REVIEW COMMENTS
'l'RAt:KING LOG - SI'I'E PLAN REVIEW SUBMI'I"l'AL
PROJEC'l' 'l'l'l'LE:
DATE REC'D:
'I'ION
<!J191_
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED:
COLORED ELEVATIONS RECID:
/
~o
(Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: ACCEPTED
DATE: 11- 8- 9..1
'------DEN lED
DATE:
DATE OF LET/fER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
2nd SUBMITTAL
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE:
DATE:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER:
REVIEWER'S NAME:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
(Label TRC Departments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW.
RETURN DATE: '1/ / ; '1/93
DATE SENT:
MEMO NUMBER:
1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
MEMO # / DATE / "c" PLANS / "CIl
93 - '1.'31 / lI/n/9.Y / 0' Planning }If) tJc-..:. ~ /'1t; / /.J.. :;; '1J /-L
q3~5L/ / 1I 1(;1 q?/~ Building hdl q3-;{3:> / ' '^~ #13/ ~
N.~"'J}#1l:la ~ / '/. ,'J I~ Engineer-M) q~ -3~ ~ / 'I ~ ~$~
3 -..;2 '1 / I,; ~1. 'r(J / Engineer/' ~ NIA ~ / - ~
&13-118 / I<h~ru / Forester ~ 73 ~ Lf(,t) / /;//~/9.J / V-
~ lJ.h/'i~ #It:MD~ ~~-500 0./"1". r~JI..~.
'I'YPE 01" VARIANCE (S) DATE OF MEETING: ""(73 q..)..:>~'
DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMME&~~~~~)f711~
(Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out wi comments
PLANS
No
No
YGS
j'e=s
N~
Util.
P.W.
Parks
Fire
Police
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC / D:
MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW.
DATE SENT: MEMO #:
RETURN DATE:
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/D" PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/D"
Util. I / Planning / /
P.W. I / Building I /
Parks / / Engineer I /
Fire / I Engineer I I
Police / / Forster I /
LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED:
SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT:
A:TRACKING.SP
- >
~[t
i
,}
~ J\ I
" ,
./
,",(
.'
/\
!J1,.'Rc -' ct- (r-t,c:~, ~QV p'lA-c-pr ~-r- /7~~ a-/r ~.;S i'#?~:J
;c J hoc..-fct/-"~c...4~ G./"~r y...J r~'Ue.s 1...tJ. -r(oy1?e.- ?~e-
7J6.2.2$"~
~,
C~.b ol~/s-S-
,. ~c....,..",mc..nc:O- C -3 ?<:>r-b'q,., 0/' S;-ce 6< 1""c~one....Q -t-o
if'-.3) .tp d)n;h~ r p"YO~k..n'f.s c.~~ G-S 0... Yesd-r ~ -f}
, ~)(~s~c-::. -f" rt,/.s c~~;-_r ~''y d2-.s*-:c:.r.
,......
,/ 7h;s recO'Y)'7 G)c;c.-(() -Gc:;;, ~Z"C.N.-rf::. ..... c:::s-~ cL.. MC="cP ;1Ite.".....r
J J E/e,.".,e....zC/71 J
-to r/Q... G-vr,1' "'c.{~,v~ ?~ (;=i:;-Tc-~ L.6-tI1..t2 Sc.. ~ ) '7~
\ f..J/,;c:.-{ c.~J.(2 6'e., as:::..cc~t';s(~ ~c-~-Hr v),T( f'-
'> r~~,~*,~ ,!:nctJ.. ~~r( ,7'1.- ~c- ~t1cu.-c~. . j;{;-fc;.. (
fd=-~.s ~ ~"5 pr~ ~.ss 6Joutl2 ~ ~( , 'CJr<:"'~O>f'\.j -
L o.:n~ (JoSe:::.. ~~+ - ) .
..--/
,
"0-
/-
~~ ~
r S'hCC. ~c...^?r~-t.y 'L~ {<:.~S -r--kv... lO ~S, -.,:t. T"';(r-,.(~--A~ 4i
6. ~ r.f'. ...-1( ..5<-...(c. ;p iCt-~
--rhc.. SJ"nGJl"r- .s<:.:..~ I. F' (c:ri\ d..m~~~Vl..T p-rr:.:."-<e.cI2~ ~ eS'~,(d l~
i V'\ Fk-..A.. Ie>-(.J. -rk:s -T~ e'tA.-a:-~v{b..-fa:9 C-1IY'(e..'^-&.fJY\<e.-~-t.. ?~c::.eJ).
~::.<~... ~ ~{~C:..U cl<c.. ~~""&d'1l~+ --fa b~ -f(Gff'c:c{2 ~ ~ Cco/
?T-ior -h::, ~'tb--t-~ rc:..Utew _ Tf.~ c;'c., c;:~ Cd-V\ ~.J{.L ,.. (-
. c...-v-f' {__-6=- f'h;.s Fr~ess c:: a...ci~ (,f :t(,.,., J /?c::.nr-is..
',,- -r;:;t3 n::_~"'v) 1'.1 'N ~ fp-iJ.. ~ -;..,. ~'~'U ~ (:t~, /lc <.r- CJ.iA,'d...~ e I;jf;- "{)i..v';'Li",Jr-.Jt;;. (j Iv,'f~ (.:. R A (.ec (r:x:..v;
4t, nJE:- "1"'tJ~c. {i't-t. " ,. - "
,{-5> /~:J G...s tic.. C-n.serl/~~""- llld' / - c::C~m~ ~
5 ~c.c,-.{ Ie{yl. D:=.t'L~;77 _ (
Dc:n~~',/ ~""::. 'cl:;s~ ~r(G-~,s ~rno-<.n '-'V1L4...~d2'y
Cf- ~Jc""'" a-,ne..n62 ~e.~.:-f c.-c4.t2 /left- 6~ tI'~...("~ ./ YJOY 4):scJC{)
~d~ ~ rC--f(;'-'c~ ~ ~ f'7~s~ 0-$ ~ /-7- .:sc...J..
\ ~~-t..
/J/} / ~ - /
_~ S5( - ~~___
3/j/f1-- ~
~ ,,J)d A._._ A ~
~~ -
-4 L- S::--S-A- GL-
(Ii 1411 h'7;;;'iC/z//jU/)tL
Ct: t9Jve ~~/V1II~'lE..
ri1,0~J\Jet ~V)<\)\V\
<$/ftfr,v( ~/641b;z/
~M!3te ( !/eyDE}J
'7~4 0DoC:)
~ 7;) (; 5rA J
73'2.-c?"~o r
(3G0 )Lf~t(- 0"'5 s-8
13<(- u-'/'{ C~
.37~-- ho?(;;,O /
r3/1f ___ ~!J?
1//1fr3 ~ I?~# r /tHl~'
.~~
fr~~-d~
.. -
r
-lfup! /~f6 ~~ uJ./lfl- a;t,^vI~' ~
~~?-~~U?
a~'
t4~. _c~:~~
~. . r~;:~~
?f~/!<j /~ (fClf ~ ~ r I' ~
"'--\
\
I
1
~
~I~\i~, ''-.../'
\Y ( ,
I \
/U
,..~~,--------.....-~-----
1,~ ~ fr'- ()AU- (~ - cr. r ~
.;j
. l- M ~ff(~
~ _ j;rtv~~R---W
.~ r~,/~ul ~. -
~~~P~i~ , ..
~ ~~-&~-h
. r-{t~ ~
_~~!f~~f
~S ~~
_ ~ /1/<;. fL rtf'll-
Il~~. ~ ~ # o/f }dtJYV
~~
~
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-310
TO: Jim Cherof, City Attorney
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden, Acting Planning 'f?;;. J
and Zoning Director tI
DATE: December 6, 1993
SUBJECT: Zoning Code interpretation - Zoning line vs.
property line
As discussed with you by phone today, please provide your op1n10n
regarding whether a building can be constructed over a zoning
district line. The zoning district line in question is a boundary
between a residential zoning district and a commercial zoning
district and normally would require a buffer wall and setbacks.
However, since the applicant has extinguished the interior property
line that coincided with the zoning line and is proposing a
building encroaching the zoning line, is this a zoning code
violation that would require unifying the zoning on the property?
Please refer to Section 3.A.5.g. of the Zoning Code.
TJH/cmc
c:zonecode
@
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
Michael E. Haa~~
Site and zonin~_D~lopment Administrator
December 3, 1993
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Agent:
File No. :
Review - 1st Review
Club 55
2404 South Federal Highway
Dale Meaux, Architect
789
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the Site
Plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It
should be noted that the comments are divided into three (3)
categories; the first category is a list of comments that
identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected and shown
in compliance on the plans submitted for second (2nd) review in
order for the proJect to continue through the site plan review
process. The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that
the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe wlll enhance the
proposed development. The third set of comments is a list of
deficiencies that are shown on the plans regarding technical
compliance and shall be corrected and shown in compliance on the
permit set of plans prior to issuance of permits for the
development of the project. The applicant shall understand that
all documents/plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review
are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the
applicant/agent contact me regardlng questions related to the
comments. If the applicant is not intendlng to correct code
deficiencies they should contact me regarding the procedures,
application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking
relief from the code requirement.
I. site plan Review Comments:
1. The site data indicates that there is a building coverage of
17,759 sq. ft. and a total coverage of 72,709 sq. ft. Amend
the drawing to identify the total footprint coverage of each
story and the total gross floor area of the entire building.
Also, identify whether the floor areas include balconies,
walkways, elevator shafts, electrical & mechanical rooms,
storage rooms, etc.
2. Add to the drawings a typical unit plan of the west end unit
and the east end unit. Also identify the floor area and
overall dimensions of each unit.
3. Add to the unit plan drawing found on the site plan, the
overall dimensions and square foot floor area of the unit.
4. The 1.43 acre portion of the total 3.48 acre site that is
zoned C-3 shows a total of 19 units. This number exceeds
the allowed density of 10.8 units per acre as specified in
Appendix A Zoning Section 6 C. 1. j. and Section 5 G. Amend
the plans to show no more than the maximum allowed density
for the C-3 zoned property. Maximum density allowed for the
1.43 acre C-3 property is 15 units.
@
CLUB 55 - 1ST REVIEW
PAGE 2
5. Omit the reference on the site plan regarding the bonus
density being applied to the .20 acre piece of property.
The Future Land Use Map shows the bonus density applying
only to the 1.80 acre portion of the 2 acre site.
6. Add to the drawing a cut-away sectlon and plan view drawing
of the mechanical and roof access tower. The City height
limitations allows, with application and city approval,
certain appurtenances to exceed the maximum height of 45
feet. It appears that the mechanical and roof access tower
is not an appurtenance that would be allowed to exceed the
45 feet limitation. Amend the plans accordingly. [Appendix
A-Zoning Section 4 F.]
7. Add to the drawlng an elevation view and floor plan drawing
of the gate house.
8. Dimension the overall size of the pool(s) and identify the
total area. Also dimension the pool pavilion and identify
the total gross floor area.
9. Amend the site data, regardlng number of required parking
spaces. Show on the plan the Code specified parking ratios.
Appendix A-zoning Section 11 H. 16. a. (3) and e. (1), (12)
(e.) identifies the required parking space ratios. [Note
the code specifies that the number of spaces required for
the pool may be reduced by seventy-five (75) percent.]
10. Add to the drawing a detailed plan and section view drawing
of the dumpster enclosure. Include the following:
a) Type of wall material.
b) Exterior finish material and color of same.
c) Overall height of walls.
d) Overall width and length of enclosure.
NOTE: A minimum of ten (10) feet clear opening width is
required. Clear opening width shall be measured and shown
from inside of gate and post materlal. Specify in note form
the method of holding the gates in the open and closed
position.
11. Show on the site plan, paving and drainage plan, and
landscape plan, the location of the City standard curbing as
specified in Section 5-142 (e) of Article X Parking Lots.
12. Show on the site plan a forty (40) foot setback/yard from
the edge of the portion of the building that is located on
the C-3 zoned property to the R-3 zoning district line.
Also show a forty (40) foot setback/yard from the C-3 zoning
district line to the edge of the building on the R-3 zoned
property. [Appendix A-Zoning Section 5 G.2. and Section 6
C. 1. j.] Note: ThlS issue is being reviewed by the City
Attorney.
13. Show on the site plan a buffer wall that is required where
the C-3 commercial zoned property abuts the R-3 residential
zoned property. [Appendix A-Zoning Section 4 L]
14. Add to the drawing a dimensioned typical section and
elevation view drawing of the item shown on the landscape
plan with a heavy dark line located on each side of the
driveway entrance. Add the structure to the site plan and
drainage drawings.
~
CLUB 55 - 1ST REVIEW
PAGE 3
15. Show and label on the site plan the location and type of
site signage proposed for the project. Also, show on the
elevation view drawings of the building, the location of any
proposed wall signage. Note that the wall and site signage
shall comply with the Sign Code. It appears as though there
are two signs shown on Sheet L1. Clarify and provide the
following additional sign information: type of sign, color,
width, length, height, configuration. Dimension the
location of the site sign(s) from two adjacent property
lines. [Sign Code Section 21-21.]
16. Add to the site data the number of stories contained in the
proposed residential structure.
17. The Coastal Management element of the Comprehensive Plan
states that the south setback for the subject property that
contains a four (4) story building shall be 100 feet. The
drawing depicts a four (4) story building located 92.75 feet
setback from the south property line. The single story pool
pavilion structure shall be setback forty (40) feet from the
south property line and 150 feet from the shoreline. Amend
the plans accordingly. [Comprehensive Plan Policy 7.9.6.]
18. The Coastal Management element of the Comprehensive Plan
states that the east setback for the subject property shall
be 150 feet from the shoreline. This site is an "A" rated
ecosystem which receives top priority by the City
Comprehensive Plan to ensure maximum preservation of
mangroves. Such sites are addressed by the following
Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.11.1., 1.11.14., 4.3.5. and
4.3.1. Preservation of this area is justified by data
analysis within the Conservation Support Documents (page 24
& 37) and the Future Land Use Support Documents (page 49).
Amend the plans accordingly to include removal of all
structures, future docks, natural stone wall, pool, pool
deck, landscaping, sldewalk, and stabilized fire lane in
this area.
19. To properly evaluate whether the "fiber cement siding"
complies wlth the required wall specifications listed in the
Community Design Plan for the coastal Village design theme,
add to the sheet depicting the elevation views a detailed
section view and partial elevation view of the proposed
material. [Appendlx II (a) Article V Chapter 7.5 City Code
of Ordinances)
20. Specify on the plan what type of material is proposed for
the pool deck.
21. Correct the inconsistency regarding the location and
configuration of the sidewalk, adjacent to the pool, shown
on Sheet L3 and all other plans.
22. The plan is void of the visual screening hedge material
required along the perimeter of east vehicle use area.
Correct the plans accordingly. [Landscape Code section 7.5-
35 (e)]
23. The spacing of the required visual screening hedge material
along the south side of the south vehicle use area exceeds
the code required spacing. The plans indicate the proposed
MYR2 (Wax Myrtle) hedge material is spaced five (5) feet on
center. The code specifies a maximum spacing of twenty-four
(24) inches on center. Correct the plans accordingly.
[Landscape Code Section 7.5-35 (e)]
24. Add to the landscape plan foundation landscape material
along the east and west sides of the building. [Landscape
Code section 7.5-35 (1)]
~
CLUB 55 - 1ST REVIEW
PAGE 4
25. Show and dimension on the landscape plan the ten (10) foot
isosceles right triangles that are required on both sides of
the ingress and egress median. These triangles form the
cross visibility triangles. Place a note on the plan that
specifies "Landscape material placed within the triangular
areas shall be installed and maintained to allow an
unobstructed cross visibility between thirty (30) inches and
six (6) feet above the driveway surface. (Landscape Code
section 7.5-35 (h)]
26. A tree and environmental survey is required for the project.
Submit the survey to Kevin Hallahan, City Forester/
Environmentalist and the planning and Zoning Department.
[Article IV of Chapter 7.5]
27. The traffic impact analysis for the subject property was
forwarded to Palm Beach County for review for compliance
with the Traffic Performance Standards. The results of
their review and the City evaluation of same must be on
record with the City prior to the site plan being forwarded
for Board approval.
II. Recommendation(s):
1. Recommend C-3 portion of site be rezoned to R-3 and unified
by title with the present R-3 zoned property, to eliminate
problems created as a result of the existence of this
commercial zoning dlstrict. (Comments #12 and #13.)
This rezoning would also require an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use Element (Map)) which
could be accompllshed concurrently with the rezoning, and
with the same application.
Since the subject property is less than 10 acres, it
qualifies for the "small-scale" plan amendment procedures as
established in Florida law. This abbreviated amendment
procedure allows the amendment to be adopted by the City
prior to State review. After acceptance of an application,
the process can be completed within three (3) months. The
rezoning process would not change the maximum dwelling units
per acre (density) allowed on that portion of the site
located outside of the bonus density area. Requesting the
bonus density of twenty (20) units per acre for the entire
3.48 acre site would require a "large scale" amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan and would take approximately nine (9)
months to one (1) year.
III. Permit Comments:
1. The plans submitted for a landscape permit shall show the
computations to verify that the landscaping required for
code Section 7.5-35 (g) and (k) are accounted for on the
plans. A distlnguishable symbol shall be used to show on
the plans where the code required landscaping is located.
