The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS PlJBUC \VORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-285 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent SUBJ: Site Plan Review - Taco Bell DATE: December 21,1994 The Public Works Department has no problems ""ith the above site. ~#/ T q.,..-,;r Qn;nn .L....u.l.1. _Y _ U.UJ.l..1 Sanitation Superintendent - LQ/cr {ill-n ~ @ ~ U ~~ lf~r;~,' I U ; ~ :' I . ! \Ll~ f ~ Y \ 1 PLANNING AND -~'D~ ZONING DEPT:.-_--\Y . DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-006 December 19, 1994 TO: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director M~i"am v. Hukill, P.E. ~~ent of Development Director TRC COMMENTS TACO BELL - SITE PLAN REVIEW FROM: RE: Attached please find review comments from both our Building Division and our Engineering Division. WVH:bh Attachments: Eng. XC: Al Newbold Ken Hall Div. Memo #94-397 & Bldg. Div. Memo. #94-282 TACO ill m@rnnwrn 001 ud~ \ 9 1994 PLANNING AND ~~ ZONING DEPT. J DEP.A.R.'T'ME~ OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-397 ~OO E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FI 33435 Phone: (407) 375-6373 (Bldg.) 3 75 - 62 8 0 (Eng.) PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS Name of Reviewer: Hall & Hukill Type of Review: Site Plan Date of Review 1st Review X 2nd Review Reviewer Phone # Project: Taco Bell Contractor Other Your permit application and supporting documentation do not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances as described below (see attached sheets if applicable). Please correct documents to comply with the comments and resubmit two (2) corrected sets of plans to the Building Division. Direct any questions to the reviewer named above. If a conference with the reviewer is necessary, an appointment is recommended. To expedite the process, changes may be made to the permit documents at the Building Division by the applicant or his agent. (Proof of authorization is required of anyone other than the design professional prior to making changes to signed and sealed documents). Timely approval of your project is dependent upon your prompt response to the comments. 1. Revise documents to reflect all comments. 2. Establish a limited access easement along S.W. 8th Street if necessary. 3. Need South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage District acceptance prior to Engineering approval. 4. Provide satisfactory drainage calculations to support design - Article X, Sec. 5-142(f). 5. Inlets in paved areas must be protected from sediment intrusion into the exfiltration trench by installation of a suitable baffle. 6. Provide details for basin, grate, pipe, etc. 7. Traffic rated manhole cover (212 lbs.). 8. Main entrance must have 100 feet clear to first access aisle unless variance previously granted. 9. Provide stop signs in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" (M.U,T.C.D.). 10. Maximum spacing of planting breaks/islands is 10 spaces (see Chapter 5, Article X) . 11. Identify parking construction (sub-grade, rock and surface) . 12. Need lighting plan including photometrics. 13. Regarding the notes: a. Change note 31 to 32 and vice-versa to agree with plan identification. b. In new note 32, change it to read 25' double 411 yellow stripes. c. In notes 16, 18 and 26, change the word blue to white, City standard drawing B-90012. d. In note 19, change to 4" double solid white stripes, City standard drawing B-90012. e. In note 28, change the color of the stripes to yellow for the loading zone. 14. In the existing parking area to the east, only remove one of the landscaped islands. 15. Add a stop sign to the stop bar at the drive-thru exit. M.U.T.C.D. 2B-9, 3B-17.' T~c~ Bell - Page Two 16, Regarding the pedestrian crosswalk - make the crosswalk across the drive-thru lane 6" concrete to delineate the accessible route to the entrance and install a stop sign in front of it. M.U.T.C.D. 2B-9, 3B-17. 17. Plan requires variance to have driveway onto roadway less than 100 feet from S.W. 8th Street right-of-way line. 18. Plan use of S-l rather than Type 2 asphalt. 19. Provide construction plans/details for road from S.W. 8th Street into Home Depot. Relocation of curbing for new road shall not impact the existing drainage along both sides of S.W. 8th Street. 20. Change all reference to 2000 p.s.i. concrete to 2500 p.s.i. 21. Locate the handicap post signs behind sidewalk to avoid vehicle and pedestrian conflict. All post mounted signs (stop and handicap) shall be installed according to City standard drawing B-90012. 22. Department of Transportation type "0" curb may be used in lieu of proposed 6" wide curb with steel (reference City standard drawing B- 90012) . 23. In the "loading zone" area, reorient the pavement message to face north and add the words "no parking" so that the message is more specific and easily read. 24. Provide necessary drainage easement for proposed 285' of 18" reinforced concrete pipe going north to existing structure. 25. Do not install trees next to stop signs to prevent future canopy from blocking line of sight. 26. Specify that plantings directly north of pedestrian crosswalk be no higher than 30" at maturity for line of sight purposes. 27. Consider enlarging planting areas two and four feet wider by substituting curbing in place of wheel stops. This will remove tripping hazard and provide a two foot wider sidewalk and additional landscaping. 28. Obtain cross-access agreement with Home Depot if necessary. WVH:bh A:TACOBBLL BUILDING DEPARMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-282 December 8, 1994 To: William V. Hukill, P. E. Department of Development Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Site Plan/Conditional Use/1st Review Project: Taco Bell Restaurant at Shoppes of Woolbright Location: Northeast corner of Woolbright & sw 8 Street Re: The Building Division has reviewed the documents for the above referenced project and support the conditional use request contingent upon the fOllowing comments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. AN: mh Atts: 1. The plans state that the type of construction would be Type III. would like the applicant to be reminded that it must meet requirements for Type III construction, inCluding Table 600 of Standard Code, as it relates to the exterior walls. We all the The pole sign does not meet setback requirements of Section 21-23 of the Sign Code. If this site is not separately owned from the P.U.D., the pole sign will not be allowed. Maximum square feet for menu board signs is 25 Sq. Ft. and not more than 5 Ft. in height. This would need to be revised to comply with the Sign Code. Directional signs shall not exceed 4 Sq. Ft., limited to four per lot, and no logo is allowed on such signs. Drive-thru speaker post has wording and logo on it making it a sign and is not in compliance with the Sign Code. .--z&~~ Al Ne16Id Plans with Planning & Zoning Department Memorandum No. 94-353 A: TACOBELL. TRC PL.-A l/S. &T\J~ FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-309 WDC TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: December 19, 1994 RE: site Plan - Conditional Use NE Corner - SW 15 Ave & SW 8 st Provide fire hydrants to conform to city Sub-Division regulations. No portion of any building shall be over 200' from a fire hydrant. ~~~~~ -. - o \VI rn rn ill ~ 0' ..-..---", i ,. 'I.. U ISlQ4 PLANNING AND ~ ZONING DEPT. Tf'rCO ~~ C <90 ~ ~ W -ex:::':> 7 bo ~ps '1:2-'\..1 ~~~.O:> MEMORANDUM Utilities #94-395 DATE: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Dirvor John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities .-'\ December 14, 1994 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Taco Bell Restaurant in Shoppes of Woolbright First Review Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. Fire hydrants shall be within 200' of all points on every commercial building, (Appendix C, Art. X, Sec. 16). 2. Please show existing utility easement at east property line. 3. Sanitary sewer main will require Palm Beach Health Department permit, (Sec. 26.12). 4. Existing force main to be removed, capped and thrust blocked at east property line and cement plugged at west property line. 5. Utilize existing watermain stub and 6" gate valve as source for proposed water service and water meter. 6. Delete detail for backflow preventor to water meter on sheet 12, (City Compo Plan, Police 3C.3.4). 7. Provide detail for reduced pressure zone backflow preventor on domestic service near proposed water meter. 8. A Reservation Fee of$I,205.82 is due within thirty (30) days of Commission approval or upon request for my signature on HRSIDEP forms, (Sec. 26-34 [ED. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. rn mow m rn 19b DEe , 4 1994 xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella 1'" /' File PLANNING AND ~ ZONING O~Pl l: 0 ~.:oLi'.;';;:" BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Office of Professional Standards To: From: Date: Re: Tambri J. Heyden / Di~ Lt. James Cummings 15 December 1994 Taco Belli Conditional Use TRC MEMO # 94-0107 I have reviewed the plans for the Taco Bell Restaurant and would request one change, regarding handicapped parking. I would request that a overlay, or template be placed on the plans so that the actual dimensions of the parking spaces and the stripping area identified. 00 ~ @ ~ :~, ~ . rn I , , VB: .. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. ~~~1:.-""'t,->\.U.)~ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-453 TO: Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist~c9~ RE: Taco Bell Restaurant - New Site Plan DATE: December 16, 1994 1. The applicant must relocate the two Sabal Palms shown to be removed on the landscape plan. 2. The applicant must review the existing landscaping/irrigation materials in the median of SW 8th Street abutting the property. The landscaped median must meet the criteria of the City Comprehensive Plan (Policy 2.4.5). KH:ad ill m @ m u WI m ,m! '6 Pl~NNING A.ND f ZONING DEPl MEMORANDUM TO: Tarnbri Heyden, Planning:& ZoninqDirector Superintendent P FROM: John Wildner, Parks /fl-/~- i'l DATE: RE: Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1st Review Project: T J:tc:.. 0 t8 e c.- (., The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the above referenced project. There are no outstanding recreation related issues on this project. ~N\NG ~ND lONING OEPT. ,~~ BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 95 TACO BELL MEMO #0146 ..::;...........:.:...~......;:. I have reviewed the above listed site pla.1l<atfdJ s~ di);iillmewate concerns or problems that need to be addressed. .(;:;:::;;:::::;:~'::;';;:;~:::';::i:::.:..,::;:\:., ~;~....,):: .,~:::::;:::::::'/::,i:::::::::'::::::,: : ....... ".;:.::.' .... Respectfully, .nr~ ~~ ~?""'::'~"h' .,:{ . ....'".... .rYYJ .)Jr.'.........:.:.:.:./: '? //(- ... Sgt. Marlon Harris Police Department ~j :r.~.~.:o~.;.;..;.::;~:\ :~ :~: . .,::: i ~: ............,......... :<;:. II ...J: ~::.:.:>:.~.;.:.:>:..........:..... .............:....;0.:;. ......:...'..'. -.: :.' ...:.".:0.... .: "......;.;.:....:.. .....:.:.,..<......)) .~....:.:..:.~...>:.. \Q) ;:........'.................:..:..:.. ii .\: ~~ ,r'.........,...;......~;.. ::;....:: ~:.,- ,.,;.;. ~:;>:.~ . .;. ::.......;...;.;.........,."..;... qL_)q .~;..,;....,~:, ;::::. {~(;:!':l :;:: .l~ :~~ ~::~:~; ::::::::;; ;J: ./'~:.:::~:,:::::::.:::;;;....:::...:.:~....:,:.. l.::' l.f....'..:....;..;:::: .'.:..;::' .:~ .:: :: ::: (..f ,i'::./'" BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-211 June 26, 1995 " D I - /,- ; ill' ~..--~~~I!:~L~ TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMENTS - 2nd SITE PLAN REVIEW TACO BELL DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT The Building Division has reviewed the amended plans for the above referenced project. Our previous comments have been met and we recommend this project be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. AN:bh Attachment/plans xc: William V. Hukill, P.E. ~' .... ~--G ~ Al Newb' ~d /; , / TACO RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-282 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director f1-f{ OOr-~~@ L~c-J h'.:,-:,:-_",jJJJ \ \1'-"> lDl~iNi.: 0LPl. ~ FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist RE: Taco Bell Drive-Through Restaurant DATE: June 29, 1995 I have no additional comments. The project should continue on the normal process. KH:ad ill ~ rn u [! mi..! JUN ? 9 1995 i 101 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPl MEMORANDUM TO: 1.41j2,tlO\I I"~ ~-" fLA ..---' .J-20'vj'J\J(; b;flec.-rolt p -rey 1J~",.j j /II #; oN'" " u I FROM: -J ol-lN \,0 ~ l" ~tV~~1 fMk.$- S \A--pr. (J ~ fv/*Jf/7S- Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans DATE: RE: Project: 'f f\ c- u B t (,,(.., After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration. amended plans ~r the above the ~t:;...d~1'IfO R~c:..ffAtl1,..7J- PARk that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. C:AMEND1.ALD TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-282 Planning Department Fire Department June 23, 1995 Taco Bell Drive-Thru Restaurant NE corner of Woolbright Ave & SW 8 st COUS 94-007 We have no objections at this time. ~ ill m~: 7U~ m,m WD PLANNING AND ZONING OEPr ~~Uq~~r;; 7 .A. 2. TACO BELL Conditional Use PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-334 THRU: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board Tambri J. HeYden-;;;;tJ-. Planning and Zoning Director TO: FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and site Development Administrator DATE: July 7,1995 SUBJECT: Taco Bell- COUS #94-007 Conditional Use (drive-through restaurant) INTRODUCTION: Eduardo Carcache of CKE Group, Ine., agent for Howard R. Scharlin, property owner is requesting conditional use approval to construct a drive-through restaurant at the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD at the northeast corner of s. W. 8th street and Woolbright Road as follows: project Name: Taco Bell Applicant: Howard R. Scharlin Agent: CKE Group, Inc. Location: Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and S . W . 