CORRESPONDENCE
PLANNING
ENGINEERING
o
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
PRINCIPALS
Robert E. Basehart, AICP
Anna S. Cottrell
William E. Schipske, RE.
Kevin C. Conner, RLA
October 6, 1993
Mike Hague
Planning & Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FI. 33425
re: Letter of authorization
BCS-Wescon Project #930330mh.1tr
Dear Mr. Hague:
This letter authorizes Ms. Anna Cottrell to make application and sign as an authorized
representative of BCS-Wescon Consulting, Inc. for any and all applications and
permits for Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. project located at Boynton Beach and
AId.- BC{Ynto~Beac~ ~~.
~[~~
Robert E. Basehart
Vice President
, m
00
State of Florida
m
OCT I f p:t:\
County of Broward
I hereby certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State of
Florida and in the County of Broward to take acknowledgements, that the foregoing
instrument was acknowledged before me by Robert E. Basehart, Vice President, BCS-
Wescon Consulting, Inc. who is personally known to me and who did not take an oath.
~ day of
3195 NORTH POWERLlNE ROAD · SUITE 106 · POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069. (305) 968-0113
1532 OLD OKEECHOBEE ROAD · SUITE 101 · WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 · (407) 688-0048
October 19, 1993
PLANNING
ENGINEERING
o
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
PRINCIPALS
Robert E. Basehart, AICP
An na S. Cottrell
William E. Schipske, p.E.
Kevin C. Conner, RLA
( .
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Attn: Mike Haag
RE: PROPOSED CHECKERS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE N/E/C OF THE
INTERSECTION OF BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD AND OLD BOYNTON
ROAD
BCS-WESCON JOB NO. 930330MH.LTR
Dear Mike:
Attached to this letter are twelve copies of revised plans for the Checkers
Restaurant which is proposed to be located at the above referenced site. Revisions
have been made to these plans to address all of the comments of your September
20, 1 993 letter to us regarding this project.
We would appreciate notification from your office of the date and time the (TRCl
Technical Review Committee will review these plans, as we would like the
opportunity to be present to address any of your comments or concerns about this
project. Also, it is our understanding the applications by Checkers for site plan
and conditional use approval will be scheduled for review by the Planning and
Development Board and City Commission in November. Please let me know the
dates and times for these meetings.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
~~~
Anna Cottrell, AICP
Principal
3195 NORTH POWERLlNE ROAD · SUITE 106 · POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069 · (305) 968-0113
1532 OLD OKEECHOBEE ROAD · SUITE 101 · WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 · (407) 688-0048
STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION .
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT
The Petitioner, Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., requests by this application
approval of a conditional use to allow a Checkers Drive-In Restaurant on a .96 acre
site located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Old Boynton Road.
Proposed site development for the requested Checkers Drive-in Restaurant is
shown on the site plan accompanying this application. In order to advance the
proposal by Checkers for development of the site, applications have also been
submitted to the City for site plan approval, as well as variances.
The conditional use requested is consistent with the development of the
surrounding area, and does not adversely affect the citizens' general welfare. As
indicated on the site plan accompanying this application, the proposed site
development allows for faithful adherence to, and fulfillment of, the restrictions
and conditions related to the dedication of property for streets (turn lanes) and
sidewalks, as have been determined necessary for the site. ,
The Petitioner offers the following justification for the granting of the requested
conditional use:
1) The proposed use will have no adverse effect on the general health, safety and
welfare of the comml ~nity, since it provides for adequate and safe ingress and
egress to the property and the proposed structure. Great care has been taken in
the design of the site to ensure automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
As indicated on the site plan, only one driveway per frontage is proposed. The
driveways have been designed to provide ingress only from Boynton Beach
Boulevard, and ingress and egress on Old Boynton Road. The driveway on Old
Boynton Road conforms to the City's requirements for driveway spacing. The
driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard is the subject of this variance application.
The Petitioner has met with the FOOT (Florida Department of Transportation)
regarding the proposed driveway location on Boynton Beach Boulevard. The FOOT
has indicated that the proposed location provides the only opportunity for the site
to meet the DOT's access management standards. The driveway has been located
outside of the required taper for the turn lane provided for west bound vehicles
turning north onto Old Boynton Road, and as far east of the intersection as
possible. The limitation on access (providing for ingress only) eliminates any
potential conflict with movements occurring at the intersection. The proposed
driveway also provides for a smooth traffic flow throughout the site, with potential
conflict areas minimized.
All other elements of the site's parking lot design meets or exceeds requirements
as provided for in City standards. The parking lot design provides sufficient access
from the public roadv fay, and maneuvering and access areas are located
appropriately and of sufficient size to permit vehicles to enter and exit the parking
lot in a safe and efficient manner.
2) The site has been designed so that all potentially impacting conditions, such as
from off-street parking and loading, glare, noise and odors, have been mitigated.
No off-site impacts will result, and there will be no detrimental effect on the
adjacent and nearby properties or the City as a whole.
3) Refuse and service areas have been located so as to eliminate any potential
impact on residences in the area.
4) Utility service and connections have been designed in a manner consistent with
the City's utility master plan and engineering standards.
5) Particular care has been given to the landscape and buffer treatment proposed
for the site. The landscape material and design selected is consistent with the
City's Design Plan Standards, and with the existing vegetation and landscape
treatment in the general area. The site plan accompanying this application
indicates the inclusion of a six-foot high wall along the north/east area of the site
where it abuts residential, affording both noise and aesthetic buffering.
6) Signs and proposed exterior lighting, have been proposed to be constructed and
installed in amber that eliminates glare, and is consistent with concerns of traffic
safety and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
7) The site design meets the required setbacks of the district, and includes open
space far in excess of minimum code requirements.
8) The use and site design are generally compatible with the development existing
on adjacent properties and other properties within the zoning district.
9) The building height will be limited to maximum allowable for the district.
10) The proposed facility will provide economic benefits for the City as a whole,
by way of: permit and review fees; capital fees (water and sewer connections,
etc); ad valorem enhancement; sales tax money and employment.
11) The proposed site design meets or exceeds all standards and requirements of
the City's codes as applied to site plans.
12) The proposed use complies with all performance standards of section 4 of the
City's zoning regulations related to abatement of nuisances and hazards, and
conforms to the City's Noise Control Ordinance.
fJ}ie City of
'Boynton 13eac/i
PlanniTlfl &' Zonine 'Departmtnt
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi. 'Boukvarrl
P.O. 'Boit-310
'Boynton 'Beadi.,:J1orit[a 3J425.0310
(407)'~~)75-6260::- 'FAX-~ .:{-4-0-1:)-::.-::375-609-0
'11"_". . __n -..--.. .....
_.
September 1, 1993
Palm Beach County Department of Engineering
and Public Works - Traffic Division
P.o. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416
Att: Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer
Re: Checkers Drive-Thru Restaurant Plus Detached Retail Building
Traffic Impact Study
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
Pursuant to City's Engineer, due to the volume of trips generated
by the subject project, this traffic impact study is to be
reviewed by Palm Beach County.
Please review the attached traffic impact study of the referenced
project for conformity with the County's Traffic Performance
Standard Ordinance and return comments to Harold Benoit, P.E. of
Gee and Jenson, One Harvard Circle, West Palm Beach, FL 33409-
19 2 3 . ( Fax: 407 - 686 -7 4 4 6 )
Please provide a copy of the comments to the Director of the
Boynton Beach planning and zoning Department. Thank you for your
prompt response.
If there are any questions, please contact Harry Benoit, 683-
3301, Ext. 6578.
Sincerely,
JJ)~~
hael E. Haag
Zon ng & site Administrator
I
,~
MEH/jm
Att.
cc: Gee & Jenson
Central File
Project File
A:CHECKERS.JM
.....21rncricas L7lUi!'z.{'J11LJ.i2 the (il1lfstrcam
t~
Board of County Commissioners
Mary McCart)', Chair
Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Burt Aaronson
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
September 9, 1993
Mr. Harold Benoit, P.E.
Gee & Jenson
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923
RE: CHECKERS DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT
Dear Mr. Benoit:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study for
the project entitled Checker's Drive-Thru Restaurant pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development
Code. The project consists of a Checker's Drive-Thru restaurant and 4,400 square
feet of retail. The build-out for the project is 1994. The project will
generate 1,361 daily trips.
The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding
this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
,J7--~~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Sen~Registered Civil Engineer
cc. Chris Cutro, City of Boynton Beach
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn24
00
o WI ~
m
SEP I 1 1993
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ prmted on recycted paper
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
%e City of
$oynton $eacli
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Buun 'Boukvara
P.O. 'Bott31O
'Boynton 'Becun, :lforida 33425-0310
City:J-fa[[; (407) 734-8111
:1M: (407) 738-7459
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
January 11, 1994
BCS Wescon
1532 Old Okeechobee Road
Suite 101
West Palm Beach, Fl 33409
Attention: Ms. Anna S. Cottrell
Principal
Re: Checkers Restaurant
Right-of-Way Warranty Deed
Jurisdictional Responsibility for Review of Deed
Dear Ms. Cottrell:
The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
is in receipt of the above referenced Right-of-way Warranty Deed
for the deceleration lane along S.R. #804.
Pursuant to our conversation of January 10, 1994, you are herein
advised to submit the Warranty Deed to the State of Florida,
Department of Transportation as improvements within S.R. #804 fall
solely within their jurisdiction.
Should you require.any additional assistance in this matter, please
contact the undersigned at telephone #(407) 375-6282.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
cj . -+ L .--:1. .
vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
VAF/ck
C~CHEKDEED.CK
~-
rn
~@~Dwm
JAN , 2 1994
c.,..
@
xc: James D. White, P.E., City Engineer
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Michael Haag, zoning/Site Administrator
.5llmeri.ca's (jateway to tlie. (julfstream
fJJie City of
r.Boynton $eacli
100 'E. iBoynton iBeadi iBouievara
P.O. iBo~31O
iBoynton iBeadi,:FforUfa 33425-0310
City:Hall: (407) 734-8111
:FlU: (407) 738-7459
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
June 13, 1994
Mr. Dick Behrend
Checker's Drive-In Inc.
P.O. Box 1079
Clearwater, FI 34617
Re: Light Level Spot Check at New Checkers Facility on Old Boynton
Road
Dear Mr. Behrend:
A spot inspection of the subject site revealed two areas of concern
regarding illumination. The first has to do with the intensity of
the four post lights in the patio/dining area. The brilliancy of
these lights affect drivers' eyesight both on Old Boynton Road and
Boynton Beach Blvd. and their intensity must either be diminished
or other fixtures should be considered to replace them.
