REVIEW COMMENTS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-281
l,~; _J~j ..JL..l~ ....._
August 4, 1995
'W
AUG - 4 1995 !~
f!ANNING AND,. . \';'$
LONING DEPl: ' ~
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
f~m V. Hukill, P.E.
~ Engineer
McDONALDS/ AMOCO COMMENTS
FROM:
RE:
We have made Engineering comments on this project on at least six
occasions, as follows:
Memo 95-196 June 20 Hall to you
Memo 95-212 June 29 Hukill to you
Memo 95-246 July 18 Hukill to Haag
Memo 95-248 July 21 Hall to you
Memo 95-267 July 28 Hukill to Haag
Memo 95-248 August 2 Hall to Heyden
The June 20 memo was reviewed for compliance on July 28, as was the July
21 memo. The June 29 memo has been complied with. The July 18 memo
requested a traffic impact study which we do not have, and a determination
(by you) regarding vesting, which we also do not have. The August 2 memo
was a repeat of the July 21 memo. As of today, the status of these memos
is as follows:
95-196
1. ok
2. ok
3 . Please comply
4. Please comply
95-212
1. ok
2 . ok
95-246 Please comply
95-248
1. Please comply
2 . Please comply
95-267
Paragraph one - covered hereinbefore.
5. ok
6. Please comply
7. Please comply
8. Please comply
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
Paragraph two - The southernmost gas pump should not be approved either
now, which was not requested, or in the future, which was requested. Air,
water, phones and curbing have been reconfigured in an acceptable
arrangement.
Paragraph three - please comply.
Time spent on my part in reviews past initial review equates to $107.93.
WVH:bh
Attachments - above numbered memos
A:AMOCO
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-267
FROM:
r
Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator
William Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
TO:
DATE:
July 28, 1995
MCDONALD'S/AMOCO
RE:
We have reviewed subject plan submitted to us late yesterday
afternoon with a request to respond by noon today. Since we do not
have time to respond fully in the 5~ hours allotted (and ignoring
the 7~ hours of meetings we were in, or will be in, during that
period), we can only review previous comments as follows:
A. Engineering Memo 95-196
1. Ok
2. Ok
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
5. Ok
6. Please comply
7. Please comply
B. Engineering Memo 95-248
1. Please comply
2. Please comply
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
C. Building Memo 95-247
1. Please comply
2. Please comply
3. Please comply
The southernmost gas pump is proposed for future use. In order to
facilitate traffic flow westbound south of that pump, the air,
water, phones, etc. must be relocated away from the area. In
addition the curb in that area (southwest corner) should be on a
diagonal line running NW/SE from the apron curb springline.
The issue of traffic impact, and specifically assigned trips,
remains unresolved. This project will not be endorsed by the
Department of Development until this issue is resolved. All other
comments should become conditions of approval, subject to complete
res0lution prior to permitting.
WVH/ck
C:MCAMOCO.COM
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-248
~. W~ ill
..~,.
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
DATE: JULY 21, 1995(2nd review) August 2, 1995(3rd review)
TI2i T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR.
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-62~
SUBJECT: McDONALDS/AMOCO RESTAURANT SITE PLAN - SECOND REVIEW
& THIRD REVIEW.
All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: Site lighting, Paving,
Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from
agencies such as the F.D.a.T., P.B. County, S.F.W.M.D., and any other permitting agency shall
be included with your permit request.
COMMENTS
1. Relocate stop bars and stop signs four feet in front of sidewalks. MUTCD 2B-9 (pg.2B-5).
2. NOTE: County pennits will be required to work within both intersecting roadways.
The county will soon let the plans to six-lane Woolbright Rd. from Congress Ave. eastward.
Applicant should contact the project engineer to correlate construction of intersection and this
project. The project engineer is Javier Lopez, 407-684-4150.
3. Provide a traffic impact analysis if the site meets city criteria (single directional trips per day:
250 in a one hour period or 3,000 per day). Chap 23. Art. I, Sect. 5814.
4. Top of ex filtration trench shall be a minimum of one foot below base material. City standard
drawing B-91007. Use ofP.V.C. pipes in lieu of perforated CMP to be approved by city
engmeer.
RECOMMENDA TION
1. W~ recommend that the plan be forwarded to the P&O Board for consideration and approval.
KRHlkrh
C: William Hukill, Oev. Oir. and to file
mcdoamoc.2rv/3rv
Sf:\) ~ d lGc..r 0, Cj :
IlvCL: 15~;;I=7b ;
120.~ cY
"
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-246
TO:
Mike Haag
Zoning/Site Administrator
W0(~ukill, P.E.
(Jti~gineer
July 18, 1995
MCDONALDS/CONGRESS & WOOLBRIGHT
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
We have reviewed Weisberg's July 11 comments on subject project and
request that you request a new traffic impact analysis from the
applicant. In addition, please determine whether the five year
vesting period has been completed.
WVH/ck
C:MCDONALD
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-212
TO: . Tambr i J. Heyden
Planning & zoning Director
FROM:
william Hukill, P.E.~
City Engineer
DATE:
June 29, 1995
RE:
MCDONALDS/AMOCO
Our. additional comments are as follows:
1. Move the north entrance east about 20-25 feet to comply
with Land Development Regulations.
2. Move the west entrance south as far as is practical.
We have not had time yet to research the platting issue, but will
do so July 6.
WVH/ck
C:MCDONALD
xc: Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
~
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-196
DATE: June 20,1995
TIt. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR.
FRO~: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-628~
SUBJECT: McDONALDS/AMOCO RESTAURANT SITE PLAN -1ST REVIEW
The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review. If any of the code
comments disallow the applicant to develop the site as submitted, the applicant may request a
variance thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter one, Article one, Section eleven
of the city's Land Development Regulations.
All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: Site lighting, Paving,
Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from
agencies such as the F.D.O.T., P.B. County, S.F.W.M.D., and any other permitting agency shall
be included with your permit request.
COMMENTS
I. North driveway should meet the I 10' minimum distance from the intersecting R/W line.
Chapter 2, Section II L, 3d.
2. Landscaped areas (islands) shall have a minimum width of five feet. Chap. 7.5, Art. II,
Sect.5G.
3. Standard parking striping on concrete shall be black. Chap. 23, Art. II, L.
4. Clear visability note should include city's standard regarding horizontal control. Chap.7.5,
Art. II, Sect. 5H2.
5. Show sidewalk thru driveways on landscape plan to reflect city standard. Chap. 23,
Art. II P.
6. NOTE: County permits will be required to work within both intersecting roadways.
The county will soon let the plans to six-lane Woolbright Rd. from Congress Ave. eastward.
Applicant should contact the project engineer to correlate construction of intersection and this
project. The project engineer is Javier Lopez, 407-684-4150.
7. Provide a traffic impact analysis if the site meets city criteria (single_directional trips per day:
250 in a one hour period or 3,000 per day). Chap 23, Art. I, Sect. 5B 14.
.' -'I
, '... j
",
NEW BUSINESS
6 .A.
MCDONALD'S/AMOCO
PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-620
STAFF REPORT
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MEETING:
November 20, 1995
PETITION:
Case No. 211
LOCATION:
Southeast corner of congress Avenue and Woolbright
Road
AGENT:
Robert E. Basehart and Anna cottrell, Basehart and
Cottrell, Inc.
OWNER:
RFK Enterprises of Boynton Beach, Inc., d/b/a
McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store
VARIANCE
REQUEST:
The petitioner requests relief from Chapter 21 -
Signs, Article IV, Section 2. D - of the City of
Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations to allow
the construction of a menu board to exceed the
height allowed from five (5) feet to a height of
6.125 feet; 1.125 feet higher than allowed.
BACKGROUND
The subject property, zoned C-3 (Community Commercial), is located
on the southeast corner of congress Avenue and Woolbright Road.
The surrounding land uses and zoning are as follows (see attached
location map - Exhibit "A"):
North -
Woolbright Road and farther north is an existing
office building, zoned Office/Professional
Commercial (C-1).
East
A bank, zoned Community Commercial (C-3).
South -
undeveloped vacant property, zoned Communi ty
commercial (C-3), formerly the site of a Westlake
Hardware, which was razed in 1992; farther south is
multi-family residential property zoned Multiple-
Family (R-3).