8th street Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail commercial (LRC) Zoning District: Planned Commercial Development (peD) Type of Use: Drive-through restaurant Number of Units: N/A Square Footage: Building: 2,616 square feet site: 39,023 square feet (.895 acres) SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: (See attached location map) North - Vacant land, zoned PCD (Shoppes of woolbright). East Existing parking lot for Horne Depot, zoned PCD (Shoppes of Woolbright). South - Woolbright Road and farther south is vacant land, zoned Community Commercial (C-3). West - S.W. 8th Street and farther west is vacant land, zoned PCD. (Shoppes of Woolbright). STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES: Section 11.2.D of the zoning code contains twelve standards, listed below, to which conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning Department's evaluation of the application as it pertains to the standards. The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of the zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of / Page 2 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell caus 94-007 property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provision has been made concerning the following standards, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. The property is a newly subdivided outparcel within the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD. Primary access to the outparcel is via a future shopping center driveway off of S.W. 8th street. Due to the approval of the most recent master plan modification for the PCD, which included a new median cut within S.W. 8th street to align with the referenced future shopping center driveway, the classification of this driveway has been upgraded to a major driveway (see further discussion of this major driveway within the staff report for a concurrent parking lot variance and Exhibit "A" latest master plan modification) . The Taco Bell site plan in Exhibit liB" shows two access aisles (points) branching off of the new major driveway. The major driveway also provides access to the Home Depot parking lot which is located east of the subject site. The parking lot variance that has been requested would allow the parcel's access point closest to S.W. 8th street to be located approximately 30 feet from S.W. 8th street. The code requires a minimum of 100 feet from the right-of-way to this first access aisle. The Technical Review Committee has recommended that the variance be approved, subject to the access aisle into the Taco Bell site being limited to ingress only, to prevent exiting traffic within the major driveway from stacking beyond, and blocking access to, the entrances to the Taco Bell property. Subsequent to the TRC meeting, the Public Works Department has determined that although safer for sanitation vehicles also, this change in the west access point to ingress only necessitates a redesign of the dumpster access/location. This issue is further discussed under standard #3 below and affects the proposed access points in that the western access point is unusable to Public Works for sanitation collection and two access points are needed. At the date of this report, a suggestion was made by Public Works to close the west access point and replace it with an access point along the east property line that could be used to maneuver cumbersome sanitation vehicles. This solution solves the access problems expressed by the TRC, enables dumpster access and would negate the need for the parking lot variance, but would require redesign of the parking lot. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection 1 above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. (-2 Page 3 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 The use requires thirty-eight (38) on-site parking spaces. Thirty-nine (39) spaces are provided, including two (2) required handicap spaces. A loading zone of sufficient size is provided at the northeast corner of the building, however as with the concerns of the publ ic Works, it is doubtful whether delivery vehicles can maneuver around the parking lot without two, two-way driveways. With respect to the drive- through lane, sufficient stacking is provided for eight (8) vehicles. 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection I and 2 above. As previously discussed, the only a~rangement acceptable to the TRC for approving the parking lot variance for the west access point to the parcel was to limit it to ingress only. However, this recommendation, subj ect to the western-most access point being limited to one-way, affects the direction from which Public Works had planned to use to access the dumpster. Due to the short distance between the west access point and S.W. 8th street, sanitation vehicles cannot ingress the parcel via the west access point. Furthermore, both ingress and egress cannot be accomplished from the east access point because sanitation vehicles, and most likely delivery vehicles, cannot maneuver within the small turning radii of the parking lot (Public Works Department Memorandum No. 95-103 in composite Exhibit "C" will be superseded by a memorandum discussing this problem.) 4. utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. All utilities are available to the site and installation will conform to city codes. 5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character. The landscaping plan submitted provides all code required screening and landscaping. The Planned Commercial Development (PCD) regulations require a ten (10) foot wide peripheral greenbelt around the perimeter of the project. The width has been provided, but no landscaping other than a row of shrubs and trees, spaced 40 feet apart, as required for vehicular use screening. Therefore, additional landscaping (trees and groupings of understory plantings) is recommended within the greenbelt. 6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. Signage shown on the drawings will require a modification to the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD sign program which will require a separate review and approval. The current sign program makes no provisions for separate freestanding signs on outparcels, since the outparcels were originally intended to be leased. The revised sign program will be expected to set forth criteria for all freestanding signs within the PCD to harmonize these signs through similar colors, materials, lettering and/or sign height; possibly use of monument signs. No problems are anticipated with the exterior lighting due to the setback from Woolbright Road and the similar zoning of adjacent properties. Sign lighting is discussed under standard #8 below. 3 Page 4 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. The proposed structure meets all setback and lot coverage requirements. 8. General compatibility with adj acent properties, and other property in the zoning district. The proposed building colors and materials are complimentary to and compatible with the existing Home Depot building which is presently the only structure within the PCD, The Taco Bell building design is more Spanish/Mediterranean looking than the most prototypes within the area and comparatively, is more attractive. However, the RaceTrac service station, with a color scheme of grey, white and red, approved but not yet under construction, is not compatible with the Taco Bell design. Also, the strong design statement of this Taco Bell sets the tone for other future buildings within the PCD when there may be no intent by the PCD owner to unify other buildings within the PCD with this design style. staff has recommended that the multi-color (fuschia, purple and yellow) awning proposed for the perimeter of the building be limited to one color that would be used for this building and could be incorporated in future buildings within the PCD. The colored awning would be a feature that could provide harmony with other buildings in the PCD. The awning is also proposed to be backlit. Insufficient information has been provided to determine the intensity of this illumination, but judging from other Taco Bell restaurants in the area, awning illumination can be distracting to motorists. On the other hand, the building is set back from Woolbright Road by an 80 foot wide state drainage ditch and is set back another 43 feet from the front property line. No exterior neon that is usually seen on Taco Bell restaurants, other than as part of the building signage, is indicated on the plans submitted. It cannot be determined from the plans whether the building signage is exposed neon or is covered; covered neon is recommended. With the adoption of the new Community Design Plan on March 21,1995, drive-up windows are no longer permitted to be located to face a public or private street. The drive-up window proposed faces woolbright Road. Although this application was submitted prior to the effective date of the Community Design Plan, the application could not be processed since pursuant to the 1985 and 1990 settlement agreements between the city and Tradewinds Development Corporation, no fast food restaurants with drive-throughs were permitted within the PCD. Processing of this application could not be resumed until the Commission approved a new agreement, which superseded all previous agreements, that lifted this prohibition. Such an agreement, which determined that fast food restaurants with drive-throughs could be allowed, subject to conditional use approval, was approved by the Commission on May 16, 1995; after the new Community Design Plan went into effect. Since the effect of these two actions on the previously submi tted Taco Bell application is unclear, staff did not require a formal Community Design Plan appeal application to be submitted. However, staff does not recommend in favor of the drive-up window location and believes the window could be relocated to either the east or north elevation. Dri ve-up windows do not need to be located along a street in order to 1- Page 5 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 be successful. Most drive-through facilities advertise their drive-up window on their freestanding sign and most customers readily associate fast food restaurants with having drive- through facilities. Relocation of the drive-up window would require redesign of the parking lot. The Community Design Plan also requires building facades that face or are visible from a street to be designed as attractively in appearance as the front of the building. Therefore, staff recommends that the rear (north side) of the building that is visible from S.W. 8th street be embellished by adding an arch, similar to the arches shown on all of the other elevations, over the rear service door. 9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The height of the proposed building is approximately eighteen (18) feet, one story. This consistent with the approved PCD master plan. 10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole, It is expected that the proposed use will have a positive effect on the adjacent property within the PCD, which has been slowly building out, which in turn has a positive economic effect on the city as a whole. Therefore, no negative economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties are anticipated. 11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances (new reference is Part III Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4). The proj ect shall comply with the above standards, upon rectification of staff comments conditioning any approval of the request, except as otherwise provided through settlement agreements between the city and the developer of the PCD. 12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance standards section 4 of the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance. The project is in compliance with all aspects of the above ordinance. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Below is a list of those departments having comments regarding this request: Department Attached Memorandum Public works utilities Fire Police Engineering Building Parks and Recreation Forester Planning and Zoning 95-103 95-205 N/A N/A 95-206 N/A N/A N/A 95-333 s ._-- ----- --- -- I \\\ \~ , w -- III ii -'\ , Gl Q. w\\tt." " A"!'\'~~:'P\i\I'I'llf' \."f,dlCnPU ~f\io.,\\\1 ,tz.&' for\\"" p\ac:tJ $~~e 100'" 1>. flor<u' 33401 ~e.\ Pt'\01. 6e~ rn r ~ ~ 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ \ _~ -;oJ, \ ' \ . , \ ~ ~.".....,.,~, \ . ('t' 'l,.::'if.~S~~~'4{;\ot \' \ ~ ~(:' H -e {,;~ >4 ::~ .I' ~ ,;"'.. ~ \~.~ 'J ~ ,,:'. ~ :,... ~ 1~ \ 'I ~ " - ," r," 'i' ,. t ' .,; . ~ \ .' . . 'JT,~r \~-: ~.; ~';! ~ i~ ~, , 't 1I>~'j;" ;j,'f..... a l~ ,,;11\\ ~t ./ ' 'l6 ,q ';I~ t ' .; ~ ~"\I~ \ ' ,~",?