The other area of concern are the shadows cast on the north side of
the parking lot and the west drive-thru area by the installation of
the palm trees. The light levels in these shaded areas are
approximately half of the lighting plan specifications. An
acceptable remedy between your corporation and the City of Boynton
Beach should be reached to resolve both of these concerns. We look
forward to remedying these items to our mutual satisfaction.
If you have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6283.
Thanks!
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
2;:~:?l7i'Ha~
::,. . -::;'J _ ,
. -{t41C, 1 ' ~
Kenneth R. Hall
Engineering Aide
KRH/ck
C:CHECKERS.LTS
attachment: Light Level Plan
xc: Michael Haag, Planning Dept.
Don Johnson, Building Dept.
YI.~rica 's (jateway to the (julfstream
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
~.2
O. 1
0.1
0.1
I 0.1
I 0.4
I
I 0.4
I
10.3
I 0.3
I
I 0.3
: PA\~5
O.J~l O.i
: 1... , (; \-\- l'
O.J .~ \ 0.5 0.8
I \\V T\-\~,~ .
I r.\(~AS
0.3 0.5 0.8
I
I
I O.J
I
I 0.2
I
I 0.2
I
I 0.2
I
I 0.2
I
.2
.2
O. 1
0.1
0.1
o.~.. ~.~o~ 0.3 0.2
U (j!J)B O..~,~ 0.2
1.9 1.8 ;:;'~.6' 0.3
~~,~
1.5 0.8 0.5, 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
~ ' \\J... '.5 ~ R..;S 1=\
0.6 0.'" O.J 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
, NU\ WG.,-'-- L \ '"
, ~p\v:SG ~~
0.4, 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1
, "~i....."'" -r~E
~ l~E...\Z~
--Er.5 0.4 O.J 0.2 0.1
,
,
0.3 '0.2
,
,
0.3
,
,
0.2
,
,
0.7 l. 2
/
0.8
2
1.6
..2,\.0
8.7 5.1
\
6.
.
8.4 .7.3
0.8
2.8
0.6
1.4
0.5
1.0
2.1
4.J
2.5~1.3
4~iJ'\
2~4
2.4
2.8
,,/")
2.7 5.2 4.8
(~
1.3
3.9
0.5
0.7
1.2
2.MB
1.9 J.J
0.4
0.6
1.1
0.3
0.6
1.1
(/'bj
'"-,~
1.0
2.~..
2.1 5.3
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.8
~
O.i
~ ~
0.8
0.8
Cs- ~>
'-
1.0
0.8
1.8 2.5
0.7 1.3 1.9
-- '--'"
$1.))
5 0.9 1.0
0.1
0.1
o. 1
'" ~
v. .
0.1
0.1
0.1
8.9
6.1
5.J
10.5
,f
10.3
4.4'-
3.0
3.0
1.5 1.8
(~1(
"---.~..'
0.1
0.1
., .
1.1
O. 1
O. 1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.8 0.5
, / ')
\ .
, .- -'
1.0 0.7
/~
2.3
3.~2.5
3.7
3.5
\-.j
3.8
4.3
1.4
0.1
" .
2.3
2.8
3.3
3."
3.2
0.1
" .
1.3
0.9
8.5
I
5.9
,
S'j J..~) 2.3 ~'~I'
11.1 6.7 3.1 2.0
. ~O"ll- Y 2sOWl
10.r ".7 .,.~ ~
I
4~7
I
3.2-3.1-2.8
Ig
3.4-:-- 2.8- 2.7
I ~,
1.7
2.5
3.1. J.8
V
4.1
~~S-
2,& 3.4
2.5 2.5
,g.0
2.8 3.2.
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
o. 1
0.1
0.4
0.8
0.8 '? ~iO.4
\.5
4.7
3.8
2.0
2.1
3.7 4.9 2;:1. 0.5
./.
~6
3.5 4.8 2.8 0.4
2.7
1.1
0.1
0.1
1.3 1.2
/
0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2~0. 1
,. 1<Er:~"(\(<oI)X;\'" ~ --- L -t- \~ J!.Q" leJ fF\fiV ARSt'\-.
~ LJ 6 \-lc;T S' ~ \J.. ~:t I rfT crrsrc'-' +: A..~8:- A B>..D r's'
0.2 '0.2 0.2 0.3 . 0.4 - ~.4 0.4 o.~ 0.3 l).~ O. 0:1 0.1
~-------------------~-----
Q-r6$ LJ:J~~~ (1{ I~';-,'Y', tr<' .~It-t P,G3. .34' Y ~ OL~ lJ~I'IiT'.!irV
~2 ~~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~2 ~1 ~1 ~1
5/i1Q..:p\,.I(.. C',j~~.~i(. ~trW\f-(<::' ~
" 1
" f
,., "
1.8 0.3
0,\2
o. 1
"0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.\
r
0.2
(1
0.2
(1
Ii
0.2
'I
0.3
0.2
n
0.2
(1
0.6
0.2
(1
1.1
0.2
o
0.11
0.2
c
1.1
0.2
c
0.7
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
nn
VI.
1'I'1-~---- 1 i _~
L
/U1io~
cc: Bldg, Plan, Rug, Uti1
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-295
TO:
J. Scott Miller
city Manager
.......--- ~
Tambri J. Heyden J~ ' ~
Acting Planning and Zoning J(rec or
FROM:
DATE:
November 12, 1993
RE:
Checker's Restaurant - File No. 777
Conditional Use (Drive-In Restaurant)
Please place the above-referenced item on the City Commission
agenda for November 16, 1993 under Public Hearing.
DESCRIPTION: .~n~ Cottrell, ~, ~&LreqUestin~conditional use
approval for a drive-in restaurant to be located .~
vacant parcel at the northeast corner of Old Boynton Road and
Boynton Beach Boulevard. Two driveways to the site are proposed;
a one-way in only from Boynton Beach Boulevard for which a
parking lot variance is required (also scheduled to be heard by
the City Commission on November 16th) and a two-way driveway from
Old Boynton Road.
The 785 square foot building provides for no indoor seating. All
food is served through pick-up windows for consumption off-site
or within an outdoor eating area. Two drive-through lanes and
one walk-up window are proposed for ordering and food pick-up.
The landscaping to be provided exceeds code. Signage proposed
consists of a freestanding monument sign using the Checker's
corporate business logo and colors of white letters on red
background with bands of black and white checkerboard including
an area with black letters on yellow background; two menu signs
(one of which requires a Board of Adjustment variance) and wall i .
signage of white and a shade of blue. (~/o1-S 4,re ~s ..sh(runt"1T",-I-t:.ee(~.
~ ~ IM~' 17L.5r (L I~ +t-v s,."..s lJ.U -IK.t.- &Jyl"nAc: ~
The builqj.A.<1lxAo.l~.s }JA1D~~ious.~ wi tK the Spanlsh/Medi terranean 'i< C~4,..;s
district~~rcll~mr~~e ts~~ated, are apricot, white, off-
white, teal and blue~i ~~~ding does not propose all of the
design elements of the Community Design Plan, therefore, an
appeal is requested for roof materials and architectural features)
JJ;I (also sChe~ule~.. to.. b he.a.rd by the City Commission on November h~~
16 th). /-J-r" ~ I I .. .
". ..,~. c.f~1J!L. Lt-Jc"iVtfL ~L -It &.;f ~ ~~
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a vote ~
of 4-2 recommended approval of the conditional use, subject to
all staff comments with the exception of Comment 4 of Michael
Haag's october 26, 1993 Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum
relative to providing a loading zone. The Planning and
Development Board re~ommended that the loading zone not be
required if delivery was limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to
10:00 a.m.
TJH/jm
Att.
A:CHECKCU.JM
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-279
TO:
THRU:
Planning & Development Board Members
Tambri J. HeYdenJ~~'1,1L,~~
Acting Planning and Zon1ng Di~~r
,
'~
Michael E. He:a-<;f'.,{f.. ('
Zoning and Site .Administrator
FROM:
DATE:
November 5, 1993
RE:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant -
Conditlonal Use Appllcat10n/Site Plan ReVlew
FILE No.: 777
SUMMARY: Anna Cottrell, AICP, of BCS-Wescon, the agent for
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc. is requesting approval of a
Condi tional Use and Site Plan Review for a drive-in restaurant
proposed for a vacant .96 acre site located at the northeast corner
of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. The appllcant is
under contract to purchase/lease the subject property. The Land
Use Plan designatlon for the property is General Commerclal. The
property is currently zoned C-2 and consistent with Sectlon 6 B 1.
qq. and 11.2 of Appendix A-Zoning. The drive-ln restaurant aspect
of the project requires conditlonal use approval. Consistent with
the Site Plan Review Ordinance, development of the slte requ1res
site plan approval.
PROPOSED USE: The proposed use includes a building where food lS
prepared and served to customers through exterior plck-up windows.
There are two (2) drive-thru lanes leading to each side of the
building. A food service pick-up window is located on each side of
the building. There is also a walk-up window to order and recelve
food. There lS no food served to customers inslde the bU1ldlng.
A fenced exterior eating area conslsting of tables and other slte
amenities is provided for customers wishing to eat at the site. A
total of thirty-four seats is specified on the site plan.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (See attached drawing) The triangular
shaped .96 acre site has two entrance pOlnts; a one-way ln only
driveway located on Boynton Beach Boulevard and a two-way driveway
located on Old Boynton Road. Both drlveways lead to the on-slte
parking area and the facilltles located on the site. Note: The
applicant is requesting a varlance from the parking lot code
regarding the distance the drlveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard is
located from Old Boynton Road. At this tlme the slte consists of
a single story seven hundred eighty-five (785) square foot buildlng
that faces Boynton Beach Boulevard. Thirty-four (34) seats are
specified on the plan to be placed on the stamped concrete exterior
patio that is adjacent to the building. The patio area wlth the
majority of the tables 1S located on the west side of the west
drive-in lane and is enclosed with a forty-two (42) inch hlgh
wrought iron fence. The fenced area has a gate with a walkway that
connects with the public sidewalk along Old Boynton Road.
