CORRESPONDENCE
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #94-204
DATE: June 15, 1994
TO: Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning & Zoning
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: C-16 Linear Canal Park - Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
Please provide source and location of irrigation supply on
your Landscape Development Plans
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
19b
xc: Cl yde II Sk ip" Mil or
Peter Mazzella
File
s
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-181
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE:
June 22, 1994
RE:
Technical Review Committee Comments
C-16 Linear Park
Attached for your review and consideration, please find a copy of
the City Engineer's June 20, 1994 comments which represent the
Engineering Department's review of the above referenced project.
Should you require any additional information, please contact the
undersigned at ext. 6282.
VAF/ck
C:C-16PARK.TRC
rnm(!Jmo\YJmrn
' ;' !! 2 2 199A ~
(Wvt ~I
PLANNING AND
, ZONING DEPT.
attachments: Shalloway, Foy, Rayman & Newell, Inc. Technical Review
Committee comments dated June 20, 1994
~
JUt~-20-t9.~,~ It::.:J'/
SF"F<t J
..10';' 655 1151 P 02
. Shalloway, Foy
_ Rayman & Newell/lIte.
EnalneersIPl~neN/S u.rY8YOrs
120] &Ivedere Road
Weat Palm Beach, Florida g~<<15
Pho1'l.e (407) 65!:,.-1151 FI\K (4D7) 832-939;:'
K. Dan Shalloway, P.E,
Jay G. Fay, P.E.
Gary M. Raym~n, R.L.S.
Warrell H. Newell
Brian J. LaMotte. P.E.
Keith B. Jackson. PE.
June 20, 1994
Vincent Finizio. Deputy City Eng:neer
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. fL 33425-0310
RE: C-16 LINEAR PARK. PRELIMINARY REVIEW
SFRN PROJECT #94051
Dear Vince,
I have reviewed the above referenced plans and have the follo'Ning comments:
1. Compaction percent is not shown on the detail of the bike path shellrock and
the parking se..:.'tion fer both base and subgrade.
2. Malerial specifications will be required for the pier and fencing.
3. Permits trom all applicable agsnciQs for the bik9 path and piers will be
required for final approval.
4. Provide soil boring information to support the pile design for the pier.
5. The parking lot lights appear to bA located in the paving. Clarify.
6. Where will the power for the lights be supplied? Is power available and will
easements be necessary?
7. Provide a radius on the (;.omer of the type 110" curb (N.W. corner) that is
shown to surround th~ planting area.
8. At fita. 29+00, how is the connection to the bike path and pier to be
constructed?
9. On the eastern terminus of the bike path, does the bike path match up with
the road a5 well as the sidewalk? The bike path should match up with the
road.
10. Are lights to be proviaecl on the piers'?
7
JUI'j-':::C,. 1 ',: c~..1 Ib: ::::,::
SFT't
JQ7 ~~S 1151 P,03
"''''UI: .~.
....... .,..... ~...,.....,..... . ,....,..,' 110.
JUNE 20. 1994
, t.
11. Are fence sates and locks to be provided on the east and west sides of ttle
project?
12. A removable bollard that can be locked and unlocked so that only authorized
motor \/9hides can get into the park is: rQcommended.
'13. Provide a detail for the 8- x 8'" concrete columns.
14. A stop sign (MUTeD R1-1) at the west entrance/exit is recommended
becasue of the proximity of Seacrest Boulavard traffic lanes
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
~
Brian J. laMotte, P.E.
Prindpal
BJUthw
TOTAL P 03
?I
J .
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-149
June 17, 1994
To:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & z1ning Director
Don Jaeger, Building Official~
Milt Duff, Chief - Plans Review & Permitting
TRC COMMENTS - Site Plan - 2nd Review
C-16 Linear Canal Park
Via:
From:
Re:
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
project and have no comments that cannot be addressed at time of
permitting.
At the time of permitting, the plans must comply with all
applicable building and handicap codes. Agency approval for
construction in the C-16 Canal is also required prior to
permitting.
We request that the Planning Department provide them with the
usual handout pertaining to permit submittal.
~J!~
Milt Duff
MD:mh
Att.
'1
~ ,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE:
July 6, 1994
RE:
Site plan
Project:
Location:
Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan
C-16 Linear Canal Park
South of C-16 Canal between Seacrest Boulevard
and F.E.C. Railroad
Lawson, Noble and Associates (Ron Last)
NWSP #94-004
Agent:
File No:
The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of
the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments
are divided into two (2) categories:
The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved
comments either from the first review or new comments as a result
of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will
not substantially alter the configuration of the site and the
design of the building.
The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will
enhance the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at
time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The
applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated
upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the
Building Department for permits for the proposed project.
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. The fence height in the front setback of Lot 22 is not clear
on the drawings (code limits height to four feet). This shall
be clarified on the drawings prior to the building permit
being issued.
2. The survey should identify the individual properties adjacent
to, and within the park at the east terminus.
II. RECOMHENDATION(S):
/1. Limit the fixture for the required parking lot lights to be
limited to the minimum light level standards. Height of the
poles shall not exceed the height of the adjacent residential
structure.
( 2. show the proposed canal bank landscape material including
material and planting specifications on the permit plans for
the park.
,,3. Staff recommends that the proposed 14 parking spaces be
sufficient for the proposed project.
NOTE: If recommendations are approved, incorporate them into the
working drawings required for permits for the project.
a:sprev2nd.c16
to
LOCATION MAP
LINEAR PARK
., . ~f I...ll-J '-J, ~~ L-L..J L...... :l. lIt -......J '""i l.[[........' I I l ,- _.- '- I---' 't
..m f -:-j I rr- ..:.: --.,...., I ..1 J it-r--t . '-- --. 'r
1~Ll" \ T~ C.:r- ~r ~.. ~-=:: ~~.',~ ,f-+J1T!-1it~f--. !r-,:,
II!' U_,-"l ..{-~- ~~ ,~~ ..i.... ' " '~I'" ,. ~I;" t::~ ':::- - 7,
i, .t' J-..~ rr, - .::::-::: '::-'"':" -:........ - , Ll,r-<l.. ho~P-;-- ~ ~T
rl', /'--" ,I. -' -+-. --\- ~ '-.. ~_.... (::J- 1-[1
[. i;' I - '--:-- 1. ',~:- T - '~t :;~ - ~~=; I- .. I
. ~ _ ~ _ n \- ,L- _ ", _ .,.:. ~ -, T
: ,f, ...:.... ~..'"': :;;~+ i_ " ~+-- ~~'
. ,I: ~. Sa I-I-"+- ~ '.. +-- . . -
r ! , ' . JI-' ' t. l . ~ Oil -_. 1
: . , '; j , I ..~ r ... . \,/ I - 1'" - ...w ~' lIT -: 3-. . ,Vi : ,
i( ,... l"f- - :11 .' I, I T 1 f r i I n cr ..1;1 i '
I I ~ j . ~.~
4f. \:.~llr, ~ ,..~;
.,: &.ttl~ ,f .... t.. ~~ 1 ,~'.
" 1- I l-r,_ ,:. \" "I'i
.\ \ " J I' rA ~ . ._ '=-' I 1 ~:--)I- - ~ _. .': :',
i.RE. C ~;ili. ;'.;:, It: t ~~. , : '~'UJi ii
, t~: L-, t r - ~ tr..~ ra. t.:i~r'"
_ .._ = IL.d i1=P' c:. t!l ~ U.J lfiT- : j Ir= ' ',' 'I1III1:=:
.Gfl ... c: >:' _ .. H ~n ('~h HW- ~ r, LIL:" -if;!; ,J pi- ~ ...... :m;::
r: r .~- r ..... .... c~ "L---l-~ .. ',.. ~. ,',:: jg3 ~ ,Iii/l ':
_:'~'" ..,...\~. T ~_ i I \ \.1 I t ~r -rl Tl I~.! v-~.'-:- :.:
~~ i 'rr-. _ . .J' I I I r~.-- rr ..'!!........ __..!!:' I ---, r,' -T<.' ---r-r ""t., r'T ,
, ., I j J ~'1;: l(~lJ) I' t:i ~- .. t:. n~ /I . ":",.'
