APPLICATION
, ~ fl"' ,v ()e J S",{j""': ff.J
:" j}M A/of- ~etv.it..< C~'fi OJ!' BOYN'J'ON BEACH, FLORIOI'.
fJ pf l/ COv +- / t',J../ ctA/V A 'pLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
H ~ SITE pLl\N l\PPROVl\L l\PPLICI\T10N
~/ J6j 11 site Han -
Major Modification to Existing site
l\pplication I\cce7nce Date..12 ;"~-9~
Fee 1\mount Paid: ..., ,.l)O. (7)
Receipt Number & n 7 S- J -,
Tbis application must be filled out completelY and accurately and submlttl
in one 11) COpy to tbe planning Department. Incomplete applications will
be processed.
Please print legibly or type all information.
I.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. project Name. JJ4rZ-lfe~ '<;. f?es rt4C(!Z4AJ T
1/ q MlJfl- r nl L y-rt./ e.t2 .It AI U e L '-II)
SoyA/TO"; f8el7cN Pt.Or?l/)4 53~!)~
I'
2.
Applicant'S name (person or business entity in whose
name this application is ~m~e):
-rD^-l-( 1-1412-JEY
Address. :L:2-1 N.. u), -rdf ctVTZT
BOy AltoN Be4c..fI, pL4 =33'13S
pbone. "02) 1-;;7 _ f'O ~7 FAX. Izip codel
3.
Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant):
S .4/71E ;::; s 4 boa E
Address:
(Zip Code)
Phone:
FAX:
Property owner' s (.or Trustee .....1 Name. ~ r 1-/4 rz--J. E -r
tlc:lJ./ No' LV. 17:tt C DVa T
Address: _E) OC! tU TO I\J 0e4 c~ ;::C 4
3 3 ~~S
(Zip Code)
4.
FAX:
s.
Correspondence address (if different
S /1 ..YI c than applicant or agen1
n"J~ A-s /I B o~ e
* T~~S is the address to which all
o er materials will bemailed.agendas.letters.al
PLANNING & ZONI
NG DEPARTMENT - November, 1991
A:SitePlan
( 5)
III. CERTIFICATION
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and
plans submitted herewith become a part of the permanent
records of the Planning and Zoning Board. (I) (We) hereby
certify that the above statements and any statements or
showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to
the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This application
will not be accepted unless signed according to the
instructions below.
-:JM/ d~ }/I ~a e/ ffJ
S!g::tkJ of ~e:~S) ~Trustee, Jrt
of Authorized Principal if property
is owned by a corporation or other
business entity.
IV. AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT
Signature of Authorized Agent
Date
(I) (We) hereby designate the above signed person as (my)
(our) authorized agent in regard to this application.
Signature of OWner(s) or Trustee,
or Authorized Principal if property
is owned by a corporation or other
business entity.
Date
SPACE BELOW THIS LINE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Review Schedule:
Date Received
Technical Review Board
Planning , Zoning Board
Community Appearance Board
City cORU1lission
Stipulations of Final Approval:
Date
Date
Date
Date
Other Government Agencies/Persons to be contacted:
Additional Remarks~
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - November, 1991
A:SitePlan
-""
/'
@Ik IF@ rR1 ~[N]~O[N]~~[R10[N]@ ~~[R1~O~~~~ O[N]~
f
Water Management Calculations
For
Harvey's Restaurant
119 Martin Luther King Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL.
July 30th, 1993
200 Knuth Road, Suite 214 . Boynton Beach. Florida 33436 · (407) 736-7047 F
C.;W~iJ.1
~~~~
-;::J:J:J
,,~f.5g55
':-,.0",0.{)
'-1fif?;~
r<q:::t:
LY~W~
i~~~
6rEr,
'.;.,L:.:"-iW
~~~(I;
7188
-N
'7N~&
",!ltllM
<1';j~~
~
ll'
~
.!;!
i
"Ie:
I Ll~~ ~~,:;",'~_b:r~,:,,:,_"'~~Jo=~ ..~.
T~,- ~l\~ b.,40 ~.lCCC\~1Z. _~Z\ h<:.
