REVIEW COMMENTS
;/12 Cpy
PLANNING
CITY OF
ZONING
BOYNTON BEACH
DEPARTMENT COMMENT
SHEET
&
Type of Review
,'Y' ft;.y,~~
permi t Application No.: CJ 1- .... /37S"
;0 I . a..I6.~ k. p:,. ~ fi"
/ltvP!-.. .Lre 11.J~ ;21JJD ,",,, !lj}p AI)
Project Title
Reviewer 1fI,J:'~ 1/MrG.
JA:;/"l/J1..u /L,/J~A .
Name of
'1'11e application number listed above is the referenced number for your
proposed construction. Prior to further processing on your project, the
comments listed below must be rectified. To discuss the comments it is
recommended that an appointment be set-up with the reviewer. For an
appointment, call (407) 315-6260 between 8 A.M. and 5 P.M., Monday thru
Friday. After amending the plants) to show compliance with the comment(s),
return both sets of plans for re-review to the Building Department. To
expedite the review of the plans, the designer responsible for the drawings
may make line changes to the plants) at the Buildi,g Department (each line
change must be initialed and dated). Note: Additional comments may be
generated as a result of the review of amended plants) and/or documents.
****************************************************************************
Applicant's Name and Phone No.:
Date Called:
Comments Received By (Print Name):
signature:
Comments only:
Date Reviewed: - ~"'- 5"-)O-ycj
****************** *********************************************************
.4C~ PtN'.;.i ~,.,te~~ w 13dJ&. '5'"/J.c.lt?r
submit for revi~w a color brochure or ~he proposed cooling
"[(vier. The brochure shall depIct t.he actual color or the
p,:opo::, ed tcwer.
1
.l .
Add to ~he subrnlttal an enlarged drawing of the area of the
proposed 2CJCJllng to\ver. The dravring shall 1n:.:lude e:-astinq
] mpl'ovement.s il~ tIle area of ':.11e proposed t')v7er such :is;
sid':-Y'Talks, landscapE' mar:erial. cUl.-bL1g vehicle u:,;,:, aL'e3.
\ acctO'SS aisle).
3.
Tc, avoid an other rEview I recommend shewing and identifYlng,
on the enl arged site pI an drawing, one I 1) 5 or 7 9a lIon
tieci1.im oleander plant placed dlrectly south of the pl.oposecl
cClclinq tov-let'. Sp,?cify, on the plan. that the neY'7 plant \.;111
ma tc11 tIH~ variety of Oleander exis t 1ng along the rear \'.'3.11 of
t.be center and not encroach tne existing sider,valk <)r v<:;.>l1icle
USE: area.
4.
Add to the drawings a partlal elevation view of the rear of
tIle building shov71ng the proposed e;~haust Vt.~li.t. SpEocify, on
the drawing, that the color cf the proposed vent assembly will
I1idtcb t.Ilt:: ,'':0101' cf the bld ldlllCJ.
IJ C~ep/?;:::." .r,;, //::,19</
***************************************~*~***'*****************************,
* Departments required to review the project
AJf
*
~**************************************************************************
Page
I
of
I
m
o
l~
d
Iz
1m
i~
J:
~
r-
;;:
~!
~r-., -
ill "li:~ '~..
"I' to l.. I
i '" "'~;l i
.., > 'I t
~--~/
I I ut :
J e ,..oan{ roJrivllus.s ....'V~......t.
I:
>>
~
~
tn
~
~
!!!
z
G)
"a
~~
IZ
~~,. "":": II--i'
::'(1-' c: r;:.
, 1
/~--
I
;Ff
irir
J
- ----- ",,'
I
! 1! I i
I,~) \~)
:. '\ I I) ':I~
II (~
:1 i I l:11 ~
~I
1---
i r s: I l
I I, I
J L-, I
I ! .=: . '1 ~
! j\) !JI
Ir ~ ~
II! ~ Il
~ L r \
II' I
I !
(JL II
~) U
n .. v'j
u
II
i
)
-------' .
~~
1
III
..
5f 1i I
h~.
nl
i
:~
Eel
"I'., hI
'I'X t)' :::~7 2"<:al.
