The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-194 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: New Site Plan - Miami Subs DATE: July 21, 1994 The present location of the dumpster at the above site is acceptable, however approach angle will need to be changed. Eichorst Works Director RE/cr 00 m 0 , JUL L 5 1994 00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-211 (Amended) TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director w~~~~m ~ukill, P.E. ~Englneer FROM: DATE: July 21, 1994 RE: MIAMI SUB'S GRILL, PLANNING FILE COUS 94-004 Attached please find Mr. Finizio's review comments on subject plans and exhibits. Paragraph #1 is self explanatory. with respect to paragraph #2, plans are not consistent. The sidewalk along the north side of the building scales 6' on site plan (cover) sheet, 8' on landscape plan L-l and site plan A-I and 5' on floor plan A-2. Depending on which configuration is correct, you mayor may not comply with the required backup space Mr. Finizio describes. Please provide revisions to plans to demonstrate compliance. WVH/ck C:MIAMISUB.TRC attachment: Engineering Memo No. 94-208 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-208 (Amended) TO: william Hukill, P.E. City Engineer FROM: vincent A. Finizio Deputy City Engineer DATE: July 20, 1994 RE: Miami Sub's Grill Planning Department File No. COUS 94-004 I am in receipt of the above referenced plan and herein offer the following comments(s): 1. The handicap stalls along the west property line of the parking facility do not comply with minimum width requirements for handicap stalls and access ramps required in Section 5- 142(k), "Handicap Requirements". The total width of the two handicap stalls and access area should equal 29', however, when I scale the drawings the total width of the two stalls and access area equals 26.5'. This deviation from City codes will impact the layout in the general vicinity of the stalls possibly requiring a modification to the plans. There is however a note that indicates these spaces are existing and it is possible that the inplace stalls comply with code but in any event the plans should be revised to provide a true representation of that which exists. 2. The area depicted along the north side of the parking facility, specifically the seven existing parking spaces immediately north of the restaurant, do not comply with the required 27' free and unobstructed backup space required by Section 5-142(i), "Parking Lot Layout", Subsection (1), " Appendix" . * VAF/ck C:MIAMISUB.VF2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-181 July 18, 1994 From: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning &lO ing Don Jaeger, Building Officia Al Newbold, Deputy Building ficial Director To: Via: Re: TRC COMMENTS - Site Plan Miami Subs, 4742 N. Congress (Boynton Lakes Plaza) The Building Department has reviewed the documents submitted and offer the following comments: 1. Handicap ramps and walks from the road right-of-way to the entrance of the building must be provided per the handicap code, and the building must also be handicap accessible. 2. Unless this property is a separate, deeded, out-parcel, it cannot have its own free-standing sign. The location of the sign needs to be shown on the site plan. Contingent upon the handicap requirements and all sign codes being met, we support proceeding with this project. A~ AN:mh A:MIAMISUB.TRC .'99lA Plz ANNING AND ONING DEPT. " FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-259 WDC TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 25, 1994 RE: TRC - SITE PLAN (I) MIAMI SUBS AT BOYNTON LAKES PLAZA 4742 N CONGRESS AVENUE There are no objections to this plan. ( MEMORANDUM Utilities #94-252 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zon' FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: July 29, 1994 SUBJECT: Miami Subs Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. Show proposed location of water meter and backflow preventor on Sheet A -1, (Sec. 26-16( c) and Sec. 26-107). 2. Show proposed location for grease trap. Drive-through area should be avoided for access and maintenance safety. 3. Dumpster is shown on irrigation pump pad and/or well. Relocation of one to be considered. 4. Oak trees are not acceptable in utility easements. Relocate or change to palm trees off set from water main, (Sec. 7.5-18.1). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. 19b xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella Y File ill Boynton Beach Police Department TraffIC Unit Memorandum From: Tambri Heyden Director Sgt. James Cummings Date: 22 July 1994 Ile: Miami Subs To: I would request tha! the plans indicate by standard drawing, the signage and space depiction Tor the handicapped parking spaces. Both existing and new should be included. m .22~ ill MEMORANDUM TO: Tarnbri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Direc~or super~ntendent ~ FROM: John Wildner, Parks 0/ ~/9'-1 DATE: RE: /~ o",~..tt'ONA-(. Site Plan Review - Major Site Plan Modification -" 1..0( Sc J 1st Review r Proj ect: ftu"A h1l . S '-t I5S The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the above referenced proj ect. There are no outstanding recreation related issues on this project. m u; 3mA PlANNING AND ZONING DEPT. C:PARKS.MSP MEMORANDUM FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and zon~ Dir~1l Michael E. Haag ~ ~ Site and Zoning Development Administrator TO: DATE: August 8, 1994 RE: Site Plan Review - 1st Review - Conditional Use Approval/New Site Project: Location: Agent: File No.: Miami Subs Boynton Lakes Plaza David Daszkal COUS 94-004 The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site Plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories; the first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents/plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant) agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Add the tabular information below to your overall site plan: SITE DATE Gross Leasable BUilding Area 123 ,432 sq. ft. Outparcel #1 Floor Area 2,934 Outparcel #2 Floor Area 4,910 Outparcel #3 Floor Area 5,883 Total leasable area and outparcels 137,159 sq. ft. Total parking required Based on square footage Variance received Case #190 Board of Adjustment 1994 Total parking required 686 27 659 (14 handicap) Total existing parking 664 (15 handicap) 1st site plan review Miami Subs page 2 2. The project is located in Community Design District II - Spanish Mediterranean. There are five (5) architectural design features missing from the list provided in the Community Design Ordinance as required features (see attached marked list). There are several choices; 1) Required design features can be added. 2) Other features could be pointed out that exist and an appeal to the code requirements could be requested accordingly. 3) A variance could be requested deleting requirements for these features. The variance request can be processed simultaneously with the project but if the Planning and Development Board and the Commission disagree with the request, the features will have to be added at permit time. 3. A loading zone that does not interfere with traffic flow or parking back up distance is required by code section II J. Provide a loading zone or request a variance from Board of Adjustment. Application with fee will be required by August 12, 1994 to be heard by the Board at the September 19, 1994 meeting. 4. For signage to be considered by the Board at one time, sign location, size, colors, etc., must be shown on the second submittal. Signage can not be located on easement or be within ten feet (10') of property line. Please show dimensions. 5. On specific site plan, show all driveway and parking space dimensions. II. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. To remain compatible with the exterior coloring of the existing shopping center, it is recommended that the color of the exterior walls proposed for the new restaurant be changed from white to a color that will match the color of the lower portion of the wall at the west side of the Walgreens tenant space. The following changes are also recommendations that would bring the new building into harmony with the existing shopping center building: a. omit the color pink and aqua from the top raised band and replace with the color displayed along the top of the walls of the shopping center. b. omit the pink and aqua architectural lighting. c. Omit the center band of pink and aqua tile. d. Omit the pink and aqua tile around the base of the building. e. Specify on the plan the new spanish stile wil1 match the tile on the existing shopping center. Note: The color of the awning and the color of other features and/or treatments will be reviewed by the Planning and Development Board and City commission. 2. To avoid a safety hazard regarding traffic flow, relocate the menu sign and order speaker closer to the take-out window. Relocate the sign to allow a distance of no less than the length of three vehicles to be parked between the east edge of the access aisle located west of the building and the speaker box where the food is ordered. a!spreview.mi& ENVIRONMENTAL REOULATION I Coostal Village Archltectutol features and/or treabneilts won nccessorles: 'SlmUcrs Lnttlce work Decorotlve moldings Balcony Windows: . M,,1U"I'IlUe gl099 wind'Jw Fixed gins! Beveled glass Extra fentures: Decorative benches Exterfor Jumps Related omamenta U l\fediterrn- nean/Spanish Iron decoratlva Grills Wood decorative srllle y"Accent tile Bnlcony Arches Dell tower Shutters App. II 3 R~Qv\1RQ;'O \ 0 N t> R I~ vJ uv b-~ - 2.. M v~SING- MulU.pone glass} ~ Fixed nlns9 Z. Stained glass t I Amenltles~ Front polio He or I'tlUO Wooll deck Trellises Ootebo Picket fence Dominant exterior colors: Beige Pole yellow Egg 6h\ n Blue to groy tone lOrd. No. 90.88, 9.18.90) Decorative lamps JrofJ ~otes Multl.panel door8 Carved doors R IZ Q" ~R lS D o tv t>RA<N .pt- "'MI,~~/AJ & .t " 2 RL2 Q\)~R~ D " () I, 0 /..J DR. A-vV ~ A.> c,. .. 2. ol M ( ~~, N" f:r Interior court } Fountains ANY OF THESE Covered walk. AMENITIES MAY ways BE SUBSTITUTE[ FOR THE ABOVE REQUIRED ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. AND/OR TREATMENTS. rlnlt White Red to orang" Earth tones MEMORANDUM TO: tambR.; :J. He.iden I FROM: Ke.v; n S. f+ttlla..l-.a'" I DATE: 8.z.Q4 fJ/41')1l'1~ -t 2 tUH '"'5 i) (~ec?;rL. rO~~STelC.l cnvlfwn "1eV\IQ/'5 T RE: Site PIan Review - New Site Plan -_~~~d~qp{an~S€ . Project: MIAMi Subs After reviewinq the referenced project --eepartmeB~ recommends the Planninq and consideration. amended plans for the above the Fo~esre~1 GnvlR..onJlvleV) /A/or that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to siqn-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. C:AMEND1.ALD MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: August 11, 1994 RE: Site Plan Review - 1st Review - Conditional Use Approval/New Site Project: Location: Agent: File No.: Miami Subs Boynton Lakes Plaza David Daszkal COUS 94-004 ADDENDUM #1 Please add the following comment to the Planning and Zoning memorandum dated August 8, 1994 as attached to letter dated August 8, from Tambri Heyden to David Daszkal. 