,~~ - '6,'-"""'\ ~e ""2.;a:.o<"-I-,o - .O~ k
-r~ '- ~ ~va:> ~ b.. - 9\28H'Z. -.: . '"2' \ \ h.~.
-+- -c:6-'P:S~ G I
l~'- ~ecc.~:-a,I-~\ ~= z~~~.~L.
~___~pe.....> b........::... ~ -- "2?C)C;;,:' -r:--"j -e....' _ ct:::)4, k.
-r"1'>..2,~",OV-s. b. 2\9QF"f"Z · .C)~k.
~ ~'-'\~ 'F:"~1 1\.1::.~ ~ K~ "Foe.
~1\e~ ~~ .
.. \, ~ OX '. -::31'2 \ ~. -'- ,--32 \ k:.. -\I.') .
-6) CJc'-l.?\.J-r='" -ZS \ N .."c ?c:~ .C' F \~J;\:a:.',,( '<.:1 ,)..:.... .. .
(~__~CG\ -~\'-~Io,.jl ~)~
,~\h..c:=. -c.C>~-_~~~c-.
c ..:;?G&Z kc .
\..\v.;:e",=,,-- ~t.. ~ -Jl>.1"'e G;Lhc.'-Ij
, -7./_./:.r7\... r-?\ /' _ \
.... . ~~ . - .Ot:;;:O:::;: L . ~ ~ f;' G ..
% c>... \ "-I-.e""",.. """'h;:e. \l~ ~-->...........7
~ .?\~b..::.../ c 8\. \ %
/~2 .
..
?6\~~ ..S\I. 2~
\&.~"'I.a ~lc 'FOC2. ~b.\..l'1y'
-:> :;;::?'~,~. x ,~2\ k..
\
IN.
~rartQI..J ~
.~:z hoc.. - \~ .
GATOR ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
200 Knuth Rd. Suite 214
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436
(407) 736-7047
~'"-.JL:.JW
o::cr:a:a:
4:<l:<Cc(
::::::l~='
~gg~
tf).n....1i)
t,t,\,"'
~~~!=
:J:l~l.Ir'~
~~:t@
(/)(/)(/)0
~tJt:it
lJ,JUJl.I..JUJ
:r::r::r:a:
Ul:ntn
Sl~~ ~
~~~~"I'
:..N<\lN
'It'=t".t'<f
J
i
~I~
- \ ~bQ.J~~~ 1.-c'G~"
\
~4~.g
, L'
; j :..
V.
\~G'l.\'Z ,J .. ?~~J:? u.t:6 -Z+ 2'l-k ~ L\7-?l,,~ ~
~\Z. \~: ~ ~ ~ c: O~-r.
~.. 4\ \1.
t
- W - ~.z;;.
L. - :.:::;;; ~ ~1e; \\ ,,' :;? ~ "1'~ 'D
~1 - \A":e~~ , ~ ~O,,\~
~""'i" 0" ~ Va.e - ==3 Qy?roe..1J
~~YQeJ' \~y ~e~i\. \Z\~.
Cb~ee1 ~ ~ ~-/ c:::;;roe~
\ Z ~ \.~c:;:;.q '" \ (03 \ \~.
\--1~C> ~,~ 4ro2.~~ v~~
. --~'p.1 0;;:- \~~e- ~~~ ,><:\'
Q,M.~..o \Jb.1a'2. ~,,~~<< B \8,...\.
Mud ~ cr:8.\6,\~. ')t --;:?\CAr-rZ- - \:z9 \~ .
. \~ OX'9~
Q.. ~:..-;?~~ _ C\~:3\- :z6.-z
. -L'"'\?~.~) 6Cp~\ ~.~;d?
(jAf It IHGINEERING SERVICES, INC.'
100 Knuth Rd. . Suite 214 c. \ /\ ~/-
. iC'INTON BEACH. FL 33436. . '-"t.~' \~ .
'407) 736-7047 .' . \' J
,....L. --.\. ..~~..y~e~\C>- 14~\~. ~ ."'32\~..
