CORRESPONDENCE
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORfu~DUM NO. 94-097
SUBJECT:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
Michael E. Haagfj' .2~Y
Zoning & site D ~ ~ent Administrator
April 14, 1994
Transmittal of Development orders
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding
development plans that received final approval by the Planning &
Development Board and/or city Commission. The following is a
list of the proJects, type of request and the documentation
transmitted:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - conditional use/new site plan
- copy of the 2nd review plans
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
- copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - parking lot variance
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
- copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission minutes
Checkers Drive-In Restaurant - community design plan appeal
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
- copy of the Ncvember IS, 1993, City Commission minutes
~Super City Food & Discount - major site plan modification
- copy of the 2nd review plans
- copy of the staff report and comments
- copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minu~es
Super City Food & Discount - parking lot variance
- Copy of the staff report and comments
copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
copy of the November 16, 1993, City Commission minutes
Harvey's Restaurant - parking lot variance
- copy of the staff report and comments
copy of the written order signed by the Mayor
copy of the November 16, 1993, city Commission ~inutes
{i~T -r,;6
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-292
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-235
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department
Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to utilities Dept. Director
Sgt. Mike Kirrmanr Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
~~
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
September 8, 1993
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1st review -
Project
Location
Applicant -
File No.
Major site Plan Modification
Super City Discount Food & Beverage
101 N. Federal Highway
shafiqul Islam
778
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above
referenced project. site plan Review approval for this project
will be granted by the City Commission/Community Redevelopment
Agency. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review
time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and
formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning
and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on Sept. 22. 1993. Do
not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the
amended plans (2nd review).
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section
8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
substantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in Section 7 of the Site plan Review Ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process
the project based on the review standards or the documents
show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections
should be requested by the reviewer through the planning and
Zoning Department.
fJJie City of
tJ3oynton iBeac/i
'1!f4nning t7 Ztmine 1JcptJl'tmmt
100 'Eo ~tlm 'Bazdi fBtluUvanl
'P.O. ~J10
'Bognttm 'Beam.:J(mUf4 JJ42S.(JJ 10
(407) 7J8-74!J0.1"JfX: {407} 7J8.7459
September 8, 1993
Shafiqul Islam
2111 N.E.3rd st.
Boynton Beach Fl. 33435
RE:Acceptance - Site Plan Review Application & Submittal Documents
Major Site Plan Modification - Super City Discount Food &
Beverage
File No. 778
Dear Mr. Islam:
On September 8, 1993, your submittal for Site Plan Rev~ew of the
above referenced project was reviewed for completeness. It has been
determined that the submittal is substantially complete and accepted
for further processing. A Planning & Zoning Dept. staff member will
be responsible for the review and coordination of your site plan
thru the remainder of the Site Plan Review process.
The next step in the review process is for the Technical Review
Committee to review the submittal for compliance with the review
standards identified in Part III, Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 and all applicable sections
of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The results of the review
will be forwarded to you within ten (10) days of the date identified
in the first paragraph of this letter.
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Very truly yours,
~-6:f::>
Christopher Cutro
Planning and Zoning Director
xc: Central File
Chronological File
Project File~
A:ACCEPT.SP
.qmernc5 Gtltewau to tfie Gu[fstream
June 23, 1995
Irn..IT-~ ~Tln":"
, - ..- ")1 ,
\ JUN 2 6 ;}J5 I W
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-204
TO:
Technical Review Committee Members
PLANNING AND \ \,A ~
ZONING DEPT. ~
Tom Dettman
Bob Eichorst
Charlie Frederick
John Guidry
Tambri Heyden
Floyd Jordan
Police Chief
Public Works Director
Recreation & Park Director
Utilities Director
Planning & Zoning Director
Fire Chief
FROM:
Don Johnson, Building Compliance Administrator
RB:
I$~ OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
~to 93-5861
101 ederal Highway
ontrossName of Contractor
,7
~Ji~
The above referenced project is nearing completion. Prior to the
Building Division issuing the Certificate of Occupancy, I would like to
ensure that you do not have any outstanding or pending conditions
concerning this site that must be rectified (excluding issues that are
covered entirely with a city approved surety) .
If any outstanding conditions are related to permits issued by the
Building Division, please provide this division a memorandum containing a
description of the unresolved conditions. If the unresolved conditions
are not permit related, please notify the owner or the owner's agent to
ensure that the matters are rectified.
Please respond to me, within ten (10) days in order that we may proceed
in a timely manner to issue the Certificate of Occupancy. No response is
necessary if your department is satisfied with the current state of the
above referenced site. Thank you for your cooperation.
~
xc: Carrie Parker
Kevin Hallahan
Jim DuVall
6/95
A:TRCMBMO
Gentry Engineering and land Surveying, Inc.
P.O. BOX 243
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33447
PHONE: 272-1924
Member
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Congress of Surveying & Mapping
Member
Florida Society of
Professional Land Surveyors
October 18, 1993
Mr. Harry Benoit, City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
Engineering Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425
Re: Super City Discount Food & Beverage
Dear Mr. Benoit,
Referencing your letter dated September 23, 1993, Departmental
Memorandum, concerning Super City Discount Food & Beverage, which
is located at the Northwest corner of the intersection of Ocean Avenue
and U.S. Highway No.1, as follows:
The Note No. 3 questioned the conductivity test data to substantiate
the value of K (hydrolic conductivity), we performed the test as called
for in the South Florida Water Management District (S.F.W.M.D.) Volume
IV, known as the Falling-head Test, which calls for excavating a
6" - g" diameter hole to a depth below the ground surface roughly
equivalent to the design depth of the trench. We found a course sand
with a high concentration of shell to a depth of 4.5 feet and we found
course sand with lower concentration of shell in the next 1.5 feet, we
next placed a 6" diameter perforated PVC pipe in the excavated hole
and back filled around the outside of the pipe we ran approximately
500 gallons of water into the pipe and were unable to fill said pipe
due to the high permeability of the soil and shell mixture in the test
area. The K value used is known to be 16~ for this site, but the
value as given in an example in the previously mentioned S.F.W.M.D.
Volume IV was used (we have completed test in course sandy areas,
which took considerably less water to perform the required test and
the K value was higher than the value used in this site design).
In regard to Item No.4, the required length of exfiltration
trench, there was a typographical error indicated on the plan and
we agree with the linear footage indicated in your letter and we
are calling for 60 L.F. of exfiltration trench to be used for this
site.
In regard to your Item No.6, the existing site previously
sheet flowed all excess runoff into the U.S. Highway No. I, positive
drainage system, which is existing. It is the intention of this
design to satisfy the S.F.W.M.D. requirements for the three year
storm (which requires the retention of the first one inch or 2.5
inches x the percent of site's impervious area, whichever is greater).
The excess storm runoff will sheet flow to the existing positive
drainage system within the U.S. Highway No. 1 Right-of-way.
The remaining items, as outlined in your letter, are indicated
on our paving and drainage plan, which is being resubmitted to the
Planning Department and would be forwarded to you shortly. If you
should have any questions regarding the above, please contact my
office.
Sincerely,
Q..7N1~YJENG!NE~ING ~ZD LAND
'~g; 7 ,~ilA~{~
Kirk E. Schreiber, P.E. No.
SURVEYING, INC.
20962
,ENGINEERING DtPARTMEN~ MEMORANDUM
i. . !. ! ! : I ! : . ,! ,
II ' .
II: .' I I "
I ,; I, 'I !' "
To:" ' Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
I ' I ,i i I
:, 'H.a.~IYI,_B~Q~~~,. Q'r .~I!9JnE!e!i, '. *.."1:.,. ~,oL,_.. _. I
, I I 'I
I 'i, ii' I .
, September 23", 1993 ; !
I ,
Super City Dis~~unt F~qd ~ Beverage
. . I, I '! ,
We have reviewed the site p~ forJe $~per City Dlscoun; Food and Beverage Store.
Our comments are as follows: I: I i
I '
I i
The applicant sho~ld coordinat~ his site plan with the streetscape plan for Ocean
' I. I .
Avenue. ' · I I I i
i I I
The applicant should show where d~liveries will be made, and their effect on traffic
circulation. !'. i ! I
" .
' I
~ . ! I
4/ The applicant should submit soils data and conductivity test data to substantiate
r.;;7 the exfiltration trench drainage system. .
i i i
~ ! I
From:
., --j ..,....,
: Date:
Re:
1.
2.
.CJ
~
c9
o
,I
I
I'
.11 € 5
/G cOr
Our, computations Ind~cate that59.7 L.F. of exfiltration trench Is required for this
site based upon the data submitted.
Please show typical cross sections for the retention swales.
Please ~ddress how storm water runoff in excess of the 2.06 inches retained will
be disposed of.
Please indicate proposed parking' 'lot, sidewalk, and dumpster area finish
elevations.
8. Please show a typical pavement cross section.
-=S.
-
92-025/241
Ibf
I,
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
September 22, 1993
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department
Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utility Director
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Dorothy Moore, Zoning & site Plan Reviewer
DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Meeting
TUESDAY, september 28, 1993
please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
Tuesday, September 28, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "C"
(West Wing) to discuss the following:
Preliminary Plat:
Jonathan's Grove - For questions regarding this
item contact the Engineering
Dept.
Discussion:
1. Review of the following site plans for inter-
departmental conflicts:
a. Checkers drive-thru Restaurant with detached retail
building. N. E. corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and
old Boynton Road.
b. Supercity Discount Food and Beverage. 101 N. Federal
Highway.
2. Conditional Use:
a. Checkers drive-thru Restaurant N.E. corner of
Boynton Beach and Old Boynton Road.
~~ =:J
Dorothy Moore
XC: City Manager
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire chief
Charlie Frederick, Parks & Recreation Director
Tom Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Mike Haag, Planning & Zoning
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Central File
City Commission
Project File
Chronological File
TRC 9/28/93
\
,
G E 0 R G E C. D A V I 5
I
Ylrc/"itect
Member of
The Am....ica.. Institute
of A~chltec"
1100 SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435
P. O. BOX 1000. Phone 732-6154
September 1st, 1993
Chris Cutrow
Director, Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
Florida
Dear Mr. Cutrow,
With reference to the sul:xnission of plans of proposed .irrprovements at 101 North
Federal Highway, and section 7.4.2 of Site Plan Review ("A colored elevation drawing
of the building ..."), a waiver of this requirement is requested.
The building color will be white, as it is now, which will conform to the
Ccmmmity Design Plan's intent.
GCD/bad
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-270
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public works Director
Vince Finizio, Engineering Department
Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde llSkip" Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director'~~
DATE: october 19, 1993
RE: Second Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
Location 101 N. Federal Highway
Applicant - Shafiqul Islam
File No. 778
Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced
development for your final review and recommendation.
We would ask that you review this amended site plan documents to determine if
the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your
department.
If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of
building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan
again, please advise the Planning and zoning Department in writing.
Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded
to the Community Redevelopment Advisorv Board for review or held for further
revisions by the applicant. All correspondence shall be received by the
Planning and Zoning Department per the following:
Please return your memo and the amended plans to the planning and Zoning
Department by 5:00 P.M. on october 27, 1993.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to
call Mike Haag at Ext. 6262 who is coordinating the review of this
development.
xc: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger
Ed Allen
Charlie Frederick
Torn Dettman
John Guidry
Project File (original)
Numbered File
A: 2REVIEW. SP
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-235
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department
Harry Benoit, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Dept. Director
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
~~
Christopher cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
September 8, 1993
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1st review -
Project
Location
Applicant -
File No.
Major Site Plan Modification
Super city Discount Food & Beverage
101 N. Federal Highway
Shafiqul Islam
778
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above
referenced project. site plan Review approval for this project
will be granted by the City Commission/Community Redevelopment
Agency. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review
time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and
formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning
and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on Sept. 22. 1993. Do
not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the
amended plans (2nd review).
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review Committee approval:
1.
2 .
Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site plan Review, section
8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
substantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process
the project based on the review standards or the documents
show code def icienc ies, additional data and/or corrections
should be requested by the reviewer through the planning and
Zoning Department.
{i~{ -r,;e
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-292
FROM:
J. Scott Miller
city Manager
Tambri J. Heyden -;g;J
Acting Planning and zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
November 10, 1993
RE:
Supercity Discount Food and Beverage
Major S~te Plan Modification - File No. 778
Please place the above-referenced item on the City Commission
(sitting as the Community Redevelopment Agency) agenda for
Tuesday, November 16, 1993, under Development Plans - Non-Consent
Agenda.
DESCRIPTION: Shafiqul Islam, applicant and owner, is requesting
site plan approval to convert the existing, vacant, nonconforming
service station at 101 North Federal Highway (northwest corner of
Ocean Avenue and US #1) into a convenience store. Due to the
change in use of the property, additional parking spaces are
required which requires the parking lot to be brought up to
current standards.
Among the improvements proposed are exterior building changes in
an attempt to comply with the Community Design Plan "Coastal
Village" district and the CBD Guidelines, driveway modifications
(including a separate agenda item for a parking lot variance to
retain the Ocean Avenue driveway), an improved parking lot
layout, lighting, landscaping and a dumpster enclosure.
RECOMMENDATION: The Community Redevelopment Advisory Board
(CRAB) unanimousli recommended approval of this request, subJect
to the attached staff comments, with the exception of comment 4
of Michael Haag's, November 4, 1993, Planning and Zoning
Department memorandum and subject to the following
recommendations:
1) if the parking lot variance (also scheduled to be
heard by the City Commission at the November 16th
meeting) is denied by the City Commission, the site
plan shall not require re-review by the CRAB, and
2) regarding the dumpster location, revised pursuant
to Public Works Department Memorandum #93-215
(Revised), to be located adjacent to the south side of
the building, the CRAB recommended that the dumpster
remain where it currently encroaches the alley at the
northwest corner of the building.
TJH/jm
Att.
A:SUPERCTY.JM
To: TRC Members
Re: Planning & Zoning Memo, # 93-235
Page Two of Two
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is
incorrectly depicted on the documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their
comments when the plans depict or when the location and
installation of their departmental required improvements may
conflict with other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of
his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code
section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review
specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward
a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the planning and
Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do
not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and
recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director
of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the
applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer
on this memo. Dotty Moore will be the Planning and Zoning Department
staff member coordinating the review of the project.
The Planning and Zoning Department will send to the applicant a cover
letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans
to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When
the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they
will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for
review and approval.
Attachment
xc: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire chief
Charlie Frederick, Parks & Recreation Director
Thomas Dettman, Acting Police Chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Project File
Numbered File
A:SUPERBEE.SP
~~
RECREATION & PARKS MEMORANDUM NO. 93-401
TO:
Chris Cutro, Planning Director
fJI+
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
DATE: September 29, 1993
SUBJECT: Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
In conjunction with City Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.4.5 p. 42, the
applicant should be aware of the requirements to meet landscape and
irrigation improvements for the U.s. #1 median abutting this site.
KJH:cm
xc: John Wildner
SEP 2 9 1993
PLANNING AND
lONING DEfT.
