REVIEW COMMENTS
f-/ L";
---'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-24
January 29, 1993
TO: Members of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board,
Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission
~
FROM: Christopher cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
RE: st. Mark Catholic School and Church - Conditional Use
Approval and Site Plan Review, File No. 711
INTRODUCTION: Dan O'Connell, agent for st. Mark Catholic School
and Church, is requesting Conditional Use approval for a preschool
facility in conjunction with Site Plan review for the construction
of a prekindergarten and kindergarten facility. The request for
Condi.tional Use approval is consistent with Appendix A-Zoning,
section 6.E.l.r. The Diocese of Miami recently purchased the .606
acre site where the new building and pre-school use will be
located. The existing school/church site plus the new site is
located approximately one-hundred thirty (130) feet east of U.S.
Highway #1 and between N.E. 4th Avenue and N.E. 6th Avenue. The new
site will be located in the northwest corner of the eXisting
school/church site. The existing and new site are both located in
the Central Business District and Coastal Village Architectural
Design District. The eXisting 19 acre school/church site consists
of a 474 seat church a two-story separate rectory bUilding that
contains offices, three car garage and 5 bedrooms. The school is a
285 student kindergarten through 8th grade elementary school with
an attached 5,184 square foot auditorium. The remainder of the
developed portion of the existing site consists of a playground
area and parking lot with associated landscaping. A large part of
the eastern and southern portion of the overall site is vacant and
covered with mangroves. The new .606 acre site has an eXisting 615
square foot residence that is proposed to be made into a storage
building. The new one story building contains an area of
\
approximately 4,396 square feet. The building will house a 30
student kindergarten classroom and a 25 student prekindergarten
faCility with kitchen and associated office space. The new facility
will add 25 children to the existing 285 students bringing the
total to 310 students and children attending the premise. A portion
of the new site will have a 4 foot high chain link fenced
playground area. The playground area will be used by the
kindergarten and pre-kindergarten children for approximately two
(2) hours per day, Monday through Friday. The building will be
constructed of concrete block with stucco finish. The gable roof
will have roof Shingles that match the existing school building.
The color of the exterior walls and roof will match the existing
school building. Concurrent with the request for site Plan Review
and Conditional Use Approval, the applicant is requesting an appeal
to the Community Design Plan. The request is to appeal prOViding
the roof material, exterior wall material and architectural
features required by the Coastal Village Architectural DeSign Theme
of Appendix II of the Community Design Plan (See separate Community
Design Plan appeal package). The parking spaces required for the
new building and use will be prOVided by the surplus parking spaces
provided on the existing school/church site. The two-hundred fifty-
four (254) prOVided parking spaces allows a surplus of ninety-eight
(98) parking spaces. The number of parking spaces required for the
entire project was calculated by applying the numbers and ratios
identified in the zoning code to the data prOVided by the applicant
for the church, elementary school, storage building and pre-school
facility. The method to determine the number of required spaces for
a rectory building is not speCifically identified in the zoning
code. However, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends that
the eight (8) parking spaces plus the three (3) car garage will
adequately serve the parking needs for the rectory building for
this site. Applying the central Business District thirty-five (35)
percent reduction in number of required parking spaces, there are
-1-
st. Mark Catholic School and Church
Conditional use, Memo #93-024
page 2
one-hundred fifty-six (156) parking spaces required for the entire
project including the new building. The new site will have new
.perimeter landscaping and incorporate some of the existing
vegetation for the yard area. The agent for the project has
indicated that the new property will be unified by title with the
remaining school/church property. consistent with Article X,
Parking Lots of the Code of Ordinances, the proposed construction
of the new building will require the applicant to upgrade the new
and existing school/church site landscaping and parking area to
comply with the current code. The applicant has applied for a
variance requesting relief from the landscaping and drainage
requirements of the code. (See separate Parking Lot Variance
package) The Public Hearing for the parking Lot variances will be
heard by the planning and Development Board at their February 9,
1993 meeting. The city Commission will make the final determination
on the variances at their regular City Commission meeting on
February 16, 1993.
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING (See attached location map): Each
property and developed site that abuts the subject property has a
central Business District zoning classification with a mixed use
land use designation. Abutting the property to the north and across
N.E. 6th Avenue are lots developed with single family residents,
duplex buildings and apartments. Abutting the property to the east
is a vacant site covered with mangroves. The east portion of the
school/church site is also vacant and covered with mangroves. The
south end of the school/church site is vacant and covered with
mangroves and south of that is a vacant site primarily covered with
mangroves. Abutting the property to the west and across a 20 foot
wide public alley are commercially developed sites: a strip
shopping center, office building and a restaurant, all buildings
front on U.s. Highway #1.
PROPOSED USES (See attached site plan): The Diocese of Miami
purchased the .606 acre site and is proposing construction of the
4,396 square foot kindergarten and prekindergarten building with a
fenced playground area. The building will consist in part of an
approximately 2,758 square foot 25 student preschool facility,
kitchen and office space with the remaining 1,638 square footage
occupied by a 30 student kindergarten classroom. As stated above
consistent with section 6.E.1.r, Appendix A-Zoning of the Boynton
Beach Code of Ordinances, the preschool facility is a use requiring
conditional Use approval. See attached "Exhibit A", a letter from
Father Block, pastor of the Church that describes the proposed use
of the new facility.
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES: The Community
Redevelopment Agency and City Commission shall consider only such
conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning
regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional
uses absolutely or conditioned upon faithful adherence to and
fulfillment of such restrictions and conditions including, but not
limited to, the dedication of property for streets, alleys,
recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary
for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens'
general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with
the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an
application for conditional use, the community Redevelopment Agency
and City commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use
on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make
written findings certifying that satisfactory provision has been
made concerning the following standards, where applicable:
NOTE: Following the standards is a brief analysis of the overall
site as it relates to the standard.
-2-
st. Mark Catholic School and Church
Conditional Use, Memo #93-024
page 3
1.
Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed
structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile
and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and
control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
~he proposed structure and use will not have a separate
1ngress/egress driveway but, will use the existing west two-
way driveway on N.E. 6th Avenue. The driveway is located east
of the new bUilding and between the new building and the
existing two story school building. This driveway leads to a
new one-way drop-off area located on the south side of the new
building. The proposed counter-clockwise flow of traffic will
allow the vehicles that are on the site for the new building
to either park in the existing parking lot in front of the new
building, use the drop-off area or exit the site by way of
existing parking lot that leads to the ingress they entered
the site or one of the other three egresses from the site.
There are two driveways south of the church that allow
ingress/egress to the site from N.E. 4th Avenue. There is also
a one-way egress from the site located at the east end of N.E.
6th Avenue. During school hours, the school parking area is
roped-off for safe effective traffic flow. The traffic for the
new faCility will be part of the eXisting flow but separated
from the existing school traffic because of the location of
the new building. The three ingress/egresses to the site allow
open access for fire and rescue vehicles.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with
particular attention to the items in subsection 1 above, and
the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional
use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city
as a whole.
The proposed bUilding and use will require 15 parking spaces.
'l'he existing school/church site will provide the required
parking spaces necessary to facilitate the new structure. The
existing parking lot is constructed consistent with the City
codes or will be upgraded to the codes with the proposed
construction. As previously stated the applicant is requesting
a variance from the drainage and landscaping requirements of
the parking Lot Ordinance. (See attached Parking Lot Variance)
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the
items in subsection 1 and 2 above.
The location and capacity of the existing refuse area allows
adequate service to the site.
4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and
compatibility.
The existing utilities will adequately serve the new use.
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type,
dimensions, and character.
The existing landscaping consists of mature perimeter hedges
and trees, and interior trees and lawn grass. However, the
existing landscaping does not meet the specifications ~isted
in the Central Business District Landscape code. As prev10usly
stated, the applicant is required to upgrade the new and
existing site to comply with the Landscape Code. However, the
applicant is requesting a variance to providing the
landscaping as listed in the Code. Basically, the only aspects
of the existing landscaping that comply with the code is the
width and size of the landscape areas and the curbing prOVided
-3-
st. Mark Catholic School and Church
Conditional Use, Memo #93-024
Page 4
to protect the landscaping. The perimeter hedges (Ficus
benjamina) that are required to form the continuous visual
barrier to screen the on-site vehicle use area are installed
in a pos i tion to form the visual barrier. However, the
screening is not continuous, the type of specie, native specie
count and spacing do not comply with the code. The number of
perimeter trees that make-up part of the required vehicle use
area screening do not comply with the number required by code.
