Loading...
APPLICATION , ~ fl"' ,v ()e J S",{j""': ff.J :" j}M A/of- ~etv.it..< C~'fi OJ!' BOYN'J'ON BEACH, FLORIOI'. fJ pf l/ COv +- / t',J../ ctA/V A 'pLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT H ~ SITE pLl\N l\PPROVl\L l\PPLICI\T10N ~/ J6j 11 site Han - Major Modification to Existing site l\pplication I\cce7nce Date..12 ;"~-9~ Fee 1\mount Paid: ..., ,.l)O. (7) Receipt Number & n 7 S- J -, Tbis application must be filled out completelY and accurately and submlttl in one 11) COpy to tbe planning Department. Incomplete applications will be processed. Please print legibly or type all information. I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. project Name. JJ4rZ-lfe~ '<;. f?es rt4C(!Z4AJ T 1/ q MlJfl- r nl L y-rt./ e.t2 .It AI U e L '-II) SoyA/TO"; f8el7cN Pt.Or?l/)4 53~!)~ I' 2. Applicant'S name (person or business entity in whose name this application is ~m~e): -rD^-l-( 1-1412-JEY Address. :L:2-1 N.. u), -rdf ctVTZT BOy AltoN Be4c..fI, pL4 =33'13S pbone. "02) 1-;;7 _ f'O ~7 FAX. Izip codel 3. Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant): S .4/71E ;::; s 4 boa E Address: (Zip Code) Phone: FAX: Property owner' s (.or Trustee .....1 Name. ~ r 1-/4 rz--J. E -r tlc:lJ./ No' LV. 17:tt C DVa T Address: _E) OC! tU TO I\J 0e4 c~ ;::C 4 3 3 ~~S (Zip Code) 4. FAX: s. Correspondence address (if different S /1 ..YI c than applicant or agen1 n"J~ A-s /I B o~ e * T~~S is the address to which all o er materials will bemailed.agendas.letters.al PLANNING & ZONI NG DEPARTMENT - November, 1991 A:SitePlan ( 5) III. CERTIFICATION (I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Board. (I) (We) hereby certify that the above statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This application will not be accepted unless signed according to the instructions below. -:JM/ d~ }/I ~a e/ ffJ S!g::tkJ of ~e:~S) ~Trustee, Jrt of Authorized Principal if property is owned by a corporation or other business entity. IV. AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT Signature of Authorized Agent Date (I) (We) hereby designate the above signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to this application. Signature of OWner(s) or Trustee, or Authorized Principal if property is owned by a corporation or other business entity. Date SPACE BELOW THIS LINE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Review Schedule: Date Received Technical Review Board Planning , Zoning Board Community Appearance Board City cORU1lission Stipulations of Final Approval: Date Date Date Date Other Government Agencies/Persons to be contacted: Additional Remarks~ PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - November, 1991 A:SitePlan -"" /' @Ik IF@ rR1 ~[N]~O[N]~~[R10[N]@ ~~[R1~O~~~~ O[N]~ f Water Management Calculations For Harvey's Restaurant 119 Martin Luther King Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL. July 30th, 1993 200 Knuth Road, Suite 214 . Boynton Beach. Florida 33436 · (407) 736-7047 F C.;W~iJ.1 ~~~~ -;::J:J:J ,,~f.5g55 ':-,.0",0.{) '-1fif?;~ r<q:::t: LY~W~ i~~~ 6rEr, '.;.,L:.:"-iW ~~~(I; 7188 -N '7N~& ",!ltllM <1';j~~ ~ ll' ~ .!;! i "Ie: I Ll~~ ~~,:;",'~_b:r~,:,,:,_"'~~Jo=~ ..~. T~,- ~l\~ b.,40 ~.lCCC\~1Z. _~Z\ h<:. ,~~ - '6,'-"""'\ ~e ""2.;a:.o<"-I-,o - .O~ k -r~ '- ~ ~va:> ~ b.. - 9\28H'Z. -.: . '"2' \ \ h.~. -+- -c:6-'P:S~ G I l~'- ~ecc.~:-a,I-~\ ~= z~~~.~L. ~___~pe.....> b........::... ~ -- "2?C)C;;,:' -r:--"j -e....' _ ct:::)4, k. -r"1'>..2,~",OV-s. b. 2\9QF"f"Z · .C)~k. ~ ~'-'\~ 'F:"~1 1\.1::.