2. Prior to the issuance of a permit to construct the building,
submit for review a Unity of Title that identifies the two
lots combined. A Unity of Title form may be obtained from
the Building Department. Note: Following review approval
from the City and prior to issuance of building permits, the
Unity of Title shall be recorded with Palm Beach County and
a recorded copy submitted to the City.
3. The permit documents shall be reviewed for technical
compliance with City codes.
MEH/jm
A:CLUB55-1.JM
(l)
~R~
~
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning and zoning Director
Michael E. Haa~~
Site and zonin~_D~lopment Administrator
December 3, 1993
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Agent:
File No.:
Review - 1st Review
Club 55
2404 South Federal Highway
Dale Meaux, Architect
789
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the Site
Plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It
should be noted that the comments are divided into three (3)
categories; the first category is a list of comments that
identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected and shown
in compliance on the plans submitted for second (2nd) review in
order for the project to continue through the site plan review
process. The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that
the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the
proposed development. The third set of comments is a list of
deficiencies that are shown on the plans regarding technical
compliance and shall be corrected and shown in compliance on the
permit set of plans prior to issuance of permits for the
development of the project. The applicant shall understand that
all documents/plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review
are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the
applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the
comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code
deficiencies they should contact me regarding the procedures,
application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking
relief from the code requirement.
I. site Plan Review Comments:
1. The site data indicates that there is a building coverage of
17,759 sq. ft. and a total coverage of 72,709 sq. ft. Amend
the drawing to identify the total footprint coverage of each
story and the total gross floor area of the entire building.
Also, identify whether the floor areas include balconies,
walkways, elevator shafts, electrical & mechanical rooms,
storage rooms, etc.
2. Add to the drawings a typical unit plan of the west end unit
and the east end unit. Also identify the floor area and
overall dimensions of each unit.
3. Add to the unit plan drawing found on the site plan, the
overall dimensions and square foot floor area of the unit.
4. The 1.43 acre portion of the total 3.48 acre site that is
zoned C-3 shows a total of 19 units. This number exceeds
the allowed density of 10.8 units per acre as specified in
Appendix A Zoning Section 6 C. 1. j. and Section 5 G. Amend
the plans to show no more than the maximum allowed density
for the C-3 zoned property. Maximum density allowed for the
1.43 acre C-3 property is 15 units.
CLUB 55 - 1ST REVIEW
PAGE 2
5. omit the reference on the site plan regarding the bonus
density being applied to the .20 acre piece of property.
The Future Land Use Map shows the bonus density applying
only to the 1.80 acre portion of the 2 acre site.
6. Add to the drawing a cut-away section and plan view drawing
of the mechanical and roof access tower. The City height
limitations allows, with application and city approval,
certain appurtenances to exceed the maximum height of 45
feet. It appears that the mechanical and roof access tower
is not an appurtenance that would be allowed to exceed the
45 feet limitation. Amend the plans accordingly. [Appendix
A-Zoning Section 4 F.]
7. Add to the drawing an elevation view and floor plan drawing
of the gate house.
8. Dimension the overall size of the pool(s) and identify the
total area. Also dimension the pool pavilion and identify
the total gross floor area.
9. Amend the site data, regarding number of required parking
spaces. show on the plan the Code specified parking ratios.
Appendix A-Zoning section 11 H. 16. a. (3) and e. (1), (12)
(e.) identifies the required parking space ratios. [Note
the code specifies that the number of spaces required for
the pool may be reduced by seventy-five (75) percent.]
10. Add to the drawing a detailed plan and section view drawing
of the dumpster enclosure. Include the following:
a) Type of wall material.
b) Exterior finish material and color of same.
c) overall height of walls.
d) overall width and length of enclosure.
NOTE: A minimum of ten (10) feet clear opening width is
required. Clear opening width shall be measured and shown
from inside of gate and post material. specify in note form
the method of holding the gates in the open and closed
position.
11. Show on the site plan, paving and drainage plan, and
landscape plan, the location of the City standard curbing as
specified in Section 5-142 (e) of Article X Parking Lots.
12. show on the site plan a forty (40) foot setback/yard from
the edge of the portion of the building that is located on
the C-3 zoned property to the R-3 zoning district line.
Also show a forty (40) foot setback/yard from the C-3 zoning
district line to the edge of the building on the R-3 zoned
property. [Appendix A-Zoning Section 5 G.2. and Section 6
C. 1. j.] Note: This issue is being reviewed by the City
Attorney.
13. show on the site plan a buffer wall that is required where
the C-3 commercial zoned property abuts the R-3 residential
zoned property. [Appendix A-Zoning section 4 L]
14. Add to the drawing a dimensioned typical section and
elevation view drawing of the item shown on the landscape
plan with a heavy dark line located on each side of the
driveway entrance. Add the structure to the site plan and
drainage drawings.
CLUB 55 - 1ST REVIEW
PAGE 3
15. Show and label on the site plan the location and type of
site signage proposed for the project. Also, show on the
elevation view drawings of the building, the location of any
proposed wall signage. Note that the wall and site signage
shall comply with the sign code. It appears as though there
are two signs shown on Sheet L1. Clarify and provide the
following additional sign information: type of sign, color,
width, length, height, configuration. Dimension the
location of the site sign(s) from two adjacent property
lines. [Sign Code Section 21-21.]
16. Add to the site data the number of stories contained in the
proposed residential structure.
17. The Coastal Management element of the comprehensive Plan
states that the south setback for the subject property that
contains a four (4) story building shall be 100 feet. The
drawing depicts a four (4) story building located 92.75 feet
setback from the south property line. The single story pool
pavilion structure shall be setback forty (40) feet from the
south property line and 150 feet from the shoreline. Amend
the plans accordingly. [Comprehensive Plan Policy 7.9.6.]
lB. The Coastal Management element of the comprehensive Plan
states that the east setback for the subject property shall
be 150 feet from the shoreline. This site is an "A" rated
ecosystem which receives top priority by the City
Comprehensive Plan to ensure maximum preservation of
mangroves. such sites are addressed by the following
Comprehensive Plan policies 1.11.1., 1.11.14., 4.3.5. and
4.3.1. Preservation of this area is justified by data
analysis within the Conservation support Documents (page 24
& 37) and the Future Land Use Support Documents (page 49).
Amend the plans accordingly to include removal of all
structures, future docks, natural stone wall, pool, pool
deck, landscaping, sidewalk, and stabilized fire lane in
this area.
19. To properly evaluate whether the "fiber cement siding!'
complies with the required wall specifications listed in the
Community Design plan for the Coastal Village design theme,
add to the sheet depicting the elevation views a detailed
section view and partial elevation view of the proposed
material. [Appendix II (a) Article V Chapter 7.5 City Code
of Ordinances]
20. specify on the plan what type of material is proposed for
the pool deck.
21. Correct the inconsistency regarding the location and
configuration of the sidewalk, adjacent to the pool, shown
on Sheet L3 and all other plans.
22. The plan is void of the visual screening hedge material
required along the perimeter of east vehicle use area.
Correct the plans accordingly. [Landscape code Section 7.5-
35 (e)]
23. The spacing of the required visual screening hedge material
along the south side of the south vehicle use area exceeds
the code required spacing. The plans indicate the proposed
MYR2 (Wax Myrtle) hedge material is spaced five (5) feet on
center. The code specifies a maximum spacing of twenty-four
(24) inches on center. Correct the plans accordingly.
[Landscape Code Section 7.5-35 (e)]
24. Add to the landscape plan foundation landscape material
along the east and west sides of the building. [Landscape
Code section 7.5-35 (1)]
CLUB 55 - 1ST REVIEW
PAGE 4
25. Show and dimension on the landscape plan the ten (10) foot
isosceles right triangles that are required on both sides of
the ingress and egress median. These triangles form the
cross visibility triangles. Place a note on the plan that
specifies "Landscape material placed within the triangular
areas shall be installed and maintained to allow an
unobstructed cross visibility between thirty (30) inches and
six (6) feet above the driveway surface. [Landscape Code
section 7.5-35 (h)]
26. A tree and environmental survey is required for the project.
Submit the survey to Kevin Hallahan, City Forester/
Environmentalist and the Planning and Zoning Department.
[Article IV of Chapter 7.5)
27. The traffic impact analysis for the subject property was
forwarded to Palm Beach County for review for compliance
with the Traffic Performance Standards. The results of
their review and the City evaluation of same must be on
record with the City prior to the site plan being forwarded
for Board approval.
II. Recommendation(s):
1. Recommend C-3 portion of site be rezoned to R-3 and unified
by title with the present R-3 zoned property, to eliminate
problems created as a result of the existence of this
commercial zoning district. (Comments #12 and #13.)
This rezoning would also require an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use Element (Map)) which
could be accomplished concurrently with the rezoning, and
with the same application.
since the subject property is less than 10 acres, it
qualifies for the "small-scale" plan amendment procedures as
established in Florida law. This abbreviated amendment
procedure allows the amendment to be adopted by the City
prior to State review. After acceptance of an application,
the process can be completed within three (3) months. The
rezoning process would not change the maximum dwelling units
per acre (density) allowed on that portion of the site
located outside of the bonus density area. Requesting the
bonus density of twenty (20) units per acre for the entire
3.48 acre site would require a "large scale" amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan and would take approximately nine (9)
months to one (1) year.
III. Permit Comments:
1. The plans submitted for a landscape permit shall show the
computations to verify that the landscaping required for
code Section 7.5-35 (g) and (k) are accounted for on the
plans. A distinguishable symbol shall be used to show on
the plans where the code required landscaping is located.
2. Prior to the issuance of a permit to construct the building,
submit for review a Unity of Title that identifies the two
lots combined. A Unity of Title form may be obtained from
the Building Department. Note: Following review approval
from the City and prior to issuance of building permits, the
Unity of Title shall be recorded with Palm Beach county and
a recorded copy submitted to the City.
3. The permit documents shall be reviewed for technical
compliance with City codes.
MEH/jm
A:CLUB55-1.JM
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-354
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Office of the City Engineer I~: ^l
James D. White, P.E., City Eng~ ~r
December 1, 1993 ;,
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Technica1 Review Committee Comments
C1ub 55
P1anning Department Fi1e No. 789
Pursuant to discussions which ensued during the November 30, 1993
Technical Review Committee meeting, the applicant is hereby granted
a favorable recommendation for exception to platting regulations
by the City Engineer's Office conditioned upon the developer's
payment of fee in lieu of land dedication pursuant to Appendix "C",
Subdivision and Platting Regulations. The developer shall submit
data which represents the fair market value of the subject parcel
on a per acre basis for usage in calculating applicable fees.
Conditions of approval set forth in this office's prior Memorandum
No. 93-335 shall remain a condition of approval (memo previously
transmitted to Planning Department) . .
~
"
JDW:VAF/ck
xc:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
~@~uw~
ill
DEe 2 '993
<:..
Wi
PLANNING AND
NING OEPT.
w
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-354
( SUPPLEMENT)
TO: Tambri Heyden December 6, 1993
Acting Planning Director I
FROM: Office of the City Engineer J/~~
James White, P.E., City Engineet>rv
RE: Supplement to Engineering Department Memo No. 93-354
Club 55 - Exemption to Platting Regulations
Please be advised that Platting is required and that the applicant
shall be responsible to submit a formal application for exemption
which shall include an appropriate filing fee in the amount of
four hundred ($400.00) dollars, prior to this Department rendering
a formal approval on the written request for exemption.
Should you require any additional information, please contact the
undersigned at extension 6282.
cc: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
~4~cr
VAF/JW/vaf
John Wildner
Parks Superintendent
(i9
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-235
November 29, 1993
To:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Di~ctor
Don Jaeger, Building Official ~~
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Of~cial
TRC COMMENTS - Major Site Plan Modification
Club 55 - 2404 S. FEDERAL HWY.
Via:
From:
Re:
After review of the plans for the proposed project, the Building
Department offers the following comments:
1. The floor plan reveals 14 units each on four floors
which totals 56 units. Please explain why the site
plan data sheet shows 55 units.
2. The maximum height for all structures is 45'. Please
review the north and west elevations and comply with
this requirement.
3. Plans should show handicap ramps and access from the
walkways to the building entrances and to all site
amenities, including docks.
4. The building should comply with Table IV for Type 5
construction minimum.
5. Signage for this project is not addressed.
6. The survey shows the building encroaching on the 40'
easement.
7. All existing curb cuts should be brought back to
standards if they have no continued use.
~7
~ "1 ,~/
A~../
AN: mh
ill
Nuv 2 9 IB3
c.-
-~".
ill
~@~nw~
A:CLUB55.TRC
(3)
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-289 WDC
TO:
PlannIng and Zon~ng Department
FROV:
Fire Department
DA'1'E :
~ovEmber 23, 1992
SUBJECT: S=TE PLAN
club 55
~404 S. Federa~ Highway
ThIS plan has been revIewed and found acceptable.
In our view this p:an may be forwarded.
~ /// ~ ~i
/~ '
----------~---------------
HILLIAM D. CAVANAUGH FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
HDC:cp
@
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-481
TO: Tambri J. Heyden,
Acting Planning & 20
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: November 16, 1993
SUBJECT: Club 55 Condominiums
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
1. Palm Beach Health Department permits for water and
sanitary sewer will be required (Sec. 26-12).
2. Developer will be allowed an irrigation water meter but
will be required to pay cap fees based on project
demand.
3. Proposed fire line, water main on site with fire
hydrants, and sanitary sewer mains to be owned and
maintained by the City of Boynton Beach Utility
Department and located in acceptable utility easements
dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach (Sec. 26.33(a),
Appendix C, Art. X, Sec. 6, Sec. 26.33[bJ).
4. Suitable backflow preventors will be required on the
private fire lines and the domestic water service
Se c. 26.107).
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
19b
xc: Clyde "Skip" Mi lor
Peter Mazzella
File
m
NOV 11.
e
00
@
MEMORANDUM
POLICE f:93-178
TO:
I'ambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Sgt. M. Kirrman
DA'liE :
November 12, 1993
REF:
Club 55 - 2404 South Federal Highway
Ms. Heyden,
I have reviewed the submitted plans and have the following
comments:
1. Suggest a "Caution Intersection 11 sign at entrance/exi 1: to U. S.
1 ;
2. '!'raffic flow arrows at entrance/exit continuing into and
throughout the parking lot;
3. Pedestrian cross walk - stop bars indicating light trip in
roadway;
4. Parking lot and outside security building lights;
5. Indication of bUilding and apartment addresses.
;; JU. W~~r
sgt M. Kirrman I
MK/jb
@
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 193-500
RE:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Ji~
Club 55 Condominiums - New Site Ple1
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
December 2, 1993
Further review of the Club 55 Condominium site plan indicates
that this project will be subject to the recreation element of
the subdivision regulations. As such, the following comments are
submitted:
1. Based on 55 multi-family dwelling units, the recreation
dedication requirement is determined to be:
55 D.U. X .Ol50 acres = .825 acres
2. Assuming the developer does not apply for one-half credit
for private recreation, the City elects to accept payment of
a fee in lieu of land.
3. Amount of the fee is to be determined by fair market value
of the land in the proposed development
JW:ad
@
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Pla~ning & Zoning irec~or
DATE:
//-- Ie; - 93
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
RE:
Site Plan Review - Major Site Plan Modification -
1st Review
Project:
C L '16
SS'
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced proj ect. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
cI
~ ."f,7 ,
or} ~\'r ~v
~~ ~ 7)
~
m
C:PARKS.MSP
fj)
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 193-460
RE:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~~
Club 55 - Major Site Plan Modification
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
November 9, 1993
This memorandum is in reference to the existing mangrove trees
and other desirable trees throughout the site.
l. The existing mangrove trees are protected by the State of
Florida under the auspices of Palm Beach County
Environmental Resources Management Department. The
applicant must submit written approval from this agency to
develop near the mangroves. The site plan indicates surface
drainage into the mangrove area which must be approved by
this agency.
2. There are existing trees on the site around the perimeter of
the restaurant and on the vacant portion of the area east of
the existing paved location. These trees in total should be
indicated on the tree survey and addressed as part of the
Tree Management Plan. The desirable existing trees include:
Seagrape, Sabal Palms and Banyan. The undesirable existing
trees to be removed include: Florida Holly, australian Pine
and Earleaf Acacia. These trees which exist inside the
mangrove stands must be removed by hand rather than
machinery during the clearing process. The project can
proceed as scheduled in your memorandum.
KH:ad
BWIf~
'.
@
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 193-489
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist r<} H-
Club 25 Condominium
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
November 22, 1993
The previous comments as directed to the applicant are
outstanding. The issue can be resolved prior to the issuance of
a site clearing permit. The project should proceed according to
your schedule.
KH:ad
~~
~ !1S ~~
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp.
James D. White, City Engineer
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer
DATE:
November 19, 1993
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Tuesday, November 30, 1993
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee wt,l I ':H",r,l- c','
Tuesday, November 30, 1993, at 9:00 A.M. in Conterence Room ""If fvJn~ L
Wing) to discuss the following:
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
Quail Lake West PUD - nka Quail Run Re-submission
PARKING LOT VARIANCE
Boynton Festive Center - Code Section S-142(h)(5).
The minimum distance from the street right-at-way line at any m:'1icr
ingress or egress driveway to any parking stall or any tnl-'2rL.11' ;:"1-,:--"
aisle having direct access to such driveway shal.l he one llunrh-,:>(j f 1 on.-
frUit,
A site plan will be available for review at the P l"lJlD ing ,Om,] '7,' 11 ',',
Department.
