Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE PLANNING ENGINEERING o LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PRINCIPALS Robert E. Basehart, AICP Anna S. Cottrell William E. Schipske, RE. Kevin C. Conner, RLA October 6, 1993 Mike Hague Planning & Zoning Department City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FI. 33425 re: Letter of authorization BCS-Wescon Project #930330mh.1tr Dear Mr. Hague: This letter authorizes Ms. Anna Cottrell to make application and sign as an authorized representative of BCS-Wescon Consulting, Inc. for any and all applications and permits for Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. project located at Boynton Beach and AId.- BC{Ynto~Beac~ ~~. ~[~~ Robert E. Basehart Vice President , m 00 State of Florida m OCT I f p:t:\ County of Broward I hereby certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State of Florida and in the County of Broward to take acknowledgements, that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Robert E. Basehart, Vice President, BCS- Wescon Consulting, Inc. who is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. ~ day of 3195 NORTH POWERLlNE ROAD · SUITE 106 · POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069. (305) 968-0113 1532 OLD OKEECHOBEE ROAD · SUITE 101 · WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 · (407) 688-0048 October 19, 1993 PLANNING ENGINEERING o LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PRINCIPALS Robert E. Basehart, AICP An na S. Cottrell William E. Schipske, p.E. Kevin C. Conner, RLA ( . City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Attn: Mike Haag RE: PROPOSED CHECKERS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE N/E/C OF THE INTERSECTION OF BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD AND OLD BOYNTON ROAD BCS-WESCON JOB NO. 930330MH.LTR Dear Mike: Attached to this letter are twelve copies of revised plans for the Checkers Restaurant which is proposed to be located at the above referenced site. Revisions have been made to these plans to address all of the comments of your September 20, 1 993 letter to us regarding this project. We would appreciate notification from your office of the date and time the (TRCl Technical Review Committee will review these plans, as we would like the opportunity to be present to address any of your comments or concerns about this project. Also, it is our understanding the applications by Checkers for site plan and conditional use approval will be scheduled for review by the Planning and Development Board and City Commission in November. Please let me know the dates and times for these meetings. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, ~~~ Anna Cottrell, AICP Principal 3195 NORTH POWERLlNE ROAD · SUITE 106 · POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069 · (305) 968-0113 1532 OLD OKEECHOBEE ROAD · SUITE 101 · WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 · (407) 688-0048 STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION . APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT The Petitioner, Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., requests by this application approval of a conditional use to allow a Checkers Drive-In Restaurant on a .96 acre site located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. Proposed site development for the requested Checkers Drive-in Restaurant is shown on the site plan accompanying this application. In order to advance the proposal by Checkers for development of the site, applications have also been submitted to the City for site plan approval, as well as variances. The conditional use requested is consistent with the development of the surrounding area, and does not adversely affect the citizens' general welfare. As indicated on the site plan accompanying this application, the proposed site development allows for faithful adherence to, and fulfillment of, the restrictions and conditions related to the dedication of property for streets (turn lanes) and sidewalks, as have been determined necessary for the site. , The Petitioner offers the following justification for the granting of the requested conditional use: 1) The proposed use will have no adverse effect on the general health, safety and welfare of the comml ~nity, since it provides for adequate and safe ingress and egress to the property and the proposed structure. Great care has been taken in the design of the site to ensure automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As indicated on the site plan, only one driveway per frontage is proposed. The driveways have been designed to provide ingress only from Boynton Beach Boulevard, and ingress and egress on Old Boynton Road. The driveway on Old Boynton Road conforms to the City's requirements for driveway spacing. The driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard is the subject of this variance application. The Petitioner has met with the FOOT (Florida Department of Transportation) regarding the proposed driveway location on Boynton Beach Boulevard. The FOOT has indicated that the proposed location provides the only opportunity for the site to meet the DOT's access management standards. The driveway has been located outside of the required taper for the turn lane provided for west bound vehicles turning north onto Old Boynton Road, and as far east of the intersection as possible. The limitation on access (providing for ingress only) eliminates any potential conflict with movements occurring at the intersection. The proposed driveway also provides for a smooth traffic flow throughout the site, with potential conflict areas minimized. All other elements of the site's parking lot design meets or exceeds requirements as provided for in City standards. The parking lot design provides sufficient access from the public roadv fay, and maneuvering and access areas are located appropriately and of sufficient size to permit vehicles to enter and exit the parking lot in a safe and efficient manner. 2) The site has been designed so that all potentially impacting conditions, such as from off-street parking and loading, glare, noise and odors, have been mitigated. No off-site impacts will result, and there will be no detrimental effect on the adjacent and nearby properties or the City as a whole. 3) Refuse and service areas have been located so as to eliminate any potential impact on residences in the area. 4) Utility service and connections have been designed in a manner consistent with the City's utility master plan and engineering standards. 5) Particular care has been given to the landscape and buffer treatment proposed for the site. The landscape material and design selected is consistent with the City's Design Plan Standards, and with the existing vegetation and landscape treatment in the general area. The site plan accompanying this application indicates the inclusion of a six-foot high wall along the north/east area of the site where it abuts residential, affording both noise and aesthetic buffering. 6) Signs and proposed exterior lighting, have been proposed to be constructed and installed in amber that eliminates glare, and is consistent with concerns of traffic safety and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. 7) The site design meets the required setbacks of the district, and includes open space far in excess of minimum code requirements. 8) The use and site design are generally compatible with the development existing on adjacent properties and other properties within the zoning district. 9) The building height will be limited to maximum allowable for the district. 10) The proposed facility will provide economic benefits for the City as a whole, by way of: permit and review fees; capital fees (water and sewer connections, etc); ad valorem enhancement; sales tax money and employment. 11) The proposed site design meets or exceeds all standards and requirements of the City's codes as applied to site plans. 12) The proposed use complies with all performance standards of section 4 of the City's zoning regulations related to abatement of nuisances and hazards, and conforms to the City's Noise Control Ordinance. fJ}ie City of 'Boynton 13eac/i PlanniTlfl &' Zonine 'Departmtnt 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi. 'Boukvarrl P.O. 'Boit-310 'Boynton 'Beadi.,:J1orit[a 3J425.0310 (407)'~~)75-6260::- 'FAX-~ .:{-4-0-1:)-::.-::375-609-0 '11"_". . __n -..--.. ..... _. September 1, 1993 Palm Beach County Department of Engineering and Public Works - Traffic Division P.o. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 Att: Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer Re: Checkers Drive-Thru Restaurant Plus Detached Retail Building Traffic Impact Study Dear Mr. Weisberg: Pursuant to City's Engineer, due to the volume of trips generated by the subject project, this traffic impact study is to be reviewed by Palm Beach County. Please review the attached traffic impact study of the referenced project for conformity with the County's Traffic Performance Standard Ordinance and return comments to Harold Benoit, P.E. of Gee and Jenson, One Harvard Circle, West Palm Beach, FL 33409- 19 2 3 . ( Fax: 407 - 686 -7 4 4 6 ) Please provide a copy of the comments to the Director of the Boynton Beach planning and zoning Department. Thank you for your prompt response. If there are any questions, please contact Harry Benoit, 683- 3301, Ext. 6578. Sincerely, JJ)~~ hael E. Haag Zon ng & site Administrator I ,~ MEH/jm Att. cc: Gee & Jenson Central File Project File A:CHECKERS.JM .....21rncricas L7lUi!'z.{'J11LJ.i2 the (il1lfstrcam t~ Board of County Commissioners Mary McCart)', Chair Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Burt Aaronson Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman Department of Engineering and Public Works September 9, 1993 Mr. Harold Benoit, P.E. Gee & Jenson One Harvard Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923 RE: CHECKERS DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT Dear Mr. Benoit: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study for the project entitled Checker's Drive-Thru Restaurant pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The project consists of a Checker's Drive-Thru restaurant and 4,400 square feet of retail. The build-out for the project is 1994. The project will generate 1,361 daily trips. The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ,J7--~~ Dan Weisberg, P.E. Sen~Registered Civil Engineer cc. Chris Cutro, City of Boynton Beach File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review h:\traffic\diw\boyn24 00 o WI ~ m SEP I 1 1993 "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ prmted on recycted paper Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 %e City of $oynton $eacli 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Buun 'Boukvara P.O. 