~ ~ K~ "Foe. ~1\e~ ~~ . .. \, ~ OX '. -::31'2 \ ~. -'- ,--32 \ k:.. -\I.') . -6) CJc'-l.?\.J-r='" -ZS \ N .."c ?c:~ .C' F \~J;\:a:.',,( '<.:1 ,)..:.... .. . (~__~CG\ -~\'-~Io,.jl ~)~ ,~\h..c:=. -c.C>~-_~~~c-. c ..:;?G&Z kc . \..\v.;:e",=,,-- ~t.. ~ -Jl>.1"'e G;Lhc.'-Ij , -7./_./:.r7\... r-?\ /' _ \ .... . ~~ . - .Ot:;;:O:::;: L . ~ ~ f;' G .. % c>... \ "-I-.e""",.. """'h;:e. \l~ ~-->...........7 ~ .?\~b..::.../ c 8\. \ % /~2 . .. ?6\~~ ..S\I. 2~ \&.~"'I.a ~lc 'FOC2. ~b.\..l'1y' -:> :;;::?'~,~. x ,~2\ k.. \ IN. ~rartQI..J ~ .~:z hoc.. - \~ . GATOR ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 200 Knuth Rd. Suite 214 BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436 (407) 736-7047 ~'"-.JL:.JW o::cr:a:a: 4:<l:<Cc( ::::::l~=' ~gg~ tf).n....1i) t,t,\,"' ~~~!= :J:l~l.Ir'~ ~~:t@ (/)(/)(/)0 ~tJt:it lJ,JUJl.I..JUJ :r::r::r:a: Ul:ntn Sl~~ ~ ~~~~"I' :..N<\lN 'It'=t".t'<f J i ~I~ - \ ~bQ.J~~~ 1.-c'G~" \ ~4~.g , L' ; j :.. V. \~G'l.\'Z ,J .. ?~~J:? u.t:6 -Z+ 2'l-k ~ L\7-?l,,~ ~ ~\Z. \~: ~ ~ ~ c: O~-r. ~.. 4\ \1. t - W - ~.z;;. L. - :.:::;;; ~ ~1e; \\ ,,' :;? ~ "1'~ 'D ~1 - \A":e~~ , ~ ~O,,\~ ~""'i" 0" ~ Va.e - ==3 Qy?roe..1J ~~YQeJ' \~y ~e~i\. \Z\~. Cb~ee1 ~ ~ ~-/ c:::;;roe~ \ Z ~ \.~c:;:;.q '" \ (03 \ \~. \--1~C> ~,~ 4ro2.~~ v~~ . --~'p.1 0;;:- \~~e- ~~~ ,><:\' Q,M.~..o \Jb.1a'2. ~,,~~<< B \8,...\. Mud ~ cr:8.\6,\~. ')t --;:?\CAr-rZ- - \:z9 \~ . . \~ OX'9~ Q.. ~:..-;?~~ _ C\~:3\- :z6.-z . -L'"'\?~.~) 6Cp~\ ~.~;d? (jAf It IHGINEERING SERVICES, INC.' 100 Knuth Rd. . Suite 214 c. \ /\ ~/- . iC'INTON BEACH. FL 33436. . '-"t.~' \~ . '407) 736-7047 .' . \' J ,....L. --.\. ..~~..y~e~\C>- 14~\~. ~ ."'32\~.. \ \. ., 411 ~ -\tJ ~ - -.---------------..-.-.--.-..---. .-.- :.J.JWUJUJ :i:i:i:i :::J::l=:l:;J 22gg L()~tnlJ') '1u'1u'lu~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~t~~ wwww II'I:a: '""''" g~~ ~ ~~~~i ~~~~j , l ~ ~Io( L~k.'~J h.17--~ "*;?~ s ~i-~~--r i i i.": " ....~" r-....-~~~ i , i ! . ,--. 1__; . '. 1 I J ._...,1_.._. _.__1...,,-1_.... ! ~c:> oS. 8,\B,~ 't< \~~~ ~ ... -...r" c:;;.,. :...., , ~& "'Z 6cP~' - .-Z6r'- , C~.~\+ ..e6.\- -- \ 0... 6C::;:; \ U ~c:>~a VC>.-..N~a ~ ~"(\O~- \O.C)~~ )I' .?Z \ b...G... ..... ~.~ bat: - \~ ..s~~.. ~~.. .. 4~( b..c:.- \"-) - ~.~~ _\~ ... \.~4 be - \~ . ~ ~~~~ z" \~ _ I " 1 A.c.. IZ;~ L.o~~ ~e.vlll.pc;~" \c;;...Z G.r~ --> ~ l"~~'t E~.\lb."~ · t G::>>. ~ .~ '~"ec> ~<Z~ -, ~tf~ \,b....& ~Cee.=--=-1l:.... I.~~ ~ ""5'(07 'r1~ .. >-~'{~ , c:O~) GATOR ENGINEERING SERVICES. INC. 200 ~nuth Rd. Suite 214 BOYNTOtit BEACH, FL 33436 (407) 736-7047 ..; f , ,-- '. 5 o I L 5 TESTING L '3 OF THE PALM BEACH' \ INC. PO. BOX 211 514 EAST COAST STREET LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA 33460 (4071585-7515 FAX: (407) 585.7622 ASPHALT. . . CONCRETE. . . MATERIALS D.O.T. PERCOLATION (exfi1tration) TEST PROCEDURES Client: Gator Engineering Service Inc. Project location: 119 Martin Luther King Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida Project No: 93/47-1 Date test performed: 7/19/93 1'-6.5' 6.5'-8.5' 8.5'-15' . 