DISCUSSION
1. Review of the following site plans tor ll1t,?r-rli?')"trtlli::n',
conflicts:
a) New Site Plan -
Project:
Applicant:
1520 Neptune Drive
C&M Builders, Inc.
b) New S~te Plan -
Project:
Applicant:
club 55 Condominiums
club 25
TRC MEETING
PAGE Z
2. Boynton B€ ach Boulevard: Bridge over the Intracoast,al ~~a ten16"Y
(see attached Department of Army Permit Request) .
D&dy~ ~ 0 :J
Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer
DM/jm
Att.
cc: MEMO ONLY
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
city Commission (5)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director
steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Central File
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner
Project File
Chronological File
A:TRCTUES.JM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-254
TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Club 55
DATE: November 17, 1993
The dumpster location at the above site is fine, however Public
Works prefers a direct approach from the north at this location.
REier
ill
u WI ~
NOV'8.
@
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-335
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
James D. White, P.E.~IJ
City Engineer ;:;
FROM:
,/
DATE: November 9, 1993
RE: Club 55 Condominium Site Plan - First Review
City Engineer's Comments
Engineering has the following comments on this plan submittal.
Sheet - Site Plan
1. Provide stop sign, stop bar at exit. Provide entrance/exit
signs at U.S. Hwy. #1, directional arrow pavement markings in
circulation area of parking, 4" line in center of entrance/exit
turn arrows. Section 5-l42(c).
2. Provide lighting plan for parking area and pedestrian walks.
Section 5-l42(b).
3. Provide minimum 25' radii for driveway cuts at U.S. Hwy. #1.
4. Provide cross section on detail of stabilized and sodded
emergency access.
Sheet #Cl
1. Provide stormwater calculations, assumptions, soils data
supporting percolation calculations, calculations and elevations,
cross sections, contours, etc. showing retention storage volume.
Section 5-142(f).
2. Show curb cuts to retention sites.
3. Provide top elevation of stone wall.
4. Show roof drain locations.
5. The finish floor elevation is same as, or lower, than top of
curb, walks immediately in front of buildings should be higher.
Deputy City Engineer's Comments
1.
Provide "Letter of Intent" from F.D.O.T. authorizing modifications
to existing ingress/egress approach.
~
NOVln.
C!.frl c:..-
III ANIIINr. AND
m
Engineering Dept. Memo. No. 93-335
November 9, 1993
page #2
2. Sidewalks shall be constructed to provide handicap access from
handicap parking stalls to the pool pavilion and swimming pool.
Site plan and Sheet C-l conflict. Revise plans accordingly.
3. Owner to coordinate with City Forester, reference landscaping
of median within Federal Highway rights-of-way.
4. Plans shall contain a notation that the abandoned ingress/egress
approach (SW corner of property) will be demolished and a standard
F.D.O.T. approved sidewalk/curb and gutter be constructed in its
place (see area designated as ramp).
5. Place notation on plans that Palm Beach County D.E.R.M. permit(s)
on exemption is required for future construction of dock(s) and
natural stone wall, including City permits if approved by Palm
Beach County, prior to commencement of construction.
6. D.E.R.M. permits required to discharge into off-site and on-site
Mangrove areas, including a variance to the City's Parking Lot
Regulations which requires the retention of stormwater on-site,
should the Developer utilize the existing 48' RCP or desire to
sheet flow into the Mangrove area.
d.' ~c..~=t .~
Vincent A. Finizio
JDW:VAF/ck
xc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
@
RECREATION Ii PARK MEMORANDUM 193-460
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
^ I
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist r<~ c:.:.rr-
Club 55 - Major Site Plan Modification
RE:
DATE:
November 9, 1993
This memorandum is in reference to the existing mangrove trees
and other desirable trees throughout the site.
1. The existing mangrove trees are protected by the State of
Florida under the auspices of Palm Beach County
Environmental Resources Management Department. The
applicant must submit written approval from this agency to
develop near the mangroves. The site plan indicates surface
drainage into the mangrove area which must be approved by
this agency.
2. There are existing trees on the site around the perimeter of
the restaurant and on the vacant portion of the area east of
the existing paved location. These trees in total should be
indicated on the tree survey and addressed as part of the
Tree Management Plan. The desirable existing trees include:
Seagrape, Sabal Palms and Banyan. The undesirable existing
trees to be removed include: Florida Holly, australian Pine
and Earleaf Acacia. These trees which exist inside the
mangrove stands must be removed by hand rather than
machinery during the clearing process. The project can
proceed as scheduled in your memorandum.
KH:ad
ill
; 1 n I9'li
c...
rn
m@rnnw
---~-.._-- - ~-----'-"--'-'-'-".'---'---_._'-'-"'-_._~--._---- -- -----,-----....----.-----
f~X q- ~
'~
PLANNING,~AND ZONING DEPARTM:ENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-285
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
James white, P.E. city Engineer
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, utilities Dept. chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Acting planning & Zoning Director' I~
DATE: November 8, 1993
RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1st Review - Major site plan Modification
Project club 55
Location 2404 S. Federal Hwy.
Applicant - Club 25 Claude Lemire
File No. 789
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above
referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project
will be granted by the City Commission/Community Redevelopment
Agency. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review
time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and
formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning
and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on November 24, 1993.
Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of
the amended plans (2nd review).
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, site plan Review, section
8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
substantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in Section 7 of the Site plan Review Ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process
the project based on the review standards or the documents
show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections
should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and
Zoning Department.
To: TRC Members
Re: Planning & Zoning Memo, #93-285
Page Two of Two
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is
incorrectly depicted on the documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their
comments when the plans depict or when the location and
installation of their departmental required improvements may
conflict with other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficil:ncy that is outside of
his/her review responsibility, the commE~nt and the specific code
section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review
specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward
a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and
Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do
not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and
recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director
of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the
applicant. please include the name and phone number of the reviewer
on this memo. Dotty Moore will be the Planning and Zoning Department
staff member coordinating the 1st review of the project.
The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover
letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans
to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When
the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they
will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for
review and approval.
Attachment
xc: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Project File (original)
Numbered File
A: 1REVIEW. SP
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-096
DATE:
Members of the Technical Revi.ew
(S~~~Distribution List Below)
"-\f~ i>>'Q for<:
t?ristopher Cutro, Planning and
May 3, 1993
Committee
TO:
FROM:
Zonipg Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Site Plan The Club 25 - Condominiums
The proposed buyers of Gentleman Jim's Restaurant have asked for
a cursory review by the City of the attached plan for major
problems. I would ask that you review these plans and, if you
have major problems and concerns (i.e. poor intersection, poor
traffic circulation, emergency access, dumpster location, etc.)
please inform me in writing by May 7, 1993. If we do not hear
from you we will assume that you have no major problems and we
will instruct the applicant to go forward and submit for formal
site plan review.
If you have any questions regarding the plan, please feel free to
call me.
Distribution: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Mike Kazunas, utilities Engineer
Richard staudinger, city Engineer c/o Gee & Jenson
Vincent Finizio, Engineering Department
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
Robert Eichorst, Public Works
Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
John Wildner, Parks & Recreation Department
CC:cp
Att.
A:93-096
CD
MEMORANDUM
U~ilities No. 93-196
TO: Christopher cutro,
Planning and Zoning
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of utilities
DATE: May 5, 1993
SUBJECT: club 25 condominiums ajkja Gentleman Jim's Restaurant
/1.
Existing water mains may not provide sufficient fire
protection. Developer shall an~icipate the posslbllity of
the upsizlng of water mains for fire protection.
~.
Existing downstream lift stations may not have sufficient
reserve capacity to accept the proJect's sewer demands.
Developer shall anticipate the possibility of upsizing pumps
and controls at receiving lift stations.
/3.
Backflow prevention on all water malns shall be anticipated.
Items 1 and 2 must be addressed at the time of slte plan approval
to determine availability of water and sewer. Remaining comments
will be addressed at ~ime of construction drawings review in
conjunction with the Health Department Permit Application.
Attached for the applicant's use 1S our General Plan Review
Criteria. We recommend to expedite our reviews that the
applicant contact this department to discuss his plans as they
become more concrete.
Provided for forwarding to the applicant are the existing water
and sewer locations drawn onto hlS plan. If he has any questlons
he can contact Mr. Mike Kazunas a~ 738-7460.
/bks
Attachment
be: Mike Kazunas
cc: Peter Mazzella
Mark Law
Skip Hilor
Brent Allen
1 hour Utility Engineer
.5 hr. Admlnistratlve Assistant
'0 l~ ("'1~r\rEr)
.L \~_;"..1 '",-.A.M' .
~ 't't }
i,:;.8
~ ' ~
f
,- t n 'i :t\! \ \'~ ,', D ~~J1T,
~ \ . . \ ,
(%)
.n
---I'- 1.
~ 2.
~3.
4.
~~
.
..."
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning ~
w. RIchard Staudinger, PE City Engln~c:: ~
Proposed Site Plan. The 25 Condominiums/Cursory Review,
Pre Submittal
DATE:
May 7, 1993
.............~*.*...**....*...**......***..**.***...*..........,.*****....................**.***.**.
The propsed site plan far this condominium is generally acceptable with the fOllowing
comments:
Provide details on how emergency access roadway will be designed to prevQnt the
condominium owners from driving on it.
Provide adequate turn around oapabilities for residents using parKing lots.
5.
Parding lot on north side appears to be very close to property line.
Lake Is assumed to be for stormwater retention purposes. It is locoted at the
highest point on the site. A pond or retention area will probably be required at the
east (low) end of the ::lite.
Pmvlde trafflce study ot entrance intersection.
:ier
93049
"t,.
@
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-116
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE: May 6, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
The Club 25 - Condominiums
Courtesy Review
The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
has reviewed the above referenced "conceptual plan" and herein
offer the following staff comments:
~. The gate at this site's ingress shall be situated a minimum of
100' east of the existing u.s. Highway #1 rights-of-way line.
~. Relocate dumpster locations to provide City Sanitation workers
with adequate backup dimensions free from obstructions such as
parked motor vehicles, raised continuous concrete curbing and
landscaping, etc.
vl3. The turning radius for the stabilized and sodded emergency access
aisles should be widened along the radii in order to provide for
the turning movements of large fire rescue vehicles and aerial
ladder trucks, etc.
~. The proposed lake is situated approximately 30' from the edge
of u.S. Highway #1 travel lanes, therefore, a guardrail system
along the west side of the lake should be installed to minimize
the chance of errant vehicles entering this body of water. The
guardrail shall comply, reference materials and construction
standards, with FDOT specifications according to the latest edition
of the Highway and Bridge Construction Manual.
5. The applicant should be advised that the construction of rip-rap
reventment and the proposed construction of a dock within the
Intracoastal Waterway requires requisite governmental agency
approval and permits for construction upon submerged lands.
Should the applicant desire to move forward with this project,
applications shall be made to the Department of Natural Resources
and Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources
Management, including, but not limited to the United States Army
Corp. of Engineers (if applicable).
vt6. The pedestrian concrete sidewalk system situated within U.S.
Highway #1 rights-of-way shall be extended thru the main ingress/
egress area and be transitioned so as to facilitate the movement
of handicapped individuals within the public rights-of-way.
~7. The submitted plan is devoid of site lighting, specifically the
perimeter post mounted lighting required by Chapter 5, Section
5-142(a) (b), "Required Parking Lot Lighting" and "Required
Pedestrian Walkway Lighting", including associated standards set
forth in the parking lot ordinance appendix.
8. Excavation of the proposed lake will require the City Engineer's
review and the applicant's compliance with Chapter 8, "Excavation
and Fill Regulations", prior to the matter being placed before
the City Commission for their review, consideration and final
dispositon as required by City of Boynton Beach, Florida Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 8, "Excavation and Fillll.
@
TRC Comments/The Club 25 - Condominiums
May 6, 1993
Page #2
9. Modification to the existing ingress/egress area shall require
the approval of the State of Florida Department of Transportation,
reference construction within the public rights-of-way under the
jurisdiction of the State.
\ l.,''t {',~ " '-:::l'--t---\~ .
vincent A. Finizio
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
w. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer
@
MEMORANDUM
TO: UtilitJ Staff
FROM: Mike Kazunas,
Utility Engineer
DATE: March 25, 1993
SUBJECT: General Plan Review Criteria
The following design standards apply to most plan reviews. The
appropriate regulation or reference source is provided for your
use.
Plan shall show location of all utility easements, Sec.
26.33(a).
Plan shall show size and type of utility pipes, Sec.
26.16(a).
No structures shall be allowed in utility easements, App. C,
Art. VIII, Sec. 9.
Sewer services shall be constructed with max. 300 slopes
into service wyes, 100 preferable, Sec. 26.33(b).
Swabbing shall be performed on all new water mains,
Sec. 26.33(b).
The water system shall be designed to provide fire flows of:
500 gpm @20 psi, residential
1500 gpm @20 psi, commercial
Appendix C, Art. X, Sec. 16.
Plan shall specify meter size and location, Sec. 26.16(c).
Location of the water meter is not allowed in pavements or
sidewalk, Sec. 26.16(c).
vlCity water will not be supplied for irrigation, City Compo
Plan, Policy 3C.3.4.
Water services of K copper must be used i~ either end of
service is under pavement, Sec. 26.33(b).
Fire hydrants shall be within 200' of all ~oints on every
commercial building, Appendix C, Art. X, Sec. 16.
Fire hydrant assemblies greater than 20' from the water main
require a second gate valve restrained to the main, Sec.
26.33(b).
Backflow preventors are required for certain uses, Sec.
26.107.
Unobstructed access to utility facilities must be provided,
Sec.26.33(a).
~12' min. easements for utilities are required, Appendix C,
Art. X, Sec. 6.
Sanitary sewer easements of twice the sewer main depth is
required, Sec. 26.33(b).
Sanitary sewer services must connect mains @ wyes, not
manholes, Sec. 26.33(b).
Design must prevent storm water or contaminates from
entering into sanitary sewer, Sec. 26.80.
A sanitary cleanout shall be installed at the property line,
Sec. 26 .33(b).
Sewer cleanouts shall be 75' maximum spacing, Standard
Plumbing Code.
Palm Beach Health Department permit may be required, Sec.
26.12. ~
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-200
TO:
Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
~~~
RE: The Club 25 - Condominiums
(Proposed site plan) - Cursory Review
DATE: May 4, 1993
1. The applicant must provide an approved permit from Palm Beach
County Environmental and Resources Management (E.R.M.) to do
any proposed construction on mangrove property. The
Intracoastal Waterway is under the jurisdiction of the Army
Corp. of Engineers for review of structures/mangroves.
Contact:
Barbara J. Conmy, Environmental Program, Supervisor, E.R.M.
#(407) 355-4011
Attached copy of permit application.
2. All existing trees on the site must be surveyed, identified
and made part of the site under the tree preservation
ordinance.
KH:ad
RECEIVED
MAY 5 1993
(])
M E M Q RAN DUM
Police No. 93-080
TO:
Christopher Cutro
Director Planning & Zoning
FROH:
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
REF:
The Club 25 Plan
DATE:
May 6, 1993
Sir,
I have reviewed the site plan submitted and I have the following
concerns:
1.
The drawing fails to show influence of the heavily traveled
intersection of S.E. 23rd Avenue. It is not a true layout of
the area.
")
Entry access is not sufficient for vehicles to line up for
gate. Very good possibility vehicles line up into roadway.
3.
please check with Engineering reference city ordinance that
states that driveways should be an X amount of feet from major
intersections.
I feel there are many areas of this in question.
HK/jb
RECE\\/ED
MAY 6 1993
(j)
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-203
RE:
Proposed Site
Planning & Zoning Dirjet r )
Parks Superintendent ,{~
Plan - The Club 25
"
TO:
Chris Cutro,
FROM:
John Wildner,
DATE:
May 4, 1993
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the proposed site
plan, The Club 25 - Condominiums. We foresee no significant.
problems. The applicant should be aware, however, that Appendix C
- subdivisions, platting art. IX, section 8 (con:erning recreation
impact land dedication) would apply to this proposed development.
JW:ad
\,~ T7('-"~~'''"l T~n
" ~,.. ~ .
.1.- 1~ ....; __.J...' J( . .1_1 t_..
! U'( .1
rLl.~lnl(I~J DEPT.
@)
May 10, 1993
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-105
To:
Chris Cutro
Planning Dir
Thru:
Don Jaeger
Building
From:
Al Newbol
Deputy Bldg. Official
RE:
COMMENTS - CLUB 25, PROPOSED SITE PLAN
The Building Department offers the following comments for
consideration based on the limited information on the submitted
plans for the above referenced project.
1. If there are three separate buildings, walls facing the six
foot (6') opening between the buildings must comply
with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code, 1991
Edition.
/2.
~.
The State Handicap code must be met, including placing the
handicap parking spaces as close to building entrances as
possible. Accessibility must be provided to all~oron
elements, such as pool and dock areas~ S' -/'1/ Ii
,
The parking shown needs to be increased to cover the pool
and docks. See.. J1. H. /lpofJlD/X ~ QIJ..) Me PIH~)(/Il/~ WRtJle;;;}) ,
rr LV rruiN 5'00 'OF rHlt ~.IJ,r UN)!
The building cannot exceed 45' in height.
4.
/5.
Landscaping is required adjacent to the parking area along
the north lot line.
6.
Gates require approval from the Police, Fire and Sanitation
Departments.
Note: Other comments may apply if we had additional information,
as required by the Site Plan Approval Ordinance, such as floor
plan and elevation detail.
