Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS ", .. (f\l2--B L- _:~\.'<-~- ~~ .. ~'-\) ~El '~~.J ~ ~F-(~ .~ cJ. ~L Vcj--{.n ~ -.I=:\LSD A5\<-. ~-~\:\::Q.. -(~t-t~ . Lv&v'-~ ,~v\Q~~ t ..Tw z> lTo.J )rV~ 5"' ' . c (] o o o. ... i') - _L\:: _~ l -C~_F 'L l' ~ (f(2..,\"P}W" Yl-~(Q _'A=l.}v~~~\ -IVG~C) - ... l~ ~G--r ..~ )...~~-r ~ ~\ ~ -2) ~ ~M& 5~c..IQ.,~G ~cfL W>Cl6~'-\> ~VtC-\.: 1(JrV f:J(CL~ ~ ~ J ~l{,{ (\~ ~\ \~5 1="~l'Y\ TIj~/w' R-v% DJv~ 0, o. o. o. o. o. ~iltJf. ".,.. C ,.IRIS ~ e.'fJ. 8 - ~I/J 30 1-861:> .. ~1S' - 11..).8 6~ ;))1) 0.: o ~ .~ .2 __ _~ ~~ '" .., "\ :.. 0.2 n' 0.. 1.0 ~ 1.8 1.4 1.3 /2 1.1 0.1 \2 0.1 o. 0.7 _ 0.8 0.8 0.7 O'.~. ~ ~ 0.4 _ 0.2~0.1 n.' ..., L \i1 J(.Q" leJ fA( l 'D ARt::d~-. E= u. ~L-\- Iy{TG:tY'.$\\:"'-' ~ A.~8:.T' A :B>j)l(', . 0.4' 0.4 0.4 O.IJ 0.3 -0.3 O. 0:1 0.1 o. . '-- -------------...---- ~- ----.. GT6s ~~~~ AT 1"f.;-t'Y\. erf' ~(r+ D,G3, '3\...w' Y ~ OL.~ OtltlllT'~rV R)), 0.1 0.2 ..0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 (1.' 5fi1aY\rlc. ~Uhl(. 1Jf[ W'tf2-(~_ 0.3 0.2 0.3 , . 1<E'r~~Y'<\~. X; "" L/61A;- S 0.2 '0.2 .2 '0.3 I 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0,' ~-". v ,,; t;, ~.' -< "",( >' ...-'\ ~ '0" 'c""" " y ,rI ;,.. -',." c' 7' r' .y . '2, v ./ c"> ./ / '~~~., ./ /I ~-, ,.)...- C.-" ,-p .> "y ,\ ..., ':..' /' r-:: ~? -..-. y.' (~ ;' 'i,"\.' ,;/ 6). c \;'" y' <S' ~<'l'~' t~ y. .", ,') ..)- \,- /' i.../ -;:.. . "',:: ,rI (~ \' --r ~)....- " 0-' ;5) ~ ~. .,-- ./ ~) /I '~ ~ O\~~, ~1) \ " -:d. '.,' .- y'" -z::., 'v ,~~, c... -1-, ,:l- ,,;A ,..:;> .$~ \)) 1,;.J ~-->y IY -->' E\, :;j.- () y"' . ~ -.{~,~~", '00 *, '.. --> , . '~{):\~, %,'() VJ~ \.~_ ~j ~j!) vy , ~,vJ \3> ,,/ ,,:) <.;j ~':S) . -} {o _.' " :"t-. 'IY J.... 0-- .6- ~";/--, (;) ,Y Y ',v y' "7 ~. ,t;-;:.;(~ "',. \Y "';'..,0.', , ,,)., ? -,I'- ...-> .' " ,... r, q: v .,:- -"'C" / \:-, ,... .:;, s, '-7 ,- y'" ,;,' X-' .'\" -~ .~.-:;~ ~ ~t ,...""'. ,/'-. , C.~ ::> /" ., ,,,/'... ~>' ,,"; ", / !~-, ./ y ~~-; A- '/ . ;'>~, .,'" ,;1 ,,/ ~ .,/ .:.J \,' ,y' ,c' .'!-, v y i@ \u.\\ ~~,l\~l~ s Li&h~POleS > a.\'I,5.--- - ."e.(P..-- \~ Was/lington Style "T, 0, )^l DIRECT BUR.AI C^T. NO WT. ~ ~ ~ I ~ lb' ~ t:: 3 6\ 'b ~ i$ ~ fa ~OST HEIGHT (excl.luminalre) 1-1- ~""\ ( ) 1 )~) . ,-." , . PO::> BASE TOP TENON SiZE 17 I 1..1. ....--- ----~----------------._-"-- ~---~-- TEL NO. Ltr,n\~' U.l~~ \..S~...~ '..,.... " Nov 02.93 14:02 P.02 Avai . 30" T radilional (T) ,J" (l.rl.)' II'I/H" / lONe:; rr Nllt'J (I 'YI-' ?) ,', J I I \ . I W 1Y1 I l- <\0" PresldenUlI Acorn Nodlfltd (P/AM) Lantem (l) Two Fixture Cross Arm (A.30) Ml'l fA!) PolIO MG MG MO-M4IdII.Im MD Typo High P'."UN Sodium MO Mil MO "'G un OPTIONS · Single Fusing (120. 240. 277V) · Double Fusing (208. 480V) · Photo Control iIrd limp v.neoo 3!J !.IO 70 '''' 100 1)U 115 r~C1 6acbc $lae "'''ClII'Y V ltpor eall,,\ M.lal HlIllde MG MG ... ..---..... .JG-MDO~ NJA MG It. SPI!CIIlICATIONS -, . . AGCOMN.MAX.WATTAOEI $IlE DESCRIPTION .1 'V 'M S 1S" WHITE PQLYU^IiUONATE 5PH~AC 300 ,.,5 11S 150 2S- CLEAA ~EJI(.tUAEO POL YC"RBON"'TE ACOFlN 500 2~ 2r,n 250 2~'" CLEAJt "tFXTURED POL YCARBON^T[ ACORN MO!?lrlEO 500 2Go ?')O 2!iC ~ CAS' ALUMINUM I AAOITIONAL. Cl,r AR PRI~t..tATIC ACRVLIC l ~;NS 300 11!. I~ 1!'" 30' CAST ALUMINI,lM OCTAGONAl. LANTERN. "CXTUREO AGllYL Ie LENS 300 , 'I!> 17& t~ -- '1. in(:;lrtdllIOl/lI: V.~t"rv VOlf'Or: "'-~.\;t' 11,,119':: S- High Preu.lJ, tj Sod'UIlI "NO denlillll"osls N8 englr"h'rcII.11U wllh.l"~ 1 00 m"" wino ro'CO!l (cMlculllllld per AASHTO slandatca; Mild inclUdO ;) 30% gl,,1 faclor) Wllh hflVl1'lO a maximum ~lllt of 6.2 SPA (aq. ft.) ~l(Jhl"g up to 1!iO Ibs, 19 I J I l1..rJlllF.T1ii'iiJ .. h J. .,... --- - -'" -- - . SE:\T' BY: tLEARWATEff FC ,- - - ' - ' - -; i 1::" i -.;';. ,. -, - g-: 57A~( '; - - - - - . , - , - . - tHEtkERS~- . - - - - - - - , - SptJCltl"iltion Guide I Midi} Na . ] Wl'1fl! I A I w I ~ I 0 I. ~ · L Voltag, Oplirln, CD/or i .._ ,,---1 U/l1fJ ,.,- " . '1 --, SlH*Oific.tiolt EK.mplfl Lr~~ 1- MV I" I n I' ! J 19 UL IZU _------ rlJpCap . -.-.- 6" (I Jr.n1J1 - Oou,,' A$81mb/y LI/mg Huld'f i I .fl" I J !/I : 'I Ii !1:-LlH !i IUI 1III or:--:,." UJ)J(q/II with I' ...' /' FfTlllfrldUnt f../ "-. '.... ..,. ,-- lt1l$ fn'(Q~u" --.. ."-81/IIast Au,ml1ly .. H.. Pott CO(l8/rlicliofl /".~ I.'~ '. "J~ "" BiI'f PI.t, , ('"' n I\,:' ",_ J 0 I fin II' {f,l' Ill! \..:.":,;=.-::;:1-' ( TtlfI CIp - Ont! pi/1C, hNvy gaug, precision spun aluminum (, 125 wall) secU/'fd with (2) J.6"I.P. ,/um{ll/Jm m~/ suppdrt rods. Sldss ar, straight and smooth with II mIx/mum 10 t,par. No exposed harawarf. Lilli Etu:Idfurt- Extruded one pltJc,. optlellly Cl8M acrylic. ~. nDmllNl/ wall. L,n, is SflClJred In ,,, unstr/JuftJ posit/on by (2) Ii" /.P. ,Iuminum support rods. Gasht seals tens from HtsfCtr and wIrer entry. PrIll ~ . Om pjtc, /!Hvy glllJ(Je (,'88 willi) fxfrtJdld lJumJnum seca'M to top by (2) Ji.I.P. Inrfffl.J $lJppOft rods ,nd to cast baSI by (4) 'lush mounl41d scs{nle9s stefl SIt SCflIWS. If" ,..,. . Heavy duly Cllst ~lJminum prtJvided with (3) W x 12" zinc elec"o-pl'lfld .lnellor bolts. nuts and washers. Ball.st support structufll is wiJld,d to blt.5tt lor rlQldlty. fJpIIuI AatfIIbN. Preci,ion ftj,metl ufJ/JIf collecting mflector and lower dls- tribdtlnt} r,tlectfJ' are .t,lIdard with specul.r Alt.k fInish and dl4lollBd for shsrp cl/t-tlff. Optlon.llouv,red "Recto' llystllm .lJsJl.bfe upon requHt tUI/I IIIIN. Porcelain with nickel platld grip SCffW shefl tor mBdJum "'Sf lamps, SscufId ID bllJlSt struetu,., It)r Iilmp protection Bnd dse of "'amping. IIIMIt A'IfIItbIV . High pQWtr ("tIlr (~ or better) capabll o( praviding rrlN,bl, /.mp 'IJ~/:lrting down to -2f1JF1-2M1 A$S.mbJie, mounM on ufll- litsd madul. for easy removal. Provided with quick dlsconntt:t fIlS'IIIff. F/nIIlI . Trlmcote.. harHurl,C6d Ir:ryflc IfIllm,1 coating. Variety 0' tolors. m tJIIM fttt WIIIlIAIIIa Horizontal/ninal Fr>t>tr1lJndl. ( :(JIIWIIK tl,fUS 'll/lifJlf~ IfJOW..,N I.!D IfII.1.Y DJ8Jance In f68t 1 i 'j I 2.8 4,'; 1D.5 2U 24.6 ---1 ,. 3 ,liS 1,4 3.2 6,6 7.4 1-- -, ~...~ 6 I : ,29 .47 1,1 2.2 :1.$ '- 11 .. I I .13 ,22 ,!If) .98 1,/ -- - i ..- --.. -. 12 .OM ,13 .30 .tsZ 10 I . . 1~ .04 .06 .14 ,27 .30 - _. I - 18 ,02 .03 ,08 .15 ,18 i I 21 -- I ! , .ilf .02 ,04 ,0' .10 ~ 6 '3 12 24 15 18 21 Hepdrt basad on 42" 80liard Heigh! 3/ 3 A Mflrlcl Number: THF 2606 (6" om T1/f 2708 (8%") B WiJllaQ9: MaXimum /oo watts lor (roo.. MdKitlllllll ISO watts tor 80/1" OD CLamp fNC . Im;anaescelll MV . Mercury Vapor MH . M~tlll Hi/lirlp HI'S. High PreSSllrt Sodium LPS . Lo w Pre!;5(Jff! Sadium (Maximum 36 wam. pro. vided with luult9iCd refleC/or) o VoltaJt /20. ~',Ji, 240, 217 : I,'j(} ';','1 t ~'rl:ll)r1 18 watt LI ilVill")b!~' III i?() or 2i1 voits E OJ)Uons HS9 ' 9(;-; Hause Shield PC . 1M/on Pnoto Cell F1 .Sillqlc Fuse f2 . VOllil/O FUGtJ (208 voll, UL . Upfirlht with frosted I, m . LOllvtled Reflector Assembly GFR 'ufQufld Fa.uit Receplill GT . Go/(! Anadlzealieflec f G%r See InsJ/:te Back Cover THF2606/270B Ser; " :f" ",~ . ,', / '- B U L 0 N G DEPARTMEN T C J/€CIt!.tPJ eU/Sf 7 ~ r:; f/J. B b y..rtll.-i &:.... 'lJ & v to SUBMITIAL DOCUMENTS Congratulations on rece1v1ng Site Approval for your proposed construction within the City of Boynton Beach. We appreciate your choosing to build within our City. In order to ensure a timely permitting process, the following documents are required to be submitted in two (2) sets. Each set must be stapled together to form a single package. Incomplete sets can not be accepted. I. A signed and sealed survey (not over six (6) months old) by a registered surveyor in the State of Florida indicating: A. All property lines B. North arrow C. Existing structures and paving D. Existing elevations E. Rights-of-way, with elevations F. Easements on or adjacent to the site G. Utilities on or adjacent to the site H. Legal description I. Nl~ber of acres to the nearest one-hundredth (1/100) of an acre J. Location sketch of property K. Surv~yor's Certificate II. A site plan properly dimensioned and to scale showing: A. All proposed structures B. All existing structures that are to remain on site C. Setback lines for all structures drawn perpendicular from the property lines to the closest vertical wall of the structures D. Use of each structure (or uses within multiple occupancies) E. Use of adjacent properties including right-of-way lines for all streets and alleys, sidewalks, turn lanes and driveways F. Elevations of the lowest finished floor of all structures on the site G. Location of existing utility lines on or adjacent to the site H. Location of fire hydrants on or adjacent to the site I. Location of dumpster enclosure and details of construction III. A paving plan in conformance with the Parking Lot Code (Chapter 5, Article X of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances) indicating: A. Calculations for the number of required parking stalls (see Appendix A-Zoning, Section llH) B. Cross sections indicating parking lot construction C. Raised curbing meeting City Standards D. Double striping meeting City Standards E. Conformance with the Sidewalk Ordinance (Chapter 22, Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances) F. Handicapped parking stalls in conformance with the State Handicapped Code G. Dimensions for all parking stalls, back-up areas, driveways and traffic lanes H. Traffic control devices and signs IV. A drainage plan for the entire site including: A. Finish grade and pavAment elevations B. Drainage calculations C. Details of the nrainage system. If total site area exceeds 25,000 square feet, plans must be prepared by a Florida registere( engineer and must be sealed D. Inlets must be placed in grassy swale areas V. A landscape plan showing conformance with the Landscape Code (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances) showing: A. Complete final landscape construction drawings B. Automatic irrigation system plans with 100% coverage (no City water to be used) C. Plant material must be keyed according to species, size and quantity D. Site walls and fences must be indicated on the plans E. Location and contours of proposed berms VI. A lighting plan for the building p-xterior and site lighting including: A. Exterior security lighting and pedestrian lighting B. Lighting for driveways and parking lots 1. Location of lighting 2. Fixture types '. Lamp types and sizes 4. Photometric plan showing illumination levels in footcandles 5. Lighting poles designed for wind loads in accordance with Chapter 12, Standard Building Code VII. Construction documents (all documents must be signed, sealed and dated) A. Floor plans for each proposed structure (indicate use of space) B. Elevations for each proposed structure (indicate exterior materials and colors) C. Soil tests D. Energy calculations plus one (1) cover sheet E. Foundation plan F. Typical wall sections G. Electrical plan view drawings and riser diagram with calculations H. Plumbing riser diagram and plan view drawings I. Air conditioning plan J. Truss layout K. Proposed finish floor elevation identified on the plan L. Board of Health Department stamp (wherp- applicable) M. Copy of D.E.R. and/or D.E.R.M. permit and plans (where applicable) N. Copy of Army Corps of Engineers permit (where applicable) o. Copy of Lake Worth Drainage District permit (where applicable) P. Copy of South Florida Water Management District permit for surface water management or water use (where applicable) bh - 3/92 A:SUBMITAL.WP5 CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ORDER In Re: The application of CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT This matter came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on Tuesday, November 16, 1993, requesting approval of a conditional use and site plan review for a drive-in restaurant proposed for a vacant .93 acre site located at the northeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. The Board having heard the recommendation of city administrative staff finds the following: 1. The conditional use requested is consistent with the development of the surrounding area and does not adversely affect the citizens' general welfare. 2. This matter has been approved subject to all staff comments, attached hereto and made a part hereof. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the applicant's request for a Conditional Use and Site Plan Review, is granted subject to staff comments attached. DATED: /2' 3 - 'i:i BY: OYNTON BEACH ATTEST: 4tL(LA'0l~ &uJk,tt City Clerk (fJ~) 7A12 CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT CONDITIONAL USE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-279 THRU: Planning & Development Board Members / . }~'/- Tambri J. Heyden -J~vj,,-, :/. ", ~ Acting Plannlng and Zonlng Dlrec or "(l'~ Michael E. Haag;;.'" (' Zoning and Slte Administrator TO: FROM: DATE: November 5, 1993 RE: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - Cond1tIonal Use Appl1cat1on/Site Plan ReVlew FILE No.: 777 SUMMARY: Anna Cottrell, AICP, of BCS-Wescon, the agent for Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc. 1S requesting approval of a Conditional Use and Site Plan P.eview for a drlve-in restaurant proposed for a vacant .96 acre site located at the northeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and old Boynton Road. The appl1cant is under contract to purchase/lease the subject property. The Land Use Plan designatlon for the property is General Commerc1al. The property is currently zoned C-2 and consistent w1th Sect10n 6 B :. qq. and 11.2 of Appendlx A-Zoning. The drive-ln restaurant aspect of the project requires cond1tlonal use approval. Cons1stent with the Site Plan ReVIew ordlnance, development of the slte requIres site plan approval. PROPOSED USE: The proposed use includes a building where food :E prepared and served to customers through exterior p1ck-up wlndows. There are two (2) drive-thru lanes leading to each slde of the building. A food serV1ce pick-up window is located on each slde of the building. There IS also a walk-up window to order and rece1ve food. There lS no food served to customers ins1de the bU1ld1ng. A fenced exterior eatlng area cons1sting of tables and other SIte amenities is provided for customers w1shlng to eat at the site. A total of thirty-four seats is spec1fied on the site plan. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (See attached drawing) The triangular shaped .96 acre slte has two entrance pOlnts; a one-way In only driveway located on Boynton Beach Boulevard and a two-way dr1veway located on Old Boynton Road. Both drlveways lead to the on-slte parking area and the facil1tles located on the site. Note: The applicant is requesting a varlance from the parklng lot code regarding the dlstance the drlveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard 1S located from old Boynton Road. At this tlme the slte conslsts of a single story seven hundred eighty-five (785) square foot build1ng that faces Boynton Beach Boulevard. Thirty-four (34) seats are specified on the plan to be placed on the stamped concrete exter10r patio that is adJacent to the building. The patio area wlth the majority of the tables lS located on the west side of the west drive-in lane and 1S enclosed w1th a forty-two (42) 1nch h1gh wrought iron fence. The fenced area has a gate with a walkway that connects with the public sidewalk along Old Boynton Road. The site and bUllding are positioned and designed to allow veh1cles to leave the on-slte trafflC flow and enter two dr1ve-thru lanes that lead to exterlor food pick-up wlndows located on each slde of the building. The drlve-thru approaCh lS from the north SIde of the buildlng. A menu slgn and speaker box for ordering food IS located adjacent to each drive-thru lane. The east dr1ve-thru lane has approxima~ely SIX, twenty (20) feet long, spaces where veh1cles may stack while waltlng serVlce. The SlX spaces include a spa~e for a vehicle at the plck-up wlndow, the west slde has a total of approxlmately seven spaces. After the drlve-ln customers recelve their food at the plck-up windows they wlll proceed around the --/- CHECKERS SP/CU PAGE 2 south side of the building to re-enter the on-s~te tratt~c flow and access aisle where on-site park~ng spaces are provided. A walk-up order window is located on the south face of the bu~ldlng to serve customers. As prevIously stated on site eat~ng ~s avaIlable for customers at exterlor tables. The appl~cant has ~ndicated that the hours of operation are as follows: servlng food; Sunday through Thursday 10:00 AM to 11:00 PM, Frlday and Saturday 10:00 AM to 12 midnight. Approximatelyelght (8) to twelve (12) employees wlll be working during maXlmum demand hours. As shown on the color elevatlon Vlew drawlngs of the bu~ld1ng the wall material is a combination of stucco (medium texture) colored Sherwin Williams Aprlcot Llly #1617 and an accent t~le wainscot. The color of the patterned t~le walnscot lS white and off white. Window and door frames are wh~te. Glass blocks la~d vert~cally with teal neon ~nserts accent four corners of the bu~ld~ng. Four metal columns support the roof above the drive-tnru lanes. The metal columns and fasc~a are pa~nted Sherman Williams Indian Summer !1621. At the top of the columns are three bands of teal neon. The base of the columns have small accent tiles that match the color of the walnscoting around the building. A recessed horizontal band around the fascia of the building ~s painted Sherman Williams Windsurf Blue #1755. The h~ghest part of tt1.? building ~s a white metal equipment screen that has rounded corners and is seen from all s~des of the building. The Community Des1gn Plan specifies tne subject slte as located In the Spanlsh/ Mediterranean design district. The colors of the bUIldIng are harmonious with the colors Identified in the Spanish/Mediterranean theme. However, the architectural design of the bu~ld~ng does not have all of the design elements requ~red by the Communlty Deslgn Plan. The applicant is seeking relief from the des~gn requlrements regarding roof materials and archltectural features. Proposed signage for the site and bUilding is also dep~cted on the color elevation view drawIngs. Note: All -i qnage shall comply with the sign code. The appl~cant is seekIng ~ from the Board of Adjustment to allow two menu signs. The ~long the fascia of the building at the roof l~ne cor ~~el letters back lit with wh~te neon. The c' signage is mostly white and/or wlndsurf directional signs, speaker boxes, safety signs and two menu boards. The configur shown on the colored elevation v~ew dra~ are also predominately whlte and windsur white checker board detailing. A monument sign ~s the main ~dentificat is positioned on the property southwes1 of the monument sign is cons~stent ' business logo. The following colors e white letters for the trademark name white checker board detailing an~ background with black copy, listing type~ ~,,~ ~~ ~?_~,~ rr:#V, Si te lighting pOles and fixtures are shown to l.L_ IN vehicle use area. A dumpster enclosure is located in the n~_ portion of the site. There is a buffer wall proposed for tne eo~~ property line startlng from the north. The butfer wall is not required and the agent has indicated that they will not show th~ wall on the perm~t documents for the project. The balance of the site is covered with landscape material with dra~nage detention areas positioned to capture storm water. The landscape materlal shown will exceed the requlrements speclfled ln the Landscape Code and the streetscape rerqu~rements of the commun~ty Deslgn Code. -1 - ,"- CHECKERS SP/CU PAGE 3 SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING (see attached location map): The property is surrounded by land 1n the C-2 zon1ng distr1ct. The C-2 zoning is ident1f1ed as Ne1ghborhood Commerc1al and has a General :ommerc ial land use des ignat10n. The property to the east is presently vacant and owned by FPL. The C-2 zon1ng west of the site terminates at the center of old Boynton Road and west of the center line is R-3 Multifamily Res1dential zoning. A rental apartment complex is located on the R-3 property. The C-2 property to the south across Boynton Beach Boulevard IS developed with ~ convenience store. STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES: Section 11.2 D of the Zoning code contains the following standards to which condItional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards IS the Planning and Zoning Department's descrIptIon of the applicat10n as it pertains to the standards. Attached "Exhibit A" 1S an evaluation of the standards prepared by the applicant. The Planning and Development Board and City CommlSS 10n shall consider only such condlt10nal uses as are authorized under the terms of these zonlng regulations and, in connectlon therewlth, may grant condltional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreatlon space and sidewalks, as shall be determlned necessary for the protectlon of the surrounding area and the cltlzens' general welfare, or deny conditlonal uses when not in harmony with the 1ntent and purpose of thlS sectlon. In evaluating an applicailon for conditional use, the Board and Commission shall conslder the effect of the proposed use on the general heal th I safety and wel fare of the community and maKe written findings certlfying that satisfactory prOV1S1on has been made concerning the following standards, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Two (2) ne~ driveways will serve the SIte; a one-way in only driveway wlll be located on Boynton Beach Boulevard and a two- way driveway will be installed on Old Boynton Road. The location of the drIveways allow efficient traffic flow on the site. The layout of the vehicle area and the two dr1ve-thru lanes enable good control of traffic. The layout of the Slte and the 10cat10n of the driveways offer ease of access tor emergency service vehIcles. The applicant IS Seeklng a variance for the distance the dr1 veway on Boynton Beach Boulevard 1S located from Old Boynton Road. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection labove, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The sixteen (16) parking spaces provided at the slte exceed the number requ1red by two (2) spaces. A loadlng space is required tor the proposed use, however, the plans do not shew a loading space. A staff comment regard1ng dep1ct1ng a loading space on the site is listed on the Plann1ng and Zon1ng Department 2nd reV1ew comment sheet. The park1ng spaces ar~ centrally posltloned on the SIte and the bUlldlng Shields the spaces from the off-slte Vlew from the west and the on-slte visual landscape screenlng shlelds the off-slte VIew from the other directions. There IS ample room on the Slte to 1nstall a loading space. -..5 -- CHECKERS SP/CU PAGE 4 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above. The Director of PubliC Works is not satisfied wIth the location of the refuse area as shown on the plans, hcwever, the applicant has adjusted the location to satisfy the Director. The new location was achieved by rotating the dumpster so t11at It will be facing east. The refuse area has a concrete block enclosure with gates. The on-site landscape material will provide shlelding of the refuse area. 4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. The applicant will construct an on-site lift station to serve the site. City water lines run parallel to the Boynton Beach Boulevard frontage of the site. 5. screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character. The new lanascaping complies with and exceeds the requirements of the Landscape Code. Ample numbers of trees classifled as large trees have been provided on the plans. The Slze specifications of some species exceed the requirements of the Landscape Code. A concrete block buffer wall is shown extending along the east side of the property startIng at the north property Ilne. The agent has indicated that the bufter wall will be removed. 6. signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. The signs proposed for the site have been limited to those required by the Sign code with the except ion of the menu signs. The appl1cant is seeking a variance to install two (2) menu signs. The code allows one (1). The size and locatlon of the signs shall be consistent with the code. The exterlor lighting is shown on twenty-five (25) foot high poles with a 1000 watt metal halide fixture. Site and pedestrian light1ng shall be installed to meet code specifications. See comment No. 10 from Engineering Department Memorandum No. 93-306. The applicant has changed the llght fixtures to decoratlve lamps. See detail drawing attached to the set of plans. 7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. The proposed bU1lding setbacks meet or exceed the setbacks specified in the zoning code for the subJect site. The maximum lot coverage is forty (40) percent. The bUIld1ng footprint coverage for the subject buildIng is one point nIne (1.9) percent. The plans ~ndicate that fifty-two (52) percent of the site is pervious. 8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other property in the zoninq district. The proposed use is compatible with the drive-thru restaurant that is located approximately two blocks east of the subJect site. The land use to the east and south allow a request tor conditional use approval for a drive-thru restaurant and the land use to the north and west 1S residential and w1ll net allow the drive-thru restaurant use. -~-1- CHECKERS SP/CU PAGE 5 9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The bUilding is one story which 1S compatIble with the surrounding commercIal buildings. The residential bUildIngs directly west of the site are two story. 10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The new use will offer fast food and some Jobs for the people in the commun1ty. 11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The project conforms to the standards and requirements of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. 