of this application and for record-keeping purposes, the
memorandum should include the following:
Q
(f)
@
A statement that the Engineering Department has reviewed
the subject project for compliance with the drainage
level of service standard; and
Determination of whether the drainage level of service
standard can be met; and
Itemization of the improvements and/or public facilities
that are to be constructed in order to meet the level of
service requirement, timing of construction, and
responsibility for construction.
For your convenience, the drainage level of service is specified
in Section 19-84{d) of the Concurrency Management Ordinance which
states:
"Drainage Level of Service shall mean that drainage facilities
for development projects shall be designed for a three (3)
year design storm for a duration of the time of concentration
for the watershed, for development projects which are subject
to South Florida Water Management District design and/or
permitting requirements, and shall mean that drainage
facilities for all other development projects shall be
designed to accommodate the first hour of a three (3) year
storm on site."
Thank you for your cooperation.
U i lD'+Sl ~11 T~ 1. !~ ~-I'+S j-eJ lI'~ ----
(/) 1 ~'b \1\ ~~.~ i\~:\~!i it ~
~ J.I p.j :a.iofl I . ti t.! [~I~\ ~J
asdl11 n11 c~~ \\'~I,.~t li\
~ li\~n i\\.J i~,' ~l\i'.\rt\\liA
~ ' ~ ~ ~ .i.:a ~ . Poofl i . A ~ . r.1 ~.b
8 ~~i · at'~,.~ i I "",oll~
... '\ tlUjl; 1 ii\ l11!1~ ';I\ill
.~ ~ !~ l~~ i11ft 1~_~.~ S1i~it 11~ .;1.
~ CARNAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
W P.O. Box 4399
6191 W. Atlantic Blvd.
Margate. Florida 33063
Fax (305) 972-4178
(305) 972-3959 SCALE 54. J o\=- 5
" i .. i+.-J.-~-+t~--W--Y-tL+-t-im[""1 1-+-[-
;: SloRM--wt..:trE.~, MAtJNG-.SMEIV1._..c.A tJL.Allo0S: : ; . :
AJ i I i !L+~ I ~+1-t++1" i~LL
21 5 A I
" ITf..DA1 ----1-----0--- l'-~~- -t- --,.--..... ..."- .: . I
j ! I I I I i I II I !!! ,I. I
; I I I I I I A I ,! I 1 ! ~ I l
01 I Pt~T ;- i ---I~..-i.--TI.i3-.IA"i.-.---l---lE.~~j~?~.-ff..I-- 1'-:' i:' - i !:
b, ! ROAt:>.A.-!S~~"",'-.-!---I-.-7.rl-'-IA~t'--]-'--'I-1 1-1- ",.__+_.2~.5_.A~ .+~.~ __I .
1 , I 1'1 I 1 I I I I II I I I I I :
c.l &RE.E;J Ae.'€~ L._L__l'C.'C..I2._,,'Ac..L__._fE~lJIOlJ.s_.. .' -I __: I! .! I
!' '1 I : I r j I . I ,I I i I .
dl I ~I1D(}. E.N'J6LL .JLll2J5!AcJ._-J-.--L ij____i._. .i
i ! i I ! i I I I I ! ! i i ; I 1 I ;
... ~b~~-j-'-1~J-;I-'.j-'-"!~;J~-1 ~J:ll-l-T__n1'-.l..-1---1
3: ! P. ~ .-r.__.I~J_.. e.:~JE1l... ~&.JDJ-.J-.J__i,_I_.J___J_j_L._L_J___._: .."
, I Ii. ! I 'ii I I i I ! 1 I I Ii: ,
400 _: No._J_A'I;I\)~A~~E:.I_"_qvelf-Fu?vJ~..~'-~~.It-.tAtJ~L~-6t~1El'-4-.-! . ---' ...
!~ i I I : Is: i : ' i ; Ie' ' I I Iii i i i ;
..' o!.Cot.,r:rAl.N--: i1~.-NA.1Ee__;.._OtJ.~ell€l__t_-i__!__I_!__'.___! -- _1__.__' --
I' "'I' I II II! ! I! I i I I I i I ill i
.. __I. I I I ! 1 .! 1 ! . . I I ! ! !
I !! . I I I i I ; i , i i ii'" 1'---' i --.-.j.- I I i I . :". .
B. r: r..:.-'. jr:.b.. ~t:.'!-f" , 't I '~! 't-.,,' ',...; . . -< J I !'l" . , .A
i" . U'~~~_!..r ~o ~_'\_'_._""__!lt.).! Q.-:--.- :......, SE.r~~~TI::i LEV pl.;, .~. rf'A&lS\:\IO~ Af:.e
10 . : 5\'16-1 D~iA :S'I _ A~EiA : B~EA.r..b.C\I'J~.i,-i..-.-: --: ..: .. :.-
fl' : ' . ; , '. . i ! f : I j ; i ; I ~ ~ ;
. , , i . , i I I i 4' I : , . ~. \ I ""...Ai . ! : '
,__.J__..--L-.!---i ___l_--{_+_----l.--i. _ROAI:>-. ..iSDwK-l-__+_~Eo.v J_ ,L\~--l-i..B LDb - '-i'-
I I I I 1 I , , i I ! , ! I ! ! ' ' , ' ! ; I I ! '
: ' , ; I I . I I j , ~ H' I : j ; ! I ' I I r I!
