APPLICATION
-l/ '~.2 c", C,-ln )-l---
e#<:.i &( (~ 0f~1~
, hU-'Llt2d /(;...d..c-ti. ..
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-059
DATE:
March 6, 1995
00 ,.,; ,.; ( J " m
1,t:-.
TO:
\~~~rieamA. Parker, City Manager
VU~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
FROM:
RE:
TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS - LAWRENCE ROAD
The 1994 average traffic count on Lawrence Road between NW 22nd
Avenue (Gateway) and Hypoluxo has been reported to us by the County
to be 7972 trips. The current FDOT Level of Service Manual defines
the threshold traffic level for LOS D for 2 lane undivided streets
as 13,400 trips.
Those two numbers are important in studying Lawrence Road traffic
because the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division has
informed Mr. Hall of this office that widening of two lane roads in
the County system is not seriously considered until LOS D is
reached. Lawrence Road is a County road.
The Traffic Division has also opined that about 1000 more units can
be occupied on Lawrence Road before LOS D is reached. Well over
1000 more units have been approved by either the City or County, as
follows:
l Lawrence Oaks 178 units
.... Nautica I 177 units
L-- Nautica II 197 units
L- -Me.J.dowwuod G.LOV~ ( d k:tt Kno 11 woodlt:oo'hc:;, 539 units
Fox Hollow (aka Manor Forest) 18 ~) unbuilt units, est.
L.- Sausalito Groves 164 unbuilt units, est.
/-- Jonathan's Grove 3 ') units
'J
i-- Lawrence Grove 75 unbuilt units, est.
/.-- Citrus Glen 20 unbuilt units, est.
v Citrus Park 113 units
TOTAL
1680 unoccupied units
The figure 1680 is not propounded to be exact, because each of the
entries marked "unbuilt units" represents our estimate of how many
units remain to be occupied in uncompleted developments. Traffic
from occupied units appears in actual traffic counts totaling 7972
trips. We believe it is reasonable to predict that when all
unoccupied units in all listed developments are in place, the Level
of Service Standard will exceed LOS Standard E, which is 15,000
trips. LOS D will be reached when approximately 2/3 of the 1680
future units are occupied.
Engineering Division Memo No. 95-059
Traffic Observations - Lawrence Road
March 6, 1995
Page #2
We have been unable to obtain accurate estimates of revenue
collected from dwelling units now contributing to the 7972 trips on
Lawrence Road. If we assume 1600 dwelling units have generated
those trips, and the average traffic impact fee collected was $1500
per unit, the total fees generated to date exceed $2,400,000. The
total fees due from 1680 additional units will exceed $2,500,000,
representing a total at build-out of $5,000,000I generated by these
developments to be spent in the immediate area. These numbers are
estimates, of course, and should be adjusted for traffic impact
fees generated by other users who pay such fees (commercial, etc.)
and those who don't (schools).
Our conclusion is that it is time for the County to begin planning
for widening of Lawrence Road so that when LOS D is reached, action
can be immediately implemented to begin construction. A four lane
undivided road will support 23,520 trips at LOS D, which is
adequate for all completed and currently proposed development along
Lawrence Road.
WVH/ck
C:LAWRENCE.LOS
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner
TA8LJi: lA
LEVEL or SERVICE D
Test 1 Altern&te
Peal( Houl:' AnT Test 1
LOS D LO' D LO", D
F^CILIT:t l'tPII S'1'ANDJI\.RO CTJI\.NDARD S'1'ANDAAD
2 lanes undi,..id9d 1,220 13,400 1,030
3 lanes two-way 1,280 14 , 000 1,080
2 tanlH, one-way 1,600 17,600 2,650
3 lanee o:1~-way 2,460 27,000 4,000
4 l<lnell uT1dh'idecl 2,140 23,520 1,770
.. laneg div....dQd 2,&70 29,400 2,210
S lanes divid~d 2,670 29,400 2,210
Ii 1an.as divided 4,100 45,000 3, 330
8 lanes dlvided 5,070 55,800 4,110
4 1.~ne8 expressway 6,070 68,900 3,450
0 lanes eXpl..8sil....ay 9,100 103,400 5,170
a l~ne~ e~pr~5~way l2,lJO 131,900 6,e90
10 lanes ~xpro~~w~y 15,170 172,300 8,610
SOurce: 100T Level of Service Mdnual, Generalized Daily Level of Service
liaxl.mum Volumes, Group C and Croup 1, and Generalized Peak Hour/Peak
Directional Level Of servtce Max1mum volumes, Group A and Group 1 tor
~r~anL:ect ~reaB (^pr~l 1992).
~or the D~tailed Analysis for Alternate Test One. L@vel of Service D shall be the
Sum of the Crltical Volumes of one thousand f~ur hundred (1,400) In accordance
with the ?iannLng Method in the 1985 Manual,
TABU: 1 a
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
'teet 1 Alternate
Peak Hour Tellt 1
LOS I!: LOS !: LOD I!:
F"'CILI'1'Y T'Ur. ST~NOl\nl SThNDARD STANDARD
:l lauliiul undbi.:iad 1, 370 15,000 1,280
3 lanAS t''''o-~/ay 1,450 15,700 1,340
2 lanes one-way 1,760 19,300 3,120
3 lanes one-~IlY 2,660 29,JOO 4,570
4 lanen und1.v1ct&<1 2,350 25,800 2,080
4 l.:lneD dtvLrled 2,930 32,200 2,&00
Ii lanoo t~'o-"ay :2,930 32,2QO 2,600
6 lJlne!l divid~d 4,440 48,800 3,890
e lanes dividad 5,550 60,400 4,810
4 lanas expressway 6,500 14,000 3,710
Ii lanoB eXfrcs8way 9,780 111,200 5,'60
e lan~K e~p~e35way l3,050 lH,200 ? , 410
10 lc:'\e:: e>:pL'.e"Wa)' 16,310 US,JOO Q,260
Sour~e: rOOT Level of SQrvice Hanual, CeneralizQd Daily Level of Service
Ha;(imur., Volumes, Group C and Group 1, and Generalhec1 Peak Hour/Peak
O!.:'Qctional Level of Service Maximum vclumes, Group A and Group Hor
urb~ni~ad areas (April 19'2).
i'.>J: tho C...tallgd An.a.ly.ia feu: A.LtQrnat:~ Teet One, Level of ServLce E shall be the
Sum of th~ Critical Volumas ot one thouaand five hundred (1,500) in accordance
with the planning Method 1n the 1985 Manual.
The Level 0' Service Standards for Teet 2 are Level or eervlce S in ~abl. la.
TOTAL P.02
Fair Share contribution for Road Improvem.nts P.. Table
Boynton B.ach
,----------------------------~----------~---~-~-----------~----~----~-----~-----
Description
Road Fee
Resident!.al
---------------------
Slngle Family Detached
Single Faml1y Att. per unit
Congr Livlng pacil, per unit
HobUe Home
Non-Residential
1,650.00
1,155.00
353.93
825.00
\
------------------------------
..General ot flce
10,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq.tt.
50,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq.tt.
100,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.tt.
150,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.ft.
200,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.ft.
300,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.tt.
400,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.tt.
500,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.tt.
600,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.tt.
700,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq.tt.
BOO,OOO sq.ft.& over per 1,000 sq. ft.
Medical Office per 1,000 sq. ft.
--..-..-.
-.--- .--
-..
1,353.00
911.90
771.65
699.05
651.75
592.35
547.80
519.75
497.75
481.25
465.30
1,819.35
..- ...... .--
General Commercial Rstall Examples
---------------------------------------------------
.
\
10;000 sq.ft. per 1,000 8q.tt.
50,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft.
100,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
200,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 8q.ft.
300,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 aq.ft.
400,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
500,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 8q.ft.
600,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 8q.ft.
800,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
1,000,000 Iq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
1,200,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
1,400,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft.
1,600,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 8q.tt.
Mi8cellaneous
Hosplta1, per bed
Hurling Home, per bed
Warehouse per 1,000 sq.ft.
Hini-warehouse per 1,000 sq.ft
Gen. Recreation per parking space
General Industrial per 1,000 8q.ft.
Fast Food wI Drive Thru per 1,000 sq. ft..
-Quality Restaurant per 1,000 eq.ft.
-High Turnover Sit Down aest. per 1,000 aq.ft.
Drive-In Bank per 1,000 aq.tt.
Ga8 Station per station
Convenience Store per 1,000 eq.ft.
Hovie Theater per seat
Racquet Club per court
Church/Synagogue per 1,000 eq.ft.
Day Care Center per 1,000 sq.ft.
Hew Car Sales per 1,000 sq. ft.
Carpet Storea per 1,000 aq.ft.
Veterinary Clinic per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hotel per room
Hotel per room
Elementary Schools ~er 1,000 sq. ft.
Hlgh Schools pe~ l,eOO sq.tt.
r:) -\. L
Mflll
~~'l-)~
, tV
5,069.60
2,822.82
2,215.50
t.;7bB ..5:S
1,648.37
1,419.10
1,403.00
1,359.49
1,360.28
1,359.01
1,384.12
1,398.19
1,431.93
------------------------------
-
647.35
143.00
268.40
143.55
165.00
383.35
12,168.31
4,511.84
9,600.58
7,816.74
8,639.40
11,162.10
96.90
2,359.50
512.60
3,923.37
2,638.35
5.95
1,804.00
560.45
418.50
589.60
599.50
\
( . -
TRAFFIC STATEMENT
for
JONATHAN'S GROVE
submitted to:
City of Boynton Beach
prepared by:
TEl
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
One Clearlake Centre
250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1001
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
407 - 659 - 8328
BACKGROUND
This report is prepared to support a request for zoning change and
for annexation for JONATHAN'S GROVE. It is submitted to the City
of Boynton Beach. Guidelines published by the City are used in the
prepartion of this study.
The first requirement of any zoning oriented study done in the City
is a comparison of traffic generated under current and proposed
zoning.
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Traffic generation is the method by which the amount of traffic,
or the number of trips from a proposed site is estimated. One
authoritative source used to estimate traffic generation is the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Report.
The most current version is the Fourth Edition.
The traffic generation data in the ITE Report is the compilation
of surveys summarized for use by a "best fit formula" which most
closely replicates the data collected. For small projects like
Jonathan's Grove however, average trip rates are recommended. These
rates are from the Fourth Edition of the ITE Report. The use of
average trip rates was the only generation method presented in the
recently outdated Third Edition.
The rates which will be used in this study for the daily traffic
generation and that which is expected in the morning and afternoon
peak hours are based on the number on single family dwelling units
as indicated below:
Daily
Morning Peak
Afternoon Peak
10.0 trips per dwelling unit
0.75 trips per dwelling unit
1.01 trips per dwelling unit
These rates will be used in a comparison of traffic generation from
the two zoning scenarios (existing and proposed) and will be used
to analyse peak hour movements at the main driveway intersection.
TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
One important consideration in an application for zoning approval
is the comparison of existing conditions with those which would
exist under the proposed conditions. From a traffic generation
standpoint the comparison is summarized in the following table.
Trip Generation Comparison
Existing
Proposed
9 units
33 units
90 daily trips
330 daily trips
240 additional
It is evident that the change in zoning from one dwelling unit per
acre to approximately three dwelling units per acre has a very
small additional impact - 240 trips throughout the entire day.
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC GENERATION
During the peak hours - morning and afternoon - the following
traffic generation characteristics are expected.
Peak hour traffic generation
Morning Peak
.75 trips per unit
27% inbound
73% outbound
7 trips
18 trips
Afternoon Peak
1.01 trips per unit
63% inbound
37% outbound
21 trips
12 trips
The implications of these peak hour vehicle trips will be discussed
in the next section.
IMPACT STUDY THRESHOLDS
There are two thresholds defined in the City guidelines for
determining the scope of the traffic impact study required. A full
impact study is required if a proposed project generates either:
three thousand trips per day, or
two hundred fifty directional trips in peak hour
It is clear that the daily generation (330 trips) and the highest
peak hour directional generation (21 trips in the afternoon) are
well below these thresholds. Therefore, a full traffic impact
analysis will not be required.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
An analysis of traffic movements at the intersections of the
driveway that would serve the property is required in this traffic
statement to determine improvements necessary to accommodate such
traffic movements. Because of the small size of Jonathan's Grove
only turn lanes at the driveway will be examined.
Requirements for turn lanes into a residential site (from Lawrence
Road in this case) are based on afternoon peak hour turning
movements. The turn lane requirement thresholds per Palm Beach
County Engineering Department are as follows:
Left turn lanes from the main street
Right turn lanes from the main street
75 vph
30 vph
It is evident that these thresholds are far greater than the total
inbound traffic into the proposed site (left turns plus right
turns). Therefore, turn lanes from Lawrence Road will not be needed
to accommodate the traffic from the Jonathan's Grove.
CONCLUSION
The traffic impact from rezoning the Jonathan's Grove site as
proposed will be negligible. The impact on the adjacent roadway
(Lawrence Road) is insignificant (less than two percent of the
capacity of the existing facility).
Furthermore, the peak hour demands at the intersection of the
future site and Lawrence Road is not significant enough to warrant
the addition of right or left turn lanes into the site.
1~--
FREDERICK W. SCHWARTZ, . E.
Florida Registration # 28403
Notice of
Municipal Annexat ion
FROM: City of Boynton Beach,
Florida
Please be advised by this notification and attached location map,
that certain lands have been annexed by BOYNTON BEACH, Florida.
Information contained herein is pertinent to the area in question.
If additional material is required, please contact the office of: '
THE CITY PLANNER.
Name of Development/Owner: Jonathan's GroveJRichard D. Johnson
Ordinance # 89-10
or
Special Act of State Legislature: Bill #
Effective Date:
6/ 20/ 89 .
"
Sq.Ft.
9.38
Acres
E~timated Present Residential Density:Vacant (C~tru~ Grove)
d.u. 's/acre
Zoning:
R-IA
" Densi ty Allowed:
5~8 net
d.u. 's/~cre
I
Existing Type of Development: Commercial Citrus Grove
Proposed Type of Development:. 33 lot single-f.amily residential spbdivision
i
_*County
*County
I
Comrnissionerf
Planning~ Bldg,Zonin~
I
*Owner or Petitioner
All City Departments
All utility Compan~es
*Area Planning Board
*County, Tax Assessor
Chamber of Commerce
!Secretary of State
*Supervisor of Registration
Bureau of Census
*Clerk of County Circuit Court
to receive copy of prdinance
xx Attachment Location Map
*State Beverage Department
I
*State Department of
Transporation
D-l
'NII~_.~"_.~-'. ..-........
L 'jCA TION MJ-,r
. .
JONATHAN'S GROVE
='9 Ir kll' """'..
.- L-
-
I
j' NIC:
:.'PUC
- .-
-,
.....L.:
V7.
~
,-
'r/,
.........