12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance standards section 4 of the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance. The project and use shall operate in a manner that 1S 111 compliance with the CIty Code of Ordinance. The restaurant use will be governed by the Health Department. REVIEW OF STAFF COMMENTS: Find attached the comments from all reviewing departments. As indicated in their comments, they recommend the project proceed through the review process subJect to their comments being corrected and technical code compliance shown on the permit documents. The following notable changes will occur to the site, as a result of the drawings, showing compl1ance with staff comments: The concern regarding Memorandum No. 93-215 from the Director of Public Works wil~ be rectified by the permit drawings showing the dumpster enclosure being rotated so that the serVIce opening wIll be facing east. The new position will the allow the sanitation vehicle to enter the site from Boynton Beach Boulevard. To show compliance with comment NO.4 from the Plann1ng & ZonIng Department Memorandum, a loading space shall be shown on the slte. There is ample room to install a loading zone south of the park1ng spaces shown on the east sIde of the site. A traffic impact study was submitted for the proJect. The trIpS generated by the proJect required the study to be reviewed by Palm Beach County. TheIr review determined that the project met traffIC performance standards. (See "Exhibit B"). The CIty Engineer also reviewed the study and determined that the study was valid and that the area of influence used in the study for traffIc on Old Boynton Road extended to Congress Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends ~pproval of the conditIonal use and site plan review, subJect to all staff comments, and the approval of the varIances regarding driveway locatIon, number of menu SIgns and the appeals to the Community Design Plan. A:CHECKCU.JM ~-- EXHIBIT "A" I o~3 STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION , APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE TO AllOW A CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT The Petitioner, Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., requests by this application approval of a conditional use to allow a Checkers Drive-In Restaurant on a .96 acre site located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. Proposed site development for the requested Checkers Drive-in Restaurant is shown on the site plan accompanying this application. In order to advance the proposal by Checker!.. for development of the site, applications have also been submitted to the City for site plan approval, as well as variances. The conditional use requested is consistent with the development of the surrounding area, and does not adversely affect the citizens' general welfare. As indicated on the site plan accompanying this application, the proposed site development allows for faithful adherence to, and fulfillment of, the restrictions and conditions related to the dedication of property for streets (turn lanes) and sidewalks, as have been determined necessary for the site. , The Petitioner offers the following justification for the granting of the requested conditional use: ,) The proposed use will have no adverse effect on the general health, safety and welfare of the community, since It provides for adequate and safe ingress and egress to the property and the proposed structure. Great care has been taken in the design of the site to ensure automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As indicated on the site plan, only one driveway per frontage is proposed. The driveways have been jesigned to provide ingress only from Boynton Beach Boulevard, and Ingress and egress on Old Boynton Road. The driveway on Old Boynton Road conforms to the City's requirements for driveway spacing. The driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard Is the subject of this variance application. l ..- Z<<3 The Petitioner has met with the FOOT (Florida Department of Transportation) regarding the proposed driveway location on Boynton Beach Boulevard. The FOOT has Indicated that the proposed location provides the only opportunity for the site to meet the DOT's access management standards. The driveway has been located outside of the required taper for the turn lane provided for west bound vehicles turning north onto Old Boynton Road, and as far east of the Intersection as possible. The limitation on access (providing for Ingress only) eliminates any potential conflict with movements occurring at the Intersection. The proposed driveway also provides for a smooth traffic flow throughout the site, with potential conflict areas minlmlL.ed. All other elements of (he site's parking lot design meets or exceeds requirements as provided for in City standards. The parking lot design provides sufficient access from the public roadvJay, and maneuvering and access areas are located appropriately and of sufficient size to permit vehicles to enter and exit the parking lot in a safe and efficient manner. 2) The site has been designed so that all potentially impacting conditions, such as from off-street parking and loading, glare, noise and odors, have been mitigated. No off-site impacts wi:l result, and there will be no detrimental effect on the adjacent and nearby properties or the City as a whole. 3) Refuse and service areas have been located so as to eliminate any potential impact on residences in the area. 4) Utility service and connections have been designed in a manner consistent with the City's utility master plan and engineering standards. 5) Particular care has been given to the landscape and buffer treatment proposed for the site. The landscape material and design selected Is consistent with the City's Design Plan Standards, and with the existing vegetation and landscape treatment in the general area. The site plan accompanying this application indicates the inclusion of a six-foot high wall along the north/east area of the site where it abuts residential, affording both noise and aesthetic buffering. 6) Signs and proposed exterior lighting, have been proposed to be constructed and installed in amber that eliminates glare, and is consistent with concerns of traffic safety and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. 7) The site design mAets the required setbacks of the district, and includes open space far in excess of minimum code requirements. -7~ 3or3 8) The use and site design are generally compatible with the development existing on adjacent properties and other properties within the zoning district. 9) The building height will be limited to maximum allowable for the district. 10) The proposed facility will provide economic benefits for the City as a whole, by way of: permit and review fees; capital fees (water and sewer connections, etcJ; ad valorem enhancement; sales tax money and employment. 11) The proposed site design meets or exceeds all standards and requirements of the City's codes as applied to site plans. 12J The proposed use complies with all performance standards of section 4 of the City's zoning regulations related to abatement of nuisances and hazards, and conforms to the City'c; Noise Control Ordinance. '6' MEMORANDUM TO: TambrJ. Heyden Acting Plannlng & Zoning Dlrector FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and SJ.te Development AdmJ.nlstrator DATE: October 26, 1993 RE: Site Plan RevJ.ew - 2nd Review New SJ.te Plan and CondJ.tional Use Drive-Thru Restaurant checkers Drlve-In Restaurant N.E. Corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard old Boynton Road Robert E. Basehart & BCS Wescon Consulting, Inc. 777 and ProJect: Location: Agent: File No: The f~llowing is a llSt of comments regarding the 2nd reV1ew ot the above-referenced proJect. It should be noted that the comments are div1ded into two (2) categories: The fJ.rst category is a list of comments that ident1fy unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the 2nd review. To show compliance w1th these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the slte and the design of the buildlng except for the following comments, Numbers 3, 4, 5, & 6. There has been a formal submittal to seek relJ.ef from the code requ1rements for comments Numbers 3, 5 and 6. The second categury 1S a l1st of recommendations I believe wlll enhance the aesthetlcs and function of the proJect. All comments can be rect1fied on the plans at time of permitting considering that the request for Conditional Use/Site Plan ReVlew and approval of variances and appeals are approved. The applicant must understand that addltional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building Department for permits for the proposed project. ~(on the site plan drawing, correctly dimension the setback ~l distance from the property lines, adjacent to the proposed monument sign, to the leading edge of the sign. Note: MinJ.mum setback distance is ten (10) feet The drawings indicate a ND ument Sign an on the plan identify a pylon sign. ,," 1"1 Correct the plans accordlngly. ) De:(L'" r ~ -, t;t ..... (~&~~ ~2. The height limltatlon for the City is forty-flve (45) feet. ~. Adjust the height of the flag pole shown on the detail draw1ng o sheet C4 to match the note identlfYJ.ng the forty-five (45) feet height of the flag pole found on sheet SP. ~3. Locat~ the pr~posed driveway on B~ynton Beach Boulevard so I that the d1stance trom the west edge ot the driveway 1S at least one hundred eighty (180) feet from the lntersectlng lJ.nes of Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard or be granted approval of a variance for said dr1veway. rJ1A fL.\! f\'~v~D' - C; - Checkers 2nd Review Comments Page 2 4. On the site plan draw~ng dep~ct, label and d~mens~on an off- street loading space that does not ~nterfere w~th requIred 5. The proposed sIte 1S located In the SpanIsh/Mediterranean esign district. Therefore, all proposed structures/buIldIngs shall be designed cons~stent with the Spanish/MedIterranean ar~hitectural desIgn theme requirements specIfIed In the community Design code. Incorporate Into the deSIgn of the building the proper roof fInIsh element as descrIbed In tne design code or be granted relIef from the specifIC deSIgn reqUIrement. The Community DeSIgn Code describes archItectural features that ~re harmonIous w~th speCIfic architectural themes. Each theme contains a l~st of features of which fifty (50) percent shall be incorpo;"ated into the deslgn of the structure to achIeve the Spanish/Mediterranean des1gn. An alternate method to ach~eving the appropr~ate features is descrIbed In the des~gn code. In~orporate Into the design of the building/site tne appropriate architectural features and/or amenities that are harmonious with the Spanish/Mediterranean deSign or be granted relief from the spec~f~c des1gn requ1rement. 7 . On the lands~ape plan modify the landscaping proposed al,)ng (1oth rights-of-ways that abut the proJect to be conSIstent WIth the species identIf1ed in the Community Design plan for the Spanish/Mediterranean streetscape design. Note: Ensure that at t.l~ least 50% of the proposed streetscapetrees along Boynton Beach , Boulevard and the shrubs/bushes mater1al along old Boynton Road are native species. Add to the plant list the speCIes of trees that is represented by the CE symbol on the landscape pl~n and show on the landscape plan where the (nat1ve) green buttonwood material that 1S ident1fied on the plant lIst (CON) w1Il be installed. ~8. On the site plan drawing dimensIon the w~dth of the reqUIred ( perimeter landscape strip at the narrowest p01nt along the east ~~ property line. Note: MinImum w1dth IS 2.5 feet. ~9. Add to the rnlnlrnurn striping standard shown on sheet SP the ( :olor of the regular park1ng space striping. Note: Black for NO concrete and wh1te for asphalt. Also correct accordingly the r color listed for other pavement and traffic control stripIng ~~~~~ shown on the plans and identlfied 1n the Grad1ng and Dra1nage ~13 Specifications found on sheet C3 and the Site spec1f~catlons VI .... on sheet C5. o ~10. (Identify on the site plan and landscape plan the locatIon of ~~M~r the ~corative lampS~(Also, spec~fy the color of the proposed ~(fl''''f:..J ""L. fountain and wrought ~ron fence and gate ~ ,I S A~ ~11. Regarding the documents subm~tted to palm.Beach County and / the City of Boynton Beach, resolve the 1ssue concerning NO resolution No. R91-62 and the ten (10) foot ut~llty easement. o 1V""",r' After this issue has become sat~sfied, we recommend a new ,~~~~ resolution be passed to clarify Section 1 and 3 of the cpt" 1 ' ,I '3. reso utlon. ,Lt12. place a note on the plan. lndlcating the area proposed for o future development shall requ~re site plan rev~eW' .An /'l. ~~I~-- 13. Provide documentatlon acceptable to the Engineering and 51> G.~" Planning and Zon~ng Department regardlng ded~cation and/or r~ghts ~ 4 of land for the aIea along Boynton Beach Boulevard where the turn ,11/)1<1 lane was e:<tended and the new sidewalk was added. These r1ght- of-way improvements are shown on the SUbJect property. -It Checkers 2nd Review Comments Page 3 RECOMMENDATIONS: ~l. Install the sabal Palms proposed for each side of the north I ingress/egress outside of the requlred line-of-slght triangle. O~ Considering the mass of space each set of three palms (clumped) will take away from the llne of slght of oncoming vehicles, I recommend locatlng the Palms outslde of the llne of slght triangle to lessen the obstructlon of visibillty. ~2. Installing tree species under the overhead wires along ~ Boynton Beach Boulevard that are listed ln the FPL catalog for acceptable trees for installation under power lines and that sald trees be compatible with the Community Design Plan streetscape species requirements. NV ~ 3. Please correct the symbol that identifies the natlve speCles ~~\ to include all native species shown on the landscape plan. A ,,;<' suggestion would be to ldentlfy the native speCles on the plant ~~~'1 list instead of the plant symbol shown on the landscape plan. t1 ".----: 4. That the color of the tables and posslble awnlng feature ~D above the tables be of a color that is harmonlous with the color ~r of the building. pt-fl. ~ t,IJ'r:t' ,0 I!J (Po" NOTE: If recommendatlons are approved, incorporate them lnto the working drawings requlred for permlts for the proJect. MEH/jm A:CHECK2ND.JM -11- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-236 TO: Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Administrator FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Checker's DATE: November 2, 1993 Having reviewed the proposed plan revision on the dumpster enclosure I find it to be more acceptable and recommend that they go forward. Eichorst Works Director REier . \. -;' _"J.. - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Harry T. Benoit, City, P.E., City Engineer W. c:,,"8. October 28, 1993 DATE: RE: Checkers Drive In Restaurant I recommend that the site plan for Checkers Restaurant be submitted to the City Commission for approval subject to comments and conditions expressed by James White,P.E., City Engineer. Mr. White's comments substantially agree with my previous comments. 92-025/240 .-/3 -- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-305 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: James D. White, P.E. City Engineer DATE: October 26, 1993 RE: Technical Review Committee Comments Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc. Planning Department File No. 777 I have reviewed the above referenced plan submittal and offer the following comments: 1. Provide drainage calculations, soils report including water table information, permeability test results and percolation rate calculations to be utilized during the permit review process. 