CORRESPONDENCE
.,.~ ..
1989 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
REZONINGS
GROUP I
1. List of property owners due: .... ..... .March 1, 1991
2. Planning & Zoning Board meeting
(public hearing): ..... ............... .April 9, 1991
3. city Commission 1st Reading: ........ .April 16, 1991
4. City Commission 2nd Reading
(public hearing): ..................... ..May 7, 1991
NAME ACRES CHANGE
APPLICATION NO. 1 (Planning Area 4.b) 2.03 R-2 to R-1A
APPLICATION NO. 2 (Planning Area 4.c) 1. 66 R-1AA to R-1A
APPLICATION NO. 3 (Planning Area 4.h) 2.06 R-2 to R-1A
APPLICATION NO. 4 (Planning Area 8.a) 2.17 R-3 to R-2
APPLICATION NO. 5 (Planning Area 8.a) .44 R-3 to PU
*****************************************************************
GROUP II
1. List of property owners due: .......... .April 5, 1991
2. Planning & Zoning Board meeting
(public hearing): ...................... .May 14, 1991
3. City Commission 1st Reading: .......... ..May 21, 1991
4. City Commission 2nd Reading
(public hearing): ..... ................. .June 4, 1991
NAME ACRES CHANGE
APPLICATION NO. 6 (Planning Area 2.c) .91 R-2 to R-1
APPLICATION NO. 7 (Planning Area 2.c) .40 R-2 to PU *
APPLICATION NO. 8 (Planning Area 2. d) 3.96 C-2 to R-1 *
APPLICATION NO. 9 (Planning Area 2.e) .40 C-2 to REC
APPLICATION NO. 10 (Planning Area 4.a) 1.17 R-1A to R-2
APPLICATION NO. 11 (Planning Area 4. f) .92 C-2 to C-1 *
APPLICATION NO. 12 (Planning Area 7. a) 2.76 R-2 to R-1A
APPLICATION NO. 13 (Planning Area 7. a) .88 R-2 to C-2
APPLICATION NO. 14 (Planning Area 7.b) .43 R-1A to REC
APPLICATION NO. 15 (Planning Area 7. d) 6.92 CG to REC
,/
,,/
======:================================================
SURFACE WATER "ANAGE"ENT CALCULATIONS
fDr
EXXON STATION - WOOLBRIGHT RD. , CONGRESS AVE.
BOYNTON BEACH , FLORIDA
=====z========z========================================
STAGE STORAGE CALCUlATIONS
============================
1) PROPOSED LAND USE
PROJECT PHASE
PHASE AREA
IACRES)
1.000
BUILDING
IACRESI
0.049
PAYE"ENT
(ACRES)
4.9% 0.651
DATE:4-1-91
JOB: 2292-12
BY: JJH
I~ERYIOUS AREA I"PERVIOUS %i
I ACRES I
65.1% 0.700
70.001
TOTAL
============zs:_=...=======================================================::========================z=========
70.001
Site Arei.........
Less Like Are.....
Off-site Are......
TDtil Area........
Building Area.....
Pive.ent Arei.....
Dry Ret. Are......
Green Area........
CanDpy Are........
1.000 ures
0.000 ures
0.000 acres
1.000 .cres
0.046 .cres
0.651 .cres
0.100 .cres
0.203 acres
0.190 acrlS
1.000
2) FLOOD AND RAINFALL CRITERIA
10 year, 1 day rainfall....
25 year, 1 d.y r.infill....
100 ye.r, 1 day r.inf.ll...
5 year, 1 hour r.inf.ll....
100 ye.r, 1 hour riinf.ll..
3) CO"PUTE SOIL STORA6E
Wet season water elev......
Ave. groundwater elev......
Ave. site elev.tion........
Depth tD w.ter t.ble.......
10.50 inches
13.00 inches
17 .00 inches
3.20 inches
5.00 inches
0.049
lake Are..........
like t.D.b. elev..
Like t.D.b. arei..
Trench Length.....
Trench Width......
Trench Height.....
Perf. Pipe Dia....
Trench BDttD' Elev
0.651
0.00 .cres
6.50 nlJvd
0.00 acrls
390.00 feet
6.00 feet
3.00 feet
15.00 inches
8.50 nlJvd
0.700
"inilU' rD.d crDlft (10 Year Flood El'y.).....
"ini.u. finish flDDr 1100 Yeir Flood Elev.)..
Actu.l flDDr elev.tiDn.......................
8.50 ngvd
8.50 ngvd
12.75 ngvd
4.00 ft. (..xilUl .llo.ed)
Assu.inlJ 251 cDlpiction, .v.il.ble ground stDragl is..
StDrage av.ilable in pervious areal Df the site is ...
CDnvlrting tD site wide .oisture stor.ge, S ..........
8.18 inches
0.14 acre ft.
1.66 inchel
P.ge 1
12.50 ngvd
14.50 ngvd
14.50 nlJvd
4/n/q(
4) CO"PUTE STAGE STORAGE
Assu.ptions:
Lakl storls linearly fro............
Pave.ent stores linearly fro........
Green areas store linlarly fro......
Trench stores fro. Ilevation........
Dry Ret. area stores linlarly fro...
8.50 to ellvation......
12.50 to elevation......
11.50 to elevation......
B.50 to elevation......
11.50 to ellvation......
----------------------------------------------------------
Storagl tacre ft.)
-------- ----------------------------------------------------------
Stage Lake Trench Pave.tAt Gre,n
Dry
Total
8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
9.50 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
10.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02
10.50 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03
11.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04
11.50 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04
12.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.11
12.50 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.07 0.10 0.21
13.00 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.40
13.50 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.25 0.20 0.71
14.00 0.00 0.04 0.49 0.36 0.25 1.13
14.50 0.00 0.04 0.81 0.46 0.30 1.61
15.00 0.00 0.04 1.14 0.56 0.35 2.09
15.50 0.00 0.04 1.46 0.66 0.40 2.56
16.00 0.00 0.04 1.79 0.76 0.45 3.04
16.50 0.00 0.04 2.12 0.86 0.50 3.52
17.00 0.00 0.04 2.44 0.96 0.55 4.00
17.50 0.00 0.04 2.77 1.07 0.60 4.47
51 FLOOD STAGE CRITERIA
-----------------------
100 Year - 3 Day Rainfall (No Discharg,)
Storag' r'quired........... 1.77 ac. ft. at elev...
Storage provided........... 1.61 ac. ft. at ,lev...
14.50 ngvd
14.50 ngvd
10 Year - 1 Day Rainfall ,
ISe' Attached Flood Routing)
5 Year - 1 Hour Rainfall
ISee Attach,d Flood Routing)
Page 2
11.50 then vertically
14.00 then vertically
13.00 then vertically
11.50
12.50 then vertically
6) WATER QUALITY - DETENTION REQUIRE~NTS
.) B'5,d Dn t~ first inch of runoff
Site .re................... 1.000.cres
RtquireG dtttntion......... 0.042 .cr, ft. IB.std on 50X Df required wtt dttentiDn fDr tDt.1
retention syste.)
b) B.sed on 2.5 inches ti.,s p.rctnt i.pervious
I.pervious are.............
Perclnt i.ptrvioul.........
Required dettntiDn.........
0.76 .crls (E.cluding building .re. . c.nDpy .rt.)
0.56 .cres (E.cluding building .re. . c.nDpy .rt.)
73.43 X
0.076 .crt ft. Ilased Dn 50% Df required wet dttentiDn fDr tDtal
retentiDn systtl)
Sit. .rf...................
TherlfDrt the required detention is.......... 0.076 .cre ft.
Corresponding 5t.ge is between...... 11.50 .nd...... 12.00 ngvd
With. weir crest elevation Df...... 11.76 ngvd
c) E.filtr.tion Trtnch C.lcul.tions
Tat.. Arli.................... I . . . . . 1 Ie re,
Building' Pervious Are............. 0.349.cres
RunDff .re. tD bt pr.tr..ted........ 0.46 .cres
Required pr.treat.ent vDlu.e........ 0.23.cre-inches Dr 0.019 acre ftet
R.quired dettntion volu............. 0.92.cr.-inches Dr
Volu.t tD bl t.filtr.ted............
0.92 .crt-inch"
T renc h . id th. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.00 fHt
Hydr.ulic Conductivity (K V.lutl....l.ooE-05 cfs I 5q.ft. - ft Df hl.d
Depth tD wat.r t.bl................. 4.75 feet
Nan-saturated trtnch dtpth.......... 3.00 f.tt
Saturattd trtnch d.pth.............. 0.00 fett
--------------------------------------------------
LENGTH OF TRENCH REQUIRED =
309 lint.r fltt, LEN6TH OF TRENCH PROVIDED =
390 lintar f.
Pagt 3
d) Dry RetffttiDn Are. C.lcul.tion, - The first h.lf inch tD be det.ined.
Totll Art........................... 1.000 .Cfes
Dry Retffttion Are................... 0.1 .cre,
P.velent Are. Less C.nDPY Are....... 0.461 .cres
RunDff .rl. tD bl pretre.ted........ 0.461 .cres
YDlulI tD be prltrl.ted............. 0.019 .crl fe.t
REQUIRED OUTFALL RI" ELEVATION IN DRY RETENTION AREA a 11.69 ngvd
7) STAGE DISCHARGE CALCUlATIONS
-------------------------------
---------------------------
Disch.rgl Ich)
------------------------.--
Stige StDrige BINder W.ir TDt.l Exfi ltr.tion
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------------
8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9.50 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
10.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02
10.50 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03
11.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05
11.50 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07
12.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08
12.50 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09
13.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11
13.50 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12
14.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13
14.50 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14
15.00 2.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15
15.50 2..~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16
16.00 3.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18
16.50 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19
17.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20
P.ge 4
:IME 09:33:51 DATE 04 2-1991
**********************************
* *
* FREDERIC R. HARRIS. INC. *
* *
* 6300 N. E. First Avenue *
* Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33334 *
* ( 305) 491-3311 *
* *
**********************************
Copyright R & W Engineering, Inc. 1988
This Program uses the Suwannee River Water Management
District's dimenionless rainfall distributions, the
total rainfall and the SCS curvelinear unit hydrograph
method to compute a runoff hydrograph. The hydrograph
is routed through a retention/detention area using the
Storage Indication Method.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
EXXON STATION - WOOLBRIGHT RD. & CONGRESS AVE. , BOYNTON BEACH , FLA.