_rZJie City of
'Boynton iBeacli
'1?fJUur.ine & Zonine 'DepartJMllt
100 'E. t;8oyntoll 'BuWi 'BouUvtII'll
P.O. 'Boi(3IO
t;8oyntoll 'Bead&. 1forU{.a 33425-0J 10
(407) 7J8.7490, "fU; (407) 738.7459
SEPTEMBER 23, 1993
Shafiqul Islam
2111 N.E. 3rd st.
Boynton Bach Fl. 33435 (407 274-7295)
RE: Initial Review Comments - Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
File No. 778
Mr. Islam:
The city of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the
documents submitted for the above referenced project. Attached are
comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial
review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and
documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90
days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not
submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When
there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not
applicable to the approval of the proj ect or will be addressed
separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the
comment(s}, you must prepare written explanation for each comment
stating why the comment is not applicable and return the
explanation with the amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12)
complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning ~nd
Zoning Department When the amended plans and documents have been
submitted to the planning and Zoning Department, they will be
distributed to the reviewing departments for a second review and
the reviewers will recommend if the site plan will be placed on a
board meeting agenda for approval (see attached meeting schedule).
I f there are maj or comments not addressed by new plans or the
reviewers recommend that the plan not be forwarded through the
approval schedule, this office will notify you on your alternatives
regarding the site plan as soon as possible.
"~merUa's Gatewau to the Gu{{stream
To: Mr. Shafiqul Islam
Re: Initial Review Comments, File No.: 778
Page 2 of 2
We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and
a checklist that contains information regarding the second
submission of the plans and documents for review.
If you should have any questions regarding the comments or on the
approval schedule, please feel free to call Micheal E. Haag 375-
6262 who is coordinating the review of your site plan for the
Planning and Zoning Department.
Yours truly,
Director
CC:ald
Attachments
xc: Central File
Chron. File
Project File
A: INTLCOM. SP
SITE PLAN REVIEW
BOARD APPROVAL SCHEDULE
1993
*original Amended Community
Submittal plans C.R.A.B Redevelopment
Deadline Deadline Meetinq Aqencv MeetinQ
Hay 7 Jun 21 Jul 12 Jul 20
Jun 2 Jul 19 Aug 9 Aug 17
Jul 8 Aug 20 Sep 13 Sep 21
Aug 5 Sep 20 Oet 11 Oet 19
Sep 2 Oct 18 Nov 8 Nov 16
Oct 5 Nov 18 Dee 13 Dee 21
Oet 28 Dee 15 Jan 10 Jan 18
~1.
o
~2.
C)
~3.
~4.
tJ\' 5 .
()~6 .
CHECKLIST
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that
the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for
review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will
enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the
Planning and Zoning Department.
Project Name: Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
Submit an amended Site plan Review/Conditional Use application form that
reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and
documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review
Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a distinguishable
symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form
with the changes identified. It is the agent of the owners responsibility
to notify the owner(s) of changes. If there are no changes required to be
documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating
same must be turned in with the amended submittal.
Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents,
including surveys that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and
comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets shall
have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer
responsible for the drawing(s). Plans and documents shall be assembled in
twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the project on
all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically numbered such
as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3.
Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain
in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are
located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property. The
minimum size is 8" by 10". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify
the location of the existing structures with respect to the location of
the proposed project.
Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all
drawings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and signage
associated with the project. The colored elevation views shall match the
elevations shown in the documents that where submitted for site plan
review. The applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be
colored with the color name and associated color reference number
identified. The type of exterior surface material shall be identified next
to the associated color. The colored elevation drawings shall have compass
direction or title of the side of the building identified. The title block
of the original drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is 2411 by 36 ". Do
no submit on board of any kind.
Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample
shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name and
numerical/letter code from an established color chart.
Submit a 8 1/211 x 1111 transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to
be used on an overhead projector at board meetings.
A:Supercit.SP
".-....-:-
-,,----..
Memorandum
TO:
Christopher cutro
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE:
September 22, 1993
RE:
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Agent:
File No:
Review - 1st Review New Site Plan
Super city Discount Food & Beverage
101 N. Federal Highway
Shafiqul Islam
778
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the Site
plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It
should be noted that the comments are divided into three (3)
categories; the first category is a list of comments that identify
deficiencies that are required to be corrected and shown in
compliance on the plans submitted for second (2nd) review in order
for the project to continue through the site plan review process.
The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that the Planning
and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed
development. The third set of comments is a list of deficiencies
that are shown on the plans regarding technical compliance and
shall be corrected and shown in compliance on the permit set of
plans prior to issuance of permits for the development of the
project. The applicant shall understand that all documents/plans
submitted for site plan and/or permit review are subject to
additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact
me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant
is not intending to correct code deficiencies they should contact
me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal
deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement.
I. Site plan Review comments:
1. On the site plan, indicate the setback distance from the
and east property lines to the leading edge of the sign.
minimum setback distance is ten (10) feet.
[Sign Code section 21-23]
south
Note:
2. Add to the submittal, drawings of the proposed signage for the
building and site. Include location, size, color and configuration
of all signage for the building, including the free standing sign,
in compliance with the sign code. [Sign Code sec. 21-21 & 21-29]
3. On the site plan drawing indicate the distance from the north,
east and west property lines to the leading edge of the overhang of
the building. [Appendix A-Zoning section 6 E. 3.]
4. The plans indicate an existing driveway located on Ocean Ave.
approximately (38) feet west of the intersection of Highway No.1.
Section 5-142 (h) (3) Article X of the Parking Lot Code requires
that the driveway be located no closer than (180) feet to the
intersection. An approval of a Parking Lot Variance for driveway
location is required prior to approval of the site plan.
page 2 - Supercity SP
5. On the site plan drawing indicate the following dimensions:
a) width of the landscape strip along the north, east and
west property lines [min. width three (3) feet;
Landscape Code section 7.5-57 (1) a. 1.]
b) back-up distance for the parking spaces located directly
east of the building [min. back-up (27) feet; city
standard Drawing B-90013]
c) depth of each parking space [City Standard Drawing
B-90012]
d) width of each parking space located on the east side of
the building [min. width (9) feet, city Standard Drawing
B-90012]
e) width of the sidewalk located directly east of the
building
6. The proposed proj ect is subj ect to the requirements of the
Community Design Code. The proposed site is located in the Coastal
Village design district. Therefore the proposed building shall be
designed consistent with the Coastal Village design theme
requirements specified in the Community Design Code. Incorporate
into the design of the building the proper exterior wall and roof
finish elements as described in the code within the appropriate
design theme. [Chapter 5 Article V Appendix II]
7. The Community Design Code describes architectural features that
are harmonious with specific architectural themes. Each
architectural theme lists features of which fifty (50) percent
shall be incorporated into the design of the structure to achieve
the Coastal Village architectural design. An alternate method to
achieving the appropriate features is described in the Design Code.
Incorporate into the design of the building the appropriate
architectural features that are harmonious with the Coastal Village
architectural design. [Chapter 7.5 Article V Appendix II]
8. Specify on the elevation view drawings of the building the
proposed colors of all exterior finish material. Also, identify
the manufacturer I s identification. Note: all colors shall be
consistent with the colors listed in the Community Design Plan for
the Coastal Village design district. [Chapter 7.5 Article V
Appendix II]
9. Specify on the site plan the height, type of material and color
of the proposed dumpster enclosure. [central Business District
(CBD) Landscape Code section 7.5-57 (1) f.]
10. Correct the inconsistencies regarding the location of the doors
and windows that are shown on the floor plan drawing and the
elevation view drawing for the south and east sides of the
building.
11. On the site plan drawing show the figures and computations for
the thirty-five (35) percent reduction in required parking spaces
that is allowed for uses in the Central Business District (CBD).
[Appendix A-Zoning section 4. (1)]
12. Specify on the site plan drawing, in note form, that the
overhead utility line for electric will be relocated to provide
underground service to the building. Also, identify on the plant
list the landscape material required to screen both pieces of
exterior mechanical equipment shown on the floor plan drawing.
[Appendix A-Zoning Section 6 3.]
13. The CBD Landscape Code and the CBD guidelines specify that the
tree species shall be either Live Oak or Mahogany. Adjust the
plans to incorporate same without omitting the required Community
Design Plan streetscape landscaping or the flowering trees required
for the CBD entrance treatment. [CBD Landscape Code Section 7.5-57
(2) a. 2., CBD Guidelines and Chapter 7.5 Article V Appendix III]
page 3 - Supercity SP
14. Add new trees in the landscape strip along the vehicle use
area at the north, east and south sides of the site. The total
number of trees required shall not be less than the total lineal
footage of the perimeter of the vehicle use area that borders Ocean
Ave., US Highway No.1 and the Alley - divided by thirty (30) plus
one. [Landscape Code section 7.5-57 (1) a. 3.]
15. To avoid a conflict between the location of the overhead power
lines and tree landscape material shown on the landscape plan the
location of overhead power lines and modify the plans accordingly.
[CBD Landscape Code section 7.5-57 (1) a. 6.]
16. The Green Buttonwood is a native species.
same on the plans.
Please indicate
17. The minimum specifications for trees located in the central
Business District (CBD) are as follows: height twelve (12) feet;
clear trunk six (6) feet and spread of seven (7) feet. Amend the
plant list accordingly and add the spread specification to the
plant list. [CBD Landscape Code Section 7.5-57 (2) a. 1.]
18. At least ninety (90) percent of the tree species shall be a
native species. Correct the plans accordingly. [CBD Landscape
Code Section 7.5-57 (2) i.]
19. Add to the landscape plan the required line of sight areas
that are speclfied in section 7.5-57 (1) 1. of the CBD Landscape
Code. Dimension the size of required areas. Specify in note form
on the plan that a clear unobstructed line of sight space between
thirty-six (36) inches and six (6) feet shall be maintained within
the line of sight areas. [CBD Landscape Code section 7.5-57 (1) 1.]
20. Add to the site plan in note form the parking area and
pedestrian lighting specifications that are listed in the Central
Business District Landscape Code Section 7.5-57 (1) g. and h.
21. Indicate on the plan the type of landscape material proposed
for the pervious area located to the west of the building and add
same to the plan list.
22. The maximum spacing for vehicle use area hedge material is
eighteen (18) inches on center. The required height is twenty-four
(24) inches with a minimum spread of eighteen (18) inches. Correct
the plans accordingly and add the spread specification to the plant
list. [CBD Landscape Code Section 7.5-57 (2) c. 1.]
23. show on the site plan drawing the location and type of an
exterior furnishing as required by section 7.5-57 (1) j. of the CBD
Landscape Code.
24. To be consistent with the Central Business District (CBD)
Landscape Code, specify st. Augustine sod as the type of lawn
grass.
[CBD Landscape Code section 7.5-57 (2) f.]
II. Recommendations:
:. I recommend that prior to submitting the variance application
for the location of the driveway that the location be shown
consistent with the working drawings of the proposed Ocean Ave.
streetscape renovation.
III. Technical Compliance comments:
1. Include within the drawings a typical pavement striping detail
for regular and handicap parking spaces.
(City standard Drawing B-90012)
page 4 - Supercity SP
2. To verify that the vehicle use area hedge material is in
compliance with the fifty (50) percent native species requirement,
add to the landscape plan figures and computations regarding the
total lineal footage of the outside perimeter of the vehicle use
area that is visible from each property line. After computing the
total, deduct the total width of all driveways and the remainder is
the lineal footage of vehicle use area required to be screened from
view, at each property line, with a continuous (18 inches on
center, 24 inches high with a 18 spread) row of hedges. Of the
total number of hedges required to form the visual screening fifty
(50) percent shall be a native species. Distinguish same on the
plans and individually list the lineal footage of each different
species. [CBD Landscape Code Section 7.5-57 (2) c. 1. and the
Comprehensive Plan]
3. On the landscape plan show the figures & computations and with
a distinguishable symbol show the location of the required parking
area interior landscaping. [CBD Landscape Code Section 7.5-57 (1)
b. ]
4. On the plans show the figures and computations to verify that at
least seventy (70) percent of the required landscape area is
planted with material other than sod. with a distinguishable
symbol indicate the location of the appropriate material.
[CBD Landscape Code Section 7.5-57 (1) a. 2.]
A:SUPERCIT.SP
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
From: Harry Benoit, City Engineer 4f ."T. 't3 ~
Date: September 23, 1993
Re: Super City Discount Food & Beverage
We have reviewed the site plan for the Super City Discount Food and Beverage Store.
Our comments are as follows:
1 . The applicant should coordinate his site plan with the streetscape plan for Ocean
Avenue.
2. The applicant should show where deliveries will be made, and their effect on traffic
circulation.
3. The applicant should submit soils data and conductivity test data to substantiate
the exfiltration trench drainage system.
4. Our computations indicate that 59.7 L.F. of exfiltration trench is required for this
site based upon the data submitted.
5. Please show typical cross sections for the retention swales.
6. Please address how storm water runoff in excess of the 2.06 inches retained will
be disposed of.
7. Please indicate proposed parking lot, sidewalk, and dumpster area finish
elevations.
8. Please show a typical pavement cross section.
92-025/241
/bf
G E 0 R G E C. D A V I 5
Y{rchitect
Memb... of
TM American In.tlitule
of Archi~lJ
1100 SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435
P. O. BOX 1000. PhDne 732-6154
October 14th, 1993
Mr. Michael E. Haag
Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
Fl(wida
Mr. Haag,
With reference to the first round of comments concerning
Supercity Discount Food and Beverage, the following answers
are made:
1. The building sign at the southeast corner of the
property has been omitted.
~. Proposed signage is shown on the east (front)
elevation.
4. A variance has been applied for.
7. Attempt has been made to comply with Community
Design Code. As for the suggestion to furnish a bench, the
owner feels that this would not be a good idea, since only the
vagrants and loiterers would take advantage of this
convenience.
12. The owner respectfully submits that the power pole
servicing his building is on the other (north) side of the
alley, and an underground service will require tearing up the
pavement, spec ial permissions, etc. It is tCI the rear of the
building, and other services are overhead. He asks
reconsideration of this demand.
The head of Public Works has been unavailable this week.
The dumpster has been moved so that when the gates are open,
they will not encroach on the alley right of way.
Public Utilities memo 93-405, item 3 (a), only take-out
sandwiches are planned. 3 (b) the site plan calls for the use
of city water in the irrigation systeml
s_:;:e:~
George C. Davis
GCD/bad
,Gentry Engineering and land Surveying, Inc.
P.O. BOX 243
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33447
PHONE: 272-1924
Member
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Congress of Surveying & Mapping
Member
Florida Society of
Professional Land Surveyors
October 18, 1993
Mr. Harry Benoit, City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
Engineering' Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425
Re: Super City Discount Food & Beverage
Dear Mr. Benoit,
Referencing your letter dated September 23, 1993, Departmental
Memorandum, concerning Super City Discount Food & Beverage, which
is located at the Northwest corner of the intersection of Ocean Avenue
and U.S. Highway No.1, as follows:
The Note No. 3 questioned the conductivity test data to substantiate
the value of K (hydrolic conductivity), we performed the test as called
for in the South Florida Water Management District (S.F.W.M.D.) Volume
IV, known as the Falling-head Test, which calls for excavating a
6" - 9''' diameter hole to a depth below the ground surface roughly
equivalent to the design depth of the trench. We found a course sand
with a high concentration of shell to a depth of 4.5 feet and we found
course sand with lower concentration of shell in the next 1.5 feet, we
next placed'a 6" diameter perforated PVC pipe in the excavated hole
and back filled around the outside of the pipe we ran approximately
500 gallons of water into the pipe and were unable to fill said pipe
due to the high permeability of the soil and shell mixture in the test
area. The K value used is known to be ~6~ for this site, but the
value as given in an example in the previously mentioned S.F.W.M.D.