6. Further review of the subdivision of the property indicates a landscape barrier may not have been placed around the entire property. A landscape barrier or hedge is required by code. If this hedge does not exist, a variance can be requested by letter, or the hedge must be installed. a~ac!dendum.llia TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-213 Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~. FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director DATE: August 22, 1994 SUBJ: 2nd Review/Conditional - Miami Subs The Public Works Department has no objections to the above site and the plans should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Board. Eichorst Works Director RE/cr @. ~ lU\) AUG 2 3 \994 n W ffi ill PlANNING AND OMlMG DEPT. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-253 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director J~Jlram ~ukill, P.E. ~Englneer August 18, 1994 FROM: DATE: RE: MIAMI SUBS - AMENDED SITE PLAN REVIEW Previous comments by the Office of the City Engineer have been met by the applicant for subject site plan approval. WVH/ck C:MIAMISUB.COM xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer Ken Hall, Engineering Aide Jim Du Vall, Engineering Inspector 00 @rnuwm @ AUG / 9 tcql1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-191 August 23, 1994 TO: Tambri Heyden Planning Di ector FROM: Al Newbol Deputy Building Official THRU: Don Jaege Building RE: TRC COMMENTS - SITE PLAN REVIEW 2ND REVIEW/CONDITIONAL USE MIAMI SUBS - 4142 N. CONGRESS AVENUE The Building Department has reviewed the amended site plan and the attached documents and offers the following comments: 1. section 4.3 of the State Handicapped Code requires an accessibility route from the street right-of-way or public sidewalk to the entrance of the building. This requirement has not been met. 2. All signs must be in compliance with the Boynton Beach Sign Code. The menu board can not exceed 25 square feet and must be constructed no more than five feet above ground level. Directional signs are limited to four per lot. The maximum allowable square footage for wall signs is 111 square feet. Since the above comments can be addressed at time of building permit submittal, we recommend that the plans be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board. AN: bh rnv~ @ ~ ~ ~I l\l\1 AUG 231994 IW ...~ SUB FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-266 woe TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE: AUGUST 23, 1994 RE: TRC - SITE PLAN (II) MIAMI SUBS AT BOYNTON LAKES PLAZA 4742 N CONGRESS AVENUE There are no objections to this plan. I' ...-~. . ,., .. ;l,,' .~.' MEMORANDUM Utilities #94-277 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: JohnA.Guidry, ~ ~,~ Director of Utilities DATE: August 22,1994 SUBJECT: Miami Subs - Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments: The Utilities Department offers no additional comments at this time. This Department will review the plans for this project again at the time of Building Department Permit Application for compliance with all City Codes and Ordinances. It is our recommendation that the request proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. 19b xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella /!Jv File AUG 2 3 1996 ~ P NNING AND Boynton Beach Police Department TraffIC Unit Memorandum To: Tambri Heyden Director I>ate: 23 August 1994 FroEn: Sgt. James Cummings Re: Miami Subs The only addition I would like to see would be the drawings for the handicapped parking spaces added to the plans '.__ ~..~ ~~(/ J es MEMORANDUM TO: ,. p.1ts~ I -:r. H Ej ~,cvJ I f'(,AnJiV'WC <t ZON ,JlJG D/~Ev1b~ FROM: :;. 01-1,.> W, <- ~ "'1""" I f'1'r'l b S ~I" T . 0 DATE: rJ F). 3/ f'l (j RE: Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans Project: kiA-hi" St.tl3..s After reviewinq the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration. amended plans for the above the f'?[C:fl~ll(tl'-o..,.J../ Pmk b.eptWtn,e..4 that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to siqn-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. ~ AUG ~ : 'qq4 m u w m C:AMEND1.ALD RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #94-309 TO: Tambri Heyden, Director Planning/Zoning/Community Improvement FROM: Kevin Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist K;} cfJ Miami Subs - 2nd Review/Conditional Use RE: DATE: August 22, 1994 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are no existing trees on the site. The project should continue in the normal review process. KH:bjm m U; 2 2 1994 ID MEMORANDUM FROM: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director Michael E. Ha:Oa;~ zoning and sit velopment September 2, 199 Administrator TO: DATE: RE: Site Plan Review 2nd Review Conditional Use Approval/Site plan Review Miami Subs Grill 4742 No. congress Ave at Boynton Lakes Plaza David Daszkal CallS 94-004 Project: Location: Agent: File No: The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories: The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the site and the design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and wor)<.ing drawings submitted to the Building Department for permits for the proposed project. These comments will result from the review for technical compliance with the City code of ordinances. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. On the site plan drawing dimension the location of the free standing sign from the adjacent property line. Note that ten (10) feet is the minimum setback allowed. 2. If the landscaping located on the adjacent property along the north property line of the subject property is proposed to satisfy the vehicle use area visual barrier requirements of the subject property, note same on the plans. The note shall include the following statement: If the existing hedge does not comply with the minimum standards for vehicle use area screening/visual barrier ( the required barrier shall be placed on the subject property. 3. On the elevation view drawings identify the name of the manufacturer and manufacturer's number for the following exterior materials and color of same: tiles, vinyl awnings, barrel tile, wall signs, site signs and automatic air curtain units. 4. Prior to receiving permits to construct the building, submit a legible copy of the corrected, City approved and recorded "Declaration of Restrictions and Grant of Easements" for the Boynton Lakes Plaza and Miami subs property. /1 page 2 2nd review Miami Subs COllS 94-004 5. Identify the correct address on the plans. 6. Show and dimension on the site plan drawings, sheet C-1 and A- 1, a distance of no less than eighteen (18) feet from the east side of the intersection of the ingress aisle leading to the diagonal parking spaces and the access aisle south of the building to the south edge of the first diagonal parking space. 7. On the site plan drawing, sheet C-l, ensure that the following site data is listed, shown and labeled: Gross Leasable Building Area (Boynton Lakes Plaza) outparcel #1 Floor Area (Miami Subs Grill) Outparcel #2 Vacant - maximum assigned floor area outparcel #3 Floor Area (Cuco's rest. - leased site on Boynton Lakes Plaza property) Total leasable area including outparcels 123,432 sq. ft. 2,934 sq. ft. 6,751 sq. ft. 5,883 sq. ft. 139,000 sq. ft. area (1:200) 695 of Adjustment - 27 668 Total parking required Based on square footage of leasable Reduction in parking spaces - Board Case #190 approved Total parking required (including 14 handicapped spaces) Total parking provided (including 15 handicapped spaces) 668 8. Modify the site plan drawing to depict a loading zone in compliance with code specifications or receive approval of a variance from the Board of Adjustment to omit the required loading zone. II. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. To remain compatible with the exterior color scheme of the existing main shopping center building, a condition attached to the original shopping center approval, it is recommended that the color of the exterior walls proposed for the new restaurant be changed from white to a color that will match the color of the lower portion cf the wall at the west side of the Walgreens tenant space. The following changes are also recommendations that would bring the new building into harmony with the colors of the existing main shopping center building: a. Omit the color pink and aqua from the top raised band and replace with the color displayed along the top of the walls of the existing main building of the shopping center. b. Omit the pink and aqua architectural lighting. c. Omit the center band of pink and aqua tile. d. change the color of the wall tile located below the windows to a color that will match the new wall color (matching the existing main building of the shopping center) e. Specify on the plan that the spanish barrel tile roof material will match the color of the roof tile on the main building of the existing shopping center. /2 Page 3 2nd review Miami Subs COUS 94-004 f. Specify on the plans that the color of the storefront windows and door frames will match the color of the storefronts located on the main shopping center building. g. Where a wall sign has a stucco finish background, modify the color to match the recommended new color of the walls of the building. Note: The color of the back-lit awnings and the color of other features and/or treatments will be reviewed by the Planning and Development Board and city Commission. 2. Omit the neon from the free standing sign. Also, change the color of the blue and pink border and sign background to the colors that match the exterior walls of the main building of the shopping center as described above in recommendation 1 and la. 3. close the outparcel entrance near Plaza Lane and relocate dumpster and enclosure to the southwest corner of the parking lot near the irrigation pad. Also, modify the turning radius at the ingress to the one-way access aisle to accommodate the turning radius of the city sanitation vehicles. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, incorporate them into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH/jj a:6prev2nd.mia /3 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-194 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: New Site Plan - Miami Subs DATE: July 21, 1994 The present location of the dumpster at the above site is acceptable, however approach angle will need to be changed. Eichorst Works Director REier rn moomowm illi JUL L j 1994 ft.AN,~G AND lONI DEn rr1ie City of r.Boynton 'Beach 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beatfl 'Boulevard P.O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'lJuufr., ~CorUfa. 33425-0310 City 9ftz[[: (407) 375-6()()() ~JU: (407) 375-6090 August 8, 1994 Mr. David Daszkal 5334 Buckhead Circle Boca Raton, FL 33486 RE: Initial Review Comments Miami Subs New Site Plan Conditional Use File No. COUS 94-004 Dear Mr. Daszkal: The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for the above-referenced proj ect. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial review of your project. In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and documents. After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been submi tted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for a second review and the reviewers will recommend if the site plan will be placed on a board meeting agenda for approval (see attached meeting schedule). If there are major comments not addressed by new plans or the reviewers recommend that the plan not be forwarded through the approval schedule, this office will notify you of your alternatives regarding the site plan as soon as possible. 5tmerica's (jateway to tfie (julfstream To: Mr. Daszkal Re: Initial Review Comments, File No.: COUS 94-004 Page 2 of 2 We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and a checklist that contains information regarding the second submission of the plans and documents for review. If you should have any questions regarding the comments or on the approval schedule, please feel free to call Michael E. Haag, who is coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and Zoning Department. Director xc: central File Chron. File Project File A:ISTCOMMT.mia CHECKLIST The following list and inrorrnation is provided as a checklist to ensnre that the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for revievI. Turning in t.his list and the appropriate plans and documents will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the Planning and zoning Department. Project Name: IifIPl!l1I .JoBS ~ ell L- 1. Submit an amended site plan Review/Conditional Use application form that reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form with the changes identified. If there are no changes required to be documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal. 2. Submit twel ve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and document s, including surveys that show compliance with the Code of ordinances and comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets slJ.::'\ll have the appropriate leqible raised seal and signature of the designo?r responsible fer tIel? drawi'.1gls). Plans and documents shall be assembled in t~.,elve (12) individ'.131 complete packages with the title of t-.he prnji?ct on all p,::lge~: and/ or S}F?et sand I:> acll page or sheet numerically numbered sucll as the following e~:ample: 1. of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3. 3. Submit color photograph:" of thl? bui.ldings on the site that are to remain in their existing concH tion and photos of existing buildings that are located on the siti?S that abut the perimeter of the subject property. 'rhe mi.nimum size is 5" by 7". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location of tll? existing structures with respect to the location of the proposed project. 4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all draY-ling:, c f the elevation viewE of each side of all buildings and signage associated with the project. The colored elevation views shall match the e leva t iOll;.:; sllOV'.TlJ :L11 the c:Jc.cumen ts tha t were submi tt.ed fOl- site plan review. The app 1 icable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be colo1'ed ~'Ji t-ll the color name and associated color reference number identified. The t.ype of ext.erior surface material shall be identified next to the af;sr:wiai:ea co1;)1". The colored elevation drawings shall have compass c1i]~ec t. ion c r ti t Ie of the s ide of the building ident if ied. The tit} e bl:)c1-: of t:llf? <'r.lgtn.31 drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is 24" by 36". Do nos ub m i t 01\ boa r d 0 fan y k i 11 d . 5. Suhmit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample 3ha1 t hove attached a 1 a.be 1 that iden t if j.es the color by 11 ame and numerical/letter code from an established color chart. 6. Submi t a 8 1/2 II :-: 11" transpal ency of the 1 andscape site plan drawing to be uRed 011 an overhead projector at board meetings. 1994 REVIEW SCHEDULE SECOND HALF SITE PLAN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL *PROJECTS LCCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT * ORIGINAL AMENDED CITY COMM REDEV SUBMI'1"1'AL PLANS P&D COMMISSION AGENCY DEADLINE DEADLINE MEETING HEETING & MEETING Jun 01 Jul 13 Aug 09 Aug 16 Jul 06 E~~ Sep 13 Sep 20 Aug 01 Sep 12 oct 11 Oct 1B Aug 30 Oct 11 Nov OB Nov 15 sep 30 Nov 10 Dee 13 Dee 20 Oct 25 Dee DB Jan 10,'95 Jan 17 , , 95 t~OTE : ( 1 >> TO FACILITATE 'I'HE PROCESSING OF THE REQUEST, 1'1' IS RECOHMEt~DED THAT THE APPLICANT SET-UP, BY APPOINTMENT, A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WITH THE DIRECTOR OF TilE PLAtUtING " ZOflIflG DEPARTMEJrr (407) 375-6260 PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL DEADLIUE DATE. THE MEETING WILL ADDRESS CONCERNS REGARDING TilE TYPE OF SUBMITTAL, BOARD REVIEW SCHEDULE, SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES, FEE, APPLICATION FORM, AI~D TYPE AND UUMBER OF PLANS/DOCUMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED. ( 2 ) IF A SUBMITTAL IS RECEIVED BY THE ORIGIflAL SUBMI'1"1'AL DEADLINE DATE AND WITHIN TWO ( 2 ) WORKING DAYS FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL SUBMI'1"1'AL DEADLINE, TIlE SUBMITTAL IS DETERMINED ACCEPTABLE FOR PROCESSING, THE SUBMI'1"1'AL WILL FOLLOW THE APPROVAL SCHEDULE IDENTIFIED ABOVE. HOWEVER, IT SHALL BE NOTED THAT THE AMENDED PLANS DEADLINE DATE ALLOCATES ONLY TEfl (10) WORKING DAYS FOR THE APPLICAI~T TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE PACKAGB THAT INCLUDES THB PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY WITH THB TRC COMMBNTS GBNBRATED FROM THE RBVIBW 01' 'l'HB ORIGII~AL SUBMI'1"1'AL DOCUMENTS. TO KEBP '1'HB RIVIEW PROCESS ON SCHIDULE Till AMINDID PLANS DIADLIUB DATE IS STRICTLY ENFORCED. IT SHALL ALSO BB NOTED, THAT PRIOR TO A PROJECT BEING RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE PLAHNlflG & ZONING DEPARTMEtfr, AND BEING PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING" DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD, THE PROJECT SHALL BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. (3) APPLICATIONS WHICH REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIPAL IMPLEMEJrrATION ORDINANCE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANnARDS ORDINANCE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW TIME. NOTE: REFER QUESTIONS REGARDING TRAFFIC TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. (4) THE ABOVE DATES HAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. A: 94REV2HF.frb ~- :" MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Tambri J. Heyden planning and zon~ Dir~ Il Michael E. Haag ~ ~ Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: August 8, 1994 RE: Site Plan Review - 1st Review - Conditional Use Approval/New Site Project: Location: Agent: File No.: Miami subs Boynton Lakes Plaza David Daszkal COUS 94-004 The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the Site Plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories; the first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents/plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/ agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Add the tabular information below to your overall site plan: SITE DATE Gross Leasable Building Area 123,432 sq. ft. Outparcel #1 Floor Area 2,934 Outparcel #2 Floor Area 4,910 Outparcel #3 Floor Area 5,883 Total leasable area and outparcels 137,159 sq. ft. Total parking required Based on square footage variance received Case #190 Board of Adjustment 1994 Total parking required 686 27 659 (14 handicap) (15 handicap) Total existing parking 664 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-211 (Amended) TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director WA~~~m ~ukill, P.E. ~Englneer FROM: RE: July 21, 1994 MIAMI SUB'S GRILL, PLANNING FILE COUS 94-004 DATE: Attached please find Mr. Finizio's review comments on subject plans and exhibits. Paragraph #1 is self explanatory. with respect to paragraph #2, plans are not consistent. The sidewalk along the north side of the building scales 6' on site plan (cover) sheet, 8' on landscape plan L-l and site plan A-I and 5' on floor plan A-2. Depending on which configuration is correct, you mayor may not comply with the required backup space Mr. Finizio describes. Please provide revisions to plans to demonstrate compliance. WVH/ck C:MIAMISUB.TRC attachment: Engineering Memo No. 94-208 ill JUt.. 2 2 1994 m~ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-194 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: New Site Plan - Miami Subs DATE: July 21, 1994 The present location of the dumpster at the above site is acceptable, however approach angle will need to be changed. Eichorst Works Director REIer ill m@IED"~ 00. JUL I. j 1994 PlAN~WS AND ZONIN EPT. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-208 (Amended) TO: william Hukill, P.E. City Engineer FROM: vincent A. Finizio Deputy City Engineer DATE: July 20, 1994 RE: Miami Sub's Grill Planning Department File No. COUS 94-004 I am in receipt of the above referenced plan and herein offer the following comments(s): 1. The handicap stalls along the west property line of the parking facility do not comply with minimum width requirements for handicap stalls and access ramps required in Section 5- 142(k), "Handicap Requirements". The total width of the two handicap stalls and access area should equal 29', however, when I scale the drawings the total width of the two stalls and access area equals 26.5'. This deviation from City codes will impact the layout in the general vicinity of the stalls possibly requiring a modification to the plans. There is however a note that indicates these spaces are existing and it is possible that the inplace stalls comply with code but in any event the plans should be revised to provide a true representation of that which exists. 2. The area depicted along the north side of the parking facility, specifically the seven existing parking spaces immediately north of the restaurant, do not comply with the required 27' free and unobstructed backup space required by Section 5-142(i), "Parking Lot Layout", Subsection (I), " Appendix" . ~. VAF/ck C:MIAMISUB.VF2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-181 July 18, 1994 From: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning &lO ing Don Jaeger, Building Officia Al Newbold, Deputy Building ficial Director To: Via: Re: TRC COMMENTS - Site Plan Miami Subs, 4742 N. Congress (Boynton Lakes Plaza) The Building Department has reviewed the documents submitted and offer the following comments: 1. Handicap ramps and walks from the road right-of-way to the entrance of the building must be provided per the handicap code, and the building must also be handicap accessible. 2. Unless this property is a separate, deeded, out-parcel, it cannot have its own free-standing sign. The location of the sign needs to be shown on the site plan. Contingent upon the handicap requirements and all sign codes being met, we support proceeding with this project. A~ AN: mh ---==----..