JOB * 07-2292-12 BY: JJH
DRAINAGE AREA = 1 ACRES
PRE-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8
POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7
STAGE STORAGE STAGE DISCHARGE
(FT) (AC FT) (FT) (CFS)
------ ------- ------ ---------
9.00 0 15.00 0.00
9.50 .01
10.00 .02
10.50 .03
11 . 00 .04
12.00 .11
13.00 .4
14.00 1. 13
15.00 2.09
STAGE PERCOLATION
(FT) (CFS)
------ -----------
9.00 0.00
9.50 0.01
10.00 0.02
10.50 0.03
11.00 0.05
12.00 0.08
13.00 0.11
14.00 0.13
15.00 0.15
~
TIME 09:33:53
DATE 04-02-1991
STORM DURATION = 24H
FREQUENCY = 10 YEAR
RAINFALL AMOUNT = 10.5 INCHES
TIME
(HR)
RAINFALL RUNOFF
INTENSITY (CFS)
(IN/HR)
OUTFLOW STAGE
--------------------- (FT)
SURFACE PERCOLATION
DISCHARGE (CFS)
(CFS)
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
16.00
17.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
28.00
29.00
30.00
31 . 00
32.00
33.00
34.00
35.00
36.00
37.00
38.00
39.00
40.00
41.00
42.00
43.00
44.00
45.00
46.00
0.00
0.10
0.21
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.63
0.63
0.84
1.05
0.74
0.63
0.63
0.53
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.32
0.32
0.21
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.15
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.29
0.29
0.29
0.44
0.44
0.59
0.74
0.51
0.44
0.44
0.37
0.29
0.29
0.29
0.22
0.22
0.15
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
'"
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.09
0.00
9.15
9.57
10.26
11 . 00
11 . 20
11.43
11.70
11.96
12.07
12.17
1 2 . 30 .,
12 . 46 .
12.61
12.72
12.81
12.90
12.96
13.01
13.03
13.04
13.06
13.06
13.06
13.06
13.04
13.03
13.02
13.01
12.98
12.95
12.92
12.89
12.86
12.83
12.80
12.77
12.74
12.71
12.68
12.65
12.63
12.60
12.57
12.54
12.52
12.49
TIME 09:33:56 DATE 04-02-1991
47.00 0.00 0.09 12.46
48.00 0.00 0.09 12.43
49.00 0.00 0.09 12.41
50.00 0.00 0.09 12.38
51.00 0.00 0.09 12.36
52.00 0.00 0.09 12.33
53.00 0.00 0.09 12.30
54.00 0.00 0.09 12.28
55.00 0.00 0.09 12.25
56.00 0.00 0.09 12.23
57.00 0.00 0.09 12.20
58.00 0.00 0.09 12.18
59.00 0.00 0.08 12.16
60.00 0.00 0.08 12.13
61 . 00 0.00 0.08 12.11
62.00 0.00 0.08 12.08
63.00 0.00 0.08 12.06
64.00 0.00 0.08 12.04
65.00 0.00 0.08 12.02
66.00 0.00 0.08 11 . 97
67.00 0.00 0.08 11 . 88
68.00 0.00 0.07 11.79
69.00 0.00 0.07 11 . 70 '
70.00 0.00 0.07 11.62
71.00 0.00 0.07 11.54
72.00 0.00 0.06 11.46
73.00 0.00 0.06 11.39
74.00 0.00 0.06 11.32
75.00 0.00 0.06 11.25
76.00 0.00 0.06 11.18
77.00 0.00 0.05 11.12
78.00 0.00 0.05 11 . 06
79.00 0.00 0.05 10.99
80.00 0.00 0.04 10.80
81 . 00 0.00 0.04 10.64
82.00 0.00 0.03 10.50
83.00 0.00 0.03 10.38
84.00 0.00 0.03 10.27
85.00 0.00 0.02 10.17
86.00 0.00 0.02 10.08
87.00 0.00 0.02 9.99
88.00 0.00 0.02 9.91
89.00 0.00 0.02 9.84
90.00 0.00 0.02 9.78
9 1 . 00 0.00 0.01 9.71
92.00 0.00 0.01 9.66
93.00 0.00 0.01 9.60
94.00 0.00 0.01 9.56
95.00 0.00 0.01 9.51
96.00 0.00 0.01 9.47
97.00 0.00 0.01 9.43
98.00 0.00 0.01 9.40
99.00 0.00 0.01 9.37
100.00 0.00 0.01 9.34
101.00 0.00 0.01 9.31
102.00 0.00 0.01 9.29
103.00 0.00 0.01 9.26
104.00 0.00 0.00 9.24
7
___.____________m._....,_._..__H_ _ --- --- ------..------- ..,--~~- --.- ...---.. .-.--
TIME 09:34:29
DATE 04-02-1991
ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE = 0.84 CFS
PEAK SURFACE DISCHARGE = 0.00 CFS
ALLOWABLE SURFACE DISCHARGE VOLUME = 0.7000 AC. FT.
SURFACE DISCHARGE VOLUME = 0.0000 AC. FT.
MAXIMUM STAGE = 13.06 FT
STORAGE REQUIRED = 0.4465 AC. FT.
8
TIME 09:37:40 DATE 04-02-1991
**********************************
* *
* FREDERIC R. HARRIS, INC. *
* *
* 6300 N. E. First Avenue *
* Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33334 *
* ( 305 ) 491-3311 *
* *
**********************************
Copyright R & W Engineering, Inc. 1988
This Program uses the Suwannee River Water Management
District's dimenionless rainfall distributions, the
total rainfall and the SCS curvelinear unit hydrograph
method to compute a runoff hydrograph. The hydrograph
is routed through a retention/detention area using the
Storage Indication Method.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
EXXON STATION - WOOLBRIGHT RD. & CONGRESS AVE. , BOYNTON BEACH , FLA.
JOB # 07-2292-12 BY: JJH
DRAINAGE AREA = 1 ACRES
PRE-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8
POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7
STAGE STORAGE STAGE DISCHARGE
(FT) (AC FT) (FT) (CFS)
------ ------- ------ ---------
9.00 0 15.00 0.00
9.50 .01
10.00 .02
10.50 .03
11.00 .04
12.00 .11
13.00 .4
14.00 1.13
15.00 2.09
STAGE PERCOLATION
(FT) (CFS)
------ -----------
9.00 0.00
9.50 0.01
10.00 0.02
10.50 0.03
11.00 0.05
12.00 0.08
13.00 0.11
14.00 0.13
15.00 0.15
~
TIME 09:37:42
DATE 04-02-1991
STORM DURATION = lH
FREQUENCY = 5 YEAR
RAINFALL AMOUNT = 3.2 INCHES
TIME
(HR)
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1. 70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.40
2.50
2.60
2.70
2.80
2.90
3.00
3.10
3.20
3.30
3.40
3.50
3.60
3.70
3.80
3.90
4.00
4.10
4.20
4.30
4.40
4.50
4.60
RAINFALL RUNOFF
INTENSITY (CFS)
(IN/HR)
0.00
0.64
1.92
3.84
6.72
6.88
5.76
3.52
2.24
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.45
1.34
2.69
4.70
4.82
4.03
2.46
1.57
0.22
0.00
OUTFLOW STAGE
--------------------- (FT)
SURFACE PERCOLATION
DISCHARGE (CFS)
(CFS)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
'0
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.00
9.09
9.46
10.29
11.23
11.78
12.07
12.16
12.22
12.24
12.24 "
12.24 '
12.24 '
12.23
12.23
12.23
12.23
12.22
12.22
12.22
12.22
12.21
12.21
12.21
12.21
12.20
12.20
12.20
12.20
12.19
12.19
12.19
12.19
12.18
12.18
12.18
12.18
12.17
12.17
12.17
12.17
12.16
12.16
12.16
12.16
12.15
12.15
TIME 09:37:45 DATE 04-02-1991
4.70 0.00 0.08 12.15
4.80 0.00 0.08 12.15
4.90 0.00 0.08 12.14
5.00 0.00 0.08 12.14
5.10 0.00 0.08 12.14
5.20 0.00 0.08 12.14
5.30 0.00 0.08 12.14
5.40 0.00 0.08 12.13
5.50 0.00 0.08 12.13
5.60 0.00 0.08 12.13
5.70 0.00 0.08 12.13
5.80 0.00 0.08 12.12
5.90 0.00 0.08 12.12
6.00 0.00 0.08 12.12
6.10 0.00 0.08 12.12
6.20 0.00 0.08 12.11
6.30 0.00 0.08 12.11
6.40 0.00 0.08 12.11
6.50 0.00 0.08 12.11
6.60 0.00 0.08 12.10
6.70 0.00 0.08 12.10
6.80 0.00 0.08 12.10
6.90 0.00 0.08 12.10'
7.00 0.00 0.08 12.09
7.10 0.00 0.08 12.09
7.20 0.00 0.08 12.09
7.30 0.00 0.08 12.09
7.40 0.00 0.08 12.09
7.50 0.00 0.08 12.08
7.60 0.00 0.08 12.08
7.70 0.00 0.08 12.08
7.80 0.00 0.08 12.08
7.90 0.00 0.08 12.07
8.00 0.00 0.08 12.07
8.10 0.00 0.08 12.07
8.20 0.00 0.08 12.07
8.30 0.00 0.08 12.06
8.40 0.00 0.08 12.06
8.50 0.00 0.08 12.06
8.60 0.00 0.08 12.06
8.70 0.00 0.08 12.05
8.80 0.00 0.08 12.05
8.90 0.00 0.08 12.05
9.00 0.00 0.08 12.05
9.10 0.00 0.08 12.05
9.20 0.00 0.08 12.04
9.30 0.00 0.08 12.04
9.40 0.00 0.08 12.04
9.50 0.00 0.08 12.04
9.60 0.00 0.08 12.03
9.70 0.00 0.08 12.03
9.80 0.00 0.08 12.03
9.90 0.00 0.08 12.03
10.00 0.00 0.08 12.02
10.10 0.00 0.08 12.02
10.20 0.00 0.08 12.02
10.30 0.00 0.08 12.02
10.40 0.00 0.08 12.02
"
~_ _ _'~n_"__'_" _..._.......__._._._.._ _ . __ _ _
TIME 09: 38: 19 DATE 04-02-1991
10.50 0.00 0.08 12.01
10.60 0.00 0.08 12.01
10.70 0.00 0.08 12.01
10.80 0.00 0.08 12.01
10.90 0.00 0.08 12.00
11.00 0.00 0.08 12.00
11.10 0.00 0.08 12.00
11.20 0.00 0.08 11.99
11.30 0.00 0.08 11.98
11.40 0.00 0.08 11.97
11 . 50 0.00 0.08 11.96
11 . 60 0.00 0.08 11.95
11.70 0.00 0.08 11.94
11.80 0.00 0.08 11.93
11 . 90 0.00 0.08 11.92
12.00 0.00 0.08 11.92
12.10 0.00 0.08 11. 91
12.20 0.00 0.08 11.90
12.30 0.00 0.08 11.89
12.40 0.00 0.08 11.88
12.50 0.00 0.08 11.87
12.60 0.00 0.08 11 . 86
12.70 0.00 0.08 11 . 85 '
12.80 0.00 0.08 11.84
12.90 0.00 0.08 11 . 83
13.00 0.00 0.07 11 .83
13.10 0.00 0.07 11.82
13.20 0.00 0.07 11.81
13.30 0.00 0.07 1 1 . 80
13.40 0.00 0.07 11.79
13.50 0.00 0.07 11.78
13.60 0.00 0.07 11.77
13.70 0.00 0.07 11.76
13.80 0.00 0.07 11.76
13.90 0.00 0.07 11.75
14.00 0.00 0.07 11.74
14.10 0.00 0.07 11.73
14.20 0.00 0.07 11.72
14.30 0.00 0.07 11.71
14.40 0.00 0.07 11.70
14.50 0.00 0.07 11.70
14.60 0.00 0.07 11 .69
14.70 0.00 0.07 11 . 68
14.80, 0.00 0.07 11.67
14.90 0.00 0.07 11.66
15.00 0.00 0.07 11.65
15.10 0.00 0.07 11.65
15.20 0.00 0.07 11.64
15.30 0.00 0.07 11.63
15.40 0.00 0.07 11.62
15.50 0.00 0.07 11.61
15.60 0.00 0.07 11.61
15.70 0.00 0.07 11.60
15.80 0.00 0.07 11.59
15.90 0.00 0.07 11.58
16.00 0.00 0.07 11.57
16.10 0.00 0.07 11.57
16.20 0.00 0.07 11 . 56
11.-
-----------~-~--- -.--. - -~_..._..- ,..