,II .\ 6' I., i I l~, L"'!li
",. }(I' (' I 11 1 ltll,
.. ,;. z. .:JA: ~.jJl<:~PH hd,
cr >1.,)
~~':".:,;'; 2::~ll "I ')'
1)')( J-<+ " .. oc.
~u'\, 1.4"(d fl,III
::,'24 x Ie:' (. u<.
,ITA: \lORK
~
lUlN'i^ V SGl:lON~:>
'.:., .
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE 1"
-30'-0"
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #92-246
FROM:
J. Scott Miller
City Manager
~e~ro
Planning and Zoning Director
-
TO:
-
DATE:
December 9, 1992
RE:
Herman's Plaza
We contacted the applicants for Herman's Plaza sign program
modification and asked them to be present at the City Commission
meeting on December 15, 1992 to answer questions from the
Commission. The applicants indicated they would be present.
If the applicants are unable to attend, we will contact you.
/
CC/jm
A:HERMPLAZ.JM
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 92-234
November 20, 1992
TO:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
~~
Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
,.I
FROM:
DATE: November 20, 1992
SUBJECT: Herman's Plaza
As requested by the City Commission we have researched the trees
near the proposed free standing sign at Herman's Plaza.
The trees in question are all yellow tabebuia. The trees located
along the street are required trees. There is no code requirement
for trees in the parking islands adjacent to street on the sit~.
However, o~ the site plan both islands show trees on them and for
that reason there should be trees in both the islands.
I have inspected the trees in question and agree that the pruning
that has taken place is improper but, as far as I could determine,
no recent pruning has been done on the trees.
Yellow tabebu1a have some problems that may have contributed in
par~ to the present conditions on the site. First, t~is species 1S
brittle and branches have a tendency to break easily, especially i~
the wind. When pruning such a break it is necessary to cut back to
the main limb and not leave a stump. Second is that the species
has a weak root system that contributes to its falling over in wind
or under wet conditions. When planting such trees the root system
should be .:overed with pebbles and then soil washed into the
planting hole. This was not done for these trees.
I have come to the conclusion these trees should not have been
planted as perimeter trees on the site. The reason they were
chosen was because they do not grow to a large size and would not
interfere with the overhead power lines on Congress Avenue.
Based on the above I would recommend the following:
(1) The applicant be ~llowed to remove the two tree stumps from
~he islands in exchange for a tree donatio~ to the City equal
to the diameter of the two removed trees.
-2-
(2) The applicant be allowed to remove and replace the stunted
yellow tabebuia and replace them with oversized new trees of
an acceptable specie3.
(3) That the City Commission consider adoption of the National
J\rborist Associatl.on Standa!.-ds for Pruning Trees. These
standards have been amended by the Southeast Florida Chapter
of the Association to address native species and palm trees.
(4) Adoption of specific removal and replacement criterl.a for
existing trees.
We have attempted to contact the applicant regarding
recommendations 1 and 2 but as of 2:00 PM on 11/20/92, we have not
been able to contact them. We will report verbally to the City
Commissl.on on their response at the December 1, 1992 meeting.
CC:cp
C : Herr.1an
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM NO. 92-376
TO:
Chris Cutro, Director of Planning
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist~
FROM:
DATE: November 20, 1992
SUBJECT: Yellow Tabebuia (Tabebuia Argentea)
This memorandum is in reference to replacement trees for the Yellow
Tabebuia (flowering trees) located next to the Herman's Sporting
Goods facility on Congress Avenue.
The trees have evidently been pruned improperly causing a dense
canopy which captures (blocks) wind, especially in stormy weather.
This activity in association with the trees having shallow root
systems cause them to fall over from time to time. The tree grows
quickly which causes it to have brittle wood. I would recommend
the trees be replaced with native trees (e.g., Yellow Elder
standard) or tree form ligustrum as an open area street tree.
KH:cm
RECEIVliD
NaV 23
PLANNING DEPT.
(\ I
a .k.1.)._
.)\!.
11"\! p.....jl,l
kA~
i
lili
-