--'-, ""--i-.--.--...-i.-I-----:-:--l--'~.i.-- i ~-~-- :--Il---1-i--I~i--l-T-i--!----:---i--!----
. . _ _ Lo'tJSR-- _, L'E:.\lElJ. ._ AR.fiA_J-~ "" "_,..1 !_A"-__.: ____:___I__ll. ~-At" ~-'--_-' -_I Jo.4-- :A~!.""-
l i I I I ' I I I I Iii ! I ! I I ! I 1 , : i
R t> . J;.L .: _ltD. 6L): _____L___L _~ _-:__,__~ ---J--- --I---'~~--:---' L__ L ., --: - -: :
i ~:T'" I :l Cl ~l ' i : ! Ii; ! I I Iii j : ! : I i
-, c';r-.--;6t.., .19 L~i-" -i-----i---t.--j---i---,---I---i-+----i-I-----r-i--+--i---;--i -..-~ ---I
:--.-!---!---! ---!---.:---.!.--!-'II..--.!--!-~ II ! 'I I _LI -~_.-!---!.-J-j-- -.I __J .: :
" ,,' '1,H-tt"'~I;"I'
__._TgA~6fnorJJ--.AA:e~-i-L_L-..--JL.(D-A I -~~JJ-ALJ._I_-LJ. -4-:.z... ~ Jo(,~ --.:
(' R~.. ~L,! JJ.6J.j~.4-lIJ-._-!.--LJJ I I : !~-j- -!-J.--.!-J-J-.J--
! F=: I , , !! I I I I Ij I ! i ! ! 1 I I I ! ~ !
I '~... ?L. ; lBi5.; 2 ~ :. -- i----i - "I --1---1 --T--I---i-~-- -I----i---i----' --,--- -i . -j--
, , I. ".1 _. _ .1 ,_ ._1 _ __ ___ _____I____._._._J__. _'-____ __ - 1 I, ,
I " Ii; I. i i i i.. I I I I I I I I I! i .
.. 'I' I I " I I :'; 'I I
; lJrPE ~ . L.~\l E~ .t\.{:.tp~.! -'Ii--:e. Ol'-~(..-li-_.:- ---I. ___.;5 ,], j~~ --j '4, .0): A<J .
.. I' i! 1 I I I I I I i
( RD. EL. '2.10.0 ...)....i _. ..J._-----,- 1__..._1..._.1_.__:___1____'____,..:____.; I i
\ f.F. iEL :2~ .0.'_: :--:---..l--.~---I-..--~---!.-l--L.~-h..!-.-!
,l I l
JOB
v!:;::I-'A~ ~~\-::-,'\it"",
CALCULATED BY
I'l"I \ ,..., I'" .-.,..,
:L. oJ ':) .~
U. T~IE.L~
OF
SHEET NO
D^TE
h 12. )" f>_
I I
CHECKED BY
DATE
,
'1--
:dJ
I l\. O)!
'-~'.\.
1\0\ :
PA[2.~
< I i
o AL.l
. i
i
4.~ -'t..,.
; 1
o :A,c.)_
-rC1AL ':,._
'11 ' '
'_ Al..__'_
~lP . ~_AL.,..
, }~. 5 A(,
m. CARNAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
.~ P.O. Box 4399
6191 W. Atlantic Blvd.
Margate, Florida 33063
Fax (305) 972-4178
(305) 972-3959 SCALE.5~. 2 of 5
, j I ! ! i ; i j' i I I I j' ! I I I I ! I J-l. I .I Ii,'
i Cf !~ILll~oJ;~--I~r-~if 1-~~'~IIToLw~J 41d)~II~~IJJ::--rl-
111"~"F-I.-~~ttl'7J~.t, '. ,-;;-. t.Q; =.l=F- i-+Jln--l-~-
'i I-I' -I-+-J~f-ILIJ..J +1 R --i-I-'
I DI : E F,~.:r~Al'o~ r~llJ.d. I'U: J.tll- ~A~.~ t..1f(t 1-r-r-l"-.I'---I---11 . 1----1..'1-1-+.
. . I c-K....1".' \. , '1--1 1 1 I .. . ,
.11'lf~~~~'=++1~=1~- ~~=rr-fH+8=rl-Tl+l~~-
I I ' I I.! !_! 1 ,_! . _._JEltJb<5~. .b-l.-.6-~P,~-t-l~'~-I.L~ , -~EA;t(,.O. !
· ; ,=JJ-I ;-),. i : I Ii:; i bf>~ :iI.".k^~ i i :
': :: -: 1.-4! -; '-- 8 -+--t--i--;-f- j-l--:-i --! ---II-UI~ :-:I~J;..fl /'!Livl -+-- -'1- ---:I----!-.-
:! !! I . I i I I I I, ! I i I : H_' _J_
+- i 1-+ -[IT: _+J_L~+ I LT - -'-1-JJ;--H-J-1-+-J.-I-I--i
. '___ i __.__ J__ _.__I_n-.l ._, _ J___.___ _ij~_.___l_ 9.1_.6L.owf:~J Ae~A)__L__ __". ._. ___ -
i ! I i. I' 1" i ; I I I! I I i '1 J I I I I i I I, I
. I Hi:: 10 I, 1~ PE~F; c..A P ,_ I I J J __ L. L___ __L_.J___ __I_L_ DJ ~ -u>__1 --
1--i-!D~'Sr+_.J II~II I-j I : H I H-++-+~+
! ! I.r ---I -l-.- ~---.-!I---.I---r--I'---: --- -- !-- -Wi'I-B.SO i (LC:W~ .Af?e~)-'-i- __-,1_- -I '--l---
i ,. [i i I I : i ! I ! I I I I Ii: i
, .i -1--~' -=i-____C_-_-r=~c_~~:~_-=C~~~j.~= ___J_ L-j.--.! __L__!__J~J~___LJ____ -Dl-:-i;--l:-
i i I 00 I I I ~.I I ~ I I i Ii! 1+R; · I j I! i
: I I, . Ft:--'-;-.. "~l- --:-~ ~ j----.r--II-i-r' Ii ! I (Q'AI~-MffA)
! : l.i)~:-~-i----j'--i'--r---I-i~l-r-='r-l--'--i--i,!"1'~' i I I" 1-1-1---
i (r~f' i6i)-r--i---r'-!"'-r---r--ili--I'-I-ri-1 i 1i-li,-rl-r--l-r-
i ')"i'; : - ..-: -J. ....-i"..~i "1 -'-'~i-~ 1-'-T:+--j--'~;J-,-~--'-r.\'-1:::~l:=7~i-ll-l-i--l-"-I----1.........-1-....