The existing black olive trees do not comply with the specie
or native specie count required by the code. The Central
Business District Landscape Code covers many aspects of the
site such as: site and Pedestrian lighting, dumpster enclosure
screening, entrance landscape treatment, pedestrian walkways
and exterior furnishings. The applicant has requested relief
from the applicable section of the Landscape Code. (See
separate parking Lot Variance package)
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to
glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and
harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
The eXisting site lighting at the school/church site will
remain in place with no changes. The Landscape Code lists
specific site and pedestrian lighting requirements for the
central Business District, therefore, approval of the variance
from the Landscape Code also varies the lighting requirements.
See the attached Engineering Department staff comments
Memorandum No. 93-016 for comments regarding existing lighting
at the site. With reference to signs there are no freestanding
signs located on the site and the plans for the new
construction do not show a request for a freestanding sign.
There is no indication that the eXisting wall signage will be
changed.
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
Once the applicant records with Palm Beach County Unity of
Title for all school/church property, the proposed new
structure and all eXisting structures will comply with the
applicable setbacks listed in the Zoning Code.
8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other
property in the zoning district.
The use of the existing surrounding bUildings vary from
residential to commercial ventures and a stand alone
restaurant bUilding. Generally, church/school buildings have
a distinct design that brings attention to the building(s).
The existing structures are no different than most
school/church facilities though the design of the school is a
simple rectangular two-story building with a gable roof. The
new building is a one-story structure that blends in with the
design of the existing school building. As previously stated,
the site is located in the Coastal Village Design District and
the new bUilding does not comply with the design requirements
listed within the Coastal Village Design Theme.
9. Height of building and structures, with reference to
compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
The height of the new building is one story and compatible
with the surrounding buildings.
-4-
02. 03. 93
05:02 PM
*GEE &. ..JENSON
POl
n
MeMORANDUM
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Deparment Director
FROM: W.R. Staudinger, P .E.
City Engineer
DATE: February 2, 1993
RE: St. Marks Site Plan Modification and Conditional Use
At the TRC meeting of January 26, 1993, the site plan Modification and conditional use
approval for a preschool at the St. Mark's Catholic Church and School was discussed.
The Engineering department has the following comments: ,
1 . Applicant shall supply unity of title for preschool site and existing facilities
&0 the parklng and infrastructure can be shared. Northeast 5th right-of-way
may not have been abandoned In this area. A survey and title search
should verify the status of the rlght-ot-way.
2. The traffic analysis and trip generation supplied by the applicant, including
the January 21, 1993, letter from Yvonne Ziel, is not adequate to'
substantlate a reduced trip generation rate of 3.0 for this facility. The 3.0
generation rate for private schools is based on a number of grades In the,
same location whereby several students from a single family could utlli~e the
same 'vehicle. I do not believt:: this is the ca$e for a pre~kindergarteh and
kindergarten school of 55 children. Utilizing th~ stand~rd rate for da~ care;,
cent~rs generates over 200 trips from this site~.. '
The above comm~nts are not of such magnitude as to stop the qondltlonal use from
proceeding with a positive recommendation from the Engineering Department. However.
staff comments should be addressed prior to payment of impact fees and permitting of
oonfitruction,
}
. "
.' 1
l 1
\
\'
.
AECEf\/ED
FEB 4 1993
-9-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-015
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
DATE: January 26, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments-Meeting of l/26/93
St. Marks Catholic Church
Conditional Use
Requirement(s) for Alley Abandonment
As a result of discussions held during the Technical Review
Committee meeting of January 26, 1993, the Engineering Department
has determined that St. Marks Catholic Church parking facility
encroaches on a public alleyway not yet abandoned by the City
Commission.
The subject alley is located along the south line of the proposed
building site where it joins the existing parking facility (10' wide
rights-of-way unimproved known as NE 5th Ave.). This alley, as a
condition of the conditional use approval, must be abandoned and
placed on the tax rolls for the benefit of the public at large.
The owner shall be responsible to provide adequate easements for
public utility companies which may occupy this public rights-of-way.
(1 ~~ A>:L .
Vincent A. Finizio ~
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
w. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer, Gee & Jenson
RECE\VEO
J ~tt '2. 7 \993
-10-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-007
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & zoning Director
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio-Telephone No. (407) 738-7487
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
DATE: January 14, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Major Site plan Modification and Conditional Use Approval
St. Marks Catholic School and Church
624 NE 6th Avenue, Boynton Beach, FI
The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
is in receipt of the above referenced site plan submission and
accompaning letter, dated Dec. 28, 1992, from Michael B. Schorah
& Associates, Inc.
1. In response to the Design Engineer's letter, dated Dec. 28, 1992,
a copy of which is attached herein, I contacted PBC Traffic
Engineering Division and pursuant to discussions held on 1/13/93,
this project is not vested, reference PBC's Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance. Therefore, the issue relative to impact fees
in this regard shall be addressed between the applicant and PBC
Engineering should the applicant attempt to seek relief. It should
be noted that the Civic Center Subdivision, according to the
Planning Department's Category (A) (5) Subdivisions which are fully
exempt, appears to be exempt for single family and duplex dwelling
units only. Additionally, this subdivision did not indicate upon
any master plan a use for this property relative to vehicle trips
generated per day and therefore according to Allan Ennis, this
project falls under the jurisdiction of PBC's Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance. I recommend that the Planning Department
forward a copy of this plan to PBC and that their comments be made
a part of our conditions of approval, whether they be at the
conceptual or permit application stage.
2. The applicant shall upgrade the existing parking lot facility in
accordance with Chapter 5, Article X, "Boynton Beach parking Lot
Regulations", Section 5-138, "Scope", which states that compliance
with City Code is required when (a) ..."a parking lot serves an
existing building(s) where said building(s) is proposed to be
enlarged or when an additional building(s) is proposed to be
constructed". The submission of this site plan did not take into
consideration the requirements to upgrade the existing site as
well as the subject site to full code compliance with the required
improvements provisions listed within City codes, therefore, since
this application addresses only the proposed construction, I
consider this application incomplete until such time as the
applicant addresses the required upgrade. The required improve-
ments that shall be depicted upon a comprehensive submission
includes, but is not limited to, parking lot lighting systems
which comply with City codes, pedestrian lighting, traffic control,
curbs and car stops. Drainage will be addressed by the City Engineer
under separate memorandum (the NE and SE section of this site
frequently floods and is considered flood prone), including all
other applicable section of 5-142.
3. It appears that the existing parking lot lighting system is time
clock activated and furthermore the levels of "illumination appear
to fall well below minimum City standards which requires a minimum
of one foot candle with no readings below one-half foot candle.
...- '
-11-
~E:CEIV1~U
JAM 15
J::fLANNI~G DEJ,.'?t ~
f' H ,. __..'4..
p"'---- ..~
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
Technical Review Committee Comments
January l4, 1993
Page #2
From a safety standpoint, it is extremely important that the
entire site be upgraded to comply with City codes as Child Day
Care Center activities and Bingo functions during the winter
months will be operated during hours of darkness. All lighting
systems shall be photocell activated.
Note: The applicant has not filed a variance for lighting and
therefore staff concludes that lighting will be upgraded as
the applicant was made aware of this requirement during the
TRC meeting of l/14/93.
Pursuant to City codes, variances are only granted on the basis of
the applicant exhibiting a true hardship relative to the section of
our codes from which they seek relief. In this case the only
justification provided appears to be a monetary one and therefore
variances should not be granted so as not to set a harmful precedent
which will erode the City's future ability to compel developers to
upgrade their sites based solely on monetary interests.
Pursuant to Section 5-145, "Variances to this Article", (I)
"Variances may be granted only when the granting of same will not
be contrary to the public interest, and where, owing to special
conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this article
would result in an unnecessary hardship not created by the applicant
or his predecessor in title, use, or possession.
The Engineering Department will however work with the applicant,
reference the analysis of existing lighting conditions and at that
time determine in conjunction with the Developer's Engineer
deficient parking and pedestrian areas which may require additional
lighting.
L \ '" :....... _ + A::t '~~:..o-
Vincent A. Finizio 0
(407) 738-7488
VAF/ck
cc: W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer, Gee & Jenson
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
attachments
-12-
CATEGORY (A)(5) SUBDIVISIONS * FULLY EXEMPT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF SINGLE FAMILY OR DUPLEX DWELLING UNITS
NAM~ SUBDIVISION / DATE RECORDED
Arden Par'k
Bar' r e t tHe i (;J h t s
Bellamy Heights
Benson Br'os.
