CORRESPONDENCE
Amoco/Mcdonalds
MDM#5179
Criteria: 25yr, 3 day Storm Event
25yr, 24hr Storm (Pg. C-I-6)
Rainfall=
12 inches
25yr, 72hr Storm (Pg. C-I-8)
Rainfall= (25yr 24hr)*1.359
= 16.31 inches
Estimating Direct Runoff Volume Qd(Pg. C-II-1):
P= Rainfall (25yr, 72hr Storm)
la= .2*S
50% of total rainfall
S=
8.154 inches
CN= 1 000/(S+1 0)
= 55.08
Qd= (P-la)^2/(P-la)+S
= 9.44 inches
Total Impervious area
Total Pervious area=
Total Area
35,583 ft^2
7,983 ft^2
43,566 ft^2
W. Avg.= 0.77
C.I.A= W. Avg*Qd*Total area
= 26435.44 ft^3
= 7.28 Acre-inches
S.F.W.M.D. Exfiltration Trench Design Length of Trench (Pg. C-V-10):
v=
W=
K=
7.28 Acre-inches
6 ft.
.0023 cfs/ft. ^2 per ft.of head
H2= 3.45 ft.
Ou= 1.83 ft.
Os= 1 ft.
L= V/(K(H2*W+2*H2*Ou-Ou^2+2H2*Os)+1.39E-4)W*Ou
= 83.27364 ft
From the above equation the required trench length is 83 feet which is less than
the 200feet shown on OR-1 (Grading Plan).
'\ "-
, "
<(', ,
~.J.'\l.-~.J
"
C I T Y
o F
BOY N TON
B E A C H
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING
AGENDA
DATE:
Monday, November 20, 1995
TIME:
7:00 P.M.
PLACE:
Boynton Beach City Hall
City Chambers
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd
1. Acknowledgement of Members and Visitors
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes
4. Communications and Announcements
5. Old Business
PUBLIC HEARING
TABLED TO NOVEMBER 20, 1995
A. Case No. 210
Location:
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Property
Owner:
Papa John's Boynton Beach
Requested
Variance:
Request for relief from Section 11.J. of
Chapter 2 - Zoning of the City of Boynton
Beach Land Development Regulations for
rear setback variance.
6 . New- Business
PUBLIC BEARING
A. Case No. 211
Location:
Southeast corner of Congress Avenue and
Woolbright Road
Property
Owner:
McDonald's/Amoco
Requested
Variance:
Request for relief from Article IV,
Section 2.D. of Chapter 21 - Sign Code of
the City of Boynton Beach Land
Development Regulations for height of
sign variance.
7. Other Business
None
8. Comments by Members
9. Adjournment
NOTICE: Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board
of Adjustment with respect to any matter considered at this meeting
will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need
-...J--.~ ;:'.Q. '). ~
1)/_, ;) cJ ~-,':",,' J-,.>,~.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-067
DATE:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~ukill' P .E., City Engineer
February 28, 1996
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MCDONALDS/AMOCO - LIGHTING
In response to the two questions in your Memo 96-098, be advised as follows:
1. Question. Can your Department cause any action to have the illumination level
reduced by virtue of non-compliance with approved plans?
Answer. Technically, no. Nothing contained within the Standard Building Code,
nor the LDR Chapters administered by the Department of Development, deals with
either glare or maximum light levels. That section of the LDR is Chapter 2,
Section 4, Paragraph N7, Page 2-13. Nonetheless, we contacted Mr. Bridgeman
prior to your memo, extracted a promise of resolution, and will follow up with him
on March 5.
2. Question. Does your Department recommend inserting maximum illumination
levels into LDR?
Answer. Conceptually yes. Realistically no. The problem is glare, which is
normally expressed in terms of brightness or intensity, not illumination.
Illumination levels are calculated based on long time maintenance factors, meaning
initial levels are usually substantially higher than maintained levels. For example,
FDOT requires a maintained level of 2 foot candles on Federal Highway, but the
fixtures proposM by FDOT actually will initially produce close to 5 foot candles -
and that is between fixtures. Illumination levels directly below fixtures would be
much higher. That, in a nutshell, is too bright. Generally speaking, City
regulations are minimums or maximums, not minimums and maximums. If you
wish, we will research glarelbrightness/intensity standards if any exist, and get back
to you. Please advise.
WVHJck
xc: Canie Parker, City Manager
Ken Hall, Plans Check Inspector/Technician
C:MCDONALD
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-098
FROM:
Bill Hukill
Development Department Dir~ctor
~~~}
Tambri J. Heyden /'$--
Planning and Zoni g Oirector
rn m F~3 m2~:: rn
ENGINEERING
TO:
DATE: February 23, 1996
SUBJECT: McDONALD'S/AMOCO - Southeast corner of Congress Avenue
and Woolbright Road
Please be advised that at the February 13, 1996, Planning and
Development Board Meeting, several Board members mentioned that
there is a glare problem caused by the lights under the Amoco gas
pump canopy at the southeast corner of Congress Avenue and
Woolbright Road. My department required that the applicant put a
note on the permit plans stating that there shall be no glare from
the lights on site as this is a violation of the performance
standards of the zoning code. I have checked the lights myself and
they are blinding, not because of direction, but due to intensity.
Two things - can your Department cause any action to have the
illumination level reduced by virtue of non-compliance with the
approved plans? If not, this may have to be handled as a zoning
code enforcement violation. Please let me know. Second, the Board
suggested amending the Parking Lot Regulations to insert a maximum
illumination level. What would you recommend?
c:McDAmoco.098
, (qU _../
1-1ft AMg'""
~ Levu /Clj)fl' .
( r;;V {eoU A, iI.r
I (}VIP
Q. /'.2.7 (q G r'- r. 'j", C""" ~ '" ~ \f\ C '=- L \~ ~ 'C. eB.. ~ OG If\, '\. 1\./ '
, '- 0'\V \ l"" \.. ~)t' . , -? "
, 7' '~c...\:;'\..-.V 4 -
.. ~ _."7 _ _ , ty\. I..: \)..:. \V ~ '- '9 ':; - U {Y '\)~~..S-.;~ f\': l> ..5 GI.j ,'-- \:.
l~~L (\'-~;;> _~'.::'" ___ r"\."""'C ",r' , ~~ L\~~-tTS' V\"J'\)\Si?- \:.H.\\JCP'(-
,- -- L :-.~ \\"7"- l 1,1" -...;..... "'- -'
W\ ,,,1_ ~ '-' ~_ ~- ~ ~R.-~ V\.\)~ ;; ~""-\.\.~~5'
-\ ,?.;::;. s:.s- I 0L.:~ '$ ~~ I\'J' ~ ~ 71- \\lV". ~- 13 (\C:l<- tJ l'lH U 5
.8>,L ~c..\r0E~2- L..\ ~\-\~r' _ HG- t ~ ~ \:::; L --=-
Rb: ~ ~~5'~Lv'b CP;~J~? ~ S~":~ I~ ;Z::iC.rJS
WI ~ " ,\~"'S"51...::::s. ~ .ILL... c~
IT H Am S....:.;J e~j7LC f+'';T\,:.3I5
Carrie Parker
Central File
.# 3CY I-"?Ou3
TJH:arw
xc:
r..:P; 't'!,,\,
,6' t Ii' \,
,!3' " ,)I
iMceon~$
!,:~;~ ~,,';':","~'~ @
McDonald's Corporation
5200 Town Center Circle
Suite 600
Boca Raton, Florida 33486
(407)391-8003
Fax: (407)750-0199
May 23, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Re: AGENT'S AGREEMENT FOR ROBERT E. BASEHART AND/OR ANNA S. COTTRELL
TO REPRESENT McDONALD'S/AMOCO, PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SEC OF
WOOLBRIGHT & CONGRESS AVENUE
Dear Ms. Heyden:
This correspondence shall confirm the authorization for Robert E. Basehart and/or Anna S.
Cottrell of Basehart & Cottrell, lnc, (BCI), to act as agent(s) and representative(s) for
development approvals to allow a drive through restaurant (McDonald's), gasoline station and
a convenience store (Amoco) on the above referenced property. This authorization is intended
to confirm that the agent(s), BCI, will prepare and submit all documentation for the required
development applications, will attend all meetings pertaining to the applications and will
represent the applicant, McDONALD'S1AMOCO, at any required public hearing, including but
not limited to, the Planning and Development Board, the Board of Adjustment and the City
Commission. As agent(s) for the referenced applicant, Robert E. Basehart and/or Anna S.
Cottrell are authorized to agree to terms and conditions which may be placed on the aforesaid
approvals.
Sincerely,
Clark W. Bridgman
Project Manager "
~r;~+v
STATE OF FL<p,RIDA &?J vb,
COUNTY OF ~ ~l
1e to"!9Pi"tl2 in~rumenl was acknowledged before me this 3Q day of ~8'{ ,1995 by
C ~(K \fJ' y") ~I\ as agent for McDonald's Corporation, d/b/a McDonald's Corporation, a
Delaware company, a H'poration duly organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, on behalf of
the corporation. -e _ is personally known to me and did take an oath.
2?hM~ ,/'{\~ 0 (}v\/)
Notary Public .::. '^^
Printed Name: ( ) yY~ct Y\ I V \eLtrS
Commission #: CGo SOIP:>5
My Commission Expires: 1 -5 - 9',
1:\WORD\AMOCO\BOYNTBCH\AGENT,Q01
.' t \,\ ~,,~r:;'"
.' \~i(J-\I'l 1.,_,,/\,5' "';"
..;.. ~'r' .......... 1; .,~,>_~
" c;) ... ~\SSlf)f/ .:v,... "'/
, ". ~~ ". e.l'/. .. ~,~
. & '\rlA' ;), r ~-<". ~
: ~ ~~ ~~~:-..J'.. ~-=:
: ~ :':.~ ~- ~ : '* ~.:
...; ',fJ ..'~... :<(,'
.:;<<~ .c._
::; -;t: .~. ,.... I" ::~ : ~ -,:
'-,0. #"'.r, 25U \ l),; . ~ '~
'~~"''-:9 .... \.;- ..t.<i::".~~.-
, ''''?l- .... ..'~ ;;,~
, , r p/ ........::..<."..'
'.!dBlle Si p. \ v, ",>
"';,',;,,;;: \\\\\\\"
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Know All Men by These Presents, that McDonald's Corporation, a corporation duly organized under the
laws of the State of Delaware, and having its principal place of business in the Village of Oak Brook, State of
Illinois, does hereby make, constitute and appoint Clark Bridgman of Boca Raton, Florida, its true and lawful
attorney, for it, and in its name, place and stead to represent McDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation or McDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF FLORIDA, INC., in any pennit, zoning or land use
application of any type for the construction or remodeling of any McDonald's Restaurant, including the authority to
sign applications and appear for McDonald's in public hearings or meetings, giving and granting to its attorney full
power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever, requisite necessary and proper to be
done in the premises, as fully. to all intents and purposes, as it might or could do, with full power of substitution
and revocation; hereby ratifying and confmning all that its attorney or his substitute, shall lawfully do. or cause to
be done, by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, McDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation has caused its
corporate name to be subscribed hereto by its Assistant Vice President this 4th day of January, 1995.
McDONALD'S CORPORATION. a
Delaware corporation
Witnessed by:
, ; / //1' / -------- / \
{- l-' -'[.1.( {L/-"<' <- ':.::.l.--
, Assistant Vice' PreSldent
/-
/
....._~...
0' .
~#:~
: L ~/; :':1'.! J ,r.
.. ' [".'1..'
STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF DUPAGE
/
f
I, Ellen L. Loess, a Notary Public in and for the couhty and state aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY. that
Michael J. Sise, Assistant Vice President of McDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation or
McDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF FLORIDA, INC.. who is personally known to me to be the same person
whose mUlle is subscribed to the foregoing instrument appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged
that he signed, sealed and delivered the said instrument as his free and voluntary act.
Given under my notarial seal. this 4th day of January, 1995.
th~/~r40~
Notary Public
Ellen L. Loess
My commission expires: May 30, 1997
/eVpowerI
r;~;::,;,~"t:3 :_~_.,(..-,:"::.j
l~
~T~
AMOCO
~I~
Amoco Petroleum Products
Florida Region
May 22, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Re: Agent"s Agreement for Robert E. Basehart to Represent Amoco Oil
Company, Pertaining to Certain Property Located at Congress Avenue
and Woolbright, Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Ms. Heyden:
The undersigned does confirm by this letter their authorization for Robert E.
Basehart of Basehart & Cottrell, Inc. (BCI), to act as representative for
development approvals to allow a drive thru restaurant (McDonald"s), gasoline
station and a convenience store (Amoco) on the above described property. This
authorization is intended to confirm that, as agents, BCI will prepare and submit
all documentation for the required development applications, that BCI will attend
all meetings pertaining to the applications, and that BCI will represent the
applicants at any required public hearings, including, but not limited to the
Planning and Development Board, the Board of Adjustment and the City
Commission. As agent for the applicants, Robert E. Basehart is authorized to
agree to terms and conditions which may be a part on these approvals.
Very truly yours,
Amoco Oil Company
~
h D. Stoll - Proje Engineer
,
~~t1J~~F 1m4iL
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 22nd day of May,
1995, by Kenneth D. Stoll who is personally known to me.
Signature of notary
Stamp:
,
MAllIA Hmmm
NOTAaY PUJLIC STATE OF FLORID
COMMlSSlON NO. CC3!l8633
MY COMMISSION EXP. OCT. ~ 19!1l!
I
FROM
f?,) \ \-. "-
I ..
L~ ,\ "\ \
\ .~.-' "'"- ..- l....-.
TO /'
--,
,
\~ ~;'0 \--\ x~ \_ ~
SUBJECT:
FOLD.
\\ \ \.' \):,.,\-.i ~ ,_ \)) I i"~ rq "-
.". I..:.,
,),_ "".,,,-, '. IV
...,..l
L-\<~ ~T
..7/1....,. I-I
.,., ,':':"-11~'
\',;, '" ~-
',--x~,
\\
i;':::<\? <." '...J '" ,~ '-
....
'..) ',,~ '..;' ...j
,--
'-- \ <.. '....
,~' \-
.~,.. .,'~\\-\' ....JV ':." !... \......... 't-\\ \ l"~-..i
',.....1 \~.. '\ (' ~2 f;' C t,) :" "(",-
""''I
'-~:. '~r' ~.-I- ' ., :, \, '...... . ...../
'-
.t'~~
. '.~ :j
.. ,.,'~ \....,
RETURN TO
REPLY
!c/t>V
('71::/
/' (". ;, '>'
,I
,. .~.t
J
DATE:
,', \..:;
DATE:
- \'." \...... \ ..~.::: t>
'-
!'"'\
1"': .\
I V ',-,,-, i'v
;~.~" .......,,0;:. ",.J.' ...;.;;,.. . ',;:-.". i ~...; \IO'~w
~.'. ---, ~......' ,." ~ - ~
;~'...._ \/ '....c <:.:.: Y ."' f\ '.. 'v '\'t~ '\ ,_ .~-)., '- '''-'''' 1"-:'
\~ :.;~ ~'"':' '""-, ~ - ~ ':C ",/ ~ ~ ~=i\t 'v \;\ (.
:-;.
...-..:.\.-.... \:_.~~ ;.~ ~.
L. ~. ,." \'-~, L
" ....c "'-
, .
:,j".\"J. -J.,;
~":ii ,_ Vi\"\- f ~ -'-'.1..
'i". --1
'J ,- '-ll '..
<; 3'; h ::i
."'.;.....>c
,---.......""""-'<
__..-J
; ~ ....-... --.. .......~~ ....- '""
:., .........; \, ''','' : i...,::, '...- ~ .i t} ",.
',~ '., ,~.,:.:
:v\<~ ~"i ,""
, ".,.. \ l<_..\.
. ;',,; , -.-., '. I ',,~
:/ ~l ~\<i~~i"ri:~
hi
. :.l., ~::. <~..-
(? ~.:::.. \,,',;;;- \'. ,:...;; ~t..:, \__~ t \; i I" L...
J \ 'F~~\
.... "\''" ~~.
,~ ~,
". "-e../) ot
"",",'~ I" "'"'.-.-J....
L;~ l~ ~) ~:., ,
'\ .
Ii ,,~ 'T) I
.-~
)
.:.-
:r \~~.
t~~..7 ))tt'""'~ \~\.- ~~ V
_n,_ 1\' --..... . \~"" ,:'.~'~~ ;:. ":::'::' <.;:,!
.~,. ". ~ ,,~. "-
", \-;,.
.\~,,~:::: .." '-..4, \'\ ~) L. <'- ~~<:::. ~';.
,~).::, \~) \ '-.,,,. \. ~ ~i 'f~,"
,'" '.\ .c
"
".f \.....
~
SIG NED
"-...
~-~. ')
~.,.'\ \:.- .' \
~. .', '1"
~...
',_:-'" ""
:/'-''(
/ // /--'
, ~./
'/?V i?(;//~' {./.,.....,< .
'7"'7<:.;4'7 !- ((;-'.5~7 I (':?- ,-..c.
/' :>:: /1-,/ 77'" E / Z/ .;>f-? c 1/..."/ -1:121/,{ 1<(...'
c:"_ .~) ?,r ',/'- c.(...... (- /".. (',:' f .~ ,'/
(.::.;/..-7'
i\
l~ 1___;./ ,~.., I.... f/ .../) -'7? '-
SIGNED
Item # F269 Grayarc, P.O. Box 2944, Hartford, CT 06104-2944
<Q Wheeler Group, Inc, 1982 PERSON ADDRESSED RETURN THIS COPY TO SENDER
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Engineering
Planning
and
Environmental
Consultants
.
4431 Embarcadero Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida
33407
May 25, 1995
Mr. Clark Bridgman
McDonald's Corporation
South Florida Region
5200 Town Center Circle
Boca Raton, Florida 33486
Re: Proposed McDonald I s/Convenience Store/Gas Station
Congress A venue at Woolbright Road
Boynton Beach, Florida
040033.02
Dear Mr. Bridgman:
As you have authorized, we have undertaken a trip generation analysis of the
vested and proposed land uses for the above referenced project located in the
southeast corner of the intersection of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road.
The comparison of trip generation is necessary to address the traffic impacts
associated with the proposed use of the property. The site is vested since the
property was occupied by 26,000 square feet of general retail on February 1,
1990 when the Countywide Traffic Performance Standards went into effect.
In 1992, the retail building was demolished and the site is presently vacant.
Even though the site is presently vacant, the traffic associated with the 26,000
square feet of retail is vested for five years subsequent to the demolition. This
letter report summarizes our evaluation.
The trip generation potential of the vested and proposed land uses are
documented in the attached tables. Table 1 presents the daily trip generation.
As can be seen in Table 1, there is a 199 trips per day reduction in the net new
external impact of the property. The daily trip reduction is approximately 12
percent. Table 2 presents the peak hour trip generation in a manner consistent
with the daily trip generation in Table 1. As can be seen in Table 2, the AM
peak hour is increased while the PM peak hour trips are reduced. The AM
peak hour increase is 69 trips. The PM peak hour reduction is 65 trips which
is a 42 percent reduction. While the AM peak hour traffic will increase, the
PM peak hour reduction is essentially equal to the AM increase. During most
.
TEL 407 845 0665
FAX 407 863 8175
Q
00(
o
P::
f-<
=
o
~
=
...lZ
gs
:::f-<
Q~
~~
Nf;l;1f;l;1
f;l;1~0
~~~
enP::
en;;;>
~g
0~
Zoo(
8~
.
en
Q
...l
00(
Z
o
Q
u
~
~-
Q) S ...
Z" "
;;,\<O
ZlI-l
~Oi
ZE:c
t;~~
ZlI-l
~-
Q) Sin
a Z v'l;
~~&1H
~
Q)
~
~
~N~
~N~
~"d"~
000.....
'" -
~M~
'" "., 0-
" ..... 00
::M~
~""=t:;;
~t'--~
000
'" '"
;;;V)~
...."'.....
li')M:::
V1c......;~
0. ' ,
l'! '" '"
3".,0
c.'" .....
0....
"., - '"
J
~
s
'"
c 8_fA
oC"O
".p.2 <<i
S C C
oo~8
:l 0 u
du~
.....
....
'"
....
0-
00
.....
on
"
on
o
'i'i
~
I
,...
,...
,...
"
....
on
o
....
'"
00
"
'"
~
'"
'"
:;
o
'"
.....
.....
"
.....
.;
o
o
o
'"
'"
's
~
"
"
"
"
....
.....
~
'"
'"
:;
~
....
'?
....
'?
lfl
'i'
00
..,
....
..,
0-
'"
.;:
f-<
;;
C
..
~
..
f;l;1
~
v
Z
;;
Z
:;
o
t!-
o
~~%
--. 0'- 0
E~~~
0......000
~~~~
~~~~
S 'C: 0\ tri N
'~~::!.-.:l-~
~~~~~
c VI VI VI
c3 ~g g g
:3000
to) 0..-............
S .... .... 'is' ti
E! & &...l <l
f-4 R R~ ~
.. 'C 'E..... 'E'"
6..... ~
~OO"""OM
~-;":Jl":
d\()"'=I"~~\O
~ i 7 ci
::E f-< H ....If...
~
~
"0
eo
C
'~
.9
~
"
-5
eo
.~
"
"0
"
tij
"3
<.>
OJ
<.>
~
C
,S!
e
"
c
"
eo
0.
'C
H
B
o
Z
~
:;
~
'Z"~'Z
"I:l "
- 0'- 0
E~~~
OOMO\
~~~~
'otT'-...... .-
C"C~M~
.9 ~ ~ ~ ~
~-.:t-.......-
~~~~~
C VI VI VI
c3 e-8 g 8
u::sooO
_ tl.- ............
IE .. .. c l:l
E! 8.. 8.....:1 c
t So a~ ~
g 'E 'S ~ 'j;
~~~1~
i 7 i ~1
~HH...:IH
II II II II
:;;rNO~
'V II') N fI')
00000000
~~~~
~~~~
c
~ ~
tii ~
" "
cUP::
.g ,g -g
~~:=~
:lg~~
Gu~1'-
AUG-07-1995 08:47
Board uf'County Commi"joJt~Q
Ken L. Foster, Chalmlan
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chaimlan
Katen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
22222222222222222
407 478 5770 P-~~/~~
County A~ini$trator
Robert Welsman
Depart:m.ent 01 Bnsl.nGGrins
and Public Works
August 4, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning and Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: MCDONALD'SjCONVENIEHCE STORE/GAS STATION
Dear Ms. Heyden:
In my letter of July 11, 1995 I reported a technical error 10 the calculations
of thQ intern~l traffic for the proposed McDonald's, conven1ence store and gas
station. The issue has been resolved. The internal rate of 27% was used. The
net new trips will be 1,491.
If you have any questio~5 regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-
4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~~~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Reg1stered Civil Enginee~
File: TPS - Mun. ~ Traffic Study R9ViQW
g:\user\dwe1sber\wp50\tps\boyn44b
@ prifll8tl rJi, ,<<""IOd IJJlIlSr'
, 'Em "klV~r"
>>An E:qualOpportunity - Affirm;)tlV~ Action r-,
Box 212Z9 West Palm Beach, Florida :3Ml6-1229 (407l 684.4000
TOTAL F.\ZJ2
DEVELOPMEft DEPARTMEHT
EHGIHEERIB8 DIVISION MEMORAHDUM RO. 95-246
TO:
Mike Haag
zoning/Site Administrator
~~Y~~Ukill, P.E.
~~gineer
July 18, 1995
MCDOHALDS/cmIGRESS & WOOLBRIGHT
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
We have reviewed Weisberg's July 11 comments on subject project and
request that you request a new traffic impact analysis from the
appl~cant. . In addition, please deter~e whether the five yea~__.__
vestl.ng perl.od has been completed. ,--
WVH/ck
C:MCDONALD
Board of County Commissioners
. .
Ken ,~. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
July 11, 1995
Mr. Bill Hukill, Director
Department of Development
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, fL 33425-0310
RE: MCDONALD'S/CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS STATION
00
JlIAI95
@
NNING AND
100 DEPT.
~
Dear Mr. Hukill:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic generation
statement for the proposed project consisting of a 2,430 square foot McDonald's
restaurant, aI, 025 square foot conveni ence store and a gas station. The
analysis compares the proposed uses to an existing use that is reported to have
been demolished in 1992. The use is reported to have been 26,000 square feet of
retail. There is a technical error in the analysis. A 37% internal rate was
used for the convenience store whereas a 27% rate should have been used. The net
new trips should be 1,532 rather than the 1,491 shown. The reduction in trips
should be 158 rather than the 199 shown.
In his letter dated June 5, 1995, Michael Haag raises two questions.
1. Will the proposed gas station, convenience store and fast food
restaurant generate more traffic than the previous request for a gas
station, 1,269 square foot convenience store and car wash?
The proposed project will generate 1,532 net daily trips. The previous
request will generate 989 net daily trips.
2. Have completed roadway improvements made the trip generation a mute
point?
The roadway improvements in the area have solved past level of service
problems. However, that does not make the traffic generated by the
rema i nder of the site a mute poi nt. Any increase in traffi c over the
vested traffic would have to address Traffic Performance Standards at the
time that it is proposed.
I should also point out that the traffic associated with the 26,000 square feet
of retail is vested only for five years from the time that it stopped being an
active retail use. This date may be earlier that the date of the demolition of
the building.
",An Equal Opportunity - Affirmiltive Action Employer"
@ prinred on 'ecycled plIpe'
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
July 11, 1995
Mr. Bill Hukill, Director
MCDONALD'S/CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS STATION
page two '
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-
4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~ ?-fr~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
cc. Tambri Heyden
Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning
~chael Haag
Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn44
-t'k
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Board of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H, Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
Department of Engineering
, ~d Public Works
August 4, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning and Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: MCDONALD~SiGONVENIENCE STORE/GAS STATION
Dear Ms. Heyden:
In my letter of July 11, 1995 I reported a technical error in the calculations
of the internal traffic for the proposed McDonald's, convenience store and gas
station. The issue has been resolved. The internal rate of 27% was used. The
net new trips will be 1,491.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-
4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~ 'Jk~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn44b
@ printed on recycled paper
"An EqualOpportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
---- ---_._------------"--~..__._-~_.,_.
Board of. County Commissioners
.
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
ill
July 11, 1995
Mr. Bill Hukill, Director
Department of Development
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: MCDONALD'S/CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS STATION
Dear Mr. Hukill:
rnm
.. J A 1995
~~
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic generation
statement for the proposed project consisting of a 2,430 square foot McDonald's
restaurant, a 1,025 square foot convenience store and a gas station. The
analysis compares the proposed uses to an existing use that is reported to have
been demolished in 1992. The use is reported to have been 26,000 square feet of
retail. There is a technical error in the analysis. A 37% internal rate was
used for the convenience store whereas a 27% rate should have been used. The net
new trips should be 1,532 rather than the 1,491 shown. The reduction in trips
should be 158 rather than the 199 shown.
In his letter dated June 5, 1995, Michael Haag raises two questions.
1. Will the proposed gas station, convenience store and fast food
restaurant generate more traffic than the previ ous request for a gas
station, 1,269 square foot convenience store and car wash?
The proposed project will generate 1,532 net daily trips. The previous
request will generate 989 net daily trips.
