REVIEW COMMENTS
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Octobe:J; 5, 1988
TO: Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Preliminary Plat and Site Plans for Quail Run, Phase II
COMMENTS:
l. The tracts that are re-platted should be identified on the
plat plan with their former identification also.
2. A construction permit will be required from the Water Management
District and the Lake Worth Drainage District.
3. A cost estimate for the bonded improvements is required.
4. The existing and/or proposed bank slopes, dimensions and
elevations should be shown on the lake outfall section
including the elevation of the lake bottom and the width of
the seed and mulch area.
5. Complete street lighting plans are required including structural
and electrical details unless done by F.P. & L. Co. If done by
F.P. & L. Co. a note will be required so stating, subject to
approval of plans by the City.
6. Unless an easement is provided for street light poles, the
sidewalks for sections A-A and B-B should be moved a foot from
the R.O.W.
7. Current bond includes $30,400 for street lights for Golf Road,
S.W. 26th Avenue and Woolbright Road. This cost should be
checked with F.P. & L. Co. and additional costs included as a
line item in the cost estimate.
8. The width of the private ingress/egress rights-of-way tracts
should be shown on the plat plan.
9. A cross-section is required thru the private streets to show
the swale construction.
10. The depth of the swale for the 60 ft. R.O.W. should comply
with City standards, ie., 0.70 ft. instead of 0.52.
con' t. . . . .
.
To: Mr. Jim Golden
October 5, 1988
Re: Preliminary Plat & Site Plans for
Quail Run, Phase II (con't.)
Page #2
11. The Tract R-3 is out of scale at dog leg curve when compared
with curve data.
l2. Refer to Bill Flushing's memo of September 30, 1988.
~v~ aJ
Tom Clark
TAC/ck
attachment
-
TRB MEMORANDUM
September 30, 1988
To:
Tom Clark
From:
Bill Flushing
Re:
Quail Run - Phase II
Plat
1. Tract "D" is missing a PCC on the easterly boundary.
2. The correct area is 12.0508 Acres, not 12.2751 as shown.
The units per acre will then equal 9.63 instead of 9.45
Tract "CIf :: 4.80606 acres
Tract IfD" :: 3.6.6552 acres
Tract "E" :: 3.57923 acres
3. A statement is required absolving the city from any
responsibility for the control of aquatic weeds (City
code Appendix C Art. VIII Sec. 6 D. 11).
4. The proposed private streets must be named.
5. Pcp's are required for the private streets.
6. Boundary bearings should be consistent in a CW or CCW
direction (see Tract "c" N 530 30' 00" E should be
S 530 30' 00" W).
7. In providing the legal description in the dedication, the
surveyor is using the most extreme interpretation of
Chapter 177.0" (11). In my opinion, although it is
technically acceptable, it does not comply with the
intent of Chapter 177. Over 95% of the surveyors who
prepare Plats in Boynton Beach would have used a metes
and bounds for Tracts ,IfC", IfD", and liE".
~
8. If the finished lake shore line is to encroach or be
close to the plat boundary line, the shore line must be
shown on the plat.
.,.....
-
-
Construction Plans
9. Handicap parking striping to be shown as being blue.
10. Sign detail should include the mounting post with
embedment.
11. Section C-C parking detail should clearly show that the
grade (for drainage) is going toward the center planting
area.
Bill Flushing
",'
-
MEMORANDUM
October 5, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: QUAIL RUN, PHASE II - STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the following Planning Department comments
with respect to the above-referenced site plan request:
1. Revise setback data on site plan sheet 2 of 9 as follows:
A. Side (from S.W. 26th Street). . . 25'
B. Building Separation.. ... 20'
C. Rear. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20'
2. Dimension a typical driveway at a minimum of 9 feet by 18
feet consistent with previously approved parking lot
variances.
3. No lighting plan has been provided for the visitor parking
lots or lights attached to the unit exterior lighting the
driveways. The lighting plan should include location,
manufacturer's specification, energy source, pole detail,
illumination level, photocell activation and wattage.
The previously approved lighting variance did not exclude
lighting these areas.
4. Include C.A.B. approved landscape plan, and previously
approved building elevations and signage program with
final sign-off drawings.
5. A back up of twenty-seven (27) feet is required for visitor
parking lots. (Appendix B of Article X, Parking Lots.)
CA~~..~N~
CSA:ro
cc Central File