West
Congress Avenue and farther west is an existing
commercial building, zoned Community Commercial
(C-3) .
Article II. variances/Exemptions and Prohibitions, section 1. B
Variances, reads as follows:
"After denial of a sign permit by the development
department, a request for variance may be filed with the
Board of Adjustment. The Board of Adjustment may grant a
variance if it finds that the unusual shape or topography
of the property in question prevents signage allowable
under the provisions of this ordinance from adequately
identifying the business or other activity located on
such property. The Board of Adjustment may only grant a
variance to:
B. Allow the area and/or height of a sign to be
increased by up to twenty-five (25) percent of
the maximum allowable height or area."
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-620
Board of Adjustment Meeting - November 20, 1995
Case No. 211 - McDonald's/Amoco Menu Board
ANALYSIS
The property is a one acre vacant site which the property owner is
proposing to develop into a combination gas station/convenience
store and restaurant with drive-through window. The
McDonald's/Arnoco facility was approved by the City Commission on
August 15, 1995 for a conditional use and site development plan.
The height variance requested is to allow a standard size
McDonald's menu board to be installed at the site, at a height the
applicant feels is convenient and easy for the customer to read.
The menu board serves to inform customers of menu selection and
price prior to ordering. The City's sign code requires that the top
of the sign, or menu board in this case, not exceed five (5) feet
above ground level at the base of the sign. The applicant requests
the height of the proposed sign to be 6.125 feet tall, or 1.125
feet higher than that allowed under the sign code.
The following language from the sign code pertains to the
applicant's request:
Chapter 21, Article IV, Section 2.D:
2.D. "In addition to other signs in this section, one
(1) on-premises sign, described as follows, shall
be permitted in those commercial districts of the
City where drive-through restaurants are permitted.
Said signs shall be an exterior single-faced menu
sign with illustrated face not to exceed twenty-
five square feet. such signs will allow for
instructions on use of pick-up window service and
list the menu and price of items to be served, with
the top of the sign not to exceed five (5) feet
above ground level at the base of the sign."
Find attached Exhibit "B" applicant's variance application,
Exhibit "C" - proposed site plan showing location of proposed menu
board, Exhibit "D" - menu board dimensions and Exhibit "E" - a
statement of special conditions for the variance requested, as
prepared by the applicant. The summary of facts are as follows:
1. The land to the east, south and west of the subject
property is zoned Community Commercial C-3.
2. The land to the north across Woodbright Road is developed
as an office building and zoned Office/Professional, C-1.
3. A request for conditional use and site plan approval was
recently approved by the City Commission at its August
15, 1995 meeting.
4. The subject one-acre site and proposed one-story 3,432
square foot combination gas station/convenience store and
restaurant is to be located on the southeast corner of
Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road.
5. The applicant requests a variance of 1.125 feet to allow
construction of a menu board at the subject site to a
height of 6.125 feet so that a standard size McDonald's
menu board can be installed on the site.
6. Relief is requested to allow a 6.125 foot high menu
board, measured to the top of the structure, versus a
maximum of five (5) feet as required under the City sign
code.
Page 3
Memorandum No. 95-620
Board of Adjustment Meeting - November 20, 1995
Case No. 211 - McDonald's/Amoco Menu Board
DCD:dcd
xc: Central File a'macmenu.BOA
LOCATION MAP
McDONALD'S/ AMOCO
~ ,.") ../J -: ,-' I . ~ I H I "'O~~. ~",) \ C "~\\:~;;''-'-:-C''\~;
'{rll~'../,\' \1l1-:,..t,fn(~ I'~ CO=> Q'r......~I. _ --Jr- l->'" Ilf1rTr1:1.rC~I~"JLJ,... 1
....u~~L.., (] I:.Y - - - -- '11 h-- ~~) , .:~_ '~~il ~~ tt-' ~ (; ~
. Ie;; :P UIZ', .~.~ "'/7./ ~ "T' ~t r::~~ ';',"'_' _,,::' III
' --.--, \~ -2,~,.' 1-' '\ - - l) - t. , ~ t-+-
I --, - ,r, ,'-.,. ( _ __ . ---r:: I >- J
-'~~>' -)
nON '.-. .\ i
'I ~n" .,.. H " , ~ ~ " :
- : I \ I -:' tJ II II' "J: ~,' , __ >~... : i' ' T
-:c :. .. f "i, : :\71'1' 1: ~ I s......'.... '. ~ .~.
~-h~l ~,::'...~-.. 4.oo'f'4-."- ,'" I '.1, t\'"l" 1/111 ~ roo::\:;r ' "~ '. ."'~~' I:
.-.. r--~--1 . " :\,r"l .-..:,~ '- ,l....u ,I
[ -, Wil. ',I " "!;1;n i H- ~ \' =\ ~ . , ',,-~ ~ 1__ I';
,\... . 1-1-"""" r IfJ! ~._' .'~ ~~ ~ Po) '. "" ~,~~ ~ \;
r'1 Iii I[ JI "'., ~,-, ,-.' 1 (. .<ioI' ~,', . .', /,(
~~. III c__ i.._.J., f I, ,> /~', '.-', ,',' "
P -.JJI I. J '00" .,' /.~ ~ ", '<. ,.,'....... '"
U ( ,,--- ~'" l'\.'f- '\ ~ :: 'r'rrrtJr..,~.. ,(~. ..~,:~o'~~~".' " ",v..... .
D /.1/ f'H-'~.._,("",~ M: \i" IV, *' '...., ;':'~'.'0~/?~~~~ "'., '.':-\ ."-1~'~ '\
,; .y~-- · 11, ~ ':~~io/~"c!f.:~~/,"""'''''-:~:, "\. \ .... " \. ,
ir ~-"",//' ~"~~~.>. ,:. I J /llC" 'Yli~/.:-1'~ t. r ( \'" U,:'
.u':~:!~"~~!ii' ="i/~~\'II:' g,~rr~::':ill:'~\~rin+i e~? ~il~ /r:,~
111~'i~UI:4...., :'" fl" I,' , r~ : 'l,'J~ll. tT.',L~.~_. -:.."Jf ", r'Ir1~~T~:"Tt; 1, : I?:~ :",-'
5.D Iii i~KES o~ __, ~'v - l!" ',r'lI : . . }i~'f JL" l!'" ~'" : ....... ~")~
. I" ,.,.'>-&-' -- ~,.... C1 . .~~ '. T I If-_ _ I' _, ~:j ~~, ~;;-
)t{~ I:L'lY:{;j'()Z:jG:Id.q ~ ei'l M:l =, !!11ft ~> !:;,l!i' :'LJ..;'~""
" "',' c.1k '1 ~=e'"- , "r=~' ~l'.. ." ___ .- -~i"'-'1. _
~,(--: ~'i~'i'Hrr.l. n,'0,,,"). __ -",,*OC-~ e, T.... y__
,~" ~-"""":~':"=-":""::-~':";:;'~'>'~'I-''':--' -~~I q1 If I R:3 r ~\'__/ [
':!:. . " "".- . -- ---1._ . 'T ~c)I4O.
- ,'.,. ~I -"-. ;'~~='-:~=S- -'-Jl-"TE-=-'.6.~:~~:m '-r- '~,_ (c,,, I~'- "'/:~'~~~r~L8R"Tr)[J '<~'
. ',. ,.: -.jifu' 1,1. ,. "'r'j> I
r )-] /" l':lt~ ~~-'-: ';'~\ 1 ~L; 'y ""';~~~ I . ., . ' ,)' *~" J ~
I I ,::1 ,', I wm ""-.:< <
' ',; " ~ ' I k.:r... ~ ,~
. ~/ j I.. "~ci' i -- ~ Ii'!.> ...:,rrIH tL"ffEC \~~~i~ ,~:\~ ~\~ ~ ",
" r[g....,:---. ": Il I, ~ 1~'1" ,,,;.t~~fy, j r-*
0:: "--,,' .' __ \~~ -.I......~.:t~.'<. ~~( "
'~:'\ I , I , '1. ". ....:..<1 :It\.',,
. ' '.,\ L- I .<~ ,n. : " ,'K, , -.'" j- " ~l,,'\,~'. t '.' " .