. . ~~.J'.~..,.t, i ,/ ~ '\~~~'~ . ~ :. i ~- .., .c...' . ~ ..
~ .!.I: 1 ;. j. j,/~,....,.-. ,~T- ;::J~ ,_I -..:...: 1~ ~- Cia-: -." - Cll'" .'
1 -r- . t -.{ _ . 'A. ;. f \....\ --t T'-~' . -
J'll l: ._~ :' . ~ ;- ~-- -,rL 1 ~~..J ,,- - -!::::= I r--=-
~ . ---.,;..., . ' ,4- -+' I-.~ - - .
;. .,........ : . r--~-"', -' - ,.. .. 'f 'fJ 'h' ~ C3 I I ! I I ' ,
. I~ . + ~ ~ '-- '-.1 i rr-- 1 t t ,~ I
.1 U i,...:-..L. :_I~.'''' 1 . " '\ + .. .1L_-is~ I I~,. ':..~ l~.='.~'.~ -~-
-1' , ,. \~~::.:::= 1\=:":.-_ _ .. :..., .. _1= ~:..-!~ ~~ ./ ~ --j \,: f I I \ I' .:T:,
..~.. _~_ _,. ~glHftl ... -- I~~.-: ,':----:- __ I - L-, ~ - . ~; I I 1 \ I \ IT '1',1 ' :
:0 _ f1f- ~W ~-::2,,L~1 i ~':II '11111 I !' 1111 \. !I.: / ..;.~ I:;"- 0-
i=f!l"'--- ,..., PU;, it: :~,"llffiffii1]l!p;:n'iI.ITfDlT' -~ -~~~Mi
W..Ll..L_: l: ~IUllli.r f&.V:;;"'- ,
.~ .~.. . .'_'" t:: .. c..T ,," " "M '!., .... ~; ,.".... .... c." J..
:~~~*''''-4 II I ; II I ':.11 ;, t:S '. L J-iJ '.
: .....Ji .;r : ! '.! 71 ~',," - if' i',;;' ~" · '1 -- [
.~=~ ~~ 1 It !~~ I~ 11\; : ~"- i i ,,: . ~ ~ ![',' J : I~;~ =- :--- ;, .. :' ,.,
.~c..o~~ r~ ";T. :)6~cr~. 0 u:"..1 - .. ." 8 - . ....' ~, _.' .r
I '-T,::.j]~~ t:l<.~;~ H: ~. Q'Jr .. ..~~ ~l ~:: '~\~ J 1\.~
.' ~ ~~-Jj,' \ill. 'u'-~,l"~~ 1 ~~: t~tt ~ "= F :,1,1, .' ~ '~ g C
1; Lr. j ffi't ..~ _ 0- = ~ B
ti " 11: I c' ~;1 t ~ll~' ','. ~ ~l n., .H-~.:t ::~. """. ...." " R3 1:= . ;,r-I
. ;,'" ~_ ~"'"', ~J _.-1 -- - IT ;.J J I
I .. I K:-... I.J = I j . j ~o ~o/ ~ 11 _ - =1- - h~B. ~ ~ ~ ~= ! 1
t......... l..J L r ...... ~ :II ,.. .E:';l ~ .~ if
i ~ L ~Ll. ::~ rl. 't~.~ j j ~f-~ C~ '-"'~',.r (,:
'\ E ,'1'~ -.~ = , ~Or-r-l-~ i~ ;;;;; i"~ .;
ell: ,1. -.~' .-( l.~ ~-1 '\II f- -. ~ ::
_ ,.) l ! F 'Ill: Ii. I ' l:l~ , I "\ I -',,: C B ItJ-, ~ :
~ .._f ~" .,t..; ~ ~(mv. M B~~tt~1'f' SEA... .. --~..vLl ~ '!
~ ,', . j1/r;'J~:' 1,j.,i,1. ...... in i; ,I EI~ I 1 "'.: rT 1
t ~1. i .. ,'j;:' 'Ji. .:"1,..,,1. l.lJIl_.I, '.IITI' I l-...J", ';" : I I,
',_. ---T ~ . .-:~ .' , .. p - ... J ...J. u' . .j. ~..... -= --'-4-'----': . : r
, 'fJL 'li!U" ~'~ 'P'l" J'-II' ' : ,;
.... .. l~' 7" . " , " '[I~ "~I 1 ~ . -, I lr-'-'- -. :f~
;.;... . . _ tiJ.Il.J.l;lill .l:' I'll . f11111 ':/1
: . ~d:~J-J..-: I': ~ lIi.ill:1111Iillrrr:m'llII ~~ I ~ [I r 1111 '
. :,;::~:t L~C!illI'l"'!. 'Ii~' ., I i1U i . I I III.:J 1fT ; rrm ! j : : n
:: .. I~ . t ~H,.;J:M :Lr~ !"j ~ :> M.\. J I'm JlL. L3'" " ,,,--ell .. I
,,_ .J [jJ~ j~~ @ 1.1 I Llo I if Ntl h H' . :A'
.... ';.: " ~\ lIT 1 ~ ill, '111, '1: ~': '0 1/8 MILESV "I
,~lQIU\i; I ~"~ rH;~~ 2 ~ Till 1 'I
'M R~.FHI1Bi!! IT '1' r d:~ .. ;:':"0 .,400. '820 FEET ---
!.:1. . _ . '; 'Tf: 11-1 r 1 ~Trrr1 u.... n 6 ...~./o '0897. r-~
, , . r._'] .], ,U-S r... II f'l --J<"I, I .r I.' ,,, \.
i~,fs I H~ '.'
T I,'
i /' ,'.'
I MIl T . -. .
fR" E~'71',':
, i TT J1~ra-(. \.::
C..- ;. ~_..._-.-:.
, -REC-- -1:'::'-"
j
'II
.
1Il
.
ocr.
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MAY 16, 1995
Mayor Bradley seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
D. Confirmation of Name for C-16 Linear Park
City Manager Parker advised that the Recreation and Parks Board recommends the selection of
"Palmetto Greens Park" as their choice for the C-16 linear Park Project.
Motion
Vice Mayor Bradley moved approval of the Recreation and Parks Board recommendation to
rename C-16 Linear Park, "Palmetto Greens Park". Commissioner Rosen seconded the motion.
Mayor Pro Tern Matson thinks this is a horrible name. Commissioner Jaskiewicz' first choice
would have been "Angler Park", and then "Boynton Canal Park". However, respecting their
opinion, she will support their selection.
The motion carried 4-1. (Mayor Pro Tern Matson cast the dissenting vote.)
X. LEGAL:
A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading:
None
B. Ordinances - 1st Reading:
Attorney Cherof requested permission to read the Ordinances in groups of three. The Commission
could then make one motion to approve each group of three.
1 . Proposed Ordinance No. 095-11 Re: Annexation - Royal Manor Mob; Ie
Home Estate Property
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-12 Re: lane Use Element - Royal Manor
Mobile Home Estate Property
3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-13 Re: Rezoning - Royal Manor Mobile
Home Estate Property
Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-11, 095-12, and 095-13 by title only.
Motion
Commissioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-11, 095-12 and
095-13 on first reading. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded the motion. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled
36
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MAY 16, 1995
I
Mayor Bradley seconded the motion which carri1unanimOUSly.
