The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE \ i IF, /' " f tr.. . J~ /1 \_.ry.' ,"~.' .. , of /0 ~! ,,>,/ ~~. VI. PUBLIC HEARING D PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM cc: Plan, Dev, Uti Agenda Memorandum for January 17, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker, City Manager I ---;; / '/:/~f / FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director DATE: January 12, 1995 SUBJECT: Lawrence Oaks (ANNEX #94-009) Annexation Program, Group 2 of Phase 2 Applications for Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning Please place the above-referenced items on the January 17, 1995 City Commission meeting agenda under Public Hearing. DESCRIPTION: The subject property, which is located at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road, is to be annexed pursuant to the Annexation Program and specifically, pursuant to an agreement for water service and annexation. The Lawrence Oaks project received site plan approval by the County in 1993, which is for the development of 178, zero lot line, patio homes (City staff has conducted a cursory review of this plan and comments are attached to Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 94-378). The infrastructure is nearly complete, and the units have been master modeled to allow for quicker expediting of permit reviews. On June 7, 1994 the City authorized the execution of an agreement for water service for this property conditioned upon annexation. Staff therefore recommends that this property be annexed, reclassified to Low Density Residential from Medium Res idential 5 in the County, and rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD) from RS-SE (Single Family Residential-Special Exception for a PUD). Annexation of Lawrence Oaks creates a unique issue for the City. This issue is the annexation of a partially complete, County-approved project. Once annexed, the City typically attains total jurisdiction over the property that is annexed. In this case, the City would then attain the responsibility for completing the necessary reviews, issuing permits and conducting inspections for a project that was not formally reviewed by the City. A possible solution is to allow the County to continue processing current development activity for a predetermined time period. It is the intent of Staff to arrive at a solution to this issue prior to completion of the annexation process. For additional information on the Lawrence Oaks applications please see Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 94-378. Approval of these applications will allow the proposed Land Use Element amendment to be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). Following their preliminary review, ordinances will be adopted, the DCA will conduct a review for compl iance determination, and once found in compliance, the ordinances will become effective (21 days following compliance determination). The total review process takes approximately 8 months. Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan and Annexation Program, staff recommends that these requests be approved. The supporting analysis is provided within Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 94- 378. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board ,recommended approval of this Plan amendment and rezoning by a 6-1 vote. TJH:mr Attachments AMJ:2:LOAKS.AGM PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-378 TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Development .Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner~ DATE: January 4, 1995 SUBJECT: Lawrence Oaks - (File No. ANNEX 94-009) Application #4 - Annexation Program, Group 2 of Phase 2 Applications for Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning r, 'k u{~~ INTRODUCTION You will recall the City's current efforts to annex western properties through the Annexation program, and that the last phase (Phase 2-Group 1) included Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, Sausalito Groves, Heartland Health Care Center, and the Greentree Plaza I shopping plaza. On October 18, 1994 the City Commission directed staff to continue implementing the annexation program by annexing the next group of eligible properties, which are identified as Phase 2-Group 2. You will also recall that eligible properties are defined as those contiguous properties whose owners have previously consented to annexation through the agreement for watep service with the City. Lawrence Oaks is one of four (4) eli.gible projects now being_recomm/endedc for,anne~ation. ~ t, r iv+t~ ~.(5 awrence Oaks is a County approved project located at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road, and south of Fox Hollow (see Attachment "A"). The Lawrence Oaks project received County site plan approval in 1993, was scheduled to be platted in September, 1994, and represents the final phase of the Manor Forest development (a. k. a. Fox' Hollow). On June 7, 1994 the City authorized the execution of an agreement for water service for this property with the condition thatt.he owners would voluntarily annex to the City. Following th~'Q.ifih\exation of the Knollwood Groves property, the subject property became contiguous and therefore eligible for annexation. The Lawrence Oaks approval consists of 178 units designed as zero lot line patio homes. Oriole Homes, Inc. began construction of site improvements approximately 6 months ago, and the individual homes will be built by the eat:~ro~rtm'LlY1/^- ~ Lowell Homes, Inc. . ~.:1.1l<,J INA \:. DELIVERY AND CAPACITY OF URBAN SERVICES The providers of major urban services (e.g. police, Fire, and Public Works) reviewed tl\e'7 proposed annexation~ for impact on service delivery, and only the Fire Department would request certain expenditures if the Lawrence Oaks site is annexed (see Attachment "B"). It should be noted that the subject properties are all within the service area (range) of Fire Station #3, Fire Station #3 has superior service capability compared to the corresponding County station (with respect to response times, staffing, and equipment), and no deficiencies currently exist or are anticipated in the near future. The potential expenditures would simply allow the City to maintain superior back-up service to this geographical area, without assistance from the remaining stations. In general, such expenditures would enable Station #3 to respond simultaneously to three (3) emergency calls (Fire Station #3 is currently capable of providing full service to two (2) concurrent calls), the potential tax revenues from all four properties would provide the funds necessary' for the potential expenditures. SUBSEOUENT REVIEW AND PERMITTING OF DEVELOPMENT The timing of annexation relative to the incomplete status of this 1 ~ ~ ...,., . pro:ject creates a unique issue of a magnitude not previously encountered by the City. This issue relates to the review and permitting responsibility required for the remainder of the project. If, once annexed, the city were to attain total jurisdiction over this project, the City would be responsible for completing the necessary reviews, issuing permits, and conducting inspections for a project that was not formally reviewed by the city. It should be noted that the City will, prior to annexation, attempt to arrive at a solution to this problem acceptable to both the City and Palm Beach County. NOTIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY OWNERS Representatives of both Oriole Homes Inc. and Lowell Homes Inc. were directly informed of the City's annexation plans, were provided a courtesy notice detailing the annexation program, as well as provided with an official zoning notice. Regarding opinions on the annexation of this property, no representatives have communicated any opposition to annexation. APPLICATION CONTENTS AND REVIEW SUMMARY Application #4 consists of an application for annexation and land use plan amendment/rezoning. As this property is being annexed in accordance with the City's annexation program, staff has completed the necessary applications, and the corresponding application fees were waived. Additional information on this application is found on the following page and is in the form of an abbreviated summary. This summary includes a brief outline describing the property, the application, adjacent land uses, the availability of facilities, the basis on which it is found consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, other pertinent information, and staff's recommendation. Attachment "B" summarizes data in this report as well as provides information relative to service delivery and fiscal impact. " -~ 2 REVIEW SUMMARY - LAWRENCE O~ ~ 42 acres LOCATION: Northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road. directly opposite the Whispering Pines Mobile Home Park. EXISTING LAND USE: PROPOSED LAND USE: Medium Residential 5 (County) Low Density Residential (4.84 du/acre)(City) EXISTING ZONING: RS-SE - Single Family Residential with Specia* Exception ~o.~r a a P ~UD~UJ' PROPOSED ZONING: PUD - Planned Unit Development W'u~ ~ [>>,t..,lt ~ CURRENT USES: A planned community of 178 single family, zero lot line homes PROPOSED USE: No change proposed. ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Northeast: East: Farther East: South: West: LAND USE ZONING Fox Hollow (Single family) MR5 RS/SE 19. lot single family homes MR5 AR Lawrence Road N/A N/A mobile homes { ~5 f\ l ~l'Y ~ Knollwood Groves \I\-wJ t ~ \1 ~'i'v~5 1t ~\ agriculture MR5 AR- CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAM Consistency with the Future Land Use Pl~n - Consistent The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map does not recommend land use designations for unincorporated properties located west of Lawrence Road. The Future Land Use map will be amended to show this annexed property as Low Density Residential since it is comparable to Palm Beach County's Medium Residential 5 classification, and since it is appropriate for the Lawrence Oaks project. Maximum densities allowed under the County's and the City's classification are 5 dwelling units per acre and 4.84 dwelling units per acre, respectively. Consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies - Consistent Given that 1) the Low Density Residential classification is comparable to the current County classification, 2) the planned Lawrence Oaks project is consistent with the definition of the Low Density Residential classification as indicated in Policy 1.16.1. and 3) since the planned development and proposed land use classification are consistent .with the adjacent land uses, the proposed annexation and land use classification are consistent with all goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. However, there are several issues that should be addressed, as they describe characterist ics of this site, indicate cons is tency with the Comprehens i ve Plan, and/or fulfill requirements of the Florida Department of Community of Affairs with respect to the review of plan amendments. Selection of ZoniDR District The Planned Unit Development zoning district is proposed as it is the most comparable district to the County's PUD district, and is the only City district that will accommodate the County approval of the Lawrence Oaks site plan (see Attachment "C"). Since zoning to PUD in the City requires an accompanying master plan, and since project infrastructure is under construction, it is not feasible at this time to negotiate a plan that meets City regulations to the greatest extent possible. Therefore, it is 14. ~JIecommended that the property be zoned to PUD, with the County approved site pl~n. t ~ ~~~~ is a brief summary of the following zoning aspects of the Lawrence Oaks s1te ~ plan. as approved by the County: A) Total dwelling units approved: 178 B) Housing type: zero lot line, patio homes C) Gross Density: 4.40 D) Typical lot dimensions: 50' x 100' E) Typical lot size: 5.000 sq. ft. F) Minimum front setback: 10' G) Minimum non-zero side setback: 10' H) Minimum rear setback: 10' I) Setback for pool/enclosures: unknown J) Maximum building height: 35' k) Maximum building coverage: 50% ::s:r _.-~ / Prior to the property recently being platted through the County process, the Plannin~ and Zoning Department solicited from the City's Technical Review Committee memoranda listing the aspects of the County approved plan that did not meet City's code. TheSE memoranda have been included for informational purposes in Attachment "D" 3 l: l>" :u , J ,I : 1 :1 ,I ;- ,: I ;;:: ~; 1 i , .. I I l"'l,;t: ~: , .... I' t ': ! ::;:- ~l I ~ ----- -.... -.. :1 ,- i~ ....... ~"'~ t~ ~ 'f I ,I J q 'I J 1 : 1 q II jl I ~ir .,~..J i ~.. 'f~ i~ ~ n . 