AGENDA DOCUMENTS
~~~. '.-;:f ~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMEMT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-268
(AGENDA MEMORANDUM)
FROM:
J. Scott Miller, city Manager
Tambri J. Heyden, Acting planning & Zoning Director~
October 14, 1993
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Jonathan's Grove - File No. ..1.72
Modification to Zoning Conditions
"
Please place the above-referenced item on the City Commission
agenda for Tuesday, October 19, 1993 under Development Plans -
consent Agenda.
DESCRIPTION: Request for modification to conditions relative to
wall location, lot depth, lot width and lot layout, imposed at time
of rezoning to R-1A. The project is a 10 acre parcel located on
the east side of Lawrence Road, approximately 1,000 feet south of
Hypoluxo Road.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board unanimously
recommended approval of the above-referenced request, submitted by
Scott Bennewitz of Gee and Jenson, subject to construction of a six
(6) foot high buffer wall to be located fifteen (15) feet south of
the northern boundary of the project.
tjh
A:PM93-268
Attachments
\
\ \
\\
I
,
7Al
JONATHAN'S GROVE
MODIFICATION TO ZONING CONDITIONS
"
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-263
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: October 7, 1993
SUBJECT: Jonathan's Grove - File No. 172
Modification to conditions of zoning
On June 20, 1989, the City Commission approved ordinances for
annexation, land use amendment and rezoning of the parcel known as
Jonathan's Grove. This approval was contingent upon the following
stipulations:
a) a minimum lot size of 9,590 square feet,
b) a minimum lot frontage of 70 feet,
c) construction of a wall, not to exceed 6 feet in height,
on the north boundary of the property,
d) a minimum living area of 1800 square feet, and
e) all staff comments which were not in conflict with the
above stipulations. (These include all comments
contained within the Planning Department memorandum dated
December 9, 1988, the Forester's memorandum dated
December 5, 1988 and all comments on the master comment
sheet within the materials presented at the meeting to
the Commission. These comments are attached as Exhibit
"A" and are summarized below.)
1. Property to dedicate right-of-way for Lawrence
Road 40 feet from centerline within 45 days of
annexation.
2. Should this request be approved as submitted
under the R-1A zoning district, the applicant
shall plat the propertv as shown on the
conceptual plan with a minimum lot size of 70
feet bv 137 feet. (See Exhibit "B" for
conceptual plan.)
3. The applicant shall submit a tree survey.
4. The applicant shall submit a plan preserving,
as much as possible, the existing grove of
trees.
5. The applicant shall prepare a tree management
plan for on-site protection of trees during
construction.
Since the Commission's June 15th, 1993 subdivision variance and
July 20th, 1993 approval of the Jonathan's Grove master plan, the
applicant has been undergoing preliminary plat review. During the
preparation of the preliminary plat, it was determined that a
modification to conditions of the 1989 zoning approval was
necessary. Pursuant to section 9.C.14.b of the zoning code,
modifications to conditions of zoning for conventional zoning
district require review and recommendation by the Planning and
Zoning Department and planning and Development Board and approval
by the City Commission.
As shown on the proposed preliminary plat (Exhibit "C"), the
modifications requested are to zoning conditions c) and e) 2 above.
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2,-
october 7, 1993
Specifically, the modifications include the following:
1) location of the wall fifteen feet south of the northern
boundary of the property rather than along the northern
boundary,
2) reduction in the minimum lot depth of 137 feet for lots
1 - 14 and lots 16 and 17 (lots 1 - 14 are less than one
foot short of 137 feet, lot 16 is short 20 feet and lot
17 is short 25 feet; lots 15 and 18 are clearly excepted
from this minimum depth on the conceptual plan),
3) reduction in the minimum lot width of 70 feet for lot 1
(lot 1 is 65.91 feet wide), and
4) creation of lots 16 and 17 as shallow, "dog-leg" lots
(these lots were shown on the master plan as "dog-legs",
however their configuration has been altered due to the
changed drainage design).
The applicant has submitted a letter (see Exhibit "Dn) explaining
what changes of circumstances have occurred to necessitate the
requested modifications. To summarize, these circumstances include
design development of storm water management facilities and hard
engineering involving survey data.
The zoning code states that the determination of what constitutes
a substantial change shall be within the discretion of the City
Commission. It further states that any proposed changes that would
increase the number of stories, or increase the amount of water
consumed, the amount of sewage collected, or the amount of traffic
generated by more than 10 percent, or that would create commercial
or industrial uses where not established by previously approved
zoning, or that would increase the area of property zoned, shall in
all cases require a new zoning application. In order to increase
the deficient lot sizes, a private road would have to be
substituted for the public road proposed to allow encompassing road
area within lot area and the storm water management tracts would
have to be substituted for easements on lots. No visual
improvement to the project would be gained by these solutions.
Therefore, based on this conclusion, it is recommended that the
requested modifications relative to lot size be considered as
nonsubstantial changes and that they be approved as presented on
the preliminary plat.
With respect to the proposed wall location, it is believed that due
to its long, uninterrupted expanse which traverses all the northern
lots, it will be difficult to access for maintenance purposes and
effecti vely reduces lot depth. The wall requirement was imposed to
buffer the large lot homes immediately to the north. If the wall
becomes unsightly, its intent is diminished. Therefore, it is
recommended that the applicant further explore, with Florida Power
and Light, locating the wall along the northern project boundary.
f i!#-dL
-=//:,t:-iYde
tjh
A:JGrvZonM
xc: Central File
EXHIBIT "A"
COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION
MUNICIPAL STAFF
Increased Increased Other
Department Personnel Capital Comments
City Clerk No No None
Planning No No See attached
Forester/
Horticulturist No No See attached
Utilities No No See attached
Public Works No No See attached
Management Services No No See attached
Finance No No None
Police No No None
Fire No No See attached
Library No No None
City Engineer No No None
Building Official No No None
Personnel and
Purchasing No No None
Parks and Recreation No No None
PALM BEACH COUNTY
Planning, Building
and Zoning
See attached
MEMORANDUM
December 9, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE:
JONATHON'S GROVE
STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request.
1. Property owner to dedicate right-of-way for
Lawrence Road 40 feet from centerline within
45 days of annexation.