'Bott31O 'Boynton 'Becun, :lforida 33425-0310 City:J-fa[[; (407) 734-8111 :1M: (407) 738-7459 OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER January 11, 1994 BCS Wescon 1532 Old Okeechobee Road Suite 101 West Palm Beach, Fl 33409 Attention: Ms. Anna S. Cottrell Principal Re: Checkers Restaurant Right-of-Way Warranty Deed Jurisdictional Responsibility for Review of Deed Dear Ms. Cottrell: The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida is in receipt of the above referenced Right-of-way Warranty Deed for the deceleration lane along S.R. #804. Pursuant to our conversation of January 10, 1994, you are herein advised to submit the Warranty Deed to the State of Florida, Department of Transportation as improvements within S.R. #804 fall solely within their jurisdiction. Should you require.any additional assistance in this matter, please contact the undersigned at telephone #(407) 375-6282. Very truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA cj . -+ L .--:1. . vincent A. Finizio Deputy City Engineer VAF/ck C~CHEKDEED.CK ~- rn ~@~Dwm JAN , 2 1994 c.,.. @ xc: James D. White, P.E., City Engineer J. Scott Miller, City Manager Michael Haag, zoning/Site Administrator .5llmeri.ca's (jateway to tlie. (julfstream fJJie City of r.Boynton $eacli 100 'E. iBoynton iBeadi iBouievara P.O. iBo~31O iBoynton iBeadi,:FforUfa 33425-0310 City:Hall: (407) 734-8111 :FlU: (407) 738-7459 OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER June 13, 1994 Mr. Dick Behrend Checker's Drive-In Inc. P.O. Box 1079 Clearwater, FI 34617 Re: Light Level Spot Check at New Checkers Facility on Old Boynton Road Dear Mr. Behrend: A spot inspection of the subject site revealed two areas of concern regarding illumination. The first has to do with the intensity of the four post lights in the patio/dining area. The brilliancy of these lights affect drivers' eyesight both on Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Blvd. and their intensity must either be diminished or other fixtures should be considered to replace them. The other area of concern are the shadows cast on the north side of the parking lot and the west drive-thru area by the installation of the palm trees. The light levels in these shaded areas are approximately half of the lighting plan specifications. An acceptable remedy between your corporation and the City of Boynton Beach should be reached to resolve both of these concerns. We look forward to remedying these items to our mutual satisfaction. If you have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6283. Thanks! Very truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 2;:~:?l7i'Ha~ ::,. . -::;'J _ , . -{t41C, 1 ' ~ Kenneth R. Hall Engineering Aide KRH/ck C:CHECKERS.LTS attachment: Light Level Plan xc: Michael Haag, Planning Dept. Don Johnson, Building Dept. YI.~rica 's (jateway to the (julfstream 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ~.2 O. 1 0.1 0.1 I 0.1 I 0.4 I I 0.4 I 10.3 I 0.3 I I 0.3 : PA\~5 O.J~l O.i : 1... , (; \-\- l' O.J .~ \ 0.5 0.8 I \\V T\-\~,~ . I r.\(~AS 0.3 0.5 0.8 I I I O.J I I 0.2 I I 0.2 I I 0.2 I I 0.2 I .2 .2 O. 1 0.1 0.1 o.~.. ~.~o~ 0.3 0.2 U (j!J)B O..~,~ 0.2 1.9 1.8 ;:;'~.6' 0.3 ~~,~ 1.5 0.8 0.5, 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 ~ ' \\J... '.5 ~ R..;S 1=\ 0.6 0.'" O.J 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 , NU\ WG.,-'-- L \ '" , ~p\v:SG ~~ 0.4, 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 , "~i....."'" -r~E ~ l~E...\Z~ --Er.5 0.4 O.J 0.2 0.1 , , 0.3 '0.2 , , 0.3 , , 0.2 , , 0.7 l. 2 / 0.8 2 1.6 ..2,\.0 8.7 5.1 \ 6. . 8.4 .7.3 0.8 2.8 0.6 1.4 0.5 1.0 2.1 4.J 2.5~1.3 4~iJ'\ 2~4 2.4 2.8 ,,/") 2.7 5.2 4.8 (~ 1.3 3.9 0.5 0.7 1.2 2.MB 1.9 J.J 0.4 0.6 1.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 (/'bj '"-,~ 1.0 2.~.. 2.1 5.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.8 ~ O.i ~ ~ 0.8 0.8 Cs- ~> '- 1.0 0.8 1.8 2.5 0.7 1.3 1.9 -- '--'" $1.)) 5 0.9 1.0 0.1 0.1 o. 1 '" ~ v. . 0.1 0.1 0.1 8.9 6.1 5.J 10.5 ,f 10.3 4.4'- 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.8 (~1( "---.~..' 0.1 0.1 ., . 1.1 O. 1 O. 1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.5 , / ') \ . , .- -' 1.0 0.7 /~ 2.3 3.~2.5 3.7 3.5 \-.j 3.8 4.3 1.4 0.1 " . 2.3 2.8 3.3 3." 3.2 0.1 " . 1.3 0.9 8.5 I 5.9 , S'j J..~) 2.3 ~'~I' 11.1 6.7 3.1 2.0 . ~O"ll- Y 2sOWl 10.r ".7 .,.~ ~ I 4~7 I 3.2-3.1-2.8 Ig 3.4-:-- 2.8- 2.7 I ~, 1.7 2.5 3.1. J.8 V 4.1 ~~S- 2,& 3.4 2.5 2.5 ,g.0 2.8 3.2. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 o. 1 0.1 0.4 0.8 0.8 '? ~iO.4 \.5 4.7 3.8 2.0 2.1 3.7 4.9 2;:1. 0.5 ./. ~6 3.5 4.8 2.8 0.4 2.7 1.1 0.1 0.1 1.3 1.2 / 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2~0. 1 ,. 1<Er:~"(\(<oI)X;\'" ~ --- L -t- \~ J!.Q" leJ fF\fiV ARSt'\-. ~ LJ 6 \-lc;T S' ~ \J.. ~:t I rfT crrsrc'-' +: A..~8:- A B>..D r's' 0.2 '0.2 0.2 0.3 . 0.4 - ~.4 0.4 o.~ 0.3 l).~ O. 0:1 0.1 ~-------------------~----- Q-r6$ LJ:J~~~ (1{ I~';-,'Y', tr<' .~It-t P,G3. .34' Y ~ OL~ lJ~I'IiT'.!irV ~2 ~~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~1 ~1 ~1 5/i1Q..:p\,.I(.. C',j~~.~i(. ~trW\f-(<::' ~ " 1 " f ,., " 1.8 0.3 0,\2 o. 1 "0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.\ r 0.2 (1 0.2 (1 Ii 0.2 'I 0.3 0.2 n 0.2 (1 0.6 0.2 (1 1.1 0.2 o 0.11 0.2 c 1.1 0.2 c 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 nn VI. 1'I'1-~---- 1 i _~ L /U1io~ cc: Bldg, Plan, Rug, Uti1 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-295 TO: J. Scott Miller city Manager .......--- ~ Tambri J. Heyden J~ ' ~ Acting Planning and Zoning J(rec or FROM: DATE: November 12, 1993 RE: Checker's Restaurant - File No. 777 Conditional Use (Drive-In Restaurant) Please place the above-referenced item on the City Commission agenda for November 16, 1993 under Public Hearing. DESCRIPTION: .~n~ Cottrell, ~, ~&LreqUestin~conditional use approval for a drive-in restaurant to be located .~ vacant parcel at the northeast corner of Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard. Two driveways to the site are proposed; a one-way in only from Boynton Beach Boulevard for which a parking lot variance is required (also scheduled to be heard by the City Commission on November 16th) and a two-way driveway from Old Boynton Road. The 785 square foot building provides for no indoor seating. All food is served through pick-up windows for consumption off-site or within an outdoor eating area. Two drive-through lanes and one walk-up window are proposed for ordering and food pick-up. The landscaping to be provided exceeds code. Signage proposed consists of a freestanding monument sign using the Checker's corporate business logo and colors of white letters on red background with bands of black and white checkerboard including an area with black letters on yellow background; two menu signs (one of which requires a Board of Adjustment variance) and wall i . signage of white and a shade of blue. (~/o1-S 4,re ~s ..sh(runt"1T",-I-t:.ee(~. ~ ~ IM~' 17L.5r (L I~ +t-v s,."..s lJ.U -IK.t.- &Jyl"nAc: ~ The builqj.A.<1lxAo.l~.s }JA1D~~ious.~ wi tK the Spanlsh/Medi terranean 'i< C~4,..;s district~~rcll~mr~~e ts~~ated, are apricot, white, off- white, teal and blue~i ~~~ding does not propose all of the design elements of the Community Design Plan, therefore, an appeal is requested for roof materials and architectural features) JJ;I (also sChe~ule~.. to.. b he.a.rd by the City Commission on November h~~ 16 th). /-J-r" ~ I I .. . ". ..,~. c.f~1J!L. Lt-Jc"iVtfL ~L -It &.;f ~ ~~ RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a vote ~ of 4-2 recommended approval of the conditional use, subject to all staff comments with the exception of Comment 4 of Michael Haag's october 26, 1993 Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum relative to providing a loading zone. The Planning and Development Board re~ommended that the loading zone not be required if delivery was limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. TJH/jm Att. A:CHECKCU.JM PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-279 TO: THRU: Planning & Development Board Members Tambri J. HeYdenJ~~'1,1L,~~ Acting Planning and Zon1ng Di~~r , '~ Michael E. He:a-<;f'.,{f.. (' Zoning and Site .Administrator FROM: DATE: November 5, 1993 RE: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - Conditlonal Use Appllcat10n/Site Plan ReVlew FILE No.: 777 SUMMARY: Anna Cottrell, AICP, of BCS-Wescon, the agent for Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc. is requesting approval of a Condi tional Use and Site Plan Review for a drive-in restaurant proposed for a vacant .96 acre site located at the northeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. The appllcant is under contract to purchase/lease the subject property. The Land Use Plan designatlon for the property is General Commerclal. The property is currently zoned C-2 and consistent with Sectlon 6 B 1. qq. and 11.2 of Appendix A-Zoning. The drive-ln restaurant aspect of the project requires conditlonal use approval. Consistent with the Site Plan Review Ordinance, development of the slte requ1res site plan approval. PROPOSED USE: The proposed use includes a building where food lS prepared and served to customers through exterior plck-up windows. There are two (2) drive-thru lanes leading to each side of the building. A food service pick-up window is located on each side of the building. There is also a walk-up window to order and recelve food. There lS no food served to customers inslde the bU1ldlng. A fenced exterior eating area conslsting of tables and other slte amenities is provided for customers wishing to eat at the site. A total of thirty-four seats is specified on the site plan. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (See attached drawing) The triangular shaped .96 acre site has two entrance pOlnts; a one-way ln only driveway located on Boynton Beach Boulevard and a two-way driveway located on Old Boynton Road. Both drlveways lead to the on-slte parking area and the facilltles located on the site. Note: The applicant is requesting a varlance from the parking lot code regarding the distance the drlveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard is located from Old Boynton Road. At this tlme the slte consists of a single story seven hundred eighty-five (785) square foot buildlng that faces Boynton Beach Boulevard. Thirty-four (34) seats are specified on the plan to be placed on the stamped concrete exterior patio that is adjacent to the building. The patio area wlth the majority of the tables 1S located on the west side of the west drive-in lane and is enclosed with a forty-two (42) inch hlgh wrought iron fence. The fenced area has a gate with a walkway that connects with the public sidewalk along Old Boynton Road. The site and building are positioned and designed to allow veh1cles to leave the on-slte traffic flow and enter two drive-thru lanes that lead to exterior food plck-up wlndows located on each slde of the building. The drive-thru approach is from the north slde of the building. A menu slgn and speaker box for ordering food 1S located adjacent to each drive-thru lane. The east drlve-thru lane has approximately six, twenty (20) feet long, spaces where vehlcles may stack while waitlng serVlce. The six spaces include a space for a vehicle at the plck-up window, the west slde has a total of approximately seven spaces. After the dr1ve-1n customers receive their food at the Pick-up windows they will proceed around the -1- CHECKERS SP/CU PAGE 2 south side of the bUilding to re-enter the on-site tratt~c flow and access aisle where on-site park~ng spaces are provided. A walk-up order window is located on the south face of the bu~lding to serve customers. As previously stated on site eating ~s ava1lable for customers at exter~or tables. The appl1cant has indicated that the hours of operation are as follows: serv~ng food; Sunday through Thursday 10:00 AM to 11:00 PM, Fr~day and Saturday 10:00 AM to 12 midnight. Approximately eight (8) to twelve (12) employees w~ll be working during maX1mum demand hours. As shown on the color elevat~on view draw~ngs of the bu~ld1ng the wall material is a combination of stucco (medium texture) colored sherwin Williams Apr~cot L~ly #1617 and an accent t~le wainscot. The color of the patterned tile wainscot is white and off white. Window and door frames are white. Glass blocks la~d vert~cally with teal neon inserts accent four corners of the bU1lding. Four metal columns support the roof above the drive-thru lanes. The metal columns and fascia are painted Sherman Williams Indian Summer ~1621. At the top of the columns ar~ three bands of teal neon. The base of the columns have small accent tiles that match the color of the wainscoting around the building. A recessed horizontal band around the fascia of the building ~s painted sherman williams Windsurf Blue #1755. The h~ghest part of the building is a white metal equipment screen that has rounded corners and is seen from all s1des of the building. The Community Deslgn Plan specifies the subject site as located in the Spanish/ Medi terranean design district. The colors of the build~ng are harmonious with the colors identified in the Span1shjMediterranean theme. However, the architectural design of the build~ng does not have all of the design elements required by the Communlty Deslgn Plan. The applicant is seeking relief from the deslgn requirements regarding roof materials and architectural features. Proposed signage for the site and building is also depicted on the color elevation view drawings. Note: All signage shall comply with the sign code. The appl1cant is seek~ng rel~ef from the Board of Adjustment to allow two menu signs. The wall signage along the fascia of the building at the roof line consists of white channel letters back lit with wh~te neon. The color of the other wall signage is mostly white and/or w1ndsurf blue. The s~te has directional signs, speaker boxes, safety signs, clearance height signs and two menu boards. The configuration of these signs are shown on the colored elevation view drawings. These sign colors are also predominately white and windsurf blue with some black and white checker board detailing. A monument sign is the main ~dentification sign for the project and is positioned on the property southwest of the bu~ld~ng. The color of the monument sign is cons~stent with the Checkers corporate business logo. The following colors are proposed: red background, white letters for the trademark name, two narrow bands of black & white checker board detailing and an area, that has yellow background with black copy, listing types of food. Site lighting poles and fixtures are shown to illuminate the vehicle use area. A dumpster enclosure is located in the northwest portion of the site. There is a buffer wall proposed for the east property line starting from the north. The buffer wall is not required and the agent has indicated that they will not show the wall on the perm~t documents for the project. The balance of the site is covered with landscape material with dra~nage detention areas positioned to capture storm water. The landscape materlal shown will exceed the requ1rements specified ~n the Landscape Code and the streetscape rerquirements of the Commun~ty oeslgn Code. -1- CHECKERS SP/CU PAGE 3 SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING (See attached location map): The property is surrounded by land 1n the C-2 zoning distr1ct. The C-2 zoning is identified as Ne1ghborhood Commercial and has a General Commercial land use designat1on. The property to the east is presently vacant and owned by FPL. The C-2 zoning west of the site terminates at the center of Old Boynton Road and west of the center 1 ine is R-3 Mul tifamily Res1dential zoning. A rental apartment complex is located on the R-3 property. The C-2 Property to the south across Boynton Beach Boulevard 1S developed w1th a convenience store. STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES: Section 11.2 D of tl1e Zoning Code conta1ns the following standards to which cond1tional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards 1S the Planning and Zoning Department's descr1pt1on of the applicatIon as it pertains to the standards. Attached "Exhibit A" 1S an evaluation of the standards prepared by the applicant. The Planning and Development Board and City Comm1SS1on shall consider only such cond1t1onal uses as are authorized under the terms of these zon1ng regulations and, in connect1on therew1th, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the clt1zens' general welfare, or deny condit10nal uses when not in harmony with the 1ntent and purpose of th1s sect10n. In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and Commission shall cons1der the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings cert1fying that satisfactory prOV1S10n has been made concerning the following standards, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Two (2) new driveways w111 serve the site; a one-way in only driveway will be located on Boynton Beach Boulevard and a two- way driveway will be installed on Old Boynton Road. The location of the driveways allow efficient traffic flow on the site. The layout of the vehicle area and the two drlve-thru lanes enable good control of traffic. The layout of the sIte and the location of the driveways offer ease of access for emergency service vehicles. The applicant 1S seeklng a variance for the distance the dr1veway on Boynton Beach Boulevard is located from Old Boynton Road. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, w1th particular attention to the items in subsection labove, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The sixteen (16) parking spaces provided at the sIte exceed the number requlred by two (2) spaces. A load1ng space 15 required for the proposed use, however, the plans do not show a loading space. A staff comment regard1ng depict1ng a loading space on the site is listed on the Plannlng and ZonIng Department 2nd review comment sheet. The park1ng spaces are centrally pos1tioned on the site and the bU1lding shields the spaces from the off-site VIew from the west and the on-sIte visual landscape screening shields the off-sIte V1ew from the other directions. There is ample room on the s1te to 1nstall a loading space. -..5 -- CHECKERS SP/CU PAGE 4 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection land 2 above. The Director of Public Works is not satisfied with the location of the refuse area as shown on the plans, however, the applicant has adjusted the location to satisfy the Director. The new location was achieved by rotatlng the dumpster so that it will be facing east. The refuse area has a concrete block enclosure with gates. The on-slte landscape material will provide sh1elding of the refuse area. 4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. The applicant will construct an on-site lift station to serve the site. Clty water lines run parallel to the Boynton Beach Boulevard frontage of the site. 5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character. The new landscaping complies with and exceeds the requlrements of the Landscape Code. Ample numbers of trees classifled as large trees have been provided on the plans. The Slze specifications of some species exceed the requirements of the Landscape code. A concrete block buffer wall is shown extending along the east side of the property startlng at the north property line. The agent has indicated that the buffer wall will be removed. 6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. The signs proposed for the site have been limited to those required by the sign Code with the exception of the menu signs. The applicant is seeking a variance to install two (2) menu signs. The code allows one (1). The size and locatlon of the signs shall be consistent with the code. The exterior lighting is shown on twenty-five (25) foot high poles wlth a 1000 watt metal halide fixture. Site and pedestrian lightlng shall be installed to meet code specifications. See comment No. 10 from Engineering Department Memorandum No. 93-306. The applicant has changed the 11ght fixtures to decorative lamps. See detail drawing attached to the set of plans. 7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. The proposed building setbacks meet or exceed the setbacks specified in the zoning code for the subJect site. The maximum lot coverage is forty (40) percent. The bUlldlng footprint coverage for the subject building is one point nlne (1.9) percent. The plans 1ndicate that fifty-two (52) percent of the site is pervious. 8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other property in the zoniuc;, district. The proposed use is compatible with the drive-thru restaurant that is located approximately two blocks east of the subject site. The land use to the east and south allow a request tor conditional use approval for a drive-thru restaurant and the land use to the north and west 1S residential and will not allow the drive-thru restaurant use. -J.j- CHECKERS SP/CU PAGE 5 9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The building is one story which is compatible with the surrounding commerclal bUildings. The residential buildlngs directly west of the site are two story. 10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The new use will offer fast food and some Jobs for the people . in the community. (Ur'r{\~ 11. Conformance to the standards and requirement ich apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, rticle II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The project conforms to the standards and requirements of the site Plan Review Ordinance. 