.1
r:"'r.. ...," '.: {:
--.
I
,. ....
NIC
,.
i.
~~ ::
~.~
)'1,-
,,}.: =
~:::
J TII
.' . .'q.:. \-U I' ,"
~ Ff!~ n! . :...:.. .0' II
'1' : :'...; es~~ .:. '. . .,' -:\
!'.A':' .:. ~ ~.~.' ,.'
i.....A..~ ~.~nz'~~.I'~Ir::r--..~
',' I":A~..'.~ m~~q~~ .9Rr"~~ ~
ff"; ......../ 8,,:..j! /JJ~\ ~S7E,.r \~~t.:o
;.AC;;: . ~ ~. JJ ' , ::
. ..... .._'.~ _ ~'r ,,' , _
. . ,.. . == '"/-4." ~ ,'. J.... -ll"J ~
I' .' '. . . 7 \ '^- " ~
"Ii~~. ~ ..~>.,>.'>.:. ....... t..~i..,:IP&fffi~ .
'. , . :. .. :; . ~ ~ il:Q:' 7.111
,~. . .... . J .:J. ~"'r:'
.., b'"/tI) "IN_ _._._ . ....:../f. ,..-. . lJ.:
" ....... '\ I 1 III I I r- I II :' \\.1; ~ -- ,8
)_ H -;:~~.~'&."";:" _ <~I' .II~ ~ .1' "! i'li 'i:i:::"~ B~~\~
fi~ 'i:, ......-' r,,' " Ii=t: " 21m .~, .:'\.,,'<f~ !~
C3lC'!J Il :"'~..' ...,', .;.;. '.:'.. . aJl1:.)~ f~~~.;i.:.:'~. .~' . ---. :.. ill~1
flS Q .. ~., '. ' ." ..' .. .,' _i:> \ ." . .. :~) ~~
"'- .' ,.., I. .11 l.tl'l. . I. ... I . ..7 . l
C~,',~"".'~"I n:fr . I '. Yil' "~~. . ,... " ....... : ::;: I .: -- --..,' .._9_ .
.;.r=:JI" '.. .. . ". ~ . c..., .1 l X'.J;r.:I.t : ,,.. ;,,,.\':.;. ."::r~.i9. . aJlZ't'l".J~'
~ J ., . . ..' : " ,.,' . '.:T~ '. . "IoUJ S """" ;.~~, i~..' r::.. u. '
'--x; .'''''',~ '1" .,' ,: ~::'; t"~ ~:\~ :~~.,~~.~,s~~t~ ,~r.~..: . ~.: ~.~o 6
_ ~~^ '.., I . - . ,'!.' .'. .' ':,\ ho. .. :..~.~ ..;,'1. .1 ~.. r. m'n
l) . ...... . .,'" .,'.' .'. . W. .~ ". .. J13 ~ ., .,' ~ a m U
=-'l'~,'~ : I '. ,. . ~ ,":>< \f, !'1~. EB. " ~ ':w Et
_~.\! .' . Ie. R. ~~'..'.1' ,[J ,:' I.o'~~". ""'e<:::;/;!i"'oo.'~)S'-....:.. .:.~...~. ..t':ii
__. . k~' .02:Yr~....~"-~ .... m~... .
.. . \':1.. r :,..., '. rtt1 i-~ t: . ....." t::e~~
~"\.:f\...:) ... '.' ...... .' rr.. r- .,' ..~:::; roo ~. .. .. .:~ ~ . ~~ .
). ~l. f T... .i..:.: [ " J [ ..J', ',0 ~ ,r~.l 'i "k.; ['.. cl '\~I
.. 'J:" ).. ....\ I" I I.' .\......./11 . . . I'" .'
. -~ ~ .': ~ -;;-. . . . . ' .~.I,~:
.... ... _.- . . I ...".. .... .', .....
~1;6.. /" 8......5.. .;:." .' ".;' "':...:'.~..... ....:...::..<.:..:?i,.::::-<,~.. ..--
:JI ". ,~..... . /..' ,,' :-.~\. .
: nC.I'TFUJS. .~l;eN:~:~:(.. .'
---y ~...l .'''" u....-41'f'~...."';..:.;,. '~e ,,:~".
- i' -, --. ':,t:. . ...- ..J"" ....... ':' '" .":' ..,'
-, ~~. ~ ,'. '. .... L ~ .... .'.'. :'~~..~;; .,~
I J.uv
\."
!
..........,................:...:...................
fA · ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\~~~~~~~~~j~j~~\j~~~j~ ~
SIT E .......... t
3
~. .
'-1' :U r~ '-
: -.~,.J .....
" : t::
, ~
~:1- ==
i~
:~
,
II
I, .
F .
t:
-
....... ::
. ~~" _~: .. I
7 :~~~~)~<1t.I~. '.~~
. ~~
1/ '" p1~~ I'. " ",
'b'S~ .j~~_.~..~~.~
- ~~ _I .~-../
~ . '. . ", :..I"~' ~'~Ir'~" ~",. . \~~'f;.':/..t ..'~'~~'
;;;'l'MI!!!'! 11j~~~.. w;. ~
. . .' . . ...'t.. . ..' ~.~~: '.,1
~. '.. " '.. :'.: .:~'t.'..~~... . ,. ~"'.~ ".
" ~.'-
J
i--
.. \ .."f";,.. .~.
:'L' I 'u' 'I'. 4.... C....' .::-,'
.. ..' . I . .
., .'. '. . ....
. ., ." .,,'., '". I . -J!l '. .", :. r' ~\~.
..... I ...~ " . ,. '. .... .' -.. .
\' ""'
,'I
, 'l'o =
. ..
-
. =
7 p'8'5...j.
...~W'... .",...,...t1"i'~" '1.1
18/8"5\
I
......._...___._.........' to .,...J
2 1 /.86 i
.1; .
.
'. I-- 'J-
:-~=
. i'~
.;. I,. " '"
. <0 .". .....
f,..'!J. " Q ~
. . .'.'
~_~I "~IV~(.
II
.
o
1/8
\ \
.400, '800
"I, ~L':~I
'\ 00 0
~.
1600 FEgT -
PI.A NN/N t: OE..pr. /0/B8
MILES.
. ..
;'\\~' ~
:l;..~I.~..I\~..~~:.: . .iJ.E
'.; ~t~ (, "'",' ," !.l"~~::"
..., .,' ~'.:j
..1..: ..', m
..' ..,~
:'.~~~
'., .-:.):'. }(..~l
........ ..' ",' ..... .... ...."':' .,..
'~/A~
.'
..
.. ".
'0
~.
4.t:::~~r~.J"~>'~~;'" ~:..
~~~;~
. )::.fi:
1.._-
.. .,"
,,'t..__
Notice of
Municipal Annexat ion
FROM: City of Boynton Beach,
Florida
Please be advised by this notification and attached location map,
that certain lands have been annexed by BOYNTON BEACH, Florida.
Information contained herein is pertinent to the area in question.
If additional material is required, please contact the office of:
THE CITY PLANNER.
Name of Development/Owner: J:..lC.th...... ~ Cv-... vel(/<f: t...."') D. :r; tr. ~50h
Ordinance # ~1-lo or Special Act of State Legislature: Bill it
Effective Date: ~ /.2(9/ f <:(
Area of Subject Property:
Estimated Present Population: C/
Estimated Number of Existing Dwelling Units: C?
Estimated Present Residential Densi ty: VM.+Nr-( v~~~ c:r,Ro{(i.:-Jd. u. Is/acre
Zoning: /( - fA- .. Density Allowed: ~';. <i /leT d.u. Is/acre
Sq.Ft.
1.,3B
Acres
Existing Type of Development: Ce7McRc:rIt:L.- .C:r:rRlA,J ~RD C/E
Proposed Type of Development: :3 3 L.o, ~~.:rNc;.L-c - FJrI'(:':lY I!-SS.:rDEAliUL
5 fA[J /J:r-V~.s:;:ON
*Owner or Petitioner
*County Commissioners
All City Departments
*County Planning, Bldg,Zonin
All Utility Compan~es
*Area Planning Board
Chamber of Commerce
*County Tax Assessor
Bureau of Census
*Secretary of State
*Clerk of County Circuit Court
to receive copy of prdinance
~AttaChment Location Map
*Supervisor of Registration
*State Beverage Department
*State Department of
Transporation
D-l
MUNICIPAL TAXES
DERIVED*
ANTICIPATED ASSESSED VALUE*
Land Value
Building Value
$ 660,000.00
1,976,238.00
$2,636,238.00
PROJECTED TAXES
Valuation **
1988 Millage
$1,811,238.00
x .0087346
$ 15,820.44
*
Based on comparable units 1988 assessment roll
(The Meadows P.U.D., Tract C and Chapel Hill)
**
Less Homestead Exemptions
EXHIBIT A
..,1 ..,.,
=~ 1 /.../1. '"",..,11"
_,...; L-
-
.-.
L:'~A TION M~r
JONATHAN'S .GROVE
I
~ ..
~(iiI.~.. ':;~
.
~
'T/.
I: ~'C: I
;"puC
\..
~
. ....... ............
fA · ~j~j]j~jjjj~jjjj~jjjj~jjjl~lj~j~j~~~~l~~~~~j~~~~~~~~ ~
SITE .......... ~
8
JL~
~~ce ~
CsJj ty 11
.;.,~.:- - ~
, "~O"
~ ./ri
r1: ~
'-~ .
~ v1' ....
1'Cr;~ ~-:
~,~.. ., 11
-'~).. ....-
)~ .' ;1'[
(' I t:.~;..
. .....
1}6 j S..5 -:':'I~':
....,. Mo.,-' '.'ITJ, .~.;....4:.:..
7 t 8' 5 .;~:
.. ".'J!,.,.. .~.
7 f.'8.5 ...i,
..~,..-~. ...-....., .... -~,
1 8/8'.5 I
I
._..__~.__._,..~..,.... .,...J
2 1/86 I
~- :--
~- -
'\.,1-
~;"~
::)S=
7-t 10-=
J I
'~ \ :UI~' l-
I ..~ ,...
" ~::
. ,-
,
: .01
=
I
t. ~r
E.~'
~
t:: =
~
......
f".~ I Q ~
-- -~. .~,.
....... ....... ..... .... ..,,"":' ".. .
'~/A~
'0
1/8
I
~o
~,
.400. . 800
. I' ;]'L ,.-J
MIL~S ..r O. 0 '.';.: O'
"A ~. ,.... ',;'
V "-\ ...~ ~~, :.:-1
\ ~ ,., .,
~ N.\N. AID.
. ,,' !.,. '.. "
r d
','
i
.~
rr.
. .. '.,:. ., .,:': ,.:'.~ '.. ' :'::.':~..:~.::":~,~::;.;;:.\\.
~nC.ITR,is ,..GLeN;n~,.. ~
,. . . p.~'~~ .:.:":'~./;;..:' -:.},~..
1/
:ru:
::::
:.", . , " .'..' .:-,'
L. 'U I'.. ,"",. 0.'
',M, .': ~ 'I..~I ......
. . ..". .,,' . ,\t.
,r..... I' l.I.o'(:.".~.:I!. ......~ '.:,'~:".' .
.j ~
~
~
..!IE
I .,,:;.': ~
i--
F
_u. J,.:J,I C~""~L.
~J""f""""""~
I
==
M.'
TT .If\ ~
. -
.-
1/4
. . \
1600 FEgT
"/~A NNIN t: OE.pr; 10/88
~7r.>-"'~:AW..:.'(:;;'::,"f;O'X(~"'.(J5':~-: r~..::.' __'w, :~irI.9;-; .~
r ,~:-:T.~.~r~~~'::::- <~ .
.\~s~
-~.._-- -.-.
-"'f
.---..1-
--- '--' ~,-----'..,.---" -.-.--..
.i __~.,Y:_
- .-
- ,
~-L
,.
i'
',' I. " '. {
..
".~............ ~
; '. .
..:..... ~.~':' ~.:
.~...~.IiI~I~ '~, ".\.
>~~~(,t,:I: III!"...; . ~'I~"::t
. t.. ,.
.1. :: y .. , .
" , ,\."..sI
..:. ~ ..~~
. '~'~rr'
. .'f"""'.... ...
. \,. ,
. . ~ ..' , t
" . ...
'.
.., '. ..
EXHIB;IT IIA"
The Korth Ra1f of the South Balf of the Mortbw..t Quart.r
of th~ Horthv..t Quart.r of S.ctioa 7, TOlfa.alp 45 South.
Ian.. 43 Ea.t. 'a1. '.ach Couat,. rlo~ida. a.ceptia.
tharefro. a .trip of laad 40 feet ia width oa eacb .ide of
tha c.nterline of lhe COUDt, road aDd excepti.1 aa,
ri.ht-of-va, for aa, aad all public road. aad e.....at..
r4.trictioD' of r.cord. coataiaiD' .pproxi.atel, 10 .cre..
, .'
,
::-',:.:.
k:'
.... "
sf."
~...:~..;
~::
~~~.~:.
';.,(..'
lL':
,.
';";
t:Xl~"!3nent%:lQ~~
~t%:lOt%:l;d>C:::==
(,)~Z eng;tz:lt%:l
t%:l0 ~~~
<. ,. 0~~t%:l"O.. ~Zz
o ~ tz:l00
0'" < ~::o
:z: ~O"O~;!
n~Z~~-:;3
C/)o t%:l Zi
[i3~00~ ~t%:l~
<>~~ t:Xl'~tz:l
t%:lH f:;.&oo
<Zt"1~O _ _
-~ - (') 0....
. Z"Ot%:l.&oo=OZ~
G')C:::no ~tz:l~
teo n
~~c:::~oenQ-
n~ c:::tz:lc:::z
"0 tz:lzng;.....
~,,<~~~ ,
:><0 <~~N C
~~" .. O~- trJ
~ O~ Z ~
en~z~..J ~ n
~ S- ::0
,....
~~~~~.. ~~ "0
<0 ~ ~ - ~
o ~ ~- ,....
~00,t%:l
~tz:lt%:l >~.&oo 0
0>:><-.. -en z
enn en 0
>tz:ltz:l = c;
n~~Ot%:l~OI-j
~ Z><"O~""
t%:lZ~ (') -
en~Zt%:l~.&oo~O
,..G')> lJ'I=z
(')~ t%:lt%:l
-,,!:;=zen
"A', ~t%:l< G')Oz~
)~ (,oJen en ~o
.\{;. O);3"~=a::::O~
. ... ~.' ,
.:F ~ ~ 0 .. ~
:)-t. .&oori~t%:l5d -
~O". >~~ t%:l~t%:l~
..
(')bOO~ en,
"Z~~oCil~N
tz:len tz:l
en ~~::c 0
1'.. 0>:: .&ooZO
1+ "'!j < tz:l> (,oJ tz:l ~
.,
....J.