The site and building are positioned and designed to allow veh1cles
to leave the on-slte traffic flow and enter two drive-thru lanes
that lead to exterior food plck-up wlndows located on each slde of
the building. The drive-thru approach is from the north slde of
the building. A menu slgn and speaker box for ordering food 1S
located adjacent to each drive-thru lane. The east drlve-thru lane
has approximately six, twenty (20) feet long, spaces where vehlcles
may stack while waitlng serVlce. The six spaces include a space
for a vehicle at the plck-up window, the west slde has a total of
approximately seven spaces. After the dr1ve-1n customers receive
their food at the Pick-up windows they will proceed around the
-1-
CHECKERS SP/CU
PAGE 2
south side of the bUilding to re-enter the on-site tratt~c flow and
access aisle where on-site park~ng spaces are provided. A walk-up
order window is located on the south face of the bu~lding to serve
customers. As previously stated on site eating ~s ava1lable for
customers at exter~or tables. The appl1cant has indicated that the
hours of operation are as follows: serv~ng food; Sunday through
Thursday 10:00 AM to 11:00 PM, Fr~day and Saturday 10:00 AM to 12
midnight. Approximately eight (8) to twelve (12) employees w~ll be
working during maX1mum demand hours.
As shown on the color elevat~on view draw~ngs of the bu~ld1ng the
wall material is a combination of stucco (medium texture) colored
sherwin Williams Apr~cot L~ly #1617 and an accent t~le wainscot.
The color of the patterned tile wainscot is white and off white.
Window and door frames are white. Glass blocks la~d vert~cally
with teal neon inserts accent four corners of the bU1lding. Four
metal columns support the roof above the drive-thru lanes. The
metal columns and fascia are painted Sherman Williams Indian Summer
~1621. At the top of the columns ar~ three bands of teal neon.
The base of the columns have small accent tiles that match the
color of the wainscoting around the building. A recessed
horizontal band around the fascia of the building ~s painted
sherman williams Windsurf Blue #1755. The h~ghest part of the
building is a white metal equipment screen that has rounded corners
and is seen from all s1des of the building. The Community Deslgn
Plan specifies the subject site as located in the Spanish/
Medi terranean design district. The colors of the build~ng are
harmonious with the colors identified in the Span1shjMediterranean
theme. However, the architectural design of the build~ng does not
have all of the design elements required by the Communlty Deslgn
Plan. The applicant is seeking relief from the deslgn requirements
regarding roof materials and architectural features.
Proposed signage for the site and building is also depicted on the
color elevation view drawings. Note: All signage shall comply
with the sign code. The appl1cant is seek~ng rel~ef from the Board
of Adjustment to allow two menu signs. The wall signage along the
fascia of the building at the roof line consists of white channel
letters back lit with wh~te neon. The color of the other wall
signage is mostly white and/or w1ndsurf blue. The s~te has
directional signs, speaker boxes, safety signs, clearance height
signs and two menu boards. The configuration of these signs are
shown on the colored elevation view drawings. These sign colors
are also predominately white and windsurf blue with some black and
white checker board detailing.
A monument sign is the main ~dentification sign for the project and
is positioned on the property southwest of the bu~ld~ng. The color
of the monument sign is cons~stent with the Checkers corporate
business logo. The following colors are proposed: red background,
white letters for the trademark name, two narrow bands of black &
white checker board detailing and an area, that has yellow
background with black copy, listing types of food.
Site lighting poles and fixtures are shown to illuminate the
vehicle use area. A dumpster enclosure is located in the northwest
portion of the site. There is a buffer wall proposed for the east
property line starting from the north. The buffer wall is not
required and the agent has indicated that they will not show the
wall on the perm~t documents for the project. The balance of the
site is covered with landscape material with dra~nage detention
areas positioned to capture storm water. The landscape materlal
shown will exceed the requ1rements specified ~n the Landscape Code
and the streetscape rerquirements of the Commun~ty oeslgn Code.
-1-
CHECKERS SP/CU
PAGE 3
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING (See attached location map): The
property is surrounded by land 1n the C-2 zoning distr1ct. The C-2
zoning is identified as Ne1ghborhood Commercial and has a General
Commercial land use designat1on. The property to the east is
presently vacant and owned by FPL. The C-2 zoning west of the site
terminates at the center of Old Boynton Road and west of the center
1 ine is R-3 Mul tifamily Res1dential zoning. A rental apartment
complex is located on the R-3 property. The C-2 Property to the
south across Boynton Beach Boulevard 1S developed w1th a
convenience store.
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES: Section 11.2 D of tl1e
Zoning Code conta1ns the following standards to which cond1tional
uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards 1S
the Planning and Zoning Department's descr1pt1on of the applicatIon
as it pertains to the standards. Attached "Exhibit A" 1S an
evaluation of the standards prepared by the applicant.
The Planning and Development Board and City Comm1SS1on shall
consider only such cond1t1onal uses as are authorized under the
terms of these zon1ng regulations and, in connect1on therew1th, may
grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the
conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of
property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as
shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding
area and the clt1zens' general welfare, or deny condit10nal uses
when not in harmony with the 1ntent and purpose of th1s sect10n.
In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and
Commission shall cons1der the effect of the proposed use on the
general health, safety and welfare of the community and make
written findings cert1fying that satisfactory prOV1S10n has been
made concerning the following standards, where applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and
proposed structures thereon, with particular reference
to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire
or catastrophe.
Two (2) new driveways w111 serve the site; a one-way in only
driveway will be located on Boynton Beach Boulevard and a two-
way driveway will be installed on Old Boynton Road. The
location of the driveways allow efficient traffic flow on the
site. The layout of the vehicle area and the two drlve-thru
lanes enable good control of traffic. The layout of the sIte
and the location of the driveways offer ease of access for
emergency service vehicles. The applicant 1S seeklng a
variance for the distance the dr1veway on Boynton Beach
Boulevard is located from Old Boynton Road.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, w1th
particular attention to the items in subsection labove,
and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the
conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
The sixteen (16) parking spaces provided at the sIte exceed
the number requlred by two (2) spaces. A load1ng space 15
required for the proposed use, however, the plans do not show
a loading space. A staff comment regard1ng depict1ng a
loading space on the site is listed on the Plannlng and ZonIng
Department 2nd review comment sheet. The park1ng spaces are
centrally pos1tioned on the site and the bU1lding shields the
spaces from the off-site VIew from the west and the on-sIte
visual landscape screening shields the off-sIte V1ew from the
other directions. There is ample room on the s1te to 1nstall
a loading space.
-..5 --
CHECKERS SP/CU
PAGE 4
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the
items in subsection land 2 above.
The Director of Public Works is not satisfied with the
location of the refuse area as shown on the plans, however,
the applicant has adjusted the location to satisfy the
Director. The new location was achieved by rotatlng the
dumpster so that it will be facing east. The refuse area has
a concrete block enclosure with gates. The on-slte landscape
material will provide sh1elding of the refuse area.
4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and
compatibility.
The applicant will construct an on-site lift station to serve
the site. Clty water lines run parallel to the Boynton Beach
Boulevard frontage of the site.
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to
type, dimensions, and character.
The new landscaping complies with and exceeds the requlrements
of the Landscape Code. Ample numbers of trees classifled as
large trees have been provided on the plans. The Slze
specifications of some species exceed the requirements of the
Landscape code. A concrete block buffer wall is shown
extending along the east side of the property startlng at the
north property line. The agent has indicated that the buffer
wall will be removed.
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to
glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility
and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
The signs proposed for the site have been limited to those
required by the sign Code with the exception of the menu
signs. The applicant is seeking a variance to install two (2)
menu signs. The code allows one (1). The size and locatlon
of the signs shall be consistent with the code. The exterior
lighting is shown on twenty-five (25) foot high poles wlth a
1000 watt metal halide fixture. Site and pedestrian lightlng
shall be installed to meet code specifications. See comment
No. 10 from Engineering Department Memorandum No. 93-306. The
applicant has changed the 11ght fixtures to decorative lamps.
See detail drawing attached to the set of plans.
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
The proposed building setbacks meet or exceed the setbacks
specified in the zoning code for the subJect site. The
maximum lot coverage is forty (40) percent. The bUlldlng
footprint coverage for the subject building is one point nlne
(1.9) percent. The plans 1ndicate that fifty-two (52) percent
of the site is pervious.
8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and
other property in the zoniuc;, district.
The proposed use is compatible with the drive-thru restaurant
that is located approximately two blocks east of the subject
site. The land use to the east and south allow a request tor
conditional use approval for a drive-thru restaurant and the
land use to the north and west 1S residential and will not
allow the drive-thru restaurant use.
-J.j-
CHECKERS SP/CU
PAGE 5
9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to
compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
The building is one story which is compatible with the
surrounding commerclal bUildings. The residential buildlngs
directly west of the site are two story.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and
the city as a whole.
The new use will offer fast food and some Jobs for the people .
in the community. (Ur'r{\~
11. Conformance to the standards and requirement ich apply
to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, rticle II of the
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
The project conforms to the standards and requirements of the
site Plan Review Ordinance.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards
in accordance with the performance standards section 4 of
the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of
Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance.
The project and use shall operate in a manner that lS ln
compliance with the City Code of Ordinance. The restaurant
use will be governed by the Health Department.
REVIEW OF STAFF COMMENTS: Find attached the comments from all
reViewing departments. As indicated in their comments / they.
recommend the project proceed through the review process subJect to
their comments being corrected and technical code compliance shown
on the permit documents.
The following notable changes will occur to the site, as a result
of the drawings, showing compliance with staff comments:
The concern regarding Memorandum No. 93-215 from the Director of
Public Works will be rectified by the permit drawings showing the
dumpster enclosure being rotated so that the service opening wlll
be facing east. The new pOSition will the allow the sanitation
vehicle to enter the site from Boynton Beach Boulevard.
To show compliance with comment No. 4 from the Planning & Zonlng
Department Memorandum, a loading space shall be shown on the slte.
There is ample room to install a loading zone south of the parklng
spaces shown on the east slde of the site.
A traffic impact study was submitted for the proJect. The trlps
generated by the proJect required the study to be reviewed by Palm
Beach County. Thelr review determined that the project met trafflc
performance standards. (See" Exhibi t B"). The Cl ty Engineer also
reviewed the study and determined that the study was valid and that
the area of influence used in the study for trafflc on Old Boynton
Road extended to Congress Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends
approval of the conditlonal use and site plan review, subJect to
all staff comments, and the approval of the varlances regardlng
driveway locatlon, number of menu signs and the appeals to the
Community Design Plan.
A:CHECKCU.JM
-s--
EXHIBIT "A"
I o~3
STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION .
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT
The Petitioner, Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., requests by this application
approval of a conditional use to allow a Checkers Drive-In Restaurant on a .96 acre
site located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Old Boynton Road.