12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance standards section 4 of the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance. The project and use shall operate in a manner that lS ln compliance with the City Code of Ordinance. The restaurant use will be governed by the Health Department. REVIEW OF STAFF COMMENTS: Find attached the comments from all reViewing departments. As indicated in their comments / they. recommend the project proceed through the review process subJect to their comments being corrected and technical code compliance shown on the permit documents. The following notable changes will occur to the site, as a result of the drawings, showing compliance with staff comments: The concern regarding Memorandum No. 93-215 from the Director of Public Works will be rectified by the permit drawings showing the dumpster enclosure being rotated so that the service opening wlll be facing east. The new pOSition will the allow the sanitation vehicle to enter the site from Boynton Beach Boulevard. To show compliance with comment No. 4 from the Planning & Zonlng Department Memorandum, a loading space shall be shown on the slte. There is ample room to install a loading zone south of the parklng spaces shown on the east slde of the site. A traffic impact study was submitted for the proJect. The trlps generated by the proJect required the study to be reviewed by Palm Beach County. Thelr review determined that the project met trafflc performance standards. (See" Exhibi t B"). The Cl ty Engineer also reviewed the study and determined that the study was valid and that the area of influence used in the study for trafflc on Old Boynton Road extended to Congress Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the conditlonal use and site plan review, subJect to all staff comments, and the approval of the varlances regardlng driveway locatlon, number of menu signs and the appeals to the Community Design Plan. A:CHECKCU.JM -s-- EXHIBIT "A" I o~3 STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION . APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT The Petitioner, Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., requests by this application approval of a conditional use to allow a Checkers Drive-In Restaurant on a .96 acre site located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. Proposed site development for the requested Checkers Drive-in Restaurant is shown on the site plan accompanying this application. In order to advance the proposal by Checkers for development of the site, applications have also been submitted to the City for site plan approval, as well as variances. The conditional use requested is consistent with the development of the surrounding area, and does not adversely affect the citizens' general welfare. As indicated on the site plan accompanying this application, the proposed site development allows for faithful adherence to, and fulfillment of, the restrictions and conditions related to the dedication of property for streets (turn lanes) and sidewalks, as have been determined necessary for the site. , The Petitioner offers the following justification for the granting of the requested conditional use: 1) The proposed use will have no adverse effect on the general health, safety and welfare of the community, since It provides for adequate and safe Ingress and egress to the property and the proposed structure. Great care has been taken in the design of the site to ensure automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As indicated on the site plan, only one driveway per frontage is proposed. The driveways have been jesigned to provide ingress only from Boynton Beach Boulevard, and Ingress and egress on Old Boynton Road. The driveway on Old Boynton Road conforms to the City's requirements for driveway spacing. The driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard Is the subject of this variance application. -& - 21~ The Petitioner has met with the FOOT (Florida Department of Transportation) regarding the proposed driveway location on Boynton Beach Boulevard. The FOOT has Indicated that the proposed location provides the only opportunity for the site to meet the DOT's access management standards. The driveway has been located outside of the required taper for the turn lane provided for west bound vehicles turning north onto Old Boynton Road, and as far east of the Intersection as possible. The limitation on access (providing for Ingress only) eliminates any potential conflict with movements occurring at the intersection. The proposed driveway also provides for a smooth traffic flow throughout the site, with potential conflict areas minimized. All other elements of (he site's parking lot design meets or exceeds requirements as provided for in City standards. The parking lot design provides sufficient access from the public roadway, and maneuvering and access areas are located appropriately and of sufficient size to permit vehicles to enter and exit the parking lot in a safe and efficient manner. 2) The site has been designed so that all potentially impacting conditions, such as from off-street parking and loading, glare, noise and odors, have been mitigated. No off-site impacts wi!1 result, and there will be no detrimental effect on the adjacent and nearby properties or the City as a whole. 3} Refuse and service areas have been located so as to eliminate any potential impact on residences in the area. 4} Utility service and connections have been designed in a manner consistent with the City's utility master plan and engineering standards. 5} Particular care has been given to the landscape and buffer treatment proposed for the site. The landscape material and design selected Is consistent with the City's Design Plan Standards, and with the existing vegetation and landscape treatment In the general area. The site plan accompanying this application indicates the inclusion of a six-foot high wall along the north/east area of the site where it abuts residential, affording both noise and aesthetic buffering. 6} Signs and proposed exterior lighting, have been proposed to be constructed and installed in amber that eliminates glare, and is consistent with concerns of traffic safety and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. 7} The site design meets the required setbacks of the district, and includes open space far in excess of minimum code requirements. -7- 3ot3 8) The use and site design are generally compatible with the development existing on adjacent properties and other properties within the zoning district. 9) The building height will be limited to maximum allowable for the district. 10) The proposed facility will provide economic benefits for the City as a whole, by way of: permit and review fees; capital fees (water and sewer connections, etc); ad valorem enhancement; sales tax money and employment. 11) The proposed site design meets or exceeds all standards and requirements of the City's codes as applied to site plans. 1 2' The proposed use complies with all performance standards of section 4 of the City's zoning regulations related to abatement of nuisances and hazards, and conforms to the City's Noise Control Ordinance. -~- MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and S1te Development Adm1nistrator DATE: October 26, 1993 RE: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review New S1te Plan and Cond1t1onal Use Drive-Thru Restaurant ProJect: Checkers Dr1ve-In Restaurant Locat1on: N.E. Corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road Agent: Robert E. Basehart & BCS Wescon consulting, Inc. File No: 777 The following is a l1st of comments regarding the 2nd review of the above-referenced proJect. It should be noted that the comments are div1ded into two (2) categories: The f1rst category is a list of comments that ident1fy unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the 2nd review. To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the s1te and the design of the building except for the following comments, Numbers 3, 4, 5, & 6. There has been a formal submittal to seek relief from the code requ1rements for comments Numbers 3, 5 and 6. The second category 1S a list of recommendations I believe w1ll enhance the aesthet1cs and function of the proJect. All comments can be rect1fied on the plans at time of perm1tting considering that the request for Conditional Use/Site Plan ReV1ew and approval of variances and appeals are approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the BUilding Department for permits for the proposed project. 1. On the site plan drawing, correctly dimension the setback distance from the property lines, adjacent to the proposed monument sign, to the leading edge of the sign. Note: Min1ffiUffi setback distance is ten (10) feet. The drawings indicate a monument sign and the notes on the plan identify a pylon sign. Correct the plans accord1ngly. 2. The height limitation for the City is forty-f1ve (45) feet. Adjust the height of the flag pole shown on the detail draw1ng sheet C4 to match the note identifying the forty-five (45) feet height of the flag pole found on sheet SP. 3. Locate the proposed driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard so that the distance from the west edge of the driveway 1S at least one hundred eighty (180) feet from the intersecting l1nes of Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard or be granted approval of a variance for said dr1veway. -9- Checkers 2nd Review Comments Page 2 4. On the site plan draWIng depIct, label and dImenSIon an off- street loading space that does not Interfere WIth requIred parking spaces and/or access aIsles. 5. The proposed SIte is located In the SpaniSh/MedIterranean design district. Therefore, all proposed structureSjbUIldlngs shall be designed conSIstent with the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural deSign theme requirements specIfIed In the Community Design Code. Incorporate into the deslgn of the bUilding the proper roof finIsh element as descrlbed In the design code or be granted relIef from the specifIC deslgn requirement. 6. The Community DeSIgn Code describes archltectural features that are harmonIOUS with specific architectural themes. Each theme contains a list of features of which fifty (50) percent shall be incorporated into the deslgn of the structure to achieve the Spanish/Mediterranean design. Ap alternate method to achieving the approprIate features is descrIbed In the deSIgn code. Incorporate Into the design of the building/slte the appropriate architectural features and/or amenities that are harmonious with the Spanish/Mediterranean design or be granted relief from the specific deSIgn requlrement. 7. On the landscape plan modify the landscaping proposed along both rights-of-ways that abut the proJect to be conslstent wlth the species identlfled in the Community Design Plan for the Spanish/Mediterranean streetscape design. Note: Ensure that at least 50% of the proposed streetscape trees along Boynton Beach Boulevard and the shrubs/bushes material along old Boynton Road are native species. Add to the plant list the speCIes of trees that is represented by the CE symbol on the landscape plan and show on the landscape plan where the (native) green buttonwood material that is ident1fied on the plant lISt (CON) WIll be installed. 