REVIEW COMMENTS
Cl:'TY OF BOYR'l'OH BEACH
COHCORREHCY MANAGEMEIft ORD:IHAHCE
EXBHP"l'l:OH S"l"ATUS
1. Name of Project MOTOROLA PID/KIDSTOP
2 . Address or Location North East Corner of the C-16 Canal and
"
Congress Avenue ~-'~--. -.,.-""",-, '%"..--.-
3. Property Control Number
4. Traffic Analysis Zone 424
5. Type of Development Order or Permit DRI
6. Date of Approval (or last time extension) January 7, 1980
7. Expiration Date and Conditions (if any) N/A
8. Type of Use:
_ Residential
_ Office
_ Retail
_ Restaurant
-1L Day Care
_ Nursing Home-ACLF
_ Church
--X.. Industrial
9. Number and Type of Units or Square Feet 825,000 square feet
I . '
(Total constructed-519,'291 sqft with approved day care)
10. Exemption Category A18
11. Exemption Status (By Facility Type):
.---
NOT
APPLICABLE
X
X
X
X
X
X
NOT
EXEMPT
EXEMPT
a) Potable Water
b) Sanitary Sewer
c) Solid Waste
d) District parks
e) Recreation Facilities
f) Neighborhood Parks
g) Drainage
h) Traffic Circulation
X
X
Planning/form.doc/10-90
00
M (Kt Ha~
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
SCAPE REVISION APPLICATION
(CHANGES TO APPROVED PLANS UNDER $100,000)
OWNER/APPLICANT'S NAME
~4 b-e:;7);:>
SUBMITTAL DATE
zr-
OWNER/APPLICANT'S ADDRESS
OWNER/APPLICANT'S PHONE NO.
PROPERTY ADDRESS
PERMIT NO. ~ ~/3iJTRB NO.
9Z-GJ~
Describe the specific changes to the plan you propose:
1. Reason(s) for change: ~ 'I (JoQ:>,rt"M- /V~'r &~k.u;-
2. Identify section(s) of landscape code affected by
revis ion: (
'7;0 CL>,u.J>fA-~~-::' C>>-I/V' I' NITV7~ 70 NH"-;~
3. Specific plants specie(s) and number changes:
-
........... PLAN'l"
1. ';OJ<fX -:!i-",-r/;-
2.. _
:L
4.
5.
- E)-;.1
NUMBER
/cSO
REPLACEMENT
~
~ t'" ~ !.M---
---
4. What is the
compared to
dollar value
the original
/to/ Z- ~
cost of the proposed revision as
cost?
~
Revised Cost $ /CtJ / Z. ;--
Original Cost $
*IMPORTANT: Provide approved TRB drawings so that proposed
revisions may be compared to original approved plans.
/ '-- \LA...CV--'lCIoo.--. ~ --' .
~& H\UL~
;';,NJ.' South Florida Water Management Distri t
.O.o....".,.c...:--.. .
3301 Gun Club Road - P.O. Box 24680 - West Palm Beach. FL 33416.4680 - (407)686-8800 - FL W A TS 1.800-432-204:i
CON 24-06
~ejulation Uepartment
ApPlication No.: 930415-4
May 14, 1993
Mendel Mark
7245 South Military Trail
lake Worth, Fl 33463
APPROVED
Fll
HAt 1 4 1993
WPB
Dear Permittee:
SUBJECT: Notice of Intent to Construct Works
Modification to Permit and
Stormwater Discharge Certification No.: 50-00931-S
Permittee: MENDEL MARK
Project: MOTOROLA DAY CARE CENTER
Location: PALM BEACH COUNTY, S17/T45S/R43E
This letter is to notify you of the District's
request of April 15, 1993, to modify the above
Discharge Certification. This action is taken
Chapter 40E-40, Florida Administrative Code.