D. Confirmation of Name for C-16Pnear Park
City Manager Parker advised that the Recreation and Parks Board recommends the selection of
"Palmetto Greens Park" as their choice for the C-16 Linear Park Project.
Motion
Vice Mayor Bradley moved approval of the Recreation and Parks Board recommendation to
rename C-16 Linear Park, "Palmetto Greens Park". Commissioner Rosen seconded the motion.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson thinks this is a horrible name. Commissioner Jaskiewicz' first choice
would have been "Angler Park", and then "Boynton Canal Park". However, respecting their
opinion, she will support their selection. .
The motion carried 4-1. (Mayor Pro Tem Matson cast the dissenting vote.)
X. LEGAL:
A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading:
None
B. Ordinances - 1st Reading:
Attorney Cherof requested permission to read the Ordinances in groups of three. The Commission
could then make one motion to approve each group of three.
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-11 Re: Annexation - Royal Manor Mobile
Home Estate Property
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-12 Re: Lane Use Element - Royal Manor
Mobile Home Estate Property
3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-13 Re: Rezoning - Royal Manor Mobile
Home Estate Property
Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-11, 095-12, and 095-13 by title only.
Motion
Commissioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve Proposed Ordinances Nos. 095-11, 095-12 and
095-13 on first reading. Vice Mayor Bradley seconded the motion. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled
36
fJ1te City of
$oynton $eacli
t,u
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadr. 'Boukvartf
P.O. 'BOl(310
'Boynton 'Beadr.,1foritfa 33425-0310
City 9fafi: (407) 375-6000
~~: (407) 375-6090
July 8, 1994
Mr. Ronald W. Last, P,E.
420 Columbia Drive
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
RE: C-16 Linear Park
Dear Mr. Last:
The attached package will be presented to the Planning and
Development Board on July 12, 1994 (see attached agenda) and then
to the City Commission the following week (July 19, 1994).
The applicant must understand that the permit plans shall be
amended to comply with the attached staff comments and that
additional comments may be generated by staff following their
review for technical compliance of permit documents that are
required to be submitted for development of the project.
For the applicant's convenience, attached is a list of documents
required for permit submittal.
An approval of the site plan by the city Commission shall be
valid for one (1) year, unless a building permit from the
Building Department is secured. If the applicant fails to secure
a building permit in that time, all previous approvals shall
become uull and void.
~n7Pcl4r
~~a:gsite Development Administrator
MH/jj
!4.merii;4's (jateway to tne (julfstream
't11ie City of
r.Boynton r.Beacn
1 oo~. 'Boyrr.ton 'Btadi 'BoukfltJrti
P.O. ~310
'Boynton 'BUJdi,!fforitfa 33425-0310
City 9ftUl: (4fJ7) 375-6000
!f}U: (4fJ7) 375-6090
May 19, 1994
Mr. Ronald W, Last, P.E.
420 Columbia Drive
West Palm Beach, Fl 33409
RE: Initial Review Comments - C-16 Linear Canal Park
File No. NWSP 94-004
Dear Mr. Last:
The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the
documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are
comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial
review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and
documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90
days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not
submi tted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.)
When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not
appl icable to the approval of the' proj ect or will be addressed
separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the
comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment
stating why the comment is not applicable and return the
explanation with the amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12)
complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and
Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been
submi tted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be
distributed to the reviewing departments for a second review and
the reviewers will recommend if the site plan will be placed on a
board meeting agenda for approval (see attached meeting schedule).
If there are major comments not addressed by new plans or the
reviewers recommend that the plan not be forwarded through the
approval schedule, this office will notify you of your alternatives
regarding the site plan as soon as possible.
;{merica:S (jattway to the (julfstTUlm
To: Mr. Ronald W. Last, P.E.
Re: Initial Review Comments, File No.: NWSP 94-004
Page 2 of 2
We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and
a checklist that contains information regarding the second
submission of the plans and documents for review.
If you should have any questions regarding the comments or on the
approval schedule, please feel free to call Michael E. Haag, who is
coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and
Zoning Department.
. fOil
T i J. Heyden
P an ing & Zoning Director
TJH/jj
Atts.
xc: Central File
Chron. File
Project File
A:lSTCOMMT.SP
a:lstcommt.c16
CHECKLIST
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that
the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for
review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will
enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the
Planning and Zoning Department,
Project Name: C-16 Linear Canal Park
1.
Submit an amended Site Plan Review/conditional Use application form that
reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans
and documents to comply with the code of Ordinances and the Technical
Review Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a
distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a
completed new form with the changes identified. If there are no changes
required to be documented on the application form, a letter from the
applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal.
2 .
Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents,
including surveys that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and
comments made by the Technical Review committee. Two (2) of the sets
shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the
designer responsible for the drawing(s). Plans and documents shall be
assembled in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of
the project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet
numerically numbered such as the following example:1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of
3.
3.
Submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to
be used on an overhead projector at board meetings.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning p~rector
'1 I :tJ./~
M1C lae E. Haag .
Site and Zoning D opment
May 23, 1994
Administrator
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Review - 1st Review -
C-16 Linear Canal Park
South of C-16 Canal between Seacrest Blvd and
the FEC Railroad
Ron Last, P.E. (Lawson, Noble & Assoc., Inc.)
NWSP 94-004
Agent:
File No.:
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the Site
Plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project.
Comments identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected
and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted
for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue
through the site plan review process. The applicant shall
understand that all documents/plans submitted for site plan
and/or permit review are subject to additional comments. I
recommend that the applicant/ agent contact me regarding
questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not
intending to correct code deficiencies they should contact me
regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal
deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement.
1.
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1.
The height of the fence located between the front property
line and the front building line (front setback 25 feet) of
Lot 22 shall not exceed four feet. Correct the plans
accordingly. The fence located east of Lot 1 is blocking
the bike path. Revise the plans to clarify the issue. Is
there a gate proposed for the Seacrest Boulevard entrance to
the bike path? If there is a gate proposed, specify on the
plan.
..,
... ,
Submit for review a site plan or add the title, IISite Planll
to the existing plans. Show and label on the site plan the
limits of construction for the entire project.
3.
The survey of the property, east of Lot 1, is not clear as
to the limits of the subject property. Clarify the survey
accordingly.
4 .
Add to the plans, parking area striping in compliance with
the city standard drawing B-90012 (see attached).
5 .
To be consistent with the landscape plan, place a note on
the site plan that indicates that the existing 10 feet wide
dirt road is being removed.
6.
Add to the landscape legend, a symbol that represents the
st. Augustine sod. Indicate on the landscape plan the
location of the perimeter boundary of the proposed sod for
the entire site.
7.
Specify on the landscape plan, the ground cover material
proposed for the area between the top of the bank and the
edge of the water.
page 2
Site Plan Review - 1st review
C-16 Linear Canal Park
8. The maximum spacing allowed for the vehicle use area
screening (hedges) is 2 feet on center. The plans indicate
the proposed hedges to be spaced 30 inches on center.
Correct the plans accordingly.
9. Add to the landscape plan, the required vehicle use area
screening along the perimeter of the south and north sides
of the vehicle use area. Note; hedges shall be 18 inches in
height at planting and spaced 2 feet on center to form a
continuous barrier.
10, Show on the plan, the line-of-sight triangles required on
both sides of the ingress/egress. Also note on the plan,
the limits of the space within the triangle that is to
remain unobstructed to allow cross visibility. Relocate the
landscape material that is contrary to the unobstructed
cross visibility requirement.
11. Change the species of the required hedge material proposed
for the perimeter of the vehicle use area to a species that
will provide at least 50% of the total number of required
hedge plants as native plants. (Note; hedges shall be spaced
a maximum of 2 feet on center to form a continuous screen
around the perimeter of the vehicle use area).