Volume IV was used (we have completed test in course sandy areas,
which took considerably less water to perform the required test and
the K value was higher than the value used in this site design).
In regard to Item No.4, the required length of exfiltration
trench, there was a typographical error indicated on the plan and
we agree with the linear footage indicated in your letter and we
are calling for 60 L.F. of exfiltration trench to be used for this
site.
In regard to your Item No.6, the existing site previously
sheet flowed all excess runoff into the u.s. Highway No. I, positive
drainage ~ystem, which is existing. It is the intention of this
design to satisfy the S.F.W.M.D. requirements for the three year
storm (which requires the retention of the first one inch or 2.5
inches x the percent of site's impervious area, whichever is greater).
The excess storm runoff will sheet flow to the existing positive
drainage system within the u.s. Highway No. 1 Right-of-way.
The remaining items, as outlined in your letter, are indicated
on our paving and drainage plan, which is being resubmitted to the
Planning Department and would be forwarded to you shortly. If you
should have any questions regarding the above, please contact my
office.
Sincerely,
Kirk E.
P.E. No. 20962
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM *93-191
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Super City Discount Food &
Beverage
DATE: September 22, 1993
The dumpster location at the above site is unacceptable as planned.
Please contact the Public Works Department for a workable solution.
Eichorst
Works Director
RE/cr
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD
AND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
November 5, 1993
Project Name:
Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
Applicant:
shafiqul Islam
Agent:
Shafiqul Islam
Location:
101 North Federal Highway - Northwest corner of
US Highway #1 and Ocean Ave.
Land Use Plan Designation: Mixed Use
Zoning District:
Central Business District - CBD
Type of Use:
Retail food store
Number of units:
NIA
Square Footage: site - 10,642 = 0.24 acres
Building - 1,784
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Mr. Islam, the applicant and property
owner is requesting site plan review approval for the proposed
modifications to the 101 N. Federal Highway site. The. 24 acre
si te is occupied with an existing one story 1,784 square foot
concrete block building. The previous use of the building was a
gasoline service station. At present time a gasoline service
station is a nonconforming use for the subJect site. The new use
is a retail food and beverage store. The existing structure will
remain in place with no increase in size.
Access to the site is by a two-way driveway on Ocean Avenue and a
two-way driveway on the twenty (20) foot wide City alley that abuts
the north side of the site. The following noteable changes are
proposed for the exterior of the building: block in existing
windows, overhead doors and door openings; install new doors and
new storefronts along the east side of the building, add wood board
& batten siding to the walls, apply decorative lamps on the walls
and install a standing seam sloped roof around the perimeter of
three sides of the building.
Note: most of the improvements to the project are a result of the
project showing compliance with the code requirements based on the
change in use from the previous service station to the new retail
store. The change of use resulted in additional parking spaces
being required.
The following colors proposed for the building and wall signage are
consistent with the colors identified in the Community Design Plan
and the central Business District Guidelines: walls - wood, beige
and stucco, light yellow; Roof - roman blue; wall Sign - dark
brown. The vehicle use area will be improved to comply with the
requirements of the parking lot code for construction material and
configuration of layout. The applicant has formally submitted an
application for a variance from the code requirement regarding the
distance the driveway on Ocean Avenue is located from US Highway #
1. The total number of parking spaces provided on-site exceeds the
number required for the new use. The plans indicate that the
installation of the site lighting fixtures will comply with
specifications listed in the Central Business District Landscape
Code. A concrete block dumpster enclosure is proposed for the site
wi th ,the color of the stucco finish matching the color of the
building. The landscaping proposed for the site will comply with
the code. Flowering trees and multiple species of plants and hedge
material are shown along the Ocean Avenue entrance to the site.
The Ocean Avenue driveway entrance has been coordinated with the
new Ocean Avenue streetscape improvement plans.
super~ity Staff Report
Page 2
REVIEW OF STAFF COMMENTS: Find attached comments from all
reviewing departments. As indicated in their comments they
recommend the project proceed through the approval process subject
to the permit documents reflecting compliance with staff comments
and technical compliance with the City codes.
The concern regarding Memorandum No. 93-215 from the Director of
Public Works was rectified between the applicant and the director.
The solution was accomplished by moving the enclosure. The new
location is directly south of the building. The new location will
include a landscape island being constructed south of the
enclosure. The handicapped parking space that is shown on the
plans at the new enclosure location will be relocated to the front
of the building. The balance of the site will remain unchanged.
The total number of parking spaces will remain the same. This
change is minor and the permit documents will reflect the correct
location. staff will witness the new location during the permit
review process. The new location was an alternate location
discussed by the Technical Review Committee during the review
process of the project.
A conflict has arisen regarding the responsibil ty of the road
improvements for the twenty (20) foot wide City alley that borders
the north side of the site and the time that the work shall be
completed. The Deputy City Engineer's comment No. 4 from
memorandum No. 93-310 states that the property owner shall be
responsible for making improvements to the alley prior to the new
business opening.
The consensus of the Technical Review Committee is that the work
should be performed by the City. Memorandum Number 93-212 from Bob
Gibson of the Public Works Department states that the improvements
for the alley are scheduled for the new year and the job was given
a high priority. The part of the alley near the proposed driveway
is somewhat improved do to the Utilities Department working on the
utilities in that area and repairing same. It is also possible
that the property owner may want to improve the alley prior to
opening the new store. It also should be noted that if the
property owner damages the existing alley as a result of making the
improvements to his site he will have to repair the damaged areas.
This conflict should be resolved during the board review of the
project.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends
approval of the site plan review request subject to all staff
comments, with the exception of the requirement of the property
owner being responsible for improving the alley. The
recommendation for approval is also conditioned upon approval of
the parking lot variance for the location of the driveway on Ocean
Avenue.
A:STASUPE.JM
, ,MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE:
November 4, 1993
RE:
Site Plan Review - 2nd Review
Major site Plan Modification
Project: supercity Discount Food & Beverage
Location: 101 North Federal Highway - Northwest Corner
of US Highway # 1 and Ocean Ave.
Agent: Shafiqul Islam
File No.: 778
The following is a list of comments regarding the 2nd review of the
above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are
divided into two (2) categories:
The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved
comments either from the first review or new comments as a result
of the 2nd review. To show compliance with these comments will not
substantially alter the configuration of the site and the design of
the building except for comment Number 1. The applicant has made
a formal submittal to seek relief from the code requirements for
the comment.
The second set of comments is a list of recommendations I believe
will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting
considering that the request for Site Plan Review is approved and
the parking lot variance is approved. The applicant must
understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of
the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building
Department for permits for the proposed project.
1. The plans indicate an existing driveway located on Ocean
Avenue approximately forty-three (43) feet west of the intersection
of Highway #1. Section 5-142 (h) (3) Article X of the Parking Lot
Code requires that the driveway be located no closer than one
hundred eighty (180) feet to the intersection. An approval of a
Parking Lot Variance for driveway location is required prior to
approval of the site plan.
2. In order to be in compliance with the zoning district setback
dimensions, remove the new portion of the roof overhang that is
proposed for the north and south corners of the west side of the
building. The new roof overhang shall not extend past the face of
the west side of the existing building. Also, specify on the
elevation view drawing that the roof overhang along the north side
of the building will not exceed two (2) fee~.
3. Amend the typical parking space drawing of the handicapped
striping to be consistent with the City standard drawing B90012.
4. specify on the site plan drawing, in note form, that the
overhead utility lines shown at the rear of the building will be
relocated to provide underground service to the building.
5. Correct the inconsistencies regarding the location of the
windows that are shown on the east elevation of the building and
the proposed floor plan.
6. On the elevation view drawings of the building specify the
color of the exterior door and window frames. I recommend using a
color harmonious with the color of the building.
7. On the site/landscape plan show and identify a code required
type of exterior furnishing. An example would be a decorative
bench, trash receptable, bollards and other related items. Adding
a decorative bench will comply with an architectural feature
required to meet the specifications of the Community Design Plan.
.
Supercity ~nd Review Comments
Page 2
8. After reviewing the amended plans, it has been determined that
they do not comply with the requirements of the Community Design
Plan regarding architectural features and/or treatments. Find
attached Appendix II of the Community Design Plan. Appendix II
sets forth the standards used to achieve the appropriate
architectural theme. Please observe the Coastal Village section of
the appendix. An asterisk has been placed next to the areas where
the project is shown in compliance with the code. The required
number of elements has been identified so that the applicant is
aware of where the proj ect is deficient. The applicant shall
understand that the wall accessory that is required to bring the
project into conformance with the design code will require separate
submittal for review by the Planning and Zoning Department, the
Community Redevelopment Advisory Board, and the Community
Redevelopment Agency prior to a permit being issued.
9. On the site/landscape plan identify the width of the required
landscape strip located at the northeast corner of the site. The
minimum width is three (3) feet.
10. Correct the inconsistency regarding the spacing of the hedging
required for the vehicle use area. The plant list specifies
twenty-four (24) inches on center and the notes identify eighteen
(18) inches on center. The minimum spacing required by code is
eighteen (18) inches. Also, add to the plant list the spread
specification for the hedge material. The minimum spread required
by code for hedge material is eighteen (18) inches. The code
required height for the hedge material is twenty-four (24) inches.
11. To show compliance with the streetscape requirements of the
Community Design Plan, omit the three (3) Black Olive trees shown
on the plan along US Highway #1 and Ocean Avenue and replace with
a species identified in Appendix III of the Community Design Plan.
Note: At least ninety (90) percent of all the trees on the site
shall be native species and all trees shall meet the tree
specifications identified in the Landscape code. See
recommendation NO.1.
12. Specify on the site/landscape plan the surface material
proposed for the island shown in front of the south end of the
building.
13. The Coconut tree is not a native species. Correct the plan
accordingly.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That the replacement tree species for comment No. 11 above be
compatible with the landscape material proposed for the new Ocean
Avenue streetscape landscaping as well as being a species listed in
Appendix III of the community Design Plan. It is further
recommended that the tree species proposed along US Highway #1 be
selected from an approved list of trees to be planted under power
lines as well as a species listed in the Community Design Plan.
All trees shall meet the tree specifications listed in the
Landscape Code.
2. That the Community Redevelopment Agency consider exercising
the code regarding section 6 E 4. d. (2) of Appendix A - zoning
[modifying requirements for parking and loading spaces].
Considering that the type of use generally results in a high number
of vehicles entering and exiting the site, the number of parking
spaces is more valuable than a loading space. The site has two
surplus parking spaces based on the thirty-five (35) percent
reduction of parking spaces allowed for uses located in the Central
Business District. Instead of omitting the surplus spaces and
arranging the site to depict a loading space, that more than likely
customers will over park, allow the surplus parking spaces to
remain as shown. It is possibly that the proprietor will
efficiently and economically operate the business by having
deliveries made during slow hours of operation.
A:STASUPE.JM
SUPERCITY DISCOUNT FOOD AND BEVERAGE - COASTAL VILLAGE
EVALUATION OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN
* IDENTIFIES THE STANDARDS LISTED IN THE COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN
THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR THE PROJECT
.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
App. II
APPENDIX II. BOYNTON BEACH COMMUNITY DESIGN
PLAN STANDARDS
. All applicable projects shall comply with the design standards
as follows:
(a) New projects. New projects shall comply with the site plan
review process contained in Chapter 19. Plans submitted
for review shall show and identify a minimum of one (1)
type of finl.h rooBn, material and an. (1) type at exterior
wall finish material from the appropriate architectura1style
list. Alternately, the applicant may submit to the commu-
nity appearance board, materials that are harmonious with
the required architectural style for roof and exterior wall
covering material. Submitted plans shall also incorporate
at least fifty (50) per cent of the architectural features and/or
treatments identified on the appropriate architectural style
list into the design of the building, or show architectural
features and/or treatments that are harmonious with the
required architectural style.
~ (bJ Modifications to existing projects. All other projects which
must comply with the community design plan shall show
and identify on the plans submitted for review a minimum
of one (1) type of ftnilh roofing material and one (1) type of
exterior wall fmish material from the appropriate archi-
tectural style list or present to the community appearance
board, materials that are harmonious with the required
architectural style for roof and exterior wall covering ma-
terial. Submitted plans shall also incorporate at least
twenty. five (25) per cent of the architectural features and/or
treatments identified on the appropriate architectural style
list into the design of the building, or' show architectural
features and/or treatments that are harmonious with the
required architectural style.
(c) Architectural amenities. All projects subject to compliance
with the community design plan may choose an architec-
tural amenity from the appropriate architectural .tyle 11.t
or pre.ent amenities that are harmonious with the re-
quired architectural style and incorporate the amenity into
the site and receive credit as a required architectural fea.
ture and/or treatment.
Supp. No. 46
635
App. II
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
(d) Colored eleva.tions. All projects subject to compliance with
the community design plan shall submit elevation draw-
ings of all sides of each building proposed to be developed
on the site. Colored elevation drawings will only be re-
quired for the front elevation of a structure when all sides
of a building are consistent in color and materials. Each
colored elevation drawing shall identify the type of each
exterior fmish material and state the color by name, man.
ufacturer and model or style number. A color sample shall
be submitted as an example along with the color or product
identified on the plans. The sample will be used for the
fmal site inspection to ensure that the correct product and
color were used for the project. For projects which require
site plan approval, all color elevation drawings and/or sam-
ples shall be submitted to the planning department by the
site plan approval deadline date.
ARCHITECTURAL THEMES
1 Coastal Village
II Mediterra.
nean/Spanish
Roofs:
{Metal standing seam
1 REQUIRED Asphalt shingle
, Wood shake
Formed aluminum
Barrel tile
S.tile
Exposed rafters
Exposed beams
Walls:
{Horizontal wood siding
Horizontal vinyl
1 REQUIRED siding
Board & batten
Slant siding
Stucco medium
to heavy
Bricks
Tile
Adobe stone
Supp. No. 46
636
111 Modem
Metal
Tar & gravel
Built-up w/deck
Space frame
w/skylight
Curtain wall
Reflective glass
Thermo pane
Glass Block
Stone veneer
Stucco
Tile
Precast wall
Plastic laminate
Wood siding
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION App. II
11 Mediterra-
1 Coastal Village nean/Spanish III Modern
Architectural features
and/or treatments
Wall accessories:
{ShuttenJ Iron decorative Aluminum grill
1 FEQUIRED Lattice work grills work
Decorative moldings Wood decorative Steel grill work
Balcony grills Accent tile
Accent tile Decorative
Balcony moldings
Arches
Bell tower
Shutters
Windows:
fMultiopane glass Multi-pane glass Spandrel glass
1 FEQUlREO window Fixed glass Fixed glass
*Fixed glass Stained glass Reflective glass
Beveled glass
Extra features:
1 Decorative beuches Decorative Exterior
1 FEQUIRED * Exterior lamps lamps lighting
Related ornaments Iron gates
Multi-panel
doors
Carved doors
Amenities:
Front patio Interior court Exterior view
Rear patio Fountains, elevator
Wood deck. Covered walk. Buildings
Trellises ways crossway
Gazebo Sculpture
Picket fence Fountain
Dominant exterior
colors:
Beige Pink No dominant
Pale yellow White color
Egg shell Red to orange
Blue to gray tone Earth tones
(Ord. No. 90-33, 9-18.90)
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-2l5 (REVISED)
TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan - Second Review - Supercity Discount Food
& Beverage
DATE: October 22, 1993
The present dumpster location at the above site could cause
stacking on Federal Highway. The approach or location needs to be
changed.