2. Have completed roadway improvements made the trip generation a mute
point?
The roadway improvements in the area have solved past level of service
problems. However, that does not make the traffic generated by the
remainder of the site a mute point. Any increase in traffic over the
vested traffic would have to address Traffic Performance Standards at the
time that it is proposed.
I should also point out that the traffic associated with the 26,000 square feet
of retail is vested only for five years from the time that it stopped being an
active retail use. This date may be earlier that the date of the demolition of
the building.
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on rllCyCled paper
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
July 11, 1995
Mr. Bill Hukill, Director
MCDONALD'S/CONVENIENCE STORE/GAS STATION
page two '
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-
4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~ ?-v~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
cc.~mbri Heyden
Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning
Michael Haag
Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn44
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-246
TO:
Mike Haag
zoning/Site Administrator
1~V~~Ukill, P.E.
(Jb~gineer
July 18, 1995
MCDONALDS/CORGRESS & WOOLBRIGHT
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
We have reviewed Weisberg'S July 11 comments on subject project and
request that you request a new traffic impact analysis from the
applicant. In addition, please deter~ne whether the five year
vesting period has been completed. \
\
'\
WVH/ck
C:MCDONALD
W6Jr L4,1ie ri4l2owlJlZ'-=-
/ '-:J/D <S. (.;',,,,:.(I!..H ~
C> e.c ,
I.I~NS~
".-
O-fJ//2ff;:)
~()//D
~
L4>sr- ./ 7 R- '\
L./TlL'7 /d'~L 0<./~'4:;p-'l S~LU-::~)
r;).~~-
\,\",f'~,\. s ~~\. S~~\..;\l ,,^c\-..)A~
\
\
\
\
~
.''''-.,
?
?
rr~<
f'. 10
'+~
~' Uff/
~~~
'-L:::
pJY
Q J-t ';:, \-...0, 0-\
-('<$ <: ~ \
.(:
(.;; ~r\p
s;~
'\
<;-Q ,"'y--U, ,,,-~ \
/--/~
""':\ -\ ~
00(\'" of
0.,
CJ1ie City of
'Boynton 'Beach
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beam 'Bouk:rlartf
P.o. 'B0l(310
'Boynton 'Be~1i., 7'forUla 33425-0310
City 9iaII: (407) 375-6000
1'JitX: (407) 375-6090
June 5, 1995
Mr. Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
west Palm Beach, Florida 33416-21229
Re: Traffic Statement: McDonald's/Convenience store/Gas Station
Congress Avenue at Woolbright Road
Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
We are forwarding one (1) copy of the Traffic Impact Study for the
above-referenced project for review by Palm Beach County.
Please review the attached Traffic Statement prepared by Kimley-
Horn and Associates, Inc., dated May 25, 1995, for conformity with
the County's Traffic Performance Standard Ordinance.
Please verify that the number of trips generated by the requested
conditional use approval for a gasoline station with convenience
store and drive-through/sit-down, fast food restaurant is equal to
the number of trips generated by the previous request that included
a gasoline station and convenience store with a detached car wash.
The staff I s concern is the trips dedicated to the subj ect use
versus the trips available for development of the remainder of the
site. Find attached your letter dated March 29, 1991 to
Christopher cutro which identified specific trip distribution for
the subject site. Please clarify whether the trips generated by
the subject request has limited the development of the reminder of
the site below the trips identified in your March 29, 1991 letter
or has completed road improvements in the vicinity made the trip
generation count at this location a mute point.
~merka's (jateway to tIU (julfstream
Page 2
Traffic statement
McDonald's/convenience store/Gas station
Please return comments regarding the traffic study to:
Bill Hukill, Director
Department of Development
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Please provide a copy of the comments to:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
Planning and Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Thank you for your prompt response.
_ ~~inM'zd~
M ,,~Jl E. Haag
o?ing and Site Development Administrator
MEH:dim
cc: Bill Hukill
w/attachment
Central File
..-.-.~,-,._-_._,_._-_._-----------
March 29, 1991
"\2 ~.v~-
):~ '~ I
~ SJ
t'~t'\\tl.G otYt.
County Administrator
Jan Winters
je-aw"'of. County Commissioners
,.-/. .
Karen T. Marcus, Chair
Carole Phillips, Vice Chair
Carol A. Roberts
Card J. Elmquist
Mary McCarty
Ken Foster
Maude Ford Lee
epartment of Engineering
and Public Works
Mr. Christopher Cutro
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: EXXON SITE (BOYNTON BEACH)
Dear Mr. Cutro:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study
for the project entitled Exxon Site (Bovnton Beach) pursuant to the 1990 Traffic
Performance Standards Code (Ord. No. 90-40). The project is located on the
southeast corner of Congress Avenue and Woolbrite Road. It consists of 1,431
square foot convenience store/service station with a car wash. An existing
26,000 square foot retail facility will be demolished to accommodate the project.
The County Traffic Division has determined the project meets the 1990 Traffic
Performance Standards Code of Palm Beach County.
It should be noted that there is one calculation error in the trip generation
information. The internalization rate of convenience store customers who also
buy gasoline should be 27%, not 37%. This changes the total project traffic to
989 trips. The balance of remaining trips is 729 trips.
If you have any questions regarding the determination of the County Traffic
Division, please feel free to contact Dan Weisberg at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGJNEER
$~ ~~, l=ulZ
Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E.
Director - Traffic Division
CRW:DW
File: New - TPS - Traffic Study Review
.. An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
BOX 2429 WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA B402-2429 (407) 684-4000
: prmrea on reeve/eo aaner
~ _ ..;... I I ..., , ~ -' . ;;) !. ';;j : 1 :) I"' . U 4
.;
I Kimley-Ho,n I
Klmley-Hom and Auocla18a.lnc.
ENQINEEflIS . Pl.ANHtAS . .URVEVOR8
4Ul Embarcadero Orh', Wit' Palm ...oh, florlda 33.07 .07 '.5-066' Faulmtt. 40r &13-8175
March 13. 1991
4277T.OO
Mr. Jonas Norda'
President
R. J. Development, Inc.
915 Middle River Drive, Suite 209
Fort Lauderdale, Florid. 33304
Re: Exxon Site (Boynton Beach) - Trip Generation Analysis
Dear Mr. Nordal:
Klmley-lIorn and Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide this letter documenting our
analysis of the trip BeneratioD characteristics of the proposed Exxon Service Station (to be
located at the southeast corner of Woolbright Road and Congre$S Avenue) for submittal to the
Cit)' of Boynton Beach. This analysis has been completed con,istent with the 1990 Countywide
Traffic Performance Standards and is based on the comparison of new external trips for an
existing 26,000 square foot general commercial retail (acility and the proposed construction
of an Exxon Service Station with a small convenience store and car wash.
Based on the standards of Palm Beach County. the 26,000 square feet of existing relail
is vested for 3,096 total daily trips. With a passer-by capture rale of 44,52 percent. the total
new external trips associated with the site are currently 1,718.
The proposed construction or In Exxon Service Station with a 1.431 square foot
convenience store and a car wash yields a total trip aeneration of 1,822 daily trips with a
total of 919 new external trips per day. The documentation for the reduction in new trips is
provided on the attached table and is consistent with the methodology accepted by Palm Beach
County.
In addition to the pllsser-by trafric associated with the service station and the
convenience store. there is also an element of traffic that will use both of these facilities and
the car wash. This interaction is renected io the reduction of the convenience store and car
wash traffic under the title - -Less Gas Customers.......
Based on this anolysis, the total new trips Benerated by the proposed Exxon Service
Station is less than that prGscntly vested for the site and results in a balance of 799 new daily
trips which can be used in developing the remainder of the she. while staying below the vested
threshold.
An.h.lm . ell.,lone , D.n.. . FOt'I l.IIlICHrdaI. . 'ClII1 "~e . N.tI>~II" . 0.1"'.... . ~.
"'1.'\1" . ..n 01'\10 . S1u.,t . T....p. . v..o ..."" . VI'tllnlt e.eell . W.., P.lm 1I...,n
Ildl"lI cll.nt re,'.,ton.Io'p. elnc. 11187
_ .L..; I. \..",,;
Mr. Jonas Nordal
-2-,
March 13. 1991
Should you have any questiona. please feelJree to contact me.
Vory truly yours,
IC.,IMLEY.HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
i:1;~e~
Tranaporlation Enaineer
DRR:map
Enclosures
,o.t\\
Florida ReBistrarion
Number 42700
4277TOO-JN -LOI.,Ol- t-drr.wp
_ ' 1 V I. v...
File - Exxon-
13-Mar-91
~:: :'.' 'i~!::-:T:':~.:: :: ("H:{:~~:::. ';':.:'i:l: .j!:t:t;A'1}:~~;ti~~rD~f::::E:fV:~VtE:~~'~:~O~~'~p~~'i~1E;fN.l;~tT::~~~f1.J;F1~~+t.:.:. '. ::. .. ....:.. .....
. .: ": . .':: ':. :':'" .;.~:~~.. ..' . .....~......,..~..... . .~..:':. '.::'~:. "
'. ': '.:: :.>:' :::'..::~'; :'. ~..::::'oAILY:iTAip..Ge.N~RAtidN: FOR?: .. .....:
. : '::: EXXON 'ciAS' '-SfATt6N/eA~\~A$B/CONVENIENCE STORE:.: .... ..
.. .... ...., . ,', . ... ...... .. .... .. ....... . " .,. ...
Gas StatIon:
TOlal Dally TrIps 748
.~~~.s. p.~~~~~y. (5~~) . (434)
~~TQtal>;::;'~\~~~1.~:1i"?~~:~~:~~~.;~.t~~<:~.:.~;;~.::~: ..,; .... ....": :.... ," 314
Car Wash:
Total Daily Trips 320
Less Gas Customers. '~orn Ab~ve (480/0) ... (154)
[To.taf:':~h~~:Xi.nULF~;fr?'g}:i::':::;'<.::::: :<;'.' ." . . .... .' .:. 166
Convsnlsnce $10'S:
Total Dally TrIps
Less Gas Customers from Above (37%)
.~e.~~. ~4i~~~~~Y (~~~).. ... .. ..
~,toUil :,;,::::;:;:':f::';:f/;:X: ?t.~6\?:;:: ~ : :: :.:: :...
1,269
(470)
(360)
... 'A39
.' .." ",' ,".. .' ..
. . '. '. ,. < .. '. '. '. '. :. '. ,.... """':' ..:'.....;...O:..I..".....:..~~~.::::.:::: ..:: ::: :.:: :.:~~.::::::.:..:.:.~.:.~::::;.:.:.:~ ::..... '. . : . .
Total DailY Trip GenerAtion E uars.~:.: :.:'.::.: ':.:~.:.:::..::~ :'~::~i~'::':~:: ',h:~ ::'.:'. :.::.:. .
::> '.~ .919
Vested Trips
General Retail:
Total Oaify Trips
. ~e88 Pa~.~~y. (~~~~~ J.. .. '.
:.Total : :<('..;:::.;;:::rr~::H:;':'/?:::~..:::..: .:.: .; . '. ": '. :
3,096
(1,3.78)
1,7\8
. ......... 0": ',' "T' .~ "R"":':' "....i:i.'I.:~. ".,;:::':.:: ;~~ :::..::::.::::::.~;./i .::' :....' :: ::..::
ealance otNew Jll y . ttp8. .~m~ ~U\g.':. ::~:'\~'~.: ;':~:':~::i.::;'::'O::.::~: . . . .:.
'.' 799
· Calculatod u.in. Sept. 22. 1988.nd lun. 29, 1990Ion.ul,om
Palm Beeeh County Engineering.
.__._----,----~_...
iJ1ie City of
r.Boynton ~eacft
100 T.. flJoynton flJeadi flJoukvara
P.O. f}Jo~310
f}Joynton flJeadi, 'fCorUla. 33425-0310
City 9fa{[: (407) 375-6000
'fJIX: (407) 375-6090
June 2, 1995
Robert E. Basehart and Anna Cottrell
Basehart & Cottrell, Inc.
1532 old Okeechobee Road, suite 101
West Palm Beach, Fl. 33409
RE: McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant & convenience store
Acceptance: Conditional Use Approval/New site Plan
Applicatlon & Submittal Documents
FIle No.: COUS 95-002
Dear Mr. Basehart and Ms. Cottrell,
On June 1, 1995, your submittal for conditional Use Approval/New
Site Plan application and submittal documents of the above-
referenced project was reviewed for completeness. It has been
determined that the submittal IS substantially complete and
accepted for further processIng. A Planning and Zoning Department
staff member wll1 be responsible for the review and coordination of
your application through the remainder of the review process.
The next step in the review process is for the Technical Review
Committee to review the submittal for compliance with the review
standards identified in Part III, Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 4, Site plan Review, Section 8 and all applicable sections
of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The results of the review
will be available to you on June 26, 1995.
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (407) 375-6260.
-1e2J;;~Yours ,
~~ri J. Heyden
prannIng and Zoning Director
TJH: an"
3.; .bl."C:t.::::-.H:LDon;!~.:1
~e"'::"DeU Ap:..i.: 4. ) 995
J<Imerka's gateway to tIU gulfstream
t .
~~;;:RL~
May 26, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Building & Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Re: Amoco OilIMcDonalds Joint Venture
S.E. Corner of Congress Ave. & Woolbright Rd.
Fire Flow Determination
MDM Job #5179
Dear Mr. Cavanaugh:
As per information furnished to MDM Engineering by Orlando Alonso Architects, the following
is the required fIre flow calculations for the referenced site. These calculations are based on
I.S.0. design criteria.
Construction Factor Formula: Section 310
C = 18F fA-
I 'V I
Cj = 18(0.8) ~3968
Cj = 907.03 round up to 1000 GPM
Occu.P3Jlcy Factor: Section 320
C-l = 0.75
Exposures 00 and Communication (P;)
Section 330 with tables 330A & 330B
(X + P)j = 1.0 + tn(Xj + PJ
= 1.0 + 1(.10 + .10)
= 1.2 Exposure & Communication Factor
I
Needed Fire Flow: Section 340
NFF = Co. (X + P).
I I I
= 1000 (0.75)(1.2)
= 900 GPM required fire flow for subject site
P,O, IlOX 6930. LAKELAND, FLORIDA 33807~930 ' PHONE (813) 646.9130 . FAX (813) 648-1106 . 3706 D.M.G. DRIVE, LAKEJ..AND. FLORIDA 33811
MAY.-26'9SIFRI) 10:00
AMOCO PETROLEUM PROD
TEL: 3511071
IIj,l'IJIll>.........L.luIlN IU,
_.':W::-l u d
Cl'-2087S
JUt.<:-i994 ~:]'1;:;,) ::;~, ...:......~ J d
ORB b :5 '5 ,-:. Ps '1 S.s 5
I. I.... .'".a. II all III
5i5,000.00 Dac 4,015. DO
1
Con
l'rOI)CCl:Y CUller!)! , Ull-1d-I,5-J2-00-00Q-JO'}Cl
-"- "-'--"~-"---iI.,\~iIOYMi'iiiii:iNBjiQ;.-.;ioaul!ll'SIISIi~--~--'"
SPECIAL W~RAN"Y DEED
STATE OF Fl.ORJD/\
I
I
i
K.NOW ~L-L MEN BY THESE PKfSENTS:
CC)lJN1'Y Of PALM IlSAClI
'nJAT ElliXON C:OllPOR","ION, ;1 N"w kr~~y L-orp..lfalion, hailing an ofli~e: ~l 800 tMI Slrc:ul. 1I0U.III11,
'1'1.:1.:15 77au2-7~lb. hc;r"illilflur c311cll 'Ch,:..llor: fur ii/ill in UUlllilllur~liul1 of IIIC lum CJr FfVE IIUNOaeU
SIIVEN'fY-FI\lE THOUSAND o\NO NOIlOO DOLL\RS ($573.000,00) ;wd olhClr jO<l\l allt! lIi,lllilOle:
uOII.id..r~li"'l in 'lWl puill by RPI\: ENTERPRISES OF 90YNl'ON BE...CII, INC.. a filoril.lil corponlliun, 1933
ClJluoi,,1 DrlYe, Cor~l Spril11ll'. Fll.ltwu 33071, hC:I'"il",fle:r c~II..1l 'Ot:IDI..c:,' .bel n:c.:illl u( which ii h~r.by
;",klW"''':clgc:d, dues he,...lly GRANT. BARGAIN, SEI.L. ;wi CONVEY ~1I11J Ihe ~i1iLl Grl'"..... ~ubjlrt[ 10 IlIe
l'Imhcr prlJviliull:l /;Ii lhis 0c:IJ. ~lIllial cerlaiIlIU",( or plJ'1:lrl uf lalld (III.. .P~ny") Iyill' all<l ~inll illlb.. Cily
IIi BUYRlon Beilch, CUllnl)' of Palm Be;u;b. SIAl" o( FIorillil. be:ill~ luor" particularly .wnbcd ill EiC/libil . A.
",,'!Chell berc:lo unll i/lCUtpllrah:d b"n:ID fQr all purpo...... '
Thill cOllveyAnc" il m~<l1: by GRIIIOr' aml ;U;C;C:plo:d by Gatil'''''' lubjc:cl IQ all vllli<l llJlIJ c;.iIUnIl 1I11,,,melu.t.
rialm-uf-wAY, c"lIdiljo'l:J. .:uvcmlnu. =lticlillns I'Cllllrva,ioll:l. illIll eaCllpJiuDJ IIf ra:uroJ, hll:lullulI ~II bllildina i10ll
iWllill~ "nJiuulH:cli. laws. rc:IlUlaliolllli ..ml Iellriclions b)' 1DlII1icipal I)J' olh"r l\ovcrnmcn~l ;llIlburily 'IlPlicQblc 10
Ihe Prolleny.
<\Ii l'unhe:r "'..llSill..r:llillU rur lhi:. UoDW'ilUUC:, GtilolcC, far Ilself. iu llllirs, Illllll reprll:llllUilIlVI.!ll, ~UClJc:ssor:;
illI.! .~..i!lIlS, lit a!'Plicabh:. b..re:by t..l~ al/d fOrever dLici1;Itll1:5 Grilliot. ill ,IlPRllClULQlivlIli. SIlC;Cl::lliUU &111.1
assilll\i, frUIn iII'y iIIld 1111 c;1"iIUi. 1lC:lllilIllJa, li"bililiC:S (iOl:h1l111ll1 lil11lli lID1l civil PCJ1I1hi",,) All4I &:i1I1.1i"~ oi ;lGlion ~I
I:.w O)r in .....uily illc1ullinS. whhow Ihnilatian. ;my 'I~culury ClIIG14l1 af aelioo, j!lc1udlo,l Jbc Cumprc:h..nsivc:
clI"irulIlIItlRlal RespollJl# Co)mpcDSD'juo amllillbllily ACI ~f 19110, as amo:nlled. rCEtlCI..A") ;ul<lllll: RIIlIiOllfCt
Con,c:rvluion anll tt"c......ry "'~l of 1!l76. iIli a1n,"l<1ell, ("RCI(A") file injury (illttudilllllh:iIlJlI, desuuGlion. loss af
dalllilge of any 1:11-.1 ur CUlt:l1:Il:r (U Ibe pcrSIJIl ur propc:ny Q( OrUDllltl (il1II1 iny $Ub5CQU.1l1 oW~r oi I/Jc: Prope:ny,
liS i1pplicllbl1:) i11101hc "011110)/1:1:5. iIJlcnll, idfVUIUS lUIl.I rcpr~e:lIll11i"tls oi ioch !>'lrlicl1. IIrlsinll UI.lI of ar ill rclalmll
Iu lhe: IOnvirornllllllud uonrJiliuo of 11.u I'rop.:rl)',
t\, turllie:r consIlJ"r:lliOll lor Ihis "lmvcyan&:c:. Gr:.mc:c sball be rC~jlon:libl" lur anll ,hllll L\eicrW ulIll in..Jcll1nU'y
GrilRIOr frolll arul 'ItaiJUI allY lalli, cl~illl, dama!!" ur lillbilily. 10 incllluc properly llJIma," And plOr:sunal injury and
10 j'ltlwle: ~n)' claim lIlullc lI/1lJer CEIiCl... anlI ReRA lIJJICrlcll by all)' Ilrird p:lny or 11ublic aUlllllrilY IIri&illl\ 0111
ur or in ",l~lian 10 ilny sutfuce: or sub.ur(uc:c I:ODlnlOimllioo or Ihe Propc:tly whicb !\lilY DCtur "II die PrOp"flY ailer
lhe Eni:c:,ivc DIlIIl. ulIl.~u C"Uldl.l \)y Ib" lIDlc ll"l\hscl_ 1)( Gramor, If ...,,11 prop..rcy iJwllIlI!C. p"rllllllullflJUry Ilr
10~1 ral/IIS [,.om Ihlt juinr I1cllligc:nee ot willfulmi,con<lIlO:ll.lf GriUllor ~n" Ille U'""!let I.lf Ule Propeny. Ihe ProllCny
Ol4'lIl1r'~ I.Illly of iJllI"lI1niticilll)l\ ih:dt bc: in prupanillll 10 ilS ~lIocQbll: ~bMr: Ilt juiul Ilcllli5cn'c or \Willful
milCUIlIlIA:I.
Tbe: c:olldilillll!, coVeWIIW wid ulher proviJ1iollli ...1 OUI in llJil D",,1l .Qallllc OO"CII;lOIll runJllIIJ! willi the 1l1li'"
allll $h~1I bG hinllins Upon "nil shall inllrc 10 Ih.. bene:oc ut lite: jl~rlies, lheir JIlWljdil1,.ia, i1i'i1i:lIu. 1e:'lIl
rr:p"~:llallilliyc.\l. Il..irs. :lllCtl:Ssors alw ilASi!lfl:l. I1S Bpptil:able:.
Ad valt)r"lI1 IMcs and special a:lICUmCIIII. rf ~nr. lIpil1Jl Ihe ProperlY for Ibe )le::!r ill wIlich Ibc: Efruc;lIvc
\)/11" uc:o:urs ...Ul lie pro-rille" bl:lWc:clI GliIIHot ;mll Gr:lIll"c ;u oi 'he E1Tcclive DIlIll. alw Qr~III"" bc:relJy I1:l1Ulnea
ill1Il al\rec! to pOly ~Ilm",
TO HAVE AND 1\J HOLD m., ""'!)Crll'. IU"'lher ",ill. Ihe al'puneOlaI1C"., 1:lf1~lc, uu.. iIIlLl ImCrc:lil "'Iuelt).
umo Granillo:, Omn,,"e'. SUCCl::lWrs, heits al1l.1 ~:Illil\lU, fllrever, 11IbjDClL 10 IIIIl pro"iSKlnli lIc;rcu(. anlI illlicu of aU
uIII...r wMrOllllil::i. C)tlln::os O)r Im(JIi,,". n.....lI!or lIolls hereby binll il.S1llf. iu; IIl~ors lulll lISlIil\ll5, 10 "I';lrrlllll &lOll
(orllVtlt lIcl..rW Ib" lilh: to Ill" I'rupcony umo Gralllc!:. Omnlct'. SlIcC"llSlJn, bt:irs iII1d lISai&DI. a~uitl51 CVIl!'Y IlC11l011
~11"IJ\I~""r liI..,rull)' "'lIil1lj"" ur '" claim rhe IiI/lie: Ilr allY purl Illcre:uf, b)'. IhrOllJjlI or ~ll4u Gnllllur. PW ,,'"
olberwi~lI.
I :U ,)
L..L., . ( , I
(.'/'\' '[ t j IV rl i_
/
.sWllLf\lB,JIol:
(O~/31/9Jl
u'i..r'( ( ,1l.1, Ii I
/)"'/" :"1 :i .....~i (.f.i(,'
P. 002
.!
MAY. -26' 95\PRI) 10:00
AMOCO PETROLEUM PROD
TEL:3511071
P. 003
OR8 ~::::5 C> Po:! 1 ~~. 0
Y" WITNESS WHEI~E01", OrallfClr /I:u1 ~illl1l:Lllhi. ..' I :VUlt)' 1>( };?r-~ '
1!:J~, bul ~"F6C"1'IVE lU uflbi:s 2!H dill/lit July . ..J9~. ("ErYClC:llvg 0111'").
tlR^NTOk:
-4~"'4J
"iO~
E"O
WITNDSSES:
EJOtON COItPORA TIC,,",
. .. ...
I} --' 1f\~ \ \ ('
By; ,(:\l ' , \ d. :"1._.
NulllC:./ .:r ~ f r: PI e "d. I. ~""
Tille: Vic:o PresiUC:UI
An'aT:
\. ..
... ,..
"
.'
....
ST ",'rE OF TEXI\S M
I
COUNTy OF IIARRIS ~
..Belure me II~ undcrs'lIncil 4ulburily. fhil &Jay PI:I'Solwlly lIppc..rcd r;". r 7"'/:1" :/)1t'//t",/
anu I 7..,."..., .' /-I, II . to Il~ well Mown llll&l kilOWD 10 mCl II> be a Vice PrcaidC:111 ~nd
Auur:uG Sc:cr<::lary. rCJlpclively. ut !he .;gtpur~lion IWrll:d hi fill: I'or..culnG illllrumc:lK, ;uul lhay sIlverally
;I~knD"'lcdlled 10 ~11<.1 belGte IDe IlIal 11Ie)' cXcc:uh:u gill I~llll.nclll 1>11 b"blll( of WId in Ihe lUImc: o( sDi(j
cc>tpclrw.iulI :ill sue" unlcc:u; thai U~ ~I\t ;I(U&Cd II> ~illll il\:llrull\lllll i~ Ibe l:ofJlOrale lil:lll o( illid CQr(lQr~rioll ilud
Ibar il WII:i .flilled Iherlllll by due 1lI111 rcllul~t corpl.lf;llc: ~ullwriIY; IhilL II1r;y art: duly aUlboriZlld by slIi~ lOorpor~lioll
Lo elllllOUIC J11l\" illlLl1lnlCm alld Ihal ~aid imlrullll!lll iJ; U... frll' ;u;l 1I.1tJ dcct.l of Aid corpllrmlOfl. "Tbey :Irc:
p.;r~IlI\i1I1)' Io;I1Q"'1I11> Ille lit hilV" prQdull<lLl ,,:~ ,,-"'oIJI.I,?;- ,hi" "J ;Ill
idel\lllicalion !lnu llhlfdlll nUL luA:e :111 llillJl. ·
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, J (Iilve ~(;ra:Wllo .':1 my lWl1U :illll ilI'UUl.lmy ot'fieialliClll. Ihii lhe l!"'iL.y of _
~/ n-r . 199.=L..
)
:' )1~~~ cd '4:i-
Prilll N' . ."7':...... 10-__ . . ."H"".-,,)
Ni.lIilry Public:. Stall: of Texas
My C"Il'l'llis~iQII Eltpi=: . I -I'i - 'i"7
--
. J-
SWIlI,NIJ.oI.N:
(1111/311\13)
MAY. -26' 95(FRII 10:00
AMOCO PETROLEUM PROD
TEL:3511071
P. 004
ORB .~356 P9 1 590
OUNT!.i;
arK ENTERPRISes OF ltQYNTON BEACH, INC.
