Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE GEORGE C. DAVIS .9lrcliitect PHONE 732-6154 January 23, 1997 Mr. Jerzy Lewicki Planning & Zoning City of Boynton Beach Fl RE: FILE MSPM 96-008 Dear Mr. Lewicki: With reference to the above-mentioned project, and as told to you last week, I was unable to complete the collection of doc- uments required for filing amended plans for the Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market. (due January tenth.) It is my intention to file the amended drawings togeth- er with required documents by the February fifth deadline. I hope this will be acceptable to you. / r,' 'I Ii /..Sincermy,l.1'1. . t!~1 ~. ~ George C. Davis lJ;j '~' City of iBoynton iBeacfi 100 'E. 'lJoynton 'lJeadi 'lJoufevara P.O. 'lJ~310 'lJO!Jnton 'lJeadi, :JWri.tfa33425-0310 City j{alf: (561) 375-6000 :J.9lX: (561) 375-6090 December 31, 1996 George Davis 2802 S.W. 6th Street Boynton Beach I Florida 33435 RE: Initial Review Comments - Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market File No. MSPM 96-008 Dear George Davis: The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial review of your project. In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and documents. After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial. A recommendation for denial will be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on the resubmitted plans. ;tnurUa's (jattway to tfu (julfstream Page 2 of 2 Initial Review Comments Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market File No. MSPM 96-008 Dates pertaining to the remainder of the review process are as follows: . The amended plans will be due by 5:00 P.M. on January 16, 1997. . The request will be presented to the Planning and Development Board on February 11, 1997. . The request will be forwarded to the City Commission as a development plan on February 18,1997. If you should have any questions regarding the comments or the approval schedule, please feel free to call Jerzy Lewicki, who is coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and Zoning Department. Very truly yours, h_G. lLrI ~v Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director T JH:bme Atts. d:\project\dutchmil\ 1 stcommt wpd ''\kL..fI\,\ (:)1 ~ -,23 --<.tQ ("tc,. ~ '.( ~ ~rl ~-l.G. "tJ.,~l"\cy J"c ff (v\R OlD 1) J-rC{.-( (VU LL ~--- --';"-'-- -r I ~l~~CN.C .......,,-_... 1979 Sea Mist Marina 1983 Commercial Fishing Boat 1984 New Marina Owners: Walter Brown! the Dutchman 1985 New Marina Owners: Edward Garcia 1995/ 1996 Rumors: Marina project to begin :fvn l-- 1996 Purchase Old Dutch Mill 6/96 fdr 1997 Site Plan! Permitting complete 7/97 rpf;a<<<mt. Cify May: Evictio~from Marina - due to construction $500./day fines 1998 June: Final C/O Old Dutch Mill September: County Core Grant $25,000. 1999 City Fa~ade $5,000. p2..cP ( fcv/tr J. 042 :j:Y1 tVC ~.s ~ f &<- j ~ - q d- ,""",~ L~\)<).~ (.(J.r- ,2.Do;l ~ ("~ ~ '?r-1J- 0, .~ c.' --~ "'...><. ..... ..>- ~ 9 ~?,</ L-. .,.~ <~ '? ~ 5~1.1 i>CJ<Y-r /I~ f;D Cd)' f f'1<'v'" k ':ft. yc<.Y7 .5~"t~y~i:- -C1d!-c<-r&z-. ;;~' " /'1cf-r~e'--f , 'J r;.. b~.,.. ~s.5e t;::- 1',-,6(..c e- ~~ ~ ,~r"( ,[ It v ~ <f-~ .~ y" ';.ttl , ~~A' ~ (tP-0' d~~ J {1 r l/II /~, ~y c~"lt &0" .A' ~ " ~ 11 } [1 'Jf" ~ ~- (jJ" ,,'1~ ~f r? )t1\&~ 11/ / ~ '\ . ~ ~ -- '-'--~--~----'--'-'-----'~-- - ------- I1c:rY;F\<;/< f~c..-/1~ c1.~ ';j; ~'rz~ -r ~ .)> ~ ;' 'I !'6FG"fY:-: ;?'-C- ~ L ~c:.'e;"SC ~o/ OCJ<::J i ;(t ~ 5~rc . 'J ~/--.. _{~~/r} ~ t:..-#.~ 5 C7IA.. Lee e:; ~ c..~ 5~<-V 100 ~. 'Boynton. 'BuWi 'Bt1ukvani P.O. 'lJoi(310 'Boynton 'Bus&. %nitfa 33425-0310 City %JJ1[: (4fJ7) 37S-6()()() :flU; (407) 375-6090 ~ City of 'Boynton $eacli To: Fax: From: Date: Pages: Comments: aCOI!{;E ]),Q-V(S ..5 c, I .- 7 ~ *' &:>/5""~ Planning and Zoning Department /t!i/l9h~ (number of sheets including cover sheet) e:{ 7-.ee C2r~ ({J.u ~1-j;~ ilku ~tJ..l ~ ~ /o?pJ~6'--' cl/o/t :/hAV 1))iJ.!, -:J4 11 dM aw-L 5",\.'"., ~ City of $oynton $each 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Bouk1Jarli P.O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'Beadi.,!JCoritfa 33425-0310 City:JfafL. (407) 375-6f)()() !JjU: (407) 375-6090 December 5, 1996 George C. Davis 2802 S.W. 6th Street Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 RE: Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market - MSPM 96-008 Acceptance - Major Site Plan Modification Application & Submittal Documents Major Site Plan Modification Dear George C. Davis: On November 27, 1996, your submittal for Major Site Plan Modification approval for the above-referenced project was reviewed for completeness. It has been determined that the submittal is substantially complete and accepted for further processing. Jerzy Lewicki, within the department will be reviewing and coordinating your application through the remainder of the New Site Plan approval process and can be contacted if you have questions. The next step in the review process is for the Technical Review Committee to review the submittal for compliance with the review standards identified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 and all applicable sections of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) will meet on December 31, 1996 to discuss the first review comments. We understand that the review schedule will be further determined after this meeting. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 375-6260. Very truly yours, /' -':l4 f 1 ~ i~,-" ~f ~ti Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director T JH:bme d:lsharelprojectsldulchmil\' slacpllr wpd ;tnuw's (jateway to tfu (julfstream P RuJ 1::(;'1' '1' 1 '1' LE : ul::::;CRIf''l'lON: 'l'~ Pi:: : DA'l'E REC' D: 'l'RACKING LuG - SI'l'E PLAN REVIEW SUBMl"l''l'AL OLD DUTCH MILL SEAFOOD MARKET FILE NO.: MSPM 96-008 Major Site Plan Modification NEW SITE PLAN MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONXX 11/27/96 AMOUNT: $ 750.00 RECEIPT NO.: 03340 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS RECIO: (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The p1annillg Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'fER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL : DATE: ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * , (Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DATE SEN'l': RETUHN DATE: 11~ MEMO NUMBER: 9G-lko/ 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED uti1. P. W. parks E'ire Police PLANS Y y MEMO # I DATE I "c" q~~~ /~/ t'./ 9"'~ ) 1-M4LL/~ - IIJ I J./ / S?- ~/o"~3<f / fUll /~ < '-O~'10 / 1.1(12. / (~ PLANS HEMO # / DA'l'E e'\h - ,gS / 12/21; / ( :96- jl/-2- / (.).j n / I J :Jfdry / "C" /~ /- /e/ /- I .J:..L y Planning BUilding Engineer Engineer J:~orester y TYPE OF VARIANCE(S) DATE OF MEETING: DA'l'E OF LETT~R SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. ~ checklist sent out w/ comments) NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLE'l'E SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: l-S' cYI (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORID BLBVATION8 RIO I D I MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd RBVIEW. DA'l'E SENT: '1-\ 0..'1"1 MBMO #: <1f\-tJ~~ RBTURN DATE: ~~{ 1-9'1 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS SHO ff I DATB I"R/D" PLANS HEMO ff I DATE I"R/D" Utile Y 7- / If C--- Planning 'If I / P.W. 1 -0 0 I I / c- Building c1'1. O'fC/ I 3/11 / C/ parks -aJl I C/' Engineer I I Fire ...~ 0 I I~ Engineer I / , Police .., # (1.... / / r Forster y / 5/fr / ('..../ LETTER TO APPLICANT RBGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DBVBLOPHBNT aXONs PLACBD AT THB PROpaRTY DATa 8BNT/SIGNS INSTALLBD: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD 2/11/97 cc/eRA 2/18/97 DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A: 'l'RACk.ING. ::>P TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR DATE: 12 DECEMBER 96 W ffi CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM FIL ~ SUBJECT: OLD DUTCH MILL SEAFOOD MARKET MAJOR SITE PLAN MOD. FROM: SGT. MARLON HARRIS ~FERENCES: 96~0290 POLICE DEPARTMENT ENCLOSURES: I have reviewed the above plans. The plans show an existing 13' wide ingress on the south side of the structure. It also appears that this is proposed to be ONE W A Y(arrow on pavement) for ingress traffic. The plans show a STOP SIGN at the driveway entrance at Federal Highway. One of these is not correct. Also, there needs to be proper signagc (DO NOT ENTER) at the end of the ONE WAY driveway throat. to prohibit westbound travel. w f~ ,(i:'; I~' n L':1 0!J J il ;'/7 r; "....'. I DEe I 6'1~ c, m PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-271 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director THRU: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director\ Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent FROM: SUBJ: Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market - Major Site Plan Modification DATE: December 16, 1996 The Public Works Department will be unable to service the dumpster location as shown on the submitted drawings. The back up required for the Sanitation vehicle is sixty feet while the drawings show a forty nine foot back up area. I would suggest r access to th 1 the dumpster enclosure to face west to allow Public Works clear ter enclosure. Larry Quinn Sanitation Superintendent LQ/cr ,.. FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-334 TO: Tambri Heyden. Director Planning & Zoning Department FROM: William D. Cavanaugh. FPO I /"/ /1.1' II Fire Department / i-. L'j-J La~~o~__ DATE: December 17.1996 SUBJ: MSPM 96-008 Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market 1022 N. Federal Hwy, We have no objections to this project. CC: Act. Chief Ness Act. FPO II Borden File [O)m@mO\V1m~ lJO DEe I 7 1996 [!J i PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-142 m(D~ ~ 7~ Jt DATE: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ Hukill, P.E., Director of Development December 17, 1996 TO: FROM: RE: SEAFOOD MARKET - 1ST SITE PLAN REVIEW We have reviewed subject project and have the following comments: 1. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 2. Revise documents to reflect all comments. 3. Drawing statement must address the effects of the anticipated design discharges on the existing drainage system. Chap.6, ArtJV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 4. Provide certification by Developers' Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8 5. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes, catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, SecAB2e, pg.6-20 6. City, County and/or State permits required for construction in R.O.W. Chap. 6, Art.VII, SecAB, pg.6-24 7. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with City codes and standards. Chap.23, Art.II, pg.23-6 8. Provide a satisfactory lighting plan. Chap.23, Art.IIA, pg.23-6 9. Photometries must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before permit can be issued. Chap.23, ArtJIAla, pg.23-6 10. Remove stop sign & "No Left Turn" sign at entrance of one-way traffic. Add "Do Not Enter" sign at east entrance of 13' lane to deny exiting traffic. Also add stop bar at north exit. Chap.23, Art.IIB2, pg.23-7 11. Along U.S. #1 provide continuation of sidewalks thru all driveways to mark pedestrian paths. Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.P, pg.23-IO WVH/ck xc: Scott & Mary Jo Bills, 700 NE 1st Ave., B.B. 33435 (Applicant) Ken Hall, Eng. Plans Check Inspector C:SEAFOOD I LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT V\.... December 20, 199 @ ~_J1 ~7 Ilr~'P"'VCotS fib. . MlMlr Kam,tt o.a Jcnn L Whltwofth III ~~r 'NlI1iIIm B. I/IIIn1erS Al&1&1a"Iol:an""", Rk:If'd S. Whaallhan AIIorney P&rry . 811 eo P.A. ~'J1/i 13081 MILITARY TRAIL OELRAV BEACH. FLORIDA 33484 TwnbriJ. Heyden, AICP Director Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box. 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heyden: Subject: Technical Revieow Committee Agenda The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the following comments regarding the items on the December 31. 1996 meeting agenda. 1. Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market. Not in the LakC' Worth Drainage:: District Service Area. 2. Blockbuster Video at Boynton Lakes Plaza- No objection. However, a drainage review will be required prior to the commencement of construction. _<\5 always, we thmAk you for being given the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, LAKE WORl"H DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~..~~~ Shau@hn J. V>\bb Chief Inspector SJW Imfb c: Patrick A. Martin, P.E., District Engineer, LWDD Delray B~ & BcaI Raton 498-5300 . ~1Dn 8e8l't'l1lo WW Palm B6ach 737,3835 . FAX (407) 49$-$694 MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 96 - 409 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: December 23, 1996 SUBJECT: Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market Major Site Plan Modification We offer no following comments on this project at this time. ~ -) Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella or Skip Milor of this office. JAG/PVM xc: Skip Milor File U:lWORDPERFINOVDEC96IDUTCH,WPD rnrn@rnowrnrn DEe 21~ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUj l,., " PLANNING AND ','.;-. ZONING DEPT. TO: FROM: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent jJ Old Dutch Mill - Major Site Plan Modification RE: DATE: December 27, 1996 The Recreation & Park Division has reviewed the plans for Old Dutch Mill - Major Site Plan Modification. There are no recreation related comments. The project may continue through the normal review process. JW:ad m lnW~ill IE 2 T 1996 ,~~, RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM TO: Tambrj Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist I<)J H- Old Dutch Mill - Major Site Plan Modification RE: DATE: December 27,1996 The Recreation & Park Division has reviewed the plans for Old Dutch Mill - Major Site Plan Modification. There are no recreation related comments. The project may continue through the normal review process. KH:ad PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-688 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Jerzy Lewicki DATE: December 20, 1996 SUBJECT: New Site Plan - 1 st Review Project: Seafood Market (Old Dutch Mill) Location: U.S. Highway NO.1 and S.E. 10th Avenue Agent: George Davis File No.: NWSP 96-008 The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicanUagent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, he should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. 