CiV
~
A Newb d RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chrstopher Cutro, Planning and zoning Director
FROM:
Fire Department
5-S'-((3
DATE:
RE:
Site Plan Review - Major Site Plan Modification -
1st Review ~ 0
Proj ect: \..:- ~L{ D - Z--5'
The Fire Department has no objections concerning the
plans submitted for the above referenced project.
/('2 ': CaLd~~ /C
Will am D. Cavanaugh, FPO I
Fire Department Representative
C:FIRE.MSP
R"r::(""E.O, i\r=D
. ...' ..... L_.
MAY 5 1993
@
MEMORANDUM
TO: Christopher cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE: May 11, 1993
RE: Cursory Review - Potential Site Plan for Club 25
Condominiums
The following general comments are regarding a cursory review of
the above referenced site plan. Full review will be initiated upon
formal submittal of documents for site plan review.
.1.
The plan does not show the required handicapped parking spaces
and associated five (5) foot wide access ais~.
--
(' 2.
The landscaping does not comply with the requirements
specified in the Landscape Code or the Community Design Plan.
\/' 3.
The site is located in the coastal Village Design District,
therefore, the building and site shall comply with the coastal
Village design theme.
/4.
A Unity of Title combining both properties will be required.
(Obtain a Unity of Title form from the Building Department)
/17 ;I~
E. Haag
@
PUBLIC'WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-113
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Proposed Site Plan The Club 25 - Condominiums
DATE: May 6, 1993
..
The proposed site listed above does not show a turn around for
sanitation vehicles.
If you have any questions please give me a call.
~~
Public Works Director
REIer
//, i~" (', . ,
, L--. '( ~ I W \1 r, \'t.~)
--~ ..If. I:
J__
1\'( -,
"I
"
..
@
f'{ ;. ..
OJ'r 'f
" i l' ( ; : {
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-096
DATE:
Members of the Technical Review
(S~~~Distribution List Below)
~f~~~ Fo~
t?ristopher Cutro, Planning and
May 3, 1993
Committee
TO:
FROM:
Zonipg Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Site Plan The Club 25 - Condominiums
The proposed buyers of Gentleman Jim's Restaurant have asked for
a cursory review by the City of the attached plan for major
problems. I would ask that you review these plans and, if you
have major problems and concerns (i.e. poor intersection, poor
traffic circulation, emergency access, dumpster location, etc.)
please inform me in writing by May 7, 1993. If we do not hear
from you we will assume that you have no major problems and we
will instruct the applicant to go forward and submit for formal
site plan review.
If you have any questions regarding the plan, please feel free to
call me.
Distribution: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Mike Kazunas, Utilities Engineer
Richard Staudinger, City Engineer c/o Gee & Jenson
Vincent Finizio, Engineering Department
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
Robert Eichorst, public Works
Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
John Wildner, Parks & Recreation Department
CC:cp
Att.
A:93-096
w
MEMORANDUM
U~ilities No. 93-19b
TO: Christopher cutro,
Planning and Zoning
FROi1: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: May 5, 1993
SUBJECT: Club 25 condominiums a/k/a Gentleman Jim's Restaurant
/1.
Existing water mains may not provide sufficient fire
protection. Developer shall an~icipate the posslbility of
the upsizlng of water mains for fire protection.
~.
EXisting downstream lift stations may not have sufficient
reserve capacity to accept the proJect's sewer demands.
Developer shall anticipate the possibility of upsizing pumps
and controls at receiving lift stations.
/3.
Bac}~flow prevention on all water malns sha~l be anticipated.
Items 1 and 2 must be addressed at the time of site plan approval
to determine availability of water and sewer. Remaining comments
will be addressed at ~ime of construction drawings review in
conjunction with the Health Department Permit Application.
Attached for the applicant's use lS our General plan Review
Criteria. We recommend to expedite our reviews that the
appllcant contact this department to discuss his plans as they
become more concrete.
Provided for forwarding to the applicant are the existing ~later
and seW~l- locations drawn onto 1115 plan. Ii 11e has any questlons
he can contact Mr. Mike Kazunas a~ 738-7460.
/bl:s
Attachment
bc: Mike Kazunas
cc: Peter Mazzella
Mark Law
Skip Hilor
Brent Alien
1 hour Utility Engineer
.5 hr. Admlnistratlve Assistant
r" r' ........yr;r~\rn-r..
~ ~ n ~ .'} '_I;, oJ LJ
..t '".._,J.. 1"-..... oM .. .
'.
t 't ~ 1 .
1/;., '.
,-I n'I~;\~\\'\'" D~:,t)T.
\. \ .,
(l)
.n
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Christopher Cutro, Planning & ZOning"
w. Richard Staudinger, PE City En9i~C I~
Proposed Site Plan. The 25 Condominiums/Cursory Review,
Pre Submittal
................**.....**...t......*...................**....*...............**...**........**......
May 7, 1993
The propsed site plan for this condominium is generally acceptable with the fOllowing
comments:
~1.
~ 2.
.....:11"" 3.
4.
Q~
.
provide details on how emergency access roadway wilt be designed to prevent the
condominium owners from driving on it.
Provide adequate turn around oapabilltles for residents using parking lots.
Parding lot on north side appears to be very close to property line.
Lake Is assumed to be for stonnwater retention purposes. It is located at the
hi"hest point on the site. A pond or retention area will probably be required at the
east (low) end of the site.
~.
ProvIde trafflce study of entrance intersection.
:jer
93049
i
't..
@
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-116
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE: May 6, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
The Club 25 - Condominiums
Courtesy Review
The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
has reviewed the above referenced "conceptual plan" and herein
offer the following staff comments:
~. The gate at this site's ingress shall be situated a minimum of
100' east of the existing u.s. Highway #1 rights-of-way line.
0.
V3.
v4.
V 6.
V7.
Relocate dumpster locations to provide City Sanitation workers
with adequate backup dimensions free from obstructions such as
parked motor vehicles, raised continuous concrete curbing and
landscaping, etc.
The turning radius for the stabilized and sodded emergency access
aisles should be widened along the radii in order to provide for
the turning movements of large fire rescue vehicles and aerial
ladder trucks, etc.
The proposed lake is situated approximately 3D' from the edge
of u.S. Highway #1 travel lanes, therefore, a guardrail system
along the west side of the lake should be installed to minimize
the chance of errant vehicles entering this body of water. The
guardrail shall comply, reference materials and construction
standards, with FDOT specifications according to the latest edition
of the Highway and Bridge Construction Manual.
5.
The applicant should be advised that the construction of rip-rap
reventment and the proposed construction of a dock within the
Intracoastal Waterway requires requisite governmental agency
approval and permits for construction upon submerged lands.
Should the applicant desire to move forward with this project,
applications shall be made to the Department of Natural Resources
and Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources
Management, including, but not limited to the United States Army
Corp. of Engineers (if applicable).
The pedestrian concrete sidewalk system situated within u.S.
Highway #1 rights-of-way shall be extended thru the main ingress/
egress area and be transitioned so as to facilitate the movement
of handicapped individuals within the public rights-of-way.
The submitted plan is devoid of site lighting, specifically the
perimeter post mounted lighting required by Chapter 5, Section
5-l42(a) (b), "Required Parking Lot Lighting" and "Required
Pedestrian Walkway Lighting", including associated standards set
forth in the parking lot ordinance appendix.
8.
Excavation of the proposed lake will require the City Engineer's
review and the applicant's compliance with Chapter 8, "Excavation
and Fill Regulations", prior to the matter being placed before
the City Commission for their review, consideration and final
dispositon as required by City of Boynton Beach, Florida Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 8, "Excavation and Fill".
@
TRC Comments/The Club 25 - Condominiums
May 6, 1993
Page #2
9. Modification to the existing ingress/egress area shall require
the approval of the State of Florida Department of Transportation,
reference construction within the public rights-of-way under the
jurisdiction of the State.
\l.. ~ (',~ .,~~-L '~~-'
vincent A. Finizio
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
w. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer
GJ
MEMORANDUM
TO: Utility utaff
FROM: Mike Kazunas.
Utility Engineer
DATE: March 25. 1993
SUBJECT: General Plan Review Criteria
The following design standards apply to most plan reviews. The
appropriate regulation or reference source is provided for your
use.
Plan shall show location of all utility easements. Sec.
26.33(a).
Plan shall show size and type of utility pipes, Sec.
26.16(a).
No structures shall be allowed in utility easements. App. C,
Art. VIII. Sec. 9.
Sewer services shall be constructed with max. 300 slopes
. 0
lnto service wyes, 10 preferable, Sec. 26.33(b).
Swabbing shall be performed on all new water mains.
Se c. 26.33 ( b ) .
The water system shall be designed to provide fire flows of:
500 gpm @20 psi, residential
1500 gpm @20 psi, commercial
Appendix C, Art. X, Sec. 16.
Plan s ha 11 specify meter size and location, Sec. 26.16(c).
Location of the water meter is not allowed in pavements or
sidewalk, Sec. 26.16(c).
vlCity water will not be supplied for irrigation, City Compo
Plan. Policy 3C.3.4.
Water services of K copper must be used i~ either end of
service is under pavement. Sec. 26.33(b).
Fire hydrants shall be within 200' of all ~oints on every
commercial building. Appendix C, Art. X, Sec. 16.
Fire hydrant assemblies greater than 20' from the water main
require a second gate valve restrained to the main, Sec.
26.33(b).
Backflow preventors are required for certain uses, Sec.
26.107.
Unobstructed access to utility facilities must be provided,
Sec.26.33(a).
~12' min. easements for utilities are required, Appendix C,
Art. X, Sec. 6.
Sanitary sewer easements of twice the sewer main depth is
r e qu ire d, Sec. 2 6 . 3 3 ( b ) .
Sanitary sewer services must connect mains @ wyes. not
manholes. Sec. 26.33(b).
Design must prevent storm water or contaminates from
entering into sanitary sewer. Sec. 26.80.
A sanitary cleanout shall be installed at the property line,
Sec. 26 .33{b).
Sewer cleanouts shall be 75' maximum spacirg, Standard
Plumbing Code.
Palm Beach Health Department permit may be required, Sec.
26.12. ((;;)
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-200
TO:
Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
~~~
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environme~talist
RE: The Club 25 - Condominiums
(Proposed site plan) - Cursory Review
DATE: May 4, 1993
1. The applicant must provide an approved permit from Palm Beach
County Environmental and Resources Management (E.R.M.) to do
any proposed construction on mangrove property. The
Intracoastal Waterway is under the jurisdiction of the Army
Corp. of Engineers for review of structures/mangroves.
Contact:
Barbara J. Conmy, Environmental Program, Supervisor, E.R.M.
#(407) 355-4011
Attached copy of permit application.
2. All existing trees on the site must be surveyed, identified
and made part of the site under the tree preservation
ordinance.
KH:ad
RECEIVED
MAY 5 1993
@J
M E M 0 RAN DUM
Police No. 93-080
'1'0:
Christopher Cutro
Director Planning & Zoning
FROt-!:
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
REF:
The Club 25 plan
DATE:
May 6, 1993
Sir,
I have reviewed the site plan submitted and I have the following
concerns:
1.
The drawing fails to show influence of the heavily traveled
intersection of S.E. 23rd Avenue. It is not a true layout of
the area.
")
Entry access is not sufficient for vehicles to line up for
gate. Very good possibility vehicles line up into roadway.
3 .
Please check with Engineering reference city ordinance that
states that driveways should be an X amount of feet from major
intersections.
I feel there are many areas of this in question.
HK/jb
RECE\\/ED
MAY 6 1993
(j)
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-203
RE:
Proposed Site
Planning & Zoning Dire]t r )
Parks Superintendent {~
Plan - The Club 25
...
TO:
Chris Cutro,
FROM:
John Wildner,
DATE:
May 4, 1993
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the proposed site
plan, The Club 25 - Condominiums. ''Ie foresee no significant.
problems. The applicant should be aware, however, that Appendix C
- subdivisions, platting art. IX, section 8 (con~erning recreation
impact land dedication) would apply to this proposed development.
JW:ad
\. ,~ T", (-"~7'lf,"\ T"'iD
' , . ~ l " ~ .
.L". '..> .J...' Jt 'i ..I_I t__
I UY .1
PLAtH 1I ~lG DEPT.
@)
To:
Thru:
From:
RE:
May 10, 1993
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-105
Chris Cutro
Planning Dir ctor
Don Jaeger
Building
Al Newbol
Deputy Bldg. Official
COMMENTS - CLUB 25, PROPOSED SITE PLAN
The Building Department offers the following comments for
consideration based on the limited information on the submitted
plans for the above referenced project.
1. If there are three separate buildings, walls facing the six
foot (6') opening between the buildings mUSL comply
with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code, 1991
Edition.
/'2.
~.
4.
!' 5.
6.
The State Handicap code must be met, including placing the
handicap parking spaces as close to building entrances as
possible. Accessibility must be provided to all~9jon
elements, such as pool and dock areas~5'-JlII ~
r
The parking shown needs to be increased to cover the pool
and docks. 5~c.. JJ. H. flpof~1)/,1. t5 01..) /IJ~ PINO(IIVG-' ~RVJ,trEj) ,
rr LV rr'HiAl 5"00 lOr m/ft J..IJ'''- v,NJi
The building cannot exceed 45' in height.
Landscaping is required adjacent to the parking area along
the north lot line.
Gates require approval from the Police, Fire and Sanitation
Departments.
Note: Other comments may apply if we had additional information,
as required by the Site Plan Approval Ordinance, such as floor
plan and elevation detail.
@
~
A Newb d RECEIVED
MAY t 0 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chrstopher cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Fire Department
5- '5'- q:s
DATE:
RE:
site Plan Review - Major Site plan Modification -
1st Review n .0 7 c-
Proj ect : 1...:_ t....-Gt 0 - .:.---)
The Fire Department has no obj ections concerning the
plans submitted for the above referenced project.
/(2',; Ca{d~~./C
Will am D. Cavanaugh, FPO I
Fire Department Representative
C:FIRE.MSP
qr.=r;E'''I~\r=D
r"~ . ... .... L_ .
MAY 5 1993
@
MEMORANDUM
TO: Christopher cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE: May 11, 1993
RE: cursory Review - Potential site Plan for Club 25
Condominiums
The following general comments are regarding a cursory review of
the above referenced site plan. Full review will be initiated upon
formal submittal of documents for site plan review.
-':1.
The plan does not show the required handicapped parking spaces
and associated five (5) foot wide access aisle.
------- --- ---,..
I' 2.
The landscaping does not comply with the requirements
specified in the Landscape Code or the Community Design Plan.
\/ .3 .
The site is located in the Coastal Village Design District,
therefore, the building and site shall comply with the Coastal
village design theme.
/4.
A Unity of Title combining both properties will be required.
(Obtain a Unity of Title form from the Building Department)
E. Haag
@
PUBLIC'WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-113
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Proposed Site Plan The Club 25 - Condominiums
DATE: May 6, 1993
..
The proposed site listed above does not show f' turn around for
sanitation vehicles.
If you have any questions please give me a call.
~~
Public Works Director
REier
.1/ i~\"'" ,
L'H"_" _,~? ~ 1 \ I {;'F)
-'--
II-Vi
"
-4
@
f'1' ,
.,': ;,
" i l' ( ; {
rrne City of
$oynton $eacfi
100 'E. flJoynton flJeadi flJouhvara
P.O. flJo~310
flJoynton flJeadi, '.Jforida. 33425-0310
City 1fa[[: (4Q7) 375-6000
1'JtX: (4Q7) 375-6090
, ,
l' ~.
December 3, 1993
, ,
Dale Meaux, Architect
7860 Glades Road suite 225
Boca Raton, Florida, 33434
~. ,.
~ -,. \.
(:,i
, \ 1
\': r
\ ")
"
.{! "
t ' ."
RE: Initial Review Comments - Club 55
File No. 789
Mr. Meaux:
The city of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the
documents submitted for the above referenced project. Attached are
comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial
review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and
documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90
'days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not
submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When
there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not
applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed
separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the
comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment
stating why the comment is not applicable and return the
explanation with the amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12)
complete sets (inc~uding surveys) of the plans to the Planning and
zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been
submi tted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be
distributed to the reviewing departments for a second review and
the reviewers will recommend if the site plan will be placed on a
board meeting agenda for approval (see attached meeting schedule).
If there are major comments not addressed by new plans or the
reviewers recommend that the plan not be forwarded through the
approval schedule, this office will notify you of your alternatives
regarding the site plan as soon as possible.
@
.9lmerit:a s (jateway to tlU (julfstream
To: Mr. Meaux
Re: Initial Review Comments, File No.: 789
Page 2 of 2
We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and
a checklist that contains information regarding the second
submission of the plans and documents for review.
If you should have any questions regarding the comments or on the
approval schedule, please feel free to call Michael E. Haag who is
coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and
Zoning Department.
Yours truly,
-,:. 'f.lko
F"DR.
a ri J. Heyden
cting Planning & Zoning Director
CC:ald
Attachments
XC: Central File
Chron. File
Project File
A: INTLCOM . SP
@
SITE PLAN REVIEW
BOARD APPROVAL SCHEDULE
1993
*original Amended city
Submittal plans P & D ccmmission
Deadline Deadline Meetinq Meetinq
May 10 Jun 22 Jul 13 Jul 20
Jun 3 Jul 20 Aug 10 Aug 17
Jul 9 Aug 23 sep 14 Sep 21
Aug 6 sep 21 Oct 12 Oct 19
sep 3 Oct 19 Nov 9 Nov 16
Oct 6 Nov 19 Dee 14 Dee 21
Oct 29 ~ Dee 16 Jan 11 Jan 18
* P&D = Planning & Development Board
CC = city Commission
@
CHECKLIST
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that
the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for
review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will
enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the
Planning and Zoning Department.