WlTI'IESSB.!l :
. , .. -
./; '. ~ll'.4 t''//:'',;! ""i - ~..J
P~I"l ~'.uIO: /.:.. ok ~'f,',; ,...-/,
Sf ,.n I ,. -)
R . I...l:.~ t'=l
N~-;-~ . I-I~, .,~ ~ I i'--Y;-,r I
TIL": t'J '.~. ..!. w ,-L _
~l ~'p... ( ,...
-. 0 , . i ,
I ,f r.. I' .~...c .....
. ~ \ I K
PtUlL NI..CDa~ 'J~.t I ~~. . . , ,,, )
A ITP.'IT:
1 CfI,- ~ /
II!': --. Lt.. 7.1...... ._
"'....; I-Ir~ -. : 9=4"" 'I ~... J'f~' /
nrl.: i... I ." '10'" ~.t" J ~_I .....
F
STA1'E OP Fl.ORIPA
COUNTY OF P,r i'(,.4..l(t ,(-I,
I!elare me I/IC llDIIaUl1/!CG I\IlDQtlly. Lhi~ 01'1 ~I...n.lly 'pp:l~lI A C, I l.: I....
~ ' 10 Ule llIeU knoWII aIld Iulown 10 .. lD ta I 7~f,' '1'/ r. ~. r;
~, ~ ~-r1 f......; U1C1 f '111 r.t'-';'" I "capc:~dYcly. Di 'b~ CDtpatadDl\ Mm. in &be
forll.aiDl ' lDIll1lmelll, UId UIo:y lIl\lllr~11 Igknuwledl~ II) anlI ~t"r~ me lhal lAcy ....C11Ic:4 solid llllUUIllCDL on
bobl1/" of lAd l.D 1lI~ /l11Jll; of laid CC1rporlllOl\ .. II1II:11 um~...I: lbat Ihc ...... atrI"col '" MloI Inl\lNm_1'l1 I, dur
I:CIrpurale .II! /;Ie uld GIX1NIrlduD ~ 1Iw iI """ .flixlWllilc'C~1;I by due aud ""lulU' corp'l'Il. 11I1I1aril)': III.tlI !hey
ara duly IWlwrlzACl by ilia carporalIO" II _Ie 1;\.111 Imlr~11I5UI au.l lb.1 .alli loalINlllGAI i. Ihe Cr.. ...1 ani de.d
of laid CC1rpDrallon. TIley UI p:uoul1y kDcI\\'IIlD IDC or lllve produ~G (or. ~,ow.. \ I, ..-~......."* \(1 "'l:...~) I -
-II . ., 'i; [. u id..nllllClllIao iIIlG dllllGillIlCll qJcc un 1IIIb.
I 11"/ WITNESS WHEREOF. J 1\11Il1o IlllrcU/lUI '.1 illY IIl1l1G 4nO am~ed Tn, uffit:i;d .cal. IlIi. Ill"-dl.cM)' or_
~~~y ,h ,) . IH.!...
t'l .!/ '- (.:.
~. ~.,,:.' J,...7(--
Pilri. NIIIlIl' , ,,- L.
l'lOI&ry l'lIDUc, SUiI!: ue Plulllla
MY Comlllwlon I!.IpllC4: -, I 'i' '/
-) -
$WDLNB,dOll
(OIn'It')
MAY.-26'95(FRIIIO:01
AMOCO PETROLEUM PROD
TEL:3511071
P. 005
ORe 3356 P9 159:1
~~OTHV ~ ~ll~EN
CLERK OF mE COURf - fB (OUtHY, fl
SP'4-SQll
J:loyOlDn 1I~, Plotida
EXHI8rr 'n' "ra SPECIAl. WAJtAANTY DEED PROM
EXXON CORPORATJON TO
RFK ENTERPRISES OF BOYNTON BEACH, Il'oIC.
J 933 CulDni.a1 Drive
Cerlll Sprinll, FL ~07 J
I
(A pMrcel of land in Section 32, TQwn~hlp '45 Sauth, Range 43 ~~~t,
City of ioyntoQ Be~eh. P~lm Beach County, F1orid~. beinu mor.
plu:"ticl.llttrly dSllcribed tiel !0110tJJi:
I From tl'le Northwf:l8t eornEtr. ot Scetion 32, To...n~hip 45 Soutb, Refl"'" 43
Ellat, P_lll Bauch Counr;y, Flor-ida, said ClOCner- be'in!.l on tile celltlilt'llll0i0
ot th& 120 toot Righ~-o(-VliY of CO(lgress Avenue; thence 'r...n South
01033'24" Ec\lIt, a..long the West llne 01 said SectIon Ja, rot" a
distance ot 357,05 teet; thdnce run North 81040'08- East. along a
liria 357.QO f.~t S~uth ot aud parallel with, a~ rneasu~e4 at ~tgnt
_ngles to, the North line of ..id Section 32. for 8 discance ~r
115.36 ~~et, to th~ Point of B~91nning ot the parcel of land
herej,n8fter c1e.acribed; thence continue North 87.40'08- !:a~L, i.11unlJ
th~ l.~t d~dcribed cour~e, lor ft di~tftnce ur \82.40 Ceet; ChencB run
Suuth 01023'24' Ea.st. ttl01J\3 .. line 297.72 feec Ease of and (lit:t"21Jlel
with, ._ rn~~.ured 4~ rigbt ang1~s'co. the s~ld West line of section
32, for 8 ~ja~~~oe ,,' ~OO.OO reet; ~hence run Sou~h 87*40'08" ~.5L.
along ft line 556.97 le-etSouth of IlI\J pArallel wIth, lIa Ineolllllcoed l\t:
, right 8>>9J 8S to, the aaid North line ot Section 32, lor 8 cSilltftnct!: of
221.7S teet; ~h~nc~ run Mor~h 0\023'24" We~t. ~long 4 line 76.00 re$t
I E&st uf end parallel ~ith, 68 m.a~ured h~ right an910M to, che sald
Wast: line ot Stlction 32, tor: 0 d.i.~tal1el!l or 1&0.65 feet; 'thence run
No~th 43008'~~. &..t, for a di~tanc~ of 56.]0 teet to tbe Poip~ ~C
Soig1nning.
SWPI.NfJ ,<1,10:
[1J8I1I/!I1)
-4-
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-250
FROM:
Carrie Parker, City Manager
Robert Eichorst, Public works Director
Al Newbold, Building Division
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utllities Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Willia: ~~,~~rector of Department of Development
Tambrl J., eyden, planning & Zoning Director
June 2, 1 95
TO:
D/.I.TE :
RE:
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL/NEW SITE PLAN
1st Review Conditional Use Approval/New Site Plan
Project - McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant
Location
Southeast Corner of the intersection of
Congress Avenue and woolbright Road
Applicant - Robert E. Basehart and Anna Cottrell
File No. - COUS 95-002
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-
referenced project. Conditional Use Approval/New site Plan
approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission.
To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time
frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal
written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and
Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on June 20. 1995. Do not
return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the
amended plans (second review).
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site plan Review, Section
8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
substantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process
the project based on the review standards or the documents
show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections
should be requested by the reVlewer through the Planning and
Zoning Department.
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is
incorrectly depicted on the documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member( s) shall identify in their
comments when the plans depict or when the location and
installatlon of their departmental required improvements may
conflict with other departmental improvements.
page 2 of 2
McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and convenience Store
To: TRC Members
Re: Planning & Zoning Department Memorandum# 95-250
5. When a TRC Member finds a code detlclency that is outside of
his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code
section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review
specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward
a memo, wlthin the time frame stated above, to the Planning and
Zoning Director statlng that the plans are approved and they do
not have any comments on the plans submitted for reV1.ew and
recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director
of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the
applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer
on this memo. M1.chael E. Haag will be the Planning and Zoning
Department staff member coordinating the 1st review of the project.
The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover
letter WhlCh includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans
to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. when
the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they
will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for
review and approval.
TJH:arw
Attachment
xc: (Memo Only)
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police chief
John Guidry, Utllities Director
Central File
,.; 1.tRVMc~/2ja
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-247
TO:
Carrie Parker, City Manager
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
William Hu ~ll Djrector Department of Development
'.'-- . fhHf) Po~
Tambri J. He en, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
July 12,
SUBJECT:
Site Plan Review - 2nd Review (Conditional Use)
Project:
McDonald's/Amoco
Convenience store
Restaurant
and
Location:
S.E. corner of Congress Ave.
Woolbright
and
Applicant: RFK Enterprises of Boynton Beach, Inc.
Agents: Robert E. Basehart and Anne Cottrell
File No, : COUS 95-002
Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above
referenced project for your final review and recommendation. We
would ask that you review this amended site plan submittal to
determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments
previously made by your department.
If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met
at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning
Department in writing. If your comments have not been met, please
advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
Finally, we would ask that you include in your memorandum a
recommendation as to whether the project should be forwarded to the
Planning and Development Board for consideration. Please return
your memorandum and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning
Department by 5:00 P.M. on July 21, 1995.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel
free to call Michael E. Haag or Dan DeCarlo at Extension 6260, who
are coordinating the review of this project.
cc: (Memo Only)
Floyd Jordan
Charlie Frederick
Tom Dettman
John Guidry
a:2ndRevMem.tlcd
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-270
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and zoni,n~ D}rector
Michael E. Haa~~~
Site and zonin~velopment
June 23, 1995 '-
Administrator
TO:
DATE:
File No.:
Review - 1st Review (Conditional Use Approval)
McDonalds/Amoco Restaurant and convenience
Store
Southeast Corner of the Intersection of
Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road
Robert E. Basehart and Anna Cottrell, c/o
Basehart and Cottrell, Inc. - Agents
COUS 95-002
SUBJECT:
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Applicant:
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the Site Plan
Review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It should be
noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories; the first
category is a list of comments that identifies deficiencies from the
City's Land Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be
corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents
submitted for second (2nd) review, in order for the project to continue
through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) are
recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe
will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand
that all documents/plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review
are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/
agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the
applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request
that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the
attached letter, they should contact me as soon as possible regarding
the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for
seeking relief from the code requirement.
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. There are inconsistencies within the drawings of the submitted
plans. The building footprint shown on sheets SW-1 and A-I do
not match the building footprint shown on sheets 1 of 3, DR-1
and P-1. Correct the plans and data accordingly.
2. For clarity in determining compliance with required setbacks,
identify on the site plan (sheet SW-1) that the west side
(facing south congress Avenue) is the front of the property,
[L.D.R., Chapter 2, Section 11. L. 3. e.)
3. Specify on the site plan the degree proposed for the diagonal
parking spaces shown along the east property line. The width
of the access aisle for these parking spaces is shown as 19'-
1" . The minimum aisle width allowed for one-way sixty (600)
degree parking spaces is 19'-8". The minimum width required
for an access aisle for one-way or two-way ninety (900) degree
parking spaces is 27'-0". Show and dimension on the site plan
the appropriate width access aisles for the diagonal and 90%
parking spaces. The dimensions shall be in compliance with
City standards. [City standard drawing B-90013]
4. Identify with a note on the site plan, the paving and the
drainage plan, and on the landscape plan, the location of the
required curbing. Also specify the type of curbing.
Correct the inconsistencies between the plans regarding the
location of the curbing. [L. D. R., Chapter 23, Article II,
Section E.]
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-270
Site Plan Review - 1st Review
McDonalds/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store
COUS 95-002
5. To avoid a conflict regarding the location of landscape
material and proposed or existing site improvements such as
easements, overhead utility lines, site lighting poles, fire
hydrants, drainage structures and other site appurtenances,
show and label on the landscape plan these improvements, where
applicable. specify on the site plan the overall height of
the proposed site lighting poles.
6. Dimension on the site plan the inside clear opening width of
the dumpster enclosure. Note the minimum, inside dimension
(including gate and gate hardware) is 10' -0". Add to the
drawings the height of the dumpster enclosure and a note
specifying the type of material proposed for the walls and
gates, including the color by name, color number and
manufacturer's name of the material. Note the wall material
shall be concrete block stuccoed on both sides. Specify same
on the plans. [L.D.R., Chapter 9, Section 10. C. and Chapter
7.5, Article II, Section 5. J.)
7. On the site plan dimension the narrowest width of the
landscape island at the "clip corner" intersection of Congress
Avenue and woolbright Road. Note minimum width allowed is
10'-0". [L.D.R., Chapter 2, Section 11. L. 3. f.)
8. Modify landscape notes #2 and #8 found on sheet 1 of 3 as
follows:
#2) "Fifty (50%) percent of the total number of required
trees and hedges shall be a native specie."
#8) "All landscape areas shall be provided with an automatic
irrigation water supply system."
Add the following as note #10:
Code required vehicle use area hedge screening material shall
be installed to form a continuous visual screen/barrier.
[L.D.R., Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5. B., Section 5. C.
3 and comprehensive Plan Policy 4.4.6.)
9. Modify landscape notes #1, #2, #11 and #22 found on sheet
titled "Landscape & Irrigation Specifications" as follows:
#1. Contractor should make his own take off to eliminate
discrepancies, in case they occur, on center spacinG of
material shall take precedence over quantities of
material identified on the plan.
#2. Exact location of plant material may vary slightly,
coordinate field location with the City of Boynton Beach
landscape inspector and other trades prior to
commencement of work.
#11. Landscape architect and the Citv of Boynton Beach shall
be notified of any, etc....
#22. Substitution: All plant substitutions shall be approved
by the City of Boynton Beach, plant substitution
requests, for plant material, etc....
Page 3
Memorandum No. 95-270
Site Plan Review - 1st Review
McDonalds/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store
COUS 95-002
10. Remove the asterisk from the two landscape symbols located
near the building; these materials are not required landscape
materials.
11. The landscape plan sheet 1 of 3 does not depict all of the
proposed site amenities such as parking spaces and loading
zone. Correct plans accordingly.
12. Show and dimension on the landscape plan the safe sight
triangles required by the zoning code and landscape code. The
safe sight corners are required on both sides of all ingress/
egresses and at the intersection of Woolbright Road and
Congress Avenue. Also specify in note form the unobstructed,
cross visibility space required wi thin the line-of-sight
triangles. [L.D.R., Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5. H,].
13. On the site plan show the traffic control markings and signage
that depict the traffic flow (one-way or two-way) for the
portion of the site west of the building. [L.D.R., Chapter
23, Article II, Section B. 1. and 2.]
14. On the site plan dimension the appropriate width (one-way or
two-way) access aisles around the perimeter of the pump
islands, exclusive of the area where vehicles are parked to
receive the services offered at the pump island (see comment
#30). [L.D.R., Chapter 23, Article II, Section I. and City
Standard drawing B-90013]
15. On the architectural plans for the elevations of the canopy
and building, identify the color of all exterior materials
shown by stating the color name, color number or designation
and manufacturer's name. submit color samples matching the
colors identified on the plans and the colored elevation
drawings matching the colors identified on the plans.
[L.D.R., Chapter 9, Section 5.]
16. On the site plan show and dimension the width of the building
overhang. Also specify the distan~e from each property line
to the leading edge of the building overhang. Ensure that the
required setbacks are maintained. [L.D.R., Chapter 2, Section
11. L. 3. e.]
17. Show on the site plan and elevation view drawings the location
and size of the mechanical equipment proposed to be attached
to the building or placed on the site, such as, lift station
and roof top mechanical equipment. Also show on the
appropriate plan the type, size, spacing and color of the
material required to screen the equipment. [L.D.R., Chapter
9, Section 11. E.]
18. To properly evaluate the required number of parking spaces for
the subject property, add to the floor plan the total number
of seats requested for the restaurant. Also, add the code
required computations for calculating parking spaces by using
seats to the parking data found on the site plan. [L.D.R.,
Chapter 2, Section 11. H. 16. d. (1)]
19. Submit for review a larger scale section drawing of the edge
of the canopy. The scaled and dimensioned drawing shall show
the requested improvements for the face and underside of the
canopy.
Page 4
Memorandum No. 95-270
Site Plan Review - 1st Review
McDonalds/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store
COUS 95-002
20. Remove the light beams shown on the mansard roof.
Chapter 9, Section 10. F. 5. and 6.]
[L.D.R. ,
21. To properly evaluate the proposed signage for compliance with
the Community Design Plan (L.D.R., Chapter 9, Section 10. I.)
add a symbol to the 8 1/2" by 11" sign drawings that links the
sign drawing to the full size site plan and/or elevation view
drawings of the building or canopy. Specify on the full size
drawings the proposed colors of the signage by color name,
color designation and manufacturer's name, including colors
proposed for sign structures. Note: signage colors are
limi ted to two (2) colors in addition to white and black.
Correct the plans accordingly. [L.D.R., Chapter 9, Section
10. 1. 3.]
22. Provide computations and documentation to verify compliance
with L.D.R., Chapter 9, Section 10. I. 2. 4, and 8. sign
regulations.
23. The survey by R. L. Vaught & Assoc. Inc. dated 5-19-95 reveals
an area on the southwest side of the property as a 10'-0" x
24'-0" cross access easement. There is a conflict between the
location of this easement and the proposed loading zone and
parking spaces. Provide for review the cross access easement
document. Show and label on the site plan the easement.
Amend the plans to omit the conflict between the location of
the easement with regard to the location of the loading zone
and parking spaces or request abandonment of the easement.
24. An approved environmental permit is required for the Service
Station, retail sale of gasoline, prior to occupying the
building. [L.D.R., Chapter 2, Section 6. C. lB.]
25. The traffic impact study prepared by Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc., dated May 25, 1995, has been forwarded to
the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for review.
26. Please be advised that the property dimensions as shown on the
"Boundary Survey dated May 19,1995, drawn by R. L. Vaught and
Associates, Inc." do not match the boundary dimensions of
subject property as shown on the Palm Beach County Tax Map.
Contact the Engineering Division of the Development Department
regarding the procedures to follow in subdividing land.
Please clarify the discrepancy.
27. Show on the site plan distance of not less than one hundred
ten (110) feet from the west edge of the driveway located on
Woolbright Road to the intersection of Congress Avenue.
Ensure that the minimum distance the driveway is located from
the interior property line is not less than thirty (30) feet.
[L.D.R., Chapter 2, section 11. L. 3. d. (1) and (3)]
II RECOMMENDATIONS
28. It is recommended that a sign be posted at the loading zone
area and the sign read as follows:
No Parking - Authorized Vehicles Only
29. It is recommended that the exterior material and color of the
cooler/freezer area and dumpster enclosure match the material
and color of the walls of the building.
Page 5
Memorandum No. 95-270
Site Plan Review - 1st Review
McDonalds/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store
COUS 95-002
30. It is recommended that an area on the site plan be delineated
that indicates the space where vehicles could park while
receiving the services offered at the pump island. The
location of this area is adjacent to the pump island and the
size of this area should be as follows: nine (9) feet wide
and thirty-six (36) feet long, with the center of the 36 feet
located at the center of the pump island.
31. Upon review of the submitted plans, it has been determined
that the "future island" as shown, will require the site
layout to be amended, as the area shown south of the "future
island" will not comply with site regulations for access aisle
width. A "Loading Zone" or space where vehicles park at a
pump island cannot be impacted by vehicles transversing the
property. The minimum dimension required between the leading
edge of the south side of the pump island curbing and the
south side of the space where a vehicle receives services
offered at the pump island shall be no less than nine (9) feet
and the distance from the leading edge of north side of the
twelve (12) foot wide "Loading Zone" to the south edge of the
space where a vehicle parks at the pump island shall be no
less than twelve (12) feet. The twelve (12) feet dimension
will allow one-way traffic. If you are going to maintain the
above dimensions, indicate on the site plan the dimensions and
identify the direction you wish the traffic to flow. A
solution to a dimensional problem may be to specify on the
plans that there are no pumps on the south side of the "future
island".
32. It is recommended that the site plan show a dimension of no
less than one hundred and eleven (111) feet between the west
side of the sidewalk, located on the west side of the building
and the west property line of the subject property. This
recommendation is with respect to an area, of adequate size,
needed for vehicles using the services provided at the pump
island. The 111 feet shall be divided and dimensioned as
follows: Starting from the west side of the sidewalk at the
west side of the building - the length of the parking space
shall be 18 feet, the width of the access aisle (back-up
space) shall be 27 feet. Maintain a distance of 18 feet from
the west edge of the 27 feet access aisle to the center of the
pump island and a distance of 18 feet from the center of the
pump island to the east side of the access aisle located on
the west side of the pump island. Show 20 feet for a two-way
access aisle and 10 feet for the required width of the
landscape strip along the property line. The 20 feet wide
access aisle will allow two-way traffic flow. If you are
desiring one-way traffic flow in this area, the minimum one-
way access aisle width is 12 feet.
33. It is recommended that the visual barrier required to screen
the roof top equipment match the color and type of material of
the exterior surface closest to the equipment as viewed from
ground level.
/'
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-196
DATE: June 20, 1995
TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR.
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-628~
SUBJECT: McDONALDS/AMOCO RESTAURANT SITE PLAN - 1ST REVIEW
The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review. If any of the code
comments disallow the applicant to develop the site as submitted, the applicant may request a
variance thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter one, Article one, Section eleven
of the city's Land Development Regulations.
All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: Site lighting, Paving,
Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from
agencies such as the F.D.O.T., P.B. County, S.F.W.M.D., and any other permitting agency shall
be included with your permit request.
COMMENTS
I. North driveway should meet the 110' minimum distance from the intersecting R/W line.
Chapter 2, Section 11 L, 3d.
2. Landscaped areas (islands) shall have a minimum width of five feet. Chap. 7.5, Art. II,
Sect. 5G.
3. Standard parking striping on concrete shall be black. Chap. 23, Art. II, L.
4. Clear visability note should include city's standard regarding horizontal control. Chap.7.5,
Art. II, Sect. 5H2.
5. Show sidewalk thru driveways on landscape plan to reflect city standard. Chap. 23,
Art. II P.
6. NOTE: County permits will be required to work within both intersecting roadways.
The county will soon let the plans to six-lane Woolbright Rd. from Congress Ave. eastward.
Applicant should contact the project engineer to correlate construction of intersection and this
project. The project engineer is Javier Lopez, 407-684-4] 50.
7. Provide a traffic impact analysis ifthe site meets city criteria (single directional trips per day:
250 in a one hour period or 3,000 per day). Chap 23, Art. I, Sect. 5B 14.
McDonald's! Amoco site plan comments/recommendations continued, page two.
8. Top of exfiltration trench shall be a minimum of one foot below base material. City standard
drawing B-91007. Use ofP.V.C. pipes in lieu of perforated CMP to be approved by city
engmeer.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Consider relocating menu board further east and also straighten drive thru aisle to eliminate
"S" curve. This should provide easier access to menu board and a longer stacking lane.
H would also provide an opportunity for additional landscaping next to building.
2. Consider locating the west driveway another 20 feet to the south. You would still retain the
parking stalls along the south property line and provide a "straight path" to the McDonald's
drive-thru. Also, it will allow an additional vehicle to "stack" in the dedicated right turn lane
before your ingress lane becomes blocked.
3. Consider relocating the two H!C stalls in front of the store entrance for a little closer
accessibility.
4. Consider using a pavement sign within the yellow striping of the loading zone stating,
" NO PARKING - LOADING ZONE".
5. Consider extending the sidewalk along both sides of building an additional two feet to create
a continuous wheel stop. This eliminates possible tripping hazard from individual wheel stops
and their maintenance, and provides a more esthetic appearance.
KRH/krh
C: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file
Page 6
Memorandum No. 95-270
Site Plan Review - 1st Review
McDonalds/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store
COUS 95-002
34. It is recommended that the pick-up window, pay window, menu
board, speaker and directional sign be shifted approximately
twelve (12) feet in a counter-clockwise direction around the
building. The relocation of these features will allow the
drive-through lane to be straightened out and constructed
parallel with the south property line. After relocating the
loading zone towards the west, and relocating the parking
spaces from the southwest area of the site to the west side of
the building in the area vacated by straightening out the
drive-through lane, and revising the location of the building
and site features at the drive-through area, the vehicle
capacity of the drive-through will not be reduced. However,
the changes will allow a more direct access to the drive-
through lane from both ingresses to the site.
MEH:arw
.'1.tMcDon.270/~.C
".
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-169
I/o] fl @ fl a WI fl ,fn)
IiIJ JUN - 7 /9!1j ~I
June 6, 1995
To:
Tarnbri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Conditional Use Approval/New Site Plan
McDonald"s/Amoco Restaurant
Southeast corner of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road
Re:
After reviewing the plans for the above subject project, the
Building Division supports the approval of the conditional use.
However, we offer the following comments that must be addressed
on the Site Plan before final approval of the Site Plan:
1. Show pedestrian access from the public right-of-way to
the building entrance, per State Handicap Code.
2. The proposed 87.5 Sq. Ft. free-standing sign exceeds
the maximum limit of 64 Sq. Ft.
3. For directional signs, maximum is 4 Sq. Ft. and 5 Ft.
high (from ground to top of sign). The maximum number
is 4 and no logo is allowed. They should be located at
points of the parking lot ingress and egress.
4. The total sum of all wall signs, including the
McDonald's sign on the roof, cannot exceed 1 1/2 times
the width of the building where the main entrance is
located.
5. The proposed x 42.10 Sq. Ft. Menu Sign exceeds the
maximum 25 Sq. Ft. Menu signs may not exceed 5 Ft. in
height above the ground.
6.
The under canopy sign maximum is 3 Sq. Ft.
Location of each sign must be clearly noted on the
plans and the square footage of each indicated. All
wall signs, McDonald's signs and Food Shop Signs should
comply with #4 above.
Site lighting shall comply with the Security Code in
addition to the Parkign Lot Code requirements.
7.
8.
AN:mh
~~
Al ewbold
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
A:McD-AMO,TRC
IfDJ m & U \YI m ,fn]
Inl .Jt!'I - 6 ~ l!!l
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-85
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.'
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ:
New Site Plan - McDonald's/ Amoco Restaurant
DATE:
June 5, 1995
The loading zone and future island with canopy at the above site will block the entrance to
dumpster location.
If you have any questions I can be reached at 375-6201 from 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM, Monday thru
Friday.
~
Public Works Director
RE/cr
BASEHART & COTTRELL, INC.
PLANNERS
1532 Old Okeechobee Road, Suite 101
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
(407) 688-0048 FAX (407) 688-2009
July 28, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Planning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Becah, FL 33425-0310
Attn: Dan DeCarlo, Associate Planner
RE: RESUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR MC DONALD'S
AND AMOCO
Dear Dan:
On July 27 we submitted revised plans for the combined McDonald's/Amoco facility, proposed for
development at the southeast corner of the intersection of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road. The
twelve sets of revised plans, consisting of the survey, site plan, landscape plan, architectural elevations
and preliminary engineering plan, indicate a fifth pump island for the Amoco, to be constructed at an
undetermined time in the future. As you know, the future pump island was proposed with our original
submittal, but omitted on our second submittal for the site plan approval application. Amoco has
determined that the future pump island is critical to their interest in the site.
As we discussed at our meeting this week, this latest site plan incorporates all of the changes
recommended by the staff in the written comments and at the TRC meeting. All of the staffs
concerns regarding the location of the driveways and the pump islands have been addressed in the new
site plan.
You asked us to review the application submitted, and determine whether the new site plan requires
changes in the application. We have done so, and have made very minor changes in the data
summary regarding the total pervious area and total impervious area. All other information on the
data summary, including building square footage and parking, is identical to that submitted with our
previous plan.