'l ~. '--... · ,- -.'::'; ~;:;iN i.v~, M
. ) ( . ~ [G';n='Ml i: \.~. ~ ;..'" . fr 7/1~#:. ~'<;.ct. ";L II " .
0/ \ fl r:)," . . "" "" __. r" · .~:., .... 'r"'h-- ,J "f~-"'U~ ,,} TI,IJ." :.
' !;j l':~ :i.-" ~~1\..) JiJ C1 [J 1'11'1 f __ I' 11.1 I . l '-:-{ ~~~7
::~'--,- , ...." n.n__:.. '~J ('.. ,'.:. R3 ,-HJ~. . .~ L LL II I I)' 13
I r 1\1 j -lilTI~n.l)m,T]Jb~_,-<*~y,' -, --' '," ---'---:='JI,-'>.L,_~jA~.r~hb~;bllITl,' 'I: '. _.p':
- ... . T T II J l.'I ' w.. '" .", .~_. ""'.' _~,_,.. :"11 , , , , , , , , I I .
"~{\~, .~ I l'~~ '1fJx~ e' 2F ~.. n I.",.j: j 'j .'~,) r,' ;1.':'l.J. !' 'e i
~ ~L. ;V~'.' l:iJ.:i~~ :-'~ 11)}/' :'R;'''}:' ..If~~'iln .' .
-lj ~i .'; tA~;J" '~i, Oif: = t<~, (lItJ7J~-~iliITl~'1iJ1 l,~jWJJt!JJ,./ :
v'. \ f- · .'.j!j ~. ,~, if III/TlTi I:::"''''; I .., 11' j' ) 1_ : : 'j f- _ . .., L h._ _..__.....1 :. .-
,\~ "l I .1:' 1 I:!S~'" -- - ,ut I. ',-.J__..~___... '-;;ji",.., "~__,'_"'_'-" ~;J)J.
'::\ ).. "'-':TI ---~ - .,.. 'U} w.. ,- "'0' 1. I ,.
, '. . I"i!! ~/. tl. ."" .....::;, I . , ,
i'- -""-', 1(1IJ>~:-lfJilt- ~l\_:,,~_ : '1;1'.%'Tr,<:,~,::-","e,. ;. r:-::'Jl~:--'~~ ~~ 'J
! J '.l ....;.. .. . , , .. , .. ,__ _~ . I,
'. : I(,\t ;~ij~iI ,1 I." l J" ...-., ,~.J.I/J.
' l11....'.. '/"A"lj/.j
1_.. 'AN.. 1/8 MILESV' '-\!/'
I I' (,- I J,. -l:-::: ---, II? _J ,- 0 400 800 FEET 1/
~l i --,- -'IJ c..~ ;~~ 'f. ~; 17 >'" 'L..3 1.1....:~UII..,..'1i p~Pr. ~;:/~i1 7
__h'_ ,4\ 1-- uf_'1f1,1+-_I.;,__, r- ... :/-/11/.""
0/079 U '1.{--cJ/,1
~" ti2/1
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
Submittal Deadline: See scehdule of dates for Board meetings and submitta
dates
Please print (in ink) or type
Submittal date:' ~1?'J'~5
The undersigned owner ( s) hereby respectfully petition ( s) the Board 0
Adjustment to grant to petitioner(s) a special exception or variance to th
existing Zoning or Sign Code of said City pertaining to the propert
hereinafter d..gribed and in 8upport thereof atateta)a
Property involved is described as follows: Lot(s) M!~and ~~
(S~~ \~\ ~~-G\~c-.\
,
, Subdivision
Block
, Page
or otherwise described as follows:
Plat Book
Property Address S E Cae,; \\QT 01; CP~r~'Ss A'lje... ~ LJOO\~\3,^-t~~.
The fOllowing documents are required to be submitted with this application t
form a single package. Incomplete package will not be accepted:
1. Two sealed survey@ by a registered surveyor in the State of Florida, no
over six (6) months old, indicating:
A. All property lines
B. 'North arrow
c. Existing structures and paving
D. Existing elevations
E. Rights-of-way, with elevations
F. Easements on or adjacent to the site
G. Utilities on or adjacent to the site
H. Legal description
I. Number of acres to the nearest one-hundredth (1/100) of an acre
J. Location sketch of property
K. Surveyor's Certificate
2. Two site plans properly dimensioned and to scale showing:
A. All proposed structures
B. All existing structures that are to remain on site
C. Setback lines for all structures drawn perpendicular from thl
properly lines to the closest vertical wall of structures
D. Use of each structure (or uses within multiple occupancies)
E. Use of adjacent properties including right-of-way lines for al
streets and alleys, sidewalks, turn lanes and driveways
F. Elevations of the lowest finished floor of all structures on th,
site
3. Certified list of names and post office addresses of property owners an
legal descriptions of their property within 400 feet of subjec
property, as recorded in the CQunt~ Courthou... Suoh 11.t shall b
acoompanied by an Affidavit (see attached) stating that to the best 0
the applicant's knowledge, said list is complete and accurate.
4. Proof of ownership of property by petitioner ( s) , such .s deed c
purchase contract agreement. If an agent is submitting the petition.
notarized copy of a letter designating him as such must accompany th
petition.
5. Statement of special conditions, hardships or reasons justifying th
requested exception or variance. Respond to the six (6) questions belo
(A-F) on a separate sheet (Please print or type):
A. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculia
to the land, structure or building involved and which are no
applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the sam
zoning district;
Page 2 of 3
That the special conditions and circumstances do not result fre
the actions of the applicant;
That granting the variance requested will not confer on tl
applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinanoe t
other lands, buildings or st~~ctures in the same zoning district
That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter wou]
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by othe
properties in the same zoning district under the terms of tl
Ordinance and: would work unnecessary and undue hardship on tl
applicant,
That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will ma~
possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure~
That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with tl
general intent and purpose of this chapter and that such varianc
will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detriment,
to the public welfare.
6. An application fee in the amount of $ 400.00, payable to the ci ty c:
Boynton Beach, must aooompany a oompleted application. The $400.00
application fee covers a request to vary one (1) section of the Code.
Seeking relief from more than one section of the Code will require
payment of $100.00 for each additional Code section.
7 . Name and address of owner: R F K Enkrpr;OGS of &yoron Fbalch ;IfJc.
8. Name of applicant: UCIb'11rt ~ Corp. 'P.J llnrn s.~1
Applicant's address: 1'5ea Old Ot<<ct'l::VcGf?a:d,'~.Ht,IDJ WPIOFL.~b1tA
Applicant's phone I: 41:'-' toee .C048
Date: Signature of Applicant: ~~
B.
~
c.
,.
D.
e
E.
F.
----------------------------------------------------~------------------
To be completed by the Building Official or Representative
1. Property is presently zoned: C - 3 Formerly zoned: R I-AA / U:r
/-
2. Property Control Number: 08 4 s Lf5 62 00 000 '~CJqo
3. Denial was made upon existing zoning or sign requirements ( Ii,
sections[s] of Code from which relief is required):
C hCt-P\.e \ ?.. \ J /l \""-l, c \~ \ V. S(:'c\~.."\ '2.:b
.
4. Nature of exception or variance required I Va~\c~C'\(~ Df' \. \ "l:S .c;,~.t
-\:q a\ \" vJ lhQ. ( 0 n~ It v C \:~ 1.'\ l-F (\. N'~ ,\V b 00..( 0 ~ -l c=t 5 v~('( (.;
f1\ d:~~,YYt \s\";'/ ~ N'\n f c ~\t Il \~ '^ J --\0 c. n~ \ ) \\\. or: <0.\1:5 ..(:'e i-\ l (\ .,)"~ e 1,6
',' 0 f' .("\~ r€,,\.
Date I N/~ Permit denied: No t1~ll.''''k.~...... "a~ b:vt'\ '7\\l'~1
1 Building Department pe,"\o\~ C\P?_o(""'.}. t:f\ ,,~\(\,,~
s. Case Number: '1. \ \ Meeting Date: N 01.', LU I ,qq...s..
r-
I
I
I
I
i ~ I
: tit"i.j
i ',"IS""1
I! H;J
'I 'Ii II
I
I
I
r
Ii
u "
Ii
Ii r
r
II
r
"
3~
-4
m
~
r-
~
Z
.