II. RECOMMENDATION{S):
None at this time.
attachment
MEH/jj
~:SPREVIEW.lST
a:sprevlst.c15
1:
.
yt
,0
.
.
~
.
r
~
.
~
.
s
~
~~a
~~~
,=-4
I C)
~~~
Rl-Qj
~~
~
Q)
I
:1
I
I
L-.
}>
(J)
~
l)
.~
:t>-
.
)>
en
s;
l'
Ii
~
()
~
O:J
~
-,3:
d"\J
'lI
tn ~
g N, G'l
:t:~ ~
(II - Vl
t5;t III
&l
""'
In
ti
'""
~
~
OJ
1+
,..... ~ 1+
. .
II .
c !l
t jj
. .
.
r
I u
r U
r,d ~ ~ ~
-'" (; ..,
~ l) -<.
~ ~ 0
.() ."
~- tlI
....'i 0
in"'" .."
VI ~
lb v~ ~ ~
~~ ~~ tb
lD ..CIl:t. ~ (; C")
() U\)] "l ;:t
o ~tJ . 0 ~~
~ :;:: (J) ~I =
I v .\1 I '0 I
~ ~~ : ~
no UlO"~
'II ~. ~ C"
of\. t"1\) ~
r) 0 =' ~
~ ~;I: (j')
~ ~ a ~
~ ::::::"
'cn~G)t-.
~~~~
~hO~
::lob.
iii~~
~~
\
~
r-
]r;
~
--(
t
,
,.& \
, /
"'-
"-~
~ ...
nt
~
~~~
1'), :to bt
(J) () ..
ti ~
. (J\
(J)
-
"-
~ 1\).
C'\~
(J)~
~ "f
"u\
r'D
(a1
go
~ ~~ I~~I
~ J,'d
~~. \-"l
w....
)!~
bO)
('),...
~~
.....
{o
~
'\
S:
~
...
'"
......
~? \0 CD
~~ ~ ~
... ...
~;~~~~a~~t~~~~~~=~~~~~~~B~
o H~H O~ ~=... ~ -~~n n~~
mo~s~~tn~~H ~i5~~~onR~=~~13
n~<~c~;~~=o~~~~~ b~~nS~~i5~~~
_M"'IIl~'" ~~I'l ~~". Iii. 1II~1II00
_ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~M MOH ~~
"J~ ~ ....HOH...~~... ~~=gz' t"'~t"' ~
Ht"'i!5I'l~O. 015 ~ '-'''' "'HH~Hn
~t"'~;;1II"" ~:Sl'l le\:! H~~~'::l::lli
~~~I'l~ R H ~~1II Z~~~1Il ~H
'~~~i;~ ~~. g~"6~e~~~~~Baa13
M~~~~a R~ ~!~ ~~~~lII~~=r ~
~..,~... ~ ~ C~~I'l~~OC~
!zl' ~~ ~ ! ~~e~r ~r' !:!a~~
; ~~~E ~~ G~~~~~lII;~l;l~a;E~
III ~~ 1Il~ ~1Il 1'l0'~' ~tIO' PI
= ~=~ m~ ~~e~~ g:~~~R~ ~
a~~ p~ =PlEe~ a~~~' E~ ~
i ~~ ~~ D~n~e h~aet~i &
!H" as: b...lE! a ~ =~HH' ;
~R~ ~ ~~~~ ~g~ ~PI... '"
H ~ ~ ~N ~M H~M~ ~~
Z ~=~ ~~ ;I. a~s ~B~~~S~ ~
~ ~gR 1II~ t ~~ ~~~a~~~~ e
~ ovf;!o PI!:! lIIH~ '... R~:zl
~ ~:zl R ~ ~Q ~ 0 0'" 0
~ ~~a ~ ~ s~ ~ e~~~~ ~
i!: o~z @iCl ~ ...~::: ~ C 'HR 1:1:
~.n ~5 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ o~ Q~ Q "'~~ "" ~ ~PI~
~ ~~>-of ~o ~ 'l"'Z ~ ~..f,:::::l
o ~~~ ~~ ~ ;I!:I~; ~nS ~
~ ...i: l:t PI>' C"I Plp.f:l';;
=< ~ l!! ~'~
cS F
PlZ t"'
C::>-of
~
.... ~
(J'l
~ ,[ ~
~mF-b I
~ -
"
..... ....1\)
.... '
,....
C/)(II
~ti
".:..;
,...
U)
,e
t-~.-t
d I~ T \:)
~1~5 ~~ Qi
d~i ~ ~~
Q...{ ~o~ 1 ~
):) ~. 'l)ll"
~~ -1 ~
2~ tI\ ~
, "1 ~~ O'l
i\i. ~ *
01 il1s:
~ ....fl\
f\)
~
~<;
~,
cnn,
I~
UI
mOJ
~e
C)
i1{
Cal
" I'.
. ..
~~:.:. '.':'
~. :::
o
~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #94-135
TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Site Plan - C-16 Linear Park
DATE: May 9, 1994
The Public Works D~partment has no problem with the above site.
Eichorst
Works Director
REier
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-144
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE:
May 17, 1994
RE:
C-16 Linear Park
The Engineering Department has no objections to the plans moving
forward to the reviewing Boards and the applicant is herein advised
that all staff comments and code deficiencies must be resolved
during the Building Department plan review process.
The plans for the above referenced project are herein returned
along with the City Engineer's comments dated May 18, 1994.
l ).' -+~ -=to Zf=
Vincent A. Finizi
VAF/ck
C:C-16PARK.CK
xc: City Manager
Brian LaMotte, P.E., City Engineer (as directed)
!II:
Shalloway, Foy
Rayman & Newell, Inc.
K. Dan Shalloway, P.E.
Jay G. Foy, P.E.
Gary M. Rayman, R.L.S.
Warren H. Newell
Brian J. LaMotte, P.E.
Keith B. Jackson, P.E.
EngineerslPlanners/Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road
West Palm Beach, Florida 33405
Phone (407) 655-1151 Fax (407) 8'32-9390
May 16,1994
Vincent Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: C-16 LINEAR PARK
SFRN PROJECT #94051
Dear Vince,
I have reviewed the above referenced plans and have the following comments:
1. Details for the wooden fishing piers, chain link fence, and 8' asphalt bike path
are to be provided.
2. Appropriate permits from all governmental agencies having jurisdiction must
be obtained. '
3. Details for the asphalt parking lot and connection to N. E. 13th Avenue are to
be provided.
4. Provide additional proposed elevations for the eastern north-south bike path
and connection to N. E. 13th Avenue.
5. Show how the chain link fence on the eastern end of the project terminates.
Is a gate to be provided?
If you have any questions please do not.hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
Brian J. LaMotte, P.E.
Principal
BJLlthw
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-113
May 18, 1994
From:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning &~o ing
Don Jaeger, Building Officia
Al Newbold, Deputy Building 0 ficial
Director
To:
Via:
Re: TRC COMMENTS - Site Plan Review
C-16 Linear Canal Park
The Building Department has reviewed the plans submitted for the
above project. The plans lack details and deminsions to
adequately address building codes.
At the time of permitting, the plans must comply with all
applicable building and handicap codes.
The Engineering Department should check the survey, particularly
Sheet 2 of 5, for accuracy. There is no N. W. 13 Street between
Seacrest Boulevard and the railroad.
We will also need documentation of water management approval
prior to permitting.
A:C16CANAL.TRC
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-231 WDC
TAMBRI J. HEYDEN
Planning/zoning Director ~
WILLIAM D CAVANAUGH J LJJ7(tH'4'~ ~'
FPO I 1(/ r
May 18, 1994
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE: TRC - site Plan Review (I)
C-16 Linear Park
Between seacrest & FEC Railway
File #NWSP 94-004
There are no further objections to this project.