8. On the site plan drawing dimension the width of the reqUIred perimeter landscape strip at the narrowest point along the east property line. Note: Minimum width 1S 2.5 feet. 9. Add to the minimum striping standard shown on sheet SP the color of the regular parking space striping. Note: Black for concrete and whIte for asphalt. Also correct accordingly the color listed for other pavement and traffic control striplng shown on the plans and identIfied in the Grading and Dralnage Specifications found on sheet C3 and the Site Speclf1catlons VI on sheet C5. 10. Identify on the site plan and landscape plan the locatlon of the decorative lamps. Also, speCify the color of the proposed fountain and wrought iron fence and gate. ~ Regarding the documents submitted to Palm Beach county and ~ City of Boynton Beach, resolve the Issue concerning resolution No. R91-62 and the ten (10) foot utility easement. After this issue has become satlsfied, we recommend a new resolution be passed to clarify Section 1 and 3 of the resolution. 12. Place a note on the plan Indicating the area proposed for future development shall require site plan review. 13. Provide documentat1on acceptable to the Engineering and Planning and Zoning Department regardIng dedlcation and/or rights of land for the area along Boynton Beach Boulevard where the turn lane was extended and the new sidewalk was added. These right- of-way improvements are shown on the subJect property. _/0 - Checkers 2nd Review Comments Page 3 RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Install the Sabal Palms proposed for each side of the north ingress/egress outside of the required line-of-sight triangle. Considering the mass of space each set of three palms (clumped) will take away from the line of sight of oncoming vehicles, I recommend locat~ng the Palms outside of the l~ne of s~ght triangle to lessen the obstruction of visibil~ty. 2. Installing tree species under the overhead wires along Boynton Beach Boulevard that are listed ~n the FPL catalog for acceptable trees for installation under power lines and that sa~d trees be compatible with the Commun~ty Design Plan streetscape species requirements. 3. Please correct the symbol that identifies the nat~ve speCles to include all native species shown on the landscape plan. A suggestion would be to identlfy the native speCles on the plant list instead of the plant symbol shown on the landscape plan. 4. That the color of the tables and possible awning feature above the tables be of a color that is harmonlOUS with the color of the building. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, incorporate them ~nto the working drawings requlred for permits for the proJect. MEH/jm A:CHECK2ND.JM -/1- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-236 TO: Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Administrator FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Checker's DATE: November 2, 1993 Having reviewed the proposed plan rev~s~on on the dumpster enclosure I find it to be more acceptable and recommend that they go forward. ~~ Ra ert Eichorst blic Works Director REier \ '- Pl~NN'NG ~KO lONING OEPl ."1 - -let.. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Harry T. Benoit, City, P.E., City Engineer ~. c;." -e. October 28, 1993 TO: FROM: RE: Checkers Drive In Restaurant I recommend that the site plan for Checkers Restaurant be submitted to the City Commission for approval subject to comments and conditions expressed by James White,P.E., City Engineer. Mr. White's comments substantially agree with my previous comments. 92-025/240 -/3- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-305 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: James D. White, P.E. City Engineer DATE: October 26, 1993 RE: Technical Review Committee Comments Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc. Planning Department File No. 777 I have reviewed the above referenced plan submittal and offer the following comments: 1. Provide drainage calculations, soils report including water table information, permeability test results and percolation rate calculations to be utilized during the permit review process. 2. Please advise the Office of the City Engineer of impacts associated with the future development of the depicted retention area situated along the southeast quadrant of the subject site. 3. Please provide all specifications and material standards for stormwater drainage system and place upon plans a notation indicating that stormwater drainage pipes which are PVC shall be of the type ASTM D-3034, SDR 35 material{s}. Revise plans accordingly. I have no objection to the plans moving forward to the reviewing boards conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with the afore- mentioned staff comments prior to issuance of City building permits. K~I2~ / James D. White, P.E. JDW/ck Note: This memo herein incorporates Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-306 -li- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-306 TO: Tarnbri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Vincent A. Finizio Deputy City Engineer DATE: October 26, 1993 RE: Technical Review Committee Comments Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc. Planning Department File No. 777 New Site Plan/Conditional Use In accordance with the City of Boynton Beach, Florida Code of Ordinances, the applicant shall revise the above referenced plan as follows: 1. The submitted sign package entitled IIDirectional Signs" is unacceptable in that the signs do. not comply with State of Florida statute Chapter 316, Section 316.0747. All directional, regulatory and advisory signage must comply with the State of Florida Department of Transportation standards, including the Federal Highway Administration's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5, Section 5.142(g), Parking Lot Construction Standards (appendix). Signage, such as the pedestrian crossing, the liDo Not Enterll sign, etc. are not permitted to be decorative and must comply with the standard color and dimensional requirements of the afore- mentioned State and Federal laws. Revise submitted sign package accordingly. 2. The proposed landscaping situated at the "nosell of the traffic diverter at stop bar along the souths ide of the proposed building site, will in all liklihood result in a line of sight obstruction diminishing the driver's view of vehicles entering the entrance from Boynton Beach Blvd. Landscaping, at this location, should be relocated in order to provide a clear view of vehicles entering the site. 3. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5, Section 5-142(g), the existing sidewalk and/or bicyle path along Boynton Beach Blvd. and Old Boynton Rd., shall transition thru all ingress/egress approach areas and be constructed to facilitate the movement of handicap individuals thru this area. Revise plans accordingly. -/s- TRC Comments/Engineering Memo No. 93-306 October 26, 1993 Page #2 4. Pursuant to State of Florida Access Management laws, the applicant shall provide the Office of the City Engineer a Letter of Intent issued from the FOOT indicating preliminary approval of the ingress approach along Boynton Beach Blvd. Additionally, the applicant shall provide the Office of the City Engineer with a Palm Beach County Permit to Construct within the Rights-of-Way required for the ingress/egress approach connection at the north end of the proposed site at Old Boynton Road. 5. The applicant shall provide a copy of a State of Florida DOT permit to amend the turn lane, reference the removal of existing curb and gutter and construction of the transition area (extreme southeast corner of project at Boynton Beach Blvd.). 6. The depicted pedestrian crossings are shown in "yellow" and shall be modified to depict the color "white". 7. The extreme north end of the pavement area is devoid of perimeter post-mounted lighting, therefore, the applicant shall depict lighting in this area in such a manner as to avoid the creation of glare along the adjacent rights-of-way. 8. The applicant shall revise plans to depict swale area along the east rights-of-way of Old Boynton Road (along property lines) to be developed into a standard swale section, fully sodded and irrigated. Revise plans accordingly. 9. The handicap stall depicted on sheet SP does not comply with State and City standards. I recommend the applicant obtain a copy of the Department on ~ommunity Affairs Accessibility Requirements Manual. 10. The applicant is herein advised that the 1000 watt metal halide fixtures mounted on 25' high fiberglass poles may generated excessive glare and result in the site being too bright. The applicant shall submit photometric data and such photometric data shall include the portion of public rights-of-way adjacent to this site. 11. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, all areas affected by drainage shall be fully sodded. Revise plans accordingly. 12. The applicant is herein advised that should the depicted dry retention area designated as "area available for future development" result in this area being developed with additional structures, etc., a formal stormwater drainage plan shall be submitted in order to ensure compliance with City codes relative to stormwater management. -It - TRC Comments/Engineering Memo No. 93-306 October 26, 1993 Page #3 13. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5, Section 5-140(a), "..provide a maximum degree of safety and protection for the public...", shall provide information to the Office of the City Engineer regarding what measures will be utilized to protect the general public utilizing the outdoor eatery area from errant vehicles along Old Boynton Rd. and Boynton Beach Blvd. (ie. guard rails, bollards, etc.) I recommend that this plan move forward to City boards with a favorable recommendation, subject to compliance with these comments. VAF/ck cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager James White, P.E., City Engineer (as discussed) -/7 - BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-215 October 27, 1993 To: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Director Via: Don Jaeger, Building Official From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re: TRC COMMENTS 2nd Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant & Detached Rental Building Location - N. E. corner of Old Boynton Rd & Boynton Beach Blvd. After reviewing the submitted plan documents, it is with regret that, even though they have removed the two-story office building from the site plans, most of our comments have not been met. Item No.1, A - D still stand and, for further clarification, attached is a comment sheet from Phil Sy from our Department and Vincent Finizio from Engineering. Item No.2, A requires that designated handicap access from the street to the building entrance must be in compliance. Item No.3, The building must comply with the Design Guidelines for the Spanish/Mediterranean District. Item No. 4 has been met in part by the elimination of the office building. However, Item No.5 also referred to Comment No.4, which may apply to the modular restaurant building. Please be advised that, after 9/30/93, all manufacturers of modular buildings must be certified by the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs if their units are installed in Florida. Items No. 6 and 7 are both self-explanatory and must be complied with. Although some of these comments can be met at the time of permit, unless the Planning Department has certified that Spanish/ Mediterranean guidelines have been met and sidewalks surrounding this project will be constructed, this department would not like to see this project go forwar rough the approval process. AN/mh A:CHECKERS.TRC ~ I New old ' -/~ --- .... r: I.,,~ yl . . '-- ~j · A~ t- ~ .. "6' \.J-L 7, \.: \.