2. Should this request be approved as submitted
under the R-l-A zoning district, the applicant
shall plat the property as shown on the
conceptual plan with a minimum lot size of
70 feet by 137 feet.
^
Co--.-. ~~A;~~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZI
CSA:ro
cc Central File
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
DATE:
December 5, 1988
RE:
Jonathan's Groves - Proposed Annexation
This memorandum is in reference to the tree
site plan submitted for the above project.
old citrus tree grove consisting of rows of
is also required to submit the following in
survey.
survey and conceptual
The site contains an
trees. The developer
addition to the tree
1. A plan preserving as much as possible the existing grove
trees in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan (section 29,
3.2.3.4.2.2, pg. 86). The plan as submitted does not make
mention of preservation methods.
2. In accordance with our City Tree Preservation Ordinance
#81-21, section 7.5-12, p. 598, the applicant must prepare a
tree management plan for on site protection of trees during
construction. The plan is also part of section 7.5-15, pg.
600.
I will discuss these two
C~inUin~or
~ --
K in J. I a an
Forester/Horticulturist
items with the applicant if they are
rezoning to RIA.
KJH:ad
DOC: JONA
BOYNTON BEACH STAFF COMMENTS
Utilities Department:
This area lies within our
designated service and must
be served and supported by
user rates whether or not it
is annexed. Annexation,
therefore, has no impact on
personnel salaries, etc.
Public Works:
This annexation alone will not
create a significant impact on
the operations of this
department.
Management Services:
Need street address and
notification to Palm Beach
County for inclusion in
Master Street Address Guide
for routing of 911 calls to
City of Boynton Beach.
Fire Department:
The subject property will be
served by our new Station 3.
r
8oar~ of County Commissioners
Carol A. Roberts, Chair
Carol J, Elmquist, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Dorothy Wilken
Jim Watt
County Administrator
Jan Winters
Department of Planning, Zoning & Building
December 6, 1988
Mr. Peter Cheney, City Manager
City of Boynton Beach
200 N. Seacrest Blvd.
Boynton'Beach, FL 33435
Dear Mr. Cheney:
Palm Beach County Planning Division has coordinated the
the proposed Jonathan's Grove annexation of 9.38 acres.
is generally located on the east side of Lawrence Road,
mately 600 feet south of Hypoluxo Road. County staff
are as follows:
review of
The site
approxi-
comments
1. ENGINEERING, Allan Ennis, Development Review Engineer
No Comment.
2. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, Bob Krause, Environmen-
tal Analyst ~
No Comment.
3 '
.,
FIRE-RESCUE, Ed Hines, 4th Battalion Chief
I
,
The subject property is approximately 9 acres in size and is
bordered by the city of Boynton Beach.on the west side.
Due to its size and location, the impact of this land use
change on the delivery of Fire Rescue services is minimal.
A limited amount of revenue will be lost; however,; it will
not adversely effect the overall service delivery system in
the subject area. I
3400 BELVEDERE ROAD WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 . (407) 471-3520
4. METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION, Teresa Cantrell, Senior
Planner '
The staff of the Metropolitan Planning Organization has
reviewed, the proposed annexation submitted by the City of
Boynton Beach, and finds it to be consistent with adopted
agency goals and objectives.
5. PLANNING DIVISION, James Ponseti, Planner
Staff comments are as follows:
A. Planning Division staff is concerned about the creation
of an unincorporated county pocket, adj acent to the
proposed annexation on the south. 'State and county
annexation policy prohibits 'any annexation which
creates a county pocket or enclave, due to their
deleterious effect upon the provision of municipal
services.
B. Staff is also concerned about whether the proposed
annexation is "compact" as defined by section 171.031,
F. S . The parcel proj ects westward from the area of
contigui ty, with an average width to depth ratio of
nearly 4 to 1, thereby creating a finger of municipal
land.
Additionally, staff questions whether the proposed
annexation is "substantially contiguous" as defined by
section 171.031, F.S. In the absence of more precise
criteria for determining what is "substantially
contiguous," the following analysis is offered.
Approximately 10% of the parcel's boundary is
contiguous to the city of Boynton Beach. Staff does
not believe that this meets the statutory requirement
for substantial contiguity.
The "Palm Beach County Interim Annexation Policy"
(hereafter, County POlicy), adopted August 2, 1988,
requires County Planning staff to review proposed
annexations for "statutory deficiencies," pursuant to
Chapter 171, F.S. If the proposed annexation is
determined not to be in compliance with statutory
requirements, then the County may take one of the
following actions:
1. The County and the municipality may enter into an
interlocal. agreement as detailed in the County
Policy, or
2. If an interlocal agreement between the County and
the municipality "cannot be executed within 30
days of the adoption of the annexation ordinance,
the county may file a lawsuit to enforce the
requirements of Chapter 171, F. S . in accordance
with section 171.081. F.S."
;
6. UTILITIES, Tim Russell, Director, Engineering Division
No impact - not in PBCWUD service area.
Based on the preceding comments, County staff requests that you
postpone any final action on the proposed annexation until an
interlocal agreement can be implemented.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to these
actions.
~~~~
RMM:jp
FILE:J1/ANNXBB1
cc: BCC
Sam Shannon, Asst. County Administrator
John Lower, Acting Executive Director, PZB
stan Redick, Planning Director
Bill Capko, Assistant County Attorney
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director, Boynton Beach
Allan Ennis, Traffic Engineering Division
Ed Hines, 4th Battalion Chief, PBC Fire-Rescue
Teresa cantrell, Senior Planner, MPO
Tim Russell, Director, Engineering Division, PBCWUD
M E M 0 RAN DUM
January 12, 1989
TO: FILE ~2--JONATHON'S GROVE ANNEXATION,
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING 12/88
FROM: TAMBRI J. HEYDEN, ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER
RE: CONDITIONS OF CITY COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 4, 1989
FOR JONATHON'S GROVE APPROVAL
The following conditions were approved by the City Commission on
January 4, 1988 for the Jonathon's Grove request (prior to
transmission to the Department of Community Affairs):
1. All staff comments not in conflict with approval of
the request as submitted, more specifically, all
comments contained within the Planning Department
memo dated December 9, 1988, the Forester memo dated
December 5, 1988, and all comments on the master
comment sheet.