";i
t',.
EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT C
COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION
MUNICIPAL STAFF
Increased Increased Other
Department Personnel Capital Comments
City Clerk No No None
Planning No No See attached
Forester/
Horticulturist No No See attached
Utilities No No See attached
Public Works No No See attached
Management Services No No See attached
Finance No No None
Police No No None
Fire No No See attached
Library No No None
City Engineer No No None
Building Official No No None
Personnel and
Purchasing No No None
Parks and Recreation No No None
PALM BEACH COUNTY
Planning, Building
and Zoning
See attached
MEMORANDUM
December 9, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE:
JONATHON'S GROVE
STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request.
1. Property owner to dedicate right-of-way for
Lawrence Road 40 feet from centerline within
45 days of annexation.
2. Should this request be approved as submitted
under the R-I-A zoning district, the applicant
shall plat the property as shown on the
conceptual plan with a minimum lot size of
70 feet by 137 feet.
^
c-'>~.~ .:A~~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZI
cSA:ro
cc Central File
41m:UC3:c'
.5! ;. ~ . S' :s c;4
~ ",CD!.. ;:;"'
_:s- l!.
.:s",-r--t
&,aocSa-cr-
N:S -00
NO c~CD"'
g~ ~CD ~
S'a · lit CD
lC - lit
Lawrence Road--
, (
~34,38'
(J)
::;
a>>
C
~
...
~
~
CD
.
..
-a. ..
CD q
I
" ~
0')
I l---
I I 00
I\) I I
:u~ - I 0 ..~ ~..
.... ~~,!D(JJCD I ...
> ~CIIC11S'W C1l
3:C~'2.CD
S'~ CD>
, l: (JJ ." n I\)
:" . . ~ I
. . a I
-< I ...
::-
~
CD
N
::-
I
I
1
J-oo
I
I, .. .
N1 \~
N
l"
CII ,.
CII \
I\)
c.n
I
I
.. """1
N
en
I\)
CD
I\)
CD
- - ....".c't-
~
(,.J
"
~
I\)
-a.
-a.
, 'I
CD
cn
C1l
::-
I
I
"1
..~
I
I
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
DATE:
December 5, 1988
RE:
Jonathan's Groves - Proposed Annexation
This memorandum is in reference to the tree
site plan submitted for the above project.
old citrus tree grove consisting of rows of
is also required to submit the following in
survey.
survey and conceptual
The site contains an
trees. The developer
addition to the tree
1. A plan preserving as much as possible the existing grove
trees in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan (section 29,
3.2.3.4.2.2, pg. 86). The plan as submitted does not make
mention of preservation methods.
2. In accordance with our City Tree Preservation Ordinance
#81-21, section 7.5-12, p. 598, the applicant must prepare a
tree management plan for on site protection of trees during
construction. The plan is also part of section 7.5-15, pg.
600.
I will discuss these two
co~::n~1:r
KEf. in J. 1 a an
Forester/Horticulturist
items with the applicant if they are
rezoning to RIA.
KJH:ad
DOC: JONA
BOYNTON BEACH STAFF COMMENTS
Utilities Department:
This area lies within our
designated service and must
be served and supported by
user rates whether or not it
is annexed. Annexation,
therefore, has no impact on
personnel salaries, etc.
Public Works:
This annexation alone will not
create a significant impact on
the operations of this
department.
Management Services:
Need street address and
notification to Palm Beach
County for inclusion in
Master Street Address Guide
for routing of 911 calls to
City of Boynton Beach.
Fire Department:
The subject property will be
served by our new Station 3.
Board. of County Commissioners
. >
County Administrator
Jan Winters
Department of Planning, Zoning & Building
Carol A. Rnberts, Chair
Carol J, Elmquist, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Dorothy Wilken
Jim Watt
December 6, 1988
Mr. Peter Cheney, city Manager
city of Boynton Beach
200 N. Seacrest Blvd.
Boynton' Beach, FL 33435
Dear Mr. Cheney:
Palm Beach County Planning Division has coordinated the
the proposed Jonathan's Grove annexation of 9.38 acres.
is generally located on the east side of Lawrence Road,
mately 600 feet south of Hypoluxo Road. County staff
are as follows:
review of
The site
approxi-
comments
1. ENGINEERING, Allan Ennis, Development Review Engineer
No Comment.
2. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, Bob Krause, Environmen-
tal Analyst ·
No Comment.
3 '
.,
FIRE-RESCUE, Ed Hines, 4th Battalion Chief
i
The subject property is approximately 9 acres in size and is
bordered by the city of Boynton Beach on the west side.
Due to its size and location, the impact of this land use
change on the delivery of Fire Rescue services is minimal.
A limited amount of revenue will be lost; however, it will
not adversely effect the overall service delivery system in
the subject area.
3400 BELVEDERE ROAD
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33406 , (407) 471-3520
. .
----_...:...-......---~-_._'------~-~---" --------'--....--..:.---~
4. METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION, Teresa Cantrell, Senior
Planner I
The staff of the Metropolitan Planning Organization has
reviewe~ the proposed annexation submitted by the City of
Boynton Beach, and finds it to be consistent with adopted
agency goals and objectives.
5. PLANNING DIVISION, James Ponseti, Planner
staff comments are as follows:
A. Planning Division staff is concerned about the creation
of an unincorporated county pocket, adjacent to the
proposed annexation on the south. 1 state and county
annexation policy prohibits any annexation which
creates a county pocket or enclave, due to their
deleterious effect upon the provision of municipal
services.
B. staff is also concerned about whether the proposed
annexation is "compact" as defined by section 171.031,
F. S. The parcel proj ects westward from the area of
contiguity, with an average width to depth ratio of
nearly 4 to 1, thereby creating a finger of municipal
land.
Additionally, staff questions whether the proposed
annexation is "substantially contiguous" as defined by
section 171.031, F.S. In the absence of more precise
criteria for determining what is "substantially
contiguous," the following analysis is offered.
Approximately 10% of the parcel's boundary is
contiguous to the City of Boynton Beach. Staff does
not believe that this meets the statutory requirement
for substantial contiguity.
The "Palm Beach County Interim Annexation Policy"
(hereafter, County Policy), adopted August 2, 1988,
requires County Planning staff to review proposed
annexations for "statutory deficiencies," pursuant to
Chapter 171, F.S. If the proposed annexation is
determined not to be in compliance with statutory
requirements, then the County may take one of the
following actions:
1. The County and the municipality may enter into an
interlocal. agreement as detailed in the County
Policy, or
2. If an interlocal agreement between the County and
the municipality "cannot be executed within 30
days of the adoption of the annexation ordinance,
the County may file a lawsuit to enforce the
requirements of Chapter 171, F. S . in acdordance
with section 171.081. F.S."
6. UTILITIES, Tim Russell, Director, Engineering Division
No impact - not in PBCWUD service area.
Based on the preceding comments, County staff requests that you
postpone any final action on the proposed annexation until an
interlocal agreement can be implemented.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to these
actions.
~~
RMM: jp
FILE:J1/ANNXBB1
cc: BCC
Sam Shannon, Asst. County Administrator
John Lower, Acting Executive Director, PZB
stan Redick, Planning Director
Bill Capko, Assistant County Attorney
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director, Boynton Beach
Allan Ennis, Traffic Engineering Division
Ed Hines, 4th Battalion Chief, PBC Fire-Rescue
Teresa Cantrell, Senior Planner, MPO
Tim Russell, Director, Engineering Division, PBCWUD
EXHIBIT D
Areas Prooosed for Annexation. and ProDosed
Future land Use Plan Classification
Area 45
Unincorporated Areas Adjoining Northwest Corner of the City.
These areas should be annexed and placed under the >>low Densi ty
Residential>> land use category, In order to ensurr compatibility with
existing developments In the vicinity. Annexatloh of these properties
w 1 I I s qua reo f f the C I t Y I S b 0 u n d a r 1 e san d w i I I a I I ow the C I t Y toe 0 n t r 0 I
the use Of these parcels and thus protect areas that are already In the
City. Development of these parcels should be compatible wi th existing or
approved residential developments in the area. In particular, the
undeveloped parcels In the immediate vicinity of Hypoluxo and Lawrence
Roads should be Ilmi ted to low-densl ty single-family dwellings, wi th a
gross densl ty of not greater than 3 dwelling un1 ts per acre, Commercial
development should not be allowed, consistent with the Palm Beach County
Comprehensive Plan. The adjacent rights-Of-way for Lawrence Road and
HypOluxo Road should also be annexed.
Area 46
Unlcorporated Area Adjacent to Thompson Road.
This area has been subdivided and Is largely developed as
single-family detached dwellings, although the northern end of this
subdivision Is still vacant, Although piecemeal annexation of the
residential lots may not be desirable, any annexation which does occur
should retain a land use and zoning designation cCI,lparable to that which
Is permitted by Palm Beach County. Current Palm Beach County land
development regulations in this area allow low density single-family
development on the southerly lots, and commercial development of the lots
near Hypoluxo Road. In order to control commercial development along
Hypoluxo Road, annexation of the commercially-zoned parcels would be
desirable, prior to serving these parcels with utilities, The adjacent
rlght-ot-way for Hypoluxo Road should also be annexed.
~
Area 47
High Ridge Road Corridor
f
i
f
Presently this area Is occupied by several large-lot
single-family subdivisions. and several large vacant parcels. Annexation
o t the sub d I v Ide d are as wo u I d not be p r act i c a I, sin eel t wo u I d not be
possible to serve these lots efficiently, if ann~xed Individually. The
unplatted parcels on the west side of HIgh Ridge Road, Immedlatly north
of the future Miner Road, should be annexed prior to development, In
order to eliminate this unincorporated pocket, and should be placed in
the "Low Densl ty Residential>> land use category. The parcel which has
been developed for warehouses at the southwest corner of Hypoluxo Road
and 1-95, however, should be place In the "Industrlal" land use category,
and the parcel Immedately to the west, which is occupIed by a church,
~~
;:.;V~
. ..
.F1
. :i
,~
,;;.
,
;
1
'..
r~
. "',t
135
..-1
,.
~
t
I
:1-.:.... p.
": :i:i~.:, ' th:~~. >.,'
',~ :'.'-~\ -'~'. .
. .
. . ..~. . : ,~
',. ',\
EXHIBIT E
."",
l.
"8..."
IL~j':'lcs:nl-"'~I-':''''''''~ ~
]~~t ;\I~~&~~~ ~ ~\.-;< .t>i -' ~
. IReLE WEST ~ ",~l~~' ) . ,\ .
'~iI':~~ ~~~tl."~" .~
. ~'" Mi~~I~.'K'~ \~ ~a' . -~.. ~
~ I~ ~ i;' i;'';:~. fi'~ ~ ~~; . ....
. .0 ::.T.~~ ~ ~ilC: . )
liVE. ,~l\.".., l~' r: i ~. ..--
- fj31d~, ~ qr~.~. ~ i ~ \ . .' . ~. ,[C,.~"-
Ii. GJ9. ~ 1m I~ VI' · , 'I ~.,~ : - ~ ;
!:.a ~ _"1J ~ ~. ."'t~ I. "V
~f\t !;;,. J I~ l~ ~ .j f ~ \- . ...~
. ~7,4" S! :l,~'i\~~' _ ~ . / \' ;z
. ..... _ ~ n ; I ~ ., .I> ~ ..t:>o ~ ~
N ~ ~ O~~i\~ ,;5 :. J~" ,- .., ' 18\~ 8\,',1 1,;'-
'" I I ...~ ~ ~ ~i . ' ~ ~ V'"
N to ~:\ ,,~.~.... j"I\ :$: . "U'1~ '."" r' ~:r"''''
:.0 ~JIi!~ ' 2 1; ~3. ':'~...'>l""~' .'.,.. .;'..... ...'. :'.;.~ 'a'OI~ ""'.\"".:!.. ..., ---;? .....' ~ .f'
~ l,t;\(1'1~0'\~,qj.~ l~l'O:l. ~~\t6~i ~~~~.\N ~;"~~t~~~H\~ . ~ ~ N~O ~191~ ~~ ~'~ ,\0 ~ ~Io~"
....~\~tc71i -4 I'E ~N ..... ,...... .. t\ '" .. ~ Y $ Jr .,.:..". ~ "l.I "\II' ;. ~ .. t:; ~ 'I /
" ::t ~"T~ .;~@'1..W- ~IN: :.. ~ "N~:O " .Y ; -; . ~ - ~ ~ ~ ,..
. ' ~~ffiI'" ~ "'10' - "IN . ~ "'\- "A " TO... ,.... ...,.. ~
\' . 1 1 ". ." .' i! i ~ 4J'. ,-;p 'L v - IIlD
. .,._~ "'_. }Io /, /1M! . ;\O~/ ~ m<-JJO oOO:EZ("T1 r G) !
. I. ' {;.. -01," . ...,~i ,~. - _, <7,':\'.'" .\ .... ""- .114' ;
~' I.!., 10 E~~~~ ~~~\~I;l~\Cf1I~~'~"::~ ~ ~~ ~\~\I~~) \I~ \1~~;ID'..'!1 n~,;
) '" Ii:P ~ ~s..l\ '1:. J:;~~ ~-.: ~. 1:; ~.. ~. .~.l ~E ",",^. ,J.. . t ~ .",\~H t: ti\~~
t.- ,'. "I\~"" '. .. ...,,,.
...... I , ' . . ." tf' ~t " ' . , ~
'" 0 .' , ' .. ffi ',. ' I" .~--.;;:-
I ~ ,,~ .....,.. rS -....aU!. .. C" -- ..
... :.,;::; . ! I - ~. ..... '--
~ ~ i12 'u,," J ~ N ~ ~., , , ' ,...
> . lis :. :. · II) ~ .( ~k'J): .., . , . .. ::<
o~ \.>>. ,,/' ~"1: ~ f.L', 1)
.....CIRClE eAST :t" _ '.': -.. : ..' : :a I ~
..__.. . ~ .I.... .. . . r-
g . I~~ ~~ ~ & ~ ~t " ~ < ' :.'" ..;:. - >-
il- i1t. ~.,~tZ~ ~'~~r :,'.....-.', : ~,
.'10 ... . .... ' - if f:)
'/0
.' .
'. .
. 1". ..'~
....~~
c;:~
~ ~
(\ ~
U' \1\-
\
~. \G--
'. \
.
. '. . I',' \
... . ,.. . . I "
..- ~ .
, " . .' :': . -i '" 'j
" ",~ . >< t> .>
:'" ,t.'. .~ 1. ::,
;g If\) . , '" \) .... .
\'.~ ~." : .:' . '.. ,~: \~ ,.
.)~. '. :..., ': .: ~' ~ -. ,
". ." _. "..... ~ J' ~
· " ;" , . , " ' r::.'
,,: ".:. ' , ' " ~ ."