I request that plans do not go forward until the problem has been
addressed.
If you have any questions please give me a call.
~---
/......
Eichorst
Works Director
REier
P~LIC WO~S DEPARTMENT
ROADS & STREETS DIVISION
MEMORANDUM *93-212
TO: Tambri Hayden, Senior Planner
FROM: Robert Gibson, Roads & Streets Supervisor
SUBJ: Alley No. of E. Ocean & South of NE 1st St.
DATE: October 21, 1993
From Federal Highway to NE 4th St. is on my resurfacing list for
"94" overall 343' X 22' wide with a rating of "13". This will take
approximately 44 tons X $30.00/ton for a total of $1,320.00.
The 60' or so of utility repairs at the east end is the best
section of alley at this time.
If you have any questions please let me know.
supervisor
ltG/cr
cc: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Harry T. Benoit, City, P.E., City Engineer iJ,'t-. B .
October 28, 1993
DATE:
RE:
Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
The comments in my memorandum of September 23, 1993 relative to the site plan for
this project have been satisfactorily addressed.
I recommend that this plan be presented to the City Commission for approval.
92-025/241
~ m OCTt'. m
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-310
TO: Ms. Tarnbri Heyden
Acting Planning Director
FROM: Office of the City Engineerj~
RE: Technical Review Comments
Supercity Discount Store
Recommendation to Forward Plans to Reviewing Board(s)
~ober 27, 1993
() vA -
The Engineering Department has conducted a review of the amended
plans and has performed a site reconnaisance of the Supercity site.
Our comments are as follows:
Deputy City Engineer's Comments
1. The existing concrete approach along Ocean Avenue shall be
removed and a standard sidewalk constructed in it's place.
2. The sidewalk shall transition through the ingress/egress area
and be constructed at elevations which will facilitate the move-
ment of handicap persons through this area. The sidewalk area
through the approach shall be constru~ted with no less than 2500
psi concrete and be a minimum of six (6) inches in thickness.
3. Provide a "Stop-Sign" (Rl-1) at the intersection of the alley
at Federal Highway.
4. The site reconnaisance revealed that the last thirty (30') feet
of the east end of the alley is in need of repair, therefore, the
plans shall be revised to indicate the removal of weeds and sand,
removal of irregular asphaltic concrete mounds, adjustment of valve
covers including the overlaying of the subject thirty (30) feet of
alley with a minimum of Type II asphaltic concrete (1").
5. The "Handicap-stall" detail does not comply with the latest
edition of the Department on Community Affairs Accessibility Manual.
A copy of the detail may be obtained in the Engineering Department.
6. The site plan is devoid of suitable Parking Lot Lighting. Revise
plans to indicate the location of lighting standards.
7. A "No Left Turn" sign shall be placed where the alley intersects
Federal Highway.
8. Provide Environmental Test Data and other related technical infor-
mation regarding the condition of sub-surface soils which currently
exist in the area where the underground fuel tanks were situated.
1._~~.,jALO
cc: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-214
October 27, 1993
From:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning,2trector
Don Jaeger, Building Officia1~
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
To:
Via:
Re:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
2nd Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Super City Discount Food & Beverage
Location - 101 N. Federal Highway
Applicant - Shafiqul Islam
File No. - 778
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
referenced project. Only Comment No. 2 has to be met:
2. The plan should show the handicap access from the
street into the building for pedestrians.
This could be complied with on the permit set of plans so we
recommend that this project proceed, however, the permit plans
will need to be approved by the appropriate state agency since
the installation of the three-compartment sinks will be used for
preparation of food.
AN:mh
SUPERCIT.TRC
~ fjJP"~
7/' ~/.
Al Newb 1d
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-283 WDC
TO: Planning and Zoning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: october 28, 1993
SUBJECT: TRC Site Plan
SUPER CITY
We have no objections to this plan.
~WI
WDC:CP
.'~
tufJ-G
D. CAVANAUGH FPO I
BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-455
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
TO: Tambri Heyden,
Acting Planning D
DATE: October 27, 1993
SUBJECT: Supercity Discount Food & Beverage - Second Review
Please be advised Items 3C and 4 of our original comments were
not addressed.
In addition, an acceptable access cover over the existing
sanitary sewer cleanout will be required.
All comments must be addressed prior to building permit issuance.
We have no objection to this project proceeding through the
review process.
Please refer any additional questions on this matter to Skip
Milor or Peter Mazzella of this office.
Attachments
19b
xc: Clyde "Skipll Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
Chief Field Inspector - .5 hour
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-405
@m mft1IEID
I Uti ~} II , I i \:J~j II .' '
DATE: September 15, 1993
TO: Chris Cutro,
Planning & Zoning
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: Super City Discount Food & Beverage
File #778 - 1st Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
1. Move water meter location to green area east of
proposed dumpster pad (Sec. 26.16[c]).
2. Reduced pressure zone backflow preventor will be
required (Sec. 26.107).
3. Technical Comments:
a) What type of food service is planned for
this facility?
b) Show source of irrigation water.
c) Show sanitary sewer service location on Sheet
1 of 4.
4. Show the proposed easement over the new water service
(Sec. 26-33[a]).
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor, 375-6407, or Peter Mazzella, 375-6404.
19b
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
Chief Field Inspector - .5 hr.
Administrative Asst. -.5 hr.
Asst. to the Director - .5 hr.
MEMORANDUM
POLICE #93-167
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
DATE:
october 251 1993
REF:
2nd Review - Super City Discount
Ms. Heyden,
I have reviewed the plans as submitted and have the following
comments:
Applicant (depending on hours of operation) must comply
with the convenience store security actl Section 15-69
My earlier comments were addressed and I recommend the plans can be
forwarded.
MK/jb
rn
m 0 WI m
rn~
OCT 2 5 I!Ri
MEMORANDUM
TO:
1J4#t(3.~ ," /-1 c Y t> (SvJ
ehri&to~hcr cutror planning
.-:s. 0 If vJ vJ I L.:b ~c R
fA rr k s tJ i v : S f O~--J
loft/9 "3
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans
anlJ
Director
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Project: $u'r~~ c,fy
I
amended plans for ~the above
the tfh,fy e:J4 -ti'Ow Aw f'A~tc5 ~1'
that the project be forwarded to
Development Board^ for their
1T,v~ Co ys-, ~ I.lIN,i~ 6?~~~(.)icLap"'''u~,''.J'1
A \) v ,~D" '-j P oA::.i/e 'P. .
This department will not be required to sign-loff the
permit documents associated with the subject project.
After reviewing the
referenced project
Department recommends
the Planning and
consideration.
C:AMEND1.ALD
RECREATION"& PARK MEMORANDUM 193-429
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~2t~
Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
TO:
RE:
DATE:
October 21, 1993
The applicant has not commented about the landscape requirements
for u.S. #1 abutting the site.
The project should proceed with review by the Community
Redevelopment Advisory Board.
I will address this comment at the permit stage.
KH:ad
1
i ;~ H ! ~~~t ~.~ f" '.'
, I I ~-I ,='sEI} .
I I. ~:" . ~ ~q I ~ I ,t'" '~~~ 1. j r
I : ,;' ~' ll; ,~ ~ ~ q ~ I ,1 i :" ~!II, 'I ~', ,I
, : 1 ! l 11', ~:, ~ ~ s ~ J >'Il l' ~ 'Ii
, P tin, . f' . 'p ~t 'jC~ i~. .o~I~ .
i I ~~' . ~ i: ~ ~ Il~ ~ ~.l i,' "
.~ 1$ ~ l!i I ') I. '~"'~ ' J '
i i;~. Q I ~,~ i~' I ". 11 l:'
. ~ q, r ~ ~ k q t '.
~,r ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ", -, '. -- _.~.' ~ : - J,I', i i
.- ~ I .1 \: .!.. ~ I ! f: i.
~ i .~. ' ~ 1 !. : 0, I ~ tI' h ~ N 0. I
I ~f':: -~ . - Jh---1- ---
I, .. "I~2.. i !
I I ~ . I :
I ~, ~ I ~! t. .,..._,!'!.... 11
i~' J: ...',
~
I I'". 'r -
uo' ~ '~I~~ ~ '3 ~I,.~ ~ ~ I
'R ~ ~ I ~ ~ , " r:
d ~I: ihif~P - (,'
;'111 ;Ii IDf~:i!~~f f
I,!I :~ j, :~n&+~( Rl
I Ii I
I p; l ~! - ~ ~ ~ :'i ~ ., j !;
i II' ;'<>-~ ;~h~)~'~'i,
.:J ~ ;-:~w&~6~i~~ ~
1~~ r: I I : rl~ I I: ' [
Ii ~ i ~ ~~. ~ (~' '1' ~'.
. 2l '. . ,.... ;... I....r, ~ ,t , j ~. J " ~ f' ~~
l!l ... I' .\Q~' 11
II~iai1l I 'Z- 'r4~ !'I 1'1 t
> ' f.~~ I, t i' ~
.: 1~,~lO\l;:il!r.,.~" I~
,.1 ":: ~r..i..:;..~~
~ .\;~' . I I
1\111 I ~,~' "'l'!l .
~ F r. ,.,. - I" '0; 'I
: ~i'- lu~.ni · i'l i
i ! ~ E i 1'1 ~i I ~ ~ ! I . i .. '. ~.
I ~~ I , lli'i ~~~8 ~p,)['~!' t
, 'Iii) ~~" " '
11'1-1. "II' /j ~ , '. I
\, >; 'l .~ j . h ; I,:t; i i;/ ii,
,..'
t'
-1
~.
.
k
I
t
I I.'
I. .
. .
I ....".J
.:...,. I. ,.
~r,~ 'I
"
!!l.~___ .'
, ;,
- -~':~ .
I
I
...'
.' - " I ,
....,....: - .....:......._.~.,_..,---...-_....
I
;.-J
a'>,
\
r~
G E 0 R G ~ C. D A V I S
Ylrchitect
Member of
The Am...ica.. In.tUIlt.
of ArchilOCU
1100 SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 33435
P. O. BOX 1000. Phone 732-6154
July 28th, 1993
Chris Cutrow
Director of Planning
City of Boynton Beach
Florida
Dear Chris,
With reference to the enclosed site plan, you told me that engineering has
little encouragement for a new traffic entrance on U.S.l.
Now, I believe Mike Haag sends a note (attached) asking if the owner (Mr.
Islam) needs a variance for the existing entrance on Ocean Avenue.
I know that Tarnbri showed me a drawing of p~ landscaping and walks on
that street and it did not include any access to the site.
Already the north entry is via the alley. So, if the south (Ocean Avenue)
access is not allowed, perhaps we should reinforce the roof for a helicopter pad.
I sent Mr. Islam over to your deparbnent to clear these questions up, because
it seems a shame to accept his $750 application fee when he IlE.y have little chance
of using the building.
Could you give me a call at your convenience and give me your advice?
GCDjbad
ef!(rJu
r~~~~
~~4-l~~O
<Vt~y
~ Gl ~J
!:i;t~Jv
.Il291!m ~
~~
---
Gebrge C. Davis
-- --
~r r,:t.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEl-lORANDUM #93-292
TO:
FROM:
J. Scott Miller
city Manager
Tambri J. Heyden -;g.jJ
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
DATE:
November 10, 1993
RE:
Supercity Discount Food and Beverage
Major S~te Plan Modification - File No. 778
Please place the above-referenced item on the City Commission
(sitting as the Community Redevelopment Agency) agenda for
Tuesday, November 16, 1993, under Development Plans - Non-Consent
Agenda.
DESCRIPTION: Shafiqul Islam, applicant and owner, is requesting
site plan approval to convert the existing, vacant, nonconforming
service station at 101 North Federal Highway (northwest corner of
Ocean Avenue and US #1) into a convenience store. Due to the
change in use of the property, additional parking spaces are
required which requires the parking lot to be brought up to
current standards.
Among the improvements proposed are exterior building changes in
an attempt to comply with the Community Design Plan "Coastal
Village" district and the CBD Guidelines, driveway modifications
(including a separate agenda item for a parking lot variance to
retain the Ocean Avenue driveway), an improved parking lot
layout, lighting, landscaping and a dumpster enclosure.
RECOMMENDATION: The Community Redevelopment Advisory Board
(CRAB) unanimousl} recommended approval of this request, subject
to the attached staff comments, with the exception of comment 4
of Michael Haag's, November 4, 1993, Planning and Zoning
Department memorandum and subject to the following
recommendations:
1) if the parking lot variance (also scheduled to be
heard by the City Commission at the November 16th
meeting) is denied by the City Commission, the site
plan shall not require re-review by the CRAB, and
2) regarding the dumpster location, revised pursuant
to Public Works Department Memorandum #93-215
(Revised), to be located adjacent to the south side of
the building, the CRAB recommended that the dumpster
remain where it currently encroaches the alley at the
northwest corner of the building.
TJH/jm
Att.
A:SUPERCTY.JM
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD
AND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
November 5, 1993
Project Name:
Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
Applicant:
shafiqul Islam
Agent:
shafiqu1 Islam
Location:
101 North Federal Highway - Northwest corner of
US Highway #1 and Ocean Ave.
Land Use Plan Designation: Mixed Use
Zoning District:
Central Business District - CBD
Type of Use:
Retail food store
Number of units:
N/A
Square Footage: site - 10,642 = 0.24 acres
Building - 1,784
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Mr. Islam, the applicant and property
owner is requesting site plan review approval for the proposed
modifications to the 101 N. Federal Highway site. The. 24 acre
site is occupied with an existing one story 1,784 square foot
concrete block building. The previous use of the bUilding was a
gasoline service station. At present time a gasoline service
station is a nonconforming use for the sUbject s1te. The new use
is a retail food and beverage store. The existing structure will
remain in place with no increase in size.
Access to the site is by a two-way driveway on Ocean Avenue and a
two-way driveway on the twenty (20) foot wide City alley that abuts
the north side of the site. The following 110teable changes are
proposed for the ex.terior of the building: block in existing
windows, overhead doors and door openings; install new doors and
new storefronts along the east side of the building, add wood board
& batten siding to the walls, apply decorative lamps on the walls
and install a standing seam sloped roof around the perimeter of
three sides of the building.
Note: most of the improvements to the project are a result of the
project showing compliance with the code requirements based on the
change in use from the previous service station to the new retail
store. The change of use resulted in additional parking spaces
being required.
The following colors proposed for the building and wall signage are
consistent with the colors identified in the Community Design Plan
and the Central Bvsiness District Guidelines: Walls - wood, beige
and stucco, light yellow; Roof - roman blue; Wall Sign - dark
brown. The vehicle use area will be improved to comply with the
requirements of the parking lot code for construction material and
configuration of layout. The applicant has formally submitted an
application for a variance from the code requirement regarding the
distance the driveway on Ocean Avenue is located from US Highway #
1. The total number of parking spaces provided on-site exceeds the
number required for the new use. The plans indicate that the
installation of the site lighting fixtures will comply with
specifications listed in the Central Business District Landscape
Code. A concrete block dumpster enclosure is proposed for the site
wi th ,the color of the stucco finish matching the color of the
building. The landscaping proposed for the site will comply with
the code. Flowering trees and multiple species of plants and hedge
material are shown along the Ocean Avenue entrance to the site.