TIME 09:39:32 DATE 04-02-1991
16.30 0.00 0.07 11.55
16.40 0.00 0.07 11.54
16.50 0.00 0.07 11.53
16.60 0.00 0.07 11.53
16.70 0.00 0.07 11.52
16.80 0.00 0.07 11.51
16.90 0.00 0.07 11.50
17.00 0.00 0.06 11 . 50
17.10 0.00 0.06 11.49
17.20 0.00 0.06 11.48
17.30 0.00 0.06 11.47
17.40 0.00 0.06 11.47
17.50 0.00 0.06 11.46
17.60 0.00 0.06 11.45
17.70 0.00 0.06 11.44
17.80 0.00 0.06 1 1 . 44
17.90 0.00 0.06 11.43
18.00 0.00 0.06 11.42
18.10 0.00 0.06 11.41
18.20 0.00 0.06 11.41
18.30 0.00 0.06 11.40
18.40 0.00 0.06 11.39
18.50 0.00 0.06 11 . 38 .
18.60 0.00 0.06 11 . 38 '
18.70 0.00 0.06 11.37
18.80 0.00 0.06 11.36
18.90 0.00 0.06 11.36
19.00 0.00 0.06 11.35
19.10 0.00 0.06 11.34
19.20 0.00 0.06 11.33
19.30 0.00 0.06 11.33
19.40 0.00 0.06 11.32
19.50 0.00 0.06 11.31
19.60 0.00 0.06 11. 31
19.70 0.00 0.06 11.30
19.80 0.00 0.06 11.29
19.90 0.00 0.06 11.28
20.00 0.00 0.06 11.28
20 . 1 0 0.00 0.06 11.27
20.20 0.00 0.06 11.26
20.30 0.00 0.06 11.26
20.40 0.00 0.06 11.25
20.50 0.00 0.06 11.24
20.60 0.00 0.06 11.24
20.70 0.00 0.06 11.23
20.80 0.00 0.06 11.22
20.90 0.00 0.06 11.22
21.00 0.00 0.06 11.21
21.10 O~OO 0.06 11.20
21.20 0.00 0.06 11.20
21 . 30 0.00 0.06 11.19
21.40 0.00 0.06 11.18
2 1 . 50 0.00 0.06 11.18
21 . 60 0.00 0.06 11.17
21.70 0.00 0.05 11.16
2 1 . 80 0.00 0.05 11.16
21.90 0.00 0.05 11.15
22.00 0.00 0.05 11.15
/3
____________...H -.-----. -...------'.-- -_..,._----~_.--_.-
TIME 09:40:49 DATE 04-02-1991
22 . 10 0.00 0.05 11.14
22.20 0.00 0.05 11.13
22.30 0.00 0.05 11.13
22.40 0.00 0.05 11.12
22.50 0.00 0.05 11.11
22.60 0.00 0.05 11.11
22.70 0.00 0.05 11. 10
22.80 0.00 0.05 11 . 09
22.90 0.00 0.05 11 . 09
23.00 0.00 0.05 11.08
23. 10 0.00 0.05 11.08
23.20 0.00 0.05 11 .07
23.30 0.00 0.05 11.06
23.40 0.00 0.05 11.06
23.50 0.00 0.05 11.05
23.60 0.00 0.05 11.05
23.70 0.00 0.05 11.04
23.80 0.00 0.05 11.03
23.90 0.00 0.05 11.03
24.00 0.00 0.05 11.02
24.10 0.00 0.05 11.02
24.20 0.00 0.05 11.01
24.30 0.00 0.05 11 . 00 '
24.40 0.00 0.05 10.99
24.50 0.00 0.05 10.97
24.60 0.00 0.05 10.95
24.70 0.00 0.05 10.93
24.80 0.00 0.05 10.91
24.90 0.00 0.05 10.89
25.00 0.00 0.04 10.87
25 . 1 0 0.00 0.04 10.86
25.20 0.00 0.04 10.84
25.30 0.00 0.04 10.82
25.40 0.00 0.04 10.80
25.50 0.00 0.04 10.78
25.60 0.00 0.04 10.77
25.70 0.00 0.04 10.75
25.80 0.00 0.04 10.73
25.90 0.00 0.04 10.72
26.00 0.00 0.04 10.70
26.10 0.00 0.04 10.69
26.20 0.00 0.04 10.67
26.30 0.00 0.04 10.66
26.40 0.00 0.04 10.64
26.50 0.00 0.04 10.63
26.60 0.00 0.03 10.61
26.70 0.00 0.03 10.60
26.80 0.00 0.03 10.58
26.90 0.00 0.03 10.57
27.00 0.00 0.03 10.56
27. 10 0.00 0.03 10.54
27.20 0.00 0.03 10.53
27.30 0.00 0.03 10.52
27.40 0.00 0.03 10.51
27.50 0.00 0.03 10.49
27.60 0.00 0.03 10.48
27.70 0.00 0.03 10.47
27.80 0.00 0.03 10.46
l-t
---------.. --~.._--_.__.._-_. --- -~-_.,._-,_._-,,----~~_._--------_.._-- ~-'--------'- -----~-_.._-_.-
TIME 09:42:07 DATE 04-02-1991
27.90 0.00 0.03 10.44
28.00 0.00 0.03 10.43
28 . 10 0.00 0.03 10.42
28.20 0.00 0.03 10.41
28.30 0.00 0.03 10.40
28.40 0.00 0.03 10.39
28.50 0.00 0.03 10.37
28.60 0.00 0.03 10.36
28.70 0.00 0.03 10.35
28.80 0.00 0.03 10.34
28.90 0.00 0.03 10.33
29.00 0.00 0.03 10.32
29.10 0.00 0.03 10.31
29.20 0.00 0.03 10.30
29.30 0.00 0.03 10.29
29.40 0.00 0.03 10.28
29.50 0.00 0.03 10.27
29.60 0.00 0.03 10.26
29.70 0.00 0.02 10.25
29.80 0.00 0.02 10.23
29.90 0.00 0.02 10.22
30.00 0.00 0.02 10.21
ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE = 5.50 CFS
PEAK SURFACE DISCHARGE = 0.00 CFS
ALLOWABLE SURFACE DISCHARGE VOLUME = 0.2133 AC. FT.
SURFACE DISCHARGE VOLUME = 0.0000 AC. FT.
MAXIMUM STAGE = 12.24 FT
STORAGE REQUIRED = 0.1796 AC. FT.
'>
~/- c},;).9d-/~
J:7-/.
tD~;l
~~.
Professional Service Industries, Inc.
Jammal & Associates Division
April 2, 1991
Project No. 771-15041
TO:
Frederic R. Harris
6300 N.E. First Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33334
Attention: Mr. John Haley
'~~^"'I'f~D
~..~, ~ -- ~ .
,r <. . ;~;: .~~~- ,j~ _'" .... ~~ "..,.~ -~ .
APR 0 5 1991
SUBJECT:
Geotechnical Services,
Exxon RAS #4-5022,
1610 South Congress Avenue,
Boynton Beach, Florida.
fnEDERaC R. hARR:S, INC.