Benson Heights
Beverly Hills Addn. 2
Beverly Hills Addn. 3
Bower's P,3r'k
Boynton (Original)
Boynton (Dade Co.)
Boy n ton B 0 f' 0 U '3 h
Boynton Center
Boynton Hghts Add Pg 64
Boynton Hghts Add Pg 5
Boynton Hghts Add No 1
Boynton Hills
Boynton Ind Pk-Pg. 232
Boynton Ind Pk, Add 1
Boynton Isles
Boynton Mem. Pk., Add 1
Boynton Mem. Pk, Bk 21
Boynton Mem. Pk, Bk 27
Boynton Place
Boynton Ridge
Boynton Ridge Replat
Boynton's Sub (Dade Co)
Ca S,3 Lorna
Centr',31 Par'k
Centr',3l Par~k Annex
Chapel Hill
CherTY Hi 11 s
~ Civic Center' Subd.
Con 9 r' e ssG 1" 0 V e
Coquina Cove
Cranbrook Lake Estates
Crescent Hei'3ht
Cr'est Vi ew
C.W. Capp's Addn.
Oebonaire Estates
Deier'l P,31~k
Dewey ((0 r' i '3 i n a 1 )
Dewey Hei';Jhts
E. Rober'ts Addn.
'rec'n Rid'~e
1=<::>1"6:51. f-n 11 s
Forest Park Heights
Frank Webb~r Addn.
Fun}~ e. r" 0:3. Add 11 .
Ga'\, -1',1,:;:1' E:3t.3tes
04-12-1913
10-13-1954
01-13-1976
12-04-1913
02-15-1955
01-21-1926
01-21-1926
03-27-1925
09-26-1926
09-26-1898
04-16-1958
02-17-1921
1'1-07-1924
03-08-1915
12-15-1926
03-25-1926
09-08-1958
03-21-1972
04-24-1957
02-21-1974
06-30-1947
06-07-1963
03-05-1925
03-20-1953
03-13-1973
03-10-1910
01-25-1911
05-04-1925
06-12-1925
05-26-1954
04-07-1926
09-10-1925
01-21-1926
12-23-1952
10-06-1977
07-06-1955
06-26-1951
01-15-1920
06-23-19-52
07-28-1952
03-25-1910
01-04-1956
08-16-1911
11-10-1959
07-08-1957
04-17-1957
08-31-1922
02-29-1912
04-30-1954
-13""
1+
NUCHAEL B. SCHORAH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SUITE 10 1
1850 FOREST HILL BLVD,
WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33406
ENGINEERS · PLANNERS · DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
TELEPHONE (407) 968-0080
December 28, 1992
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: St. Marks Classroom Addition
Conditional Use Application
To Whom It Concern,
In my opinion, the above captioned building will not generate more than 160 trips per
day and since the property was platted prior to January 13, 1978, I consider it to be
exempt from concurrency requirements.
Sincerely,
U~~6~~~
Michael B. Schorah, P.E.
President
MBS/kmh
-14-
CIVIL. STRUCTURAL · DRAINAGE · HIGHWAYS · WATER & SEWER · SOIL MECHANICS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-026
February 3, 1993
TO:
Chris Cutro
Planning D~'re tor
Don Jaeger
Building 0 cial
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
TRC COMMENTS
ST. MARK'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL
PARKING LOT & LANDSCAPING VARIANCE
After a second review of the above referenced project, the only
remaining comment by the Building Department references the Unity
of Title. A recorded copy of this document can be presented at
the time of permit submittal. The applicant should also be made
aware that, since there is an existing structure on the site, the
permit plans must be in compliance with Table 600 of the Standard
Building Code.
We recommend that the plan be forwarded to the Community
Redevelopment Advisory Board for their review.
A~
AN : bh
STMARK
-15-
MEMORANDUM
Christopher Cutro, planning and Zoning Director
~O /-IYI/ W \ L ~n./(C.v€. ( {f R c. -+ yOA~" V:J;;:,<J I
.3- - (.J - '1-5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
h1 OUJ/f' Lt,+i (. ?I.v C':;
Site Plan Review - ~Site Plan - Amended Plans
Project:
S Ii t -v,.. It.? All' k CA t I-\u C' <... S c l-t{) <.) L- ;f- C lJ k~ <. (..{.
After reviewing the
referenced project
Department recommends
the Planning and
consideration.
amended.() plansA fot' tJ1~ ,above
the fA(i<... { }1 If' ~ fj;-::-.,o J
that the project be forwarded to
Development Board for their
This department will not be required to sign-off the
permit documents associated with the subject project.
C:AMEND1.ALD
-18-
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-61
TO:
Chris Cutro, Planning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
I-<~ H-
RE:
St. Mark's Catholic School & Church
Second Review
DATE:
February 4, 1993
This site contains twenty-four trees to be removed to make site
improvements. Can these trees be relocated to other greenspaces on
the new site or old parking lot interior medians? The City
comprehensive plan directs the preservation of existing trees
rather than replacement. [Policy 4.4.2 p. 68].
KH:ad
RECE\VED
FEB 4 1993
-19-
i,: ,- i ~ Ii .lj i c
i! !~ ;! ,I I n n ~
!; ; mm ,
i~ nn ~
" j " ~I $$
;! :, Ii
." " I
J> .11 I ,. 'i n
'" 5fU . 1~ I E~
'" Ii :~;l: Ii
z i'" I .i ~~
'" .=':1 t S!
UI .I~l il i;!~i~
-i I I. ~ I
J> i I II:. . 'l:~
r- "rl I . ~
r- I I . i~
c f &
fTI f II I
.-i Ii
J> I i ~ ~ 118s"
F .~-:-r
~ I s
f ~
f f
~ j [ u
iU i J .Jj I;;;~~t~. ~~
::t: ;: a: I~ Ii
I~
J> ' 'j :~
z Pj
c i~ "~
n . ! ....
)> . I~ \
... i!
)> ji I'; \..
z ;~
c ,. >-
UI ..
-i ;~
0 .
... $4 d5
'"
i5
z
c FI- - ~
fTI '\
-i
)> i I
!~ I
I
3/i
s~
h
8'"
~t
~~
""
~
rJ-----.:.=-
~1I'"
L, h~ I
r ~' ,... I
I (L------~~9!!
~I~i=) il; : "
~ ~ "'t !
: ;
~
of
i'
.~
.
~
~
~
~~
~\2J
!~~
li~~
'1\"
t.~
t~=
!~f
~
!
,
.
!
.
;
~ ~ ~
N !!I (0 !
-~ ~
ffi
SCAU
I....
PROJECT:
ST, MARKS CATHOLIC CHURCH
MICHAEL 8, SCHORAH
& ASSOCIATES, INC,
ENG"'URS. ~"'EIIlS. Of\IEL~E"'T C<l'lSUl.,....u
DESCRIPT1ON:
PARKING LOT PLAN
TEL (4011088,00lIO
1850 FOREST HILL BLVD., SUITE 101
WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33406
-20-
III
:: :; -r 1
l i~\'! "
\; \ lli \
~ i~ \ ~
~ ~ ii;' \ II
S 'i \ h
\' I II .,l!.11).1
~ \ ; " 11 p~\
~t ~ f ~L \ \
\~; i lP j
H R-
0
0
~ ,
~. ~_~/~_,_/'~, i\
. ~ . \ '
~ ~ \
~\_~,g,. \ '
, ..?'i'
~' ..~' ,\\\ 1
---~-\~~ :~"-,.- .:.---' ~.
~ '!. ~ ~ '-~ . " ~,
. " ' .' '\
. _ . ~\" ' ~ i
~ . , \. ,\
P {' ,
. ;i . ~ \ \
i-i~ ~-~-- i
\,- -.'
1
'~
~/-;ii;r=-- ~.:.' '" ~ <
! ..
'\ U ~~:
\'\ t' \~ 1\-I\1i t \
t. < ~ Q 1: 0 '" .' "
fl' ..r ~ _ r' ;l
~ 1 ~ '" ~ 'l.~
\\ ;\ ~ lil '- 'l. ~
! \ i
~ ~ 'i '
\7;;
. ~ ii
0
r
~ .. . s ~
.
s~s~ ia~a ;~s~ ~~~i i~~~ i~i~ ~~
!~~~ ~:~~ ,~~g ~~:; ~~~~ \~~; :;~
FS;; :8\lS ~s~: ~S~. ~~.~ i;'~ ~
. "!<. .... ~. _ _.._ _~ '. . i~C 0'"
." i ;:;~ ~. ! ~~:~ . c~..: ~ FO
b .1;.~ al ~ R!O~~ R!O<- :~ ~ 1: ~
~. g:g.AS';;~;;';;:~\" 0"
i:;l _. ~ j1;; ~;; ~l:;O', ~ ~ c
,~ H ~ ~~ ~~ ~s i ~ a ~
r, ~~ ii ;~ ~~ :
~; a~ ~ i
;;
" ~
. .