'SOIL DESCRIPTION Light brown medium fine sand, trace to little shell, limestone (SP) Dark brownish gray medium fine sand, trace shell (SP) Very light brown medium fine sand (SP) Dark brown medium fine sand (SP) Brownish yellow medium fine sand (SP) LOCATION #P-1 - 60' North & 25' West of Southeast property corner. DEPTH 0'-0.7' 0.7'-1' Water table 10.4' Average Q = 24.8 gpm or KIV -= -4 7.53x10 2 cfs/ft - ft head NOTES: The test procedures were conducted in general accordance with the latest D.O.T. percolation (exfiltration) test procedures. The water table depth is the distance from the ground surface to the water table before the addition of water. Hole Diameter: 7 inches Casing: 6 inches diameter Depth of hole: 15' Respectfully submitted, TESTING LAB OF THE PALM BEACHES, INC. By ~~... < . . .,......,... ( 2 ) 6. What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (Qwner, buyer, less~, builder, developer, contract purchaser, ete.) Uw u e eo 1. Street address or location of site: L!.1..M4(Z"1fV LU1IJ€L./tltJ4iG _BOcf1J-'O"; fOeLl~ FL4 -=33~.3S 8. Property Control It Legal description of site: l07S (P ,4A10 7 BLo(~JlI Fit /lAiIt I.AJ e 88R(2 4~1J, 7ttJAl Less -rfle~7I1 I D f7 ldett€ 01= ~12 fZ04h (2,CAT- otc. Lt)4y 9. Intended usets) of site: 1?eS? AU{ZI4-ItiT --- 10. Developer or Builder: 10 13<,; ItS..s ((,~UP'!) 11. Architect: !lttnlu// JZ-t'1MS ~() , 12 . Landscape Archi tect : --rz.- 73G- ASS I G k.)B 1) 14. Site Planner: Engineer: 01110e' E'lJ{I/ Vf2::E'e'AJ ~ Surveyor: 0 E;/2tE. IJ~ ~ U rrete /3 13. 15. 16. 0' BelEAJ. IA.! C . Traffic Engineer: 18. Has a site plan been previously approved by the City conunission for this property? Aft?, Estimated const~e on costs pJ proposed improvements shown 01 this site plan:~ t? ~ 17. PLANNING & ZONING DBPARTMENT - November, 1991 A:SitePlan II. SITE DATA ( 3 ). The following information must be filled out below and must appear, where applicable, on all copies of the site plan. 1. ~~nd Use Category shown in the Comprehensive Plan 2. 3. Zoning District C -$ Area of Site /1; tWsr FT..' acres O. 03.:2/ sq . ft. .4. Land Use -- Acreage Breakdown a. Residential, including \.J\A- acres !Ii of sit4 surrounding lot area of grounds b. Recreation Areas * -1V\P\ acres " of sib (excluding water area) c. Water Area ~ ~ N't~ acres , " of sib - d. Commercial q, 00 ":3~1 acres ,~ " of sit e. Industrial ----AlJiL acres .. of sit f. Public/Institutional ~ acres " of sit g. PUblic, private and ~ \A- Canal rigl.ts-of-way acres % of sit h. Other (specify) acres % of sit i. Other (specify) acres .. of sit j. Total area of site /4, OOO~;1'acres "'O~2.1 I()t) , of sit * including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft. by 50 ft. .! 5. Surface Cover a. acres b. c. Ground floor building f ()~jY.:J area ("building footprint" IS , of si1 Water area acres .. of si1 Other impervious areas, including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking lots' driveways (ex- cluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios, 0,:211 decks, and athletic courts. tP0 !Ii of si ........",... ~ "'1 _ acres d. .. of si Total impervious area aoc:; DC? acres e. Landscaped area inside of parking lots (20 sq. ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of Landscape Code). acres !Ii of s1 PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - November, 1991 A:SitePlan Board of County Commissioners Mary McCarty, Chair Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Burt Aaronson Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman Deparbnent of Engineering and Public Works ill JUL ~ ~ w ~m 5 1994 ,l; c......