\ \. ., 411 ~ -\tJ
~
- -.---------------..-.-.--.-..---. .-.-
:.J.JWUJUJ
:i:i:i:i
:::J::l=:l:;J
22gg
L()~tnlJ')
'1u'1u'lu~
~~~~
~~~~
~t~~
wwww
II'I:a:
'""''"
g~~ ~
~~~~i
~~~~j
,
l
~
~Io(
L~k.'~J h.17--~
"*;?~ s
~i-~~--r i
i
i.":
" ....~" r-....-~~~
i ,
i !
. ,--. 1__; .
'. 1 I J
._...,1_.._. _.__1...,,-1_.... !
~c:> oS. 8,\B,~
't< \~~~ ~ ... -...r" c:;;.,. :...., ,
~&
"'Z
6cP~' - .-Z6r'- ,
C~.~\+ ..e6.\-
-- \ 0... 6C::;:; \ U
~c:>~a VC>.-..N~a ~ ~"(\O~- \O.C)~~ )I' .?Z \ b...G...
..... ~.~ bat: - \~
..s~~.. ~~..
.. 4~( b..c:.- \"-) - ~.~~ _\~
... \.~4 be - \~ . ~ ~~~~ z" \~ _
I " 1 A.c.. IZ;~
L.o~~ ~e.vlll.pc;~" \c;;...Z G.r~ -->
~ l"~~'t E~.\lb."~ · t G::>>. ~ .~
'~"ec> ~<Z~ -, ~tf~
\,b....& ~Cee.=--=-1l:.... I.~~ ~ ""5'(07 'r1~ ..
>-~'{~
, c:O~)
GATOR ENGINEERING SERVICES. INC.
200 ~nuth Rd. Suite 214
BOYNTOtit BEACH, FL 33436
(407) 736-7047
..; f
,
,-- '.
5
o
I
L
5
TESTING L '3 OF THE PALM BEACH' \ INC.
PO. BOX 211
514 EAST COAST STREET
LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA 33460
(4071585-7515
FAX: (407) 585.7622
ASPHALT. . . CONCRETE. . . MATERIALS
D.O.T. PERCOLATION (exfi1tration) TEST PROCEDURES
Client: Gator Engineering Service Inc.
Project location: 119 Martin Luther King Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida
Project No: 93/47-1
Date test performed: 7/19/93
1'-6.5'
6.5'-8.5'
8.5'-15'
. 'SOIL DESCRIPTION
Light brown medium fine sand,
trace to little shell, limestone (SP)
Dark brownish gray medium fine sand,
trace shell (SP)
Very light brown medium fine sand (SP)
Dark brown medium fine sand (SP)
Brownish yellow medium fine sand (SP)
LOCATION
#P-1 - 60' North & 25'
West of Southeast
property corner.
DEPTH
0'-0.7'
0.7'-1'
Water table
10.4'
Average Q = 24.8
gpm or KIV
-=
-4
7.53x10
2
cfs/ft - ft head
NOTES:
The test procedures were conducted in general accordance with the latest D.O.T.
percolation (exfiltration) test procedures.
The water table depth is the distance from the ground surface to the water table
before the addition of water.
Hole Diameter: 7 inches
Casing: 6 inches diameter
Depth of hole: 15'
Respectfully submitted,
TESTING LAB OF THE PALM BEACHES, INC.
By
~~...
< . . .,......,...
( 2 )
6. What is applicant's interest in the premises affected?
(Qwner, buyer, less~, builder, developer, contract
purchaser, ete.) Uw u e eo
1. Street address or location of site: L!.1..M4(Z"1fV LU1IJ€L./tltJ4iG
_BOcf1J-'O"; fOeLl~ FL4 -=33~.3S
8. Property Control It
Legal description of site: l07S (P ,4A10 7
BLo(~JlI
Fit /lAiIt I.AJ e 88R(2 4~1J, 7ttJAl Less -rfle~7I1
I D f7 ldett€ 01= ~12 fZ04h (2,CAT- otc. Lt)4y
9. Intended usets) of site: 1?eS? AU{ZI4-ItiT
---
10. Developer or Builder: 10 13<,; ItS..s ((,~UP'!)
11. Architect: !lttnlu// JZ-t'1MS ~()
,
12 . Landscape Archi tect : --rz.- 73G- ASS I G k.)B 1)
14.