Please accept our thanks for your cooperation and assistance in completing our application in
anticipation of the August 8 Planning and Development Board meeting. Please feel free to call if you
need any further information.
Anna Cottrell, AICP
Principal
. .,,, .-,--..~--.-- ,-
~'::~'- ~- Ii';~[;:i-~'-':':j c:, ;'f\ ".
"r') 'OJ ",'l '0' ", _...~.,.-ll"
\_ '; j ... .....~~,.........._.~~.<"...,..- - ~ 1 ~ i
\ ~~ I'UG 2 1995 : ~
,
PLANNING AND -J..
ZONING DEPT.
Sincerely,
~
fJJie City of
tJ3oynton tJ3eacli
faften+in i
to{1ttt
/:DOf/l'
100 'E. flJoynton flJuu:!i flJoulevartf
P.O. 'Boi( 310
'Boynton 'BetU!i,:FfmUia 33425-0310
City :J{Il11: (407) 375-6()()()
:FJU: (407) 375-6090
June 26, 1995
Robert E. Basehart and Anna Cottrell
Basehart and Cottrell, Inc.
1532 Old Okeechobee Road, Suite 101
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
RE: Initial Review Comments
Convenience store
File No. COUS 95-002
McDonald/Amoco Restuar~rit and
Dear Mr. Basehart and Ms. Cottrell:
The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the
documents submitted for the above-referenced proj ect. Attached are
comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial
review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and
documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90
days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not
submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.)
When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not
applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed
separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the
comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment
stating why the comment is not applicable and return the
explanation with the amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12)
complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and
Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been
submi tted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be
distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and
recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial
(see attached meeting schedule). A recommendation for denial will
be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on
the resubmitted plans.
We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and
a checklist that contains information regarding the second
submission of the plans and documents for review.
JlmeTUas (jateway to tfU CJuifstream
Page 2
McDonalds/Amoco Retaurant and Convenience store
Initial Review Comments
If you should have any questions regarding the comments or the
approval schedule, please feel free to call Michael E. Haag, who is
coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and
Zoning Department.
Very truly yours,
~~fl4
~IZ.
a ri J. Heyden
P nning and Zoning Director
,
, {
"'t
TJH:dim
Atts.
A,18tCoIILtr.M8C
CHECKLIST
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that
the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for
review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will
enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the
Planning and Zoning Department.
Project Name: McDonalds/Amoco Retaurant and Convenience store (File No. COUS
95-002)
1. Submit an amended Site plan Review/Conditional Use application form that
reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans
and documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical
Review Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a
distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a
completed new form with the changes identified. If there are, no changes
required to be documented on the application form, a lett~r from the
applicant stating same must be turned in with the amende~~ubmittal.
2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents,
including surveys that show compliance with the Code of ordinances and
comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets
shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the
designer responsible for the drawing(s). Plans and documents. shall be
assembled in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of
the project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet
numerically numbered such as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of
3.
3. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain
in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are
located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property.
The minimum size is 5" by 7". Each photograph shall be labeled to
identify the location of the existing structures with respect to the
location of the proposed project.
4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all
drawings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and
signage associated with the project. The colored elevation views shall
match the elevations shown in the documents that were submitted for site
plan review. The applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall
be colored with the color name and associated color reference number
identified. The type of exterior surface material shall be identified
next to the associated color. The colored elevation drawings shall have
compass direction or title of the side of the building identified. The
title block of the original drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is
24" by 36". Do not submit on board of any kind.
5. submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample
shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name and
numerical/letter code from an established color chart.
6. Submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to
be used on an overhead projector at board meetings.
1995 REVIEW SCHEDULE
SECOND HALF
SITE PLAN REVIEW AND
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
. [
*PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
*
ORIGINAL AMENDED CITY COMM REDEV
SUBMITTAL PLANS *C.R.A.B. P&D COMMISSION AGENCY
DEADLINE DEADLINE MEETING MEETING MEETING ,& MEETING
May 30 ~Ul iY ~ 0g 0:9 ~
Jun 29 Aug 11 Sep 11 Sep 12 Sep 19
Jul 28 Sep 11 Oct 09 Oct 10 Oct 17
Sep 01 Oct 13 Nav 13 Nav 14 Nav 21
Sep 28 Nav 09 Dee 11 Dee 12 Dee 19
Oct 23 Dee 06 Jan 08, '96 Jan 09, ' 96 Jan 16, ' 96
NOTE: (1) TO FACILITATE THE PROCESSING OF THE REQUEST, IT IS RECOMMENDED
THAT THE APPLICANT SET-UP, BY APPOINTMENT, A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WITH THE
DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT (407) 375-6260 PRIOR TO THE
SUBMITTAL DEADLINE DATE. THE MEETING WILL ADDRESS CONCERNS REGARDING THE
TYPE OF SUBMITTAL, BOARD REVIEW SCHEDULE, SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES, FEE,
APPLICATION FORM, AND TYPE AND NUMBER OF PLANS/DOCUMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
BE SUBMITTED.
(2) IF A SUBMITTAL IS RECEIVED BY THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE
DATE AND WITHIN TWO (2) WORKING DAYS FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL
DEADLINE, THE SUBMITTAL IS DETERMINED ACCEPTABLE FOR PROCESSING, THE
SUBMITTAL WILL FOLLOW THE APPROVAL SCHEDULE IDENTIFIED ABOVE. HOWEVER, IT
SHALL BE NOTED THAT THE AMENDED PLANS DEADLINE DATE ALLOCATES ONLY TEN (10)
WORKING DAYS FOR THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE
PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY WITH THE TRC COMMENTS GENERATED FROM
THE REVIEW OF THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS. TO KEEP THE REVIEW PROCESS
ON SCHEDULE THE AMENDED PLANS DEADLINE DATE IS STRICTLY ENFORCED. IT SHALL
ALSO BE NOTED, THAT PRIOR TO A PROJECT BEING RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT, AND BEING PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD, THE PROJECT
SHALL BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE.
(3) APPLICATIONS WHICH REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF A TRAFFIC IMPACT
ANALYSIS, PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE OF PALM BEACH
COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW
TIME. NOTE: REFER QUESTIONS REGARDING TRAFFIC TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT.
(4) THE ABOVE DATES MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
a:95rev2hf.sch
--
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 95-190
TO: Tambri 1. Heyden,
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: ~ John A. Guidry, ?
Director of Utilities
Date: June 8, 1995
SUBJECT: McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant,
New Site Plan First Review
Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
1. Plans show several water meter locations. Please clarify or specify meter
sizes proposed, (Sec. 26. 16(c)).
2. A Capacity Reservation Fee will be required within thirty (30) days of
City Commission approval, or upon request for my signature on the HRSIDEP
permit applications. The fee amount will be determined based upon meter
size or expected demand, (Sec. 26-34 [ED.
3. Please relocate the proposed water meter llml wet lap to a position near the
proposed fire hydrant.
4. Final location of the proposed fire hydrant should be coordinated with the City
Fire Department.
5. Please show location of proposed force main and connection to existing utilities,
(Sec. 26.33(a)).
6. Palm Beach Health Department permit will be required, (Sec. 26.12).
7. City water will not be supplied for irrigation, (City Compo Plan, Policy 3C.3.4).
8. A reduced pressure zone backflow preventor will be required for each water
meter, (Sec. 26.107).
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, plcllse contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404,
sm
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
STA TEMENT OF USE AND JUSTIFICA nON
PROPOSED McDONALD'S AND AMOCO STATION ON PROPERTY AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WOOLBRIGHT ROAD AND
CONGRESS AVENUE
The Petitioner, McDonald's Corporation, requests by this application approval of two conditional
uses, being a convenience store/gasoline station and a fast food restaurant with drive-thru service,
in order to construct a new facility on property located at the southeast corner of the intersection
of Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue. Proposed is a 3,431.91 square foot facility that will
be occupied by both McDonald's and Amoco.
The subject site, which is 43,570 square feet, is currently vacant.
The facility proposed is a new type of convenience market oriented toward both the traveling
public and residents and businesses in the area. The facility will be comprised of a 2,378.40
square foot fast food restaurant and a 1,053.51 square foot convenience store/gasoline station,
without major repairs, in one single story building. The convenience store/gasoline station will
offer the retail sale of gasoline.
The site plan accompanying this application details the site development for the facility. Access
to the site is via one full-directional driveway on Congress A venue and one driveway on
Woolbright Road which allows right turn in and out only. Five pump islands (includes one
future) are proposed for the Amoco station. A total of 30 parking spaces will be provided.
The use and site development proposed is entirely consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zoning Code. The proposed facility meets aH
of the standards for evaluating conditional uses, as follows:
1) Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures is adequate. As indicated
on the site development plan, both pedestrian and vehicular circulation is functional, safe and
convenient, and accommodates appropriate traffic flow and control in case of emergency.
2) Off-street parking has been provided consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code.
The required loading area has been provided.
The parking and vehicular circulation areas of the site have been designed to minimize glare and
noise, and to contain such on the site. Odors from the operation of the two businesses will be
contained also, so there will be no adverse impact on adjacent properties.
3) Care has been taken in the design of the site to locate refuse and service areas in areas that
offer the least impact on adjacent properties. The dumpster area will be screened, as required.
4) Utilities are available to service the development at the site. All utility demands from the
proposed facility have been evaluated, and it has been determined that there will be no demand
placed on public facilities or services that cannot be met while maintaining mandated levels of
service standards.
5) The screening, buffering and landscaping proposed for the site is detailed on the site and
landscape plans accompanying this application. The screening and landscaping proposed meets,
or exceeds, code requirements in all respects, and provides the functional buffering required. The
landscaping at the site will consist of a mixture of native and ornamental canopy trees, palms and
hedge material, selected to provide a variety of color and enhancement to the building and site.
The landscape plan is compatible with other development in the area.. The palette selected will
provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance for the site, in harmony with other developed sites
in the area.
6) There is one freestanding pole sign proposed for the facility, to be located at the northeast
corner of the site. The sign will be 20' in height with the McDonald's and Amoco corporate
logos, and the gasoline prices. There will be signage on the walls and canopies of the store.
The signs, and exterior lighting, have been designed so that there is no impact on traffic safety,
for either users of the facility or passersby.
The signs are compatible with other signs along the Woolbright Road corridor, and are within
the limits of the Code.
7) The site plan proposed meets all required setbacks, and contains the minimum required open
space.
8) The use and site development proposed are entirely compatible with the development of
adjacent sites and other properties in the same zoning district. The use and site development are
in harmony with the established character of the area.
9) The proposed facility is a one-story building, approximately 16.92 feet high. The building
height is well below that allowed by the code for this area. The heigbt proposed is in harmony
with the buildings in the immediate area, and consistent with the established character of the area.
10) The site development will generate a positive economic benefit to the City. Development
of the site will move the property from vacant to improved commercial on the tax rolls, The
operation of the McDonald's will provide revenue from sales taxes, and the Amoco will generate
both sales and gas taxes.
11) This submittal is consistent with the requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in
Chapter 19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
12) The proposed site development is in compliance with all performance standards, as outlined
in Section 4 of the Zoning Code, including that which applies to the abatement of nuisances and
hazards and noise controls.
The use and site development proposed wiJl generate no adverse impact on established land uses
in the area. The use and site development are consistent, and entirely compatible, with existing
uses immediately adjacent to the subject site and in the surrounding area.
The site is located within the strip commercial area located on either side of the Woolbright Road
corridor. To the north of the subject site, across Woolbright Road is an office building. To the
east of the site is a bank. To the south of the site is a vacant parcel, separating the subject from
the residential south. To the west of the site are offices known as Woolbright Plaza.
The use proposed meets all of the performance standards imposed, including the Countywide
Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. There will be no adverse impact on the City's ability
to provide the facility with public services, and no reduction in mandated levels of service
standards.
OS/22/95 MON 16:02 FAX 40 '50 0199
McDonald's Corpor "ion
[4] 002
McDonald'S
.
McDonald'$ Corporation
5200 Town Center Circle
Suite 600
Boca Raton, Florida 33486
(407)3g1-8003
Fax: (407)750-0199
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The undersigned does confirm by this letter hislher authorization for McDonald's
Corporation (MeD) and/or Amoco Oil Company (AOC) to act as representative (s) for
development approvals to allow a drive thru restaurant (McDonald's), gasoline station
(Amoco) and a convenience store on the above descn'bed property. This authorization is
intended to confirm that, as agents, McD and/or AOC will prepare and submit all
documentation for the required development applications, attend all meetings pertaining to
the applications, and will represent the applications at any required public hearings,
including, but not limited to, the Planning and Development Board, the Board of
Adjustment, City Conunission, and any permitting agency relative to the development of
the referenced parcel. As agent(s) for the applications, McD amI/or AOC are authorized
to agree to terms and conditions which may be placed on the approval of the aforesaid
applications.
Very truly yours,
~ ;q. !~
Greta Koppel
President
RFK Enterprises of Boynton Beach, Inc.
STATEOF~ ,4
COUNTYOF~W~
The foregoing instrnment was acknowledged before me this ~t, day of Jd.", "95, by
who is personally known to me, or who ~ed
idcntif'lC . n and who did/did not take an oath.
Signature of Notary:
Serial Number:
NOTARY SEAL
~L
MAmA HUMENYJ
NDl'AaY PUBLIC STATE OF FLO~If)A
CDAII9SION NO. CC3986.1,
EXP, OCT. 23 1~..., I
May 23, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Re: AGENT'S AGREEMENT FOR ROBERT E. BASEHART AND/OR ANNA S. COTTRELL
TO REPRESENT McOONALO'SlAMOCO, PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SEC OF
WOOLBRIGHT & CONGRESS AVENUE
Dear Ms. Heyden:
This correspondence shall confirm the authorization for Robert E. Basehart and/or Anna S.
Cottrell of Basehart & Cottrell, Inc, (BCI), to act as agent(s) and representative(s) for
development approvals to allow a drive through restaurant (McDonald's), gasoline station and
a convenience store (Amoco) on the above referenced property. This authorization is intended
to confirm that the agent(s), BCI, will prepare and submit all documentation for the required
development applications, will attend all meetings pertaining to the applications and will
represent the applicant, McOONALO'S1AMOCO, at any required public hearing, including but
not limited to, the Planning and Development Board, the Board of Adjustment and the City
Commission. As agent(s) for the referenced applicant, Robert E. Basehart and/or Anna S.
Cottrell are authorized to agree to terms and conditions which may be placed on the aforesaid
approvals.
Sincerely,
Clark W. Bridgman
prJjer ~jni\e~ ~.
r!ft/jW ~~~.t~
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF P?\lA"" fJ~ t\{ H
The foreqoing instrument was acknowledged before me this :l: day of ~;\A { , 1995 by
/' \r.\r~ tJ. [.:-,,1<1'\'\.\;'\ as agent for McDonald's Corporation, d/b/a McDonald's Corporation, a
Delaware company, a cOrPqration duly organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, on behalf of
the corporation. ,-1 ~.:..- is personally known to me and did take an oath.
( ~) rl[~ '\(l:~~\Q.tL/\.'''-)
INota,y Public c'
Printed Name: ,-~\'\()'f(h", ~ntt({:.,
Commission #: G..:-Z~' b :)
My Commission Expires: I-":i - e,l
. '\~;-:'~.f:).;~;~ [-i~/~
..' ~~(., II;!; ......e." ~\
< ~:'~:s~!.." ,<;~_>
" '" ,......'
J. .~...; ,
1:\WORD\AMOCO\BOYNTBCH\AGENT,1XI1
.
.
.., ..--
:.<--
" ...J....
. '
. to (}..;. .
.; ~ .. II :.. . 't~....." ': ~~ '
"I{ ::'1"'" f--.'
MAY,-2G'9S(FRI) 10:00
A' "0 PETROLEUM PROD
TEL: - ~ 11 0 71
P. 002
.I<L'UIIU......IIUUIlN IU,
JiLC-IUd
Cl-2087S
Jut.<~-i-?9l, ~:J'f;:;,j '9~, ...__...'5 J i~ 1.!
ORt!. b :E ~.-:. Ps 'i 5.s.5
I 111'.,1,111..111 all III
CDn Si5iOOD.OO Doc 4.025,DO
l'repc:ny l.:uIlCC'Ql , Uti-4l-Jt5-J2-00-00Q-j(J90
-"- ....-.-. '.--i~"i:ijiilO\'KTriii iJNr..s;'-..;.i:o.>>ialsi~~-----."
SP!;C"IAL WARRAN1'Y OPP:O
.!l'TATE OF FLORlD^
COllN1''I' Of PALM DS....CIl
I
I
i
K.NOW ..\1.1. MeN BY THESE PKES6N"fS:
.m....T E)(XON c:oltPOR^,'IOfII, ij New Jcnu:)' I.vrpo.I(alioll, IllIvillll iut of Ii co:: "I 800 U....I S4J1lIlI. II\)u~IDIl,
Tllaas 77l)U2-7ol.!b, hcn,iu;sIll:r '-":IlIaI "Cit:llllur." (IIr UII'l in o;UIllillll:r.lliulI of II... sum br FIVE lIUNL:lIlElJ
SIlVENTl"-FIVE THOUSAND ^l'U) NOIlOO DOl.LAItS ISS'J5.llW.DO) iIUlI Giber aoo,l iIIKI "'dlUiobIc:
&:CI""id..r~lio>ll in cillill PIlW b)' RP~ EHTEllPRISHS OF 80YNl'ON BEACII. INC.. Ol fllorillil CDl'ponllNI\. 1933
Culuoial Drive, Coroll Sprin&l, FluM 33011, hc:reillOlflc:r 1:;11..11 "Orllmdr:," IbIl n:ccilll ui wl1ic:11 il; her.by
lIl;kMwhl\llllU. dues hc:relbl' GRANT. 8AIlOc\tlll, SEI.L. aIIlI CONVEY \lulU I~ SMid Orl'lI.... ~ubjl" 10 III"
ftrrllMlr prllvisiullll oi IIlis D=J, ;,11 &l1li cartailllrlL:l or parc.llIf IIIIU Iliac: .Propeny") I)'inll iIlklllcinll in lbe Cily
IIi Buynloll Snell, Cuunly of Palm Bc:Ic:h. SIDle ot Flarillil. bc:illll luorll ponil:ulltrly lloAr:nbcl.l ill Exhibil . ^.
~lIo'lCbe" IIcrc:IO ;,mJ illCllrplJrDlcd ben:lD fur 1111 purpo......
Thill C:OIIYCYIlnc:e is lIIllt.lu by GRIIIW' ilIllI lIc:&:llplcd b)' GnolllllC lubjc:cl III all vllliu IUIlI c:lli51in1l CII..mIlIW.
riahll-uf-way. o;ulwidell':'. llUVClIanlS. 1alric:liunJ l'll.WrvaliolU. ;uw C:1CIjlIiuDl ot r~n1, illdlll!ill& all bundinll iIIIlI
;woiDllllrdillllllCC. U1"'I. rellulllliullli.... mtriclions b)' wllnicipDI llr Giller lovcnlllll:lllll! i1ulh<lrity .ppticQblc 10
Uac Pro",,"y.
o\:i Junhcr L:lIIllillJcnlliull liu" lb~ _""'7l1li1:1:, OrilDIc:I:, for 111..lf. ils Jilin, ~IJ n:pru:llllWlllvWi, 'UCCclSOr:i
iIIW ~l:Iilllll, II. ajlfKic:able. JIDreb)/ ~ 11111 fulcv..r u~Charlles Ol'llllor. ill I'lIp,....,lIl1lli.,.. lUl:CllUOfJ &1111
alliJIIS, {rum i11IY IIIUI1111 l:lilUu'. dl:IIIJ11ll1, Ii-oabililic:s (iu.:lwJiIIlIlillCli IIIIIl c:ivll pclllllticsl aII\J .:awe, or uWOIl :4
law ..,. in IlIuily illclul/ipS, wllllUllI _illlian, any 11~lUlury ClI\IlW$ of ac;IiDD, inc:ludill. "'" Cumprc:JICIIlIlvc
Ellvirunmemal RClpollla CllmpclUDliao awl Ullbllily Ac;l IIi 19l1C. ill lIIDIlJIil.cI. ("C'eRCLA') ood 1111: RNIIUrc~
CutllCrvIliun aniJ Ro:c::uv.:r.'f t\~l 0{ 1~16.1li ulllull&led. (.Relt.....) (lit injury Iiw:.ludina lIcilUII. IldtnlGlion. lull of
clQllllIl:C or ;u'ly I:ir.l ur c1uar.u:lcr 10 Ibe il"- ur "ropel1)' ot tiruDl1!e (;wd any iub$cqUICI OWflgr Df Ihe Propc:ny.
II>> i1ppliolbl&:l ;uld Ihl!: CUllJlU)'LlCli. ilICIlII. ICIrvalll' iIIKI rc:pr"""Dlilliva oi liUCh pllrliCl1. .rl,jRJ: UlIl or or in ,.dialinll
Illllle InVirOnJlllllllaJ colllJilion of t1I1lI'rGlErl)l.
..., iunhc:r cllosIIJc:r:alion (or Ihi, cClDftYilftl:e. Cir..lllcc lihall "" rc:'{lUlWllle 10{ iIllll slllll "~iGnaJ DIl&! intJcl1lnify
OralUOl" frum ;uW a&Ol;IUI allY IOii. Clllilll. oll\l1l'lllu lIr Iwtlilily. 10 illl:lulle property Wlln~,. and p...rsunal iujury iINl
Ie i.1I:lwJe ..n)' claim Inllll" w.Jc:r CEIlCu. mil RCIlA IlJlIc:rlc" by 'IllY Ibird pliny or I,ulllic: DwJl&IrilY ansitll: IIUI
111' or ill Nlillion ID iln)' surfalle or .ub.urCIcc: CLIIIllllnill:lliao Ill' die Properl)' wbicb tlIiI)' occllr WI dac P.Dpeny ailer
Ibc EU"clive 011111. unleu C..lIII..... (.Iy d1l: ..Ie IlellliC"ng: II( OranlQr. If _It prapc:ny WaIlIIJld. pcrlll)lIi11 injury llr
Iou raulls frool 11111 juinl nCllligc:1ICC or wiltfullnW:ol""n:1 uf Ohllllor ;smj IDe uwner \It Uu: ProperlY. II..: proJlen)'
U....II.:t'.J aluly III illUlllnnificalklll Ibldt lII: in prupartillll Ie its IIlJocQblc ~l1Me lit jOilll IIC&liscnc:l: ur willful
milll:und....."I.
n... cundiliuftJ, cOVIIDl1IWllllW Ulher proviliolll 'ell 01.11 in dlis DIItMl m.1I be: c:owellllPlll runlllftl! with die Il1nd
and ~h.1I be: bil1l.liDI;\ L1pllll IIp!l ~lIi11) iIIIIrc 10 rb.. bcncDI ot 1Ilc: parliu, lllcir lubtidiiar~. aillli:alll:O. 1111"1
rapn:lIC:llIlIlivGlI, IlCirs, lIucCClSlorJ :uW iWitlN. IIIIIPIiWlble.
Ad ~lol'1"" \llllCS lllIil 3pllCwl OlSsea.<:I1IS. If any. lIpilllll lhl: Properly for Ihe YO::llr ill wIlich Ihe Etrucllvc
Dnl" occurs ",ill \1e pro-rlllcd belWC"ll GnIuor ;uu.I Gr:am...e ;as at Ihe ElTCCliv... DIIlIl, 111111 Gramee bcrllby \IJIlilun..1
111111 alreel 10 p;sy ~ll:,
TO Ii.;.VE AND 'ill HGLD m., ".......01'. .....111..' will. I/i. OII'P'U1"1llllGG', """;'1", .lU. lIIld Inlerell lltere\o.
URlll UrllD...... Gram.I', sllCCC:$uri. /\&:in i1Dd wi&ll!I, flltl:vc:r, lubjDlllIO 11111 p.uviaiuullicn:u(, ;uu.I inliclI or 211
1lI1ler wllrraluic:i. cll[l~ o>r ,,,,!,Iiell, C"HlIIIIUC *. hereby binu illlUlf. iu ,UCl:Il;ilIO{J will lWIillllS. 10 wamUIL Wlu
(DIlIVer ol4lc:l1lllhe lill.: III Ihe i>rOfICrly IIIIIl CirlJllC:c. Cir:amce'i SUCC:"lIIUrl, heirs ilIId :1IIilDS. 1I.lIi.1I1 C:VIl!'Y pclrllOll
"'1",,_..... la..f.,lly l:lllimill& ur w c:1aim lhe nllld lit ;my pari Ihc.cuf, by. .hrllllllll UT Illl~r Oro\luur. bUI 11111
Dlbcrwi:lo.
';u.J L.,L., .(,1
('/-_: i t. I IV rI L_
f
SWl>lJoIB.J.c;
CUd/lI/YJ)
If I,':'r ( "Lt, ,i r
II.. 't' ,:" :i ',:d:' I .{.il L'
MAY.-26'9S(FRI) 10:00
A' "0 PETROLEUM PROD
TEL: - q 071
P. 003
OR8 ~:::Sb p~ 1 ~f1.o
Y'" WITNESS WHRI~EOr, Omlllol bWl ~i.IlI:&lI"i. .,./ iPUk)' uf }I"/r'~~ '
l\l~. bul ErFECTIVE lIS .....,bi~ 2Lu ullyof July . ".I!.l~. ("liil'eC:lll/c; Dahl.),
WliNnSSI!S;
J L/4 C'
~:~u ~~I~!q .'; .~: I I<L ~ '. ~~~ i,~ ~,)
E.(XON COMPORA TIOI'I
I:;
"41}.'ct
"OJ-.
E'O
UR...NTOR:
. ,. - ."t
By; '.J;" .11\1.:: \ \\d,C"l._..
NII1l1O:: '" (J r r: PI c. ". L I. ,;.,J
Tillll: ViQ Prcsh.l.,1l
An'EST:
\. ..
\
~/'_.\..
~ -~
By; -' J~..,; ~
Anle" )~~I:'.: ~I
~Ihl;: Aailtllllt Scc:rt.:u...y
..-'
..
.'
.....
ST A'fa OF 'rEXAS I
I
COUNTy OF IIARRIS f
..JJ-IUro mil u~ undcfSlllac~ IIl1l1writy, IlIl.s WI)' pt=l'IOlIlIIly Ilppcura.l >>'~ r 7"/:~' "/7!;/ka,
IIlId , I.....,..., .' J.I. II Ia IlW well ~wn IIIIIlIu_n /0 1M 10 b. 1I Vicl: Pru~11l liIId
AI,br~rr Sacra.ry, rCllplC:Livcly, ut lIu: cotpQIillioll 1Wnt::U III \be iDr.."ln8 illlllnuncln. IUI&I llaey Hl/crAlly
;,u:kno....Ic&lJlld 103M bclClte IDe I hal Ibay ClKulc&l gill Wlfll\AWll ull behalf fll and in UIc IIoInl1: ot sAil!