Project Name:
club 55
1. Submit an amended Site plan Review/Conditional Use application form that
reflects the change~ that were made as a result of amending the plans and
documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review
Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a distinguishable
symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form
wi th the changes identi f ied. I f there are no changes required to be
documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating
same must be turned in with the amended submittal.
2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents,
including surveys tl1at show compliance with the code of ordinances and
comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets shall
have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer
responsible for the drawing(s). plans and documents shall be assembled in
twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the project on
all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically numbered such
as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3.
3. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain
in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are
located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property. The
minimum size is 5" by 7". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the
location of the existing structures with respect to the location of the
proposed project.
4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all
drawings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and signage
associated with the project. The colored elevation views shall match the
elevations shown in the documents that were submitted for site plan
review. The applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be
colored with the color name and associated color reference number
identified. The type of exterior surface material shall be identified next
to the associated color. The colored elevation drawings shall have compass
direction or title of the side of the building identified. The title block
of the original dra'tllng shall be shown. The maximum size is 24" by 36". Do
no submit on board of any kind.
5. submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample
shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name and
numerical/letter code from an established color chart.
6. submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to
be used on an overhead projector at board meetings.
@
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
Michael E. Haa~~
Site and zonin~_D~lopment Administrator
December 3, 1993
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Agent:
File No. :
Review - 1st Review
club 55
2404 South Federal Highway
Dale Meaux, Architect
789
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the Site
plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It
should be noted that the comments are divided into three (3)
categories; the first category is a list of comments that
identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected and shown
in compliance on the plans submitted for second (2nd) review in
order for the project to continue through the site plan review
process. The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that
the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the
proposed development. The third set of comments is a list of
deficiencies that are shown on the plans regarding technical
compliance and shall be corrected and shown in compliance on the
permit set of plans prior to issuance of permits for the
development of the project. The applicant shall understand that
all documents/plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review
are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the
applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the
comments. If the applicant is not intendlng to correct code
deficiencies they should contact me regarding the procedures,
application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking
relief from the code requirement.
I. Site Plan Review Comments:
1. The site data indicates that there is a building coverage of
17,759 sq. ft. and a total coverage of 72,709 sq. ft. Amend
the drawing to identify the total footprint coverage of each
story and the total gross floor area of the entire building.
Also, identify whether the floor areas include balconies,
walkways, elevator shafts, electrical & mechanical rooms,
storage rooms, etc.
2. Add to the drawings a typical unit plan of the west end unit
and the east end unit. Also identify the floor area and
overall dimensions of each unit.
3. Add to the unit plan drawing found on the site plan, the
overall dimensions and square foot floor area of the unit.
,.(_0'''-..
1
4. ,:
The 1.43 acre portion of the total 3.48 acre site that is
zoned C-3 shows a total of 19 units. This number exceeds
the allowed density of 10.8 units per acre as specified in
Appendix A Zoning Section 6 C. 1. j. and section 5 G. Amend
the plans to show no more than the maximum allowed density
for the C-3 zoned property. Maximum density allowed for the
1.43 acre C-3 property is 15 units.
,
. - ..--//~
@
CLUB 55 - 1ST REVIEW
PAGE 2
(S::.~)
, /1'
6.
7.
8 .
9.
10.
/)
12./
: .,./
,'----...-...---,,/
omit the reference on the site plan regarding the bonus
density being applied to the .20 acre piece of property.
The Future Land Use Map shows the bonus density applying
only to the 1.80 acre portion of the 2 acre site.
Add to the drawing a cut-away section and plan view drawing
of the mechan~cal and roof access tower. The City height
limitations allows, with application and city approval,
certain appurtenances to exceed the maximum height of 45
feet. It appears that the mechanical and roof access tower
is not an appurtenance that would be allowed to exceed the
45 feet limitation. Amend the plans accordingly. [Appendix
A-Zoning Section 4 F.]
Add to the drawing an elevation view and floor plan drawing
of the gate house.
Dimension the overall size of the pool(s) and identify the
total area. Also dimension the pool pavilion and identify
the total gross floor area.
Amend the site data, regarding number of required parking
spaces. show on the plan the code specified parking ratios.
Appendix A-zoning Section 11 H. 16. a. (3) and e. (1), (12)
(e.) identifies the required parking space ratios. [Note
the code specifies that the number of spaces required for
the pool may be reduced by seventy-five (75) percent.]
Add to the drawing a detailed plan and section view drawing
of the dumpster enclosure. Include the following:
a) Type of wall material.
b) Exterior finish material and color of same.
c) overall height of walls.
d) Overall width and length of enclosure.
NOTE: A minimum of ten (10) feet clear opening width is
required. Clear opening width shall be measured and shown
from inside of gate and post mater1al. specify in note form
the method of holding the gates in the open and closed
position.
11.
Show on the site plan, paving and drainage plan, and
landscape plan, the location of the City standard curbing as
specified in section 5-142 (e) of Article X Parking Lots.
show on the site plan a forty (40) foot setback/yard from
the edge of the portion of the building that is located on
the C-3 zoned property to the R-3 zoning district line.
Also show a forty (40) foot setback/yard from the C-3 zoning
district line to the edge of the building on the R-3 zoned
property. [APpendix A-Zoning Section 5 G.2. and section 6
C. 1. j.] Note: This issue is being reviewed by the City
Attorney.
, \
13.1 show on the site plan a buffer wall that is l-equired where
/ the C-3 commercial zoned property abuts the R-3 residential
zoned property. [Appendix A-Zoning Section 4 L]
14. Add to the drawing a dimensioned typical section and
elevation view drawing of the item shown on the landscape
plan with a heavy dark line located on each side of the
driveway entrance. Add the structure to the site plan and
drainage drawings.
(0)
CLUB 55 - 1ST REVIEW
PAGE 3
15. Show and label on the site plan the location and type of
site signage proposed for the project. Also, show on the
elevation view drawings of the building, the location of any
proposed wall signage. Note that the wall and site signage
shall comply with the Sign Code. It appears as though there
are two signs shown on Sheet L1. Clarify and provide the
following additional sign information: type of sign, color,
width, length, height, configuration. Dimension the
location of the site sign(s) from two adjacent property
lines. [Sign Code Section 21-21.]
16. Add to the site data the number of stories contained in the
proposed residential structure.
.-:;:~~'-:-,
//' 'j
,/17//' The Coastal Management element of the Comprehensive Plan
iJ/ states that the south setback for the subject property that
contains a four (4) story building shall be 100 feet. The
drawing depicts a four (4) story building located 92.75 feet
setback from the south property line. The single story pool
pavilion structure shall be setback forty (40) feet from the
south property line and 150 feet from the shoreline. Amend
the plans accordingly. [Comprehensive Plan Policy 7.9.6.]
/., )
(18~/ The Coastal Management element of the Comprehensive Plan
',~~ states that the east setback for the subject property shall
be 150 feet from the shoreline. This site is an "A" rated
ecosystem which receives top priority by the City
Comprehensive Plan to ensure maximum preservation of
mangroves. Such sites are addressed by the following
Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.11.1., 1.11.14., 4.3.5. and
4.3.1. Preservation of this area is justified by data
analysis within the Conservation Support Documents (page 24
& 37) and the Future Land Use Support Documents (page 49).
Amend the plans accordingly to include removal of all
structures, future docks, natural stone wall, pool, pool
deck, landscaping, sidewalk, and stabilized fire lane in
this area.
19. To properly evaluate whether the "fiber cement siding"
complies with the required wall specifications listed in the
Community Design Plan for the Coastal Village design theme,
add to the sheet depicting the elevation views a detailed
section view and partial elevation view of the proposed
material. [Appendix II (a) Artlcle V Chapter 7.5 City code
of Ordinances]
20. Specify on the plan what type of material is proposed for
the pool deck.
21. Correct the inconsistency regarding the location and
configuration of the sidewalk, adJacent to the pool, shown
on Sheet L3 alld all other plans.
22. The plan is void of the visual screening hedge material
required along the perimeter of east vehicle use area.
Correct the plans accordingly. [Landscape code Section 7.5-
35 (e)]
23. The spacing of the required visual screening hedge material
along the south side of the south vehicle use area exceeds
the code required spacing. The plans indicate the proposed
MYR2 (Wax Myrtle) hedge material is spaced five (5) feet on
center. The code specifies a maximum spacing of twenty-four
(24) inches on center. Correct the plans accordingly.
[Landscape code Section 7.5-35 (e)]
24. Add to the landscape plan foundation landscape material
along the east and west sides of the building. [Landscape
Code Section 7.5-35 (1)]
rY
25.
CLUB 55 - 1ST REVIEW
PAGE 4
26.
27.
II.
"")
"
:' 1
\. ...., "",,~<'.<""
Show and dimension on the landscape plan the ten (10) foot
isosceles right triangles that are required on both sides of
the ingress and egress median. These triangles form the
cross visibility triangles. Place a note on the plan that
specifies "Landscape material placed within the triangular
areas shall be installed and maintained to allow an
unobstructed cross visibility between thirty (30) inches and
six (6) feet above the driveway surface. (Landscape Code
Section 7.5-35 (h)]
A tree and environmental survey is required for the project.
Submit the su~vey to Kevin Hallahan, City Forester/
Environmentalist and the Planning and Zoning Department.
[Article IV of Chapter 7.5]
The traffic impact analysis for the subject property was
forwarded to Palm Beach County for review for compliance
with the Traffic Performance Standards. The results of
their review and the City evaluation of same must be on
record with the City prior to the site plan being forwarded
for Board approval.
Recommendation(s) :
Recommend C-3 portion of site be rezoned to R-3 and unified
by title with the present R-3 zoned property, to eliminate
problems created as a result of the existence of this
commercial zoning district. (Comments #12 and #13.)
This rezoning would also require an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use Element (Map)) which
could be accomplished concurrently with the rezoning, and
with the same application.
since the subject property is less than 10 acres, it
qualifies for the "small-scale" plan amendment procedures as
established in Florida law. This abbreviated amendment
procedure allows the amendment to be adopted by the City
prior to State review. After acceptance of an application,
the process can be completed within three (3) months. The
rezoning process would not change the maximum dwelling units
per acre (density) allowed on that portion of the site
located outside of the bonus density area. Requesting the
bonus density of twenty (20) units per acre for the entire
3.48 acre site would require a "large scale" amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan and would take approximately nine (9)
months to one (1) year.
III. Permit Comments:
1. The plans submitted for a landscape permit shall show the
computations to verify that the landscaping required for
code Section 7.5-35 (g) and (k) are accounted for on the
plans. A distinguishable symbol shall be used to show on
the plans where the code required landscaping is located.
2. Prior to the issuance of a permit to construct the building,
submit for review a Unity of Title that identifies the two
lots combined. A Unity of Title form may be obtained from
the Building Department. Note: Following review approval
from the City and prior to issuance of building permits, the
Unity of Title shall be recorded with Palm Beach County and
a recorded copy submitted to the City.
3. The permit documents shall be reviewed for technical
compliance with City codes.
MEH/jm
A:CLUB55-1.JM
(iJ
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-254
TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - Club 55
DATE: November 17, 1993
The dumpster location at the above site is fine, however Public
Works prefers a direct approach from the north at this location.
REier
ill
muw. &fnl
I H" lE),
j!l i/
@J
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-335
TO: Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
James D. White,
City Engineer
: .On lJ
P.E/, "
~
,/
DATE: November 9, 1993
RE: Club 55 Condominium Site Plan - First Review
City Engineer's Comments
Engineering has the following comments on this plan submittal.
Sheet - Site Plan
1. Provide stop sign, stop bar at exit. Provide entrance/exit
signs at u.S. Hwy. #1, directional arrow pavement markings in
circulation area of parking, 4" line in center of entrance/exit
turn arrows. Section 5-l42(c).
2. Provide lighting plan for parking area and pedestrian walks.
Section 5-l42(b).
3. Provide minimum 25' radii for driveway cuts at u.S. Hwy. #1.
4. Provide cross section on detail of stabilized and sodded
emergency access.
Sheet #Cl
1. Provide stormwater calculations, assumptions, soils data
supporting percolation calculations, calculations and elevations,
cross sections, contours, etc. showing retention storage volume.
Section 5-l42(f).
2. Show curb cuts to retention sites.
3. Provide top elevation of stone wall.
4. Show roof drain locations.
5. The finish floor elevation is same as, or lower, than top of
curb, walks immediately in front of buildings should be higher.
Deputy City Engineer's Comments
1.
Provide "Letter of Intent" from F.D.O.T. authorizing modifications
to existing ingress/egress approach.
riP
rn
, "fO't1
un c-
PI ANIiUNr. AND
00
Engineering Dept. Memo. No. 93-335
November 9, 1993
Page #2
2. Sidewalks shall be constructed to provide handicap access from
handicap parking stalls to the pool pavilion and swimming pool.
Site plan and Sheet C-l conflict. Revise plans accordingly.
3. Owner to coordinate with City Forester, reference landscaping
of median within Federal Highway rights-of-way.
4. Plans shall contain a notation that the abandoned ingress/egress
approach (SW cJrner of property) will be demolished and a standard
F.D.O.T. approved sidewalk/curb and gutter be constructed in its
place (see area designated as ramp).
5. Place notation on plans that Palm Beach County D.E.R.M. permit(s)
on exemption is required for future construction of dock(s) and
natural stone wall, including City permits if approved by Palm
Beach County, prior to commencement of construction.
6. D.E.R.M. permits required to discharge into off-site and on-site
Mangrove areas, including a variance to the City's Parking Lot
Regulations which requires the retention of stormwater on-site,
should the Developer utilize the existing 48' RCP or desire to
sheet flow into the Mangrove area.
L.l:- - -ot- Do.:-=t .~
Vincent A. Finizio
JDW:VAF/ck
xc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
@
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-354
FROM:
Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Office of the City Engineer 11, .
. ." Ie
James D. Whlte, P.E., Clty Englneer
TO:
DATE:
December 1, 1993
RE:
Technical Review Committee Comments
Club 55
Planning Department File No. 789
Pursuant to discussions which ensued during the November 30, 1993
Technical Review Committee meeting, the applicant is hereby granted
a favorable recommendation for exception to platting regulations
by the City Engineer's Office conditioned upon the developer's
payment of fee in lieu of land dedication pursuant to Appendix "C",
Subdivision and Platting Regulations. The developer shall submit
data which represents the fair market value of the subject parcel
on a per acre basis for usage in calculating applicable fees.
Conditions of approval set forth in this office's prior Memorandum
No. 93-335 shall remain a condition of approval (memo previously
transmitted to Planning Department) .
~J~' -r A ~y
Vincent A. Finizio (
JDW:VAF/ck
xc:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
rn ~ ~ \\ ~i] ~
ill
DEe 2 1993
<:..
w
PLANNING ANI)
ZONING DEPT.
/7\
/ ;)1;; J
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-354
(SUPPLEMENT)
TO: Tambri Heyden December 6, 1993
Acting Planning Director I
FROM: Office o~ the City Ez:gineer. J~UI
James Wh~te, P.E., C~ty Eng~nee~/
{/
RE: Supplement to Engineering Department Memo No. 93-354
Club 55 - Exemption to Platting Regulations
Please be advised that Platting is required and that the applicant
shall be responsible to submit a formal application for exemption
which shall include an appropriate filing fee in the amount of
four hundred ($400.00) dollars, prior to this Department rendering
a formal approval on the written request for exemption.
Should you require any additional information, please contact the
undersigned at extension 6282.
cc: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
~A~cr
VAFjJWjvaf
John Wildner
Parks Superintendent
~7
'"
To:
Via:
From:
Re:
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-235
November 29, 1993
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Of
TRC COMMENTS - Major Site Plan Modification
Club 55 - 2404 S. FEDERAL HWY.
After review of the plans for the proposed project, the Building
Department offers the following comments:
AN: mh
A:CLUB55.TRC
1.
The floor plan reveals 14 units each on four floors
which totals 56 units. Please explain why the site
plan data sheet shows 55 units.
2.
The maximum height for all structures is 45'. Please
review the north and west elevations and comply with
this requirement.
3.
Plans should show handicap ramps and access from the
walkways to the building entrances and to all site
amenities, including docks.
4.
The building should comply with Table IV for Type 5
construction minimum.
5.
Signage for this project is not addressed.
6.
The survey shows the building encroaching on the 40'
easement.
7.
All existing curb cuts should be brought back to
standards if they have no continued use.
A~V
/
ill
~@~ow~
-
00'
c.....
0J
FlEE CEPARTHEN'l' HEHORJl.NDUH 1-10. 93-::'89 \iDe
'l'C) :
P 1 alllllng and ZOinng Depal' t1l1en t
FHQi".:
tile Depa.rtment
D ;'.'1" E :
Kovemb8~ 23, 199~
3ULJECT: S=TE PLAN
Club ~J 5
24U4 3, F~deLa~ Hi0hway
nilS 1)16.n hctS i)2t~n .lev lEVied and. found dccl=ptable.
III 1,'iU' \iitW tbis p~all I1lay be f(ll"viarjed.
