AGENDA DOCUMENTS
f .
7el
KID STOP II
NEW SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
Applicant: Mark and Joan Mendel
Agent: Bob Kuoppala - Kuoppala and Associates P.A.
Location: 3800 Quantum Boulevard
Land Use Plan Designation: Industrial
Zoning Designation: Planned Industrial Development (P.I.D)
Type of Use: Day School
Number of Units: N/A
Square Footage: Site - 47,912
Building - 8,852
Description of Project:
The applicant wishes to develop the vacant 1.1 acre site into a
day school project. The site is located in Quantum Corporate
Park in an area designated on the Master Plan for office uses.
The proposed use is compatible with the permitted uses listed
within in the conventional C-1 Office and Professional Commercial
Zoning District. The proposed building has a total are of 8,852
square feet. The building is divided into four (4) structures
connected with a single roof. The building is located on the
site within the setbacks designated for the zoning district.
Based on the parking space requirements for the zoning district,
there are surplus parking spaces provided at the site. The plan
shows seven, 11 foot by 18 foot, drop-off parking spaces located
directly in front of the building. The site landscaping exceeds
the code required material and also contains existing trees
preserved from the original site. The project is not located
within a community design district, therefore, the colors and
architectural style are subject to approval by the Board.
Harmonious comparison of the adjacent projects is an integral
part of approving site plans, however, the subject property is
bordered by vacant lots. The closest building is the Allstate
building located west of the subject property on N.W. 22nd
Avenue. The dumpster enclosure and refuse truck turn-around area
has been placed in front of the building along Quantum Boulevard,
however, for aesthetic consideration, staff recommends that if
the enclosure is not completely concealed with additional
landscape material, it should be relocated to the rear of the
project with the location meeting the requirements of the
applicable departments. Another aesthetic concern of the staff
is the height of the exposed surface of the retaining wall that
is located along the front of the property. A tall stark wall
would detract from the architectural design of the building and
site. Staff recommends that if the wall creates a harsh view
that the design of the wall include offsets spaced along its
length and landscaping be added along the street side of the
wall.
Mark and Joan Mendel
Page 2
Review of Departmental Comments:
The comments from the reviewing departments are attached. Based
on the Engineering Department comments, the applicant has agreed
to omit the parking space that borders the east property line to
allow for a turn-around area at the end of the parking lot. The
Technical Review Committee recommended that the project be
forwarded to the Planning and Development Board with the
understanding that their unresolved comments and code
deficiencies will be rectified and corrected at the time working
drawings for the project are reviewed for permit issuance.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that this site plan be forwarded to the Planning
and Development Board and City Commission with a recommendation
for approval.
CC/jm
Att.
A:KIDSTOP.P&D
MEMORANDUM
July 30, 1992
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
RE: Site Plan Review - New Site Plan
Amended Plans
Project - Kidstop II
Location - 3800 Quantum Boulevard
Applicant - Mark and Joan Mendel
File No. - 684
The amended plans for the above referenced project have been submitted and
reviewed. The following comments are either comments from the original set
of comments that were not satisfactorily corrected on the amended plans or
were generated as a result of the way the plans were amended. All comments
shall be corrected. However, it is acceptable to show compliance with the
outstanding comments on the plans that are required to be submitted to the
Building Department for permit review.
1. Specify on the elevation view drawings the color of each exterior
finish material and feature. The colors shall match the colors
identified on the color elevation drawing. Place a distinguishable
symbol where each finish material and feature is shown on the
elevation drawings. The symbol shall correlate with the same type of
symbol that is placed next to the appropriate color specified on the
color list.
2. Specify on the Landscape Plan that the space within the line-of-sight
triangle between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet shall provide
unobstructed cross visibility.
3. Show and specify on the Landscape Plan and plant list that fifty (50)
percent of the total numbers of all shrub material proposed for the
site is of a native specie. Identify on the plant list each native
specie material by placing a distinguishable symbol next to the
botanical plant name. Note: Eugenia Guianensis is not a native
specie.
4. To evaluate the aesthetics of the site as viewed from Quantum
Boulevard specify on the Site Plan drawing the elevation of the
retaining wall and the elevation of the finish grade on both sides of
the wall. Note: If the elevation of the wall and grades vary along
the length of the wall, provide at least four elevations along the
entire length including an elevation at each end of the wall.