The Ocean Avenue driveway entrance has been coordinated with the
new Ocean Avenue streetscape improvement plans.
-1-
Supercity staff Report
page 2
REVIEW OF STAFF COMMENTS: Find attached comments from all
reviewing departments. As indicated in their comments they
recommend the project proceed through the approval process subject
to the permit documents reflecting compliance with staff comments
and technical compliance with the City codes.
The concern regarding Memorandum No. 93-215 from the Director of
Public Works was rectified between the applicant and the director.
The solution was accomplished by moving the enclosure. The new
location is directly south of the building. The new location will
include a landscape island being constructed south of the
enclosure. The ~~andicapped parking space that is shown on the
plans at the new enclosure location will be relocated to the front
of the building. The balance of the site will remain unchanged.
The total number of parking spaces will remain the same. This
change is minor and the permit documents will reflect the correct
location. staff will witness the new location during the permit
review process. The new location was an alternate location
discussed by the Technical Review Committee during the review
process of the project.
A conflict has arisen regarding the responsibil ty of the road
improvements for the twenty (20) foot wide City alley that borders
the north side of the site and the time that the work shall be
completed. The Deputy City Engineer's comment No. 4 from
memorandum No. 93-310 states that the property owner shall be
responsible for making improvements to the alley prior to the new
business opening.
The consensus of the Technical Review Committee is that the work
should be performed by the City. Memorandum Number 93-212 from Bob
Gibson of the Public Works Department states that the improvements
for the alley are scheduled for the new year and the job was given
a high priority. The part of the alley near the proposed driveway
is somewhat improved do to the Utilities Department working on the
utilities in that area and repairing same. It is also possible
that the property owner may want to improve the alley prior to
opening the new store. It also should be noted that if the
property owner damages the existing alley as a result of making the
improvements to his site he will have to repair the damaged areas.
This conflict should be resolved during the board review of the
project.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends
approval of the site plan review request subject to all staff
comments, with the exception of the requirement of the property
owner being responsible for improving the alley. The
recommendation for approval is also conditioned upon approval of
the parking lot variance for the location of the driveway on Ocean
Avenue.
-2-
A:STASUPE.JM
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Acting 2lanning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE:
November 4, 1993
RE:
Site Plan Review - 2nd Review
Major Site Plan Modification
Project: Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
Location: 101 North Federal Highway - Northwest Corner
of US Highway # 1 and Ocean Ave.
Agent: Shafiqul Islam
File No.: 778
The following is a list of comments regarding the 2nd review of the
above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are
divided into two (2) categories:
The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved
comments either from the first review or new comments as a result
of the 2nd review. To show compliance with these comments will not
substantially alter the configuration of the site and the design of
the building except for comment Number 1. The applicant has made
a formal submittai to seek relief from the code requirements for
the comment.
The second set of comments is a list of recommendations I believe
will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting
considering that the request for Site Plan Review is approved and
the parking lot variance is approved. The applicant must
understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of
the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building
Department for permits for the proposed project.
1. The plans indicate an existin] driveway located on Ocean
Avenue approximately forty-three (43) feet west of the intersection
of Highway #1. Section 5-142 (h) (3) Article X of the Parking Lot
Code requires that the driveway be located no closer than one
hundred eighty (180) feet to the intersection. An approval of a
Parking Lot Variance for driveway location is required prior to
approval of the site plan.
2. In order to be in compliance with the zoning district setback
dimensions, remove the new portion of the roof overhang that is
proposed for the north and south corners of the west side of the
building. The new roof overhang shall not extend past the face of
the west side of the existing building. Also, specify on the
elevation view drawing that the roof overhang along the north side
of the building will not exceed two (2) fee~.
3. Amend the typical parking space drawing of the handicapped
striping to be consistent with the City standard drawing B90012.
4. Specify on the site plan drawing, in note form, that the
overhead utility lines shown at the rear of the building will be
relocated to provide underground service to the building.
5. Correct the inconsistencies regarding the location of the
windows that are shown on the east elevation of the building and
the proposed floor plan.
6. On the elevation view drawings of the building specify the
color of the exterior door and window frames. I recommend using a
color harmonious with the color of the building.
7. On the site/landscape plan show and identify a code required
type of exterior furnishing. An example would be a decorative
bench, trash receptable, bollards and other related items. Adding
a decorative bench will comply with an architectural feature
requir2d to meet the specificatIons of the Community DesIgn Plan.
-3-
Supercity 2nd Review Comments
Page 2
8. After reviewing the amended plans, it has been determined that
they do not comply with the requirements of the Community Design
Plan regarding architectural features and/or treatments. Find
attached Appendix II of the Community Design Plan. Appendix II
sets forth the standards used to achieve the appropriate
architectural theme. Please observe the Coastal Village section of
the appendix. An asterisk has been placed next to the areas where
the project is shown in compliance with the code. The required
number of elements has been identified so that the applicant is
aware of where the proj ect is deficient. The applicant shall
understand that the wall accessory that is required to bring the
project into conformance with the design code will require separate
submittal for review by the Planning and Zoning Department, the
Community Redevelopment Advisory Board, and the Community
Redevelopment Agency prior to a permit being issued.
9. On the site/landscape plan identify the width of the required
landscape strip located at the northeast corner of the site. The
minimum width is three (3) feet.
10. Correct the inconsistency regarding the spacing of the hedging
required for the vehicle use area. The plant list specifies
twenty-four (24) inches on center and the notes identify eighteen
(18) inches on center. The minimum spacing required by code is
eighteen (18) inches. Also, add to the plant list the spread
specification for the hedge material. The minimum spread required
by code for hedge material is eighteen (18) inches. The code
required height for the hedge material is twenty-tour (24) inches.
11. To show compliance with the streetscape requirements of the
Community Design Plan, omit the three (3) Black Olive trees shown
on the plan along us Highway #1 and Ocean Avenue and replace with
a species identified in Appendix III of the Community Design Plan.
Note: At least ninety (90) percent of all the trees on the site
shall be native species and all trees shall meet the tree
specifications iden~ified in t~n Landscape code. See
recommendation No. 1
12. Specify on tht ;ite/landscap plan the surface material
proposed for the isL.,..ld shown in front of the south end of the
building.
13. The Coconut tree is not a native species. Correct the plan
accordingly.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That the replacement tree species for comment No. 11 above be
compatible with the landscape material proposed for the new Ocean
Avenue streetscape landscaping as well as being a species listed in
Appendix III of the Community Design Plan. It is further
recommended that the tree species proposed along US Highway #1 be
selected from an l,pproved list of trees to be planted under power
lines as well as a species listed in the Community Design Plan.
All trees shall meet the tree specifications listed in the
Landscape Code.
2. That the Community Redevelopment Agency consider exercising
the code regarding section 6 E 4. d. (2) of Appendix A - Zoning
[modifying requirements for parking and loading spaces].
Considering that the type of use generally results in a high number
of vehicles entering and exiting the site, the number of parking
spaces is more valuable than a loading space. The site has two
surplus parking spaces based on the thirty-five (35) percent
reduction of parking spaces allowed for uses located in the Central
Business District. Instead of omitting the surplus spaces and
arranging the site to depict a loading space, that more than likely
customers will over park, allow the surplus parking spaces to
remain as shown. It is possibly that the proprietor will
efficiently and economically operate the business by having
deliveries made during slow hours of operation.
A:STASUPE.JM
-4-
SUPERCITY DISCOUNT FOOD AND BEVERAGE - COASTAL VILLAGE
EVALUATION OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN
* IDENTIFIES THE STANDARDS LISTED IN THE COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN
THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR THE PROJECT
}il.>-
,
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
App. II
APPENDIX 11. BOYNTON BEACH COMMUNITY DESIGN
PLAN STANDARDS
. All applicable projects shall comply with the design standards
as follows:
(a) New projects. New projects shall comply with the site plan
review process contained in Chapter 19. Plans submitted
for review shall show and identify a minimum of one (1)
type of ftnl.h rooan, materlll1 and one (1) forp. of exterior
wall finish material from the appropriate architectural style
list. Alternately, the applicant may submit to the commu.
nity appearance board, materials that are harmonious with
the required architectural style for roof and exterior wall
covering material. Submitted plans shall also incorporate
at least fIfty (50) per cent of the architectural features and/or
treatments identified on the appropriate architectural style
list into the design of the building, or show architectural
features and/or treatments that are harmonious with the
required architectural st), j e.
(hJ Modification. to existing project.. All other projects which
mn ! comply with the community design plan shall show
and identify on the plans submitted for review a minimum
ot one (1) type of ftnilh roofing material and one (1) type of
exterior wall fmish material from the appropriate archi-
tectural style list or present to the community appearance
board, materials that are harmonious with the required
architectural style for roof and exterior wall covering ma-
terial. Submitted plans shall also incorporate at least
twenty. five (25) per cent of the architectural features and/or
treatments identified on the appropriate architectural style
list into the design of the building, or show architectural
features and/or treatments that are harmonious with the
required architectural style.
(c) Architectural amenities. All projects subject to compliance
with the community design plan may choose an architec-
tural amenity from the appropriate ID"Chitectural Ityle lilt
01' pre.ent amenities that are harmonious with the re-
quired architectural style and incorporate the amenity into
the site and receive credit as a required architectural fea-
ture and/or treatment.
Supp. No. 46
635
-5-
App. II
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
(d) Colored elevations. All projects subject to compliance with
the community design plan shall submit elevation draw.
ings of all sides of each building proposed to be developed
on the site. Colored elevation drawings will only be re-
quired for the front elevation of a structure when all sides
of a building are consistent in color and materials. Each
colored elevation drawing shall identify the type of each
exterior fmish material and state the color by name. man.
ufacturer and model or style number. A color sample shall
be submitted as an example along with the color or product
iden~ified on the plans. The sample will be used for the
fmal site inspection to ensure that the correct product and
color were used for the project. For projects which require
site plan approval. all color elevation drawings and/or sam.
pIes shall be submitted to the planning department by the
site plan approval deadline date.
ARCffiTECTURAL THEMES
I Coastal Village
II Meditella-
neanlSpanish
Roofs:
{Metal standing seam
1 REQUIRED Asphalt shingle
, Wood shake
Formed alurirlnum
Barrel tile
S-tile
Exposed rafters
Exposed beams
Walls:
{Horizontal wood siding
Horizontal vinyl
, REQUIRED siding
Board & batten
Slant siding
Stucco medium
to heavy
Bricks
Tile
Adobe stone
Supp. No. 46
636
-6-
III Modt.m
Metal
Tar & gravel
Built-up w/deck
Space frame
w/skylight
Curtain wall
Reflective glasa
Thermo pane
Glass Block
Stone veneer
Stucco
Tile
Precast wall
Plastic laminate
Wood siding
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION App. II
11 Mediterra-
I Coastal Village neanlSpanish III Modem
Archi;ectural features
and/or treatments
Wall accessories:
tShntters Iron decorative Aluminum grill
1 REQUIRED Lattice work grills work
Decorative moldings Wood decorative Steel grill work
Balcony grills Accent tile
Accent tile Decorative
Balcony moldings
Arches
Bell tower
Shutters
Windows:
~Mnlti.pane glass Multi-pane glass Spandrel glass
1 REQUIRED window Fixed glass Fixed glass
*Fixed glass Stained glass Reflective glass
Beveled glass
Extra features:
1 Decorative benches Decorative Exterior
1 REQUIRED . Exterior lamps lamps lighting
Related ornaments Iron gates
Multi-panel
doors
Carved doors
Amenities:
Front patio Interior court Exterior view
Rear patio Fountains, elevator
Wood deck Covered walk- Buildings
Trellises ways crossway
Gazebo Sculpture
Picket fence Fountain
Dominant exterior
colors:
Beige Pink No dominant
Pale yellow White color
Egg shell Red to orange
Blue to gray tone Earth tones
(Ord. No. 90-33. 9-1S-90)
-7-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-215 (REVISED)
TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan - Second Review - Supercity Discount Food
& Beverage
DATE: October 22, 1993
The present dumpster location at the above site could cause
stacking on Federal Highway. The approach or location needs to be
changed.
I request that plans do not go forward until the problem has been
addressed.
If you have any questions please give me a call.
~--
//
Eichorst
Works Director
REier
-8-
P~LIC WO~S DEPARTMENT
ROADS & STREETS DIVISION
MEMORANDUM #93-212
TO: Tambri Hayden, Senior Planner
FROM: Robert Gibson, Roads & Streets Supervisor
SUBJ: Alley No. of E. Ocean & South of NE 1st st.
DATE: October 21, 1993
From Federal Highway to NE 4th St. is on my resurfacing list for
"94" overall 343' X 22' wide with a rating of "13". This will take
approximately 44 tons X $30.00/ton for a total of $1,320.00.
The 60' or so of utility repairs at the east end is the best
section of alley at this time.
If you have any questions please let me know.
Supervisor
ltG/cr
cc: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
-9-
..
"
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Harry T. Benoit, City, P.E., City Engineer +f~'-t. 13 .
October 28, 1993
DATE:
RE:
Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
The comments in my memorandum of September 23, 1993 relative to the site plan for
this project have been satisfactorily addressed.
I recommend that this plan be presented to the City Commission for approval.
92-025/241
ill mOCHO. m
PlANNING~D
10NI D~n.
-10-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-310
TO: Ms. Tarnbri Heyden
Acting Planning Director
FROM: Office of the City Engineerj--'
RE: Technical Review Comments
Supercity Discount Store
Recommendation to Forward Plans to Reviewing
o~ober 27, 1993
() r.rf /\ ~
Board(s)
The Engineering Department has conducted a review of the amended
plans and has performed a site reconnaisance of the Supercity site.
Our comments are as follows:
Deputy City Engineer's Comments
1. The existing concrete approach along Ocean Avenue shall be
removed and a standard sidewalk constructed in it's place.
2. The sidewalk shall transition through the ingress/egress area
and be constructed at elevations which will facilitate the move-
ment of handicap persons through this area. The sidewalk area
through the approach shall be construyted with no less than 2500
psi concrete and be a minimum of six (6) inches in thickness.
3. Provide a "Stop-Sign" (Rl-1) at the intersection of the alley
at Federal Highway.
4. The site reconnaisance revealed that the last thirty (3D') feet
of the east end of the alley is in need of repair, therefore, the
plans shall be revised to indicate the removal of weeds and sand,
removal of irregular asphaltic concrete mounds, adjustment of valve
covers including the overlaying of the subject thirty (30) feet of
alley with a minimum of Type II asphaltic concrete (1").
5. The "Handicap-stall" detail does not comply with the latest
edition of the Department on Community Affairs Accessibility Manual.
A copy of the detail may be obtained in the Engineering Department.
6. The site plan is devoid of suitable Parking Lot Lighting. Revise
plans to indicate the location of lighting standards.
7. A "No Left Turn" sign shall be placed where the alley intersects
Federal Highway.
8. Provide Environmental Test Data and other related technical infor-
mation regarding the condition of sub-surface soils which currently
exist in the area where the underground fuel tanks were situated.