,-' \{C!lLVtv\ 6__1 ~MP'A~l1. - .l.-~t::: . . rr_L....JdDI'-'-+-l.JS,,:~~-\"O.l:: --. ---j---1---I----,'--1-_.- ---
I Ii! : ! ! I I _+ I ~ j.. I! I I I I I I I . I I I
.!.1! K; --'-i c;'i?7r'l: JF---r-~E-4--} 4:L~rF-1-I-*A.,\JC:~. ~IU~Y~ ICl'~JiOr~i"c~l. S'i--i.----i--
: I II.' i- '1 i"i'.'I-1 --l-..-J--L-I-1. t--TA~~- -~1--ff,SE~~o-lE.T~}t'-lAt-)p-I----
I _.I... .... ._.____... ._.... ...... __~.__--..J I -1 I _JT.6.~tl ---,JNd~pJre[b_JjL>L.""_.i8..J}OJ$2.'i-
Iii i i i i I I I l--t- .----1 I I I . .~. I I I r r, I I j
.....1_..._ ! ... ! _. i i!! I ! ! I I I I I ! I I I ! Iii I I I
-1-' -I. -..~ !-u..-!--i~--j-l-l-.1.Iill I : IIVI : I i I ;'-:'-{-"-i-
, --;.-... SF-'NM. D.__.;robJ\~L~;__q. ~-~ -ij-~ -~.l~~-D04I2:->>lDs,::'\.-+--,..~O<.)L-~. D:.-f1VJ bu--!---.
I 'i i I I I I I I I to I I 2. 0, t 1/. ..I. I I I
I ". I I . I I I I I I I . 1
! !:' r f : j I ' , I , ! I 1 , ,
'"!"'''''T-----i--'j -1--'1 I:: i Li ' i J \...., _ " Zo', i i ~ J" ~4 ~ i
, .,-----,--,)/-..--.,- .~(~(~'l.vJ 1..2J~z.D~_'~fJ u~2.~,2.Ds:)., ,3'1-10;..\0\) DtJ)
: i ; ! 1 I I i21 I I ii' I ! I i I I ! i i
, --, ---I' --I . I I ' i . I !
0., uPPE~ L!"~t.. 1i:~AJ~H!u L!~t:+j~~eil'( _; j_~~~_~
\J:: ~~: 'I- (.O~O~?7(ID~8+!Z.~\Ojh..:-~-),*- DO:DJ~G)~BJB') "
~ 1 I I i I! . I I I
. ._' ; ..__.__..,.__:~..,. _.....___ ~,_...._..: ._.~_.._..! ..1.........."".1 ",. _, ~ ~.._: ,...J
i l : !!
\f:: )3.4-;; f...L-fT. ;
SHEET NO.
C'I:::' [> tl. 2' r ~ n \J E"
~ J ()~n5
(\. I~ lE.L~
OF
DATE~
DATE
JOB
CALCULATED BY
CHECKED BY
~_ . CARNAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
W P.O. Box 4399
6191 W. Atlantic Blvd.
Margate, Florida 33063
Fax (305) 972-4178
(305) 972-3959
SHEET NO.
r.t;D~i2. (....lC.tlV 2
t'\ ".
0')1 O/"")D ~
Lt IH If:. I-e:
OF
DATE~
DATE
JOB
CALCULATED BY
CHECKED BY
SCALE
SHe ~ (}J=. ~
i i i i :'- j - .j --.-.!- ~.j_-+_J~ I I j-._l_LJ. 1._ i -- 1_
Dl zl r.1 : ~)l:~I\.i"'~~1\O~ I il~.~,lt4L uLX1eLThJtJ~14J, I .! I_
I i 1- -1"1 ~+~lr+-'_I~n~J" ~-+-
I ! rfr 1~~I(.j~;4f -"- h 1. --'- ~2'~"). J ,)_8~/pJ-=I-=!~:
I I... -H..' , . II.... j-I.--r+-- ,---H--I-+l+h-I-I--
:----l';! ~?i~li-it.~lfJl'-11 ' , -'-l~-]---i--II--l-
~.., .J~J~,:,~;.rl~:ci~-l~ll<. A, . ,^;:rl~!l?l~.-~v~01--r-
; , '. I , i ~ ' t' I; -' l
! i i i I i I Ii! i ! i I Iii i i i
: ii' i i Ii! I 1 KE~~I- I+H. i i ! I I J i I Iii
I. ~!>1~1<;--!-:-tll I t-~tll' -++t-I-i-I---i-L-j .
, i I ! F'''':i-~.-I qr.P l ~)f.r.~.O --I' I--rfof-::lj;-..II-
--'-"'--"'--1--'- ."-'T-.-r--t--- i '. I . T--I1-..-.---i--------'--
l:~:' _,-+Eo(-=:Z~+1 I )\i .; ~ -+ orrl~~-Lj ~ ~
_..~ .J-~,i~~J._.I__L~j~J_I_sb~_kk\LL~J-1--1-
: !.: '. _ ._ ~__ ,I -.J--'.--.L--!--!-J--!,-+-~--!-!._--!._--!-!---! --L-I--,-!..--
, " "" i t;.:1 t~ I I I I i I I I
i - ; _'h~ Sr..1.t~J~A'-i,-Ai€f"'\_- ~-_.-- fB ,:i-J.5~-'_':-i---:> 7. -_1_- i.---J--j---i--i-f ---I -
'-:--'-'--1-1 I I r-~-J-I-I~ d-+.-:I I r--
c.~.---)JO~M:E-. :tJ9-9U~fL~H$1t[c:~b~-T9~\^1~t:Pf-+QT.~ttL.e:VE.ll I I I---
I L~Nt:.:t~ ,_ ;:; lLP5!b-\.1E_L--{JNd.WPE:-=S"-1tQd ~~-:5yJ. ALoJ'JLr_i5C~~_II__
i : !! I I I I I I , I! _JQ~L I I I I I I
';i i i i i---i--i'4t>-rl'-- -OtL{irr-I!." II i*- _.e -- I...
. ;: ..: u-i--i-'-;- -j.-t--tl-ri~[. . I Iii
. : : . I'lC\...--~._; -:Jl_:*-f-J~5CDI' -Lf-I~-~~.161 CLr::',-.a.l ,_A~-'J:L!---T---!I-l-i----I--.--.'
i i I I' i- ii- :--i..i-LI-~~~f-t-J--=1-i-'---
.. Fr-; ~1EtT-t~r~D~Hl~ I ~At L frJtttt+dl~ .J~( d-)
!. '.: REQ.:.l,D I - e., :1F.._N~..i:~.-l_L-.I.---I.--+.5{-.-J<I.--i-i~ --A-~'-YfZ-.a{':",-A'i'-_~' - I . ,LS_j.tLJ1. e~I,_.L.I-.-
: ' i ! : : ~ : I ' I 'I 'I I I 'I r I'''' ! I I
~ "I: i !; I ~ I I
: : i ! .1 i :: i i ! i .! "-'r--'i .---) - 1'- -, ""'1 r", '."1 I '-T' I 1- j-
.. 'l.~ ~: - ) IIi 'I- .. 5~,1 A L__:.~. . :_..4. .4-B. -AL:.,f+'I---:--l--.-l----!---'.-----.-.'.-! .J...- -'I----i ... :.__!__
I. , ! i I ! I I , : I i I I I I I ! ! i i
-- -; ..--I----j-:-i-f----1-r-r--i-..-: -i--i--j -i----,'- -i----I-.-.-(--
,)3.i4-~ A~f:q_.+-:1-2~.L,,~"r f~L:-'t1--~-. :3~-,1'q.. A:<..-t;"r- 1 --1--: !-
. i!: Ii' i ' . l I l I ' ! : I
L,_..i. .J.__.!_._! '------'r~a'l\t>er:>-!JtJr !:'Y,f'JL1iGtrnol..)
; ! I I; I j i ; ~ : I ~ 1
: --J._-_: -:rkt~li1-----! --! ;o\<.- . II. II
! i ! ~ ! f r ; ==1 l
I' _ I _ _ _! . ;
,
i
E',
,
e!
~. . CARNAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
~ P.O. Box 4399
6191 W. Atlantic Blvd.
Margate. Florida 33063
Fax (305) 972-4178
(305) 972-3959
USDtl.~ r..~n\.l ~
l1)} nRu::;
CALCULATED BY ~ . -r H 16 L.. ~
SHEET NO.
JOB
CHECKED BY
OF
DATE~
DATE
5~. + oF- 5'
. .. i ; j ! i i i~iil1 .j~J. I L I j , .
! i! i i- - !--'+~-i-t-~-J ",{ ., ~)'fo~ T'-F- ---,--.-,----f-.~- -"
. ~i. SrAb6! - 61oRlJ\l1E; .1__ .(F1:>~.__.. .. _~ -tl~l .0 .Y__ _~1o~m_ ~VAL.Ui :1joiJ ).__
I I I II-I--_L_I-f-J~ I l
, tJ~El"! LEJiJE'j--rll"-L 1;. :r ~ I - 'j. jJ.;r A' JO _, ". _~l_~=-
A~D, ~.l... ~_-~1_ ...J.. e ~ .' I --loY'J 1.-$\1 I E~ -lLiPP,-1O ----'1----
! ' ' I I ! . . I I.. ~ .. _ I . . r-- I I
, ~0w-oftLa~~lE~- to~=4~,~. 1 I .m IbA:m 11111 R=f
: i . , i J I, '1 :"'l'-~l ...! . ! i ! i : '. : : '
!. e:,~A~H)c-..' e..6~.:)8V>7Aifl{)r(j I art .... :suR-t-J:j.(...c_._$Td~El__-!__LitlWER.I_ L6\J8L_J _.