5. I recommend for aesthetic consideration that the dumpster enclosure be
relocated to the rear portion of the site and that the code required
landscaping material replace the enclosure or that a dense evergreen
landscape material of three (3) feet in height at planting, spaced two
(2) feet on center be shown, specified and located around three sides
of the enclosure directly in front of the five (5) to seven (7) foot
high Wax Myrtle plants. The Ixora and Liriode would still be
installed but, moved forward allowing room for the medium height hedge
material. This recommendation is to conceal the enclosure with a
layered effect of short, medium and tall landscape material. The
recommendation to relocate the dumpster enclosure to the rear of the
parking area is based on the fact that there is a surplus of parking
spaces at the site.
C:KIDSTOP.ald
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #92-297
TO:
Christopher Cutro,
Planning and Zoning D
/
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: July 27, 1992
SUBJECT: Kidstop II
Site Plan - Second Review
We have reviewed the amended site plans for Kidstop II and find
it in compliance with our previous comments.
The 1 1/2" water meter reservation fee is $1,205.02 and will be
due and payable in accordance with Ord. 91.59 (Sec. 26-34(E)),
Please refer any questions on this matter to Mike Kazunas of this
office.
19b
xc: Mike Kazunas
Peter Mazzella
File
Time: Utility Engineer - 1 hour
RECEIVED
JUl2 8 1992
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 92-169
July 22, 1992
TO: Chris Cutro
Planning D7f;'r tor
THRU: Don Jaeger
Building 0 lal
FROM: Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
RE: NEW SITE PLAN - 2nd REVIEW
KIDSTOP II DAY SCHOOL
The Building Department recommends that the above referenced
project be forwarded to the Planning & Development Board.
However, the Building Department's previous comments (see memo
attached) should be complied with prior to permit issuance.
A~~
AN:bh
Attachment
_,,,', ,....f""'lI.
~r.:'r'\, .':';'
J'" '2 '1. \~~l
KIDSTOP2.DOC
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 92-168
July 15, 1992
TO: Chris Cutro
Planning Director
THRU: Don Jaeger MI1~
Building Of~~ial
FROM: Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
RE: TRC COMMENTS - SITE PLAN REVIEW
KIDSTOP II DAY SCHOOL
The Building Department's comments can be addressed at time of
permit. They are as follows:
1. Approval by the utility companies is needed for the sign
located in the utility easement.
2. When two or more buildings are on the same site and one wall
is not a minimum 4-hour fire wall, the percentage of
openings and fire wall ratings must comply with Table 600 of
the Standard Building Code. This condition would not apply
if the buildings were tied together at the breezeway and a
single building was created.
3. State on the plans if the driveway will be asphalt or
concrete (not both), in order that the appropriate codes
will be addressed.
#1'/. i''1/;/
,~~-t'-<y/
Newbold, 38-7480
Al
AN : bh
KIDSTOP2.Doe
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #92-264
TO: Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~~
RE: Kidstop II - Second Review
DATE: July 27, 1992
1. The applicant must provide a written document to correlate
to the site plan tree management sheet. This document must
be prepared prior to permitting the clearing permit for the
site.
2. The applicant has not yet supplied a letter from Quantum
Associates that the site will not be a microsite set aside
area. The note on the tree management sheet must be
documented from the association.
KH:ad
Time: Forester/Environmentalist:
Secretary:
15 minutes
15 minutes
RECEIVED
JUl 2 7 1992
M E M 0 RAN DUM
POLICE #92-141
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Lt. Donald I. Thrasher
Community Relations Division
Police Department
DATE: 23 July 92
SUBJECT: Second Review - New Site Plan - Kidstop II
I have reviewed the new site plan for Kidstop II and find
everything satisfactory.
~
Le. Donald I. Thras er .
Community Relations Division
Police Department
DIT/dmj
~~Cf.".\\fE.O
I') '1 ''oj'!,'/..
.\\\\ t. ;J
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 92-152
July 21, 1992
T Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Mike Kazunas, eity Engineer
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utility Director
Lt. Don Thrasher, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
K_eviy }lal~t~ ~o ester/Environmentalist
~ //l,,'4f !,
~6~1. christoph r tr., planning & Zoning Director
RE: Second Review - New Site Plan
Project - Kidstop II
Location - 3800 Quantum Boulevard
File No. - 684
RECEIVED
JUL 24
PLANNING DEPT.