Proposed site development for the requested Checkers Drive-in Restaurant is
shown on the site plan accompanying this application. In order to advance the
proposal by Checkers for development of the site, applications have also been
submitted to the City for site plan approval, as well as variances.
The conditional use requested is consistent with the development of the
surrounding area, and does not adversely affect the citizens' general welfare. As
indicated on the site plan accompanying this application, the proposed site
development allows for faithful adherence to, and fulfillment of, the restrictions
and conditions related to the dedication of property for streets (turn lanes) and
sidewalks, as have been determined necessary for the site. ,
The Petitioner offers the following justification for the granting of the requested
conditional use:
1) The proposed use will have no adverse effect on the general health, safety and
welfare of the community, since It provides for adequate and safe Ingress and
egress to the property and the proposed structure. Great care has been taken in
the design of the site to ensure automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
As indicated on the site plan, only one driveway per frontage is proposed. The
driveways have been jesigned to provide ingress only from Boynton Beach
Boulevard, and Ingress and egress on Old Boynton Road. The driveway on Old
Boynton Road conforms to the City's requirements for driveway spacing. The
driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard Is the subject of this variance application.
-& -
21~
The Petitioner has met with the FOOT (Florida Department of Transportation)
regarding the proposed driveway location on Boynton Beach Boulevard. The FOOT
has Indicated that the proposed location provides the only opportunity for the site
to meet the DOT's access management standards. The driveway has been located
outside of the required taper for the turn lane provided for west bound vehicles
turning north onto Old Boynton Road, and as far east of the Intersection as
possible. The limitation on access (providing for Ingress only) eliminates any
potential conflict with movements occurring at the intersection. The proposed
driveway also provides for a smooth traffic flow throughout the site, with potential
conflict areas minimized.
All other elements of (he site's parking lot design meets or exceeds requirements
as provided for in City standards. The parking lot design provides sufficient access
from the public roadway, and maneuvering and access areas are located
appropriately and of sufficient size to permit vehicles to enter and exit the parking
lot in a safe and efficient manner.
2) The site has been designed so that all potentially impacting conditions, such as
from off-street parking and loading, glare, noise and odors, have been mitigated.
No off-site impacts wi!1 result, and there will be no detrimental effect on the
adjacent and nearby properties or the City as a whole.
3} Refuse and service areas have been located so as to eliminate any potential
impact on residences in the area.
4} Utility service and connections have been designed in a manner consistent with
the City's utility master plan and engineering standards.
5} Particular care has been given to the landscape and buffer treatment proposed
for the site. The landscape material and design selected Is consistent with the
City's Design Plan Standards, and with the existing vegetation and landscape
treatment In the general area. The site plan accompanying this application
indicates the inclusion of a six-foot high wall along the north/east area of the site
where it abuts residential, affording both noise and aesthetic buffering.
6} Signs and proposed exterior lighting, have been proposed to be constructed and
installed in amber that eliminates glare, and is consistent with concerns of traffic
safety and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
7} The site design meets the required setbacks of the district, and includes open
space far in excess of minimum code requirements.
-7-
3ot3
8) The use and site design are generally compatible with the development existing
on adjacent properties and other properties within the zoning district.
9) The building height will be limited to maximum allowable for the district.
10) The proposed facility will provide economic benefits for the City as a whole,
by way of: permit and review fees; capital fees (water and sewer connections,
etc); ad valorem enhancement; sales tax money and employment.
11) The proposed site design meets or exceeds all standards and requirements of
the City's codes as applied to site plans.
1 2' The proposed use complies with all performance standards of section 4 of the
City's zoning regulations related to abatement of nuisances and hazards, and
conforms to the City's Noise Control Ordinance.
-~-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and S1te Development Adm1nistrator
DATE:
October 26, 1993
RE:
Site Plan Review - 2nd Review New S1te Plan and
Cond1t1onal Use Drive-Thru Restaurant
ProJect: Checkers Dr1ve-In Restaurant
Locat1on: N.E. Corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and
Old Boynton Road
Agent: Robert E. Basehart &
BCS Wescon consulting, Inc.
File No: 777
The following is a l1st of comments regarding the 2nd review of
the above-referenced proJect. It should be noted that the
comments are div1ded into two (2) categories:
The f1rst category is a list of comments that ident1fy unresolved
comments either from the first review or new comments as a result
of the 2nd review. To show compliance with these comments will
not substantially alter the configuration of the s1te and the
design of the building except for the following comments, Numbers
3, 4, 5, & 6. There has been a formal submittal to seek relief
from the code requ1rements for comments Numbers 3, 5 and 6.
The second category 1S a list of recommendations I believe w1ll
enhance the aesthet1cs and function of the proJect.
All comments can be rect1fied on the plans at time of perm1tting
considering that the request for Conditional Use/Site Plan ReV1ew
and approval of variances and appeals are approved. The
applicant must understand that additional comments may be
generated upon review of the documents and working drawings
submitted to the BUilding Department for permits for the proposed
project.
1. On the site plan drawing, correctly dimension the setback
distance from the property lines, adjacent to the proposed
monument sign, to the leading edge of the sign. Note: Min1ffiUffi
setback distance is ten (10) feet. The drawings indicate a
monument sign and the notes on the plan identify a pylon sign.
Correct the plans accord1ngly.
2. The height limitation for the City is forty-f1ve (45) feet.
Adjust the height of the flag pole shown on the detail draw1ng
sheet C4 to match the note identifying the forty-five (45) feet
height of the flag pole found on sheet SP.
3. Locate the proposed driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard so
that the distance from the west edge of the driveway 1S at least
one hundred eighty (180) feet from the intersecting l1nes of Old
Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard or be granted approval
of a variance for said dr1veway.
-9-
Checkers 2nd Review Comments
Page 2
4. On the site plan draWIng depIct, label and dImenSIon an off-
street loading space that does not Interfere WIth requIred
parking spaces and/or access aIsles.
5. The proposed SIte is located In the SpaniSh/MedIterranean
design district. Therefore, all proposed structureSjbUIldlngs
shall be designed conSIstent with the Spanish/Mediterranean
architectural deSign theme requirements specIfIed In the
Community Design Code. Incorporate into the deslgn of the
bUilding the proper roof finIsh element as descrlbed In the
design code or be granted relIef from the specifIC deslgn
requirement.
6. The Community DeSIgn Code describes archltectural features
that are harmonIOUS with specific architectural themes. Each
theme contains a list of features of which fifty (50) percent
shall be incorporated into the deslgn of the structure to achieve
the Spanish/Mediterranean design. Ap alternate method to
achieving the approprIate features is descrIbed In the deSIgn
code. Incorporate Into the design of the building/slte the
appropriate architectural features and/or amenities that are
harmonious with the Spanish/Mediterranean design or be granted
relief from the specific deSIgn requlrement.
7. On the landscape plan modify the landscaping proposed along
both rights-of-ways that abut the proJect to be conslstent wlth
the species identlfled in the Community Design Plan for the
Spanish/Mediterranean streetscape design. Note: Ensure that at
least 50% of the proposed streetscape trees along Boynton Beach
Boulevard and the shrubs/bushes material along old Boynton Road
are native species. Add to the plant list the speCIes of trees
that is represented by the CE symbol on the landscape plan and
show on the landscape plan where the (native) green buttonwood
material that is ident1fied on the plant lISt (CON) WIll be
installed.
8. On the site plan drawing dimension the width of the reqUIred
perimeter landscape strip at the narrowest point along the east
property line. Note: Minimum width 1S 2.5 feet.
9. Add to the minimum striping standard shown on sheet SP the
color of the regular parking space striping. Note: Black for
concrete and whIte for asphalt. Also correct accordingly the
color listed for other pavement and traffic control striplng
shown on the plans and identIfied in the Grading and Dralnage
Specifications found on sheet C3 and the Site Speclf1catlons VI
on sheet C5.
10. Identify on the site plan and landscape plan the locatlon of
the decorative lamps. Also, speCify the color of the proposed
fountain and wrought iron fence and gate.
~ Regarding the documents submitted to Palm Beach county and
~ City of Boynton Beach, resolve the Issue concerning
resolution No. R91-62 and the ten (10) foot utility easement.
After this issue has become satlsfied, we recommend a new
resolution be passed to clarify Section 1 and 3 of the
resolution.
12. Place a note on the plan Indicating the area proposed for
future development shall require site plan review.
13. Provide documentat1on acceptable to the Engineering and
Planning and Zoning Department regardIng dedlcation and/or rights
of land for the area along Boynton Beach Boulevard where the turn
lane was extended and the new sidewalk was added. These right-
of-way improvements are shown on the subJect property.
_/0 -
Checkers 2nd Review Comments
Page 3
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Install the Sabal Palms proposed for each side of the north
ingress/egress outside of the required line-of-sight triangle.
Considering the mass of space each set of three palms (clumped)
will take away from the line of sight of oncoming vehicles, I
recommend locat~ng the Palms outside of the l~ne of s~ght
triangle to lessen the obstruction of visibil~ty.
2. Installing tree species under the overhead wires along
Boynton Beach Boulevard that are listed ~n the FPL catalog for
acceptable trees for installation under power lines and that sa~d
trees be compatible with the Commun~ty Design Plan streetscape
species requirements.
3. Please correct the symbol that identifies the nat~ve speCles
to include all native species shown on the landscape plan. A
suggestion would be to identlfy the native speCles on the plant
list instead of the plant symbol shown on the landscape plan.
4. That the color of the tables and possible awning feature
above the tables be of a color that is harmonlOUS with the color
of the building.
NOTE: If recommendations are approved, incorporate them ~nto the
working drawings requlred for permits for the proJect.
MEH/jm
A:CHECK2ND.JM
-/1-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-236
TO: Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Administrator
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Checker's
DATE: November 2, 1993
Having reviewed the proposed plan rev~s~on on the dumpster
enclosure I find it to be more acceptable and recommend that they
go forward.
~~
Ra ert Eichorst
blic Works Director
REier
\
'-
Pl~NN'NG ~KO
lONING OEPl
."1 -
-let..
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Harry T. Benoit, City, P.E., City Engineer ~. c;." -e.
October 28, 1993
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Checkers Drive In Restaurant
I recommend that the site plan for Checkers Restaurant be submitted to the City
Commission for approval subject to comments and conditions expressed by James
White,P.E., City Engineer.
Mr. White's comments substantially agree with my previous comments.
92-025/240
-/3-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-305
TO: Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: James D. White, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: October 26, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc.
Planning Department File No. 777
I have reviewed the above referenced plan submittal and offer the
following comments:
1. Provide drainage calculations, soils report including water table
information, permeability test results and percolation rate
calculations to be utilized during the permit review process.