- A:MIAMISUB.TRC n. , 9 /9q,1 PLZOANNING AND NING DEPT. FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-259 WDC TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 25, 1994 RE: TRC - SITE PLAN (I) MIAMI SUBS AT BOYNTON LAKES PLAZA 4742 N CONGRESS AVENUE There are no objections to this plan. ~ William ~ m JJ. 2. 6 1994 r MEMORANDUM Utilities #94-252 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zon' FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: July 29, 1994 SUBJECT: Miami Subs Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. Show proposed location of water meter and backflow preventor on Sheet A-I, (Sec. 26-I6( c) and Sec. 26-107). 2. Show proposed location for grease trap. Drive-through area should be avoided for access and maintenance safety. 3. Dumpster is shown on irrigation pump pad and/or well. Relocation of one to be considered. 4. Oak trees are not acceptable in utility easements. Relocate or change to palm trees offset from water main, (Sec. 7.5-18.1). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. 19b xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella ~ File ~~WgE'P~~ Boynton Beach Police Department Traffic Unit Memorandum From: Tambri Heyden Director Sgt. James Cummings Date: 22 July 1994 Ftc: Miami Subs To: I would request that the plans indicate by standard drawing, the signage and space depiction~ the handicapped parking spaces. Both existing and new should be included. nu rn ill JI. 2 2 lqoll PlANNING AND ZONING DEPT. MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director super~ntendent ~ FROM: John Wildner, Parks ~/!l19{-/ / j DATE: /c oou~..t,.o-o RE: Site Plan Review - Major Site Plan Modification -, l..C. s.c 1st Review Proj ect: )11/'/4. i'I1 t' S '1 ~.s The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the above referenced proj ect. There are no outstanding recreation related issues on this project. 00 m 0 , m rn AUG 3 1qQ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. C:PARKS.MSP MEMORANDUM TO : -ram b R.; :J . FROM: 1-< ev ," W'\ :s. Heyden I l+t:tllttha", ) fJlal'llli~5 1" 217""'\5 i) (~ec7;R- rO~"STeR..1 iEnvlIlon ~V17q I,~ T DATE: B.~.Cf4 Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - ~~d~~p{an~SE RE: . Project: MIAMi Subs After reviewing the referenced project --aepartmeB~ recommends the Planning and consideration. amended plans for the above the Fo~es~R.1 [5flVIR.onMe'1 !AJ,}T that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. \'t~nm~~t~~ C:AMEND1.ALD PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-262 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden ~ Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator DATE: September 9, 1994 SUBJECT: Miami Subs Grill - COUS #94-004 Conditional Use (drive-through) INTRODUCTION: David Daszkal, applicant, through his agent, American Architrave, Inc., is requesting conditional use approval to construct a 2,934 square feet drive-through restaurant on outparcel flA" of Boynton Lakes Plaza, located at the northeast corner of Plaza Lane and Congress Avenue. The outparcel was created by an exception to platting request granted by the Planning and Development Board on September 14, 1993. The site was developed as part of the shopping center and the following improvements exist on the vacant site: utili ties, drainage, landscaping/irrigation, parking spaces, access aisles and a vacant building pad. The site does not have direct access to the abutting rights-af-way and a cross access/cross parking agreement between outparcel flAfI and the shopping center was a condition of the exception to platting approval. The building pad will remain unchanged except for a portion of the south end and east side which will become part of the proposed drive-through lane. The parking spaces located east of the pad will be reconfigured to accommodate the proposed drive-through lane. The reconfigured spaces, which will become diagonal with a one-way access, reduced the existing spaces for the overall project by four (4) spaces from 672 to 668. A Board of Adjustment variance for eliminating a loading zone has been requested and is being processed and considered separately by the Board of Adjustment on September 19, 1994. PROJECT DATA: (See attached drawing) Project Name: Miami Subs Grill Location: Northeast corner of Plaza Lane and Congress Avenue File No.: COliS 94-004 Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Zoning District: Community Commercial (C-3) Type of Use: Restaurant with drive-through Number of Units: N/A Square Footage: Building: 2,934 square feet site: 31,051 square feet (.713 acres) SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING (See attached location map): The subject outparcel and Boynton Lakes Plaza are located in the C- 3, Community Commercial, zoning district. The following is a description of the land uses and zoning districts of the properties that abut outparcel "A": I TO: Planning and Development Board -2- September 9, 1994 North - an existing major driveway entrance leading to the Boynton Lakes shopping center; farther north is outparcel "B", a separately owned, vacant outparcel adj acent to Boynton Lakes Plaza, zoned C-3, Community Commercial. East an existing shopping center (Boynton Lakes Plaza), zoned C-3, Community Commercial. south - Plaza Lane, a City right-of-way; farther south is undeveloped residential land zoned PUD, Boynton Lakes. West Congress Avenue, a county right-of-way; farther west is Meadows Plaza, an existing shopping center, zoned C-3, community Commercial. STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES: Section 11.2.D of the Zoning Code contains the following standards to which conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning Department's evaluation of the application as it pertains to the standards; The Planning and Development Board and City commission shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provision has been made concerning the following standards, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. A cross access agreement between the owners of the shopping center and outparcel "A" will allow access to the proposed use. No changes are proposed to the location, shape or size of the existing shopping center ingress/egresses. Additional signage proposed for the subject site will be provided to help direct the increased traffic flow generated by the restaurant. The closest ingress/egresses to the subject site are the major driveway entrance on Congress Avenue and the access aisle at the Plaza Lane driveway. The Planning and Zoning Department is recommending that the proposed outparcel ingress/egress near the access aisle at the Plaza Lane driveway be closed. The reason for this is twofold. First, this outparcel ingress/egress is within 25 feet of the shopping center driveway off of Plaza Lane. This driveway is heavily used and there have been problems with cars, as well as delivery trucks, parking and blocking one of the traffic lanes along the west side of Walgreens, creating a bottleneck. Also, it is anticipated that cars may back up into Plaza Lane, waiting to turn left into this outparcel entrance, due to the limited stacking area. Therefore, it is believed that this outparcel ingress/egress would worsen the current situation, since of the two outparcel entrances proposed, it would be the one most used. 2- TO: Planning and Development Board -3- September 9, 1994 second, a "hairpin" turn has been designed at the south side of the drive-through lane entrance. A vehicle entering the outparcel at this entrance would not be able to enter the drive-through lane from the south without making several maneuvers which would block oncoming parking lot traffic. The outparcel entrance proposed on the north side of the outparcel near Congress Avenue provides adequate and and encourages safer traffic flow to the restaurant parking lot and drive- through. This recommendation will necessitate relocation of the dumpster to the southwest corner of the outparcel, which has been accepted by the Public works Department. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection I above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. A cross parking agreement between the shopping center and two of the three outparcels (the Cuco1s outparcel is leased) known as outparcel "A" and "B" of Boynton Lakes Plaza was established to allow the project to be developed and function by sharing parking spaces. The parking spaces provided for the overall project and a previously approved variance for 27 parking spaces will support the proposed shopping center uses. However, the actual total number of parking spaces required for the overall project, which includes the shopping center site, cuco's restaurant, and outparcels "A" and "B", will not be realized until outparcel liB" is developed. The total gross leasable floor area for the project, including the shopping center building, Cuco I s restaurant, the proposed drive-through restaurant, excluding the vacant outparcel "B", is 132,249 square feet. This figure requires 662 parking spaces based on the shopping center parking ratio of 1 space for each 200 square feet of gross leasable floor area. A total of 668 parking spaces are proposed for the overall proj ect. This total does not consider the variance (Case #190) that allowed a reduction of 27 required spaces. The subject outparcel has 55 existing parking spaces that will adequately support the proposed restaurant. The restaurant building is required to have 15 parking spaces. The applicant has requested a variance from the Board of Adjustment to eliminate the requirement for a loading zone in order to retain existing parking spaces. Provision of a loading zone decreases the amount of parking spaces available to the overall project by only four (4) spaces. Compliance wi th Planning and Zoning Department comment #6 will also reduce the number of parking spaces for the overall project. 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above. The dumpster location has been approved by public works and the enclosure meets all code requirements. As previously mentioned in item #1 above, due to the recommendation to close the outparcel entrance near Plaza Lane, the dumpster will need to be relocated to the southwest corner of the outparcel. Public Works has accepted this revised location. 4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. The proposed project meets all code requirements with respect to availability and location of utilities. 3 TO: Planning and Development Board -4- September 9, 1994 5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character. The applicant will provide landscape materials adequate to meet all code requirements. An existing six (6) feet high si te wall borders the south property line of the subject property. 