/
\
.~~
I
I
.,/
/
I
/
!
~~t
'),,,
i~~\'
"
.'
...~ ......./..
~.~
Attached is the amended site plan for the above referenced development for
your final review and recommendation.
We would ask that you review this amended site plan to determine if the
plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your
department.
If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time
of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in
writing.
If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site
plan again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be
forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board for review or held for further
revisions by the applicant.
Please return your memo and the revised plans to the planning and Zoning
Department by 5:00 P.M. on July 28, 1992.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to
call Mike Haag at 228 who is coordinating the review of this development.
pw~
xc: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger
Ed Allen
Charlie Frederick
Edward Hillery
John Guidry
Project File
Chronological File
7/~vjq :f--
il-ltfUJ,f A~t
R(c ef.lA, jlo_v JYeL-ldf~
fR ~ ~ e(.,.(:
e:2REVIEW.SDD
N 0 C u 15 tAN\) /Al ~
,..sS 4 t'S ON -rift' oS
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #92-160
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Carel Fisher, Assistant Public Works Director
SUBJ: Site Plan Modifications - Kidstop II
DATE: July 27, 1992
The Public Works Department approve Site Plan Modifications for
Kidstop II per previous memo indicating over-head clearance.
~
Ca e F1sher
Assistant Public Works Director
CF/cr
~~Y;,O
~~C; 1 \~~~
~\)\. t
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 92-244 WDC
'1'0 :
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
DATE:
JULY 21, 1992
RE:
TRC - KIDSTOP II
LOT 38, QUANTUM BLVD.
THERE ARE NO FIRE DEPARTMENT OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSAL
SUBMI'I'TED.
'C.
4/d'~ ~dic~~..'~
WILLIAM D. CAVANAUGH, FPO I
FIRE DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE
~
~~~
~~,-M p~
c771v/.L
$~'1r2-
kidstop.wdc
pg
n
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date: August 6, 1992
Re: Kidstop II
TRC Comments
The conceptual drainage plan for the referenced project has been revised by the
applicant as the result of a meeting with the applicant's engineer on July 29, 1992. The
revised plan, dated 7/30/92 responds to the engineering department concerns as outlined
in our TRC memorandum. Based upon the revised drawings, this plan can now go
forward. All of the outstanding engineering comments can be handled at the building
permit stage.
WRS/bf
92-049
cc: Vince Finizio
to'
~C)\~
t\fI \0 ~.
G 'O~
~"'~~\~ .~
GEE, ilf. "JENSON
. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 92-213
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
DATE: July 28, 1992
RE: Technical Review Board Comments
Kidstop II
Kuoppala & Associates, P.A.
Metric Engineering Inc.
Please be advised that staff comments (Memo No. 92-182) have not
been resolved in the applicants' resubmittal. We recommend a
meeting be scheduled, with the applicant, to resolve major comments
#4 and #7. Should the comments not be resolved at this meeting,
we would then recommend that the project not be allowed to move
forward.
l l' - 1:.6:4. 6~
Vincent A. Finizio
Admin. Coord. of Engr.
VAF:WRS/ck
Note: Memorandum #92-182 stands as originally submitted.
N~O
!(,(j~ ~
~ ~,
~~\.
JUL-28-92'TUE 9:14 Kuo~~~I~
,r
A:ss.:&-oc:..
P.01
KVOPPALA & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
6204 10th AVIAlJ8 Nor1h
LAKe WORTH, FLORIDA 33463
(407) 439.fi4U
To--.cd11 (l''f hfrl,ft..pN 6~ 6'fANI4Jr.' ~
_~OO ~, 1JSo-{~ 1;tl~ ~~ ~O
l -- ::~AA~~
M re m (f))l
Dece
1~t
1'.\ P$~ :a:-
t) l~ul1"- IfA<1L.