1. City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.A require that a survey provided as a part of the site plan submittal contains existing utility lines and easements. The survey included in this submittal does not provide this information, however, the site plan shows several utility lines on the site and within the adjacent areas. In order to meet the submittal requirements and to avoid possible conflicts of the proposed building expansion with the location of existing easements provide a survey that has been abstracted and researched for utility lines and/or easements. 2. Any roof top equipment will have to be screened from view at a distance of 600 feet. If such equipment is planned, indicate its location and the height of the equipment above the roof level. Provide elevations of the structure showing the roof top equipment and the required screening (all reduced to a small scale) and draw in on these elevations the lines-of-sight connecting the highest point of the equipment with the eye level from a distance of 600 hundred feet from the building (LDR, Chapter 9, Section 11.E). 3. On the elevation drawings depict color code and manufacturer's name of all exterior building finishes. 4. Submit to the Planning and Zoning Department a presentation board containing all color elevations of the building prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting. 5. Submit to the Planning and Zoning Department a presentation board containing samples of all exterior building materials and/or finishes to be used for construction prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting. 6. Provide the anticipated number of peak hour trips per day and total trips per day. Include these numbers in the site plan date summary. 7. On the site plan, show all setbacks as required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.8.1. 8. The property, as indicated on survey, consists of three separate lots. Provide unity of title document for all three lots. Page 2 Memorandum No. 96-688 1 st Review - New Site Plan Old Dutch Mill NWSP 96-008 9. Indicate the height of the structure on the elevations of the building, as required by LDR, Section 7.D.1. 10. Provide a note on the site planllandscape plan that the hedge within the line-of- sight areas shall be maintained at the maximum level of 30 inches. 11. Prior to the Planning and Development Board Meeting provide drainage calculations as required by LDR, Section 7.F.1. 12. On the Landscape Plan, Sheet 6 of 7, amend the tabular summary of the planting material to include a "landscape material required by the code" category. Also, provide relevant calculations for this category. For the landscape buffer adjacent to the right-of way and along abutting properties, provide perimeter distances of the parcel for which the landscape buffer material is being calculated (Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code). 13. Since the property has been vacant for more than six months its legal, non- conforming status has ceased and any new lot layout has to meet the city standards. The one-way entrance from U.S. Highway NO.1 is proposed within less than required 180 feet from the intersection of streets. Since the property has an alternative access from N.E. 10th Avenue, eliminate the non-conforming access from U.S. Highway NO.1. 14. In accordance with LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.E, amend your site plan tabulation to include the following: A. net buildable land area in acres and feet (net buildable land area is the area of the lot within the required setback lines) B. other paved areas (paved area other than vehicular use area) C. total lot coverage (total lot coverage is the sum of building coverage and all hard surface pavement coverage) D. height of the building. 15. Landscape Code requires that the vegetative buffer along a right-of-way contains trees of a maximum spacing of 40 feet o.c. In order to meet the code requirement and to better screen the loading zone area from the rights-of-way add one more tree to the buffer at the south-west corner of the lot. 16. According to LDR, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 11.J.1 the minimum size of the loading zone is 12 feet in width and 35 feet in length. Delineate the proposed loading zone on the submitted site plan meeting the above design standards. 17. On the site plan provide dimensions of parking spaces and parking aisles in conformance with the city's design standards. 18. Provide signage of premises as required by the code (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.1). xc: Central File D:\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\DUTCHMIL\1 REV-COM,WPD \i~-[f@ l\ u~; R r;;J uJ ~I.'P ''1I~''1''( \ WI l ___...