2. A minimum 9,590 square foot lot size.
3. A minimum lot frontage of 70 feet.
4. A minimum living area of 1,800 square feet.
5. A wall no higher than six (6) feet, along the northern
property boundary is required.
{7 . f1 ~ J_ ,
"C=/~~ ' ~
TAMBRI J. HEYDHH
TJH:ro
EXHIBIT "B"
~",=g~c:'
.s! ;'!:iE 5':1 0'
lS ~CD a.. ::;-
.5'a=r--t1!L
!,fQ g~ a~ Ii'
NSA c:~CD-
0:1 :I"" ~
:J- ::;- Sit
5'~ .11 CD
fQ - .
~
CD
=-
~~C;~~cnCD
,. ~UlUl5'W
~C~'2.CD
5'E CD,..
. ~~"n
n"..
. . a.
-<
Road--
CJ)
::;
(1)
C
C)
...
C)
r
I
I
I ~..
~ ..~ I _
N I r-
.... I
I
N
U1
I
I
..-;
- --,.<r
....
Ol
....
c.n
,....
~
....
~
Ol
U1
~
I
I
1
I
..~
EXHIBIT "c"
EXISllItG RIGHHlf.NA'f ~ I
10.NS''''S saul'. ."'1" IAS1, LAHRENCE ROAO [AS PER PALM BEACH I-or LA,",NCE 00.0 ,Pl." ,"liS ?~
~ ~I~E _'83918 : . c.? COMM~SIONER: MINUTE:' SEPT. ~.~}_ __ ~-~02':'S~Oi.-'.J. _ ~'~ _ ~.. -
,~ NO 02'51'[ 112.28,- ,~ .' ltQl'OZ'SI'[ 111.91'-' ......
rO'llNSIIIP'SSDUTH, A1H6(OU51J; t3.04'urlll ~~!JdH'--'\ '/NQrol"5I'[ 33..,17' ,I ~ __~ C'I ;g
lQl~ lQt.,.- -- l!ii -
"lil ~i~ ~ '::;,~...,:: '\ :
i<;!1! ;~i. ~:;;~ "'",lQ ~ III I;~
jlll; ~: ,,_ ~ ~ ~- 0 ;; . ~::;. II
.~ -~ a :::~:;:"";;~ ~VJ~ ;
::2 ; l:l p ~ ,~ ~~ ~~ ~~2 i
~~~ !_ ~ g It:
;; - 131 00' . i~
. Ip
I~
...- --,
, =~
~g
l;; $i~
'I!; ~~
~
0:
;; w 0,
0 - - ~1~
0
1J1.00' -
w ~
!! 0 ~ ~
~
137.00'
ru ;J
!! lD l!
131.00'
;; ru ;;
!! Q) I!
ill 00'
~ ru
1;
l:l '36.63
;: ; w
I' ~
I
136.60
8
'l3
~
8
<=l
8
"li
a
fii
Fa
8 'i3<=l
f'T'1 SJ~
Z <=lAPEl
~ G=[!3g
::l El<=lB""l
~~~ t::3@.,.
.,,1Il e::a ~
~~' BaA
~."" fii"llB<=l
m~~C1rn 8
~~=~g E3 A E3
m~",e::a a a ~
i!;;;;[;; ~aB
~,~ q~~
-"."ze::il a <=:l 'i3
_~~ ~E3... ~
:go~ fii B "ll ~
.....:n <=lfiip
!" ~ae::a
Z 8AB~
" FJB=<=l
~ ~J-3
B
~
8
6il
fii
~
~
m
~
~
=;
IS
8
B
SJ
c:::J
B
SJ
B
~
~
EJ
8
c:s
rn
I
IP
: I!;
I
~ ::z: ~
I'"
I~
p'
\;
,
I
I
:\
I
\
I
j~
~\i
,:.:
\
I
I
I
!
I;;
i.E
I
lJl).!)8
I
I;;
l!!
I
lJ1
';;
\~
--L--
U6.55
~
,.
I
C1
I ,0
I II!;
,L.I
;;
ru
-..
;;
I!
l!
~;
;IIi
di
l<l-
~
IlJ.oo'
lFJ ~i~
is
I'
I
136.5)
13100'
,,"I
g~
~: 5
::
~O
;~
'"
"
m~~
~;~
.!!;~;!i
o ~~~
~ l!:
;;
c
z -
TI
r
l>
.., ~ l!:
[Tl
0
~ 8
'"
C1
~~
ru
lJ1
:::
~
III 00'
ru ~.;
" ~~ ~
\3100'
O~
. ~
l!:
"
ru
w 2!
13100'
'J
ru ~
!l1CilO
'" ;;
!31(!1J'
'"
0
~i
l!;
,;;
",g
I~
ig~
~~~
~~jf;~-
,
:::;;~
w
---1R-QL_
- ':':'
~~
"'"'
-' .
lD .....
C1!~
>>>tJo 13636'
~.;.--
w 'g:
"l
'.
l!
o Q)
I~
l~
~
\
i; /
~ ~: ~i ~
c
~S ,:~ ~$i
.0 c ... r a~ !:
~~ Z I!:;q ,;;
TI
i~ r ~~
aM l> ~~;
> ..,
III on .., ~~"
i ~ rn ~~z
0
..
!ilO;<
a~
li
III 1"10 a...o... nil)
'I~ ;8 ;g~-g i~
..- .... ... -",
:r ..co 0._...
n..c... ~ 0
I ,." ~.'l~
, ~. I ; I ..~
: ~~ I~:e.:~;~
_ D" ,. '"'
~co: ...
EXHIBIT "D"
GEE&JENSm~
1D: 7-686-7446
OCT 06'93
9:24 No.003 P.15
n
GI!I " JENSON
Enginoefs,^rch_eo".AanNl,.. Inc.
Pili' Harvaro Cirelli
w... P.IITI SMeh, ~L 33.0100
TelephOt'G (407) 803.000'
File (<401) 606.7446
September e, 1 U93
Mr. Christopher Culro
Plannin!~ & Zoning Director
City of Boynton Be8ch
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Jonathan's Grove
Dear Chris,
Tho following response is per your memo of SeptE~mber 02, 1993 requestlng that a written
response statinn what changes of circumstanct:!$ have caused lots to be reduced. It
should be noted that all minimum lot standards per the rezoning have been met with the
excepti(>n of lot depths.