~~~-~~---
HILLIJl.H D. CAVANAUGH FPO I
BOYNTON BEA~H ~IRE DEPARTMENT
HLIC: C1)
@)
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-481
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden,
Acting Planning & 20
Director
FROM:
John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
Ik-
DATE: November 16, 1993
SUBJECT: Club 55 Condominiums
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments:
1. Palm Beach Health Department permits for water and
sanitary sewer will be required (Sec. 26-12).
2. Developer will be allowed an irrigation water meter but
will be required to pay cap fees based on project
demand.
3, Proposed fire line, water main on site with fire
hydrants, and sanitary sewer mains to be owned and
maintained by the City of Boynton Beach Utility
Department and located in acceptable utility easements
dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach (Sec. 26.33(a),
Appendix C, Art, X, Sec. 6, Sec. 26.33[b]).
4. Suitable backflow preventors will be required on the
private fire lines and the domestic water service
Sec. 26.107),
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review
process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact
Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
19b
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
rn
iUN I " .-
C
00
if)
HEMORANDUM
POLICE f93-178
'rG:
l'ambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
sgt. M. Kirrman
DATE:
November 12, 1993
REF:
Club 55 - 2404 South Federal Highway
Ms. Heyden,
I have reviewed the submitted plans and have the following
comments:
1. Sugqest a "Caution Intersection" sign at entrance/exi 1: to U. S.
1 ;
2. 'l'raffic flow arrows at entrance/exit continuing into and
throughout the parking lot;
3. Pedestrian cross walk - stop bars indicating light trip in
roadway;
4. Farking lot and outside security building lights;
5. Indication of building and apartment addresses.
7
j~i it1(. [lJiJLt{wucf!
~1rrman {
MK/jb
(;]O)
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '93-500
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks superintendent;.,~
Club 55 Condominiums - New Site Pl
,
TO:
RE:
DATE:
December 2, 1993
Further review of the Club 55 Condominium site plan indicates
that this project will be subject to the recreation element of
the subdivision regulations. As such, the following comments are
submitted:
1. Based on 55 multi-family dwelling units, the recreation
dedication requirement is determined to be:
55 D.U. X .0150 acres = .825 acres
2. Assuming the developer does not apply for one-half credit
for private recreation, the City elects to accept payment of
a fee in lieu of land.
3. Amount of the fee is to be determined by fair market value
of the land in the proposed development
JW:ad
~
I ,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tambri Heyden, Acting Pla~ning & Zoning irector
DATE:
II--Ie; -q3
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
RE:
Site Plan Review - Major Site Plan Modification -
1st Review
Project:
CLvr.B
55-
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced proj ect. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
'V
g:
4t .,..l-7~.J
d ~~~- ;j;
~(;.~ tJt?-j
~
m
lit IV '9 ~
c....-
m
C:PARKS.MSP
r;;)
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '93-460
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist fz2t~
Club 55 - Major Site Plan Modification
TO:
RE:
DATE:
November 9, 1993
This memorandum is in reference to the existing mangrove trees
and other desirable trees throughout the site.
1. The existing mangrove trees are protected by the State of
Florida under the auspices of Palm Beach County
Environmental Resources Management Department. The
applicant must submit written approval from this agency to
develop near the mangroves. The site plan indicates surface
drainage into the mangrove area which must be approved by
this agency.
2. There are existing trees on the site around the perimeter of
the restaurant and on the vacant portion of the area east of
the existing paved location. These trees in total should be
indicated on the tree survey and addressed as part of the
Tree Management Plan. The desirable existing trees include:
Seagrape, Sabal Palms and Banyan. The undesirable existing
trees to be removed include: Florida Holly, australian Pine
and Earleaf Acacia. These trees which exist inside the
mangrove stands must be removed by hand rather than
machinery during the clearing process. The project can
proceed as scheduled in your memorandum.
KH:ad
m
BWM~
f!IN
'.
@
-- " ''\
y)
<' '
, ! ~A /V1v "
\ LJ rr'/"-
, (J.,,"
. .-<
.,.------.-----
= __::;::; .Ii-J
.. -' -
- ...., ~ ~
.. ,
-
..,
. ~
- ~~
at1J
&U:.ijp
- ' -
- .
.; - __0 ,...
." - {ijjj)
'l~ ~ ~ tJAu... (~ - 1'; r ~~
~ t-1F
-J
(~ m1f/~
j - ktv~~fL-IJ-
,~ A--r, 0 A IJ! d tf-~ ~I -'
() JA-.:I- L/ ~v7 eP - A1 d/J I ~./~.r ,-II
~ ~ ~ ~ a,~U-;C
..
~/J~ = A tlUJUL ~ ~~ ~ tv
~~1I;yr---ff!L ~
- ~~ ~ drJ {~~1
~S ~4
___ ~: /t/~4 t?- Flf?~
d /Ptt;J1-r:-t-L /)vJ'ic (zC?L f'7'- ,y/'-c 'u;. H 0/1! .". t L//',.{:. (?
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-310
TO: Jim Cherof, City Attorney
FROM:
Tarnbri J. Heyden, Acting Planning '/Q J
and Zoning Director tI
DATE: December 6, 1993
SUBJECT: Zoning Code interpretation - Zoning line vs.
property line
As discussed with you by phone today, please provide your op~n~on
regarding whether a building can be constructed over a zoning
district line. The zoning district line in question is a boundary
between a residential zoning district and a commercial zoning
district and normally would require a buffer wall and setbacks.
However, since the applicant has extinguished the interior property
line that coincided with the zoning line and is proposing a
building encroaching the zoning line, is this a zoning code
violation that would require unifying the zoning on the property?
Please refer to Section 3.A.5.g. of the Zoning Code.
TJH/cmc
c:zonecode
t;g\
(...- .'
~
u
.
>
a! ~
;:l
- 0
J: ::t
..
.. .0
..
:I 0
U ~
.....- 00
(. ~ III .0
., .,
.. ..
<!
-
'1;
C.,Q.
~ '" III
~::l~
.
.
'"
J:
~
~
..
"Q
~
J:
~
U
J:
DC
Wi
..
Q
"Q
J:
III
.. III
'"
;:l
'1;
C
III
~
..
..
=
:I
~
CoI
C
c:;
..
Q.
~
..
-
ij5
~
..
:c
~
"Q
::OC
~ J:
g.C 0
..Q U
=..N =..
~
oc _~
_.5 .... a:
.!!J: _
M~ r.-.
~N U
..
"QIIl
..;:l
'" ..
~ ..
a..:::s
Q-
.. :::s
=.."'-
r,
~ S,-\C- ~~)(':~~\~~'N'- ~
. ~,c: I c:......(
\c<'-~---"O"i'L \,l"<
j
-
III
..
..
'a
Vi
J:
~
U
it Iii io "B l5 l5 ~ "B io ~ ~ >; ~ Meld c 'E ~ ~ iii :l g ~ ~ E'S 'E
o 0 - - - .... - ._ U lIS ._ :I':'" .- 0 U III
= .0 '0 0- u C. '-e !; ~ 0" :....-_ ~ t: ,.::: "C s:: ~ Q "u" e" >
< = - ~ U ::s 3 Z .- u':: ::s ~ .:: u u - a:l ... DO > u
..g<ll~ ... ... ~~e ct~~ ... u:~ 1(:2~U e-;goOe]
>. ' .. U .0 -E - u._ = 0 J: U '-e III _ U e _
c u ~ '0 'i) U U) ~.5 0 e.o DO ... .- - g e _ .8 "5 ~ e a:l
o u.... U III '" e. ::s ::s.S - J: 0 0 .. ::s _ . 111 u .c
- ;.s.o o' 0 DO iii iii -5 "C U III ~ '"' .- - N 0 eo..... "C ~ "C J: u
u c. ~ ~ C .- .c .- .. c::S ..... '" - u . ::s.o 0 u 0 <II
~-5~g - - j~:ig~l~ w ~~DO~ ]J: i~~i~
c. ::S': ~ ~ ~ I( e ~ :2 U 0..;., <II ; '1::... ...s '" >. s:: I(.!!.~ ._ -;:: g U C
o "'._ U E >. III.c e ii . 0 c: ($ - U . ~ '" - _"C DO 0
,€"'u"'u" !l !l EOt:e~..iiiC. ..1 u-2-~~~uij ~u"..~c
c: ClO 'c'c U U - U - E ... - DO '" U "C C - - s:: 0 >.
g 0 ~ go ::s ::s .g 0 go ~ e ($ 5 ~ ~ ~ is f.!::: ~ u e. ~.- ~ 5 ~ U "B ~
ODO ct ~ ~..~::s>.._ uu.o g..u_.._..u e..>:
... C"C U. - ~ c. ~'2 - - <II .c .c::: U) 8".5 OC oS! .~ ~ ~ e u 0 0 e ..:.
.. .-.-. U) ~ u . J: '" 0 -. III U - ill U -.c u -
~~~~ "B <llIII~~18!.o SS~ a:e.s~U.~M.c.c ~III_~~
~..1:1 ] .c ~:cg~e_-:l" cCl ~~DO-de....o:~= ~J~~~
-.0 u u "'DOO J: -' -<IIJ:U)_e '" -_"C
'a 1 .c ~ ~ ..- - 0 ~ <II C ~ ~ u u:o:> ..... 0 . ::s Iii:s ~ ; 2
C <II.~ iii Iii ; (:) 6 t: 5 u c. e ~ 0 O.c t a: C III U u "C e ~ "'.: - t:-
.. u .- ~ ... 0 U U - '" 0 -...... - u.... <II .. ... J: U u;;;; U c.::s
url.cc >. >. ~c."'-5=.=" "'III::S~"C,,;;(O'OoS!"'"<II ~ c:::sc.
:f iii ~ ~ 6 6 1 a: .......:0' ue c '"' M M 2 g c ~ u c !! >. ~ ~ ~ 0 .vi .:!,;;;; u
.. '" <II .- ;;;; ;:; <II:> e · 2 III "'. 0 0 J: III e::S :::s .. u <II "".- ~ 00 U DO C U III
o-erl ~uIII-III~3 ....o~ uue:olll",c eo~:::s
;:; ......... M M .. - <II .. <II U .. U .. _ DO DO:2 c.:: : e &. III U U U
o .. .c u u '0 '" .. .- .- !l" <II III o.&l 0 u >. C .-
Iii .0:; e . 0 0 .~ >u M C::s c: : rlu 111- e e c.E iii_ ::: S::o -u .c'" "u ::Se ~ 1 ~ g .S .- :0
o ......" OJ C - ... u Cd....-.- U . .... ..... . u =::1
.0 u" .c <II... .. .c:;;; u.o . ~ '-"5 ...J..J e 8 = e ute U'2 '" S DO ';' 0 C.
.. :f~:; -a.s 's ....... C ;; ~ U ::s 111._ -5.:.:.:.: u 5...... '0.... ~"s :a 0 i::" c'~ 6
]~~2"B~~~ ~6]c~iii~~~~~i~~~~e~"C ~e ~1~~0..;.,
..J III. oot.:: III . '-' to I( ~ U) l5 ::s DO C 5 0' e:- :.: ~ .- g c ; <II U (;:) Cd c. e ~
o c'- .. - .. u 0 ".c u = u u u o.-.c ;; = 0 - <II DO .
ii u r.-. 0 ; 0 : ~:2 ~ ~ li. e ;;;'~ J: ....~ oS ~ ~.: Wi e DO c .- u rI -;; .S ~ ~ ; ~ ~'2
'" > uiii :> u_ III 0 0 c. u:: c u u u ::~.~"C"':" !.!::-::s.. ..._::;0 III. &.
:::s~.. =c."C~--="''O~~u o......r.-. IIIUU-::S"C~U~-IIIC
Q "Q .; ::;; ';:.- ; - rI III <( '-' ; .. e 5'i "U >. >.-E 5 ~ l5 ~.: 0 "B g' 0 ~ J: II: Q ~.; ;;;;
:> cO',. -= ;: ;: it M .. E ~ .c... 5:::::: u 0..;., .- '" _ I( '" ~ 0 .9 a:l DO-a 0
~ ::s ~ ~ J: - .. - iii u u .~ 0 III e e'" u ~ iii '-.- u .. - u u e
u 0 a: ?'- u.S ~.S 1 g .: .c.~ u.. DO <II.. U in.c 1 .: - ~ e ..!l oS ~ ~ 6 iii E .
($~~2t: .. 1lI..5t:liigijJ~t~~:o~~u5~~~!l~J:o~~~~u~
g ~;[ ~ ~ ~ g ~ 8'S ~ g ~ ~ E u ~; ~ ~'5 ~ ~ 3~ I] ~,~'r;;:s ~ ~ ~"C B ~ ~
ct l5 e e 8:( ~:( ~ ~ e g ~ <( ~.~ u.B ~ ~ > iil M ~ e ~,g < li.~'i -s u ~ ; ~ 2]
-
J:
..
e
a..
~
~
>-
Q
..
-
ij5
2
~
e
e
Q
u
t"'l t"'l t"'l
, , .
c:: c:: c::
<( <(
<( <(
- - r.-.
c:: a: a:
- - .......
e e e
III rI ~
u
'" a: c::
]
~
0
::t
.g
::e
= c ~
. <II
U U U
'" <II .
> > >
~ ~ r-:
- -
-
N r.-. ~
u
.t:
Wi
0
t"'l t"'l t"'l 0_ ~
a: a: a: u. u
Q..a: z
-<
<( III
- r.-. u
a: ~< .t:
- .
r.-. r.-. r.-. M- >
uuu ua:
.......
....... 0
'" ><
..J ~
..............- '-'
eee ~2 '-'
'0
u
'" ... III I(
U U U o ~ ~
c::a:a: UC::
b 5 b '"
u u
~ . ~ ~
>
eld '"
::s
u u c:.
'iO e 'iO '5
.S 0 .5 >
U) ::t U) eld
:':-u ~5 5
~;:::
uu.o U u u
. ... 0 . . ..
>>~ >> >
00-10 -0 0
~N"; viM vi
0-
lOt--oo 0-0 -
- -
-77-
Q
~
.......
c::
~
-
~
u
.
~
u
i
~
E
:..r
~
l;l
>
~
~
~
"
:s
.~
r.-. C
- I:l
~
i:lJ
H
a:
Q
lXl
U
~
r.-.
~
r.-.
U
~
'"
eld
.:J
~
c
.
U
<II
>
~
cO
V'l
.
'"
C
~
iQ
...
III
'a
;;;
J:
~
U
J:
all
Vi
III
Q
'a
J:
~
u
'"
::l
'a
C
CII
~
U
..
=
-
:I
~
CoI
=
c:;
..
a..
~
'1;
::all
Q J:
a..-
~ J:
.. Q
=..N
all
-.:
~c
M Q
;:IN
~
ij5
~
..
'a '"
u::l
'" III
~ ..
c.:I
~-
.. :I
=..~
..
:c
III
!-
.....
=~
.. ~
<CoI
"l::i .. ~
~;S-
.5 -0 CIo
i: C ~
<:l ~.c
1.1 ~
'"
C
~
-
III
..
..
'a
Vi
J:
~
U
~CMU 0 U
5 0 .s :a E ~;; 0 -=
;; ~~::I ] !! c. I). J: C
- CG c.. ... .-. .!: U I ..!! --.
N5Po.c Srl:'i" ~::I ~ ~ M Cil-= ~
_ _ 0 0 til.= u.9- :.c 3" 9 '2::1 .~ U ~ .=
~ .~ Z'a .!! '2'6 : ~ M a:;.-3 .5 ~~ ... 3:..0 .~
...... C . ~ ..0 U rl.=. 'c- 5 U- N e .0 -: III 8 .E 4) C U
-uu-o-oos"",..._u . -"Ou e....... ..co
.- "0 ::1'- > .t:: - - co;; .- C "0 III 0 _ _ til -.- OIl
a'5 5 e = ::8 ." sa ! ~ ~ .~ : s';;j 8 ~ ;; ~ -d .:; ~ sa -: .~
... ~ > c. -. OIl ....~ ti.o e ........ III J:;; ~ u C
~ < rlu-su-.8 ~M "'MM .E.!!O=o !!l.tlt:e ~
.::: . _.8 ti < ~. ii J: VI i5..5 M C J: -0 :-::.!! : ~ 8. til U III e
. .. til III - W C. 0 til N 0 .- I)..... ~ ... "0 0...
.- ... - 0 u::l N ~ 'j:! !;; .. ;;; =.0:. til ... U I cOo
~ c - CI:l 0 t> s ... GO M 3 .- '::1 o.!! u = 'a'- ~'"'" .c
u l.tl 0 .- I) . S 0 J: M ~ C" - 0 l:::: .- u ~ u
a- e ~ ~.9 IC ;;; u::: U .= 'i: ~ .= .s ~ u VI .c ::I :::s ~ J! c'~ :E
u .- - "0::1 - = 0 t: = i: 0 · III ~ .0 U .... u.. ,.
-0 .!:: "0 ~ - - '<:t 's;.o M;: N .'s 8 e 8 .9.a e u.J:l ~
;&;~~~~e86~~is.b~ .~8~~ "O~~ue ~
e... - C .. ~c..- - M'~'- e III _ III 0 t::: 0 u 1II.c. D
u --. e u . u. .- til J: = P '- til U U M 0
U = .!!!l e In c ... M U - C. 0 ~ c:: ii = 0 "s U .J:l::l .c.QQ III .!l
<.::M.~eC.to-..oJ:.c......!2.eu.="o Ui.....; e:ll? "0.