2. Please advise the Office of the City Engineer of impacts associated with the future development of the depicted retention area situated along the southeast quadrant of the subject site. 3. Please provide all specifications and material standards for stormwater drainage system and place upon plans a notation indicating that stormwater drainage pipes which are PVC shall be of the type ASTM D-3034, SDR 35 material(s). Revise plans accordingly. I have no objection to the plans moving forward to the reviewing boards conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with the afore- mentioned staff comments prior to issuance of City building permits. t~ IJ l-M " James D. Wh~te, P.E. / / v/ JDW/ ck Note: This memo herein incorporates Engineering Dept. Memo No. 93-306 ~ 1X:f26- -Ii - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-306 TO: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Vincent A. Finizio Deputy City Engineer DATE: October 26, 1993 RE: Technical Review Committee Comments Checkers Drive-in Restaurant, Inc. Planning Department File No. 777 New Site Plan/Conditional Use In accordance with the City of Boynton Beach, Florida Code of Ordinances, the applicant shall revise the above referenced plan as follows: I. The submitted sign package entitled "Directional Signs" is unacceptable in that the signs do not comply with State of Florida statute Chapter 316, Section 316.0747. All directional, regulatory and advisory signage must comply with the State of Florida Department of Transportation standards, including the Federal Highway Administration's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5, Section 5.142(g), Parking Lot Construction Standards (appendix). Signage, such as the pedestrian crossing, the liDo Not Enterll sign, etc. are not permitted to be decorative and must comply with the standard color and dimensional requirements of the afore- mentioned State and Federal laws. Revise submitted sign package accordingly. 2. The proposed landscaping situated at the lInosell of the traffic diverter at stop bar along the souths ide of the proposed building site, will in all liklihood result in a line of sight obstruction diminishing the driver's view of vehicles entering the entrance from Boynton Beach Blvd. Landscaping, at this location, should be relocated in order to provide a clear view of vehicles entering the site. 3. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5, Section 5-142(g), the existing sidewalk and/or bicyle path along Boynton Beach Blvd. and Old Boynton Rd., shall transition thru all ingress/egress approach areas and be constructed to facilitate the movement of handicap individuals thru this area. Revise plans accordingly. -/!;'- TRC Comments/Engineering Memo No. 93-306 October 26, 1993 Page #2 4. Pursuant to state of Florida Access Management laws, the applicant shall provide the Office of the City Engineer a Letter of Intent issued from the FDOT indicating preliminary approval of the ingress approach along Boynton Beach Blvd. Additionally, the applicant shall provide the Office of the City Engineer with a Palm Beach County Permit to Construct within the Rights-of-Way required for the ingress/egress approach connection at the north end of the proposed site at Old Boynton Road. 5. The applicant shall provide a copy of a State of Florida DOT permit to amend the turn lane, reference the removal of existing curb and gutter and construction of the transition area (extreme southeast corner of project at Boynton Beach Blvd.). 6. The depicted pedestrian crossings are shown in "yellow" and shall be modified to depict the color "white". 7. The extreme north end of the pavement area is devoid of perimeter post-mounted lighting, therefore, the applicant shall depict lighting in this area in such a manner as to avoid the creation of glare along the adjacent rights-of-way. 8. The applicant shall revise plans to depict swale area along the east rights-of-way of Old Boynton Road (along property lines) to be developed into a standard swale section, fully sodded and irrigated. Revise plans accordingly. 9. The handicap stall depicted on sheet SP does not comply with State and City standards. I recommend the applicant obtain a copy of the Department on ~ommunity Affairs Accessibility Requirements Manual. lOa The applicant is herein advised that the 1000 watt metal halide fixtures mounted on 25' high fiberglass poles may generated excessive glare and result in the site being too bright. The applicant shall submit photometric data and such photometric data shall include the portion of public rights-of-way adjacent to this site. 11. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, all areas affected by drainage shall be fully sodded. Revise plans accordingly. 12. The applicant is herein advised that should the depicted dry retention area designated as "area available for future development" result in this area being developed with additional structures, etc., a formal stormwater drainage plan shall be submitted in order to ensure compliance with City codes relative to stormwater management. I' - - , I - TRC Comments/Engineering Memo No. 93-306 October 26, 1993 Page #3 13. Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, specifically Chapter 5, Section 5-140(a), "..provide a maximum degree of safety and protection for the public...", shall provide information to the Office of the City Engineer regarding what measures will be utilized to protect the general public utilizing the outdoor eatery area from errant vehicles along Old Boynton Rd. and Boynton Beach Blvd. (ie. guard rails, bollards, etc.) I recommend that this plan move forward to City boards with a favorable recommendation, subject to compliance with these comments. " VAF/ck cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager James White, P.E., City Engineer (as discussed) -/7 - BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-215 October 27, 1993 To: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Director Via: Don Jaeger, Building Official From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re: TRC COMMENTS 2nd Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project - Checkers Drive-in Restaurant & Detached Rental Building Location - N. E. corner of Old Boynton Rd & Boynton Beach Blvd. After reviewing the submitted plan documents, it is with regret that, even though they have removed the two-story office building from the site plans, most of our comments have not been met. Item No.1, A - D still stand and, for further clarification, attached is a comment sheet from Phil Sy from our Department and Vincent Finizio from Engineering. Item No.2, A requires that designated handicap access from the street to the building entrance must be in compliance. Item No.3, The building must comply with the Design Guidelines for the Spanish/Mediterranean District. Item No. 4 has been met in part by the elimination of the office building. However, Item No.5 also referred to Comment No.4, which may apply to the modular restaurant building. Please be advised that, after 9/30/93, all manufacturers of modular buildings must be certified by the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs if their units are installed in Florida. Items No. 6 and 7 are both self-explanatory and must be complied with. Although some of these comments can be met at the time of permit, unless the Planning Department has certified that Spanish/ Mediterranean guidelines have been met and sidewalks surrounding this project will be constructed, this department would not like to see this project go forwar rough the approval process. AN/mh A:CHECKERS.TRC ~/ 1 New. old /.::::') """ .- ,......... ~ ~ ' /\. '~ -" - " r' ...:\ -:'~ . -, .... .~.~ <.. ~ - . / ~ '.- . ," {".,:" ~~ ,. 10...:.... ~,~ , ./ ,.) \- """ ~ ''/, '( /'>. c; ti~ '/ loA \ - Yi)J AFFAIRS FLORIDA 32399-2100 LAWTON CHILES LINDA LOOMIS SHEllEY Secrfw., Cowfmor August 11, 1993 Dear Building Official: This is to,~nform you that Florida will no longer be a :a=.ber o'f ,t.he CC1U"cll of St:~tes. on Industrialized Housing and / Buildings after September 30, 1993. The Council of states on Industrialized Housing and Buildings was established in 1986 to facilitate the approval, acceptance and installation of manufactured buildings between the state of manufacture and the state of installation. Under the agreements of this Council, the state of manufacture's approval of a building would be recognized by the state where the building was installed. . . The Department determined that the Council system was not working adequately and therefore, concluded that it was in the best interest of both Florida citizens and manufacturers to terminate its membership in the Council. After September 30, 1993 all manufacturers must be certified by the Florida Department of Community Affairs to manufacture buildings for installation in Florida and their buildings must be inspected and approved under Florida's system. Documents Reauired for Permittina after SeDtember 30. 1993 An individual making application fer a permit to install a manufactured building in your area of jurisdiction must submit the following documents: 1. Plans approved by a Florida Department of Community Affairs certified Plans Review Agency. 2. Energy Code form bearing a Florida certified modular plans examiners stamp. 3. A current letter issued by the Florida Department of community Affairs granting the manufacturer approval to manufacture buildinqs for installation in Florida. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. HOUSING AND COMM(JNIT't DEVELOPMENT · RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT -/7 - Building Officials August 11, 1993 Page Two 4. In addition, each building installed in your jurisdiction must bear a Florida insiqnia. Please contact me at 904/487-1824 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~ ",[( ~~ - wrenc ~ian Planning Manager ~nufactured Buildings Program IJt1/bs - lu - 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. .P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Phone: (407) 375-6350 PL.AN"S REV:!: EW COMMENTS Name of Reviewer {t\ \L-\ ~ .:;/ ~ \ Permit * Type of Review :/\ (.;d'~ Project c.\-\~ Date of Review \0\ 2,:::- \q~"....- Contractor The Building Department and other applicable City departments have reviewed y permit application and supporting documentation and have determined that y submittal does not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please rectify the plans comply wi th the Gode conunents and resubmit two (2) complete corrected sets of pI to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any questions regardin conunent, you may call to speak with the reviewer who made the specific conune (The reviewer, affiliated department and applicable phone number are indicated the top of each conunent sheet). If the conunent cannot be rectified by a ph call, a conference may be scheduled. If a conference is necessary, an appointm is reconunended to assure that the reviewer is available. To expedite the re-rev process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit documents at Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making chan, to signed and sealed documents by anyone other than the design professio responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is based upon y' prompt response to the comments. Please advise us if we can be of assistance you in the re-review process. ***************************************************************************** Comments rec'd. by: Name (print): '( signature) : Date: Comment only_ Plans & Applicant's phone * Date called & caller's initials: 1st comment 2nd 3rd ***************************,************************************************** A-.) ~ ou ~~./ ~\lJ\T1()'~ (~\':O \)\'i.-~~~_ <7\,=,,1...) - \J.-\:CZ- r;;:>~ ~? 0't\ou..)\,.jc- 6> I \-A.A..)C. /'o.U..O'~~Q \7-( ("~ \<:::> ~ 0=L- LDT Y? ') ~ ~9\1.,:)(::7 t?\.,"P ~ ~ VI.) '?I..AD pQe<=;? 00~ \.A~, ~ ~ \c::... G) \ ~A. v.~l0U ~C? ~~Gh\eb \)A'l\~ t:tL ~Q ~~ AQ)(.\.C;.-n-f<=vt , D ') ~9i~Q\\:)(? '?twlvNve \~ ~ 'IUvL-U~O wi \\~\.C? ?AJ.~\~L.. K,A..)C. . Al}~~ N-LuWeO \0 &t\ ~o. r-\. ~. eJ6~na:12.nb~ CDHMEm'3 ~ VIJ.JCPu:f' FI~'"LID ~.CI,,\ BJ.6~40'7!1'7S"z..~ \ I)'1b1JoT' E~1EIi'~~ is. "..h',~~h:....12aJde ;>'Am-'o ~c.\--""J:>.'O;rs"'T1) RS~j,. :549'" ~) VU )I.-I'ne. ~"t'\',~ uvv.Jrr~l~ .~'Sf.,T'\CVt\."'4c>~I("1-~~ l.A.l1lA-2- ~r,\\""\ ~ ~ '""PZtd ~G- t>a...u~ ~""6. ~t2---S ~ \V"\(jpz)f2IU!C:r' ~ sh.dlO be... c:\.~, ~ V' ~'1'E1 02>~(U-t\"'-c;.. ~\~:):or ~ fa> C::;'11>S totL ~qn ~Ot..ft-~. -PLJ~p.n-r ~ F\A.-St-:Pnure;. 3llo.07it-7 ~ ~en"Oneb ~f\FT6E" .S~, ~-tt:>~ ol.z, F".'b.OT. ~d ~ ~~. ~~e ~f\fW3€ ,'~ ('\0\ ~\ ~ . ~~ ,4\\ ~1~\ S-u:;.\"\A-6e' Ie.. S1'Of - 'fl~ -D..-tt.... 5h~\ ~o :bl:; 1("\ ~,.., l.U\~ ~ ~ ~. ~ . A:COMHENTS. WP5 - bh 1/8/93, Rev. 8/93 --..2) - --- BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-183 September 9, 1993 TO: Chris Cutro Planning Di Don Jaeger, A Building icial THRU: FROM: Al Newbol Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMENTS - CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT & DETACHED RETAIL BUILDING - 1ST SITE PLAN REVIEW Per your request, the Building Department offers the following comments for the above referenced project: 1. All signs must comply with Chapter 21 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Please rectify the plans to comply with the fOllowing: A. Section 21-25 permits only 1 menu board, not 3 as proposed, and allows a maximum height of 5 feet to the top of the sign (see menu board on the front of the bu1ld1nq) . B. Only 1 free standing sign is allowed for the site. What about the signage for the retail building? r c:a....