CQtpOrllliDl1 >> IlMlb oft"r.; Ih;1 Ibe a:~l iltnacd III liIMI illlHrullkllll i. Ibe 1l00000rllle idll o( said corpclr~liQtI iIIx1
lllllf i. wua "rnulllhct'lll&l by dUI: ami I'Il&Uhlf ,"~r;l4. iIIIl1UJfily; lWu.11Iq i1n: \July iIUlboflUll by 111111 !;Orporaliolt
10 Cll..'UlC _.bl il\Jll'llllllltll II'" lhill ""ili illltrum&e11l iI UIt ft.. ;IIOl ..Ill 1Ic:cd of Aid c:orpur,llion. They arc
p.::rllQllillly krl_,11) DIe or Ila".. prolkw<:d ~Y P."..',,).. "?i- .bl', "IJ ~
iUcl\llfl'i1liOll .011 uillldid 11111 1111:.: ;gl oOllh. ·
IN WITNESS WHEIU!OF. I have bcrlllllllD >0:1 my hllnd 1II111 ill'fIUllmy official ....al. Ilaili lhe //1l.y of _
~/ }')'r . 199:L
.J
O TrBngT. Nguyllft
::...t.; ,..1..., Hille
. .1A.' SlAT!OFTEX-S
4" llJ' il IIy ConII\. I... 7 - , 9-97
"--
')?f ~7 ~
~ .~.~ ~ J..'.'~
Prilll N~ '"7:-..._ "'.. ~,,,.\.,._..)
NoI;ry Public. SIIIIe of leus
My C"II'IIIl~,iQII Expires: . I -It.j - 'j?
. ::!-
SWI)I.NIJ.oIul:
lllll/) JIll))
MAY, -26' 95(FRll 10:00
A" '0 PETROLEUM PROD
TEL:--'1071
P. 004
ORB .~356 P9 1 ~9n
QRANT1!.E:
IlK ENTERPIUSI!S Of aoYNTON BEACH, INC.
WITNEoUa!I:
~ ,'TI I' ,)
Ily' I..l:. I.. '=l
N~7' , I-'~"i~ f- I i,~.,.. I
TIL": t'l ',~ 1. - ,-L
. ";. - -
.~; ; ...U ,,_4 ,,'.,/1':"; '-1. ~."
Prln' NAIl": /.;., If J(;../ >,; .'~'-/.
~" }' f--' r "
_. t , 'j ,
\ '("" n '~"..t .....
. '\ I K
P,uu Nam.~ ~ "I f .(' . . , t'\;,
ATTP.U:
L...... crt j( /
>>,: ;J' -1.1- .-
NtIIlIIIf 1-11 -~, ~.... 'I ~"'l'F'1
nll..--.C", I ," lit'" , ~,' "'" ~ "'-1 ~'.
,
ST^1"E OP FLORIOA
COUNTY OF V',ri'!.^.'rt 11,-1,
UClorc me UIc llIlIIafllll'Clll\IlllGtll1. lbb .w, fo'C"....lAIly APJllI~ A 'c,' l.: :...
UI4 . 10 1M well nWD aad IuJowIlIO _ 10 ta . '''1',' '/" r, !' ~
-:.;,: /, ;,.,. ..,/ anca -r ,,.,, I.,,"'" . &.'Cjpcwd.cly. oi tbg CDlpcl&"DIlDfl EMili iA r.bc
farcaoiAa ' 1IUI111l1llelll. IIId UIcy ICWI'aJl)' ",luIuwlcd.cd III anCIlIIllDrp DIe lhal lbay NIICIlIGd said iDlUllIllllllL Oil
bobaU' Dr &A4 111 ilia nlme of gid ClIl'JKlr.lllol1 " lMII:h urn.,.,,: Ibu llIc .ul adI.... \II ...w Inll~1 I. lh.
1lCI1'JIDTIIC IICU of nld ~r8liDD and 1Iw iI w... ImUd IiIcnCo by due Iud r~.utU' GDlPWllC IUllloray; ,1lA1 die)'
irQ dut)' IlllllarWoll II)' Illd COlplltlllOll III C&l:QI~ GIll IaLr~Ul8lllllJ Ib.& .alli 11UlNl85A1 i. lhG fr. 8CII ;ud de.d
Df laid ClIJ'l101"llon. ~y atl JICfIllIIII1y ="''1110 IDC or !lIve prDdllucl 1'1. /)r I ,toro "C(.~...... -'* 1<1 "'rr~,oI -
-II . '~ 5';' C. II idcmll1C1111on uu:l dllllGid DDlQlCc DII 0IIII.
! 1f"1 WITNESS WHEREOF. J 1llI"- twDlIIlIll.eI wy l\qQ ana lfJl-Uld '111 uffilli;O! ocaI. Ihi> r1\"..a.Lda, ar_
~~I .(': ~ . 1f9.!-.
'I I " r-
~~.....-L ~,"7(~-
Pilli. NIIIltl' , ,,- L.
No,.". "'DUe, Sl8l1s uC Plul k1.
MY CClIIlIIIWlOn I!.'Ipll": -, f 'i' .,
-3 -
SWDUlII.daa
((lIf.U"')
MAY, -26' 9SlFRIl 10:01
AY' 1 PETROLEUM PROD
TEL: ~ I" . 1071
p, 005
ORB 3356 P'9 159:1
wlfOTHY Ii LllLI\EN
CLERK OF rHE COURT - PB COUNT'r I H
SP/4-S02l
BDYnIOn U.acl1, flDtiLla
EXHlsrr ',\. 'ro SPECIAl. WAllRANTY DEED PROM
EXXON CORPORA'nON TO
RfK E~JUSB OF BOYNTON BEACH, '''''C.
1m Cullmial Drive
CD~ 5,rUtIlI, PL 33071
I
(A parcel of land in Seccion 3~, TQWn~hlp 45 S~uth, R8nge 43 ~~$t,
City of Boynton Be~chr P.lm Beach County, Florid., beinu m~r.
p~rticut~rly deBcribed .~ !oll~a:
From the Northw..t corner of Sect.ion 32, To,-n$hip 45 South, RaralJ_ 43
Ea,at., falll Bttach Counl;y, Flodda. 58 iQ c:oC"ne[" belng on tIle centlilrl lU.:
ot the 120 toot Right-or-Vay of Co(uJre:u ""enue; 'thence 'r~n South
01033'34" EcUlt, a.long the West linE! ol ~aid Sliectlon Ja. tot' a
diatance ot 357,05 teetj th$nce run North 8'-40'08" Eas~, along a
lili.. 357.00 fill:t Suuth of tlud parallel oIith, all measured at t"tgrtt
_ng16s to, the North line or ..id Section 33, tor 8 discance ~t
115.36 rtfet, to tho} Poirlt: of Beginning of I:he parcel of land
heT.i,nafter c1"8cribed; thence continue North 87040' 08" B:clbl L, i.11c.nt)
th.. l...t dedcribed eOUr.!il8, lor . dilOtance ul t8:a.40 teet; tll_neli run
Suuth 01023'24' East, 1\1c)J'Jg II line J97.72 feec East ot and parallel
with, II" mlu\lIurad lit. righl.: angles' t:o. the :I~.id Vest line of seal:ioll
32. for 8 dj.~_nae c.! 300.0D reel; thence run Suu~h 87040'08" WesL.
, ~lang 8 line 556.97 teet South of ~IIJ parallel with, .. me.Bu~ed .t
right angl8. to, ~h. saia North line ot Section 32, lor a diat6nCp. of
~21.7S leet; th~nc. run Murl:h 0'023'24- We~t. dlong d line 76.00 reet
I E"lIt of end paJ;'811.l wittl, a~ lII.allured III.: right angloll ta, clle .aid
W65t: line at Section 32, tor a di~tane. or \60.65 feet; thence run
North 43008'3.... E..t, far. di:Hancc or 56.]0 feet. Co tbe Point. .,.(
B.glnnlng.
SWIlI.NJj.1lo1l:
(U&lll/93)
-4-
BOYNTON MCDONALDS
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
SUBJECT SITE: 08-43-45-31-17-001-0020
MOBIL OIL CORP.
% PROP TAX DIVISION
P.O. BOX 290
DALLAS, TEXAS 77521
08-43-45-32-00-000-3080
PALM BEACH FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
% RE RECOVERY INC./J EVERY
927 CLINT MOORE RD.
BOCA RATON, FL 33487
08-43-45-32-00-000-3090
RFK ENTERPRIZES OF BOYNTON BEACH, INC.
1933 COLONIAL DR.
CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071
08-43-45-31-17-001-0010
CARMEN LOPEZ & EDGAR & CECILIA IBANEZ
4855 HUNTERS WAY
BOCA RATON, FL 33434
08-43-45-31-17-002-0000
BARNETT BANK PREMISES CO.
BOYNTON BCH % REAL ESTATE MANAGER
9000 SOUTHSIDE BLVD. BLDG. 300
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256
08-43-45-31-17-007-0000
WOOLBRIGHT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC.
% JOSEPH COGEN TR, INC.
2622 NW 23RD. WAY
BOCA RATON, FL 33431
08-43-45-31-21-009-0000
QUAIL LAKE WEST CONDO & HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.
645 5TH AVE. #8TH FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10022
08-43-45-31-17-005-0000
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33425
08-43-45- 30-01-127 -0021
MARRIOTT SENIOR LIVING SERVICES INC.
10400 FERNWOOD RD.
BETHESDA, MD 20817
08-43-45-30-16-000-0260
DWIGHT & LIDUBINA FOSTER
26 PEACHTREE PL.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436
08-43-45-30-16-000-0270
DIANA ARBOLEDA
27 PEACHTREE PL.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436
08-43-45-30-16-000-0280
GARY AND ZOE TOMAINO
28 PEACHTREE PL.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436
08-43-45-30-16-000-0290
MOHAMMAD & NA T ASA BHUIY AN
29 PECHTREE PL.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436
08-43-45-30-16-000-0300
MOHAMMED M. MIA
18415 ALGIERS ST.
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91326
08-43-45-30-16-000-0310
CAROL A. GIALLORETTO
31 PEACHTREE PLACE
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436
08-43-45-29-12-082-0080
BEULAH & BETTY BLANTON
1308 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-082-0090
CAROLYNW. FOLENA
1310 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-082-0100
DORA C. SAW ALLISCH
1312 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-082-0110
LENA T. ORIOLA
81 CAMPBELL ST
QUINCY, MA 02169
08-43-45-29-12-082-0120
MARCEL & AGNES REPLA T
1316 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-082-0130
MARIA K. SPIES
1318 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-082-0140
WILLIAM W. WAHL
9 ESTATE HA VENSIGHT
ST. THOMAS, VA 00802
08-43-45-29-12-082-0150
MILTON JR. & DORIS SETTERHOLM
7810 209TH ST. N.
FOREST LAKE, MN 55025
08-43-45-29-12-082-0160
ANDREW & BEVERLY HAYNES
2394 SW 14TH AVE.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-082-0170
WILLIAM B. ELMBLAD
2392 SW 14TH AVE.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-081-0020
MICHAEL & DOROTHY FOLEY
1307 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-081-0030
ROBERT & JACQUELINE DUNNE
1309 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-081-0040
MILDRED L. MAHIN
1311 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-081-0050
KATHARINE M. CREGAN
1313 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-081-0060
HARRY & EDITH WOHLR
1315 SW 24TH ST.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-081-0070
EDYTHE G. HOOD
2397 SW 14TH AVE.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-081-0080
JOHN & RAE ROTH
2395 SW 14TH AVE.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
08-43-45-29-12-081-0210
MICHAEL & LEONA STIRPE
216 LOCK ST.
CLYDE, NY 14433
08-43-45-29-12-081-0220
MARGUERITE MEDENDORP
326 E. FAIRMAN AVE.
WATSEKA, IL 60970
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-382
TO:
Sue Kruse
city clerk
~M( ~
Tambri J. Heyden ,C11J
planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
July 27, 1995
SUBJECT:
Conditional Use
McDonald/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience store
(File No. caus 95-002)
Accompanying this memorandum you will find an application and
supporting documentation for the above-referenced case. A check in
the amount of $1,000.00 to cover the review and processing of this
application has been forwarded to the Finance Department.
The legal advertisement for this request will be forwarded to your
office after review by the city Attorney and City Manager. The
requested variance is scheduled for the August 8, 1995 Planning
and Development meeting and August 15, 1995 City Commission
meeting.
TJH:dim
Attachments
s:l~lnot.ca.M:A.C
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Know All Men by These Presents, that McDonald's Corporation, a corporation duly organized under the
laws of the St~lle of Delaware, and having its principal place of business in the Village of Oak Brook, State of
Illinois, does hereby make, constitute and appoint Clark Bridgman of Boca Raton. Florida. its true and lawful
attorney, for it, and in its name, place and stead to represent McDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation or McDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF FLORIDA, INC., in any pennit, zoning or ImId use
application of any type for the construction or remodeling of any McDonald's Restaurant, including the authority to
sign applications and appear for McDonald's in public hearings or meetings, giving and granting to its attorney full
power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever, requisite necessary and proper to be
done in the premises, as fully, to all intents and purposes, as it might or could do, with full power of substitution
and revocation; hereby ratifying and confmning all that its attorney or his substitute, shall lawfully do. or cause to
be done. by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, McDONALD'S CORPORA nON, a Delaware corporation has caused its
corporate name to be subscribed hereto by its Assistant Vice President this 4th day of January, 1995.
Witnessed by:
McDONALD'S CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation ,
'7 I
. ' -.' 1 '. , -------. J ;
{ - I ... ''(.tt /.. <~,.;. (':.::.l. --
Assistant Vice" PreSident
1-
,/
..-'
---
t. .
~~~
;' .I .J
. " I . . r .! .
~' t ;. :1 ~ ,""
/
f
. .~ ': I.'
~ . C":,. !-;', 'rf
ST ATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF DUPAGE
I, Ellen L. Loess, a Notary Public in and for the county and state aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that
Michael J. Sise, Assist.ant Vice President of McDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation or
McDONALD'S REST A URANTS OF FLORIDA, INC., who is personally known to me to be the smne person
whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument appeared before me this day in person WId acknowledged
that he signed, sealed and delivered the said instrument as his free and voluntary act.
Given under my notarial seal, this 4th day of January, 1995.
~~/~~o-
Notary Public
Ellen L. Loess
My commission expires: May 30, 1997
/cl/powerl
'1.-'"-"--" ..........-0...': . ~:.".... ~'. .: .- ~ -. .~'" .
!
[~;7~'~';:-":'<}~i:':}~:':'~ :~-.:. .~~~~_~'~ ~~...J
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Basehart & Cottrell, Inc. as agents for RFK Enterprises of Boynton
Beach, Inc., has requested that construction of A COMBINATION GAS
STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE WITH DRIVE-THROUGH RESTAURANT be
considered for conditional use approval:
COUS #95-002
Owner:
RFK Enterprises of Boynton Beach, Inc.
Agent:
Robert E. Basehart and Anna Cottrell
Basehart and Cottrell, Inc.
Proposed
Use:
Construct a
convenience
restaurant.
combination
store with
gas station/
drive-through
Location:
Southeast corner of Congress Avenue and
Woolbright Road
Legal
Description:
A parcel of land in Section 32, Township 45
South, Range 43 East, City of Boynton Beach,
Palm Beach County, Florida, being more
particularly described as follows:
From the Northwest corner of Section 32,
Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach
County, Florida, said corner being on the
centerline of the 120 foot Right-of-Way of
Congress Avenue; thence nm South 01023'24"
East, along the West line of said Section 32,
for a distance of 357.05 feet; thence nm
North 87040'08" East, along a line 357.00 feet
South of and parallel with, as measured at
right angles to, the North line of said
Section 32, for a distance of 115.36 feet, to
the Point of Beginning of the parcel of land
hereinafter described; thence continue North
87040'08" East, along the last described
course, for a distance of 182.40 feet; thence
run South 01023'24" East, along a line 297.72
feet East of and parallel with, as measure at
right angles to, the said West line of Section
32, for a distance of 200.00 feet; thence run
South 87040'08" West, along a line 556.97 feet
South of and parallel with, as measure at
right angles to, the said North line of
Section 32, for a distance of 221.75 feet;
thence run North 01023'24" West, along a line
76.00 feet East of and parallel with, as
measure at right angles to, the said West line
of Section 32, for a distance of 160.65 feet;
thence run North 43008'22" East, for a
distance of 56.10 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
A HEARING before the Planning and Development Board will be held at
City Hall, Commission Chambers, 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard,
Boynton Beach on August S, 1995 at 7:00 P.M.
ALSO
A PUBLIC HEARING is scheduled before the City Commission at city
Hall, Commission Chambers, 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton
Beach on August 15, 1995 at 7:00 P.M.
Page 2
Notice of Public Hearing
McDonald/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience store
caus 95-002
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearing in
person or by attorney and be heard or file any written comments
prior to the hearing date. Any person who decides to appeal any
decision of the Planning and Development Board and City Commission
with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a
record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
SUZANNE M. KRUSE
CITY CLERK
(407) 375-6062
PUBLISH:
a:L~lnotco.MAC
~~ , ,.
.J (.!0-",
~,~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-396
FROM:
TO:
DATE: August 2, 1995
SUBJECT: McDonald's/Amoco (CODS 95-002)
Thank you for your comments of July 28, 1995 (Engineering
Division Memorandum #95-267) regarding the above-referenced
project. Please note that the plans were actually transmitted to
the TRC on Friday 28, 1995, rather than on the 27th as your
memorandum noted. Also, at the request of the applicant, a third
review was sent out July 28, 1995 for which comments are due
Wednesday, August 2, 1995 at noon. A separate transmittal memo
is forth coming if you have not already received it. This will
allow you a little more time to catch something you may have
missed within your July 28th comments. We did not issue you
plans on July 27, 1995 to respond with comments in 5 1/2 hours.
MEH: jms
c:t:IelZio.39fi
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-391
TO: carrie Parker, City Manager
Clyde "Skip" Milor, utilities Dept. chief Field Insp.
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Bill cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
Al Newbold, Building Division
William Hukill, Director of Department of Development
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director I~
DATE: July 28, 1995
RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
3rd Review -
conditional Use
Project
MacDonald's/Amoco
Convenience store
Restaurant
and
Location
S. E. corner
Woolbright
of
Congress
Ave.
and
Applicant
RFK Enterprises of Boynton Beach, Inc.
File No.
COUS 95-002
Please find attached an amended site plan for your 3rd review for
the above-referenced project. Please discard all other plans on
file for this project. The applicant is requesting approval of the
plans that have the following caption handwritten in the upper
right hand corner of the first sheet of the set of plans: "3rd
Review". If there are additional questions regarding the review of
the plans, please contact Dan DeCarlo (ext. 6264). To ensure that
the project stays on track with the review time frame, the plans
and exhibits shall be reviewed and formal written comments on legal
size paper transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning
Department no later than 12:00 P.M. on Wednesday. Auaust 2. 1995.
Return plans and exhibits with formal comments. The project will
be discussed at the August 8, 1995 Planning and Development
meeting.
Due to additional staff time required to review resubmittal of the
above-referenced plans, please document in writing the cost of your
additional review time and return to me no later than 12:00 PM on
Wednesday, August 2, 1995. The cost is to be computed as follows:
Additional reviews will be billed to the applicant based
on the hourly salary of employees involved in the review,
plus 35% for fringe benefits.
TJH: jms
attachment
xc: (Memo Only)
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
central File
.:3rdrev...c/T~C
?lie City of
tJ3oynton tJ3ecu;h
~
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Buz&. 'BoufaIart{
P.O. 'Boi(310
'Boynton 'BeadJ./ iffori4a 33425-0310
City:Hal!: (407) 375-6OOD
if.5U: (407) 375-6090
August 8, 1995
Robert E. Basehart
Anna Cottrell
Basehart & Cottrell, Inc.
1532 Old Okeechobee Road, Suite 101
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Re: McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and Service
Station/Convenience Store - File No. COUS 95-002
Dear Mr. Basehart and Ms. Cottrell:
The cost of the third Technical Review Committee review for the
above-captioned submitted is as follows:
Forester/Environmentalist
Utilities
Engineering
Planning and Zoning
$31.44
19.60
127.93
145.25
Total
$324.22
Please remit the amount of $324.22 to the City of Boynton for the
cost of this review, prior to August 15, 1995
Also please include the fee of $400.00 for the appeal of the
lighting of the mansard roof (CDPA 95-002).
Z~Jh:;;
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
TJH:dim
xc: central File
.'3rdrsvCoet,MAC/trc
Ylmuu:a's (jilUway to the (juifstream
2X~,_
'11ie City of
'Boynton 'BetUli
100 'E. 'Boynton '1ka&. tJJoulevartl
'P.O. 'B~.310
'Boynton 'Beatfr.. ~foritIJz .3.3425-0.310
City?fa[[: (407) 375-(j()()()
'.TJlX: (407) 375-6090
August 7, 1995
Robert E. Basehart and Anna Cottrell
Basehart and Cottrell, Inc.
1532 Old Okeechobee Road, Suite 101
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Re: McDonalds/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store
Property Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of
Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road
File No. COUS #95-002
Dear Mr. Basehart and Ms. Cottrell:
The attached package will be presented to the Planning and
Development Board on August 8, 1995 and to the City Commission
August 15, 1995.
The applicant must understand that the permit plans shall be
amended to comply with the final determination of the request
and that additional comments may be generated by staff fOllowing
their review for technical compliance of permit documents that are
required to be submitted for development of the project.
For the applicant's convenience, attached is a list of documents
required for permit submittal.
An approval of the site plan by the City Commission shall be valid
for one (1) year, unless a building permit from the BUilding
Department is secured. If the applicant fails to secure a building
permit in that time, all previous approvals shall become null and
void.
ve~J!/ tr}\l~'jyoUrs,
7~f:-,~
! Michael E. Haag
~nn~ng and Zoning Administrator
MEH:dim
attachments
xc: Central File
.:P&r>pkqltr,NJlC
jJmerial s (jateway to tlU (julfstream
S~I
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-437
TO:
FROM:
Carrie Parker
city Manager ~
Tambri J. HeYde~e~~~
Planning and zoni~irector
August 14, 1995
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Copies of Development Plans of Current Projects
Scheduled for Review by the City Commission at the
August 15, 1995 City Commission Meeting
Please find attached five (5)
current development projects:
sets of plans for the following
Master Plan Modification -
Nautica Sound f.k.a. Knollwood
Groves (File No. MPMD 95-006)
Conditional Use
McDonald' s/AmOCO Restaurant and
Service Station/Convenience
Store (File No. COUS 95-002)
New Site Plan
LoDolce Warehouse (File No.
NWSP 95-006)
Note:
Please return the plans/documents to the Planning and
zoning Department following the meeting.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me.
TJH:dim
Attachments
a,CC.lana.a15/.6D
VI. PUBLIC ~~NG
AttomeY&r~1>rn in those who would be presenting testimony this eve~th~~t~
Ite~~~: ~ ~ \P\
')(. Project Name: McDonald's Amoco Restaurant and Service
Station/Convenience Store
Robert E. Basehart and Anna Cottrell
Basehard & Cottrell, Inc.
RFK Enterprises of Boynton Beach, Inc.
Southeast corner of Congress A venue and Woolbright
Road
Conditional Use: Request for conditional use approval to
construct a 3,431.91 square foot building for a
combination gas station/convenience store with drive-
through restaurant on a 1.0002 acre lot
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Elevations were displayed and referred to throughout these presentations. Anna Cottrell, a
planner, represented this application. This is an application on behalf of McDonald I sand
Amoco for a new type of facility to be located at Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue. It is
a facility that combines those two users into one building which will have some cross access
between the two portions of the building. It will have a retail gasoline operation in addition to
a convenience store and a McDonald's food store. We have reached agreement with staff on
virtually all the elements related to the conditional use approval and we come to the City
Commmission with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Board.
There were just a couple of issues that we had to work out with the Planning and Development
Board related to the appearance of the building and the actual intensity of the use. Initially,
the application had a request for four pump island for Amoco and one island to be added in the
future. Staff had some concerns with the proposal for the fifth pump island. It would have
been our choice to have left that as part of the application tonight and would like to bring that
back in the future as a site plan modification when we can address those with some hard
evidence of how that will work after this facility is built and is operational and we have some
history of traffic patterns within the site, distribution of trips in and out of the driveways, etc.
The other issue is related to the appearance of the building. The Planning and Development
Board suggested that the color of the roof beams be white. We have reached a compromise
with staff wherein there will be additional roof treatment on the canopy above the pump island
that will be similar to the roof treatment on the actual building. (Elevations were displayed.)
Roof beams will be attached that will be the color of the lightest tile within the mansard barrel
tile roof.
Ms. Cottrell said the facility will be very pleasing in appearance and will be an enchancement
to this particular area. It has two users who are good corporate citizens and are very much
interested in meeting the standards that have been established by the City. Ms. Cottrell stated
tha~ 'i~i1ity will also offer an economic benefit to the City. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~n Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director, said there are 12 standards in the zoning code
~\ Wthat have to be evaluated when considering conditional use approvals. With regard to ingress
"\S) and egress to the site, there is a two-way driveway on Congress A venue and a two-way
driveway on Woolbright road. There is a median on Woolbright Road which extends beyond
the property line. Therefore, with respect to the pump island, traffic is going to concentrate
on Congress Avenue. Most likely someone will not, in exiting the site, will not go out
Woolbright Road and make a u-turn; they will cross over the pump islands and exit on
Congress Avenue. With the exception of the rear, the access is two way. Using the overhead
projector, Ms. Heyden pointed out the location of the drive-through window, the drive-
through lane, parking, the pump islands, and the cross access to serve the parcel to the south.
This property was subdivided from the hardware store that was raised in the rear. The level
of service problems that will probably be a concurrency issue will be addressed at the time of
widening of Woolbright Road.
Ms. Heyden pointed out the location of the loading zone. She said it has been improved with
the resubmittal and works well and is acceptable to the Engineering and Public Works
departments. She also pointed out the dumpster location and advised that it works well for the
Public Works department.
Utilities are already available to the site and a private lift station is proposed. The applicant
will provide the landscape materials that are required by the code, subject to staff comments
being met. There will be one freestanding pole sign for the site. The sign will be 20 feet high
which is consistent with the sign code. A Community Design Plan appeal had been requested
for lighting along the roofline. That lighting was deleted by the applicant.
General compatability with adjacent properties - Staff has made some comments regarding the
architecture of the building. The applicant covered some of those issues. (Elevations were
displayed.) Ms. Heyden said the applicant has agreed to add an awning to the canopy similar
to the roof that is on the main building. However, staff was still of the opinion that this roof
needs to be extended around the entire building so that you do not have a roof of this shape on
one portion of the building and a flat roof right next to it. The Community Design Plan
requires that all sides of the building that are visible from public and private streets be
designed as attractively in appearance as the front of the building. Ms. Heyden believed that
in order to be consistent with the Community Design Plan, the roof needs to be extended.
The proposed building is a single-story building 16.92 in height which is consistent with the
buildings in the surrounding area. Staff feels there will be no negative effect with regard to
the economic effects of the adjacent and nearby properties. The nearest residential property is
within 300 feet. There are some multi-family units south of the project. However, in between
them are the undeveloped portion of the old, raised hardware store.