- ~ "~ ,r' ..~:'~. '. J . .. ~ -, <:-. ". l>. ~~ .' S TAT E 0 F F LOR IDA ,.' ....J .~ . ,,", .01" ~A R T MEN T 0 F COM M U NIT Y A F F A IRS ,..... ~. . ,."".\;0' <:;/ 'I: . /" 1'ERVIEW DRIVE · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399.2tOO LAWTON CHILES LINDA LOOMIS SHelLEY Secr.Wy Cov.rnor August 11, 1993 Dear Building Official: This is to.~form you that Florida will no longer be a =a~e:' o.f .t.he CC1wc;.l of St:i!tes. on Industrialized Housing and / Buildings after September 30, 1993. The Council of states on Industrialized Housing and Buildings was established in 1986 to facilitate the approval, acceptance and installation of manufactured buildings between the state of manufacture and the state of installation. Under the agreements of this Council, the state of manufacture's approval of a building would be recoqnized by the state where the building was installed. . . The Department determined that the Council system was not working adequately and therefore, concluded that it was in the best interest of both Florida citizens and manufacturers to terminate its membership in the Council. After September 30, 1993 all manufacturers must be certified by the Florid~ Department of Community Affairs to manufacture buildings for installation in Florida and their buildings must be inspected and approved under Florida's system. Documents Recuired for Permittina after Sectember 30. 1993 An individual making application fer a permit te install a manufactured building in your area of jurisdiction must submit the following documents: 1. Plans approved by a Florida Department of Community Affairs certified Plans Review Agency. 2. Energy Code form bearing a Florida certified modular plans examiners stamp. 3. A current letter issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs granting the manufacturer approval to manufacture buildinas for installation in Florida. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT · HOUSINC AND COMMtJNln DEVElOPMENT. RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT -/7 -- Building Official. August 11, 1993 Page Two 4. In addition, each building installed in your jurisdiction must bear a Florida insignia. Please contact me at 904/487-1824 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~~f( /4'- wrenc ~ian Planninq Xanaqar ~nutactured Buildinqs Proqram LHJ/bs -~6 - ~u~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~T 100 B. Boynton Beach Blvd. .P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 l?L.ANS R.EV::J: EW COMMEN'TS Phone: (407) 375-6350 Name of Reviewer ~\l-\ '? ~~c. Permit * Type of Review 9\(v~ Project ?~ Date of Review \0' ?-?- \q"?/ Contractor The Building Department and other applicable City departments have reviewed · permit application and supporting docwnentation and have determined that ~ submittal does not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinance! described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please rectify the plan: comply wi th the c:ode comments and resubmit two (2) complete corrected sets of p: to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any questions regardil comment, you may call to speak with the reviewer who made the specific comm~ (The reviewer, affiliated department and applicable phone nwnber are indicate( the top of each comment sheet). If the comment cannot be rectified by a pi call, a conference may be scheduled. If a conference is necessary, an appointr is recommended to assure that the reviewer is available. To expedite the re-re~ process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit docwnents at Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making chaJ to signed and sealed docwnents by anyone other than the design professic responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is based upon) prompt response to the comments. Please advise us if we can be of assistancE you in the re-review process. ****************************************************************************, Comments rec'd. by: Name (print): . (signature) : Date: Comment only_ Plans ~ comment Applicant's phone * Date called & caller's initials: 1st 2nd 3rd ***************************.*************************************************~ A.') ~ 0\..) \lJt~ ~'~::H,\.i1~ h~ '\)\ 't-~,""lO..:~.L <?\ bI... ') - ~ ~ ~~ \:::> <? Mu.n ...Jc.. 6 I HA)C. ~'-J~Q e"< (~ \0 ~ 0=L- l-DT , ?J) ~~9U~(..? ~v..::> ~ ~Vl.) '?LAD PCle:<=.? "'O~ ke:s-, ~~~ 0) \ ~ ~u. ~Q -9Y...GI.L.\~ \)A'l\~ ~ ~9 6>~ AO.)ti.S.t'~. !)") ~9i~\7\\:JC:? ~(P,v~ \~ ~ \IIJVL-U ~O W / \\~\.C? W~\~l- KA)C. . AO~ ,6.LL.Oweo \C-.? &~ ~o. 'r-\. ~. ~;n~nb~ GDHHC:m13 ~ \J"~Jo:u-rF'Mn..ID ~.G..,. BJb2.4c73'7Sttz.. , ,\ "c:::. ;" ..t......:. Ct' ~ lb 't..Ierr E~1ER...-.,t'\ ~ un,6J'.~'<.... "{Z.aJlse ltlAC\S -'0 -.c..\--"b,'O:l Si'Q) "S"~ ~ ~(\, ~)?e-d. ')(-,nb ~~',~ \Jlf'V~rt'.~,~ .~'~f.;"f~~A..f'\"+~s..-b L.J11.A..2. ~,.~ ~ ~ '"Pad. '!4AG,. ?a.u~~""'60 eaU)tz..4 ~ \~e~ ~ sh.dlO bt... ~~, ~ .. ~'-Tel ~~IlM'l\.~ ~\~ ~ . Fe ~S ton- "'t>e3I'\W'"t ~ou1-~. , . -Pc.Jo~"Ptnr \0 F~ ~ 31#0 .o7it-7 ~ ~eT\"'oneb ~r\~c ~~, CC>i\~ ~ F:D.O\. ~ -r~ ~~Js. ~~e ~nA-E'e ,"~ {'\crr ~~\ \.kd . ~~ M\ ~'A-'~\ ~t'~E." Ie.. S1'Of - 'f'~ -A-u... .shM\ A-\so :bot '''' ~'-" l.U\-k.. ~~ if ~. ~ . A:COHHENTS. WPS - bh 1/8/93, Rev. 8/93 -1/- ------ BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-183 September 9, 1993 TO: Chris Cutro Planning Di THRU: Don Jaeger Building FROM: Al Newbol Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMENTS - CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT & DETACHED RETAIL BUILDING - 1ST SITE PLAN REVIEW Per your request, the Building Department offers the following comments for the above referenced project: 1. All signs must comply with Chapter 21 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Please rectify the plans to comply with the following: r 1 A. Section 21-25 permits only 1 menu board, not 3 as proposed, and allows a maximum height of 5 feet to the top of the sign (see menu board on the front of the building) . B. Only 1 free standing sign is allowed for the site. What about the signage for the retail building? C. Only 4 directional signs are allowed. Five are proposed. r ..-.r-==c D. Setbacks for all signs shall comply with Section 21-23. 2. Please show the following on the plans: A. Handicap access from the street to both buildings. B. Handicap ramp at the parking stall for the 2-story building. _I r-- I ~ _e_e_e_e_e___e___e- _ _....... -. ----- ------ti!W-OUSic5YNTON ROAD ~ It (.1 r.'1I ! l.;.\ \ ~:1' l I UI , I;.~ , ,r ,I I r '.1 I L! Ow Memo No. 93-183 to Chris Cutro RE: CHECKERS September 9, 1993 Page Two 5. The restaurant is a modular building; however, comment #4 may apply to it as well. 6. There are no dimensions shown on the floor plans; however, Section 1105.2 of the Standard Building Code does not permit exit access corridors or hallways in excess of 20 feet. 7. Sidewalks must be provided along Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. NOTE: The Building Department does not object to the Conditional Use Request subject to our comments being met. AN: bh CHECKERS -13- FIRE DE?A~TMENT MEMORANDGM ~o. 3~-:S~ WC~ T-' . F 1. dlLllng and Z-::rllng Department =?,':M: F :. r e : e;> 2. r t m c ~1 :. L::"TE; .:. c t ob E ~- 23. 1 9 '~ ~ 3CB~ECT: T?C Slte ?_an :H'::CTEF..3 he ~:ave n.-=. Cb]ect:lo.1S to tlns pldn. ~ t-z k~ C-. WILLfAM D. CAVANAU:;H fF~ ::: EOYNTOt-.i BEA.::H FIRE :JE?':-.F.-=->:E::r:- lfiDC ; ,:F -.1'1- MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 93 - 453 DATE: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Dir~ctor John A. Guidry, Utilities Director I~// October 22, 1993 1 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Checkers Drive-in Restaurant - Second Review Pleas~ be advised that none of our original comments hav~ been addr~ssed by the plans submitted for second review. My assistant met with the project engineer earlier this week to review desiqn comments and provided a copy of our standard criteria at that time. All comments must, however, be addressed prior to building permit issuance, and we have no objection to this prolect proceeding throuqh the review process. In addition to the previous comments, the applicant will be required to pay a capacity reservation fee of $790.02 to this office within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval of the site plan, or upon request for my signature on Dept. of HRS permit applications, whichever occurs first.(Sect. 26-34(E)) Please refer any additional questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella or Skip Milor of this office. JAG/PVM bc: Peter Mazzella xc: Skip Milor File Assistant to the Utilities Director - 0.5 hours - ~S'- MEMORANDUM Utilities #93-404 TO: Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning D FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: September 15, 1993 SUBJECT: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant and Detached Retail Bldg. File #777 - 1st Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Irrigation to be supplied by well {City Compo Plan, Policy 3C.3.4}. . 2. Backflow preventors to be furnished and installed by owner (Sec. 26.107). 3. Show easement for new 6" watermain (12' minimum) (Sec.26-33[a] ). 4. Relocate water services to come off new 611 watermain (in green area) (Sec. 26.16[c]). 5. Consider utilizing existing 6" watermain near south side of property. 6. No trees are permitted in utility easements (App. C Art. VIII, Sec. 9). 7. Palm Beach County Health Unit/HRS permits for new watermain, lift station and force main will be required. 8. Add note to plan sheet #C-2: 1I0nsite Lift Station and Force Main to be Privately Owned and Maintainedll. 9. Provide Fire Flow Calc's: The water system shall be designed to provide fire flows of 1500 gpm at 20 psi for commercial properties (App. C, Art X, Sec. 16). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor, 375-6407, or Peter Mazzella, 375-6404. 19b xc: Clyde "Skipll Milor Peter Mazzella File Chief Field Inspector - 1.0 hr. Asst. to the Director - 0.5 hr. Administrative Asst. - 0.5 hr. '" / -;LGJ - MEMORANDUM POLICE ~93-169 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Zoning & planning Director FROM: Sgt. Michael Kirrman DATE: october 27, 1993 REF: 2nd Review - Checkers Restaurant Ms. Heyden, I have reviewed the plans as submitted. My earlier comments were addressed. I rec::>mmend that the plans be forwarded for further review by Planning and Development Board. I ...