II
~tti
~
II
- I
,;
-n
j:
i!
Ii
H ~
----
/ ~ .11 ~
~ ~
,;
~
-.
----~
I
~
~Itfl!~ Ii j Wfiiljii! nrtf'il'fi~ ;!f!UiJliitUi~Ulliiii Ii ~i;lljiiiiiji!ri ~ f r} ~
~! !-liij i tJ ~. tI p ~;I mHlf~;i!IIJm 1 h ;<I!i IflJ! .: I, 0
ri I. f 0 _ I II ~ !IJiI i II I i JI' J f'
d Ii: U I it I' . ;,'. ! H .
I U ~ . i,5" 1 ... ,- ,,=: loj, I 1 . t .', , , '.
.I. . h I 0 :o!o.u.t II orl 'U 01 ~I'u . .~.. . I
._ 1 I 'I' ,~, I
I I d
. ~
II --'I
... 4... "'_'"
_._ __.__... I
, ~~----"=""""..
__ ______._ . _ J
:=--::-- ..IT,. -- --- _ AM.......O! M.- "'ON.\- D' r:
. WlW'..,CMO'" I~~~ ___ ,... ,~ . ....."" L- -'
I. tt \.....".. =--=- _..... ---=.::=-..;;.: -.
~ ; >" ~~;:).. _~T~ -:.. ~:=s:-:ia~:.:_..:=-...::?:.:..=.:~.
~ t ~ ,......;.~..:.,.,...,~:::r.<< - - ---:-.:.=.-:..--::.--::w:=-.::-::::--=..-:,;:.::.-:=-:.....-
I "'.' .. ..... _..- -.. - ---.--.....
...,..,.". .:::~;....
_/ J ~ I .- r:::
7f ~I V /I iO GW V ( S L{ kk 'cpp (\, (7 J - i D 7 ccC . . I . -:;r!:J sg. '1i .
MENU BOARD
Colors
Llgnt Beige Cabinet and
Frame
Dark Selge Face
Dark Brown Outline Trim
ELECTRICAL
Lamps: 4 ea. F72T12CWHO
Ballast: 1 ea. G E 6G-3959W
Service: 1 ea. 15 Amp Circuit.
120V.60 HZ
Load: 2.9 Amps
Approximate Weight
485 Ibs.
Installation
,. Remove crate and set on
level surface
2. Remove front A.B.S. face
at bonom to get access to
mounting struC,ure. 80th
faces can be removed if
desired. Use care and do
not lay face on finished
surface.
3. Lift sign and remove s.,ip-
ping angles.
4. Place signs on anchor
bolts and level
5. When sign is in correct
position. audio should be
on right and , 20 volt
primaries snould be on left
6. Open hinged face by
turnIng south co fasteners
counter clockwise to dis-
engage (DO NOT
REMOVE). Open face
and install hold oul rods.
7. Connections for i 20V
prrmarres can be made in
box marked i 20V A.C.
only.
8. Audio connections to be
mace by audio contractor
only
9 Close face and reolace
A a.s Dane!
i 0 Check jar Droper
ooeratlon.
i i Clean and touch UD sign.
i 2. Remove crating from lOb
SllE Immediately.
NOTE Sign IS U.L. approved.
r"O"l
5t:-Y;"
n
/~[
To install P.O.P. only:
1. Open front A.B.S. face
and install hold out rods
2. Grasp edge of poster grip
and lift open all four sides
3. Place P.O.P. .in this area.
be sure it's straight. and
flip each side down
To remove speaker grill and
add P.OP.:
1. Open front A.B.S. face
and install hold out rods
2. Remove (8) screws from /
aluminum frame and take
aluminum frame and grill
assembly off
3. Install dear cover in alumi-
num frame. Replace
frame and screws
4. Install P.O.P. as noted
above
5. Remove speaker
enclosure as noted
r
79 !I.,./'
-f' /"2.3)'1"
,
i ~~...v-
:2C:-~ .. , ,
, :> ,. ~
0
75/~" D
I...
These holes used when
replacing existing menu
speaker menu board with
new 84 series.
(4) % /I Dia. Anchor Bolts
spaced 5/1 x 17" for new
installation.
~. projection above base
CURB
DRIVE
I
/ "l
r
4'
1..
NOIE: To rf!loeve your c::m- C. (1) box wnn prce taPeS. (3)
pan)' of IlabtIllY. yOU ml.-S: 00llles of toucn.up pasn\,
venty lTleSe pat1S are snlPOed and irIslructions tor II\SlalI-
or rotate ~ are m_no at lno;l :aoes
~ ome of oel.-y- Erector 1$ 10 remove 1l1ese
A. (1) dear cover (lor conve<. pans !rem SIgn. take tOud'l-
SlOt'I wnen rllQu~eC) I.IP oaw>l !rem t;lOx. and
B. (' I canon WIl7\ rTllInIJ SITltlS OM! all Olnef pat1S to $lore
manllQer.
STATEMENT OF USE AND JUSTIFICATION
The Petitioner requests by this application approval of a variance from Chapter 21, Article 4, Section
2D of the City Zoning Code, , to wit: "... Such signs will allow for instructions on use of pick-up
window setvice and list the menu and price ofitems to be served, with the top of the sign not to
exceed five (5) feet above ground level at the base of the sign." Specifically requested is a variance
of 1.125 feet, to allow the construction of a menu board at the subject McDonald's! Amoco facility,
to a height of 6.125 feet.
The McDonald's!Amoco facility was approved by the City Commission on August 15,1995, for a
conditional use and site development plan. In all respects, the site development plan meets all of the
property development regulations of the City's Zoning Code, and meets or exceeds all of the
landscape code requirements. No variances other than the menu board height are requested.
The height variance will allow a standard size McDonald's menu board to be installed at the site, at
a height that is convenient and easy for customers to read. The menu board serves to inform
customers of menu selection and price prior to ordering. The additional height is needed to present
the menu board at the most appropriate customer viewing level, so that all of the menu selections and
prices are displayed in an easily read format.
The variance requested meets all of the criteria required for approv~ as follows:
A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning
district. The special conditions which exist are related to McDonald's site development and building
plans. The site development plan provides the minimum stacking before the menu board, and
between the menu board and the pick up window, for an order to be placed by customers with
sufficient time for the McDonald's staff to have the items ready by the time the customer reaches the
pick up window. The speed and efficiency which is accomplished is due, in part, to the ability ofthe
customer to see the full range of menu items and prices, so that ordering is accomplished without
delay. A menu board that is reduced below the height that is easily read by all customers, or below
the size which is required to provide room for all of the menu items, requires much more
communication between the customer and staft: and slows down ordering time considerably, thus
hampering operations.
B. The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The
special conditions and circumstances are the result of the specific operation and building for the
McDonald's restaurant. McDonald's has tested its operation many thousands of times, and has
determined that the menu board must be easily read from all vehicles, and must contain all of its menu
items and prices to allow the speed and efficiency that customers expect. A change in the height of
menu board would place much of the lettering below that which is easily read from a vehicle. A
reduction in the size of the menu board to meet the five feet height limitation, would require the
removal of some of the menu items, or the removal of prices, or a reduction in the lettering size.
N one of these options are feasible, since any would significantly hamper operation and reduce the
viability of the business.
C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that
is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district. The
granting of the variance will allow the placement of the standard size McDonald's menu board which
meets all of the City's codes other than height. Other restaurants provide a much more limited
selection of menu items, so menu boards meeting the size and height requirements provide enough
area to display all items and prices at a height easily read. McDonald's larger selection requires the
fu.ll25 square feet allowed by the Code for menu boards, and the placement of the board at a height
above five feet so that all portions of the board can be easily read from a vehicle. There is no special
privilege gained by the height increase, only the ability to display all of the menu selections and prices.
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions oftbis chapter would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the Ordinance
and would work UWlC'JCC'JSSJUy and undue hardship on the applicant. A literal interpretation of the
City's codes which restrict the menu board height to five feet would require placing the standard size
McDonald's menu board below the height which is easily read by customers seated in a vehicle. This
would hamper the efficiency of the McDonald's operation, and would be an inconvenience to
customers.