Typical lot deptrls of 1a7' have been maintained wherever possible. The minImum 137'
depth was based upon the Conceptual Master Pllan submitted with the rezoning request
which was approved on January 4, 1989. The 13:7' lot depths indicatad on thi~. plan were
conceptual In that hard engineering had not balm done.
In our preparatie,n of the pial we determined that by holding 137' lot depths on the south
side of the development and providing a 60' wiele roadway that lot depths 011 the north
side of the road would vary from approximately 136.36' to 136.65' with the exception of
lots located on U18 cul-de-sac. The cul-de-sac lots would be shallower but wieler in order
to maintain a minimum lot area of 9590 squarel feet As stated in Tambri'!; memo of
August 24, 199~~ a oondition of approval of this ~~oning action is that it is subject to staff
comments which are not in conflict with the speciifled development standards. ConditIon
2 of the staff comments states "Should this reqUl~st be approved as submitted under the
R 1 A zoning distr let, the applicant shall plat the property as shown on the conc1eptual plan
with a minimum lot size of 70 feet by 137 feet~. The platting of this propc~' aa.sbQ.Wo
would be in conflict with the stated minimum lot size of 7'0' X 137' as shclwn on the
preliminary plat.
Another issue unresolved on the Conceptual Master Plan is water management concerns.
It is indicated on the 1989 Conceptual Master Plan that a minimum of 10% of the site
would be utilized for retention purposes but. there was no indication as to how this would
be accomplished. It would have to be assurnod that if water management facilities were
included on the pion that thoy would have to bo incorporatod within the lots, We have
reducec.1 tile doptll of lots 16 and 17 to provide for retention areas outside of the lot areas.
GEE&JENSON
ID:i -686-7446
OCT 06'93
9:24 No.003 P.16
i
n
Mr. Christopher Cutro
Jonathan's Grove
September 8, 1'193 - Page 2
If the depths of those lots were to be increased the water management areas would have
to be Included within the lots. The net usable area of the lots would remain the same.
Lots adjacent to the cul-de-sac are less than 137' in depth as were lots located on the
cul-de-sac on thf~ 1989 Conceptual Mastor Plan. Lots 1, 3 and 32 had all or portions of
their depths less than 137' on the 1989 plan.
Our adherence tQ the requirement that "the applicant shall plat the property as shown on
the conceptual plan" has been to the greatest extent possible within the confines of
meeting current standards and conditions of the master subdivision approval. It should
bl') noted that d,:velopment standards for the R1 A :toning district have been met or
excoeded for the, project.
[f you huve any 'questions or need addltlonallnfclrmatlon please call.
Very truly yours. /
JA
B. Scott Bennewi
Project Manager
BSB:jer
91-351/200
cc: Glen Nicotra
Chuck Sharman
Richard Staudinger
. \
LO~Al\ON MAt
JONA1\-\ANS GROVE
.~
__.'l'ipD~--7i!f;1fP . ... -,~-
--<~~[ \ g ~ ~\
~ l' c.1,..;A ~". ~. l. ,S ~
- - ~ ~ ~
H~ ~
-1~-~
~ --:1-
~'~
~1~\:::
~~
~.1 ~ ~\ \ ~I; F~.'..
p X:<' \ ,'-;: ~~~~;::
p~ ,,, c---: ~;::
--" ,,~._ ,,;~ t:
::1," f-- ; .:f- V- '" ~
~~ i,~~~~;j~
1----- c::: r-}..l \ r-t.R~::
~l 1;:::,./1. r 1...... f-
_l. ~lIl1llT'.'.I~I~ ' ~,,,;-,,,
~_- ;;:'17 -r- (;"~ V' J' ~--
J tl . 7 I \ .....-
:=l _:2- ('-'1:1
_. _' .. ~~ "ow;-:-"i( ~ =bJ-
, I t~1;i)':" ',~ r'l.
.~ 'L\ \j~: ''')J ~....,~
~ ~) E:P r::. Je."f'. 0, '.
r~.1 r:'~" t.\
(l ,,): i\
0.-., .\._~
" .
, '
. I'
t. ,;
j
c:3
,~_..
S\~7E.
~
NIC
pUO
\
\-u' :
, '
n. a.O ~\
lr\ '
puo .~:.~~~.
~ . . .\; A .tP .' ?fl'(;i~:~
~ ~_.. ~~
. .\<,,,,0\.\.\1\1000, ~/I ~ ~~ ~'\J
~\\ GI='O",es 1 .~f::
. I '\
I l...-? r,
I ,- -~ F'. ."C,
.. .,. ,'._" ,,' i.. "TI'l"TI .. 7' ~ ~~Ii}ltnU-II~"; .fJ/"a '~'.f l
.' -1',;: .... ,.~ ~
t - . _'~ ~ - ~;;~
,..- ~. '
I .. . 'T ,. , ", \\ ~'.;
.~ '. " . 'I"'?:
,J;- . '"' \T/~ 1 ;
:'.''''11'11 1 .. n '1'( .J. '..\ \\. ,,~ .~.'
nil''' '" ., rrrflTl"'" /~ ~.:;...,
_ ,~ .......";;L ..
\
\ '- Y( \ \
,I T'f' "" \' \ ,.,-' "n -,
--::.~
\
V;ZH;~77,/ /
'/;7.TJ'-////
.. ">
~
-.---
I
P
---
--------- -
-~\
\
~
~ ._------._---~----~
...--. .' .
-
1=
\..\..
. -- ------
-
J-,Jo
- J-j'O/p.tJ
Crl'''''~/.
c,r('I i-1M,-r7l
------
"N
..,.-..-T~' . . , ., .,..": ~ --' -.......--
.", " ,\ I : I'
\..,......-~" \ ......\I~
r-'-~~ ~ . . . - . \
'. .- ~.\.--- --.--
\ --,--- ..-'
~ \ \ \
I \
....eo~N'TON
NU~se1=',e6"
PuO
,-U'~~ .0
1
~ -
,t ni 4\j\
'\ l ~\ \': . \
,\ II' r.A.: -.
