AGENDA DOCUMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING
LASERFICHE TEMPLATE
PROJECT NAME: C II CL/{&-eS OfC/r/E - / IV 1?~5T1W teStVT
PROJECT TYPE: ~/1E AfJN KE7/IE:w/(!oAli)rTl6NA~ VS~
I '
PROJECT ADDRESS: IS- 6" lu. f.3:;y /lIlON 73E1K11 & CIj)
PROJECT NO. if:: 117
PCN:
DOC TYPE:
(RIGHT CLICK FOR PULL DOWN MENU)
STATUS:
(RIGHT CLICK FOR PULL DOWN MENU)
APPROVAL/STATUS DATE
III r& I 93
QII ;(()(J9
I
DESTRUCTION DATE: I
S :\Plan n i ng\Plann ing\Laserfiche template .doc
AGENDA.
oocU ME"''' 5
\., ,J.;-, ':. . _ - t.
~ ~ t t C,. H
CITY COMMISSION OF THE
~ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
ORDER
In Re:
The application of CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT
This matter came before the City Commission of the City of
Boynton Beach, Florida on Tuesday, November 16, 1993, requesting
approval of a conditional use and site plan review for a drive-in
restaurant proposed for a vacant .93 acre site located at the
northeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road.
The Board having heard the recommendation of city administrative
staff finds the following:
1. The conditional use requested is consistent with the
development of the surrounding area and does not adversely affect
the citizens' general welfare.
2. This matter has been approved subject to all staff
comments, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the applicant's request
for a Conditional Use and Site Plan Review, is granted subject to
staff comments attached.
DATED:
I'),' 8 - 93
BY:
,~~::.;;:,- ~/
A:;' :;~t~~;';"k .-( ()~
:..\'.. . '.' \ J '-. ~ "
;' .:"'''':''' .... ", ~ " .
\~" - . , ,
'-~':. f_
.. .
.'\;.t-~-i" ;.
'l.
~".. :~
\. '2'~
.'\~:;~,
{.-..',.. .
. ~
. "
~-. ~ "1 ;
'- '--..~
, -'1~ I'
\ ~ , . '
"
,.' \
'\ '\ \
"
. ,
."
7A12
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT
CONDITIONAL USE
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-279
THRU:
Planning & Development Board Members
Tambri J. HeYdenJ~'9..1L'L~
Acting Planning and Zoning Di~~r
Michael E. H::ar.\~
zoning and Site inistrator
November 5, 1993 \
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant -
Conditional Use Application/Site Plan Review
FILE No.: 777
SUMMARY: Anna Cottrell, AICP, of BCS-Wescon, the agent for
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc. is requesting approval of a
Condi tional Use and Site Plan Review for a drive-in restaurant
proposed for a vacant .96 acre site located at the northeast corner
of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. The applicant is
under contract to purchase/lease the subject property. The Land
Use Plan designation for the property is General Commercial. The
property is currently zoned C-2 and consistent with Section 6 B 1.
qq. and 11.2 of Appendix A-Zoning. The drive-in restaurant aspect
of the project requires conditional use approval. Consistent with
the Site Plan Review Ordinance, development of the site requires
site plan approval.
PROPOSED USE: The proposed use includes a building where food is
prepared and served to customers through exterior pick-up windows.
There are two (2) drive-thru lanes leading to each side of the
building. A food service pick-up window is located on each side of
the building. There is also a walk-up window to order and receive
food. There is no food served to customers inside the building.
A fenced exterior eating area consisting of tables and other site
amenities is provided for customers wishing to eat at the site. A
total of thirty-four seats is specified on the site plan.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (see attached drawing) The triangular
shaped .96 acre site has two entrance points; a one-way in only
driveway located on Boynton Beach Boulevard and a two-way driveway
located on Old Boynton Road. Both driveways lead to the on-site
parking area and the facilit~es located on the site. Note: The
applicant is requesting a variance from the parking lot code
regarding the distance the driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard is
located from old Boynton Road. At this time the site consists of
a single story seven hundred eighty-five (785) square foot building
that faces Boynton Beach Boulevard. Thirty-four (34) seats are
specified on the plan to be placed on the stamped concrete exterior
patio that is adjacent to the building. The patio area w~th the
majority of the tables is located on the west side of the west
dri ve-in lane and is enclosed with a forty-two (42) inch high
wrought iron fence. The fenced area has a gate with a walkway that
connects with the public sidewalk along old Boynton Road.
The site and building are positioned and designed to allow vehicles
to leave the on-site traffic flow and enter two drive-thru lanes
that lead to exterior food pick-up windows located on each side of
the building. The drive-thru approach is from the north side of
the building. A menu sign and speaker box for ordering food is
located adjacent to each drive-thru lane. The east drive-thru lane
has approximately six, twenty (20) feet long, spaces where vehicles
may stack while waiting service. The six spaces include a space
for a vehicle at the pick-up window, the west side has a total of
approximately seven spaces. After the drive-in customers receive
their food at the pick-up windows they will proceed around the
CHECKERS SP/CU
PAGE 2
south side of the building to re-enter the on-site traffic flow and
access aisle where on-site parking spaces are provided. A walk-up
order window is located on the south face of the building to serve
customers. As previously stated on site eating is available for
customers at exterior tables. The applicant has indicated that the
hours of operation are as follows: serving food; Sunday through
Thursday 10:00 AM to 11:00 PM, Friday and Saturday 10:00 AM to 12
midnight. Approximately eight (8) to twelve (12) employees will be
working during maximum demand hours.
As shown on the color elevation view drawings of the building the
wall material is a combination of stucco (medium texture) colored
Sherwin Williams Apricot Lily #1617 and an accent tile wainscot.
The color of the patterned tile wainscot is white and off white.
Window and door frames are white. Glass blocks laid vertically
with teal neon inserts accent four corners of the building. Four
metal columns support the roof above the drive-thru lanes. The
metal columns and fascia are painted Sherman Williams Indian Summer
#1621. At the top of the columns are three bands of teal neon.
The base of the columns have small accent tiles that match the
color of the wainscoting around the building. A recessed
horizontal band around the fascia of the building is painted
Sherman Williams Windsurf Blue #1755. The highest part of the
building is a white metal equipment screen that has rounded corners
and is seen from all sides of the building. The Community Design
Plan specifies the subject site as located in the Spanish/
Mediterranean design district. The colors of the building are
harmonious with the colors identified in the Spanish/Mediterranean
theme. However, the architectural design of the building does not
have all of the design elements required by the Community Design
Plan. The applicant is seeking relief from the design requirements
regarding roof materials and architectural features.
Proposed signage for the site and building is also depicted on the
color elevation view drawings. Note: All signage shall comply
with the sign code. The applicant is seeking relief from the Board
of Adjustment to allow two menu signs. The wall signage along the
fascia of the building at the roof line consists of white channel
letters back lit with white neon. The color of the other wall
signage is mostly white and/or wJ.ndsurf blue. The site has
directional signs, speaker boxes, safety signs, clearance height
signs and two menu boards. The configuration of these signs are
shown on the colored elevation view drawings. These sign colors
are also predominately white and windsurf blue with some black and
white checker board detailing.
A monument sign is the main identification sign for the project and
is positioned on the property southwest of the building. The color
of the monument sign is consistent with the Checkers corporate
business logo. The following colors are proposed: red background,
white letters for the trademark name, two narrow bands of black &
white checker board detailing and an area, that has yellow
background with black copy, listing types of food.