-===C Only 4 directional signs are allowed. Five are proposed. D. Setbacks for all signs shall comply with Section 21-23. C. 2. Please show the following on the plans: A. Handicap access from the street to both buildings. B. Handicap ramp at the parking stall for the 2-story building. 3. The buildings must comply with the Design Guidelines for the Spanish/Mediterranean District. 4. Section 1104.2.1 of the Standard Building Code requires not less than 2 approved independent exits accessible to each tenant area, serving every story, except in 1 and 2-family dwellings. The second floor of the retail/office building needs to comply with this requirement which will necessitate an opening to be approved in 1 of the elevation plans. Please show location for approval. '} "'l _ \( ,'" . . Memo No. 93-183 to Chris Cutro RE: CHECKERS September 9, 1993 Page Two 5. The restaurant is a modular building; however, comment #4 may apply to it as well. 6. There are no dimensions shown on the floor plans; however, Section 1105.2 of the Standard Building Code does not permit exit access corridors or hallways in excess of 20 feet. 7. Sidewalks must be provided along Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. NOTE: The Building Department does not object to the Conditional Use Request subject to our comments being met. AN : bh CHECKERS - 1.3 -- T-' ' ::?,:H. [~~.~E ~ -3 !..:E ~- E ~"T : F!RE DE?AFTME~T HEMaRAND~M ~C. 3:-:3~ ~cc ~... .:'.lLlli1g :ilia ZJlllllg Department F _ r ~ : e ~' :-. r t:1~ C ~1 : - t b ., ' _C ,,~ .~:- "'::1. 1 =, : ~ T?,'': .:..:..:.e ?_a:-,L =:H::CTEF.3 v..e .~a'/e n:. ':b~~Ct:lO,lS t,) t111S pldn. ftI: C . ':!? A1t, tL kilt!- wr:..:..fF-.M D. c.'\Vl-.nAU3r: t ~. BaYNT:r-.; BEA:H ::IRE ::E:,:,::-::::'::,. '7 ~- -'- MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 93 - 453 DATE: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Dir~ctor / .J ohn A. Guidry, ut il it i es Di rect or /e>/ O~tober 22. 1993 1 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Checkers Drive-in Restaurant - Second Review Pleas~ be advised that none of our original comments have been addressed by the olans submitted for second review. My assistant met with the project enqineer earlier this week to review desiqn comments and provided a ~OOy of our standard criteria at that time. All comments must, however, be addressed prior to buildinq permit issuance, and we have no oble~tion to this orolect proceedinq throuqh th~ review process. In addition to the orevious comments, the applicant will be required to pay a capacity reservation fee of $7<:10.02 to this office within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval of the site plan, or upon request for my signature on Dept. of HRS permit applications, whichever occurs first.(Sect. 26-34(E)) please refer any additional questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella or Skip Milor of this office. JAG!PVM hc: Peter Mazzella xc: Skip Milor File Assistant to thr Utilities Director - 0.5 hours ,- 2 '" -- : _.I MEMORANDUM Utilities #93-404 TO: Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning D FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: September 15. 1993 SUBJECT: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant and Detached Retail Bldg. File .", - 1st Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Irrig4tion to be supplied by well (City Compo Plan, Policy 3C.3.4). 2. Backflow preventors to be furnished and installed by owner (Sec. 26.101). 3. Show easement for new 6" watermaln (12' minimum) (Sec.26-33[a] ). 4. Relocate water services to come off new 6" watermain (in green area) (Sec. 26.16[c]). 5. Consider utilizing existing 6" watermain near south side of property. 6. No trees are permitted in utility easements (App. C Art. VIII. Sec. 9). 7. Palm Beach County Health Unit/HRS permits for new watermain, lift station and force main will be required. 8. Add note to plan sheet #C-2: "0nsite Lift Station and Force Main to be Privately Owned and Maintained". 9. Provide Fire Flow Calc's: The water system shall be designed to provide fire flows of 1500 gpm at 20 psi for commercial properties (App. C. Art X. Sec. 16). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor, 375-6407. or Peter Mazzella. 315-6404. 19b xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File Chief Field Inspector - 1.0 hr. Asst. to the Director - 0.5 hr. Administrative Asst. - 0.5 hr. " I '- :>t...c. - MEMORANDUM POLICE ::93-169 TO: 'Tambr i Heyden Acting Zoning & Planning Director FROM: sg~. Michael Kirrman DATE: october 27, 1993 REF: 2nd Review - Checkers Restaurant Ms. Heyden, I have reviewed the plans as submitted. My earlier comments were addressed. I rec:>mmend that the plans be forwarded for further review by Planning and Development Board. I "1' - / ! I /" i' I ( .. .11 . . v.........' _..... 1 _ _ '1 I~ s~t~ Michael Kirrman , ' , / " . ."t" t .w'. 11_ .Ij :/ MK/jb Qel :- :' co; C{ 3 I ' -27- MEMORANDUM TO: 711~ll3rRf HE/bE...) Car i B toplu3 r ('11 t ro , :r c H N lIvll L.- b^,'.G~ Project: L IIKc k. K.tK S Acting planning lnd Zoning Director ~ Site Plan - Amended Plans tRtv,( fv--/ f?iE'J/A~~,l.rJ\ FROM: DATE: lo/:J5-jY 3 Site Plan Review - New RE: After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration. amended plans for the above the fRJt(R~AI(oj t- PAJ\? k ~ that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. m ~1'lm ocr I.. :; ,gc~ C:AMEND1.ALD - ,Q? - RECREATION , PARK MEMORANDUM 193-430 TO: Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist .- , " \ . I / . /I ji RE: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc. DATE: October 21, 1993 The applicant has not stated whether the existing trees will be relocated, removed or preserved on site. The project should proceed with review by the Planning and Development Board. I will address this comment at the permit stage. KH:ad ~ 5/ _I r- - I ~ (., t:1I I \ l\\ ' I, ~ , I, (II t I r -.I \ LI, L11 11',1, 1'1 I \'\ \ t:\11 ~g 1.,1 , ~ 1 ,1:1, 2 \ UI ,.\ ~H\ \,,1 ;:JJ)o l- \ .~ I '" ~~ ~ II - ~ L Vi' ~ 1 \ \ \ . \ I I. ,- I rJ, 1\ 11 J I \'I \'\ I 1 -.-.---.-----.----- - -' -.. - - - - - - - - - - -..ew-a:D BOYNTON RO~ ~~! - Ii I ;;I~r.' i! It :1 , t "'1-- / ... ~. / I! / / ; / . I" / I t''' II -I 1/' I: 1/ ii II / ~. \I l II! II~ ,I I' t 11' I'll 'II II . r pi . . :'~ .. =~ V) "'" ~I !: ~ ; ':' - He ,., .. .PO > t-J ~ll r- ~ i;:l .. zoO .,... .: . ' ... f! = ~ . ~ I - _~D - 1 "j' . " A tm 'r,,, l '2. 1f, 1-'1 i') r is>- Ji.,;;; ""I"t' _,J ~ ~ \" l r'/ ,ll%:: \ V",/ \ '7 r" 'l '",I'- '~ 't' ,.;-:;) , ". "~fl' \~ , ~ -k~V " ~ lH ~ ~ <- .,. ,4 ~' ~ , ,. ~. ~t f>::'" l' " ~ J,. ~ '" -. , ,,- - -- ~ , d- ,- r.... . .1 d- ' . ' ". ..:;, · · , . '" ~,' '!;. ~ l-' ~,~ ... ~ '. \ ~ / ~ \:"':' ~_ '1"...,.-- , '} j to. Ilo, '" ~.... · ..l~: d ,-r'" '111/. r -" y ~ \ 'J' " 0 ," 1'. ,'j. . 1l ~ m ~>, , - ~'" 7 .' ~.. ac aO "" ;! ~ (\, ~7, ../!4 ~ ~ ~ ." ~ >) 9 '" ,9~-'1, i; ~ ~ ;yJ' z tJ.- Z ';} s %. ~y ! !f >. .~~ .'~ Im-l ~ : 't" ~ ..... r ti" ~I I .., } !! ''i' :J, T / ' / ,." if ,.~,.... '5'; ,,~II ~' _ . .10 1'- (Y .~_. ,%,~' r.. ~ ..1, .~ ~~i ~ ~ 1Y .!., . ~'''' Illo' '" . ~ -l-' @ · Y l" ~ ~/ <,,,. · , _ " _..,.'_ - .... ~, .."c,- ,. v' ./1 !...I 7 ~ "p, UI"" ~~ '. '.J -,l o~ @--.'..... :.:" ,...,f~ nJ,.'<:. r7 ~ '\" /" R <)0\ ..... '::".~..' 1-} C' $0; ;;\ 1,,,-AC 't -- ~ t. '1 01- 1 II.! ~;, , ~ \~ ~ " \ ~ _ . 'O-.!:1 I~ It, I '7,'" .... ~ ...... '" 4-/ ~'1i ~ -' ~ ~ ;i\1~ j, _ _ _ - '~~i ~ J - - - /~",.,\~~,~! ~(j); V ,'T'~-' .,. ,/ . _ Il ,'~ · ~ '. - .. _ _ :/7flY/' - - .- - -- - /";rp./ \ ~ ~~ ~~ I ~ ~ .. ,~ ~ ':. r , - 1'" ... y . .... - (tiC' t \ ; ~:r I ;f'T f! f~ j... ~ j. /1(;u , ~. ""'1'1\1'01'1 e.~ l'>~"O' I ----. - -- VV' ~ ~---:-- , d- ~tOl ~ ~ ,.@ \~ \ ~ ,"Y ~ J' f tj ; \;~ ;/).:< - ti' - ,- \ti~' 't}r, \f' ~~ :: ,I 'J' "- ~: ,# \ ~ ./ / \ ~, ' -..:--: ,,.....,'\ '-:. \ \ ,3 \ 14, '5, \.;, '7, ,e" 9,Zo,2 ",' "d' ,- - ~ ' . ' ",,' \ . ' ",.. -' . ' ~ ,. '_" I / '~ ~\ ~' .. 2Z ~~1~11' ~ (X.. \'J- I' I'~ ,1) ~\ t.9Jl2.9J..' -~ . ~ ~ q i.b \- ~ ;Y 1,';Yg , ,,, ..:. .,:".' ..' ,-:-; III '~. .,0 '"0"'" 'j ~...' 1 . , \ '. I I~~ 4 ~.I; \~,\T \~ ',~ IJ jOy \ <:! 1.1 ~ ~ -- -- 'W .... t _ ~I ul' , ~.. '. \ ~ \5 U ~ t~ ,k \U 'f.:~ ~ I~ I~ ~; ?~I';;;' ,- \ , , ..t '"." c,( ( "...' - 1. S' -c:...'':.;'' ~ " ',' _v,-,,,".lc ,,: " \ "1 _ ,'... I . \ \0 \' 4 ,,/I ~,c..5,,' ~ ~ " - -\,~ II\~ \ ,I -'- ,_." ," , I' \:r., \ _ .1""', ~ \ 1 ~ 111 . .., \ II ',e..' ._1" I~' I'll lD ~ \'~\ i'~ ,j"'" I~ J ..- \ - " . "':. . ...' '.. I I, " \ -.\..:I :s: ~:::,~: } --;--~~~,- \~F,' ~_11\\~~~~~ I- ,." · ..., . ' w ~ \ _____\/ \\ \Q. 9 ,/ \ el ,?' - ,'" ..~tS.\ l v ~II \:;' e \ ~ \'"; \ \.' ) ...,y ~I ,; \" "~ .~ / - ~ 1" 1 -,~/ /..,.~ ,.ri ~l. "'--- -r \ ./ -.,- \ ~-~ \. \ ~-' : ". ~,., llY~!. ,~' ~ \ \ \2\ \ --- -----..--:::- 1.'\tJ1 -~. - 54 f5. ' @ @ \ ~j \ . ..... . . -,--- @ t ~ I _ ( )'.\ _/ 6 r 4 - -... \ ., . \ -~ T' -..Jut- ~~ \~,2;.'\2?. ~~" \ . \ - f)(,E AU . r" '~. \ 4? . 4 \ - \ \ - \ \ ,_' \ --J 9.... ~ ~ ~ .:1.\ \ \24 j~ \ ~ \ ,d \'~ \ - \ ,r \ ' \" \ ' \ ~. S.W ------ ,0 ;, ..... /, c. \ f" IO~ ~, ,,,, ' @ \ 0\ '\ :.T 1 ~\ ? I ' :;.-- ~ \ . ....... ~\ V 'J r" \ - \ , ;. . .\ -,; \ Q -. \ '13 /A1-MPP Jf' :: 200' ~ ~ ~..I jM .' i ' , , ,.' ~ 2 \, l ~ '. - '-\ ~'l-l..:J~i L ~ - \.... ... , A",'Y" T.- ~ _..- \ Q. l- ~ :~~i 1,. \ , 'W.':.\"""'!" ~..."'~ - !"T ., \4 · . .:.\....r!' .l\'" ~ o !. j'~ ~: .. 1- 'tT t' ~~ ~ J,. ~l ,.9.' . ~ " 1.1- q J- 'f.;I. /. ,,), D 1 ;::. ,. ... ~ ~ ~ I , , ",1 ,/ ~ , l~ 4--) ~ ~ ~ /. ;., 1-- 'l'RA<':KING LOG - Sl'l'E PLAN REVIEW SUBMI'!"!'AL PROJECT 'l'I'rLE: CH6:.Kt:.R.~ ':I J)(;/AlNtJ) Rtr.tm,. eOil.4,/lI(,. FILE NO.: "7? 7 DESCRIPTION: .D~lVt:; .rnl<o RE1T. Ii '1.'1"0 dI Jlfb~y REf/);/,_ 6'vIL':)'..J' 'l'YPE: C:;.,.",fli)tJl" /11.' NEW SITE PLAN - 11>/4. MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICA'I'ION DATE REC'D: AMOUNT: RECEIPT NO.: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * " TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: ~~ COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D: No (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The planning Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: ACCEPTED DATE: t~- ~1-')3 DATE: rNIED N~ . DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: DATE: ~ ACCEPTED A):4 DATE: AliA DENIED 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DATE SENT: <1/,)/'13 RETURN DATE: 9/17/13 MEMO NUMBER: 93 -~3D ,4 ~ h/'A.t'L X '1G~-~p Sltl~4)/>'I,""fNfJ 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED '1/1)193 PLAf'lS IJfM / DATE / "C" PLANS MEMO # / DA E j "ClI Util. No "3- /9-/&'-'131 fi::s- Planning AI/) 'f$.(.Cho I" ,~/ Vtt "P. W. NO f:1. P' 11-1-13 j~Building ~ ~::..."'" IV 1 1'. I :r 1 y6s.. ~ "Parks NO - 19/dl'/3 jlY"o'''''1JtdEngineer d Y'.~:;;)7a / :--~'ll /~ ~ Fire rg'.~ 19-/cf-f31_ Engineer ~ ~ ~ 1 ~__.s/~ police Nt> '13-1,-/1, I Ci'Jl7jln /~ Forester r- ..-3' (j''''/Y?~ I~ TYPE OF VARIANCE(S) DATE OF MEETING: ~~e. P6N' ~L" ,.. PI 1'\1. DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING 1~~1 {"~i':WBco'tI~4J~s: ~j,JD . (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out wi comments NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd R~VIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) '-'OLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D: Mh. DA'l'hSENT TO~RC TO PERFORM 2nd REVU;W. "::l /2i ~ ,,1/ ''":NT: ~r:i*JI/fr MEMO #: /~"ri?-::> RETURN DATEUe.r ;)'/,/19- 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL ~ANS ~EMO # / DATE /"R/D" PLANS ~".. ~'" / /o/;'>/H/ "I< " planning ~s '13-..11; /(J -14 1 " Building ~.; _I It) _2--c. I f"/f Engineer ( / Engineer 1_ 1 Forster Utile P.W. Parks Fire Police MEMO # / DATE /uR/])" 1 1 I 1 1a-;fJ~ II~ I~ t<. / -, 1 \. 1:/3 - 'faD 1 /Q/d-Jj~!. / 1< Y~r tf YtE.~ LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A:TRACKING.SP CC/CRA \, , \ , ). , /- . :I . \ \ :: I \ ' .,- " L,I\ ::).6:~ ",- .. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET ... Name of Reviewer /~K{; 14AfO Permi t Application No.: r~ - S 780 Project Title Cl/cCK(;R~ /)R/Vc - /IV Rt:.sfAU~~tVT fi:,12101Ir" - _ A. 'l'ype of Review SUIt-DINt.. i s,ttE WDRr( ~R. T1J,;; 1C.!..!fAIJRAtJf !.rt \W1r' R..w e,ry t.vJ,h)'JJ>>"J IUI'Hf.v~L 'l'he application number listed above is the referenced number for your proposed construction. Prior to further processing on your project, the comments listed below must be rectified. To discuss the comments it is recommended that an appointment be set-up with the reviewer. For an appointment, call (407) 375-6260 between 8 A.M. and 5 P.M., Monday thru Friday. After amending the planes) to show compliance with the comment(s), return both sets of plans for re-review to the Building Department. To expedite the review of the plans, the designer responsible for the drawings may make line changes to the plants) at the Building Department (each line change must be initialed and dated). Note: Additional comments may be generated as a result of the review of amended plan~s) and/or documents. **************************************************************************** Appl icant I s Name and Phone No. : Date called: Comments Received By (print Name): Signature: _ Date: Comments Only: Plans and Comments: Date Reviewed: / /lb/fJ.! ***** * ********;********************************************************* ... ~4U:"J1t.vT 11I4r / S J.l4iJA) f .... o \'" ~ ,-, ' ,... v' ***************************************************************k***********~ * * Departments required to review the project ~ l>~ 'I ., 'S~~ f/J-(.~ 111 *******************************************~**~****************************111 Page / of 7' CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET Name of Reviewer /11/~ JlMt Permit Application No.: 95.5786 Proj ect Title C,Je: cK.c.R.j Drclvr:. -J^' B<::s.r: 'l'ype of neview 'pf:R~'r I3II1Lll'N'I"""'d. I'oll-G\AJW6 C7 tiM",JJ/~#)pp~VJY.-. 