5Jsed on the information submitted which includes surface water management system
design plans signed and sealed by a Florida registered Professional Engineer, a
modification to the above referenced Permit and Stormwater Discharge
Certification ;s in effect for this project subject to:
agency action concerning your
referenced Permit and Stormwater
pursuant to Rule 40E-1.606 and
1. Not receiving a filed request for a Chapter 120, Florida Statutes,
administrative hearing,
2. the attached 12 Standard limiting Conditions, and
3. 5 Exhibits.
Should you object to these Conditions, please refer to the attached "Notice of
Rights" which addresses the procedures to be followed if you desire a public
hearing or other review of the proposed agency action. Please contact this
office if you have any questions concerning this matter. If we do not hear from
you in accordance with the "Notice of Rights", we will assume that you concur
with the Distr1ct's action.
P~ECEIVEp'
Gvverning BO,lrd'
Allan Milledge. Chairman. Miami
Valerie Boyd. Vice Chairman - Naples
Ken Adams. West Palm Beach
James f.. Nail - Fort Lauderdale
Annie Betancourt.. Miami
Franklin B. Mann - Fort Myers
Leah G. Schad.. West Palm Beach
Frank Williamson. Jr. - Okeechobee
Eugene K. Pellis - Fort Lauderdale
.IAY 1& '.
PLANN'NG DEPT~"
...,
Tilford L. l reel. Executive Director , -
Thomas K. MacVicar. Deputy Executive Direcl
MENDEL MARK
Subject: Notice of Intent to Construct Works
May 14, 1993
Page 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTlFYthat a IINotice of Rightsll has been mailed to the addressee
(and the persons listed in the attached distribution list) no later than 5:00
p.m. this 14th day of May, 1993, in accordance with Section 120.60(3), Florida
~tatutes.
Sincerely,
~ /}---
Carlos A. de Rojas, P.E.
Supervising Professional .
Surface Water Management Division
CR/kt/l d
CERTIFIED MAIL NO. P 253 288 725
Enclosures
~ FORM 0537
~10'87
South Florida Water Managemenf District
GENERAL PERMIT
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
This Notice of Rights is intended to inform the recipient of the administrative and judicial review which may be aVl
mandated by sectjon 120.60(3). Florida Statut.s. e. advis.d that although this notic. is intended to b. comprehensive. tl
procedures set forth h.r.in have b..n the subj.ct of judicial construction and int.rpretation which may affect the admini!
judicial review availabl.. R.cipients are th.refor. advised to become familiar with Chapt.rs 120 and 373. Florida Statutel
judicial int.rpr.tation of the provisions of th.se chapt.rs.
1. If a substantially aff.c....d person obj.cts to the staff's r.comm.ndation. that person has the right to requ.st an admil
h.aring on the proposed ag.ncy action. Th. substantially affected person may requ.st .ith.r a formal or an informal
as s.t forth b.low. Failur. to comply with the prescribed time periods shall constitute a waiver of the right to a h.a.l
2. If a substantially aff.cted person believ.s a g.nuin. issue of mat.rial fact is in di~ute, that person may request a form~
pursuant to section 120.57(1). Florida Statutes. by filing a petition not lat.r than:
a. IF NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION WAS PUBLISHED BY THE APPLICANT. within fourteen (14) days after
mailing of the proposed ag.ncy action or
b. IF NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION WAS NOT PUBLISHED, within founeen days after receipt of actual
notic..
Th. request for a s.ction 120.57(1). F.S., formal hearing must comply with the requirem.nts of Rul. 4OE-1.521
Adminlstrativ. Cod.. a copy of which is attached. P.tltlons are de.med flied upon r.ceipt by the District. F
substantially comply with the provisions of Rule 4OE-1.521. Florida Administrativ. Code. shall constitut. a waiver of th
a 120.57(1) h.aring. If a petition for administrative hearing is not timely flied, the staff's proposed ag.ncy will autol
mature into final agency action.
3. If a substantially affected p.rson beli.ves that no issu.s of material fact are in disput.. that person may request an
hearing pursuant to section 120.57(2). F.S.. by filing a p.tition for h.aring not later than:
a. IF NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION WAS PUBLISHED BY THE APPLICANT, within founeen (14) days after
mailing of the proposed agency action or
b. IF NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION WAS NOT PUBLISHED, within fourteen days after receipt of actual
notice.