~ .;;I.,i~~~;"tll \ ; ~':~.:-: \..~~, 'i 'r ~~. \ \ " .' ," ,..h .. - 10 .. \.. ; ~.~. ~ . 1 = ~ \I. ;i'} " ~ ',: f.',. ~,~.: ',';.':' \ ',', . :. '" >- ~ -, ,. r 1;.. ::,', \ .. ,. . ~ ',' ,. ~ " \ ' ~ ';/.",'t j, ...\.~. ~ ", -,,~~, \', " . '; r . .' . (J) ., .. '.' .~ -: I\;. r" ' ! __,\..r-. ,~\~ Y. \ '" ':;; ,,"\,~: '. .:, ,. \," , " ~ ' t~,:',; " , \ , , \ , , , , , t , / ~ a\.t \ a ~ \1~ :! ~ " ,~... .~~ ~'! '" ... ~ ~ so a . '. ,I' J \ (, ~ ~,~~~\i\' r.,," t" '6 :~:t t:. s~ \ " ; 1\ · f: :; \;,.' . ~ ~~ : <!' \- -,' . \ '\ ~ \, ~. "... c. .~ ~.' (" ~ ~ r . .~ ... ~ , 4"r ,~ ~,', r'" ~'1 \ j ,,, ,~';,~, "6 ~ ,:' <A :; ,':. ::c tOl ~ s: 'Z ~. .. :.~'~: . I~' ~ . o ('"", ..-\ ,-_..... \ \ \ , r' '\ \ , '.}!...l! \ 11.\" .' ' \:.~. .' , . , - . .." i"~ <r .' ...:' .J" \\. Ii ... 'I .' , I' '&'-t \\ % \ " - '=' " ,.,.j!~'~"""" ( ~l~ \. I 1.1."'.1""" I . - (.' , ,,'" , . ,.. ' ; " I' . '. . .' . ~ I rAhlll.11I ."lI ' · u-.".H" /10< .\ I 00. e~ft, G1l0\lfl.' ItlC- ~ . ~rt\)SC^P~ \,\.J\l'I .~......... .-::.;,;::" ." .'- . ~~. ., ...-' - ." -" -. . ,.-- ~_. ".11\'..' "".n~ . l\I.'.'" ----' JD :MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-205 Date: June 23, 1995 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ A.v~ ~fo"~ A. Gui~ . Director of Utilities FROM: SUBJECT: Taco Bell Drive-thru, Site Plan Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Proposed fire hydrant location to be approved by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department. 2. Fire hydrant assemblies greater than 20' from the water main require a second gate valve within 3' of the hydrant, (Sec. 26.33(b)). 3. Plan shall show location of all utility easements, please show a 12' utility easement for the proposed fire hydrant, (Sec. 26.33(a)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella Steve Campbell. Fire Dept. File /3 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-333 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: July 7, 1995 SUBJECT: Site Plan Project: Location: Review - 2nd Review - (Conditional use) Taco Bell at Shoppes of Woolbright PCD Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and 8th St. CKE Group, Inc. COliS 94-007 S.W. Agent: File No.: The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the building Department for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. The landscape island located at the northwest corner of the site requires a continuation of the screening hedge material similar to the rest of the periphery of the parking lot. 2. Modify landscape note 2 to read as follows: "50% of the total number of all required trees and shrubs shall be native species". 3. Omit landscape note 3 and replace with the following text: "On center spacing of required landscape material shall take precedence over quantities of material identified on the plan." 4. Remove from the landscape data the following information: "(Per PCD Requirements) 194 223". 5. Place a note on the landscape plan that indicates the quality of plant material and the standards by which landscaping shall be installed. 6, On the landscape plan place a note indicating that the required vehicle use area screening, hedge material, located along the north 150 foot of the subject lot will be located on the Horne Depot site and if the existing material on the Home Depot site does not meet the specifications of the landscape code, the proper vehicle use area screening will be shown on the plans for Taco Bell and installed accordingly. 7. Construction of the major driveway leading to the site, modifications to the Home Depot site and the median cut on S.W,. 8th Street will require review and approval of separate permits, considering they are not on the Taco Bell property. -' IS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-103 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Taco Bell Drive- Thru Restaurant DATE: June 22, 1995 The parking space next to the dumpster enclosure obstructs entrance to the dumpster enclosure at the above site and if adjustment can be made it would be appreciated, however this concern should not hold up forwarding plans to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory. ~~ ~bert Eichorst Public Works Director RE/cr JJ ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-206 DATE: June 26, 1995 TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 ~ SUBJECT: TACO BELL - SECOND REVIEW The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review. If any of the code comments disallow the applicant to develop the site as submitted, the applicant may request a variance thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter one, Article one, Section eleven of the city's Land Development Regulations. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: Site lighting, Paving, Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from agencies such as the F.D.O.T., P.B. County, S.F.W.M.D., and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. COMMENTS 1. Regarding comment #6: Exfiltration trench detail should reflect city standard dwg. B-91 007. Chap.23, Art.2F. 2. Add stop sign/bar at S.W. comer of parking island (same ref. as original note 9). 3. Change identification of easement from" 1 0' sanitary sewer easement" to read a drainage easement on sheet Al B. To correct intent of original note 24. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Consider making the west driveway one-way in. Make the first aisle one way eastward, the other aisle two-way except for signage to disallow a northward movement. This would allow the location of the subject driveway an additional 14' to the east, would not impact interior circulation regarding access to the drive-thru, and most importantly, eliminate a conflict between exiting site traffic with stacked vehicles waiting to cross over onto S.W. 8th St. KRHlkrh c: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file tacobell.2rv jLf HAND-OUT 7 .A. 2. TACO BELL CONDITIONAL USE /:;) I ::iENT BY: ; 7- 7-95 ; 2:13PM; Boynton Bch fax~ 4073756211;# 2 ."~"'~a''' l'Iliiil t . '. III It' ; I II. ,,' , I,". 1,1\;,1 li'ii illd .. ," '11'111' ." ".!;III!I!!!II1IJlJliUlIII,:.ji,- · · · II ': II I 'I I i I I I 'i' l r I!: Ii! :! !lii! I! III I'i ~ · - 1111~ i~I'! Jill~il!'I~illj!!lillll' ifll, I I: I : '!Iii 1'1': ~ : !, h !!Ii !III!I r~I!!l !il~lll!i"lllllllill!l~ mllli~!!lIir fill! : · < Ill! l!iid ~1111I11!lllldll ; IIII/illllll! l'UJ!~I~!lIn" Ifill; ~ :f J I /VP A ~ I .,. 01, I I!I' I,ll .11..'.......' h' ~ trI. T"f"". I I,.jlll/llml Iii' i I r(hnlf,tull .1,1 : '.. n h Ii J, V IJ'f'JI!;~qli IJJ.~ i :;f 'I' "ifl'h' II I ;R ,J~lu 'I" If ' slili,Jihlll,J Ill' _, 'm tl ,uII1'.1'1'.' 111 0 (I j I I ,. r'!'~ ,," Z ' \ . ''','' . \' \ 1'1 '\11 If .\ I r ii .~ I --- ----- b '\ n \ r~ ~ \ ;; - :\) o ': ~ )01,[ ~-- __..."...-./ 1 6" : ('OJ : - . - 111''''' .1111111 rlll!'I' I II ,._,~ 'J nH~in I ~I'" I . :II I II' 4 ~n;-. . . . -- . ! , I ~ ! I I I : tn I i .1 ,. I I ,) to''' ,/ ~ ~ z I .---,.~..-~ ( , I ! I' -" I 1 I I . i . ::- - - ~O~IIT 1l0AD I' , ______.._.._.._.l... r ~ ::-. -I ------C.--- .! i .- -'--'-:-1 --_..~-~.tr-:.:-- - -\.:. - - - - - . ~':"':::>" - - \;1 . . n_.._....p_ 1,1 I f \ c:.... _ .,=.-_.,-n_.._n_ j.j - 7 .__.._~ , . \ SITE PLAN IICOll"fGHT lIlOolIl nco BIb\- BOYNTON IEl(:: .I,~:~ I1lt!:rT "~T"f::A _.- ilL!] C.K.t. GROU" '''~IIO''''" . .... INC. t_ .. ::1....lIIl'1t -- .........~4 71 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-211 June 26, 1995 'rD~-----"- W!'-1fl}J I,' r:JiTrj-- '.' ",~-\.~ -----. ";, .~'t..~.., TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE : TRC COMMENTS - 2nd SITE PLAN REVIEW TACO BELL DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT The Building Division has reviewed the amended plans for the above referenced project. Our previous comments have been met and we recommend this project be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. AN:bh Attachment/plans ~ xc: William V. Hukill, P.E. dltf41://' Al ~ew~ ld --j ~.~ / / TACO TO: FROM: DATE: REF: BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT MEMO #0146 I have reviewed the above listed site pl.~:::a:ttdJ seb....d~~:i~m~diate concerns or problems that need to be addressed. :::::::::::::::':::::;:;::;:~;:::::::;:~::::.:..,::'::::::- :t..,i::: '::::;::::::'../::;::::::::::>;: ::..t?} ...;::::::":::,::::::::;:::::::::::,..., . .(.:.:/::,.. ..'....;:::..",. .-::' ..... '::" ........ Respectfully, n "::"'::::::::...:): -/ / ~ll ~::.:i~::::::::::':""'~:l JVYr ;:7 ) ,JLfi -'::(:i' ......... Sgt. Marlon Harris Police Department "':: .., ::. l ~r ..:\\;. '\::\:. ':i:\ '.~ ~'. .:.:. "\;~':\ \::: ~""I:~.::~'.:':::::;) ~ .r....w...~...:j;\~l l.;.:~:::::;:;:;::~:~::;~~;..i' Jl::~~~ .:.........................~.... . .. ::: :;.:.:.:.;.:.~.:....:.. '';;~ .',' .', ,'. I :!::::::::::::::::t/:. :;\ ;1 'i: 1~. ., . .. .:: :::';':,:0::' ,:,:,:,~,,':". ..:=- ::~"":: ~::.:.:.;.:O:.:.:.:O:;........':o'~.. ~::o:.~ ::..........................:..~.... I r;::;';:;';::":.;;:i:) ~ ~ ::..A ................'..,'..,.,..... :: ;.:.:.;.:.:.:.:......~:....::>. j~ ~~ .....'::; '\. Ii ! ] J ~::;~ t.:~~:;:~;:;:;:::~:::::~~~:...:{ t;l c:;::;:::;~~~:;) :c::;:~::::;.J \g :';'.;.. !lift; (~)) ~t.....;:::~.. ..:.........:/.. 0: /~~Ql tJ i!.~..~::::;::;:;~;::~::>:: RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-282 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director DATE: June 29, 1995 ~Tf OO[t (f! . }, m -.. . J (;. 'J' \!'-> I Jc:i:'1~lj! f~/) \ FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist RE: Taco Bell Drive- Through Restaurant I have no additional comments. The project should continue on the normal process. KH:ad ~ MEMORANDUM fD)~~ fU D ~,~"'\I,I UlJ JWJ'} 9 /995 U . I i PLANNING AND I f _.__ ZONING DEPr --""._-~ -.. TO: 1'.4;:,{3i{1 l-Ic,/bEt.~1 fl.A,v.-v.ATC t Z(),v,',vC h/Rec.rOl~ FROM: -S 0 f/ N I.J . t- i),.Jq.., f MJc>' ~ wpi . jJ DATE: Ivl ~ f /1S- RE: Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans Project: 'tf\Lu Btt-L- After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration. amended plans ~r the abOVj the .~.f > f1 ~ ~ Rlit:, ffA 1"/4. ,}- P ~R k that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. " C:AHEND1.ALD ~ FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-282 i{DJm@muwmrn UIJ JUN 2 7 1995 11 WD PLANNING AND (\ ZONING DEPT. TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: June 23, 1995 RE: Taco Bell Drive-Thru Restaurant NE corner of Woolbright Ave & SW 8 st COUS 94-007 We have no objections at this time. ~;;{d I? wVe- Willia D. Ca anaugh, FPO ~ Page 2 Memorandum 2nd Review Taco Bell File No.: 8. 9 . 10. 11. No. 95-333 Site Plan COUS 94-007 To properly review the impact the proposed project will have on the vested traffic for the entire PCD, a traffic statement is required to be submitted for review, prior to approval of the building permit for the Taco Bell building. All previous traffic conditions attached to the latest master plan modification approval are still applicable, specifically a traffic study is required to be submitted, prior to application for permits, to install the median cut within S.W. 8th Street. The applicant has requested a variance (PKLV 95-003) to the parking lot regulations to reduce the required distance the ingress/egress driveway to the Taco Bell site is located from S.W, 8th Street. This variance has been recommended for approval by the TRC, subject to a proviso. The applicant shall modify the drawings to comply with the Commission's determination of this variance. On the landscape plan place a typical dimension along the S.W. 8th street and Woolbright Road frontages of the site that indicates the required trees are to be spaced a maximum of forty (40) feet center to center. A rectified master plan showing compliance with the city Commission, Planning and Development Board and Technical Review Committee comments regarding the latest master plan modification (MPMD 95-003) is required to be signed-off by the Technical Review Committee prior to the issuing of the building permit for the Taco Bell building. Three copies of the rectified master plan are required to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department for review and signed-off by the Technical Review Committee. 12. The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD sign program shall be modified in order to allow the signage proposed for the Taco Bell site. A modification to the existing sign program will require a separate submittal by the owner of the PCD. II. RECOMMENDATIONS 12. It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be used in the planting beds. 13. It is recommended that the color of the one foot ten inch (1'-10") wide decorative awning proposed for the perimeter of the building be changed from a multi-color (3 colors) horizontal pattern awning to a solid color awning that could be compatible with further develop- ment within the PCD. The colored awning could become an architectural feature that could be used on the other buildings proposed for the project to bring harmony to the planned commercial development. It is further recommended that ground mounted lights be used to illuminate the facade of the building and, therefore, omitting the backlighting of the awnings. 14. It is recommmended that the drive-up window be relocated to the east or north side of the building. jb LOC~",\ON M~P .,.~CO BE.LL _ ,qt.A(,--;" ___ ~....>' '\ 3'I("lT\.~'t":1'~OW:':ll!~ \~ \\\ , ~.~ . , \ ,... Ir- -,~\' ,-"1''''- ?'