[' -; } i , I' {.'" . f L'. \ I J1 ' ~ '- . '-t "--' I ' ,,~\ J'n ,~_,- ... ./ ' ~ - - It=-' s~t~ Michael Kirrman MK/jb ,_ /193 _ ,J '- -:27- "I r- - I ~ (~, t:J1 ! l:\ \ n, l t (it I IJ , '1.,1 I 1'.1 \11 f.l1 ...1 1',1 I l'.l , ['J 'n \(,11 HI i I ~ 1 0 I (II Z \.1 ,..... \ f:,.\ 'I' ~~ [.\ .2 ~ ~'11[ ~~ ~ \l!1 ~ II I' . \ ' \ 1'1 fJ,) \1 \ :1 U :I I 1'1 r' \ 1 I ___._._e___.-e_e-.- .. ... - -----------NEW-oLOiO~ONAO~ ~ .. ~~! ~ I. I '. ;\;lC' I. I :1 , "\... ... " s- " I! / " ; / . l" ~ BOYNTON BEACH CIJecIlerS FACILITY ..~ ICIL..............,.- . ...-:.. ,...-' - I LAND'CAPS 1 __..- _" ..." _._ Pt.AN co ~f ~ I ~ i ;'1 ! .~ (I) ~ 11 r I!: ~ ~ .. - .'" ~ 0 to.) IS! r: ~ en I~ Z'" ...... ~ oZ . . ... '1 0 "'-- !:: 0 I' IIII I\' . , - 3D - I '7 . , A 1Jt) '~4 l 3. -n., -y ,1;)- ~! is." j\;J" -p ~6 ! It&C r:.... . ... ~ ~ i-- ~ ~ 1 E"' ... ~..kl. ~..p ~ \ . /~ ~- - \ - -~- , ~ ~- ~!' R'\' ..- I'~' . ~,Q'})- -- \ >--1 . ~ 54 ~ . @ '2 \ \ l~ 2.J I -' ' ...... ~. @ \' -. ' . ~~1~11- ~ ~.--:- ~ ~ ." n .' , \ T' ,9 ,- -~. * -JU ~\\2~ ~~... 1 f)(,E AN ' '~'\~. J' . l : _ \ \ ~~~. '. 1 . ) \ \ \24 J '\.\ '. " 2- \ \" c:= -\~ -~- \ .' , . \ \. ,. ' ~. S.W ____- 1 ;.T T ~\ ~.1l\ _.. L U 'w"\ c. \ .,. '\I' . ~ \ \ . ... t.... ~ ( ~. . u.' \" 22- 0:. '/ ," '! \1~ 't'..t\ 1.91 "'" -.. ~ 1-' -7 ".9- eo I<it. . . ._ 1Il....J-.. - .,.. ,0 O"".) ,J, -It..' , I~ 1~~4 ~f~, '- '\1 11~ ';1 1.' _ _ - ' i.. .,.. -", ~ u.l _.;,: ~ ~ ~ '_ \ ~ ,\~ I ,~ ,~,.\ ~ <l '~.' !!' ~ u ;. '}i, I- \ · _ ,~ ....~ . ~ _' V'I , , . ...". .. ' . I.. ..' " ~"",..tt . , , l.S" c-/ 1'....- _ _ ",'. ..~,J.. ,'- ." ....... " \I~ \ ,\~' 'J.'.., ''';~. ~" ;.t ':l:l \ ' . '9. ,I.: _ _' ....... ", I . ,. ~ ,- _ d.... I ~ !i! L 71 I~I \:tl. 211 ?,2,!"~" ';. ~ " . I .. ..., ." \ I I ~ III ,_. ~, _, ' . _a.-III , . \. -" - - _ :-r;_!~' "" --::--~ L-II } - ~, ~~, L, \ " '1 ~"., ~~ l~\~' ' 9 I' 'eL I~' U \JJ. ":'-6J ~ l"; . 1L' 1 .." ," .P ~ --::; , I \' ~~ \ ul2:~ _ . \., 11 ' /" . "T . --.., (!) ~ ,. ...f' 6 r 4 ... ,o~ ~, Ih' \ \,.. \ "'y ..... " . (, . @ , \ 0,\ . - . " \ '13 rA1-r'tPP 1" :: ~t70' ~ , ~ , . . \ . - \ 1-.':\ . - \.6! 5 'tl" ~ [It Co ,ft' .. U)~ \:} '\1. \ ~ ~,.., ,. ~ ,~!'. '2' ~ ~ , 2 'or - t. - l.!/-":~ " .' I.'\" " to> -... .-,.... ,... J ... :: 11tut.' Y' ... "!:. ~ :;-.:: 1'1(, __~. _d..i 1.. .~. ...:1J ~,'-", ~. )" ~\ - -I""f -. . .:.\ _. fl' . 1\\4 ~ 4. R1AA -j /~ /~~~ ~.< 8LV~ ~ il -:~l/~U '~:\ J',\- / ~ ~-~ -.--...- ~ II. --- -- ~ I"') 1'1 "- -reI..... r'lI.l a-r "7' f(;;. .. - ~._.. - "~. .. j '-\ (-.)., ITlII I 1:lJJ '-, ~ I IT - '- "" "ft- : \::1 " nlT _ =.... ~ " I \ II == :::::.- I . ,,,, l' , . '....J rl-' ._-_~ .-)- r::S .. ~_...l:;: I , ' -l' R i.... L.... ' .,. ~ 'l1\' I 1 -- ~ \ ,_' ..... . _ L... ' , I '_\'~' , .... -- i:==. i-- ;;.. \: "~'Q'\ ~~', E :;:,~;: ,...-', ,- -- , ' ~~ - t "" .."",... , \". , " ti- _~ ,-', - .. 1 v ."'IUt~~!ll~1 m '.' "'It.L-' _ ." - - . Imnr ~ ''L\.... ._ L- i-~'~ - .' ~= 1:=:- I ,.. .A" i-- ...."'"" _ _ ...... '.. I Itfl 'u, Y"\. ...., .. ~........ ~. - ~ .' + I, '. ''''i:J..",J1..1 i-- :.. ~c: ..:..~ ~ - · II, '.\1\'- "=' '-:ftr' ?-== ~r- 1m """e tm:1T'\ll\illl,ll~ m '\, \,' 11 '" .";"" ,r- III ;;;...._ i- ". r..w ~w \ :_ ~I. ~,\ ~'\ c:: _-.-. - - [ill C llilllil.IJ11J1~1'\1111];1lIIID m i: >).) ;TTT 1 :r1- ' ,- :.:.. l.nlli\[I1~!.@llU , ~ ~ ..... __ '-t;l-' IT~; '1\ !.ill :nm [ , :_~_~_. IL-. I ..- , -C' -r--_) , :.... _>- _ , _ ~,'- ::=' !i I . = ~ ,- - , ;;.- ......--' ~~ , j' ., "~ ,~ _~... ,_ 'L : : ' 'i' , ~ \>-' , ..... - - ~I ,- .....~,: ~" \ ~. _ ' i J-' "- '- 0;; ,-' -- - C-- ... -: i= - I .. t " <:_' .1',,-'>'( '- -c. f- ,\ \- i~: ,- ,I r! ( , ; \J:= c..r-r~t .!::i'r" I ::!'- I ~W- -,...J . ~ oU) 60 'N;~N ~l) tl.---'.:-:i 1 ~ V jJll ..J '-;... 1-- ._. _ . c::::::::-~ P i= . L fl TT If ' ' ' '- 0-- '- c----. ',-' ->- 1 R:3 . . .', '-1 ,'. u ' ,. !5:;;~ ',-'-, '::' ,,; U "-' ~ ~ \ \ I <-{~ J~ RllJ.i.' 7\'v~' 5',~, : _H - t:. -4- __~ ' ::-.'_t:=~ _ , "\ 1 1 J Cj : T1V ~ ':X.J ! ' R 1= _ '~rll '\ I ~-i-J-" '\rl 1 Il~ ~O^(~~ -~: E E _ ':: I-< ~ ....' , ~'~} ." _: eE' ~ ' <IU: If.... ~--- ,\: Ie I'r~l .... " . II ~,,~:Z'T :-- I · O. ,.. ,..-. pee r c---- ~g;,.- I. :ll:.l{:....~:J1 ,,~ II p ~ ~I " I'. .,_ ("'~I lit tl u'!ool I 'I~ ~\\ /jOy-lira;v ~; ~:" ~)-1'''.: \' ,::Br~I~LM ,i~f ~I " r"I'I~1\f: .-J~ ""..~,-, ~':- ~ ' L "jw ITTT 1 11 ~ T . \'~ -'./ ~I'::l 'it"" ... li7 "-' Ii : :: ~ j 1 jr.'~lJ III ' III "','ll '".{0' ml- mrn . ,'- 1 ...' O'R-, v ~ ..... ' BIiJ \ C:": RF3.::~.~. \I~"'" \ 1\11 hi. ~-:-;;r'lI:JLTIf7,c'm : l1llI , iF;" ; ~:: ,,(..r~'I;~.tE'l ~>-T "".ffi~~!~-:-:~' 1 \ en. RI- 1\ ~' { -.l : ' -' r, .. ,='=I n:::;iJ iIllJJilll" ":/, r ' ,. r I 1 ' , ,T I it --- "'. - (;k~:~~ nITIm 1mII!lllill".' , , -) d ' r; ,j ~._~I _ -- '1 ...1& tffrI \l\ ~~'~1llliii..' D;:: c::::J [' Itt~t$i I'~ II 11- [l. ~ ) ,.-.-' ,.. '-~ T =tJ R1i . .....,1 ru: ,\ 'i f-"f \ ,; \ 'j O 1-' .....,.. I ~ 11--'1~'l;Iil' - I 'I, >. 1-'" I 1..L-I I ~ ; II' ' I I 'I r _ . ,j) _' 'I ..: II , I ,--"f"llmr <:"" T F\- RC:C.~;.j ", -c ; ,F I ~"T m" H 'h~ f' 11 h \ \ l- -4- ~ .,-.[ /. [ . i _ ~~~f-'- T 'c--- ~,l,'\l I [ ", _ >-~ ~ ~' ,...,!;.!,"'.... In., IT; II \ t '. '}'.i"", .; , ., '~Jj. \\ ~ ,i c:;( ....' '. "~~~'r' 1\ L.Ul:B.D ~- flWJ..ill\ ._ ~I r "....l~ ", '.. .,'. ,~~.,..... \ ~ '~ro---,,/:.';/ ,/:.... ~.,/ -' ",'.' ~"~PLBFl'GHT! ~~ G.~ .....' ,':"'v' .... ........:Jo..' .~,.'" ' WLAce" CELl.TI' ~....,,'))i?/.';Y~"'" .,:.......- ~\' II ,d---" - ' l :;" ''''IY''' .'Y: \ }"'\ .~\ \\0;:._ 1\\ ' \ \ '0 1/8 ,S J pes - ~j , 'r\\ \ \ I \. _ _: ~\',\) ,--- c-- ;III~~ ~ '0 400. 800 FEET ""~, -- ~ ,. mlt! n, . DfI!.Pr, /o.Q3 _~~ ~_.- . ~ 'J::?" / , II II \ : Fl :3 i -I'~'" ~-~=-II -- - !IT ./ -.3 :;, - LOCATION MAP CHECKERS HANDOUT 7A12 CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT CONDITIONAL USE EXHIBIT "8" 1 t~ Board of County Commissioners Mary McCartt, Chair Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus C/.;I'ol A. Roberts P . .".-en H. NeweU :.i..... Aaronson 1\/.;1O~.i.e j.=ord Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman Deparbnent of Engineering and Public Works September 9, 1993 Mr. Harold Benoit, P.E. Gee & Jenson One Harvard Circle West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923 RE: CHECKERS DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT Dear Hr. Benoit: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study for the project entitled Checker's Drive-Thru Restaurant pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The project consists of a Checker's Drive-Thru restaurant and 4,400 square feet of retail. The build-out for the project is 1994. The project will ~enerate 1,361 daily trips. The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER .,8---~~ Dan Weisberg, P.E. Sen~Registered Civil Engineer cc. Chris Cutro, City of Boynton Beach File: TPS - Hun. - Traffic Study Review h:\traffic\diw\boyn24 .. ill 51:P I ') I~ PlANNING AND ZONIN DEPT. . An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ ",",,<<1 CHI r<<ycled ,.."., Box 21129 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (401) 684-4000 PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORfu~DUM NO. 94-097 FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official Michael z. Haag6"~~~ Zoning &. Site :" :' ~ent Adnlinistrator April 14, 1994 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Transmittal of Development Orders Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding development plans that received final approval by the Planning & Development Board and/or City Commission. The following is a list of the proJects, type of request and the documentation transffiltted: ~heckers Drive-In Restaurant - conditional use/new site plan - copy of the 2nd review plans - copy of the staff report and comments - copy of the written order signed by the Mayor - copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission minutes Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - parking lot variance - copy of the staff report and comments - copy of the written order signed by the Mayor - copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission minutes Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - community design plan appeal - copy of the staff report and comments - copy of the written order signed by the Mayor - copy of the November IS, 1993, city Commission minutes Super city Food &. Discount - major site plan modification - copy of the 2nd review plans - copy of the staff report and comments - copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes Super City Food &. Discount - parking lot variance - Copy of the staff report and comments copy of the written order signed by the Mayor copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes Harvey's Restaurant - parking lot variance - copy of the staff report and comments - copy of the written order slgned by the Mayor - copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission ~inutes Planning & Zoning Department Memorandum No. 94-097 April 13, 1994 Page 2 of 2 Agape Dry Cleaners - major site plan modification - copy of the 2nd review plans copy of the staff report and comments copy of the written order signed by the Mayor copy of the December 21, 1993, City Commission minutes ~ Quail Run Villas - master plan modificaticn - copy of the master plan signed by the chairman of the Planning and Developemnt Board and members of the TRC - copy of the January 11, 1994, Planning & Development Board minutes C&M Buildings, Inc. - new site plan - copy of the 2nd review plans copy of the staff report and comments copy of the written order signed by the Mayor copy of the January 18, 1994, City Commission Minutes * Transmitted to the Engineering Department - Copy of the master plan signed by the Chairman of the Planning and Development Board and members of the TRC MEH:frb Attachments Project File A:94-097 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director DATE: October 27, 1993 FROM: Sue Kruse City Clerk RE: Conditional Use Application Checkers Drive-In Restaurant Attached please find a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing for the Checkers Drive-In Restaurant Conditional Use application, which is scheduled to be advertised in the Boynton Beach News on Thursday, October 28, 1993. Notices to property owners within 400' are being mailed today. ~/~ ~/J~ ~ SK:slb attachment cc: City Manager ill OCT 26_ 00 PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. \ PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF , " uested the plicant has req locate a -In RestaUran~, Incf~ra~ONDITIONAL USE to Checkers Drive 1 to be cons1dered'ng location: following parce t at the folloW1 drive-in restauran Legal Description: , 2.0 TownshiP 45 A portion of sect10n palm' Beach county I S uth Range 43 East, particularlY o , ' being more Flor1da, - llows. described as to. . t corner of sa1d commence at the southeass th 88 degrees section 20; thence run owu st along the 21 seconds e - a 02 minutes 'd section 20 tor south line of s;~ feet to the easterly distance of 1~~1. f a forty foot road as ~~~~~-~~-~~~ P~~~ ~f subdivision of sai~ section 20, as recorded in PLat BOO~ 7 a page 20 of the public Records ot palm Beach county, Florida; thence run North 00 degrees 49 minutes 09 sec~nds East along said East right-of-way l~ne ,for a distance of 106.84 feet to the po~nt of beginning; thence continue Nort~ 00 degrees 49 minutes 09 seconds East t~r a distance of 301.90 feet to a po~nt; thence run South 41 degrees 47 minutes 42 seconds East for a distance of 227.66 feet to a point; thence run North 48 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East for a distance of 10.00 feet to a point; thence run South 41 degrees 47 minutes 42 seconds East for a distance of 110.00 feet to a point of curvature of a circular curve, concave to the northeast; thence run southeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 368.97 feet, thru a central angle of 23 degrees 41 minutes 37 seconds, for an arc distance of 152.58 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence run North 89 degrees 59 minutes 53 seconds West along the North right-of-way line of Boynton Beach Boulevard for a d~stance of 45.67 feet to a point; thence run North 85 degrees 02 minutes 51 seconds West along said North right-oi-way line for a distance of 150.60 feet to a point; thence run North 89 degrees 59 minutes 53 seconds West along said right-Of-way line for a distance of 143.67 feet to a point; thence run North 44 degrees 10 minutes 51 seconds West for a distance of 27.89 feet to the point of beginning. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-273 TO: Robert Eichorst, Public works Director Vince Finizio, Engineering Department Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skiplt Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp. Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director ~ DATE: october 20, 1993 RE: Second Review - New Site Plan/Conditional Use Project Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc. (NOTE: The applicant has omitted the retail building) Location N.E. corner of New Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Blvd. Applicant - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc. File No. 777 Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced development for your final review and recommendation. We would ask that you review this amended site plan documents to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your department. If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded to the Planninq and Development Board for review or held for further revisions by the applicant. All correspondence shall be received by the Planning and Zoning Department per the following: please return your memo and the amended plans to the planning and Zoning Department by 5:00 P.M. on october 27, 1993. If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Mike Haag at Ext. 6262 who is coordinating the review of this development. XC: (Memo Only) Don Jaeger Ed Allen Charlie Frederick Tom Dettman John Guidry A: 2ndcheck. SP Project File (original) Numbered File PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO.93-230 TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Dept. Director Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department John Wildner, Parks superintendent Ke~in Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~ ~A:::::>- FROM: Christopher cutro, Planning & Zoning Director DATE: september 2, 1993 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1st REVIEW New Site Plan and Conditional Use for Checkers restaurant project Checkers Drive-in Restaurant with detached retail building Location N.E. corner of Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Blvd. Applicant - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc. File No. 777 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission/Community Redevelopment Agency. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on Sept. 17. 1993. Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the amended plans (2nd review). Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the code of ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and zoning Department. To: TRC Members Re: Planning & Zoning Memo, #93-230 page Two of Two 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the proj ect be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memo. Dotty Moore will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the review of the project. The Planning and Zoning Department will send to the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When the planning and zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval. Attachment xc: (Memo only) Don Jaeger, Building Official Ed Allen, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Parks & Recreation Director Thomas Dettman, Acting Police Chief John Guidry, utilities Director Project File Chronological File A:Checkerlst.SPjCU fJ1ie City of , flJoynton !Seacli 1!f4nning t!1' Zoning'Dtpartmmt 100 ~ ~ttm 'BUIdi 'BoulI.varrl P.O. ~JIO ~tIm 'BUIdi.:1ftnitI4 JJ425-oJIO (407) 7J8.749O, 'jJfX: {407} 7J8.7459 September 20,1993 Robert E. Basehart & BCS WESCON Consulting Inc. 1532 old okeechobee Rd. Suite 101 W.P.B., Fl. 33409 (407 688-0048) RE: Initial Review Comments - site plan Review & Conditional Use Approval; Checkers drive-thru rest. with a detached retail building File No. 777 Mr. Basehart: The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial review of your project. In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the proj ect or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and documents. After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been submitted to the planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the rev~ewing departments for a second review and the reviewers will recommend if the site plan will be placed on a board meeting agenda for approval (see attached meeting schedule). If there are major comments not addressed by new plans or the reviewers recommend that the plan not be forwarded through the approval schedule, this office will notify you on your alternatives regarding the site plan as soon as possible. .'~merU:a~' Gatewau to tfte Gu{fstream TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUl1 september 22, 1993 TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Pete Mazzella, Assistant to utility Director Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist FROM: Dorothy Moore, Zoning & site Plan Reviewer DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 1993 RE: Technical Review Committee Meeting TUESDAY, September 28, 1993 Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on Tuesday, September 28, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "e" (West Wing) to discuss the following: preliminarv Plat: Jonathan's Grove - For questions regarding this item contact the Engineering Dept. Discussion: 1. Review of the following site plans for inter- departmental conflicts: a. Checkers drive-tl1ru Restaurant with detached retail building. N. E. corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. b. :Supercity Discount Food and Beverage. 101 N. Federal Highway. 2. Conditional Use: a. Checkers drive-thru Restaurant N.E. corner of Boynton Beach and old Boynton Road. ~~J Dorothy Moore XC: city Manager Don Jaeger, Building Official Ed Allen, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Parks & Recreation Director Torn Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, utilities Director Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner Mike Haag, Planning & Zoning steve Campbell, Fire Department Central File city Commission Project File Chronological File TRC 9/28/93 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Sue Kruse city Clerk I .~ Michael E. Haa:Y5.~~ Zoning and Site lopment Administrator October 14, 1993 DATE: RE: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant Conditional Use - File No. #777 Accompanying this memorandum, you will find a copy of the application and supporting documentation for the above-referenced request. A check in the amount of $1,000.00 to cover review and processing of this application has been forwarded to the Finance Department. The legal advertisement for this request will be forwarded to your office after review by the City Attorney and City Manager. MEH/jm Atts. A:PHMEMOCH.JM PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-273 TO: Robert Eichorst, Public works Director Vince Finizio, Engineering Department Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, Uti:ity Dept. Chief Field Insp. Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director ~ DATE: October 20, 1993 RE: Second Review - New site Plan/Conditional Use project Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc. (NOTE: The applicant has omitted the retail building) Location N.E. corner of New Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Blvd. Applicant - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc. File No. 777 Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced development for your final review and recommendation. We would ask that you review this amended site plan documents to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your department. If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time oi building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded to the Plannina and Development Board for review or held for further revisions by the applicant. All correspondence shall be received by the Planning and Zoning Department per the following: Please return your memo and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5:00 P.M. on October 27, 1993. If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel call Mike Haag at Ext. 6262 who is coordinating the review development. free to of this XC: (Memo Only) Don Jaeger Ed Allen Charlie Frederick Torn Dettman John Guidry A: 2ndcheck. SP Project File (original) Numbered File RECREATION Ii PARK MEMORANDUM 193-430 TO: Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist I~'~ sL! . / FROM: RE: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc. DATE: October 21, 1993 The applicant has not stated whether the existing trees will be relocated, removed or preserved on site. The project should proceed with review by the Planning and Development Board. I will address this comment at the permit stage. KH:ad -17- _._____e_____e_e--- .. -- . -----------NEW-6UOiO~ONAO~ \ L-- : -I I I " _ ::IE. f.' t:\1 ! l:.J1 \ H' til , I I;,~ I ' r: I I r'.l \ l.1 fl t,} 1'.' I 1',1 , \' ) '1'1 \ r.1I :.'~~I ~ 1..1 ~ I ~ 1 0 ,1;.11 2 \ :-;1 'I' ell '.',1 ,... It\, i~ 1\1 - s ~ \1 ~ II I! II II . \ ~) \i,.l: L t I ~ I n r'l I I ~~I ~ Ii I ~;ae' .! . :1 ~ t ...... ... / lil- ,- I! / / ... 0 ,- . I' I I ~f t Id ;, ! ! -= (I) CD ~ ,. ~ I 1I r I~ ,., "" .. ... ..~ ~ 0 N t~ r.' "" en ~i Z" ~ "" . .: , ... 0 ~ !;: 0 '. ~ BOYNTON RAe" CIJecIlerS FACILITY ....... ICIL a.. 6 OU ....... .. .. .. ,....-. _ I LANDICAPI I ~... ~ -:..~.". (Iff) :.,.._ PLAN " 1111 111 II . . - j!) -