A request for informal h.aring shall be considered as a waiver of the right to request a formal s.ction 120.57(1). F.S.. ht
request for a section 120.57 (1 ). F .5.. formal hearing not in substantial compliance with the provisions of rule 40E- 1.52'
may be considered by the District as a requ.st for informal hearing. If a petition for administrative hearing is not tim.ly
staff's proposed ag.ncy action will automatically mature Into final agency action.
4. Pursuant to section 373.114, Florida Statutes. a party to the proceeding below may seek review of a Final Order rendert
permit application b.for. the Land and Water A~judicatory Commission. as provided th.rein. Revi.w under this s
initiated by filing a reQu.st for review with the Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission and serving a copy on the Des
of Environmental R.gulation and any p.rson named in the Ord.r within 20 days after rend.ring of the District'
However. when the ord.r to b. r.vi.w.d has statewide or regional significanc.. as d.t.rmin.d by the Land an
Adjudicatory Commission within 60 days aft.r r.c.ipt of a r.qu.st for revi.w, the commission may ~cc.Pt a r.quest fe
from any affdcted person within 30 days after the r.nd.ring of the order. Revi.w under section 373.11<4. Florida SU
!;mited sol.,y to a d.t.rmination of consist.ncy with the provisions and purpos.s of Chapt.r 373. Florida Stat~tes. Thl
is appellate in nature and limited to the r.cord below.
5. A party who is advers.'y affected by final ag.ncy action on the p.rmit application is entitled to judicial review in the
Court of Appeal pursuant to s.ction 120.68. Florida Statutes, as provided th.rein. Review under section 120.68. Florida
in the District Court of Appeal is initiat.d by filing a p.tltion in the appropriate District Court of App.al in accorda!
Florida rule of app.llate Procedure 9.110. Th. Notice of Appeal must b. fil.d within 3b days of the final agency actil
6. Section 373.617(2). Florida Statutes. provides:
Any person substantially affected by a final action of any ag.ncy with respect to a p.rmit may seek r.view
within 90 days of the r.ndering of suCh d.cision and request monetary damages and other relief in the circuit court
in the judicial circuit in which the aff.cted property is locat.d: however, circuit court review shall be confined
solely to det.rmining wh.ther final ag.ncy action is an unreasonable exercise of the state's polic. pow.r
constituting a taking without just comp.nsation. Review of final ag.ncy action for the purpose of d.t.rmining
whether the action is in accordance with .xisting statutes or rules and based on component substantial.vidence
shall proceed.in accordance with Chapter 120.
7. Please be adVIsed that .xhaustion of administrative r.medi.s is generally a prer.quisite to appeal to the District I
Appeal or the se.king of Circuit Court review of final agency action by the District on the permit application. no
howev.r. exceptIons to the .xhaustlon requIrement. The applicant is advised to consult lh. case law as to lh. reQuirel
exhaustion .xceptlons.
40E-1.S21 Initiation of Formal Proceedings. .I
(1) Initiation of formal proceedings shall be made by petition to the District. The term petition as used herein in
application or other document which expresses a request for formal proceedings. Elich petition should be printed. typ
otherwise duplicated in legible form on white paper orltandard lega' size. Unless printed. the impression shall be on one
paper only and lines shall be double-spaced and indented.
(2) All petitions filed under these ru.es Shall contain:
(a) The name and address of the District and the District's file or identification number.Jf known;
(b) The name and address of the petitioner or ~tItIO"'''';
(c) An explanation 0' how each petitioner's aubatantiallnternts will be affected by the District's determination
(d) A statement of when and how petitioner received notice of the District'. decision or Intent to renoar a decis
(e) A statement of aU disputed iau.. of material fact. If there are none. the petition must so indicate;
(f) A concise ltatement of the ultimate facts which petJtioner believel entitle petitioner to the relief sought as w
rules and statutes.which support petitioner's claim for relief;
(g) A demand for the relief to which the petitioner deems himself entitled; and
(h) Other information which the petitioner contend. is material.