-- I June 29, 1994 Hr. Ronald last Engineering Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Fl 33425-0310 RE: HARVEY'S RESTAURANT Dear Hr. last: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the project ent itl ed Harvey's Restaurant, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County land Development Code. The project will consist of a 1,084 square foot addition to the existing 1,016 square foot restaurant. The project will generate 90 additional net daily trips. The build-out for the project is 1994. The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER a:ft: ~ Dan WeiSber~ Senior Registered Civil Engineer cc. ~r. Hike Haag, Zoning Administrator File: TPS - Hun. .. Traffic Study Review h:\traffic\diw\boyn32 "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on rflCYCled paper Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 SIMMONS & WHITE, INC. Engineers · Planners. Consultants April 4, 1994 Job No. 94-30 TRAFFIC GENERATION STATEMtNT Harvey's Restaurant Boynton Beach, Florida SITE DATA The subject parcel is located on the north side of N.E. 10th Avenue approximately 300 feet east of Seacrest Blvd. and contains approximately 0.3 acres. Existing site development on the currently developed site consists of a 1016 S.F. CBS restaurant and accessory parking. Proposed development consists of refurbishing the existing restaul~ant and expanding by 1084 S.F. for a proposed total development of 2100 S.F. For additional information concerning site location and layout, please refer to the site plan prepared by Gator Engineering Services, Inc. TRAFFIC GENERATION The Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code Article 7, Section 7.9 (I) C - Traffic Performance Standards, APPLICABILITY, Subsection 2 (B) requires that for any application for a site specific development order on property on which there is an existing use shall be subject to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards to the extent the traffic generation projected for the site specific development order exceeds the traffic generation of the existing use. The generation rates and capture rates of the existing use shall be updated to current pro forma traffic generation and pass-by rates and shall be used to calculate previous approval traffic. Because the structures and land have been in use within the last five years, they shall be considered an existing use. The previous approval traffic from the existing restaurant may be calculated as follows in accordance with the rates provided in Table 10.8-1 Fair Share Road Impact Fee Schedule: QUALITY RESTAURANT (1016 S.F.) 96.51 tpd 1000 S.F. )( 1016 S.F. = 98 tpd (15 tpd) Less 157. Capture = 83 tpd 4623 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 112, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415 Telephone (407) 965-9144 Traffic Generation Statement .Job No. 94-30 April 4, 1994 ~ Page Two TRAFFIC GENERATION (CONTINUED) The traffic to be generated by the total 2100 S.F. restaurant upon completion in 1994 may be calculated as follows: QUALITY RESTAURANT (2100 S.F.) 96.51 tod 1000 S.F. x 2100 S.F. = 203 tpd (30 tod) Less 15% Capture = 173 tpd The proposed expansion will therefore result in a net increase of 90 trips per day over the existing use: 173 tpd - 83 tpd = 90 tpd The Palm Beach County Land Development Code Article 7, Section 7.9 (I) G Procedure, Subsection 1 (C) (2) provides that amendments to non-residential projects generating fewer than 200 gross trips shall not be required to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. A brief review of the directly accessed links, however, Seacrest Blvd. and Federal Highway, reveals that adequate capacity is available to