Si te lighting poles and fixtures are shown to illuminate the
vehicle use area. A dumpster enclosure is located in the northwest
portion of the site. There is a buffer wall proposed for the east
property line starting from the north. The buffer wall is not
required and the agent has indicated that they will not show the
wall on the permit documents for the project. The balance of the
site is covered with landscape material with drainage detention
areas positioned to capture storm water. The landscape material
shown will exceed the requirements specified in the Landscape Code
and the streetscape rerquirements of the Community Design Code.
CHECKERS SP/CU
PAGE 3
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING (See attached location map): The
property is surrounded by land in the C-2 zoning district. The C-2
zoning is identified as Neighborhood Commercial and has a General
Commercial land use designation. The property to the east is
presently vacant and owned by FPL. The C-2 zoning west of the site
terminates at the center of Old Boynton Road and west of the center
line is R-3 Multifamily Residential zoning. A rental apartment
complex is located on the R-3 property. The C-2 Property to the
south across Boynton Beach Boulevard is developed with a
convenience store.
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES: Section 11.2 D of the
Zoning Code contains the following standards to which conditional
uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is
the Planning and Zoning Department's description of the application
as it pertains to the standards. Attached "Exhibit A" is an
evaluation of the standards prepared by the applicant.
The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall
consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under the
terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may
grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the
conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of
property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as
shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding
area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses
when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section.
In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and
Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the
general health, safety and welfare of the community and make
written findings certifying that satisfactory provision has been
made concerning the following standards, where applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and
proposed structures thereon, with particular reference
to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire
or catastrophe.
Two (2) new driveways will serve the site; a one-way in only
driveway will be located on Boynton Beach Boulevard and a two-
way driveway will be installed on Old Boynton Road. The
location of the driveways allow efficient traffic flow on the
site. The layout of the vehicle area and the two drive-thru
lanes enable good control of traffic. The layout of the site
and the location of the driveways offer ease of access for
emergency service vehicles. The applicant is seeking a
variance for the distance the driveway on Boynton Beach
Boulevard is located from Old Boynton Road.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with
particular attention to the items in subsection labove,
and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the
conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
The sixteen (16) parking spaces provided at the site exceed
the number required by two (2) spaces. A loading space is
required for the proposed use, however, the plans do not show
a loading space. A staff comment regarding depicting a
loading space on the site is listed on the Planning and Zoning
Department 2nd review comment sheet. The parking spaces are
centrally positioned on the site and the building shields the
spaces from the off-site view from the west and the on-site
visual landscape screening shields the off-site view from the
other directions. There is ample room on the site to install
a loading space.
CHECKERS SP/CU
PAGE 4
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the
items in subsection 1 and 2 above.
The Director of Public Works is not satisfied with the
location of the refuse area as shown on the plans, however,
the applicant has adjusted the location to satisfy the
Director. The new location was achieved by rotating the
dumpster so that it will be facing east. The refuse area has
a concrete block enclosure with gates. The on-site landscape
material will provide shielding of the refuse area.
4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and
compatibility.
The applicant will construct an on-site lift station to serve
the site. City water lines run parallel to the Boynton Beach
Boulevard frontage of the site.
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to
type, dimensions, and character.
The new landscaping complies with and exceeds the requirements
of the Landscape Code. Ample numbers of trees classified as
large trees have been provided on the plans. The size
specifications of some species exceed the requirements of the
Landscape Code. A concrete block buffer wall is shown
extending along the east side of the property starting at the
north property line. The agent has indicated that the buffer
wall will be removed.
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to
glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility
and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
The signs proposed for the site have been limited to those
required by the Sign Code with the exception of the menu
signs. The applicant is seeking a variance to install two (2)
menu signs. The code allows one (1). The size and location
of the signs shall be consistent with the code. The exterior
lighting is shown on twenty-five (25) foot high poles with a
1000 watt metal halide fixture. Site and pedestrian lighting
shall be installed to meet code specifications. See comment
No. 10 from Engineering Department Memorandum No. 93-306. The
applicant has changed the light fixtures to decorative lamps.
See detail drawing attached to the set of plans.
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
The proposed building setbacks meet or exceed the setbacks
specified in the zoning code for the subj ect site. The
maximum lot coverage is forty (40) percent. The building
footprint coverage for the subject building is one point nine
(1.9) percent. The plans indicate that fifty-two (52) percent
of the site is pervious.
8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and
other property in the zoning district.
The proposed use is compatible with the drive-thru restaurant
that is located approximately two blocks east of the subject
site. The land use to the east and south allow a request for
conditional use approval for a drive-thru restaurant and the
land use to the north and west is residential and will not
allow the drive-thru restaurant use.
CHECKERS SP/CU
PAGE 5
9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to
compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
The building is one story which is compatible with the
surrounding commercial buildings. The residential buildings
directly west of the site are two story.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and
the city as a whole.
The new use will offer fast food and some jobs for the people
in the community.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply
to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
The project conforms to the standards and requirements of the
Site Plan Review Ordinance.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards
in accordance with the performance standards section 4 of
the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of
Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance.
The project and use shall operate in a manner that is in
compliance with the City Code of Ordinance. The restaurant
use will be governed by the Health Department.
REVIEW OF STAFF COMMENTS: Find attached the comments from all
reviewing departments. As indicated in their comments, they
recommend the project proceed through the review process subject to
their comments being corrected and technical code compliance shown
on the permit documents.
The following notable changes will occur to the site, as a result
of the drawings, showing compliance with staff comments:
The concern regarding Memorandum No. 93-215 from the Director of
Public Works will be rectified by the permit drawings showing the
dumpster enclosure being rotated so that the service opening will
be facing east. The new position will the allow the sanitation
vehicle to enter the site from Boynton Beach Boulevard.
To show compliance with comment No. 4 from the Planning & zoning
Department Memorandum, a loading space shall be shown on the site.
There is ample room to install a loading zone south of the parking
spaces shown on the east side of the site.
A traffic impact study was submitted for the project. The trips
generated by the project required the study to be reviewed by Palm
Beach County. Their review determined that the project met traffic
performance standards. (See "Exhibit B"). The CJ.ty Engineer also
reviewed the study and determined that the study was valid and that
the area of influence used in the study for traffic on old Boynton
Road extended to congress Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends
approval of the conditional use and site plan review, subject to
all staff comments, and the approval of the variances regarding
driveway location, number of menu signs and the appeals to the
community Design Plan.
A:CHECKCU.JM
EXHIBIT "A"
'o~3
STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION .
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO AllOW A
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT
The Petitioner, Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., requests by this application
approval of a conditional use to allow a Checkers Drive-In Restaurant on a .96 acre
site located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Old Boynton Road.
Proposed site development for the requested Checkers Drive-in Restaurant is
shown on the site plan accompanying this application. In order to advance the
proposal by Checkers for development of the site, applications have also been
submitted to the City for site plan approval, as well as variances.
The conditional use requested is consistent with the development of the
surrounding area, and does not adversely affect the citizens' general welfare. As
indicated on the site plan accompanying this application, the proposed site
development allows for faithful adherence to, and fulfillment of, the restrictions
and conditions related to the dedication of property for streets (turn lanes) and
sidewalks, as have been determined necessary for the site. ,
The Petitioner offers the following justification for the granting of the requested
conditional use:
1) The proposed use will have no adverse effect on the general health, safety and
welfare of the community, since It provides for adequate and safe Ingress and
egress to the property and the proposed structure. Great care has been taken In
the design of the site to ensure automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
As indicated on the site plan, only one driveway per frontage Is proposed. The
driveways have been jesigned to provide Ingress only from Boynton Beach
Boulevard, and Ingress and egress on Old Boynton Road. The driveway on Old
Boynton Road conforms to the City's requirements for driveway spacing. The
driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard Is the subject of this variance application.