(3) Upon receipt of a petition for formal proceedings. the District shall review the petition for the degree of complla
subsection (2) and shall accept those petitions In substantial compliance therewith which have been timely fUed and whic
dispute which is within the jurisdiction of the District to resolve. If accePted. the District shan designate the presiding offi
District shail promptly give written notice to an parties of the action taken on the petition. and shall ltate with particu
reasons therefor.
(4) If the District designates a Hearing Officer assigned by the Division of Administrative Hearings as the presiding ofl
District Clerk shall forward the petition and all material. filed with the District to the Division of Administrative Hearings. I
notify ail parties of its action.
Specific Authority 373.044. 373.113 F .5.
law Implemented 120.53(1). 120.57 F.5.
History - New 9-3-81.
Formerly 16K-1.09(1). 16~-1.112(1) through (3). '8K-1.1~.
"
...~.~~-----------
LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROSECUTE THE WORK AUTHORIZED IN A MANNER SO AS TO
MINIMIZE ANY ADVERSE IMPACT OF THE WORKS ON FISH, WILDLIFE, NATURAL
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, AND WATER QUALITY! THE PERMITTEE SHALL INSTITUTE
NECESSARY MEASURES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, INCLUDING FULL
COMPACTION OF ANY FILL MATERIAL PLACED AROUND NEWLY INSTALLED STRUCTURES,
TO REDUCE EROSION, TURBIDITY, NUTRIENT LOADING AND SEDIMENTATION IN THE
RECEIVING WATERS.
2. WATER QUALITY DATA FOR THE WATER DISCHARGED FROM THE PERMITTEE'S PROPERTY
OR INTO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DISTRICT AS
REQUIRED. PARAMETERS TO BE MONITORED MAY INCLUDE THOSE LISTED IN CHAPTER
17-302. IF WATER QUALITY DATA IS REQUIRED, THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE
DATA AS REQUIRED, ON VOLUMES OF WATER DISCHARGED INCLUDING TOTAL VOLUME
DISCHARGED, DURING THE DAYS OF SAMPLING AND TOTAL MONTHLY DISCHARGES FROM
THE PROPERTY OR INTO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE.
3. THE PERMITTEE SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS AND OTHER LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. IN ADDITION, THE PERMITTEE
SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND SPECIAL DISTRICT
AUTHORIZATIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION OF
WORKS AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT.
4. THE OPERATION PHASE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE UNTIL A
FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CERTIFIES THAT ALL FACILITIES
HAVE ,BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIGN APPROVED BY THE
DISTRICT. WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SURFACE
WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, THE PERMITTEE SHALL SUBMIT THE CERTIFICATION AND
NOTIFY THE DISTRICT THAT THE FACILITIES ARE READY FOR INSPECTION AND
APPROVAL. UPON APPROVAL OF THE COMPLETED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM,
THE PERMITTEE SHALL REQUEST TRANSFER OF THE PERMIT TO THE RESPONSIBLE
ENTITY APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT. .
5 ALL ROADS SHALL BE SET AT OR ABOVE ELEVATIONS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FLOOD CRITERIA.
6 ALL BUILDING FLOORS SHALL BE SET AT OR ABOVE ELEVATIONS ACCEPTABLE TO THE
APPLICABLE LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
7 OFF-SITE DISCHARGES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE MADE ONLY
THROUGH THE FACILITIES AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT. NO ROADWAY OR BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMMENCE ON-SITE UNTIL COMPLETION OF THE PERMITTED
DISCHARGE STRUCTURE AND DETENTION AREAS. WATER DISCHARGED FROM THE
PROJECT SHALL BE THROUGH STRUCTURES HAVING A MECHANISM SUITABLE FOR
REGULATING UPSTREAM WATER STAGES. STAGES MAY BE SUBJECT TO OPERATING
SCHEDULES SATISFACTORY TO THE DISTRICT.