~~ ~~.e~~~~~.!!-o~a~= ~u:-::ugu~-5o] .c
u c .. U I) W "". ; 0 M J: U u. .. U 111._ a 0 .E '" .- U
...: 'a 8 c. ~ ~ ~I::I S::'- Cil.5 .. -0. ~;;; c:; e.5 c;.......c -g -:=: ~ e
.!! ...... ~ U ~ "0 0 Ie - Po. "'....... = > U .- C. - "0 - til til ... -5l i5. c.
C ~ is :1.5 u. Cil . U e ~ M - ~ o.g !;l ~ .!! U .9 - 'j;j.!! c rl G;; '" .e
U . .0 C - .... r.-. ,U ::I 0 ~ ~ "II e'- ~ 0 U M 'a ~.c ~ .2 U lJ U !! U
:s ?: ~ c.o:. :;.~ S ~ ~ - oS U -g ~ - l:!.!!!!'il t: U ;; ~ 0 .c :l t
rl > co < .~ >. 0 ~'j:! = ~.~ ~ :: 8 -0 ~ -d It 5 'e-.c g 5 G 4) :9 .!:! l:i "0 ..:
.. - oW U os '<:t M'- III - = III c" III _ .t: >.. e -0.0 :I.c .... ._
....... ~ g 5 -0 ;:j@> J: e e c. U '2 c.:g III 8. o. :=: (.." 6 O'j;j 0 0 ~ I 0 e
~:-UU~ ~4)'2~~u~...=e~....-~.9 ~6:~~ ~E:=:
'Q-< 8 a:l ~ li- 0 ~.~:g ... 'a e ~ 's.!! ; c. t ';:5 M':.5 e U 5 l:'l; 'j:!!!.a
Cil .... ~uou>-o5 t:1II= -0-= J: cu"'suu o~~
.- . 0 .. _ '" Cil e c ~ ..... ~ 4) :-:: .- -'j:! .. u C rl u b N c.'-
o ~ J:.sa u ::I N -5 c." >.'- .5 u:; C ~ J: ~ 0 ~ Cl U U C. III ..!! >. ..8
u u =._ _ ....- _ u 0 0 l:i 1lO U 0 . _ _ >.
u ........2 ... b o~ ~ "0 b'a 5....... M 0 N.... N e N e "'....... < u 1:-:1 c'-:-:: >..
til .. - 5 CI:l .- 5 'E ii -0 ~ J: ~ :l - 0 r.-. u ~ 0 ~ > U 0 0 ~ j: (.."
::l.!! 5 e >. ~ - c '" u. !; o'w; 8 e.!! .. U e u ;; ~ U ~ ~ .~ '- .= u. &;'l 9
'a 8 c. e t: (.. oW '~ ~.o u 3'~ ~ .: e i!!! g. u .~ CI:l ~ <; o.!:! u ..... '"
U III .c.- u ~ ~ '-'C u - .- _'- iJ u ~.- ~ - ~ -0 - ~ ....... - E = -0 _.!! u
~ E - :I C. J: .0 ... III ~ M -0 ::I CJ'l 0 '""'.:::: s:: ~ u o'B u 0 til '5- ~ .~ ClI' 1lO e
.- :I C" 0 0 - J: U III J: I) M C - ':i '" c - > - QQ- U .g 0 .. c =.c
:::s~ae~u~8~~~~e~~.oe~~~~s~~~~~~~~~~
-
J:
u
e
Q.
~
U
~
u
Q
.!
Ci5
u
"S
'"
Q
~
U
Z
u
"S
'"
i:S
~ ~
~Z
u
-S
OIl
Q
~ ~
UZ
~
oS
til
i:S
~
U
Z
r.-.
~
CI:l
r.-.
U
r.-.
U
."
U
f"'l
~
N
U
r.-.
U
UU
--
ZZ
u
-
Z
M
a:
g
Z
f"'l
ClI::
-
U
Z
f"'l
U
UU
ZZ
r.-.
~
-
U
-
Z
r.-.
~
......
ClI::
~
.......
......
~
~
.......
......
a:
~
.......
6'
jd
o ::
u~
6'
.......
s:
CI:l
.......
-
::t
VI
.......
..
U
a:
-......
~~
..............
~
o
U
~
o
U
~
o
U
~
o
U
..
U
a:
OIl '"
4) U
ClI::~
a!
::l
~
]
":
';
e
'B
U
'"
..
::I
Z
e
~
~
c
.
U
III
>
~ ~
U U
. III
> >
~>.
]]
~ ~
] ]
.
.~
~
8
~
u
.
>
33
.. ...
~~
'a "0
.s.s
~~
u u
. .
>>
U
...
;:l
'2
~
~
.!! U
MiiO
.5 J:
..W;
u>.
513
u.-
. ..
>~
U 4)
iiO iiO
.~ .~
-
J:
..
..
..
:I
U
~
C
.;;
~
N
00
~ too:
NM
~.o
In
.0
\Q\Q
NO
-
to-
0\
In
Q\
0\
:::!
~
- M
M N
~
~~
IC
-
co Q\
--
A
-78-
U
'"
:J
-0
~
.:!
~
tf
c
U
e
U
Lij
U
-5
.~
ClI::
CI:l
~
U
~
:J
Cl
IC
-
.......
~
M
C ~
U U
e >.1)
~ .~
III ~ "0
5 '0;
~ ~~
.!! M'-
~ 'C ~ 'd
8 ~ -8 '5
U u.J::'~
U C .~ .~-o
CI:l 0 til.J:: M
t:-=.=.. .5
.8 · 5'- ~
~ j .~ ~ ~
ZUIIIOC
t<.= U - ;.s
U CI:l b I'! C
05"0 Is < ~ &.
~ rill Q v.a
c.c.......'"
lII.e::t5
~~OCl:lU
r.-.
c.i:
~
.
.
I I
+--
~
Z
-
::t
VI
-
..
I)
a:
b
]
-:
"3
e
a'l:I
U
iiO
J:
~
u
05
..:
-.
..
.!!
'ii
:.t::
::C
}j
.
~
-
N
\Q
M
Ii
~
:l
o
CI:l
41
41
41
@
r
Policy 7.9.5
.
~~Cy 7.9~
Policy 7.9.7
Policy 7.9.8
,r::..
Within five years, the City shall investigate the
long term feasibility of transit facilities to
serve beach front parks.
subsequent to Plan adoption, the city shall adopt
and implement the land use and zoning
recommendations outlined in Coastal Management
Element.
Cognizant of impacts to established uses, the
city shall subsequen~ to Plan adoption, establish
criteria for marina siting and to give priority
to development plans which increase public
interaction with the waterfront. The City shall
consider developing performance standards which
guide the review of proposals in this respect.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, ID?dify the land
development regulations to enforce public access
to beaches renourished at public expense, enforce
the public access requirements of the Coastal
Zone Protection Act of 1985 and investigate the
financial feasibility of providing transit
service to beachfront parks and access locations.
.
Objective 7.10 By 1995, protect, preserve and or provide for the
sensitive reuse of historic properties in the
coastal Management area.
Policy 7.10.1
Policy 7.10.2
Policy 7.10.3
Policy 7.10.4
Subsequent to Plan adoption, establish procedures
to investigate the feasibility of establishing an
historic preservation ordinance that includes
performance standards for development and reuse.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, establish procedures
to encourage the property owners of historic
sites to maintain the design and structural,
integrity of the bUildings.
Prior to the five (5) year Evaluation and
Appraisal, prepare an inventory of historic
properties worthy of preservat~,on.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, the City shall
consider allowances for historic preservation
efforts in the review of site plans and building
permits.
Objective 7.11 To provide for the ongoing development of the
coastal area in a manner which will reduce the
exposure of human life and public and private
property to natural hazards by developing a
Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan.
.
86
~}
-\( ,,"-<.. o\::~-- -
\: ," -(..7- ~ ,>c:...~~'\-
-(, Go-- Jr ~e 4,ll..C(
~Jl 1: 9- \
&(\; Table 2. Listing of Boynton Beach Natural Resource Sites
'.
,. ~",:.~.s J:;
Site Geographic Area in Swnmary
# Location Acres Evaluation
1 43-45-08-1 88.6 B
2
3
4.a.*
43-45-08-2
43-45-07-1
43-45-17-1
4.b. 43-45-16-3
-- 4.c. '43-45-20-2
5*
43-45-16-2
6*
43-45-16-5
43-45-21-1
7*
8
43-45-20-1
.
9
43-45-20-4
29.7
52.4
141.8
40.1
19.0
9.6
11.2
6.2
A?
10 43-45-30-1 21.6 D
11 43-45-20-5 17.1 D
12* 43-45-29-1 ~52.1 A
13* 43-45-32-1, -2,43r925.Q A
14* 43-45-32-3
15* 43-46-05-1
16 43-45-31-1
17 43-45-31-2
18 43-45-30-2
.
continued ...
24.1
7.0
22.4
17.6
17.4
x
X
A
Annotation
Pine Flatwoods and disturbed PF; pond with emergent
vegetation. East of High Ridge Country Club. Lift Station
#717 is located here.
Residential development in progress.
Cleared.
Florida Scrub. County Site "Eoo-87 Quantum NE Scrub".
West of Highridge Rd.; Part of the site is in the Quantum
Park DRI developmenL Portions in Boynton Beach and
County.
Disturbed Florida Scrub corridor. County site "Eeo-36
Quantum RR-195 Route".
Restricted access. South portion of Quantum DRI
developmenL
Florida Scrub. County site uEe0-36 Quantum High Risk".
Part of Quantum Park development both east and west of
Highridge Rd.; road clearing and development in progress.
Composite of Quantum sites total 9 listed endangered
species.
Florida Scrub with disturbed border. County site "Eeo- 34, I
Rolling Green Scrub". Endangered species total 8.
Florida Scrub. County site uEco-32, Galaxy Scrub".
Endangered species total 9.
Florida Scrub site with scrub oaks of shrub and small tree
size disturbed by trails and disturbed borders along RR and
1-95 rights-of-way. County site "Eco-32 Industrial
Scrub".
Dense stand of Melaleuca (Mtlaleuca quinquenerviaJ,
Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifoliaJ, and Brazilian
pepper (Schinus terebinthifoliusJ, and area of grassy and
ruderal species.
A mix of Melaleuca and other exotics.
Former Pine Flatwoods now crowded with weeds.
3 parcels. Disturbed Pine Flatwoods, Florida Scrub, and
open grassy with ruderal species. Conidor, western border
of 1- 95, Eeo-31 Boynton 7th St Scrub right of way. ~
text narrative for additional information.
South of Woolbriiht Road. Pine Flatwoods and open
grassy; disturbed by previous clearing at ground level and
entry of ruderal species. County site "Ec0-70 N 195-RR 23
Rd Conidor". No on-site visiL Endangered species total I.
A continuation of site 1f13. County site "Ee0-70 S 195-RR
23 Rd Corridor". No oD-site visiL
Small disturbed Pine Flatwoods ecotone with Florida
Scrub. Caloosa Park. Cited for preservation due to location
within a public park.
Disturbed Pine F1atwoods with exotic weeds. Seen only
from Congress Ave.
Already Developed.
Already Developed.
A
A
A
A
B
D
A
B
C
X
X
-23-
(iV
tt)
Table 2. Listing or Boynton Beach Natural Resource Sites
continued ...
Site Geographic Area in Swnmary
# Location Acres Evaluation Annotation
19* 43 4 S 29 :2
20 43-46-05-3
21 42-46-01-1
22 43-45-06-1
23 43-46-04
24 43-46-04-4
25* 43-46-04-3
26 43-46-04-2
27* 43.45-34
~ 28* 43-45-33-3
29* 43-45-33-2
30* 43-45-22-3
31 43-45-15
32 43-45-15
33 43-45-15-4
34
35 43-45-16-1
36* 43-45-33-1
37* 43-45-09-4
38 43-45-09
39 43-45-22
40 43-45-22
34.4
21.8
60.2
44.5
7.8
8.7
50.4
11.0
4.5
2.9
6.0
23.5
5.8
4.3
10.0
11.0
12.2
12.5
12.4
3.2
4.3
A
.. -
C
X
X
C
C
Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
A
C
F19rida Strub, partly disturbed. Part of County site "Etg.-
31 Qoynlen 7m St Stlllb". IinSanger@d spedes total 7.
Narrow band; apparently mostly Brazilian Pepper.
Development in progress. County site "Eco-85 Hunter's
R.un Golf'.
Cleared. Located in Hunters Run development.
Cleared and abandoned Florida Scrub; a few oaks and
herbaceous plants remain. South of County site "Eco-29
Seacrest Scrub".
Pine FJatwoods ecotone with Florida Scrub, previously
cleared strips, heavily re-grown with vines. Near County
site "Eeo 29 W Seacrest Scrub". Endangered species total 1.
Florida Scrub and ecotone with Pine Flatwoods. County
site "Eeo 29 Seacrest Scrub". Endangered species total 12.
Mangrove about 2 acres; 8 acres grassy ruderaJ; more than
1(1 developed.
Beach and Strand (ocean face of dune) with expected species;
dune back is landscaped, rates "D". Preservation of the
Beach and Strand ecosystems in their native state as far as
this remains is recommended, as it is the only such site in
the City. Sea oats and sea grape are protected by state law.
Endangered species total 1.
Mangrove with about 1 acre disturbed. (Aerials overlap;
site appears on section 33 and 34.) Mangrove protection
law.
Mangrove having western border of disturbed Swamp with
intermixed ornamental exotics. (Aerials overlap; site
appears on section 33 and 34.) Mangrove protection law.
Mangrove: site proposed for CARL acquisition Mangrove
protection law.
Mature planting of tropical ornamentals. Former
horticultural garden under developmenL
Disturbed Florida Scrub, cleared grassy ruderal west of
Federal Hwy; cleared east of highway.
Cleared. Approved for Bond Open Space purchase.
Not in City; withdrawn from invenlOry.
Cleared and partially regenerating Florida Scrub. County
site "Eco-35 Boynton 20 Ave-1St". Rated "B" due 10
endangered species, otherwise much disturbed. Endangered
species IOtaI 7.
Disturbed Florida Scrub. County site "Eeo-29 N Boynton
Water Tower". Endangered species lists. 2 species.
Florida Scrub. County site "Eeo-36 c Rosemary Scrub".
Endangered species IOtal 8..
Abandoned mango grove and disturbed Florida Scrub.
Abandoned mango grove.
Area of secondary growth of black and white mangroves
due to tidal flooding and deposition. Bounded or traversed
by roadways, little apparent tidal flushing.
tiJ
B
A
A
A
D
C
X
B
B
A
D
D
B
~
-24-
(0)
,.~
r--'lT-; ~ - - - r- CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
,-.J Ql JJm.:I ~-C (-c. ~ r I CONSERVATION RfNfNT
I -r!f!.t1y.J d'f~' ' FIGURE 4 - NATURAL RESOURCES
~_ - . - Gl~~ ~ =,-h-!!,' 2 I ; II
L____J-.~! ;;:) J r 1 /,,, ~. ..-___J LI I-. l
i '-' jjS. /;\\ ~ re3S~ ~_I J( n
: J"')'-.. A' L_ -
;-_ _ --.!_ __ _ . =-_':-- i ' t. ,~ .:0 I
i ,--,"121'1)'1 7,' """CL t=::tlT
.------1 I ~ :!- ii ., f rj'~
L_ . 7 ~. if ,,,f I I I=;r---7
r( if '-~l\' /y. !.. ,F: . 1-1 i I
:'" ~:; P'~~.J..:J; , {j tll% If-:, i
I \T'~' ~ (I,'i
I ~ ir~ ~~ _48, ~f!~} i
It\< !. S: 11 TIT ~34
t
I
I
,
, . . \\ -o:::r:nll
~~ YP=I':aL., L-f- ~ I ~I
~ ut ::Itnu - 1 I
IT . ~ - - 1/ --. "-I- .....1
;1 i __ ~r@~~n ~ Skf- I ?-It'~/r-"o
:_, I ~ ~~ f- ~';:; ;;. +- ii
I ~l" I rr=)I~ l\Il AU' T I'
W UI ILni~ /1.: I ~I'
I n~~ 1 --:--'...:.::; 'I' {- -, . ri ,L.
pd~~ -1b7 "'m __T12 I--f--j - I :-LID ,hIt'..!?
. ~,.. ~ 17 ro) ~ =,.- ~ -1 - II'
I I' I '\Q ~~ ' I r;;:;.",
1sC::--01 I~,~/f:'\\~.:' =jp~i:L_~
- ::~ -:;:.'" ..::,::.r;- Lw~ ,_ li:= ~~;.; _~l )1i\ '1F->-- I ~i E
'-OJ e:d.,;- r::J.. .-f'! i 13 r...; l1.8A1;H RO 36- !! /
: .-'L ~~--if" ~.. f
~ .;:,(] i I=l"-:::>~illl }, . 29 &..
i:~.\: lq 'P:t({');\'P:lii ~ · J J."'-
I.--J, ,I' .-'0,1 -rf~~
r~J_) ~1,.-~ / tr a 1; ~i ;
_.t: ._ ____ i~ _:2 --4:=n r Ei= l t== /,=.J rJ if -
~UW I...~~~- -' ;::: '--:-:TV . ~ TfJ/~R ~JI 27
~ ~~:!. ----m-~ n I'rill UlrRi_=..,
I n U ~. 15' L= :~
" "'f" ~'~ . ~ I =-
l~~ ?;q=P 22 .5 ~ 0:.. II' 20 ~ ,~U1 .Iii Int-- ~
I :'7, . :1" ,~ III ~.\\~ I. . _ ' r.- , "r &
, ~ 'J jF () ( ~~ t ' \ 23 26
l~~~~i~ ~ ~~~}_~~_~! \ k-~~J
LEGEND
~ - NATURAl RESOURCE ARe.t.S
Z2 - NATURAl. RESOURCE
REFERENCE NUMBER
. - A & B RATED SITES
IN PUBlIC OWNERSHIP
Scu-ca: "-"cry" E""sys_.. Pam
~ County, """.. III R-
__and~ ~"
w.~. H. 1<011. ~,: ~ ,-,
--.., r.....t<tI by Or ^.