In addition, the applicant would be required to design and have manufactured a menu board that is
usable for this subject site only, since it would be inconsistent with the standard McDonald's menu
board. The design and manufacture of a sign for this site only would be very costly, and would
produce a less than desirable result, since it would require either the deletion of certain menu items,
deletion of pricing information, or a reduction in lettering below that which is convenient for
customers to read. The requirement to design and manufacture a menu board for this site only would
place an undue hardship on the petitioner.
E. The variance requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the
land, building or structure. The requested variance is the minimum variance needed to provide a
menu board which can accommodate all of the menu items and prices the restaurant offers, placed
at a height conveniently and easily read by customers. A reduction of the menu board height would
place the board below that which is required for easy reading, or would require the deletion of some
menu items or the items' prices, or, alternatively, a reduction in the size of the lettering. Deletion of
menu items or prices would hamper operations by slowing drive-thru service. Reduction in the size
of the letter would pose an inconvenience for customers.
F. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and pwpose of the City's
codes, and such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the
public welfare. The intent and pwpose of restricting the size of menu boards is to limit the
opportunity for on-site advertising above that which is granted by the sign code. The granting of the
requested variance of 1.125 feet above the five feet which is allowed does not in any way provide
additional advertising for the McDonald's proposed. The additional 1.125 feet is only related to the
placement of the standard McDonald's menu board in such a way that it is easily read by customers.
",
..,....
~."l;:"-
-'.
Menu boards are also limited in size in order to reduce the aesthetic impact of such structures. The
McDonald's menu board will be placed in the southeast portion of the site, behind the restaurant. It
will not be visible from off:.site, nor even from any portion of the site other than from the position of
a car entering the drive-thru service lane. There is no aesthetic impact associated with the menu
board, so there will be no impact associated with an increase in height by 1.125 feet.
There is no impact whatsoever on the public health or safety which is related to the requested
variance. Granting the additional height requested for the McDonald's menu board will simply
provide more convenience and better setvice to customers, and, therefore enhance the McDonald's
operation.
m@ml
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
ill
JUN-f
,t.,.
TO
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR:
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
6 JUNE 95
AMOCO OIL/McDONALDS PLANS MEMO #0143
::;:":""'::::::;::::::::::=:'
I have reviewed the above plans and fi.r.l~:::~~eraf'ijOipts;'of,F~?O~t~eration and proposed changes:
/....~~:?~::;~:.:::::;~:::~;<},;.:..~.:~::::.. ~r J ::;?' .:.;:::;;::~:?::;:::.
- The drive-through confi~u;iti<;::pf~'s~nts"'a"':possi~J.ltb~zar4Qus situation. The traffic
entering the property from S. J,tPngre'ss"Ave is in direct alignmept'\~:jth the furthest south gas
pump island. Traffic would hliye'1<> travel in between the gas islai;fds"tc position their vehicle
properly for the drive-thro~h,9Ir the southwest comer of the bui\4hi~~, I also see the plans make
provisions for future ga~::p'~~,hland expansion. I would strongl~;,?pq~ this future expansion
due to the amount of vehituIaf travel in that particular area. Attach~:lk a diagram that proposes
an alternative suggestion to the drive-through. The diagram also addresses the A/W N (located
in the extrem~ southw:rp~:~tr of tyy:::prq,P'frty. .pp:e:::t~5re liryife.:d~:~~.ess f~r sanitation trucks
and the reducmg "loadIp.g.zo~t', I wp.w.d..~ggest tij.!.~...~rje.~ be c9IPplet~~;y deSIgnated for A/W N
access and not allow aqyH,arIq'4g sp~q~itHl::~ avaV,ble"ln this ~r~a. J1t~ diagram also allows for
these sacrificed parking,..g~,:'td.::PosS:ibl;V<reldbattd on the West..Si:d~foftliabuilding. My diagram
is not to scale or survey, but was traced over from the original plans. The dimensions would have
to be verified. <.."....,....,..:~'::::::::\ (,',:,:",:,:,.,',:::,",'":",::,:,,,;:,:";':'~':'"',i,;.)
:~) . ..
;;espe tfully SUbmitted4idt~ ..
/fn /l /'. "",,,,,"", i"';:;,:~,~::::::.,:,..
// /aff/YJ .:..:; ~, ~"';':':';';'~""
... l..~l' .l' ./;'>:"-:':";:-':~""\
Sgt. Marlon Harris \..,:' "t/,.
Traffic Unit, Police Department
:~:::::~: .......
n(~i
\
&
/
AvAIt...AtkE JADblTlOAJAL PAu/Altr
g"JkS'.t !
R ~
---'-- ---
~:~~#l 0
s,....A;..~
8t)x
,
(i
M C LJOAJ.ALbS J
A M.. 0 L..Cl
". ".'r - JIJOI cAr _ ~ A,(cA 6
Pi'.OPOSE"fJ c: IJAJJt:..E
~ _ ..~o PAT?)(.uJii. k)JnMf 'J .sJ~1J
''(:IF
~ R€L()~ATEl} A/W Iv
'\I. PAi<]c.IAl &: $'PA c:S s
DEL r;TE n
.
H:O/OJ't:D VOhC.Lf ~JIlAv~L
{20tJ&tU;s:;; A,; t:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-277
Planning Department
Fire Department
June 2!il, 1995
McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant
COUS 95-!il!il2
congress Ave & woolbright Rd
./
Move the fire hydrant to the west, next to the woolbright entrance.
..~ ;1(tCZ~~' (
FPO
r/
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-270
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Director, Planning & Zoning
Kevin J. Hallahan, F oresterlEnvironmentalist j( If / d
FROM:
RE:
Me Donald's Amoco Restaurant
DATE:
June 20, 1995
There are no existing trees on this site. The project should continue in the normal review process.
KH:ad
..-".--",.......... ,..."
~~ (il\ ~ \:
n~..", .,.,
,\ ,IiI;:
~::: ?-'
........"-.------"...,,....,,' .,
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-398
Conditional Use
McDonald/Amoco
File No. COUS 95-002
conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of
property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as
shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding
area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses
when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section.
In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and
Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the
general health, safety and welfare of the community and make
written findings certifying that satisfactory provision has been
made concerning the following standards, where applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subj ect property and proposed
structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and
control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
As shown in Exhibit "B" - site plan, access to the site is via
a two-way driveway on Congress Avenue and a two-way driveway
on Woolbright Road. Traffic flow on site is two-way, with the
exception of the south and east sides of the building where
the drive-through lane and drive-through window are located,
respectively. Access to the angled parking spaces on the east
side of the building is also one-way.
The gasoline pump islands are located on the west side of the
building. Four pump islands are proposed with a fifth island
(the island furthest to the south) to be included in the
future. During the review process, staff raised serious
concerns regarding the fifth pump island, due to conflicts
with drive-through traffic and vehicles maneuvering into and
out of the parking spaces at the southwest corner of the
building, the location of the loading area and of the dumpster
and congestion close to the driveway onto Congress Avenue.
The most recent site plan (the site plan shown in Exhibit "B"
is the most recent plan) has been improved by modification of
the loading area and of the dumpster, further discussed below.
However, there is still concern that the fifth pump island
concentrates too much traffic with conflicting traffic
movements in this area. This is due to the fifth pump
island's adjacency to the driveway on Congress Avenue, the
drive-through lane which will funnel traffic from both the
north and the west at this point and heavily used parking
spaces near the front of the building.
In addition to the degree of vehicular acti vi ty in this
southwest corner of the parcel, an existing cross access
easement to the vacant parcel to the south (formerly Westlake
Hardware which was razed in 1992) exists in this same area.
This cross access easement was established in 1992 when the
subject outparcel was subdivided from the westlake Hardware
property immediately to the east and south and conditional use
approval was granted on April 21, 1992 for an Exxon service
station under the current service station regulations which
became effective March 3, 1992. The current community Design
Plan requires vehicular circulation systems on adjacent
properties to be linked to encourage cross access between
parcels. The purpose of cross access is to minimize the
number of curb cuts on major roads for traffic safety reasons.