...: ~f:J ~; '':.:' r' /"..: ......
0- . -. .....
40
"t.;
<~
~:~
.,....V)
IC
,'; 0::1
{-....... .
\. .. -
,\:,,:,;,~
, :,-f"f.
::'~
. . .' .
'co
~
~
-
\~
bo
I~... l~~ ~" .t&1+ C\
@) €> ~ l~ ~
, \.:....
~ y "...
'\, '~
.., '"
~
"'"
~,
-
\~
-:'.... '10 1 ....
~'t.. _. I
\" I. ~ ' L..-;..,
. ,
~.
<>'
;
'"
" ~
'.t.
." ~
t ~ L r
t. G) 0'
~r-, ~o
" :c:. ~- ~ 0'\
1M
~ <~ 10 ~' .
..
"' 0' ~ ~
..... V)o \
, 0 II
.&4'"
of..,
...
"c
f<>
,\UJ
;., 0
~ \CP
~
~\Vl
~~
z:.,tp
'c;.:.:<-. '
- \VJ J~ ~ ~
~"" ....'"
~ v 41'\
~
,
-..
<.
-,.
~
~~ \~ ~
~ () \1\.) ~
~ <<:) VI
.......
l;:)
"\
~-
s
J
~.
~
...
~
6'1
1'1
$\~
~
r-
to
'(
.""
,
~4
~t
~~
u
~l
EXHIBIT F
M E M 0 RAN DUM
December 8, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: REQUESTS FOR ANNEXATION, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT
AND REZONING SUBMITTED BY KIERAN KILDAY FOR
RICHARD D. JOHNSON
Kieran Kilday, agent for Richard D. Johnson, property owner, is
proposing to annex into Boynton Beach a 9.3814 acre tract of land
located on the east side of Lawrence Road, approximately 700 feet
south of Hypoluxo Road (see Exhibit A). This property is
currently zoned AR (Agricultural Residential) and it is occupied
by a mature orange grove.
Paralleling this request for annexation is a request to amend the
Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan to show annexed
land as Low Density Residential, and to rezone this property to
R-I-A, Single-family Residential. As shown in Exhibit B, the
preliminary master plan provides for 33 single-family lots with a
minimum lot frontage of 70 feet and a minimum lot area of 9,590
square feet. These criteria exceed the minimum building and site
regulations for the R-I-A district.
PROCEDURE
These applications for annexation, amendment to the Future Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning are being
processed consistent with State Statutes, and Boynton Beach
Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions as follows:
1. F.S. 163.3161: Local Government Comprehensive Planning and
Land Development Regulation Act.
2. F.S. 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of Ordinances and
Resolutions.
3. F.S. 171.011: Municipal Annexation and Contraction Act.
4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Section
3A5(e): Boundary and Zoning.
5. Boynton Beach Ordinance #79-24.
6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X: Procedures for Annexation.
These regulations have been listed for informational purposes.
Paraphrasing, these regulations require review by the City
Department Heads, newspaper advertisements, public hearings with
the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Commission, review by
Palm Beach County, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council,
and the State Department of Community Affairs, and Commission
adoption of ordinances to annex, amend the Future Land Use
Element and rezone.
CURRENT LAND USE AND ZONING
As previously discussed, this property is undeveloped and zoned
AR (Agricultural Residential). The land use and zoning in the
surrounding area varies and is presented for your information in
the table which follows:
-2-
DIRECTION JURISDICTION ZONING LAND USE
North Palm Beach County AR Five
single-family
homes on large
unplatted lots/
Brewster Nursery
Further North Palm Beach County AR Living Color
Nursery
East Boynton Beach AG Mature orange
grove (Knollwood
Groves)
South .. Palm Beach County AR K&W Nursery/
single-family
home on large
unplatted lot
which will result
in a small
unincorporated
area upon
annexation.
Further South Boynton Beach AG Mature orange
grove (Knollwood
Groves)
Southwest Palm Beach County AR Palm Beach
Groves-commercial
orange grove and
fruit stand
West Palm Beach County AR Dahlgren's
Nursery
(undeveloped)
Northwest Palm Beach County AR Three single-
family homes
on large lots.
FUTURE LAND USE AND REZONING
Hypoluxo Road forms the northern limit of the City's Reserve
Annexation Area and the City's Utility Service Area. It is
contemplated that all lands between Lawrence Road and Congress
Avenue on the south side of Hypoluxo Road will at some time in
the future be annexed. This proposal represents a continuation
of previous actions to close unincorporated pockets in this
portion of the reserve annexation area.
The land use category requested, Low Density Residential, is
consistent with the future plans for land use in Palm Beach
County for this area as indicated in the correspondence in
Exhibit c. The land use category requested is also consistent
with the Future Land Use Plan for this area which identifies this
property as "Low Density Residential".
In regard to the proposed density for the Jonathon's Grove
subdivision (3.52 dwelling units per acre), the Comprehensive
Plan recommendation for this area (see Exhibit D-land use
conflict area 45) is low density single-family dwellings with a
gross density of not greater than three (3) dwellings units per
acre. Therefore, the proposed density slightly exceeds the
Comprehensive Plan recommendation.
-3-
The R-I-A zoning category requested requires a minimum lot area
of 7,500 square feet with a minimum lot frontage of sixty (60)
feet. Although the applicant exceeds these minimum development
regulations for the R-I-A district as shown in Exhibit B (a
minimum lot area of 9,590 square feet or .22 acres and a minimum
lot frontage of 70 feet), the following conditions exist in the
surrounding area with respect to lot size and frontage (see also
Exhibit E which corresponds to the data table below):
Parcel #
Lot Size
1
1.69 acres
2
2.15 acres
3
2.17 acres
4
1.69 acres
5
1.69 acres
6
4.53 acres
7
4.84 acres
8
1.12 acres
9
.82 acres
10
.88 acres
11
1.00 acre
12
1.00 acre
Frontage
220 ft. on
private access
road
279.5 ft. on
private access
road
282.75 ft. on
private access
road
220 ft. on
private access
road
220 ft. on
private access
road
590.24 ft. on
private access
road
630.24 ft. on
private access
road
140 ft. on
Lawrence Rd.
and 300 ft. on
Hypoluxo Rd.
114 ft. on
Lawrence Rd.
132 ft. on
Lawrence Rd.
132 ft. on
Lawrence Rd.
132 ft. on
Lawrence Rd.
Land Use
single-family home
single-family home
single-family home
single-family home/
Brewster Nursery
single-family home
single-family home
Single-family home/
K&W Nursery
single-family home
Lots 9 & 10 are
developed together
as a single family
home
Single-family home
Vacant
The existing homes in the area, particularly those north of the
subject property which front on a private access road that runs
adjacent to the northern boundary of the subject property, are
large single family homes averaging 3,000 square feet in size
with assessed building and land value averaging $113,600 (1988
tax roll). The contract purchaser, Excel Builders, has indicated
that he plans to build 3,000 square foot, custom-built homes
ranging from $130,000-$150,000 within the proposed subdivision
(comparable to the surrounding area). However, with a maximum
lot coverage of 40% in the R-I-A zoning district and a proposed
lot size of 9,590 square feet, a structure no greater than 3,836
square feet can be built (including any roofed patio area). In
addition, the large unit size (3,000 square feet proposed), 70
foot lot width, and 7 1/2 foot side setback (minimum required in
the R-I-A zoning district) will result in only a fifteen (15)
foot building separation.
-4-
Other Comprehensive Plan policies that address land use that are
relevant to this request are as follows:
1. "Provide an adequate range of housing choices." (p. 6)
2. "Provide a suitable living environment in all
neighborhoods." (p. 6)
3. "Preserve the present stock of sound dwwellings and
neighborhoods." (p. 6)
4. "Provide a range of land use types to accommodate a full
range of services and activities." (p. 7)
5. "Eliminate existing and potential land use conflicts."
(p. 7)
6. "Encourage the development of complementary land uses."
(p. 7)
With respect to policy 1 and 4 above, the Planning Department's
Comprehensive Division has done a study on the supply and demand
for residential land within the City and the reserve annexation
areas. It was concluded that 13,228 additional housing units
could be constructed through build-out. Of this total an
estimated 4,877 of these units would be single family units and
only 125 of these single-family units would occupy lots of 8,000
square feet or more. '
Currently, there exist approximately 750 mature citrus trees on
the site, primarily orange trees with some grapefruit trees on
the 9.3814 acre parcel. It is recommended that the existing
trees in the grove be preserved to the greatest extent possible
and incorporated as an amenity to the proposed project as
outlined in the memorandum from the Forester/Horticulturist which
appears in Exhibit c.
Based on the preceding findings and analysis, it is the Planning
Department's recommendation that the request for rezoning to
R-I-A, Single-family Residential, as submitted by Kieran Kilday
for Richard D. Johnson, property owner, be denied owing to the
following:
1. proposed lot width (70 feet)
2. the proposed density (3.52 dwelling units per acre)
3. the 7 1/2 foot side yard setback which will result in
only a 15 foot building separation for the large units
proposed
4. the rural character of the area in general.
As an alternative to the proposal submitted by the applicant, the
Planning Department recommends that the subject property be
developed under the R-I-AAB zoning category which requires a
minimum lot area of 9,000 square feet, a minimum lot width of 90
feet, a minimum side yard of 10 feet and a maximum lot coverage
of 35%. Developing the subject parcel under the R-I-AAB
regulations would optimize compatibility with the surrounding
area by reducing the number of lots from 33 to 28, creating 90
foot by 137 foot or 12,330 square foot minimum lots and reducing
the density to 2.98 dwelling units per acre consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan recommendation for this property of 3 units
per acre.
As a point of information, a similar discussion arose with a
previous application for this property (Honeybell Hollow P.U.D.)
where the recommendation for large lot single-family homes was
supported by the Planning and Zoning Board. The applicant
subsequently withdrew the request.
-5-
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANNEXATION POLICIES
There are three policies in the Comprehensive Plan which address
annexations as follows:
1. "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to
present municipal boundaries;"
2. "Annex property only after the preparation of a study
evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the cost
of providing service;" and
3. "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to
provide efficient service and on which urban development
is anticipated."
In order to determine the consistency of the Johnson request with
the Comprehensive Plan Policies, each of the three policies will
be addressed individually.
Policy 1 - "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to
the present municipal boundaries."
The Johnson property is contiguous to current municipal limits
along its entire eastern property line (334 feet or 10.7%) of the
total property boundary. In addition, this property lies in the
path of urban development.
Policy 2 - "Annex property only after the preparation of a study
evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the cost of
providing services."
In response to policy two, you will find accompanying this
memorandum Exhibit F which attempts to evaluate the cost to the
City of annexing this parcel and the dollars returned to the City
in taxes.
Policy 3 - "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to
provide efficient service and on which urban development is
anticipated."
As previously reported, the Johnson tract is 9.3814 acres in
size, and due to the availability of public utilities, the
existence of this parcel as a County pocket in the Reserve
Annexation area, plus recent improvements to Hypoluxo Road, it is
anticipated that this parcel will experience urban development.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends that the applications
submitted by Kieran Kilday for Richard D. Johnson, property
owner, be approved subject to the comments listed in this
memorandum relative to the zoning category under which this
property should be annexed, as well as those which accompany
this memorandum as Exhibit c:
1. The parcel is contiguous to the corporate limits;
2. The parcel lies within a county pocket and it is in the path
of urban development;
3. The parcel is located within the City's municipal service
area;
4. The request is consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies
for annexation;
5. The land use category requested must be considered as a
part of an overall strategy for annexation and it is
appropriate;
6, The request will not impair the value of future use of lands
in the surrounding area; and
-6-
7. The costs to serve versus the benefits received by the City
indicate a positive return.
\..-
cf~- s~ AN~~ZI~
CSA:ro
cc Central File
s
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 21, 1988
TO: PETER L. CHENEY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: JONATHAN'S GROVE-ANNEXATION
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of an
application for annexation submitted by Kieran Kilday and
Associates, agent and applicant for Richard D. Johnson, owner.
Mr. Kilday is proposing to annex a 9.38 acre tract of land
located on the east side of Lawrence Road, approximately 700 feet
south of Hypoluxo Road. The property is contiguous to the
corporate limits along its entire eastern boundary (approximately
334 feet or approximately 10.7% of its entire property boundary).
Please place this item on the City Commission agenda for November
15, 1988 for the Commission's. consideration and for forwarding
to the Planning and Zoning Board for public hearings.
~
C~ (JL- fiX
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIAT
CSA:ro
Attachments
MEMORANDUM
October 11, 1988
TO: BETTY BORONI, CITY CLERK
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: TRANSMITTAL OF LAND USE AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS
SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ON OCTOBER 1, 1988
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of the
application and related documents for the following Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning applications:
1. Boynton Beach Mall Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning
($1,800 fee includes postage) ,
2, Alhambra Square North Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning
($700 fee)
3. Alhambra Square South Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning
($700 fee)
4. Alhambra Square ACLF Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning
($800 fee)
5. Winchester Tract #1 Annexation and Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning ($1,400 fee)
6. Winchester Tract #2 Annexation and Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning ($1,400 fee)
7. Winchester Tract #3 Annexation and Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning ($1,300 fee)
8. Jonathan's Grove Annexation and Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning ($900 fee)
The public hearing dates for the above requests have been
tentatively scheduled for December 15, 1988 and January 4, 1989
pending approval by the Planning and Zoning Board and City
Commission respectively. Legal advertisements (one-quarter page
map ads) will be prepared by the Planning Department and
forwarded to your office upon completion. '
~/.~
J6MES J I GOLDEN
JJG:ro
cc Central File
.
be~Q_~8s_e~s~Q~g~I_a~QLQB_6~ZQ~I~~_eEEbI~aIIQ~
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
.....--
Planning and Zoning Board
This application must be filled out completely and accurately and
submitted, together with the materials listed in Section II below, in two (2)
copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete applications will not be
processed.
Please Print Legibly or Type all Informa.tion.
I. ~g~gBab_I~EQB~eI!Q~
1. Project Name:
Jonathan's Grove
2. Type of Application (check one)
a.
Rezoning only
b.
Land Use Amendment only
x
c.