'l'he application number listed above is the referenced number for your proposed construction. Prior to further processing on your project, the comments listed below must be rectified. To discuss the comments it is recommended that an appointment be set-up with the reviewer. For an appointment, call (407) 375-6260 between 8 A. M. and 5 P. M., Monday thru Friday. After amending the plan(s) to show compliance with the comment(s), return both sets of plans for re-review to the Building Department. To expedite the review of the plans, the designer responsible for the drawings may make line changes to the p1an(s) at the Building Department (each line change must be initialed and dated). Note: Additional comments may be generated as a result of the review of amended plan~s) and/or documents. **************************************************************************** ~ . t ~ -d ~ . () . C(.} IN." ce 11/.: 7l!t:f: tBe ~~N f1..4!: AAO f1Ji? S,lvt-IL 11~!ta.v~ 6A,si c).?~ IAt.hl,. **************************************************************************** * Departments required to review the project * See- fA-',~ L(~'I * * **************************************************************************** Page ~ of 'f CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET of Reviewer ;?I1,t'e:- IiAIJ 6 Permit Application No.: C{3- 578D Project Title C DA.I-t: 'l'ype of Rev iew '1lhe application number listed above is the referenced number for your 1 proposed construction. Prior to further processing on your proj ect, the 12. comments listed below must be rectified. To discuss the comments it is r recommended that an appointment be set-up with the reviewer. For an ~ appointment, call (407) 375-6260 between 8 A. M. and 5 P. M., Monday thru Friday. After amending the plan(s) to show compliance with the comment(s), ci1 return both sets of plans for re-review to the auilding Department. To ~ ~ expedite the review of the plans, the designer responsible for the drawings ~ may make line changes to the p1an(s) at the Building Department (each line ) 0 change must be initialed and dated). Note: Additional comments may be ~ q generated as a result of the review of amended p1an~s) and/or documents. ~ ~ **************************************************************************** Appl icant I s Name and Phone No. : d ~ Date Called: ~ Comments Received By (Print Name):____ 1 Signature: . . j. Comments only: Date Reviewed: **************************************************************************** ~ ,Date: 11ans and Comments ~ r,ttntl6- lAt-ffJ. U;fc>RlG,-1/Jt; i 'fLAM toR.. 1I1/J IIR./'IVI'1 1bPGC: /Jj)n1JI1;.R l:-fVC..tas~. Co~ llASc.r .t1M iC ~ .; ,5. 1.J<?"'1 C \]:...\1 ,0 **************************************************************************** * Departments required to review the project * s: j; IS:- f>,46 .!;- * Li?JLf **************************************************************************** '3 of '-I * Page CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET project Title /Jt1l.'...5. Atd 6 D>AJt: Permit Application No.: q~ - S?B6 Name of Revie,.,er 'l'ype of neview '{Ihe application number listed above is the referenced number for your proposed construction. Prior to further processing on your project, the comments listed below must be rectified. 'ro discuss the comments it is recommended that an appointment be set-up with the reviewer. For an appointment, call (407) 375-6260 between 8 A.M. and 5 P.M., Monday thru Friday. After amending the p1an(s) to show compliance with the comment(s), return both sets of plans for re-review to the lJuilding Department. To expedite the review of the plans, the designer responsible for the drawings may make line change~ to the plants) at the Building Department (each line change must be initialed and dated). Note: Additional comments may be generated as a result of the review of amended plan(-s) and/or documents. **************************************************************************** App1 icant IS Nallle and Phone No. : Date Called: Comments Received By (Print Name) : signature: Date: Comments Only: Plans and Comments: Date Reviewed:. *** ************************************************************************ 'J Ii t 1 NO tE. T. n/ll6 M> R./J\> (. J/~;/~R. AN (.. 1l>P b. Il1:- '- SClU.C/UI.u6 1JJ1. LI' IJr f, 'I. TV rtlll fl4f11tl' RcJDh,s.I I~N 4N f7J~ .sIT~ /l4V. .5.410 flI4;. W/J.J #or 1()6 r,I/t:.() ~~ . C, ~h)'JI/~"'; ~.,.~:rl I tlI/U. /.1 f)~/R.!,fJ 77I~""11V fJjJ(),(Dmer-r:'C ~~J4JU SNdW/Nt. w~~ f'}J(.. /{LUhlIIVAno4l&'" ~R J IV IJ1l:. . J A - IV A!c"lJ ~ ON - {,~ IV rM r Il 6.~ fE..A.JbI/. L I~ JJ,,"'1 I ~ lULL 8~ ~ /.j(tL 0 cD '!'tJ .s TbP 6 ~4(lt: F(Q,m .rfIL(,I/tJ~ t>tI~n.. -ro 1/ /}S4cf:.vr P/2df~R17ci. lloo"1'J}.:. ~rY1t M>~ '/b TIlt ~7t!: j !vIUI....'" 6Uc.~/ol fJ[Al./. L) ~I./{;,C:T e 11-1 we. 'Cor T1.u~. e~,fJR~/II~ F~~I & Lcv~ 1'7a UI6:.W f)R4vVJAJ<, stJnv AJ1b ~fi f:. 6. eJ~ fiNJJJJ A14~et.-1.. A c bit. T'!J /liAr 11 SA..." 6 '4r ili! I{O.N ..,4fflt(J~J!'f) ~ , aJ ct.' C A' O~1J -r nit: 2.. - 7bJL }/~~N TlI6~ !IJ~# h,J 71J~ tJR.d..oI,vd " ,'f"fJ6- fASCIA ~c6..J.r. tiJ6 /tI6-&>/U ,.. JtIUI nJ~ ~b jJ ,..b~6 JS'r"' ."Jt;. C; r CJA~ltflJt<J -4J .:rNIJI.An.=- /;1J N~tl!- /d/l.<!Yt\.:).'\) -oJ.': J;r.t Pt~N tZM, MlllIbv. /~ 1'193 711& C; ~ J({/'A A-toIJIl4W= AN' ,41!cAt. /D ()n'I,r- T7Jt:. ICaof 6: "116vr (we- t 1A/4oJL) r;. . iV tf 'I Ai?<.III$clUll4L r/f;4~()~tt. 77U.dm1f.AJr F'~ 71I~~/UfA4Nf,p.?!;fA fftl1J6.fIIAJ 1J;E""" J~ /1)6 tdl"h/Y1v;".h'h. }6J/4.AJ /'I.,u. 'Jd..f' _':V8m/r fJl/t>h/1f{f 'l!/d /t.{Af ~/L 1VE /)ceoeATlt./c LlwJT o/~.s fJl1ofOSh J;~77H. ~lJh/K , , tJJNjl'f/6 ,4&(1. 5D $uO/rJJf fJl{b~T/lIL.pt4N! ~R.. SIV't: i/C,;./I/-Vi7l/I1T f)o IUJT S;JiJW II &c,1tVO(t.. L~vt:.L Jo/f3 .5 ovhf;~'C 6 {1t.ot)'::'R- L~.6' \0 ~ ..w. ""'" u, cJ) "E ~***.***.*****.********************************~*******~ ~\*~*~ft~ P~IJl..tC. WpIU~S N~. I.?~D'. Departments required to review the project , c: J JJ .J ~ '::? F/.B6 tl77tln6-( ~ ~;v(J I eVltV IV. , "i:\ 'S. .. .. .. * .... · * · .. * * · .. · .. · .. * · * ~ .. * .. .. .. :. .. * * · "::::;r::!r. fY.'l * .. .. * * .. * .. * , ]~ Page if of Lf '-. ':: " \..". .t.Nl:d.l~.t.l'.lU.N~ u.t.1.' lU\ ll'Ujl1 J. CIT~,o.~ BOYNTON BEACH ......J .. ,OO"B. Boynton Beach Blvd. loynton Beach, Fl 33435 Phone: (407) 738-7487 Name of Reviewer J,~t..'PYrr ~V"\.\2.~ 0 Type of Review ~ . DateofReview \ f<c /9 4-- COMMENTS Permitl g'~-576o Project Ct-\-tL'?--tlC-~ Contractor ,The Engineering Department & other applicable City departments have reviewed your permit application and supporting documentation and have determined that your submittal does not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances as described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please rectlfy the plans to ~:::(',r.~;p1y with the code comments and resubmit: two (2) complete corrected sets of ~:,;~.b.{lS to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any questions ~~.:;aJ'arding a conunent, you may call to speak with the reviewer who made the specif ic comment. (The reviewer. affiliated department and applicable phone number are indicated at the top of each comment sheet). If the comment cannot be rectified by a phone call, a conference may be scheduled. If a Qonference is necessary, an appointment is recommended to assure that the reviewer is available. To expedite the re-review process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit documents at the Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making changes to signed and sealed documents by anyone other than the design professional responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is based upon your prompt response to the comments. Please advise llS if we can be of assistance to you in the re-review process. ***************************************************************~*************** Applicant's Comments rec'd. by: Comments phone' Name (print)s only Date called & caller's (signature): Plan~ initialss 1st Date: comments_ 2nd 3rd ******************************************************************************* , e lL-- , ,f) U,Q\f '(..? . _.;"~>J \ \~_ \. 'i ,~., ):~ { 'I' i,":. ~ ~ , \-0 , ,> ',.' ',.1.), \ \ ,I ~,~ \ ~"\ , ~ ~.- ........f, \. . , . ... A:Ct1tMENTS.WP5 - bh levlsed 1/8/93 bNLj;Nr;~R1NG'U~J!JU(1!Mt.jL~1!- t-Of<C!r::;),C/< / t::/ )V//(OIl/'-r=V\1t:i2. ~( CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH . . ' . ,0' .. .. . ....... ~ " . . 00 'B. Boynton Beach plvd.i .' Phone: (407) 738-7487 oyn~~~!!!!i1J1,' f:f. 331~~,t'~i,;r;<:,:", .~l~f,~?f, . ''<.' "':~,~,..} ~,1~ ' P, , '.U/"j)' ',; '~~:~,MW~" <\~i.'-'1,;;. N...... of Ili"fewer 4{:I~~4~::t 70~9 3- 37 ?,O , , . . .v .,., ~ ,., , Type of Review t~5 n')~' .';~TRee S Project Chec-f(~ 5 D~teof RlIV1~W l? ',~"f:4~;. . CObtraotor~ tifRec{ . r1;< ::"~? :.l~ ,.~., The Engineering Depa~tme.!'t'~ other applicable, City departments have reviewed your permit application and supporting documentation and have determined that your submittal does not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances as described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please rectify the plans to j::r..r.ij1ly with the code cormaents and resubmi t two t 2) complete corrected sets of >~~ns to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any qllestions ~~.:}yarding a conunent, you may call to speak with the reviewer who made the specific comment. (The reviewer. affiliated department and applicable phone number are indicated at the top of each comment sheet). If the comment cannot be rectified by a phone call, a conference may be scheduled. If a Qonference is necessary, an appointment is recommended to assure that the reviewer is available.' To expedite the re-review process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit documents at the Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making changes to signed and sealed documents by anyone other than the design professional responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is based upon your prompt'response to the comments. Please advise us if we can be of assistance to you in the re-review process. ************************~*****************************t**tt****~***~**t**t****t Applicant's Comments recede bya Comments phone I Name (pr!nt)a only Date called' caller's (signature) a Plan~ ,initia18a 18t Date: comments 2nd 3 rd ' - ******************************************************************************* , , . f.'. : . . '. .: ~I:' t'~ I ~!:' t-" ,', t:.. :. ;j;), , ~'l.' ,," ~ t'::~ ',:1,.("; "; . '.....t,. t:. ....t.....,a../i',. ' j , ~ (; 1't.Ji::",~\ j ')1 ;,'0\,'" . ,'. , . 'f" . ,,,-, ", J , .,. ;1',. 'i ,I \ l \ i, f ;'Ili'~:, , j"!~ U' i . '"I \. tlJt)J,i'; i:.l4,~Q.ti.~1i\11 ' . , ,~' ;..... .\ .}.l: .'.'~ ~\L' ,tt" i . ...., ..q.~I,t~ ,.':: " \' f ',~o,l':~:~ i'l.;~i:, " " ), ';f,H'I . , ~ ~ ;"~#.Pt~ ~"" \,,' , '"'i.~Ilt':"'~,, I.;b . ", " 'I j', . ~,,~ I , ,'" i.; ,. 1 's " "II l t~ . ,:JCi:' ~l... . 'l:~w.r" :.a.tr i..l,..d,,~~;, ,.t1f.l~P~~I\" AtcottaO'S.WPS..-, bh. R..ls.d 1/8/93 "","" {" : \~. ',.'r' j. \~I ; r "',' I....: ~,..q~i~'~~T 7 '~,~f.'~. <'li} t ': " , I -l ,~..[ I -., f ~c~,,~~6;,d:t- ;,. :" ,/-,; .M..Jo llJ ...... .........J&..J -L Jl..... '-::.- .A.J ~.Jt::' ~. 'Jo.A.. "I... ...L L...J..J.!..L.... ...L 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. ~P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Phone: (407) 375-6350 .. " PLAN'S REVIEW COMMENTS Name of Reviewer Y'~\L\P' ~'( Type of Review t?W-UC\U~L- Permit # ~~ - 71~O Date of Review 12--\(.....-0\"7 Project ~c/ Contractor ~~ The Building Department and other applicable City departments have reviewed your permit application and supporting documentation and have determined that your submittal does not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances as described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please rectify the plans to comply with the code comments and resubmit two (2) complete corrected sets of plans to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any questions regarding a comment, you may call to speak with the reviewer who made the specific comment. (The reviewer, affiliated department and applicable phone number are indicated at the top of each comment sheet). If the comment cannot be rectified by a phone call, a conference may be scheduled. If a conference is necessary, an appointment is recommended to assure that the reviewer is available. To expedite the re-review process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit documents at the Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making changes to signed and sealed documents by anyone other than the design professional responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is based upon your prompt response to the comments. Please advise us if we can be of assistance to you in the re-review process. ******************************************************************************* Applicant's phone # Date called & caller's initials: 1st Comments rec'd. by: Name (print): '( signature) : Date: Comments only Plans & comments_ 2nd 3rd ***************************.**************************************************** 1....:> \ p '.' ! ,;. ~ ~ ,- e7 (!!)V- :;....4 c\L. \) VViN\~~ ~~ tAL.-. ~~ {;. ~L '2.. ') 'JJ \.\b<<:;: I. ~ "t4.. ~ LAI-.)f?~~ '" lJS.A) . 7 ') V'?Vv\~ ~\LA~ ~ ~lD0 . <\) ~ \s.. \~t: W\i\~~ ~L- . 0/ ?- \~~ &0\0& "to ~ \7AJi-\- ot:: -- . ,:\. - '. \ ~- '\< -~"' '-r' ~!..... _c,'. r J\.. \ . . .:;;.L,/ ~ ..}-~, . ~ ',-~ ..., ... \ , ,"",J /".1) '). " \) 3IJr"'^-"'.Q./ , - It ~. J \..-..;i'~ ~~ (!)~ R~. Y'e6IJ\ve:: ~ ~ 9\~~ \, -'" A:COHHENTS. WP5 - bh 1/8/93, Rev. 8/93 '100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Phone: (407) 375-6350 ~,P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 .~ .