'I ~ ~ .. ~ ~I-I ~ UI ~ 0 ~[~l ~ N 0 ~ l.o< 0 ~ Z t) 0 ::0 -i :J: U> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l'\ ~I~I ~I :I: ] m ,.. ,.. ~ m ~ ~ -t 0 ~ ~di .. ... :< ~~; ... ~ I ! . ; ( '~Ji I ! ~-i~1? ' ... I S~ _' ' , ;. , ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ " 1- -t ~ ;. 1) !:: ;r-l> ;>0 IJ' t i i < . ~ .' : . ~ i ~ ~ 't ~ . : 11 J ;~: I ~ if: \,.: '" :F Ll ~ i .. - " Q ~l :;:--- ill! ~ J .r La ~; ~:..t~ ;1 '1' f4 -, =c JJ - 'oo~j~ ;J n:-, l' o .~ l _ _ _ : 4 . '''' t:; , - ~k ~ ~~ : ; :! ." ~.. .. s~ v, .~ ., .. ~; ~ ~, or; " ~~ ," .s ~ 7 ~ ~,11 ,'~ ,. :-: , y j F ..., IMANOR FOREST ~ED FOR VAN~~UARD REAllY & I ~ Ii r", -'~"f _' .. r. ~ . -~ .. \ ;. . ~~, ,,:: .~: rv:' OPMENT C' 'ORPOR' A~I- .-% -~:. ~ i. MII\.II'1I :t ' ':-:' , -PAlMBEA~HC~~,R.~" ";!':';' - '1 R ( \ -. L: ., ~ . I J I It' .. ! i J II ~ , 1 t : . '\0 \, t L . !, " , J -" '1J ) iO - . c..:.' ~ ~ r-.. "1 -.... , ~ .., : 4.... ~~:~ ~)~ ::~ I: .: f~~ ;~ 3. ..r. . ' ~ ~ l. 1:J ~'. . t ~ ,- . IH im~i i~; ln~ii ~f! mE1 ':l~ ! , i . ;,;: ;~~.o; ~~)~ .~ . . .1 " . ~~, :.' .. ,Ii; -~ ;;~:{' ~,J: :J~:p';:'ln~"IH.'~':: 1: ,:''':::: ",.,. ':.. .,--: "~'~"":!'_'-,'r:.Pl'rH..,.....d:~,-._:.. ',' .. ':"....:" .....-:fQl ..oJi_ ~- -:. ..=:r=ii'i,~f.:., :'! . .:" .:.. ." \ . t .. .. ...-:. 10. \ ..., ,. & ,.... .... I ' '. ' i: !It! ; ti,':: ~~t'!l' I: fi !h:,}!fl'r': 11 ilH r~~ ~i ! :!i Ii ~; ;,; ; t' ~; I.'-f-. ., . J, 01 I . ..A'\" 'II:.: :1"',., . :...,1, t'" f~l""llll.;:i J,~l'I!,j"H" f,;...:,lj:; 1J," -.....' 'h I' hh ,ii' 'l_h i'.f'~ '-1 . -. '. . 1 !;!~ '~'!\~ft1"'I'J:";I:!\~:~,li:t'"~"'~li~!~!f!i lit: !!I..l....,III.~\i..lr.l; 1~...Ii-.::l~J:: :<' ::: ",,; :', ,l.- "l-i' ...!". ,. i I ".1."1"1 t'- ,-,,~:'-.l;,'~: , ,.1- lt~i~!~3.i;:j":-~;~~i,~f~~!~fi.J!~;!!:T;,i:;;;1:i1 ~:i~ "f," i'f' !f't~llftst'il~J~lll'-h'h,""i-'!-:. ,,:, :~;, ,. . 'f:, j. II" ""1-" ."-, .... ..' .-. !IIU :i:Jji 'i"li".:':;;'" 'f.loh~~:fi::i, ~i~~:f "j; :'I'~'~I'I"j.i-I'lJ 'C..ll,' If ~1!1':!'I"!"I:I:I'I: ~i-' Hili li.q ,'l II ht~.I"1J i,' -. "J~- . .... -" ,-r. . .ii'~ ,...l:l~'~'~':'!~~'i\' ~I~~l!!~:i' .:~!i~r~~i !;f~ ;1". i',I"1 ;.i,I.rl~f"l.i-l.l!lll"J,_f"I" -.,;;: 'I' iil ~ll iatl~~ ~:.tf!,l ~i.: "G:tfi ~~t ~l t! 1 if i~;;:~ f ~ I. i !; ~ ~t~~ r i i .r~~;l~!:' ~:l!l~ f ::1; !~:f~; ~:~! (~t!;; l ~ ~;;: ~ ~.. ~ ~j:E; ::i~mi:Hmw:~~!n:~:~:~~i;':?~~:"::(, :;: .., ~'t ~1 (; },;! ..= , ~ ~ i .T .. 'JI ... . .I , r' , """f - 0 ~ 2 u "."...:. r- C' ~'. c. "t) .. , ..... ... i7 4; ... ". J;- :'l :.., ... ;." II ,- ~ X ~J ....., ~ u 1 ~,......, M ~ :: II ;. '1' :; ~ ~ ~ ;:- c~.. e. ~ VJ ~ c,,' ~ :. tt ::J ~ (') - C' ' JI ~~-tq~~c ~ P~ri~~~~~ :~~ ,,~~ 1-~~~~~~~~;a~~I~~~5~~~3 ~;r t ~! Y ::-; ~ -~ ~ ,_ (., j ~ (Y ~ ~:i::: b:= " ~ I~~,;~~~~~~~' ~ ~~~~ ~~rr .' (g ,*, 0 ~ ':;:I~ II ~'2:..~ ."Y1V1~:) .... Jl ~~.,) ~~ ~a ~ 8'i~':: ~~~...: ~ ...~ ~~ 0 ...~;;; ':(<~l/' ;i. ..,i: ~r < 5 ~~ .'~~~ ,....,..., fT'~ C 5 - . <CD ~~ ~~~. 8 " ~~~> ~ ~~~ 0 ~ ~ ~~~~ In "0 0.., ,. -:; :-. 2D l=. !)!. o~~~ ~l>:I: "'V,,. j=r-~ " ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~M ~- f ~ ~~-~ ....- :; }l> -- ~~~f?1Z .~: ~v: ~ ~ ~~ :-t~ ~ ... :jl,)in.,t:,.,!11I I ~if';;f~Jll'f'll'ff'rl" " 'lqlHti I,U'f!l.l Ii IJ'lli ~ ! fJH 1111 111ff' : i- ,q' I ,I'I-t :!lI' i ,IIJ ~~ ~ , 1:1 I :; . :, t/ 'I C! " . ! ~ f ..... ;:., "' -'1 ;...: -fI -If i1lf.ll fi,-li: i: (n J' f , 1 II · ill -,.' ~ - -;-~! I krt:,' I-i, 1 ~ - 'f - -. i j:l-f 1 I. . l' l' .. -L -1 _ I -L.l..-.t n'tlf.'f Fa rf', ~ i,lfir; iff 'flii "': r;; ! ( I J~ JII ~ lit, '~f if~' h l~~ -,I' .'~ I~:'I:~ ~~I ~i ~I''''''';''-f -I =~J . ,- E~ .~ l:' ~.' -. ,. .. =!, ~~ It ~jfl~ l ~\ !;~ il\f i;i~;! , III'lMt t" I ,_:- t ,_ ~ _ '--=_+. "inn I 1 ~ ~ ~~ I .... ~-" 'I 1 I ;,., fs ,;, ~: ~I ~l ~\~! J ~. ~ i:; ; a ~ I, I .' It. I ,."' , " - I' -!. I . :- C I: :l- r- N I ~ -:' "':1 _ ~ . r') f. (, ~. '7' U ....1 ,~.. ~ ~ ~~~ ~~,;~ ~ I::,~r~ ~ t ~ ~ ); ;: :.t J. =- ,:;:.: < -:Jl ~ I: 0 ~ ~J~' ~ Tl ~ ,,' :-: =. ~ 9-' M;.n~ . ;rJ = - :<;1 n F~O ';~~~ ~:;~ ~~;:~ ~tr.~,.. '!--~ ;1 ;::; ~ e c _ g~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~l ,. ""t; ~ ~ ~ ~ --- " ;:r. ", ~ .:t < ,.. ;r. .... ,. N '" " o g (....C,...l.......l" -- o.po'....,""....... )l>)>:'>l> (""icn~'J gc....~~~~~ ~~V1V1Ul.J1V'1 r:: z ,.... ".. .. ::40 ". :J5~~ ::1:1=........0)): i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VI fT'1::t:l ..'" U'I""T'HI'Ii''T) (II U LANDi DESIGN SOUTH Londscopa Architeclure I ,..-' c., ~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMO # 94-227 R~..J').!I DATE: AUGUST I, 1994 TO: T AMB~II HEYDEN, PLANNING DIRECTOR THRU: 'tt~ HUKILL, CITY ENGINEER FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AID@. SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON UNDEVELOPED PHASE OF MANOR FOREST TO BE KNOWN AS LAWRENCE OAKS The engineering department finds that the following site plan details do not conform to city codes: I. STREETS: A. The local streets and the collector street do not meet minimum right of way widths. [Appendix C. Art. 10. Sect. I OB]. and minimum pavement widths are not specified, B. Dead-end streets are prohibited unless they end in a cul-de-sac [C/X/IOD]. C. The minimum distances bctwccn some local streets connecting thc collector street do not meet the minimum distance required (660') [C/X/l]. D. A crosswalk may be requircd for access between units 44 and 173 based on the length of the block [C/X/3D.2]. 2. The parking lot for the sales trailer shall conform to Chapter 5. Articlc 10 of the city's codes. 3. No access from individual lots shall be allowed directly onto collector streets [C/X/7]. 4. The plan will require permitting from other agencies such as the S.F.W.M.D.. P.B, Co. Engineering Dept.. D.E.R.M. and p<>ssibly L.W.D.D. 5. The site plan should have P.B. Co.certification of concurrency approval and comply with thcir traffic performancc standards ordinance. A traffic impact analysis may be rcquircd if one is not already done. si '~it~ca~~r~~el~e ~ a op o~acr6's. The engineering department reserves all other comments regarding this site plan subject to review ofthe master plan and preliminary plat. KRH/krh ~{'~ ~ C\i -'-r-~ M 0 9... \. lawroaks PL-~~--;~ ""t>\5~EC~L~ C.'~r("\mi:=l\)l c.~~'S.sG":V 6\J"""C A\3~v'c - '\~A~~ ~ k,,", \-\~Ll Q. ~', ~.~ \ ~ . \ - CJ . \-W ~ q., L.. , .., ..., . RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '94-284 TO: Tarnbri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ',,\ # 1./ , r--..;..:. . RE: Lawrence Oaks DATE: August 5, 1994 The site contains numerous native Sabal Palms, Live Oaks and other trees that should be preserved in accordance with the Preservation Ordinance. The developer has initiated preservation and should coordinate efforts with my office. plans meet City code to date of this memo. Tree the All KH:ad . m U"_ 51994 ill 10 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-192 August 5, 1994 From: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Z~g Director Don Jaeger, Building Official ~ Milt Duff, Chief - Plans Review & Permitting To: Via: Re: TRC COMMENTS - Manor Forest (Lawrence Oaks) (Residential development to be annexed) The Building Department has reviewed the plans submitted for the above project and offer the following comments: I. Plans are unclear - cannot read all details 2. All easements need to be shown 3. No residential developments within the City of Boynton Beach allow la' front yard setbacks nor 50% lot coverage 4. Appendix B, Section 9 (B) addresses front yard requirements. 5. Plans need to reflect setback for all lots, including irregular lots 6. Setbacks for pools and screen enclosures must be shown 7. If 18" roof overhang is allowed, easements need to be larger to allow for roof maintenance 8. Sales trailer area, signs and all other construction will be reviewed for code requirements at the time of permitting h.:QK. ~A.(~ Milt Duff MD : mh A:MANORFOR.TRC ill AUG - 5 - ill I' .... ..., , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-202 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Manor Forest DATE: August I, 1994 The site listed above shows several stub roads with no turn arounds, turn arounds must be provided. If you have any questions please let me know. . Eichorst Works Director REier rn ,.. RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-285 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent 1A~ Manor Forest (Lawrence Oaks) - Annexa~o~- FROM: RE: DATE: August 8, 1994 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the MasterPlan for Manor Forest. The following comments are submitted: 1. Art. IX, Section 8 of the City subdivision regulations requires that "park and residential land for residential subdivisions be dedicated in accordance with the general standard of 6 acres per one thousand (1,000) persons". This MasterPlan calls for a total of 178 single family and duplex units to be constructed in the P.U.D. Based on an average household size/d.u. of 3.0 for single and duplex units the following formula applies: . .0180 (average acreage requirement/d.u.) X 178 d.u. = 3.204 acres. 2. This same section allows the City the option of requiring either land (or a fee in lieu of land) and allows the City the option of granting up to one-half credit for private recreation provided. In order to qualify for one-half credit, the developer must provide 5 separate recreation elements of sufficient size to serve the residents of the community. 3 . If the developer decides to apply for one-half credit, the City would consider accepting cash in lieu of land equal to the 'acreage required. JW:ad ~ 13 ...., ~ MEMORANDUM , TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director Michael E. Haag 1:-~' Zoning and Site ~lopment Administrator August 8, 1994 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Manor Forest Master Plan (178 single-family lots, including a recreation facility) Please be advised of the following comments relative to the preliminary review of the above-referenced Master Plan. A. Building setback and lot comments: 1. Establish setbacks for screen roof enclosures and pools. 2. Identify on the plan which side corner floating lots have a IO foot side setback and which ones have a 15 foot side setback. 3. Specify on the plan the setbacks for all irregular shaped lots. 4. Show on the plat the overhang easement (note 18" is too narrow for a home owner to repair and maintain their house if they have to go onto the adjacent property owners property). Other projects have dedicated three to four feet for an overhang easement. 5. Note; the ten foot front setback is not consistent with the front setbacks required for conventional zoned lots. To my knowledge there are no single family platted lots with detached units that have a IO foot front setback. 6. ' Specify on the plan that all residential units have two parking spaces. 7 . Fifty percent coverage is more than we are accustomed to, however, the county may have a different definition for coverage than we do. 8. Specify on the plan the minimum lot size for each different type of lot. B. Site comments: I. Revise the shape of the lots and streets to remove the deadend streets and replace with a circular cul-de-sac (radius to satisfy the Fire and Public Works departments needs) . 2. Provide code required parking for the recreation area. 3. Show the landscape buffer ,areas as tracts on the plat and reference maintenance of same in the association documents. 4. Submit drawings showing the proposed entry signage and other signs such as recreation area. 1"1 page 2 Manor Forest Master Plan memorandum 5. Provide drawings indicating the finished landscaping for the area identified as a sales facility. Specify on the plan the sales faci,li ty and models are temporary in nature and will be refurbished to comply with approved landscape plans prior to the certificate of occupancy being issued for the last house in the development. 6. Add a cross section drawing of the proposed roads to the plan. 7. Submit, to the City, the landscape and tree preservation plans for the project. a: ............n,f r .lIpl 2 Ie III i V 1 1 ! tillI'. '{ f L& · ,^ ' f."ill rn @ ~ n w ~ ,~,..1 . lV~ / ~ l'i;' ~1' . I J.Il 2 0 1997 11.0 LAND.LandP,anning ~~' 1 ~_J~ DESIGN Lan?scape Architecture,' ", PJ:!\,N:!'!;,',;,~,f1'tD lbV", EnVironmental Consultation L:Jd';':~-2.._~'_~i _~_~_.e_' SOU T H 561-478-8501 . FAX 561-478-50 12 . Congress BusIness Center' 1260 N, Congress Avenue' SuIte ;;~ . West Palm Beach. Florida 33419 June 19, 1997 Tambri Hayden City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Dept. 