Dear Mr. Haley:
As requested, we have completed two (2) borehole permeability
tests at the above-referenced site. The tests were of the con-
stant head type, as per South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD) criteria, and positioned near the northeast and south-
west portions of the property, as referenced on the attached
sheets.
The permeability test results are shown on Sheets 1 and 2, along
with the subsoil stratigraphy and water table levels as indi-
cated by the auger borings. Two (2) auger borings, to depths of
15 feet, were completed at the referenced locations. The bor-
ings disclosed the site to be asphalt paved with relatively
clean to slightly silty sands extending from beneath the pave-
ment structure to the terminal limits of the boreholes. The
water table was measured in the borings at depths of 5.2 and 5.5
feet. Based on the existing site topography (R.L. Vaught &
Associates, Inc., 1-18-91), we estimate the groundwater eleva-
tion at +8.3, as referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical
Datum (NGVD).
2540 Metrocentre Blvd., Suite 1 . West Palm Beach, FL 33407. Phone: 407/689-3400. FAX: 407/684-9398
Frederic R. Harris
Project No. 771-15041
-2-
The water table level will fluctuate in response to rainfall
conditions. Historic u.s. Geological Survey (USGS) groundwater
level data, available from the SFWMD, indicates the "wet season"
water table level in the vicinity of the site is about +9.5
NGVD. Considering the historical data and the current levels,
we recommend assuming a wet season water level of elevation +9.5
feet NGVD for designs.
The tests for this study indicated hydraulic conductivities of
3.6 x 10-5 and 4.1 x 10-5 cfs per foot 2 (of seepage area)
per foot (of head). These values are slow to moderate and with-
in the range expected for the encountered subsoils. We recom-
mend using the average value, or about 3.8 x 10-5 cfs/ft2-ft
for use in design of the trenches.
The hydraulic conductivity values discussed above are typically
used assuming a constant head and gradient condition. The per-
formance of the trenches should be evaluated in view of poten-
tially diminishing head as a result of groundwater mounding of
the exfiltration waters. The analysis method would include use
of a three-dimensional groundwater flow model (MODRET), with
input consisting of pertinent soil and groundwater parameters
obtained from the borehole permeability test data.
We are pleased to be of assistance. If you should have any
questions, please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
PSI/JAMMAL DIVISION
r!;;;7.~
ames J. DeReuil
Staff Geologist '
Ke~#tE'
Division Manager -
Geotechnical Services
JJD/KEA:dsw
1169W/2-2
Attachments
ls.sil
o A A PHI X INC. 3 2 4 5 0 4
TEST GEOMETRY
SOIL PROFILE
+0.3'-'-- -
0.0
Depth
(ft.)
0-0.8' Asphalt over shellrock base (PAVEMENT SECTION)
0.8-11.5' White SAND, trace .111 (SP)
11.5-15.0' Brown SAND, slightly silty (SP-SM)
-15.0 -
Casing sIze (Inches) =
Ground surface level (reference) =
Static head level (durIng test) =
Groundwater level =
..
0 (ft.); 13.8 (NGVD)
0 (ft. ); 13.8 (NGVD)
5.5 (ft. ); 8.3 (NGVD)
Constant rate of pumping (avg. for =
10 min. test duration)
2.60x10-3 (ct.); 1.17 (gpm)
-5 2
3.6x10 (eta/ft. -ft. 'hd.)
Hydraulic ConductivIty
Reference: .. De.lgn of Exflltratlon trenches
to meet SFWMD Regulatory Criteria"
=
rest No.:
Loacflon:
BHP-1
BOREHOLE PERMEABILITY TEST RESULT
EXXON RAS NO. 4-5022
1610 SOUTH CONGRESS AVE.
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NE PROPERTY CORNER
l,"D.'
~..,.
Jammal & Associates, Inc.
A Division of Professional Service Industries, Inc.
20'5. 10' W OF
DRAWN
SC^lE
CIIECKED
JD
DAlE
4/9t
PROJ IM1
771 -15041
SHEET t
MW
D RAP H I X I N G. 3 2 4 5 0 4
TEST GEO~ETRY
SOIL PROFILE
+0.3'-- r-
0.0
Depth
(ft.)
O-O.~'
Asphalt over shellrock base (PAVEMENT SECTION)
0.4-10.0'
White SAND, trace slit (SP)
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
10.0-15.0' Brown SAND, slightly silty (SP-SM)
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
-15.0
.....
Casing size (Inches) =
Ground surface level (reference) =
Statlc head level (during test) =
Groundwater level =
-4
0 (ft.); 13.5 (NGVD)
0 (ft.); 13.5 (NGVD)
5.2 (ft. ); 8.3 (NGVD)
Constant rate of pumping (avg. for =
10 min. test duration)
2.77x10 -3 (cfs); 1.24 (gpm)
-5 2
4.h10 (cb/ft. -ft. hd.)
Hydraulic Conducttvlty
Reference: "Design of ExfJltratlon trenches
to meet SrwMD Regulatory Criteria"
=
Test No.:
Loaetton:
BHP-2
10'N. 10' E OF
SW PROPERTY CORNER
BOREHOLE PERMEABilITY TEST RESULT
EXXON RAS NO. 4-5022
1610 SOUTH CONGRESS AVE.
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
l"'~.l
~...,.
Jammal & Associates, Inc.
A Division of Professional Service Industries. Inc.
DRAWN
SCAlE
CHECKED
totw
JD
DATE
4/91
PROJ. NO.
1171-15041
~HEET 2
~u~~ S-~1 W.D 17=Z~ LAW OFFXC.
p.mJE;
. LAW O"lCl:.
PERRY, SHAPIRO & MILLER. P.A.
__ ..uaTKAL.I_ AyeNUe ..,u,,"
. U1TC 200
WlE5T ""L'" ,1:,,\;". "LO",DI'I n"DI
.. MARTIN 'ERIlV
IIO.EIlT LEE 'MA~IIlQ
0I0ll0AN ". ..'L..CIl
JIU A.. JI'lllCIIY
.....C_ONII: 040'.....4404
f"C""'LI! "071131-'2117
.Jun. ~, 1~'31
YlA F~CSIKI~~I ~07-73e-745!
Mr. Vernon Thomp$on, Chairman
City of Boynton Beach Board of Adjustment
2535 S.W. 12th Street
Boynton B~8Ch, FL 33426
RE: Ex~on Station - Fi1. No. t 91-011
Soard of Adjustm~nt Case No.: 151
Board of Adjustment Hearing Oete: May 13, 1991
Ovner: Westl.ke Hardvar., Inc. (Loneatar Hard~.r.)
Contract Purchaser: R3 Dev~lopment.. Ine.
Our File Ho.: 3157.01
D.er Mr. Thompson:
Pl..s~ be advie9d ~ha~ ~hi. lay ~ir~ r&prG..n~. RJ Dev.lopm~n~.,
Inc., 'th& cont.raet. p\Jrc:h8czer o~ th. Bbo."e-descJldb~d property.
Ap~lics~ion Lor vQrianc. - C.~. No. 151 - wee presented to ~h~ C~ty
of Boyn~on BQ8Ch Doard o~ AdjuBtm.n~ at it. hearing held at 7;00
p.m. on Monday, "_y 13, 1991 by Deniel Sh.~low.y o~ Sh.~loY.y, Yay,
Rayman & Noy~ll, Ino., Engin..re, Plenne~. end Surveyor.,
r.pr...nting ~h. Owner at ~ha~ h.aring_ Th. .Q~1on taken by the
Board ci Adju.tm.nt va. . dentel ot the requ~.t ~or 8 VsrlBnC~ cy
. S to 2 yot..
On b~hal1 ol our client .. heve revlewed the typ~wr1tt.n m~nutea of
that ~.et1n9 prepared by the City as veIl.. the tape r.coraings of
tb.~ me~ting. Beued \Jpon Qur r~v1ev 0% the proceed~ng8 we are of
the clear opinion that tb~ den181 was based upon Zectors that bore
no rel.tion8hip to the 1.sue ot th. r&quested varianc@ trom the
1000 ~OQt ee-parat1on r~qU:1relllent bet.v_en gasc11ne s&rviclt stations.
In our op1n1on, a PQurt of 1av Y111 requirtt this matter to tie
reheard by t.he Soerd or AdJu.tment. In vi.. of this and in thv
1nter~st ot .a~1ng cons1derable time and ~xp~n8e not only for the
City ot Boynton BeSCh but also my client, ve hereby d.~8nd that
thiS ~attwr b. placed on the agenda of your June 10, 1991 ~eeting
ror recons1derat~on and rehearing on that evening_ We also Tequ~st
that the City Attorney be present at the hearing to en.ure that the
eSgenti81 reqUirement. of lav are followed by tha Bo.rd in making
1 t. dete-rm1nat10n rltlative to the rl'quest.d variance and th~t
proce~urel and 8ubstanttve due proc~S8 are afforded to ~y client.
3UN- ~-~~ w.n ~7:~~ LAW OFFXC.
P.l2I:::2
Mr. V.rn~n ThoMp.on, Chairman
Jun. ~, 1991
Page 2
By copy of thi. 1.~t&r I am notifyin~ all member. o~ th. Bosra of
Adjustment ineludin9 both .l~~rn.t~. .. well .. ~he C1ty Kan.g~r'.
Office, the City Atto~ney'. o~tio. and the !u11ding Off1cla1.
PleBse govern yovrg.1vee .ooo~dingly.
FHP/rar
eo: Raymond En.y, Bosra of Adjust.~nt
3ame. "iriana, Board o~ Adjustment
Thomas C. "ewton, Board of Adjustment
Andrew Hayes, Board of Adjustm~nt
Henr1etta SOlomon, Board of Adjustment
Ben Uleck, Board of Adjostment
Kevin ftich.el Clair, Board of Adjustment Alternate
Paul Slavin, Board of Adjustment Alternate
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Scott Killer, City Manager
James A. Cherof, Esq., City Attorney
Chri8topher Cutro, City Planner
Richard J. Fer.yorni, RJ Oevelop~ent., Inc.
PERRY. SHAPIRO & MILLER. P.A.
n
GEE & JENSON
May 28, 1991
Mr. K. Dan Sha11oway, P.E., President
Shalloway, Foy, Raymond, Newell, Inc.