2. Please advise the Office of the City Engineer of impacts
associated with the future development of the depicted retention
area situated along the southeast quadrant of the subject site.
3. Please provide all specifications and material standards for
stormwater drainage system and place upon plans a notation
indicating that stormwater drainage pipes which are PVC shall
be of the type ASTM D-3034, SDR 35 material{s}. Revise plans
accordingly.
I have no objection to the plans moving forward to the reviewing
boards conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with the afore-
mentioned staff comments prior to issuance of City building permits.
K~I2~
/ James D. White, P.E.
JDW/ck
Note: This memo herein incorporates Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-306
-li-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-306
TO: Tarnbri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE: October 26, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc.
Planning Department File No. 777
New Site Plan/Conditional Use
In accordance with the City of Boynton Beach, Florida Code of
Ordinances, the applicant shall revise the above referenced plan
as follows:
1. The submitted sign package entitled IIDirectional Signs" is
unacceptable in that the signs do. not comply with State of
Florida statute Chapter 316, Section 316.0747. All directional,
regulatory and advisory signage must comply with the State of
Florida Department of Transportation standards, including the
Federal Highway Administration's Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically
Chapter 5, Section 5.142(g), Parking Lot Construction Standards
(appendix). Signage, such as the pedestrian crossing, the liDo Not
Enterll sign, etc. are not permitted to be decorative and must comply
with the standard color and dimensional requirements of the afore-
mentioned State and Federal laws. Revise submitted sign package
accordingly.
2. The proposed landscaping situated at the "nosell of the traffic
diverter at stop bar along the souths ide of the proposed building
site, will in all liklihood result in a line of sight obstruction
diminishing the driver's view of vehicles entering the entrance
from Boynton Beach Blvd. Landscaping, at this location, should
be relocated in order to provide a clear view of vehicles
entering the site.
3. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5,
Section 5-142(g), the existing sidewalk and/or bicyle path along
Boynton Beach Blvd. and Old Boynton Rd., shall transition thru
all ingress/egress approach areas and be constructed to facilitate
the movement of handicap individuals thru this area. Revise plans
accordingly.
-/s-
TRC Comments/Engineering Memo No. 93-306
October 26, 1993
Page #2
4. Pursuant to State of Florida Access Management laws, the
applicant shall provide the Office of the City Engineer a Letter
of Intent issued from the FOOT indicating preliminary approval
of the ingress approach along Boynton Beach Blvd. Additionally,
the applicant shall provide the Office of the City Engineer with
a Palm Beach County Permit to Construct within the Rights-of-Way
required for the ingress/egress approach connection at the north
end of the proposed site at Old Boynton Road.
5. The applicant shall provide a copy of a State of Florida DOT
permit to amend the turn lane, reference the removal of existing
curb and gutter and construction of the transition area (extreme
southeast corner of project at Boynton Beach Blvd.).
6. The depicted pedestrian crossings are shown in "yellow" and
shall be modified to depict the color "white".
7. The extreme north end of the pavement area is devoid of perimeter
post-mounted lighting, therefore, the applicant shall depict
lighting in this area in such a manner as to avoid the creation
of glare along the adjacent rights-of-way.
8. The applicant shall revise plans to depict swale area along the
east rights-of-way of Old Boynton Road (along property lines) to
be developed into a standard swale section, fully sodded and
irrigated. Revise plans accordingly.
9. The handicap stall depicted on sheet SP does not comply with
State and City standards. I recommend the applicant obtain a
copy of the Department on ~ommunity Affairs Accessibility
Requirements Manual.
10. The applicant is herein advised that the 1000 watt metal halide
fixtures mounted on 25' high fiberglass poles may generated
excessive glare and result in the site being too bright. The
applicant shall submit photometric data and such photometric
data shall include the portion of public rights-of-way adjacent
to this site.
11. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, all areas affected by
drainage shall be fully sodded. Revise plans accordingly.
12. The applicant is herein advised that should the depicted dry
retention area designated as "area available for future development"
result in this area being developed with additional structures, etc.,
a formal stormwater drainage plan shall be submitted in order to
ensure compliance with City codes relative to stormwater
management.
-It -
TRC Comments/Engineering Memo No. 93-306
October 26, 1993
Page #3
13. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5,
Section 5-140(a), "..provide a maximum degree of safety and
protection for the public...", shall provide information to the
Office of the City Engineer regarding what measures will be
utilized to protect the general public utilizing the outdoor
eatery area from errant vehicles along Old Boynton Rd. and
Boynton Beach Blvd. (ie. guard rails, bollards, etc.)
I recommend that this plan move forward to City boards with a
favorable recommendation, subject to compliance with these comments.
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
James White, P.E., City Engineer (as discussed)
-/7 -
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-215
October 27, 1993
To:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Director
Via:
Don Jaeger, Building Official
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Re:
TRC COMMENTS
2nd Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant & Detached
Rental Building
Location - N. E. corner of Old Boynton Rd &
Boynton Beach Blvd.
After reviewing the submitted plan documents, it is with regret
that, even though they have removed the two-story office building
from the site plans, most of our comments have not been met.
Item No.1, A - D still stand and, for further clarification,
attached is a comment sheet from Phil Sy from our Department and
Vincent Finizio from Engineering.
Item No.2, A requires that designated handicap access from the
street to the building entrance must be in compliance.
Item No.3, The building must comply with the Design Guidelines
for the Spanish/Mediterranean District.
Item No. 4 has been met in part by the elimination of the office
building. However, Item No.5 also referred to Comment No.4,
which may apply to the modular restaurant building.
Please be advised that, after 9/30/93, all manufacturers of
modular buildings must be certified by the State of Florida
Department of Community Affairs if their units are installed in
Florida.
Items No. 6 and 7 are both self-explanatory and must be complied
with.
Although some of these comments can be met at the time of permit,
unless the Planning Department has certified that Spanish/
Mediterranean guidelines have been met and sidewalks surrounding
this project will be constructed, this department would not like
to see this project go forwar rough the approval process.
AN/mh
A:CHECKERS.TRC
~
I New old '
-/~ ---
....
r: I.,,~
yl .
. '-- ~j · A~
t- ~
.. "6' \.J-L
7, \.: \.- ~ "~
,r' ..~:'~.
'. J
. .. ~ -,
<:-.
".
l>. ~~ .' S TAT E 0 F F LOR IDA
,.' ....J .~ .
,,", .01" ~A R T MEN T 0 F COM M U NIT Y A F F A IRS
,..... ~.
. ,."".\;0' <:;/
'I: . /"
1'ERVIEW DRIVE · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399.2tOO
LAWTON CHILES
LINDA LOOMIS SHelLEY
Secr.Wy
Cov.rnor
August 11, 1993
Dear Building Official:
This is to.~form you that Florida will no longer be a
=a~e:' o.f .t.he CC1wc;.l of St:i!tes. on Industrialized Housing and /
Buildings after September 30, 1993.
The Council of states on Industrialized Housing and
Buildings was established in 1986 to facilitate the approval,
acceptance and installation of manufactured buildings between the
state of manufacture and the state of installation. Under the
agreements of this Council, the state of manufacture's approval
of a building would be recoqnized by the state where the building
was installed.
. .
The Department determined that the Council system was not
working adequately and therefore, concluded that it was in the
best interest of both Florida citizens and manufacturers to
terminate its membership in the Council.
After September 30, 1993 all manufacturers must be certified
by the Florid~ Department of Community Affairs to manufacture
buildings for installation in Florida and their buildings must be
inspected and approved under Florida's system.
Documents Recuired for Permittina after Sectember 30. 1993
An individual making application fer a permit te install a
manufactured building in your area of jurisdiction must submit
the following documents:
1. Plans approved by a Florida Department of Community
Affairs certified Plans Review Agency.
2. Energy Code form bearing a Florida certified modular
plans examiners stamp.
3. A current letter issued by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs granting the manufacturer approval to
manufacture buildinas for installation in Florida.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT · HOUSINC AND COMMtJNln DEVElOPMENT. RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
-/7 --
Building Official.
August 11, 1993
Page Two
4. In addition, each building installed in your
jurisdiction must bear a Florida insignia.
Please contact me at 904/487-1824 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~~f( /4'-
wrenc ~ian
Planninq Xanaqar
~nutactured Buildinqs Proqram
LHJ/bs
-~6 -
~u~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~T
100 B. Boynton Beach Blvd.
.P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
l?L.ANS R.EV::J: EW COMMEN'TS
Phone: (407) 375-6350
Name of Reviewer ~\l-\ '? ~~c. Permit *
Type of Review 9\(v~ Project ?~
Date of Review \0' ?-?- \q"?/ Contractor
The Building Department and other applicable City departments have reviewed ·
permit application and supporting docwnentation and have determined that ~
submittal does not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinance!
described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please rectify the plan:
comply wi th the c:ode comments and resubmit two (2) complete corrected sets of p:
to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any questions regardil
comment, you may call to speak with the reviewer who made the specific comm~
(The reviewer, affiliated department and applicable phone nwnber are indicate(
the top of each comment sheet). If the comment cannot be rectified by a pi
call, a conference may be scheduled. If a conference is necessary, an appointr
is recommended to assure that the reviewer is available. To expedite the re-re~
process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit docwnents at
Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making chaJ
to signed and sealed docwnents by anyone other than the design professic
responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is based upon)
prompt response to the comments. Please advise us if we can be of assistancE
you in the re-review process.
****************************************************************************,
Comments rec'd. by:
Name (print):
. (signature) :
Date:
Comment
only_
Plans ~
comment
Applicant's
phone *
Date called & caller's
initials: 1st
2nd
3rd
***************************.*************************************************~
A.') ~ 0\..) \lJt~ ~'~::H,\.i1~ h~ '\)\ 't-~,""lO..:~.L <?\ bI... ') - ~ ~ ~~ \:::> <? Mu.n ...Jc..
6 I HA)C. ~'-J~Q e"< (~ \0 ~ 0=L- l-DT
,
?J) ~~9U~(..? ~v..::> ~ ~Vl.) '?LAD PCle:<=.? "'O~ ke:s-, ~~~
0) \ ~ ~u. ~Q -9Y...GI.L.\~ \)A'l\~ ~ ~9 6>~ AO.)ti.S.t'~.
!)") ~9i~\7\\:JC:? ~(P,v~ \~ ~ \IIJVL-U ~O W / \\~\.C? W~\~l- KA)C.
.
AO~ ,6.LL.Oweo \C-.? &~ ~o. 'r-\. ~.