\\N' ~ "-" I\~ . " ".'"', \' .- ,,~' ~~> ' .. .:. .-''-''~I'' ,,', ,'^" '\ r:i- . . ~-,,-,' ~..~ . l'\~ \~\.....~ ~'_ ~. ('J .' \ ~~t::'11~':"~:' .:;.p lJSr '" 1\\1' .........' .,1 >. .in ' I ., ~ .,., \,--! l ~ ,... \lV I \ \ \' K,~ \':,\ ';, ~ {i' .r! -' "Wr" · ~,~,i-' '. '"'i I ,:::" :\ \ .' ' ' , . \I .' ' ,'\:j:'~, .' \, ::JL"" fi:}.\ ~ ~' 'r- :I \ ~ >-' ' ~'. _ ' . 1" . .r;::-\ . ~ """"""' r:--. \ \ ,1,[ 1 \I'cI I l\ .__ V, · ,-\.11-<' . ~ 1m' " ' . ~...._~~, _ -=::---1 n. cu:..o",\l"'\\" ,\~.~:':f> ~ [~~~ ~;'..\l ,rT\ \\ 1 t'1 ~'I}::' .'';' ~ ~.-:JI- ~W" ~ '- ; ....... '7 ,- .. QP.-" . '. .., ' -"1 ('<",,' ,\" I . . I '\ . ." .. ;. . c (i ~ IS. c -:''-->::J' ~ ../ -: . - c.. ~ " ~ '" .i _, . l"' 1 D . I~~P\ ~ :0b ~ ~.:, _.- :3 :{' /~_ ~rl~1ti \ ':s:/d.:,,f.T' . "ill II .:. Ill" :."";,, ~_'~~' I'R~/^' +~ \-\-.I :, q. I :;:= "'\... ',1 rOlnT y tt'; . \.~ ..;..~.,.~"SJ IV> ','; ..... '0 .,' ,. . '-"". --....--... . .=-<.' 1_ " . '1 .-'"" . i~Y~'C .-!/.:.~~~ ~~:r'-"k ~ J (' \..1..1\,6.0 I--~ .. ~ to/l~'~ ',j, ''''I;'~~' .. ,"l\{.,,- 'e, \ I..... ' ~i _, ,~~/,>"~~!:~':f' ~', ~ ;' II ,.~.""~o\..e"'\GH-r I , ~."41P-"J' ., ~..~, ",....' j' n .:....1 ce.. \ . _ .."." .. ,',,",-oJ( .: ", ,"':' ..;,:. t-- . '-. -' II ' ... \.. Po . ' \\,\~\~~~Z~l'1J.~\>~\ \~ =-C_ ~ ,<<\~),<:j\}. \"'~"I j.::~,\\ .,;- ..~' :\ ~\_-- \ J ~ ..I"':Y/~~ . IT. ,e4! 11li ~,j ", '. \ \~ lI::U ... ~ \,'11 __\ ~.A .,:' \ ~\JI.' ,1 \~:::. ~~" ~ ~; lr-'v ~ ~ ~t:l I '. v _\~Y','" '\ I II'"'' \ /I ,I.... ~:; l i\' ~ J ~ 1. \ II "..;' .,0-;'''''' ,__ ,1 . . ': I \' ',,... _ 'l'!". . :' '":' )p' ,",,' . "'lfj .. \ i;"" 1 .~~ , _: ~ ":: ;c \\"l\\ I' I · r ~. =. :, -,;:; '-' . ( . ,l'o'" \ 1 r I \ \\;,1;'. L~ __......--:: ' "'l ,r.",P , , . .~~;-/ ~~._-_~~:; C3! ,~ ~" . ,q' ..",n' CHT '-')'f' --s:: ... ' l'" ,. ,"' " 1'1 I" jl' ,nn. '-- ' ..~ 'T '.:'f ,~:'l ,n7\-+ '- :::~ lJ ,~J~ '(j7! 7 II ...::;3J' _1 _~ - ~-\.v< - ~'N ,F-'''' J \:1f: . . I _:_', . ,-;:\' < )<"," ~ ~ 1 I . , .)/.,.-1: " , ~ : I , ..-Q'{''''' . ,'1' ' i.... ..' Fl ,,/ / _ t: ~:r~"nT ~.~r~~r~~~~\Yt1rg~= ~ ~ l~' 0 -; II/J[i o ...d~.w-., ):' I .~ ~ "'" /....>50; .' .," · ._ ., . t"'! '-0" '. "lt~ " ,,' ~ ') . ' " ~-' ' . r-- r r<"'7...... ;;:~ ~:'tn ' :.. ~~, )i J,~ ,\ '- 'HL" ~<~ ... x'~ ~ ~ PJ ., ( \.----': / J. 11;'-- . ,. j 'TH' t'tl:-f, '::'V: N~ y n < ,;r .. ~ ~ ~ ,"" d. ." I., \'..'- ." I-- rH.".v YO ., .y . I , -' '7 all \ "".\. ':';. T 1~H-'..1-- 011 V .'--~ . ~ C\ l-, " /' . 7/A'1 T~ffi~' _ .. l' ^ C . or 0 "'f! ~ y>~ ......: /?fI\. \ .... C, \ ' '.V ~..........- ..... ~ I.-n \. _\ ..-'\ ---,.~.' .n ' .. , ICl d \1.... "I \. . \' , 'if: r ,'11 i I 11 \ UJ ~. 1 ...~.\\\ \ II" ,Dt' <\1'\ 1" 'tI-j: : 1//;,'1// 11 crJ ,..~~"'__-=~~ :-r" -.;"fl',_"C1l1{ T',' \ ,.' \ : Fl ii' / III:' ~ j. ;:t\ B---\ \ . .'" L';..'" \.__... ........' <~ "'" i I ....:. I I 1/, ~- .;---1 \ ,.... ... .._ .' ",.. SO" H - . ...;.-' \ \ V nl-t .('u... I ~ \~". ,""'" ., . I ,--' '// e :ll~ \' \ ./ p.fi~:\ . \. .~~~~),~ liT i Pp) p,S~t 0: . rill' nI c;o~: .~nL~.\.~11 \ " I I .~..~;-;.. .....' '~ ..H r:1. . (1111 nl-i.,8l1 ~n ; [ \ · ' 'If \\ ....~.\. '\/B t-A\\..ES(' ~ \::J~;:Q. '~l " i !ll1.;(IP Iff K u,\ \ 0 \ ' \' ..,y..' ,..' II ('\" \ t, .\\ \ \ \ \. . Ir"~~, \ ~ II/' ','.In '1'1 ~. 1 W Ji~~~.'o 400. BOO fEEl _ .". 6-q~ }iJ~ '~l~tll UW/lj I ~ ~ \ '''If -r \ l 1III _ ..;.....r. ,J~~.,,' , . H--n 1 , ' \ . . .' ~ ' , , ''I' II I \ ... ~tYi~'C.JT()N ~~~ ..,j~ MER' · '\ . . II · \ ',1 lIt ::::M\ \ ,.\ \ .~~ - d . . " L1- \ l~ ttill 'G}l Wt ~~ ~(I\~~ ~ ~J L~ ~:\ ~~ ,r,111 .. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAR'l'MENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-593 TO: Al Newbold Deputy BUild~ficial D~ Assistant Planner FROM: THRU: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator DATE: October 12, 1995 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Development Orders TACO BELL Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding development plans that have received final determination. 1. Project Name: Type of Application: TACO BELL Conditional Use (Drive-through Restaurant) Planning and Zoning Department File No.: Staff Report and Comments: Control Plans: Color Elevation DraWings: Board of Adjustment Approval: Planning and Development Board Approval: City Commission Approval: Resolution No.: Ordinance No.: COUS 94-007 27 pages Attached - ! 1 t ':::c'.~ N/A (Site photos in file) N/A N/A 7-18-95 meeting minutes N/A N/A MEH:arw Attachments . :Trn..itl. Taco PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-334 '1'0 : Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board Tambri J. Heyden ~ Planning and Zoning Director THRU: FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and site Development Administrator DATE: July 7,1995 SUBJECT: Taco Bel1- COUS #94-007 Conditional Use (drive-through restaurant) INTRODUCTION: Eduardo Carcache of CKE Group, Inc., agent for Howard R. Schar1in, property owner is requesting conditional use approval to construct a drive-through restaurant at the shoppes of Woolbright PCD at the northeast corner of S. W. 8th street and Woolbright Road as follows: project Name: Taco Bell Applicant: Howard R. Scharlin Agent: eKE Group, Inc. Location: Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and S. W. 8th street Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) zoning District: Planned commercial Development (peD) Type of Use: Drive-through restaurant Number of Uni.ts: N/A Square Foo.tage: Building: 2,616 square feet Site: 39,023 square feet (.895 acres) ~9RROUNDJ~G LAND USES AND ZONING: (see attached location map) North - Vacant land, zoned PCD (Shoppes of Woolbright). East Existing parking lot for Home Depot, zoned PCD (Shoppes of Woolbright). South - Woolbright Road and farther south is vacant land, zoned community Commercial (C-3). West - s.W. 8th street and farther west is vacant land, zoned peD. (Shoppes of Woolbright). STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIQNAL U~EQ. section 11.2.D of the zoning code contains twelve standards, listed below, to which conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning Department's evaluation of the application as it pertains to the standards. The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of the zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may gl-ant conditional llses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of / Page 2 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provision has been made concerning the following standards, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the subj ect property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. The property is a newly subdivided outparcel within the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD. Primary access to the outparcel is via a future shopping center driveway off of S.W. 8th Street. Due to the approval of the most recent master plan modification for the PCD, which included a new median cut within S.W. 8th street to align with the referenced future shopping center driveway, the classification of this driveway has been upgraded to a major driveway (see further discussion of this major driveway within the staff report for a concurrent parking lot variance and Exhibit "A" latest master plan modification) . The Taco Bell site plan in Exhibit "B" shows two access aisles (points) branching off of the new major driveway. The major driveway also provides access to the Home Depot parking lot which is located east of the subject site. The parking lot variance that has been requested would allow the parcel's access point closest to S.W. 8th Street to be located approximately 30 feet from S.W. 8th street. The code requires a minimum of 100 feet from the right-of-way to this first access aisle. The Technical Review Committee has recommended that the variance be approved, subject to the access aisle into the Taco Bell site being limited to ingress only, to prevent exiting traffic within the major driveway from stacking beyond, and blocking access to, the entrances to the Taco Bell property, subsequent to the TRC meeting, the Public Works Department has determined that although safer for sanitation vehicles also, this change in the west access point to ingress only necessitates a redesign of the dumpster access/location. This issue is further discussed under standard #3 below and affects the proposed access points in that the western access point is unusable to Public Works for sanitation collection and two access points are needed. At the date of this report, a suggestion was made by Public Works to close the west access point and replace it with an access point along the east property line that could be used to maneuver cumbersome sanitation vehicles. This solution solves the access problems expressed by the TRC, enables dumpster access and would negate the need for the parking lot variance, but would require redesign of the parking lot. 2. of f-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection 1 above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. (1 Page 3 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 The use requires thirty-eight (38) on-site parking spaces. Thirty-nine (39) spaces are provided, including two (2) required handicap spaces, A loading zone of sufficient size is provided at the northeast corner of the building, however as with the concerns of the Public Works, it is doubtful whether delivery vehicles can maneuver around the parking lot without two, two-way driveways. With respect to the drive- through lane, sufficient stacking is provided for eight (8) vehicles. 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection I and 2 above. As previously discussed, the only a~rangement acceptable to the TRC for approving the parking lot variance for the west access point to the parcel was to limit it to ingress only. However, this recommendation, subj ect to the western-most access point being limited to one-way, affects the direction from which Public Works had planned to use to access the dumpster. Due to the short distance between the west access point and S.W. 8th street, sanitation vehicles cannot ingress the parcel via the west access point. Furthermore, both ingress and egress cannot be accomplished from the east access point because sanitation vehicles, and most likely delivery vehicles, cannot maneuver within the small turning radii of the parking lot (Public Works Department Memorandum No. 95-103 in composite Exhibit "C" will be superseded by a memorandum discussing this problem.) 4. Util i ties, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. All utilities are available to the site and installation will conform to city codes. 5, Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character. The landscaping plan submitted provides all code required screening and landscaping. The Planned Commercial Development (peD) regulations require a ten (10) foot wide peripheral greenbelt around the perimeter of the project. The width has been provided, but no landscaping other than a row of shrubs and trees, spaced 40 feet apart, as required for vehicular use screening. Therefore, additional landscaping (trees and groupings of understory plantings) is recommended within the greenbelt. 6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. Signage shown on the draWings will require a modification to the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD sign program which will require a separate review and approval. The current sign program makes no provisions for separate freestanding signs on outparcels, since the outparcels were originally intended to be leased. The revised sign program will be expected to set forth criteria for all freestanding signs within the PCD to harmonize these signs through similar colors, materials, lettering and/or sign height; possibly use of monument signs. No problems are anticipated with the exterior lighting due to the setback from Woolbright Road and the similar zoning of adjacent properties. Sign lighting is discussed under standard #8 below. ,3 Page 4 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. The proposed structure meets all setback and lot coverage requirements. 