LETTER
Subject
I) :(:. "Spor;.. (. w, 7tJ IMr5 1711?tU,l.. ASLA. c~ T1..f~
"'-U,(!~ ~U6-~A rlro6-'f. 10 !E.u,"L.JJ!r:- ~LJ'AJ-If.r.I$/S
___ /In" $Pr-01t. /f1E(G/r3 11t'z'iIOVJ'/ 7I7tC./FfC,(J.
1-)"yf.-U1t 1m tJt?, /lAf($.JrJ(j stAt< Zr ~\JI/U() hi
~ ~ jMf6t11( LINt:.
lIaNIO..~ .b:. ..I(,...c.J. .Ax"JA ~ ~ . .'''''''''"'''',.,.'''''~...''.\~~_:' ;~..,..,.~
.,' . .. f WU..CI.1:~'~
RECEIVED
JUl2 8 1992
. '-N' ...~t;
...-.........~-:. ..
j,j..... """ ' . - ...... ...... ....
" .~....~ ' .
'''4 ,...~, r'.t~
" .. ,""' ." - '
......~._d ~.'....
Il......~-:. . ' .'
1i@"l" l
\
~...
t
I
bOI-'1.t>
-~---~- -'~-~'- -----
, 1 f:,' · \\\ ~I' \ ~ \i\ \\ \
I .\ I . .' t \' \\1J. ,1\ U ·
....' ~\ . \, ,t .\Is \, \ . ,...," ~"~\,t\,,.
Ii \\ . \' I' '\' ,'I" " I
i \~\\\\ \ ',\ \\ \\1, \\ \\t\~ \ ~
\ '\ ~~\)\ - \)~1,\\)~
-'
.~
1
\
,
\\
.n
\....
~
~\
. .
1'1' .
\ ~\lh it tt1i~
'\ ~.... \~ \
i{il'lloi&\\!\ t
. \\ . \ \\,,\\\\,~\.
. in \ 1 \, 1 . \ \.
.' i\ ,Awn \\~~~\\\\~~
. . \\\ \\'\\\ ~ r\ \ \\\\\\\\\~\~\~
~ 'it ,il.~ '\\~ \ I'
'i \ \~\\\ \ ~ \ \~ ~ \ ~\\\\~\b~\1
\\~\ \' \ \', Ii \~ i\
\\~, ~\ i i\ i\ \1' \'t ....,,~\\.,\.,.1
-
#
\\
,a'
K\DSTOP \\
LOCAT\ON MAP
..
{----;'?n .~
l X )al T .
~ . AR RI~
[ ~~STATIl:~
t1" \
I~ ~..
- I~ I_E
~ ~ _.
"
\ '--'
:\ :\
::\ .
:\ ,
, ,
~ .
. :\
. ,
:\ ,
. \
, \
'. .
. ,
"
,
\
~~ I~
R4'I AA~i'
-
,
~
~
It .,.\ ~
;. ,; ~
FI i [JI
~
\
: It. ft~
.uJ"'~ ~~b'~t1~11
P \ '
" , .
/II' ,-.---
r-- ' .'" ~
. \ .
f--::....::-l r~--;,
r-!"~ ~~_:.:J.
\ T"T-'
'. t.
~~_~ -c. ~"~~ ,
~ ~j ~.l E = ,
~.uJ:t- ~~ i
~; ~.~-~
. ..t4~
2r ~ -..........J. :; <>~ T ~~'~/.;A '
~' ,_.. vrr ~ r~ ~
<<,~:d ~- t' ~ fi >__ v.>'/,.../ . ,........----1.
r;;'I ~ \, r...J= '- I - .'
l.=:J :" \~"'l'..j --- "
rj1' VA' ;:n~ ll=:; ~'---l1N: /1
~ ~,,-1 /', J1
0''' _' , -., >:c, .-.... -'- -
- t. ~f11 l-
n \\ It~/, !~~ rE;.. - ", ,/
.... fj ,:1-' ..( / ", - I
I \-f: 3 \\'\ \ \ ./'.. ~ \" ~ >j" . " :; I
;:= i:, ': \fi~ ~~\, ..::, r;,'
;;: I :....:.', ; JiiJ~-Jr(""' ....~ .......#'9 A
~I \ , ,~
V:'-~ \ - ~ I!,~l~~~'o-Zl ,'..,'1..
~,':/. ,I ( ',1'" \, _ It t" .. ~" ,/ ({
I .., · -~.. "..'
-' I ' /.' ' ~ 1 .' \
.~ =-L ~;:.,' ,'~ - - · Y NT ,.. - ,~,...... L.