Site Planner:
Engineer: 01110e' E'lJ{I/ Vf2::E'e'AJ ~
Surveyor: 0 E;/2tE. IJ~ ~ U rrete /3
13.
15.
16.
0' BelEAJ. IA.! C
.
Traffic Engineer:
18.
Has a site plan been previously approved by the City
conunission for this property? Aft?,
Estimated const~e on costs pJ proposed improvements shown 01
this site plan:~ t? ~
17.
PLANNING & ZONING DBPARTMENT - November, 1991
A:SitePlan
II. SITE DATA
( 3 ).
The following information must be filled out below and must
appear, where applicable, on all copies of the site plan.
1. ~~nd Use Category shown in
the Comprehensive Plan
2.
3.
Zoning District C -$
Area of Site /1; tWsr FT..'
acres O. 03.:2/
sq . ft.
.4. Land Use -- Acreage Breakdown
a. Residential, including \.J\A- acres !Ii of sit4
surrounding lot area of
grounds
b. Recreation Areas * -1V\P\ acres " of sib
(excluding water area)
c. Water Area ~ ~ N't~ acres , " of sib
-
d. Commercial q, 00 ":3~1 acres ,~ " of sit
e. Industrial ----AlJiL acres .. of sit
f. Public/Institutional ~ acres " of sit
g. PUblic, private and ~ \A-
Canal rigl.ts-of-way acres % of sit
h. Other (specify) acres % of sit
i. Other (specify) acres .. of sit
j. Total area of site /4, OOO~;1'acres "'O~2.1 I()t) , of sit
* including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and
having a minimum dimension of 50 ft. by 50 ft. .!
5. Surface Cover
a.
acres
b.
c.
Ground floor building f ()~jY.:J
area ("building footprint"
IS
, of si1
Water area
acres
.. of si1
Other impervious areas,
including paved area of
public & private streets,
paved area of parking
lots' driveways (ex-
cluding landscaped areas),
and sidewalks, patios, 0,:211
decks, and athletic
courts.
tP0
!Ii of si
........",... ~
"'1 _ acres
d.
.. of si
Total impervious area aoc:; DC? acres
e.
Landscaped area
inside of parking lots
(20 sq. ft. per interior
parking space required -
see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of
Landscape Code).
acres
!Ii of s1
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - November, 1991
A:SitePlan
Board of County Commissioners
Mary McCarty, Chair
Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Burt Aaronson
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Deparbnent of Engineering
and Public Works
ill
JUL
~ ~ w ~m
5 1994 ,l;
c......-- I
June 29, 1994
Hr. Ronald last
Engineering Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl 33425-0310
RE: HARVEY'S RESTAURANT
Dear Hr. last:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the
project ent itl ed Harvey's Restaurant, pursuant to the Traffic Performance
Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County land Development Code. The
project will consist of a 1,084 square foot addition to the existing 1,016 square
foot restaurant. The project will generate 90 additional net daily trips. The
build-out for the project is 1994.
The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding
this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
a:ft: ~
Dan WeiSber~
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
cc. ~r. Hike Haag, Zoning Administrator
File: TPS - Hun. .. Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn32
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on rflCYCled paper
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
SIMMONS & WHITE, INC.
Engineers · Planners. Consultants
April 4, 1994
Job No. 94-30
TRAFFIC GENERATION STATEMtNT
Harvey's Restaurant
Boynton Beach, Florida
SITE DATA
The subject parcel is located on the north side of N.E. 10th
Avenue approximately 300 feet east of Seacrest Blvd. and contains
approximately 0.3 acres. Existing site development on the
currently developed site consists of a 1016 S.F. CBS restaurant
and accessory parking. Proposed development consists of
refurbishing the existing restaul~ant and expanding by 1084 S.F.
for a proposed total development of 2100 S.F. For additional
information concerning site location and layout, please refer to
the site plan prepared by Gator Engineering Services, Inc.