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd, Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL. 33425-0310 Dear Tambri, Enclosed is a copy of the Manor Forest master plan, application and justification statement that was submitted to the PBC zoning department on Wednesday June 18, 1997. This information was submitted for the purpose of a Development Order Amendment which will finalize the PUD separation process. If you should have any questions regarding this information, please do not hesitate to call our office. Sincerely, Land Design South enc, cc: Mike Briggs Dennis Koehler 38/21 ' 97 13: 48 ID:PZB-ZONING FAX:5612335165 PAGE 2 Retyped for readability. tiLe-~r ~ SEPARATION AGREEMENT April 17, 1997 Manor Forest H.O.A, Inc., Lawrence Oaks H,Q,A, Inc. and Lowell Homes, RBGXltd" a Florida limited partnership, at ai, hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. 1) Manor Forest H.O.A I Inc. will immediately flatten the dirt berms located along the western fence border separating Lawrence Oaks (east of Manor Forest Blvd.). 2) Manor Forest H,Q.A. Inc. will mow Tract A at least 1 time per month. 3) Manor Forest H,Q.A. Inc, will install a hedge along the southern and western 6' fence line separating the Manor Forest H,QA. Inc. property from the Lawrence Oaks property. 4) Lawrence Oaks H.C.A. Inc, will maintain the land and shrubs south and west of the 6' fence that separates this Lawrence Oaks H,Q.A. Inc. property from the Manor Forest H.D.A. Inc. property. 5) Lawrence Oaks H,Q.A. Inc, and Lowell Homes RBGXLtd., a Florida Limited partnership, at ai, agree to offer oral and written support as needed to help Manor Forest H.C.A., Inc, bifurcate/or separate the 2 communities to become completely separate from each permanently, 6) Lawrence Oaks H.Q,A., Inc. shall be responsible for all the community maintenance and upkeep on the south and west side of the fence line separating the two properties (excluding all of the connecting lake) and Manor Forest H.Q,A. Inc, shall be responsible for all the community maintenance and upkeep on the north and east side of the fence line separating the 2 properties (including all of the connecting lake). This agreement shall be null and void in the event Palm Beach County denies the Development Order Amendment intsnded to formally approve the separation of our 2 communities, The intent of this agreement is to bring harmony to our communities while we live our separate lives. Signed by Manor Forest H.O,A., Inc., Lawrence Oaks, H.O. A. Inc. and Lowell Homes, RBGXL TO., and dated May16, 1997. - 08/21 '97 13:49 lD:PZ8-20N1NG FAX:S612335165 PAGE 3 AUG-21-1997 12:38 PHLM BEACH Ci'( ATTY ~t'AM1~lO~ AOUtr.tENT 407 ~S5 4398 p.a2/e2 ';p,~1 ~(Q)[PV ADrll l"7.J!W? " ~tllL\Cl( for~~\ 1l.O.^. tlW" Lt\Wf$n.CI Oult, Joto,A-ll\o.. 't1C1 Lowell R01\i'" PJ)Q" L1"D.. (\ HQnda Hrt\tl~~ ~&rtnonblp_ et 81. . ~&re\~ J.ateo to lh. rol'~~nl tt~'\n' '!ld eOl1d,tlQnll 1) MtUlor Forest }ilO.A. ItlC. wlU 'rt1tn~4'M'ty Aatt.Ot\ tn- d\tt bortn1 \~k4 "1)01 t~o weden~ ftu~e b~r~er Gcft4!lljng t.wreno, O,lc. (..ut otManor llo....t >>lv4.). ~) MLl\Qr l'Clr'l't !t.O.A. Jrw, wlll 'l'\I.)W '(let A. at 1~' t tlQ'l.t ~ ~I\~, :I) M~or Poroit 1l10.A. Xu". wllll~&aU . htd,. .t0J\8 d\A ,oulh.m and we.tel"tl t fo!\ce lint s*ara.t\t\1 t~6 M&nur F<lt'06t H,O.A. Ino. f~part)t 'toW. ,)1.. Ll\\vtenQt Ot\\u ~tOPWi)', . 4) Llwt.n~ OQkl KO.A. In~, wiU P\atnlldll the bLn4 ~cl wub, ,outh a.td west of thD (l r.,,,~~ \~\ '.pGf-'-e, the. t,w1'.~o. Or.k,s H.O"\' It\~. ptopttty hrn tho Mlt.ll~t Forest H.O.A. 'no. pr()p~. $) L,wrcn~ O~. ll.O.A 1t\~ ~ LDW6t\ HOlnN bo X. LtD.. A Itluft4t I"hntt~ ptllintt$blp, ~t 11. . lirel to ofl'er cui tt.d ~rl'\1.e1\ I\lp~tt (Ii tl.cdM to help ).W'tOf p()(..llt,OiA, ~. blJt\f66le 16t ".~ud. \\1. ~ oo~1tdd~, to bt~~dUJ eo~~lo~Y "p.rato /fom eAch o~... pittfaln_l~. 6) L,wr~ncc Oft\c. H,O.AI l11e shaU ~e rMpon.t~" lot i\\ \\,. o01.nn-...n1t~ tnalnhmanct ~tJ ~".oop 04 th, aOJill\ ~C! w.,t .td. ~, t\\c f.f\ecl Unot sa~'n.\tnl th,1 pr(lpvflei (~~Jud1o. 611 Qf the ~nI\HttL\j b1c~) &44 MaAOr l'Of"t 'H.O.A fno~ ,h.n be t'esporu\b'e tot an the ~om,mui1U>, 1'4f1Wt1llttCO and ~p1teDp on 1h. nortb lnd 'Fatal c\de ot the '~lce Jl12c; .~p&rlttt1l1bo 2 pl'op~l,. (.J.no!ud~ .n of ~h, ~Mect~a lak.,. Th:S aBtc~ment .h"l be mdl e!\G void lit t~ .vent ~"m t)MO~ Coun~dol\jQ. tho Owelopmect Order Amendl1'tftt tnt.ft~." io tom"!)' II'tn'OV. tn. .epa'falton or our t COTlWunidd. TIl, il\t~t or i1U3 "",.Ql\1t1\l It to ~rln. bltmOtl-~ to 0\1: ~~nltttll wblIe ll'VO Q\n' .ep4ta.t. Uyea, )'1'l\~"O{ \tor;, .Q,A. Inc. a\fiY~f9 ~-- ... ""Cti"'~ TOTR.. P.02 - LAN D . Land Planning D ESI G N Landscape Architecture Environmental Consultation SO UTH 561-478-8501' FAX 561-478-5012 , Congress Business Center'1200N. Congress Avenue . Suite 215 . West Palm Beach. Florida 33400 Mr. Mike Rumpf City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Division 100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 ...~,.<",.~........~-"'....-~..._"'~--..".,-."..,.,......,......" ,,,.,.....,~ ,"w, Ie.. (."". ,', \1 nr; p.r . \ 1 l:~ t~j \_~ Li\lj l :~'" I DJ C" "'.~-"" ...- '.^ \ \ r\1; AUG I 2'V'!'7 August 8, 1997 ,..; Re: Manor Forest/Lawrence Oaks PUD Dear Mike, I am sending this correspondence to confirm our earlier conversation regarding the Manor Forest / Lawrence Oaks PUD split that is being processed through the County. As we had discussed, our goal was to allow this application to proceed through the expedited application process in PBC in order to split the PUD, and to resolve a code enforcement case that is presently active on the site, At present, the County has put the project on the normal public hearing schedule, which would put the item before the Zoning Commission on September 4, 1997 and before the Board of County Commissioners for approval on September 25, 1997. Their reason for not allowing us to proceed forward on the expedited route is due to the City's concerns or objections to this request. It is my understanding from my conversation with you that the City inquired about the termination of Manor Forest Boulevard between the two communities, but raised no formal objection. Our office is attempting to resolve any issues remaining on this project and to move the item on to the County Commissioners for approval expeditiously. The Homeowners Association is the petitioner on this project, and has limited resources to work with. There is also a current code enforcement case for the existing fence crossing Manor Forest Boulevard that will not be resolved until this petition is finalized. Because of this, it is imperative that we have no more delays and move forward to the final hearings without opposition, I hereby request that your office please review the submitted plans and respond to our office with any concerns so that we can resolve prior to the final hearings. If you have any questions regarding this request, please feel free to call our office. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. Sincerely, LAND DESIGN SOUTH JDL/lb CC: Mike Briggs letters\rumpf87 Dennis Koehler File # 1 06.31 REVIEW SUMMARY - LAWRENCE OAJ;.-:> lllli 42 acres LOCATION: Northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road. directly opposite the Whispering Pines Mobile Home Park. EXISTING LAND USE: PROPOSED LAND USE: Medium Residential 5 (County) Low Density Residential (4.84 du/acre)(City) EXISTING ZONING: RS-SE - Single Family Residential With. spec. ial Exception ~o~. a a ~ PUD~UjL' PROPOSED ZONING: PUD - Planned Unit Development ~V(~ ~ ~MJbo ~ CURRENT USES: A planned community of 178 single family, zero lot line homes PROPOSED USE: No change proposed. ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Northeast: East: Farther East: South: West: LAND USE ZONING Fox Hollow (single family) MR5 RS/SE 19. lot single family homes MR5 AR Lawrence Road N/A N/A mobile homes ( ~5 -\:\ l iJ.. t ~ Knollwood Groves '\I.}\..wJ t~\" i\.t",,~51t>'~1A'~'l\\ agriculture MR5 AR CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Consistency with the Future Land Use Pl~n - Consistent The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map does not recommend land use designations for unincorporated properties located west of Lawrence Road. The Future Land Use map will be amended to show this annexed property as Low Density Residential since it is comparable to Palm Beach County's Medium Residential 5 classification, and since it is appropriate for the Lawrence Oaks project. Maximum densities allowed under the County's and the City's classification are 5 dwelling units per acre and 4.84 dwelling units per acre, respectively. Consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies - Consistent Given that 1) the Low Density Residential classification is comparable to the current County classification, 2) the planned Lawrence Oaks project is consistent with the definition of the Low Density Residential classification as indicated in Policy 1.16.1. and 3) since the planned development and proposed land use classification are consistent .with the adjacent land uses, the proposed annexation and land use classification are consistent with all goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. However, there are several issues that should be addressed, as they describe characteristics of this site, indicate consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and/or fulfill requirements of the Florida Department of Community of Affairs with respect to the review of plan amendments. Selection of Zonin2 District The Planned Unit Development zoning district is proposed as it is the most comparable district to the County's PUD district, and is the only City district that will accommodate the County approval of the Lawrence Oaks site plan (see Attachment "C"). Since zoning to PUD in the City requires an accompanying master plan, and since project infrastructure is under construction, it is not feasible at this time to negotiate a plan that meets City regulations to the greatest extent possible. Therefore, it is :4. ~lIecommended that the property be zoned to PUD. with the County approved site plan. r ~ ~~dW is a brief summary of the following zoning aspects of the Lawrence Oaks site \ plan, as approved by the County: A) Total dwelling units approved: 178 B) Housing type: zero lot line, patio homes C) Gross Density: 4.40 D) Typical lot dimensions: 50' x 100' E) Typical lot size: 5,000 sq. ft. F) Minimum front setback: 10' G) Minimum non-zero side setback: 10' H) Minimum rear setback: 10' I) Setback for pool/enclosures: unknown J) Maximum building height: 35' k) Maximum building coverage: 50% ~ ---- / Prior to the property recently being platted through the County process. the Planning and Zoning Department solicited from the City'S Technical Review Committee memoranda listing the aspects of the County approved plan that did not meet City'S code, TheSE memoranda have been included for informational purposes in Attachment "D" 3 N ~ ~ o ~ - N ~ ~. ~~~ O~~ ~ -< ~ E-t ~ ~ l:>t HO E-tH ~E-t ~~U) Z~ zz -<Z <( ~ ~ U) o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o r-f Ql ..Q 0 0 ra::I Or-f 0 U 0 0 Oe'll 0 H .. ~ Z Z ";j 0 Os:: 0 Ms:: M 0- "'e'll .,. 0 M 0.-4 C"') LO ra::I oltl LOr-f M en~ ..+J Me'll .. ra::lH O.~ .. ;j M ~~ 0lJ. MS:: C7\ ~ C\Ie'll o\s:: N *U .,.1tI .,. H Q Z ra::I' o-~ ~. 0 0 0 0 ra::lo- Z Z Z Z 0 iC . * Q . ~ . en 0 ex) ra::I ex) . \0 ..:I::J 0 \0 1.0 M 1.0 <Z 0 ('I') . III M .. .. Hra::I \0 .. .. .. N E-t:> C\I .... C\I Zra::I * C\I ('I') III ..... ra::lP: .,. .,. * ..... E-t * 0 g,. iC ~ E-t ..:Ira::I 1.0 CO . . CO 0 CO <i .... ('I') 1.0 ('I') CO LO 0\ . Hra::I .. .. .. .. .. ~:> .... ex) ..... ..... ('I') ra::Ira::I ~ C7\ M III III N . E-t~ * * * * * 0 g,. oil OZ ra::l0 E-tH CO ~~ CO \0 N N 0 LO III . III 0 E-t~ ..... ('I') .... .... .. cng,. N ra::l0 oil 0- ~ ~ .d ~ en Ei rn Ei rn .... E-4 ex) C\I H CO CO .... CO ..... ~ r-- M ..... .. ..... ~ ~ ..... oil oil en r-- .... 0 0 ex) ra::I . . . . P: . N III 0 \0 U 0\ ~ ex) .... . < .... N ~ H e'll ^ 0- ^ ^ > Ql rn i (IJ E-4 +J ~ ~ ~ e'll e'll H < ra::I C) 0 0 E-4 0- s:: 0 0 Ql Ql e'll 'tj E-4 ~ 01 u X H 0- e'll s:: e'll .~ Ql r-f :.t H H e'll 'tj H :.t >. s:: e'll e'll 0 .~ u ~ ~ ~ rn Ql +J o s:: Ql Ql en i< o MO LOO M .. "0 \OMO LONN N.-l* ..* 1.0 1.01 It'l en *enw ra::I~ IP:~ ~E-4 UlE-4H ra::lHQ ~QZ ZZra::I ra::lWo- :>o-~ ra::I~ra::I ~ra::I ~ ~~< ........E-4 i$~ ~~t3 QQQ ra::Ira::Ira::I E-4E-4E-t ~~~ HHH E-4E-4E-t en en en ra::lra::Ira::I ~~~ <<II( E-4E-tE-4 000 E-4E-4E-e c. 4.l III III Ql 3 . 0 _ '..-l "tl Q...-l Ql 0 0 . 4.l 110 ~ - Ql "tl..-l III QlQ.'~ 4.l 5 III III Ql 0 4.l Ql ~ Ql 4.l ..-l U U u:J ..-l ,..I Q. Ql~ 0 ,QC::: SlIl'''''::l..-l as::l 04.l00..-l >< U'rl~lIl 0 as"tl 9 Q.- ~ ~ 4.l 2l .e Ql ~ 0...1 Ql Ql N....tO ""C::: .d..-l >. N ,Q ..-l ::l 4.l Q. 4.lN as 0 c::: 5 9 .~-g 'rl~ ~8 o >< Q..d 4.l 4.l ~ UQ.S4.l '..10 ~lIl Q.OQl C:::4.l as.o .dasU5::l C1l-.-4 u_ >. ::iC1llll~ as ~ - "tl,Q ..-l:> 4.l I C1l>.00) C1l as'rl'rllll j:Q 4.l .-4 4.l "tl :> 4.l c::: Ql C:::lIlll'l C1lQl as::l4.l ~g~~ ~~ ~~>.e asuc:::..... 5Q. ,QQl~ 110 C1l 0 ...1 as III 0 >. .dU~ U4.l ><C:::4.l4.l C:::u 0 ..-l asOlll'rl ...1 as <:) ,,7::l 4.l U I U QlO'\C1l...5 N ..-l j:Q 0'\ OO..-l 4.l Ql c::: as .-4as ,Q ~ u,QQlO :> S ..