2.,0
The Petitioner has met with the FOOT (Florida Department of Transportation)
regarding the proposed driveway location on Boynton Beach Boulevard. The FDOT
has Indicated that the proposed location provides the only opportunity for the site
to meet the DOT's access management standards. The driveway has been located
outside of the required taper for the turn lane provided for west bound vehicles
turning north onto Old Boynton Road, and as far east of the intersection as
possible. The limitation on access (providing for Ingress only) eliminates any
potential conflict with movements occurring at the Intersection. The proposed
driveway also provides for a smooth traffic flow throughout the site, with potential
conflict areas minimized.
All other elements of (he site's parking lot design meets or exceeds requirements
as provided for in City standards. The parking lot design provides sufficient access
from the public roadway, and maneuvering and access areas are located
appropriately and of sufficient size to permit vehicles to enter and exit the parking
lot in a safe and efficient manner.
2) The site has been designed so that all potentially impacting conditions, such as
from off-street parking and loading, glare, noise and odors, have been mitigated.
No off-site impacts wi!! result, and there will be no detrimental effect on the
adjacent and nearby properties or the City as a whole.
3) Refuse and service areas have been located so as to eliminate any potential
impact on residences in the area.
4) Utility service and connections have been designed in a manner consistent with
the City's utility master plan and engineering standards.
5) Particular care has been given to the landscape and buffer treatment proposed
for the site. The landscape material and design selected is consistent with the
City's Design Plan Standards, and with the existing vegetation and landscape
treatment in the general area. The site plan accompanying this application
indicates the inclusion of a six-foot high wall along the north/east area of the site
where it abuts residential, affording both noise and aesthetic buffering.
6) Signs and proposed exterior lighting, have been proposed to be constructed and
installed in amber that eliminates glare, and is consistent with concerns of traffic
safety and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
7) The site design meets the required setbacks of the district, and includes open
space far in excess of minimum code requirements.
3ot3
8) The use and site design are generally compatible with the development existing
on adjacent properties and other properties within the zoning district.
9) The building height will be limited to maximum allowable for the district.
10) The proposed facility will provide economic benefits for the City as a whole,
by way of: permit and review fees; capital fees (water and sewer connections,
etc); ad valorem enhancement; sales tax money and employment.
11) The proposed site design meets or exceeds all standards and requirements of
the City's codes as applied to site plans.
1 2) The proposed use complies with all performance standards of section 4 of the
City's zoning regulations related to abatement of nuisances and hazards, and
conforms to the City's Noise Control Ordinance.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE:
October 26, 1993
RE:
Site Plan
Review - 2nd Review New Site Plan and
Conditional Use Drive-Thru Restaurant
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant
N.E. Corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard
Old Boynton Road
Robert E. Basehart &
BCS Wescon Consulting, Inc.
777
and
Project:
Location:
Agent:
File No:
The following is a list of comments regarding the 2nd review of
the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the
comments are divided into two (2) categories:
The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved
comments either from the first review or new comments as a result
of the 2nd review. To show compliance with these comments will
not substantially alter the configuration of the site and the
design of the building except for the following comments, Numbers
3, 4, 5, & 6. There has been a formal submittal to seek relief
from the code requirements for comments Numbers 3, 5 and 6.
The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will
enhance the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting
considering that the request for Conditional use/Site Plan Review
and approval of variances and appeals are approved. The
applicant must understand that additional comments may be
generated upon review of the documents and working drawings
submitted to the Building Department for permits for the proposed
project.
1. On the site plan drawing, correctly dimension the setback
distance from the property lines, adjacent to the proposed
monument sign, to the leading edge of the sign. Note: Minimum
setback distance is ten (10) feet. The drawings indicate a
monument sign and the notes on the plan identify a pylon sign.
Correct the plans accordingly.
2. The height limitation for the City is forty-five (45) feet.
Adjust the height of the flag pole shown on the detail drawing
sheet C4 to match the note identifying the forty-five (45) feet
height of the flag pole found on sheet SP.
3. Locate the proposed driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard so
that the distance from the west edge of the driveway is at least
one hundred eighty (180) feet from the intersecting lines of old
Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard or be granted approval
of a variance for said driveway.
Checkers 2nd Review Comments
Page 2
4. On the site plan drawing depict, label and dimension an off-
street loading space that does not interfere with required
parking spaces and/or access aisles.
5. The proposed site is located in the spanish/Mediterranean
design district. Therefore, all proposed structures/buildings
shall be designed consistent with the Spanish/Mediterranean
architectural design theme requirements specified in the
Community Design Code. Incorporate into the design of the
building the proper roof finish element as described in the
design code or be granted relief from the specific design
requirement.
6. The Community Design Code describes architectural features
that are harmonious with specific architectural themes. Each
theme contains a list of features of which fifty (50) percent
shall be incorporated into the design of the structure to achieve
the Spanish/Mediterranean design. An alternate method to
achieving the appropriate features is described in the design
code. Incorporate into the design of the bUilding/site the
appropriate architectural features and/or amenities that are
harmonious with the Spanish/Mediterranean design or be granted
relief from the specific design requirement.
7. On the landscape plan modify the landscaping proposed along
both rights-of-ways that abut the project to be consistent with
the species identified in the Community Design Plan for the
Spanish/Mediterranean streetscape design. Note: Ensure that at
least 50% of the proposed streetscape trees along Boynton Beach
Boulevard and the shrubs/bushes material along Old Boynton Road
are native species. Add to the plant list the species of trees
that is represented by the CE symbol on the landscape plan and
show on the landscape plan where the (native) green buttonwood
material that is identified on the plant list (CON) will be
installed.
8. On the site plan drawing dimension the width of the required
perimeter landscape strip at the narrowest point along the east
property line. Note: Minimum width is 2.5 feet.
9. Add to the minimum striping standard shown on sheet SP the
color of the regular parking space striping. Note: Black for
concrete and white for asphalt. Also correct accordingly the
color listed for other pavement and traffic control striping
shown on the plans and identified in the Grading and Drainage
Specifications found on sheet C3 and the Site Specifications VI
on sheet C5.
10. Identify on the site plan and landscape plan the location of
the decorative lamps. Also, specify the color of the proposed
fountain and wrought iron fence and gate.
11. Regarding the documents submitted to Palm Beach County and
the City of Boynton Beach, resolve the issue concerning
resolution No. R91-62 and the ten (10) foot utility easement.
After this issue has become satisfied, we recommend a new
resolution be passed to clarify Section 1 and 3 of the
resolution.
12. Place a note on the plan indicating the area proposed for
future development shall require site plan review.
13. Provide documentation acceptable to the Engineering and
Planning and Zoning Department regarding dedication and/or rights
of land for the area along Boynton Beach Boulevard where the turn
lane was extended and the new sidewalk was added. These right-
of-way improvements are shown on the subject property.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-236
TO: Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Administrator
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Checker's
DATE: November 2, 1993
Having reviewed the proposed plan revision on the dumpster
enclosure I find it to be more acceptable and recommend that they
go forward.
Eichorst
Works Director
REier
--_._~~~-~---------------
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
DATE:
Harry T. Benoit, City, P.E., City Engineer <jJ, ~ ~ .
October 28, 1993
RE:
Checkers Drive In Restaurant
I recommend that the site plan for Checkers Restaurant be submitted to the City
Commission for approval subject to comments and conditions expressed by James
White,P.E., City Engineer.