Land Use Amendment and Rezoning
"
3. Date this Application is Accepted (to be filled out by Planning
Department):
--------------------------------------------------------
4. Applicant"s Name (person or business entity in whose name this
application'is made):
_Kj~_~a_fL~J_~~LKi~da~-~-Associates----________________
Ad d r es s : _~5~_~!'-"_~.!.l!...J>J-2~~..z_.sJJ.i.1:sLl.Q.Q=A___________.._______________
_~~~_~2_~_>>~E~D~_FL~_JJ~Ql______________________________
Telephone
Number:
407-689-5522
---------------------------------. '---.------1'-----------
5. Agent"s Name (person, if any, representing applicant):
~j~3~~~~_~ilg~yL~ilge~_~_8~~Q~i~tea____________________
Address: })~1_~2IEELglEg~~_~yitg_1QU=a___________
----------------
_w~3~_~21~_>>~Egb~_E1~_JJ1Ul_____________________-________
Planning Dept. 4-86
page 1
Telephone __iQI~~~~~~~~~__________________________________________
Number:
6. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name:
Ris~ard D. Johnson
---------------------------------------------.-----------
Address:
10295 St. Andrews
_~Qyn~Qn_~g~~hL_E~~_ll!l~~___________---.--___-----------
Telephone
Number:
---------------------------------------------------------
7. Correspondence Address (if differen~ than applicant or agent>:*'
________~b___________________________________----_____--
----------------------------------------------------~---
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters, and other
materials will be mailed.
8. What is the applicant.s interest in the subject parcel?
(Owner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder, Developer, Contract purchaser, etc.>
Agent
-------------------------------------------------------------------
9.
Street Address or Location of Subject Parcel:
_82QEQ~!IDst~1~_____
700 Ft. South of Hynoluxo Road on the east side of Lawrence Road.
------------------ ~------------------------------~---------------
10. Legal Description of Subject Parcel:
See Attached
----------~-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------~------------------------_._---------------
--------------------------------------------------~---------------
--------------------------------------------------~---------------
---------------------.---------------------------------------------
~ "I
11. Area of Subject Parcel
(to the nearest hundredth (1/100) of an acre):
9.38 acres
--------------------------------------------------~-------~------
Planning Dept. 4-86
page 2
. --',
EXHIBIT "A"
Th. Korth R.1f of the Soutb aalf of the Kortb.a.t Quart.r
of th~ Horthv..t Quarter of Sactioa 7. Towa.alp 45 South,
aaD.e 43 K.,t. 'a1. '.ach Couat" rlo~ida, e.ceptia.
th.r.fro. a .trip of leod 40 f..t ia widtb 00 eacb .ide of
the c.oter1io. of lh. couot, road aod exceptlal aa,
ri.ht-of-va, for .a, aad .11 public road. aad e.....at..
r...trictioD' of record. cODtaiaiD, approxi..tal, 10 acr...
....
-- -"-~--'-~- ---------.-.-.---
12. Current Zoning District:
_lQQYDt~l_=_AR_=-Aq~i~ult~~~
R-1A
13. Proposed Zoning Dis~rict:
---------------------------------------
14. Cur r en t Lan ~,. Use Cat eg or y: if9~!}!::tl_~2~=~~~!.1.::~_~~~~<!~I2.1:..~c:..t_______
......--
15. Proposed Land Use Category: L9~_!?~E~J:.!:Y_g~~!~~~~~~!_______--------
16. Intended Use of Subject Parcel: _~.!:!}9'1~_:_!::~~~!~_~=.~~~~r:.1:.~~_____
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--------.----------------------------------------------------------
17. Developer or Builder:
Excel'luild,e:r.s
----------------------------------------~--
------------------------------------------------------------------
18. Architect:
Not Xnown .
-------------------------------------------~----------
19. Landscape Architect:
~j}~3~_~_~~~E~1~~~~_________________________
20.
Site Planner:
Kilday & Associates ,
---------------------------------------------------
21.
Civil Engineer:
_~~c:..ll~w~J_~~3j~~~~3____________~_________________
22. Traffic Engineer:
_!~~~~~~_~n3j~~~_~iE3~_lE~~______________________
23. SLlrveyor:
Shalloway Engineers
-------------------------------------------------------
II. ~BIsBlebg_IQ_~g_gUg~lIIsQ_~lI~_aEEbl~aIIQ~
The following materials shall be submitted, in two (2) copies, unless
otherwise noted;.
(check)
_~_~a. This application form (3 copies for PUDs, peDs, and FIIDs).
_.__~~_b: A copy of the last recorded warranty deed (3 c:opi es for PUDs, peDs,
and PIDs).
____c. The following documents and letters of Consent (3 copies for PUDs,
PCDs, and PIDs): ~'
( 1) I f the property is under j 01 nt or several ownersh i p: A wr it ter
consent to the application by all owners of record~ and
(2) If the applicant is a contract purchaser: A copy of the
purchase contract and written consent of the OWner and seller, and
(3) I f the appl i cant is represented by an aLlthor i::::: ed agent: A cop~
Planning Dept. 4-86
page 3
of the agency ag~eement, o~ w~itten consent of the applicant, and
(4) If the applicant is a lessee: A copy of the lease ag~eement,
and the w~itte~~consent of the owne~, and
(5) If ~he applicant is a co~po~ation or other business entity: Th
name of lhB--office~ or pe~son responsible fo~ t'he application, and
w~itten p~oof that said pe~son has the delegated autho~ity to
~ep~esent the co~poration o~ other business entity, o~ in lieu
the~eof, w~itten p~oof that he is in fact an office~ of the
corpo~ation.
d, A sealed bounda~y survey of the subject parcel by a surveyor
~egi5te~ed in the State of Florida, dated not more than six (6) months.
p~ior to the date of submission of the application, at a scale prescribe
by the Planning Department, and containing the following information:
(1) An accurate legal desc~iption of the subject parcel.
_ (2) A computation of the total acreage of the subject parcel to the
nearest hund~edth (1/100) of an acre.
(3) A t~ee survey, which conforms to the requirements of the City of
Boynton Beach Tree Preservation O~dinance, This requirem~nt may be
waived by the Planning Di~ector where found to be unrelated to the
land use O~ zoning issues involved with the application.
e. A complete certified list of all property owners, mailing addresses,
and legal descriptions for all properties within at least four hundred
(400) feet of the subject parcel as recorded in the latest official tax
~olls in the county court house shall be furnished by the applicant.
Postage, and mailing labels or add~essed envelopes must also be provided.
Said list shall be accomp~nied by an affidavit stating that to the best c
the app 1 i cant. s knowl edge sai d list is compl ete and' accurate.
Notification of su~rounding property owners will be done by the City of
Boynton Beach. .
f. A copy of; the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's maps showing all
of the properties referred to in paragraph e. above, and their relation t
the subject parcel.
____g, A statement by the applicant justifying the zoning requested,
including reasons why the property is unsuitable for development under t~
existing zoning and more suitable for development under the proposed
zoning.
____h. 'A compa~ison of the impacts that would be Created by'dev.elopment unde
the p~op05ed zoning, with the impacts that would be created by developmer
under the existing zoning, which shall includ~:
(1) A comparison of the potential square footage or number and type c
dwelling units under the existing zoning with that which would be
allowed unde~ the p~oposed zoning or development.
(2) A statement of the uses that would be ~llowed in the proposed
Planning Dept. 4-86
page 4
zoning or developme~t, and any particular uses that would be eXCludeL
(3) Proposed timing and phasing of thu development.
____~4) A ,comparison of traffic which would be generated under the
proposed zoning or development, with the traffic that would be
generated "Ll'nd..er the current zoning; aluo, an analysis of traTfic
movements at the intersections of driveways that would serve thQ
property and surrounding roadways, and improve~ents that would be
necessary to accomodate such traffic movements (in 1 copies). For
proposed developments which would generate three-thmusand (3,000)
vehicle trips per day or more, or two-hundred fifty (250) or more
single-directional vehicle trips within a one (1) hour period, a
traffic impact analysis shall be required (in 1 copies). S~id trafii
impact analysis shall includ~ projected trip generation for the
development, for all major roadways and intersections within one and
one-half (1.5) miles of the subject p~rcel, as well as traffic that
would utilize local streets through residential zoning districts.
Said traffic impact analysis shall compare traffic levels between the
existing zoning and the proposed zoning o~ development of the Subject
parcel, and shall take into consideration all development that would
be possible under the current zoning within the City, adjacent citie~
and within the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within.a
radius of five (5) miles. For those parcels lying in the,
unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, which are not currently
zoned for urban land uses, the potential land uses according to the
Palm Beach County comprehensive plan shall be used. Where said
parcels are shown on the Palm Beach County comprehensive plan under
residential land use categories, the midpoint of the'density range
shown on County comprehensive plan shall be used. Where a county-wid
study of traffic generation at build-out has been adopted or is
utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of traffic that are
projected by said study shall in all cases be used to project
background traffic in the traffic impact analysis submitted by the
applicant. The format and standards Used in the traffic impact
analysis shall be the same as those wh1ch are required by Palm Beach
,County, with the exception of the reqU1rements listed above. Such
traffi~ impact analysis shall include recommendations for the
mitigatio~ of traffic impacts, consist~nt with the standards which
have been adopted by o~ are utilized by Palm Beach County.
(5) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of th~ w~ter
. demand for development under the propOsed zoning or development with
water demand under the existing zoninQ. Water demand shall be
estimated using the standards adopted by the Palm-B~ach County Health
Department for estimating such demand. unless different standards are
justified by a registered engineer. Commitment to the provi$ion oT
improvements to the water system shall also be included, where
existing facilities would be inadequat~ to serve development under th
proposed zoning.
(6) For parcels larger than one (1) a~re, a comparison of sRwagQ
that would be generated under the proposed, zoning or development
that which would be generated under the existing zoning. s~wag~
shall be estimated usin~ the standard~ adopted by the Palm Beach
flol'
witt"
f I 01'-
Planning D~pt. 4-86
page 5
County Health Department for estimating such flows, Lmless different
standards are justified by a registerQd engineer. Commitment to the
provision of improvements to the sewage collection system sh~ll al~o
be included, where the existing facilities would be inadeguate to
serve ,development under the proposed ~oning.
.( 7) For p~'clpa.sed resi dent i al deve10pmants I arger than one (1) acre, a
comparison of the projected population under the proposed zoning or
development with the projected population under the existing zoning.
Population projections according to age groups for the propoped
development shall be required, where more than fifty (50) dwellings,
or 50 sleeping rooms in the case of group housing, would be ~llowed
under the proposed zoning. Applications for rezoning to commercial 01
industrial zoning districts which exceed one (1) acre in are~ shall'
also provide projections for the number of employees.
(8) At the request of the Planning Depa~tment, Planning and Zoning
Board, or City Council, the applicant shall also submit proposals for
minimizing land use conflicts with sUrrounding properties. The
~pplicant shall provide a summary of the nuisances and hazards
associated with development under the proposed zoning, as well as
proposals for mitigation such nuisances and hazards. Such summary
shall also include, where applicable, exclusion of particular uses,
limitations on hours of operation, proposed location of loading areas
dumpsters, and mechanical equipment, screening of service areas and
mechanical equipment, location of driveways and' service entrp.nce, and
specifications for site lighting. Nuisances an hazards shall be
abated or mitigated so as to conform to the performance standards
contained in the City's zoning regulations and the standards containe
in the City's noise control ordinance. Also, statements concerning
the height, orientation, and bulk of 5ltructL\r-es,. setbacks from
property lines, and measures for screGning and buffering the propOsed
development shall be pr~vided. At tho request of the Planning and
Zoning Board or City Council, the applicant shall also state the type
of construction and architectural styles that will be employed in the
proposed development.
(9) A~ ~h~ request of the Planning Department, Planning and Zoning
Board, or City CounCil, the applicant shall also submit the follOWing
information:
(a) Official soil conservation service classification by soil
associations and all areas subject to inundation and high ground
water levels.
(b) Existing and proposed grade elevations.
~ "
(c) Existing or pr-oposed water bodies.
(d) Form of ownership and form of organization to maint~in commor
spaces and recreational facilitie~.
(e) A written commitment to the P~ovision of all necess~rY
facilities for stor~ drainage, water supply, sewage coll~ction ar
treatment, solid waste disposal, hazardous waste dispos~l, firQ
Planning D~pt. 4-86
page 6
, .
protection, easements or rights-of-way, roadways, recreation and park
areas, school sites, and other public improvements or dedications
_;;:; .:':.=\)> =~ r-=-qi...i,"ed.
_ul~(l(;) For rezonings to planned zoning districts (PUDs, PCDs, and PIDs),
the specific requirements for submission of applications for rezoning tc
such districts shall also be satisfied. Copies of evidence for unified
control and development of the property, as well as condominium,
homeowners', and property owners' association documents shall be
submitted in three (3) copies for planned zoning districts.
Furthermore, all materials required for a subdivision master plan (in ~
copies, including survey) shall also be submitted.
III. eEEbI~eIIQ~_E~s~~ Fees shall be paid at the time that the application is
submitted, according to the fees which have been adopted by resolution. P
fee schedule is attached to this application. All fees shall be paid by
check, payable to the City of Boynton Beach.
IV. ~~8IIEI~eIIQ~
( I ) n'Je) underst.:lnd that thi s app 1 i cat i on and all pI an and papers
submitted herewith become a part of tha permanent records of the
PI ann i ng and Zon i ng Board. (I) (We) hereby cert if y that the above
statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans
submitted herewith are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and
belief. This application will not be accepted unless signed according
to the instr~ctions below.
J 3;~~~L 4&.~___
Signature o~~s) or Trustee,
or Authorized Principal if property
is owned by a corporation or other
business entity.
___-'2./.;_ !.1L'!._______
DIte
V.
B~IHQ81IeIIQ~_QE_e~~~I
_" _~a/~~.l.L[e.AL~y:_ ,r;~j/
Signat re~f Author~ed Agent /
----~~~~-----
~g;~~
(I) (tIJe) hereby desi gnate the above 5i ~jned per"son
~gent with rega d to this application.
A~e~LL _ '____~~_________
Signature of w er(s) or Trustee.
l '
or Authorized Principal if property
is owned by a corporation or other
bL\siness entity.
as ("my) (our) authorized
----~~~~j-------
Date
Planning Dept. 4-86
page 7
"
APPLICATIONS
AND
OTHER REQUIRED DOCUMENTS
,/ .;:~: ""X. ;.t,<
"14' ..
~l'f .
>>? .'
,','.,..'~"~~
/ '-f' .", .;~:;'
,:~! .j, ;J~ ,." ,: . It '
BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION INFORMATION FORM
NOTE: This form must be filled out completely and accurately
and must accompany all applications submitted to the
Planning Dept. (2 copies of application required)
PROJECT NAME:
Jonathan's Grove~
.
AGENT'S NAME:
Kie~an J. Kilday/Kilday & Associates
ADDRESS: 1551 Forum Place, SUite 100-A
West Palm Beach, FL. 33401
PHONE: 407-689-5522
OWNER'S NAME: Richard D. Johnson
(or trustee's)
ADDRESS: 10295 St. Andrews
Boynton Beach, FL. 33436
PHONE
Approximately 700 feet south of Hypoluxo Rd.,
PROJECT LOCATION: on the eastside of Lawrence Road.
(not,legal description)
.....
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:* NA
(if different than
agent or owner)
:'
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters and other
materials will be forwarded.
'"
-
." . ..