. ~ _ ~" ,,,,W> _' ro .
\.. PAUK OF COMMERC'i?"" --7~'
--PlO
"MOTOROLAl. .. ~l ]) jl JI
'", _ pM" 1t\O.. B LV , · 'III
/~., ~~_ \~' .., I
,~": ~~
%
\~ ~
t l ~
-~.
.----~ -r
__ I
-1
~I
NO'"
IN
CITY
:.--
,....,..... \. ..J
- . ^ ^ ,(' .. '<.'
~.- -.... -- /'''' ~
~./'\
-
....---\ \
~
p
c
c
-
~___I~~ /'--
/ f~
i/
--I . --
......
~
-
......
~
--'
-->
.
-
.,
iili.
-
,.
~-
-"--- -- --.
...)
u,\ \:i~ :::~ 1~~\l.lm\1w"I" \-'-'t:1 -
_.~~ _.F.::
--
" I
.~
\
. . .._ ... .__ -",~..u"- ---------.---------
,
,
\
\~ ;
· J.\
~.....~~ ~ \
I
II
.'
-,
,
,
\
,
---.----- .'
- -- ---- - -- -----\
'~
l
to \
'Sit'
'l~\,
1;;')
..'" \
1 ~I
\
,
, .
I , ;.
\ j ::
~ I S
I 2
I :
I ~
I t
I ~
V
I
I
,
I
."C\t '" ..90",..... ~
_ __......---r>.-.....'....
-- - .......
~ -~ - -. -. . ~
\
\
.
i
.- - - -- .-
,.
.
,\
~ ,~
J. H .
~ s; :
i :~ \t
. it ,\
.a: !. .i t.
~ \. ..' \~
o i .,i.t ::. :
. .. - ~ is '*.. p'"
~. \\\\ \';;;.\~\\~\
o .' '1 :1!.!. .. 1::. ·
t ~ ~ ,7 ~':? \1\ \:
\i~i'Ai' \i\\
il\~'U \ U)"
\
\
\ \
\ '
\. \ 1
.0 ~ ..-'"
. ~ t~~
i ~ -l.\)
i'i1i~~.
o ~,~, :.';
... a.~:'~ ...-
.. .-
-:--_.--:
I i:' .4.._t~ :
\ i
I. g\
l~\
\ '
....
, ~\',
~~ ~
:..\~
.,'
Jl\ "
, .
\, ~
I
I~ '
, f)
'j' ~.~i
'/.'"
~.. .
~: \
I i
/1/
';At
I
i .'.
\.~ \ ,.;
\: \ \~;
\.. \ "
,.....L \
. .'
I~ '.'. ,- :.\
\ ~ ' ..
. \
\'" \
, l\
, .,
, '
'. \ . Ii
" ~
,I
. ..
,..-'..:
a'
. '
..
li/
,/'
,
, ,
.. ,,'
'i..
1'\:
. .
'! t "
\\1.//
1-. .
I
~ ...~
/ ,.."
, t~~
~;' ,- \ '
'."; i ....-r. 1 .:::
/ \ " \ .
.' ./ l"\" <.,.
,/)/
..#
" ,
I"
,.',1,
h
h
.. .
'1'
4C
i\
..~
~ '!; it
":I> __ !f
~ .. ",.
, 1 :;'"\
'::. ,,""
~ ~~..
tt'1:.l ·
~~:.1 ~r~
~tI.,,;.,.~-:~
..a.,......~~
~'i"l-::;s
!.. ~ \ t 4 ;
4~t.:\;
..~~lt..t
~l~\~i~:
. '. .. .' r. , ..
...... 'I" ... .~ ...
.'
/
%
4
..J
0..
/
,
,
~K,
1(' .,'
, ,
'" ~..
"<:~ ' ,
'\~t.',
';:1" "
, ,\ 'II
. ,.
''l\ "
'.\~ "
,,;~
"
/
:-;
\II .,
t:~
CI)~
"
'\.
0-
o
'm
o
~
"
" \
' 's.
",'" ! ...
;,,' :. ~ ~ : ~ 1
..... '!: ... .
~<2~i.~ ~ ~;.
..' .' ."
," ~ "' ~.: ~:
,--'