The Planning and Development Board recommended unanimous approval of this request,
subject to staff comments, with the exception of the extension of the roof. Their
~'"
re~~dation for approval included the deletion of the fifth pump island. Thi' u~ ~
~r'd1nding the pump island are that there is a two-way driveway close to tl1' ,sl IJ . ~Tik
~,Mtivity from the cross access and the drive-through lane and cars backing ou~ah at was
~\ ,;)~, not se~n as a safe locatio~ ~or the fifth pump island. The applicant is willing to delete that
~' pump Island and request It In the future.
~
Ms. Heyden said she met with the applicant today and an agreement was reached with regard
to the beams. They were originally proposed to be blue and lighted. The lighting is being
removed and the color will be a light beige or the color of the lightest tile on the roof.
Ms. Cottrell stated that the roof treatment on the canopy has been added in keeping with the
Community Design Standards and the desires of the Planning and Deveopment Board. This
was a compromise from the design standards presented by Amoco because it is not typical of
their design. She said there have been a lot of compromises made in the standard corporate
architecture for both Amoco and McDonald's to create a facility that works for each but still
maintains some of their identity. With respect to the roof around the entire facility, she felt it
was not an issue that was subject to compromise because she did not feel there is a particularly
pleasing appearance that is created by extending the mansard roof around the entire building.
For reason for that is because with the height of the building and the size of the canopy,
particularly with the addition of the mansard roof, that the appearance is going to be very
bulky and will have very little visual contrast to bring in any archectural interest. (An
elevation was displayed.) She said the west elevation is going to be almost obscured by the
canopy when you look at it straight on. The extension of the roof around the entire building is
costly, does not serve any architectural purpose, and will create an appearance that
McDonald's and Amoco feel is not going to be as pleasing and is going to be a radical
department form the architecture they have established. Typically, it is extended over the take
out windows and order windows to provide some protection from the elements so that
customers can reach out of their cars and not set wet. It provides some protection over each
of the doorways. It is not extended for only a portion of the two longest sides of the building.
She felt the extension of it is going to double the cost of the roof treatment and not provide
any utility.
Ms. Heyden said flat roofs are not attractive and there are other ways to make a building more
attractive and be compatible with the residential character of the adjacent properties. She said
the building would be too large a mass if the roof is extended all the way around the building.
The beams have been allowed to break up the mass of the building.
Ms. Cottrell believed that the architecture that has been presented meets both the letter and the
intent of the Community Design Plan. There is no inconsistency nor are we seeking variances
or relief from any provision of the Design Plan.
Clark Richmond represented McDonald I s and Amoco corporations. He stated that the
mansard roof is a typical detail of McDonald's. This is a brand new concept we have engaged
with the Amoco Corporation. This is a brand new prototype building. Our architectures have
designed this building to provide a pleasing effect and to be commensorate with the
a continuation of the mansard. All the air conditioning equipment and ice condensin
machines are totally hidden behind the parapet wall. The parapet is actually a continuation and
there is no visible flat roof from any bystander standing on the ground. The parapet wall is
behind the mansard roof. The parapet wall extends about four feet above the roofline.
Therefore, the equipment is hidden from view. The building does not give an appearance of a
flat roof.
Ms. Heyden pointed out the portion of the building where the roof is requested to be extended.
She said "flat roof" technically is the wrong terminology. It is not a flat roof. What she meant
was that here is no peak or roof on it per se. It is just a parapet. She also stated that the
elevation does not show a realistic view.
City Manager Parker said she received a call this afternoon advising her that there was also a
problem with the size of the drive-through sign. This was not covered in staff comments nor
was staff aware of that. She asked Ms. Cottrell is she has a problem with the size of the
drive-in window sign where the menu board was located. Ms. Cottrell said she and the
applicants met with the Building Official and one of this assistants this afternoon and went
over the calculations for the required signage (wall signage, menu boards, and the pole sign).
The applicants have to make some adjustments and understand they will have to come into
compliance with the code in all respects or seek a variance. They anticipate that the wall
signage will be reduced to comply with the code. The only problem they have is with the size
of the menu board because McDonald's does not have a manufacturer that can make a menu
board only 25 square feet in size. McDonald's will make a decision whether to seek a
variance or engineer a new cabinet, which is a very expensive and time consuming process.
However, everything else will be consistent with the code. Ms. Heyden said the applicants
would have to seek this variance through the Board of Adjustment and the applicant is only
allowed a certain percentage above and beyond the size that is permitted by code.
Mayor Pro Tern Matson asked if the other two McDonald's in the City have the same
problem. Ms. Cottrell said they have standard McDonald's size signs. She said they were
built prior to the time the sign code was changed.
Mr. Richmond said we are trying to reduce our cabinet size so that we can coincide with the
wishes of the Board. He was willing to put up a temporary menu restricting the number of
items available until he can meet the compliance of the code.
Barbara Grisdale, 2400 S.W. 19th Avenue, #135, said her unit faces the garbage dump, the
menu, and the drive-through. She asked if landscaping can be added so she does not have to
see these things. She also expressed concern that the walk-in customers will litter the area and
that crime, drugs, and prostitution will increase.
Bruce Dunkoff, 2400 S.W. 19th Avenue, #139, said his back door also faces these things.
Joan Wilson, 2400 S.W. 19th Avenue, #134, said there used to be an ordinance that stated that
<?\
1" \,
\\: "
~ ~~\ ~~ stations could not be within 1000 feet of another gas station. She asked if this ordinance is
\S' still in effect. Mayor Taylor knew of no such ordinance. Ms. Wilson also wondered how ~
many senior citizens will be found in a McDonald's in the area where Leisureville is located. ~ \\
She suggested putting McDonald I s in a family-oriented area rather than a retirement ~ \,' j
community. ~ W \',
\' \ ',\
',,'\ \ "
Ms. Cottrell said the closest resident to this project is more than 350 feet away. The/plan
meets or exceeds all code requirements, including landdscaping. There is a perimeter
landscape buffer. The buffering that is proposed and the spacious separation, the fact that cars
are entering and existing the site only on arterial roads (there is no access to local streets)
provides the protection that the code intends for residential areas. This has been a
commercially zoned piece of property for a very long time. She was not aware that it was
ever not zoned commerical. This development plan meets the locational criteria for gas
stations. Actually, it will supersede the previous approval that is still in effect for a gasoline
station only. She felt that visual and in terms of the impact, it is an improvement over that
approved plan.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz asked if there is any possibility of relieving the residents' concerns
by putting a wall and landscaping on the south side. She stated that a precast concrete wall is
inexpensive compared to a cinderblock wall. Ms. Cottrell said you get more negative affects
than positive effects with those types of structures. They become magnets for graffiti, reduces
the air flow and the visual connection with other commercial development that may go next
door. She reitered that the spacial separation and the proposed landscape is going to provide
the buffering that residents needs.
City Manager Parker said there is another parcel between this parcel and the residential
development. Ms. Heyden concurred that the remainder of the hardware store parcel and
another parcel before you get to the villa project. A wall will have to be constructed by
whoever develops this parcel. Commissioner Jaskiewicz said that will be the major concern of
the surrounding residents, but the landscaping should be dense enough to shield the view until
something goes in there.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz about about the type of landscaping that will be used. Ms. Cottrell
advised that Laurel Oak and Live Oak trees will be used, as well as some ornamentals and
Silver Buttonwood. Primarily, the hedge material consists of Wax Mertle which, if allowed to
grow, presents a fairly dense hedge. This is within a 10 foot landscape strip.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz asked if there is a sidewalk planned along there. Ms. Cottrell said a
sidewalk is not planned along the back. There is a sidewalk planned along Congress A venue
and along Woolbright Road.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz said at the Planning and Development Board, there was a suggestion
about moving the driveway. She asked if the new plans accommodate this suggestion. Ms.
Cottrell said that initially was a recommending from staff. We have moved them in either
direction as far as we can. There is a minimum separation on both the south and east sides.
~"?
./\ ,\
~ w,\( ...
~\ \' 'Therefore, the driveways are at the maximums and the minimums that staff had recommended. ~
'0. Commissioner Jaskiewicz asked if they are wide enough to enter and exit from the same one '" ~ ~
on Congress Avenue. Ms. Cottrell answered affirmatively. \~ \'\\ "
W \~\~ \ .. 5'-,'
Commissioner Jaskiewicz thought the roof line on the station was lower so as it was n~jll\he
same. She asked if the mansard roof continues along any part of the station other than over
the pumps so you get the appearance of an unbroken line of the mansard. Ms. Cottrell and
Mr. Richmond answered affirmatively. Mayor Taylor said it is the applicants contention that
it would like it continues. However, staff does not believe it would look that way, depending
on what angle you are looking at it. Commissioner Jaskiewicz asked Ms. Heyden if the angle
that disturbs her the most is to the rear. Ms. Heyden said the elevation the applicants are
referring to is the west elevation which is Congress Avenue. That is the side of the building
where the pump islands are located. If you were to look from the south driving north on
Congress Avenue or if you driving on Woolbright Road you are going to see the building, not
the pump island, and whatever portion of the building does not have the roof extended around
it.
Mayor Taylor felt if you are on Woolbright Road and look at McDonald's, which is the side
that has the entire roof, your eye will be drawn to the roof and you would have to look past
the roof to see the parapet. If you are far enough east of it, you could see that the roof ends
somewhere along the east side. However, if you are looking dead onto it, it looks like it is an
entire building with a roof. Commissioner Rosen said from where he comes from, you will
see an empty space.
Mayor Pro Tern Matson said she has never gone somewhere to get something to eat or fill up
her car with gas and made a point of looking at the mansard to see if it continues all the way
around to the back of the building.
Ms. Heyden referred to the south side that you see while driving north on Congress Avenue,
and was of the opinion that looks like the rear of a building.
Comissioner Rosen said all the other McDonald's are completely mansard roofed and he
would hate to see on Congress A venue the mansard roof not continued. He said it looks like
an extension of the men's and ladies I room. Mayor Pro Tern Matson asked him if he was
aware that there is going to be another project between that roof and where he is coming from
so that he is not going to see that anyway. Commissioner Rosen thinks the code calls for a
full view on the major highway of the rooftop.
Vice Mayor Bradley was pleased to see that at this point in time the fifth island is being
deleted because it seemed like a traffic jam potential. He understands McDonald's need for a
corporate image and he thinks part of the problem you worry about is if you wrap that
mansard roof all the way around the pump islands, it will look like some sort of floating
McDonald's roof or something strange. The concern he was hearing from staff is if there is
someway to give the roof over the pumps a little more depth. Ms. Cottrell said that was a
compromise reached at the recommendation of the Planning and Development Board. That is
~~~~ ~~~~~
~ 0:v an added feature that was initially proposed as a typical wrap around metal fac\kle ~ilh the
'\0 Amoco colors and the addition of the mansard roof treatment around all four sides of the
canopy has been done at the recommendation. The addition of the roof is not just a matter of
maintaining some corporate identity. It is also important architecturally . We think that
uniformity is not always best and, in fact, can deflect from any architectural interest. There is
not a truly established characteristic or typical building appearance in that area. We do not
feel that the portion of the roof that is in question is one that is going to add anything to the
appearance of the building and, in fact, will detract from it because of the uniformity of it.
The extension of the parapet wall above the roofline has a color accent on it and we think that
brings a little more architectural interest. The cost is an issue as well.
Mr. Richmond added that in 1994 we did not build any buildings in South Florida with a
continuous parapet roof. The building style has changed over the years and this is a brand
new prototype joint venture between McDonald's and Amoco and we would like to build the
first one in South Florida in the City of Boynton Beach.
Vice Mayor Bradley understands that Mr. Richmond is not trying to disguise a gas station or a
McDonald's and that he is trying to put up a building that is a combination use and he wants
people to know that for the sake of both businesses.
Commissioner Rosen found it unusual that we call uniformity unattractive. He stated that
besides traffic flow, there is a design problem. He said there would be a bare wall on three
sides and he did not think this would be attractive.
Vice Mayor Bradley asked about the demographics pertaining to McDonald's in retirement
communities. Mr. Richmond advised that McDonald's caters to senior citizens offering
certain discounts. We are a family-oriented business which includes senior citizens. In
addition, one of the first and foremost things McDonald's trys to provide to the community is
that we will employ senior citizens, as well as the younger generation.
Mayor Pro Tern Matson pointed out~ery morning many of the senior citizens from Sterling
Village and Colonial Club gather at the McDonald I s on Federal Highway for breakfast.
~
Mayor Taylor asked who has the overall authority if there is a problem. Mr. Richmond stated
that Amoco will be purchasing the property and McDonald I s will be leasing from them.
Mayor Taylor felt the citizens I concerns about the view will dissipate when the landscape goes
in. In addition, a large parcel separates them from this project. With regard to the comment
about walk-in customer throwing the trash on the ground, Mayor Taylor stated that most~ '1
McDonald's that he has been to maintain their places quite well. He was complete~st
the fifth pump. With regard to the roof, he thinks this is a unique design where we are
combining two different places. The pumps seemed to be lined up right. The people will
probably be exiting on Congress Avenue. He thinks it will work.
Commissioner Rosen said we are taking something that was developed for the beautification of
-- ~
~~~ ~~
~\ \~~ J' '\j' fu \5 '0
./ the City and tearing it apart. The Planning and Development Board are dOi~W~1 tiWthink
is best and so is he. He thinks we should be consistent with the kind of bea~cation we talk
about all the time. This is not a beautification problem. This is a serious problem of
inconsistency.
Mayor Taylor did not see any inconsistency. He said McDonald's is covering their roof with
what they always do and the other portion of the business is a parapet wall. He said beauty is
in the eye of the beholder and he did not have a problem with the parapet wall. He thinks it
can be done correctly.
Vice Mayor Bradley asked how this McDonald's compares with the traditional McDonald's in
terms of seating and size. Mr. Richmond said it is slightly smaller. There are approximately
50 seats. Some of the other McDonald's have as many as 70 to 100 seats.
Commissioner Rosen asked Ms. Heyden to display the illustration of the traffic flow. He said
we have a unique setup with three units combined into one. As you come into Congress
Avenue and go around to the menu window and then exit the site, hopefully, to Woolbright.
But if people want to continue on Congress A venue, there is a good possibility they might try
a shortcut by going around the gas pumps and out. He asked what the distance is between the
gas pumps and the west ~. Ms. Cottrell said the distance between the back of the curb
protecting the landscaping and the fuel pump is 35' 4". Commissioner Rosen said the
possibility of a truck gasing up and someone trying to skirt around would be pretty tight. He
asked if there is a possibility of egress out to Woolbright to avoid that turnaround. He noticed
that the parking for McDonald's is on the left side. So cars will possibly be backing up there
trying to get onto Congress Avenue. Ms. Cottrell stated that when you have two different
users that may have different peak hours, we wanted to make sure that the traffic circulation
works. In all respects the driveway isles meet or exceed what the code requires. She felt
there was a logical traffic flow through the site and that there are very few areas within the site
where there is any potential vehicular conflict. In addition, they have been minimized to the
maximum extent possible. There is plenty of room if there is an automobile at a normal
fueling position at any of the pumps, there is about 30 feet at least between the rearend of that
car and the landscape island. So you have a lot of room to maneuver in around there. There
really is not any place within the site with a normal traffic flow through the site that you are
going to have problems with through traffic and backing up motions, which is a primary
problem within any site.
Commissioner Rosen asked if this project precede the extention on the building of the three
lanes on Woolbright Road. Mr. Richmond answered affirmatively. He said he spoke to
Harvey Lopez who is with Palm Beach County and we are about a 30 day window ahead of
them. They are starting the east end of the project first, so we will be in and completed
construction prior to them reaching our part of their project.
Motion
Mayor Pro Tern Matson moved to approve the McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and Service
tY-'
FROI"
.~ '~.1995 1:3:05
P. i
~dW
'MClon;~
t.Ar:L>onalds CorpOration
5200 Tow... Cent!!' Cirr.:"
Suite eoo
81)c6 R.ton, r!ori::la 3:l486
(401)39~ -800,3
FlIlI, (407)7~O-OI99
September 9, 1995
VIA FAX AND REGULAR MAIl.
The Honorable Jerry Taylor
Mayor of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Ae: New McDonald's Slore
SEe: Wooloright & Congress Ave.
Menu Board
Dear Mayor Taylor:
As you are aware. the referenced site plan was approved August 16, 1995 by the City of
Boynton Beach Town Council. However, during our site plan approval process, we were
informed that some new code ordinances had been established. Specifically, we were
informed that the sign code limited any menu board to twenty-five (25) square feet. After
weeks of research and communication with our sign compan~ and operations personnel, we
developed a sign that would meet the ourrent code. The menu board we de$l~ned is non-
standard and 8ven though it will have two (2) faces we were not successful in containing our
complete menu. The men!J board will have to be manually rotated after our breakfast period
has ended. As you can imagine, this wll! be very awkward and cumbersome partlcularly during
our rainy S8ason. However it meets the City's current code.
After some research, we have reviewed our current menu boards a8 well as our competition's.
The industry standard is greater than twenty-five (25) square feet. The existlng menu board at
Peul Raffa's McDonald's store et Woolbnghtand Federal is our standard 5 x 7 foot model. The
menu board at Subway's, also on Federal Highway, is twenty-eighty (28) square feet inClusive
of all menu lteme. The Wendy's menu board on Boynton Beach Boulevard contains forty-
seven (47) square feet inclusive of all menu ,tems. The Burger King's menu board on Boynton
Beach Boulevard and Congress Avenue contains thirty (30) square feet inclusive of all menu
Items. The Polio Tropical's menu board on COl1gress Avenue north of Gateway contains thirty-
two (32) square feat. it appears thet existing stores in the City have menu boards that were
apparently built prior to the new ordinance.
I have inCluded photos of all the menu boards discussed above. As you can see, all of the
menu boards are behind the buildings and do not create an unpleasant appearance. I have
also included a cut sheet ot our standard menu board for your review.
We at McDonald's believe the oode restricts the referenced project to a menu board to a size
that Is below industry standards. Further it piaces us at an unfair advantage when we can not
provide our customers all of our menu items. This project Is the fualof it6 kind in South Florida.
We would like for this project to become a signature of our new alliance with Amoco and for
~ t-:ur1
'~. '~. 1 ';'95 18: 06
P. ~
The Honorable Jerry Taylor
Mayor of Boynton Belle!1
Page Two
the project to historica!ly set the tone for construction in the City of Boynton Beach. This
project will receive a significant amount of publicity during our grand opening.
We at McDonald's would ask for your assistance tor any variation of the current City code
which would allow us to install our standard menu board. Our customer's would also appreciate
your a8slstancB.
We are In the process of permitting our store, We are optimistic about the City's new five day
review time period. We anticipate that we will be 6uccessfulln permitting and commencement
of construction prior to September 30.1995. It is our goal to open this slore this year. The
proj&ct will require approximately three (3) months of construction.
Should you have questions relative to the enclosed, please contact me at your convenience.
S~~?felY~ )\)( _}_
()tJl;1tJ'4~
Clark W. Bridgman '
Project Manager
cc: Carrie A. Parker w/attch.
1:\WOI'ICMMOOO''eoVHTBCH\T''\'lOR,001
FROM
'84/5'1(7' (152.40 c::m, K 213.3e om,)
78 Menu Item line.
(21-5/16"-54.13 em, panel1ength)
314" (1.90 em.l eopy size
Eesy-Change Price System
Ord.r board configuration
(2) Trln.files - 13.3/4"1l13-3/4"
(34.93 em, )( 34,93 em,)
'.
i
;.
,:TENCON
\,
Relere"ce board vUflfigulalion
(3) Transli1es' 13.3/4" X 13-3/4"
(:3493 em, j( 34,93 em,)
.. lllvlf/ofl Of Plalt/.un., //JC,
on EHI fnlO/)' ~
, Powell, tlJ aM
, HoX 615~7.11531
j ,: 8Oll..fM-1..,
I
'.
.,~ "I..II.LI,'., 'nc,
. ,~ ,. I
Ii i I i ~ i <
1(; :.\t' {I
FF'OM
9. '3. 1'39~, 1:;;:08
P. ':'
ROLLAORAPI:fIC 5' j( 7' MENU BOARD
'8415'" l' (152,40 om. )( 213.36em I
,'q
r- 3OM~ I
rG
Z"~W'
72,3h""
I
-I.
I
,'.r
"- lIOG,IIOt:tr.,
".10"
SS.. Ollt
1
'1
I
Z'.4W
'711,~CI/I1
.,
~l
)5
!~
-t-
.;
.~
I -
D
I D
0 ' ". ,
1-
~, (
. ~
..~
~-;-
.-
-:-:
":
~~
-t
;g
, .:11
;"Iil
r=1,
-. D ~,!
~ I~-t-
. g
r~
ELECTRICAL
L",'pa:
4 eu, F42T'2CWHO
4 es, F24T1,CWHO
, ea. Jefferson Bat
256448.100
1 ea. Valmor.t
6G3&t4W
1 e8. 15 Amp CircUit
12DV, eo HZ
Sall..t:
S.r\llce:
LOld:
2,9 Amps
(Per Cabinet)
,I .,
, !
"
11 I
:1
September 14, 1995
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-342
""
\
FROM:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
I~~l~m V. Hukill, P.E.
~~ng Official
SIGN ORDINANCE - MENU BOARDS
-&1
(11..
~
TO:
RE:
The most recent revision to the City Sign Ordinance (other than
the April 4, 1995 LOR codification) was January 15, 1991
(attached). The ordinance prior to that time delineated a 25 sq.
ft. maximum menu board. So did the 1991 ordinance, which is
still in effect. We can safely conclude that the 25 sq. ft.
requirement has been in place at least since 1988 when the
previous ordinance (also attached) was adopted. It is possible,
and even probable, that the 25 sq. ft. requirement was in place
prior to 1988.
I understand some statements have been made regarding larger menu
boards in existence in Boynton Beach. I have discussed this with
Mr, Newbold, Mr. Haag, Mr. Duff and Mr. Sy and none of them know
of any larger menu boards in Boynton, or recall any variances
granted.
A recent statement made to Mr. Newbold that menu boards as small
as 25 sq. ft. are not available appears to be in error. Many
menu boards are depicted in manufacturers literature in a wide
variety of shapes and sizes both larger and smaller than 25 sq.
ft.
The following locations were mentioned by the persons I discussed
this with as locations with menu boards not exceeding 25 sq. ft.
in area:
Checkers on Boynton Beach Boulevard
Subway on Congress Avenue
Miami Subs at Congress & Hypoluxo
Boston Chicken
PolIo Tropical
Kentucky Fried Chicken at Oakwood Square
Kentucky Fried Chicken on Boynton Beach Boulevard
We don't support an increase in size of menu boards at this time
for several reasons including the fact that the present size
limit has served all of the cited locations very nicely, and
allowing new franchises to have a larger board would provide them
with a competitive advantage. From a more pragmatic standpoint,
Memorandum 95-342 to Carrie Parker
RE: Sign Ordinance - Menu Boards
September 14, 1995
Page Two
changing a law to accommodate a particular complainant is not
sound public policy, particularly when a variance procedure is
already in place.
One final thought, please. On June 19 of this year the Commission
adopted a Community Design Plan. Nothing in the Community Design
Plan mentions menu boards, but there is a section on signs (Chap.
9, Sec. 10, paragraph 1, page 9-5). It does not establish
maximum sizes for menu boards or any other kind of sign.
However,the Community Design Plan does contain a specific
condition (Chap. 9, Sec. 7, paragraph C, page 9-3) which says
"Whenever the regulations and requirements of this chapter are at
variance with the requirements of any other lawfully enacted and
adopted rules, regulations, ordinances or laws, the most
restrictive shall apply." Chapter 21 is clearly more restrictive
than Chapter 9 with respect to menu boards, and therefore is
applicable.
WVH:bh
Attachments
XC: Tambri Heyden
Al Newbold
Michael Haag
Milt Duff
Phil Sy
MBIIU
~Otk- f?t1((/I1.. TO A'P/l ~ /qq5
SIGNS
~ 21.14
(3) For those signs whose faces are generally parallel to the
street centerline, one (1) of the following is permitted, in
lieu of the above:
(a) A freestanding sign as described in subsection (2Xa)
above.
(b) A fixed projecting sign as described in subsection (2)(b)
above. .
(4) In addition to signs in section 21-14(DX2)and (3) above, one
(1) or more flat signs on one (1) or more walls advertising
the business use shall be allowed provided that the area of
all such signage shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the
building face' area of the wan which abuts the main street.
(5) In addition to the other signs in this section, one (1) on-
premises sign described as follows shall be permitted in
those commercial districts of the city where drive through
restaurants are permitted. Said sign shall be an exterior
single-faced menu sign with illustrated face not to exceed
twenty-five (25) square feet when 8 restaurant has a drive-
through pickup window service. Such signs will allow for
instructions on use of this service and list the menu and
price of items to be served, with the top of the sign not to
exceed five (5) feet above ground level at the base of the
sign.
(6) Instead of other signs in this section one (1) temporary
sign, maximum of thirty (30) days, can be placed when a
certificate of occupancy is issued pending the approval of a
sign application if at the time of the certificate of occu-
pancy an application for a sign has been submitted to the
building department.
(7) Each use may also have window signs which shall not
exceed twenty (20) percent of the window being used.
(8) A directory sign consisting of signs each having an area
not exceeding eighteen (18) square feet per sign face. If
such directory sign is a flat sign, it should not exceed ten
(10) feet in height. If such directory sign is freestanding, it
shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. Freestanding direc-
tory signs are permitted in addition to signs permitted and
regulated in section 21.14<EX3).
Supp. No. a7 1493
ORDINANCE 88-33
(b) One fixed projecting sign which advertises the use or
uses of the premises provided that the sign and its
supports shall not extend more than three (3) feet
beyond the wall, nor shall it extend above the parapet
of any building. The maximum area of such sign shall
not be more than eighteen (18) square feet each face
and in no case shall be closer than twenty-four (24)
inches of the curb line.
(3) For those signs whose faces are generally parallel to the
street centerline, one of the following is penmitted, in
lieu of the above:
(a) A free standing sign as described in (2)(a) above.
(b) A fixed projecting sign as described in (2)(b) above.
(4) In addition to signs in Section 21-15(0)(2)(3), one or
more flat signs on one or more walls advertising the busi-
ness use shall be allowed provided that the area of all
such signage shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the
building face area of the wall which ~bwtti abuts the main
street.
(5) In addition to the other signs in this section, one on-
~remi$i$ premise sign described as follows shall be per-
mitted in those commercial districts of the city where
drive through restaurants are penmitted. Said sign shall
be an exterior single-faced menu sign with illustrated
face not to exceed twenty-five (25) square feet when a
restaurant has a drive through pick up window service. '.
Such signs will allow for instructions on use of this ser-
vice and list the menu and price of items to be served,
with the top of the sign not to exceed five (5) feet above
ground level at the base of the sign.
(6) Instead of other signs in this section one temporary sign,
maximum of 30 days, can be placed when a Certificate of
Occupancy is issued pending the approval of a sign appli-
cation if at the time of the Certificate of Occupancy an
application for a sign has been submitted to the Building
Department.
(7) Each use may also have window signs which shall not exceed
20% of the window being used.
(8) A directory sign consisting of signs each having an area
not exceeding eighteen (18) square feet per sign face.