-l'~ ~ <:) .~ Ql "tl 0.-4 S..-lM ~OM'''''O::l"tl ~ ~ 0...10'\ as 0'\ 0'\ 0 lIl..-l C1l Q.11o ~ x: 0'\ Q. ~ 0'\ ~..-l U III Q. ~ .-4SO'\.-4Q.~c:::as as >. CO 0 I.Q .... .c co,Q ~.S oJ U_ oJ~ ~"tl ell C:::..-l as4.l....t~~.-44.l S Ql C1l ,..I as"tl as 0 0 0 0 0 4.l E! C::::> ~.~ llI::4.lC1lU... o 0 4.l Ql C1l C1l 4.l ::i Ql N~''''Q.~::l::l~"tlas~:> c::: 8:90E-o~~E-o2l.~~ ~ o as c::: :>:> as 4.l c::: ~o>. >...-llllOC:: "tl CO Ql +.l Ql Ql +.l 0 Ql U 0 C1lC:::Q."tl~....t..-l~Q. '... lIl.rl C1l C1l,Q,Q C1l as III Ql 4.l as c::: c::: III Q.as ~ Q.~'rl,Q U ,QooasO><><04.l.d Ql NlIl,Q~~~~><+.lO..-l III ~ f::l.o4.l+.lf::l.o~_4.l..-l ~~QlC1l 0 wC1lQ.::l U o Q. c::: c::: Ql Ql"tlO:> I I U ~ Ql C1l III c:::as"tl~4.l"=": ~~~><~~ 3 c::: as ~ as ...1 ,Q ~ Ql Ql ...:I~ '..-l:g +.l....Q.~'rlC1l as as 0 .... ~ ~ 110 4.l ~ 3 III III c::: as ~ ....4.l 'QlU...:I ...1 ...1 +.l 4.l c::: c::: ell 0 =:;l=:;lto:lf::l.o >. U c::: C1l 't:l '... ell C1l ~ ..-l ~ 0 ell as C1l ell ~ 0 ~ "tl ~ C1l ..-l .... III >. ::i ..-l .,.., C1l "tl :> as .... 4.l 4.l as 0 ..-l c::: C1l ~ ................................. ........... .-4NM~ III C1l 4.l o Z as III as- .dO) ..... .d.-4 U- .... .d't:l :J Ql :> o ~ Q. go III .... III .... 4.l 9 .... 't:l 9 Ql Ql .....d Ql .... ..-l Q.'t:I ~ ~ U ~ <:) >. II'l ~ o ~4.l o III I lIl.-4 C1l ::i C1l ..-l ~ as as :> I ~ o c::: I as"t:l x: ~ as ..-l :J as"t:l >.c::: 0.... llI:::Z o Ei - 4.l .... 9 ~ 5 - ex) I.Q II'l ~ -g as o S - .... .... 9 ~ ell - ..... ~ Ql 4.l ell as :J 't:I ...1 ..-l o III ..-l al j - II'l /'- ~ .,.... h Iv k ~ ~J~~ ?Y'~:' 6..,>1-( ""f ~V\ ~ 4F;L1..fl.-c1 oJ,-rt 7 +r? 0 >Ie<' e' .'-~ '(fl;.,:..~ -"'IS ~~ cQJ S c"....cJ- ~ .j<--'T'f 1<- P ( .fd'~'oO ~~ t';ff~ _ v 1, .~ . () ~5t ,J "",~(.. (e--"IC:-~ .t:') 11'-4< JI U ~ >ee~1IOJ- (.-0:>,.;( :;;<,,~S" e--;:; (1l- ~l (<<,<,'<'1 ---- -p?(,)6:2 t rJ.-us #1n-dJ~ . L d.-o-V e.... ~ .0/;~-- - _ G-> ~ ;Iv!- L .0, p 1..--<- r:::.- frd'f<7dJ I-A c--.f1'.- &-<vr~ ~ ;(64 tJhA ~ ~;I ~&Z.../r. c4 r"-f~"--" r.--/ru. ~+ G;;:f!Pr. 0.-\'J.W U.k( ~+-f \"k>- 'CA +-n.- ",,,-,,- 6t ~~ . ..(:.. ~. (~ (' <<-S ()~* f. f-{ D~.~S;!%::Q ~1- S~ \'I'\,,-,,--f G -\t ~<- ::t:.~-, . III =-'" Lr--~ { pue!.""" "" 1hu.-r-- PLANNING AND ZONING LASERFICHE TEMPLATE PROJECT NAME: Lawferce OQJ<.S PROJECT TYPE: Anne xat"IO() PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NO. PCN: DOC TYPE: (RIGHT CLICK FOR PULL DOWN MENU) STATUS: A~ro"ed (RIGHT CLICK FOR LL DOWN MENU) APPROVAL/STATUS DATE UJ/ LP / q5 DESTRUCTION DATE: / / (03 dOlO S :\Plan n ing\Plan ning\Laserfiche template.doc MCC.L.I.L......M.L.LVn; J-\IU'il~.Al'\.L- .LVi'il .L1'tTV \,;.LT I APPLICATION: AMENDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP From - Medium Residential 5 (County) To - Low Density Residential (City) APPLICATION: REZONING OF PROPERTY From - RS-SE single Family Residential with Special Exception for Planned Unit Dev. (County) To - Planned Unit Development (City) ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE NOTIFIED TO APPEAR AT SAID HEARINGS IN PERSON OR BY ATTORNEY AND BE HEARD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OR CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THESE MEETINGS WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. ~)..-:>~_,7:"'.. *..- rz1ie City of $oynton tJ3each 100 'E. 'Boynton flJeadi. 'Boulevard P.O. flJo~310 'Boynton 'Beadi., 1foritla 33425-0310 City!Jfal[: (407) 375-6000 :f.9lX: (407) 375..(j()9() December 13, 1994 The IPARC Clearinghouse c/o Town of Lantana 500 Greynolds Circle Lantana, FL. 33462 RE: AMENDMENTS TO CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANNEXATION PROGRAM APPS. #1 TO #4, PHASE 2, GROUP 2 (95-1) AND PRIVATELY INITIATED AMENDMENT 95-S1 The City of Boynton Beach is processing five (5) amendments to its Future Land Use Map. Attached are the five executive summaries with a corresponding location map. Should you have any questions or need additional information, contact Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner at 375-6260. Sincerely, J~~~,~~ Tambri J. H~ j7 Planning and Zoning Director TH:mr Enclosures MIBCIX:P2G2IP.C.LI~ !lLrrrew's (jateway to tfie (julfstream Page 1 of2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS DATE: D t::GE-M eE~ 9 ~ ,I:! q Lt Reference #: q5- I CA PP. #'1 - P;) '"'~) . General Information Initiating Local Government: CiTY OF 50 YIVTCN BEACH Contact Person: MICHAEL w. RUmPF} SEMCI<. PLfHJNF-R Address: /00 EA.":;T ?x1VNToN BBgCH AOU'-EVARb. BO'YNION BEACH. FL~ ~3$l~5 , TelephoneJFax: .tf.071375- 6.~~c '/-0 7/3 7S. - (, 0 90 Applicant! Agent: c. JTY OF ROYAlITJN 13 Ef1 cl-l TelephoneJFax: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Textual Amendments General Summary of Amendments: - amendments relating to traffic circulation or the roadway networks - amendments relating to affordable housing Amendments related to the following elements: -X- land use - traffic circulation - mass transit - ports and aviation - housing infrastructure sub-elements - - coastal management - conservation - recreation and open space - intergovernmental coordination - capital improvements - other Summary of addition (s) to adopted comprehensive plan: /linT APPLlr AAL1= I - - ----.._-~--_.__._.._._-------~._-'--- Page 2 of2 Summary of proposed change (s) to adopted comprehensive plan: Nllr f}PPL /eA ALE Proposed Amendments to the Future Land Use Map Location of proposed map amendment (include a location map) NORTH/NEST CORIVER OF LA w R~NCE ROJg/) PIYD kNOLLIA'/OCli) ROAfl Size of Area Proposed for Change (acres) '+~ AC~ES Present Future Land Use Plan Designation (include a density/intensity definition) MEDIUM RES I hc.~ITI AL 5 (cnu ~IY ) Proposed Future Land Use Designation (include a density/intensity definition) L 0 \Iy /)FN<;.iry ,~"l,1-)~b RES1DENT/FlL (CiT y) 4'. gt-I ct.., /AcRE . Present Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition) RS -SE SiNGLE FAM/Lv RES/DEN - . TIAL INITJ-I SPEC/.QL EXCEPT/();\I f:rJR PJ...~AlAlE/) 1/#1 T D~v.. (CoUNTY) Proposed Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition) PlANN E.D lfNJT DE Y E;LoP/YJENT (CITY) Present Development of Site CON STR. LtC '10 N G(jfCl ^ E. NC E h Proposed Development of the Site, ifknown (Number of Dwelling Units; Commercial Square Footage; Industrial Square Footage; Other Proposed usage and intensity): /78 SINC:.L.j.= FI7MII....Y liD 1''1155 Is proposed change a Development of Regional Impact? No Comprehensive Plan Change Processing DatelTimeILocation Scheduled for Local Planning Agency Public Hearing :rANUARY /OJ \o,9sh:ou AM. - elT\! C (J/VlMl SSloN cJ-lAmJ3FRS) 100 E. Rc;YN/aN RERcrJ .flLf.)/} . BOVNTON BEi=lCH. PL . DateJTimeILocation Scheduled for Governing Body Public Hearing ::SANLt4R.y 17, J995 J 7':0() P /VI. Scheduled Date for Transmittal to DCA :rANU~Rv ~~~ 19Q.&} ~ , LAWRENCE OAKS IJJ Ap-p. '*'-~ ...J ~ <' WINDWAR 0 0 A-pp C:;' *1 q S: . ...J ..l ~ > a: ~ .:! :E ~ LOCATION MAP HYPOLUXQ ROAD GA WAY A-rP. /' #..2 ( ROYAL MANOR MOBI E HOME PARK BOYNTON CANAL C-16 OLD BOYNTON ROAD CARRIAGE ATE 8 A pp. ....3 OYN7i N BEACH BOULE ~RD c < o a: w (,) z w a: 3: :5 z ~ o~ z w > <( UJ UJ w a: (!J z o (,) ~ ANNEXATION IN PROGRESS WOOLBRIGHT I PROFESSIONAL ~er. 91-51- CENTER ====rr fill \ \\A'\ ----r;;. 171 ;k € e.u"- r~ r '-I I ". >. DEPARTMENT OF DE~' ---- .... :: rroJ,. _. ~J. ~-~~u. ~ I · ~II'-'~, :'8 D~lent E. Kastarlak, JV I' ~ I . ' "ectOT 'l~il tlW2l41llB :Aiu~c /p/I:::-- 11;,-, I) JIIt-r {I,dK C;;a!f 5'hkiccltC- ~ ~ ~lttt~Jt.'l,(} f/A';f. " . .' 0<) 71lL.. J:ul-1-c/ --tif- fjt;tU7tuc ..h ~ ?tf('> 1ftlf .:J; !-2H/" -& o' J~ ' 3) 'li/1~~U,~ f/tl!f .t? de-(!,UAtM 'ftLL . u~.[(.c../v f '1.... , " C<V:t tt(lflOIl(t~ 7.~.iiCI al1:1yWftl. fk~'-~C"J(.!u{{d;( {Lr't{{~( i~. . -lWel.[ J'-(.dk..- .Iiu: ?tij'f - it c-ue!( · ~J..c~J HL. t lJ ')Z( -{cftllL (([(u()....J . .' ' 4) fit; ff Ctldt o4-/1lJI-j t;. a-I;r C0. ' ol~l r;/f<< '7ttU) . ftJ f) flute- l 0- ,-.-c ( ~,,,, c:.e. 0 =- JL '.:' ~L ~ - _..._...~-~--........---------- November 16, 1998 Scott Straleau, L.C.A.M. Gulfstream Services Management, Inc, Post Office Box 4225 Boynton Beach, FL 3342..1. Re: PRIVATE LEASE AGREEMENT OVER COMMON BUFFER TRACTS - LAWRENCE OAKS PUD Dear Mr. Straleau: In response to your request regarding the above referenced matter, I must advise against this proposal. The reasons for opposing this modification to the Lawrence Oaks PUD are listed as follows: · Reduction in the landscape tracts or parameter buffers is contrary to the enhancing provision for PUDs, intended to visually enhance the PUD as well as create comparability between a PUD and adjust uses through establishment of comparable setbacks, · The use of the leased area will certainly differ by individual property owners and therefore create an irregular border around the PUD, which would decrease PUD quality; · Granting this request could contribute to the mismanagement of the parameter areas through the encroachment, or further encroachment, into these landscape areas; and · The granting of this request would set a precedence that is ready to be followed by associations through out other PUDs in the City. This statement is based on the other similar requests received by this office within the past several years, I trust I have adequately responded to your request; however, if you have any further questions regarding this matter please call me at 561-742-6260. Sincerely, Michael W. Rumpf Acting Planning and Zoning Director MWRjma .~ OULFSTREAM SERVICES MANAGtMENl INc. Condomllllum AlIlloclnlllJlIs , 101M' Ow, I" AllIoeh'flulIS t',opgtly Stnvlces tt V. A..ed.do t'tf1t... JfotttI November I, 1998 l~l\' \ .;i NOV 41998 iwi .,.. "">""....,,--1 fLfIt~N\NG P,ND IONING OEPT. Department of Development, City of Boynton Be~~h 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. :U~l Boynton Beach Fl. 33425-0310 Attention: Bulent Cast~rlak Dear Mr. Castarlak, I have been advised to write this letter to you following a recent meeting that I had with Michael Rumpf, Senior Plan- ner. I am the Propetty Manager for a Homeowners Association in west Boynton Beach called Lawrence Oaks. The Board of Dir- ectors asked me to write to you regarding a lease agreement bet""IF.:'F.>n the Ac.:;sc,,::: :i.,3.t ieln r and the HClmeclwnel"!::. in the AC.5S0C i'-' i:"t:i,c,n, ff)l'. buffE~l'. z(:;.nes in the Association. Many homeowners would like to lease the buffer zones for private use. The Association contacted the Association attor- ney, \JJhcl dl'.E",.) u.p the lease agl"eements fOI" the Ac.'~sociation. It was following this action, that I was notified that the City of Boynton Planning and Zoning Department may object to the lease agreements. Mr. Rumpf informed me the City has in the past frowned on this agreement for a number of reasons. I have informed the Board that these agreements cannot be utilized until I have received contact from you. Please contact me to set up a meeting, or to discuss this delicate issue. The office number is 561 733-5550, or I can be reached in writing at the above address. Your prompt consideration in this matter is appreciated. ~;~~ S~ott Straleau, L.C.A.M. ~anager for the Board, ~awrence Oaks Homeowners Association cc: Michael WH Rumpf, Serlioy Plarlrler Board of Directors Psger: 7ti-t'0097 Oull.tr~.m Service. Mauagemellt. lllc. Posl Office Box 4225, Boynton Beach. JtL 33424 Phone' (561) 733-5550 Pallft: ~M.'Ut6t NOT ICE 0 F Z 0 N I N G C H A N G E C I T Y 0 F BOY N TON B E A C H PUB L I C H EAR I N G S In connection with the City's Annexation Program, the City of Boynton Beach proposes to annex, amend the land use plan for, and rezone the property indicated on the map below. A public hearing on these proposals will be held before the Planning and Development Board on January 10, 1995, at 7:00 P.M. at City Hall in the Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida. A public hearing will also be held before the City Commission on January 17, 1995 at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the agenda permits, at City Hall in the Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida. r.. ~~ ~:J{ ~ ,~. f-, ----- -~ t{ijJ bJ=f tfH5I gf I I<-rL~,.k"- ill lIlIU i II In I ~! IT"-.. IT ,;;;q;r~ Or ~'r ~<: B I i....., !f" 94' ~",,- - "'1 ~SITEt tJ r~::\~ ((-1- ~.- .~,:> \ -I~ ~ . 6; ~~.. VIII · / r~1\ ' J' , ~"""~.:l IY \ .".~ '., . 11li-. ~ 1. I '~~-J~fil ~~~ = 'lllllll ~ '~<lIT ~~ .. ~~_Im6 m -'I.f. J<< ' ~~ Ibl , .. II tcN,iu.w poD "P -::!T~. AG': ','1: .. ' i . ..- ,... .', _ I Bff ~~,.I' ,UII' ."'"/1, '. :- ~ ~.,'~~tl, , -:: - ~ .- j' : _ Trf>"A ~ ." ~...:' ~, .- I, l- I- I-~ Ioo.....~ I" T ( -TX; x I III~ [ IItI/G'.; I r ..J'III '. r, III 11'[1111:1 ~_._..A.:. ..... '- , w g. Ii' I L IIII,T-:: --I 4-.l--4 ~ 1_ ..e 'I. H rrrn ~ ,;..,,; - . ~ -- -~'~A/'~IA L ~-_.:..