1201 Belvedere Road
West Palm Beach, FL 33405
Re: Exxon, Southeast Corner of Woolbright & Congress
City of Boynton Beach, SFRN Project 90085
Dear Mr. Shalloway:
In response to your recent letter concerning the referenced
project (requesting driveways in excess of the 32 feet width
allowed by City Code) this letter is to inform that 35 feet wide
driveways are not approved for this project at this time. The
Community Appearance Board has denied a request for a gas station
to be located for this site. Because of this denial, the project
will not move forward and as such the question concerning
driveway widths is moote. If you have any questions, please
call.
/C~~
W. Richard staudinger, P.E.
WRS:kvc
91-025
cc: Chris cutro
Vince Finizio
J. Scott Miller
- -,
RECEIVED"'
JUN 1 ~r
PLANNING DEPT."
"
--
-
One Harvard Circle. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409-1923 . 407/683-3301 . FAX 407/686-7446
l~
-<
~.-
-
LAW OFFICES
PERRY, SHAPIRO & MILLER, P.A.
400 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE SOUTH
SUITE 300
WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33401
F. MARTIN PERRY
ROBERT LEE SHAPIRO
JORDAN R. MILLER
JILL A. JARKESY
TELEPHONE 14071 833-4404
FACSIMILE 14071 S33-32117
June 5, 1991
VIA FACSIMILE:
407-738-7459
Mr. Vernon Thompson, Chairman
City of Boynton Beach Board of Adjustment
2535 S.W. 12th Street
Boynton Beach, FL 33426
~ ..:
;> Q..
IlllI
~ a
0 CJ
U ...... ~
-
~ <::
1991 ~ <::
~ ~ ~
Hardware)
RE: Exxon Station - File No.: 91-011
Board of Adjustment Case No.: 151
Board of Adjustment Hearing Date: May 13,
Owner: Westlake Hardware, Inc. (Lonestar
Contract Purchaser: RJ Developments, Inc.
Our File No.: 3157.01
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Please be advised that this law firm represents RJ Developments,
Inc. , the contract purchaser of the above-described property.
Application for variance - Case No. 151 - was presented to the City
of Boynton Beach Board of Adjustment at its hearing'held at 7:00
p.m. on Monday, May 13, 1991 by Daniel Shalloway of Shalloway, Foy,
Rayman & Newell, Inc., Engineers, Planners and Surveyors,
representing the owner at that hearing. The action taken by the
Board of Adjustment was a denial of the request for a variance by
a 5 to 2 vote.
On behalf of our client we have reviewed the typewritten minutes of
that meeting prepared by the City as well as the tape recordings of
that meeting. Based upon our review of the proceedings we are of
the clear opinion that the denial was based upon factors that bore
no relationship to the issue of the requested variance from the
1000 foot separation requirement between gasoline service stations.
In our opinion, a court of law will require this matter to be
reheard by the Board of Adjustment. In view of this and in the
interest of saving considerable time and expense not only for the
City of Boynton Beach but also my client, we hereby demand that
this matter be placed on the agenda of your June 10, 1991 meeting
for reco~sideration and rehearing on that evening. We also request
that the City Attorney be present at the hearing to ensure that the
essential requirements of law are followed by the Board in making
its determination relative to the requested variance and that
procedural and substantive due process are afforded to my client.
."
"
Mr. Vernon Thompson, Chairman
June 5, 1991
Page 2
By copy of this letter I am notifying all members of the Board of
Adjustment including both alternates as well as the City Manager's
Office, the City Attorney's Office and the Building Official.
Please govern yourselves accordingly.
F.
FMP/rar
cc: Raymond Eney, Board of Adjustment
James Miriana, Board of Adjustment
Thomas C. Newton, Board of Adjustment
Andrew Hayes, Board of Adjustment
Henrietta Solomon, Board of Adjustment
Ben Uleck, Board of Adjustment
Kevin Michael Clair, Board of Adjustment Alternate
Paul Slavin, Board of Adjustment Alternate
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Scott Miller, City Manager
James A. Cherof, Esq., City Attorney
Christopher Cutro, City Planner
Richard J. Ferayorni, RJ Developments, Inc.
PERRY, SHAPIRO & MILLER, P.A.
-,.'
LAW OFFICES
t~~.
......'o--t#1L"'-
,""".~.\.J~
~
PERRY, SHAPIRO & MILLER, P.A.
400 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE SOUTH
SUITE 300
WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33401
F. MARTIN PERRY
ROBERT LEE SHAPIRO
JORDAN R. MILLER
JILL A. JARKESY
TELEPHONE (4071 S33-4404
FACSIMILE (4071 833-32117
May 16, 1991
VIA FACSIMILE:
738-7459
Mr. Christopher Cutro
Planning Director
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: RJ Developments, Inc. I City of Boynton Beach
Board of Adjustment Variance Request
Petition No.
Our File No. 3157.01
Dear Mr. Cutro:
I have been retained by R. J. Developments, Inc. relative to the
Board of Adjustment's unreasonable and arbitrary denial of the
above-referenced variance request. In order to avoid the
unnecessary expense of litigation, I am requesting a meeting with
you, the City Manager and the City Attorney to discuss the denial
by the Board of Adjustment of an otherwise valid and legitimate
variance.
The Board of Adjustment's denial of the variance request has had
and will continue to have significant financial ramifications to my
client. Therefore, I would respectfully request that you schedule
a meeting at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
{1,,/ o. (]~~
1J~ ?I jO) FP-jOA--ci/"i .p~
F. Martin Perry c?
~,.,....".~~
~-'f. "".
n ~,r. "". ,;. .,..'
J..~.u~~.)~~.j.,.~ . .
_ f1A.V ~.i :0
~ ~~'\..,..
FMP/rar
I 1\ "'. ~ \ .,'"
F!~:..t;...,~ -.. - -
cc:
James A. Cheroff, City Attorney
Scott Miller, City Manager
Richard J. Ferayorni, RJ Developments. Inc.
___..,-_C+'-
~~..-.-~-- ~~
..~
J
I
J
i
.
1'-'- "lU.
~WestJake
Hardware . Runous for SeJedkm
jU~ 565 ~~~L Hpr l~,~L
;;';' .. ...,..
. 'NntIak8 H~, lno. 1$501 West 99th LtnaQ, Kansaa e6219 (it3) 88&0008
.
.'
Apr1~ l~, 1991
EXXON S~TE (S.B. CORNER OF CONGRESS AVENUE
AND WOOLDIGHT ROAD)
SOARD OF ADJOSTMENT APPLICATION
VARIANCE - 1,000 PSET
Dear Bcar4 H~er8$
Ral
W..tlak. Har4ware, Ino. hertby authoriz.. Mr, Jonas S.
Nordal of R. J. Developmant., Inc. (Contract Purchaser) and Mr.
Brian J. LaMotte of Shalloway, Fay, Rayman, & Newtll, Inc. to act
in o~r b.half a. a~plioant and ag.nt r$.PQotiv~lY.
aincla...ly,
~fIu
Anne w. Elsborry
Becr.tary/General Coun..l
An l dh
tJt\ii?
\ '
, .
/
."--.
EXHIBIT --A,--
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43
EAST, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH,
RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID CORNER BEING
ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE 120 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CONGRESS
AVENUE, THENCE RUN SOUTH 01023'24" EAST, ALONG THE vlEST LINE
OF SAID SECTION 32,
FOR A DISTANCE OF 357.05 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 87040'08"
EAST, ALONG A LINE 357.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH,
AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO, THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 32, FOR A DISTANCE OF 115.36 FEET, TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED:
THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 87040'08" EAST, ALONG THE LAST
DESCRIBED COURSE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 182.40 FEET; THENCE RUN
SOUTH 01023' 24" EAST, ALONG A LINE 297.72 FEET EAST OF AND
PARALLEL WITH, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO, THE SAID WEST
LINE OF SECTION 32, FOR A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE
RUN SOUTH 87040'08" WEST, ALONG A LINE 556.97 FEET SOUTH OF
AND PARALLEL WITH, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO, THE SAID
NORTH LINE OF SECTION 32, FOR A DISTANCE OF 221.75 FF.ET;
THENCE RUN NORTH 010 23' 24" WEST, ALONG A LINE 7 6 . 0 0 FEET
EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO,
THE SAID WEST .LINE OF SECTION 32, FOR A DISTANCE OF 160.65
FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 43008'22" EAST, FOR A DISTANCE OF
56.10 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 1.0002
ACRES MORE OR LESS.
/
/
_ Shalloway, Foy,
___ Rayman & Newell, Inc.
April 17, 1991
Christopher Cutro, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
Planning Department
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: EXXON (S. E. CORNER OF CONGRESS AVENUE AND
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD)
SFRN PROJECT #90085
Dear Chris,
Enclosed for your review is our applications and
associated back-up material for site plan approval and an
environmental review permit approval.
I am submitting both applications at this time for
processing simultaneously. According to the site plan
meeting schedule we would want to be placed on the April
30th T.R.B. meeting.
I have previously submitted six (6) copies of traffic
analysis for review by the city as well as Palm Beach County
Engineering Department.
If you need additional information or have any
questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
~~.~Motte,
Associate
P.E.
BJL/ar
Encs.
cc: Jonas Nordal/ R.J. Development
Engineers. Planners. Surveyors
1201 Belvedere Road, West Palm Bel!ch, Florida 33405
Tel. 407/655-1151 Fax 407/832-9390
Suite 340, 900 East Ocean Blvd., Stuart, Florida 34994
Tel. 407/286-3223 Fax 407/286-8491
EXXON SITE (S. E. CORNER OF CONGRESS AVENUE AND WOOLBRIGHT ROAD)
SITE PLAN APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL
ITEMS INCLUDED IN PACKAGE
A) 1 - Original Site Plan Application with a $500.00 check.
B) 1 - Copy of Site Plan Application
C) 1 - Original Environmental Review Permit Application with a
$500.00 check.
D) 1 - Copy of Environmental Review Permit Application.