111\1
MA'( , ~ \g9a
P\J.NN\NGOE~pMl\)
GlUM .
.
~
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #94-155
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning & Zoning
..
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: May 18, 1994
SUBJECT: C-16 Linear Park - First Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
Supply for irrigation not noted:
1. Due to limited access and park site super'lision, this
Department would consider permitting irrigation by City
water. Please supply area to be irrigated and
projected G.P.M. requirements to the Utility Department
for consideration, if desired.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
19b
xc: Clyde" Sk ip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
ill ~ MAY I 8 i994 ~ ill
Boynton Beach Police Department
TraffIC Unit Memorandum
From:
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
Sgt. James Cummings
Date: 18 May 1994
To:
Fle:Site Plan Review
C-16 Linear Park
In accordance with the memorandum sent to me regarding the
above noted project site, I have reviewed the plans and find
no problems with design or signage.
rnrnlilrnnwrnrn
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM *94-181
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist t<Slff-
C-16 Linear Park
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
May 10, 1994
There are no existing tree concerns for the project.
c.:~~
rn
PZLOANNING AND
NING DEPT.
KH:ad
7. A. 1
New Site Plan
C-16 Linear Park
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-186
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
July 6, 1994
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Project Name: C-16 Linear Canal Park
Applicant: City of Boynton Beach
Agent: Lawson, Noble and Associates (Ron Last)
Location: South of the Boynton C-16 Canal, between Seacrest
Boulevard and the F.E.C. Railroad tracks
File No.: NWSP #94-004
Land Use Plan Designation:
Moderate Density Residential and
Recreational
Zoning Designation: R-2, Single Family and Two Family Residentlal
Type of Use: Park
Number of Units: N/A
Square Footage: Site: 2.28 acres or 99,300 sq. ft.
Building: N/A
surrounding Land Uses and Zoning District:
North - C-16 Canal and single family homes, zoned R-1A, Single
family Residential
South - Northeast 13th Avenue and farther south single family
homes, zoned R-2, Single Family and two Family
Residential
East - F.E.C. Railroad
West - Seacrest Boulevard and farther west, single family
homes, zoned R-2, Single Family and Two Family
Residential
Existing Site Characteristics:
residential housing.
Vacant, undeveloped land behind
Proposed Development: Landscaped walking path along canal with
three (3) dock and associated parking area.
Driveways: A two-way drive on N. E. 13th Avenue leads to a
parking area located on a residential lot.
parking Facility: Fourteen (14) spaces including one (1) handicap
space are proposed to be constructed on the vacant residential lot.
Following compliance with staff comments, the parking area will
meet the requirements of the parking lot code.
Landscaping: plans depict canal bank and pathway landscaping that
includes trees and ground cover. Following compliance with staff
comments the parking area landscaping will meet the requirements of
the landscape code.
Site Plan Review
C-16 Linear canal Park
Memo #94-186
Page 2 of 2
Building and site Regulations: The building and site regulations
are not applicable considering there are no buildings proposed for
the project.
Community Design Plan: This development is not within a community
design district.
Signage: Signage was not requested as part of this phase of
development.
REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS:
Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding
this request.
DEPARTMENT
ATTACHED MEMORANDUM
Public Works
utilities
Fire
Police
Engineering
Building
Parks & Recreation
Forester/Environmentalist
Planning and Zoning
No Comments
#94-204
No Comments
No Comments
#94-181
#94-149
No Comments
No Comments
Memorandum dated July 6, 1994
The Engineering, Building, Utilities and
Departments' comments may be addressed on
drawings. The remaining departments did
regarding their review of the amended plans.
Planning & Zoning
the permit set of
not have comments
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site
plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being
amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinance.
A:STAFFREP.C16
L
,.
fieF/ I I
. ~",~~:~~=~~Jll~c~ ~ 1-:7)
fT 'In
" Ii (~; 1 all,',
II ! ::, <J) I I I
'I '1,1
:~'I"':l
" -I.
. "
., .
'I ,..1.
~: ,~: ': 1
II ;11 I
:: jJ :: I
fr; If
II ",
II I'~II
~" 1-..)1
11"'1'<1'
:: ' ::
II II
:: ~~
,; '"
:: t :11
" .
I ~ I ,
. "
~:.~~ :\11
I' ~ II
:;~,i!1
:: -~::
'I I II
II ~"
"~,I
~\ ,:,
II I II
. II "
II III
II II
II "
II "
:: ' ~: I
II I "
" :1
~ \~I
r'l,
II I,
---=;~ &' i ;Ij'
Ni:iSi ~ "
1lO"'~TI ~"
===="'0. I t
';.i : :',
" -~"II
,,~-': t
::JS;:l"
II ~!:".
II -i$j',
II "I
~~I:
/I '."11
II "I
'I,' :~'~
II I'
" ,
II ,
~ Il:i,J
" ,::
':../',
:r" ::1
" ',-
:: :'
II , 'I I
II. I"
II I,
II III
I I 'I
,j I "
:: I ::
:: ~;
': I~
:i l..~l
:: I :
II I
:: 1111
:: ~::'I
n I }I
::~ Ii!:
If ",I,
II "'I
11 I'.
:Yf ::1
" I"
II ,I
II jlt
II !It
:: -'~::/'
" ~I_,I
::j~::1
II ...1:. II ~
:: -r::11
It II
II !I
:: I ::,
1/ I ~: l
:"~
(!Il)
(~,l
(@
\ \
I I
I I
~'
~
I ,
I I
@
(~)
I
I
,
I
'"f'..'":
I I
11'" f
J 11
t~
,-
t,
I
~ "I
I, ,','
. I,
, "
, I
I. I
~,
It'
If
, I
I
,
I
"\
~~
(Ill)
-"'
'~i
(~I
(9:)
@
(i)
(~
@
(~)
;: I :"
II !:
\I 1 II'
:: 1 :'-
II ,I
" 'iJ'
::' H
I
If I "I
:: :'
II ,
::.' :'
:: I :r
II "I
II , "1
" I"
If 'I
II 'I
:: . :!\
,
'; i ,:/
:, i II
!I II
;', I.:,
': ,,'
;:, I :;1
,. , II
.. II
. I 'II
I "t
'i~:\1
:: Iii "
': .~"II
:; -~I I
'; J II J
.' I II ..
I ' IiJ
~: I :: I
:~ + ~:I
II I II
:: I~::j'
II \I
" 1\
~Il
:: I!:'
II Il'
" "I
1\ I II
II II
II III
" I! t
II I~
~ I :~
= I !,
~: " .
" II
::)':::
II Il
II Il
1\ 1\
, , II
Il III,
" !ifI
" "1
II 1/
:: I :,
111111
:: ::.
" I II I
" II
:I ! !I
:: I ;:,
:: i';j:',;.
". .,
II J "
II I II
'1"'.11
rr::}1
1\ II
1\ II ,
"<<llitHR f Ilii~ I il"I: )1 I l.: ) I
U "IIU' :Iii:: : j
It. 1m it., " I II ~
1$:i P. . ~ :: II:' I ~
.i " d I II ~ , ____ __
II.' a ~I,- ~- r---:--r
t --- I'
I a
i
I
a 'i'
e a;
~ i
i
.
.
,
I
;
~
~
I I,IIIIIII,P, I
,ill
I
. ;iiii ~~i
I~~~~ ~
lill !
11101
i II I
I ~~ I
x ~ !Z
~ a V
~
t~)
@
@
@
I
I
n
f,
I
. ..: .~~:.
...
-I
Ill,
N!
=!
i
(01
I
i?