~;n~nb~ GDHHC:m13 ~ \J"~Jo:u-rF'Mn..ID ~.G..,. BJb2.4c73'7Sttz..
,
,\ "c:::. ;" ..t......:. Ct'
~ lb 't..Ierr E~1ER...-.,t'\ ~ un,6J'.~'<.... "{Z.aJlse ltlAC\S -'0 -.c..\--"b,'O:l Si'Q) "S"~ ~ ~(\,
~)?e-d. ')(-,nb ~~',~ \Jlf'V~rt'.~,~ .~'~f.;"f~~A..f'\"+~s..-b L.J11.A..2. ~,.~
~ ~ '"Pad. '!4AG,. ?a.u~~""'60 eaU)tz..4 ~ \~e~ ~ sh.dlO bt... ~~, ~ ..
~'-Tel ~~IlM'l\.~ ~\~ ~ . Fe ~S ton- "'t>e3I'\W'"t ~ou1-~.
, .
-Pc.Jo~"Ptnr \0 F~ ~ 31#0 .o7it-7 ~ ~eT\"'oneb ~r\~c ~~,
CC>i\~ ~ F:D.O\. ~ -r~ ~~Js. ~~e ~nA-E'e
,"~ {'\crr ~~\ \.kd .
~~ M\ ~'A-'~\ ~t'~E." Ie.. S1'Of - 'f'~ -A-u... .shM\ A-\so
:bot '''' ~'-" l.U\-k.. ~~ if ~. ~ .
A:COHHENTS. WPS - bh 1/8/93, Rev. 8/93
-1/-
------
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-183
September 9, 1993
TO:
Chris Cutro
Planning Di
THRU:
Don Jaeger
Building
FROM:
Al Newbol
Deputy Building Official
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT & DETACHED
RETAIL BUILDING - 1ST SITE PLAN REVIEW
Per your request, the Building Department offers the following
comments for the above referenced project:
1. All signs must comply with Chapter 21 of the Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances. Please rectify the plans to comply with
the following:
r
1
A.
Section 21-25 permits only 1 menu board, not 3 as
proposed, and allows a maximum height of 5 feet to the
top of the sign (see menu board on the front of the
building) .
B. Only 1 free standing sign is allowed for the site.
What about the signage for the retail building?
C.
Only 4 directional signs are allowed. Five are
proposed.
r ..-.r-==c
D. Setbacks for all signs shall comply with Section 21-23.
2. Please show the following on the plans:
A. Handicap access from the street to both buildings.
B. Handicap ramp at the parking stall for the 2-story
building.
_I r--
I ~
_e_e_e_e_e___e___e- _ _....... -.
----- ------ti!W-OUSic5YNTON ROAD
~
It
(.1
r.'1I !
l.;.\
\ ~:1'
l I
UI
, I;.~
, ,r ,I
I r '.1
I L!
Ow
Memo No. 93-183 to Chris Cutro
RE: CHECKERS
September 9, 1993
Page Two
5. The restaurant is a modular building; however, comment #4
may apply to it as well.
6. There are no dimensions shown on the floor plans; however,
Section 1105.2 of the Standard Building Code does not permit
exit access corridors or hallways in excess of 20 feet.
7. Sidewalks must be provided along Boynton Beach Boulevard and
Old Boynton Road.
NOTE: The Building Department does not object to the Conditional
Use Request subject to our comments being met.
AN: bh
CHECKERS
-13-
FIRE DE?A~TMENT MEMORANDGM ~o. 3~-:S~ WC~
T-' .
F 1. dlLllng and Z-::rllng Department
=?,':M:
F :. r e : e;> 2. r t m c ~1 :.
L::"TE;
.:. c t ob E ~- 23. 1 9 '~ ~
3CB~ECT: T?C Slte ?_an
:H'::CTEF..3
he ~:ave n.-=. Cb]ect:lo.1S to tlns pldn.
~ t-z k~ C-.
WILLfAM D. CAVANAU:;H fF~ :::
EOYNTOt-.i BEA.::H FIRE :JE?':-.F.-=->:E::r:-
lfiDC ; ,:F
-.1'1-
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 93 - 453
DATE:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Dir~ctor
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director I~//
October 22, 1993 1
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Checkers Drive-in Restaurant - Second Review
Pleas~ be advised that none of our original comments hav~ been
addr~ssed by the plans submitted for second review. My assistant
met with the project engineer earlier this week to review desiqn
comments and provided a copy of our standard criteria at that time.
All comments must, however, be addressed prior to building permit
issuance, and we have no objection to this prolect proceeding
throuqh the review process.
In addition to the previous comments, the applicant will be
required to pay a capacity reservation fee of $790.02 to this
office within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval of the
site plan, or upon request for my signature on Dept. of HRS permit
applications, whichever occurs first.(Sect. 26-34(E))
Please refer any additional questions on this matter to Peter
Mazzella or Skip Milor of this office.
JAG/PVM
bc: Peter Mazzella
xc: Skip Milor
File
Assistant to the Utilities Director - 0.5 hours
- ~S'-
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-404
TO: Chris Cutro,
Planning & Zoning D
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: September 15, 1993
SUBJECT: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant and Detached Retail Bldg.
File #777 - 1st Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
1. Irrigation to be supplied by well {City Compo Plan,
Policy 3C.3.4}. .
2. Backflow preventors to be furnished and installed by
owner (Sec. 26.107).
3. Show easement for new 6" watermain (12' minimum)
(Sec.26-33[a] ).
4. Relocate water services to come off new 611 watermain
(in green area) (Sec. 26.16[c]).
5. Consider utilizing existing 6" watermain near south
side of property.
6. No trees are permitted in utility easements (App. C
Art. VIII, Sec. 9).
7. Palm Beach County Health Unit/HRS permits for new
watermain, lift station and force main will be
required.
8. Add note to plan sheet #C-2: 1I0nsite Lift Station and
Force Main to be Privately Owned and Maintainedll.
9. Provide Fire Flow Calc's: The water system shall be
designed to provide fire flows of 1500 gpm at 20 psi
for commercial properties (App. C, Art X, Sec. 16).
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor, 375-6407, or Peter Mazzella, 375-6404.
19b
xc: Clyde "Skipll Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
Chief Field Inspector - 1.0 hr.
Asst. to the Director - 0.5 hr.
Administrative Asst. - 0.5 hr.
'" /
-;LGJ -
MEMORANDUM
POLICE ~93-169
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Zoning & planning Director
FROM:
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
DATE:
october 27, 1993
REF:
2nd Review - Checkers Restaurant
Ms. Heyden,
I have reviewed the plans as submitted. My earlier comments were
addressed.
I rec::>mmend that the plans be forwarded for further review by
Planning and Development Board.
I ...[' -; } i , I' {.'" . f L'. \ I
J1 ' ~ '- . '-t "--' I ' ,,~\ J'n ,~_,-
... ./ ' ~ - - It=-'
s~t~ Michael Kirrman
MK/jb
,_ /193
_ ,J
'-
-:27-
"I r- -
I ~
(~,
t:J1 !
l:\
\ n,
l t
(it
I IJ
, '1.,1
I 1'.1
\11
f.l1
...1
1',1
I l'.l ,
['J
'n
\(,11
HI i
I ~ 1 0
I (II Z
\.1 ,.....
\ f:,.\ 'I' ~~
[.\ .2
~ ~'11[ ~~
~ \l!1 ~
II I'
. \ ' \
1'1
fJ,)
\1 \
:1
U
:I
I
1'1
r' \
1 I
___._._e___.-e_e-.- .. ... -
-----------NEW-oLOiO~ONAO~
~
..
~~! ~ I. I
'.
;\;lC' I. I
:1 ,
"\...
...
" s-
" I!
/
" ;
/ .
l"
~ BOYNTON BEACH
CIJecIlerS FACILITY
..~ ICIL..............,.-
.
...-:.. ,...-' - I LAND'CAPS 1
__..- _" ..." _._ Pt.AN
co ~f ~ I ~ i ;'1 ! .~ (I)
~ 11 r I!: ~
~ .. - .'" ~
0 to.) IS! r:
~ en I~
Z'" ......
~ oZ
. . ... '1
0 "'-- !::
0
I'
IIII
I\'
. ,
- 3D -
I '7 .
, A 1Jt) '~4 l
3. -n., -y ,1;)-
~! is." j\;J"
-p
~6 ! It&C
r:....
.
...
~
~
i--
~
~
1
E"'
...
~..kl.
~..p
~
\
.
/~
~- - \ - -~-
, ~ ~- ~!' R'\' ..- I'~'
. ~,Q'})- --
\ >--1 . ~ 54 ~ . @
'2 \ \ l~ 2.J
I -' '
......
~.
@ \'
-. '
. ~~1~11- ~
~.--:- ~
~ ." n .'
,
\
T'
,9
,-
-~. *
-JU
~\\2~
~~... 1
f)(,E AN '
'~'\~. J' . l
: _ \ \ ~~~. '. 1
. ) \ \ \24 J '\.\ '. " 2- \ \"
c:= -\~ -~-
\ .' , .
\ \. ,. '
~. S.W
____- 1 ;.T T
~\ ~.1l\
_.. L
U 'w"\
c. \
.,.
'\I' . ~ \ \ . ... t.... ~ (
~. .
u.' \" 22-
0:. '/ ," '! \1~ 't'..t\ 1.91 "'" -..
~ 1-' -7 ".9- eo I<it. . .
._ 1Il....J-.. - .,.. ,0 O"".) ,J, -It..' ,
I~ 1~~4 ~f~, '- '\1 11~ ';1
1.' _ _ - ' i.. .,..
-", ~
u.l
_.;,: ~ ~ ~ '_ \ ~ ,\~ I
,~ ,~,.\ ~ <l '~.' !!' ~ u ;. '}i, I- \ ·
_ ,~ ....~ . ~ _' V'I ,
, . ...". .. ' . I.. ..' "
~"",..tt .
, , l.S" c-/ 1'....-
_ _ ",'. ..~,J.. ,'-
." ....... "
\I~ \ ,\~' 'J.'.., ''';~. ~" ;.t ':l:l \ ' . '9. ,I.:
_ _' ....... ", I
. ,. ~ ,-
_ d.... I ~ !i! L 71 I~I \:tl. 211 ?,2,!"~" ';. ~
" . I .. ..., ." \ I I ~ III
,_. ~, _, ' . _a.-III
, . \. -" - -
_ :-r;_!~' "" --::--~ L-II
} - ~, ~~, L, \ " '1 ~"., ~~
l~\~' ' 9 I'
'eL I~' U \JJ. ":'-6J ~
l"; . 1L' 1 .." ," .P ~
--::; ,
I \'
~~ \ ul2:~
_ . \., 11 '
/" .