0-<~~-t-4:t "l::)
cc: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
-11-
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-214
October 27, 1993
'1'0:
From:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning,2trector
Don Jaeger, Building Official~
A1 Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Via:
Re:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
2nd Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Super City Discount Food & Beverage
Location - 101 N. Federal Highway
Applicant - Shafiqu1 Islam
File No. - 778
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
referenced project. Only Comment No. 2 has to be met:
2. The plan should show the handicap access from the
street into the building for pedestrians.
This could be complied with on the permit set of plans so we
recommend that this project proceed, however, the permit plans
will need to be approved by the appropriate state agency since
the installation of the three-compartment sinks will be used for
preparation of food.
AN:mh
SUPERCIT.TRC
~ fjJP~~
'Z/ ~; ,
A1 Newb ld
-12-
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-283 WDC
TO: Planning and Zoning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: October 28, 1993
SUBJECT: TRC Site Plan
SUPER CITY
We have no objections to this plan.
1M ~ tuft-
~vWI IAM D. CAVANAUGH FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
WDC:CP
-13-
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-455
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
TO: Tambri Heyden,
Acting Planning D
DATE: October 27, 1993
SUBJECT: Supercity Discount Food & Beverage - Second Review
Please be advised Items 3C and 4 of our original comments were
not addressed.
In addition, an acceptable access cover over the existing
sanitary sewer cleanout will be required.
All comments must be addressed prior to building permit issuance.
We have no objection to this project proceeding through the
review process.
Please refer any additional questions on this matter to Skip
Milor or Peter Mazzella of this office.
Attachments
19b
xc : Clyde II Sk i p" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
Chief Field Inspector - .5 hour
fu), m 111;\ ~ ~ I~n~ ID
lUU (Crtl"
Pll\NNING AND
-14-
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-405
~ m ~1.l'ml ~ :jJm ~..
DATE: September 15, 1993
SUBJECT: Super City Discount Food & Beverage
File #778 - 1st Review
TO: Chris Cutro,
Planning & Zoning
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Dlr.c~or of Utl1itl..
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
1. Move water meter location to green area east of
proposed dumpster pad (Sec. 26.16[c]).
2. Reduced pressure zone backflow preventor will be
required (Sec. 26.107).
3. Technical Comments:
a) What type of food service is planned for
this facility?
b) Show source of irrigation water.
c ) Show sanitary sewer service location on Sheet
1 of 4 .
4. Show the proposed easement over the new water service
(Sec. 26-33[a]).
It is our recomm~ndatlon that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor, 375-6407, or Peter Mazzella, 375-6404.
19b
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
Chief Field Inspector - .5 hr.
Administrative Asst. -.5 hr.
Asst. to the Director - .5 hr.
-15-
MEMORANDUM
POLICE #93-167
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
DATE:
october 25, 1993
REF:
2nd Review - Super city Discount
Ms. Heyden,
I have reviewed the plans as submitted and have the following
comments:
Applicant (depending on hours of operation) must comply
with the convenience store security act, Section 15-69
My earlier comments were addressed and I recommend the plans can be
forwarded.
MK/jb
OO~D\Y1rn
rn
00
OCT 2 ) 19m
-16-
r
MEMORANDUM
TO:
1Jq#t(S,~ " 1-1 c Y t) r:-"J
ehri&tophcr Outro, Planning
-~ol-fw \tv IL~f'VCA
fA fi k ~ ~ i v : S ; 0.--..)
I oJ! 1/ 9 :>
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans
an;:3
Director
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Project: Sur It/l. C,' f Y'
I
amended plans for ~the above
the ~f&G~~A-tif)w Aw~~ .fA~k5 ~1'
that the project be forwarded to
Development Board^ for their
/l",v ~ Co 0 ~ "" t.l rv l.t~ 6? ~ ~ ~Ulc Lop.........e _v '1
A'\)V:~M~I po~~.
This department will not be required to sign..,foff the
permit documents associated with the subject project.
After reviewing the
referenced project
Department recommends
the Planning and
consideration.
m
ocr , 9 1993
00
C:AMEND1.ALL
-17-
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '93-429
RE:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~2i1Pt-
Superc~ty Discount Food & Beverage
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
October 21, 1993
The applicant has not commented about the landscape requirements
for u.s. #1 abutting the site.
The project should proceed with review by the Community
Redevelopment Advisory Board.
I will address this comment at the permit stage.
KH:ad
~
-18-
'p' I'
--1
I'
~.
,
I. .
, .
..'
~ I <~'~.: .].
\ ~r t:+ . I
!,.,..-.: ..1!'l!!!!!.l.t-t- !t....., ~ ~
, .
, t,
~ ~ '.1
, .
'-.. - -.J.-~_ ..~.:_~.-: __....
" I .
I
. 'J
.~
I
I
,
i :
I
, i
...'
-19-
NEW LOCATION OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
APPROVED ,BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBUC WORKS
l ,
~ ~
r-: L
....
lI/IIt ,~ 0
0 11,
'-l
m '-I
~
~
~ OF ~AReA~6 mVC~
<- -..........
\1
-, 1010.0'1'
~'"
- ,
~
-r
~~ L oeATIO" OP 4)u~I'rf..'" '.
p~",~. T_,' (..... CO'" ~.. ~
;.,;- ~ ~ p-L:. ~ I ' I (.n=.>/...L.....- '1
~~ ) ~(,,..c.... .. .,
~ff...-; - ~ "a ,.,.
~~ G.vn
7i:J-"~ '
tf.. 101 IJ. reDBed!, 14/;1;)",".
....=lZE'Vl"7Str? rrsr:- - .. .-
"-~e.kC..&-:"'r.~~ 11-0.
AfCfMIIct .. ftOI ,......... lilt ...., .... ..... 0 lilu:z.l:ae C. Oavls. A.I.A. ~ ","0 ..,...
fMfIIn'" .......... .. .. . .. IMd .... ... ......
1uMI"ft.... AIf.............................. 1IIIa. architact ll!!
. , 0 BOil toaa .,.,NTOH _II_eN fLOIltmA ~ ......
l!I.J!8 ...-..
F.UJJ
-20-
Il"'~ · I !II I .11:p' ." ,,'.' ~ : r I I .V~.I~~I"~:.~. ~':~~Ul;'!~' r
t . , !! +' -- --; iii 111I v' .
,:~_~ i,',' 'I I' w'.uii n;: ,t'., ,. .....,: -3~:' "",,; HU~ . .
'I' ....~ !i'- · I -,.-
, ~.-
'.. '_ ~ ( ~ = ' . _=..... ~ 11111 . 'H ---
I~i ~ n:~ I ~ ,- =9~~~:~~ ,i..' ~==:'
; : ~~ ~ ~ t J II ' , i '-- ,-- I-- ~ ~ .
~llt:tS ~ ~ ,HI Tn::. : fl).;C / - _~4 - i: I I ~~-
'~~'19 __ ~ r-r _.... _ - ~ I ==
, " , I! I -tnn&' ..... .. I ; ~ T: I ~- ==-_--
., 1 T '- . ., T - "
.. .-. ~ rta ~ R:3 ,- . .
."JTIr~ll 1 I t II ~ ~: ~~;;. ~ ~ ' I ' , ,J
') 1,1 · - = - II ',' .
1:!11)OQJI ~ ,- ~ J~~ - :=;.
:~~!t 1- eI~~ C~ ..---. .... \-- --- -I~- :
'i~;B:~JL.i. .. II -; .~~v!J .... '=',--'
.,-., i" ...;>; , I..... .,,~ "'. I r; '1 I ',1 f: .-
..: I R ~ .;", ,,~.J:tWii:y< _._ ~ ~f .' :rr I: ~~:.~ ~I Ti~~-~"~~F i : Iii u__
I~c;g - u.... - .. II : I II . ! i :. I I I .,
:.'~;-~i .; i ,*il= . mmJ: m'l - i 1~-";~1nri ~ '1 !If....T .~! i
· IIl1'lllllli!: ,~ ~ <' ~.lll ' " " T fT Ii It.
,: 1'1"1' ..: ~ II ' I r J' i r TT :
. << . '~I' TTTT I I I
'~, '! ~~ ~ rt~ I 'I ~ ~ ':'::~~I ~ rn.\1T ----" 'Ii I 1- -,-.--':'~"'i~. t=
-= ~~~: ! Hili '\' II! :=,lu~ j" _~J~I::.. '1~~'l~~DL-
-:. Jill ~ITri, Hf ff.H~.. .::: 136 ,.. fT,.!' ".~-) __J .
.~~:- =nil 'I' 1.1 II ~ -- ~ ]. I\... k4 r '.'D"
...... =.J] II I;~ r I II -.-.-. -- -~ :"~ :1
'IT I,A ""I'~ l'~ ~ 1-- =~I r=r -_-l!fTI, ·
11 : A: ' : : t ' ; :i c _. - = ~I .1= ~ . ! ~ --. J~
J. -.- 11 II, -,';1 ~"I 1I u.r, f -1/ ,: ei.':.,i l',.--
,., , .... "~' .'. I1L.1' - r---u I-j " I--
,:::JU1.4'1 r'.tt1:~~~;; ~ +l~~i ,l~ I~~ ~ ~~ " 'r-I ,11I('[' L i I 't ~-J ~' : ,I
:EJ [1 i . i :' I' "'! I ''T1 i' -- -- 'I I .1-- -' I
_:::J. s-.!~':i :.;). ''t chi J~ -- + _ " T ':','f ~: ,. '(!:$iw/i ~ (i
'~3'" II.. ~ 1 ,. fil 8 -- f_ "', I ,!< e.~.:-+-7:, '.'J, ) : :
I '1'; , i II I i" I . ill : ..... .... c' .,~ ' --........--:- .....,-'.
'.. J...J ~.-...--- .
I- _., -..... : .. -- ~~/ H
J. I : I I I iI, I':' I' - a ., V" _..............~' J I ::I
,==:J~ '!lI! I I II I 'TTli -i I. I.~ . -:1 ..::::. i IT: I' C~. 7 ~
'3 :~q~ ,tP 1 ( ,+ t9 1 ~l ~ -II~ :,11 ' '. I ,.... : S- 1--- . "It -'
,.~,:,:.~t.,1 I I I , :, _-t -- - -~ ".T,"" . }"--:-; -I. -- :co.. -."C:
:~ ~1!1~~rt ,: .-~-~y. ".1 '. -I.-'~I:.:r.....:.~)-
I~~l '.j 1.'.111 I I I: iiiii~- - " /,'1('1 Ijf~ -- - I
.... t 1 I :,' ' ,! I ' I-- r-' -....,
,', -.J~-iT.--r.>- , . (l~L 1=
PU; ! j L w ~/,~,<)lff~t: 7,
'.1 ... a . " , F'I-- ).l ~ II .
LJ :' :'1 0 ...- I r-' ; (;.:::;:-::/1 ' - "
J 'r In -- - - f:~ 1I1i.11l1t=--1 fJ ,. '. '- p-
jjN~~1 FL' I~-::J:: -- _u e.o 1/8 MILE.S~
j-f __/c :];,:" ::':: : : ~L ~.: r:/;i~ '1111 I, .
I L '.J~,.....r JII~,J . .1 r ,I r ) J J .: ~"O ,400. '800 FE~T - 4It
,1 I flr 0/4",,,11""" "e,.,- II)-q~
-i.
~f.
.. z
1
.,
~
G
t
l-
f-
I
~
.
,..
3
""
"
[';~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-333
TO: Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: James D. White,
City Engineer
DATE: November 8, 1993
RE: Supercity Discount Food & Beverage Site Plan
Engineering Comment 14, Memo No. 93-310
Since the paving of the subject alley is planned to be paved by
Public Works in the future, Engineering will waive this condition
of approval.
JDW/ck
cc: Vincent A. Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
m
~ln\1 - 8 mJ
~
PLANNING AND
ZONING PI
m
-/-
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
D.l
cc: Bldg, Plan, Eng, Util
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-292
TO:
J. Scott Miller
city Manager
FROM:
-~, i
Tambri J. Heyden /;,,;i fJ
Acting Planning and zoning Director
DATE:
November 10, 1993
RE:
Superclty Dlscount Food and Beverage
Major Slte Plan Mod1fication - File No. 778
Please place the above-referenced ltem on the Clty Comm1sslon
(sitting as the Community Redevelopment Agency) agenda for
Tuesday, November 16, 1993, under Development Plans - Non-Consent
Agenda.
"
-(~W~
D~SCRIPTION: shaf,~g~~Islam, a~plicant and owner, 1S requ~sting
slte plan approva~~'convert the existing, vacant, noncontorming
service station ai' 101 North Federal Highway (northwest corner of
Ocean Avenue and US #1) into a convenience store. Due to the
change in use of the property, additional parking spaces are
required which requires the parking lot to be brought up to
current standards.
Among the improvements proposed are exterior bU1lding changes 1n
an attempt to comply with the Community Design Plan "coastal
Village" district and the CBD GUldelines, drlveway mod1ficatlons
(including a separate agenda ltem for a parking lot varlance to
retain the Ocean Avenue driveway), an improved parking lot
layout, lighting, landscaping and a dumpster enclosure.
RECOMMENDATION: The Communlty Redevelopment Advisory Board
(CRAB) unanimously recommended approval of this request, subJect ~(O? ~
to the attached staff comments, with the exception of comment 4 ~~~i
of Michael Haag's, November 4, 1993, planning and Zoning kh~ ~
Department memorandum and subject to the following
recommendations:
1) if the parking lot variance (also scheduled to be
heard by the Clty CommiSSlon at the November 16th
meeting) is denied by the Clty Commission, the slte
plan shall not require re-review by the CRAB, and
2) regarding the dumpster locatlon, rev1sed pursuant
to Public works Department Memorandum #93-215
(Revised), to be located adjacent to the south slde of
the buildlng, the CRAB recommended that the dumpster
remain where lt curr,entlY encroacheS~,he alley at the, _ J
nort,hwest c~rner of1tt~e building. ~. t: tJ Jd, ~v _ (" 5 fYtt' ~
, '-+-1) IJ.-Lr t j..5 -+t'U..4-- At -c .
TJH/Jm IV /
Att.
A:SUPERCTY.JM
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD
AND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
November 5, 1993
Project Name:
Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
Applicant:
Shafiqul Islam
Agent:
shafiqul Islam
Location:
101 North Federal Highway - Northwest corner of
US Highway #1 and Ocean Ave.
Land Use Plan Designation: Mixed Use
Zoning District:
central Business District - CBD
Type of Use:
Retail food store
Number of units:
N/A
Square Footage: Site - 10,642 = 0.24 acres
Building - 1,784
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Mr. Islam, the appl icant and property
owner is requesting site plan review approval for the proposed
modifications to the 101 N. Federal Highway site. The .24 acre
si te is occupied with an existing one story 1,784 square foot
concrete block building. The previous use of the building was a
gasoline service station. At present time a gasoline service
station is a nonconforming use for the subJect SIte. The new use
is a retail food and beverage store. The existing structure will
remain in place with no increase in size.
Access to the site is by a two-way driveway on Ocean Avenue and a
two-way driveway on the twenty (20) foot wide City alley that abuts
the north side of the site. The following noteable changes are
proposed for the exterior of the building: block in existing
windows, overhead doors and door openings; install new doors and
new storefronts along the east side of the building, add wood board
& batten siding to the walls, apply decorative lamps on the walls
and install a standing seam Sloped roof around the perimeter of
three sides of the building.
Note: most of the improvements to the project are a result of the
project showing compliance with the code requirements based on the
change in use from the previous service station to the new retail
store. The change of use resulted in additional parking spaces
being required.