~i11
~~
i
i
( <J)'
\CD;
(~)
I en I
\
\uq
,-
;.. )
~ <I' ;
i
(,.,;
.
i?
Sa;
~i
i
i
-----::-~--
~
I~
------L
'\
---
------.:-~
-------
I~: =--
8IT.,PAYM CiIUrOM:: DIlQrWZ....".
C 16 PARK
~.... - .. ..._~.... ..
....n.-:--UtG:::;_ r:: I'll
-~-:.- '-:.-:..,:,.:- ~ "-
23
Coco 1 urn Hedge
8 .~
':.' 8~'.'
. .
. .
. .
- JL= x =....L - L= X
)(
)(
)(
)(
2
21
Sabal Palms
:2.5' LANDSCAPE
STOP SIGN .
2#/' WHITE
STOP BAR
- - - -
-----
Maintain a clear and unobstructed
view between 30" and 6'-0".
CURB
CD
7-94
1
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #94-204
TO: Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning & Zoning
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: June 15, 1994
SUBJECT: C-16 Linear Canal Park - Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
Please provide source and location of irrigation supply on
your Landscape Development Plans
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
19b
xc: Clyde" Sk i P II Milo r
Peter Mazzella
File
,)
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-181
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE:
June 22, 1994
RE:
Technical Review Committee Comments
C-16 Linear Park
Attached for your review and consideration, please find a copy of
the City Engineer's June 20, 1994 comments which represent the
Engineering Department's review of the above referenced project.
Should you require any additional information, please contact the
undersigned at ext. 6282.
00
~ " , ,~ : I~^ ~ rn
O-tvl ~
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
VAF/ck
C:C-16PARK.TRC
attachments: Shalloway, Foy, Rayman & Newell, Inc. Technical Review
Committee comments dated June 20, 1994
~
""'.....'. ...._ . _ _, -, ~t..I' ..J I
=,rn:j"j
407 655 1151 P O~
'. ShallowaYI Foy
_ Rayman &: Newell,tIle.
l;.nsineerslPlanners/S W'V8YOrs
1201 Belvedere Road-
Weat Palm Beach, Ploridll 3~405
PhOl'le (407) 65!:r-l151 PI\X (4.07) 832-939"
1.<.. Dan Sh.alloway, P.E.
Jay G. Foy, P.E.
Gary M. Rayman, R.L.S.
Warrell H Newell
Brian f. LaMotte, P.E.
Keith B. Jacbon, P E.
June 20. 1994
Vincent Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
P.O, Box 310
Boynton Beach. fL 33425-0310
RE: C-16 LINEAR PARK - PRELIMINARY REVIEW
SFRN PROJECT #94051
Dear Vince,
I have reviewed the above referenced plans and have the following comments:
1. Co"\paction peroont is not shown on the detail of the bike path shell rock and
the parking se,,1ion fer both base and subgrade.
2. Material specifications will be required for the pier and fenting.
3. Permits from all applicable itg"#nciQs for the bike path and piers will be
required for fina.l eppro",al.
4, Provide soil boring inrormalion to suppon tl;e pile design for tne pier.
5. The parking lot lights appear to be located in the paving. Clarify.
6. Where will th6 power for the lights be supplied? Is power available and will
easements be necessary?
7. Provide a radius on the c~mer of the type "D. curb (N.W. comer) that is
shown to surround the planting area.
8. At Sta. 29"'00. how is the connection trJ the bike path and pier to be
conStructed?
9. On the eastern terminus of the bike path, does the bike path match up \'lith
the road ae well as the sidewalk? The bike path should match up with the
road.
10. Are lights to be proViCled on the p{eC'S'?
7
_'-'" ... _ __ ~L"'_~.J
"....' f '
JO~ ~=~ 1~~1 ~ ~~
rl"\UI; .~-
~ . OW. .........,..",,, " '""'I '-1"
JUNE 20. 1994
11. Are fence gates and locks to be provided on the Bast and west sides of tne
project?
12. A removable bollard that can be locked and unlocked so that only authorized
motor \l9hides can get into the ~r1< is; n;commended.
.t 3. Provide a detail for the 88 x 6'" cona-ete columns.
14. A stop sign (MUTeD R1-1) at the west entrance/exit is recommended
becasue of the proximity of Seacrest Boulevard traffic l~nQs
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
~
Brian J. laMotte, P.E.
Principal
BJUthw
TOT~L P 03
~
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-149
June 17, 1994
To:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Z?ning Director
Don Jaeger, Building Official~
Milt Duff, Chief - Plans Review & Permitting
TRC COMMENTS - Site Plan - 2nd Review
C-16 Linear Canal Park
Via:
From:
Re:
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
project and have no comments that cannot be addressed at time of
permitting.
At the time of permitting, the plans must comply with all
applicable building and handicap codes. Agency approval for
construction in the C-16 Canal is also required prior to
permitting.
We request that the Planning Department provide them with the
usual handout pertaining to permit submittal.
~Jj~
Milt Duff
MD:mh
Att.
'1
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE:
July 6, 1994
RE:
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan
C-16 Linear Canal Park
South of C-16 Canal between Seacrest Boulevard
and F.E.C. Railroad
Lawson, Noble and Associates (Ron Last)
NWSP #94-004
Agent:
File No:
The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of
the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments
are divided into two (2) categories:
The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved
comments either from the first review or new comments as a result
of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will
not substantially alter the configuration of the site and the
design of the building.
The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will
enhance the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at
time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The
applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated
upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the
Building Department for permits for the proposed project,
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. The fence height in the front setback of Lot 22 is not clear
on the drawings (code limits height to four feet). This shall
be clarified on the drawings prior to the building permit
being issued.
2. The survey should identify the individual properties adjacent
to, and within the park at the east terminus.
1J-,n1 II1/b
II, RECOMMENDATION(S):
~ t..C. ~ 1.
Limit the fixture for the required parking lot lights to be
limited to the minimum light level standards. Height of the
poles shall not exceed the height of the adjacent residential
structure.
2 .
show the proposed canal bank landscape material including
material and planting specifications on the permit plans for
the park.
(".) rYlll'f'6!>
~ 3.
Ar C.c..
staff recommends that the proposed 14 parking spaces be
sufficient for the proposed project.
NOTE: If recommendations are approved, incorporate them into the
working drawings required for permits for the project.
a:sprev2nd.c16
10
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-225
Agenda Memorandum for
July 19, 1994 city commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
city Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden ~
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: July 13, 1994
SUBJECT: C-16 Canal Linear Park - NWSP#94-004
New Site Plan
Please place the above-referenced item on the City Commission
agenda for July 19, 1994 under Development Plans, Consent Agenda.
DESCRIPTION: This is a request to construct a City park along
the south side of the Boynton (C-16) Canal, between Seacrest
Boulevard and the F.E.C. Railroad. The park includes
landscaping, a sidewalk system, a parking facility and three
docks.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development unanimously
recommended approval of this request, subject to staff comments
(Utilities Department Nemorandum #94-204, Engineering Department
Memorandum #94-181, Building Department Memorandum #94-149 and
Planning and Zoning Department memorandum dated July 6, 1994).
tjh
Attachments
xc: central File
A:CI6PkSP
LOC~l\ON M~P
L\NE.~R p~R\<
.
. )\.J
.~..
. ..~, ~.-""- T \.::;:~
'.', ...., .~. \..'
,..1!~ ' - ,
_ 0 .",18 MILE
'\\ \ \ \ \ \
"0 400.800 FE
I
r-' r' ,__.Y"
.
I.'
.~ .
C I ~
P /-1 ~ K
2DA;G' R2.