support the proposed restaurant expansion and the project appears to meet the requirements of the Traffic Performance Standards. The low A.M. and P.M. peak hour turning movement volumes at the project entrance with N.E. 10th Avenue do not warrant the construction of exclusive turn lanes based on the Palm Beach County engineering guidelines used in determining the need for turn lanes of 30 left turns or 75 right turns.in the peak hour. SUBSURFACE SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED STRUCTURE ADDITION RESTAURANT ADDITION @ 119 MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD City of Boynton Beach Palm Beach County, Florida April, 1994 Prepared for: Mr. Tony Harvey FRASER ENGINEERING AND TEsTING, INC. 120 HIBISCUS STREET . JUPfmR, FLORIDA 33458 . TEUtPHONE (407) 746-76118 FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC. Z20 HIBISCUS S1'REET. JUPITER, FLORIDA 334S8 . 1'EIEPHONE (407) 746-7698 Mr. Tony Harvey 224 N.W. 7th Court Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 April 22, 1994 Re: SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION FOR STRUCTURE ADDITION FET Job#: 0-94564 Gentlemen: Enclosed are the results of the subsurface soils investigation performed on April 20, 1994, for the proposed restaurant addition to be constructed at 119 Martin Luther King Boulevard in the City of Bounton Beach,located in Palm Beach County, Florida. The purpose of this investigation was to obtain general subsurface data to provide an engineering evaluation of the subsurface conditions. The existing structure is a one-story C.B.S. Building. TEST BORINGS The soil on which the structure will rest has been tested in accordance with Section 1302 of the Standard Building Code, 1991 edition, as amended. The test locations, depths and frequencies meet the requirements of Table 1302.2.9.3. Tests were performed on natural grade. A total of four (4) Cone Penetrometer Test soundings (CPTs) and one (1) Hand Auger boring (HAs) were taken at the locations noted on the layout drawing. Cone Penetrometer Test soundings are performed in accordance with ASTM 0..3441-79, "Deep Quasi-Static, Cone and Friction-Cone Penetration Tests of Soils". CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The near surface soils are fine sands with traces of shell fragments. The depth of the water table was more than 6.0 feet below existing grade. The cone soundings indicate suitable subsurface soil conditions for support of the proposed structure addition using conventional shallow footing foundations. Site preparation, any excavation and backfilling required during site preparation, fill placement, and excavation for footings should be done in accordance with the applicable sections of Attachment A. 1 ArIur Pa'lterson Restaurant Addition 119 M.L., Kina Boulevard April 22. 1994 With the above criteria satisfied, a soil bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot may be used in the design of the footings. CLOSURE This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted foundation engineering practices. The recommendations presented herein are based on the data obtained from the soil borings previously described. This report may not account for all possible variations that may exist between conditions observed in the borings and conditions at locations that were not explored. The nature and extent of any such variations may not become evident until further explorations are made. If variations are observed, we recommend that Fraser Engineering and Testing, Inc. be requested to inspect the actual site conditions and, if necessary, re-evaluate the recommendations of this report. It has been our pleasure to assist you in this phase of you project. If you have any questions about this report or need any additional information, please call at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, GINEERING AND TESTING, INC. aul H. Danforth, .E Florida Registration No. 44653 PHD:pd Client .. 