"T
. --..,
(!)
~
,. ...f'
6
r 4
...
,o~
~,
Ih' \
\,.. \ "'y
.....
" .
(,
.
@
, \ 0,\
.
- .
"
\ '13 rA1-r'tPP
1" :: ~t70' ~
, ~
,
. . \ . - \
1-.':\ .
- \.6!
5 'tl"
~ [It Co
,ft' ..
U)~
\:} '\1. \ ~
~,.., ,.
~ ,~!'. '2' ~ ~
, 2 'or - t. - l.!/-":~ "
.' I.'\" " to>
-... .-,....
,... J ... :: 11tut.' Y' ... "!:. ~ :;-.::
1'1(, __~. _d..i 1.. .~.
...:1J ~,'-", ~. )" ~\ - -I""f -.
. .:.\ _. fl' . 1\\4 ~ 4.
R1AA
-j
/~ /~~~ ~.< 8LV~ ~ il -:~l/~U '~:\
J',\- / ~ ~-~ -.--...- ~ II. --- -- ~
I"') 1'1 "- -reI..... r'lI.l a-r "7' f(;;. .. - ~._.. - "~. .. j
'-\ (-.)., ITlII I 1:lJJ '-, ~ I IT - '- "" "ft-
: \::1 " nlT _ =.... ~ " I \ II == :::::.- I . ,,,, l' ,
. '....J rl-' ._-_~ .-)- r::S .. ~_...l:;:
I , ' -l' R i.... L.... ' .,. ~ 'l1\' I 1 -- ~
\ ,_' ..... . _ L... ' ,
I '_\'~' , .... -- i:==. i-- ;;..
\: "~'Q'\ ~~', E :;:,~;: ,...-', ,- -- , ' ~~ - t "" .."",... ,
\". , " ti- _~ ,-', - .. 1 v ."'IUt~~!ll~1 m
'.' "'It.L-' _ ." - - . Imnr
~ ''L\.... ._ L- i-~'~ - .' ~= 1:=:- I
,.. .A" i-- ...."'"" _ _ ...... '.. I Itfl
'u, Y"\. ...., .. ~........ ~. - ~ .' + I,
'. ''''i:J..",J1..1 i-- :.. ~c: ..:..~ ~ - ·
II, '.\1\'- "=' '-:ftr' ?-== ~r- 1m """e tm:1T'\ll\illl,ll~ m
'\, \,' 11 '" .";"" ,r- III ;;;...._ i- ". r..w ~w
\ :_ ~I. ~,\ ~'\ c:: _-.-. - - [ill C llilllil.IJ11J1~1'\1111];1lIIID m
i: >).) ;TTT 1 :r1- ' ,- :.:.. l.nlli\[I1~!.@llU
, ~ ~ ..... __ '-t;l-' IT~; '1\ !.ill :nm [
, :_~_~_. IL-. I ..- , -C' -r--_)
, :.... _>- _ , _ ~,'- ::=' !i
I . = ~ ,- - , ;;.- ......--' ~~
, j' ., "~ ,~ _~... ,_ 'L : : ' 'i'
, ~ \>-' , ..... - - ~I ,- .....~,: ~"
\ ~. _ ' i J-' "- '- 0;; ,-' -- - C-- ... -: i= - I .. t
" <:_' .1',,-'>'( '- -c. f- ,\ \- i~: ,- ,I r! (
, ; \J:= c..r-r~t .!::i'r" I ::!'- I ~W- -,...J . ~
oU) 60 'N;~N ~l) tl.---'.:-:i 1 ~ V jJll ..J '-;... 1-- ._. _ . c::::::::-~ P i= . L
fl TT If ' ' ' '- 0-- '- c----. ',-' ->- 1
R:3 . . .', '-1 ,'. u ' ,. !5:;;~ ',-'-, '::' ,,; U "-' ~
~ \ \ I <-{~ J~ RllJ.i.' 7\'v~' 5',~, : _H - t:. -4- __~ ' ::-.'_t:=~
_ , "\ 1 1 J Cj : T1V ~ ':X.J ! ' R 1=
_ '~rll '\ I ~-i-J-" '\rl 1 Il~ ~O^(~~ -~: E E
_ ':: I-< ~ ....' , ~'~} ." _: eE'
~ ' <IU: If.... ~--- ,\: Ie I'r~l
.... " . II ~,,~:Z'T :-- I · O. ,.. ,..-.
pee r c---- ~g;,.- I. :ll:.l{:....~:J1 ,,~ II p ~ ~I " I'.
.,_ ("'~I lit tl u'!ool I 'I~ ~\\
/jOy-lira;v ~; ~:" ~)-1'''.: \' ,::Br~I~LM ,i~f ~I " r"I'I~1\f:
.-J~ ""..~,-, ~':- ~ ' L "jw ITTT 1 11 ~ T . \'~ -'./ ~I'::l 'it"" ...
li7 "-' Ii : :: ~ j 1 jr.'~lJ III ' III "','ll '".{0' ml- mrn
. ,'- 1 ...' O'R-, v ~ ..... ' BIiJ
\ C:": RF3.::~.~. \I~"'" \ 1\11 hi. ~-:-;;r'lI:JLTIf7,c'm : l1llI , iF;"
; ~:: ,,(..r~'I;~.tE'l ~>-T "".ffi~~!~-:-:~' 1 \ en. RI-
1\ ~' { -.l : ' -' r, .. ,='=I n:::;iJ iIllJJilll" ":/, r ' ,. r I 1 ' , ,T I
it --- "'. - (;k~:~~ nITIm 1mII!lllill".' , , -) d ' r; ,j
~._~I _ -- '1 ...1& tffrI \l\ ~~'~1llliii..' D;:: c::::J [' Itt~t$i I'~
II 11- [l. ~ ) ,.-.-' ,.. '-~ T =tJ R1i . .....,1 ru: ,\ 'i f-"f \ ,; \ 'j
O 1-' .....,.. I ~ 11--'1~'l;Iil' - I 'I,
>. 1-'" I 1..L-I I ~ ; II' ' I I 'I r
_ . ,j) _' 'I ..: II , I ,--"f"llmr <:"" T F\-
RC:C.~;.j ", -c
; ,F I ~"T m" H 'h~ f' 11 h \ \ l- -4- ~ .,-.[
/. [ . i _ ~~~f-'- T 'c--- ~,l,'\l I [
", _ >-~ ~ ~' ,...,!;.!,"'.... In., IT; II \ t
'. '}'.i"", .; , ., '~Jj. \\ ~
,i c:;( ....' '. "~~~'r' 1\ L.Ul:B.D ~- flWJ..ill\
._ ~I r "....l~ ", '.. .,'. ,~~.,..... \ ~
'~ro---,,/:.';/ ,/:.... ~.,/ -' ",'.' ~"~PLBFl'GHT! ~~
G.~ .....' ,':"'v' .... ........:Jo..' .~,.'" ' WLAce" CELl.TI'
~....,,'))i?/.';Y~"'" .,:.......- ~\' II ,d---" - ' l :;"
''''IY''' .'Y: \ }"'\ .~\ \\0;:._ 1\\ ' \ \
'0 1/8 ,S J pes - ~j ,
'r\\ \ \ I \. _ _: ~\',\) ,--- c-- ;III~~ ~
'0 400. 800 FEET ""~, -- ~ ,. mlt!
n, . DfI!.Pr, /o.Q3 _~~ ~_.- . ~ 'J::?" /
, II II \ : Fl :3 i -I'~'" ~-~=-II -- - !IT ./
-.3 :;, -
LOCATION MAP
CHECKERS
HANDOUT
7A12
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT
CONDITIONAL USE
EXHIBIT "8"
1
t~
Board of County Commissioners
Mary McCartt, Chair
Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
C/.;I'ol A. Roberts
P . .".-en H. NeweU
:.i..... Aaronson
1\/.;1O~.i.e j.=ord Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Deparbnent of Engineering
and Public Works
September 9, 1993
Mr. Harold Benoit, P.E.
Gee & Jenson
One Harvard Circle
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923
RE: CHECKERS DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT
Dear Hr. Benoit:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study for
the project entitled Checker's Drive-Thru Restaurant pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development
Code. The project consists of a Checker's Drive-Thru restaurant and 4,400 square
feet of retail. The build-out for the project is 1994. The project will
~enerate 1,361 daily trips.
The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding
this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
.,8---~~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Sen~Registered Civil Engineer
cc. Chris Cutro, City of Boynton Beach
File: TPS - Hun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn24
..
ill
51:P
I ') I~
PlANNING AND
ZONIN DEPT.
. An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ ",",,<<1 CHI r<<ycled ,..".,
Box 21129 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (401) 684-4000
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORfu~DUM NO. 94-097
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
Michael z. Haag6"~~~
Zoning &. Site :" :' ~ent Adnlinistrator
April 14, 1994
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Transmittal of Development Orders
Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding
development plans that received final approval by the Planning &
Development Board and/or City Commission. The following is a
list of the proJects, type of request and the documentation
transffiltted:
~heckers Drive-In Restaurant - conditional use/new site plan
- copy of the 2nd review plans
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
- copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission minutes
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - parking lot variance
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
- copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission minutes
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - community design plan appeal
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
- copy of the November IS, 1993, city Commission minutes
Super city Food &. Discount - major site plan modification
- copy of the 2nd review plans
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes
Super City Food &. Discount - parking lot variance
- Copy of the staff report and comments
copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes
Harvey's Restaurant - parking lot variance
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order slgned by the Mayor
- copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission ~inutes
Planning & Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 94-097
April 13, 1994
Page 2 of 2
Agape Dry Cleaners - major site plan modification
- copy of the 2nd review plans
copy of the staff report and comments
copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
copy of the December 21, 1993, City Commission minutes
~ Quail Run Villas - master plan modificaticn
- copy of the master plan signed by the chairman of the
Planning and Developemnt Board and members of the TRC
- copy of the January 11, 1994, Planning & Development Board
minutes
C&M Buildings, Inc. - new site plan
- copy of the 2nd review plans
copy of the staff report and comments
copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
copy of the January 18, 1994, City Commission Minutes
* Transmitted to the Engineering Department - Copy of the master
plan signed by the Chairman of the Planning and Development Board
and members of the TRC
MEH:frb
Attachments
Project File
A:94-097
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
DATE: October 27, 1993
FROM:
Sue Kruse
City Clerk
RE: Conditional Use Application
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant
Attached please find a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing for the
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant Conditional Use application, which is
scheduled to be advertised in the Boynton Beach News on Thursday,
October 28, 1993. Notices to property owners within 400' are being
mailed today.