Mr. White's comments substantially agree with my previous comments.
92-025/240
,
.-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-305
TO: Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: James D. White, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: October 26, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc.
Planning Department File No. 777
I have reviewed the above referenced plan submittal and offer the
following comments:
1. Provide drainage calculations, soils report including water table
information, permeability test results and percolation rate
calculations to be utilized during the permit review process.
2. Please advise the Office of the City Engineer of impacts
associated with the future development of the depicted retention
area situated along the southeast quadrant of the subject site.
3. Please provide all specifications and material standards for
stormwater drainage system and place upon plans a notation
indicating that stormwater drainage pipes which are PVC shall
be of the type ASTM D-3034, SDR 35 material(s). Revise plans
accordingly.
I have no objection to the plans moving forward to the reviewing
boards conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with the afore-
mentioned staff comments prior to issuance of City building permits.
Jft-
I}
D. White, P.E.
JDW/ck
Note: This memo herein incorporates Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-306
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-306
TO: Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE: October 26, 1993
HE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc.
Planning Department File No. 777
New Site Plan/Conditional Use
In accordance with the City of Boynton Beach, Florida Code of
Ordinances, the applicant shall revise the above referenced plan
as follows:
1. The submitted sign package entitled "Directional Signs" is
unacceptable in that the signs do not comply with State of
Florida statute Chapter 316, Section 316.0747. All directional,
regulatory and advisory signage must comply with the State of
Florida Department of Transportation standards, including the
Federal Highway Administration's Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically
Chapter 5, Section 5.142(g), Parking Lot Construction Standards
(appendix). Signage, such as the pedestrian crossing, the "Do Not
Enter" s"ign, etc. are not permitted to be decorative and must comply
with the standard color and dimensional requirements of the afore-
mentioned state and Federal laws. Revise submitted sign package
accordingly.
2. The proposed landscaping situated at the "nose" of the traffic
diverter at stop bar along the souths ide of the proposed building
site, will in all liklihood result in a line of sight obstruction
diminishing the driver's view of vehicles entering the entrance
from Boynton Beach Blvd. Landscaping, at this location, should
be relocated in order to provide a clear view of vehicles
entering the site.
3. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5,
Section 5-142(g), the existing sidewalk and/or bicyle path along
Boynton Beach Blvd. and Old Boynton Rd., shall transition thru
all ingress/egress approach areas and be constructed to facilitate
the movement of handicap individuals thru this area. Revise plans
accordingly.
TRC Comments/Engineering Memo No. 93-306
October 26, 1993
Page #2
4. Pursuant to State of Florida Access Management laws, the
applicant shall provide the Office of the City Engineer a Letter
of Intent issued from the FDOT indicating preliminary approval
of the ingress approach along Boynton Beach Blvd. Additionally,
the applicant shall provide the Office of the City Engineer with
a Palm Beach County Permit to Construct within the Rights-of-Way
required for the ingress/egress approach connection at the north
end of the proposed site at Old Boynton Road.
5. The applicant shall provide a copy of a State of Florida DOT
permit to amend the turn lane, reference the removal of existing
curb and gutter and construction of the transition area (extreme
southeast corner of project at Boynton Beach Blvd.).
6. The depicted pedestrian crossings are shown in "yellow" and
shall be modified to depict the color "white".
7. The extreme north end of the pavement area is devoid of perimeter
post-mounted lighting, therefore, the applicant shall depict
lighting in this area in such a manner as to avoid the creation
of glare along the adjacent rights-of-way.
8. The applicant shall revise plans to depict swale area along the
east rights-of-way of Old Boynton Road (along property lines) to
be developed into a standard swale section, fully sodded and
irrigated. Revise plans accordingly.
9. The handicap stall depicted on sheet SP does not comply with
state and City standards. I recommend the applicant obtain a
copy of the Department on Community Affairs Accessibility
Requirements Manual.
10. The applicant is herein advised that the 1000 watt metal halide
fixtures mounted on 25' high fiberglass poles may generated
excessive glare and result in the site being too bright. The
applicant shall submit photometric data and such photometric
data shall include the portion of public rights-of-way adjacent
to this site.
11. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, all areas affected by
drainage shall be fully sodded. Revise plans accordingly.
12. The applicant is herein advised that should the depicted dry
retention area designated as "area available for future development"
result in this area being developed with additional structures, etc.,
a formal stormwater drainage plan shall be submitted in order to
ensure compliance with City codes relative to stormwater
management.
TRC Comments/Engineering Memo No. 93-306
October 26, 1993
Page #3
13. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5,
Section 5-140(a), "..provide a maximum degree of safety and
protection for the public...", shall provide information to the
Office of the City Engineer regarding what measures will be
utilized to protect the general public utilizing the outdoor
eatery area from errant vehicles along Old Boynton Rd. and
Boynton Beach Blvd. (ie. guard rails, bollards, etc.)
I recommend that this plan move forward to City boards with a
favorable recommendation, subject to compliance with these comments.
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
James White, P.E., City Engineer (as discussed)
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-215
October 27, 1993
To:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Director
Via:
Don Jaeger, Building Official
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Re:
TRC COMMENTS
2nd Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant & Detached
Rental Building
Location - N. E. corner of Old Boynton Rd &
Boynton Beach Blvd.
After reviewing the submitted plan documents, it is with regret
that, even though they have removed the two-story office building
from the site plans, most of our comments have not been met.
Item No.1, A - D still stand and, for further clarification,
attached is a comment sheet from Phil Sy from our Department and
Vincent Finizio from Engineering.
Item No.2, A requires that designated handicap access from the
street to the building entrance must be in compliance.
Item No.3, The building must comply with the Design Guidelines
for the Spanish/Mediterranean District.
Item No. 4 has been met in part by the elimination of the office
building. However, Item No.5 also referred to Comment No.4,
which may apply to the modular restaurant building.
Please be advised that, after 9/30/93, all manufacturers of
modular buildings must be certified by the State of Florida
Department of Community Affairs if their units are installed in
Florida.
Items No. 6 and 7 are both self-explanatory and must be complied
with.
Although some of these comments can be met at the time of permit,
unless the Planning Department has certified that Spanish/
Mediterranean guidelines have been met and sidewalks surrounding
this project will be constructed, this department would not like
to see this project go forwar rough the approval process.
~~
AN/mh
A:CHECKERS.TRC
.. "" '~911
~.~~~~.
"
,,-
t....:" ~~ ,_ S TAT E 0 F F LOR IDA
..... ;~} .~ "
~-:-,ri~";"I\ R T MEN T 0 F COM M U NIT Y A F F A IRS
~.~ <? /
.~I~ 1~'-" /,'
'tERVIEW DRIVE. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100
I" \...~
yl '
,
, -
~
LAWTON CHILES
LINDA LOOMIS SHELLEY
Secretary
Covernor
August 11, 1993
Dear Building Official:
This is to.~nform you that Florida will no longer be a
::a~e:: o,f .'t.he CC1U"c';.l of St:~tes, on Industrialized Housing and ./
Buildings after September 30, 1993.
The Council of states on Industrialized Housing and
Buildings was established in 1986 to facilitate the approval,
acceptance and installation of manufactured buildings between the
state of manufacture and the state of installation. Under the
agreements of this Council, the state of manufacture's approval
of a building would be recognized by the state where the building
was installed.
" .
The Department determined that the Council system was not
working adequately and therefore, concluded that it was in the
best interest of both Florida citizens and manufacturers to
terminate its membership in the Council.
After September 30, 1993 all manufacturers must be certified
by the Florida Department of Community Affairs to manufacture
buildings for installation in Florida and their buildings must be
inspected and approved under Florida's system.