__-~J f"' -,f ~N\NG r,NO "'1'.:G [)Ff'T. '''~',~# PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #97-040 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP THRU: Carel Fisher, Acting Public Works Director FROM: Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - 2nd Review - Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market DATE: March 12, 1997 The Public Works Department has no comments in reference to the above site plan modification. I recommend that the project be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration. arry Quinn Sanitation Superintendent LQ/cr MEMORANDUM Utilities # 97-053 ~~r:-~~::1rn1 lJUL~~ PLANNING AN!) ZO~~uEPt , Date: Tambri Heyden. Planning & Zoning Director John A. Guidry, \\, to. / Director of Utilities ~ ~N2S- March 17, 1997 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market, Major Site Plan Modification - Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Backflow preventors are required for certain uses. Please show reduced pressure zone backflow preventor on your plans as close to water meter as possible, (Sec. 26.207 (d) (4)). 2. The Utilities Department will permit irrigation by city water on properties between Federal Hwy. and the ocean. Please show location of proposed water meter and backflow preventor on your plans if you so desire. 3. These plans will be reviewed again, by the Utilities Department, at time of Building Permit Application for addition of items 1 and 2 above. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. smJdutch2 xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION Memorandum No. 97-220 -1.['0) ~ @ ~ 0 WI ~ 1~1 ,IJJ MAR 201991 ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPI TO: DATE: Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department ~illiam D. Cavanaugh, FPO I 1;1//lJ /;. i a,q ~ /i I / Fire Department //! V'f (Ui t/~j~ March 20, 1997 FROM: SUBJECT: Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market 1022 N. Federal Hwy. MSPM 96-008 We have no objections to this project. CC: Acting Chief Ness FPO II Campbell File CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORID1-\. INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR DATE: 13 MARCH 97 FILE: FROM: SUBJECT: OLD DUTCH MILL SEAFOOD MARKET- 2nd REVIEW -MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICA nON SGT. MARLON HARRIS~EFERENCES: 97-0012 POLICE DEPARTMENT 'f ENCLOSURES: w ~ ~ LS Ll ,J n' l \ ~ ~ H M^D , ? ",~,-- ; l...."I \ ..._ ..1... \ P :'NNING fINO ,~ :_ Z~.J:PT. ~~~ --,,~........-~ - I have reviewed the above plans. The "DO NOT ENTER" sign is positioned in the wrong location at the driveway ingress from N. Federal Highway. The sign needs to bc rclocatcd pcr thc below diagram. ;-1 => . '--' I .__._____.___~~____n_ ___ "' t:H,1l,'f 8 tiJl? I~P'G/:4e. t;t;' j' Vt1i1 )0 ! ! j ; , !:!. , (--' (J 4J:7' ! I ! , o 'I ~^ t'J @ . ----- i-= !..1, I'::-LDCl.':: ~ I \-At\'? ! L.B~E W l~ ~ ~\~ u:tJGC:Y~',V, I)l-~D . bWtTlt-.lu U:lJ:,W\2b DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 97-049 " ' '-I I:; is n v!; ;-,~ ~~l i 0 Ii l.S ;) .'.;.1 n. i I - -, -! i .~ MAR 2 4 ~99{ J:.:./:. JU ~j I i; I ~'.'-'.. ~~. I " '. P' ',;,; (, ;jJl' L___r'~:'i;L;~j;_ _- .-.., March 11, 1997 TO: Tambri Heyden Director of Planning and Zoning FROM: RE: T.R.C. COMMENTS OLD DUTCH MILL SEAFOOD MARKET, 2ND REVIEW In review of the resubmitted drawings and related data for this project, I find that all of our comments have been satisfied and therefore recommend that the project be fOlwarded to the Planning and Development Board for their consideration. AN/sd old AttachmentIPlans m ~ f ~ --'0-' "' LV LS l: . -.-.."...... <.,.,":",~.,. "";; . "'~~4l MAR I 7 <'..' RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-100. ~~~hNgE~~D RE: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent r Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market - Major Site Plan Modification TO: FROM: Date: March 17, 1997 The Recreation and Park Department has performed the 2nd review of the plans for the Old Dutch Mill Seafood Market. There are no further recreation related comments. The plan may continue through the normal review process. JW \"j "'\1 r ,~ . I \\ I ~) rn~muwrn rn MAR I i1 '991 RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. Tambi Heyden, Planing and Zoning Director TO: !(d-~ Kevin John Hallahan ,Forester, Environmentalist FROM: Old Dutch Mill-Major Site Plan Modification-2nd Review RE: March 17, 1997 DATE: There are no issues pertaining to my review. The plan may continue through the normal review process. kjh ~ ill I RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-1251 ~@~~\nrn MAR 3 I 1997 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPI RE: Tambri Heyden, Planing & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks superintendent~ Old Dutch Mill - 2nd Review TO: FROM: Date: March 31, 1997 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the plans for the Old Dutch Mill . There are no recreation issues on this project. The plan may continue through the normal review process. JW