'\'0 '\18 }/I\L~SV ~ to
\i. . \ \ \ \
;- j \ 100.800
", AN
...~
.10=-=
-
i:;; -:'\
I .
\ '
t- - -'~
~'~
>
"
2 z. H p. ..1".
1\
MEMORANDUM
11 April 1989
TO:
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
RE:
Preparation of Ordinances to Annex, Amend the Future
'Land Use Element and Rezoning Jonathan's Grove Property
I" 111-1 rl
Attached please find the comments which were received from the
Department of community Affairs concerning the Jonathan's Grove
and Winchester projects. Receipt of these comments clears the
way for the City to adopt ordinances to annex, amenq the Future
Land Use Element and rezone. Please recall that Mr. Winchester
has withdrawn his requests from consideration. In addition to
the State's comments, you will find a legal description and a
list of conditions which were imposed by the City Commission on
Jonathan's Grove property.
Please forward the City Commission's conditions and the legal
description to the City Attorney for the preparation of
appropriate ordinances.
...
Co CARMIDi ~ ANmJi$I~'
/bks
cc:
Wm. Winchester
Kieran Kilday
Beach Blvd.
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
Florida 33425-0310
(407,) 738-749{)
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
January 6, 1989
.
.
Mr. Ralph Hook
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Division of Resource Planning and Management
Bureau of Local Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Re: Transmittal of' proposed Local Government
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Dear Mr. Hook:
Accompanying this letter you w!ll find materials which are
related to Comprehensive Plan amendments for the C~ty of Boynton
Beach. These plan amendments were considered by the Planning and
Zoning Board, sitting as .the Local Planning Agency, and"also by
the City Commission, at pUblic hearings which were held after due
public notice. The City commission of Boynton Beach has approved
the transmittal of these plan amendments to the Department of
Community Affairs. The two (2) plan amendments enclosed are
entitled as follows:
..'\,
1) Jonathan's Grove
2) Winchester Parcels 1, 2 and 3.
With respect to Rule 9J-11.006, which outlines the procedure for
submitting comprehensive plan amendments, please be advised of
the following for the above-referenced applications:
1. Public hearings for these requests were held before the
City Commission on January 4, 1989, at which time the
Commission approved these requests for transmittal to
the Department of Community ~ffairs.
. ^.._----~-------_._-"._._-----
"
Mr. Ralph Hook
January 6, 1989
Page -2-
2. These amendments constitute the first set of
comprehensive plan amendments for calendar year
1989. Pending review and approval by DCA, it is
anticipated that the ordinances for these
transmittals will be adopted during the month
of April or May, 1989. The City's Comprehensive
Plan will constitute the second set of plan
amendments and is due on June 1, 1989.
3. The local government contact person is:
James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
P.o. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
(407) 738-7490
4. Enclosed you will find ten (10) copies of the staff
report, location map (zoning map) and land use element
map which address items (b) 1 through 5 of Rule
9J-11.006.
5. Concerning the recommendations from staff, the local
planning agency and the local governing body, the
staff recommendation is outlined on the last page of
each staff report. The recommendation from the local
planning agency (Planning and Zoning Board) and the
Local Governing Body (City Commission) are as follows:
JONATHAN'S GROVE
Local Planning Agency: Recommended approval of the
annexation application as submitted. Recommended
approval of the land use element amendment and
rezoning application subject to staff comments,
including the staff recommendation that the property
be zoned R-1AAB instead of the R-1A zoning category
requested by the applicant.
Local Governing Body: Approved the annexation
application as submitted. Approved the land use
element amendment and rez9ning application to the
R-1A zoning category requested by the applicant,
sUbject to all staff comments, ex~ept those in
conflict with the R-1A zoning category requested,
and subject to the following additional stipulations:
-'"\
_.- , ._.~-~-_..- '.
.._ __"0-- ______.._.____.,.______....__.._
1-
"
Mr. Ralph Hook
January 6, 1989
Page -3-
a) Construction of a wall along the north side of the
property.
b) All lots shall have a minimum area of 9,570 square
feet.
c) All lots shall have a minimum frontage of seventy (70)
feet.
d) All homes shall have a minimum living area of 1,800
square feet.
WINCHESTER PARCELS #1, #2 AND #3
Local Planning Agency: Recommended approval of the
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning
applications subject to staff comments.
Local Governing Body: Approved the annexation, land
use element amendment and rezoning applications
subject to staff comments.
6. Copies of the land use policies which appear in
the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan
Evaluation and Appraisal Report for these two
portions of the Reserve Annexation Area are enclosed.
7. In addition to the above, all relevant information
concerning these applications should be contained
within the respective staff reports.
If you have any questions concer~ing these plan amendments or you
find that you require additional information, please contact
Senior Planner James Golden at the address and telephone number
listed under item #3 above.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
,
Ca--. J~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, AICP
PLANNING DIRECTOR
~-
-_/
CSA:ro
Enclosures
cc Daniel M. Cary, TCRPC
Central File
... 1 :'.',l"":, :"
','1.'
------~.-----_._~-
,-........ -~
.-"._------"'.~
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
DATE:
December 5, 1988
RE:
Jonathan's Groves - Proposed Annexation
This memorandum is in reference to the tree
site plan submitted for the above project.
old citrus tree grove consisting of rows of
is also required to submit the following in
survey.
survey and conceptual
The site contains an
trees. The developer
addition to the tree
1. A plan preserving as much as possible the existing grove
trees in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan (section 29,
3.2.3.4.2.2, pg. 86). The plan as submitted does not make
mention of preservation methods.
2. In accordance with our City Tree Preservation Ordinance
#81-21, section 7.5-12, p. 598, the applicant must prepare a
tree management plan for on site protection of trees during
construction. The plan is also part of section 7.5-15, pg.
600.
I will discuss these two
c~nUin~for
: "'~ ,..--
K' in J. 1 a an
Forester/Horticulturist
items with the applicant if they are
rezoning to RIA.
KJH:ad
DOC: JONA
- "
-..--.-...---.....----.-.--..... -_._--._~----"--
M E M 0 RAN DUM
December 9, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE:
JONATHON'S GROVE
STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request.
1. Property owner to dedicate right-of-way for
Lawrence Road 40 feet from centerline within
45 days of annexation.