Documents Reauired for Permittina after SeDtember 30. 1993
An individual making application for a permit to install a
manufactured building in your area of jurisdiction must submit
the following documents:
1. Plans approved by a Florida Department of community
Affairs certified Plans Review Agency.
2. Energy Code form bearing a Florida certified modular
plans examiners stamp.
3. A current letter issued by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs granting the manufacturer approval to
manufacture buildinqs for installation in Florida.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. HOUSING AND COMM{JNITY DEVElOPMENT · RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
~~~,
Building Officials
August 11, 1993
Page Two
4. In addition, each building installed in your
jurisdiction must bear a Florida insignia.
Please contact me at 904/487-1824 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~.d: /~-
Lawrenc ~;an
Planning Manager
~nufactured Buildin~s Program
LHJ/bs
- ---------.----.---------.------------------
:v,"
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
.P.o. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Phone: (407) 375-6350
"
i'
PL.AN"S REVIEW COMMENTS
Name of Reviewer rn. \ L\ '?' c;/~ \;, Permi t #
Type of Review
9\0~
\0\ 2-2-- \q~~
Project
c.\-\~
Date of Review
Contractor
The Building Department and other applicable City departments have reviewed yot
permit application and supporting documentation and have de'termined that yot
submittal does not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances c
described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please rectify the plans t
comply wi th the code comments and resubmit two (2) complete corrected sets of plar
to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any questions regarding
comment, you may call to speak with the reviewer who made the specific comment
(The reviewer, affiliated department and applicable phone number are indicated a
the top of each comment sheet). If the comment cannot be rectified by a phor.
call, a conference may be scheduled. If a conference is necessary, an appointmer.
is recommended to assure that the reviewer is available. To expedite the re-revie
process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit documents at th
Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making change
to signed and sealed documents by anyone other than the design professiona
responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is based upon you
prompt response to the comments. Please advise us if we can be of assistance t
you in the re-review process.
*******************************************************************************
Applicant's
phone #
Date called & caller's
initials: 1st
Comments rec'd. by:'
Name (print):
'(signature) :
Date:
Comments
only
Plans &
comments_
2nd
3rd
***************************.****************************************************
A..) ~ 0\..) m~ ~t/:)\.""tl~ 0\'7 \)\'t-~,~_ '?\.~) - \'+\:(z:. \?L.At0 \.S> ':?Mw\0C-
6 I H.oi.)C. AUO':.,)~Q \7-{ (~ \0 "'\: ~ LOT
I
\?) ~~9U.)& t?\.~p ~ ~Vl) '\?lAO PO€:"? fJO~ \A~\ "7eX~\<-.
c-) \ ~ ~li ~Q -Qk--~u.~ \)A'i.\~ -r\L ~9 6>~ AO~c;.-rHt=ot- ,
D") ~91~'Q\~ 0{(t,?IV~ \0- ~ \1Uc.-L-U~O wi \\~\.C? W~\~L. KA.',C.
.
AO~ N..LoWe-O \0 &~ ~().. 'r-\. ~.
~ \ n~nb ~ C()HM t;l\\3 ~\ VI ~CA..t'1" Fa N-I 'l..1 D ~. G...,. B.16. R:.. 40"7 3"75''" 2..~2..
,)'lh ~ Et.l1Eli'~t'\ \!>> unAaL~' <.... '{2aJlse ~'A(\S ~ ~c.\---"J):o;r 5"0) R5 -: ~ ~(\ .
~)?u ')(-lOb ~,^<'I~ \J,,",CJro:f:~,"h'f .~~f..."f\o..-ns.-.1c>~I(,..-t:l:>OT!:fr'b W11.A-2.. ~t'f""
~ ~ r:p~ "l4AG. ?Gl..U~ ~V'\& eah:)~ N2t;; IV'\QrDtmeer" ~ sh..c..a.O b.t... AOf' ~ vo-
~1-e, Co>...rtocu-t, h.'" ",\~:::l;:o'r ~ Fe> C;:;;'11> S "fOR- ~ q r'\ ~ou1-~ 4
, .
"'Pt,J 2!:i)ANf""TO FIA-- 5r:Prn.n-e;. 3'(0 .074-7 ~ ~ennoneb ~f\ FT6E" s~l
~-+oe>>--t ~ F.'D.OT. A-r\d t~ ~~. ~~e ~~A--€'€
i.~ (\0\ ~l \.k.d .
~~ ,4\\ ~lPnt:P-\ ~Y'\%e' Ie.- S1'Of - 'fl~ ~u... shA-t\ ~()
:b}; l~ c.:~'''k(' lP\~ ~ ef ~. ~.
A:COHMENTS. WP5 - bh 1/8/93, Rev. 8/93
-----
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-183
September 9, 1993
TO:
Chris "':utro
Planning Di
THRU:
Don Jaege :
Building !
FROM:
Al Newbol
Deputy Building Official
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT & DETACHED
RETAIL BUILDING - 1ST SITE PLAN REVIEW
Per your request, the Building Department offers the following
comments for the above referenced project:
1. All signs must comply with Chapter 21 of the Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances. Please rectify the plans to comply with
the following:
A. Section 21-25 permits only 1 menu board, not 3 as
proposed, and allows a maximum height of 5 feet to the
top of the sign (see menu board on the front of the
building) .
B. Only 1 free standing sign is allowed for the site.
What about the signage for the retail building?
C.
Only 4 directional signs are allowed. Five are
proposed.
r ..-e:=;
D. Setbacks for all signs shall comply with Section 21-23.
2. Please show the following on the plans:
A. Handicap access from the street to both buildings.
B. Handicap ramp at the parking stall for the 2-story
building.
3. The buildings must comply with the Design Guidelines for the
Spanish/Mediterranean District.
4. Section 1104.2.1 of the Standard Building Code requires not
less than 2 approved independent exits accessible to each
tenant area, serving every story, except in 1 and 2-family
dwellings. The second floor of the retail/office building
needs to comply with this requirement which will
necessitate an opening to be approved in 1 of the elevation
plans. Please show location for approval.
~.
"
/'
1"
Memo No. 93-183 to Chris Cutro
RE: CHECKERS
September 9, 1993
Page Two
5. The restaurant is a modular building; however, comment #4
may apply to it as well.
6. There are no dimensions shown on the floor plans; however,
Section 1105.2 of the Standard Building Code does not permit
exit access corridors or hallways in excess of 20 feet.
7. Sidewalks must be provided along Boynton Beach Boulevard and
Old Boynton Road.
NOTE: The Building Department does not object to the Conditional
Use Request subject to our comments being met.
AN: bh
CHECKERS
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-284 WDC
TO: Planning and Zoning Department
FROM: Flre Department
DATE: October 28, 1993
SUBJECT: TRC site Plan
CHECKERS
We have no objections to this plan.
/4f tr/J) c!-/
WILL AM D. CAVANAUGH FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
WDC:CP
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 93 - 453
DATE:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Diry..tor,
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director.
October 22, 1993 I
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Checkers Drive-in Restaurant - Second Review
PI ease be advised that none of our original comments have been
addressed by the plans submitted for second review. My assistant
met with the project engineer earlier this week to review design
comments and provided a copy of our standard criteria at that time.
All comments must, however, be addressed prior to building permit
issuance, and we have no objection to this project proceeding
through the review process.
In addition to the previous comments, the applicant will be
required to pay a capacity reservation fee of $790.02 to this
office within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval of the
site plan, or upon request for my signature on Dept. of HRS permit
applications, whichever occurs first.(Sect. 26-34(E))
Please refer any additional questions on this matter to Peter
Mazzella or Skip Milor of this office.