IJ ' ; i i I I I-+-t-t-H I I I 0 I i I I I. i I
, ! -1~ll.1~~I~i--,-J 1l-1lj~]-=1:::r=I:::1-~;r~
-i--r-Tr -+-rl~ F'I"7?1-I-1-TI-"{-1-
I ! , i i -=-r;~f-Y'- i----- __.L '-I -r-rL-j- --"'--r-r--j--i "-1---
i l ! - -! --. -I - ',--(--- ! -- 1-- t-T~-:1 I I I ,-
ROAD,):S~W~___<_____j_ -- -;_'I~Gf:E: I _b,-~~A.l 1 -B.ukD.G1-r I~-
: 'I l : ~ I; I J I I
+. )- Po. ~ .. -' .... -'..' - '-- 1_._ l}~~_Aa.'--[-'__ ~__JQ.. _At-,-,_ __,--_
,: ! :: Iii I I I I . ! I ! I I ,
---'_.. '-_.' I -' - :- -, ___J _..J---'---!---i- ~! o-l I 1 !
: ..-:-._~------~-._-:-J-J-t-lll_U.J I I ~ ~ I I I
. . , . I !. I I . : 1 I I.; I &I~l~~h
. ~. -- ~J,Abt~ 6~O~J~~:-~oWi~-.LJ8\1fLt-i: i I i I I if ~
o OJ-inTi I . I ~~--n I r-l-lJ-lj'~I--I-~.--I-'
EL. 15.16. --' '.'. - T gEi.N&J q. 0 trk. JLE\lEL,'6"Tof1.--,--..L.1 nji-I _1_4L~&L_
--j-_i_.J__J_J_j~_J ']' I I I I . I _+-[_Ll_J_
Iii i !] .1 I-t-~L " J ~ I 41~~.;l-1~
f:L. lL.'''iO_.,_;_C;"'Erw+~lSEir'' I J~r,"-~__'7nl _YI'\,lolAI-L1=tj- ,1~'r II .
-I Ii' ,n!.-._:_q-I--+'-j-Jj-7-', I j- ,1 _ -l --1 --
--,- _~.._.__n. ._-t:l.._...__.LJ1~:],~__;._~.__GgE:bJ~.. ..A~, ~I"Z-i_t.. --- - ,)J~. 0 .~r'J--1. 1-58""1'l-1j-
: : : , . ; I , I ' ! I ! I II I I I I I J I I
;-(---1--- iQ~I-i.-~.itt1:"-~I}'~N~I-5JI I ~I'-I-I l-t-,-l---I--
· I " i--r-il--i;-rT~-h1l I I I I I--r
EL.. tB.5: . :QII~-+-':4JI)~,7~ -r1-Jl'!1~15'r~t'IA.tlt.2~--!-nT'-I-~ln-llp.l'+-'I--I----
. i ! ! . ! ! . , ; I! I I 1 I I I I .
. , I i I !!,., \ I , I j I
..' ..-- ------ ~. i.-=._i~=~I-=l---I=I=!---i--'-I=[~]~.=]~]=C:~!--=]=~J-.J~:-
! ; ~ ! ! It! ! ! ; : ! I ! I ! j
I ~ f : 1 : ; i ~ : I : : ' : l i
--"-'1 .--1 ~r -_._.~-"~ ,----oi .---1".'---1---- !. -'--'-4i'-.-'~_hi~' "_"I_"'~W"_ L. ---1---'.! I
j I ; ~ ! i !! i I I
; ''''-'''-'-'', .'---",'--'-~' ~--.,.---'-_.....-._.i.--~r--.-.--I'.-T-- --.-. ---j" : -~----l-~-
! ._____ --n.._.-----l--:-----!----.-,-..--.--...-- u_ .,.__.. ,~. ; _1._ .
; : i ! i I !
[ ',-- I
-.,
i i
SCALE
Hi
" .
$
CARNAHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
P.O. Box 4399
6191 W. Atlantic Blvd.
Margate, Florida 33063
Fax (305) 972-4178
(305) 972-3959
JOB
GEf) h~ r~'\J~
0))()60~
CALCULATED BY ~ ~. i r]1 E L~
OF
SHEET NO.
DATE
.' 0 )?J)O)2,.
CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
~-s~ . 5" r')~ 5
i Iii i I I I i I I I i
Hl ~s ~R.!- ~ [)~,k-o~I_' r-T~'-.--- --
IljllllEi-ilill
I I, fAlf'J,\.~~ , _l! ~
I ' ~ 4..:s I .,!:.5'I'J- _J__I.- ....:...-
!! ! ,__ .u_!_ _ -Jb~ _ I .
: i i i ! i I llj-t-J- JL---H ll-l_1 F
i c.3", ~?T:i~lJll-f!t:1.A1 :I~~,- (~:,~:~) 1--~-+;l1-
A"'II"'lP^,....f> rtJAt..: ";'Cllt1!! .L<::" ,. ~.''': 0 +-- Ie... '! - ''5' . )l.D.l.A6 : Fi.1
I ! i I' I I I i Ii' 1.7 i ii' I I N&>J D
, .,. "., I . 1 . ! I I
t~~:~~t~H~b I ~~II'--- -,---- fl j~ti-tJ :
i ". ..... u;hsl.':.~~i_LLrLk LJ ~ I !! I I U
: : . ! ! !- 1-.-I---"li_'-'I-.m'llm /~-'~-l-~J I I E I I I !' I-
i ' ; ! ! I ! I ; I
; ~ : i ~ . ; f 1 ~ I
.!' . i : 1-'r-'j--J4tj-' ---,--,- I I
C. RUN-Ort:__'\I~ '-_:_!_-:___,._lZ-.; ~--5~lk~-f--,_~. ..~5-iA.r..J6., .---,-H-~-
sl,\"'I'''l\'b~.t>~-B~t~~ 1-~-i~'J~+~~'J 'I..'~sl :B.2.,\ 1= I ~J IT 1 -
, . . . I . IITt.~~' ,\, I lJ~~.. / ffit! !