~
0
~ .
.
t
r
~
.' -
.0
~ .; ~
. \
1 1
~
~
~
i
\
}
( . \
>~
( \
r -.... A/ -
I . {\ t e, J
\ '\ .. t'l,
r, '-. i"'.:!-i /
(1\/
~".
.\
I ~\
'I-\
\ ~ \
I ~ \
I \
\
i' -.... ' \---
" 0../ ( ~ \ -=-\) " \
/___ \" )~, _J
I ---(~\
____/ "J
\
q
~ .
"''-, ~
i
.
~S
" .
i \
s
( 7\
\..../
/-
\ 0 \
_J
~
1
~
c
,
"
fl\\
n \ \ \ \ \ \\~\~
FLOlUD.A 1J\NDsCAPE DESIGN
~
i
+
\~
. iI
~ ~
\
;
(
1"
\t '
~t
. ~
~'---
i"'"
\ " )
-/
H
, ~ ~
_ "i
1 .
III \
~ ..
....
III t
;! ~
,. ~
& ~
t
o i
~
:'}.,
~? ~
t
.:,./
~
i
1
~
f
1
'.
~
1.
0lf ~
" !,
. !
nn
-21-
~----------~- "-- .--' - - >
.----------.---------
LOCATION MAP
ST. MARK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH
. .
11i.t:tjt::d~~ ,T1r~' : 1 \1
I ! I I I ' ' I ~
I
I I
. ,1
: !
.
I
: I I I I I}-
, I I j n "
'J! I
:j
:/,
_:,
, .
rtf\ '...~: ;A:T_
.-J"i'-~~--;~:~~: ,
III II' .\1'......
-
.. ~.
_P ~.- . ~. _:."1. _-... - - - " I - .. .. -... -
. -- "-- ~--_.- _. ~.'..:- _:.-_:_-:~.-:-~--' .-..-..
I ! T1' Ill, l' ,'1 1, I : ' , , I I II' ~ I T I ' . - 't ll-
PU ~ ~EffiJil2f:::~~U++Y-Ej i I I - ,
:' I ,::1 I ~;W I!' , I;: L- 1t111f',',L~::JI ' ."I!~('
, I! I I ,f, ! I t'---.:'!vi III ", ~.
j I I I 1 I I ii' ,I I I I "U:Si' '~'1:1
II ',r II '..I..i'A I II W:~,!., I, Ii ~_I("'-"-" (g
)l1!I!IIill1IIill ~r T T I iT T 7 I rrr~ III T~rr; fI" ~i. 1", \ I :!', - ~-- G
-m1 filTITllTTT!TlT:.; , '" I :r p. ..... JI I 11111 11 t"I'I' .! I'
..iliJ~ IL :Ii t=:: \- -
mrn lIT Ij In Ll.........cr ~~. r, , .-= ....::::::J \ ; ... t -. .,.: <
.illll. I II \l \;; IH lliI: . jil JJ 0.... :TI'" .~. I' . \ ~ ! ! '- t:.=! I ~ I - ~ :
m 1\ II", - -/~/:\w- ~ ..~... . j ~;-' ---,
_ u "f- ~ ---III Im...:.~' '- t=I, i " r- :=-:--:-. fiflj5
-:--:1 \ I I I II ::: - ,:'1'\.' /I.... ~ I ~ II I ~ "I 1. .'
. ~ =: ~ ~ ~~,.\ It'r p , ,. ^. ~ . t= : , ' I f- ~;-- ~ ,
== _, ll. - 0.... -" =l -----II I III - H ....../ .Jl 1= !, I I ] 1 ~ - :
ill .- i -~...... T f-'.=i~ Nr
~ ~ i ft 11 =- -:A:Y i L .. fl' d C ~ 1- ,/ f I!5'j == ~ : I , 1 1 'T 1= ==, r::IIJJ,
_ 'T i1 I III _ / I' rTlTf "T ' I · '===.. ~
ilL-- ~, ~1'\~llJ 'U;J.. LD 71 TTr '.Jnlid I t= R3 ~~ '; "
- f t..... 11=rl -f I ~ r:;::.::! ~-'"" - = .. ::;: TI" I. -
, ==,.... ~"-ll.u T J,~ r ~ - , :=; ';:'"''' · :.'
"!~ ;?~i~ 0 ~~ Fe~ =- ~" ~, '~.. ,',
"" '1 ; >-- ~ .f>..;4F" S 1M C4 T(~ ~ ,,~ SITE
_ I I I 1::-1= !'-. 0 ...--..... . ) '-S ~' '.
= =1= Va L i~ ~ ~ ...'
= II I - t:: ~ m 1Ji ~ " .,
.L , :,111 To- / '. ,"" .,,1,.... II' C i'?~t~~.. ..
, ,;". ,T'" ;., ~OYN;rtiM ~E."::~,Jl~ ;.::' 8EAG/( r== 6',-vDiLl~ ...~~ ::/
.. fi . ,1, '1 ~I T , [1 ' 111:1. ~f--- T I ',:" I , I ,I I
l-.---. ii,' ." 1,.J:ii "..."""U .;..ai", II , -1' I.-.-- \ . ....... '''. :':'1 I ' ~
. .. III IT,. , '- ___ I ~.._~ "
tIIIII:J " I' ... III -~ ~ -;:;;.. , : ..... 'I' : ~--' lr - ~ '
~1d:IIl..... ,GiI, T ,lIill ,a j '1f'1....' 'wI m::m L.-- I l:-nrTITlT j I ,I I -: 1:
r+-1 ~ nr.r11I!IIIIIlIID:!IffII1IJIIl.~lIII J): ~.I ~, LID~' .1 I ~--
,: II~ fil"llm~1 '1lIl ji "'IL I" : 'T L "f-t\:~ : IT' ! , i !
~ 1 ~~TIWmm. II: ~ mt3 ~ -.;r~. Ii: I '1!Jj ~TIl \-ll:r u~~.L t-lF~~ ,- ';, I i_...: 1 'I I
~I i-~ r,~I.lill iiF " ii"l1A:l im", LU I ~... I ,,!=f,' Iof'*'i h~T" .r!. ~ ~1'1 " ,[1 1 ./" I
1'~ ST, MARK'S PROPE~ ~: I I,: ~. :r...... .1,:= .' , . ....
B!fi NEW CLASSROOMS AREA ;.J I! : '~: ~.: 3 (~ Fe [ ~
~~,~ MANGROVES ' :: III ~ ~ ,-.+ C=> -~. " "~
&' .no ... ~D':'~ "J f ~,~- t~
t[ . ~ OJ ,!' ~ ~ --- =j · 1 ~- ' ~
['0 1/8 MILESV ~ ~ 1 !I:i).... c _.- =~ .~ I, I
I Till \ II, g ~ ~ ~= tdJ~ '~LJlf L '
1'0 400, 800 FEET j -, , .- l::::: I.J".... i
PLANN/Nr. ot;./Jr. Z--~3 '1 J...}, :~~~~ I r.r ~J -r~~-' -......-~
__. ~_ " . ..,~J..: r'\ ____. -::J':..' ':et . -:r: ,-
r 0
r rnm ',;1'111 liT
-' WlJ...;.:.....u.;. E... LU
D till ~ffijm ~ ~ r-t
IHI!ffi: '
, I
-22-
fJ1ie City of
~oynton ~eacli
r:, "- (
J JI.r._ .-')F'l
Planning &' Zoning 'Department
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Buuli 'Boulevard
P.O. 'Bo;c310
'Boynton 'Beadr.1 ~foritfa 33425-0310
(407) 738-74901 ~JJfX: (407) 738-7459
January 22, 1993
Mr. Daniel O'Connell
215 N.W. 3rd Street
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
(407) 734-0786
RE: Initial Review Comments - st. Mark's Catholic School
File No. 711
Mr. O'Connell:
The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the
site plan for the above referenced project. Attached are comments
made by the reviewing departments during their initial review of
your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and
documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90
days of the date of this letter. ( If amended plans are not
submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When
there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not
applicable to the approval of the proj ect or will be addressed
separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the
comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment
stating why the comment is not applicable and return the
explanation with the amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12)
complete sets of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department.