~;<'Jt1 . .;,. PLAN'S REVIEW COMMENTS ',: '.' .': I" . Name of Reviewer tt~~e~Mt,U) D_t:,~1I Permit I 9 J1. - 5":7 Be:; Type of Review 1'tv~~""16IMECIlA-N,~".,~roject t: AllfE' t': K.e cr Date of Review /2.'2/- ?? Contractor ". The Building Department and other applicable City departments have reviewed you permit application and supporting documentation and have determined that you submittal does not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances a described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please rectify the plans t comply with the code conunents and resubmit two (2) complete corrected sets of plan to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any questions regarding, comment, you may call to speak with the reviewer who made the specific comment (The reviewer, affiliated department and applicable phone number are indicated a the top of each conunent sheet). If the comment cannot be rectified by a phonl call, a conference may be scheduled. If a conference is necessary, an appointmen' is reconunended to assure that the reviewer is available. To exp(~dite the re-reviel process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit documents at thl Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making changel to signed and sealed documents by anyone other than the design professiona: responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is based upon yoU) prompt response to the conunents. Please advise us if we can be of assistance tc you in the re-revie~ pr~cess. , ' I ******************************************************************************* ~ , \- i -, . Conunents ree'd. by: Name (print): ~(signature) : Date: Comments only Plans & Applicant's phone ~ Date called & caller's initials: 1st ..4- #Ji. ~ . Jfff~:;' f:;1.r~~~~:~:;~~':;;;; ;;:?~:~~~ '.;iZd ~~ \. i. c..:... ""j " \ : ,', .~..f. ~q~ 1..,>.\ ,"'1'J~ j ":~i..lt'\ " :'~"'~~~~w~.~". , ,,' . f. . .~ ; .' '. ~ ~ I ~ \ , , , , ~ ;, . A:COHHENTS. WP5 - bh 1/8/93, Rev. 8/93 CITY OF BOYN'l'ON JJW\L:U lOQ E... Boynton Beach Blvd'. ~~ '<.... \ - "L- Boynton Beacb, FL 334~5 . Phone: (407) 738-7480 Ext. 271 Name of Reviewer Type C?f Review PLANS :REVIEW' CoMMENTS MIKE JACOBSON Permit' q~ ~ ~I ~O ELEcrRICAL . . Project SITE LIGHTING Contractor ("'"1_'^-e.<::....\.~v....l~ '? \.\.!)-e~' Dateof Review l 'l.--\t?; -o,~ The Building Department and other applicable City departments have reviewed your permit application and supporting documentation and have determined that your submittal does not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances as described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please rectify the plans to comply with the code comments and resubmit two (2) complete corrected sets of plans 'to the Building Department for re-review. If you have any questions regarding a comment, you may call to speak with the reviewer who made the specific comment. (The reviewer, affiliated department and applicable phone number are indicated at the top of each comment sheet). If the comment cannot be rectified by a phone call, a conference may be scheduled. If a conference is necessary, an appointment is recommended to assure that the reviewer is available. To expedite the re-review process, changes may be made by the designer to the permit documents at the Building Department. Proof of authorization is required prior to making changes to signed and sealed documents by anyone other than the design professional responsible for the drawings. Timely approval of your project is based upon your prompt response to the comments. Please advise us if we can be of assistance to you in the re-review process. ******************************************************t*t********************** Applicant's 'Comments rec'd. by: Comments phone' Name (print): \\u.,)~ ~. ~~ only Date called & caller's (signature) : ~~ ~""- Plansr initials: 1st Date: \.l.\\'b\ ~ comments_ 2nd 3rd .********~****************************~**************************************** ELECTRIC REVIEW ~ Submit .lte lighting e1ect~ic.1 p1.ns that .~e .ianed and le.led by . Florid. regi.tered architect .nd/or engineer. ~ ~w and .pecify the following inform.tion on the p1.n(s): (/"_. AND/OR Show .nd .pecify the followinl informatlon on the signed .nd .ealed electrical site lighting plan(.): ~ e,e1.. S~ \ "e>~ . ~Y\~ .,. (;lJ l j C)f' ~..:~ ~... \ ~~...e, 0"'(, I. . cut .heet for each fixture .pecified on the photo- .etric pl.nC.). E.ch cut sheet will .how .nd .pecify the followlna information: \/1)' ..nulacturer(s) name and model number of each I ,fixture ~ll) . di.tlnguishable .ymbol that directly r.1.te. the cut sheet fixture to the llxture. .hown on the .ite lighting photometric dr.wing, site lighting electric pl.n .nd site pl.n the type of 1umin.ry th.t m.tche. in every ~e.pect with the type of luminary specified on the photometric dr.wing the power or watt.ge of the lumin.ry th.t m.tches in every re.pect with power or watt.ge of the luminary specified on the photometric drawing - I foot candlepawer . the depth .t which the conduit that carrie. the powe~ .ource to the pole. i. installed below gr.d. ehe type .nd .i.e of the conduit that carr i.. the power .ource to the pole. che .t.. of the wire thac carr i.. the power lourc. to the poles enabling the voltage to maintain mini- mum level allowed' ~ the type and . he' 0 f ground ing for each pole , \~~\ the location of the lauree of power (ex: .e~vice ~(~~ p.nel or .ep.r.te power drop, p.nel and .eter) : ~ the de.ign.tion of the electrical panel and the 'i~~' circuit numbers th.t are required lor .11 reqUi~' ~~ alte lightln. fixture a . ~~~ ~ where direct burial cable i. .pecified, idantlfy , the following lnfor.ation: i) type of cable ii) .ize of the cable iii) the depth the cable i. installed below grade Lv), provide a eut sheet for the propoaed Junction box ~U) t;( v) ) r}G v'LQ G1.(V ...........--.. unc. _ 1.10 v.." l..n.I 1/R/9] PUBLIC WORKS D!rARTMENT MEMORANDUM 093-217 \)0\0 ~'v~ to J' ., ~ ((\0 ~ TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Major Site Plan Review - Second Review - Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc. DATE: October 22, 1993 Having had the second chance to review the plans I find the dumpster location to be in a high traffic area creating many safety concerns. The dumpster location should be re-Iocated. If you have any questions please give me a call. Eichorst Works Director RE/cr PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-217 (REVISED) TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Major Site Plan Review - Second Review - Checkers Drive-In Restaurant, Inc. DATE: October 22, 1993 Having had the second chance to review the plans I find the dumpster location to be in a high traffic area creating many safety concerns. The dumpster location should be re-located. I request that plans do not go forward until the problem has been addressed. If you have any questions please give me a call. ,/ RE/cr TO: FROM: DATE: REF: M E M 0 RAN DUM POLICE NO. 93-146 Christopher cutro Planning & Zoning Director Sgt. Michael Kirrman September 16, 1993 1st Review Site plan - Checkers Restaurant I have reviewed the site plans in question and have the following comments: MK/jb Post a yield to traffic sign at point vehicles leave drive-in to re-enter parking area, near South entrance. stop sign, stop bar posted at exit on North side. )/)1 Utl{ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-278 TO: Christopher Cutro Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Vincent A. Finizio Deputy City Engineer DATE: September 16, 1993 RE: Checkers Drive-in Restaurant Pursuant to City Code of Ordinances, Checkers Drive-in Restaurant shall construct a S' pedestrian sidewalk along Boynton Beach Blvd. and Old Boynton Road (Chapter 22, "Streets and Sidewalks"). Deceleration lanes along Boynton Beach Blvd. and Old Boynton Road should be depicted upon plans with adequate transition tapers and storage capabilities. Additionally, it is my understanding from State of Florida Department of Transportation Access Management laws adopted by legislature that a Letter of Intent from the D.O.T. permitting access from Boynton Beach Blvd. shall be submitted by the applicant to this City prior to City approval of the conceptual plans. Should the State deny access along Boynton Beach Blvd., the plans may have to be redrawn eliminating this entrance. Ju.:r..;\-A ~ ' Vincent A. Finizio 0 VAF/ck cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager Harry Benoit, P.E., City Engineer BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO.. 93-183 September 9, 1993 TO: Chris Cutro Planning Di FROM: Al Newbol Deputy Building Official THRU: Don Jaeger Building RE: TRC COMMENTS - CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT & DETACHED RETAIL BUILDING - 1ST SITE PLAN REVIEW Per your request, the Building Department offers the following comments for the above referenced project: 1. All signs must comply with Chapter 21 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Please rectify the plans to comply with the following: r A. Section 21-25 permits only 1 menu board, not 3 as proposed, and allows a maximum height of 5 feet to the top of the sign (see menu board on the front of the bui lding) . B. Only 1 free standing sign is allowed for the site. What about the signage for the retail building? C. Only 4 directional signs are allowed. Five are proposed. D. Setbacks for all signs shall comply with Section 21-23. 2. Please show the following on the plans: A. Handicap access from the street to both buildings. B. Handicap ramp at the parking stall for the 2-story building. 3. The buildings must comply with the Design Guidelines for the Spanish/Mediterranean District. 4. Section 1104.2.1 of the Standard Building Code requires not less than 2 approved independent exits accessible to each tenant area, serving every story, except in 1 and 2-family dwellings. The second floor of the retail/office building needs to comply with this requirement which will necessitate an opening to be approved in 1 of the elevation plans. Please show location for approval. RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-376 RE: Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director Kev in J. Hallahan, Forester /Env ironmentalist uO ~ Checkers Drive Inn - Site Plan 1C1 TO: FROM: DATE: September 14, 1993 The applicant must preserve or relocate existing desirable trees on site as part of the Tree Protection Ordinance #81-21. KH:ad o WI rn rn m SEP I 5 1993 MEMORANDUM Utilities #93-404 TO: Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning D FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: September 15, 1993 SUBJECT: Checkers Drive-In Restaurant and Detached Retail Bldg. File #177 - 1st Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Irrigation to be supplied by well (City Compo Plan, Po 1 icy 3C. 3 .4 ) . 2. Backflow preventors to be furnished and installed by owner (Sec. 26.107). 3. Show easement for new 6" watermain (12' minimum) (Sec.26-33[a] ). 4. Relocate water services to come off new 6" watermain (in green area) (Sec. 26.16[c]). 5. Consider utilizing existing 6" watermain near south side of property. 6. No trees are permitted in utility easements (App. C Art. VIII, Sec. 9). 7. Palm Beach County Health Unit/HRS permits for new watermain, 11ft station and force main will be required. 8. Add note to plan sheet #C-2: "0nsite Lift Station and Force Main to be Privately Owned and Maintained". 9. Provide Fire Flow Calc's: The water system shall be designed to provide fire flows of 1500 gpm at 20 psi for commercial properties (App. C, Art X, Sec. 16). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor, 375-6407, or Peter Mazzella, 375-6404. /gb xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File Chief Field Inspector - 1.0 hr. Asst. to the Director - 0.5 hr. Administrative Asst. - 0.5 hr. Memo No. 93-183 to Chris Cutro RE: CHECKERS September 9, 1993 Page Two 5. The restaurant is a modular building; however, comment f4 may apply to it as well. 6. There are no dimensions shown on the floor plans; however, Section 1105.2 of the Standard Building Code does not permit exit access corridors or hallways in excess of 20 feet. 7. Sidewalks must be provided along Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. NOTE: The Building Department does not object to the Conditional Use Request subject to our comments being met. AN : bh CHECKERS From: Harry Benoit, City Engineer =H. ~ '13 , Date: September 14, 1993 To: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director Re: Site Plan of Checkers Drive-in Restaurant with Detached Retail Building We have reviewed the site plan for Checkers Restaurant. Our comments are as follows: 1. The handicapped parking space at the retail/office building should be revised to comply with City and Federal standards. 2. The applicant should provide drainage computations (Chapter 4, Sec. 7.6). 3. The one way entrance from Boynton Beach Boulevard is less than 180' from the intersection of Boynton Beach Blvd. and new Old Boynton Rd. which will require a variance. Additionally, the turn lane on Boynton Beach Blvd. may need to be extended to accommodate the additional volume of turning vehicles (App.C, Sec.1 ). 92-025/240 Memorandum TO: Christopher cutro Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator DATE; September 17, 1993 RE: Site Plan Review - 1st Review New Site Plan and conditional Use drive-thru restaurant Project: Checkers Drive-Thru Restaurant with detached retail building Location: N. E. corner of Boynton Beach Blvd. and Old Boynton Rd. Agent: Robert E. Basehart & BCS WESCON Consulting, Inc. File No: 777 The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the Site plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced proj ect. It should be noted that the comments are divided into three (3 ) categories; the first category is a list of comments that identify def iciencies that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The third set of comments is a list of deficiencies that are shown on the plans regarding technical compliance and shall be corrected and shown in compliance on the permit set of plans prior to issuance of permits for the development of the project. The applicant shall understand that all documents/plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. T. Site Plan Review comments: 1. Include in the site data the number of seats proposed for the restaurant building. Note: if the number of seats exceeds thirty- four (34) provide the appropriate number of additional parking spaces. [Appendix A-Zoning section 11 H. 16.] 