3 2 FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC. 220 HIBISCUS STREET JUPITER. FL 33458 EXISTING HOUSE CPT-1 ~ CLIENT: AR1HUR PATI'ERSON LAYOUT DRAWING PROJEcr: RESTAURANT ADDmON (Not to scale) SITE: 119 M.L. KING BOULEVARD, BOYNTON BEACH lOBI D94564 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL DATE TESTED: APRIL20,1994 ~ CPT-2 ~ CPT-3 HA-1 · CPT -4 o fi}... .......................... .....' .'.... . .. ... . . - ... . .. ....,.. ".. .. ... N. PROPOSED ADDITION ~ PA. t IF t FHASER ENGINEERING Ahtl TESTING. INC. CLIENT : ARTHUR PA TTEASON 220 HIBISCUS STREET PROJECT: RESTAURANT ADDITION .APITEA. FLORIDA 338 SITE: U9 M. L. KING BOULEVARD. BOYNTON BEACH. FL. TEST DATE :04/20/94 JOB f 0-94564 CPT , i IPOINT FRJCTIlIf POINT RESISTANCE - ~ (J<u/square em. or Tons/.quare tt.J FRICTION RATIO - I ~J. RAllO q I M FT 100 200 300 400 o 123 .. 5 6 7 8 9 . p--- . ~ S ... . Ie p--- ~ ./ I-- . SA I...... . 1.:1 , - · lfiSTEADY READING . . POlIIIIlESISTANCE TOO lOW TO ACTIVATE GASE , PAlE S rtF s FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING. INC. CLIENT : ARTHUR PATTERSON 220 HIBISCUS STREET PROJECT: RESTAURANT ADDITION .APITEA, FLORIDA 33458 SITE: U9 M. L. KING BOULEVARD. BOYNTON BEACH. FL. TEST DATE :O~/20/9~ JOB , D-9~56" CPT f 2 :&~NT FRICTII* POINT RESISTANCE - lie ~g/sQuare c.. or Tons/_Quare ft.' FRICTION RATIO - I 1ST. RATIO qc I M FT 100 200 300 400 o 123 456 1 8 9 D "- / ~ ~ S - · ttmEADY READINS I · PODIT RESISTANCE TOO LOW TO ACTIVATE SASE t PAlE t .. t . FRASER ENGINEERING NIl TESTIN6. INC. CLIENT : ARTHUR PA TIERSON 220 HIBISCUS STREET PROJECT : RESTAURANT ADDITION .lPITER. FLORJOA 33-458 SITE: 119 M. L. KING BOULEVARD. BOYNTON BEADi. FL. TEST OA TE : 04/20/94 JOB , 0-94564 CPT , 3 ris~NT FRICTICIf POINT RESISTANCE - ~ ~g/8quare c.. or Tons/square ft.J FRICTION RATIO - I 1ST. RATIO CIc: I M FT 100 200 300 400 o 123 456 7 8 9 . " l . . .. . . 2 t3 . t . 3 I - · lImEADY READINS . · PGDIT IlESISTANCE TOO LOIf TO ACTIVATE SASE . PAIl! t " t FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC. CLIENT: ARTHUR PATTERSON 220 HIBISCUS STREET PROJECT: RESTAURANT ADDITION .lP ITER. FLORIDA 33458 SITE: 119 M. L. KING BOULEVAfIJ, BOYNTON BEACH. FL. TEST DATE : 04/20/94 JOB f 0-94564 CPT , .. ~~NT FRICTJCIf POINT RESISTANCE - lie ~g/aqua~e c.. O~ Tons/.qua~e ft.) FRICTION RATIO - I 1ST. RATIO qc I M FT 100 200 300 400 o 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 " . II 31 to t5 I - · lImaDY READINS . · POJI(J IBJS1'ANCE 100 LOW TO ACTIVATE SAGE t BORING LOG DEPTH (1) (2) DESCRIPTION 0 - Sand, light brown, fine, - with shell fragments. - - - 1.0' I - Sand, medium gray, fine, - with a trace of shells. - - - 2.0' 2 - light gray to white, fine. Sand, - - - - 3 - - - - - 4 - - - - - 5 - - - - - 6.0' 6 - - Boring Terminated at 6.0' . - - Water Table Below 6.0'. - 7 - - - - - 8 - (1) PENETRATION - BLOWS PER FOOT (2) DESIGNATIONS "7 GROUND WATER BORING NO.: SA-I DATE DRILLED: 04/20/94 