~ ." ;" .... . I " , APPLICATION #4 - LAWRENCE OAKS OWNER: PROPOSED: LOCATION: Lawrence OakS-Oriole Inc. 178 Single Family Homes 42 acres of property at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road Complete legal description on file in the Planning Department, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: APPLICATION: ANNEXATION INTO CITY APPLICATION: AMENDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP From - Medium Residential 5 (County) To - Low Density Residential (City) APPLICATION: REZONING OF PROPERTY From - RS-SE Single Family Residential with Special Exception for Planned Unit Dev. (County) To - Planned Unit Development (City) ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE NOTIFIED TO APPEAR AT SAID HEARINGS IN PERSON OR BY ATTORNEY AND BE HEARD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OR CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THESE MEETINGS WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. PLEASE CALL (407) 375-6260 FOR ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ABOVE MATTERS. SUZANNE M. KRUSE CITY CLERK Byrne, Nancy From: Sent: To: Subject: Rumpf, Michael Saturday, October 24, 1998 3:35 PM Byrne, Nancy Note for Bulent OO~~;6\~OOI F', " , , Please inform Bulent: Expect a letter from the management from Lawrence Oaks residential association requesting the ability for homeowners to lease the landscaping buffer along perimeters of the project. I conveyed my reasons for opposing the request but he said it is best that he put a formal request in. I affirmed the request but explained the likely response. You will recall that you were approached by residents of Hunter's Run for same. I oppose this for the following reasons: 1) It is contrary to the requirements for a perimeter buffer requirement in the PUD regulations and therefore jeopardizes the built in enhancing provisions for PUDs; 2) The use of the lease area will be different by each adjacent resident and therefore create an irregular border around the PUD which would decrease the quality of appearance; and 3) Granting this request would not end here, but would set poor precedence to be repeated throughout the city. Let me know if I can assist you with this response. Mike ;(ip/rP / 10 : '"Pi~ r · 1MWlJ f~U/. a, (j OiJVtr ; ..L de '7 (re( Jf~ ~f f!~...: ! ()(l/t,/f J.J: 11/ c~J~,v\i 2'(~f nit -.1 -H I \.to ~/~t, 0: ./ :/ /YtJr!/f /1/1 ,! ;wct~~ I~I(" S '-' 'j "'v~ 1 -. ... " .- o \- (i ..J,- Cx:' ,...\-.) . .... U-) .--...- uJ- CJ " !, 1,1.:\: \ . : : \ ';' ~ .<i l..~ u..\ : ~ . -- --.--' \ . b'- U ., ~ ,. - ,'0 ~ ~ U U' . V C " . -- - ~ L · c · - - . ... -- ~ ~ '~ ~ _ ~ ~ " . ~ . _ ~ ' '';' ':c .' ~ ~.. , · ~ " ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ - · - '- .' · .. - ~ .. " 0 _ _ . . ~ C 0 _. O' ~ U ~ · · " C - ;l' , 0 - 0 il :: · , U ::~.~ ::. ~i~ 0 ~'O~:'l~ ':"~ "81."2b~~U'~ij~el>!;8 .~u-ol!~1i. u ' _ . c ~._ .. L C' C .' . .. -0. , '" c 'Ie il ~ .:. u - u . y ~ ~ ,.. c .. ~ 6 .. il ~;:: ~ _ I, ~ '~ . ~ ;; . c t i- '. !:! ~;.!.. a'1; :;; \; · .. i. 11- '. ~ '1; .~ 1:_-- 6 _,.e-uS-o ~il..,.;'" -..y... u,.. .....l .-0 .. 0 ~ ~ GO. ~ " . _ _. ..,. N ., ",' o~.. 11 - · 1! ". - \; '1;.~ l> 5 .. · 1! · '0 Il ~ . .; :. ~ " . . u' . tr. .." ,,- ;; u '" " " 0 i'r" "9. \i)o '0 Co ,.' '" r" '9 . < ~ _ u f il {,..,., _ g f,. :l ... f. ,_ ~ '0 . _ - :: u u · & .. ,. "'.. ~ 'l .. II ;l' !; ~ \\ 11 · o _ .. .. _ r *. r _ '6 . u u, t u . ... .. c .. S." 1> .. " ' ;. 0 11I ~ _. c u ~ .. s . 0 t1.. .t -. ~... .!'. .,.!', 1ol. .. · ~ 0 ~ ~ '0 11 ,;." , " · b !; I, lr. Go e 0 ~ ~~ -a. b "- ..&:. ~ ~ rr .., 1- ~' ~ !1' 0 ~11 c' ~ ~ -slit ..J p. r. "O.J:. Z .. \.. .. (fie:. >0 ~ ", o.n u .. _ .. _. ... .. . __ .. < ~ ~ .. _ NO. _ . ,.. c - u' ..' -0 ,p' ..2' \, ~ ~ c .; O' . f ~ "...... · . 0 ~';J · ",'. 0 0 < · il--' · -.. . . "';. ,". -0 . i ~ ~. ~\ :! ;' ~ l!> ~ ~ .. ~ . - '; :.. - \'.0 · t .'0 -0 ~ :l :: ~ ..., ~ ::. .. a ~.o .. -;,~, . " ~. ...2 .. " _" u . co~ f< eoN III f; g ~ \iI- il · 0. 1i:2 L ~ co:::;- c ~ 0'" of' ~ .f' III .~ oil N _(\ n' lIS "-..:l "e:.~ 0 ... rl _ - . . 0 "'e" ..".,.,> \I'l .... 0 _ .. iii .. _ .', 0 c. ~ 0 - . U -0 .. , " .. ~ l\ '.p\~' o' 0 ~ .' .. ~ '0 .. ~ ,~l\"" 0 5 - .. -.'1; \. ., ! 0"" c .. ~ '0 ~ '0 · D.,J 10 ., 0 ~ .,. III s:. 2 "0 <1 .... ~ ... u 0 .... . ^fIl" ~ ... · - a ~ 0 '. 11 ! ~ ~ .! ~ .. _ t ; N .:\ .. t b" = .. ~ ; · a l\'s '0 re.. .;., ..... 0 l '1; ~ N · · · . ~ ~.. .,. . _, ~ _" u ,... t,}i. "," G & .-.- 5'" "'.0 u-o -- ~- · · . _ ill c''!! "" a\;; 'i . . _';; 'to illl _. ~ .t ~, '" '.. . - .~ · ~ '.;1 l.:'''' t''i.,!'''; 10 'j t 'i 11.. t 5 ~ '.... _ ';\ " . . c ... . .; _ , lo;l, . lo ';\ .. ~ 0'" .. "" ~ l> - L 0 ~ , o . ~ .... ..::l 8. ~ .,; i:\ ~..'" i. \' ~ ~ 2: "l!." t . ;; .. ~. .' - f;. -.:. .. N: ..." &..... - .r ! _' _ 5 . ..,' ,,0'-"" ~ ....0"...;; ,0. ~'i''';!'- t -. ..,.::;-.>>' ~ --U' · ';0;> ..~.. .. .. · · 2 ' . ". .,,... n. ., n. ".. " .. ,.""0 ., ~ ~...t:" · ...,. .,;'c~ "LaClI-. 0 '" ~ ., III ~ 51 L.. lO · u _ c " . ., 0" ,. '. .' 0 .. . c ' -' .. - · c · L . -0 - ..' .n'~ c .' .. ~ .. . 't\1 0 u' ..,.. .n " ~ .,. .. .. m.; ...... U ,; ,\ · ';\ <.>' .. r' .. ,. · · 0 ~,,~ , . c Il II. . :>. ,n. " f, ,'.,li '" .' y, .' ,,"i; f, .,. u r. il , ,: ",;:: ,,11 'l:. .,,-~. ;;,;l t\ ~ .' \- (; t ~ t o L _,. n... ..0' ' . c .. '" .... U .... , ." ~_.,,_. ,. t. u" ..N ,.. C " ~., C .~ ..'_ 0 ,. . .' _ ,t..n .".... II'. " 8 ft'l \ ',i1I .j'.' "!::. ",... ti 0 II. 1\1 ., · . III III ,"' ,~ Y' .,..... \II ~ \l Ii ~ jJ'" III III " ~ tit ",.' III" ~ ...' .... r.).' on" "., . . . ,... \' .. ,.., " ...' '" U ,.." .. ,.' . · ... - · .... - .. .'. ~",,, " .... .." . .' r ' ...,., ,..., ,~...... .,.~.. <> ,. ....,.. ..' ....... .". C' ,," " . .... ...." ... · _",-.0 <L , - cL c..",......,.. I' 't' ,II '- . ~. 0 "." .." ..,' 'CO." ....... ..... > .., .. U . ,. i .' at ,- ..,- '" .- ' .,J \ U -" .. , ... ,. .. nO....' .' . U' ~ U" m 6 > ~. '" VI ~)o . \..;." _,,,,0', ~'.O" "'$r('.~':IUI""'."'."<"'-<> ~ --" ....N_".U. 4 '" ..." V" ~ . ",' ,..", U" ....,."".." 0 0 ~i " U C" U CD"" U L C , .t' . . /' ........~ .- -.......... ( I L . _._._~.~ -1'::1----..----.-.- W-:j vi W Jl .. 7 ~ -~t; GS ~-;-\:)-_... -('~---- ~ ~ o-~~ L....c.u ~ ~ .J C..J0 <..." 'O;;~ Z. II.! C ..,.\0 :jCO .o(,<"'uJ :x: . w ,"l <...' 0 . Cj~ 'X CD .... ~~~ :>.:t. . - ...0i=- j:".D >< U; IU \ .~ ..)Q l- ...,. "l . tL t!_ .0 L ,- '- '::L ,:o,J- ~t..0 ~~t:[rn ~~~V' "1- J (!) <( 0: So 4;c"C:t'v CC _w.o(, tJ~oa::.:Z(D V J~~~W ~t-_~0Vl 7L.JJ,..l,..J3: 00 .0(, 1ra::.:2~e.AJ \>. ~ 1/ VI Vl ~ . -.,. . ~ LJ \l:1' . ~ .,1 -I L... . oj ....:. l~ 1" oJ. - I II ,-. , .J 1 roW n:: CO ~3 .Ll ~<t- :? ---J t; C ,,' u}5-'<t j 0" - y, . _,.-ct-CL."'j \ r- . \11~ \ \----- ~ J-- - .- 0:.1- .....0 .z.J 0:. , O.z -~ ) u- ':i uJo (1.. ( t 2.... < ,., .... <: .....:::. L1- .:l ~,C) rr. . ") -T ~ 'tw'.' ..... 1..') ...., ex. (' (", C) ~J (:) a:' ..J- c-:!, ro tLO t- \.u - rt- . ~ ? Z. u. :::>c J ~ ~- \-: n::n..'1c:!. <i ') a:.. ..... - .,.. (-' jj '~ c:( ~~~6 ..,o~ro . . } ld ( 'c \ ~ \ J , t---'(;C l --i c. y .0 { 1.. ( u (". l--T-1' t1- T h.:-L--:19 S ~ \ \ ;-------- ;, \ l' ~ 1.- ' ~ r----- /)0 I ....----4 t4 · """) uJ L.0 ~-) ..... / .0, 1. \ l. :) .::, ::n z c n:: JJ D:t. . .J zw ll- S::> . -.J :r: ~m 0 o::\- t:i ~ <!. (/) ..- to o ~WN >- 3="'-4:- w !;~, w 0::. ~ :> '-" '-'" r- uJ 0 0:: Z Il) - >- ...t- W.-:J-r'"l :J (!)...t- (/) 0:: r') b .'1 .~~~.~ r:) I ll't ! 1-.1-. .-- - - r-; ---.00 ~ - h~ .. \o~ ~ ... iO) '~ ';' ~\..;;..., - ,;;;;y ~;r'g~j ., tJ: ." :~. t- <3 o n. lu N 1"-' t-- ( t-- -z t\.' C) cr.: , ..lJ f"l ~ e~: tl'i :, e~t" ~T,I~~' -~.. .~ .,"-- ~. '. .... ~:...: .~.' ~"!i'l'~'~,{ ':"; :.:"-, ~-.I . (~. ""; . :-.;. '. -<:- /' .-- :t ..,.... ;.~~. -- .1~... 0- G .--1 W ?" . "l: ;~~ .., ....to '. .. ,~! .. . , 0- r-- S:,; '( ... .. , .. ~ ~/ ;~, \ ; , , J -1\. , ~ ~ pp Vj ~/ ~ ,\-' ~ 'n~-\ ~-~ ~r A.7 ' .~ \ ..\ I \ , I p.........- ....-,."'. "., . ...... .""',....~. . ~ -/"'" ", - ........ . " 2 -27 p..C 2.7. " ~\~~. "'"'9 ) , ~.,..... \ l , \ \ .... 'h';''''';' ,!~ - I. .....'..... "'........(..<.... .~~ ,.' . ",....~~;..~.... . ; \ ~. - ";. .. ~ ."""..,.. ."...,."". ~.".."",... . ~ ~ ,-- -- ."",.,. rJ1ie City of 'Boynton 'Beach 100 'E.13oynton iBeadi iBoukvartf P.O. iBo~310 iBoynton iBeadl., :Florida 33425-0310 City 9fal[: (407) 375-6()()() :F!ifX: (407) 375-6090 December 16, 1994 Mr. Marc Bruner Director of Planning and Env. Programs 7501 North Jog Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33412 RE: Availability of Solid Waste Facilities Analysis for Windward PUD Royal Manor Mobile Home Park Carriage Gate Condominium Lawrence Oaks Woolbright Professional Center Dear Mr. Bruner: This office is processing a land use amendment for each of the above-referenced projects/developments, and an application for annexation for all but the Woolbright Professional Center. Each project is described in the enclosed public hearing notices and by the following: The Windward PUD is currently under construction and once completed will consist of 418 single-family dwelling units. The maximum gross density allowed under the city's future land use designation is 4.84 du/acre which is comparable to the County's 5 du/acre limit; The Royal Manor Mobile Home Park is a built community consisting of 437 mobile homes. If the property was redeveloped the City's Comprehensive Plan would limit the density to 7.26 dujacre, which is comparable to the County's 8 du/acre limit; The Carriage Gate condominiums are also complete and consist of 88 mUlti-family units. The proposed land use classification is High Density Residential, which has a maximum density of 10.8 du/acre, and is slightly higher than the County's maximum of 8 du/acre; Development of Lawrence Oaks has recently commenced, and has approval for 178 single family homes. Furthermore, the proposed and existing maximum densities are comparable at 4.84 and 5 du/acre, respectively; and Jtmerica's (jateway to tlU (julfstnam Mr. Marc Bruner -2- December 16, 1994 The Woolbright Professional Center represents a change from Office Commercial land use to Local Retail Commercial land use to allow for the development of a small neighborhood shopping center which could consist of approximately 45,000 square feet. Whereas the existing land use and zoning would allow a two-story office building, the proposed land use and zoning would allow a two-story office and retail project. I respectively request a statement in writing which verifies that there are solid waste facilities available to serve the demands generated by the most intensive development scenario permitted on each individual site. Please include in each statement a description of current capacity, the projected increase generated from each project, and the resulting surplus or defecit. As you know, this information is required by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for compliance review. Furthermore, the state has a specific time frame within which this information must be transmitted to them. Therefore, your response would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you. Sincerely, ~Zr~ Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner Attachments A'AllZZIWA.L." tJ1ie City of 'Boynton 'Beach 100 'E. flJoynton 'Beadi 'Boufevara P.O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'Be(U./i., :FforUfa 33425-0310 City!Jla[[: (407) 375..