...-. Sop(_ ._: ~.ca
.
.
-25-
IUl. IDl H, mr fJl .R.. VI:
ClnAJl t!iW e..t..."..., I 'l,..,wn
f~ ~,,,.~ ~'.
.
.
~
.
Site #27 Beach and Strand: The City of Boynton Beach has very little beach and strand
ecosystems. The upland portion of the system found in the City proper consists of a
single condominium development. Native vegetation and other natural dune
characteristics were essentially eliminated with the prior construction of this
development in the early 1970's. However, the City has endeavored to restore and
preserve the natural integrity of the beach ecosystem in the Boynton Beach
Oceanfront Park (located in the Town of Ocean Ridge). In addition, the Co~stal
Management Element of the City's Plan includes an assessment of the unincorporated
area immediately north of the City's boundary on the coastal barrier island. It is this
latter area that is discussed in the previous Tables and the following paragraphs.
Although disturbed by development and numerous footpaths, the approximate 4 acre
site of coastal beach and strand is the only representative area of these ecosystems in
the City. Dune grasses and other native vegetation species are found along the strand
area,; the dune back is comprised of a mixture of native, ornamental and exotic
(Australian Pine) species. One listed species is part of these ecosystems; marine
tunIes may also be part of the Beach ecosystem during nesting.
Keeping as much of this native environment as it now exists will enhance the
ecological diversity of the City. Efforts to protect, maintain and improve the quality of
this area through vegetation plantings and dune crossovers should be continued.
Sites #28, 29, 30 Mangrove Sites: By account and by observation, these mangrove
ecosystems are young, establishing themselves following historical ditching of the wet
borders of Lake Worth in an attempt to control mosquito populations. White and Black
mangrove are abundant dominants, along with a few Red mangroves. Occasional
larger mangrove trees with a wider crown appear to have produced the smaller slim
trees that now crowd these sites. The high continuous mangrove canopy makes a
shaded open forest largely lacking shrubs and ground plants. Bird and crab species are
a noticeable and common part of the system.
Apparently hand construction of the mosquito ditches made the soft spoil ridges too
wet for the three exotic weed species (Australian pine, Melaleuca, and Brazilian
pepper) to become established as they have bordering most mosquito ditches.
Mangroves and a variety of invertebrate species were instead available as entrants,
so that the resulting Mangrove ecosystem appears to include a diverse assemblage of
-37 -
@?
life. These sites may thus be regarded as essentially native systems, albeit developed .
recently and as a indirect by-product of man's ecological interference. However, since
mangrove ecosystems are normally decimated by storm from time to time, the current
stage of regrowth may resemble other natural systems associated with the City.
The shaded Mangrove forest, for the most part lacking the arching roots of Red
mangrove, and with a diverse component of vertebrate and bird life should be retained
for the observation, discovery, and educational opportunities it offers City dwellers.
As an adjunct to the Mangrove ecosystem next to the Merkel nursery, strong
consideration shoulci be given to keeping the nursery business to offer a living
demonstration of a pioneer industry, and its functional relationship to the wann
wetland border of Lake Worth. TIle nursery might even continue to function, paying its
way while displaying a pan of the City's history. Although a replica might be built in
the future (though almost certainly a prohibitively expensive endeavor). the present
opponunity is to keep the authentic sample. Site # 29 is publicly owned.
Site #35 Boynton 20th Avenuell st Street (County site "Eco-35"): This is a badly
disturbed Florida Scrub site. The 11 acre site was apparently scraped bare some time
ago, and now is comprised of mostly open sand. In the sparingly regenerating Florida .
Scrub system, a selection of characteristic plant species are present, but only three
Sand pines could be located on the site. Various Pine Flatwoods and rudera! or garden
exotics are present. Seven listed species are pan of the system. 2 of these are
currently under review for federal listing.
This site has the lowest priority as a representative of native Florida Scrub. If
acquired, however, it might be traded to obtain a better example for preservation.
Site #36 Boynton Water Tower Scrub (County site "Eco-29N"): Although a disturbed
area of the Florida Scrub ecosystem, this approximate 12 acre site may be essential to
the survival of an especially interesting federally listed species, the Scrub jay, endemic
to Florida Scrub. The expected species of oaks, Sand pine, and other characteristic
species are interspersed with open areas apparently resulting from previous clearing
of the understory. A grassy area borders Seacrest Blvd. and covers much of the
cleared rectangular area east of the railroad.
The site has two listed species, Scrub jay and Gopher tortoise. While the site is no
longer characteristic of the ecosystem as a whole, Scrub jays may be nesting here, and .
-38-
(LilJ
,
..
Policy 4.2.15
Objective 4.3
~ Policy 4.3.1
..
Policy 4.3.2
Policy 4.3.3
Policy 4.3.4
,....~ _1,,"'.J
l 4-
\, !,,}. r
Planning Council relative to the management of
hazardous waste to protect natural resources.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, modify land
development regulations to protect and conserve
the natural functions of existing soils,
fisheries, floodplains, wildlife habitats,
natural reservations, canals, lakes, rivers,
wetlands, estuaries, harbors, freshwater beaches
and shores and marine habitats.
To provide for the continued existence of at
least 75% of the acreage occupied by "A" rated
ecosystems sites through the long term plan
horizon.
The city shall designate all natural resource
areas depicted in Figure 4 as environmentally
sensitive sites. The city shall also adopt the
"Conservation Overlay" of "A" rated ecosystems
sites as part of the Future Land Use Map of the
Comprehensive Plan.
within one year of Plan adoption, the City shall
establish a varied program with respect to the
protection and acquisition of "A" rated
ecosystems sites. This program may include the
use of bonds, shared funding and grants to
purchase sites; solicitation of property owners
for site contribution; application and, where
necessary, revision of site plan, subdivision,
PUD and PCD development regulations; enforcement
of regulations regarding tree removal; support
and, if applicable, local coordination of private
sector efforts to preserve sites, or to establish
taxing districts for the open space preservation.
If a specific mechanism cannot be established for
acquisition or preserving a site, that site will
be removed from the "A" rated list (see policy
4.3.10).
The city shall establish a Density Bonus program
or other incentives in the city Plan and/or
appropriate support regulations to preserve
Latural areas; this provision to be explored with
regard to the densities and intensities of use in
the city and adjacent jurisdictions.
The City shall forward documentation and mapping
identifying each "A" rated site and formally
request assistance and financial support from
State and County agencies to preserve "A" rated
ecosystems sites in the City. The City shall as
routine procedure also contact the County
60
@
~
~~ ~ (:;,?S
rV
.
.
.
, I
TllIIN QF HYfIllUlCll
LEGEND
@
- INlEX PI.HlEA QF SIra ~ OISTIN5
llaiSm EXCEEDS I'\IT\R LNIl USE PUll llaiSm
sm InNlAIIY
....
-
~
'"
...
..
...
..
...
-
~
...
...
~
\1_
~Ut 1.1." ........
"1"'1"" _. -...-"
FI&UlE II - NON-tllN'ORMIN; RESIDENTIAl OENS:r:ES
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
;;;::~/
I
I
i
~
........"-..
~~~
,,---------
---..-...-..--
-- - .----
- .. - -- -,. -.. -
-..-"---..--
SOURCE: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
May 1989
-~~
... ....... .
.....- --.'---
.... --- '-"
-67-
~
Table 21. Non-Conforming Residential Densities .
Map Plan Existing
Index # Density Density Comments
1 10.8 38.3 Multi-Family
2 10.8 40.0 Multi-Family
3 10.8 18.1 Multi-Family: includes
Recreation Area
4 10.8 17.9 Multi-F9.'11i1y
5 10.8 29.0 Multi-Family
6 10.8 45.7 Multi-Family
7 10.8 30.0 Multi-Family
8 10.8 18.0 Multi-Family
9 10.8 20.3 Multi-Family
10 10.8 18.6 Multi-Family
11 10.8 27.7 Multi-Family
12 10.8 25.4 Multi-Family
~13 10.8 32.2 Multi-Family
14 10.8 21.0 Multi-Family
15. 3.0 5.3 Single Family; County
Density; City Plan
indicates Mod Density
16. 8.0 8.1 Combination Single and
multi family; County
Density
17. 8.0 9.7 Single Family
.
Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. Note: Asterisked sites are subject
to potential land use
modification per the
following Table 24.
Redevelopment Potential
As stated in the previous discussion, much of the coastal management study area is
characterized by established and stable land uses. Based on a historical observation
of more built-out communities further to the south, coastal area redevelopment will
probably occur on a scattered basis, and only after the regional supply of vacant land
suitable for new fust stage development has been effectively diminished. Considering
the available vacant land in both the study area and in the area west of 1-95, the
potential for extensive areawide redevelopment is considered low within the ten-year
planning horizon.
In terms of residential activity, existing mobile home parks and a few underdeveloped
multifamily shoreline properties have the greatest potential for redevelopment. This
potential is highest in Planning Area 1 due to the proximity of these sites to Lake
Worth and the Boynton Inlet. Substantial renovation or reconstruction of existing
.
-68-
~
( ~(?
...
~ Policy 4.3.5
.
...
Policy 4.3.6
Policy 4.3.7
Policy 4.3.8
Policy 4.3.9
Policy 4.3.10
Objective 4.4
whenever a development proposal is formally
initiated on a "A" rated site.
Cognizant of prior development approvals or other
vested rights, the city shall require a detailed
flora and fauna survey on any "A" rated site
subject to a development proposal and any site
greater than 10 acres in size. The City shall
require preservation of a minimum 25% of all
native plant communities which occur on "A" rated
ecosystems site, the specific location to be
determined as a result of the site survey.
Habitat shall be preserved with intact canopy,
understory and ground cover.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, the city shall
participate in programs and adopt model
ordinances developed by the Palm Beach Countywide
Planning Council, for the purpose of protecting
recognized Countywide natural resources in the
form of "A" rated quality native Florida
ecosystems as delineated in the Inventorv of
Native Ecosvstems in Palm Beach Countv. (Iverson
and Austin, 1988).
Subsequent to Plan adoption, the City shall not
require the preservation of more than 25% of the
native habitat occurring on any particular
property as a condition of the approval of a land
development permit.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, amend the land
development regulations to prohibit land clearing
practices that destroy native Florida ecosystems
in who~e or in part prior to approval by the
City. :
Subsequent to Plan adoption, policies regarding
the preservation of native habitat and endangered
or threatened species shall also apply to any
property which is owned or acquired by the City.
Within one year of Plan adoption, the City shall
have prepared a program for the preservation of
~A" rated sites. This program shall be
coordinated with property owners and developers
of "A" rated sites.
The city shall, to the maximum extent feasible,
protect all remaining areas of substantial native
upland and wetland vegetation and eliminate
undesirable exotic tree species.
61
~)
,--
~ ~~-( ~ l.c)-c:..-~ aF'
1)c f". 0"1$\. \..f;:) Lj- -\.. 'QV ~6- ~
~ere is one other portion of the Coastal Area in which commercial
redevelopment is desirable. The segment of u.s. 1 near the southern City
limit currently contains a significant number of vacant parcels, Obsolete.
buildings, and margiual commercial uses. In order to upgrade the
properties fronting on u.s. 1, the Coastal Management Element recommends
that the existing Local Retail land use category be maintained, rather
than permitting heavy commercial uses. Heavy commercial uses would be
limited to the parcels which front on Old Dixie Highway. In order to
absorb some of the commercial acreage along u.s. 1, the Coastal
Management Element recommends that new car sales be allowed on the C-3
zoned property south of Old Dixie Highway, on parcels that have a minimum
area of 2 acres.
~
There are sever 1 arcels and areas where increased densities
are recommended, in order to encour 1 development. T ere are wo
small parcels, of 1. acres and 1.2 acres, locate on t e north side o~
Dimmick Road and at the end of Las palmas Avenue, where it is recommended
that the land use category be changed from Low Density (4.84 dwellings
per acre) to High Density Residential (10.8 dwellings per acre). These
density increases are contingent on limiting development to two-story
townhouses.
\:1
.\'"
~ f)
~
In order to encourage infill development south of Woolbright Rnad. the
~~ Management Element recommend~ that the density be increased<>n
the largest remaining vacant multiple-family parcels. Currently, t~
maximum residential density in the City is 10.8 dwellings per ac~ The
Coastal Management Element recommends that a Special High Density land
USe category be creazed a maximum den it of 2 wellin s r acr
e applica 10n 0 this land use category would be imited to the coasta].
Area, however. The arc in e Intracoastal
Waterway and is partly occupied bv mangroves. Although the manqroyes are.
rotected law, it would be pOSSible for this densit to be transfer
to the upland por ~ons of this propert~. It is also recommended, n this
ement, that residential densities of up to 40 dwellings per acre be
permitted in the CBD zoning district, and that this density be applied in
addition to the commercial intensity which is permitted in the ceo zoning
district.
.
49
M)
~
should be limited to 2 stories (25 feet), in order to ensure
compatibility with the residences which lie to the east. In
order to minimize industrial and commercial traffic on S.!. 12th
Avenue, access to Gulfstream Lumber, should be prohibited on S.E.
12th Avenue and other local streets in the vicinity, if this use
is expanded.
.~
7'
o ol.o .~c-(
\ ( ~w1.n.
..\' J-k! S . E .
0(\
Undeveloped Parcel Adiacent to Intracoastal Waterway. at
23rd Avenue and u.s. Hiahway 1
This parcel is shown on the Future Land Use Plan as Special High
Density Residential; however, t~e Conservation and Coastal
Management Elements recommend that the portion of this parcel
which is vegetated by mangroves be preserved as such. In
recognition of the need to preserve these mangroves, this site
has been placed in the Conservation overlay category on the
Future Land Use Map.
1.0. Neiahborhood in Vicinity of S.E. 20th Avenue and S.E. 3rd
street
This is a small neighborhood, which is largely surrounded by
commercial uses, and which is showing some Signs of
deterioration. The eXisting zoning allows for multiple-family,
duplex, and single-family housing, and as a result, a mixture of
housing types has been established. Several actions should be
taken in order to upgrade this neighborhood and prevent further
decline: First, the City should consider acquisition of property
along the FEC tracks for a mini-park, which should be construed
to be in the Recreational land use category, if acquired for such
use; second, the City should pay particular attention to
minimizing conflicts between surrounding commercial uses and the
residential uses that are located in this neighborhood; third,
the City should provide concentrated code enforcement, in order
to help improve the condition of buildings, yards, and swales;
finally, buildings should not be permitted to exceed 2 stories
(25 feet), in order to minimize encroachment on the low-rise
residences in this neighborhood.
410.
~l
- .~
1.p. Parcels at Northwest Corner of u.s. 1 and Old Dixie Hiqhway
Due to the limited demand for commercial floorspace along this
segment of U.s. I, the Coastal Management Element originally
recommended that these parcels be taken out of the Local Retail
Commercial land 'lse category, and placed in the Special High
Density Residential category. However, because a site plan and
construction drawings for a shopping center on this site have
been approved by the City, the City Commission decided to keep
these parcels in the Local Retail Commercial land use category.
.;
65
~
f.'
/
.
~
.
.
\
policy 1.10.4
Obj ecti ve 1. 1:'
Policy 1.11.1
Policy 1.11.2
policy 1.11.3
policy 1. 11.4
districts be discontinued within 5 years of the
adoption of this plan.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, require, in the
~oning regulations, that all bulk storage or
distribution of other petroleum products which is
located within 600 feet of property within
residential zoning districts be discontinued
within 10 years of the adoption of this plan.
By June 1, 1990, or when mandated by ~tate
statute, land development and future land uses
shall include provisions for the protection of
native habitat, preservation of existing trees
(other than undesirable exotic vegetation),
minimizing surface and groundwater pollution,
minimizing air pollution, preserving of wetlands,
and preserving archaeological resources and
historic buildings in conformance with the
policies below.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land
development regulations to require the-
preservation of mangrove trees, except for an
overiding public purpose, and small stands and
clumps which are only intermittently connected to
the waters of Lake Worth and the Intracoastal
Waterway and do not perform a significant
function in the aquatic food chain. Removal of
mangroves will be subject to the approval of
those regulatory agencies vested with this
responsibility.
SUbsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land
develop~ent regulations to reqUire the
preservation of native habitat, endangered
species, and native vegetation in accordance with
the policies contained in the conservation
Element.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land
development regulations to require littoral zone
plantings around bodies of water in accordance
with the policies contained in the Conservation
Element.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land
development regulations to require the
mitigation, protection and preservation of
wetlands and deepwater habitat in accordance with
the Conservation and Coastal Management Elements,
and the policies concerning wetland and deepwater
rabitat which are contained in the Treasure Coast
Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan.
13
@)