2. Should this request be approved as submitted
under the R-I-A zoning district, the applicant
shall plat the property as shown on the
conceptual plan with a minimum lot size of
70 feet by 137 feet.
^
(l-<l-~ ~~A ~A'~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZI
CSA:ro
,~ cc Central File
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 17, 1988
TO: ALL DEPARTMENT HEADS
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: JONATHAN'S GROVE ANNEXATION
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a Departmental Review
Form which must be completed in order to provide the information
required as part of the Commission's annexation policy. Also
attached is a location map for the property requested to be
annexed.
Please complete this form and return it to me by Friday, November
4th for inclusion in the public hearing proceedings.
~ ~__ tf1
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
d~
CSA:ro
Attachments
cc Central File
;,
::::.....
: 1.r t. ./,. CAHIIJ.
-- -
LJCA TION MP?
JONATHAN'S 'GROVE
I
-.
. .
~'L
~.
~t";1ilr...,.,.:;;
rt--'-
II'
.... .:;:. '..
NIC
,: NlC:
I
:',puc
,..., -
-- ~
').J=
:J: '_
/1'-
<~
J ilL
\..
!
:................:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::::::.:.:::.:.:'
. .A" ::~:~:~f::~:~:~~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:i:~:;:~:~::::::~:~:::f:~:~ ~
( ::::::::::::::::::::~::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~
SITE .......... ~
S
I:~:.':.'::,.: LU~.~ '. ."
~. ,,': 15;0: . .' \, O. .
~'~A" ..~.(~.:~ ,.~.:~. ~'-'~ (~.:- \.
~."',: .i""'" ~ ~
',' I A... ~,\ h:-~,~~/-,..,.. I
l":A.'.': '~" ~ J: C~.~ ILl::' ' }f.3 :"~/ol..JJ '../.......- '.
k- :,....'1, .,:.. /# ,,,#...... ~l,' ,I-::: r.:::
'..... r--- ~'N 0'.' '\\~..:.
~ "~~~,: ~ -
:..-.. ......'1.. I...... =
,., - .~" ''I -l ". ,k'\ III"'J -
; "',,'l.>::':~ .. . / ~ ,-~ ~~ ,/~LIID ~
.. .... . ,~"'.. ;=;I.1'~ ~ :~~ffillU ::
~ . "/~ NAi-'" ;.' .._ . ~. .,-. .....f" , n.~. ~ . I~
... ,e '"'' /~Irj~pn ~4.. . \d.IoD~;mi II
~, ..~~.. ..('. ,-:-{ .. . ,w#". li'ri"'~;'~~"'" ~~ I
o-~ . ~ ., '~b: =..:.. " . {(Ill ''''''.,P.,~, ..' ~<Tl
...'~' ., '., ',' '. . ~ =~.. . ~ ~:,tt~,;il~::. .~" . --=---: '. ': ))))~I
"= ~". "" . "lJ' ," ...' .,:.. :~"I'C"'~~' 1 - ',' '.:"" '--.' ~\:i~'
I :: I..... -.. . 'I~ :.'.:' ~ "". ,.\.;.::~:;:~.. II'''' .~_~' ---J~..' .--: :;...,'
.. ;-.:-. . . " . I." ..f :t"'..W/~~ II../'Ij;.r .~. "'f . .. ~ U!
I " .' l I I . ,_ I...,... .:' <I . ~ . ,r,..,...;.:', .
"11'11 ':;1'1 ".r. i. ~ ......,.... "'1" 1 ' ., '. I
. n II I I I . I "I .1111 ,~. ...~" " '.', .;..' ;::' ~:':~. :, " ~,~;~.v:~.: J~.qp~.. ~ '. '...
. _ . .'l" . . ,:;', - ,.:,~~" ~"r.:J '.~'i":*'Q " ~ .,
, ..' . ",<... ...~ '....''ftfI. 'EB ':J~ ,iii'" ~,." .,
.. ..r_ "'J . ....:>. ir~.'......~~~><.. .~~o:~lH~~,~,.. U::::
_ . . .. 'J~" ',. ~7",~. .,..,'is'til.EBEE
., 'K,y I :,' '.: ~ -:::""e:: .:-:..::. 'mm':&,g
.' i'--'t ~: m ~='~ .,): 63~>.vS
rr .: .,.,.:" . -4'.:A~ DI . '. ~- ~. .
. . ::".;.. ~r "oj (.1: fl ..l ~ ~
.J-- [ ,J "'; .... ~. ".\ "II' Il....:: I,:" .'... \ . dm
'j:" ) I. "'.1" I I I , '/ f 11'.1 . I '- ~
..., L .~. 'Il . , . . I ,....:,
.' '- ~,. .
. . I~_~RJ_ :t;f,': . .
, .'; ;;. f'l1 ,l1{1i/ ~r~: ~~ ~lJ1W;~' (
.. .' :' ~.~ .~: .. ,:,;::.'-J. I
,~ , .....1...... ~ ,,"~. .,
~.t.. ".,' . ~ ~ ~ ,:
.j ~ ~.: .L,...~:I..' ~~ ". \: ii:(Jzj.
== ....'...,...<u:~., ~'. '.. ~~ :~j~")~~~~
I .~~
.' , " :....~. ":.1'';' ~~:~h~."!""
;1.;hMa'.!'n'ft~;~" . m
. . · . ,. . . "'.k.:.r'.HMf.~"; ';~' ';.:, '.~
;:;J! ~ ...~~ . ,': .'
~~= '/ .. --.
~
11 .',.; f\~ . '.' " " ,."",
"r_'~ . ..
. I'f;-~ ~ . 1 : ' .. ,:(.. , .: ~
"1" ~ L-.. ..,. ---J '. - '!.I~~: . . ..~
MILE'S - .,1 DO", 0 .;~"'\i '''~:,~!;
V..,,\ 4 -,i;-' ,=- ":~~,~~
I ~ ,.II; . I., 4;, I~
~.' ~l r~' AI. ?7~ . ".~ ..' ...,
. I I 11. II .. "
I
~: :~ r- ~ '-
-i. .. ~ t"-
o' :t- ~
. l-
.. .-!
..; I l-
I
.
U.
. ,
- -
-
-
""-1-
,r" ',. ," '(
I'A~
. ',." ..-_':'1
~ ..' , ,
;~ ~
Csl! ')1 ~ .