(b I 1< e P cA T ~ cL. \ &> V\ ~ Cd -'d \
() 5 l2 S f t:= R ~ lITe- 0 1
~ c. Ctrj D'-'VNG~ ~
Cj 0 I FeD rJ ~ 5 e ~ R e ~.r- t?c.A -+ ~ 0 o4J
I I J
25-~'O \..VI e 5T'Il,P
3 5-c.5h.-'j p(e........~
f) Pi?: V-< f-\-It.? D ~ ~ (I 1/-<
cL.J(3~
s C2 T f2:::>o.. eo ~ ~
L- b" f- -..; '"'- +--.A.. 'd e 7 6' J
A- R. e -"--. 4-s-t) 0
~ if (r"'.:r- k R Q cJ ..... "Z S-
\::0> S(JL 10
)
"FlJ..o-"\. F 1 ~ ~
A ~ ~e.{. y c:1./ '3 c> 0 5 r::-
pet... ~.. ~ P i'c::> v lel ~~
- 2 , 2 <a" h0
J 4. <5 P Ae'c:;? -5
^
L/~tA) SCcAP~ 1~4.i?A-
0p ... k"'\roj L-l> T
6(.}e PeA.-tfl\
, 01 (0 /::::.... t:-
j,~ <1 :/ ~ 4- e....
Pdol~.J
A./'\~cA
PCJ/ t:-- c. ~ ~ I /p A 'C.-
g ( t<.p rd\ ~ . 2 ~ A c-
~,,1kf"(!) 0.-. S ~
.
e ~'" L, \c..
,....
\..... e... '"\. e.- ~
6
(-I (
~-
<sr=.Hi 1.)"-' ""'YI~ lulV fJ)l).t f'IIt.- ~,,;,---.._~_ ~-- I"-r;r- - .- '--
. ~vl():::,.r ~ j'/t::.i.J'~ J.PS >-.A"v>J4, -I'<...tv .,. ,.
J ~ ,.~
~F v~1f " ~ f.I. 0 ~"'c?, e -;
< ""1' -y f.....", J 1'1- P)If) __u as' ('mf) r?>""} W 7 I >.';5
~rn/~~\'" )-yh7/? ~Q",~tI )t(?~r:J/J' -i9~-?~ ,?/:>yJ" ~ Of}'~k/t! O~/"
~ ~ ~ -'J'1"+~~4 r ~
/~ p' ~j>' -w:tf"r;;,}.I" Jti'r.;rI (1;/ II 8/
lf~~}1 r,Q (J~ ('"'r?J ,J'1J()/\;f)? tt.-L :;rz; ~~tI
11- ~ ~'3;'J
t / /' ~ ~/rr J.Sr? .r ~ -.,/vj ""~o/ 1>" =n7'rd )'1
~"Yn Or i (" C7 ;;.-'"3.f
I ' -:::-
-- ~/(f vcwruJ.S 0!J~orl(l1 <;
I
~ ~'1' \lfI;' ~-;1
f;Vt/. ~#~ ry,' ../~:ll
...., (J -l.:t?Jf l1. $'
~ r"701 v /J "Vtlll.? 'rvi? 1~
~(IV;>;()J :;"'17.:;.+7 :..rN-f ..;rA '~rF'rI,1I "~ '"'In--(rJfIS ('IflLfJ/f-rtA; '7r!L
. l.:J) .
r:r\
lit
~
-
-
'1"
:J"..
(pV,"7~ ~~tl
(W tf'ftt-""(/ I" t .ij'-rr' ~.; r '?.I (] t d 9/L-< C'. ~"'>d S 0
)::;'1'/>/ >ftIIP nv? ;,u: ."''' -;;""'d ~tiJ j~ ~ nil "4;/'1)'; I
"",:;.p ,npr~hl "v7 "",,"'IT ::rb ~~J, :,1.-')"'''7 .:J1U Co- 7"'>15: '? t
~~::;7 ~ ~ \.t II l't~(f) IcY1tl
~ -"I,t ., ~C7? ~----'1>'1 "a('~ ,..,.v ~iJ ~ (VI ~
P -7'?"')d 1P(! ~J 11(") ~ V(I"f/J/'rt! ..t?(d1'O ~rl ~,t(l n'7l ? Jl5 (;/V~7 !!l- 'S ('
PLl\NNING }\ND ZONING I1EP.'\R'fHENT MEMORi\NDUH
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
1\1 He\'lbold, Deputy Building Official
william Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Jim Cummings, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
clyde "Skip" Milar, utilities Chief Field Insp.
Vince Finizio, Deputy city Engineer
Michael Haag~~~ing & site Development Administrator
May 18, 1994 (J
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Tuesday, Hay 24, 1994
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
Tuesday, May 24, 1994, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "c" (West Wing)
to discuss the following:
I. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans)
Please note that a statement from your department as to
conditional use approval/disapproval is required either
separately or as part of 2nd review site comments.
A. CONDITIONAL USE
1.
PROJECT:
Palm WaD",
LOCATION:
S.W. 19th Avenue & Roma Way
DESCRIPTION:
48 Bed ACLF built to Alzheimer/Dementia
specifications
II. REVIEW OF TECHIJICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PL^N REVIEW COMMENTS
RECEIVED
A. MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
1. NONE
B. NEW SITE PLAN
1.
PROJECT:
Linear Park (C-16 Canal)
LOCP,TION:
Southside of canal - Seacrest east to
railro:id trac]t.s
DESCRIPTION:
Walking path with fishing piers and
parJ{.ing lot
III. OTHER
None
PLl'.NNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-178
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
P.l Newbold, Deputy Bliilding official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, utility Dept. Chief Field Insp,
Sgt. Jim Cummings, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Vince FiniZi~,~e~t~ineer
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Plannlng & Zoning Director
DATE: June 13, 1994
......... 'RE-..t....
Review - 2nd Review
C-16 Linear Canal Park
south of C-16 canal between Seacrest Boulevard
and the F.E.C. Railroad
Applicant - city of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
NWSP #94-004
Site Plan
Project
Location
File No.
Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced
development for your final review and recommendation.
We would ask that you review this amended site plan documents to determine if
the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your
department.
If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of
building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan
again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded
tc: the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board
for review or held for further revisions by the applicant. All correspondence
shall be received by the Planning and Zoning Department per the following:
Please return your memo and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning
Department by 5:00 P.M. on Friday, June 17, 1994.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to
call Michael E. Haag at 6260 who is coordinating the review of this
development.
XC: (Memo Only)
Don Jae.ger
Floyd Jordan
Charlie Frederick
Tom Dettman
John Guidry
Ron Last, City Engineer
project File (original)
Numbered File
a:2sprev.c16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
.;11- (!? u /s ~rfl.. )
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-125
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Officer Louis Zeitinger, Police Department
John wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Vincent Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
~ (~rL-)
Tambri J. Heyden, planning & Zoning Director
May 4, 1994
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1st Review - New Site Plan ~
Project - C-16 Linear Park
Location - south side of C-16 Canal between seacrest Blvd
and FEC Railway
Applicant - Ronald w. Last, P.E.
File No. - NWSP 94-004
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-
referenced proj ect. Si te Plan Review approval for this proj ect
will be granted by the City Commission/community Redevelopment
Agency. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review
time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and
formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning
and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on Wednesdav Hav 18.
1994. Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the
review of the amended plans (2nd review).
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section
8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
substantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process
the project based on the review standards or the documents
show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections
should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and
Zoning Department.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
Tambri J. Heyden
planning and Zoning pirector
. I :;:.IJt1
M1.chae E. Haag ,
site and Zoning D opment
May 23, 1994
Administrator
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Review - 1st Review -
C-16 Linear Canal Park
South of C-16 Canal between Seacrest Blvd and
the FEe Railroad
Ron Last, P.E. (Lawson, Noble & Assoc" Inc.)