When the amended plans and documents have been submitted to the
Planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the
reviewing departments for a second review and the reviewers will
recommend if the site plan will be placed on a board approval
schedule (see attached). If there are major comments not addressed
by new plans or the reviewers recommend that the plan not be
forwarded to the Planning and Development Board, this office will
notify you on your alternatives regarding the site plan as soon as
possible.
t211ffl'rirn/, (:nfI'7,'n." f,.., +(,1' (":1'(-lr#--rI't""......
To: Mr. o'Connell
Re: Initial Review Comments, File No.: 711
Page 2 of 2
We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and
a checklist that contains information regarding the second
submission of the plans and documents for review.
If you should have any questions regarding the comments or on the
approval schedule, please feel free to call Michael Haag who is
coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and
Zoning Department.
Yours truly,
~t.~/--
Christopher cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
CC:ald
Attachments
XC: Central File
Chron. File
Project File
C:INTLCOM.SDD
SITE PLAN REVIEW
BOARD APPROVAL SCHEDULE
1993
COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY SUBMISSION ADVISORY BOARD
DEADLINE MEETING
Mar 22 Apr 12
Apr 20 May 10
May 17 Jun 14
Jun 22 Jul 12
COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
MEETING
Apr 20
May 18
Jun 15
Jul 20
CHECKLIST
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that
the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for
review. Turning in the list and the appropriate plans and documents will
enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the
Site Development Division of the Planning and Zoning Department.
Project Name:
St. Markls Catholic School
1. Submit an amended Site Plan Review application form that reflects the
changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents
to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee
comments. A copy of the original form with a distinguishable symbol
identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form with
the changes identified. It is the agent of the owners responsibility to
notify the owner(s) of changes. If there are no changes required to be
documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating
same must be turned in with the amended submittal.
2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents
that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and comments made by
the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets shall have the
appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer
responsible for the drawing(s). Plans and documents shall be assembled
in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the
project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically
numbered such as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3.
~/A 3. Submit a locator map that identifies the location of the site and the
surrounding roadways and zoning districts. (Refer to directions on the
attached sheet titled submittal requirements)
NJA 4. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain
~~'o~sl~ in their eXisting condition and photos of existing buildings on sites
5~~\*el that abut the subject property. (Refer to directions on the attached
sheet titled submittal requirements)
5 .
Submit a legible 8 1/2" by 11" transparency of the landscape site plan
drawing. (Refer to directions on the attached sheet titled submittal
requirements)
~/~ 6.
~~\ Otl6l\"
SUbV' \ Well
Submi t colored elevation view drawings - Duplicate drawings of the
drawings submitted for site plan review that have been colored. (Not
mounted - Refer to directions on the attached sheet titled submittal
requirements)
Nl~ 7. Submit color samples of the proposed color(s). (Refer to directions
~. .It~the attached sheet titled submittal reqUirements)
~~\I\t)~
<;..; b\'i\ \ .
on
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
The following shall be incorporated as part of the submittal of
amended plans and/or documents for review
1. Submit a scaled locator map that identifies the location and
perimeter boundary of the site and the surrounding roads and
current zoning districts including the district of the subject
property. The map shall show and identify by name the roads
surrounding the site and the roadway path that links the site
to the closest arterial road with the names of the roads and
arterial road(s) identified. The map shall show the zoning
district line and the title of the zoning districts that abut
the perimeter of the zoning district where the subject
property is located. The map shall have the North compass
direction and scale identified. Maximum size of locator map is
8 1/2" by 14".
2. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are
to remain in their existing condition and photos of existing
buildings that are located on the sites that abut the
perimeter of the subject property. The minimum size is 8" by
10". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location
of the existing structures with respect to the location of the
proposed project.
3. Submit a 8-1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan
drawing to be used on an overhead projector at board meetings.
4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate
copy of all drawings of the elevation views of each side of
all buildings and signage associated with the project. The
colored elevation views shall match the elevations shown in
the documents that where submitted for site plan review. The
applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be
colored with the color name and associated color reference
number identified. The type of exterior surface material shall
be identified next to the associated color. The colored
elevation drawings shall have compass direction or title of
the side of the building identified. The title block of the
original drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is 24" by
36". Do no submit on board of any kind.
5. Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors.
Each sample shall have attached a label that identifies the
color by name and numerical/letter code from an established
color chart.
6. Where a specific exterior surface is not applicable to the
project, signify by placing a "N/A" on the appropriate line.
7. Submit a copy of the legal description of the subject property
on an 8 1/2" by II" sheet of paper.
MEMORANDUM
January 22, 1993
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
RE: Major Site Plan Modification and Conditional Use Approval
Project - Saint Mark's Catholic School
Location - 624 N.E. 6th Avenue
Use - Kindergarten and Pre-kindergarten Classroom
File No. - 711
The following comments are in response to the submittal of the
conditional use and site plan modification for the above referenced
proj ect. The comments for the proj ect will be discussed at the
January 26, 1993, Technical Review Committee meeting. The site plan
was reviewed for consistency with the review standards specified in
Section 8 of Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Part III, Land
Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances. The applicant
shall amend the drawings and documents to show compliance with the
following comments:
1. To determine the number of required parking spaces for the new
structure clearly delineate on the floor plan drawing the
square foot floor area for each of the two uses, kindergarten
and pre-kindergarten. Specify wi thin the parking tabular data
the code required ratios for required parking spaces for each
use. Below are the code sections describing the procedure for
determining the number of required parking spaces. Revise the
drawings and Site Plan Review Application to align with the
required parking calculations.
2. Amend the drawings to show the handicapped parking spaces
designed to meet the current handicapped requirements. The
number of handicapped parking spaces required for your parking
lot is seven (7).
3. Dimension of the plan the width of the new one-way aisle
proposed for the south side of the new structure. The minimum
one-way width is twelve (12) feet. The drop-off area shall not
obstruct the one-way access aisle. I recommend showing nine to
twelve feet for the width of the drop-off area.
4. The total count of spaces shown on the plan is 272 and the
tabular data indicates a total of 271 spaces, correct
accordingly.
5. The site is located within the Coastal Village Design theme.
The present design of the building does not comply with the
Coastal Village Design theme as described in the Community
Design Plan, Article V of Chapter 7.5 of the Code of
Ordinances. Either amend the drawings and color elevation to
show compliance with the design requirements or request relief
from same. To request relief from the Community Design Plan,
see the attached exhibit "A". The request for relief will be
evaluated at the same time that the site plan for the project
will be reviewed by the applicable Boards. Requesting relief
at this time would not require changing the existing drawings.
6. Amend the landscape plan to show the perimeter hedge landscape
material required to form a continuous visual barrier to
screen the view of on-site vehicle use areas from adjacent
rights-of-way on abutting properties specified and installed
at eighteen (18) inches on center and twenty-four (24) inches
high. Delineate on the landscape plan with a distinguishable
symbol the perimeter hedge landscape material that is required
to screen the vehicle use area.
To: Christopher Cutro
Re: st. Mark's Comments
Page Two of Two
7. Specify on the Landscape plan the code specified spacing
requirements for the trees required around the perimeter of
the vehicle use area. The code requires one (1) tree per each
thirty (30) lineal feet of perimeter vehicle use area.
Delineate on the plan with a distinguishable symbol the
location of the trees required to meet the perimeter
requirements.
8. Due to the conflict with the area of the new structure
discussed at the January 14, 1992 Technical Review Committee
meeting, submit drawings that include tabular data indicating
the correct floor area for the new structure. Amend the Site
Plan Review application and plans to match the new
calculations.
9. Consistent with Chapter 5, Article X, Parking Lots of the
Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, the construction of the new
building will require the entire school/church property to be
upgraded to the current parking lot and landscape code
specifications. Incorporate into the submittal of amended
plans, draWings showing the school/church properties in
compliance with all code requirements specified in the Parking
Lot and Central Business District Landscape Code.
In order for the proj ect to continue along the February review
schedule , twelve ( 12) complete sets of amended plans shall be
submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00
P. M. on January 27, 1993 and following the Technical Review
Committee review of the amended plans they recommend the project to
be forwarded to the appropriate Boards.
Review schedule:
Site Plan
Reviewed by the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board on
February 8, 1993 and the Community Redevelopment Agency/City
Commission on February 16, 1993.
Conditional Use
Reviewed by the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board on
February 8, 1993 and the Community Redevelopment Agency/City
Commission on February 16, 1993.
Parking Lot Variance
Reviewed by the Planning and Development Board on February 9, 1993
and the City Commission on February 16, 1993.
-Zulj)t: ~
,/ ~l E. Haag .