The following colors proposed for the building and wall signage are
consistent with the colors identified in the Community Design Plan
and the Central Business District Guidelines: Walls - wood, beige
and stucco, light yellow; Roof - roman blue; Wall Sign - dark
brown. The vehicle use area will be improved to comply with the
requirements of the parking lot code for construction material and
configuration of layout. The applicant has formally submitted an
application for a variance from the code requirement regarding the
distance the driveway on Ocean Avenue is located from US Highway #
1. The total number of parking spaces provided on-site exceeds the
number required for the new use. The plans indicate that the
installation of the site lighting fixtures will comply with
specifications listed in the Central Business District Landscape
Code. A concrete block dumpster enclosure is proposed for the site
wi th ,the color of the stucco finish matching the color of the
building. The landscaping proposed for the site will comply with
the code. Flowering trees and multiple species of plants and hedge
material are shown along the Ocean Avenue entrance to the site.
The Ocean Avenue driveway entrance has been coordinated with the
new Ocean Avenue streetscape improvement plans.
-1-
.
supercity staff Report
Page 2
REVIEW OF STAFF COMMENTS: Find attached comments from all
reviewing departments. As indicated in their comments they
recommend the project proceed through the approval process subject
to the permit documents reflecting compliance with staff comments
and technical compliance with the City codes.
The concern regarding Memorandum No. 93-215 from the Director of
Public works was rectified between the applicant and the director.
The solution was accomplished by moving the enclosure. The new
location is directly south of the building. The new location will
include a landscape island being constructed south of the
enclosure. The handicapped parking space that is shown on the
plans at the new enclosure location will be relocated to the front
of the building. The balance of the site will remain unchanged.
The total number of parking spaces will remain the same. This
change is minor and the permit documents will reflect the correct
location. staff will w1tness the new location during the permit
review process. The new location was an alternate location
discussed by the Technical Review Committee during the review
process of the project.
A conflict has arisen regarding the responsibil ty of the road
improvements for the twenty (20) foot wide City alley that borders
the north side of the site and the time that the work shall be
completed. The Deputy City Engineer's comment No. 4 from
memorandum No. 93-310 states that the property owner shall be
responsible for making improvements to the alley prior to the new
business opening.
The consensus of the Technical Review committee is that the work
should be performed by the City. Memorandum Number 93-212 from Bob
Gibson of the Public Works Department states that the improvements
for the alley are scheduled for the new year and the job was given
a high priority. The part of the alley near the proposed driveway
is somewhat improved do to the Utilities Department working on the
utilities in that area and repairing same. It is also possible
that the property owner may want to improve the alley prior to
opening the new store. It also should be noted that if the
property owner damages the existing alley as a result of making the
improvements to his site he will have to repair the damaged areas.
This conflict should be resolved during the board review of the
project.
RECOMMENDATION: The planning and Zoning Department recommends
approval of the site plan review request subject to all staff
comments, with the exception of the requirement of the property
owner being responsible for improving the alley. The
recommendation for approval is also conditioned upon approval of
the parking lot variance for the location of the driveway on Ocean
Avenue.
-2-
.n.: STASUPE . JJvt
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Acting planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Zoning and S1te Development Administrator
DATE:
November 4, 1993
RE:
site Plan Review - 2nd Review
Major site Plan Modification
Project: supercity Discount Food & Beverage
Location: 101 North Federal Highway - Northwest Corner
of us Highway # 1 and Ocean Ave.
Agent: Shafiqul Islam
File No.: 778
The following is a list of comments regarding the 2nd review of the
above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are
divided into two (2) categories:
The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved
comments either from the first review or new comments as a result
of the 2nd review. To show compliance with these comments will not
substantially alter the configuration of the site and the design of
the building except for comment Number 1. The applicant has made
a formal submittal to seek relief from the code requirements for
the comment.
The second set of comments is a list of recommendations I believe
will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project.
All comments can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting
considering that the request for Site Plan Review is approved and
the parking lot variance is approved. The applicant must
understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of
the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building
Department for permits for the proposed project.
1. The plans indicate an existing driveway located on Ocean
Avenue approximately forty-three (43) feet west of the intersection
of Highway #1. Section 5-142 (h) (3) Article X of the Parking Lot
code requires that the driveway be located no closer than one
hundred eighty (180) feet to the intersection. An approval of a
Parking Lot variance foi driveway location is required prior to
approval of the site plan.
2. In order to be in compliance with the zoning district setback
dimensions, remove the new portion of the roof overhang that is
proposed for the north and south corners of the west side of the
building. The new roof overhang shall not extend past the face of
the west side of the existing building. Also I specify on the
elevation view drawing that the roof overhang along the north side
of the building will not exceed two (2) fee~.
3. Amend the typical parking space drawing of the handicapped
striping to be consistent with the City standard drawing B90012.
4. specify on the site plan drawing I in note form, that the
overhead utility lines shown at the rear of the building will be
relocated to provide underground service to the building.
5. Correct the incons istencies regarding the location of the
windows that are shown on the east elevation of the building and
the proposed floor plan.
6. On the elevation view drawings of the building specify the
color of the exterior door and window frames. I recommend using a
color harmonious with the color of the building.
7. On the site/landscape plan show and identify a code required
type of exterior furnishing. An example would be a decorat1ve
bench, trash receptable, bollards and other related items. Adding
a decorative bench will comply with an architectural feature
requi r 2d to mee t the spec i f ic a tlons of the COlnlllUnl ty Des 19n plan.
-3-
supercity 2nd Review Comments
Page 2
8. After reviewing the amended plans, it has been determined that
they do not comply with the requirements of the Community Des1gn
Plan regarding architectural features and/or treatments. Find
attached Appendix II of the Community Design Plan. Appendix II
sets forth the standards used to achieve the appropriate
architectural theme. Please observe the Coastal Village section of
the appendix. An asterisk has been placed next to the areas where
the project is shown in compliance with the code. The required
number of elements has been identified so that the applicant is
aware of where the project is deficient. The applicant shall
understand that the wall accessory that is required to bring the
project into conformance with the design code will require separate
submittal for review by the Planning and Zoning Department, the
Community Redevelopment Advisory Board, and the Community
Redevelopment Agency prior to a permit being issued.
9. On the site/landscape plan identify the width of the required
landscape strip located at the northeast corner of the site. The
minimum width is three (3) feet.
10. Correct the inconsistency regarding the spacing of the hedging
required for the vehicle use area. The plant list specifies
twenty-four (24) inches on center and the notes identify eighteen
(18) inches on center. The minimum spacing required by code is
eighteen (18) inches. Also, add to the plant list the spread
specification for the hedge material. The minimum spread required
by code for hedge material is eighteen (18) inches. The code
required height for the hedge material is twenty-tour (24) inches.
11. To show compliance with the streetscape requirements of the
community Design Plan, omit the three (3) Black Olive trees shown
on the plan along us Highway #1 and ocean Avenue and replace with
a species identified in Appendix III of the community Design Plan.
Note: At least ninety (90) percent of all the trees on the site
shall be native species and all trees shall meet the tree
specifications identified in the Landscape code. See
recommendation No.1.
12. Specify on the site/landscape plan the surface material
proposed for the island shown in front of the south end of the
building.
13. The Coconut tree is not a native species. correct the plan
accordingly.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That the replacement tree species for comment No. 11 above be
compatible with the landscape material proposed for the new Ocean
Avenue streetscape landscaping as well as being a spec1es listed in
Appendix III of the Community Design Plan. It is further
recommended that the tree species proposed along US Highway #1 be
selected from an approved list of trees to be planted under power
lines as well as a species listed in the Community Design Plan.
All trees shall meet the tree specifications listed in the
Landscape Code.
2. That the Community Redevelopment Agency consider exercising
the code regarding section 6 E 4. d. (2) of Appendix A - Zoning
[modifying requirements for parking and loading spaces).
considering that the type of use generally results in a high number
of vehicles entering and exiting the site, the number of parking
spaces is more valuable than a loading space. The site has two
surplus parking spaces based on the thirty-five (35) percent
reduction of parking spaces allowed for uses located in the central
Business District. Instead of omitting the surplus spaces and
arranging the site to depict a loading space, that more than likely
customers will over park, allow the surplus parking spaces to
remain as shown. It IS possibly that the proprietor will
efficiently and economically operate the business by having
deliveries made during slow hours of operation.
A: STASUPE . ,JM
-4-
SUPERCITY DISCOUNT FOOD AND BEVERAGE - COASTAL VILLAGE
EVALUATION OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN
. IDENTIFIES THE STANDARDS LISTED IN THE COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN
THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR THE PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
App.n
APPENDIX II. BOYNTON BEACH COMMUNITY DESIGN
PLAN STANDARDS
. All applicable projects shall comply with the design standards
as follows:
Jil;>-
(a) New projects. New projects shall comply with the site plan
review process contained in Chapter 19. Plans submitted
for review shall show and identify a minimum of one (1)
type of ilnllb roonn, mat.et'lll1lU1ct ane (1) typ. or exterior
wall finish material from the appropriate architectural style
list. Alternately, the applicant may submit to the commu.
nity appearance board, materials that are harmonious with
the required architectural style for roof and exterior wall
covering material. Submitted plans shall also incorporate
at least fifty (50) per cent ofthe architectural features and/or
treatments identified on the appropriate architectural style
list into the design of the building, or show architectural
features and/or treatments that are harmonious with the
required architectural style.
(h, Modification. to e%i,ting project.. All other projects which
must comply with the community design plan shall show
and identify on the plans submitted for review a minimum
of one (1) type of t'lnllh rooflng material and one (1) type of
exterior wall finish material from the appropriate archi-
tectural style list or present to the community appearance
board, materials that are harmonious with the required
architectural style for roof and exterior wall covering ma-
terial. Submitted plans shall also incorporate at least
twenty. five (25) per cent of the architectural features and/or
treatments identified on the appropriate architectural style
list into the design of the building, or show architectural
features and/or treatments that are harmonious with the
required architectural style.
(c) Architectural amenities. All projects subject to compliance
with the community design plan may choose an architec-
tural amenity Crom the appropriate architectural Ityle lilt
or prelent amenltles that are harmonious with the re-
quired architectural style and incorporate the amenity into
the site and receive credit as a required architectural fea-
ture and/or treatment.
Supp. No. 46
635
-5-
App.D
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
(d) Colored elelJations. All projects subject to compliance with
the community design plan shall submit elevation draw-
ings of all sides oC each building proposed to be developed
on the site. Colored elevation drawings will only be re-
quired Cor the front elevation of a structure when all sides
of a building are consistent in color and materials. Each
colored elevation drawing shall identify the type oC each
exterior rmish material and state the color by name, man.
ufacturer and model or style number. A color sample shall
be submitted as an example along with the color or product
identified on the plans. The sample will be used for the
Unal site inspection to ensure that the correct product and
color were used for the'project. For projects which require
site plan approval, all color elevation drawings and/or sam-
ples shall be submitted to the planning department by the
site plan approval deadline date.
ARCmTECTURAL THEMES
1 COa8tal Village
11 Mediterra-
nean/Spanish
Roofs:
{Metal standing seam
1 REOUIRED Asphalt Shin,gle
, Wood shake
Formed aluminum
Barrel tile
S-tile
Exposed rafters
Exposed beams
Walls:
{Horizontal wood siding
Horizontal vinyl
1 REQUIRED siding
Board & batten
Slant siding
Stucco medium
to heavy
Bricks
Tile
Adobe stone
Supp. No. 48
636
-6-
111 Modt.m
Metal
Tar & gravel
Built-up w/deck
Space frame
w/skylight
Curtain wall
Reflective glass
Thermo pane
Glass Block
Stone veneer
Stucco
Tile
Precast wall
Plastic laminate
Wood siding
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION App. II
11 Mediterra-
1 Coastal Village neanlSpanish III Modem
Architectural features
and/or treatments
Wall accessories:
{Shutters Iron decorative Aluminum grill
1 REQUIRED Lattice work grills work
Decorative moldings Wood decorative Steel grill work
Balcony grills Accent tile
Accent tile Decorative
Balcony moldings
Arches
Bell tower
Shutters
Windows:
~Multi.pane glas. Multi-pane glass Spandrel glass
1 REQUIRED window Fixed glass Fixed glass
*Fixed glass Stained glass Reflective glass
Beveled glass
Extra features:
1 Decorative bench.. Decorative Exterior
1 REQUIRED . Exterior lamps lamps lighting
Related ornaments Iron gates
Multi-panel
doors
Carved doors
Amenities:
Front patio Interior court Exterior view
Rear patio Fountains, elevator
Wood deck Covered walk. Buildings
Trellises ways crossway
Gazebo Sculpture
Picket fence Fountain
Dominant exterior
colors:
Beige Pink No dominant
Pale yellow White color
Egg shell Red to orange
Blue to gray tone Earth tones
(Ord. No. 9()"8S, 9-18-90)
-7-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-215 (REVISED)
TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan - Second Review - Supercity Discount Food
& Beverage
DATE: October 22, 1993
The present dumpster location at the above site could cause
stacking on Federal Highway. The approach or location needs to be
changed.
I request that plans do not go forward until the problem has been
addressed.
If you have any questions please give me a call.
Eichorst
Works Director
REIer
-8-
P~LIC WO~S DEPARTMENT
ROADS & STREETS DIVISION
MEMORANDUM *93-212
TO: Tambri Haylen, Senior Planner
FROM: Robert Gibson, Roads & Streets Supervisor
SUBJ: Alley No. of E. Ocean & south of NE 1st st.
DATE: October 21, 1993
From Federal Highway to NE 4th st. is on my resurfacing list for
"94" overall 343' X 22' wide with a rating of "13". This will take
approximately 44 tons X $30.00/ton for a total of $1,320.00.
The 60' or so of utility repairs at the east end is the best
section of alley at this time.
If you have any questions please let me know.
supervisor
ltG/cr
cc: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
OC1 'I- , ,gro
mnM
-9-
,
"
"
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
FROM:
DATE:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Harry T. Benoit, City, P.E., City Engineer -f/--'1-. b .
October 28, 1993
TO:
RE:
Supercity Discount Food & Beverage
The comments in my memorandum of September 23, 1993 relative to the site plan for
this project have been satisfactorily addressed.
I recommend that this plan be presented to the City Commission for approval.
92-025/241
m
PlANN'NG~O
IONIN O~n,.
-10-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-310
TO: Ms. Tarnbri Heyden
Acting Planning Director
FROM. Office of the City Engineerj--'
RE: Technical Review Comments
Supercity Discount Store
Recommendation to Forward Plans to Reviewing
O~tober 27, 1993
()~rfl::
Board(s)
The Engineering Department has conducted a review of the amended
plans and has performed a site reconnaisance of the Supercity site.
Our comments are as follows:
Deputy City Engineer's Comments
1. The existing concrete approach along Ocean Avenue shall be
removed and a standard sidewalk constructed in it's place.
2. The sidewalk shall transition through the ingress/egress area
and be constructed at elevations which will facilitate the move-
ment of handicap persons through this area. The sidewalk area
through the approach shall be construqted with no less than 2500
psi concrete and be a minimum of six (6) inches in thickness.
3. Provide a "Stop-Sign" (R1-1) at the intersection of the alley
at Federal Highway.