NWSP 94-004
Agent:
File No.:
The following is a list of 1st re'liew comments regarding the Site
Plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project.
Comments identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected
and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted
for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue
through the site plan review process. The applicant shall
understand that all documents/plans submitted for site plan
and/or permit review are subject to additional comments. I
recommend that the applicant/ agent contact me regarding
questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not
intending to correct code deficiencies they should contact me
regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal
deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement.
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. The height of the fence located between the front property
line and the front building line (front setback 25 feet) 0
Lot 2~ ot exceed four c the plans
accordingly, The ence ocated east of Lot 1 is blocking
the bike path. RE'visE' the plans to clarify the issue. Is ../
there a gate proposed for the Seacrest Boulevard entrance to~
the bite path? If there is a gate proposed, specify on the
plan.
"
.. .
Submit
to the
limits
for review a site 'Plan or add the~le, "Site plan"
existing plans. Show and label on the site plan the
of canst 1..1 ion for the entire ro'e
The survey of
to the limits
accordingly,
the property, east of Lot 1, is not clear as
of the subject property. Cla~iLY th~vey
s~e"I';-"'1'-,"'ft'..\ o..~~ ..,.",L. -.-
4.
Add to ns, parking
the city standard drawing
e<N _ ./
area striping 1.n compliance wi th ~ 0 " y
B-90012 (see attached). NO'\.S. ~Dt'"t""dl.c.\~
5 .
To be consistent with the landscape plan, place a note on
the site plan that indicates that the existing 10 feet wide
dirt road is being removed.
v
6.
Add to the landscape legend, a symbol that represents the
st. Augustine sod. Indicate on the landscape plan the
location of the perimeter boundary of the proposed sod for
the entire site.
v--
Specify on the landscape plan, the ground cover material
proposed for the area between the top of the bank and the
edge of the w~ter. ~e.. D l.O D'V 6- \ \ ~
tJ 0 -.<S\. ,,,\~1"~
... s It- ...~ t Oft
u~'"\
page :2
Site Plan Review - 1st review
C-16 Linear Canal Park
The maximum spacing allowed for the vehicle use area ~
screening (hedges) is 2 feet on center. The plans indicate
the proposed hedges to be spaced 30 inches on center.
Correct the plans accordingly. t
Add to the landscape plan, the required vehicle use area t)
screening along the perimeter of the south and north sides
of the vehicle use area. Note; hedges shall be 18 inches in
height at planting and spaced 2 feet on center to form a
continuous barrier.
8.
9.
10.
show on the plan { the line-of-sight triangl~s required on
both sides of the ingress/egress. AlSO note on the plan,
the limits of the space within the triangle that is to
remain unobstructed to allow cross visibility. Relocate
landscape material that is contrary to the unobstructed
cross visibility requirement.
Change e species of the required hedge material proposed
for the per eter of the vehicle use area to a species that
will provide least 50% of the total number of required
hedge plants ative plants. (Note; hedges shall be spaced
a maximum of 2 fe_t on center to form a continuous screen
around the perimete- of the vehicle use area).
0'<-
~ kC?e \1...
A.J dtJ't J i.J l(....-
fl (6-Mt+ ~
II. RECOMMENDATION{S):
None at this time.
attachment
MEH/jj
.\: SPREVIEh'. 1ST
a:sprevlst.c16
/Jot"
el~J..r
the
'v~
s~l
Ol-~
.~,
~
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning pirector
. I ~e.,~
Mlchae E. Haag .
Site and Zoning D~opment
May 23, 1994
Administrator
TO:
DATE:
RE:
site Plan
Project:
Location:
Review - 1st Review -
C-16 Linear Canal Park
South of C-16 Canal between Seacrest Blvd and
the FEC Railroad
Ron Last, P.E. (Lawson, Noble & Assoc., Inc.)
NWSP 94-004
Agent:
File No.:
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the Site
plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project.
Comments identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected
and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted
for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue
through the site plan review process. The applicant shall
understand that all documents/plans submitted for site plan
and/or permit review are subject to additional comments. I
recommend that the applicant/ agent contact me regarding
questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not
intending to correct code deficiencies they should contact me
regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal
deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement.
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. The height of the fence located between the front property
line and the front building line (front setback 25 feet) of
Lot 22 shall not exceed four feet. Correct the plans
accordingly. The fence located east of Lot 1 is blocking
the bike path. Revise the plans to clarify the issue. Is
there a gate proposed for the Seacrest Boulevard entrance to
the bike path? If there is a gate proposed, specify on the
plan.
2, Submit for review a site plan or add the title, "Site Planll
to the existing plans. Show and label on the site plan the
limits of construction for the entire project.
3. The survey of the property, east of Lot 1, is not clear as
to the limits of the subject property. Clarify the survey
accordingly.
4. Add to the plans, parking area striping in compliance with
the city standard drawing B-90012 (see attached).
5. To be consistent with the landscape plan, place a note on
the site plan that indicates that the existing 10 feet wide
dirt road is being removed.
6. Add to the landscape legend, a symbol that represents the
st. Augustine sod. Indicate on the landscape plan the
location of the perimeter boundary of the proposed sod for
the entire site.
7. Specify on the landscape plan, the ground cover material
proposed for the area between the top of the bank and the
edge of the water.
page 2
Site Plan Review - 1st review
C-16 Linear Canal Park
8. The maximum spacing allowed for the vehicle use area
screening (hedges) is 2 feet on center. The plans indicate
the proposed hedges to be spaced 30 inches on center.
Correct the plans accordingly.
9, Add to the landscape plan, the required vehicle use area
screening along the perimeter of the south and north sides
of the vehicle use area. Note; hedges shall be 18 inches in
height at planting and spaced 2 feet on center to form a
continuous barrier.
10. Show on the plan, the line-of-sight triangles required on
both sides of the ingress/egress. Also note on the plan,
the limits of the space within the triangle that is to
remain unobstructed to allow cross visibility. Relocate the
landscape material that is contrary to the unobstructed
cross visibility requirement.
11. Change the species of the required hedge material proposed
for the perimeter of the vehicle use area to a species that
will provide at least 50% of the total number of required
hedge plants as native plants. (Note; hedges shall be spaced
a maximum of 2 feet on center to form a continuous screen
around the perimeter of the vehicle use area).
II. RECOMMENDATION(S);
None at this time.
attachment
MEH/jj
A:SPREVIEW.lST
a:sprevlst.c16
;,I- (f?t~, yd e d/ )
%e City of
'Boynton 'Beach
100 'E. flJoynton 'Beadi. 'Bou!e'lJaT({
P.O. ~310
'Boynton 'Beadi., %niIfa 33425.0310
City %zfl: (4()7) 375-6f)()()
~JU: (4()7) 375-6090
May 4, 1994
Ronald W. Last, P.E.
420 Columbia Drive
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
RE: C-15 Linear Park - File No. NWSP 94-004
Acceptance - New Site Plan Review Application & Submittal ~
Documents
Dear Mr. Last:
On May 4, 1994, your submittal for Site Plan Review of the above
referenced project was reviewed for completeness. It has been
determined that the submittal is substantially complete and accepted
for further processing. A Planning & Zoning Department staff member
will be responsible for the review and coordination of your site
plan through the remainder of the Site Plan Review process.
The next step in the review process is for the Technical Review
committee to review the submittal for compliance with the review
standards identified in Part III, Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 and all applicable sections
of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The results of the review
will be available to you on May 25, 1994.
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
me at (407) 375-6260.
Very truly yours,
~
(ro~ )
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
TJH/jrn
XC: Central File
Chronological File
Project File
~riuJs (jateway to the (julfstTUlm