.;. .~~ ~ l::1
. ..~ ~ ", Ci'"
~. lfi.
"\", ~h
:~
"-' ~~~ .
C,Yfl .... I
ji>Q,~ ~"I'
1\!~/a~" :
~,c..'r ,
..,~ ).. . ..
t~T ...':: ( ..
..... ... '.
1;6 j 8 5';'~I'
~ kJ..,"" ."T ~ .. "f 1 J ~ ..~ "r:",
'7 i~, ~ .;..:.
I I' U V
0' \,".1:4., ", ",
7 p'8'S".j.
...~........ '.'-'~',; .... "~l
18/8:51
,
:....._..___._.......... to .....J
2 1 /'86 I
(".~ " Q a
._..
..-.... ..,,\, ..... .......":".,..
'~/P.~
'0
1/8
'0
~
.400. '800
~,~;~r.7:~:,:~~~,r!>.'.: .
~ . . . .. ,. '" '," " . .' ,....."
. . '.,: t'. ..~.t'" ,", ....~..~...,~...l~>:.."...i~.. . .--..,
O"crrRLisGLe:N:n> ..
. . ......~ .'.~ " .... . .::/,~.
:': '. ..... L..I ~l:::J '. ,'. :,..;...",)..~
;.' .' ,.' 0....: .:.'
L'.'UI".4. ..
,. '. . . . .
.:' ". '. . ',.,
. I'" ... "j i ,,'~ ',."". t' IU'
..,., , h'(,' .\'" '. .., .~. ". .
,I, ==
. '.'".~
";"~I.
E:j,~ -
.
..
, ..
. I ..
~...............~I ~"IoJ"4.
/
1/4
.
1600 FEgT -- -
PI_ANNIN t: 00.1'''-' /0/138
--'Rm.;,:
,,,-,@"n,. .,1,"
..,......
,"~f. _.
.,v". .
'..
.---. '1"'"
VI;
-
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
,
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing units -0-
Existing Use .. . Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
__~ ~.; f,} ,'"'"")
33 Single-family unit. {1,-s-e-6- square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
.....................
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Engineer
City Clerk
Finance
Building Official
Planning
Police
Utilities
Fire
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreatior
.
Public lvorks
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
T
'.,
"
It d
" .' ~I
I,' :~
,. ~
, !l
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
';
ALL DEPARTr'1ENTS
TO:
t~.
RE:
I
ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED. HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use .. . Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RlA zoning)
..................
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No X
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation'? Yes No X
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
/
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Building Official
Planning
Police
publ ic \"orks
Library
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreatior
Utilities
Fire
6
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
r
- J Q~f':
9 I\' r
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
,
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED. HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of' Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present Population -0-
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use "Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit. (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
..................
Would your Department need to increase the number
result of this annexation? Yes
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
of personnel as a
No V',
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No Lr
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space. )
City Clerk Finance City Engineer
V Planning Police Building Official
Utilities Fire Personnel and
# Purchasing
Public \\lorks Library Parks & Recreatior
Energy Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
.'
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
,
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use '. 'Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit. (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
....................
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
This area lies within our designated service area, and must be
served and supported by user rates whether or not it is annexed. Annexation,
therefore, has no impact on personnel, salaries, etc.
(Attach if insufficient space. )
City Clerk Finance City Engineer
Planning Police Building Official
X Utilities Fire Personnel and
- Purchasing
Public ~vorks Library Parks & Recreatior
Energy Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
,
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present Population -0-
Sq.Ft. or
9.38
acres
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use .. . Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
..................
Would your Department need to increase the number
result of this annexation? Yes
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
of personnel as a
No V....
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result~f
this annexation? Yes No ~
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
Nor l2: ,,~h:> L> .. H I"'"' ~l:.--r u.J I &..~ '"i!Je- 'FU '" 0,..:) IH 1 S
. ::I).e'(:;1r:::va T"N"\ El'.J<r -ro .~ c...L~ . 73 Y -T7f l.,s ~ IVAJ-Ifrx ~ rID A..J
(Attach if insufficient space. )
City Clerk Finance City Engineer
Planning Police Building Official
Utilities Fire Personnel and
# Purchasing
V Public tvorks Library Parks & Recreatior
Energy Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
.~
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
.
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Sq.Ft. or
9.38
acres
Existing Use ., 'Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit. (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
. .....................
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No X
Estimated number of additional personnel required: N/A
Would your Department need to increase
this annexation?
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
expenditures
Yes
N/A
N/A
as a result of
No X
N/A
Comments:
Need street address and notification to Palm Beach
County for inclusion in Master Street Address Guide (MSAG) for
routing of 911 calls to City.of Boynton Beach.
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk Finance City Engineer
Planning Police Building Official
Utilities Fire Personnel and
~ Purchasing
Public \o?orks Library Parks & Recreatio:
X Ha..n~L-~,.,1- Date Processing
...' ;-v ice s;.
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possibl
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
,
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use .. . Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit. (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
..................
Would your Department need to increase the number
result of this annexation? Yes
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
of per~~nnel-7.a
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a resul~of
this annexation? Yes No ~
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
/,
Finance City Engineer
Planning
Police
Building Official
Utilities
Fire
Personnel and
purchasing
Parks & Recreatior
~
Public \1orks
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
.'
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
I
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED. HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Sq.Ft. or
9.38
acres
Existing Use "'Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
....................
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation'? Yes No ~ '.<H
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as aNOresu~ of
this annexation? Yes ~
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
~
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Conunents:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Building Official
Planning
Utilities
Fire
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreatior
~
publ ic t~orks
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
.'
y.
y ~
.::":/~
,a--
>~
~~
&..-- ----
<.
,;:;;."..
(~:.
:~;i'
;1
/:.
......~..~i:..
':,~:
:k
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 17, 1988
TO: ALL DEPARTMENT HEADS
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: JONATHAN'S GROVE ANNEXATION
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a Departmental Review
Form which must be completed in order to provide the information
required as part of the Commission's annexation policy. Also
attached is a location map for the property requested to be
annexed.
Please complete this form and return it to me by Friday, November
.4th for inclusion in the public hearing proceedings.
,
C!..-~~ (/} ~
CARMEN S. ANNUN~E. ~.