4. The site reconnaisance revealed that the last thir"ty (30') feet
of the east end of the alley is in need of repair, therefore, the
plans shall be revised to indicate the removal of weeds and sand,
removal of irregular asphaltic concrete mounds, adjustment of valve
covers including the overlaying of the subject thirty (30) feet of
alley with a minimum of Type II asphaltic concrete (1").
5. The "Handicap-stall" detail does not comply with the latest
edition of the Department on Community Affairs Accessibility Manual.
A copy of the detail may be obtained in the Engineering Department.
6. The site plan is devoid of suitable Parking Lot Lighting. Revise
plans to indicate the location of lighting standards.
7. A "No Left Turn" sign shall be placed where the alley intersects
Federal Highway.
8. Provide Environmental Test Data and other related technical infor-
mation regarding the condition of sub-surface soils which currently
exist in the area where the underground fuel tanks were situated.
~>o<..j~~S-
cc: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
-11-
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-214
October 27, 1993
From:
Tambri Heyden, Acting P1anning,2trector
Don Jaeger, Building Official~
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
tro:
Via:
Re:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
2nd Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Super City Discount Food & Beverage
Location - 101 N. Federal Highway
Applicant - Shafiqul Islam
File No. - 778
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
referenced project. Only Comment No. 2 has to be met:
2. The plan should show the handicap access from the
street into t~e building for pedestrians.
This could be complied with on the permit set of plans so we
recommend that this project proceed, however, the permit plans
will need to be approved by the appropriate state agency since
the installation of the three-compartment sinks will be used for
preparation of food.
~ fP~~
7/ ~~,
Al Newb ld
m
m@fEH
m
AN:mh
SUPERCIT.TRC
-12-
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-283 WDC
TO: Planning and Zoning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: october 28, 1993
SUBJECT: TRC Site Plan
SUPER CITY
We have no objections to this plan.
)cWl lAM
BOYNTON
WDC:CP
-13-
WfJG
D. CAVANAUGH FPO I
BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-455
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
TO: Tambri Heyden,
Acting Planning D
DATE: October 27 I 1993
SUBJECT: Supercity Discount Food & Beverage - Second Review
Please be advised Items 3C and 4 of our original comments were
not addressed.
In addition, an acceptable access cover over the existing
sanitary sewer cleanout will be required.
All comments must be addressed prior to building permit issuance.
We have no objection to this project proceeding through the
review process.
Please refer any additional questions on this matter to Skip
Milor or Peter Mazzella of this office.
Attachments
19b
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
Chief Field Inspector - .5 hour
fn), ~ 111\ ~ ~ \~n~ ID
lU\1 (lht"
Pll\NNING AND
-14-
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-405
ill m ~1.l'ml ~ ~j~ ~..
DATE: September is, 1993
SUBJECT: Super City Discount Food & Beverage
File #778 - 1st Review
TO: Chris Cutro,
Planning & Zoning
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilitie.
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
1. Move water meter location to green area east of
proposed dumpster pad (Sec. 26.16[c)).
2. Reduced pressure zone backflow preventor will be
required (Sec. 26.107).
3. Technical Comments:
a) What type of food service is planned for
thi~ facility'?
b) Show source of irrigation water.
c) Show sanitary sewer service location on Sheet
1 of 4.
4. Show the proposed easement over the new water service
(Sec. 26-33[a)).
It is our recomm~ndation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor, 375-6407, or Peter Mazzella, 375-6404.
19b
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
Chief Field Inspector - .5 hr.
Administrative Asst. -.5 hr.
Asst. to the Director - .5 hr.
-15-
I
MEMORANDUM
POLICE #93-167
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
DATE:
October 25, 1993
REF:
2nd Review - Super city Discount
Ms. Heyden,
I have reviewed the plans as submitted and have the following
comments:
Applicant (depending on hours of operation) must comply
with the convenience store security act, Section 15-69
My earlier comments were addressed and I recommend the plans can be
forwarded.
MK/jb
oomowm
ill
rn
Or.T l ~ 1900
PLANNIN AND
-16-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
1f4Y1t~fJ.,' 1-1 € Y t) ~VJ
~hri&to~acr Cutror planning
'vJ I L ~ rvcA
~ i v : s; o.--.J
.::s 0 {.f w
fAfYk~
101/? "3
Site Plan Review - New
anj3
Director
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Site Plan - Amended Plans
Project: Su.rt/l. c, t'-I
I
amended plans for ~the above
the tl&Gfi.e:A "t'i Ow Aw' f'A~k5 ~1'
that the project be forwarded to
Development Board^ for their
It- ,v):. Co 0 )'S'l ",., 1.ll"11'tp If? {? \:} ~v12 q,o..... ~.<
A, \S v: ~"" '- OA.f'\' ~.
This department will not be required to Siqn~f the
permit documents associated with the subject project.
After reviewing the
referenced project
Department recommends
the Planning and
consideration.
m
OCT , 9 1993
m
C:AMEND1.ALD
-17-
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 193-429
TO:
RE:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning , Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist f(2f~
Supercity Discount Food' Beverage
FROM:
DATE:
October 21, 1993
The applicant has not commented about the landscape requirements
for U.S. #1 abutting the site.
The project should proceed with review by the Community
Redevelopment Advisory Board.
I will address tl.is comment at the permit stage.
KH:ad
L.
-18-
'li .
t'
-t
il
I
I
: I
f. .
, .
't
~
...'
. .
.......... - ~-_.._.._._--,...
. I .
I
.~
..
-19-
NEW LOCATION OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBUC WORKS
~
I
l
,
l"-
I'-
t..:
....
~
~ OF CA3~AC4& TRVClc:,
---- ---......
\1
1010. 1l'1'
^. r/..". .
~~ LeeATlDo' Op -""/' "
/~~. T_ . r- ... ~..;..-..
,q-~"" "...(:...,"'1 ~ ~-:f.'7
pl,.~ 1 ~(,rl- , ./
i5-,H...-., - u---I "a ,.,.
~~~
7;J~-"~ .
l 101 /I.,'. F'eoee.t. 14'11..,.,.'.
~r:n'l~8{T' ?lTrF.U.JJ'. _.
. '41:.&.4. ~r.~~ .'-0.
~f"O ~
Arct'\IIrIet .. .... ,....-. .... .... .... .....,.,. 0 ~geC. Cavia. A.I.A.
......".. ........... " .. . .... .... ..... ... ---
~. .... ~ ..... .. -..... - ... ef"Cnltect :!!!!.,
. ..:1 .0. 11I111I ~~ ..AblI h.~ -~
.._-
-20-
LOCATION MAP
SUPERCITY DISCOUNT FOOD & BEVERAGE
\~'" '1 "" ',', '\ /'I"! " "-,,_I-~; ;""'''''~:';'>~~WJ!:-! r . .~,., L "-,,,! I~
f' : I ! ., J}:....l
. i. ,I I'.IJ a I ...... : '-<::' l' . fl'" ;: I I .
'::'1 2~ '~~ I III" '" '" lft!n::::..r.: -:iiii · --- LJf,I(8 :: ,i,;=, I
!' ~~. 0 - ( -t \I d ": ' ..~..~l::r.. I I . .! ~ f-, -- . . ~ h"j i' i :.. r, f--
I, ~.\l~ t n -:1\ I H::::J 11-=- =: =:J ~ ,Tl ill'ctfi ~. -:-:- - " - . ft' ~ I--
, __ . '\.. lAP 11I!J:l I -- -.,:mn"".. =:.=- .;1 "- I I I ' '~
:-:-t\.\ ~ . II I 1'f '- _.4 _ !.;. III ij:,,, 0--;=. r, 1 , " -,/-j.---
~1IL.L) q_ ( F- ' ~ II . I iOI t-- I I I I . "1 ' .
,'~~'I~:r~ c_ "": .. !--. === \... I I" -. '1,--
",,112 i t-= ! 1 II 1- - -
" 11 T 1\." 1 1_' lCoIIi ~ I' I I I I I T J, ~ - -.
:~Jj ~~ ': ~ i =: ~~~.i~r, ";; R3 ir " f( ~"
{~~~ lO-~- ~.~ c~-..~'_,__n _=- 't-11
;1 c -. I ElK . ~ . f{j (
;;tD:l~~ ~,~ 1'1M ~ -; ,~~~!J " \-=-'I'~i!';'
.. ..__: "--1; ....~~ _11_ T 11 _. BE' = 8 V '111 r'''''-:--~''
" I '; , ~... " lil!l. II, I 1-- - dJ._.~ . I I ' iT1 t -- 1----.-:
1r:'-'~!!lIIJ! ...~t-:I illII ' ;:;J'" :.: I) II ,.... ---'! " , I ' :! :, I · T, -- - j
~,'::~Qfu~,'lj \ n.... rrn ~I.' : Ib($ ~ i 1~;;~lnri ~ '111-:..1.1 .~: ; --
. TlJ!:IIillITIIIIIltL. ,. , ...., ~: ! I' :.111 ' ',' I! I -. _.
@~_T~I"T' I I'~ :..~ srt~ r~ 11\: ~1111;~1,~1.:; :; -~ - ., I';! ".', ' , , T r l
~ ' rr.'" ~ ..... t= I' ... ...::::=:
E1 . lJ I . T '. ..' '~1'"'' i I f"~--'~'~~ ----:-J f=:.:_-
U _ f11 I ! ' ' I .-.- LJ) r . f ' . 1 - ..:.-L-1 ~
. Alii r\ Hili 1 ill:~' lu~ '=, · " ==, ,~ ; ", ' ", l~Dun'F; \
II I Ill, '.1 ell c:=. re'" ~ ~ .
,J _,,-1lI ,\ :1 ".1 I .. ~ '. =1 /5=. ", ''{;, L '~j)I" I
l - _- ~ IT ~LJ m~ u. ..........,."......'11 ~
, " CJl U I ,~AI iT n:: - -- ... ~~-~~' ~.; - -. '0-:-"1
~IT u ..., ~D:~ '. : ~ u. r11
liR lTf11 I !I~ B ,-_. c:=~ '~ J --~ ';
1 Q: ',~l :~i ~ .. - ~I .~ 4 . I 1--1 j
. __ .' i. ..... at I C I = i -1 r : : I : -_. 1
] i.....,.: r ... '0" 'Ill. ffio} __~ 'tr-1I:# ; : \ J-
":-:i1 r~--T 11 I' Ti I :r:r..: I I -- ---1
'~:11,\.11 \"'T1, ,~,::, . I.:.. ~~' '-- ~ ",' M " L i I ~ .~- . ,.
~,'.:~. ~~.~ +~~; , Il'~ : ~; I :: I It w-!' '1= ~- 'f~' . i ,; ~~~' ;i i~ I, \ fJ1tlk-flfi t~ (I
::3 I. ' . I' ~'- I- ~i-- -- /' i':)' ~" 1 'I 1 J ~ : I
-=:J II'IT I' Ii '.1 ..- 0 . . --~- 'J .
'.:.::.u i\r~1tt I ,',1,'.11 -: ...,:. ,J.;;;,.1';;;' ~ .:ti~:~":~.. .
.. ._ 111:111 In I IT . r:l ~ ro.;... ' i.. / 'i .. v' -~.~' ~":/" I~J
,_~~ '!II! III in I I "'TTl 'J .. ~~ =:f ~ ' ill '; i!,~---'-' n
---:J 1; i1 irf r 1 -~ I -.f I~.r . I ,-.- .: r: -~ -, .. ~ .
:~ t..~:, Ii 1 r ~, · LJ; .1 ~ -: T ~ I I I' '1+'" 1 I. - - - .-
,~~ ..,:;~ql;1I' 11 Ir T \,~: -=' - ~ ~~T' I, ij '~''''''';I~ .. ~'~:_" 1/-,1
~.I '!!III tl U ,: . ~~" '/.. --/'r' .r--iJ~
\ '. ~ l ,1 \: I "i I '1 'TI : iiiiirl - - - J. : 1 I (-.' ~~_ - f-~ ---4 I
. -.J I, __~_~,.- \" J ~ r I I ' fa f- -7
11r.".... IW..... iif'. 'iOiiT; : L t'~L -::::::::n:m:=:1 ~-;--, c;==-==--} rr= .. .. - '-, =-
PU ~ ! i _ U, , ,''='''c.J 1r[: '-fl~ r
I I ,; i! 0 G a I I" ,(/,,:::;-;/1[-- I.
J ~ , , r-il--1. .- - ' .I, 1I1i1l11l~-1 n . ..-.-
~ u d'-];J r=: i.. IlL- --:J~ =- -- -- _.,. : F . 1/8 MILE.SV~ !
LU rr .rIIl : '--' : ' L..a 0 ~.
\ r-J,r I ~I:: T ,:',,:' : : ~' l'; i~ Till 1 II .' ~ i
I L~/ ~ J: 1111 T I I ) I j ':1 ~ '0400. '800 FEET - ..
.~, , .,.,.! II , 1f1r 01 a..",,,.,,,. "...,.~ I(}-q~
~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-333
TO: Tambri Heyde~
Acting Planning , Zoning Director
FROM: James D. White,
City Engineer
DATE: November 8, 1993
RE: Supercity Discount Food & Beverage Site Plan
Engineering Comment 14, Memo No. 93-310
Since the paving of the subject alley is planned to be paved by
Public Works in the future, Engineering will waive this condition
of approval.
JDW/ck
cc: Vincent A. Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
ill
. .' 1 _
~ :'"
~I(W - 8 f!RJ
rtrn
PlANNING AND
ZONING EPT.
-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEIIORAHDOM NO. 93-310
TO: Ms. Tambri Heyden ~ber 27,
Acting Planning Director ~~
FROM: Office of the City Enqineerj--' ()
HE: Technical Revicnr Comments
Supercity Discount Store
Recommendation to I'o~ard Plans to Reviewinq Board(s)
1993
The Engineering Department has conducted a review of the amended
plans and has perfor.med a site reconnaisance of, the Supercity site.
Our comments are as follows:
Deputy City Engineer's Comments
1. The existing concrete approach alonqOcean Avenue shall be
removed and a standard sidewalk constructed in it's place.
2. The sidewalk shall transition through the ingress/egress area
and be constructed at elevations which wil~ facilitate the move-
ment of handicap persons through this area. The sidewalk area
through the approach shall be construqted with no less than 2500
psi concrete and be a minimum of six (6) inches in thickness.
3. Provide a "Stop-Sign" (R1-1) at the intersection of the alley
at Federal Highway.
4. The site reconnaisance revealed that the last thirty (3D') feet
of the east end of the alley is in need of' repair, therefore, the
plans shall be revi.ed to 1n41ca~. the ~8mov.l of ...de and sand,
removal ot irreqular asphaltic concreta mounds, adjus~ent of valve
covers including the overlaying of the subject thirty (30) feet of
alley with a minimum of Type II aspha~tic concrete (In).
5. The "Handicap-stall" detail does not comply with the latest
edition of the Department on Community Affairs Accessibility Manual.
A copy of the detail may be obtained in the Engineering Department.
6. The site plan is devoid of suitable Parking Lot Lighting. Revise
plans to indicate the location of lighting standards.
7. A "No Left Turn" sign shall be placed where the alley intersects
Federal Highway.
8. Provide Environmental Test Data and other related technical infor-
mation regarding the condition of sub-surface soils which currently
exist in the area where the underground fuel tanks were situated.
L ~,~_.-t:A.~', ;2)
cc: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
-~-..,-