E) 7 - Sets of Complete Sets of Plans, which includes:
1. Site Plan (1 Sheet)
2. Landscape Irrigation plans and Details (3 Sheets)
3. Lighting Plan (1 Sheet)
4. Canopy/Building Elevations and Floor Plans (2
Sheets)
5. Paving and Grading Plans (4 Sheets)
6. Water, Sewer and Lift Station Plans and Details (2
Sheets)
7. site Details (1 Sheet)
8. Car Wash Details (1 Sheet)
9. Fuel Storage and Dispensing Plans (3 Sheets)
10. MSDS Information. (Booklet)
11. Survey (1 Sheet)
F) 9 Partial Sets of Plans Including:
1. Site Plan (1 Sheet)
2. Landscape Plan (1 Sheet)
3. Irrigation Plans (1 Sheet)
4. Canopy/Building Elevations and Floor Plans (2
Sheets)
G) Three (3) Signed and Sealed copies of Surface Water
Management Calculations.
H) Fire Flow Calculations (Not Applicable)
I) One Copy of Colored Elevations for Buildings
J) One 8 1/2" X 1111, Transparency of Site Plan and Landscape
Plan.
K) Colored Photos 8" X 10".
- . . ... - - - - - - - - - -- . . - -. I - - -, - - - -
Director - Traffic Division
CRW:DW
File: New - TPS - Traffic Study Review
80a'l"o of County Commissioners
Karen T, Marcus, Chair
Ca-tole Phillips, Vice Chair
Carol A, Roberts
Carol J, Elmquist
Mary McCarty
Ken Foster
Maude Ford Lee
.
~5
t=:" '<~, 'f-~
//
./ . U~~. ~
. County Administrator
Jan Winters
February 22t 1991
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
R J DEVELOPMENTS, ING.
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS
RICHARD J, FERA YORNI
SUITE 209
915 MIOOlE RIVER ORlVE
Vincent Finizio FT.LAUrEROALE,FL33304
City of Boynton Beach
211 S. Federal Highway ~_.'
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 ~\oJIC.~ S~or"\
SUBJECT: RIGHT OF WAY REQUiREMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION o~
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD AND CONGRESS AVENUE
(305) 565-148E
FAX (305) 565-555::
Dear Mr. Finizio:
As I am sure you are awaret the County's Thoroughfare Right of Way Protection
Map provides for special expanded intersections at all at-grade crossings of
Thoroughfare Plan roadways. Additional right of way, beyond that. required for
the standard roadway sectionst is needed to accommodate these expanded
intersect ions. It is my understand i ng that the City is go1 ng<tobe '. asked to
approve a gas station at the southeast corner of the intenet;tiol'1Qf;~oolbright
Road and Congress Avenue. .,: ." .'
I would request that as a part of your conditions of approval "forth1s project
that the following right of way dedications be required frQ',jthEf'd~veloper:
11'( . '::".' . "Yo".'
o On Woolbrioht Road - 64' from centerline of right of'way for "a distance
of 400', measured from the expanded right of way 1 ine for~png~Ss".Avenue.
IS' . ". . .
o On Congress Avenue - 76' from centerline of right of way fora distance
of 400' measured from the expanded right of way line for Woolbright Road.
P:..,,'....' . ~ '~' :~"
o A safe corner - The long chord of a 40' radius at the intersectipn of the
two rights of way.
o On Both Wool brioht Road and Congress Avenue - A transition, 250' longt from
the expanded right of way lines to the normal 60' from centerline half
section.
I am enclosing a copy of an expanded intersection right of way detail, which
should help to clarify the foregoing requirements.
/ ,
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmativ,/ction Employer"
BOX 2429 WEST PALM BEACH, FLOR~pA 33402-2429 (407) 684-4000
@ printed on recycJed paper
-
r,,~ lt1/\
'U~( )
~"'.lf\1\\ i
>~
)~
VTU~iYJ
I
~"')>h'-J.'-{J ~
\ -('-n4:JNtJ .~' .~ '<fYu ..~ {"'" m~
UOJ'LOOft\\4Sl!
anUaAV ssa~6u03 i pl!O~ l46~~qLooM - UO~lJas~alUI
4Jeaa UOlU^Oa 10 ^l~3 - sa~l~led~J~unw :al~~
uO~l~S~nbJV ^l!M JO l46~~ '~OlJa~~o - U~L~Ul!~~ l!~J~~ll!d
UO~S~A~O UO~lJnpO~d ^l!ft\peOH '~OlJa~~o - '3'd 'LlO~~l!3 u40r :JJ
L~l!lao :lUaw4Jl!llV
6Wa~: MH3
UO~S~A~O J~JJl!~l - ~OlJa~~o
'3"d "~r '~a~ll!M .~ saL~l!4J
~~
M33NI9N3 A1Nn03 3Hl ~O 3JI~~O
'^la..taJU~S
. .suonsanb ^Ul! aAl!4
no^ 1~ aJ~JJo S~4l lJelUOJ Ol alel~sa4 lOU op aseald "pale~Ja..tdde ^la..taJu~s s~
UJaJUOJ LeUo~lJ~pS~Jnr-~alu~ JO s~allew asa4l 4l~ft\ aJUl!ls~SSl! ~no^ 'S^eft\le sv
- Z -
--- --------~--.......-----------------_.-
- ~~.I~~I~~O:~lJ~;~:ij~: A'rJM.:lO lH91Y 0311lnQ3Y 0
,. /
SlUJO/\ JlllN lM MIIDlI!>>B ' . NOI.L:>3S~::u.NI 1VI03dS
AltmJ HJ\I1II H'Wd " . . .w,..
.....-.
.. ~I
.. ~ If ,:
~ 1 ~ I
.... .. -... ..j III
\.0' I I
H I
I I
I I
+-i ,Ot.
I
I I I
I
, I .
I
i I I .
,
I
L I I
I ifJ;. '1
I , S"e. .' ",--..
~ '. + 'R
o . .. ...
oJ _ _ ': ~_._. .__-::_'~
.. . , .
_........_.., ""n ___-...,,",
I
I
j l.
11~ '~JI
JJ..___ I ,'--
~~
~ .
I I" t ... I
} .w': I
.
i
"
o
.
n.
u
I
. ,
I
I
." . ,.j
liI-.._~
.---.---.--_-L-____.
1.1ie City of
1loynton r.Beacli
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi. 'Boulevarti
P.D. 'Bo{.31O
'Boynton 'Bead!., 'fforiaa 33425-0310
City :J{af{: (-l07) 734-8111
:F~: (.107) 738.7459
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
March 19, 1991
Mr. Dan Weisberg
Palm Beach Cty. Engr. Dept., Traffic Div.
PO Box 2429
West Palm Beach, Fl 33401-2429
RE: Exxon Site (Boynton Beach)
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
Enclosed please find a study documenting the trip generation
characteristics of a proposed Exxon Service Station to be located
at the southeast corner of Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue.
R. J. Development, Inc. proposes to demolish an existing 26,000
square foot general conunercial retail facility and construct a
new l,431 square foot gasoline service station/convenience store
and car wash. It is anticipated that an application for a site
plan modification will be submitted to the City of Boynton Beach
for the above-mentioned project prior to our next submission
deadline (April 19, 1991).
Please review the enclosed study for compliance with all
applicable provisions of the 1990 Countywide Traffic Performance
Code of Palm Beach County (County Ordinance No. 90-40). We would
appreciate it if you could provide conunents to our office prior
to April 30, 1991.
Thank you for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
tL1:iL- frb
CHRISTOPHER CUTRO, AICP
Planning Director
JG:frb
Enc
C:Exxon
J:lmerica's (jateway to tfie (jul/stream
t< J'~ u~ v't.LU/-'/"1l::.N T S
TEL No.
305 565 5552 Mar 15.91 9:15 P.Q2
r~Clmlel'.HoI'n I
t<imley-Hom and Aaaoclatee,lno,
ENGINEERS. f't.ANHtR$ . SURVEYORS
..31 Embarcadero Drive W.tt p.lm a..o". florid. 33.01 olI01 e"$-0665 Flcllmll. 407 863-8175
March 13t 1991
4277T.OO
Mr. Jonas Nordal
President
R. J. Development. Inc.
91 S Middle River Drive, Suite 209
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304
Re; Exxon Site (Boynton Beaoh) - Trip Generation Analysis
Dear Mr. Nordal:
Kimley-Horn and Associates. Ino. is pleased to provide this letter documenting our
analysis of the trip generation characteristics of the proposed Exxon Service Station (to be
located at the southeast corner of Woolbright Road and Congress A venue) for submittal to the
City of Boynton Beach. This analysis has been oompleted consistent with the 1990 Countywide
Traffic Performance Standards and is based on the comparison of new external trips for an
existing 26.000 square foot general commercial retail facility and the proposed construction
of an Exxon Service Station with a small convenience store llod car wash.
Based on the standards of Palm Beach County. the 26,000 square feet of existing retail
is vested for 3,096 total daily trips. With a passer-by capture rale of 44.52 percent. the total
new external trips associated with the site are currently 1,718.
The proposed construction of an Exxon Service Station with a 1,431 square foot
convenience Slore and a car wash yields a total trip generation of J ,822 daiJy trips with a
total of 919 new external trips per day. The documentation for the reduction in new trips is
provided on the attached table and is consistent with the methodology accepted by Palm Beach
County.
In addition to the pRsser-by traffic associated with the service station and the
convenience store, there is also an element of trlCfic Chat witJ use both oC these facilities and
the car wash. This interaction is renected in the reduction of the convenience store and car
wash traffic under the title - "Less Gas Customers........
Based on this analysis, the total new trips generated by the proposed Exxon Service
Station is less than that presently vested for the site and results in a balance of 799 new daily
trips which can be u~ed in deveJoping the remainder of the site, while staying below the vested
threshold.
.tnohelm , Cn..,IOlW . DI"II . fOo1 ~uderdal. . 'QIt ...~r. . N.",vU~ . Or1at\llu . Phoenl.
Aa'a'II" . San 01'''0 . lIuI,1 . Tampa . V.ro 8.a"" . Vlrolnl. 1!l..~1I . W"I P.lm 0..""