8. General compatibil i ty with adj acent properties, and other property in the zoning district. The proposed building colors and materials are complimentary to and compatible with the existing Home Depot building which is presently the only structure within the PCD. The Taco Bell building design is more Spanish/Mediterranean looking than the most prototypes within the area and comparatively, is more attractive. However, the RaceTrac service station, with a color scheme of grey, white and red, approved but not yet under construction, is not compatible with the Taco Bell design. Also, the strong design statement of this Taco Bell sets the tone for other future buildings within the PCD when there may be no intent by the PCD owner to unify other buildings within the PCD with this design style. Staff has recommended that the multi-color (fuschia, purple and yellow) awning proposed for the perimeter of the building be limited to one color that would be used for this building and could be incorporated in future buildings within the PCD. The colored awning would be a feature that could provide harmony with other buildings in the PCD. The awning is also proposed to be backlit. Insufficient information has been provided to determine the intensity of this illumination, but judging from other Taco Bell restaurants in the area, awning illumination can be distracting to motorists. On the other hand, the building is set back from Woolbright Road by an 80 foot wide state drainage ditch and is set back another 43 feet from the front property line. No exterior neon that is usually seen on Taco Bell restaurants, other than as part of the building signage, is indicated on the plans submitted. It cannot be determined from the plans whether the building signage is exposed neon or is covered; covered neon is recommended. With the adoption of the new Community Design Plan on March 21, 1995, drive-up windows are no longer permitted to be located to face a public or private street. The drive-up window proposed faces Woolbright Road. Although this application was submitted prior to the effective date of the Community Design Plan, the application could not be processed since pursuant to the 1985 and 1990 settlement agreements between the City and Tradewinds Development corporation, no fast food restaurants with drive-throughs were permitted within the PCD. processing of this application could not be resumed until the Commission approved a new agreement, which sup'erseded all previOUS agreements, that lifted this prohibition. such an aqreement, which determined that fast food restaurants with drive-throughs could be allowed, subject to conditional use approval, was approved by the Commission on May 16, 1995; after the new Community Design plan went into effect. Since the effect of these two actions on the previously submi tted Taco Bell application is unclear, staff did not require a formal Community Design Plan appeal application to be submitted. However, staff does not recommend in favor of the drive-up window location and believes the window could be relocated to either the east or north elevation. Dri ve-up windows do not need to be located along a street in order to if Page 5 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 be successful. Most drive-through facilities advertise their drive-up window on their freestanding sign and most customers readily associate fast food restaurants with having drive- through facilities. Relocation of the drive-up window would require redesign of the parking lot. The Community Design Plan also requires building facades that face or are visible from a street to be designed as attractively in appearance as the front of the building. Therefore, staff recommends that the rear (north side) of the building that is visible from S.W. 8th street be embellished by adding an arch, similar to the arches shown on all of the other elevations, over the rear service door. 9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The height of the proposed building is approximately eighteen (18) feet, one story. This consistent with the approved PCD master plan. 10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. It is expected that the proposed use will have a positive effect on the adjacent property within the PCD, which has been slowly building out, which in turn has a positive economic effect on the city as a whole. Therefore, no negative economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties are anticipated. 11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances (new reference is Part III Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4). The project shall comply with the above standards, upon rectification of staff comments conditioning any approval of the request, except as otherwise provided through settlement agreements between the city and the developer of the PCD. 12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance standards section 4 of the zoning regulations; also, conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance. The project is in compliance with all aspects of the above oL-dinance. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: Below is'a list of those departments having comments regarding this request: Department Attached Memorandum Public Works utilities Fire Police Engineering Building Parks and Recreation Forester Planning and zoning 95-103 + q5 - 111 95-205 N/A N/A 95-206 N/A N/A N/A 95-333 -i) Page 6 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell caus 94-007 The above departmental comments are also subject to the TRC recommendation regarding the requested parking lot variance (see Planning and Zoning Department staff report memorandum number 95- 335) . RECOMMENDATION: The primary issues of conflict with this conditional use request are the location of the drive-up window and access to a suitable dumpster location. Suggestions for both these issues have been presented above, but require redesign of the parking lot and one or more access points. If these suggestions are agreeable to the applicant, staff recommends approval of this conditional use request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable city of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. MEH:dim xc: Central File .:STrRPT.TACICODU ~ ~ L -" -.--.- ._-- ----- ~ tH l~ '. l\\i 't['('1 ..~~ I, r I ~I' I ~ I : Ii T' , I R I - . ,0; )...Tl U"I oC ;i ,. II ~, . J. HI n " " If l I i S ~ ~_p \_ Met";... J 1 1 ~ g -=- =-: _ 0 ca .. -\ 0 I III q t fll _.,. .z III I ~ IlIa.:II.: "II!II'IPllllllll"1 I' ~I .;,;:.tt'ltf.r.!!-' .~.fih K! h IU~~I! UIO I. ~ " ,III.' :1.,' ,\1 Iii ' .~ "WJt'i~Jt!t~\~ \\\~ I'i is III ha~~lli i'l ii! 1 'I!H;lih; ,; · .~ iW\',\tw p' ~ :. ~ I" ",. I · I r' lii I~' I ~ ~ ,..~. "'I!J !? Ii! in l~\i!,II\\ Iii!" III ~ ~ ,,'n~-;, f! ! ~ ~I til!dll' , ~ ~ ~ \II ;m.. , !Il! \! M it q . ' ~, _' III 1-,11, lllil }' i Ill. III i~l~i:I~~! ;:~rrl!I!!'I:' IIi i .,..._~t _' . ~.=.l. .' I ~ 1\ I ~ II ~ . ~ p ;;; .. i ' 'I :I"~f:' t '\;~"'Io \, .jill'liiil;:P ~ IIII I Be.. t: Ii i q,\.\l\, ',llh;1I II J! 'II I .I Ill! ; ~ II'" "I I ; \Fi,:!t: i!i!,I',I;:II!, 11 Gte, . I 1111 ,'I' . ,;,( I I 'I . Iii li'II' I i ii:i1i'.1 !~.llli Ii I ,ni I i IUi~.i '3M Ii . ~n tell! I ~ . I E,!!di li~l!l! II . H i~ {! . . hib, , . m\:Ii: .i ~ It i ..... .l-:HI--.::::.=:::. _-.!~P.' 011 WOOL.~'~~ t"_"r.'m". . . · WF~- ~:.:~ .~~i; I =:_ .:~'. _ ~_. -, ~ 81~, Fl.ORIDA ~ t~._"""~?i'l !~ 1C1I1I" II A....I.... Lft'tCl'C:"IlU Arul"'\J\:",..,.ll\ll\lt' 1661 Fo,um Plit'. Suill 100,\ WII' p"',,, BeKh. nOUui 33401 7?r-~1 8 .. . t '" . ..... ~. ..~. , ", I;' 'it ~ =.. \~ ~ ~\ .. ~ ... #" ': ;. ,,;.l'" ..i' 04.' " ~,'.~. . ".\1. ... \, , :, 11 !.~ ~'..J...,:\,~t5)."" -, fl. (\;" ~ .~ ~\.~ ~ ", ~.~ .\. ; .. ....,..~. .:.... \l. J ":,. ,,~ ~ ~ ........ ~\~. .! l\ " ", . ."'{ \l _Jr.? I ~.... i :" 'f ~ ". 'H ~ \\.) ~ 1 :.l.ilf~' .t.. . ......, o. .... ; _,.... \...r ','.ii; ; :, ./. (~~.. ~:- l'~ ,/ .....\.~ ;.;\ ;\~;i'} . ~. i : - ~ i" ~.;' \. \ ~.::.'~::{, .~. ~:~:~', I - :'. '~ !' ' ....r ';1 . ~ ~ ',: · ':' ;/.", ::. ",:~ '....J \'~ " .., J, "I~ \l~ \,)" i' i' t;.. r ~,~ it. \ \ ,.{\.7~~ :..,. t. \ ';J ;. ': ',', ~ ... :~ :.:'\i \, ~~ ' ~ I I . I . . . . . . / to .. ~;." {:.. \!~ \ . \ ( '.\ l\ ~~ .7 \ . \ \ . . \ \ \.)' ...' '. . . F .- .~, ~~ \ ~~ .' . \. 06 '\ .' ~ . \. _. . l\. ~ \ ;... .' .. e p' ..,:- .:;. r. " .. .. . ,.' \\ ~:;j s: I .~; .~ ':'", d -;;. -:' (/'& (.::' ~ ...., ~ ': .~ tf\ ~ r." ~ '". ;. s: ~. .... "Z. .( G ~/ : : ,- \'^tl\)SC~"k'. \.V\t4 . \1 ._", .. ~. .... 'l\lliL' , f(/:iJA~' -:;'" .. II....... . . ,\ltl1l"'" ,,,'" . '( tl'{(' " ........",. · . .. \ . . \\!\,~ ....' .... ;::: ',:: ~ \.0'\1.1 Ittll ...IU " \!\e~ t. GllOUII. \\'lC' G ~.............. ~. .1 '. ::]:!:' \~ ~\ \ \ \ \ -' ..' ..~.,_. .....- \ \ =----. .---.... JV \ \ J PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-103 TO: . Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Di~l;ctor FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Taco Bell Drive- Thru Restaurant DATE: June 22, 1995 Thl: parking space next to the dumpster enclosure obstructs entrance to the dumpster enclosure at the above site and if adjustment can be made it would be appreciated, however this concern should not hold up forwarding plans to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory. , ~~ ~bert Eichorst Public Works Director REier J:J MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-205 Date: June 23, 1995 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~/G--b4 ~fochn A. Gui~~ Director of Utilities FROM: SUBJECT: Taco Bell Drive-thru, Site Plan Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Proposed fire hydrant location to be approved by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department. 2. Fire hydrant assemblies greater than 20' from the water main require a second gate valve within 3' of the hydrant, (Sec. 26.33(b)). 3. Plan shall show location of all utility easements, please show a 12' utility easement for the proposed fire hydrant, (Sec. 26.33(a)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella Steve Campbell. Fire Dept. File ~ /J , , \ i ,j ,. ".'J " i i ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-206 DATE: June 26, 1995 Illi TAMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 Cl!- SUBJECT: TACO BELL- SECOND REVIEW The following comments/recommendations arc submitted for your review. I f any of the code comments disallow the applicant to develop the site as submitted, the applicant may request a variance thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter one, Article one, Section eleven of the city's Land Development Regulations. All plans submitted for specific pennits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: Site lighting, Paving, Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from agencies such as the F.D.O.T., P.B. County, S.F.W.M.D., and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. COMMENTS I. Regarding comment #6: Exfiltration trench detail should retlect city standard dwg. B-91 007. Chap.23. Art.2F. it 2. Add stop sign/bar at S.W. comer of parking island (same ref. as original note 9). 3. Change identification of easement from "to' sanitary sewer easement" to read a drainage casement on sheet A I B. To correct intent of original note 24. RECOMMENDA TJONS I. Consider making the west driveway one-way in. Make the first aisle one way eastward, the other aisle two-way except for signage to disal10w a northward movement. This would allow the location of the subject driveway an additional 14' to thc cast, would not impact interior circulation regarding access to the drive-thm, and most importantly, eliminatc a contlict bctween exiting site traffic with stacked vehicles waiting to cross over onto S,W. 8th St. KRHlkrh C: Wi11iam Hukill, Dev, Dir. and to file tacobc11.2rv J1j- PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-333 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: July 7, 1995 SUBJECT: Site Plan Project: Location: Review - 2nd Review - (Conditional use) Taco Bell at Shoppes of Woolbright PCD Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and 8th St. CKE Group, Inc. COUS 94-007 S.w. Agent: File No. : The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the building Department for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. The landscape island located at the northwest corner of the site requires a continuation of the screening hedge material similar to the rest of the periphery of the parking lot. 2. Modify landscape note 2 to read as follows: 1150% of the total number of all required trees and shrubs shall be native speciesll. '" 3. Omit landscape note 3 and replace with the following text: "On center spacing of reqUired landscape material shall take precedence over quantities of material identified on the plan. II 4. Remove from the landscape data the following information: "(per PCD Requirements) 194 22311. 5. Place a note on the landscape plan that indicates the quality of plant material and the standards by which landscaping shall be installed. 6.' On the landscape plan place a note indicating that the required vehicle use area screening, hedge material, located along the north 150 foot of the subject lot will be located on the Home Depot site and if the existing material on the Home Depot site does not meet the specifications of the landscape code, the proper vehicle use area screening will be shown on the plans for Taco Bell and installed accordingly. 7. Construction of the major driveway leading to the site, modifications to the Home Depot site and the median cut on S.W,. 8th Street will require review and approval of separate permits, considering they are not on the Taco Bell property. ~ IS Page 2 Memorandum 2nd Review Taco Bell File No.: 8. 9 . 10. 11. No. 95-333 Site Plan COUS 94-007 To properly review the impact the proposed project will have on the vested traffic for the entire PCD, a traffic statement is required to be submitted for review, prior to approval of the building permit for the Taco Bell building. All previous traffic conditions attached to the latest master plan modification approval are still applicable, specifically a traffic study is required to be submitted, prior to application for permits, to install the median cut within S.W. 8th Street. The applicant has requested a variance (PKLV 95-003) to the parking lot regulations to reduce the required distance the ingress/egress driveway to the Taco Bell site is located from S.W. 8th Street. This variance has been recommended for approval by the TRC, subject to a proviso. The applicant shall modify the drawings to comply with the Commission's determination of this variance. On the landscape plan place a typical dimension along the S.W. 8th Street and woolbright Road frontages of the site that indicates the required trees are to be spaced a maximum of forty (40) feet center to center. A rectified master plan showing compliance with the City Commission, Planning and Development Board and Technical Review Committee comments regarding the latest master plan modification (MPMD 95-003) is required to be signed-off by the Technical Review committee prior to the issuing of the building permit for the Taco Bell building. Three copies of the rectified master plan are required to be submitted to the planning and Zoning Department for review and signed-off by the Technical Review Committee. 