TRAFFIC GENERATION
The Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code Article 7,
Section 7.9 (I) C - Traffic Performance Standards, APPLICABILITY,
Subsection 2 (B) requires that for any application for a site
specific development order on property on which there is an
existing use shall be subject to the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards to the extent the traffic generation
projected for the site specific development order exceeds the
traffic generation of the existing use. The generation rates and
capture rates of the existing use shall be updated to current pro
forma traffic generation and pass-by rates and shall be used to
calculate previous approval traffic. Because the structures and
land have been in use within the last five years, they shall be
considered an existing use. The previous approval traffic from
the existing restaurant may be calculated as follows in
accordance with the rates provided in Table 10.8-1 Fair Share
Road Impact Fee Schedule:
QUALITY RESTAURANT (1016 S.F.)
96.51 tpd
1000 S.F.
)( 1016 S.F. =
98 tpd
(15 tpd)
Less 157. Capture
=
83 tpd
4623 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 112, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415
Telephone (407) 965-9144
Traffic Generation Statement
.Job No. 94-30
April 4, 1994 ~ Page Two
TRAFFIC GENERATION (CONTINUED)
The traffic to be generated by the total 2100 S.F. restaurant
upon completion in 1994 may be calculated as follows:
QUALITY RESTAURANT (2100 S.F.)
96.51 tod
1000 S.F. x
2100 S.F.
=
203 tpd
(30 tod)
Less 15% Capture
=
173 tpd
The proposed expansion will therefore result in a net increase of
90 trips per day over the existing use:
173 tpd - 83 tpd
=
90 tpd
The Palm Beach County Land Development Code Article 7, Section
7.9 (I) G Procedure, Subsection 1 (C) (2) provides that
amendments to non-residential projects generating fewer than 200
gross trips shall not be required to submit a Traffic Impact
Statement. A brief review of the directly accessed links,
however, Seacrest Blvd. and Federal Highway, reveals that
adequate capacity is available to support the proposed restaurant
expansion and the project appears to meet the requirements of the
Traffic Performance Standards. The low A.M. and P.M. peak hour
turning movement volumes at the project entrance with N.E. 10th
Avenue do not warrant the construction of exclusive turn lanes
based on the Palm Beach County engineering guidelines used in
determining the need for turn lanes of 30 left turns or 75 right
turns.in the peak hour.
SUBSURFACE SOIL INVESTIGATION
FOR PROPOSED STRUCTURE ADDITION
RESTAURANT ADDITION @ 119 MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD
City of Boynton Beach
Palm Beach County, Florida
April, 1994
Prepared for:
Mr. Tony Harvey
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TEsTING, INC.
120 HIBISCUS STREET . JUPfmR, FLORIDA 33458 . TEUtPHONE (407) 746-76118
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
Z20 HIBISCUS S1'REET. JUPITER, FLORIDA 334S8 . 1'EIEPHONE (407) 746-7698
Mr. Tony Harvey
224 N.W. 7th Court
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
April 22, 1994
Re: SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION FOR STRUCTURE ADDITION
FET Job#: 0-94564
Gentlemen:
Enclosed are the results of the subsurface soils investigation performed on April 20, 1994, for
the proposed restaurant addition to be constructed at 119 Martin Luther King Boulevard in the
City of Bounton Beach,located in Palm Beach County, Florida.
The purpose of this investigation was to obtain general subsurface data to provide an
engineering evaluation of the subsurface conditions. The existing structure is a one-story C.B.S.
Building.
TEST BORINGS
The soil on which the structure will rest has been tested in accordance with Section 1302 of the
Standard Building Code, 1991 edition, as amended. The test locations, depths and frequencies
meet the requirements of Table 1302.2.9.3. Tests were performed on natural grade.
A total of four (4) Cone Penetrometer Test soundings (CPTs) and one (1) Hand Auger boring
(HAs) were taken at the locations noted on the layout drawing.
Cone Penetrometer Test soundings are performed in accordance with ASTM 0..3441-79, "Deep
Quasi-Static, Cone and Friction-Cone Penetration Tests of Soils".
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The near surface soils are fine sands with traces of shell fragments.
The depth of the water table was more than 6.0 feet below existing grade.
The cone soundings indicate suitable subsurface soil conditions for support of the proposed
structure addition using conventional shallow footing foundations.