!;
..
i
I
I
i
I
I'
I
!
II
,1
I
I
I
,I
I!
:'
i:
I:
II
/i
I'
/!
.j
11
Ii
,;
I
il '
,.
"
;i
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOIUDA
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
"
~ :
j.
"
j.
i! DATE APPLICATION FILED:
i'
;j
;) DATE OF TENTATIVE APPROVAL: RE,TECTION:
Ii
I: D1\ TE OF COMPLETION Oli' ANNEXA TION REPORT:
I;
I"
Ii DATE OF ~RDINANCE PROPOSAL: ORDINANCE H
Ii
I; DATE OF ORDINANCE ADOPTION: REJECTION:
:1
"
Ii DATE OF REFERENDUM IF REQUIRED:
t
I RESULTS OF REFERENDUM: FOR AGAINST
I
I DATE ANNEXATION BECOMES EFFECTIVE:
I
j
I DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE. FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY
I ~mMLMU
I
Name of Developer/Owner: LOU'1' s F. Mana /R' h d
v i~capra lC Rr n ~nhnQnn
Area,o(Subject Property: 408,593 Sq. Ft. or 9.38 Acres
Estimated Present Population: NA
.
: Existing Zoning: AR-Agricul tural
I Residential
I Proposed Zoning: RIA
I
I
Density Allowed: 0.2 d. u. 's/acre
Density Allowed: 4.84 'd. u. 's/acre
EXISTING UTI LITIES
'Water: Boynton Beach
Wastewater Collection: Boynton Beach
, Solid Waste (garbage):
Bovnton Beach
A-2
:, .
"
STA TE~IENT OF USE
!; Existing Use:
I:
r
I ~
I
I: Proposed Use:
I:
. ~
"
;1
;\
'i
..
Ii
"
I.
i:
j!
I:
r
,I
II
II
! Express in your own words why this annexation will be beneficial to Boynton
Beach, Florida:
Orang~ Grnv""
Single Family Residential
,. 1 '
JUSTIFICA TION
"A"
Ult~ ...
EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED
~
11,
I:
Ii
II
;
j
I
I
l'
Ii
Ii
I
~ :
,
.,
h
"
,I
;
~ ~
i ~
I;
"
A-3
,!
n
i
I:
Kilday & Associates
Landscape Architects / Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(305) 689-5522
\' If
e..~++ \ e;." A
JUSTIFICATION FOR ANNEXATION
FOR
JONATHAN'S GROVE
The petitioner is requesting annexation of the above
described project in compliance with the ultimate
development plan for the City of Boynton Beach. The
current plan anticipates the annexation of lands up to
the intersection of Hypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road.
In fact most of the annexations in this area have
already taken place. This area is specifically referred
to as Area 45 within the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation
and Appraisal Report of 1986. These two major arteries
provide a clear demarkation between areas already
receiving City services and the County.
The proposed development is already adjacent to the
City limits of Boynton Beach. Approval of this
annexation allow the City to control the ultimate
design and development of this property to be
consistent with the development of other properties
within the City. The proposed single family development
is anticipated to add good quality housing to the
City's inventory and allow the establishment of single
family homes within an area already serviced by
surrounding schools.
"..
--
EXHIBIT "A"
The Korth Half of the South ..11 of tbe Morthw..t Quarter
of rb~ Horthv.at Quartar of s..clo. 7, TowaaDlp 4' South,
aaDle 43 la.t. 'al. '.ach Couat" rlorida, e.c.ptial
th.refro. a atrip of l..d 40 f..e 1. width OD .ach .id. of
the ceaterliae of Lb. couat, road aD. ..c.ptlal .a,
rl,ht.of-va, for aa, .a. .11 ,ublic road. aD' ......at..,
r...trictioa. of racord. coatalala, .pproxf...t.l, 10 acre..
-.. ..
.... .
-.
. ,. . ".. ........... ". '.---.,;- " .~_ ,. ,.' L_ "'~-'-"'-' oJ, ,---"~--=-'. ",'
..' . - .
~"f ......
,'----"
- _./
. ,
...
"
\
-'
"
--t"":
I
-y
- ...........
..,.._~
-
..-:r
---'
....r--'
,
.
\ ,..
lI..
lI..
I 4
" '\I)
~
>-
~
.... ~
rO
. U
.
, :c
~ t
= \
:IE
oJ
4
.,.,.
._'
.....-
.
i
\ .
L;
~...--
...~.. ....~ ..
1
...01I1TOII
lI..
o
~
4-
o
g)
C)
:z:
-~
~
J
A.
~
ex::
.:{
?n
o
w
a::
4
n.
\.oJ
a:
0.
-'---
..----
.'.~'. ';"':""~t ' ,:,/,1'
':~,:l~L 1 i '""', ;;
~\i~~ ~~'i' .1 jfS;~. '.. :,
:'r,;;il~~'l" ;t: iY~~ ,,.
, :.}f~~ :;.;:,\,. ,,' .' ~ ' "
-~: ',' '.'" ...~,.,,;\ ~,' ... .. .~'
",?"",:;/;;~f,(':":'~: ,~! .:: ,....., . .'>., '" -,. I
....,' ~1", 't",...~.\ ':,...,'"t'<'l-:l"' l' ~_.,' C'~,~ " .'1' 'M'
'." ,'.. ".~'::\:;~;.~::::':;+''r~ ,::'7 ,'" ./
i' ' '~, .,.,,:,.Ji., '. . ,", ',' ~ ' .... ~ W:: .. - J
,::,,:~;li4." .;l:"''!11';''ft ~~? -.:-.... " .. .:; ,,~-,
. ,"; ,7.;" ",1,,,,,;::..,,.. :t~" ..*1;;" . l\ ~ " I
.. .t'.c.:f.l ...'1":-;;.,,,..'.'>':-..; ,,,,;,"1"" ~". ' .' ,to ,~~' ,.....
'::""~~'~ ~,>", ,', ..,""~:....:;..:'I:,' .&::.l!.'t':' , ~j,.::; :"'. :;"'1~
, '. ~ ~~,.,.. 'fi.....Z:c.!::EI] ..r::..:. ;~~
.,' _:11.>>'''''' ,-,' "~ .' '.' ~ ,~,'" -': ,.
;tr.~'.;..;.z.x~~/'. ;~;c: :~2 .~ ,J:r~ ;"~ ~
w !~~~. .>-:-....,...... .? ,,,. ft I~~', .:,.
~~.:.....('~:::.'r.~~ ':*~ ' .' ~ ~ ".,
, " "",':;;'" ',.J ~"""-'~ ,.,~" " '
.. .... ". ,.~" ' .- . ~
.' ~., ~_'_ "',f~\I~-':-'; L~~ ~.!j~j~~' , ' i,i!- \'1 ~,
~ " _.\, ;: \l --(1:;1l.w.."<ir&;1 l:~~m1 ~ r -,,5, :~:di
\... _ -# , \ \~_~TtJ .,' J+f1~~ '~:' .:.~ ~,~ l
rr~f.? ;~i 'fS' . ,I
^:l" ' .:"" ...Ie'" '~~:~ ::_-:-~'l" 't;1h1 .~, 9~A""~"1 '
;;""11'" "'. M~tff;.:i:-'~';" ;,.':$;;'}~ ';~lil1- ;":'..o!~'l ' '~
4" ~-t~t:~~~ 1~8~;;:';':'Z:' :!,U;,: ~~~ ~ n
j ,..lff"'lb~''''''' ;,<r.>;"'"'' E::' .,.~.' UI '
~. ",Co' S:'':-J';':'':';'r.;;;;~ '~~f...~::>J.' IJ.'~P ~r,1:\ ~. ....1
\_ ",..' ,..,:.;~::.:?.:.;:,~ ':,r':t.~~'~: t,,: '. ' 1i:U, "
," ..' '~",'5r: ~.~;ll''''';II:'- ~... I
'~ . c~~,.i';~ :,-~~;;.~r! .. . ~ T .'
._ ,,;';:"\.;f~>J'l.. ''''''\;'':~'i# ~ L ~
':rr;.;:' ':'la ...,,~> - -
.' ~~1"';::4"'}' .~8 " "". ( il i..-l , .II \
~ ll~~.:i~'o< o..iAt.~,!-;.,'::OO" l ....l,;...}-
_ -' -, ..rr; h-:-::
/: I ,./1' \ \.; V.:, ~~, ~l,>r ~'I
I . I \ l~' t' rJ.{ 1 f
c-/ --r ~~" .-;-;~i..~:~~!J 'fl~l t.
I
~
-
~ -j
(I
-"",00
,\?t' .'
.,.' -
,
.
,,,
...
, 1;--...' - -
.aT
liD
L...
-'
\' ~ ,,0
r~~'
Lo . -
-
ooI,
:c
..
t-
ool ~
.. r-\..'
..
..
u I
..
.:. ~
..
5
:II
-~
I \
-
~
:::
.
... ;
l
'I i
,
w
u
..
w
..
.
..
oJ
I .
mil
~~.
.....
r.
A-
l
,
~
~
~
.(.)
~
~
,~
~
,
..
\
f -
f~ BOYNTON
~ CORPOR~
LU"lTS.
APRiLe. ,~
I
- ~
Scale in M
-.
Name of oevelopment fowner ::?onatban' a Grove/Ricbard DJJobnaon
Locate the subject property on this mOP and shade in the" oreO.
V
I',
\\
1\
j;
.\
\'.
i'
I'
"
II
"
II
~
A
-
.
.,..' . I
r ..
A-5
APPLICANT'S CERTfFIGATJON
(1) (We) affinm and certify that (1) (We) understand and will comply with
the provisions and regulations of Boynton Beach. Florida Zoning Code.
(1) (We) further certify that the above statements or diagrams made on anY
paper or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge
and belief. Further (1) (We) understand that this application. attachments,
and fees become part of the Offici al Records of Boynton Beach. Florida
, and are not returnable~ ,"
"
APPLI CANT IS:
...
Owner
...
""-
. ~....
Optionee
Kieran J. Kilday/Kilday ~:::As~ociate
Type Name of Applicant
lessee
1551 Forum Pl. Suite 100-A
Street Address
, .
xx Agent
West Palm Beach, FL. 33401
Ci.ty and State
Contract Purchaser
40.7-689-5522 '
.Telephone Number
.
.
--
.
0--
!'
A-5
,:
~
I
~~~ _._~----- .,. .-
~
~
~
A-6
OWNERS AUTHORIZATION
Under the provisions for Voluntary Annexation. Florida Statutes require that
a petition for annexation must bear the signatures of all owners of property
in an area to be annexed, The authority authorizing a person other than the
owner to sign such a petition must be attached to and accompany such petition.
/ 7?~;~L /'
Signature of Owner,
.tV~
of Applicant
Richard D. Johnson
Type Name of Owner{s)
Kieran J. Kilday/Kilday & Associates
Type Name of Applicant
,"
10295 St. Andrews
Street Address
1551 Forum Place, SU1te 100-A
Street hldress
-.
Boynton Beach, FL. 33436
Ci ty and State
~est Palm Beach. FL. 33401
Ci ty and State
407-689-5522
Telephone Number
Telephone Number
, ' ,
.1
.
-
""
E
i:
I,
,l
Ii
j'
I:
I'
"
i'
,
I
I
"
A-6
I
!:
;,
!:
:i
.
...... ti.,~.._
.
, _____ _ ___ _J~~" _~. "'~h~-'-""""--~.s..~.J!.!:- u..>--..-L:~I!............ J.._.~ _ _... ,j_ '-----........ ~. _ 'h___ h'~.._ ~C)..L . ~
--~~ .,.~ _.......-__._--~..~, - ----~,_...-
"
:... (.
.. "
. .
-
--
~
A-7
,
AFFIDAVIT
..
J
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
SS
.
1
J
J
1
J
)
J
Before me. 'the under-signed authority personally appeared
RleHARD D, JOHNSON
_(Name of Owner) , who being by me first duly sworn,
on oath deposes and s~s:
, .'
property.
1, Tha. he is the fee simple owner of the following described
. '. .
to-wit: (Give legal description)
~ a :h27~~
...
\JoI.~ ~
(Attach if insufficient space)
2. That he desires annexation to Boynton Beach, FLorida.
,.
KIERAN J, KILDAY
3. That he ~as appointed_(Name of Agent) KIl.tlAY, & ASSOCIATES
to act as agent in his behalf to accomplish the above. ,
'7< ?71~6L J
(Signatur
Affiant
.
Sworn to and subscribed before me
th1~ 2NO day of ex 700<<''K ,191138
q:--L?~ '
! H~;;r; ~lfc.'~~frd~.lMc%tAW~ ,;~. .
MY CO"ItIISSI(JI E)(p,.Aft: 14 1Gg2'~ .
I1Y Comnfss1on Expires:lMN>a>llAJClENEiW.INSI~. .'~
J
J
~
~
~
.
.
'-----11
I!
"
j'
i:
l:
II
I!
i'
A-7
I,
"
EXCEL BUILDERS
ENGINEERS STATEMENT
PROJECT NO. 88107
1) UTILITIES This project will be serviced by a
water main lying along the east side of Lawrence
Road and a force main lying along the West side of
Lawrence Road. A lift station built to City
standards will be installed on site to provide for
the 33 units.
Flow generation will be as follows:
WATER
33 Units 350 gpd/unit =
SEWER
11.550 gpd
33 units 280 gpd/unit =
9240 gpd
2) DRAINAGE The project lies in the C-16 basin, which
has a drainage capacity of 62.6 cubic ft/sec/square
mile. The property would therefore he allowed 0.9
CFS discharge. In addition, approximately 0.78 Ac.
ft. of retention will have to be provided to meet
water quality criteria.
Onsite storage will be provided at the back of the
lots where a total of approximately 1.2 acres of
swales will be constructed. In addition, a berm
will be constructed along the property line to keep
drainage on site in addition to supplying a visual
barrier. A control structure with overflow will
discharge to the ditch along Lawrence Road.
OCT 3 1988
TRAFFIC STATEMENT
for
JONATHAN'S GROVE
submitted to:
City of Boynton Beach
prepared by:
TEl
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
One Clearlake Centre
250 Australian Avenue, South, Suite 1001
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
407 - 659 - 8328
BACKGROUND
This report is prepared to support a request for zoning change and
for annexation for JONATHAN'S GROVE. It is submitted to the City
of Boynton Beach. Guidelines published by the City are used in the
prepartion of this study.
The first requirement of any zoning oriented study done in the City
is a comparison of traffic generated under current and proposed
zoning.
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Traffic generation is the method by which the amount of traffic,
or the number of trips from a proposed site is estimated. One
authoritative source used to estimate traffic generation is the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Report.
The most current version is the Fourth Edition.