6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. The signage complies with the shopping center sign program and will be permitted consistent with the requirements of the sign code. The exterior lighting around the top of the new building is neon. The existing shopping center does not have neon lighting around the top of the building and the shopping center and outparcel building located to the west across Congress Avenue do not have neon lighting around the top of the buildings. The only ornamental lighting in the vicinity are the christmas lights located on the exterior of the Cuco1s restaurant. A recommendation by the planning and Zoning Department to omit the neon lighting is included in the attached comments. 7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. All required setbacks are in compliance with the C-3 zoning district building and site regulations. 8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other property in the zoning district. The restaurant has modified their standard franchise architectural features to meet the requirements of the mediterranean spanish design district in which they are located. The applicant feels that their color motif must be incorporated for their customers to readily recognize their building, particularly since the colors meet the design district requirements. A recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Department to match the shopping center colors is identified in the attached comments. 9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The building height is eighteen (18) feet, which is lower than the main shopping center building. 10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The restaurant will most likely attract additional people to the shopping center and a positive economic benefit should accrue to the center and the city. 11. conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the Ci ty of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. [Part III Land Development Regulations Chapter 4] Permit drawing compliance with the attached staff comments will provide conformance to site plan standards and requirements. 4 TO: Planning and Development Board -5- September 9, 1994 12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance standards section 4 of the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Noise control Ordinance. Compliance with performance standards section 4 is anticipated and no additional nuisance or noise would be generated by the proposed use in comparison with the remainder of the shopping center. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED MEMORANDUMS # Public works utilities Fire Police Engineering Building Parks and Recreation Forester planning and Zoning N/A 94-277 & 94-252 N/A N/A N/A 94-197 N/A N/A Memo Dated 09/02/94 The utilities, Building and Planning and Zoning Department comments may all be addressed at permit time. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this condi tional use request, subj ect to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. a:cond-use.mia s CO"-lGRE"55 AVENUE ~ ~ rn ~ : ~ ~ I'~ ! I ~ (; "'f'SnN4 ~ 0 - 00 00 . $1 - J Iii ! I i I -~(- OO~' ~ '=F\ -1-:1 =F =l=J-=t= I ! * 1 i ( I s: :..)-~o - c::==J oM - 00 00 ,,0 v-o ~ 2: \:>0::1:. ~ '::'0 .a =..... t====:>..... 00 - o o PISTUU~ ~"'c c .,1 u I~ t~ :I n 1 I , ~i ~~ tz. ;0 . ~~ x ;;; : ~ J ~ \J <=:) oil ql)) ~ ~ . ~ ~ov""TOI,rLAKES e.LVD ~ ~ t - ~ r ~ ~ ~ c; lj\ ~ , ~ (1 .II. ~! ~I ~I ~r . I ~, i11 . ! .- ~ ~ . ,"I~,"I S,iUI3S fS~ILL 000 AMERICAH ARCHITRAVE IHTERHATlOHAL _n_ ""_Int_~"""'" _..II.. _.....nt. ._ 47770 NORTHCONGAESS AVENUE. 14".......... ... .,............... OM 1. C40'1 .......,.. ----_..- - ____1IlUD ~..........-_.._"'...._" LANTANP" FLORID~6~..,.Q" ~F-A''''' 1...._______ _,..... ............---.-----..........."......... _____.......a-......,.~ c.u. ..-..............- ,_.0 ...."...... -...... ...... ......... ............---. =-.::-====':"~-:-:~~~, ......................-..-... ..--,.- :::::=..:.,:=:--u..-.ou ___...:... _____....~_"'.....~__'#It.......'1 ---.--._......_1_...., .,~,.,... .........a.u.a.u. u,.... ...........ftINI,........,M.,_te"II'ft..""'".. .. h - \- .... 0: I T- .... ~~ H .tk ~ U 1\ II ~'\ IPI H ~. d . . . 1/ . i m~ gll\ ~ 11'1"', \ .. &~ ~4 ~l ~ ~ !!" ~ II ~i~~ ~t ~ :! =~L ~ ~ '\ ~ ~ n~l ~~ ~\'.\1: P H~ . I \I l.~ ~ll l · 11 ", ~ ~l ~ ll~ it i li ~ i;~~ !II {~ f'i ~ ~ ~.. " l r .. " ,.lJ <t. 1 2 \ ' Q '\ r ;;- ~~ t \ - .... l"~ 1 nit ~ ~ r' ~~~ Met>.t;:C'V Sc><Uu.r.E: elC?p1l-lCo CTI2l & I ""*'..~S .vEHUE <t H n r :- I I 2/>1 \ I I o \~ g -{ ~ ~;~~t 1 ~~",js .13 ~ \At~i~ -~ . r ~~~ :t !f \ ~ ~. >/-. i1I t- I \fl \\ ~J \ 1;; ~ :<-t 'I ~ lr-~tlll h 11 i~i; .. ( au ~ Wt)1l l\i~ ~~ l~ ~ ~~ till ,6- ~ I~ t ~ iih ~I ii . t ~.r- i- I ~I I . !5 ~ l~!i t~ 1;...... I il 6i!! ~". ... l' l!><>y'fJToN lJ>,I<.es PL"Z""' 11 . .~ , ~ ~ ~ .. ", ~l ~! ~l ~, t'I Ih ...... :a . I ~ ~ .. 7 MEMORANDUM Utilities #94-277 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: JohnA. Guidry, ~ /fr',-:r;i<' Director of Utilities DATE: August 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Miami Subs - Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following c.ornments: The Utilities Department offers no additional comments at this time. This Department will review the plans for this project again at the time of Building Department Permit Application for compliance with all City Codes and Ordinances. It is our recommendation that the request proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. 19b xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella /!!Y' File Alll~ ) 3 Iq0~ ~ PLANNING ANtD NlNG DEP ~ MEMORANDUM Utilities #94-252 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zon' DATE: July 29, 1994 FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities SUBJECT: Miami Subs Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments: I. Show proposed location of water meter and backflow prp.ventor on Sheet A -I, (Sec. 26-16( c) and Sec. 26-107). 2. Show proposed location for grease trap. Drive-through fJ"ea should be avoided for access and maintenance safety. 3. Dumpster is shown QIl irrigation pump pad and/or well. Relocation of one to be considered. 4. Oak trees are not acceptable in utility easements. Relocate or change to palm trees off set from water main, (Sec. 7.5-18.1). It is our recommendation that the plan proeeed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. /gb xc: ill ^U6 . 2 ~~4 Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella ~ File PlANNING AND ONING DEPt q BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-197 August 23, 1994 TO: Tambri Heyden Planning Di ector THRU: Don Jaege Building FROM: Al Newbol Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMENTS - SITE PLAN REVIEW 2ND REVIEW/CONDITIONAL USE MIAMI SUBS - 4742 N. CONGRESS AVENUE The Building Department has reviewed the amended site plan and the attached documents and offers the following comments: 1. Section 4.3 of the State Handicapped Code requires an accessibility route from the street right-of-way or public sidewalk to the entrance of the building. This requirement has not been met. 2. All signs must be in compliance with the Boynton Beach Sign Code. The menu board can not exceed 25 square feet and must be constructed no more than five feet above ground level. Directional signs are limited to four per lot. The maximum allowable square footage for wall signs is 111 square feet. Since the above comments can be addressed at time of building permit submittal, we recommend that the plans be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board. AN : bh ~ ~ A~'O ~.. ~ i:9A~ ~ SUB III MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator DATE: september 2, 1994 RE: site Plan Review 2nd Review Conditional Use Approval/Site pIan Review Project: Miami Subs Grill Location: 4742 No. congress Ave at Boynton Lakes Plaza Agent: David Daszkal File No: COUS 94-004 The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories: The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not subEtantially alter the configuration of the site and the design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and wor]~ing drawings submitted to the Building Departrrent for permits for the proposed project. These comments will result from the review for technical compliance with the city code of ordinances. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. On the site plan drawing dimension the location of the free standing sign from the adjacent property line. Note that ten (10) feet is the minimum setback allowed. 2. If the l~ndscaping located on the adjacent property along the north property line of the subject property is proposed to satisfy the vehicle use area visual barrier requirements of the subject property, note same on the plans. The note shall include the following statement: If the existing hedge does not comply \'1i th the minimum standards for vehicle use area screening/visual barrier ( the required barrier shall be placed on the subject property. 3. On the elevation vie",' drawings identify the name of the manuf ac turer and manufacturer's number for the follovving e~:terior materials and color of same: tiles, vinyl a\^mings, barrel tile, wall signs, site signs and automatic air curtain units. 4. Prior to receiving permits to construct the building, submit a legible copy of the corrected, City approved and recorded "Der:laration of Restrictions and Grant of Easements" for the Boynton Lakes Plaza and Miami Subs property. /1 page 2 2nd review Miami Subs ceDS 94-004 5. Identify the correct address on the plans. 6. show and dimension on the site plan drawings, sheet C-1 and A- I, a distance of no less than eighteen (18) feet from the east side of the intersection of the ingress aisle leading to the diagonal parking spaces and the access aisle south of the building to the south edge of the first diagonal parking space. 7. On the site plan drawing, sheet C-1, ensure that the following site data is listed, shown and labeled: Gross Leasable Building Area (Boynton Lakes Plaza) Outparcel #1 Floor Area (Miami Subs Grill) outparcel #2 Vacant - maximum assigned floor area eutparcel #3 Floor Area (Cuco's rest. - leased site on Boynton Lakes Plaza property) Total leasable area including outparcels 123,432 sq. ft. 2,934 sq. ft. 6,751 sq. ft. 5,883 sq. ft. 139,000 sq. ft. area (1:200) 695 of Adjustment - 27 Total parking required Based on square footage of leasable Reduction in parking spaces - Board Case #190 approved Total parking required (including 14 handicapped spaces) 668 Total parking provided (including 15 handicapped spaces) 668 8. Hodi fy the site pI an drawing to depict a loading zone in compliance with code specifications or receive approval of a variance from the Board of Adjustment to omit the required loading zone. II. RECOMMENDATION(S}: 1. To remain compatible with the exterior color scheme of the existing main shopping center building, a condition attached to the original shopping center approval, it is recommended that the color of the exterior walls proposed for the new restaurant be changed from white to a color that will match the color of the lower portion of the wall at the west side of the Walgreens tenant space. The following changes are also recommendations that would bring the new building into harm0ny with the colors of the existing main shopping center building: a. Omit the color pink and aqua from the top raised band and replace with the color displayed along the top of the walls of the existing main building of the shopping center. b. Omit the pink and aqua architectural lighting. c. Omit the .:enter band of pink and aqua tile. d. change the color of the wall tile located below the windows to a color that will match the new wall color (matching the existing main building of the shopping center} e. Specify on the plan that the spanish barrel tile roof material will match the color of the roof tile on the main building of the existing shopping center. /2 Page 3 2nd review Miami Subs caus 94-004 f. Specify on the plans that the color of the storefront windows and door frames will match the color of the storefronts located on the main shopping center building. g. Where a wall sign has a stucco finish background, modify the color to match the recommended new color of the walls of the building. Note: The color of the back-lit awnings and the color of other features and/or treatments will be reviewed by the Planning and Development Board and city Commission. 