Site preparation, any excavation and backfilling required during site preparation, fill placement,
and excavation for footings should be done in accordance with the applicable sections of
Attachment A.
1
ArIur Pa'lterson Restaurant Addition 119 M.L., Kina Boulevard
April 22. 1994
With the above criteria satisfied, a soil bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot may
be used in the design of the footings.
CLOSURE
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted foundation engineering
practices. The recommendations presented herein are based on the data obtained from the soil
borings previously described. This report may not account for all possible variations that may
exist between conditions observed in the borings and conditions at locations that were not
explored. The nature and extent of any such variations may not become evident until further
explorations are made. If variations are observed, we recommend that Fraser Engineering and
Testing, Inc. be requested to inspect the actual site conditions and, if necessary, re-evaluate the
recommendations of this report.
It has been our pleasure to assist you in this phase of you project. If you have any questions
about this report or need any additional information, please call at your convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
GINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
aul H. Danforth, .E
Florida Registration No. 44653
PHD:pd
Client .. 3
2
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
220 HIBISCUS STREET
JUPITER. FL 33458
EXISTING
HOUSE
CPT-1
~
CLIENT: AR1HUR PATI'ERSON LAYOUT DRAWING
PROJEcr: RESTAURANT ADDmON (Not to scale)
SITE: 119 M.L. KING BOULEVARD, BOYNTON BEACH lOBI D94564
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
DATE TESTED: APRIL20,1994
~ CPT-2
~
CPT-3
HA-1 ·
CPT -4
o
fi}...
.......................... .....' .'....
. .. ... .
. - ... .
.. ....,..
".. .. ...
N.
PROPOSED
ADDITION
~
PA. t IF t
FHASER ENGINEERING Ahtl TESTING. INC. CLIENT : ARTHUR PA TTEASON
220 HIBISCUS STREET PROJECT: RESTAURANT ADDITION
.APITEA. FLORIDA 338 SITE: U9 M. L. KING BOULEVARD. BOYNTON BEACH. FL.
TEST DATE :04/20/94 JOB f 0-94564 CPT , i
IPOINT FRJCTIlIf POINT RESISTANCE - ~ (J<u/square em. or Tons/.quare tt.J FRICTION RATIO - I
~J. RAllO
q I M FT 100 200 300 400 o 123 .. 5 6 7 8 9
.
p--- .
~ S
...
.
Ie
p---
~ ./
I--
. SA I......
. 1.:1
,
- · lfiSTEADY READING . . POlIIIIlESISTANCE TOO lOW TO ACTIVATE GASE ,
PAlE S rtF s
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING. INC. CLIENT : ARTHUR PATTERSON
220 HIBISCUS STREET PROJECT: RESTAURANT ADDITION
.APITEA, FLORIDA 33458 SITE: U9 M. L. KING BOULEVARD. BOYNTON BEACH. FL.
TEST DATE :O~/20/9~ JOB , D-9~56" CPT f 2
:&~NT FRICTII* POINT RESISTANCE - lie ~g/sQuare c.. or Tons/_Quare ft.' FRICTION RATIO - I
1ST. RATIO
qc I M FT 100 200 300 400 o 123 456 1 8 9
D
"-
/
~ ~
S
- · ttmEADY READINS I · PODIT RESISTANCE TOO LOW TO ACTIVATE SASE t
PAlE t .. t
. FRASER ENGINEERING NIl TESTIN6. INC. CLIENT : ARTHUR PA TIERSON
220 HIBISCUS STREET PROJECT : RESTAURANT ADDITION
.lPITER. FLORJOA 33-458 SITE: 119 M. L. KING BOULEVARD. BOYNTON BEADi. FL.
TEST OA TE : 04/20/94 JOB , 0-94564 CPT , 3
ris~NT FRICTICIf POINT RESISTANCE - ~ ~g/8quare c.. or Tons/square ft.J FRICTION RATIO - I
1ST. RATIO
CIc: I M FT 100 200 300 400 o 123 456 7 8 9
. "
l
.
. ..
.
.
2
t3
. t
. 3
I
- · lImEADY READINS . · PGDIT IlESISTANCE TOO LOIf TO ACTIVATE SASE .