JAG/PVM
bc: Peter Mazzella
xc: Skip Milor
File
Assistant to the Utilities Director - 0.5 hours
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-404
TO: Chris Cutro,
Planning & Zoning D
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: September 15, 1993
SUBJECT: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant and Detached Retail Bldg.
File #777 - 1st Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
1. Irrigation to be supplied by well (City Compo Plan,
Policy 3C.3.4),
2. Backflow preventors to be furnished and installed by
owner (Sec. 26.107).
3. Show easement for new 6" watermain (12' minimum)
(Sec.26-33[a] ).
4, Relocate water services to come off new 6" watermain
(in green area) (Sec. 26.16[c]).
5. Consider utilizing existing 6" watermain near south
side of property.
6. No trees are permitted in utility easements (App. C
Art. VIII, Sec. 9).
7. Palm Beach County Health Unit/HRS permits for new
watermain, lift station and force main will be
required,
8. Add note to plan sheet #C-2: "Onsite Lift Station and
Force Main to be Privately Owned and Maintained".
9, Provide Fire Flow Calc's: The water system shall be
designed to provide fire flows of 1500 gpm at 20 psi
for commercial properties (App. C, Art X, Sec. 16).
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor, 375-6407, or Peter Mazzella, 375-6404.
19b
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
Chief Field Inspector - 1.0 hr.
Asst. to the Director - 0.5 hr.
Administrative Asst. - 0.5 hr.
MEMORANDUM
POLICE #93-169
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Zoning & Planning Director
FROM:
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
DATE:
October 27, 1993
REF:
2nd Review - Checkers Restaurant
Ms. Heyden,
I have reviewed the plans as submitted. My earlier comments were
addressed.
I recommend that the plans be forwarded for further review by
Planning and Development Board.
, .11kti~i
sgt
MK/jb
QC\ L8 19r:r3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
'fl1ntl56?1 HEybFvJ
Christopher ("'lltro,
-:r oJlIA.J W ('L-bAJ.&~
DATE:
/0/;;'5/er 3
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans
nd Zoning Director
FROM:
RE:
Project:
L J..flCc,kK~S tRiu~ '1vJ R~J'1A~~ArJT"'
After reviewing the
referenced project
Department recommends
the Planning and
consideration.
amended plans for the above
the tRJt(f(~AT"O.J t- PA~K ~
that the project be forwarded to
Development Board for their
This department will not be required to sign-off the
permit documents associated with the subject project.
m
OCT l 0 J9q1
C:AHEND1.ALD
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '93-430
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
J<~~
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
RE:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc.
DATE:
October 21, 1993
The applicant has not stated whether the existing trees will be
relocated, removed or preserved on site.
The project should proceed with review by the Planning and
Development Board.
I will address this comment at the permit stage.
KH:ad
(.'
, ~'11 !
I 4:11
t:,l ,
\H
UI
, ',hi
I r '.I
LI
f.l1
U
1".1
':1,
['J
I \'1
I kH
n'.:1 ~~
I.-I
I ~ 1 0
11;"1 Z
L1 .....
11'.:1 'I' 2HR
I.~I ,.. >
I t:.\1 i~~
~I F1 .....
\"
II \,J...,', ~
II \'\
1111
'11
~I)\
,:\
1<1
I'~
I
F\
_._e_e_e_e_e_._e_._ _ _ _ .... --
- - - - - - - - - - -fEW-0u5 iOYNTON ROAD
I
I
E
Ii
~'I
--~'-
,
/
/
..
o
.
I'
t' '" /I
.1 /I'
~~ /I
;= 1/
~!
.. II
.. II~
II~
,I
I"
,!I
1'1,
III
II
I
. , pI . . ;.S ~ .~ (I)
:.. !:!
~ :I ., - S~ ~
0, ..po >
N I!~ r.-
Q) i...
z'" ....
. 0% fi
. ,.,
~ = , ~
I ; BOYNTON BEACH
. FACILITY
.~ ___.a.~__
( ~ E ~...-. -
_ ~'I LANDSCAPE I
,..... .8ft
0UIlW1'III. ~ ..." (It" "1__ PLAN
.. .
?/_ . ,;<. 1. \ d< I r /' .u~l""/ \ .)1 \"/!1 '1 .~
~ ~"A HI! Y
.~ . ". ." ,,~I ""'~' \
~ ,; +.-"~~ ~ ~~ "; t,)} ~ ~' "".
. ,4'; ~.. *' ~
,~~~: ~ ~" ~ J.,. ~ ~ ~ ~1:2:'
~ &.<(' d- . '- r .- ·
~~ ~.. " d- '.., /1 · ( ·
. .. "', :><, . ~' . '- /' ;. . \ 1tJ~
~ "...~,'" - . ~ "'~ ... y
I \ ...~,,-T:''\.. .,. O("} j !- U ~ ~ '" ~ ~ : ~
,)' . ,..- '
'''l \.i~lg ~ ~" ~ t:, '7
q ~/o.: ~.f <<>. ~ ~
,'0 .' ../ I _".. ~ ~ I,)' 'S ~
!1 > 6'd 'lI/ :>:.. ~.I ' ' ..
,," :l:i-"o ....~*' ~ z IJ.. z ~ S ~
_ >.'...~ to ~ / m..... :=---- " · "l\. I
} I" "'to ,,,' I';. , ~."'-
~~' ~.ff . '~(\ 'po "($> ,~ .~~ ~. ,- ~ .." ..,:...;' ~T ~ 'l-
, ,2' , ~,""'~ -.'" . _--t,-t!\) , ~ 1~1~ ~ ..} .)l'- ~ ~ ~ t1) ~ ~ ~.l ~
'* {(' I II l'-. _ Irt ~.....,.:.... ~. ,..", '[I> ., ;;.,~;. .,. ",..
~ ' ~'"I _ ~~. o,.~ ~ ~ 3 ":"""-~' n If I ~~ Q ~ ~ '" ':'!o:
,,"'- , '" !' J.fool-~~"'" ..:' .i'~ ~ ~ '7 ~x
'/ \ ,,' @t. t:.O~ ' _I ~ .,.
~ ~ ...,..~.''''}' $-1 ..\ ~ ~ ~
..... ~', II />.l' i" ·
'I...,," ",,,,,-
0/-111i. "'f '!J ,,\';.- ~
\ '7. 'j',.... Ql I '- .., ....!!.,::;- · I
; ~ ~ ..... _0<1<< ..~"
, n '"2... " . ' .. i"
~'lIl;, .:; .;) _ _ _ ;/ ~ 'd.
_ _ .." i _ _ ~,. " ~~ :~a;-
_.: ~i/, V'~ ,~'~ ~ ~ ;./, ~ ~
" W^.; 1 ' " J.. ~ J.- l p...
~ r ./. ..G "-- ~.... ~ f.i: l;;U
. ~-
eo'(N1"OH ~EA~K e>~V\?"
, _ ...-r----. - --
"",., '1'lD~,or ,.~~ /,--Y/ )~'1 ~., .'"
~'Ol J@\...,II. \ ~ /1 1. Jt · .'.1 t" ~. ~',' $
=' _ I '\' \' ' - II' · '
, ...., t -P- ..,+ ,4' ,I ~:J' ',::' ~ I; ''" \
,/ / ' ' 1 0 . 0 ...r
,3\ ,4 ~ I ~', \1" le':"i 9.Z(l,zt ,~,':'o ,,' \ i.....
_; . . . "., I . '- .' .. . , . '," ,.