: ! !'-\ --!--+-t-li-f-i- , Ii 1.-1U~
, I' :-'nnl--i-i-1-lT . i ~
;ia~_M~Ei--~ ''T'~-i M"'f---i_hL~"~4-I~ ~~g.K e!-$ ,,""D__!,__
: I -!- !~'!-1-:1-ttt_nJ~_L~__-----T.-,tr~
I~:'_-:. =r=~=ffi Ik I 1 I-R Illl~-
; ! '-i-'j---j--t-l1 i il1It1i--t-i-l-li'
-! ""T'.--r---i--Til I I I '-rTTli-!-l-rir
-' , ::.r'_J=J"~]J=]=I==[-=[]~~J'~J~']'._'.:i.J]'Tl--[
; : i i i Ii! II i ; : .1 :.' i i i I
. :.,..!! I I I . ' I I . ! , i I
, ,:~: -)=:l=~~C~r-~:~-1~'.l"::T'-: --T-\'-l~J=-.i=~
I ;!,! I : I I ' I I i
_n__'_____; ---^'-i -""-"-l----!n-~-,i.,-,--;-.-.---+~.'~-i-'-..-,-"- r ! i [ -"'---i"-'--~-'l-~'
, . i I . I , I I
~ I !! ! f I :
-! ; 1 - - ! ".-. I .-,- i i ~ I 1-- ---: ---.--1------
! I j __~ 1 1 '
~_ _I .._I_+.J+~_
---.. .. +-..- -'---J-.' --'
'--r-- --- ' -- --'
: ;
I
i
, I ,
: _.
;
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
FOnT PIERCE: 13(6) 461.7508
VERa BEACH: 1305; 567~167
STUART: 13051283-7711
H04 INDUSTRIAL JJrd STREET
FORT PIF.RCE. FLORIDA 33450
Report
of
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
Client Carnaham Associates Inc.
Date
July 3, 1992
FET #J-1805
Contractor Client
Site Cedar Grove, Boynton Beach
Location #l
USUAL OPEN HOLE TEST
Q
,
'"
I
N.G.
l
"'''''''''.~'''''''''''A''-
._",.".",~""""~,,
~d
'-.
WATER Hz
TABLE
"V
.
1
D
s
K =
4Q
~d(2H: + 4HzDs + Hzd)
K
Q
d
= HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
= "STABILIZED" FLOW RATE
= DIAMETER OF TEST BOLE
-3
1.08xlO
-2
2.37xlO
0.375
H = DEPTH TO WATER TABLE
2
D = SATURl\TED HOLE DEPTH
s
6.0'**
CFSjFT.2- FT.BEAD
CFS
FEET
FEET
FEET
0.0
**Used for calculations - Actuar Water Table - 28.01
i; "/ ;Fed,
ALEXANDER H. FRASER, P.E.
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING. INC.
ronT PIERCE: 13061 461.7!',os
VERO BEACH: 13061567~167
STUART: 130612~1711
3504 INDUSTRIAL Hrd STREET
FORT PII':RCE. flORIDA 33450
Report
of
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
Client Carnaham Assoicates Inc.
Date
Contractor Client
July 6, 1992
FET #J-1805
Site Cedar Grove, Boynton Beach
Location # 3
USUAL OPEN HOLE TEST
Q
,
"
,
N.G.
1
"",.". .,.~"""'...
. ",."""."""",,-,,
I
'd I
. I
'-.
WJ\TER Hz
TABLE
\7
.
1
D
s
K =
4Q
7t'd(2BzZ + 4HzDs + Hzd)
-4 CFS/FT. z FT. HEAD
K = HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY 8.34xlO -
-2
Q = "STABILIZED" FLOW RATE 1.82xlO CFS
d = DIAMETER OF TEST BOLE 0.375 FEET
Hz = DEPTH TO WJ\TER TABLE 6.0'** FEET
Os = SATURATED HOLE DEPTH 0.0 FEET
**Used for calculations - Actual Water Table
..-
--
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
220 IllBISCUS STREET. JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458. TELEPHONE: (407) 746-7698
July 6, 1992
Carnaham Associates Inc.
6191 W. Atlantic Blvd.
Site 5
Margate, Florida 33063
RE: Cedar Grove, Boynton Beach, Florida
FET # J-1805
Gentlemen:
As requested by the client, Fraser Engineering and Testing
performed four (4) Auger Borings, two (2) Hydraulic Conductivity
Tests and one (1) Double Ring Infiltrometer Test. The locations
were located by the client. The boring logs and test results
are attached.
Based on the soil profile, the water table elevations and
the soil survey of Palm Beach County, Florida,
we determine that the wet season water table in the high ridge
area is 8.5 MSL and the wet season water in the low area is
8.0 MSL.
If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience
at my office.
FRASER
STING, INC.
AHF/jw
Client - 3
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
FOUNDATION INVESTIGATIONS
CONCRETE, SOIL & ASPHALT TESTING
3504 Industrial 33rd St.
Fort Pierce. FL 33450
Telephone: 1-800-233-9011
1015 W. Newport Center Dr.
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
Telephone; (305) 698-6155
~a~
\i\
-l"
... 5
l"~
\,.-
,~\
\1
-f;\
~Cl
i~
~t
\~
~
..,
~
:II
i
'"
'"
-<
-.
--
~
~
~
",
---
~~
~~
~~
? :sIO
- "'..,
'" .....,..
... ~ ""
~ "'0
i"':II
,,::;:!-l
~-
",Cf.
~~
~
%
?
...
" "
> Ie.