PAIl! t " t
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC. CLIENT: ARTHUR PATTERSON
220 HIBISCUS STREET PROJECT: RESTAURANT ADDITION
.lP ITER. FLORIDA 33458 SITE: 119 M. L. KING BOULEVAfIJ, BOYNTON BEACH. FL.
TEST DATE : 04/20/94 JOB f 0-94564 CPT , ..
~~NT FRICTJCIf POINT RESISTANCE - lie ~g/aqua~e c.. O~ Tons/.qua~e ft.) FRICTION RATIO - I
1ST. RATIO
qc I M FT 100 200 300 400 o 123 4 5 6 7 8 9
"
.
II
31
to
t5
I
- · lImaDY READINS . · POJI(J IBJS1'ANCE 100 LOW TO ACTIVATE SAGE t
BORING LOG
DEPTH (1) (2) DESCRIPTION
0 - Sand, light brown, fine,
- with shell fragments.
-
-
- 1.0'
I -
Sand, medium gray, fine,
- with a trace of shells.
-
-
-
2.0'
2 - light gray to white, fine.
Sand,
-
-
-
-
3 -
-
-
-
-
4 -
-
-
-
-
5 -
-
-
-
- 6.0'
6 -
- Boring Terminated at 6.0' .
-
- Water Table Below 6.0'.
-
7 -
-
-
-
-
8 -
(1) PENETRATION - BLOWS PER FOOT
(2) DESIGNATIONS
"7 GROUND WATER
BORING NO.: SA-I
DATE DRILLED: 04/20/94
JOB NO.:
D-94564
FRASER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
ATTACHMENT A
General Site Preparation
The foundation and pavement areas should be cleared of all trees, roots, surface vegetation, and
any other deleterious matter to 5 feet outside of the proposed structure and pavement areas.
After clearing, the area is to be graded and then compacted with a self-propelled steel drum
vibratory roller having a minimum total applied force of 10 tons. Sufficient compactive effort
should be applied to obtain a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density for a depth of 2 feet
as determined by AASHTO T-180 (ASTM 0-1557). The vibratory compactor should make a
minimum of 12 overlapping passes, 6 in one direction, and 6 in a direction at right angles over
the entire cleared area. If any unstable soil conditions or soft areas are encountered during the
preparation of the foundation, the project engineer, geotechnical consultant or other responsible
professional should be informed, the matter investigated and the problem resolved. Any
subsequent excavation and backfilling should be in accordance with the criteria as outlined
below.
Fill Placement
Where fill is to be placed on natural ground, the surface must first be prepared as outlined
above. The fill at grade should extend a minimum of 6 feet beyond the structure outline.
Fill should be a uniform free draining granular soil (clean sand) and be placed in layers not to
exceed 12 inches loose measure and compacted as outlined above. Sufficient compactive effort
should be applied to obtain a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by
AASHTO T-180 (ASTM 0-1557).
excavation and Backfilling
Where excavation and backfilling are required, the soils should be removed to the specified
depth. Sufficient compactive effort must then be applied to the excavated surface to obtain a
minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by AASHTO T-180 (ASTM 0-1557).
Backfill should be a uniform free draining granular soil (clean sand) and be placed in layers not
to exceed 15 inches loose measure. Sufficient compactive effort should be applied to each layer
to obtain a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density for the entire depth of the fill as
determined by AASHTO T -180 (ASTM 0-1557). The excavated surface and each layer of
backfill should be compacted with a self-propelled steel drum vibratory roller having a minimum
total applied force of 1 0 tons.
footing Excavation
After the footings have been excavated representative density tests should be taken. The
density at the footing grade should be a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density as
detennined by AASHTO T-180 (ASTM 0-1557). If the bottom of the footing has been loosened
during excavation, or if the bottom of the footing is below 1 foot from natural ground, the footing
area should be compacted with a heavy plate vibratory compactor. Sufficient compactive effort
should be applied to achieve the required density.
ATTACHMENT A (cont)
Groundwater
The groundwater at the time the test borings were taken was sufficiently below the ground
surface, so that the required site preparation could be completed without any adverse effects.