Bulldlnll elll,,1 ,,'I\lOIl.hlp. .lnCI 1887
- --_._----~------~----~--~._.__.._.-
/'< J" lit. Vt.LUI-I'It.I~ I S
TEL No.
305 565 5552 Mar 15,91 9:15 P.03
Mr. Jonas Nordal
-2-
Should you have any questions. please feel free to contact me.
V cry truly yours.
March ) 3. )99)
KIMLEY..HQRN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
~';W~
Transportatjon Engineer
DRR;map
EncJosures
Florida Registration
Number 42700
4277TOO-JN -LOaUI)! .t-drr.wp
,.0"" \
FROM:
File #595
Exxon - Site Plan
Tambri J. Heyden, Senior Planner ~
Exception to Subdivision and Platting
TO:
RE:
DATE:
May 29,199l
With respect to the April 17, 1991 memorandum to the Planning
Department from Vincent Finizio of the Engineering Department
requesting that the above-referenced request be placed on the
Planning and Zoning Board,it was agreed between the Planning
Director and Mr. Finizio that sufficient evidence existed which
qualified the subject parcel for deletion of the requirement for
platting. Furthermore, it was determined that review by the
Planning and Zoning Board was not necessary to confirm that the
conditions under Appendix C, Article VI, Section existed.
TJH/cmc
C:EXEXCEP
. .,./I~L.~' 11L.1i I.;;,
'1...:"'>"""
. .~... .
" ' .t"t~
,,.
','. :'
".7;;;; ,
, "
J.." ./:~'
I
ILL HU.
.:>U:, ~t:.:, ~:':'.L Hal' 1:', ':11
9: 15
P .'02
r~/ml.Y.Horn I
~ml.y..Hom and Aaaoclatea,lno.
ENGINEERS' PlAHNiR$ . IURVliYOR8
....31 Embarca<lIlO Orlv. W.., ".Im 'noh. 'Iorld. :S:S401 .07 e45-0GG5 F.cllmnl 401 1153-11175
"
...
March 13, 1991
4217T.OO
Mr. Jonas Nordal
President
R. J. Development, Inc.
91 S Middle River Drive, Suite 209
Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33304
.
Re: Exxon Site (Boynton Beach) - Trip Generation .Analysis
Dear Mr. Nordal:
Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc. is pleased to provide this Jetter documenting our
analysig or the trip generation characteristics or the proposed Exxon Service Station (to be
located at the southeast corner or Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue) for submittal to the
City of Boynton Beach. This analysis has been completed consistent with the 1990 Countywide
Traffic Performance Standards ond is based on the comparison of new external trips for anI
existing 26.000 square foot general commercial retail (acUity and the proposed construction
of an Exxon Service Station with a small convenience store and car wash.
Based on the standards of Palm Beach County, the 26,000 square feet of existing retail
is vested for 3,096 total daily trips. With a passer-by capture rate of 44.52 percent, the total
new external trips associated with the site are currently 1,718.
'rhe proposed construction of an Exxon Service Station with a 1,431 square foot
convenience store and a car wash yields a total trip seneration of J .822 daily trips with a
total of 919 new extemat trips per day. The documentation for the reduction in new trips is
provided on the attached table and is consistent with the methodology accepted by Palm Beach
County. .
In addition to the passer-by traffic usociat6d with the service station and the
convenience store, there is also an element of traffic that will use both of these facilities and
the car wash. This interaction is reOected in the reduction of the convenience store and car
wash traffic under the title - -Less Gas Customers.......
Based on this analysis, the total new trips senerated by the proposed Exxon Service
Station is less than that presently vested for the site and results in a balance of 799 new daily
trips which can be used in developing the remainder of the she, while stayins below the vested
threshold.
"'n",",lm , Ch.,lol\4 , Cd.. . fOti LAudtlrdll'. . I'QI\ UY9r. , Na-,>wO,. . o.1...,L1u . Ph""",.
""I.'P" , all" DI.go . 'lua'l . Tamlla . V.ro a.."", . Vlrll'n'. 1I'.~h . WUI Plllm DOlI""
BuIldIng ell.nt ,.iallon.hlp" ..Ine.. 11181
':.' :~~f::I'
. i,~:"r .
.,
:..""
1:(1) ~:
,,; '>'\il,;;
A?~:~:'
,..,(j-:--
.,':',..~.',,';".:~.;,r, .
) .~ ':"..' ~ >ei/
":<";~J'
i ~
:~ '
,"
I,
(f:i~'
">~
,'.~..
l
'~:;'
~:
;;.;
if./
~: .' .
"> '
';j , t"
,
~; .
, ,~ !
"'i'
,~:
ti;.
. ",.
'l.,~,~.\JI~':'?,;.i ,.
>/.~\:y.. .,~;"<';
, . ,) ".,..
:'::";:..1'1' V:1,:
'I' . ''; " ' ,
. ,;;,>i ~:':' .
, ,~i,
, <'?!i:
, ti.'
',' ~~L
,'~:r,'
, j{
.r.:
LLII I ILli I ..:>
Mr. Jonas Nordal
It.L No.
S05 565 5552 Mar 15.91
"
...
-2-,
9:15 P.03
March lJ. 199)
Should you have any questions. please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
~L::(~
Transportation Engineer
DRR;map
EnClosures
Florida Registration
Number 42700
.cJ T7TOO-JN -LOS1101.,-drr.wp
:.'-
.
,
, II
l.fi"l\ ,
?ftFl'.,;7;. .
. .\,..- 'l'~ .. . -,' ~. .
",i," 4i;' ':t' ;:}: .'
. ....','~.'.. '.',
'. ;,~X1:~1;:"":'i';
.':;:'~J:;f
~/t~',f'
rt:'r;' .
;<h ~"',,:
'~:Ji",~;' ,
.~;~~, .
.~. '\ :rlt..
.;:.: il1i.'. ' ~ ",~,
f)iti'.
, ,..[:,'~i;'
:\.:~?~. .
'0"
. I:~'r;
",,,,'
i. ,t
. '~'.fl
:':~\F"
,.'~,.:
, fi'Ht'
'!:if$" '
.' : ~fJ'" .
...,~."
>.:~:;" ,
':,:.:~~\: '
;;'~fi;:' ..
,,' .,!*":,,
~il''4.;
"~ff
1_-
/
,.
Vince Finizio, city Engineer
April 1, 1991
Page -2-:
the planning and zoning board and the city
engineer would not conflict with the purpose and
intent of this ordinance.
The improvements and dedications that are proposed
will be in substantial accordance with the
requirements of this ordinance and by waiving the
requirements of platting would not conflict wi th
the purpose and intent of this ordinance.
B. The resubdivision of land heretofore platted is of such
unusual size and shape or is surrounded by such
development or unusual conditions as may be determined
by the planning and zoning board, the city planner and
the city engineer to justify the waiving of the
requirements for preparing a replat.
This property is not of unusual size or shape or
surrounded by such development or unusual conditions.
Based on the comments as mentioned above (A-1,2,3) we
again feel that platting of this property would not be
necessary.
As we also discussed, Mike Haag and Chris Cutro will
also be reviewing this request. It would be greatly
appreciated if the determination as to the waiver of
platting can be done as soon as possible so that we can plan
our submittal for site plan review on April 19, 1991. I
have enclosed three (3) copies of the site plan and survey
for Mr. Cutro and Mr. Haag's review.
Sincerely,
~
Brian J. LaMotte, P.E.
Associate
BJL/ar
Encs.
cc: Jonas Nordal - R.J. Development
March 29, 1991
\'~~I
\81
r\
'k--"
Mr. Christopher Cutro -
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: EXXON SITE (BOYNTON BEACH)
Dear Mr. Cutro:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study
&~~ ...l.~ ~~~.;~~... ~~"'';''''~r1 ['vvn... c;+.... (Dn"...+nn D...."'rh' nll~CII"'nt tn thp lQQn Tf'~ffir
FROM:
File #595
Exxon - Site Plan
Tambri J. Heyden, Senior Planner ~~
May 29, 1991
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Withdrawal of site plan request
Due to the denial of the variance to the 1000 foot distance
separation for service stations, by the Board of Adjustment on
May 13, 1991, the site plan had to be withdrawn and was
therefore, not heard at the May 14, 1991 Planning and Zoning
Board meeting.
TJH/cmc
C:EXXONSP
MEMORANDUM No. 91-112
May 7, 1991
FROM:
Chris Cutro, Planning Director
James A. Cherof, City Attorney ~LC-
Service Stations/Required Frontage
Code Reference: Appendix A Section 11 L 2
TO:
RE:
You
referenced
measurement
essence is:
have
code
for
requested clarification of
section with respect to the
determining frontage. Your
the above
points of
question in
When a service station is located on the
corner of two intersecting streets
should frontage be measured from the
point of intersection of the property
lines at the corner?
Your question is answered in the affirmative.
Section 11 L 2 of Appendix A provides that the minimum
frontage for service stations is 175 feet on all abutting
streets. No specific method of measurement is provided.
However, the Boynton Beach Parking Lot Regulations, adopted
after Section 11 of Appendix A, provides guidance for
purposes of interpretation. Section 5-142(h)(3) deals with
driveway set-backs and provides that the measurement is
"from the intersection of the right-of-way lines along local
streets". This appears to be a practicable approach to the
measurement of frontage since lot configurations are
variable. Accordingly, this method of measurement should be
used to calculate frontage. For purposes of clarification I
have attached a diagram.
If you require further clarification, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
April 17, 1991
TO: Christopher Cutro
Director of Planning
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
RE: EXEMPTION TO SUBDIVISION & PLATTING REGULATIONS
PROPOSED EXXON STATION
SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF CONGRESS AVENUE AT WOOLBRIGHT ROAD,
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
The Engineering Department, for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, has determined
that platting will not be required for the above referenced Exxon Station.
Attached please find an April 15, 1991 correspondence from W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.,
of Gee & Jenson, detailing our department's position.
An additional copy of Mr. Staudinger's letter has been
utilization in responding to the applicant's request.
position in this regard, please feel free to schedule
appropriate Planning & Zoning Board meeting for their
disposition.
submitted herein for your
Should you concur with our
the exemption request on the
consideration and final
next
If I can be of any further assistance, please advise.