_~~~ _./~m-/ 5CACI1<B':: ,-/ ~-~ -WEVA~U -
- /__~-~~~--::::::::::~-:.- _.~_; -. OO"c_--
--------r~-..\ -- - .~.'" ,~," ~.:~~ .
1: i '~ i ~tp
, 5 .' U.
~ ~ 1fI'"
\}/ ~ . (fl. -
.. ,t l> "'0 ;....
" If 'I ;; ~ ~'",,""
:0\ !~,;;: IS' - '" m~~~
\ I' g ,0 ;; "
,:' :b- '1
I ,i It..
if. ~
~ -;. ........ ::L
(, (p 0
~ r, ~
~;i\ (fl
~~
~o
g~
'"
.- --- .--- -.--.-. ---
J"
.~\
~
\'~ '
/ ~. ~ ~ ",
/--.....~k. " ",
v..:. 'b~. '
,~.;S> '\...
'~~ . ~ ,~ '<:)
"6v. ...~~ '\."
..,. ~
'"'"~~.'" _6'0
~',.'l>
\...l' '. '"
,.
.:D
t'fP
~...
~
\
_ _-- -9~ ~Jm"---"---o
_--J\---- 6-~-'\
OCEAN VIEW -- ~ -
---11 \.. '/ .
g~ '[, \ .~
n >>\ t
H ..
t ~ \
~ \
,,---- \
"\ ~ .
\~i ~+e \k
_---.l.~\"I -. 5 "
.; - - - ---
BuENA .,sTA \.. ".;<; ~':" ....>- _-m-- --.. - -- - ',' . ~
_--, . _rroI<EJof,1:iJ' ~t-- (fl .) r-;:~'
~.\ ~ \ n
. \ 1>/'
~ .\\ '" 0> I!I
- .' ~
\ ~ i
% "
~ ,...
.... ,-: -- :--- ~ ';
" ~ ~
, 00
~~
1/
1/
.' /
/;- ';"-
//
~I,/
/ !
\ '
'. \
\ 1
J --------
.... -r-------
, ;
1)
/- .....
,\
....
.'\
'\
:.......
.7-~
-I
..
~
S.E. 3td. COURT I
\~......._//
~
~
-~.~ -
(
.....
......
\
.c::
; ~
~~:D
~~~
~ ~ (fl v-~
1> '" \
~0
'\""
",'"
~~
~(5
o c:;
~<fJ
. . ~ J" I..t I J
--- -- -- ~. - ~-
---~
. J ~ .... . .
/<
...-- - ...~
,~ . "
\
\
...
...
l1'
~
'0
'"
~
(5
c:;
<fJ
...
...
....
..
n
Ii
'"
-0'
~
(fl
m
;JJ
.c.
1)1
\
__1.
S E ----
. . 4th. STREET
-,----
ili
>>
.
. "
,
~
" 't.
~
'0..
. I
r ~..., ".
""'-.~ I' 1,- f~. .'
',~' .
I I I I
F E I I I , I I t252.2r
. .C. 11 1 J
R ^ II Dr" _ J I
-:t=/
I I I I I
I I I I I
----_._---~.
.:r
I '
----------
ClPlH
(1)
(2) DESIGNA nONS
(1)
(7)
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
GROUND WATER
....... lOSS OF DRILliNG FlUtD
C ROCK CORE
... UNDISTURBEO SAMPLE
3.5'
7 . 0 '
20.0'
t1vl'lllib lUb
DE SC RIP lION
White fine sand with trace of roots.
Orange fine sand
White fine sand
BOR!NG NO.: #1
DATE DRILLED: 7/3/92
JOB NO.: J-1805
FRA~ER ENCf"EERING A~D TEST1~G. INc
- ~ - -,' -,----- - .--- 1
tlPlH ( 1) (11 Dl!'CFllrtIOH
20 -
21 .
.
22 -
23 -
White Fine Sand
24 -
25 .
26.0'
26
.
27 - Tan fine sand
28 28.0'
.
2 9 Brown fine sand
- -
- 30.0'
30
-
. Boring Terminated 30.0' I
at I
-
- Ground Water Table - 29.5'
.
-
-
-
-
A
-
-
..
.
-
.
-
---'
r
I'"
l>vr.il'\b lUb
GROUND WATER
...... LOSS OF ORILlING flUID
C ROCK CORE
"I UNDISTURBED !;t..MPLE
BOR!NG NO.: #1 Continued
DATE DRILLED: 7/3/92
JOB NO.: .J-1ROt)
(1)
(2) DESIGN~ liONS
FR.....5ER ENCl""EHING .I,~D TESTING. INC
- --------- ---- -- -- -.- _n_
ClPlH (1) (1l DE!>CRIPlIO..
---
0 -
.5' Grav fin P !=: rl n il tAT; t- h '" 11 ,.. -F ::l ro c> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
;.J.
1
.
2 -
. White fine sand with trace of roots
3 3.5'
4 -
.
S . Orange fine sand
.
6 -
.
7 7.0'
-
8 -
.
9
-
10 -
II -
A
12 -
. White fine sand
13 - I
-
14 -
IS
16 -
.
17 .
-
18 18.0'
. Boring Terminated at 18.0'
19 - (Done by hand - not accessible for rig)
.
20 - Ground Water Table - none encountered
t'Ul\IMb
lUb
GROUND WAlER
...... lOSS OF DRILLING flUID
C ROCK CORE
't: UNDISTURBED 5AMPlE
BOR!NG NO.:
DATE DRILLED:
JOB NO.:
#2
7/3/92
J-1RO<<;
(1)
(2) OESIGNA liONS
FR.4.SER ENCl"'EERING .4.,,0 TEST1~G. h-l(
. tJ r\Jltb
lUb
-- ._- --,..--. ._-
t'EPlH (1) {2') OESCAIPl'ON
0 -
Gray fine sand with surface organics
1 1. 0'
2 -
.