2. It appears the sheet that is labeled SP within the sheet no. area is incorrectly titled landscape plan. Correct the title accordingly. 3. On the elevation view drawing of the retail building show the dimension of the overall height of the building from the established finish grade to the top of the peak of the roof. Note: the maximum allowed height for the structure is twenty-five (25) feet, not to exceed two (2) stories. [Appendix A-Zoning section 6 B. 3.} 4. On the site plan dimension the setback distance from the three property lines, adjacent to the pylon sign, to the leading edge of the sign. Note: minimum setback distance is ten (10) feet. [Sign Code section 21-23] Page 2 - Checkers SP/CD 5. On the site plan drawing of the retail building show with a distinguishable symbol the size and configuration of the building overhang including the awning. specify the width of each. 6. Adjust the setback distance shown on the site plan drawing to indicate the distance from Boynton Beach Blvd. to the leading edge of the overhang of the restaurant building. [Appendix A-Zoning section 6 B. 3.) 7. Adjust the setback distance shown on the site plan drawing to indicate the distance from Boynton Beach Blvd. to the leading edge of the overhang or awning of the retail building. [Appendix A-Zoning section 6 B. 3.] 8. Adjust the setback distance shown on the site plan drawing to indicate the distance from the east property line to the leading edge of the overhang or awning of the east side of the retail building. [Appendix A-Zoning section 6 B. 3.] 9. Add to the site data the percent of coverage the total footprint area of both buildings represents of the entire site. [Appendix A-Zoning section 6 B. 3.] 10. The height limitations for the City is forty-five (45) feet, adjust the helght of the flag pole so that it does not exceed forty-five feet. [Appendix A-Zoning section 4 F.] 11. The site plan drawing indicates that the property that borders the subject property to the east is existing residential, however, City records indicate that only one hundred forty-seven (147) feet of the east property line measured from the north property line is zoned residential. Correct the plans accordingly and add to the site plan drawing a six (6) feet high buffer wall that is required where the subject property abuts the residential zoned district. Also, add to the site plan drawing a typical section detail drawing of the required buffer wall. Include on the section view drawing the location of the property line, type of material and the color of the stucco finish. Note: See attached buffer wall section of the code. [Appendix A-Zoning section 4 L.) 12. Relocate the driveway on Boynton Beach Blvd. so that the distance from the west edge of the driveway is at least one hundred eighty (180) feet from the intersection of Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Blvd. [Chapter 5 Article X section 5-142. (h) (3)) 13. Amend the configuration of the handicapped parking space located at the retail building to include the required five (5) feet wide access aisle. [Accessibility Requirements Manual figure 30] 14. The proposed site is located in the Spanish/Mediterranean design district. Therefore all proposed structures/buildings shall be designed consistent wi th the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural design theme requirements specified in the Community Design Code. Incorporate into the design of the restaurant building the proper exterior wall and roof finish element as described in the code within the appropriate design theme. Also change the smooth stucco finish specified for the exterior walls of the retail building to a finish described in the des ign code. [Chapter 7.5 Article V Appendix II] Page 3 - Checkers sP/CU 15. The Community Des ign Code describes architectural features that are harmonious with specific architectural themes. Each archi tectural theme lists features of which fifty (50) percent shall be incorporated into the design of the structure to achieve the Spanish/Mediterranean Architectural design. An alternate method to achieving the appropriate features is described in the Design Code. Incorporate into the design of the restaurant building and the retail building the appropriate architectural features that are harmonious with the Spanish/Mediterranean design. [Chapter 7.5 Article V Appendix II] 16. On the Landscape plan modify the landscaping shown along old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Blvd. to be consistent with the species specified in the Community Design plan for the Spanish/Mediterranean streets cape design. Ensure that fifty (50) percent of the required landscape material is a native species. [Chapter 7.5 Article V Appendix III] 17. On the elevation view drawing of the retail building identify the color of each exterior finish material and include the manufacturers name. Note: All colors shall comply with Design District requirements. [ site plan Review requirement section 7.4.1.] 18. The contract to purchase the subj ect property does not specifically describe parcel A as being part of the property being purchased, however, the survey and site plan show parcel A as part of the proposed site. Correct the contract purchase to include parcel A or remove same from the drawings. 19. Add to the submittal the proposed signage for the retail building. Include location, size, color and configuration of all signage for the building in compliance with the sign code. [Sign Code section 21-21] 20. I have attached the criteria by which conditional uses are evaluated. To support your request for approval of a drive-thru restaurant you may respond in writing to each criteria, said response will be incorporated into documents forwarded to the reviewing board. [Appendix A-Zoning section 11.2] 21. On the plant list identify the native species with a distinguishable symbol. 22. On the landscape plan sheet LAl identify the plant species proposed for the vehicle use area hedge material shown along the west side of the drive-thru area south of the match line. [Landscape Code section 7.5-35. (c) (3)] 23. continue the required vehicle use area hedge material (2 feet on center, 18 inches high) around the radius at the south west corner of the site. [Landscape code 7.5-35. (c) (3)] 24. Adjust the spacing or add new trees in the landscape strip around the radius of the vehicle use area at the south west corner of the site. The spacing of the trees shall not be greater than forty (40) feet between the trunk of the Ligustrum Lucidum and the trunk of the Quercus Virginiana. [Landscape code 7.5-35. (d)] Page 4 - Checkers SP/CU 25. Adjust the spacing or add new tress in the landscape strip along the edge of the vehicle use area south of the dumpster area. The spacing of the trees shall not be greater than forty (40) feet between the trunk of the Cocos Nucifera and the Swietenia Mahogany. Place the following note and dimension on the landscape plan: show at each roadway a dimension between the tree symbols, and note that the typical spacing is forty (40) feet on center. [Landscape Code 7.5-35. (d)] 26. omit the symbol on the landscape plan that indicates the number of plants associated with a species of plant material for each hedge plant that forms the continuous visual barrier required to screen the vehicle use area, insert the following: maximum spacing two (2) feet on center. [Landscape Code 7.5-35. (c) (3)] 27. On the landscape plan add to the substitution note written authorization from the owner and the City of Boynton Beach. 28. On the landscape plan add the following note: All landscape material shall be irrigated with an automatic water supply system. [Landscape Code 7.5-35. (b)] 29. On the site plan drawing depict, label and dimension an off- street loading spaces. [Appendix A-Zoning section J] II. Recommendations: 1. For aesthetics, I recommend adding plants around three sides of the dumpster enclosure: such as; evergreen native hedge material at least six feet in height, staggered spacing at three feet centers and placed between the syzygium paniculata and the exterior face of the enclosure. 2. For aesthetics, I recommend lowering the height of the site lighting poles so that the top of the fixture does not exceed twenty-five feet above the finish floor level of the Checkers building. III. Technical Compliance comments: 1. The County tax map of the subject property indicates that a unity of title is required to combine all properties to form a complete site. A unity of title form may be obtained from the Building Department, said form shall be completed and submitted for review to the Building Department prior to the issuance of a permit for the proposed construction. 2. On the site plan and/or the landscape plan dimension the width of the perimeter landscape strip at the following locations: a) west side of the seating area and b) the narrowest point between Boynton Beach Blvd. and the parking spaces directly south of the retail building. Note: Minimum width is Five (5) feet [Landscape Code 7.5-35. (d)] 3. On the site plan and/or landscape plan dimension the width of the perimeter landscape strip at the following locations: a) narrowest point between the east property line and the parking spaces located directly east of the retail building and b) the narrowest point between the east property line and the on-site traffic aisle east of the dumpster area. Note: Minimum width is two point five (2.5) feet [Landscape Code 7.5-35. (e)] Page 5 - Checkers SP/CD 4. To avoid a conflict between the location of the overhead power lines and tree landscape material show on the landscape plan the location of overhead power lines and modify the plans accordingly. 5. Add to the landscape plan the required line of sight triangles 'that are specified in section 7.5-35. (h) of the landscape code. Dimension the legs of each required triangle. Specify in note form on the plan that a clear unobstructed line of sight space between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet shall be maintained within the line of sight triangular areas. Also, show and dimension on the plan three (3) feet of clear space between the edge of the driveway access aisle and the beginning of the landscape hedge required to form the continuous barrier to screen the on-site vehicle use area. [Landscape Code 7.5-35. (h)] 6. To verify that the vehicle use area hedge material is in compliance with the fifty (50) percent native species requirement, add to the landscape plan figures and computations regarding the total lineal footage of the outside perimeter of the vehicle use area that is visible from each property line. After computing the total deduct the total width of all driveways and deduct three (3) feet of space, required to be clear of hedge material, on both sides of each driveway the remainder is the lineal footage of vehicle use area required to be screened from view, at each property line, with a continuous (2 feet on center, 18 inches high) row of hedges. of the total number of hedges required to form the visual screen fifty (50) percent shall be a native species. Individually list and distinguish same on the plans the lineal footage of each different species. [Landscape Code 7.5-35 and the Comprehensive Plan) 7. On the landscape plan show the figures & computations and with a distinguishable symbol show the location of the required parking area interior landscaping. [Landscape Code 7.5-35. (g] 8. Include within the drawings a typical pavement striping detail for regular and handicap parking spaces. (City Standard Drawing B- 9001:2) A:\CHK.DOC ATTEN: APRILLE DAY MEMORANDUM TO: Chrstopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: John Wildner, Parks Superintendent q / 3 Jq"3 I ' 5/1e PLAN fit. VifC,vJ Site Plan Review - K&jer Oite Plan Hodifis.atioR - 1st Review. I Proj ect: t N/JL freRS (f~ sTAc.{ Ie AtJl DATE: RE: The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the above referenced proj ect. There are no outstanding recreation related issues on this project. C:PARKS.MSP PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-187 TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - Checkers Drive-In Restaurant with Detached Retail Building DATE: September 7, 1993 The Public Works Department has no comments or concerns concerning site plan review at the above location. RE/cr ~ SEP-l~ rn SEP \ A 1993 L..F ,~h~ FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-282 WDC TO: Planning and Zoning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: September 13, 1993 SUBJECT: TRC - Site Plan and Conditional Use Checkers Drive-In Restaurant with detached retail building These plans do not reflect fire hydrants to conform to city sub- division requirements, i.e. no portion of any building shall be over 200' from a fire hydrant. In my opinion this development may have a hazardous impact on the traffic in the area. The plans do not reflect the east entrance to the Casa Blanca apartments f the FPL sub-station f or the Jacobs official complex (east of the property). Traffic at this intersection is rarely light at any time of day and I feel traffic numbers should be shown. /VL-114~ WILLIAM D. CAVANAUGH FPO I BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT WDC:cp