J.~,:~ A~6'
Vincent A. Finizio
VAF/ck
attachment
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Site Plan File
EC........ -.... ;1!':D
R 1 ,...".....
API{ :~: q \
Pl.ANN\I'~~ Uc..~r~ \\"
;'
, ,
'. t:~ ~
...
-
'...'..& ''II
.'
March 29, 1991
pC"f.~ Coun.y Admin;.!...o.
Ili~ S 1 ~ ]an Winters
~\ttG \)t.~.
~\,J\tt. - ~epartment of Engineering
~ and Public Works
- ~ocird of County Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus, Chair
Carole Phillips, Vice Chair
Carol A. Roberts
Carol]. Elmquist
Mary McCarty
Ken Foster
Maude Ford Lee
1\
br
Mr. Christopher Cutro
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.o. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: EXXON SITE (BOYNTON BEACH)
Dear Mr. Cutro:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study
for the project entitled Exxon Site (Boynton Beach) pursuant to the 1990 Traffic
Performance Standards Code (Ord. No. 90-40). The project is located on the
southeast corner of Congress Avenue and Woolbrite Road. It consists of 1,431
square foot convenience store/service station with a car wash. An existing
26,000 square foot retail facility will be demolished to accommodate the project.
The County Traffic Division has determined the project meets the 1990 Traffic
Performance Standards Code of Palm Beach County.
It should be noted that there is one calculation error in the trip generation
information. The internalization rate of convenience store customers who also
buy gasoline should be 27%, not 37%. This changes the total project traffic to
989 trips. The balance of remaining trips is 729 trips.
If you have any questions regarding the determination of the County Traffic
Division, please feel free to contact Dan Weisberg at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
oB-~ ~~ J:"ul{
Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E.
Director - Traffic Division
8 ~r (
il j-. ~)'.). i _\,~'
./ ~>
i
:} -
CRW:DW
File: New - TPS - Traffic Study Review
.. An Equal' Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
BOX 2429 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402-2429 (407) 684-4000
@ printed on recycled paper
n
GEE & JENSON
April 15, 1991
vince Finizio
city of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Platting Requirements for Proposed Exxon station
Congress Avenue at Woolbright Road
Dear Vince:
As a follow-up to our discussion last week, I had the Planning
Department research ownership of the referenced site. It appears
the site has been split once before. This gas station split
makes the total three. "In Appendix c; Subdivision and Platting
Regulations", Page 2098, Subdividing is defined as the division
of land into four (4) or more continuous parcels or lots.
Therefore, a plat is not required under our present code. In
accordance with Article VI, section 4 of the Code a certified
survey is required. The Engineering Department also has the
reserved right to require necessary dedications, reservations or
improvements to meet the intent and purpose of the subdivision
code.
Please call if you have any questions.
~(C~
W. Richa~d Staudlnger,
WRS:kmk
enc
91-025
t
One Harvard Circle. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409-1923 . 407/683-3301 .. FAX 407/686-7446
MEMORANDUM
TO: Technical Review Board
John Guidry, Utilities
Robert Eichorst, Public Works
Charles Frederick, Recr & Parks
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Edward Hillery, Police Chief
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
W. Richard Staudinger, Gee & Jenson
Vince Finizio, Admin Coord of Engineering
Don Jaeger, Building Official
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Senior Planner
DATE: April 25, 1991
SUBJECT: Addendum to Technical Review Board Agenda -
Tuesday, April 30, 1991
Please be advised that the following additional item will be
reviewed at the above-referenced meeting of the Technical Review
Board:
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Exxon Service Station
<r~~
TAMBRI . ~EYDE
~
TJH:frb
cc: City Manager
Chris Cutro, Planning Dir
Jorge Gonzalez
Johnnetta Broomfield
John Wildner
Central File
William Cavanaugh
Lt. Dale Hammack
David Crockett
Mike Kazunas
Mike Haag
A:TRBAgda
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-097
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Officlal
-v' /1 i/~:rr:
Michael 3. Haag ',~~~
Zoning & Site D ~ ent
April 14, 1994
Adnli::1istrator
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Transmittal of Development Orders
Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding
development plans that received final approval by the Planning &
Development Board and/or City Commission. The following is a
list of the proJects, type of request and the documentation
t::::-ansffiltted:
Chec~ers Drive-In Restaurant - conditional use/new site plan
- copy of the 2nd review plans
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
- copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - parking lot variance
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
- copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission minutes
C~eckers Drive-In Restaurant - community design plan appeal
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the wr1tten order slgned by the Mayor
- copy ot the November- 15, 1993, City Commission minutes
Super City Food & Discount - major site plan modification
- copy of the 2nd review plans
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes
Su~er City Food & Discount - parking lot variance
- Copy of the staff report and comments
copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes
Harvey's Restaurant - parking lot variance
- copy of the staff report and comments
copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission ~inuteE
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chris Cutro, Director of Planning~~ ~
James A. Cherof, city Attorney ~~--
Code Interpretation, Parking Lot Driveways for
Service stations
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
March 1, 1991
You have asked me to examine an apparent conflict between Section
11 L 5 of Appendix A of the Zoning Regulations and section 5-
142 (h) (3) as they relate to setback requirements for driveway
entrances from intersecting right-of-ways. Stated differently,
you have posed the following question:
Should the requirements of the Boynton Beach Parking
Lot Regulation be applied to the construction of
driveway entrances for service stations?
The question is answered in the negative.
There are several principals of statutory construction that must
be applied:
1. The principals of statutory construction apply to
zoning ordinances which are issued by cities. Rinker Materials
Corp. v. city of Miami, 286 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1973).
2. The general, and most persuasive rule of statutory
construction is that whenever possible, the Courts will, and
must, attempt to construe related statutory provisions, if
conflicting, in such a way as to harmonize them and give them
both full effect. Palm Harbor Special Fire Control District v.
Kellv, 516 So.2d 249 (Fla. 1987); Villery v. Florida Parole and
Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1980); District School
Board of Lake County v. Talmadqe, 381 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1980).
3. Where a statute is passed with knowledge of prior
existing laws, construction is favored which gives each statute a
field of operation rather than a construction that would leave
one statute meaningless or released by implication. State
Department of Public Welfare v. Galilean Children's Home, 102
So.2d 388 (Fla. ~ DCA 1958).
4.
law and
Since zoning ordinances are in derogation of the common
deprive owners of th~~<:It.r\rif.[jr 'property, any
MAR lq6
PLANN1!:G DEPT.
~~
...
..
ambigui ties which may arise from conflicting zoning ordinances
should be resolved in favor of the property owner. Thomas v.
city of Crescent City, 503 So.2d 1299 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
5. Courts must also give specific terms and provisions
precedence over those terms and provisions which are more general
in nature if the two provisions conflict. Lake Barrington
citizens Commission v. Villaqe of Lake Barrington, 312 NE.2d 337
(1974) .
In applying the above rules of statutory construction to the
question posed I conclude that the two provisions of the Code are
not in conflict and can be read together. The parking lot
regulations should be generally applied to all parking lot
construction unless a more specific ordinance of the City exists,
such as the one which applies to service stations. The Boynton
Beach parking lot regulation does not apply to the construction
of driveway entrances for service stations. section 11 L 5 of
Appendix A controls the distance requirements for parking lot
entrances for service stations.
Ilms
LIB
CUTROMEM
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Vince Finizio, Administrator Coordinator of Engineering
~~_.,
._~
;~. '
,.r
~ 'f <,
',{ ,l
~
t- -.4~
~
".
,'I'
-
,,.
....
"
.
-, '.~.
. ..-.....
\
11~
I
E 'f. 'f.o~ st: R\J1.CE Si(1-t:CoN
C~IL'(Y>.D\:;..<''v... UJ~\b.\le, l~\/"~"'lJ.tf~ ~ ~
~\..V\J~ u... .>\v-. \\un I G\)y.utu.{~li ~ ~ N. ( lA.V..l CA.( W~ ')
tJEw Sl\~ ~GPr~
y
R. J. ~(Ut~O~tAf.V\tS J 4t. I d-.~~l\('lJ..~t- I h R~UQ.5*,\'\' ~I.k ~~~V\ ~~~\'tl\l~\
h ~Q.~\)\;.\\-.. ~ <..10]000 ~1-u",,\I'c. ~Qt h~,,'~_~trz..v,jj.t'\j Wts.+\<<.,u
t~r!.~ll~ ~U .I\~\V\~ o..V'J... to,"s+r""d 0... 1\€.-'^' :1..1'4 '31. s ~V~...(, 1=-00 t-
~o..<;'Q~~'t~uvtlt ~~O~J {;oV\VtM"'~(2.. ~tore. } o.Y\~ (;CA.'(" wo.s:h. the
t;i k ts. \oc.",h~ cv\ +~t 500~'''U-S\- c.oW'Y\U f)~ G>"'~.,.e~~ truuwe.
~~ WOO\~v'1~\. \\.O,~. ftu_et;s.J-o ~ c;; k. i ~ ~ 0.. ~-Wd
c}.,.",v<.v.. r..,,\ , \,~~+el.- h ri~t tvy~ 0\'1', ) o\')-hJ \v 00\ ~~S"'~ ~oJ ~~A
'^- \'tN1- \}J ~ ~,",,\l{w'-1 Qv\~ CnIl\.~'(~~S ~,^\le. ~>
"fcz Yr\)es~ ~ s\ \e.. ~\~ v- V-r(l>-l~ \ s su~ J e~+- h ~~ ~ Y1)~ c>~
~VCk"'l(J..~l(. ~J.+0. p.>oc..vl /19 A-J-~~s~ ~ ~ \o\j0
Gb-t ~s~tL. \('t~\(~\N.II\+- ~t~ ~asb~~ ~LLS-\-~.\:.~5.
\\- ~D6.~O\'-- f\\~\J-.~~ '~-t<-~Y\) .(~ 5c\"~)-",\.R_& ~o'(
('\~\~~I (ftr..\.