JOB NO.: D-94564 FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC. ATTACHMENT A General Site Preparation The foundation and pavement areas should be cleared of all trees, roots, surface vegetation, and any other deleterious matter to 5 feet outside of the proposed structure and pavement areas. After clearing, the area is to be graded and then compacted with a self-propelled steel drum vibratory roller having a minimum total applied force of 10 tons. Sufficient compactive effort should be applied to obtain a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density for a depth of 2 feet as determined by AASHTO T-180 (ASTM 0-1557). The vibratory compactor should make a minimum of 12 overlapping passes, 6 in one direction, and 6 in a direction at right angles over the entire cleared area. If any unstable soil conditions or soft areas are encountered during the preparation of the foundation, the project engineer, geotechnical consultant or other responsible professional should be informed, the matter investigated and the problem resolved. Any subsequent excavation and backfilling should be in accordance with the criteria as outlined below. Fill Placement Where fill is to be placed on natural ground, the surface must first be prepared as outlined above. The fill at grade should extend a minimum of 6 feet beyond the structure outline. Fill should be a uniform free draining granular soil (clean sand) and be placed in layers not to exceed 12 inches loose measure and compacted as outlined above. Sufficient compactive effort should be applied to obtain a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by AASHTO T-180 (ASTM 0-1557). excavation and Backfilling Where excavation and backfilling are required, the soils should be removed to the specified depth. Sufficient compactive effort must then be applied to the excavated surface to obtain a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by AASHTO T-180 (ASTM 0-1557). Backfill should be a uniform free draining granular soil (clean sand) and be placed in layers not to exceed 15 inches loose measure. Sufficient compactive effort should be applied to each layer to obtain a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density for the entire depth of the fill as determined by AASHTO T -180 (ASTM 0-1557). The excavated surface and each layer of backfill should be compacted with a self-propelled steel drum vibratory roller having a minimum total applied force of 1 0 tons. footing Excavation After the footings have been excavated representative density tests should be taken. The density at the footing grade should be a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density as detennined by AASHTO T-180 (ASTM 0-1557). If the bottom of the footing has been loosened during excavation, or if the bottom of the footing is below 1 foot from natural ground, the footing area should be compacted with a heavy plate vibratory compactor. Sufficient compactive effort should be applied to achieve the required density. ATTACHMENT A (cont) Groundwater The groundwater at the time the test borings were taken was sufficiently below the ground surface, so that the required site preparation could be completed without any adverse effects. Heavy rainfall and/or a high water table may occur before the earthwork commences, or during the earthwork operation. When these conditions occur and the site preparation cannot be achieved as specified, an evaluation of the existing