2. omit the neon from the free standing sign. Also, change the color of the blue and pink border and sign background to the colors that match the exterior walls of the main building of the shopping center as described above in recommendation 1 and la. 3. Close the outparcel entrance near Plaza Lane and relocate dumpster and enclosure to the southwest corner of the parking lot near the irrigation pad. Also, modify the turning radius at the ingress to the one-way access aisle to accommodate the turning radius of the City sanitation vehicles. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, incorporate them into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH/jj !i:Gprev2r:d.mili )3 ~ ' __ ~ ,_ ~.." ,." ~i\=i\ ':i '1; ~ f =- r ~~ ~.::>.-"'.~...... F\ill~i i t:m1 ::;~ 1 c: ~ C ',,"," -: ir ~ "5?-' :~ ;. . ..,e \: ."'-'-:,;. : ~ l.m1.<-=- pUO ..IC 1/ ~. ~ -- Fi .~~,.."'~ E \-U'- t/ ~ rf:~t(----'" .ft.=.'" ~"<i~ ~, '.J ! f\ -~ ~1 '~:[f' ,.... ]J.~.r':'~0;..' ~ >-J I ''', 6.0 ' \,^ -= -;;;, "'~ '17 ~.-..<".,. ,'i"ll! ~' r \ \ .. , -- , ,f' tI ....-iJ? 'I \~"'::?";j ,$~~;'\1" - ~:S ~:~~~ J;~i~J~';~l(r) 1i\7..~.p'J).","C .l-li' (G'~~ = r.' .h. ... II~'J ',', t'l _ 1- ""./ ' ,L"~" , . ~.... .. ~:::?! ~)" ~" ;: if' .-,.....-: \'.' ." ~ !dJ'fJ '" ~ ~ . \~ -:::-- J ;:._ ",I ~.. : J' \" 111 . riJi3 ,~ tiEI"'::::-- 1~it'D :.. :/ >.,,~. .. ~ ~,- .::\ -e\B ~ FI ~ ff 'Ji,;\,~. J ~ '1:. ...: :/":; ,Iii:: ,. ,,'In r ", ~ !!!!J ~ ~. .. 7'~' \ ',,\. ~ ~, ~ ~,~ .,' ., _' .,,;;;;., "".-l"'Il' - s;iio ~ ....' .1.... 'n 1~.. ~. " ,,,'iT lIU' II 1~.1" "'-/1 ......... o:=!:'t1 . '1: C t:I 0'" 'n ~ t":';- "1--' .. T'----\ \~ Cf'J~ ,< ~,g, ,,~d' I. -~ d'rp~ '_')" 'c['l' ,,)..r _ _ '^.~ ~J" .J ,'~ If' . f:. ?jt ~~ 'i M:i U' ,.; ~/t ft". ~ ~o ... ~;;; .J', "", fC' ",en irr :JI:: ,. ," IE ~ _ , I tlll!!" ' ,0/ "','" - , =,-," !-= ~ ~ _. co : . ~ u_ ,,- ;-5" , " .: r. " cr . g?, W ';::;: .... ..~~ .' :>~' ',~ I:rU ~ \~: :"" ~ f~ ~, 1 _ . ~\\ ~\ "~fiitJ=~._j ~ ,C E!ltJl'~"" till: " S..:'"' '-' r > '- . .. \17 ''i''' H: l "'" rd " H 7 cor':' "~'.-i' 7 ::: -<1 HI:1j,.o~ lIVl ~, \ ~..-,-~. " )." ''!1ifj f ~:\ \\i ;-~'........: 1.~.v' ~:-; ~\-~ .:;,.---,.".::.@\\ ~~,)e-; "p- '" iT m\\\~ "". F' , '--<::: '<;;i. :: ~ \I (l./j 7 c::,"" t II::g l~, ~A1"m~~~~~ lilro2\ [rIil;;~(Jt1r' .--!~ · J~.F ~ " 'Ii' "-7fili : "'- r-" T -', r --\ ' ~ ",! ' '" ~ 1 \ ;::::: \ "'''' lJ./l,! :=:: _ '1' r\ ;.-_ r \ \\ ,=,.~ C' '1if"",,,' ~ ...-, ~-" - "" _. " , ..... ,_A . =--4J I , ..... '.-< \/' ,," __ C," ,-~. ="'==-- ~ ' ,-~~~if~1 :;1 - -u.1 ~c'i\ ~ ~\&B t-t.-: "-/~- .- Cj 1 ~~\" ~JG'J'-, l!) -0~ t::,~ I: \ \ "~fj^,-~r~P0 \'e:'-N ,C - ~ .'-_..-\~ \ ~l"ill~ p~ 7:/ \ ':J!J/J ~--.. ~ r ~ t : \ .~ "" Iti'm'::== \..~ , . ;;a.~1,.I [( I n ~ I, " ~ ~ , "'~ I r-. ~\I1\'A;:: A ~ ...., 1\\ ...."",l /J 1. ::1 ' ' ' "'" \l-g~ .~ ~ 'I,,, iiF'~ ~ ~ / . 'i i)' ~ ~~~ ..""e\..::-~ ,f"""77 '~~~\',;jr.. . - ,.'..... ':'>~' t:: :" t::: ~\....-'l ~, ~" ?'. 1-:: · .. ., \'=' '~ ~ __ ~ r."\~ E:.---J (:! ""; ~ " ,\-7'" ' ' D- > : ..IV --1 ,: ~I) ;:::: r}\ V.... VfjJ_;:: ~ : it i I , . , .;::.1. L"'.-W...---- ,_........-- '0 400 800 fE.EI r-J~-c-:J:~ ~Q / ,\ cf4j!J ,...=>>I '\ ~\r. LOC~,.\ON M~P M\~M\ SueS GR\LL .... .... , ~ . ' ., .~ r'" ~' ~, .... ... ' ,~ . "'\ 'lo" ~ ~...\ ., , ~ .~. , ~,. ~ . "~::~ '.' F' #\ J' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-142 FROM: Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Board Tambri J. Heyden ~CL,Ji ,~ Planning and Zoning Directo{ - ~ Michael E. Haa:q- r~ Planning and ZOn~Administrator April 7, 1995 TO: THRU: DATE: SUBJEC'l': Miami Subs (1920 South Federal Highway) Community Design Plan Appeal - exterior lighting File No. CDPA 95-003 NATURE OF REQUEST Joe Marouf, owner of the Miami Subs restaurant at 1920 South Federal Highway, is requesting approval of an appeal to Section 10.F.6. of the Community Design PIan (see Exhibit "A" - letter of request) . The appeal is in connection with a building permit submittal to install two (2) rows of exposed neon lighting to the painted trim at the top of the parapet waIl of the building. BACKGROUND city records indicate the existing building was built in 1979 as a Wuv's restaurant. In 1989 the City Commission approved a site plan modification which allowed renovation to the building for its present appearance. This modification was for a Mr. Submarine restaurant which changed to a Miami Subs in 1991. The building is located on the west side of Federal Highway, across from Spring House adult congregate living facility (see attached 10cation map). ANALYSIS The neon lighting proposed for the parapet wall is exposed and colored to match the existing pink and aqua painted trim; a color scheme customary of Miami Subs. The attached drawing depicts the shape of the building and the proposed location of the neon (see Exhibit "B" - proposed elevations) . Section 10.F.6. of the new community Design Plan states: "Lighting attached to the form of the exterior of the building or part of the building exterior or visible from the exterior of the building shall not be permitted if it is contrary to the architectural style of t!1e building." Until the recent adoption of the new community Design Plan, neon was not specifically addressed in either the sign code or the previous Community Design Plan. It is staff's conclusion that the proposed exposed neon lighting is contrary to the architecture of the Miami Subs building which is somewhat of a "south-of-the border" /mission style building, typically not having a modern, flashy appearance. Also, the buildings in the area do not use exposed neon to accentuate their outline. However, if the exposed neon would be limited to the three (3) irregular shaped sections of the parapet wall the neon could be acceptable. This limited use would be consistent with the location of the neon on the recently approved Miami Subs Grill, located at the northeast corner of Plaza Lane and Congress Avenue. / Page 2 Miami Subs Community Design Plan Appeal - exterior lighting File No. CDPA 95-003 Memorandum No. 95-142 RECOMMENDATION staff recommends approval of this request, subject to the limi tation of the two rows of exposed neon to the three (3) irregular shaped sections of the parapet wall. All documents shal1 be amended to comply with the final commission determination of this request. MEH:dim xc: Central File .:M1..18p...D/App..l '"'7 /---.. EXHIBIT A 3 --- "[ ---~ , ; .,'.------ ,. . , . , 1 " l ! ~' _ ~ l ----.--.~-l.. , ' I '-. J '-' : I -:I 'J ' 4/6/95 MIAMI SUBS. GRIJ. 1920 S. FEDfMY """ON 8EAQf. fL", r ; " I .' i r I " Attn: Tambri Heiden Re: Miami Sub's, City of Boynton :Beach ' 1920 S Federal Hwy. '; Pl~nhing & Zon1.nq Director Boynton Beach, F~. I.i> hd ietter is to request approval for architectural lighting J the:, .... b~r~meter of the abo~e referenced restaurant. 'f ".: '~h~~ lighting consists of two neon tubes to enhance the colors (Pihk:' top~and aqua bottom) which are painted on the top part of our ,! ;: bu~lding. t - '" ' (, Th~~ neon matches these pink & aqua colors and highlights the . . ': architecture of the building. This is an importa.nt part of the Miami. ,!, ~\lb',s th~me and a1'so is very helpful in providing additional 11ghtlng' , at .night. which is necessary due to our late night operating hours.' i: ,: ~h~~ lighting allows the public to see we are open and provides-a wel1~ ~i~{SeCUre area. . . I .' ~e~~re located in a commercial area and have no residential area which th~f lighting would affect. I Th:tk y'ou for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, \!.~~ .jIl a rt!J IA r ~ ........... 1_ 8......., IIOVNTON EACH. Pl.'" ! ~ ~ i : I i) : 1 4 ., ~U' '.F; 1:1,:: II I !.~ r U ~ - c::::: ~I J ;. ;'1 C _ ~ :,=::1' ., , I ---~ . :.0:: : : ~ II: I I! - ~-= = Ii ,.:' S ii II J1Tl ' '- ~;: II r;" :...... 1-..... ..... I: ........ . ';1 I~'~ II I ./ :!t/ I -._.. N,1 11 i F '-- I n. .'~ ......; _ , I r 1 I / [W,LL I , I r I: f- I: ' "'"" -'- i"J-':1 :.::r I I . I <J,tN I Ilj __' ~J.iilI' ;.';tu'U".i.i~I-'_"';': .~F' "'-!-I . I" WIn '. J... l ..' .. : {'r; , I IT.". . rrl r"'1 ~ .r i ". i2 ,.of,., I ( I I ' : Ii .... II ; ..,: !::ail I /I... I I I J [./ ! 'i :f J'I Ij -7 .~"I_~.;,:i ~_----, ::; =I ~ J~".I/(~'.' :.~' 7 I I I J;; ~ - -- J- ~ I L I I .! l ~ I I I 7 --, 'O.=, 'I : 'T ___ 'j,: i.C1 '.-J I I 7 /-+~I : ' W , ~~~I ;1 Ii 11 : -". - - I:' ,: :'~ / 1 I / . / ~~ I 1 I~ ..... :rt", 'I I {-. '/Ar--I-~r-~ ! j L - !i ;: ~/ n ~! : ,..~. ~1'.rEI ( .:':.~'" ;-~/:II! ....L ~- ~\j! i 0 ~ ....,. I I r i' ,'~' V' r-;J I I. 1(' I r I ~rl- : : ;" . -=;- I I I I ~.. ~~ ! L ~~_ : ;;'f' · .-' . ,~, 1. =:J' - !91~~~ JI.. r ,...._~ JJ]~. I,:.: r - '~~ j'/ - ,.1:- "-r1~T'-'-----:-I-l ~ " -- j ~ ~ - Ji ;' i - ~,,'" -. !' I ii' I 1 ~ / i! '1111 : .~,.,. r" R~ / .! ~_ l:m~ ~j u : .J}] ~c, ~/- ',":,j.,j IT: .i:.: "" ~~ - _:'~I~ WW4i~14;Pi' ~.cE L.r:. ...: . := - _ . :. E:J~~.;~'- Uj r~~: ,:i ~::j L..~,jr' 1 ,:-: ~ ',"~~ ':, I .. IiJWJI I ~ 1 -' ~2 ; I'. I ..H. .;tl. 'g" ~ /7 . ,.1.... ~ J : ' ~'-/ ,. .~ ~ ~ .... JJ~ I !J II. I f I ]11. \F' I ;\J~I I_~ - .' " ~ if~~~'~ REC .r if-:-~. u '.- III .,~" l(-,. .. ...._~_ , T I I ,:Ir>>.r.)L i /r:::::-..... :' I ~~ L. - R3-- I T Clr I Ij~d I =- :Y '')) ',: ~--~ ~ -1!liF\. I . ::: ,_- I LJ I ' '- .-' I_ I I I I 1.J . I J I I I I I I ""-' ' l/ - f-+- I I 1111:,' ,: L-~~':' j r--~; II~:' ~~. ~ I ' I~/J/ --- .I. r~.,.- Ir ,_ f I 1, ,.f . --- .I ~ 1---',- ',r;: I ~'" r'f'~ ,~i ~ , y1rrf=:j f~ '._ ~. ~ -rr[ -r7 -'- ~~',. ~ T I1t-J e:"[ ;. ~ . ~ ~ IH.~l. . . i - ~/ --,-.0 1/8 MILEsf' ~ C~J 7 I I / !i;~ r'"' I-t-. "'1111 'I' "'; ~ ~ r "'Jt-f:~iA,::.U/ . 1-'.. . . ~ 0-.. r~.i" ~:F' ;1l.,J., , :~. t=i !l 0400. 8~^,~~;,T Peer: i" -.c:J T Y - f - t:; ~aj .' .F;l." .' >r-/ - P t:- 1(' . , /".,. - ---- -~ '~ ~.:i--l1- i! :t.,,', l~ . I I I .J III "If r Ii ! I I III IIIIIDl D J I ~III m II " H I II H I II "' J-~i' "I II ~IIJiIII LI I I II H" I III f-l I III t-1 II ',1 . . , I r', B{ -..,..... .J -r- ., -f- - ~ --' f-r-.l '-.....' " I I I I I I ~ I ; ~ : I : R&{ , . , // :1 :11. j LOCATION MAP .....MIAMI. SUBS ~'Ir"'_"" & - !: ~I II! ~ I Ill, _ I '--JI-~ M: J-U -/ --'::...:.... ~ 1 . .... II 11 ~ I II II II II I II \I II ! I -- I-- . f-- -- '-. - -< '-- III II I " II I I III 1111 :1 n II II J ]: I .