For all of the above reasons, staff recommends against the
future, fifth pump island.
Level of service problems on Woolbright Road will soon be
remedied after the county lets the plans to six-lane
Woolbright Road from Congress Avenue eastward, which is
2-
Page 3
Memorandum No. 95-398
Conditional Use
McDonald/Amoco
File No. COUS 95-002
scheduled for the very near future. This overcapacity status
of this section of Woolbright Road does not jeopardize the
project's ability to meet Palm Beach County's Traffic
Performance Standards Ordinance. Palm Beach County informed
staff today that traffic concurrency will be met. This is
based on trips that are vested with the razed Westlake
Hardware use. However, vesting from abandoned uses is only
valid for a period of five years after abandonment. Palm
Beach County has indicated that a building permit must be
issued by the end of September of 1995; the expiration date of
the five year period. A letter from Palm Beach County
verifying their approval with conditions was to be faxed
today, which has not yet been received, is forthcoming.
It should also be noted that on May 18, 1993, the 1992
conditional use approval for the Exxon station on this
property was granted a one year time extension of the
conditional use approval and concurrency certification which
was to have expired April 21, 1994. Extensions expire unless
a building permit application is made. A building permit
application was made and has been extended several times. The
permit is currently being reviewed by the Building Division
for another extension. The applicant is requesting this
extension of the building permit in the event this
McDonald's/Amoco application is not approved.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with
particular attention to the items in subsection I above, and
the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional
use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city
as a whole.
Based on the square footage of the building, thirty (30)
parking spaces are required and to be provided, including two
(2) required handicapped spaces. As previously mentioned,
angled parking is proposed east of the drive-through
window/lane on the east side of the building and ninety (90)
degree parking is proposed along the north and west sides of
the building.
A loading area, as required by code, is to be provided along
the south property line. The loading zone is hatched on the
site plan within Exhibit "B". Staff finds this location of
the loading zone to be acceptable.
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the
items in subsection I and 2 above.
The dumpster location is proposed for the southeast corner of
the parcel. The Public Works Department has approved the
location and enclosure.
4 . Utili ties, with reference to locations , availability, and
compatibility.
All utilities are available to the site.
private lift station is proposed.
In addition, a
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type,
dimensions, and character.
The applicant will provide landscape materials adequate to
meet all landscape code requirements. The screening and
landscaping proposed meets, or exceeds, code requirements in
all respects and provides the functional buffering required.
3
Page 4
Memorandum No. 95-398
Conditional Use
McDonald/Amoco
File No. COUS 95-002
The landscaping will consist of a mixture of native and
ornamental canopy trees, palms and hedge materials, selected
to provide a variety of color and to enhance the building and
property. The intensity of landscaping is compatible with
other developments in the area.
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to
glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and
harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
There will be one freestanding pole sign for the site to be
located at the northwest corner of the parcel. The sign will
be twenty (20) feet in height and will display the McDonald's
and Amoco corporate logos, and the gasoline prices. There
will be signage on the building walls and canopies (see
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 399, comment #2
and Building Division Memorandum No. 268 regarding compliance
with Community Design Plan and sign code.)
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
All code required setbacks are reflected on the site plan
submitted. No open space requirements are applicable.
8. General compatibility with adj acent properties, and other
property in the zoning district.
The size and proposed colors of the building are compatible
with the surrounding buildings. However, the metal, striped
pump island canopies do not blend well with the stucco walled,
Spanish" S" roof tiled, restaurant/convenience store building.
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-399 contains
recommendations (comments 11 and 12) to replace the pump
island canopies with a terracotta tiled mansard roof to match
the building (similar to the Mobil station at the southeast
corner of Hypoluxo Road and Congress Avenue) and to improve
the appearance of the flat-roofed portion of the building by
extending the mansard terracotta roof around the entire
building. The plans submitted do not show lighting on the
perimeter of the canopy.
A Community Design Plan Appeal has been submitted which is
being processed simultaneously with this request to permit
mul tiple, vertical lighting beams to be attached to the
roofline (recommendation regarding the appeal is under
separate cover).
9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to
compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
The proposed building is a single-story and 16.92 in height.
The building height is well below that allowed by the code for
the C-3 zoning district. The height proposed is harmonious
with the buildings in the immediate area and consistent with
the established character of the area.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the
city as a whole.
Development of this site will have a positive economic benefit
to the City. The use of the property is compatible with
surrounding commercial uses, therefore no negative effects on
adjacent property is expected. Furthermore, the restaurant
use will provide revenue from sales taxes and the convenience
4-
Page 5
Memorandum No. 95-398
Conditional Use
McDonald/Amoco
File No. caus 95-002
store/service station will generate both sales and gas taxes.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to
site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the City
of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances (new reference is Part III
- Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4).
The proj ect shall comply with the above standards, upon
rectification of staff comments conditioning any approval of
the request. One other requirement not specifically mentioned
elsewhere is concurrency certification for drainage levels of
service. Commercial approvals must be certified or exempted
for both traffic and drainage levels of service. The
Engineering Division has indicated that drainage can be
certified at time of rectification of staff comments.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in
accordance with the performance standards section 4 of the
zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton
Beach Noise control Ordinance.
Compliance with the city's performance standards is
anticipated and no nuisances or noise would be generated by
the proposed use beyond what is currently experienced with the
other commercial uses in the immediate vicinity. Since the
1992 Exxon environmental review approval has expired, a new
application for environmental review must be approved prior to
issuance of a building permit.
REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT COMMENTS:
Below is a list of those departments having comments regarding this
request:
Department
Attached Memorandum
Public works
utilities
Fire
Police
Engineering
Building
Parks and Recreation
Forester
Planning and zoning
N/A
95-250
N/A
N/A
95-281, 196, 212, 246, 248, 267 .
95-268 .
N/A
N/A
95-399
The comments above are of a nature that can easily be addressed at
time of building permit review.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this
conditional use request, subj ect to the permit plans for this
project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and
the applicable city of Boynton Beach Code of ordinances; this
includes deletion of the future, fifth pump island nearest the
south property line.
DCD:dim
A:Mac1
xc: Central File
c: \WP51 \'OA.'TA\MA.C
:;-
LOC~1\ON M~P
MCOON~~~'~\;~~~~~EC ~,~\~~:~'
i' r, \~t 'f-n?\ . \ ,- () ~..,~' ,-'\\ .. --- ',C!! 0~ 11'J~:' ('f~~ ~\ ,: '
" ,'y (\ ty \ \, . ; 'b I \ :;" L' :;c - -
JO . n 1" \ ' . j ( . *" ' 1 L , . 1:-::: ,,:'
. 't~~./: '~i ~\J \ ~~:M.r\ ~c::C ~~~. ;;~- . - -: [Difll ~ Jtt~\\~
\ \ .'1 \ \ r ,<- - "-! ~ U ~ " i i 1 1
N ' , ' ~.. \ \ 3 ' / ~ '" """ ..,':u ,.\
~ \\:" ':,. -\ to: \ \ !",-,"" - c.:C I' "-~~ .:Ilill<'Q
'. ~: tl \ ' ; _ ....... c. · --.'--' '- \'..
" \ n;.", ,__~\: ~_ . .., ~I.<' '~ J ',' ".,,' ,',":""(' -= '/ . -
~~..\ C</ .,:--. w '( \ \, ' . y 'lll~\" ~ (~~~
. ,W"- _ " \ lil~ \' . ~ " .' ~ r
~~>_\ \~-'fff ./~ ,. \ \'Y~~l'>~.">" ."'~,
, L----=~\\- J-- }.~\-~ " ~ \:..: ~",~,,'\IW!lt'':..''~'''',/i'f~&1:~& :/:':~. ,,~:~..~i...'~:
~ ~--' " ' - ,,~), ,'" '\
.J i r- ~~ " - ..... .. ,,71~ ......',. "
'\ \' ,., "" .c", 1 \'c' . I' ., ..:.S //" p",. :', ' ". \
.:I \ 1 .. I \ . ..~,' "'j" " - ..' v
\;. :/-';_ '" ' I 1 .,,~1r" '- " ,"' \ ~\'<< '.'