If such directory sign is a flat sign, it should not
exceed ten (10) feet in height. If such directory sign
is a flat sign, it shall not exceed ten (10) feet in
height. If such directory sign is freestanding, it shall
not exceed six (6} feet in height. Freestanding directory
signs are penmitted in addition to signs penmitted and
regulated in Section 21-14(E)(3).
(9) Identification signs, not painted on the wall shall be
permitted on the rear wall of business establishments pro-
vided they are limited to four (4) square feet of sign
area and provided that the rear of the property is buffered
when contiguous to residential zoning districts
'?lie City of
'Boynton 'Beach
100 'E. 2Joynton 'Beadi tJJaJeVtJ1Tl
P.O. 2Jo~Jl0
'Boynton ~~n, ~riI:JfI. JJ.f25.0JIO
City ?fail: (4fJ7) 375-61J(J()
1"Iv(: (4fJ7) 375-6090
August 8, 1995
Robert E. Basehart
Anna Cottrell
Basehart & Cottrell, Inc.
1532 Old Okeechobee Road, suite 101
West palm Beach, Florida 33409
Re: McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and service
Station/Convenience Store - File No. COUS 95-002
Dear Mr. Basehart and Ms. Cottrell:
The cost of the third Technical Review ~ommittee review for the
above-captioned submitted is as follows:
Forester/Environmentalist
Utilities
Engineering
Planning and Zoning
$31. 44
19.60
127.93
145.25
Total
$324.22
Please remit the amount of $324.22 to the City of Boynton for the
cost of this review, prior to August 15, 1995
Also please include the fee of $400.00 for the appeal of the
lighting of the mansard roof (CDPA 95-002).
Z::Jhdii
Tambri J, Hey~
planning and Zoning Director
TJH:dim
xc: Central File
e:3rdrevCoBt.MAC/trc
jifmerica s tjateway to tlie (jutfstream
o ~ @ ~ OW ~l~\\
~ \ i995 \U\
PLANNiNG r,ND ~
ZONING D\;.pl . __-
,...,~--.........-
S'/ --1; (to &~
3t~s. C{)i~qinia flaW 0 t
44 jf/aoo. Sh,d .'Y1tA- 11 ~ ~n:
Lindenhu~st, ~ew Cl.Jo'Zk t 1757 .. . _ r, [J! 1)
l/t1'~ 1<.1L~~~!,~
. - "I I"'.......
, .:.,'\
0J1Z: "f ~U1<' tJ<:4.d; - .fa ~,,~
t . ./ CA/ / / _ j '~h~ "" ~~.A . i
, i 'C.y:";"/"W'Jt..<./ "/,./ .~ ~.;C?~- 1- i '':4t-ot'c? <"b
::'0 ~i:~~\, \.~~~
/ . I ! .<~"/ '.... '\ . "
I. /. /. '" / 1{/ // It, /~ //~ , · ,':',}-_________( ':'0'/ ,
A...../...<'~./ /f "'"', ,,-, ~. ., '" ~ I I I I HI - "
r; d /"./ /J.;' "1/../-:-1 ,c.//!""_ ,(.,v '4~~/'1 - j'?/k,:../k";'~/V!.d,
V I -14/1/ vvl/ />L oJ..., /1, ---
" :; f - ~ '
)/~/'" - /) I, .1./ ~ "'t'.(. /zt-i"!'!/ Ve2/ L:-C7-td~t ~.
.?'l,J (<;, l. F10.!...J1/1#~ '- ':' ," - ~ -.I
.' I . .' t _ / UI<-1C -
8:y'fi:j~~ / (_t:~~4h-~t:..:?-~~ ,~ _Z-t-uZ/ ~ .
-::;0 ;I r' /.----:'t.f 1 j /.<H' H:~""" I ' ~'7V' ,L ~~-CI/"'-4.;t/ //]L<u:-.ku.--.~,
/Z.I;~.( (/ /c..v {;/'; . :AV'4C~' - - ~
. ~ .~ ., j ~ / J 7;! // d #j:~ v ,Z /j,~"",;/- ~-:; c1.,/~ /":v~~t4
,kF .",... 4- '" f.. ./} . /r. / / a~""-"'" ~ 7 ~ -<-'1' .,/ / . l'
./' 2"" _ 7h-~.. / 4" 1'.- _.7 '/.J___/ ~../!t".......-:u{~ k4/~0*d
~/'?~ ~~t.-(~-, ~l,...~~ -., ~ . ; ~ j'.
(,?~h~ /(;1.~.4?~. . &wuc; ""; /}~//k,z--f'Jf'.p--
!~<_"?'.A~-uj ;;;/~ >'1/1/Uf d?V1utir'w /In;p~~~~~~-/'
.J, ~J/ \ 'II .
-) iZ?&.c2,i"..-p~' /I~ tl~r c!/ik' /" ' w Z -r--;?/ ..,;//,~;~,?/., ,.....w
V 7, lel- . / - . 1. ' ,/....?t.<-. '- h~ -CC<--c....b
(, i /Jt.b. 2'U#~u..~ /,u l~t4-1 r /..,.c.~:U--~~~ .hr/d.
/, /! r ~'_~ ,-.'7/. ./ " / .'. (../ . ./ /' - ~ '
/:-: ,,--t~~../ ~;fM.~C!/ .~~u.? C?-Mr..' ~d--YA~ --n~c~~t;.--:'
,A:.-'1/'./?..z- ,ou/ r~ P;/YV'n'U' .,;~aZ- <:2/z.?-a/ Y~-v2 *~,...;:;;: c2f~/
~<:/~,~ Md~ .L;.4t...~un-/ '77r!""~'kd:'
'/1:;~dj;~rz/~ I~ ~~~~~ t:?t4!k:Yuh{ ~.'c :!:
"/:~~t:/: I/~~?" ta;Z'h.- P.L~<./ /'L~t0~;Z~ ~[~(~
,::t(<0 'I ~ ;r:-7~~;;: / i2"Z:"~~1 (it 1~V"'- - _
'---::tr7~:i yffi ~0...zU~U'PV/Y.2:::-,,?i-7 /Y7,,~~'.3
,/ ~jo/- ~~ ,/z.e'a,[~'u J-4~ {ltuC ,r::~ ,~~7c:~ ,2 ",~d~ _ d .
It:! rl<0 C-";r~-; ?";W'le ~rz:.; ,0,r~ ~ /?Z<'~- . c.,,~v<' &
/.....:~t'/ /<-..(.u1:.-: <:)'-L j...-;~-;'f'/ .c~~~.z;~?7~ k /~ ct-:u:~ ~~ ,ce
. /2' t;...>7: ;i~? '1~: .:..1.
.'-/ ".,-;zA ~ e:?-.u? ~~!.? <.!c:d c~ ;ir;tC J- {~7? f'e -'jc: ;s.+ l' d~ _ .;....,;; -'h:..!", c~
~ . ,/..-;- _- r / ~7
:.d6U'Uk ,,-"J-t1 //?' ~C?te.-;...... C'~71:: ....,;.;.><-?J--. //.;.,r;~:.:K'.Y~:
(, Je: ..;. c.:: u il- ':J.c t.: ~,..:-r;,
' .' ,/ /. '
/ 1C;;' _ ,;':"d.. ",/4 ~::~ .-
::.. ':r- ~ -
--~----------------~---------~
11/22,95 12:49 FAX 407 355 3201
INFO RES MGMT
141002 ,
fiWII!IIl ST^TE OF Fl.ORJD^ '.,. . . .
~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABIUTATIVE SERVICES
Stage II: Vapor RecQvery Systems
T~lementation Guidelines
, Gaso~1z1.e Vapor Contro~"",
-
Recently the State 'of Florida'~dopt~d Gas~ii~e vapor Control Rule 17-252
Florid~ Admi.nistrative Code (FAC). In order to assist you in complying ,
with this rule the local air prqgram of the Palm Beach County Pub~io Health
Unit offers the following guidelines:
- -
1) ~l~ Review - Each faoility subject to this rule should complete' the
attached System Specification Form and submit construction drawings
to include a plan.lled, layout. of the. system to be installed oriented to
tbe bui1ding. The drawing o~" the vapor recovery system must include:
tank and dispenser locations, dispenser island configuration and
components,~vapor recovery piping diameters, piping manifolds (if any),
and piping slope. Only plans prepared under the supervision of and
signed .~nd ~sealed by a :Professional Engineer registered in the "State
of -Florida ,will be accepted~_ In addition I "we request a reduced 'copy
(i. e., 8 -~/2 II x ~111) "of ~ the, planned layout for our files. '. _ ...'.'
} Eou4>m~t Specificatio:qs - Only the latest generati.on systems currently
certified by the California ~r Resources Board (CARE) or Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) approved Stage II systems that meet a minimum
of 95% vapor recovery efficiency will be considered.
Te~tincr Reauirements-.. Upon completion and prior to operation of. the
Stage II Vapor Recovery System, the ownerr contractor or respons~le
party shal~ perform the fol~owing tests to meet facility certification
requirements. Please notify our office ,regarding the testing schedule
7 days in advance.
a.
Pressure Decay Test (aleak testn) to ensure vapor tightness of
the system.
b.
Dynamic Back Pressure/Liquid Blookage Test to ~etermine the
pressure drop during vapor flow and to ensure that accumulated
liquid in the vapor return line flows to the underground tank,
thereby preventtn~ the restriction of va~or.flow. (This test
is recommended ir~or tOI and after backf~ll~ng) .
c.
Vapor to liquid ratio test for vapor assist systems.
f.
11/22/95 12:50 FAX 407 355 3201
INFO RES MGMT
1aI003
Highlights of 27-252 V.A.C.
~.. :.:. .- Af)"licabil'i.ty'~,,::; .~.. .:',.. ..... "'-
..::,,~.;:!~:~:);::;?;*{
.j..,.,+ ~,....."....!~~.
~ .........- _...."f_.., -.....'":.J
'" ,'.-' ,'-
'.
*
Only fa~ilities which have dispensedmore~than 10,000 gallons of
gasoline in anyone month during.or after 1991 are subject to these
provisions. Independent small business gas marketers are subject to
these provisions if they have dispensed ~?re than 50,000 gal/mo.
.. .'
".
Com%)~.:Lanoe Scb.~du.lell . .
1J Facilities which began construction or had a significant modification
after Nov. 15. 2992, must install a stage II vapor Recovery~sys~em'
priQ~ to di~~nsi~a product.
2] o'months - facilities which began constr~tion'~ft~r Nov. 15, 1990 but
before Nov. 15, ,1992 an~ dispensed more t~an 10,000 gal/mo in . any :one
month after lS9~, must l.D..Sta11 Stage. I~..bY. June 301 1993 .;. ~.~. :. ;"~::
-.. '. ~ - . -..... ~
3J ~ ve~r ~ facilities which were in operation:or under;constrUctioD~cin
. Nov< ).5, ~990 arid di~pensed more than 100;000 'gallroo....in any,~one..imonth
after ~99~/; must install Stage II by D~c.' '~3J:>'~ ~993 ~. .::: 1:: ': ~'1 ~}
4J .2 year - facilities which were in operation or..under.constrUction~'on
Nov. 15, ~9S0 and dispensed more than 1.01'000 gal/mo but less than:'~:'~
100,000 gal/mo in anyone month after 1991, must install Stage-II by
Nov. 1.S ( 1.994. .. .
Control Teclu:J.oloqv, R~cord K~ep:J.ncr &: Trairlint]:
*
Operating instructions for use of Stage II System ~t each facility
must be conspicuously posted.
*
_. .
Records 6fthe following shall be maintained for 2 years and shall
be available for'inspection: quantities of gasoline delivered arid
dispensed, log of maintenance inspections and invoices of repairs .
performed on Stage II components, results of any tests of the
Stage II Syst~m, and equipment manufacturer contacts fo~ parts and
service.
*
p~l Stage II System shall be maintained in proper working order in
accordance with manufacturerig specs. If the vapor recov~ry system
or componenc contains a.significan~ defect the system or component
shall be taken out of service and be tagged Jlout of Order". Only'
original manufacturer parts, or aftermarket parts that have been
approved by CA.~ or EPA shall be used to replace existing Stage II
equipment.
*
At least one representative of the facility must be knowledgeable
in the operation and mainCenance of the Stage II Vapor Recovery
System.
Not:e: Should EPA promulgate standards requiring "onboard" evaporative
control systems, moderate ozone non-attainment areas (Palm Beach councy)
may not be subject to_Stage II requirements.
AUG 05 '95 10:24 BASEHART/COTTRELL
P.02- ,
.; \
BASEHART & CO'ITR.ELL,INc.
PLANNERS
1532 Old Okeechobee Road. Suite 101
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
(407) 688-0048 FAX (407) 688-2009
August 3j 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Planning Oepartment
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Attn: Dan DeCarlo
RE: REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF CHAPTER 9, SECTION 1O.P, 5 & 6 FOR THE PROPOSED
McDONALDSI AMOCO
OUR REF.N95044
Dear Dan:
On behalf of McDonalds Corporation, we are hereby requesting a waiver from the standards :IS set forth
in Chapter 9. Section 10F. Exterior Lijrhting, Subsections 5 & 6, to run conCUlTent with the site plan
review application previously submitted. The purpo~e of the waiver is to allow the placement of light pipe
roof beams on the proposed building.
It ill our belief that the lighting in quc:stion is not contrary to tbe Intent of the provisions of Section 10 F.
The lighting tn question Is a pan of the arChitectural theme at the building, and does not function as
signage or an attention attractor. The proposed building and accent lighting is a corporate standard' for
McDonalds Corporation and is present on numerous buildings in the Palm Beach County area. The
lighting in question is entirely compatible with the architectural design of the buildini and functions as
an accent feature which we believe enhances the aesthetic appearance of the building. The lighting will
be turned on during all hours of operation, :u!d therefore is not used to increase the buildings visibility
after dark.
Pleue add this as an agenda item and allow this waiver to move forward concurrent with the site pian
review application, whlch wIll be heard at the Planning and Development Board. heartng on August 8.
1995 and City Commission Public Hearing on August 15, i995.
Sincerely.
~
Annal Cottrell, AICPrfJ-
Principal
AC:pl
,. "T.:;....
~. .' ...,
I". .
I
I
i
I
I
~ '
i
,
,
I .'
.,....~~..,.....,,_.-...u
~~~s>>:~:-',~_,.,. ~~.;......
~INUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOY~TON BEACH. FLORIDA
'-
FEBRUARY 13, 1996
~. CO~I~ll~ICA TIONS AND Al'i"NOUNCEML1\ffS
A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Departmmt
(1) Final disposition of last month's agenda items
Ms. Heyden reported on the following:
Isles of Hunters Run Site Plan Approval - The Board recommended approval. subject to
deletion of three comments. The City Commission concurred with the Board's
recommendation.
Romano's Macaroni Grill - The Board recommendedappreival, Subject to all staff comments
and working out some elevation changes. That entailed not accepting the shared parking
study. At the City Commission. meeting, the applicant proposed a plan to add the parking
spaces that they were short. Those parking spaces are going to be added to the rear of the
shopping center. Therefore. that negated the need for the shared parking study. With respect
to the elevation changes, the applicant and staff were able to work out the color of the
building. and also the color of the awnings. However. they could not reach an agreement on
eliminating the stone. The City Commission agreed to allow -the stone.
WhipowiIl Arms Time Extension - The City Commission approved this, subject to all staff
comments.
8. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
Chairman Dube suggested that Ms. Heyden look at the red color on Hops in the daylight.
Chairman Dulle advised that former Commissioner Rosen commented to him after the last
Board meeting about the lights at the Amoco station. Ms. Heyden agreed that the lights under
the canopy are blinding. She advised that there is a minimum amount of foot candles required,
but there is no maximum. However. they cannot produce glare. Mr. Rosenstock suggested
that the Code be revised to include a maximum. Ms. Heyden will pass this information on to
the City Engineering Department.
Chairman Dulle reminded the members of the Board whose terms expires this April to
resubmit an application if they desire to continue to serve on the Board.
23
':'" .~;._~>.....--~~~..,._~.." ,~":"::~
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT rn
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-125
rn@~~wrn~
." ~
APR'I~
TO:
Carrie A. Parker
City Manager
~'~~. 1 " '~ukill. P.E.
n neer
~ :1
April 8. 1996
1J)~
FROM:
DATE:
RE: McDONALDS/AMOCO - LIGHTING
The canopy lights at subject location have been downsized and the perimeter lighting has been
shielded. all in response to questions raised earlier regarding glare.
WVHIck
C:MCDGLARE
~(f\
~~
^ ~ ~-tV
rf\ G V- 0 JvJ- JIIf'i
1 ;\(}l"0f) t
t ~ \1'+
RECEIV'ED
,~;..IR 10 1996
CITy MANAGER'S OFflCS
- ~
Miscellaneous Cash Rec~ipt
crry 0. BOYNTON BEACH
4 (,::>0
Accowac No. /
l'~\O
\\r.. \ 1 \~~'i
.,,\1 \'\ s~c\'\
No. 0 2 ~:J ;,~: -
A 1#1.>
R.eceived 01
Addre.. ".. "
'or
~
.1 i
; ""__'\. ,-_c
)
Depr. r~ ,
/ (~~ 0 -4'
. "!-iJ.-I
/,-~
.19_
I-
i
./
-7
1 ' ~C1f! nn
Ref'n: U'2- 3U27 6
/;-P,S-187t UI!SltjOf'7'1I,rll t.3:2 L 22
/ ' .' I / ' /l~f I ! 7. r~ 2
t< I ..~: U.,.... ~.UL lo
,-
..
.,.
f~" . , f,,-~-it~ . n w rn l~~ 1
,j \' 'I II
'if d "l ,
, Ll : I ~ T? ? 2 1996 LF
DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-083
FROM:
Carrie A. Parker
C1ity ger
it ~ukill, P.E.
~1 gmeer
March 11, 1996
iLL ;~l
I" ~/lu
5'u- bJ' 1-
TO:
DATE:
RE: McDONALDS/AMOCO - GLARE
McDonald's Bridgeman has agreed to either paint lenses or replace canopy fixtures within about a
week.
WVH/ck
xc: Ken Hall, Plans Inspector/Technician
/i N~f'., /.
. \5--11
v
'n
,/ ~'- 061' ~\Y cJ
.J) 0 )- <J'\
-ftv(j ,~l\)
~
C:GLAREMcD
RECEIVl!D
)'1 'C4 t'1
(VI DJtCl f C v '\ ,-,erN",
C t1i..1I1~b(-\ J/t#-}
111M f2.. 1Q96
CJ1Y MANAGER'S OFFlQE
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-115
FROM:
William Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
Tambri J. HeYden~~
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
March 5, 1996
SUBJECT:
Measurement of Glare
In response to Department of Development, Engineering Division
Memorandum No. 96 - 071, I assume this in regard to my request
regarding the glare caused by the lights at the Amoco/McDonald. If
so, then you are correct. Based on my instructions to Doris
Marttila of my department on March 1st, she called Carol Kribs to
let your office know that I would like to take you up on your offer
in Engineering Division Memorandum No. 96-067 to research standards
for glare for a possible code change. Please accept this as my
written request for your recommendation on glare standards.
TJH:dim
xc: Central File
a:Glare.mem
II ~-
f I ~~)1-~ - ~ ~-\lf; .~,: ['
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT I~r M;~ ~'~C~l ~
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-011 I
, PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
."'r,,_..... .... --..~'"
TO:
Tambri 1. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
IWJltLHukil~ P.E.
!.JjIII(p.gmeer
FROM:
DATE:
March 1, 1996
RE:
MEASUREMENT OF GLARE
We have heard by the grapevine that you may have requested research by this Department relating
to standards for glare. Is that correct?
WVH/ck
C:GLARE
r~ ~ @ [ffi.}r!i
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT [ FEB 2 9 IlII8 I W
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-06 PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
_ukill' P.E., City Engineer
February 28, 1996
>,
jj ,J...,
, ~
f' ,~.,/r
...""",
FROM:
DATE:
RE: MCDONALDS/AMOCO - LIGHTING
In response to the two questions in your Memo 96-098, be advised as follows:
1. Question. Can your Department cause any action to have the illumination level
reduced by virtue of non-compliance with approved plans?
Answer. Technically, no. Nothing contained within the Standard Building Code,
nor the LDR Chapters administered by the Department of Development, deals with
either glare or maximum light levels. That section of the LDR is Chapter 2,
Section 4, Paragraph N7, Page 2-13. Nonetheless, we contacted Mr, Bridgeman
prior to your memo, extracted a promise of resolution, and will follow up with him
on March 5.
2. Question. Does your Department recommend inserting maximum illumination
levels into LDR?
Answer. ConceptUl:illy yes. Realistically no. The problem is glare, which is
normally expressed in tenns'ofbrightness or intensity, not illumination.
Illumination levels are calculated based on long time maintenance factors, meaning
initial levels are usually substantially higher than maintained levels. For example,
FDOT requires a maintained level of 2 foot candles on Federal Highway, but the
fixtures proposed by FDOT actually will initially produce close to 5 foot candles -
and that is between fIxtures. Illumination levels directly below fixtures would be
much higher. That, in a nutshell, is too bright. Generally speaking, City
regulations are minimums or maximums, not minimums and maximums. If you
wish, we will research glare/brightness/intensity standards if any exist, and get back
to youc!'lease adVise0
WYH/ck
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
Ken Hall, Plans Check InspectorfT echnician
C:MCDONALD
~J7
,I
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-098
TO: Bill Hukill
Development Department Dir~ctor
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden 1)~~
Flanning and Zoni~Oirector
DATE: February 23, 1996
SUBJECT: McDONALD'S/AMOCO - Southeast corner of Congress Avenue
and Woolbright Road
Please be advised that at the February 13, 1996, Planning and
Development Board Meeting, several Board members mentioned that
there is a glare problem caused by the lights under the Amoco gas
pump canopy at the southeast corner of Congress Avenue and
Woolbright Road. My department required that the applicant put a
note on the permit plans stating that there shall be no glare from
the lights on site as this is a violation of the performance
standards of the zoning code. I have checked the lights myself and
they are blinding, not because of direction, but due to intensity.
Two things - can your Department cause any action to have the
illumination level reduced by virtue of non-compliance with the
approved plans? If not, this may have to be handled as a zoning
code enforcement violation. Please let me know. Second, the Board
suggested amending the Parking Lot Regulations to insert a maximum
illumination level. What would you recommend?
TJH:arw
xc: Carrie Parker
Central File
c:McDAmoco,D98
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-418
VI. PUBLIC HEARING
A.
cc: Utilities
Planning
Development
Agenda Memorandum for
August 15, 1995 City Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
City Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden 0 J
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: August 10, 1995
SUBJECT: McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and Service Station/
convenience Store - COUS #95-002
conditional Use (drive-through and service station)
Please place the above-referenced request on the August 15, 1995
City Commission agenda under Public Hearing.
DESCRIPTION: Robert E. Basehart and Anna Cottrell, Basehart and
Cottrell, Inc., agent for RFK Enterprises of Boynton Beach, Inc.,
property owner, are requesting conditional use approval for a
combination gas station/convenience store and restaurant with
drive-through window at the southeast corner of Congress Avenue and
Woolbright Road, zoned C-3.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0
vote, recommended approval of this request subj ect to staff
comments (Utilities Department Memorandum No. 95-250, Engineering
Division Memorandum No. 95-281,196,212,246,248, and 267,
Building Division Memorandum No. 95-268, and Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 95-399) with the exception of comment #11
,of th annin and Zoning Department memorandum, which recommended
that the tile roof be exten e aroun t e ent1re building to meet
the Community Design Plan requirement that all facades of buildings
visible from a right-of-way be designed as attractively as the
front of the building and to improve the appearance of the flat-
roofed portion of the building. upon the applicant's withdrawal at
the Planning and Development Board meeting of their community
design plan appeal for lights on the vertical beams of the roof of
the building, the Planning and Development Board further
recommended that the color of the beams be changed from blue to a
color to be worked out with s~aff that will blend with the roof
color. l
be; ~-<-"CY (; f]'--h f ~
\;) I / VI.. V t of'
TJH:dim
Attachment
a:CCA\lBnda,MAC
.
...
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-398
FROM:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
r- 1/
Tambri J. HeydelY vt/lA.' ,yUc< ch"v
Planning and zoningr?Birec~r ~
TO:
DA'l'E :
August 4, 1995
SUBJECT:
McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience store/
Service Station - COUS F95-002
(Conditional Use - drive-through and service
station)
INTRODUC'l'ION:
Robert E. Basehart and Anna Cottrell, Basehart and Cottrell, Inc.,
agent for RFK Enterprises of Boynton Beach, Inc. , d/b/a
McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience store, is requesting
conditional use approval for a property owned by RFK Enterprises of
Boynton Beach, Inc. as follows:
Location:
Southeast corner of Congress Avenue and
Woolbright Road
Land Use Plan
Designation:
Local Retail commercial (LRC)
Zoning District:
Community commercial (C-3)
Type of Use:
Combination gas station/convenience store and
restaurant with drive-through window (C-3
district requires conditional use approval for
drive-through windows and service stations).
Number of Units:
M/A
Square Footage:
Building:
Site:
3,432 square feet
43,566 square feet (1.0002 acres)
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING:
The surrounding land uses and zoning are as follows (see attached
location map - Exhibit "A"):
North -
Woolbright Road and farther north is an existing
office building, zoned Office/Professional
Commercial (C-1).
East
a bank, zoned Community Commercial (C-3).
South -
undeveloped vacant property, zoned Community
Commercial (C-3), formerly the site of a Westlake
Hardware, which was razed in 1992; farther south is
multi-family residential property zoned R-3.
West
Congress Avenue -"'nr'l f.::lrrhp1- I"Q~t' is an existing
commercial building, zoned Community Commercial
(C-3).
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES:
Section 11.2.0 of the Zoning Code contains twelve strlndards, listed
below, to which conditional uses a.re required to conform.
Followiny each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning
Department's evaluation of the application as it pertains to the
standards. The Planning and Development Board and City Commission
shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under
the tenns of these zoning legulations and, in connection therewith,
may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the
I
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-398
Conditional Use
McDonald/Amoco
File 1'10. COUS 95-002
conditlons including, but not lirliitt:.~d to, the dedication of
property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as
shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding
area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses
when not in harmony with the intent and purp0se of this section.
In evaluating an application for conditional:use, the Board and
Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the
qenel-al health, safety and wel fare of the community and make
written findings certifying that satisfactory prOVision has been
made concerning the following standards, where applicable:'
1. Ingress and egress to the subj 2ct propel-ty and proposed
structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and
control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
As shown in Exhibit "B" - site plan, access to the site is via
a two-way driveway on Congress Avenue and a two-way driveway
cn Woolbright Road. Traffic flow on site is two-w~y, with the
exception of the south and east sides of the building where
the drive-through lane and drive-through window are located,
respectively. Access to the angled parking spaces on the east
side of the building is also one-way.
The gasoline pump islands are located on the west side of the
building. Four pump islands are ~roposed with a fifth island
(the island furthest to the south) to be included in the
future. During the review process, staff raised serious
cClncerns regarding the fi fth pump is land, due to conflicts
wi th drive-through tl-affic and vehicles maneuvering into and
out of the parking f;paces at the t::outhwest corner of the
building, the location of the loading area dnd of the dumpster
~nd congestion close to the driveway onto Congress Avenue.