~/~ ~/J~ ~
SK:slb
attachment
cc: City Manager
ill
OCT 26_
00
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
\
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF
, " uested the
plicant has req locate a
-In RestaUran~, Incf~ra~ONDITIONAL USE to
Checkers Drive 1 to be cons1dered'ng location:
following parce t at the folloW1
drive-in restauran
Legal
Description:
, 2.0 TownshiP 45
A portion of sect10n palm' Beach county I
S uth Range 43 East, particularlY
o , ' being more
Flor1da, - llows.
described as to. .
t corner of sa1d
commence at the southeass th 88 degrees
section 20; thence run owu st along the
21 seconds e - a
02 minutes 'd section 20 tor
south line of s;~ feet to the easterly
distance of 1~~1. f a forty foot road as
~~~~~-~~-~~~ P~~~ ~f subdivision of sai~
section 20, as recorded in PLat BOO~ 7 a
page 20 of the public Records ot palm
Beach county, Florida; thence run North
00 degrees 49 minutes 09 sec~nds East
along said East right-of-way l~ne ,for a
distance of 106.84 feet to the po~nt of
beginning; thence continue Nort~ 00
degrees 49 minutes 09 seconds East t~r a
distance of 301.90 feet to a po~nt;
thence run South 41 degrees 47 minutes 42
seconds East for a distance of 227.66
feet to a point; thence run North 48
degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East for a
distance of 10.00 feet to a point; thence
run South 41 degrees 47 minutes 42
seconds East for a distance of 110.00
feet to a point of curvature of a
circular curve, concave to the northeast;
thence run southeasterly along the arc of
said curve, having a radius of 368.97
feet, thru a central angle of 23 degrees
41 minutes 37 seconds, for an arc
distance of 152.58 feet to a point of
non-tangency; thence run North 89 degrees
59 minutes 53 seconds West along the
North right-of-way line of Boynton Beach
Boulevard for a d~stance of 45.67 feet to
a point; thence run North 85 degrees 02
minutes 51 seconds West along said North
right-oi-way line for a distance of
150.60 feet to a point; thence run North
89 degrees 59 minutes 53 seconds West
along said right-Of-way line for a
distance of 143.67 feet to a point;
thence run North 44 degrees 10 minutes 51
seconds West for a distance of 27.89 feet
to the point of beginning.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-273
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public works Director
Vince Finizio, Engineering Department
Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skiplt Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director ~
DATE: october 20, 1993
RE: Second Review - New Site Plan/Conditional Use
Project Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc.
(NOTE: The applicant has omitted the retail building)
Location N.E. corner of New Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach
Blvd.
Applicant - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc.
File No. 777
Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced
development for your final review and recommendation.
We would ask that you review this amended site plan documents to determine if
the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your
department.
If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of
building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan
again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded
to the Planninq and Development Board for review or held for further
revisions by the applicant. All correspondence shall be received by the
Planning and Zoning Department per the following:
please return your memo and the amended plans to the planning and Zoning
Department by 5:00 P.M. on october 27, 1993.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to
call Mike Haag at Ext. 6262 who is coordinating the review of this
development.
XC: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger
Ed Allen
Charlie Frederick
Tom Dettman
John Guidry
A: 2ndcheck. SP
Project File (original)
Numbered File
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO.93-230
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department
Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Dept. Director
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks superintendent
Ke~in Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
~ ~A:::::>-
FROM: Christopher cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
DATE: september 2, 1993
RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1st REVIEW
New Site Plan and Conditional Use for Checkers restaurant
project Checkers Drive-in Restaurant with detached
retail building
Location N.E. corner of Old Boynton Road and Boynton
Beach Blvd.
Applicant - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc.
File No. 777
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above
referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project
will be granted by the City Commission/Community Redevelopment
Agency. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review
time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and
formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning
and zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on Sept. 17. 1993. Do
not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the
amended plans (2nd review).
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section
8 of the code of ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
substantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process
the project based on the review standards or the documents
show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections
should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and
zoning Department.
To: TRC Members
Re: Planning & Zoning Memo, #93-230
page Two of Two
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is
incorrectly depicted on the documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their
comments when the plans depict or when the location and
installation of their departmental required improvements may
conflict with other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of
his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code
section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review
specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward
a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and
Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do
not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and
recommend the proj ect be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director
of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the
applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer
on this memo. Dotty Moore will be the Planning and Zoning Department
staff member coordinating the review of the project.
The Planning and Zoning Department will send to the applicant a cover
letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans
to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When
the planning and zoning Department receives the amended plans, they
will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for
review and approval.
Attachment
xc: (Memo only)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Parks & Recreation Director
Thomas Dettman, Acting Police Chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Project File
Chronological File
A:Checkerlst.SPjCU
fJ1ie City of
, flJoynton !Seacli
1!f4nning t!1' Zoning'Dtpartmmt
100 ~ ~ttm 'BUIdi 'BoulI.varrl
P.O. ~JIO
~tIm 'BUIdi.:1ftnitI4 JJ425-oJIO
(407) 7J8.749O, 'jJfX: {407} 7J8.7459
September 20,1993
Robert E. Basehart & BCS WESCON Consulting Inc.
1532 old okeechobee Rd. Suite 101
W.P.B., Fl. 33409 (407 688-0048)
RE: Initial Review Comments - site plan Review & Conditional Use
Approval; Checkers drive-thru rest.
with a detached retail building
File No. 777
Mr. Basehart:
The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the
documents submitted for the above referenced project. Attached are
comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial
review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and
documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90
days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not
submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When
there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not
applicable to the approval of the proj ect or will be addressed
separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the
comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment
stating why the comment is not applicable and return the
explanation with the amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12)
complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and
Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been
submitted to the planning and Zoning Department, they will be
distributed to the rev~ewing departments for a second review and
the reviewers will recommend if the site plan will be placed on a
board meeting agenda for approval (see attached meeting schedule).
If there are major comments not addressed by new plans or the
reviewers recommend that the plan not be forwarded through the
approval schedule, this office will notify you on your alternatives
regarding the site plan as soon as possible.
.'~merU:a~' Gatewau to tfte Gu{fstream
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUl1
september 22, 1993
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department
Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to utility Director
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Dorothy Moore, Zoning & site Plan Reviewer
DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Meeting
TUESDAY, September 28, 1993
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
Tuesday, September 28, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "e"
(West Wing) to discuss the following:
preliminarv Plat:
Jonathan's Grove - For questions regarding this
item contact the Engineering
Dept.
Discussion:
1. Review of the following site plans for inter-
departmental conflicts:
a. Checkers drive-tl1ru Restaurant with detached retail
building. N. E. corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and
Old Boynton Road.
b. :Supercity Discount Food and Beverage. 101 N. Federal
Highway.
2. Conditional Use:
a. Checkers drive-thru Restaurant N.E. corner of
Boynton Beach and old Boynton Road.
~~J
Dorothy Moore
XC: city Manager
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Parks & Recreation Director
Torn Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Mike Haag, Planning & Zoning
steve Campbell, Fire Department
Central File
city Commission
Project File
Chronological File
TRC 9/28/93
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Sue Kruse
city Clerk I .~
Michael E. Haa:Y5.~~
Zoning and Site lopment Administrator
October 14, 1993
DATE:
RE:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant
Conditional Use - File No. #777
Accompanying this memorandum, you will find a copy of the
application and supporting documentation for the above-referenced
request. A check in the amount of $1,000.00 to cover review and
processing of this application has been forwarded to the Finance
Department.
The legal advertisement for this request will be forwarded to
your office after review by the City Attorney and City Manager.
MEH/jm
Atts.
A:PHMEMOCH.JM
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-273
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public works Director
Vince Finizio, Engineering Department
Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Uti:ity Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director ~
DATE: October 20, 1993
RE: Second Review - New site Plan/Conditional Use
project Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc.
(NOTE: The applicant has omitted the retail building)
Location N.E. corner of New Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach
Blvd.
Applicant - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc.
File No. 777
Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced
development for your final review and recommendation.
We would ask that you review this amended site plan documents to determine if
the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your
department.
If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time oi
building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan
again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded
to the Plannina and Development Board for review or held for further
revisions by the applicant. All correspondence shall be received by the
Planning and Zoning Department per the following:
Please return your memo and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning
Department by 5:00 P.M. on October 27, 1993.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel
call Mike Haag at Ext. 6262 who is coordinating the review
development.
free to
of this
XC: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger
Ed Allen
Charlie Frederick
Torn Dettman
John Guidry
A: 2ndcheck. SP
Project File (original)
Numbered File
RECREATION Ii PARK MEMORANDUM 193-430
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist I~'~ sL!
. /
FROM:
RE:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc.
DATE:
October 21, 1993
The applicant has not stated whether the existing trees will be
relocated, removed or preserved on site.
The project should proceed with review by the Planning and
Development Board.
I will address this comment at the permit stage.
KH:ad
-17-
_._____e_____e_e--- .. -- .
-----------NEW-6UOiO~ONAO~
\ L--
: -I I
I "
_ ::IE.
f.'
t:\1 !
l:.J1
\ H'
til
, I I;,~ I
' r: I
I r'.l
\ l.1
fl
t,}
1'.'
I 1',1 ,
\' )
'1'1
\ r.1I
:.'~~I ~
1..1 ~
I ~ 1 0
,1;.11 2
\ :-;1 'I' ell
'.',1 ,...
It\, i~
1\1 - s
~ \1 ~
II I!
II II
. \ ~)
\i,.l:
L
t I
~
I
n
r'l
I I
~~I ~ Ii I
~;ae' .! .
:1 ~ t
......
...
/ lil-
,- I!
/
/ ...
0
,- .
I'
I
I
~f t Id ;, ! ! -= (I)
CD ~ ,. ~ I 1I r I~ ,.,
"" .. ... ..~ ~
0 N t~ r.'
"" en ~i
Z" ~
"" . .:
, ...
0 ~ !;:
0 '.
~ BOYNTON RAe"
CIJecIlerS FACILITY
....... ICIL a.. 6 OU ....... ..
.. .. ,....-.
_ I LANDICAPI I
~... ~ -:..~.". (Iff) :.,.._ PLAN
"
1111
111
II
. .
- j!) -