(j()()() :F!JIX: (407) 375-6090 December 16, 1994 Mr. Dave Kovacs, Director Palm Beach County Planning Division 100 Australian Ave. West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 RE: Applications for Annexation and Land Use Amendment/Rezoning Windward PUD Royal Manor Mobile Home Park Carriage Gate Condominium Lawrence Oaks Woolbright Professional Center Dear Mr. Kovacs: This office is processing a land use amendment for each of the above-referenced projects/developments, and an application for annexation for all but the Woolbright Professional Center. Each project is described in the enclosed pUblic hearing notices and by the following: The Windward PUD was approved in Palm Beach County, is currently under construction, will consist of 418 single-family dwelling units once constructed. The maximum gross density allowed under the city's future land use designation is 4.84 units per acre which is comparable to the County's 5 units per acre limit; The Royal Manor Mobile Home Park is a built community consisting of 437 mobile homes. If the property was redeveloped the City's Comprehensive Plan would limit the density to 7.26 units per acre, which is comparable to the County's 8 units per acre limit; The carriage Gate condominiums are also constructed and consist of 88 multi-family units. The proposed land use classification is High Density Residential, which allows a maximum density of 10.8 units per acre and is slightly higher than the County's maximum of 8 units per acre; jilmerica's qateway to tIU qulfstTlam Mr. Dave Kovacs -2- December 16, 1994 Development of Lawrence oaks has recently commenced, and has approval for 178 single family homes. Furthermore, the proposed and existing maximum densities are comparable at 4.84 units per acre (City) and 5 units per acre (County), respectively; and The Woolbright professional Center represents a change from Office Commercial land use to Local Retail Commercial land use to allow for the development of a small neighborhood shopping center which could consist of approximately 45,000 square feet. Whereas the existing land use and zoning would allow a two-story office building, the proposed land use and zoning would allow a two-story office and retail project. Please provide me with your comments relative to consistency with the County's Comprehensive Plan. Since these requests will be reviewed in January, your response would be appreciated at your earliest possible convenience. If you have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you. sincerely, ~ e, Ur/ Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner Attachments A'AZ2:I.aeO.LIl'1' fJ1ie City of 'Boynton 'BelUh 100 'E. 1Joynton 1Jeac/i 1Joukvartf P.O. flJo~310 'Boynton 1Juu:./i., :Floritfa 33425-0310 City 9fall: (407) 375-6000 :F.9lX: (407) 375-6090 December 16, 1994 Mr. Pat Martin Lake Worth Drainage District 13081 Military Trail Delray Beach, Florida 33484 RE: Availability of Drainage Facilities Analysis for Windward PUD Royal Manor Mobile Home Park Carriage Gate Condominium Lawrence Oaks Woolbright Professional Center Dear Mr. Martin: This office is processing a land use amendment for each of the above-referenced projects/developments, and an application for annexation for all but the Woolbright Professional Center. Each project is described in the enclosed public hearing notices and by the following: The Windward PUD is currently under construction and once completed will consist of 418 single-family dwelling units. The maximum gross density allowed under the City's future land use designation is 4.84 du/acre which is comparable to the County's 5 du/acre limit; The Royal Manor Mobile Home Park is a built community consisting of 437 mobile homes. If the property was redeveloped the City's Comprehensive Plan would limit the density to 7.26 du/acre, which is comparable to the County's 8 du/acre limit; The Carriage Gate condominiums are also complete and consist of 88 multi-family units. The proposed land use classification is High Density Residential, which has a maximum density of 10.8 dujacre, and is slightly higher than the County's maximum of 8 dujacrei Development of Lawrence Oaks has recently commenced, and has approval for 178 single family homes. Furthermore, the proposed and existing maximum densities are comparable at 4.84 and 5 du/acre, respectively; and .9lmem4 s gateway to tlit G" {(stream Mr. Pat Martin -2- December 16, 1994 The Woolbright Professional Center represents a change from Office Commercial land use to Local Retail Commercial land use to allow for the development of a small neighborhood shopping center which could consist of approximately 45,000 square feet. Whereas the existing land use and zoning would allow a two-story office building, the proposed land use and zoning would allow a two-story office and retail project. I respectively request a statement in writing which verifies that there are drainage facilities available to serve the demands generated by the most intensive development scenario permitted on each individual site. It is my understanding that as long as a given project is within the LWDD boundaries and, is developed consistent with District operational policies and gUidelines, that drainage facilities would be available; however, a statement from you which specifically indicates the ability/inability to serve the anticipated demand upon drainage facilities is required for transmission of this amendment to the state for compliance review. Furthermore, the state has a specific time frame within which this information must be transmitted to them. Therefore, your response would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you. Sincerely, ~ ~t rt-rt Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner Attachments A:AllZ2DItAI.LIl'l' MEMORANDUM FROM: Pete Mazzella, utilities Department Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner ~~ TO: DATE: December 16, 1994 SUBJECT: Analysis on the Availability of utilities for Windward PUD Royal Manor Mobile Park Carriage Gate Condominium Lawrence Oaks This office is processing a land use amendment for each of the above- referenced annexations, and as you know, each submittal to the State for compliance review must include an analysis on the availability of facilities based on maximum development allowed under the proposed land use classification. Each project is described in the attached public hearing notices, and by the following: The Windward PUD is currently under construction and once completed will consist of 418 single-family dwelling units. The maximum gross density allowed under the city's future land use designation is 4.84 du/acre and is slightly less than the County's 5 du/acre limit; The Royal Manor Mobile Home Park is a built community consisting of 437 mobile homes. If the property was redeveloped the city's Comprehensive Plan would limit the density to 7.26 du/acre, which is also slightly less than the County's 8 du/acre limit; The Carriage Gate condominiums are also complete and consist of 88 mul ti-family units. The proposed land use classification is High Density Residential, which has a maximum density of. 10.8 du/acre, and is slightly higher than the County's maximum density of 8 du/acre; and Development of Lawrence Oaks has recently commenced, and has approval for 178 single family homes. Furthermore, the proposed and existing maximum densities are comparable at 4.84 and 5 du/acre, respectively; Please prepare statements which verifies that there are water and wastewater facilities available to serve the demands generated by the most intensive development scenario permitted on these sites. Please provide as specific a review as possible, including the projected number of units and the capacity available, before and after project development. If you have any questions, please call me. Thank you. A.All22U'I't.1C1I1C '0'.. , ' ri Ill' !H '^" 1 '"j ,'>'W'"'''' c:r.p ~ \r<,~.i' ,"._c~,______,_."_~j flLMlNING AN!) (qN ~ l,{; ~)E PI ~-,..,.;.""""",""..,""""~~~""""._,.,..,,,,,.,,.,. Dominic Sims P.B.C. Planning, Zoning & Building RE: Boynton Beach Annexations August 30, 1995 Page Two Other areas recently annexed by the City are either built-out, or enclaves, or some combination of the two. Permitting in those areas should be accomplished by the City. Your thoughts are solicited. Sincerely, ~dt/'~t'f It/rird William V. Hukill, P.E. Building Official WVH:bh XC: James Cherof, City Attorney Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning Director ANNBX ~,~ SWA SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY December 22, 1994 YOUR PARTNER FOR Michael Rumph, Senior PlanM~ WASTE SOLLTIONS City of Boynton Beach lODE. Boynton Beach Blvd. P.o. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Land Use Amendment: Application # 4 - Lawrence Oaks Dear Mr. Rumph, The Solid Waste Authority has reviewed the information supplied to this office concerning the Lawrence Oaks Annexation/ Land Use Change/ Rezoning Application. Based on the information supplied to this office regarding this land use amendment, the Authority does not ob;ect to this proposal. It is the Authority's understanding that this land use amendment would change the land use of a 42 acre parcel of property from R-5 (county designation), which allows for up to 5 dwelling units per acre to Low Density Residential (city designation) which allows for a maximum density of 4.84 dwelling units per acre and is in fact part of an annexation process that will provide for consistent, county to city land use designation. Based on the Authority's calculations, this land usage change would decrease the potential for solid waste generation by 13.4 tons per year. This land use change, in combination wi th the land use changes contained in City of Boynton Beach Applications 1,2,3 & 5 result in an overall reduction in the potential for solid waste generation. Because the net result of all of the land use changes contained in Applications 1-5 of this annexation/land use change/rezoning process is a reduction in the potential for solid waste generation, the Authority can assure that there are solid waste facilities and disposal capacity to serve the most intensive development scenarios that may take place on these sites. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, M~~~ Director of Planning and Environmental Programs 7501 North Jog Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33412 (407) 640-4000 FAX 683-4067 Rec~/cled p3rer BOMl of Supervisors C. Stanley WerlNer Kermit Dell John I. Whitworth III Secl8IarylManager William G. Winters Asalslant Manager Richard S. Wheelihan Anorney Perry & Schone, P.A. ~.88 LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 January 4, 1995 Mr. Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner City of Boynton Beach Pldllnifig Dcp~rtrn~nt. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Dear Mr. Rumpf: Re: Availability of Drainage Facilities for Windward, P.U.D. (86-370D.01), Royal Manor Mobile Home Park (L-21), Carriage Gate Condominium (L-24), Lawrence Oaks (F.K.A. Manor Forest, 87-629D.01), Woolbright Professional Center (F.K.A. Woolbright Office Center, 88-669D.01) The above referenced projects are located within the service area of the Lake Worth Drainage District and currently discharge into its system. All have received drainage permits from this District with the exception of the Royal Manor Mobile Home Park which existed prior to the establishment of formal permitting by the LWDD and has a "grandfather" status. Please feel free to contact this office if you have any further questions. Sincereiy, LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1!:i~~~ Chief Inspector SJW/mfb rl;::'~' ji; ~li0,:7~-..'~- 1 J ""t 'I I ~ ; L'J L~ Ll \~! ~ r 1 !' .. l..-< '-- ...--..----l : I, u J! il ~i q nUll i L..i I . I L- ~ PLANr~ING AND ZONiNG DEPT.. <._ . cc: Patrick A. Martin, P.E., District Engineer, LWDD C:\WP(,(l'DOC9MARY\U. TTER"AAUMP.PfR Delray Beach & Boca Raton 498-5363 . Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach 737-3835 . FAX (407) 495-9694 Board of County Commissioners Ken L. Foster, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman Department Planning, Zoning & Building January 13, 1995 Mr. Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 RE: VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF WINDWARD P.U.D., ROYAL MANOR MOBILE HOME PARK, CARRIAGE GATE CONDOMINIUM AND LAWRENCE OAKS Dear Mr. Rumpf: Thank you for submitting notice of the City's intent to annex the above referenced areas. On behalf of Palm Beach County, the Planning Division has completed its assessment pursuant to our 11 Interim Annexation Policy. 11 For your information, I have enclosed a briefing sheet on the review process. The findings of our review are as follows: 1. PlanninG Division: The proposed voluntary annexations are consistent with the statutory requirements of Chapter 171, Florida Statutes (F.S.) Our findings are as follows: a. Windward P.U.D.: Although this area is reasonably compact, it is not contiguous to the City's boundaries. However, if Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates is annexed prior to the Windward P. U. D., then the contiguity concern would be satisfied. b. Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates: Chapter 171, F. S. precludes annexation of finger areas. Although this area is finger-like in appearance, it is not contrary to the compactness requirement of the statute because the property itself is shaped like a finger. c. Carriage Gate Condominium: The area is reasonably compact and contiguous to City boundaries. Boynton Beach Annexation Page 1 Four Areas "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on ,ecycted paper 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (407) 233-5300 d. Lawrence Oaks (a/k/a Manor Forest P.U.D.): The area is reasonably compact and contiguous to City boundaries. However, the City is not annexing the entire P.U.D. but only that portion of the P. U. D. that is not fully developed. Accessibility to that portion of the P.U.D. may be a problem. Another problem pertains to the administration of zoning and building codes while the P. U. D. is being developed. These issues should be resolved prior to annexation. 2. Enqineerinq Department: No comments offered. 3. Fire-Rescue Department: Persons residing in Windward, Royal Manor, and Carriage Gate would receive approximately the same response time in the City as they would in the County. Persons residing in Lawrence Oaks could be better serviced by Palm Beach County Station 43. 