REVIEW COMMENTS
MEMORANDUM
---------
July 26, 1989
TO:
Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
THRU:
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
FROM:
Raymond Rea, City Attorney
RE:
Cross Creek Site Plan Modifications
At the last City Commission meeting I was directed to
research whether or not any site plan modification on the
Cross Creek Planned Commercial Development would be required
to come back before City Commission for their approval under
the provisions contained in Chapter 19, Article II. After
evaluating the appropriate provisions, it is my opinion that
any site plan modification shall be handled administratively
under the provisions of Section 19-23. It should be noted,
however, that this administrative review shall not apply if
the modifications contemplated by the new site plan involve
costs in excess of $100,000.00.
3~~~
RR/r
cc: Honorable Mayor Moore
City Commissioners
RECEIVED
JUL 2'% 1989
PLANN\NG DE-PT.,
..,-
-
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
July 12, 1989
TO:
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
RE:
Cross Creek Centre - Master Plan Modification
Please place the referenced item on the City Commission agenda
for Tuesday, July 18, 1989, under Development Plans.
DESCRIPTION: Request submitted by Steve Rhodes to amend the
master plan for Cross Creek Centre to change the permitted use
designation for 2,775 square feet of the 15,000 sq. ft. office
building from C-1 uses to C-3 uses. Cross Creek Centre is
located on West Boynton Beach Boulevard between Congress and
L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Board recommended
approval of this request, subject to staff comments, copies of
which are attached.
~
c:,h_" _ ~~
CARMEN S. AN ZIATO
CSA: frb
Encs
crcreek.71l
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
June 27, 1989
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
RE:
Cross Creek Centre Planned Commercial Development
Master Plan Modification - File No. .r+a- CJ..'l'5
Steve Rhodes of Denho1tz-Rhodes Associates, property owner, is
requesting a modification to the previously approved master plan
for the Cross Creek Centre Planned Commercial Development (PCD).
The modification requested is to change the permitted use
designation for 2,775 square feet of the 15,000 square foot
office building from those uses allowed in the C-1
(Office/Professional) zoning district to those uses allowed in
the C-3 (Community Commercial) zoning district, as outlined in
the attached letter of submittal (see Exhibit "A"). The approved
master plan limited the use of the entire 15,000 square foot
office building to those uses permitted under the C-1
(Office/Professional) zoning district regulations (see conditions
of zoning approval from staff report in Exhibit "B"). This
limitation was based on the applicant's master plan submittal,
showing a 15,000 square foot office building (see Exhibit "C"),
traffic impact analysis (which assumed 15,000 square feet of
professional office floor area) and the City Commission's desire
to lessen the impact of the project on the adjacent residential
area which lies to the north (based on concerns expressed by the
neighboring residents at the public hearings). In addition, the
developer submitted a list of self imposed conditions that were
entered into the record at the City Commission meeting (see list
of conditions in Exhibit "D"). Condition no. 8 of this list
restricts the use of the 15,000 square foot office building to
those uses permitted in the C-1 zoning district.
The procedure for approving master plan modifications in planned
commercial developments is outlined in Section 6.F.13 of Appendix
A-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances. Subsection "a" states that
modifications to approved plans which result in an increase of
less than ten (10) percent in measurable impacts may be approved
by the planning and zoning board; however, any changes in traffic
generated, water consumed or sewage to be collected will require
approval by the City Commission. The board's decision to
recommend approval, approval with modifications or denial shall
be predicated upon a finding of consistency with the
comprehensive plan and a finding that any such increase will not
1
result in a negative impact on infrastructure delivery systems or
the surrounding area in general. It is the intent of this
section that all additional impacts be mitigated. Any decision
of the board in this regard is appealable to the City Commission.
With respect to the modification requested by Mr. Rhodes, the
Technical Review Board met on Thursday, June 22, 1989 to review
the plans and documents submitted, and they are recommending that
this request be denied. The basis for this recommendation is
that the property owners who live in the residential subdivision
to the north may be adversely impacted by the proposed change
without having the opportunity for public input if this request
is approved. This recommendation is based upon condition no. 8
of the applicant's list of self imposed conditions in Exhibit "D"
and the nature of the original zoning approval, as documented in
the minutes of the City Commission public hearings in Exhibit
"E".
PROJECT APPROVAL
If it is the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board to
recommend approval or the City Commission to approve this
project, it is recommended that the approval be contingent upon
the staff comments that accompany this memorandum as Exhibit "F".
^
c..a...--.... ~
CARMEN S. ANN~IATO-
JJG:frb
Encs
cc: Central File
crcrctre
2