MEH: aId
C:STMARK.CU
A.
B.
rJl~
rJ1A
~,~
EXHIBIT "A"
COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN APPEAL
INCLUDES FREESTANDING SIGNS OR APPEALS TO COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN
Review and Approval Process: Review by staff, projects located
in the Central Business District will be reviewed by the
C.R.A.B. and C.R.A. at a public meeting. Projects located in
all other zoning districts will be reviewed by the P&D and city
Commission. Refer to board meeting schedule for day and time
of each meeting.
C.
Submittal deadline is 10 working days prior to the board
meeting.
Fees: Check fee schedule. tF/IJD. ~
D.
submittal ReqUirements
1. One (1) colored elevation view drawing of the item(s)
involved with the request. The drawing shall be scaled
and the scale identified on the drawing.
2. Letter to Christopher Cutro, Director of the Planning and
Zoning Department, detailing the request. The letter
should specify how the request is different than the code.
3.
For projects going before the C.R.A.B. and C.R.A., submit
eight (8) copies of the elevation view drawing of request.
The drawing shall be scaled and the scale identified on
the drawing. (Drawings may be black and white or blue
line, minimum size is 8!" x 14", maximum size 24" x 36").
Legible copies of large scaled drawings that were reduced
to the appropriate size are acceptable.
For projects going before the P & D and city Commission,
submit twelve (12) copies of the elevation view drawing of
request. The drawing shall be scaled and the scale
identified on the drawing. (Drawings may be black and
white or blue line, minimum size is 8!" x 14", maximum
size 24" x 36"). Legible copies of large scaled drawings
that were reduced to the appropriate size are acceptable.
4 .
Site plan drawing drawn to scale identifying and showing,
with a distinguishable symbol, the location of the
proposed request. (Size to be the same as in #3)
5 .
color samples with manufacturer's name, color number and
color name specified on the sample. (Maximum size is
2" x 2")
6. The applicant must be present at both public meetings.
(Staff will review board meeting schedule with applicant)
\
....
APPENDIX A-ZONING
See. 11
with the city swimming pool ordinance and shall be subject
to the approval of the building department. No swimming
pool shall be constructed closer than eight. (8)_ feet fro~_~ ,,",,-'.
,:pr~p~!Fy)i . "and no swimming pool shall be built in front
or the build" gijne. On corner lots, property bordering th
streets shall considered as front yards. Location of above
ground pools s 11 comply with building setback tz.equir. ments.
F. SCREEN CLOSURES. All screen enclosur (screen
walls and screen of) shall comply with buildin side yard
setback. No screen closure shall b~ constructe closer than
eight J~W~et from property line anJ no sc en enclosure
shall e constructed in font of the building nee On co:-ner
lots, property bordering oth streets shall e considered as
front yards.
G. TOWN HOUSE. All to
form to the district zoning an
mum requirements:
velopments shall con-
eet the following mini.
1.
2.
3.
All off-street parking areas shall conform to 'the design
and layout requirements of Chapter 5, Article X of the
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, and shall
be approved according to the procedures contained
therein.
. .
2. All off-street parking facilities shall be main~ined and
drained so as not to cause nuisance or danger to the
public, or to adjacent public or private property.
I
Supp. No, 35
1945
~
'.,.
s,,' .
~/
See. 11 BOYNTON BEACH CODE
3. A certificate of occupancy for a structure or premises
shall not be issued until the required parking area has
been inspected and approved by the building official.
4. Driveways shall satisfy the parking space requirements
for single-family detached dwelling units, duplexes, and
multifamily dwelling units containing garages, providel!
such driveways are of sufficient size to meet the parking
space requirements of this subsection.
5. No fewer than four (4) parking spaces shall be. pro-
vided for any nonresidential use.
6. Stabilized sod may be substituted for up to fifty (50)
per cent of the requiJ:ed parking spaces, where eighty,
(80) per cent or more of the parking demand falls
within a twenty-four-hour period each week. Sod may
be substituted only for the area of parking stalls. All
driveways, aisles, and maneuvering areas shall be
hard-surfaced and shall conform to the design re-
quirements contained in Chapter 5, Article X of the
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Sod l'arking
stalls shall have a base consisting of' not less than
eight (8) inches of stabilized shell rock, lime rock,
or sand, or an equivalent material as approved by the
city engineer. Sod parking areas shall have dimensions
equivalent to the dimensions of paved parking areas
with ninety (90) degree parking stalls and two-way
traffic in aisles, as specified in Chapter 5, Article X ot.
the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
7. Parking space requirements shall be computed on the
basis of the principal use of a structure or lot, and
using gross floor area unless stated otherwise in para-
graph 16 of this subsection. Gross floor area, for the
purposes of this subsection, shall include the floor area
occupied by the principal use, plus the floor area occu-
pied by all accessorY uses, including storage rooms,
maintenance and mechanical rooms, offices, loupges,
restrooms, lobbies, basements, mezzanines, and hall-
ways.
.
Supp. No. :15
1946
.
APPENDIX A-ZONING
Sec. 11,
8. Where several principal uses exist in one structure or
one one lot, parking space requirements shall be com-
puted separately for each principal use, unless stated
otherwise in paragraph 16 of this subsection. Where
parking spaces are required in paragraph 16 for each
of several principal uses that commonly occur together,
this is done for the purpose of clarification only, and
shall not limit the application of the requirement con-
tained in this paragraph.
9. A use shall be considered a principal use, for the pur-
poses of this subsection, if it could exist separately
from all other uses in the same structure or on the
same lot, and would by itself generate significant park-
ing demand.
10. Where a use is located in a shopping center, office
building, or office-retail complex, the parking space
requirement for the shopping center, office building,
or office-retail complex in which it is located shall
apply; except that where a theater is located in a
shopping center the parking space requirement for
theaters shall apply for the seating or gross floor area
of the theater.
11. Where several principal uses exist in one building or
part of a building, and the floor area of each principal
use cannot be clearly delineated, the parking space re-
quirement for the use requiring the greatest number
of parking spaces shall apply.
12. Where a use is not listed below, parking space require-
ments shall be determined by the city council after
review and recommendation by the planning and zoning
board.
13. Parking spaces required in this ordinance for one use or
structure may be allocated in part or in whole for the
required parking spaces of another use or structure if quan-
titative evidence is provided showing that parking demand
for the different uses or structures would occur on different
days of the week or at different hours. Quantitative evi-
Supp. No. 36
1946,1
Sec. 11
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
dence shall include estimates for peak hour/peak season
parking demand based on statistical data furnished by the
Urban Land Institute or an equivalent traffic engineering
or land planning and design organization. Quantitative
evidence may also include, where appropriate, field stud-
ies and traffic counts prepared by a traffic consultant ex-
perienced in the preparation of parking studies. In addi-
tion, a minimum buffer of ten (10) percent shall be provided
to ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are
available at the peak hour/peak season of parking demand.
Calculation of said buffer shall be based on the total num-
ber of parking spaces determined to be required at the
peak hour/peak season of parking demand. Evidence for
joint allocation of required parking space shall be submit-
ted to the technical review board, and approval of joint
allocation of required parking spaces shall be made by the
city commission, after review and recommendations by the
planning and zoning board.
14. Where the number of required parking spaces as
computed includes a fraction, the number of required
parking spaces shall be the computed number rounded
to the next highest whole number.
15. There shall be provided off-street handicapped parking
spaces consistent with section 5-141 (j) of the Boynton
Beach Code at the time of the erection of any struc-
ture or the enlargement of any structure.
16. There shall be provided, at the time of the erection
of any structure or establishment of any use, a num-
ber of off-street parking spaces- in accordance with
the following minimum requirements, and subject to
paragraphs 1 through 15 of this subsection. Where a
structure or use is enlarged or increased in capacity
by any means, including a change in building occupancy
which requires the provision of additional parking spaces,
or a change in use to one which requires additional park.
ing spaces, the minimum number of parking spaces shall
be computed by applying these requirements to the entire
structure or use.
Supp. No. 36
1946.2
Sec. 11 BOYNTON BEACH CODE
rooms, meeting rooms, recreation facilities and
ellings.
(2) The ters, auditoriums, meeting
other laces of assembly: One 1) parking
space r four ( 4) seats, but ot less than
one (1) p rking space per one undred (100)
square feet f gross floor are .
(8) Clubs, lodges a d fraternal 0 ganizations: One
(1) parking sp ce per e hundred (100)
square feet of gro flo area.
c.
(1)
(2)
(3) Libr les and museums: One (1) arking
space per three hundred (800) square
noss floor area.