CSA:ro
Attachments
OCT 31 1988
PLANNING DEPT.
cc Central File
-/Au /.-A~M<b{ 1",,11 A 4"'.
('i c !-(,l'/f /"'/l.
;J ,-11 ,}-.t.C1..?. .be;._-c
A JJV\'h '. l/.Ttj;;".. .
.." \./
-f!
I/t't~
/~.J f
11'.l' ..-:1 r n .,( n,9 /J/ A\
...'.... <.'1: /~7._Y~' (' \ U.--/
qr9.
j; .. . t'r
. (11/,)f.,
J {/
~
..
/
.I
f
/
'\ 4-_;:....., ...
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW I vKM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
,
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED,HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Area of Subject Property
9.38
acres
sq.Ft. or
Estimated Present Population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use 33 Single-family unit (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
..
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No X
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No X
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments: This area will be covered under our new Station 3.
(Attach if insufficient sp~ce.)
City Clerk Finance
City Engineer
Planning Police
Building Official
Utilities e ~ Fire
Personnel and
purchasing
Parks & Recreatio~
Public Works Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible
Attachment: Location Map
----_.."--,~~;..-". "'._,~_._----
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
.
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Area of Subject Property
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Estimated Present Population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use .. . Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit. (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
. ....................
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No /'..
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Wou~d your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No V
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Planning
Utilities
Police
Building Official
Fire
/ Library
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recrea tiol
"
Public \~orks
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possibl
Attachment: Location Map
.'
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
.
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED. HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use .. 'Commercial Citrus Grove
Propos~d Use
33 Single-family unit. (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
.................... .
Would your Department need to increase the number
result of this annexation? Yes
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
of per~~nn~~ a
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a resu~ of
this annexation? Yes No ~
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
Planning
Police
(Atta~~icient space.)
y[~ ity Engineer
Building Official
City Clerk
Finance
Public \'iorks
Library
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Utilities
Fire
"
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
RECEIVED
jeT 3 1 1988
PLANNING DEPT.
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION 0: PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present Population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Existing Use .. . Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
..................... .
Would your Department need to increase the number
result of this annexation? Yes
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
of personnel as a
No X
,)' ;;
.. / -'" ,
Would your Department need to increase
this annexation?
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
expenditures
Yes
,.-!.....~
t
as a result of
No.Y
/
..-) /) /7
. /
.-, .' ..')"
(.
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City'Clerk
Finance
Police
,
-) //
l /
VI' .
L . .~.
t?
City Engineer
Planning
Building Official
Utilities
Fire
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreatior
-
Public Harks
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
,
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED.HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present population -0-
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use "'Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
............,......
Would your Department need to increase the number
result of this annexation? Yes
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
of personnel as a
No i/ ......
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No ~
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Building Official
Planning
Utilities
Police
Fire
v~
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreatior
#
Public Works
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
.'
) .
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTt-1ENTS
.
RE: ANNEXATION O? PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Jonathan's Grove/Richard D. Johnson
Sq. Ft. or
9.38
acres
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present population -0-
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units -0-
Existing Use " . Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Use
33 Single-family unit. (7,500 square foot lots)
subdivision (proposed RIA zoning)
....................
Would your Department need to increase the number
result of this- annexation? Yes
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
of personnel ~s a
No )<J
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No)Q
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Conunents:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Engineer
City Clerk
Finance
Building Official
Planning
Police
Personnel and
Purchasing
"-\ ;;ZtZ:;tior
Utilities
Fire
#
Public ~10rks
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possiblE
Attachment: Location Map
'"
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
To:
Council Members
P.GEND.~ ITEM 6B
(AS REVISED BY COUNCIL)
From:
staff
Date: February 17, 1989 Council Meet.ing
Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review - Two
Amendments to the Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Introduction
Pursuant to the prov1s1ons of the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes, the Council must be provided an opportunity to
review and comment on comprehensive plan amendments prior to
their adoption. The City of Boynton Beach has submitted
proposed amendments to the state Department of Community
Affairs, which in turn is seeking Council's comments.
Council's review of the information forwarded by the Department
of Community Affairs is in the context of the relationship of
the proposed amendments to the regional policy plan developed
pursuant to Section 186.507, Florida statutes. If a conflict
with adopted plans or policies is identified, the regional
planning agency is to specify any objections and may make
recommendations for modifications. Council also provides
informal comments to the local government through a spirit of
cooperation, and technical assistance on matters related to the
proposed amendments. These advisory comments are aimed at
providing coordination between the local and" regional
comprehensive plans.
Backqround
The City of Boynton Beach is considering two amendments to the
Future Land Use Element. The locations of the properties under
consideration are shown on the accompanying map, and the number
of acres and proposed changes in land use designations are
summarized in the following list:
.,
,
..
,.
..
"
.
Evaluation
The proposed amendments have been reviewed in accordance with
the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida statutes, Council's
review procedures, and Council's adopted Regional Comprehensive
Policy Plan. The following comments are offered as a result of
that review.
6AS & 6A6 - lfft~s- paroel:---btte--eeeft--recen~~--annc.xed.
The proposed land use designation is
similar to the former designation and the
use is compatible with the surrounding
area. However. the annexation aDpears to
create a narrow finaer of unincorDorated
territorv to the south of the Darcel to
be annexed. Such an action may be in
conflict with the aeneral 90a1 of
interaovernmenta1 coordination and mav
not be to the mutual benefit of both
local aovernment iurisdictions.
6A7-6A12 - lffte--~aa --I'ftree%s--~--~I'l--~i!l
I'rol'ol!les---efta-~-- fta~."~-- bean----reoent.1y
ftl'll'leXeST The proposed land use
designation change from commercial to
agricultural is an interim one, according
to the city. The property may be used
for commercial uses in the future. When
such a change is formally proposed, there
may be traffic and capacity
considerations re1ati ve to Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Congress Avenue.
Based on the information provided, the proposed
amendments do not appear to be in conflict or
inconsistent with the policies contained in the
Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan.
Recommendation
Council should adopt the comments outlined above and
their transmittal to the State Department of Community
in fulfillment of the requirements of Chapter 163,
Statutes.
approve
Affairs
Florida
Attachments
,
I
'l
"'
:,
,
.
..