3
. White fine sand
4 -
5 .
5.5"
6 n O' T)rlrk . -Finp ~;:)nd
.
7
-
Brown fine cemented sand (Hardpan)
8 -
.
9 9.0'
10 10.0' Brown fine sand
II
-
12 -
.
13 .
.
14 Boring Terminated at 10.0'
-
Ground Water Table - 7.0'
15 -
.
16 -
.
17 .
.
18 -
.
19 .
20 -
-
(1)
GROUND WATER
..... lOSS OF DRilliNG flUID
C ROCK CORE
"I UND1STURBEO St..MPlE
BOR!NG NO.: #3
DATE DRILLED: 7/3/92
JOB NO.: ,1 1 H05
(2) DESIGNA TlONS
FFV'.SER ENCf'EERING :l.~D TEST1~G. INC
"
~Ut\lnb lUb
- ._- --...----.
CLP1H C1t t1l DESCRIPTION
--
0 -
. Gray fine sand with surface organics
I 1. 0'
Brown fine sand with trace of roots
2 ? 0'
3 -
4 -
-
5 White fine sand
6 -
6 .5'
7 .
7.5' Dark brown fine sand
8 - Dark brown fine cemented sand
8.5' (Hardoan)
9 - Brown fine sand
-
10 10.0'
.
11 - Boring Terminated at 10.0'
-
12 - Ground Water Table - 9.0'
13 .
14 -
15
16 -
.
17 .
18 -
19 -
20 -
C11
BOR!NG NO.: # 4
DATE DRILLED: 7/3/92
JOB NO.: J-1805
(2) DESIGNATIONS
GROUND WATER
.... lOSS OF DRILLING flUID
C ROCK CORE
'W UNDISTURBED St..MPlE
FR....SER ENCf'HRiNG ........0 TESTI~G. It
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
fOHT PIERCE: (3061461.7508
VERO BEACH: (306; 567~157
STUART: (305) 283-nl1
3504 INDUSTRIAL 33rd STREET
FORT PIERCE, rtoRIOA 33450
Report
of
HYD~ULIC CONDUCTIVITY
Client Carnaham Associates Inc.
Date
July 3, 1992
Contractor Client
FET #J-1805
Site Cedar Grove, Boynton Beach
Location #1
USUAL OPEN HOLE TEST
Q
,
'.
r
N.G.
!
"'''~'''''~''''''''~''''''''''''A'''
, '..,...,.""" /..;,.. .,., , .. "",.".. '"
WATER Hz
TABLE
"V
,
I d I
, I
I
,~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
D
s
K =
4Q
1fd(2H/ + 4HzDs + Hzd)
K
Q
d
= HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY 1.08xlO-3 CFS/FT.z- FT.HEAD
= ftSTABILIZED" FLOW RATE 2.37xlO-2 CFS
= DIAMETER OF TEST HOLE
0.375
FEET
FEET
Hz = DEPTH TO WATER TABLE
6.0'**
Ds = SATUR1\TED HOLE DEPTH 0.0 FEET
**Used for calculations - Actuar Water Table - 28.0!
~ J~ ; ;Jltted,
ALEXANDER H. FRASER, P.E.
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
220 mBISCUS STREET · JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458
JUPITER (407) 746-7698
DEERFIELD (305) 698-6155
DELRA Y (407) 265-1211
STUART (407) 283-7711
FT. PIERCE 1-800-233-9011
Report
of
DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER TEST
ASTM 0-3385
Client Carnaham Associates, Inc.
Date
July 3, 1992
Contractor C 1 i en t
FET #J-1805
Site Cedar Grove, Boynton Beach
Location #2
Elapsed
Time (min.)
Quantity of
Water (ml)
Infiltration Rate
(cm/hr)
Infiltration Rate
(in./hr)
5
5110
86.8
34.3
10
5250
89.1
35.2
15
5310
90.2
35.6
SOIL PROFILE:
o - 6"
Gray fine sand with roots.
6" - 4' White fine sand with trace of roots
4' - 61 Orange fine sand
61 - 18' White fine sand
Water table 28'
Head of Water Used 5"
copies: Client - 3
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING. INC.
runT PIERCE: (3051461.7,108
VERa BEACH; (3051567~167
STUART: (3051 283-n11
3504 INDUSTRIAL 3Jrd STREET
FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 33450
Report
of
HYDRl\ULIC CONDUCTIVITY
Client Carnaham Assoicates Inc.
Contractor Client
Site Cedar Grove, Boynton Beach
Location # 3
Date
July 6, 1992
PET #J-1805
USUAL OPEN HOLE TEST
Q
,
"
f
N.G.
l
~"""'.."'''',;'''''''''''
. -,""''''''';''''''';'''';'
WATER Hz
TJ\BLE
"V
I
'd I
: I
,-.
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
: 0
I S
I
K =
4Q
1fd(2n/ + 4HzDs + Hzd)
K
= HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
= "STABILIZED" FLOW RATE
= DIAMETER OF TEST BOLE
Q
d
-4
8.34xlO
-2
1.82xlO
0.375
CFS/FT.z- FT.HEAD
CFS
FEET
FEET
FEET
H 2 = DEPTH TO WATER TABLE 6.0' * *
Ds = SATURATED HOLE DEPTH 0.0
**Used for calculations - Actual Water Table