'. ~,j, I: ,; I"" . .'.,,~)<'~,*l1\'ir1-m1\ · ".~ ., ~ \' '
,,'. \:0,.4- '_ .~'7 Ib ' · . \':=l 'f"'I. . \ ' )
p.CI ~ \i ~~Ke';' Ol"_"...,.~ t:J~ C'" \.n>.~" ,"'~1- . ~-"I \ \\,11;\ \ 1\ ,,,,,~t:-
" 'I.. ., _ ~ __ '-~...- . \' ~" l ,co \' .r ~ j.. ~.' L-;- .. '" ~
\ _ ~" ,.-~ ~ ' .. . . . " .. 1 . _. ,.~ 1'":'
II" /' t\11): 1\/;\ };. ... t: ~ ' . ,:' ,~'c ".. 1 .. :.::.. "...- ,,-' ~-...,. .y""'-'
.. ."-. . " Ie' Po . ,~.):- ).,-.'" .~ -"~ ~ ~ - ,,,r -..ooA /
. c~: ...;? '\"~ \~\\lI\>' . ..r~'" ",- . 1 P. 3 ..JIl":" V
. I "'," \ \ \_.....;.;."~.,, - 'f'" .~"1 "0," . \ , ".. w'" aN ,,"1 - &:UJO ~
, ." I.... ;;:.._;,;; ,., .. _ ," _ 'L-rt ~E--'O" ',," ,., '.1' " , '11 ,c.,J ,. <0 ·
~ ~'" ",~.~~e---------"--~ ~-: -=-~;:~\__" -~~.~{,%~ -,/. ~. c.' .. '11=1'~ ~ \\\\', l~lf --.'1
_ / ~: 9 .. '\, C~~_\ r' \j;,~' II ,,<~ it\,;l \ 'J.
~ '-, \..," l ) . 1011/" >< ~".,( ~ "
~ ~.; ",,,...,,: ~ .', ~ _,"('" IL ' ' · r,
. ~ ~'~__ \ 1 .. "H," "
, \ ) " ".~ ."._" ',\ '" n ,.. <'-'-' \ ,If ;:;,' ,0" "
J'.! ' ,': \ \,,\~I\'\\\\ \ ,; \,'ff-( ~C ",si;'; ':~): .
I ,_ ,I .--' , ... ,.. u' ' .. ",. > .
'--. I' ~ \- 1I::l ,.'.
,.'.' 0\ L ' ~ . : : "I ' ~ .. V '1' ~ ,~~' :,' ',..11
(, _ \"~~:> '.-_,\ i~j4(\ . ,,) '0 ~;.. ] 1 ~~"' ,_,,~-:?J5.. ~ ~~~\!III
. '\:. -r:. ...1. -.:; 14 .'-~~ ~~~" '" '
,~ Y' ,_~~ \t.t,,\:.~K~: ~.c \\C-~ ,,1 ~>~J q~~\'Q \i-\"
~, \ " \ ~..-'~! '\ _. ,. _ ,..:..'" .' .;f.R ,- 11~mXYJ,' ~:,')..I
'J ,1\ ..".' \ I \ ~ ',' ", \I
,/. ",/.' ..... \ @ ~"\ ~L\\\' ~,\ n ",'lld'
~ 1\ I\" ,,\;J'[;" C" r){" '\ . \' ,
.. u. L;~ '1',(~'\...\ .9 LU~ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ 1 \ " \, '0\".
,~'(' . _, . ,,_' ,,' '" _ p.:3 ?!.lJ- " \ I...: c >_l.- .f n' ,
.__--"- _ .-~:~:,..;::rtr .1 \ _ ,'- ~../-~-; I . \ " tl.LL.~.\-o:D.'\~M
.. .. L0--2i';"~. L I ~> O>l ,,>,,' , :, - .-\ o~
~'<~ J-- :~_' \', · '. '\ \ ~ri l~
,<;: ....,;:; \' .~~:~~ ~~. 'C:~:~~' :: L:~~:"~~\ . '11 .j
_____1 ' ?,~ ." . .. " . ......o..P"l . ,) ,
,,' ' '- . ,,_' ~ ,,_,C .' . i . . \ ) '- " -'
" _~ " _.~p.c 0 .. _ ,_:H"^" ...," ) l - . \\'" > ~-
" _ ~.", ,," "nT' .' \I.. - . . -
"...~ \;' ~_' """"", , ~ ''J. I~' ..:,., .", 1'.....:.. ..' . \ . . .
\ <1'l. \ \ .~~ -j ~.l1"" -, c . .. . . . ~r"': : ,., ~- 1 \ ' ~\ "\
. ?\ .\ ,., .\'C/) ,ji;I,,,,h... ,'-"" ..... \1\~ 'II"
~.\ I '_, j ~"'l'r1'~" 1\ ,1: " ,,\'~l'(~t' "~~"'l' ...... . ::. ,::,;,:Ull. ': ..",,,,},
'< " - ~ . . >.. . <"''' .' \ \ . .
,\ \ ,'. . _ \ ,,' eh'1' \- ,4~ ", \1\ . " ", , . ' \ - ,-
" \..'':-,.:---l " ''i:~ ,'r"\ . -. . >., . , . . . - . . "/1
" ,\ '. '<ire, \ .;; \I \., . . . f...
:~ \ \'3\~j~jC "',~1.-':~"\\ \ \ \~/\ \~\L~SV1
: I \ ,~~ \L\,:.\.' 1 ~ \ j ,\.'0 400. 82.0 ~~J.) I
\ _:"\~~t\_-,\\v~~, _ -' /---~ \\1;~' \\pU" \ ..
~I L-I \ -.1 1-""'" II II
WOOLBRIGHT ~D
~sOD~ ~
.
. .
.
.
.. ".... ... ".... "',.. ,,8
i Ii Ii i lI,il Ii ~ j Ii j ;1"1' i IIII II i
I~r II Ii! 1~!.1 t II , I" i ~ i P Id
I; 'I ~ If R!i i Ii ,; i . i - ~: I
Hmjal'iif Ii; U ~ I . i i
~ Ii ~A d ~B ~ i; ~ ~ f ~ g 0 ~ ;I = ~ . ! i
~,' ~I~~il <Slit l~ Z; B
J : hll! H ~ U ; ~ ~ ~ ~ a 5 i
~ . ,S"SI B ~ ~ ~ ~ S
~ ; f IA~ i 'I i ~ ~ ~
I !,12 ~~ ~
~ ~
M ~
'( !'I q
~
, ;~.;.
!a5It..,Jtliil
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-281
I,' [I" 'l "
.l~ ..jL.,.~.,_lL~~ M~'..~__'
w
, LI i" '"
1'/'1 I
l~
August 4, 1995
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
~m V. Hukill, P.E.
~ Engineer
McDONALDS/AMOCO COMMENTS
FROM:
RE:
!" I,
\ II i
We have made Engineering comments on this project on at least six
occasions, as follows:
Memo 95-196 June 20 Hall to you
Memo 95-212 June 29 Hukill to you
Memo 95-246 July 18 Hukill to Haag
Memo 95-248 July 21 Hall to you
Memo 95-267 July 28 Hukill to Haag /
Memo 95-248 August 2 Hall to Heyden
The June 20 memo was reviewed for compliance on July 28, as was the July
21 memo. The June 29 memo has been complied with. The July 18 memo
requested a traffic impact study which we do not have, and a determination
(by you) regarding vesting, which we also do not have. The August 2 memo
was a repeat of the July 21 memo. As of today, the status of these memos
is as follows:
95-196
1. ok
2. ok
3 . Please comply
4. Please comply
95-212
1. ok
2 . ok
95-246 Please comply
95-248
1. Please comply
2. Please comply
95-267
Paragraph one - covered hereinbefore.
5. ok
6. Please comply
7. Please comply
8. Please comply
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
Paragraph two - The southernmost gas pump should not be approved either
now, which was not requested, or in the future, which was requested. Air,
water, phones and curbing have been reconfigured in an acceptable
arrangement.
Paragraph three - please comply.
Time spent on my part in reviews past initial review equates to $107.93.
WVH:bh
Attachments - above numbered memos
A:AMOCO
12-
. '
McDonald's! Amoco site plan comments/recommendations continued. page two.