Heavy rainfall and/or a high water table may occur before the earthwork commences, or during
the earthwork operation. When these conditions occur and the site preparation cannot be
achieved as specified, an evaluation of the existing conditions should be conducted and the
specifications revised accordingly.
Where Vibratory Eaulpment May Affect Adjacent Structures
Where there are existing structures adjacent to the site that may be affected by the self-
propelled steel drum vibratory equipment, densification must be performed using equipment that
will satisfy the required densification without the risk of damage to the existing structure(s).
Loaders and heavy plate compactors are two types of equipment that have been used
successfully. Densification procedures must comply to the capability of the equipment employed.
Alternative to Self-Propelled Steel Drum Vibratory Eaulpment
When self-propelled steel drum vibratory equipment cannot be used as specified, vibratory plate
compactors may be used. When this condition occurs, the overall densification procedure must
be revised to comply with the capability of the equipment employed. In general, small plate
compactors will be effective to a maximum depth of 6 to 8 inches.
On-5lte Inspection
We recommend that the site preparation and subsequent earthwork be monitored by a qualified
soils technician. The soils technician should be responsible to observe the clearing and
compaction of the building and payment areas, determine the suitability of the fill and backfill,
and take representative density tests on the prepared surface, fill, backfill, and footing
excavations.
ii
'l'RAt:KING L(1!~ - Sl'l't: PLAN Rl::V lEW SUBMl'l"l'AL
PROJBC'l' 'l'1TLE:
DESCRIPTION:
'l'YPE:
DATE REC1D:
!fAR..Ul:y . S
~RAWT
FILl:: NO.: Be r
~MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
RECEIPT NO.: 0 7S/ 7
NEW SITE PLAN
l-~ 1- 9' f AMOUNT:
5": I'M,
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED:
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D:
2.-4- 9 1"
(Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL:
DATE:
~CEP1D
2-- - 9
--sENIED
DATE:
DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
2nd SUBMIT'I'AL
ACCEPTED
DATE: DATE:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEP'I1ANCE LETTER: 2--7 -<t"T
REVIEWER'S NAME: D., \,-,,-O~~E"'
DENIED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
(Label TRC Departments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW.
c:rI.- ~.
MEMO NUMBER: '(')
/'
"2. - i -~ r
RETURN DATE:
~ - '2.2- -Cf 1-
/
DATE SENT:
1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
PLANS
MEMO # / DATE / "c" PLANS
91-'~')1.'-t / ./. ..2.'--1'/ ~'E.s Planning
?1-01-~1 / 2-'/4-~).f/ C~.,'i:le1u0 Building
,'. - '("14 / 2 ."r -'1,:;;/ ,_~,J,~; o~''''v''':-)Engineer 'J.iJ''1e:s i\ ~~Ihg
';?.c.i, ,:'::-i S' / L-6-;-k./ c!::ful'1'2",v7\ Engineer
~Jf- ,")2~<;' i ;....//-<;11-- i l;;~) , Forester ___
MEMO # /
/
91-~ ":;.,3':5 ' /
,../'<J-..c 53 /
i
'Iq.- c 5'(.; i
DATE i "ell
1-
2. - 'cL....k/ .ll, -
IT-~,~
. 'dl ,. '
2'/! -Yi 'Ie: :,
i_
.,1. ,I. ->'.:1 1>-J (;; .,,.-
. ... ~el<..
Util.
P.W.
Parks
Fire
Police
TYPE OF VARIANCE(S)
DATE OF MEEn"ING:
DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: 3.. I-~
(Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out wi cammer.'::..'
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS Of. AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D:
MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW.
DATE SENT: ,5"-~(,-'J/ MEMO #: 9</-/VY
/ .
RETURN DATE:
, -5-~
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
Util.
P.W.
Parks
Fire
Police
DATE /"R/D"
/ c...
/ IrJJ
/ /fJv
/ do
/ do
PLANS MEMO #
Planning ~
:~~~~~~; ~ 1;Y~~
Engineer
Forster "fCS 9,'/- ~ o~
/ DATE /"R/B~'
/ /
i~/ /J;)
/ --P;Lk-/ C-
/ I
I v/,:t. 7 / Ai J
LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED:
SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT:
A:TRACKING.SP