12. The Shoppes of Woolbright PCD sign program shall be modified in order to allow the signage proposed for the Taco Bell site. A modification to the existing sign program will require a separate submittal by the owner of the PCD. ~ II. RECOMMENDATIONS 12. It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be used in the planting beds. 13. It is recommended that the color of the one foot ten inch (11-10") wide decorative awning proposed for the perimeter of the building be changed from a multi-color (3 colors) horizontal pattern awning to a solid color awning that could be compatible with further develop- ment within the PCD. The colored awning could become an architectural feature that could be used on the other buildings proposed for the project to bring harmony to the planned commercial development. It is further recommended that ground mounted lights be used to illuminate the facade of the building and, therefore, omitting the backlighting of the awnings. 14. It is recommmended that the drive-up window be relocated to the east or north side of the building. /b Page 3 Memorandum 2nd Review Taco Bell File No.: 15. 16. 17. 18. NOTE: No. 95-333 Site Plan COllS 94-007 It is recommended that an arch, similar to the arches on the front and sides of the building, be added over the rear service door on the rear (north side) of the building. Due to a subsequent problem with dumpster access as a result of the staff parking lot variance recommendation proviso, it is recommended that the west access point requested for a variance be deleted and replaced with a new access point along the east property boundary. It is recommended that no additional neon, other than that shown for the building signage, be permitted. It is also recommended that this neon be covered, rather than exposed. It is recommended that the peripheral greenbelt be supplemented with additional landscaping to include additional trees and clusters of understory plantings. If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH:dim xc: central File .:2ndcolI.TAC ~ / ~7 LOCATION MAP TACO BELL aOY'JLiro/'.1 '~E.ACH,~"~~,,I,'m"lt I '..' '"f'!Jrjl'1.r~~~'!IIr:,"::::JIL 1;---' .~~.\ ill ~....~,., .~~ ."~ +--t--t.r+-.T I JIRPI'hw:~I~ I .' .-.J " ~.~~~- r ~-l [it'.t I 1 ~.(,~ ~. ~ :~---' . _ l...u r~\) . t3 ~~ , ~: '.: .:- ~t r-- .t~-:~-}l ~llf~:~' ~.:? ~ I~ I mnn,Ul' , ,'" ~ ' , I -Jrt.....iJ ~~ ~:.L.;0 ,\, ~: I :,; : ~ \.. -~~. ,ii~ri.i I ~. J ~ <:1: : I! '" II I .' ." . ., :lJ. I r+frl.., r~t_ '. ~ '/: ;'; ._~B~ l 1== 1'1 1 -----..- 0 '., ~R' C tn~--'.. t~ ftn lBIIIIIIiD .... l' ; '711 I ' = · '-'II - --------IIi 0" --<l'?l~~lli\:' l,J;'j ~ htl..*ll'~ i'!+:1 . ~ltj~ >- -; .,.~:)::+- --:': ~~fA:~~ ~ ~r-~I I. .' /, . t'l I . ;..no rm .Vi' 1;.1 I I ~ .": ,---.'. .,1 -, ' .. . r '_ ~__ -=- '~"I.r-- . ~1" I r 'f" .It, . I'l '4REC ~ /i-/ - ';:,':= ~ r r't l'~ ..-- .}.,::.::--. _.~F-, I 7~ ~~ .~' I l1J "". t- - II . ....., ~\ 'J 1".1,/1 In It: 1. ~ \,,'IG. ~~~.~ 1TW8+ E!2 i; \ \III' 1 ~ " ,., ..~, ~ ' ~ ) J 1.-- , ::::l LlU. ~I. 'q'" \ "" "',,,,- ~'" / !,. ~ PUD lliI .' : t, \~"',' . . ~'t~' "" - L.. U l: 5.0 1--- :rrr \ '- .,~?< .;'~tI ')''-''.'''. '< :'~ .- ~". ~ I {fLirt I - "0.." - .~-{ . 4"'S ~ ".~ ". '- . ~' '~ I : 4~:;;~~JJr7'-~':~1"'(."';" ~~;.:",.,. ~;r.':<>;:' .....~'0, 1'WqJPLBRIGHT, rrrm I' . 'T~~~~"''\'' ,-,~?:.r.~,,(~.. -:-'. ,'I' ,#..~ I~LACE" .~:!il :';"SY" \\ >- )./.' ~ ".,', ',,\-. '. II ' I {IlEr I :- I-hl" I' :::. :~~~~~C6~"""':~~'~ rb:"'\. \\ \\). \ '\ ... · q -.- 1 ~. .,' {o,' <4~:: . I ( \\1.. : I (I", c:''',,/ < .' .."l, ::R3:: ..,.~,' \\ . .r' ' P .. ~ -',i ~ J' '. . . :- 1 '\';. rr 1 --rll~:-i "\Tr ~' I~;' lV ~ I Ij I 7 :--i4p -J, 0 I ., - _. /:. 1,.. ~..1 I. I - :, -} 8 _~ t ' . -Fr- - . -= ~ . L I ' ~ - '!: . ' . ,~. -:/f) ~ ~ - . r 1 ~,' . l< ~- i ~ MI. . ;:1: ~ ~ · ~/ -.!. ~ t " q1 i R3 ~~-----~ ,:' ~ r -1 -J-- fT, -- I I I I n':':;;T-- I~ T l! IJ .1 ff J\ III -' _ .:j ; =~ "~'. ,"~,~L . . '-.~ ll- . 1l!;~(;~'M(~f"';~ .'~ ,! IJ7! :~:/J I) ---'- '- "',' 'j,* _. --. - .,l{~-I:J - l'r ., ..' ~ ' I,Z - ~ :i . :~;. ~ ~.- . \b,'< ?:/./ /~ - ~ - . ~ ..~ '~~j;::i~ ::;u.,tt~~ qE~ ~> <' ~,~',.,I;; r I~I c~l R 1/1 _f .~ I!, -- '.'--'1 ~. '-< tcrn:.Yf'r ~ ~, '\'1f /.~ ~ 7' (~ 'f'l'1 L --.../1 'iJ ,'r;;~~ .. ~ -' ~ \~~~~ '. I. '. -:'__' : --1:' ~1.i3 '... %:'" ".' '.. )' ~ ~ ~ '\." " ./ I ___ " , " ~ -. . ~~)(x' :. 'It. 'l. '.. .' _-: - 'j . ' ._ ~ I / 11 &-- -" , ' . . . .' ~,' J -...... - : I~ _ ~: _~l rJ-jJ -y.0?~!l~ ~\~k ~- .t~~ ~ \ I~ ~ I ~~,' tJ1 r 6 _ I - -.J ~ -....< AI- ~ t-\ ,.\--\", _ ...... ~ .....,' J ...._ 'j'" ~~, ,/ - : - J' '>(.llY~ ~1'\ I~( l!~ - . /IJ 'o~ p.L I -",.. J~_ · R~ >'< rl:~Of-'- i ,.::;_ V 7J/~ W~~~~ ~ p "I C1 t ftt .. ~ -~ - ',:r ~ --'if P' Atll ttJ :: >- LL 1_- r_-~-~"'-=-=ll '~c-- ~Li:r~I'~: I,r ~111: J1.'R1r /~~~I ":~~; '-Willi 'All"" . ~rr~LA'" WA~i,..,~'( I' L-Z.-;':'; , " 'J.~J - +-t. ._ ,_ i- 'T - UPI lY 1ft; -~. --~-~ (b-'~- 1 I I I I I i I.i 1 E,' ~ '-- I- 1-, 1\ ('LJ:ttardt j ~U'i;'\~~ ~y~~\-\ ~-'$l.'~'fi II,! J iT 1 J '-t : C:, ~~ R f-:-_ .:- .Il ::~ 1: f- ~II~ I1nf[~Bi ) ~ 'H~ ' } 'I ' I , ~" J E . . 1-1- _:'=-1 - - -- I {m~lMM1/ i " t:";".~~),\ lFi f{J,'t',"~~~~f;~f4/I! ~~.~~~!tL ..,:; : 'r . ~ I , --: 'I)~H'I!,L !-.d (, J=+= T - :! .. '\' I' .J' , I 1j~ 11 I . I I ...1 '-- f. IIII \. .~~::~t~-'1 i p~/// ': ~l Wll If I -~ t. n ~I!,:I'O 400.82~ F~~T DE:' :-95 I,JJ.J:IJ, ; ,/'11;/1(1 .l, 711 -I: . H-" ~~::; ~ I' Ii I I I ' . . , .~ I,/I/~I/ 1. J J LIfT TT III !)Tm / HAND-OllT 7.A.2. TACO BELL CONDITIONAL USE " " , ( ...-- () PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-117 ~ ..' \ \ \. .~ \ \ \. ;, \ I' ',\ ',1, TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - Taco Bell DATE: July 10, 1995 In reference to the above site the previous comments made by the Public Works Department should be disregarded now that a new traffic pattern has been shown in the latest site plan which had resulted in the present dumpster location being unacceptable. If you have any questions please give me a call at 375-6201. II' ~a~ Robert Eichorst Public Works Director RElcr \ -, '" 'cx\- :'tf .( :r I 1~;' I ~ [ '",,_,t :r' ; .J I - .... !l 01'111" I j. .' l~ 1/:1, i I,; ~~.; : "HI ill, H III iliHiiPiiiW"iji Ii 'ii ,....- · · , Ililii!j i I I I! Illrll/ I rllllfllll i II 1111 ill I/Ii i 1M III /l/lllwr '~, ~111111~'I,i i mll,lllli/lli li!llll~ I~~ II · ~ II I I, Ii I I ! Ii'! r :!' I ~ il!II!!!!I!II' I I il~ i~I'!~/illl~III!II~I:11 11/!llij! ill/ill _ I I I I : 'I !II I'l'! : : t I I II !lli ~IIII ~ii!III!li~llil'ill !lllli! ',/11 illllll~!!lqlllll! ~ ' ~ :I I. ; , A l' l ill! lhill ill~1 nllllullll' i 1IIIf',il ~llll 'fll'~'~tllrb' 1(1'1; pI'" /V,r.,..... II i I I li~ilUIii!31Iii. i ~ !i I "I t .L, I[hHUll,JlI .'ll: ~ !;~ \ · iJili:fi~I.IJi i,h~ Vi I :;q , ~/ 4/ !lj1i!'tfl'h' J'I : I ,III 'rJl ~._ "" I H::i!i!~fll;!,; ,iil 0 Ii \ m I 1Ci),\ :... I - I Ir ~ ~ ~ I I \ I = '~I ,u ~I~ \~ I II..... - ~, , I!i i ~ I?) -w \ I "') _' \ I . , 'W-! ~ ,\ - '---I I I :1 ,1._ . ~ \\.. --.- I ' . ..... ..' ,~" ' "' I ~: e'\fT ~~!I. \ ..~'rl -. -+-_J t....... Ig "\ ~ I u 1 I , ;;! ,3 K .4l'cr... .n..... . .' ~ .1 ,:tc.:fT - . . ~ A);;: : ! fJ \ ,I I,,, ' i I~ 1;W~!'r 'j ,11"'--"} OJ ..... II o I il ,I 1 I. r \ II "\.- r" I ,,:-j 10 · -' ,11-' I, I '" Ii t _ 'Ii ~J;t: · r Ii 17'-~ II~ ,- I. ,,; ~ ~II:;;;:: I, ~ u:l ~'-"'1Ir~-' "} \~JI !:; ~t.!l J l~ ~i I 'L I I. ~: ", -' W-ll II ~ iV , I I 11 1 I r 1:- I I I:' L 1.14 / ~ -Lj '--', ~,'-l l ~. ,!; i ~ :: '! .. ~. lJ F 7:f~'~11.~:r;"~'1 'f,,(.\!J...r i i 0 I ~), ' .. ~- I -our-,-- J . -- "~~7;' r . I, ~ I~' J.... ." I ~ .. ..]. I-- / AI t ' I J I J ,:, :...j..... !~ 7> ...T............... I;. ':-- Ii 'I 'I' ,., .-'- ~ ~1" 8<- ,- ,. III II ,11'1 ~:.;o I i\' , :: 1m .,7iIi ~I II d i~'.I./" .. ...: II'~~) I " ' ' ,:t,: : : '-"'-" .' . ..L, I'/! I I ~ : il'! ': ::. 11r~r,," "'"= l.tf -I -1 I' I I' i i i 1 !! II , II i : I Ii I : _Q9!lll . ~ ..m' · '" I / I ~ I . . /I I : (CD \' :; I' If ~~.I., I !- a...... r. w t < ~ U I Ii;;;! ,: I '. r.liS! I, LJ lj ,"" .. I III i i ! I i I;' ,)~~ ' ~, ~ I I _ _ . I I I ': J. i' ~l';I.ji; .. . · ~ . . _..- . . L- .... --11// ~~ I~'" T ': I · ~I"i_. "I" I ..~. ....... ~I '1<1 / Ig,:. ! II ....!~L..p.:A!.j....M....~:. -1. I {I OJ I I I I' 'j . · .f.....-1..........".:.i...:. ~,.~~..:.-... ~ I ~ I" i ~ i . ( .~ ~'-~' ", . ~~ I , ; I ' !," I~""":... ~~~......~~~ I - · .L I I, ." ~ ~ ~..'e.'l>.>~~'>--,..'_.:. r,\\ i~.1 I .1,-r-~~"~~~'~;f_!B::: fl~tl)~ (0-"_" . i I .::-. ,.... .~O~~!!!.. ..!!l~!?.... -. - .111 it,~I' ; _.._.._.._~_.._.._.._~ --~._.~--- '....t,..',..',., \~I I .._..."....~. ,--_.-~~- II . ' I . ..-..-..-.. .,-. - )' L I I c.- - '5''1 ~.._.. H_".H-J.j >; -If( · '( ;: I i,l; i III . ,I 1 I T ~ ' L " I I 11"111 :11110- SITE PLAN I i I I I """;':. "lI:.: .. ....... ~ I Ii I [!]' . ~lOA I . I C.~~~,!~OUP' INC.- 'M .-........ I u=- ..~. - 71 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-211 June 26, 1995 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMENTS - 2nd SITE PLAN REVIEW TACO BELL DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT : ,. " -- .....\, ....., D : ., -. I~ ZOt';.Jl:..nrp/ The Building Division has reviewed the amended plans for the above referenced project. Our previous comments have been met and we recommend this project be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. Al AN: bh Attachment/plans XC: William V. Hukill, ~.E. TACO . . ,'-- BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 95 TACO BELL MEMO #0146 I have reviewed the above listed site P.I:~J1Jfd;}stf""J~;{~m9difl:te concerns or problems that need to be addressed. I!) 1~' U l.;~ #;1; iiLrf0' Sgt. Marlon Harris r';::::~:'::~:~~\ Police Department L"w.,.<) :;!..............*)..~:. :!\ '.-:' ::: ;: . :.;~::::~~:::~..i [:1 .;..,.;....;..~.....~::j %...;....:..."i.;.;,~....:. ~.<;. f< .'" ~ r..........O; )~ \..-.O:...."i~.~:...........'* (.~Y"~,. \\.. ~\ ~~::::~~.:i B , ~.....;:~;:;:;:;:;:::~;::.~~ ~ .. '::. ] ; !:;:::::::::;:::~j t:l tJ !"Yi;:~;~:;::;:::;:::;\\ ~ ~ ~ J: l 't......./' n L.:.;::;:~:;:...)' r.~ ./r~;:>:~:~:)..):;::;~;~o.,:,:; .... .:> ;',' \ ~ '0. lr !.~ ...;....~ s' .~ *-:"'~ f<Yl*< ':.:P" ~. ~'d t} ~.? d !. linN :k ~~ i~A' l .~~~:~~:;~::"" ., l:' tl<l .~:-) ~.:: ,': * n~~~? \. ~ ~t:-~::;~~~" :<....1 '.. RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-282 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director DATE: June 29, 1995 f1~ 00 lli J~ ' -~.i~ @: [''':';ii'iW ~ ",) ZONING lJEPl ~ FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist RE: Taco Bell Drive-Through Restaurant I have no additional comments. The project should continue on the normal process. KH:ad ~ rOJ ffi@rnOWmfn) UIJ JUN 2 9 1995 @ MEMORANDUM PLANNING AND ZONING DEPI TO: 14itrf!>~.j Iliyb'ct.,Jj fl.A/fI/V,'.-v-C t 2D.v,'iV' hiRec-rO/~ FROM: -:r OJ./iJ W. '" b,ui11', f'Mh S '-'-{>/. jJ DATE: tv/ ') f /1S' RE: Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans Project: 'tALc;) Bt"''' After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration. amended plans ~r 0 the above., l)L1 k the j..~ , I' '" ,,'Ji;r.:.. ffA tll.J '-T rr,R that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. ~ C : AMEND 1 . ALD FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-282 ill m~:7u~ m m WD PLANNING AND f\ ZONING DEPt TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: June 23, 1995 RE: Taco Bell Drive-Thru Restaurant NE corner of woolbright Ave & SW 8 st cous 94-007 We have no objections at this time. ~# I:. WV~ Willia D. Ca naugh, FPO ,. VI. PUBLIC BEAlUlfG A. cc: Utilities Planning DeveloplU!ut PLANNING AND ZONING DE MEMORANDUM NO. 9s-3~5 Agenda Memorandum for July 18, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden 7Pd- Planning and Zoning Director DATE: July 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Taco Bell - COUS #95-007 Conditional Use (drive-through restaurant) Please place the above-referenced request on the July 18, 1995 City Commission agenda under Public Hearings. DESCRIPTION: This is a request submitted by Eduardo Care ache of CKE Group, Inc., agent for Howard R. Scharlin, property owner for conditional use approval to construct a 2,619 square foot drive- through restaurant at the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD, located at the northeast corner of S. W. 8th street and Woolbright Road (see attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-334 for details regarding the drive-through design). This request is submitted in connection with a parking lot variance that is also scheduled for the July 18th Commission meeting (see separate transmittal - Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95- 348) . . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote, recommended denial of this request. The reasons for this recommendation were unresolved problems with the western access point, which revolve around approval of the parking lot variance, and lack of substantiation by the applicant that relocation of the drive-throuqh window to the north or east elevations could not be satisfactorily accomplished. If approved, it is recommended that approval be conditioned upon only those attached staff comments which are not in conflict with the approval. Staff comments include Public Works Department Memorandum No. 95-103 - which has been replaced with Public Works Department Memorandum No, 95-117, Utilities Department Memorandum No. 95-205, Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-206 and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-333. TJH:dim Attachment a:CCA;enMe.Tac ~ t a · H~ e," ~.'# !!~. i ~ \i ~ . . i i\ '. l&il eo... l' - ~11 .. :~ - f. . !ll: , . ~. .. ...,. " '" ."" ~ .., ~ ~'.l.l'~ "f. i S ~e \I "f; g' ~ ""t'. jI... Ii1 ,. ..;'$ .. A ,J ot '''; & ~.'" ... :- ;. '.. -.c .: ..~,.~"t ....a 'I ~~~'~ 11i F ~~ ~~~ i ~, ~ ~~~;. ~:'> II ~ q~ Ii ~~ J C,i'J~ .,~ f '~I;l! ., .;t , l,...,.4 .:~. i&f fI, ,r 'l'"'o..-', t. ~ ~ " y ::" ~ .y,;," f" I; ~~ iI ..~ ,,1.; . l":. ~. r J . !!,'+ ,~ f 3 t ~ II i~ f. :~ :;:'. .~ '.; I~' i~"~:: II" .:' r . ~ 7: l~.{ ~~.. ~ ~ :,' :' ~ . . ! ~ 'J' . . t"' ~,..... ", " I '.... .~.; '_" " '" '. 1- -, \ i~ . :' '. - " . '" I'" ~ . '..\ ~1.: ;..... ~.; J 1 ,.., ,"~' I... ~ I :', : I ~ ~~ ,/f . ":: ,'0 '; ~ \ .J :.... I 'i~":' I , I , . . , , , . , . r , ..} .. , "I I-:~' ,..' ~ 0 " , 4 . il ~~ ,.:j ':. 1 .~ ~ ~ I, _.' . ~: :~ I~ ~ t' ;: ~ J. ': .. ..If . 4" l' .~.~ r- .:,'~" ~ ~ '~: ~ ~ .: ~ ~ . ;. t'l 't ~".. - '. ~ . I~' t: :i % . ... ~ 1 ". .. .:;' ". ~J!1"~-":" -( [rlt I'. ii,' .,. ,y"h' . . " o l I 1.^IolIUU ...tI 'I)d.,ft ",'l.l 00 e~,E. GROUP, IHC. .-.-' -- -:;::.. "..... . .... . !f . .......,.. c-I I ~I 8"U~ -l U:cs" '=' I' lIlIOlllflGlll MOAlI .. ,. .... IUlUI '.'1''''11. IV"'U . It.",.". LANUSCAPt: l'LAt4 . TAGQ..~ Q ~ 1ft ID \ \ } " PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-103 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Dit~tor FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Taco Bell Drive- Thru Restaurant DATE: June 22, 1.995 Th~ parking space next to the dumpst~r enclosure obstructs ~ntrance to the dumpster enclosure at the above site and if adjustment can be made it would be appreciated, however this concern should not hold up forwarding plans to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory. REier JJ Page 3 Memorandum No. 95-333 2nd Review Site Plan Taco Bell. File No.: COUS 94-007 15. 16. 17. 18. NOTE: It is recommended that an arch, similar to. the arches on the front and sides of the buildin~~e added over th7 r7ar service door on the rear ~.n6rpl side) of the bu~ld~ng. / (t,., ; ,..,- Due to a subsequent problem with dumpster access as a result of the staff parking lot variance recommendation proviso, it is recommended that the west access point requested for a variance be deleted and replaced with a new access point along the east property boundary. It is recommended that no additional neon, other than that shown for the building signage, be permitted. It is also recommended that this neon be covered, rather than exposed. It is recommended that the peripheral greenbelt be supplemented with additional landscaping to include additional trees and clusters of understory plantings. If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH:dim xc: central File .:2ndoo..'I'AC , .......... LUL;A IIUN MAfJ _ TACO BELL 80 T(J/V . ~c, ~ ' .~, I' A H'~"'~\-oml ~;.I Ir~,~i~llt!T~r ~ ~~ .-.J~' ~.!V'-T \-1 U,'.t' \:...G~ ~ . l rt~ I ~4~ '?1(1~' ~:-- \\\ < . Ii: +( r- .,;:j ,Jli)~"III..TlT: .:J~ W rR3 '. RI- :::~.Ff' ~- ';'T IL=_~~.~/ , ~ _.l \ ~;: . :(.i.~"I~:::J ~....-~I:b1 Ili~rT1[1 iF:.i1 ~.jv ~Ji ~ IW\ .. _ I ~ ,. ,: I ;,: ~. . ~1::t:1. L~ 1.f=Jfi r.m ~ ~./I . -; lV . .._._ _ _-' i .... " (-t\".. .'- ,'u ,~~_ .,----! I:~ ........~ tl ~ 1 J v, :c ~tn~"~- c;, L..-...W ~ .. . 1. ._1~ l I t= i'i "'" e. .., II - - I] 1 ~ -UlT!l 'r . ~"~~1 tllil~ I~ r'"I,I,I~: t~71 U~:: L7L~-+ ~ r ". ) ,". :.. lS.~ I i ~ n r~11rT I ' ' ~ f i: l " : IJ .- ",' ..... ~- ~::: I! ..... TJ.r1 .A:1 ; , I .r, ., ~j) 1~' ' .. . I~ 111'-: --l- f- , R Ll R e'c . '~~ J' t . _./.' .' '. ~ '1-===1. r:~ - ;1m r AvlTTT 31 ; . ~ I I ~~~ /::: -:- ~ ..r- ~-, l~ ,",' f-rr m . ~ :lJrnT I nlll n ~\ , ~ ~l, ::~" g:j. f .J...v~-, ~. .FL ~ I ~,I~~L 1J. ~. I:.:. ~::-: :i\C' II-~!. ~.I ~ rJ~ "I,.! i I i I 'l'.,.... ! . 'oj '.illlT'T" H .-t _ \ll~1 .~ll..//\'.....;. '. ~-, , fj~-'I?':;~ ~ ,I, ~\;,~" "<.-.~'~ ::' \ 1/11 II .' ~~Wl' \~ ><,)~' ,~,~--'-'<\{q!.. I',[:~ p~O . ~ I".' , ," .)-,,' . 'i' '~\~.(.. L.Ul.5.0 I__ I .0.." ......(. ' , ~ .' . '.... "'i..- l- I 1_ ~~~;~TTrr--, .'jt....,~~~,1,~..~:.,<~{ ..,' ') '>; ~ I : :=~~~"'o.:~~i.~~~'~'J~ ~.",,~..., . .'~ 1'WQPLBRIGHT I \ = ~5Y~ .-) /~,,(?, 0fJ '0 -:. ~\.,' . ,I~LACE" , _ .. , ' . ' . fi7> ... "'. .fJ . . _ ' . (0' H/ ~' (... '.' '" . . \ II . \ ' I 1 ,. 0 '. . "'~Ji~6'"'''' 'o~...,) :'. "':"~:" '\. \~o"" ~.~. \ '.. \ I U" '. _ - . ,1'.0' . ' 0 '-:: ' \. \ \r~ " '~\ I I. I . .,"./ (, 0 "R I (. . . ,;. ..._~~,~.. .:..::...:~::: 3:: ~." . 1 J I ~: ;;l'l~fl ~IEC: rnrY.lt~~ J. : ::\. r-~' -... I~ { : 1 - : ~ ! . n -. -I E ! 1 ; ~ . I ~ :!~;: ~J.; IE.: .-: . I.li(~ ~ I I ~ \ ~ : .~._.~. -::..t 4 ,~y J ,-. ~ I . ~: , -.:_ -r.~ ~ +n= . ~: i![ I : ~ ~ f - . . :.--7 . \\: "",- l.-. 1 H r) . n _ ....... ,iT.'''' ~ r- ~,._, ...! ~ / V, --'.J ;Jf1 ~ 1 Q1' II . -~;-. ...... I~~..::..::=_ -~ :"~ w u, U"r-r. (~.... ~'.. .....!1.....: 1.(()[;~t1R,;N7 ,.,'rQI/)~' ~ Ce1 c~ ,~.~/, ' "':i~~ 71-, '" "1T I _.di' ~ ~'h' I . ". . ... .. TI Ji HilI.. ' $I.~ ~ '" _,1' "1 - I, m[' R}t'~"''''t''1- ~I ~7! :' . . ~ /~ . ~ ~p ~J-'l.' t: 'lJ 1/ .I :, . . ~ ..... . ~ " ~. ,., -,.. /-...1- 0 .' . ':':;:;= ;::: 'ftv ., ~ ,k; , .' "- - . .11, 'Tn "T -, -l a ~,:..' ~.'-<'~ . '< ~ ; .~ ~ '. 111s:d n:, I'I~:~C >~i9~~;::; n/:! I~II~-:::::i R ! ~.. Ci~~~~~~:~~:-' I.~~- .. ---.".. . ~t"I ~ )(")..'- \~ .~~' ~-. .. . :::::;!' ....: _ <....,[ d'J j 'I I ~..~. ~, - 0 - - t:::~:: '~ · ~ .,: .1- f. ;;;:r.~'J ;l", ""It~)(,J I-< ~V'fJ' . \. .:.: ~ ~- ....,,' 1 . t-0" ~!~ ~ ><; . ~ . 'yo- r f-t .t (I ]/ J~ "'t ~'N\.X ~ '" '01 ":'''J _ R~ V'W \.?-1 ~l.. l/J,ot.; u.. ~':I; , 11/( ~.I":. ~ I' ...,j, 'J ~ 1~ N ~ ~. ~ V" .. r ,L'-trn' rf(p ""R .. L-): __ L t1j I- Ll , ! _.~_~,oc-== ),=4 I . t . " I r 1'-, ttr\ , 'l1 ,,' ":' .~ ;,~.,. E: 1 ." .~~. T~rn I, ,TIIT.J I nT ~-i: : " I I EB >-e- . rnl~"!~~'~~~~ ,~"""L~'" .....~.-II...,I'V I - L. -2.7 J'R:' 'II J II ~ IT f-.- ,/I \ -:1k~ _ _ li..~-~ L"J~ ~ ('C'E ~~ l I 'Yl/ E,' f/1. (~CT H-~:::= ~:= n I I ['1Iiifi:ili ~ i' :l~ \ \, ].1-1 I [I, f ) ! 117 . ;, c: I W' ..- ::!::n~::: >- HI (r., 1 _ ">_.' ,,'fL . .-1-\ - ,--1-- . ~I "I;{O 1/8 MIL~S~ ii11fflB: i ~fj;~,-,-{~)_Itjff!~ E ~ '\"1111 '\' V I ~l ~,:.:.:lJ :' :If! ~IIiFIJ611Thl - .;:; >- t' )'f51 . .~-~.~~ : l '// ~ I 1 ,l fi llB ~=.~ ...-,= . ~ , ~:.'O 400.800 FEE;T - - ~ 11J1 ,i1. '/0/ " 1'1 ~ ~ - """.,... ..--. I I' .' . ., - - ;~...;. ~...: 6-9~ :j,~~", ,~I -j UN-I- . e' '+, c:=~::: ~ 1 I . . . ': .~ 'I, ,l~)'f.~Fl~.. JL I .~.Y-VHj ./ I , ~ 3 iljll~~ I ~U ~' ~ ~... ':' ~I;IP i---oJ~ ,1 ~I ~ .lJl [ill [E] {iill .~ ~TIE -----, IJ~ r--'~ ::.- , ;' PU[ -ld-II B J- ~"l5' :: I I Ii ,- i''' If.~,.;. iil C1 \ l ) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-103 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Di~~tor FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Taco Bell Drive- Thm Restaurant DATE: June 22, 1.995 The parking space next to the dumpster enclosure obstructs entrance to the dumpster enclosure at the above site and if adjustment can be made it would be appreciated, however this concern should not hold up forwarding plans to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment\Advisory. REier J) MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-205 Date: June 23, 1995 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~/4~ A-fo~ A. Gui~ .. . Director of Utilities FROM: SUBJECT: Tal:o Bell Drive-thru, Site Plan Second Review Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Proposed fire hydrant location to be approved by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department. 2. Fire hydrant assemblies greater than 20' from the water main require a second gate valve within 3' of the hydrant, (Sec. 26.33(b)). 3. Plan shall show location ofa1l utility easements~ pleaSe show a 12' utility easement for the proposed fire hydrant, (Sec. 26.33(a)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella Steve Campbell. Fire Dept. File /3 ; . I \ , I; . ,. , ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-206 I DATE: June 26, 1995 IOi TAMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 ~ SUBJECT: TACO BELL - SECOND REVIEW The following comments/recommendations arc submitted for your review. If any of the code comments disallow the applicant to develop the site as submitted. the applicant may request a variance thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter one. Article one, Section eleven of the city's Land Development Regulations. All plans submitted for specific pennits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of application. These permits include. but are not limited to the following: Site lighting. Paving. Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping. Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from agencies such as the F.D.O.T.. P.B. County. S.F.W.M.D., and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. COMMENTS I. Regarding comment #6: Ex filtration treneh detail should reflect city standard dwg. 8-9 1007. Chap.23. Art.2F. 2. Add stop signlbar at S.W, comer of parking island (same ref. as original note 9). 3. Change identification of easement from "10' sanitary sewer easement" to read a drainage easement on sheet AIB. To correct intent of original note 24. RECOMMENDATIONS I. Consider making the west driveway one-way in. Make the tirst aisle one way eastward, the other aisle two-way except for signage to disallow a northward movement. This would allow the location of the subject driveway an additional 14' to thc cast. would not impact intcrior circulation regarding access to the drive-thru, and most importantly, eliminate a conflict betwecn exiting site traffic with stacked vehicles waiting to cross over onto S. W. 8th St. KRH/krh C: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file tacobell.2rv jLf Page 2 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of th4 Dcction ;1(5)'''- In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provision has been made concerning the following standards, where applicable: I11gress and egress to the subj ect property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and' pedestrian safety and convenience A' traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or c~tastrophe., , I ...'~~"""" .., ., i ! ". ( \,1 J 1.'''-7 f / ':1r~A~" 1',,1 I!-,( '-{("'~:=_~.....J-~-' ,~' I,d. :":'-'1' of- !'4'l ' ''-c ,:'~}' r ' <,," The property is a newly subdivided outparcel wi thin the &" ( Shoppes of Woolbright PCD. Primary access to the outparcel is . -/""'~ via a future shopping center driveway off of S.W. 8th street. Due to the approval of the most recent master plan modification for the PCD, which included a new median cut within S,W. 8th street to align with the referenced future , .shopping center.driveway, the classification of this driveway I/-("(":....:rff:~'~r-l~. upgrade'd' to a major driveway (see further discussion of this major {driveway within the staff report for a concurrent parking lot variance and Exhib,i1: "A" latest ,.,m~~trr.,~,l,~}l mOd~l~~_)!~ /( r ",.< ~: ,.:'- ^.' :~~4~t~:,~ ., >, " The Taco Bell site plan in Exhibit liB" shows two access aisles (points) branch~off of the new major driveway. The major driveway also provides access to the Home Depot parking lot which is located east of the subject site. The parking lot variance that has been requested would allow the parcel's access point closest to S.W. 8th street to be located approximately 30 feet from S. W. 8th street. The code l"eq\f1'I~8~_,......." a minimum of 100 feet from the right-of-way to this first access aisle. 'c't ..f ~ " ~ 1. 1': ......" IV i..j(, ~ ..t.'xj' ~.-. }~-~'~,\. t .J, ..... t. . . /, {' The Technical Review Committee has recommended that the variance be approved, subject to the access aisle into the Taco Bell site being limited to ingress only, to prevent exiting traffic within the major driveway from stacking beyond, and blocking access to, the entrances to the Taco Bell property. Subsequent. to the T:~~,:;ng, tl1e, .rl1.b.1.~E, w,00s Department has de~erm~ned that saf~~nltat~ort vehicles also ~r-,~~..~t!t'";.,*'_. ,t1.,""",'.!!,(l 1:: "8~C~f1e poiftii,..ti;e. ia~J>g.~. I~ .o'k.'iy I-a. ___1 U...L__ a redesign of the dumpster access/location:' r( This issue is further discussed under standard #3 below and ( affects the proposed access points in that the western access point is unusable to Public works for sanitation collection and two access points are neede~. AtJ t/ll~A9~~.f~~1'01i~,ts report, >,r a suggestion was made by Public works~cr6se tlie w~st access point and replace it with an access point along the east property line that could be used to maneuver cumbersome sanitation vehicles. This solution solves the access problems expressed by the TRC, enables dumpster access and would negate the need for the parking lot var;i.ance, but would require redesign of the parki..ng lot I . ~,J{, j) ,: , /t,~~t~'_':t~~'~t pa~~~'~n~~./.;;:d "{~aJi~'g a;ea~'~~e~~ /'~'~~~ir~a~ ~f~;th" ;.