[
-.;- "-~'
/ . l
.". . \' ' _ "~ . ':l! \ all <..!.! ;
. .,,~. ; t ,
/ ~
W c.-'--' .' ~ '
~ 0- " I \6 \ 1".1\' -,nt' 22 . "~6IV211' ~
(.. \ ,"_"b \-\, '. - \!.<- ,\g;. 191...'.IC~I" -,,' ~ ~
r ,'. .' :.- ....,
.. ,~ ~- ~O. {Oo"'~~ ,~" -~~ .~. "
_, ' \l..i"'->'- '~ t\ l~ ~ ~ ~.! \~' \:".'J I! 12
~ -;. ....
,"I' uJ
... k " "\ ~ \5
!} \~,.1 k It' 0 &! Ii ,,? 4 I- \ ' - Ul
, \.5! I"~ d" -' I.. U\
(,r. .-~,I.. .... '
',' " - 151 -c"-:';"'"
_..... ..1,:-'.,'1':, ...
. ..; '~.. . I' It./ c; ~., "'.f \ ~
,,\ 1.0\ ,!.. -; .." ," ":r ~
_ I .".... , ..,
1"'_ \"'.,' I' :101,'''l
. t.l~ I~ Ii! L" I~I !1;l 210. ~ ,,~\ '''~
" '.' :~:, .," " \ \
.;
"
\ e\.. \~ U \!J. ..~ ~. ....
Ii: . . \ \J ~ "" " , .. ;;- e; \,.;...- ..-.
"I ~"'., ',' '"""J
, r 2' '. t t.\; 1..
.' \-s:\.. u' II
"-:\A' ,.;:... ~"!-~ .-'~
........ .........
- . ,
~ 'd \ 1-. .-;;.
...'\.'&~' ...
__"' ... ~ A '
~,:~t.
~'
--f - -- .. - -~ -
\
~ .
\
\ .
,...-
:"'- - '\ - ...----""'-
, ... ......-~ ~ 1~ R'" -" 7~
, ~" 03>- --
\ ~I ' - 54 Ii . @
\ \ @"
\2 \ I 2J}
I \ " \
. ,
0:;:-
.....
-,. ... .
"1*.-
@ ~
1. ~
I.. ___
(~~
lW
4: ~'/'
r 4
6
'\
, -~-
T' -oJ ur
~~ . ~I\ 22-
<,-": 'l.
-
., .
f)(,E AN
r' \~,J',
- \, - ;.:. \ \
_ _ " ~9"'"' 1 1
~\ \ \2~ )~ \ ~' i7.1\ i-
\ \ \ \' "rj\'
\\", I,
." 5.'11
------
'"
"
.,
IO~
~l
'1,1 ' ·
-
@
,~ \ 0.'
.
~.
1 :.'T 1
~ ..&! '
\
~\
u '"
\ '13 fAY.MPR
J" :: .2.00' ~
1
o l,,~
---
b-~
~
~ ,~
a \~ I~
~ A ~ Irt" l
2. 1t,'" 1\;)
~~ is." ~;;;
~
--
'-
~
1'" .,. It Ie,' ~
y ! ~
.....
~l -I}: .
~.,.. 0
,.rl !. -
~yS ~~ ~.\
--
~
~ ~
~
+"
y
",
".
.
<:,0;
~~ \ h~
... -', ~!",.,
.
\ -'
~,.;:' . ~
l~ \ fi.
~
\;.~ \1:\ \1-
~\ . ,I' '4
EXHIBIT "B"
tA-v
Board of County Commissioners
Mary McCartt, Chair
Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman
Karel' T. Marcus
Ca.rol A. Roberts
',v;1t;-en H. Newell
f\;J!i Aaronson
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
September 9, 1993
Mr. Harold Benoit, P.E.
Gee & Jenson
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923
RE: CHECKERS DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT
,.4 I'
Dear Mr. Benoit:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study for
the project entitled Checker's Drive-Thru Restaurant pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development
Code. The project consists of a Checker's Drive-Thru restaurant and 4,400 square
feet of retail. The build-out for the project is 1994. The project will
generate 1,361 daily trips.
The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding
this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
: ..
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
,>>-..-Yr4
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Sen~Registered Civil Engineer
cc. Chris Cutro, City of Boynton Beach
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn24
..
00
SI:P
I ') /qq1
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
@ p'.n/ed on recycJed "."er
"An Equal Opportunity. Affirmative Action Employer"
Box 11129 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1129 (401) 684-4000
y)- ---,'"
/t.- ( i,..
~
//'
-/'
/
v
JiJN-2~'-1994 2:03pm 94-225687
ORB 8325 Ps 1 986
1111.,111111.111111111
~ 10.00 Doc .70
lOD
EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE made this 9th
day of May
1994
,A.D., ~~,
by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
a corporation existing under the laws of
Delaware
and having its principal ~lace of business at Clearwater, FL
first party, to the City of Boynton Beach, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, second party:
(Wherever used herein, the terms, "first party"
and "second party" shall include singular and
plural, heirs, legal representatives and assigns
of individuals and the successors and assigns of
corporations, wherever the context so admits or
requires. )
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the first party is the owner of property situate in
Palm Beach County, Florida, and described as follows:
Legal Attached - See Exhibits A, B, & C
and,
WHEREAS, the second party desires an easement for water and
sewer utilities and/or other appropriate purposes incidental
thereto, on, over and across said property,
and,
WHEREAS, the first party is willing to grant such an
easement,
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual
covenants each to the other running and one dollar and other
good and valuable considerations, the first party does
hereby grant \Into the party of th~ second part, its
successors and assigns, full and free right and authority to
construct, maintain, repair, install and rebuild facilities
for above stated purposes and does hereby grant a perpetual
easement on, over and across the above described property
for said purposes.
ORB
83 --.e- ,..,
..:: _z r S
1987
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the first party has caused these
presents to be duly executed in its name and its corporate
seal to be hereto affixed, attested by its proper officers
thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first above
written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the prese e of:
. . ...1
........a. t I
.'
\' '.
~ I'
t- '~-1 CC?RP~~~TZ SEAL)
. "
-
. ", .'.:.,,',
''::ti~~~'''~F J~
COUNTY OF (;i!Juu..Lf.~./
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an
officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid t~
take acknowledgements",", ~~ersoiially appeared .:::rAni F-S ~ fL)4~ j~
, II/.) JM.- -LJ ./J- ~ ...
well known to me to be the President and ~
respectively, of the Corporation named as first party in the
foregoing Easement and that they severally acknowledged
executing the same in the presence of two sUbscribing
witnesses freely and voluntarily, under authority duly
vested in them by said Corporation, and that the seal
affixed thereto is the ~rue Corporate seal of said '
Corporation.
WITNESS my hand and of~ial seal in the County and
~~;~~ last aforesaid tr.is ~day of ~ ' A.D.,
My commission expires:
~.....
C~~ OFFICIAL seAL
DIANNE M. AUS TIN
~, My Commission E:'tplres
~.I April 28. 1996
~~~OF~.. Comm. Nu CC 1971114
.........