The traffic generation data in the ITE Report is the compilation
of surveys summarized for use by a "best fit formula" which most
closely replicates the data collected. For small projects like
Jonathan's Grove however, average trip rates are recommended. These
rates are from the Fourth Edition of the ITE Report. The use of
average trip rates was the only generation method presented in the
recently outdated Third Edition.
The rates which will be used in this study for the daily traffic
generation and that which is expected in the morning and afternoon
peak hours are based on the number on single family dwelling units
as indicated below:
Daily
Morning Peak
Afternoon Peak
10.0 trips per dwelling unit
0.75 trips per dwelling unit
1.01 trips per dwelling unit
These rates will be used in a comparison of traffic generation from
the two zoning scenarios (existing and proposed) and will be used
to analyse peak hour movements at the main driveway intersection.
TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
One important consideration in an application for zoning approval
is the comparison of existing conditions with those which would
exist under the proposed conditions. From a traffic generation
standpoint the comparison is summarized in the following table.
Trip Generation Comparison
Existing
Proposed
9 units
33 units
90 daily trips
330 daily trips
240 additional
It is evident that the change in zoning from one dwelling unit per
acre to approximately three dwelling units per acre has a very
small additional impact - 240 trips throughout the entire day.
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC GENERATION
During the peak hours - morning and afternoon - the following
traffic generation characteristics are expected.
Peak hour traffic generation
Morning Peak
.75 trips per unit
27% inbound
73% outbound
7 trips
18 trips
Afternoon Peak
1.01 trips per unit
63% inbound
37% outbound
21 trips
12 trips
The implications of these peak hour vehicle trips will be discussed
in the next section.
IMPACT STUDY THRESHOLDS
There are two thresholds defined in the City guidelines for
determining the scope of the traffic impact study required. A full
impact study is required if a proposed project generates either:
three thousand trips per day, or
two hundred fifty directional trips in peak hour
It is clear that the daily generation (330 trips) and the highest
peak hour directional generation (21 trips in the afternoon) are
well below these thresholds. Therefore, a full traffic impact
analysis will not be required.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
An analysis of traffic movements at the intersections of the
driveway that would serve the property is required in this traffic
statement to determine improvements necessary to accommodate such
traffic movements. Because of the small size of Jonathan's Grove
only turn lanes at the driveway will be examined.
Requirements for turn lanes into a residential site (from Lawrence
Road in this case) are based on afternoon peak hour turning
movements. The turn lane requirement thresholds per Palm Beach
County Engineering Department are as follows:
Left turn lanes from the main street
Right turn lanes from the main street
75 vph
30 vph
It is evident that these thresholds are far greater than the total
inbound traffic into the proposed site (left turns plus right
turns). Therefore, turn lanes from Lawrence Road will not be needed
to accommodate the traffic from the Jonathan's Grove.
CONCLUSION
The traffic impact from rezoning the Jonathan I s Grove site as
proposed will be negligible. The impact on the adjacent roadway
(Lawrence Road) is insignificant (less than two percent of the
capacity of the existing facility).
Furthermore, the peak hour demands at the intersection of the
future site and Lawrence Road is not significant enough to warrant
the addition of right or left turn lanes into the site.
/)~
:L[---------
FREDERICK W. SCHWARTZ, . E.
Florida Registration # 28403
. "'C'"
!'rin'" f", Low",...' Title Gua,anly Fund, 0.......... FIeridct
lhis inslru....' "val prepa,ed b,:
Ifarranty Iud
Rd"uA..~,~: NORMk", L. SCHROEOER. II
., ... '- 0/_ .,
MeG~ JORDAN. SOUEY,
KOONS -' SCHROEDER. P,A,.
Flnl F...... ~.I__lhe c..ill"r
(SUTUTOIY fOIM-SfCTIOIl "',12 f,S,) 1601 T..... A_ ........ s..Jte Sit
L.Ul& WOJlTII, ILOIUDA ~1
AI
f\1
:f"
fT
fT
C
(J1Jt. Jnbm1un. Mode this
.,Ii
.). & doy of
fJfrY
19 83, .rlmrra
JOSEPH A. PALEPMO and H. LOY ANDERSON, fR.
Florida
of lho Covnty of Palm Beach
, gra_-, and
, State of
IQ MIDDLE STATES COAL COMPANY, INC., a Kentucky corporation
..
who.. PO" oHie. add,ess is PO Box 11, David, Kentucky 41616
=
,...
t!;
of lho County of Floyd , 3tate of Kentucky . g,antee-,
.tlnt..rr... Thot said granto" ,.., and in considorotion of lho sum of
",ell and no/lOO (SID. 00) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dollars.
and atho. good and ...JuobIo conside,otion. 10 said gtOIIIO, ir hand paid by said gran,", tho __pi whereof i. hereby
ad_wledged, ha. grontwd, bo'goin", and ",Id to tho said ""0"'", and g,on_'. heirs and assign. fa'....', tho following
...ribed land, oituoto, lyi"ll and being in Palm Beach County, FIorido, to-wil:
CD
N
i
~i
The North Half of the South Half of the Northwest Ouarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 45 South, Range
43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, excepting therefrom a
strip of land 40 feet in width on each side of the centerline
of the county road and excepting any right-of-way for any and
all public roads and easements, rest~ictions of record: con-
taining approximately 10 acres.
"'~ (..-cP
?"',
q~ '"
.
\,-\1(c
SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED
_._-~-- --...- -
.' .. .
_.,--,-
.- !:: .'~
, fi" ,"
~~':'
... -....
. '~~I~. ~. .," _.,. .
""I"'~'~'
..... .' . ...,
, ,,-; '/-.'
---.....
. -.. .-----.
.. IlIid .-- dOik-...., "'" _rr_ tho titIo to taid land, and will ....... lho some Q1IOinst lho lawful claim. of 011
-- .........-.
- "GhMltot" and ........." _ used for siftvuIa, or plural, en context requi-.
J. .tau.. ."""'f. and ....1 lhol'foy J"'d ~, firs' above w"".n,
Sogloed, and ' ,
..,
C)
C)
I Jose A. P 1 rmo
I~C:
...
ST"n Of FLORIDA
COUNTY <.A PALM BEACH
I ...IV CfMT"V ... Oft this day bofof. _, on oHic., duIr _lihod 10 .... oc._~-", portoftolty appea,",
.JOSEPH A. PALEfU40 and H. LOY ANDERSON, JR.
.. _ ,_ to be ......- ...ribed.. 0f0d who ..."utod lho ........ i~ and ad_fldgd be,..,. me thai
w::.~-:-,.: .:- ofIiciol toOl ," .. COlIRlY ..... ~ .... al:'this ~~",{~. ", ~~
1.8) " ,( (j._
+-&.... r.. ' ,~ . (Seal)
,., c_n apifft l ~'. a ~ , . .1 r ~ry PIrblic
: ,.,. .. . . . ~ ...,
flA)l,;"~;:,,,.1l ~li.(~~.ij~, AT Wc.t
Mi!;~'>>'~~,~~:,~' ~ Iou .
~ ,-. ~:~" w"-IAt.._,.tl)
. . .,."
CWO)
an
-
'CD
CD
--'~::.:...
~
(Seal)
1 Seal)
(Seal)
(Seal,
.... .
BXHIBI~ A ~ MkRRARTY DEBD
FROM
JOSEPH A. PALBRMO AND R. IDY ANDBRSON JR.
~
MIDDLE S'l'ATBS COI - COMPMfY, INC.
May '6, 1983
SOBJECT to restrictions, eaeeaents, reservations and other ..tters of
record and taxes for the year 1983.
SOBJECT to Mortgage in favor of Harrison Snider, Clarence Shelton and
Lou Ann Shelton, his vife, recorded May 25, 1983, in the Public
Records of pala Beach County, Plorida under Clerk's Pile '83-097890,
which Grantee hereby assuaes and agrees to pay.
This property is not the ho..stead of either Grantor.
PROVIDBD, however, that the preaisee conveyed herein aay not be used
at any tiae for the operation of a oo...rcial fruit or citrus paCking
plant, nor for the aaintenance or operation of a fruit stand. This
restrtctio.. shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the
grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns.
.~
.-
.0
.-
L
..
~
-
un
III
__ 4l_1lO
'ALII BEACH COO"". f~
.10"" 8, DUNKlE
ClEM CUCJl COURt
'.S~"AD ...
___.. .. N. SO.
~_...
,...-. ~ .....
d.!f., .f
r
c:r
a
a
'"
'"
~.I' ,WIT-CLAD DI.I. ...cut.. tbl.
D.c_ber. 1986. by
IIlDDLI S'UTII COAL CON'Aft, IIC., . E..tuct, C.w,o~.tlo.,
firat p.rt" to
IICHAID D. JOBIIOI, w~o.. .ddr... 1. 10295 IC. A.'r.w.,
loyatoa I..cb. 'lorl'. 33436,
.II ..cood p.rC,:
.. ,";
-.(V~.~.~.r u..' '.r.io. c~. c.~ NIlrlt ,.rc,. .., "...... ,..".
...11 i.cl... .l.,ul.r ... ,law.I, b.lr., 1...1:...'........,1.... ...
,];...il" 0' la.hl.u.h,... cia. ..cco..e,. ... ........~. .,......-
~'Clou, ..laua.u Cia. co.c..e .. ,"ito 01' ,...h~..)~'.',.;;~f
fit WITD..n.. Tbat cia. ..U fiuc ,.~c" for ..." t. '0'-
~ lid.ratioo of cb. .u. of T.. D.n.n (UO.OO) h baD' ,al' II, t~.
..id ..coad p.rt,. th. r.calpt wla.r.o' 1. Ia...a'" .ck.owl....., '0..
o bor.by r..l.., 1'.1.... _.. quit-cl.1. .Dto Cia. ..1. ..co.' ,.rt, '01'-
... .ver, all tb~ d,ht, titl., l.t.r..t. cl.l. ... ...... vlticla tla. ..1.
:bi fir.t part, h.. la .a' to tb. lollov1.. '..crlho' lot, ,loco or por-
~ cal of 1aa', .itu.t.. 1,10' 00' b.lo. 1. tb. Cou.t, of ,.1. I..cb.
, n r · t. 0 f r lor 1 .., to vi t I
~ ~. Th. North a.1f of tla. 'outb ..1f of tb. 1I0rtbw..t Quart.r
~ IJ of the lorthv..t QuartoI' of Soctio. 7" Towo..lp 45 South,
.....'L! ' 1'0" 43 la.t, ,.1. I..ch Cou.C" 'lorlel., ..c.ptl..
ill :a. tla....rro. . .trip 01 1... 40 ,..t 1. wi'tb 00 ..ch Ii.. of
U.I....IJ. tb. c..t.r1 h. of Lb. couot, "0" ... ..copti., ..,
~t;~ dlht-of-va, for ao, a.eI all ,.'Hc road. aD' 'O'.'DU,
.... W ~ r..trlct io.. of r.cor.; cODtal.l.. .ppro.l.at.l, 10 ocr...
_ fen ~o aft AID~. ..... th. .... co,Uh.r vitia .U ... 01.-
2 ~~~ .ular th. .ppurtouacu tla.rau.to b.1o..101 or la ..,vl.. .".rtai.'
C ~ ~al, .nd .11 the ..t.t., rilht, titl.. i.ce~..t, li.., ..uit,. .od
':> t::; c1.i.. vh.e.oa"ar of tha ..id fir.t part" eith.r ia 1.v o~ ..uh" to
blc, i!lJ the oaly prop.~ u... boa.fit ... b.hoof of tba ..i. ..co.. p.rt, '01'-
r-ll .".r.
. I. .I~"'I "I"O~. T~. ..i. fi~.t ,art, b.. .1.... .ad
tla.i. pr...at. tb. .0,. aoel ,.ar fir.t above vrittao.
.ila.d. ..ala. ..eI "d. 1 i..ra.
io tho pr....c. of:
/~.?/. ~~
7?]1J,~~',.v C)J~~~ .:::L
I'.. '~r.J
S~O
.S!)
NIDILI STArl. COAL
COII'AI'. IIC., . a..tuck,
c~or'orat~o. ~'
I' ~~ .;
chard ll. J 00,
'ra.ida.t, '
(tlU J
,..,,\
STATE or PLOIIDA
co UIlTY or 1I0"AlD
::
,.
,'"
"
I .....r c..~lrr t~at o. tlai. "" "'01'0 .', ..
offic.r du1, autlaoria.d 1. th. It.ta al......l. .ad 10 th. Co..t,
.for...id to tat. .ckaovl......t., '.1'....11' .pp.ar.' IIClAID D.
JOB.SO. .. 'r..l.lat of NIDILI "Arl' COAL C~.A", IIC., . Ea.tuck,
Corpor.tlo., Co .. kao.. Co .. tla. p.r... '..crl'" i. ... .'0
a.acut.d tb. fora,oia, l..tr....t .n' ~a .ck...l..... "'0'" .. Chat
h. ,.,c,ut.. th. .... ua'.r ..t~o~it, du1, "..t... 1. hi. '" ..i.
Corporatlo.. ,.'.,
.I~" .Y h... ..~J-ffici.l
It.te 1..t afo~...id thi. ~ 'a, of
a..l I. th. C~..C, ...~
.r..,t.:~ "~
...." .. ~ --
PAlM BEACH COUNn'. fILA.
JOtiN., l..JNCLE
CORK c:nr;u' r COURT
My Co..i..ion I.pira.:
10"" ...rc ..... . 'UlIIlN
If............ .C N.'.
'"-. '... "",.. "S, "Ill,
--. ..~ ~
~ .~--......_._~~-~,._~ ~. .~_.~-'-..._---_.._.,
--
Kilday & Associates
Landscape Architects I Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(305) 689-5522
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
FOR
JONATHAN'S GROVE
Includes Items g., h. 1, and (7)
The petitioner is requesting annexation of the above
referenced property into the City of Boynton Beach with
a Comprehensive Plan designation of Low Density
Residential and a zoning classification of R-1A.
Currently this property which is located on the east
side of Lawrence Road south of Hypoluxo Road is zoned
AR-Agricultural Residential in unincorporated Palm
Beach County. The site contains 9.3 acres.
The current zoning classification of AR is the
underlying classification of most lands in the County
until they are zoned to a classification consistent
with the Palm Beach County Plan. This classification
which is designed for the agricultural use of property
requires a minimum of five acres in order to construct
a single family home. Therefore, only one single family
home could currently be constructed on the property
with the ~~lance of the site being utilized for
agricultural purposes.
However, in all likelihood, ultimate development in the
County would be in conformance with the County's
current plan classification of Low to Medium
Residential which allows three units per acre with
standard zoning and five units per acre with a
concurrent Planned Unit Development. This development
is entirely consistent with the proposed zoning and
plan designation being requesteed in the City of
Boynton Beach. The proposed plan for the development of
this site will allow 33 single family lots to be
constructed at a density of 3.5 units per acre. This
use is similar to what the County would most likely
approve.