<1~ Top of exfiltration trench shall be a minimwn of one foot below base material. City standard
drawing 8-91007. Use ofP.V.C. pipes in lieu of perforated CMP to be approved by city
engmeer.
RECOMMENDA TIONS
I. Consider relocating menu board further east and also straighten drive thru aisle to eliminate
"S" curve. This should provide easier access to menu board and a longer stacking lane.
It would also provide an opportunity for additional landscaping next to building.
2. Consider locating the west driveway another 20 feet to the south. You would still retain the
parking stalls along the south property line and provide a "straight path" to the McDonald's
drive-thru. Also. it will allow an additional vehicle to "stack" in the dedicated right turn lane
before your ingress lane becomes blocked.
3. Consider relocating the two H/C stalls in front of the store entrance for a little closer
accessibility .
4. Consider using a pavement sign within the yellow striping of the loading zone stating,
" NO P ARKlNG - LOADING ZONE".
5. Consider extending the sidewalk along both sides of building an additional two feet to create
a continuous wheel stop. This eliminates possible tripping hazard from individual wheel stops
and their maintenance. and provides a more esthetic appearance.
KRHlkrh
C: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file
/4-
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM RO. 95-212
TO: .
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
William Hukill, P.E.oj(
City Engineer
FROM:
DATE:
June 29, 1995
MCDONALDS/AMOCO
RE:
Our. additional comments are as follows:
1. Move the north entrance east about 20-25 feet to comply
with Land Development Regulations.
2. Move the west entrance south as far as is practical.
We have not had time yet to research the platting issue, but will
do so July 6.
WVH/ck
C:MCDONALD
xc: Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
IS-
.(J
"
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-246
TO:
Mike Haag
Zoning/Site Administrator
W~~Ukill, P.E.
~gineer
July 18, 1995
MCDONALDS/CONGRESS , WOOLBRIGHT
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
We have reviewed Weisberg's July 11 comments on subject project and
request that you request a new traffic impact analysis from the
applicant. In addition, please determine whether the five year
vesting period has been completed.
WVH/ck
C:MCDONALD
/b
Iwm
.~: ,.
rn
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-248
m<
DATE: JULY 2], 1995(2nd review) August 2, ]995(3rd review)
PLANNINGOEApNtD
ONING .
TI!;. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR.
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-62~
SUBJECT: McDONALDS/AMOCO RESTAURANT SITE PLAN - SECOND REVIEW
& THIRD REVIEW.
All plans submittcd for specific permits shall meet the city's codc rcquirements at time of
application. These permits include. but arc not limited to the following: Site lighting. Paving.
Drainagc. Curbing. Landscaping. Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Pcrmits rcquired from
agencies such as the F.D.O.T.. P.B. County, S.F.W.M.D.. and any other permitting agency shall
be included with your permit request.
COMMENTS
C!jRelocatc stop bars and stop signs four feet in front of sidcwalks. MUTCD 2B-9 (pg.2B-5).
(2) NOTE: County pennits wilt bc rcquired to work within both intcrsecting roadways.
The county will soon Ict the plans to six-lanc Woolbright Rd. from Congress Ave. eastward.
Applicant should contact the project engineer to correlatc construction of intersection and this
project. The project engineer is Javicr Lopez. 407-684-4 I 50.
(.:3) Provide a traffic impact analysis if the site meets city criteria (single dircctional trips per day:
150 in a one hour period or 3.000 per day). Chap 23. Art. I. Sect. 58 J 4.
~)rop of cxfiltration trcneh shall be a minimum of one foot below base material. City standard
dnlwing B-91 007. Use of P. V .C. pipes in lieu of perforated CMP to be approved by city
engmeer.
RECOMMENDATION
1. W~ recommend that the plan be forwarded to the P&D Board for consideration and approval.
KRH/krh
C: William Hukill. Dev. Dir. and to file
mcdoamoc.2rv/3rv
~y ~"'-V lGw-- Ct- (J :
II1JCL: 15~It;{=1 t5 ;
:Jf201~ (8
/7
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-267
FROM:
r
Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator
William Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
July 28, 1995
TO:
DATE:
RE: MCDONALD'S/AMOCO
We have reviewed subject plan submitted to us late yesterday
afternoon with a request to respond by noon today. Since we do not
have time to respond fully in the 5~ hours allotted (and ignoring
the 7~ hours of meetings we were in, or will be in, during that
period), we can only review previous comments as follows:
A. Engineering Memo 95-196
1. Ok
2. Ok
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
5. Ok
6. Please comply
7. Please comply
B. Engineering Memo 95-248
1. Please comply
2. Please comply
3. Please comply
4. Please comply
C. Building Memo 95-247
1. Please comply
2. Please comply
3. Please comply
(~ The southernmost gas pump is proposed for future use. In order to
" J facilitate traffic flow westbound south of that pump, the air,
water, phones, etc. must be relocated away from the area. In
addition the curb in that area (southwest corner) should be on a
diagonal line running NW/SE from the apron curb springline.
,~ The issue of traffic impact, and specifically assigned trips,
remains unresolved. This project will not be endorsed by the
Department of Development until this issue is resolved. All qther
comments should become conditions of approval, subject to complete
res0lution prior to permitting.
WVH/ck
C:MCAMOCO.COM
I?
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-268
August 2, 1995
~ IE @ ~ U Wi m:'!
n I,
AIlS 3/995 @'
~'1rM~WgF~~D
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Site Plan Review - Conditional Use - 3rd Review
McDonald's/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store
S.B. corner of Congress Ave. and Woolbright
Re:
The Building Division has reviewed plans for the above project
and have no comments on the conditional use, however, we have the
following comments regarding the site plan:
1. It should be in compliance with the security code and
convenience store requirements at the time of
permitting.
2. Pedestrian access must be provided from the right-of-
way to the front entrance of the building, per Florida
Handicap Code.
3. The free-standing sign did not meet required setbacks
of 10 Ft. from the property line to the leading edge of
the sign.
4. Wall signs exceed the allowable 136.5 Sq. Ft. by
approximately 7.5 Sq. Ft.
5. Dimensions of the directional signs must be shown to
comply with 4 Sq. Ft. maximum.
6. Maximum number of directional signs is 4, with a height
of 5 Ft. from ground to top of sign.
Time and charges for this third review is submitted separately.
AN:mh
Att.: 3rd Review Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
A:McP-AMO.TRC
/1
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-399
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Zoning and site Development Administrator
DATE: August 2, 1995
SUBJECT: McDonald I s/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience Store/Service
Station - COUS #95-002
(Conditional Use Approval - drive-through and service
station)
The following is a list of comments regarding the third review of
the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments
are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list
of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first
or second review or new comments as a result of the third review.
To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter
the configuration of the site and design of the building. The
second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance
the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at
time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The
applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated
upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the
Building Division for permits for the proposed project.
I. COMMENTS:
1. A Community Design Plan appeal has been filed regarding
exterior lighting, specifically the proposed light beams
shown on the mansard roof. Drawings shall be amended to
comply with the outcome of this appeal. Also, write or
show on Section AA of SW-2 that no lighting will be on
the perimeter of the pump island canopy.
2. Provide a computation and documentation to verify
compliance with the Community Design Plan, section 10.1.
Signs, regarding sign regulations to illustrate required
signage and dimensional requirements for the free-
standing sign, wall signs and directional signs.
3. Verify on drawings compliance with section 11.E of the
Community Design Plan regarding screening of rooftop
equipment.
4. Environmental review approval must be granted for retail
sale of gasoline, prior to issuance of a building permit.
(Zoning Code, Section 6.C.1B.e)
5. show on the landscaping plan the size, specie and spacing
required to screen liftstation.
6. To confirm the required number of parking spaces for the
subject property, add to the floor plan the total number
of seats requested for the restaurant. Also, add to the
parking data found on the site plan the code required
computations for calculating parking spaces by using one
parking space for every 2.5 seats.
7. The applicant shall pay the additional fee required for
the extra (third) review requested, prior to the City
Commission meeting of August 15, 1995.
8. Reflect a pavement connection to the property to the
south consistent with the recorded cross access easement.
20