4. Water Utilities Department (WUD): No comments, as the properties are outside the County Utility Service Area. Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to the proposed voluntary annexations. Please be advised that the comments represent staff review and not the position of the Board of County Commissioners. Cordially, C'. ',_'/~~~><3J ~UQ!' L. David J. Kovacs, A.I.C.P. Planning Director p.c. : External Distribution List Honorable Warren H. Newell, District 3 Commissioner Robert P. Banks, County Attorney's Office Iva Barnett Grady, County Administration Bevin Beaudet, P.E" Deputy County Administrator Allan Ennis, Traffic Engineering Division Don Grund, Parks and Recreation Department Lawton McCall, Water Utilities Department Diana Newcomer, Sheriff's Department Kathy Owens, Fire-Rescue Department PZ&B Distribution List Kris K. Garrison, Executive Director, PZ&B Beth McCall, Zoning Division Earl Hahn, Planning Division Boynton Beach Annexation Page 2 Four Areas BRIEFING SHEET - ANNEXATION REVIEW PROGRAM Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy I-b provides that "the County shall implement the County's Interim 1, 'lexation Policy". The County's Interim Annexation Policy provides hat "All annexations will undergo a preliminary review by the Planning Division according to the following threshold criteria to determine the extent, if any, of statutory deficiencies and impacts on the Countyll . The County agencies responsible for reviewing proposed annexations and the review criteria are as follows: * Planninq Division: reviews statutory requirements and impacts on County. * Enqineerinq Department: reviews to ensure that all rights-of- way, as identified by the County Thoroughfare Right-of-Way Identification Map (TIM), are protected. * Fire-Rescue Department: reviews to protect level of service provided to both the residents of the municipality and unincorporated area, and prevent efficiency decreases in service delivery. * Water Utilities Department: reviews to ensure water and sewer services are provided in a cost-effective manner, recognizing the impact of service area dislocations. I:\COMMON\PLANNING\DATA\ANNEX\BOYNTON\JAN13_95 roo ~ @'rn u'w .~ r-~)r . [-'--'--'~'l. 1: i. I f II i ' ,I". . I ,. " , , " , ' 1" , , ~ I . ---1.-' ~;'~-;-;--- -_.~ .:\!-11 ~ If,,\.] f'd"~ . 7r)i'~! L.ll: [,1 !-T~;- ." .'~.... "~."'-'.' _. " -_.. Boynton Beach Annexation Page 3 Four Areas .~. ,. \ --" .-. . '.. .. ..1':2 .-.. j .. T 11 ~'': .j,,-i.. \_. 'I~ I.-C..............--......, I ~ I .:~~-'f;'~- i _ ~_,~ .......J \~ ~. ~\ ~; -- ..... ,.... 1,-20 canal rsr: . ... 1\ . ........:. .. "e" ...... . . -f""""" "...",~,f' -... i~.: ' I ....., 'i.- to ~:\'..~ ' t, ''--:.,.I.~ .~ <..,. . -.... '"~. ~-I -.-. \\ \~ '" :t. " 'r-I.'. ) ,.. . , 8 .,- .~::~:"~''''''' ,- .-.; , +.::-~ \,3. .j c..-.- -=-~ L,'. r-"..J L.- -:D r---::. . Boynton ~ ; ..........:,. .... \ \:'d~ ..._1Il .t- l' \ GENERALIZED LOCATION MAP =-r-.....~~ ~~ll\~J:-..7,.-'t..,. .~..'. \ "1{\ 8' \ &W~ ~. -:::~~J~'~:;: \ 1~ ~'. ..d:.. .. ... \. - l\ \.-. J...--- _., ,.: ~,~ ' . . II ~ ~... . . r .~. ...,., -' -" '.- ~~ . .. ' .' ~ ..- . . '.. ,.l..,,,--"" . ,,~ .' i'\,.' ~- -," .-.---- ~---~~~.,_._....._----,----- Board of County Commissioners Ken L. Foster, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman Department Planning, Zoning & Building January 17, 1995 Mr. Michael Rumpf Senior Planner City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 Re: County Planning Division Review of City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments Clearinghouse Ref. # BOY-2 Dear Mr. Rumpf: Thank you for providing Palm Beach County with the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed amendments to the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan. On behalf of Palm Beach County, the Planning Division has completed an assessment of the City's plan amendments pursuant to the requirements of Section 163 .3184, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J -11.008 (12) (c), Florida Administrative Code. We have not identified items of concern or objection in the City's proposed amendments in terms of land use compatibility and consistency with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. Once again, thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Please be advised that the comments represent staff review and not necessarily the position of the Board of Ccunty Commissioners. m rn @ rn n \If] ~ m'l D r---~-ll~!1 I ~ I . I - ,',.','," [)~ 'i \-y U~ David J. Kovacs, A.I.C.P. Planning Director I:\COMMON\PLANNING\DATA\BOY3LET 1 "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ ptinted on recycled paper 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (407) 233-5300 p INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING PLANNING DIVISION TO: Kirk Crane, Senior Planner FROM: Laura M. Minns, Planner I~ fV'-.. September 21, 1995 DATE: RE: Petition 82-71 A, Manor Forest PUD BACKGROUND The following petition scheduled for the September 27, 1995 DRC meeting is located within the West Boynton Area Community Plan (WBACP) and has been reviewed by the neighborhood planning staff for consistency with the draft plan. Petition #82-71A: The property is located at the intersection of Lawrence Road and LWDD Lateral Canal No. 20. The petition is a request for a Development Order Amendment to delete internal access within an approved PUD. FINDINGS Petition #8271A: . This proposal conflicts with several draft recommendations of the WBACP. This plan is scheduled for BCC adoption by resolution on October 3, 1995 and will be used as a guide for future development within the West Boynton Area. The City of Boynton Beach adopted the plan on September 19, 1995. The proposal conflicts with the following recommendations and should be considered in reviewing this petition. · Recommendation 34: Reduce the need for widening major and minor thoroughfares by encouraging the placement of a well inter-connected system of collector streets. Where interconnected systems become possible, care should be given to a community's quality oflife, the amount of through-traffic, the impacts on safety, and overall security, · Recommendation 35: Discourage the use of dead-end streets, loop streets and oversized blocks in favor of through-street (collectors) and shorter blocks. Provide cut-throughs for pedestrian access to transit. Promote the landscaping of rights-of- way. · Recommendation 36: Encourage new residential developments to include: 1) an September 21, 1995 Page 2 interconnected system of collector streets in their development plans which consider , appropriate adjacent undeveloped parcels with a potential for future development; and 3) stub streets that tie into existing adjacent stub streets. DISPOSITION Please include the findings listed above in the Planning Division report. If you need further action contact me at your earliest convenience. pc: Maria Bello Carl Flick file: I:Ic\p\acMlaura\drcrcv82-71a,kc Board of County Commissioners Ken'l" Foster, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H, Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee County Administrator l{obert Weisman Department of Engineering and Public Works January 23, 1995 Mr. Michael Rumpf Planning & Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR LAND USE AMENDMENTS Dear Mr. Rumpf: As per your request, I am providing the following traffic analysis information for the 4 proposed land use amendments in the City of Boynton Beach. Project: Windward DUD Size: 110 Existing Land Use: 5 du/ac Dwelling Units: 550 single-family Daily Trips: 5,500 Change in trips: 180 reduction Project: Royal Manor Mobile Home Park Existing Land Use: 8 du/ac Dwelling Units: 684 multi-family Daily Trips: 4,785 Change in trips: 438 reduction Project: Lawrence Oaks Size: 42 Existing Land Use: 5 du/ac Dwellino Units: 210 sinole-family Daily Trips: 2,100 - . Change in trips: 68 reduction Project: Carriage Gate Size: 9.7 Existing Land Use: 8 du/ac Dwelling Units: 77 multi-family Daily Trips: 539 Change in trips: 189 increase Existing Traffic Volume on Old Boynton Traffic Increase: Total Traffic: LOS 0: 29,400 acres Proposed Land Use: 4.84 du/ac Dwelling Units: 523 single-family Daily Trips: 5,320 Size: 85.6 acres Proposed Land Use: 7.26 du/ac Dwelling Units: 621 multi-family Daily Trips: 4,347 acres Proposed Land Use: 4.84 du/ac Dwellinq Units: 203 single-family Daily Trips: 2,032 acres Proposed Land Use: 10.8 du/ac Dwelling Units: 104 multi-family Daily Trips: 728 Road: 12,356 189 12,545 @ printed on recycled paper "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative I\clioll Elllplo}l'l' Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 January 23, 1995 Mr. Michael Rumpf TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR LAND USE AMENDMENTS page two If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684- 4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER J;L. ')Ar~f Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review h:\traffic\diw\boyn35 ?:fie City of tJJoynton tJJeach 100 'E. flJoynton flJeadt. flJoukvartf P.O. flJo~310 flJoynton flJeadi, :fforitfa 33425-0310 City 1fa1[: (407) 375-6000 :f.9lX: (407) 375-6090 November 28; 19q4 Mr. Harvey Geller 2240 Woolbright Road Boynton Beach, FL 33426 Dear Mr. Geller: Pursuant to the city's Comprehensive Plan the city has embarked on a program to pursue the annexation of both unincorporated enclaves and selected properties that are contiguous to the City's boundary. The Annexation Program has currently identified contiguous properties whose owners have agreements for water service and annexation with the City. You will recall that on June 7, 1994 the City authorized the execution of a water service agreement for the Lawrence Oaks development with the condition that the owners would voluntarily annex to the City. This requirement for annexation, which remains in place if the property is sold, is included within the agreement for water service and is typically activated by the City at any time once the property is eligible for annexation under state law. The decision by - the city Commission to require immediate annexation is based on the property being contiguous to the City's boundary, as well as meeting all other conditions of state annexation law. Although an official notice of rezoning will soon be sent to all property owners, this courtesy letter is intended to disseminate general information which is absent from the notice of rezoning. The first public hearing on this matt~r is scheduled for January 10, 1994. If you have any questions regarding the annexation process, please contact me at (407) 375-6260. Sincerely, ~~~ Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner A:AlmLftP..Lft 5tmerica's (jateway to tfU (jufJstream %e City of '.Boynton tJ3each 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Buu.n 'Boufevartf P.O. 'B~310 'Boynton 'Buu.n, %>>ida 33425-0310 City:Jfa[[: (407) 375-6000 ~JifX: (407) 375-6090 November 28, 1994 Mr. Larry Kahn, President Lowell Homes Corp. 1451 S. Miami Avenue Miami, FL 33130 Dear Mr. Kahn: Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive plan the City has embarked on a program to pursue the annexation of both unincorporated enclaves and selected properties that are contiguous to the City's boundary. The Annexation Program has currently identified contiguous properties whose owners have agreements for water service and annexation with the City. You will recall that on June 7, 1994 the City authorized the execution of a water service agreement for the Lawrence Oaks development with the condition that the owners would voluntarily annex to the City. This requirement for annexation, which remains in place if the property is sold, is included within the agreement for water service and is typically activated by the City at any time once the property is eligible for annexation under state law. The decision by the City Commission to require immediate annexation is based on the property being contiguous to the City's boundary, as well as meeting all other conditions of state annexation law. Although an official notice of rezoning will soon be sent to all property owners, this courtesy letter is intended to disseminate general information which is absent from the notice of rezoning. The first public hearing on this matter is scheduled for January 10, 1994. If you have any questions regarding the annexation process, please contact me at (407) 375-6260. Sincerely, ~Z,~ Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner JL:JLKKLrrp7.LII'l' jfmerica's (jateway to tfie (julfstream fJ1ie City of 13oynton tJ3eacn 100 'E. tJJoynton tJJeac/i. tJJoufevarti P.O. flJo~310 tJJoynton tJJeadi.,:fforUla 33425-0310 City!Jfa[[: (407) 375-6000 1'JlIX: (407) 375-6090 November 23, 1994 Ahmanson Development Inc. 1370 S. Valley Vista Dr., #100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 To whom it may concern: Pursuant to the city's Comprehensive Plan the city has embarked on a program to pursue the annexation of both unincorporated enclaves and selected prop9rties that are contiguous to the City's boundary. The Annexation Program has currently identified contigUous properties whose owners have agreements for water service and annexation with the City. You will recall that your property (PCN 00-42-45-13-10-001-0010), as part of the Windward PUD, has a water service agreement containing an agreement for voluntary annexation, which is to be activated by the city at any time once the property is eligible for annexation under state law. This current annexation process was initiated on October 18, 1994 when the City Commission recommended that staff pursue the annexation of three (3) properties or developments including the Windward PUD. Although the media described the City's action as "approving" the annexation of these properties, no official action will occur until property owners are notified, advertisements are published in a local newspaper, and public hearings are held (approximately three public hearings ~ill be held prior to completing the annexation process). Although an offi~ial notice of rezoning will soon be sent to all owners wi thin th: ,s planned unit development, this courtesy letter is intended to di;seminate general information about the annexation program which is absent from the notice of rezoning. If you have any questions reqarding the annexation process, please contact me at (407) 375-6260. Sincerely, ~z.~ Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner A:AWltLBDti.LIlY .9tmlrUa's (jateway to the (julfstream lJ1ie City of tBoynton tBeacli 100 'E. 'Boynton tJJeadi flJoultvartl P.O. tJJo~310 tJJoynton flJeadi, ~t:oritfa. 33425-0310 City!Jlafi: (407) 375-fj()()() ~JU: (407) 375-6090 November 23, 1994 Mr. Don Ray 9818 Nickels Boulevard, Unit 1105 Boynton Beach, FL 33436 Dear Mr. Ray: Pursuant to the city's Comprehensive Plan the City has embarked on a program to purSlle the annexation of both unincorporated enclaves and selected propt!rties that are contiguous to the City's boundary. The Annexation Program has currently identified contiguous properties whose owners have agreements for water service and annexation with the City. You will recall that this property's water service agreement contains an agreement for voluntary annexation, to be activated by the City at any time once the property is eligible for annexation under state law. This current annexation process was initiated on October 18, 1994 when the City Commission recommended that staff pursue the annexation of three (3) properties or developments including Carriage Gate. Although the media described the City's action as "approving" the annexation of these properties, no official action will take place until property owners are notified, advertisements are published in a local newspaper, and public hearings are held (approximately three public hearings uill be held prior to completing the annexation process). Although an official notice of rezoning will soon be sent to all owners wi thin thir; development, this courtesy letter is intended to disseminate general information about the annexation program which is absent from tle notice of rezoning. Please assist us in this effort by passir,g on this information to other owners within Carriage Gate. If you have any questions regarding the annexation procedures, please contact me at 375-6260. Sincerely, ~z:. ~ Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner A,AKItLK'rPZ.L." filmerii;4s (jateway to tlie (juE/stream rz7ie City of $oynton $eacli 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'BouferJa1"ti P.O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton flJuu/i., :fforUfa 33425-0310 City 9fa{[: (407) 375-6000 :f.9lX: (407) 375-6090 November 23, 1994 Dennis O'Connor Four Waves Enterprises Inc. 5701 North Pine Island Rd., suite 390 Tamarac, FL 33321 Dear Mr. O'Connor: Pursuant to the city's comprehensive Plan the City has embarked on a program to pursue the annexation of both unincorporated enclaves and selected properties that are contiguous to the City's boundary. The Annexation Program has currently identified contiguous properties whose owners have agreements for water service and annexation with the City. You will recall that this property's (Windward POD) water service agreement contains an agreement for voluntary annexation, to be activated by the City at any time once the property is eligible for annexation under state law. This current annexation process was initiated on October 18, 1994 when the City Commissit)n recommended that staff pursue the annexation of three (3) properties or developments including the Windward PUD. Although the media described the City's action as "approving" the annexation of thene properties, no official action will occur until property owners dre notified, advertisements are published in a local newspaper, and public hearings are held (approximately three public hearings will be held prior to completing the annexation process). Although an official notice of rezoning will soon be sent to all owners within this planned unit development, this courtesy letter is intended to disseminate general information about the annexation program which is absent from the notice of rezoning. If possible, please provide this information to the new residents of Princeton place, and forward any questions regarding the annexation procedures to me at (407) 375-6260. Sincerely, ~2.~ Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner .,...Ln.6.LB'r Jl.merica'.s (jateway to tfu (julfttream %e City of $oynton $eacli 100 'E. 'Boynum flJeadi 'Boufevartf P.l). flJo~310 flJoynton flJeac{~, J1orU[a. 33425-0310 City 9fal.~ (407) 375-6000 :f.9lX: 1'407) 375-6090 November 23, 1994 Mandogian, Hegerdich & Engele La Petite Academy Inc. 8717 W. 110 st., #300 Overland Park, KS 66210 To whom it may concern: Pursuant to the city's comprehensive Plan the city has embarked on a program to pursue the annexation of both unincorporated enclaves and selected properties that are contiguous to the city's boundary. The Annexation Program has currently identified contiguous properties whose owners have agreements for water service and annexation with the City. You will recall that your property (PCN 00-42-45-13-10-0C1-0020), as part of the Windward POD, has a water service agreement containing an agreement for voluntary annexation, which is to be activated by the City at any time once the property is eligible for annexation under state law. This current annexation process was initiated on October 18, 1994 when the City Commission recommended that staff pursue the annexation of three (3) properties or developments including the Windward PUD. Although the media described the City's action as "approving" the annexation of these properties, no official action will occur until property owners are notified, advertisements are published in a local newspaper, and public hearings are held (approximately three public hearings will be held prior to completing the annexation process). Although an official notice of rezoning will soon be sent to all owners within this planned unit development, this courtesy letter is intended to disseminate general information about the annexation program which is absent from the notice of rezoning. If you have any questions regarding the annexation process, please contact me at (407) 375-6260. Sincerely, ~z.~ Michael W. Rumpf Senior Planner A.A.llL~5.L.'I' 5lmericas (jateway to tfie (julfstream FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-11 January 13, 1995 TO: Rescue FROM: SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTIES WEST OF LAWRENCE ROAD After a thorough review of the fire and emergency medical needs of the properties west of Lawrence Road being considered for annexation, and the fire and emergency medical capability of Fire Station #3 which would serve the area versus the capability of Palm Beach County Station 141 now serving the area, we have concluded Boynton Beach Fire Station 13 provides superior equipment, more personnel, and quicker response times. To clarify the memorandum submitted to Michael Rumpf of the Planning Department on August 18, 1994, the request for additional equipment and personnel is not to provide basic fire and emergency medical service, but to enhance our backup capability without relying on backup from Stations 11 or 12 initially. Our present capability will result in a higher level of service to those areas including Palm Shores, but an improvement in our backup capability will reduce the possibility of delays if all units are out on calls. FJ/lmb RECEIVED ~~{'f\ ~0}~. r{\(}~~i\\.~ , "l \ '0 \<t e:; \.: \.... oJ /. ',,/\ . \'1 . \.1.!- I;' \. ., tit 'J- f\';o j '..VV ~.I' ";-X...../ "e.." \V't- ./ ,',:" . '-:"" \, .J~l'v 1 3 1~1J5 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE - MEMORANDUM FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director , ~ Michael W. Rumpf, Senlor Planner TO: DATE: June 2, 1994 SUBJECT: WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR/ANNEXATION OF LAWRENCE OAKS MANOR FOREST - PHASE III Please be notified that Oriole Inc. has requested water service from the City for their above-referenced proj ect, which is the remainder of the Fox Hollow development. Water service is being requested to serve 178 equivalent residential connections, which in this case, is also 178 detached dwelling units. I have brought your attention to this matter as I believe this is the appropriate time at which annexation of this property should be considered and evaluated. Annexation of this property should be considered for the following reasons: 1) This property has frontage on Lawrence Road and will be contiguous to the City on its entire south side once Knollwood Groves is annexed; 2) Annexation of this area could become difficult once it is in the possession of individual property owners; 3) If eventual annexation is likely, then annexation should occur now in order to collect building related fees and revenues; and 4) Although this action would result in the partial annexation of a residential development, there are obvious points of separation between the two areas, including a separate entrance, which would assist with the efficient delivery of urban services. Annexation of this development would represent a more logical annexation than the present lot-by- lot incorporation of properties on Old Dixie Highway and Federal Highway. I would suggest that this matter be discussed with the City Manager as soon as possible. Please let me know when I can be of additional assistance. xc: Don Jaeger, Building Official 1l:1l1l110R!OL.KI!M PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-253 Agenda Memorandum for June 6, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker city Manager F~OM: Tambri J. Heyden ~ Planning and Zoning Director DATE: May 31, 1995 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION PROGRAM - PHASE 2, GROUP 2: Application #2-Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates Application #3-Carriage Gate Condominium Application #4-Lawrence Oaks \~ Ordinances for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment, and Rezoning Please place the above-referenced items on the June 6, 1995 City Commission meeting agenda under Legal - ordinances, Second Reading. DESCRIPTION: You will recall that the above-referenced properties are being annexed as Phase 2, Group 2 of the City's Annexation Program. The city Commission approved the applications for these properties on January 17, 1995, therefore approving for transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) the respective proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Map. The DCA conducted an summary review of the proposed amendments and finding no need for a comprehensive review, advised the City on April 12, 1995 to continue processing them through the adoption of ordinances. You will also recall that there were originally four (4) properties being processed in this phase of the Annexation Program. Excluded from the above list is Application #1-Windward PUD, which has been separated from this group as a result of pending litigation. The litigation involves the validity of the water service/annexation agreement, which is the primary mechanism used in the Annexation Program. Whether Application #1 is processed further will be determined through the outcome of the court proceedings. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that these ordinances be approved. TJH:mr Attachments MlleX'P2G20RDI.AGM