Return to: (enclose self. addressed stamped envelope)
Name
Address:
ORB 8325 Fs 1988
Property Appraisers ParcelldenlificaljQn (Folio) Number(s):
EXHIBIT A
+
SKETCH AND LEGAL OESCAIPTION
BY
PULICE LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
~ NOB HLL ROAD
SUNRISE, FLORDA 333S1
(305) 572-1777 . FAX -(305) 572-1778
+
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A portion of Section 20, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, being
more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCE at the Southeast corner of said Section 20; thence run South 88002-' 21" West along the
South line of said Section 20 for a distance of 1631.39 feet to the Easterly right-of-way line
of a forty foot road as shown on the plat of subdivision of said Section 20, as recorded in
Plat Book 7 at Page 20 of the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence run North
00049'09" East along said East right-of-way line for a distance of 106.84 feet to a point;
thence run South 44010'51" East for a distance of 27.89 feet to a point; thence run South 890
59'53" East for a distance of 60.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run North 00000'07"
East for a distance of 32.00 feet to a point; thence run South 89059'53" East for a distance of
12.00 feet to a point; thence run South 00000'07" West for a distance of 32.00 feet to a point;
thence run North 89059'53" West for a distance of 12.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
(containing: 384 square feet)
NOTES:
1) This ske~ch does not represent
a Field Survey.
2) Bearings are based on the South line
of Section 20 being South 88002'21" West.
.I'"
5.....'0.51'"[ Sb
C7.89 bO
P"
0">
o
z
-60.00'
589'59'53"E
POINT OF
BEGINNING
589'59'53"E
/ 12.00'
~ ~
/'/. "
~gp
~ NIS
"'0
~ ~
,
)
CHECKERS
SITE
"-
""
~
-Q9-
a
~
o
a:
z
o
!z
>-
o
al
a ~I
..J 21
o
~ il
~ i)
~.
I
I
~
!
'"
'"
""
N89'59'53"W
12.00
""
---~
-.::::"..
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
-'-"
_.-"
_ . _ . ~o~ ~ ~C~O~45-43 ~ - . - '.:=:t
S88'02'Z!"W 1631.39' POINT OF COWMENcalENT ~
s.E. CORNER SECTION 20-45-43
FnJE: CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS
SCALE:
ORDER NO.: 28512C
DATE: 5- 3-94
,"~~~
c;z~~
~ - ;?-cy d-
Boynton Beach Blvd/New Old Boynton Road
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS
FOR:
John F. Pul1c8, Reg. Land Surw)lOf' 12691
MIcl\a.el Chart.. Fl~n. R~ Land Surwyor 13281
stcrt. of Florida
lJ)
HelUrn 10, \en<.lose Sell-dOOreSSeo Sldm~eO en~elope)
Name
. Address:
ORB
83-,,:\S PI:; 1 C!Bc=
.&:- --" I _ ~ ;'
Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Number(s):
EXHIBIT B
+
SKETCH AND LEOAL. DESCAPTlON
BY
PULICE LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
S381 NOS HLL ROAD
SUNRISE. FLORIDA 33351
(;305) 572-1777 . FAX (305) 572-1778
+
LEGAL 'DESCRIPTION:
A portion of Section 20. Township 45 South, Range 43 East. Palm Beach County, Florida, being
more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCE at the Southeast corner of said Section 20; thence run South 88002'21" West along the
South line of said Section 20 for a distance of 1631.39 feet to the Easterly right-of-way line
of a forty foot road as shown on the plat of subdivision of said Section 20, as recorded in
Plat Book 7 at Page 20 of the public records of Palm Beach County. Florida; thence run North
00049'09" East along said East right-of-way line for a distance of 106.84 feet to a point;
thence run South 44010'51" East for a distance of 27.89 feet to a point; thence run South 890
59'53" East for a distance of 118.95 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run North 00000'07"
East for a distance of 25.00 feet to a point; thence run South 89059'53" East for a distance of
12.00 feet to a point; thence run South 00000'07" West for a distance of 25.00 feet to a point;
thence run North 89059'53" West for a distance of 12.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
(Containing 300 square feet)
NOTES:
1) This sketch does not represent
a Field Survey.
2) Bearings are based on the South line of
Section 20 being South 88002'21" West.
a I
~ I
a:
z ~
~
)-
0 I
m
a ~I
..J
0 WI
~ ",
0
...
W :t'
z ~I
~
CHECKERS
SITE
"-
"
,
~~
S89'59'5J-E
12.00
"
'"
S44'O'S1.E
27.89
NOO"OO'07"E 1\.' ~'OO'07.W
25.00' -=--l '\ -- 25.00'
t\..
Si'i'5l1'5J"E 118.95' - --' \ --
N89'59'5J.W
POINT OF 12.00
BEGINNING
'"
'-.....
~~
~
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
-.--
-'--
_' _' ~~1li~S~C~~45-43~ _' _, ~
S8l!'02'21"W 1631.39' POINT OF COMMENCEWENT ~
5.E. CORNER SECllON 20-45-43
FIJE: CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS
SCALE: 1" = 50'
ORDER NO.: 28512B
[)A11:: 5-3-94
Boynton Beach Blvd/New Old Boynton Roa<
Boynton Beach. Florida
~ CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS
~ "~f.
"'~
/ff~b+
Joh." F ~~Ull(;". Reg. Land Surveyor 12691
~lchQeI r-ttan.. A)fln, RC9. Land Surwyor 13281
state of florfdo
( 1)
Heturn to: (enClose sell-addressed stamped envelope)
Name
AddreSs:
ORB B32=~~ P9 1 C;:S~O
OOROTHY H WIlKEN
r'L~R':' rr: "'HE rOlJnT - pc r.-IIINTV i-.-L.
w .....,r, Jr I w...1'{ ,I..' ...U... I'
Property Appraisers ParcelldenlificaliQn (Folio) Number(s):
EXHIBIT C
+
SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPllON
BY
PULICE LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
5381 NOS HLL ROAD
SUNRISE. FLORIDA 33351
305 572-1777 . FAX 305 572-1778
+
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A portion of Section 20, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, being
more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCE at the Southeast corner of said Section 20; thence run South 88002'21" West along the
South line of said Section 20 for a distance of 1631.39 feet to the Easterly right-of-way line
of a forty foot road as shown on the plat of subdivision of said Section 20, as recorded in
Plat Book 7 at Page 20 of the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence run North
00049'09" East along said East right-of-way line for a distance of 106.84 feet to a point;
thence run South 44010'51" East for a distance of 27.89 feet to a point; thence run South 890
59'53" East for a distance of 254.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence continue South 890
59'53" East for a distance of 26.85 feet to a point on a curve, concave to the Northeast, the
center of which bears North 30054'18" East from said point; thence run Southeasterly along the
arc of said curve, having a radius of 477.47 feet thru a central angle of 03011'10" for an arc
distance of 26.55 feet to a Point of Cusp; thence run North 75025'41" West for a distance of
51.66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. (containing: 171 square feet)
NOTES:
1) This sketch does not represent
a Field Survey.
2) Bearings are based on the South line of
Section 20 being South 88002'21" West.
a
~
a:
~- ~ C'0-51
Z 27.
>-
~ I - - - - S89'59"53"E 254.54'
9 ~I
o ~
~ ~I
w ~
z ~l
\1 _._'
~ -.-'
'"
CHECKERS
SITE
'"
'"
""-
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
_ . _ ' ~OU~ ~ ~Cll~~4S-43 ~ ' _ ' ~
S88'02'21'W 1631.39' POINT OF' COMMENCEMENT ~
5.E. CORNER SECTION 20-45-43
~LJ:: CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS
SCALE:
ORDER NO.:
DATe
28512A
5-3-94
Watermaln
s;- ~ --0/4--
Boynton Beach Blvd/New Old Boynton Road
Boynton Beach, Florida
~~ CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS
John F', Pulice. Reg. Land SUrw)'Ol' 12691
Michael Chart.. fl)"ln. Reg. Land SUrve)'Or 13281
Stat. of Ftor1do
(3)