conditions should be conducted and the specifications revised accordingly. Where Vibratory Eaulpment May Affect Adjacent Structures Where there are existing structures adjacent to the site that may be affected by the self- propelled steel drum vibratory equipment, densification must be performed using equipment that will satisfy the required densification without the risk of damage to the existing structure(s). Loaders and heavy plate compactors are two types of equipment that have been used successfully. Densification procedures must comply to the capability of the equipment employed. Alternative to Self-Propelled Steel Drum Vibratory Eaulpment When self-propelled steel drum vibratory equipment cannot be used as specified, vibratory plate compactors may be used. When this condition occurs, the overall densification procedure must be revised to comply with the capability of the equipment employed. In general, small plate compactors will be effective to a maximum depth of 6 to 8 inches. On-5lte Inspection We recommend that the site preparation and subsequent earthwork be monitored by a qualified soils technician. The soils technician should be responsible to observe the clearing and compaction of the building and payment areas, determine the suitability of the fill and backfill, and take representative density tests on the prepared surface, fill, backfill, and footing excavations. ii 'l'RAt:KING L(1!~ - Sl'l't: PLAN Rl::V lEW SUBMl'l"l'AL PROJBC'l' 'l'1TLE: DESCRIPTION: 'l'YPE: DATE REC1D: !fAR..Ul:y . S ~RAWT FILl:: NO.: Be r ~MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION RECEIPT NO.: 0 7S/ 7 NEW SITE PLAN l-~ 1- 9' f AMOUNT: 5": I'M, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D: 2.-4- 9 1" (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ~CEP1D 2-- - 9 --sENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DATE: DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEP'I1ANCE LETTER: 2--7 -<t"T REVIEWER'S NAME: D., \,-,,-O~~E"' DENIED * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. c:rI.- ~. MEMO NUMBER: '(') /' "2. - i -~ r RETURN DATE: ~ - '2.2- -Cf 1- / DATE SENT: 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANS MEMO # / DATE / "c" PLANS 91-'~')1.'-t / ./. ..2.'--1'/ ~'E.s Planning ?1-01-~1 / 2-'/4-~).f/ C~.,'i:le1u0 Building ,'. - '("14 / 2 ."r -'1,:;;/ ,_~,J,~; o~''''v''':-)Engineer 'J.iJ''1e:s i\ ~~Ihg ';?.c.i, ,:'::-i S' / L-6-;-k./ c!::ful'1'2",v7\ Engineer ~Jf- ,")2~<;' i ;....//-<;11-- i l;;~) , Forester ___ MEMO # / / 91-~ ":;.,3':5 ' / ,../'<J-..c 53 / i 'Iq.- c 5'(.; i DATE i "ell 1- 2. - 'cL....k/ .ll, - IT-~,~ . 'dl ,. ' 2'/! -Yi 'Ie: :, i_ .,1. ,I. ->'.:1 1>-J (;; .,,.- . ... ~el<.. Util. P.W. Parks Fire Police TYPE OF VARIANCE(S) DATE OF MEEn"ING: DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: 3.. I-~ (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out wi cammer.'::..' NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS Of. AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D: MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW. DATE SENT: ,5"-~(,-'J/ MEMO #: 9</-/VY / . RETURN DATE: , -5-~ 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL Util. P.W. Parks Fire Police DATE /"R/D" / c... / IrJJ / /fJv / do / do PLANS MEMO # Planning ~ :~~~~~~; ~ 1;Y~~ Engineer Forster "fCS 9,'/- ~ o~ / DATE /"R/B~' / / i~/ /J;) / --P;Lk-/ C- / I I v/,:t. 7 / Ai J LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A:TRACKING.SP