- partic~lar attention to th~.~tems in subsection 1 above, and ./!l' the economic, glare, noise ,.~nd odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent a ':nearby properties, and the city as a whole, / / ~ I "", . ,...1 , ~%~' , .,,' ~ /~/ (. /, ./ -<' . / "".,, .,0'..' /-: "1' '// ; .( ".~_/ '" ) -..y. ~ t.., \ . ~",/ / .... / ,;) .,' // ,/' / , ;J'Y: The use requires thirty-eight (4 on-site parking spaces. Thirty-nine (39) spaces are ~~~~ded, including two (2) required handicap spaces. A loading zone of sufficient size is provided at the northeast corner of the building, however as with the concerns of the Public Works, it is doubtful whether delivery vehicles can maneuver around the parking lot without two, two-way driveways. With respect to the drive- through lane, sufficient stacking is provided for eight (8) vehicles. /Mb.... Refuse and service areas, with particular rper~nce to the -r /f-_/' / i ten;ts in subsection land 2 above '//// 1<, ClFJr, Jt' , As previo:usly disc~ssed, the O~lY/~\-r~~ge~ent acceptable to ,""-J II tA~;' the TRC for appro".~ng the park~pq lot var~ance for the west )', r--- i access point to the pa.:J;cel ~~..., to limit it to ingress only. {l :' However, this recommen~.:it6:!!1 sUbjec,,1.- to the western-most f\ ( access point being limJ~d to'one-::-waY1('""affects the direction - t" i '- from which Public ij.01.-ks had planned~..t9 use to access the I dumpster. Due to,..A:he short distance betw~e.R,J:he west access point and s.w.~h street, sanitation vehicf~,ca~p~t.~ngre~~ the parcel vla the west access point~""tifi1tnet~oi.'€f:~~""--_ ingress apd egress cannot be accomplished from the east access point because sanitation vehicles, and most likely delivery vehicles, cannot maneuver within the small turning radii of the parking lot (Public Works Department Memorandum No. 95-103 in composite Exhibit "C" will be superseded by a memorandum discussing this problem.) Page 3 Memorandum Taco Bell COUS 94-007 Number 95-334 ; / --.''4~ Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. All utilities are available to the si,te ~~t_..;lf~'~ conform to city codes. ~ ~ ptf' 5. ~ Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dim"'ions, and character. ~' 6. The landscaping plan submitted provides all code required screening and landscaping. The Planned commercial Development (PCD) regulatioI}s require a ten (10) foot wide peripheral greenbelt around the perimeter of the project. The width has been provided, but no landscaping other than a row of shrubs and trees, spaced 40 feet apart, as required for vehicular use screening. Therefore, additional landscaping (trees and groupings of understory plantings) is recommended within the greenbel t. f4.../\....o--f t;l Sf"IL(! e...(:.~......".. <:;,...{ ~__, Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties, Signage shown on the drawings will require a modification to the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD sign program which will require a separate review and approval. The current sign program makes no provisions for separate freestanding signs on outparcels, since the outparcels were originally intended to be le~sed. The revised sign program will be expected to set forth criteria for all freestanding signs within the PCD to harmonize these signs through similar colors, materials, lettering and/or sign height; possibly use of monument signs. No problems are anticipated with the exterior lighting due to the setback from Woolbright Road and the similar zoning of adjacent properties. Sign lighting is discussed under standard #8 below. 3 Page 4 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 . j 7 . Required setbacks and other open spaces ~ .(.tl" ~ ,Ii (I;: ',>,'1 The proposed structure meets all setback and lot coverage requirements. 8. General compatibility with adj acent properties, and other \ property in the zoning district. i \ ) ,.., II 1 / Lc' ..- ,.. .//'" -."..-- The proposed building colors and materials are complimentary to and compatible with the existing Home Depot building which is presently the only structure within the PCD. The Taco Bell buiJ,.ding design is more spanish/Mediterranean looking than the most prototypes within the area and comparatively, is more attractive. However, the RaceTrac service station, with a color scheme of grey",. white and-' red, approved but not yet under c.9nst~uG~i.~ll1t,)V'1~"" lJ8t ,s~ml?a"t!ible with the Taco Bell design."'J, ~'1'S0 ; the <$troll~ design'statement of this Taco Bell set1? the tone for other futUit:%. b\1j.1di1l2S, ~~,~hin the PCD when there may be no intent b~~!ftl'Wfl ff'c!1-' o~ei" to unify other buildings within the PCD with this design style. "c, ,.itl' '.': <'. ' ,.' ,; . 'f '~ , ..,. Staff has recommended that the .mul ti-color (fuschia, purple and yellow) awning proposed for the perimeter of the building be limited to one color that would be used for this building and could be incorporated in future buildings within the PCD. The colored awning would be a feature that could provide harmony with other buildings in the PCD. The awning is also proposed to be backlit.~nsufficient information has been provided to determine the intensity of this illumination, but judging from other Taco Bell restaurants in t~e area, ,awni~~ illumination can be distracting to motorists';v "011A' t~"''''b'tfier' hand, the building is set back from Woolbright Road by an 80 foot wide state drainage ditch and is set back another 43 feet from the front property line. ~j:.fL1!'."- ..,-{\....;.. j ".J f:, i At iL" 'c C ,:L~,t ~!,..A_, ~. .~,r-""(':)-i.~-A No exterior neon that is usually seen on Taco Bell restaurants, other than as part of the building signage, is indicated on the plans submitted. It cannot be determined from the plans whether the building signag~ is exposed neon or is covered; covered neon is recommended. t!.,(>tJ--'"t.LP( f" ,S'-f~1.1 11" ,.' .. - With the adoption of the new Community Design Plan on March 21, 1995, drive-up windows are no longer permitted to be located to face a public or private street. The drive-up window proposed faces Woolbright Road. Although this application was submitted prior to the effective date of the Community Design Plan, the application could not be processed since pursuant to the 1985 and 1990 settlement agreements between the city and Tradewinds Development Corporation, no fast food restaurants with drive-throughs were permitted within the PCD. Processing of this application could not be resumed until the Commission approved a new agreement, which superseded all previcius agreements, that lifted this prohibition, Such an agreement, which determined that fast food restaurants with drive-throughs could be allowed, subject to conditional use approval, was approved by the Commission on May.. 16, JI119.~5; af.t. er ..t}e n. ew. co.mmunit~ D.esign Pl~n we.nt i.l,1to . e f f e. c t. ' . .- ,,/'/t L . 'IL. ....... 1 .. ct.t/.. it. ~ /'......t -.1--:. .J, _"-"! /t I.., A .. . ~ t, U- t/, i J , ;', , ~.. j<.' ,..... t'} ~~ i J ~ i! \) IF.' //...0~)i~b~l(~he'<~ff~~~~-' ~t: these two ~ctions on Lthe "preViOuslY submi tted Taco Bell application is unclear, staff did not require a formal omnunity Design Plan appeal application to be submitted. staff does not recommend in favor of the drive-up window ocation and believes the window could be relocated to either the east or north elevation. Drive-up windows do not need to be located along a street in order to 1- Page 4 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 I . ) 8. \, ) lC ~J ! ~/ .' ---/ .....~--- 7 . Required setbacks and other open spaces i .(.tl,.<: .,,/j (Ii:. ".,--1 The proposed structure meets all setback and lot coverage requirements. \ General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other property in the zoning district. The proposed building colors and materials are complimentary to and compatible with the existing Home Depot building which is presently the only structure within the PCD. The Taco Bell buL\-ding design is more spanish/Mediterranean looking than the most prototypes within the a~ea and comparatively, is more attractive. However, the RaceTrac service station, with a color scheme of gre~,I.. whi te and-- red, approved but not yet und~r C.9I;lst5u~t~,?ntJV~,~i,U8t C;?]11l?a~ible with th~ Taco Bell des~gn.J..'''X1:'So, the~trOlt~ desf~ .~tatement of th~s Taco Bell set~ the tone for otheL fut~r~b~ild~~~s ~~~hin the PCD when there may be no intent b~ '~1W'fl1'Ct1"' o~ei.' to unify other buildings within the PCD with this design style. 1-,' fl'I"~' ", ' ,: ; ; . [. . staff has recommended that the ,multi-color (fuschia, purple and yellow) awning proposed for the perimeter of the building be limited to one color that would be used for this building and could be incorporated in future buildings within the PCD. The colored awning would be a feature that could provide harmony with other buildings in the PCD. The awning is also proposed to be backlit.~nsufficient information has been provided to determine the intensity of this illumination, but judging from other Taco Bell restaurants in t~e area, ,awniaq illumination can be distracting to motoristspf''--t5it'' t~""c)ttier- hand, the building is set back from WOOlbright Road by an 80 foot wide state drainage ditch and is set back another 43 feet from the front property line. ._>io-U',L i:.{I_" ;, ,j {j l.t ,I.", \c :J.~ f< ~"....( , -(r1-("I-,,,-, No exterior neon that is usually seen on Taco Bell restaurants, other than as part of the building signage, is indicated on the plans submitted. It cannot be determined from the plans whether the building signag~ is exposed neon or is covered; covered neon is recommended. (!J~ ',., .:7i~-1I'"'' With the adoption of the new Community Design Plan on March 21, 1995, drive-up windows are no longer permitted to be located to face a public or private street. The drive-up window proposed faces Woolbright Road, Although this application was submitted prior to the effective date of the Community Design Plan, the application could not be processed since pursuant to the 1985 and 1990 settlement agreements between the City and Tradewinds Development Corporation, no fast food restaurants with drive-throughs were permitted within the PCD. Processing of this application could not be resumed until the Commission approved a new agreement, which superseded all previous agreements, that lifted this prohibition. Such an agreement, which determined that fast food restaurants with drive-throughs could be allowed, subject to conditional use approval, was approved by the Commission on . ~~~e~~:_;;/~~~/,:~r 0.' ~ew, COt;~~i~1;:Aen:"i!Lt~1 v,,{, ! /L.,Lsi~be( (~he((eff~~t,l!1 ~t these two ~ctions on I...fhe ' previOusly' submi tted Taco Bell application is unclear, staff did not require a formal omnunity Design Plan appeal application to be submitted. staff does not recommend in favor of the drive-up window ocation and believes the window could be relocated to either the east or north elevation. Drive-up windows do not need to be located along a street in order to i ~' <r,.. ~t Lj- Page 6 Memorandum Number 95-334 Taco Bell COUS 94-007 The above departmental comments are also subject to the TRC recommendation regarding the requested parking lot variance (see planning and Zoning Department staff report memorandum number 95- 335) . RECOMMENDATION: The primary issues of conflict with this conditional use request are the location of the drive-up window and access to a suitable dumpster location. suggestions for both these issues have been presented above, but require redesign of the parking lot and one or more ?ccess points. If these suggestions are agreeable to the applicant, staff recommends approval of this conditional use request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. , I ~'/J,- )/ 1" .. /i ',- .l,( (&; t' . i MEH:dim xc: Central File .:S'l"R''I'.'I'~CICODU 1'"'., /1' i " .'- .f. . , . I f' .1 '" . / 1/. .......-) "' ----_.-...."'..,-...._------~...,-,.,. J~ ./ "J 1..{J / I. J,.>',' ...~ .U.t (:, V .- l _.,i4"'" ,,'. / ' ,. I I / "\ I j) -) .'1:./ .4./C --- ~. I' ./( ! ' , ',~---. -~! ',' : ~. / f1 ,~~ I ~ -' ~ . ,.. OJ! ,_/~ ~ .,' . - &;;f ( ( I .j ~.f :> , II J -,' I i ,.....- p.,.--- '.? (J :..../. I ,I i !' i, 111,i '!f(' ~ I ' i ;I~ .: II t~ ! I . . .. · nl'lill.llI IlIl'!- IIIII i !1l'i;rI;19i~I:~Jm::Ip'"'llil III III II II Ii 1I:t I I,ll '1.'11\' "1*.I.~ 'II 'I · In !t",illli. jl.lii I it fi II!I !:i~~~!;'li~;l~ ~~ :~ u I' ~.. III''" ~ !i!!~~i!~~~~ i!~ Ii i il!:;', iiiil::II:~,ia!illlll " ~_I.. i~. ! i~ I I ~.I d ~ . I · · i Ill' !;:I'II!I!!~'!;:!'!'I il~ II ~ I III ......a.llh.;c.l...... ~ Ii j Iii )' 1111; · II:i~!ia~~!l"~1 :a;I!!'I:II'ii ! f f Ii II I ~ II ~ J ~ : I :I}III:;:III il~"il!I, I,' :r I I I h",- Hid . .",I,1t t P JII ~ c' liB; ! ! :~~2!::,! l!ml~ ~ 1,1'1 .1011,. II ! i ~.:i.!~I~' W!uifi l,' aUil : '''i3Ii 'b ~1:;If.lI' . ~I if lill! I' . I ~~~~~" ~I~iiji ,: . If i~ I.! l'I~!!n:;~ -ill, !il1~:b: ,i os .. E =.nI:H-.:::.::=... ',!![P.' 0" waOL.A~l I ._~.. . . . I. ......1&IL.J. Yilt. . III!at FLORIDA' -.... '"lot, _..J'-_ . , I , >.1/ ..~ ~ --.. ....: -. ~ I 2 III i~ I!l.. ~I I 1"1' ~ill .h;t J!l1: >> ;i ~ . .. :: . I = " - ~... -;;";... -< ---.---- .0; .or'. I .,.t' I I ~ ""II.. .. All"'.." L-..lCtIc~tPU A,~h\l\h:"''''''''''u" 1HIFcw.onl'loc:. SUiIe 100A Wall Poll.. IMIC". FlOrlll. 33401 I / 1':i1. 7f:A"-~'I"}J 3