~:I till o PU~ I - .~ I !/t~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-262 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board 'fHRU: Tambri J. Heyden ~ Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator DATE: September 9, 1994 SUBJECT: Miami Subs Grill - COUS #94-004 Con~itional Use (drive-through) INTRODUCTION: David Daszkal, applicant, through his agent, American Architrave, Inc., is requesting conditional use approval t,:, c.:>nstruct a 2,934 square feet drive-through restaural1t on ollt.prJ.r'cel "A" of Boynton La}:es Plaza, lCJcated at the northeast con1er of Plaza Lane and Congress Avenue. The outpo.l'cel .'lab crear.ed by an exception to platting request granted by the Planning and Development Board on September- 14, 1993. The site _'las developed as part of the shopping center and the following improvements exist on the vacant site : utilities, drainage, landscaping/irrigation, parking spaces, access aisles and a vacant bUilding pad. The site does not bave direct access to the abutting rights-of-way and a cross access/cross parking agreement between out~parcel "A" and the shopping center \folaS a condition of the E~zception to platting approval. The building pad will remain unchanged except for a portion of the south end and east side which will become part of the proposed drive-through lane. The parking spaces located east of the pad will be reconfigured to accommodate the ~roposed drive-through lane. The reconfigured spaces, which will become diagonal with a one-way access, reduced the existing s~~ces for the overall project by four (4) spaces from 672 to 668. A Board of Adjustment variance for eliminating a loading zone has been requested and is being processed and considered separately by the Board of Adjustment on September 19, 1994. PROJECT DATA: (See attached drawing) Project Name: Miami Subs Grill Location: Northeast corner of Plaza Lane and Congress Avenue File No.: COUS 94-004 Land Use plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Zoning District: Community Commercial (C-3) Type of Use: Restaurant with drive-through Number of Units: NIA square Footage: Building: 2,934 square feet site: 31,051 square feet (.713 acres) SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING (see attached location map): Th,::: subj ect outparcel and Boynton Lakes Plaza are located in the C- :~, Community Commer'cial, zoning district. The following is a description of the land uses and zoning districts of the properties tL It 3but ,)utparcel "A": I TO: Planning and Development Board -')- September 9, 1994 NCJl'tll - an existing major driveway entrance leading to the Eoynton Lakes shopping center; farther north is outparcel ItBII, a separately owned, vacant outparcel adjacent to Boynton Lakes Plaza, zoned C-3, Community Commercial. East an existing shopping center (BoynLon Lakes Plaza), zoned C-3, Community Commercial. south - Plaza Lane, a city right-of-way; farther south is undeveloped residential land zoned PUD, Boynton Lakes. West Congress Avenue, a County right-of-way; farther west is Meadows Plaza, an existing shopping center, zoned C-3, Community Commercial. STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES: Section 11.2.D of the Z0ninq Code contains the following standards to which conditional m:es are required to conform. Following each of th:?se s'tandards is the Plallnlng and Zoning Department's evaluation of the application as it pertains to the standards; The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony wi th the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an appllcation for conditional use, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory prOVision has been made concerning the following standards, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastl'ophe. A cross access agreement between the owners of the shopping center and outparcel IIAIt will allow access to the proposed use. No changes are proposed to the location, shape or size of the existing shopping center ingress/egresses. Additional signage proposed for the subject site will be provided to help direct the increased traffic flow generated by the restaurant. The closest ingress/egresses to the subject site are the major driveway entrance on Congress Avenue and the access aisle at the Plaza Lane driveway. The Planning and Zoning Department is recommending that the proposed outparcel ingress/egress near the access aisle at the Plaza Lane driveway be closed. The reason for this is twofold. First, this outparcel ingress/egress is within 25 feet of the shopping center driveway off of Plaza Lane. This driveway is heaVily used and there have been problems with cars, as well as delivery trucks, parking and blocking one of the traffic lanes along the west side of Walgreens, creating a bottleneck. Also, it is anticipated that cars may back up into Plaza Lane, waiting to turn left into this outparcel entrance, due to the limited stacking area. Therefore, it is believed that this outparcel ingress/egress would worsen the :urrent situation, since of the two outparcel entTances i)::cr~of.;ed . it '.lculc' bE~ the ':,ne mest tu:(:d. 2- TO: planning and Development Board -3- September 9, 1994 second, a "hairpin" turn has been designed at the south side of the drive-through lane entrance. A vehicle entering the outparcel at this entrance would not be able to enter the dl-i ve-through lane from the south without making sevel-al maneuver3 which would block oncoming parking lot traffic. The outparcel entrance proposed on the north side of the outparcel near Congress Avenue provides adequate and and encourages safer traffic flow to the restaurant parking lot and drive- through. This recommendation will necessitate relocation of the dumpster to the southwest corner of the outparcel, which has been accepted by the Public Works Department. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection 1 above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. A cross parking agreement between the shopping center and two of the three outparcels (the Cuco's outparcel is leased) known as outparcel "A" .3.nd "E" of Boynr.or1 Lakes Plaza ~,/as established to allow the project to be developed and function by sharing parking spaces. The parking spaces provided for the overall project and a previously approved variance for 27 parking spaces will support the proposed shopping center uses. However, the actual total number of parking spaces required for the overall project, which includes the shopping center site, cuco's restaurant, and outparcels "A" and "B", will not be realized until outparcel "B" is developed. The total gross leasable floor area for the project, including the shopping center building, cuco IS restaul-ant, the proposed drive-through restaurant, e~~cluding the vacant outparcel liB", is 132,249 square feet. This figure reqUires 662 parking spaces based on the shopping center parking ratio of 1 space for each 200 square fE:et of gross leasable floor area. A total of 668 parking spaces are proposed for the overall proj ect. This total does not consider the variance (Case #190) that allowed a reduction of 27 required spaces. The subject outparcel has 55 existing parking spaces that will adequately support the proposed restaurant. The restaurant building is required to have 15 parking spaces. The applicant has requested a variance from the Board of Adjustment to eliminate the requirement for a loading zone in order to retain existing parking spaces. Provision of a loading zone decreases the amount of parking spaces available to the overall project by only four (4) spaces. Compliance with Planning and Zoning Department comment #6 will also reduce the number of parking spaces for the overall project. 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection I and 2 above. The dumpster location has been approved by public works and the enclosure meets all code requirements. As previously mentioned in item #1 above, due to the recommendation to close the outparcel entrance near Plaza Laner the dumpster will need to be relocated to the southwest corner of the outparcel. Public Works has accepted this revised location. 4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. The proposed project meets all code requirements with respect to availability and location of utilities. -~ TO: Planning and Development Board -4- September 9, 1994 t.: --' . Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character. The applicant will provide landscape materials adequate to meet all code requirements. An existing six (6) feet high site \^lall borders the south property line of the subject property. 6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. The signage complies with the shopping center sign program and will be permitted consistent with the requirements of the sign code. The exterior lighting around the top of the new building is neon. The existing shopping center does not have neon lighting around the top of the building and the shopping center and outparcel building located to the west across congress Avenue do not have neon lighting around the top of the bUildings. The only ornamental lighting in the vicillity are the christmas lights located on the exterior of the Cucols restaurant. A recommendation by the planning and Zoning Department to omit the neon 1 ighting is included in the attached comments. 7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. All required setbacks are in compliance with the C-3 zoning district building and site regulations. 3. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other property in the zoning district. The restaurant has modified their standard franchise architectural features to meet the requirements of the mediterranean spanish design district in which they are located. The applicant feels that their color motif must be incorporated for their customers to readily recognize their building, particularly since the colors meet the design district requirements. A recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Department to match the shopping center colors is identified in the attached comments. 9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The bUilding height is eighteen (18) feet, which is lower than the main shopping center building. 10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The restaurant will most likely attract additional people to the shopping center and a positive economic benefit should accrue to the center and the city. 11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the ci ty of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. [Part III Land Development Regulations Chapter 4] Permit drawing compliance with the attached staff comments will provide conformance to site plan standards and requirements. /1- TO: Planning and Development Board -5- September 9, 1994 12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance standards section 4 of the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Noise contr~l Ordinance. Compliance with performance standards section 4 is anticipated and no additional nuisance or noise would be generated by the proposed use in comparison with the remainder of the shopping center. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED MEMORANDUMS # Public works Utilities Fire Police Engineering Building Parks and Recreation E')rester Planning and Zoning N/A 94-277 & 94-252 N/A N/A N/A 94-197 N/A N/A Memo Dated 09/02/94 The Utilities, Building and Planning and Zoning Department comments may all be addressed at permit time. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Department recommends approval of this conditional use request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. !:I;C"Jlld-t.l6-3.mia t::~ - ) I C Ol-lGRES5 AVENU~ l.rsn"'4 ~ ;;;:J ~l- - <>~ 00 00 00 . 'I ~.~\ " ~ 1~ 00 l I Ii ' -r- ' I ,. ;t; ~l:i= I ~ -< ~ I ! 00 r- c II ~ yO ~I i l ~' r- ~I I~' I r- m , V~z.2:V~z.I~';:;O I ' :, ~ x. :..)-~o .a ===' _ =:::=:l- 00 - c::::= AI - C .J ~ 0 PISTIN~ ~.\[~ C 1 1:- c::) ) oil .~ 0)0 0 n I~ 1 t H: ~ I . . ~<J l~ , 111 ~' \ , "-.-' ~I Ilt .~ ~ en ~ : ~ t "tL1 . I ~ Oil .at ~ , ~ _~OVt-lTC""L"KES I!.LVD ~ ~ ~ '1i1 i' ~ ~ , l Cl Jl [I ~! ~I I :r ~I I ~ I I-l ~ ~ . ; MIAMI ~U~S e3~ILL @@O AMERICAH ARCHlmAVE IHTERHATlOttAL ...bl...... ,1__ ..._ ~.......... _otroc"", .....n...' ,_ 47770 NOATH CONGRESS AVENUE. un.......... .....lDt. .....-. ...... CISII 1.r. 1.&0"11.....1&' ~-- - --....~....-..~ ~ML....__..~'II...._'I lANTANE. FlORID~6t'...,..c.,_ ..._....~...r-I I._ML NK.....____.._.._.. ...._"'...""a1 ____.-..JIt'I_......,___ """.................._.......,.at (1Il.........0JUI ,.,,, .,.. c.u ......... .."..........., ____".__.._~______n ;:A''''' ~~=--:::'MO:::':-: :::=.~~.'=-..::::-::.:."r::.':::u-~~~:~: 1111.'.............., MI.InrIn'I........,...........,_..... .,~",., l_dLMWU ..~.. ......, ""~"'_"'~""'_","_""""",,', -- h " 0: = I ~ ~I h "a ~ .. . ~ ~ ~ 1'& !~ a 3. ~~... t' ~ l" F i at ! r ~" It ~" a "b t \ III I ~~ n ~ u i~\ { ~ , i 1\'11 5 1 MeADC'V sc;;UAPoE eMCpplNC, CTF> a~ ~= d . . . 1\; mm~ !. ~~iht 1\: II ~ ~ ~ i i Ii h r . \ ! U~l l i~a., ,~al I \" ~ I .;;; ~~ . t.... t ~Zt .... ~~l I ..........."55 AVEHUE - ~ ~l:i! . -[ ii!l~ !;!..I ~- . ~ ? '-- Ip~~ ~ ~ CJJ I r~r\~ ~a f ~/" lH Jt ~ ~ I l~,,~ ~ ~ I"d J '. ~ ~ t ;1 ~ . ~ g \~ -{ ',," 1. ~;~1t ~ ~ ~~Oi:;;~ ill tE~a~ -~ ~ It ~~ .q 111 IfI HI I "\l C .r I I ~ :<.t I UI lHl'<1l~ I i r~ i~H .. ( iti~ ~~ ~l!I ~i \~I ,G, ~ J I t ~h ,I It Jun fl l I ~i. I ~l I ld ~r iijl I f~ t 1;.... II d~! it ii{~ ..., .. ...~ .1; c4 l' 1!oC>'y'IJTot,j LAl'>15S F\..~z;A 'I ~~~~ t, ~ IIll .~ , A ~ )- .. ". ~I ~! ~I k-I 1'1 lh ~. ~ jooooL :0 . J & t MI4.MI SUES C3~ILL 47770 NOATH CONGRESS AVENUE LANTANA, FLOAIDB---~.~2 A... r""''''''' ___---:.'::.-::.~-: CK~ y ~~.. 7 MEMORANDUM Utilities #94-277 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, ~ ~,1l<' Director of Utilities DATE: August 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Miami Subs - Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments: The Utilities Department offers no additional comments at this time. This Department will review the plans for this project again at the time of Building Department Permit Application for compliance with all City Codes and Ordinances. It is our recommendation that the request proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. .--- 19b xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella /!!y File ~ Alll~ ) 3 Iqo1 ~~ PLANNINGEAp"TD NING \) . "P MEMORANDUM Utilities #94-252 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden Planning & Zon' FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: July 29, 1994 SUBJECT: Miami Subs Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. Show proposed location of water meter and backflow pr~ventor on Sheet A-I, (Sec. 26-16( c) and Sec. 26-107). 2. Show proposed location for grease trap. Drive-through ,.rea should be avoided for access and maintenance safety. 3. Dumpster is shown QI1 irrigation pump pad and/or well. Relocation of one to be considered. 4. Oak trees are not acceptable in utility easements. Relocate or change to palm trees offset from water main, (Sec. 7.5-18.1). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella r File m 19b xc: AUG . 2 ~l9~ J; ',~ P' ~ ' " tp PlANNING AND ZONING DEPt q BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-197 August 23, 1994 TO: Tambri Heyden Planning Di ector FROM: Al Newbol Deputy Building Official THRU: Don Jaege Building RE: TRe COMMENTS - SITE PLAN REVIEW 2ND REVIEW/CONDITIONAL USE MIAMI SUBS - 4742 N. CONGRESS AVENUE The Building Department has reviewed the amended site plan and the attached documents and offers the following comments: 1. Section 4.3 of the State Handicapped Code requires an accessibility route from the street right-of-way or public sidewalk to the entrance of the building. This requirement has not been met. 2. All signs must be in compliance with the Boynton Beach Sign Code. The menu board can not exceed 25 square feet and must be constructed no more than five feet above ground level. Directional signs are limited to four per lot. The maximum allowable square footage for wall signs is 111 square feet. Since the above comments can be addressed at time of building permit submittal, we recommend that the plans be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board. AN: bh ~ m ~~,om ~ ,:9Am ~ SUB 10 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director Michael E. Haag zoning and Site Development Administrator September 2, 1994 site Plan Review 2nd Review Conditional Use Approval/Site Plan Review Miami subs Grill 4742 No. Congress Ave at Boynton Lakes Plaza David Daszkal COUS 94-004 Project: Location: Agent: File No: The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories: The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not sub::-tantially alter the conf iguration of the site and the design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the request is approved. The applicant must understand that additicnal comments may be generated upon review of the documentE and v-lor]"ing drawings submitted to the Building Departrrent for permits for the proposed project. These comments will reslllt from the review for technical compliance with the city code of ordinances. 1. 1. ') .... . 3 . 4 . SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMEN'rs: On the site pI an dra\Aling dimension the loc a tion of the free st~nding sign from the adjacent property line. Note that ten (10) feet is the minimum setback allowed. If the l~ndscaping located on the adjacent property along the ncrth prcperty line of the subject property is proposed to satisfy the vehicle use area visual barrier requirements of the subject. property, not.e same on the plans. The note s11all include the following statement: If the existing hedge does not comply vii th the minimum standards for vehicle use area screening/visual barrier r the required barrier shall be placed on the subject property. On the elevation vieh' drawings identify the name of the manufacturer and manufacturer's number for the follm"ling e~~terior materials and color of same: tiles f vinyl av-mings, barrel tile, wall signs, site signs and automatic air curtain units. Prior to receiving permits to construct the building, submit a legible copy of the corrected, City approved and recor~ed "De.:laration of Restrictions and Grant of .Sasements" for the Boynton Lakes Plaza and Miami Subs property. /1 page 2 2nd review Miami Subs caus 94-004 5. Identify the correct address on the plans. 6. show and dimension on the site plan drawings, sheet C-1 and A- 1, a distance of no less than eighteen (18) feet from the east side of the intersection of the ingress aisle leading to the diagonal parking spaces and the access aisle south of the building to the south edge of the first diagonal parking space. 7. On the site plan drawing, sheet C-l, ensure that the following site data is listed, shown and labeled: Gross Leasable Building Area (Boynton Lakes Plaza) outparcel #1 Floor Area (Miami subs Grill) Outparcel #2 Vacant - maximum assigned floor area Outparcel #3 Floor Area (Cuco's rest. - leased site on Boynton Lakes Plaza property) Total leasable area including outparcels 123,432 sq. ft. 2,934 sq. ft. 6,751 sq. ft. 5,883 sq. ft. 139,000 sq. ft. area (1:200) 695 of Adjustment - 27 Total parking required Based on square footage of leasable Reduction in parking spaces - Board Case #190 approved Total parking required (including 14 handicapped spaces) 668 Total parking provided (including 15 handicapped spaces) 668 8. 110di fy the site pi an dra\'-7ing to depict a loading zone in compliance with code specifications or receive approval of a variance from the Board of Adjustment to omit the required loading 20ne. II. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. To rgmain compatible with the exterior color scheme of the existing main shopping center building, a condition attached to the original shopping center approval, it is recommended tlnt the color cf the exterior walls proposed for the nE'W restaurant be changed from Hhite to a color that will match the color of the lower portion cf the wall at the west side of the Walgreens tenant space. The following changes are also recommendations that would bring the ne\'1 building into harmony with the colors of the existing main shopping center building: a. Omit the color pink and aqua from the top raised band and replace with the color displayed along the top of the walls of the existing main building of the shopping center. b. Omit the pink and aqua architectural lighting. c. Omit the center band of pink and aqua tile. d. Change the color of the wall tile located below the windows to a color that will match the new wall color (matching the existing main building of the s 11 0 pp in g center) e. Specify on the plan that the spanish barrel tile roof material will match the color of the roof tile on the main building of the existing shopping center. /2 Page 3 2nd review Miami Subs CaDS 94-004 f. Specify on the plans that the color of the storefront windows and door frames will match the color of the storefronts located on the main shopping center building. g. where a wall sign has a stucco finish background, modify the color to match the recommended new color of the walls of the building. Note: The color of the back-lit awnings and the color of other features and/or treatments will be reviewed by the planning and Development Board and City Commission. 2. Omit the neon from the free standing sign. Also, change the color of the blue and pink border and sign background to the colors that match the exterior walls of the main building of the shopping center as described above in recommendation 1 and la. 3. Close the outparcel entrance near Plaza Lane and relocate dumpster and enclosure to the southwest corner of the parking lot near the irrigation pad. Also, modify the turning radius at the ingress to the one-way access aisle to accommodate the turning radius of the City sanitation vehicles. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, incorporate them into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH/jj 8. : 6 p r' e'" 2 r: j , !r: i .lJ J?J