(4) Day care centers and nursery schools: One (1) park-
ing space per three hundred (300) square feet of
gross floor area, plus adequate provision for a con-
venient drop-off area adjacent to the building pro-
viding unobstructed ingress and egress.
Elementary and junior high schools: One (1)
parking space per five hundred (500) square
feet of classroom floor area, including floor
area of shops.
ondary schools and high se
par I ace per one red (100) square
feet of clas oor area, plus one (1)
parking s per t dred (200) square
feet 0 oor area occupied by
(5)
Supp. No. 40
1948
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-004
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Site Plan Review - Saint Mark Catholic School and Church
DATE: January 12, 1993
The Public Works Department does not have any comments regarding
the site listed above.
ichorst
Works Director
REier
RECEIVED
JAN l3
I PLANNING DfP
.~. T.
--..~
u~
n
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Christopher Cutro, Director
Planning & Zoning Department
FROM:
W. Richard Staudinger, PE
City Engineer
DATE:
January 18, 1993
RE:
St. Marks Catholic School & Church
Conditional Use - Development Review
The Engineering Department of the City of Boynton Beach has the following Development
Plan Review comments on the proposed conditional use (day care center) at St. Marks.
1. The December 28, 1992 letter stating 160 trips from the site is not in accordance
with Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards. Based on the unverified
size of 4,380 Sq. Ft. for this day care center, approximately 310 trips are generated
by this use. Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards indicate no
distinction between day care center, kindergartens, and pre-kindergartens for traffic
generation purposes (Section 8.3.8)
2. The site does not meet City Standards for drainage. No drainage appears to have
been provided for any of this conditional use s' ion 8.6 .
~
W. Ri /hard Staudinger, PE
City Engineer
WRS/bf
92-049
1CrT':< ,r:.~)
R, .. ,....,...-'-
.. .-"-"
,."
,!p.~~ 19
.l,,'';}
....01
p\'p'NNF~G. Qt.. '3 "-
-----------
C;;(;:l: :& .,II::NS(u\1
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-007
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio-Telephone No. (407) 738-7487
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
DATE: January 14, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Major Site Plan Modification and Conditional Use Approval
St. Marks Catholic School and Church
624 HE 6th Avenue, Boynton Beach, FI
The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
is in receipt of the above referenced site plan submission and
accompaning letter, dated Dec. 28, 1992, from Michael B. Schorah
& Associates, Inc.
1. In response to the Design Engineer's letter, dated Dec. 28, 1992,
a copy of which is attached herein, I contacted PBC Traffic
Engineering Division and pursuant to discussions held on 1/13/93,
this project is not vested, reference PBC's Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance. Therefore, the issue relative to impact fees
in this regard shall be addressed between the applicant and PBC
Engineering should the applicant attempt to seek relief. It should
be noted that the Civic Center Subdivision, according to the
Planning Department's Category (A) (5) Subdivisions which are fully
exempt, appears to be exempt for single family and duplex dwelling
units only. Additionally, this subdivision did not indicate upon
any master plan a use for this property relative to vehicle trips
generated per day and therefore according to Allan Ennis, this
project falls under the jurisdiction of PBC's Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance. I recommend that the Planning Department
forward a copy of this plan to PBC and that their comments be made
a part of our conditions of approval, whether they be at the
conceptual or permit application stage.
2. The applicant shall upgrade the existing parking lot facility in
accordance with Chapter 5, Article X, "Boynton Beach Parking Lot
Regulations", Section 5-138, "Scope", which states that compliance
with City Code is required when (a) ..."a parking lot serves an
existing building(s) where said building(s) is proposed to be
enlarged or when an additional building(s) is proposed to be
constructed". The submission of this site plan did not take into
consideration the requirements to upgrade the existing site as
well as the subject site to full code compliance with the required
improvements provisions listed within City codes, therefore, since
this application addresses only the proposed construction, I
consider this application incomplete until such time as the
applicant addresses the required upgrade. The required improve-
ments that shall be depicted upon a comprehensive submission
includes, but is not limited to, parking lot lighting systems
which comply with City codes, pedestrian lighting, traffic control,
curbs and car stops. Drainage will be addressed by the City Engineer
under separate memorandum (the NE and SE section of this site
frequently floods and is considered flood prone), including all
other applicable section of 5-142.
3. It appears that the existing parking lot lighting system is time
clock activated and furthermore the levels of 'illumination appear
to fall well below minimum City standards which requires a minimum
of one foot candle with no readings below one-half foot candle.
~,.
~ECEIVBD
JAM ~5
~.~.:?~
~~~., .'
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
Technical Review Committee Comments
January 14, 1993
Page #2
From a safety standpoint, it is extremely important that the
entire site be upgraded to comply with City codes as Child Day
Care Center activities and Bingo functions during the winter
months will be operated during hours of darkness. All lighting
systems shall be photocell activated.
Note: The applicant has not filed a variance for lighting and
therefore staff concludes that lighting will be upgraded as
the applicant was made aware of this requirement during the
TRC meeting of 1/14/93.
Pursuant to City codes, variances are only granted on the basis of
the applicant exhibiting a true hardship relative to the section of
our codes from which they seek relief. In this case the only
justification provided appears to be a monetary one and therefore
variances should not be granted so as not to set a harmful precedent
which will erode the City's future ability to compel developers to
upgrade their sites based solely on monetary interests.
Pursuant to Section 5-145, "Variances to this Article", (1)
"Variances may be granted only when the granting of same will not
be contrary to the public interest, and where, owing to special
conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this article
would result in an unnecessary hardship not created by the applicant
or his predecessor in title, use, or possession.
The Engineering Department will however work with the applicant,
reference the analysis of existing lighting conditions and at that
time determine in conjunction with the Developer's Engineer
deficient parking and pedestrian areas which may require additional
lighting.
L \ '" ~,._ +~ ~~J.e-
Vincent A. Finizio 0
(407) 738-7488
VAF/ck
cc: W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer, Gee & Jenson
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
attachments
CATEGORV (A)(S) SUBDIVISIONS * FULLV EXEMPT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF SINGLE FAMILV OR DUPLEX DWELLING UNITS
NA,M~ SUBDIVISION / DATE RECORDED
Ar'den Park
Bar-rett Hei ghts
8ell'3my Hei9hts
e,enson Bros.
Benson Heights
Beverly Hills Addn. 2
Beverly Hills Addn. 3
Bower's Par' k
Boynton (Ori9inal)
Boynton (Dade Co.)
BoY' nton Bor'ou9h
Boynton Center
Boynton H9hts Add Pg 64
Boynton Hghts Add Pg 5
Boynton Hghts Add No 1
Boynton Hills
Boynton Ind Pk-Pg. 232
Boynton Ind Pk, Add 1
Boynton Isles
Boynton Mem. Pk., Add 1
Boynton Mem. Pk, Bk 21
Boynton Mem. Pk, Bk 27
Boynton P1.3ee
Boy nton R i d';je
Boynton Ridge Replat
Boynton's Sub (Dade Co)
Casa Lom,3
Centr'al Park
Centr'.3l Par'k Annex
Chapel Hill
Cher'r'y Hi 11 s
--<:;:::0 Ci vie Center' Subd.
Con 9 r' e ssG 1" 0 V e
Coquina Cove
Cranbrook Lake Estates
Cr'eseent Height
Cr'est Vi ew
C.W. Copp1s Addn.
Debonaire Estates
Deierl P,::H'k
Dewey (()r'i';,dnal)
o e we v He i 'd h t s
E. Roberts Addn.
teen Rid'Zje
f-=,ol"est H'il1s
Forest Park Heights
Frank Webber Addn.
Funk E:.r'os. Addn.
Go3\' -,'i.:.:,r Estates
04-12-1913
10-13-1954
01-13-1976
12-04-1913
02-15-1955
01-21-1926
01-21-1926
03-27-1925
09-26-1926
09-26-1898
04-16-1958
02-17-1921
1'j-07-1924
03-08-1915
12-15-1926
03-25-1926
09-08-1958
03-21-1972
04-24-1957
02-21-1974
06-30-1947
06-07-1963
03-05-1925
03-20-1953
03-13-1973
03-10-1910
01-25-1911
05-04-1925
06-12-1925
05-26-1954
04-07-1926
09-10-1925
01-21-1926
12-23-1952
10-06-1977
07-06-1955
06-26-1951
01-15-1920
06-23-19-52
07-28-1952
03-25-1910
01-04-1956
08-16-1911
1 1 - 10- 1 959
07-08-1957
04-17-1957
08-31-1922
02-29-1912
04-30-1954
4
I I -
-
- III
-
"MICHAEL B. SCHORAH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SUITE 101
1850 FOREST HILL BLVD.
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406
ENGINEERS · PLANNERS · DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
TELEPHONE (407) 968-0080
December 28, 1992
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: St. Marks Classroom Addition
Conditional Use Application
To Whom It Concern,
In my opinion, the above captioned building will not generate more than 160 trips per
day and since the property was platted prior to January 13, 1978, I consider it to be
exempt from concurrency requirements.