The most recent site plan (the site plan shown in Exhibit "B"
is the most recent plan) has been improved by modification of
the loading area and of the dumpster, further discussed below.
However, there is still concern that the fifth pump island
concentrates too much traffic with conflicting traffic
movements in this area. This is due to the fifth pump
island's adjacency to the driveway on Congress Avenue, the
drive-through lane which will funnel traffic from both the
north and the west at this point and heavily used parking
spaces near the front of the bUilding.
In addition to the degree of vehicular acti vi ty in this
southwest corner of the parcel, an e.xisting cross access
easement to the vacant parcel to the south (formerly Westlake
Hardware which was razed in 1992\ exists in this same area.
This cross access easement was established in 1992 when the
subj ect outparcel waE, subdivided from the Westlake Hardware
propel-ty immediately to tho a::>d~ ,::>,:,-1 ::-.:o"t-1' ::Inn r()Dditiol1al use
approval was granted on April 21r 1992 for an Exxon service
station under the current service stdtiol1 regulations which
became effective March 3, 1992. The current Community Design
plan requires vehicular circulation systems on adjdcent
properties to be linked to encourage cross access between
pdrcels. The purpose of Cl-OSS aCC8SS is to minimize the
numbel- of curb cuts on major roadE: for tl=affic safety reasons.
For all of the above reasons, staff recommends against the
future, fifth pump island.
Level of service problems on Woolbright Road will soon be
remedied after the county lets the plans to six-lane
Woolbright Road from Congress Avenue eastward, which is
2-
Page 3
Memorandum No. 95-398
Conditional Use
McDonald/AmOCO
File No. COUS 95-002
scheduled for the very near futur~. This overcapacity status
of this section of Woolbright Road does not jeopardize the
project's abllity to meet Palm Beach County's Traffic
P:rformance Standards Ordinance. Palm Beach County informed
::ctaff today that traffic concurrency will be met. This is
based on trips that are vested with the razed Westlake
Hardware use. However, vesting from abandoned uses is only
valid for a period of five yeart; after abandonment. Palm
Beach County has indicated that a building permit must be
issued by the end of September of 1995; the expiration'date of
the five year period. A letter frolll Palm Beach County
verifying their approval with condi tions was to be faxed
today, which has not yet been received, is forthcoming.
It should also be noted that on May 18, 1993, the 1992
conditional use approval for the Exxon station on this
property was granted a one year time extension of the
conditional use approval and concurrency certification which
was to have expired April 21, 1994. Extensions expire unless
a building permit application is made. A building permit
application was made and has been ext~nded several times. The
permit is currently being reviewed by the Building Div1sion
for another extension. The applicant is requesting this
extension of the building permit in the event this
McDonald's/Amoco application is not approved.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with
particular attention to the items in Subsection 1 above, and
the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional
use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city
as a whole,
Based on the square footage of the building, thirty (30)
parking spaces are required and to be provided, including two
(2) required handicapped spaces. As previously mentioned,
angled parking is proposed east of the drive-through
window/lane on the east side of the bUilding and ninety (90)
degree parking is proposed along the north and west sides of
the building.
A loading area, as required by code, is to be provided along
the south property line. The loading zone is hatched on the
site plan within Exhibit "B". Staff finds this location of
the loading zone to be acceptable.
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the
items in subsection land 2 above.
The dumpster location is propose.d for the southeast corner of
the parcel. The Public Works Department has approved the
location and enclosure.
4. Utilities, with refel-ence to locations, availability, and
compatibility.
All utilities are available to the si te.
private lift station is proposed.
In addition, a
5, Screening, buffering and landscaping with refel-ence to type,
dimensions, and character.
The applicant will provide landscape materials adequate to
meet all landscape code requirements. The screening and
landscaping proposed meets, or exceeds, code requirements in
all respects and provides the functional buffering required.
3
Page 4
Memorandum No. 95-398
Conditional Use
McDonald/Amoco
File No. caus 95-002
The landscaping will consist of a mixture of native and
ornamental canopy trees, palms and hedge materials, selected
to provide a variety of color and to enhance the building and
pl"Operty. The inten;:3i ty of landscaping is compatible with
other developments in the area.
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, wi tl1 reference to
glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and
harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
There will be one freestanding pole sign for the site to be
located at the northwest corner of the parcel. The sign will
be twenty (20) feet ill height and will display the McDonald's
and Amoco corporate logos, and the gasoline prices. There
will be signage on the building walls and canopies (see
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 399, comment #2
and Building Division Memorandum No. ~68 regarding compliance
with Community Design Plan and sign code.)
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
All code required setbacks are reflected on the site plan
submitted. No open space requirements are applicable.
8. General compatibil i ty with adj acent propert ies, and other
property in the zoning district.
The size and proposed colors of the building are compatible
with the surrounding buildings. However, the metal, striped
pump island canopies do not blend well with the stucco walled,
spanish" S" roof tiled, restaur anti convenience store building.
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-399 contains
recommendations (comments 11 and 12) to replace the pump
island canopies with a terracotta tiled mansard roof to match
the building (similar to the Mobil station at the southeast
corner of Hypoluxo Road and Congress Avenue) and to improve
the appearance of the flat-roofed portion of the building by
extending the mansard terracotta roof around the entire
building. The plans submitted do not show lighting on the
perimeter of the canopy.
A Community Design Plan Appeal has been submitted which is
baing processed simultaneously wlth this request to permit
multiple, vertical lighting beams to be attached to the
roofline (recommendation regarding the appeal is under
~)epal-ate cover).
9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to
compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
The proposed building is a single-story and 16.Q2 in hpiaht.
The building height is well below that allowed by the code for
the C-3 zoning district. The height proposed is harmonious
witll the buildings in the immediate area and consistent with
the established character of the area.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the
city as a whole.
Development of this site will have a positive economic benefit
to the City. The use of the l)l-Operty is compatible with
surrounding commercial uses, therefore no negative effects on
adJacent property is expected. Furthermore, the restaurant
use will provide revenue from sales taxes and the convenience
+
'.
Page 5
Memorandum No. 95-398
Conditional Use
McDonald/Amoco
File No. COUS 95-002
store/service station will generate b,)th sales and gas taxes.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to
site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the City
of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances (new reference is Part III
- Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4) .
The proj ect shall comply wi tl1 the above standards, upon
rectification of staff comments conditioning any approval of
the request. One other requirement not specifically m~ntioned
elsewhere is concurrency certification for drainage levels of
service. Commercial approvals must be certified or exempted
for both traffic and. drainage levels of service. The
Engineering Division has indicated that drainage can be
certified at time of rectification of staff comments.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in
accordance with the performance standards section 4 of the
zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton
Beach Noise Control Ordinance.
Compliance with the city's performance standards is
anticipated and no nuisances or noise would be generated by
the proposed use beyond what is currently experienced with the
other commercial uses in the immediate vicinity. Since the
1992 Exxon environmental review approval has expired, a new
application for environmental review must be approved prior to
issuance of a bUilding permit.
REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT COMMENTS:
Below is a list of those departments having comments regarding this
request:
Department
Attached Memorandum
Public Works
Utilities
Fire
Police
Engineering
BUilding
Parks and Recreation
Forester
Planning and zoning
N/A
95-250
N/A
N/A
95-281, 196, 212, 246, 248, 267
95-268
N/A
N/A
95-399
The comments above are of a nature that can easily be addressed at
tim~ of building permit review.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of thi ~
concli tional use request, subj ect to the permit plans for this
project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and
the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances; this
includes deletion of the future, fifth pump island nearest the
south property line.
DCD:dim
A:Macl
xc: Central File
c; .,IIP51 \D"T"\I~"C
.~
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-399
3rd Review
McDonald/Amoco
File No. COUS 95-002
9. Compliance with forthcoming traffic comments from Palm
Beach County is required including timing for building
permit application and resubmittal of traffic study if
ti.le vesting expires prior to a building permit. - "
II. RECOMMENDATIONS
10. It is recommended that the exterior material and color of
the cooler/freezer area match the material and color of
the walls of the building.
11. Omit the wide accent band and top band shown on the
elevations and replace with the extension of the mansard
terracotta roof around the entire building.
12. Modify the materials and design of the canopy to include
a terracotta mansard roof to match building.
13. Match the color and type of material of the exterior
surface of the rooftop equipment with the rooftop
screening.
14. Delete the future, fifth pump island due to potential
problems with a concentration of traffic in the southwest
area of the parcel and conflicting turn movements from
veh~cles approaching and exiting the pumps, the drive-
through lane, the cross access area and the parking
spaces closest to the menu board.
tjh
a:3r<1coll.MAC
xc: Central File
21
,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-399
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE: August 2, 1995
SUBJECT: McDonald' s/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store/Service
Station - COUS #95-002
(Conditional Use Approval - drive-through and seFvice
station)
The following is a list of comments regarding the third review of
the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments
are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list
of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first
or second review or new comments as a result of the third review.
To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter
the configuration of the site and design of the building. The
second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance
the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at
time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The
applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated
upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the
Building Division for permits for the proposed project.
I. COMMENTS:
1. A Community Design Plan appeal has been filed regarding
exterior lighting, specifically the proposed light beams
shown on the mansard roof. Drawings shall be amended to
comply with the outcome of this appeal. Also, write or
show on Section AA of SW-2 that no lighting will be on
the perimeter of the pump island canopy.
2. Provide a computation and documentation to verify
compliance with the Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.
Signs, regarding sign regulations to illustrate required
signage and dimensional requirements for the free-
standing sign, wall signs and directional signs.
3. Verify on drawings compliance with Section 11.E of the
community Design Plan regarding screening of rooftop
equipment.
4. Environmental review approval must be granted for retail
sale of gasoline, prior to issuance of a building permit.
(Zoning Code, Section 6.C.lB.e)
5. Show on the landscaping plan the size, specie and spacing
required to screen liftstation.
6. To confirm the required number of parking spaces for the
subject property, add to the floor plan the total number
of seats requested for the restaurant. Also, add to the
parking data found on the site plan the code required
computations for calculating parking spaces by using one
parking space for every 2.5 seats.
7. The applicant shall pay the additional fee required for
the extra (third) review requested, prior to the City
Commission meeting of August 15, 1995.
8. Reflect a pavement connection to the property to the
south consistent with the recorded cross access easement.
2C)
~~~~gF~~D
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-268
August 2, 1995
~
From:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Site Plan Review - Conditional Use - 3rd Review
McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store
S.B. corner of Congress Ave. and Woolbright
To:
Re:
The Building Division has reviewed plans for the above project
and have no comments on the conditional use, however, we have the
following comments regarding the site plan:
1. It should be in compliance with the security code and
convenience store requirements at the time of
permitting.
2. Pedestrian access must be provided from the right-of-
way to the front entrance of the building, per Florida
Handicap Code.
3. The free-standing sign did not meet required setbacks
of 10 Ft. from the property line to the leading edge of
the sign.
4. Wall signs exceed the allowable 136.5 Sq. Ft. by
approximately 7.5 Sq. Ft.
5. Dimensions of the directional signs must be shown to
comply with 4 Sq. Ft. maximum.
6. Maximum number of directional signs is 4, with a height
of 5 Ft. from ground to top of sign.
Time and charges for this third review is submitted separately.
AN:mh
Att.: 3rd Review Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
A:McD'AMO.TRC
/1
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-267
FROM:
r
Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator
William Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
July 28, 1995
MCDOHALD'S/AMOCO
TO:
DATE:
RE:
We have reviewed subject plan submitted to us late yesterday
afternoon with a request to respond by noon today. Since we do not
have time to respond fully in the 5~ hours allotted (and ignoring
the 7~ hours of meetings we were in, or will be in, during that
period), we can only review previous comments as follows:
A. Engineering Memo 95-196
1. Ok
2. Ok
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
5. Ok
6. Please comply
7. Please comply
B. Engineering Memo 95-248
1. Please comply
2. Please comply
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
C. Building Memo 95-247
1. Please comply
2. Please comply
3. Please comply
(~ The southernmost gas pump is proposed for future use. In order to
.' J facilitate traffic flow westbound south of that pump, the air,
water, phones, etc. must be relocated away from the area. In
addition the curb in that area (southwest corner) should be on a
diagonal line running NW/SE from the apron curb springline.
/) The issue of traffic impact, and specifically assigned trips,
remains unresolved. This project will not be endorsed by the
Department of Development until this issue is resolved. All Qther
comments should become condieions of approval, subject to complete
res0lution prior to permitting.
WVH/ck
C:MCAMOCO.COM
I.?
~
..: I.
~
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-248
m'
DATE: JULY 21, 1995(2nd review) August 2, 1995(3rd review)
IUNNINGEAHplD
NINGO
TI!:. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z OIR.
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-62~
SUBJECT: McDONALDS/AMOCO RESTAURANT SITE PLAN - SECOND REVIEW
& THIRD REVIEW.
All plans submitted for specific permits shalt meet the city's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include. but arc not limited to the following: Site lighting. Paving.
Drainage. Curbing. Landscaping. Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from
agencies such as the F.D.O.T.. P.B. County. S.F.W.M.D.. and any other permitting agency shalt
be included with your permit request.
COMMENTS
~elocate stop bars and stop signs four feet in front of sidewalks. MUTCD 28-9 (pg.28-S).
G) NOTE: County pennits witt be required to work within both intersecting roadways.
The county will soon let the plans to six-lane Woolbright Rd. from Congress Ave. eastward.
Applicant should contact the project engineer to correlate construction of intersection and this
project. The project engineer is Javier Lopez. 407-684-4150.
(:3) Provide a traffic impact analysis if the site meets city criteria (single directional trips per day:
150 in a one hour period or 3.000 per day). Chap 23. Art. 1. Sect. 5 B) 4.
\~}rop of exfittration trench shall be a minimum of one foot below base material. City standard
dnlwing 8-91007. Use ofP.V.C. pipes in lieu of perforated CMP to be approved by city
engmeer.
RECOMMENDA TION
J. Wt; recommend that the plan be forwarded to the P&D 80ard for consideration and approval.
KRH/krh
C: William Hukitt. Dev. Dir. and to file
mcdoamoc.2rv/3rv
3ev ~dlGi.r O'(d:
/lvCL: 'S~~/=1 ts ;
:If -20, S!>L (f;l
/7
"
.()
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-246
TO:
Mike Haag
zoning/Site Administrator
FROM:
P.E.
DATE:
July 18, 1995
MCDOHALDS/COHGRESS , WOOLBRIGHT
RE:
We have reviewed Weisberg's July 11 comments on subject project and
request that you request a new traffic impact analysis from the
applicant. In addition, please determine whether the five year
vesting period has been completed.
WH/ck
C:MCDONALD
/ LJ
DBVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BNGINBBRING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-212
TO: .
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
william Hukill, P.E.~
City Engineer
June 29, 1995
DATE:
RE:
MCDONALDS/AJII.OCO
Our. additional comments are as follows:
1. Move the north entrance east about 20-25 feet to comply
with Land Development Regulations.
2. Move the west entrance south as far as is practical.
We have not had time yet to research the platting issue, but will
do so July 6.
WVH/ck
C:MCDONALD
xc: Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
:.
Jt)
McDonald's! Amoco site plan comments/recommendations continued. page two.
(8~ Top of ex filtration trench shall be a minimwn of one foot below base material. City standard
drawing 8-91007. Use ofP.V.C. pipes in lieu of perforated CMP to be approved by city
engmcer.
RECOMMENDA TrONS
I. Consider relocating menu board further east and also straighten drive thru aisle to eliminate
"S" curve. This should provide easier access to menu board and a longer stacking lane.
It would also provide an opportunity for additional landscaping next to building.
2. Consider locating the west driveway another 20 feet to the south. You would still retain the
parking stalls along the south property line and provide a "straight path" to the McDonald's
drive-thru. Also, it will allow an additional vehicle to "stack" in the dedicated right turn lane
before your ingress lane becomes blocked.
3. Consider relocating the two H/C stalls in front of the store entrance for a little closer
accessibility .
4. Consider using a pavement sign within the yellow striping of the loading zone stating,
" NO PARKING - LOADING ZONE".
5. Consider extending the sidewalk along both sides of building an additional two feet to create
a continuous wheel stop. This eliminates possible tripping hazard from individual wheel stops
, and their maintenance. and provides a more esthetic appearance.
KRHlkrh
c: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file
14-
. 1
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-196
DATE: June 20,1995
TIlL T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR.
FRO~; KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-628~
SUBJECT: McDONALDS/AMOCO RESTAURANT SITE PLAN - 1ST REVIEW
The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review. If any of the code
comments disallow the applicant to develop the site as submitted. the applicant may req1test a
variance thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter one, Article one. Section eleven
of the city's Land Development Regulations.
All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include. but arc not limited to the following: Site lighting, Paving,
Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping, Irrigation. and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from
agencies such as the F.D.a.T., P.B. County. S.F.W.M.D., and any other permitting agency shall
be included with your permit request.
COMMENTS
I. North driveway should meet the 110' minimum distance trom the intersecting RIW line.
Chapter 2, Section II L. 3d.
2. Landscaped areas (islands) shall.have a minimum width oftive feet. Chap. 7.5. Art. II.
Sect. 50.
G) Standard parking striping on concrete shall be black. Chap. 23. Art. II. L.
(.i) Clear visability note should include city's standard regarding horizontal control. Chap.7.5.
Art. II, Sect. 5H2.
S. Show sidewalk thna driveways on landscape plan to reflect city standard. Chap. 23.
Art. II P.
c1J NOTE: County permits will be required to work within both intersecting roadways.
The county will soon let the plans to six-lane Woolbright Rd. from Congress Ave. eastward.
Applicant should contact the project engineer to correlate construction of intersection and this
project. The project engineer is Javier Lopez. 407-684-4150.
WProvide a traffic impact analysis if the site meets city criteria (single. directional trips per day:
250 in a one hour period or 3.000 per day). Chap 23. Art. I, Sect. 5814.
I~
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-281
I:;...~_~.J~.. .~._
August 4, 1995
w
/" ii" . 4 I",.j"
\ I t, '# ,
l!U
TO:
FROM:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
~m ~. Hukill, P.E.
~ Eng~neer
McDONALDS/AMOCO COMMENTS
<'""~s
RE:
We have made Engineering comments on this project on at least six
occasions, as follows:
Memo 95-196 June 20 Hall to you
Memo 95-212 June 29 Hukill to you
Memo 95-246 July 18 Hukill to Haag
Memo 95-248 July 21 Hall to you
Memo 95-267 July 28 Hukill to Haag
Memo 95-248 August :2 Hall to Heyden
The June 20 memo was reviewed for. compliance on July 28, as was the July
21 memo. The June 29 memo has been complied with. The July 18 memo
requested a traffic impact study which we do not have, and a determination
(by you) regarding vesting, which we also do not have. The August 2 memo
was a repeat of the July 21 memo. As of today, the status of these memos
is as follows:
95-196
1. ok
2 . ok
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
95-212
1. ok
:2 . ok
95-246 Please comply
95-248
1. Please comply
2 . Please comply
95-267
Paragraph one - covered hereinbefore.
5. ok
6. Please comply
7. Please comply
8. Please comply
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
Paragraph two - The southernmost gas pump should not be approved either
now, which was not requested, or in the future, which was requested. Air,
water, phones and curbing have been reconfigured in an acceptable
arrangement.
Paragraph three - please comply.
Time spent on my part in reviews past initial review equates to $107.93.
WVH:bh .
Attachments - above numbered memos
A:AMOCO
12-
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 95-250
FROM:
John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
w
l! )
TO:
Tambri 1. Heyden,
Planning & Zoni
~ & ~ n ~,
"
PLANNING AND
ZONING DFPr
Date: August 2, 1995
SUBJECT: McDonald's/Amoco
Site Plan Third Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
1. A Reservation Fee of $2,106.72 is due within Thirty (30) days of
Commission approval or upon request for my Signature on HRSIDEP
forms, (Sec. 26-34[E]).
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella /y
File
additional review time:
Clyde "Skip" Mil or: O.Shrs @ $ 19.16 per hr.
I I
WOOLSRIGHT ROAD
":"'SQD-L. ~
.
"' .
.
. ili i=; w'i -~ i; ,; ~ ~i ~
UUHUh Iml~! diU II II UHU
HRhui,h ~H ~;Ii Pil~I~;
lii2~1'II~J3 ~~!' R ~ ~i A~~
~~!: .w!i ;~! ,; I ~ ~ i I
~lm;~IBiP o~ ~! ~ i ~ ~
~ J~ ~h ~~5! "d ~ ~ go. ~ = ~ · ~ ! 8
~ ~ f E; I ~ 5i ~ ~ iii t r 't :: a
I Ii i~n H ~ U ; t" ~ 0 = 5 I
~ ~~~g61 a~ ~: ~
III ~~~~~~ vi g. ~
I !,~ ~~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
-c !"
~
q
. .'~.
~i5,'i'IJI'iil
LOliA\\ON MAP
MCDONALD1S1 AMOCO ,-
_ -----'_' \." I: \ ~ \ ;;0 "-' 1$>')\ \.'ClE.C~~\\:;;;\~\1~
"f. t t r r----(: Ll f\ . ...-" "~ 11 ,~(\f\ ~. \). .;:0., .<\
i":~1 I: 1\ \ -= o. '-'\\ - // n U! "\ . ,. II:.: ' mr \ I;
\' .;~ _\ I _ \" \ ~ Li ' C ~..;:I : ~''{1' t~ ~ ~,. 0\ ,;
)1'1 " .~r'\ \' :3l r I . . . L.~, ::;,~ '-.,ML' " .i
\\ '.'" ':\ ~,.,,/.. ~. l~lR~ ." \
, ,,;'.\l t:~ ' , ~ \ .: \ . ~' , ~. .~l~{''''\.1
~~~\,_c ;~~ ^. . . '""",,,'
\\\ . ""'\ l"'ff, T . .~ . \.,,: \. 1:: './::1~""".:' "./', . ~
~~---J' ~.~\:~ \. ~ ':: ~:,,:~f;~i' ":)'& .~/; .~\
LJ' \ \' ~,.,,,,.~,,r"~ ~\ \\ '\' : -::. ~.-~"'), ~.;-2//j?/" J' ~ ~'" '::-. \;\
O. '; /).. .~ \ I \ - ;0~~"/~/:":.' . "" "'':.~'.,' \\' \" ". \' '
I \. :; / '. .~\ ,} \' \ ,,"'.' ";" . " .' C..." \
'\ ", .I ",' ..""~",,, .. \ ..' .' .-1."/.' . .I" ,.~:3' c<~. \ .'
\ .
\. '" .... .'! .' . ." . . '. .' . '\ . , \ ,;\' \:.....- \. I '.
. .." ..' .' 0- ' ,\' -S " . .~i .. ' .- ."~. . \,
\...\..J\: \'\L,.!P4P~::\~ '\\ Ij'" '. " \~.\':1~ ~J::.a.ti\\-~'~-:i....~1..~..\ ~'; \~':.
6 f~i t~~;. ~z;. '.: b~ ~'\. J,\ ,) \ (l~'>.\'t f-:l \ \\" i ,y: ~-,...
i ':' II, . .;:;.. --;0JYl3.,.S c ~ . f \ II;' \t~ ~\ \ \"r....wJ \ \I.:.\.\:.',..I,;i: )':~>\
~\" .l1~" \\,\".\p;''0''~~~ .' .,!\. ".._::~':'1~-' .. .-.--..~ t=' y
I ). .~(\ ,\ \",.,\l1\. VH\~ ~ . ' r< "......: --'-' c-~. , ~:3 \ i ~./
~:~ ._.._.._.~.~~:::~ ",-"'r" 'C\ '\ \ \" ' wo--' uN.'.' ~~f),~
._ .:.. ," .' /.' .\......-L-- Ie ", ~~ T: :.;.;.- ,,- -..., '1'-' 111 l...J .
. "."e----- ~ .., .'
.-
~'-. "";~, \ : ~ ij (.~, \. . ;;," '.
'" ."... '\. ~ r """",,,,' ~I \',r '''' <:. ,';.'.'
. " ' _ ~, ';.',i1W'iW I\,~ (Itf-\'.-\--\l C,,:C ,~",/~':.~~~~ '
~ 6. , -.- II: \ ," -. ~_~"",\'i,.x".
~ ..-1' ." ,5-'i4",f'[\rt~ I /,yS>,<.~ W.Y
I' t';-'!....:;...'.... 1 l~~.I/$'-~~~.(-
, . _..: .\ ,:' ,..... _ H"-." ,. _'\,~~'9''''' ",'"
'-_,\ 1~r4(\ .,,) . ~~., 1.\\......"~~0'~~ ~I
. r.:>'1J' .. l~"~At<.~' ~: 1 . 1 ~fn ;;rt1!fv-+ ~~ il.' '-. 1 \j
_..- \ ~ <. 'I... ~....' " -H u t ~"v' ~ "<. ~ ," ,IT
~~ .,,:: '\pq~ ',: 'IT .., "hi - ';{N{iZt"-rJYt ." ~,
1\' 1".,...... : \.... ~ :\~q\ -\\\\1rll-'1' -\l
L\ \~l.~.~._. ,.....>~ \ p\ c.2,. ,J11~;;J.~~'f~~\ \ \ I\\JII
:.., h. \ "._.:\ ))--~\\ \ I \ · 1.1 \ \ .
,__ . ..... ..._.. "1 \. .,,~:3 . \L.l... ":. . rpll\
_._ _" I: 1 . ." I .-""" -....: .-------c .- .- - 1 ..' \ . i · \ l.\1:Y
. / \ _~ \ \. LLDJJf\0'lJh:> yl.-::::- ':\l ~ -' :: '.'>-~. -';'i;o:.;.~i., "1 u .-diI
II \ \ \:,~\! ~ ,,' ~ \'{j~ Ifh~~\.:.,.~~~~f:\\\ V-:<o\i\\~1l]
') .~ \, I ,~:," . c:~ L.--"; J, I ,! :,....".::.;,' .: l' . i
..-- " ,. . _._ a," ......,~ ~ .' J f
.""__ . ,..Lv. .;.p __ ,_ . ".~'., ,". " l.f' .;
, .
, ~) , :' p.. ~. 0 ~ ~,~ ):.. -r., 1 \ . , ,\ ) l - . \\.,....\.
, "", ~),~"~' ) \ '1'T' 71 ' \ \ - - . .-
'-" ~ $; .' .. , '. . . ........ ..,.. .". .' \ .
" c:: c::' ,- "" '. '.+ . ",,' .' . . ' .
\ ~\ \- ~ ~ \ f' \, r I'" ' . . . .... . . . . . \
\ . " I \ ' .... 1 t ,. '1 .-. . . . " .' ,\ ! \ \ :
.' . ' ." " . . , . ~ . . . ". . .. ' '
J ,(A\~' \ .., \ .. ' ' < .r . \-'1
III - I: l;~r~~~\:'\'! \:'" .' f"..., ",'. .'.\ 11'~I'11
,,~J. · .'!. .. . .
, " \.... ..
I \\~ ~~\\fJ .. :\:_.~, ~.~. '? ~l\ \ M\L~SV1
\ \
\\
\ _" _ 1:\~1' .' \\1.: r-LL-\ \\pU\\ \ ..
~ ~IP \ \' '
\ i
\
---]
\~ 1\1
./ '/) I
. I J
- ~~.<:'
.- 0\
~~~\\
// \