Likewise the population of this development (utilizing
2.6 persons per unit) of 86 people would be consistent
with the potential density under the County plan which
could allow up to 130 people if the Planned Unit Devel-
opment density of five units per acre was approved.
~.~
'1:"..
,;j,
Jonathan's Grove
Page 2
It is clear that Agricultural zoning in this area is no
longer appropriate. The current trend of Comprehensive
Development in Palm Beach County is to promote
development along the Coast and emphasize continued
Agricultural uses west of the Turnpike. In this area,
residential development is already the primary land
use. In addition, a high school is located immediately
to the north on the north side of Hypoluxo Road and
shopping facilities exist at the southwest corner of
Hypoluxo Road and Congress Avenue. The extension of
Miner Road and the development of a new middle school
to the south on Hypoluxo Road make the area even more
desirable for single family development.
.,.,
~~~- -_._------------~---------
filii'
assigns for complying with my attorney's requests. In addition, I
hereby authorize all physicians and psychiatrists who have treated
me, and all other providers of health care, including hospitals, to
release to my attorney all information or photocopies of any
records which my attorney may request, If I am incompetent at the
time my attorney shall request such information, all persons are
authorized to treat any such request for information by my attorney
as the request of my legal representative and to honor such
requests on that basis. thereby waive all privileges which may be
applicable to such information and records and to any communication
pertaining to me" and made in the courae of any confidential
relationship recognized by law.
In the event any question may hereafter be railed as to the
effectivenesl of this powlr of attorney, depending on whether I 1m
then living, I hereby direct that this instrument shall be
irrevocable except by another instrument under my hand and seal,
duly aCknowledged; and if I shall be dead when any Ict is done by
my attorney, the powers herein given Ihall be regarded II
testamentary powers given to my attorney .s trustee, and when my
death is ascertained, this instrument, unless revoked as aforesaid,
may be read into any will that I may leave, whether executed prior
to or subsequent to this instrument, thereby giving full force and
eflect to a contractual obligat1on by me with those dea11n; with my
attorney whether I ~e living O~ d..d, 'u.thermore, this power of
attorney shall not be affected or terminated by my subsequent
disability or incompetence or by lap.e of time. However, nothing
herein contained shall relieve my attorney from a proper accounting
to me or my estate, as the case may be, but persons dealing with my
attorney shall be under no duty to see that such is don..
My attorney shall generally act in relation to the premises
and all other matters in which I may be interested or concerned,
and on my behalf execute all such instruments and do all such acts
and things, as fully and effectually in all respects as I myself
could do if personally present. And I hereby ratify and confirm
all acts done by my attorney by virtue hereof,
To the extent I am permitted by law to do so, I herewith
nominate, constitute and appoint Michael P. Johnson to serve as my
conservator, the guardian of my estate or of my person, and/or in
any similar representative capacity; and if I am not permitted by
law to so nominate, constitute and appoint, then I request in the
strongest possible terms that any court or county commission of
competent jurisdiction which may receive and be asked to act upon a
petition by any person to appoint a conservator, guardian or
similar representative for me or my estate give the greatest
possible weight to this request, Any person nominated and
appointed as conservator, guardian or similar representative under
the preceding sentence shall serve without bond or other security
required by law.
WITNmss my hand and seal this ~~ day of ~~;O;r
19$%.
~...J1 ~~.....J{SEALJ
R1char ,Johnson
7
Witnesses:
This instrument was prepared by:
Bruce L. Stout, Attorney at Law
Post Office Box 2185
Huntington, West Virginia 25722
.... -
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,
COUNTY OF CABELL: ~
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~
day of cx-l'~'e.r- _ I 19S2:', by Richard D. Johnson.
F 'IA E L
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF wesT VIRGINIA
ANN ROBINETTE
2400 M~s Rd
Lynn Ann Farm
BitbourlYIIII, WV 25504
MJ Commi$$lOn bPi!" Oct 1 .
01""Yo\l
Notary PUblic, Cabell County, W. Va.
[NOTARIAL SEAL)
8
QaU-CIo.1II ...
_.,..N' Go4. _
~...:.'"
/$/1{., .f
D.c.. ber,
~.I' .aIT-~.mI .... ...cut.. thi.
1 986, b1
MIDDLI STATIS COAL CONPAII, IIC.. . K.atuck, C.rporat!oa.
r
fT
o
o
II'
~
Hrac P.rt1, to
RICHARD D. JOB.SOI, vbo.. .ddr... il 10295 It, Aadr.v.,
loyntoa I..cb, 'lorid. 33436,
..0 ..cond p.rt,:
.....
., (Wber~..r u... h.r.in, tb. t.ra Nitr.t p.rt," ..d "..co.' ,arc,.
.ball i.clud. .i..ul.r ... ,1ur.l, b.ir.. 1...1 r.pr....c.ti.... ..d
...l.n. of iodi.i'ual., ... c~. .ucc....r. ... ,.Ii... .f ..~,.r.-
.. tiOl1l, "h.n".r tb. coae..t .0 ._it. or ,...lr,..) , ' ,.,"
...'
~ .nn"IT.. Th.t th. uid fiut p.rt" for ... 1. ...-
~ .ider.tion of tbe .u. of T.a Doll.rl <'10,00) i. baad ,.1. b, tb.
.aid ..cood p.rty, the r.c.ipt vb.reof i. h.r.b, .ckaovl....., do.a
a hareby r..iae, 1'.1.... aael quit-claim u.to tb. ..id ..co.el p.rt, for-
... .v.r, .11 tho! ri.ht. title. i.t.r..t, claim .". '..aad vhicb the ..i.
::&I lirat p.rty h.. in .nd to the fOllo"in. d..crill.d lot, piece or par-
~ eel of land, aituata, l,i., aad b.i". ia the Count1 of ,.1. 'e,ch,
, n r · t e 0 f '10 I' i d., to" it:
~ ...,. The Korth Ralf of tll. South Balf of the Rortllv..t Quart.r
~ JJ of tbe: Morth...t Q urt.r of Sactio. 7, Towol.l, 4' louth,
~~ ' Ian.. 43 aa.t, 'al. a.ach Couat" 'lori'a, ....ptla.
i! :0. th.r.fro. . atrip of l."d 40 f..t ia vi'th 00 .ach ai d, of
~""II' the c.nterline of Lb. couat, ro.d .ad ..c.pti.. ..,
~Vl!i2 ri.ht-of-.., for .., aad all p.blic roael. all. ea._e.t.,
~, W~ r.utriction. of r.cord; co.t.iaia, approxi..t.l, 10 .cr.a.
Z ..
~~ TO .... ..D TO .O~D tb. .... to..th.r "ith all... li.-
- ~ ~ ~ "uler the .ppurt.n.nc.. tla.r.uato baloa,ia. or in aay.l.. .pp.rtaia'
~ ~ -1=0', .nd .11 the .atat.. ri,bt. titl., i.t.reat, Ii,., ..uit, and
';) to clai... "h.t.o.....r of the .aid fir.t part" .ith.r in 1.. or equit" to
~~ t!!J the only prop.r U", bea.fit and b.hoof of th. ..id ..co.d p.rt, for-
~ .ver.
_ 1. .IT.... .....0.. Th. ..id fir.t part, h.. .l,n.d aad
th... pr...nt. the da1 aad "ar fir.t .bove "ritten.
li,n.d, ...1ad .nd-deli....r..
ia the pr...ac. of:
~,J/. 'ffI~
7/j I It, i-...l IJ I ~ u.- ..r::!-
~, f'(. ..,
S:~0~-'
,SU
[UAL J
STATE or rLOIIIA
COUNTY 0' I&OW"ID
I ....., ClaYlrY tb.t 00 thl. "" befor. .., .a
officer dul, .utbari&ed ia tb. Stat. .for..aid aad ia tb. Couat,
.for...iel to t.k. .c:knov1.d....t., p.r.o..1l, .pp..r.d tICS"RDD.
JOHNSON a. .raaident of "IDOLI .TAfIS COAL CON.ART, I.C., . Keetuck,
Corpor.tioa, to .. kilO". to be tbe par... '..crib.d i. ... wbo
...eute. the for..oin, ia.trwa.at and Il. .ckaovl.d,.d '.fora .. that
be nec,lIta. the ...e un'.r autltodt, dull "..t.d i. Id. ., ..ld
Corporat loa.
.1T8&.. .Y ha.. ..~ffici.l
St.te la.t .for...id thi. ~ d&, of
a..l 1. the C~..t, ...""
.t~L:C ~,'~
Rot.ry 'U ~
MCOAO yEfW8
PAtN BEACH COUNTY. RA.
JOHN B lAJNCLf
C' RK C W:,j-, COURT
My Co..i..ion lapir..:
.0,,,, "'e ....n " '&lItlllA
.. co.ualU r.. .c .'.....
"'80(0 ,.._ UIIf'lL ! .1, "If!!,
.'
...
-......
....~~~.e~
.~~ l' ;.:
Prin'ed .'" LDwy.n' Ti'" Guaranty Fund. Orlando. FIericIa
lhis. in,trumenl 'va, p,epared b,
1QJ<4A .~,~..
NOR~~1 L. SCHROEDER, II
., ... &.. 0/_ .1
M~"':i., JORDAI~, SHUn,
KOONS a SCHROEDER. P,A.
FIn. FeoIenJ 4oIaJa'.-un c..~
1601 T.... Awe... N-dl, ""he .n.
LUUl YOa11l.lLOIUDA "",1
Ifarranty Jttd
(STATUTOIY FOIM-SECTIOIl "',Df F,S.)
AI
fYl
::t-
a-
fT
C)
1I1Ji. Jnbmturr, Mode .hi.
t6
.). & day af
J11,.Y
19 83, Irtwrrn
JOSEPH A. PALEPMO and H. LOY ANDERSON, lR.
Florida
af the County o' Palm Beach
. 9ronto'., and
, Stote of
In MIDDLE STATES COAL COMPANY, INC., a Kentucky corporation
-
whoM PO" office address is PO Box 11, David, Kentucky 41616
0' the County of Floyd
. .ilole of Kentucky
, gran.ee.,
-
N
'...
~
.itM..rlII. Tha' said gran'or, for and in consideration of t'" sum of
:'ell and no/lOO ($10.00) . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . Dollars,
and 0''''' good and ....Iuob.. considerotions to soid grantor ir hand paid by said gron..., the _eipt whereo' is hereby
odno..ledged. has granted, bargain"" and sold to the said 9ro....., ond grontee's t.e;,. and assigns forever, .h. 'ollowing
described land, ,;tuate, lying and beinv in Palm Beach County, Flarida, to-wit,
co
N
-
2
:1
The North Half of the South Half of the Northwest nuarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 45 South, Range
43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, excepting therefrom a
strip of land 40 feet in width on each side of the centerline
of the county road and excepting any right-of-way for any and
all public roads and easements, rest~ictions of record; con-
taining approximately 10 acres.
'"'~ C<Y
?~ ,
q~ .;
\~1~
SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED
.-.---
. - . ~ .
~-"
:t.~.
.,.s'
->---
. r\'''., ....._
,,,. (Ill' '..
.. ," "~":
,.4 .;.....
.. ,
.__.~.
... laid .-- dots'.... fully _"ant the ~ 10 said land. and wiI defend the some agoinst the lawful claims a. all
--..........-,
. "~" and "11"1-" _ used to. singular OW plural, as context requi....
and ....1 thel'foy J"'d ~r first obove wrillen,
:'f i, ,
I Jose A. P 1
/~0.
..,
C) S'AlI Of FLORIDA
C> CQUoITY VI PALM BEACH
. ....Y CERTIfY _I .... ..... day befoo. _, an oH;c., duly _~hed to .... o<~now~~, p.rsanally appeo,""
L
JOSEPH A. PALERMO and H. LOY ~~DERSON. JR.
.. _ ,_ to be tile....... de1cribed in ond who ...,uted the ~ i...__ and od-'tdged before .... ,hat
r-. .uc......... - ' , / ."L, A ~
~ss ..., "'"""' and official MOl In the c~ aftd Slate lost a~.~ ,
198) I. '. '(
.. ,.-... " I (Seal)
... c_n n~ : ". ':) ~" ,} ~ NnfC!.., MlK
~
In
e
, CD
CD
,. .........
::-: .' '(" ;; '. r
t<U,,,,,fk..,.:';1J ,-1) ,,~,~,'" ~
M;'-~ha,_"1AJ_~j-'.,~, G ,.I;t)
~ II1lK4 ~ ::::<1'" ~;.u..~~.,.ll)
....\
.ii.'
J
,.:,~~
. ~.:
'-""~"'t"'" ,
',.:4"'",","" '\, ,,'
_ '~~-:t~t_".t ~_~
~.:,. ~ '~~;/!
"!';L" ,1~ A
,^~ ,..r",j:t>:l
}-:~; t'.~~~
'. ~".
.' ,,", 't
~ :-;;":j .;110 - f1
, "1, '~'.~~; :.'~
:~t~J J:~
';'" \I[~~~~
,t~~"it: ~,~
", -! " ;r:"f", ,.:."~.. .':.t.-'
.!.;' i,:;. "'\ >,..._ ",~;~
-;;,,:~:, ~1,~'t
h"",";i.~~'~
. I. .'-"f~ ..,r'-~'
, ,,-,.
" '
J~',":
'~i~
,', ,,:,1;,
,;'J~t~ ;~
.Jw~,,"'iii'~
.. ," ,i!
(Seat)
I Seal)
lSeal)
~
. ~::l: .
7 ~_i ;.~~'~ ~i
iSeaI)
~
t,
~t,~:
,', ~t1~~J,~
. ~.~~
:C,,," 'i'ol',;
- :; :'.
?,~~~";
. ...
'.
-0
.-
~
1ft
-
.en
tD
EXHIBI7 A ~ ~ DEED
FROM
JOSEPH A. PALERMO AND H. LOY ANDERSON JR.
TO
MIDDLE STATES CO~- COMPANY, INC.
May ?6, 1983
SUBJECT to restrictions, eaaeaents, reservations and other aatters of
record and taaes for the year 1983.
SUBJECT to Mortgage in favor of Harrison Snider, Clarence Shelton and
Lou Ann Shelton, his vife, recorded May 25, 1983, in the Public
Records of Pal. Beach County, Florida und~r Clerk's File '83-097890,
which Grantee hereby aasu.es and agrees to pay.
This property is not the hoaestead of either Grantor.
PROVIDED, however, that the pre.ises conveyed herein allY not be used
at any tiae for the operation of a co..ercial fruit or citrus packing
plant, nor for the aaintenance or operation of a fruit stand. This
restrictio.. shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the
grantee, ita heirs, successors and assigns.
L
RECORD 1f...1lO
'ALII BEACH coutnV, f~
JOHtt 8, DUNKlE
CUM CUOJl COURT
, .,;.:.~