Sincerely,
U~~t3x(~~
Michael B. Schorah, P.E.
President
MBS/kmh
CIVIL. STRUCTURAL · DRAINAGE · HIGHWAYS · WATER 8c SEWER · SOIL MECHANICS
F.IRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-20i WDC
TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
DP.TE:
JANUARY 21, 1993
RE:
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION AND CONDI'1'IONAL USE ST. MARKS
SCHOOL AND CHURCH
624 NE 6TH AVENUE
WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES.
....
~-ii
WILLIAM D. CAVANAUGH, FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
wdcjpg
REceIVED
JAN 2 11993
UN.
MEMORANDUM
utilities No. 93-016
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
TO: Chris Cutro,
Planning Director
DATE: January 15, 1993
SUBJECT: st. Mark's Catholic School, File 711
Major Site Plan and Conditional Use
First Review - Comments
We've reviewed the plans and offer the following comments.
1. A reduced pressure backflow prevention device is required on
water services for this use (Ord. 90-51).
2. Sewer laterals should enter the sewer in the sewer trunk line
not in the manhole. An additional cleanout is required at
the right-of-way line.
3. If public potable water is anticipated for irrigation, then a
pressure vacuum breaker, backflow prevention device is
required (Ord. 90-51).
If you have any questions, please contact Mike Kazunas at
738-7460.
/bks
xc:
Mike Kazunas
Peter Mazzella
Skip Milor
File
.".~ T~D' ~
U~rr:, \. jj,:
L\~l':,,-' :,,"~.."'.\...;.!-- tI .
.. 19 ....~
, '-~~!,
_ J
Utility Engineer 3 hours
Administrative Assistant .5 hours
, . ''', ".:~ DEPT~
F ,-ji~J ~ i It l' " ~ \
-
hL~~
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-33
TO:
Chris Cutro, Planning Director
~~ 1f-
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
RE:
Major Site Plan Modification and Conditional
Use Approval: St. Mark's Catholic School
and Church
DATE:
January 15, 1993
The applicant must meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation
Ordinance #81-21 for any existing trees on the additional (newly
purchased) site (single family residence).
KH:ad
RECEIVED
IN' 19''-
p\J\N\'UNG DE.PT~.,
-
--
M E M 0 RAN DUM
93-005
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Lt. Donald I. Thrasher
Police Department
Community Relations Division
DATE: 14 January 93
SUBJECT: Site Plan - Saint Mark's Catholic School Day Care/Pre-K
Classroom
I have reviewed the above site plans and I recommend the
following:
1. Parking lot lighting detail, activation per City
Ordinance. (Ordinance 5-138, Public Safety).
2. Stop signs and stop bars at the end of all parking isle.
(City Ordinance 5-142C).
3. Do Not Enter sign at end of parking isle west end of
property. (City Ordinance 5-142C).
Donald I. Thrasher
Lieutenant
Community Relations Division
DIT/dmj
RECEIVED
JAN 2 0 1993
ATTEN: APRILLE DAY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chrstopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
DATE:
j-j.j-Cj3
.
RE:
Site Plan Review - Major Site Plan Modification -
1st Review -r h 1_ ./1 ..J.-d t', > C' ~ (. v'l- ,/\ C ILl>>, "
Project: ~;pVl /,//j-RK C'llDo I\.... -....)(.....- au "iN') 'vvn.,c,..-
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced proj ect. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
RECEIVED
JAM 2 1 1993
C:PARKS.MSP
ICtM:C w0Nlt01~ ....OWO:llt lI'\l1Wlll J.S:INl
'0' 3.1'1"15 "'0..\-' ..,....... lS3iIIK)~ OM'
~_w:>>) 'liJ.
NVO< = .'~>RJVd~'_I. I
~ ::rnu~ ~ .is ""..1'1"" ~I
~ ..- ~---
~v...::.:n""""""""IO.SM~.......oat.
i I
~
i
i
t
~
..
~
.
till
t. : .
f !f' ,
., to~ . .. to ~
. (...........
iilr~~.)'
r:--' .
L_, UI ~
.,
-
Il~l-~
...,.. .1
......
~
~
~;
~~
~
{
.."
h
l~
...1
if
\;:-
liE
r
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
j
~ .'
,
,
r
, 1
'" i
="
~
...
...
c
Z
1:>
in
cs.
o
...
..
c
~ , I ~
q1ffiJJ ~; ~
~=i !
~~
,
;~
, iill,
'\ II I P
~I il )!
~: It.. i !
t' id;!
.' I:" j .
~: :i: I i
!p t 'f
f i!
\
1:
J
t;i
:J
I ·
~1I~~-", ... I
....... J J ·
~ .! II !
I .!U I ell
,I J
I ~~ I i .~ !
~ ;!ii!! i If, t
Q I-! I 1:1 '] I
! I~!:I i il i~ i
~ 0 ie!uG~ ~ I' 1~ ;
~ ~ vc~rr. J _ it J! m i
"......
; +-,--'
i '
, ..
I
i.(.
'-i!
n.,> ,
i;;r
.:.!
ug
...J
;t
...
1- I: I ~ II:; I! g
C5\.:+ I~ ~ 11~! 'I i
! ['.i04) ! l"-, :i
ii! ~i a.
;~:: H
i;
:;}r(e,
%e,_(ity of
13oynton 13eac/i
Pfanning c!r Zoning 'Departnunt
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi. 'Boukvara
P.O. 'Bo~310
'Boynton 'Beadi., 1'wriaa 33425-0310
(407) 738-7490, 1';tX: (407) 738,7459
l1arch 11, 1993
Mr. Dan O'Connell
215 Ncrthwest Third street
Bo::nton Beach, FL 33435
Re: st. Mark's catholic Church, Site Plan Review, Conditlonal
Use, Parking Lot Variance and Community Design Plan Appeal
Dear Dan:
This is to advise you that, on February 16, 1993, the city
Commission of Boynton Beach approved the site plan, conditional
use, parking lot variance and Community Design Plan appeal at the
above referenced location.
This approval was subject to the following conditions:
1.
~)
<... .
Install 24 trees (19 missing from old plan and 5 new)
on the church site. If possible, replacement can be
made with available trees that will need to be removed
during construction of pre-kindergarten and
kindergarten building. If these trees are unsuitable,
trees to meet city codes will be planted.
A landscape entrance feature on N.E. 4th Avenue will be
installed that contains 2 native flowering trees and 3
palm trees.
3. Gaps in existing hedges will be filled to form a
continuous hedge. The same specie of hedge material may
be used. Existing hedges will be extended to within
three feet of ingress/egress driveways. Plants shall be
spaced 24 inches on center except that no hedge
material is required along the east property line to
screen this vehicle use area.
1Jml'rirn', Gntf1711m, tn ,hI' Gu({ctrpnm
To:
Re:
Page
Mr. Dan O'Connell
st. Mark's Catholic Church
Two of Two
4. Submit drainage plans that correspond to the attached
parking plan prepared by Michael Schorah dated January
27, 1993. This plall f.hould be amended to show an
accessway west of the new drainage area. This accessway
must meet the code requirements fer paving and
landscaping.
5, Lighting on the site will be upgraded to meet the CBD
Landscape Code, Article 3, Section 7.5-57 (1) g. & h.
This approval modified to meet the above conditions entitles you
to develop the property as shown on the approved plans. If you
wish to modify the plan prior to submission of your building
plall, please contact the Planning and Zoning Department.
Modifications during the building permit process will be handled
as part of that process. The approval of the Site Plan remains in
effect for one year, until February 17, 1994. If an extension is
needed, please forward your request to the Planning and Zoning
Department 30 days prior to the expiration date.
We have attached a list of submittal documents from the Building
Department to asslst you 1n assembling your building permit
package. We have also attached copies of the comments mllst be met
in the building permit submittal.
We would like you thank you for building in Boynton Beach. If we
can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call me.
Yours truly,
~~~
Christopher cutro
Planning and Zoning Director
CC:ald
Att.
cc: Michael Schorah
Rev. John Black
A:APPROVAL.JH