8. NO CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED HEREIN SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL A RESPONSIBLE
ENTITY ACCEPTABLE TO THE DISTRICT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND HAS AGREED TO
OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM. THE ENTITY MUST BE PROVIDED WITH
SUFFICIENT OWNERSHIP SO THAT IT HAS CONTROL OVER ALL WATER MANAGEMENT
FACILITIES AUTHORIZED HEREIN. UPON RECEIPT OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE OF THE
SATISFACTION OF THIS CONDITION, THE DISTRICT WILL ISSUE AN AUTHORIZATION
TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION.
9. THE PERMIT DOES NOT CONVEY TO THE PERMITTEE ANY PROPERTY RIGHT NOR ANY
RIGHTS OR PRIVILEGES OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT AND CHAPTER
40E-4, FAC.
~--,~---~-_._-_.~-_..~--~--
LIMITING CONDITIONS
10. THE PERMITTEE SHALL HOLD AND SAVE THE DISTRICT HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL
DAMAGES, CLAIMS, OR LIABILITIES WHICH MAY ARISE BY REASON OF THE
CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE OR USE OF ANY FACILITY AUTHORIZED BY
THE PERMIT.
11. THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED BASED ON THE APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED INFORMATION WHICH
REASONABLY DEMONSTRATES THAT ADVERSE OFF-SITE WATER RESOURCE RELATED
IMPACTS WILL NOT BE CAUSED BY THE COMPLETED PERMIT ACTIVITY. IT IS ALSO
THE REPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE TO INSURE THAT ADVERSE OFF-SITE WATER
RESOURCE IMPACTS DO NOT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION.
12. PRIOR TO DEWATERING, PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DISTRICT FOR
APPROVAL. INFORMATION SHALL INCLUDE AS A MINIMUM: PUMP SIZES, LOCATIONS
AND HOURS OF OPERATION FOR EACH PUMP. IF OFF-SITE DISCHARGE IS PROPOSED,
OR OFF-SITE ADVERSE IMPACTS ARE EVIDENT, AN INDIVIDUAL WATER USE PERMIT
MAY BE REQUIRED. THE PERMITTEE IS CAUTIONED THAT SEVERAL MONTHS MAY BE
REQUIRED FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE WATER USE PERMIT APPLICATION.
- _.._--,._-~-~~----_.~.._-'---
"--.L/
I I
l---A'VE
t8
~
MOTOROLA
B
,nnr. Ay,
Harlow. Aw
t.I7 Iwanho. Aw
~ KIt.', An
~ Loth." Aw i
~ Marlow A. rr
;Z 19
".. -
.
J
llf" N IV( .
1-,
Awp ~ I
>'
Avp <,
.., "
Aw, I
, Piane'er
Cllnal
r.: rk
BEACH
MALL
.
.
c:(
po.
'"
-
5 -
..
..
./
LOCATION MAP:
lNOT TO SCALE)
,~ ' *
'I.'
ORlGIf\!/\l s: ~p~~~jTTAL
APR 1 5 b.)J
\teM 1-\ Loc,o...-f\or\ ~
WPB A
Jt\c,
(A ,?O
EXI-{(Ct T I
)II S~:l3~IH:ltfV
,,,cd S3J. "IOOSS" 'Ii "'''ddOn>l
InN'A" aNI. ...~
IJ." "'0_01011
.
U _
III fl II I III I
LmllilU
_ ..~ "-.. ...~:. ":2L:.~:.:.:~_.._:_:..... _~' \';'"'_: ::.. ~~:..:. :~.'/';:-."'~1:"~-:~;;~.:....; :.:~~
,
I.
w
>
04:
o
z
('II
('II
~
Z
I
]I dOJ.SOI)I
100N:lU"0 UO!. 'NO ...
~~ -=-~~
!I I'll
~ i_ j. 'I
~ il:!
. ._.~ , 'IHln
II
00 i! Iii
~' II
I,.
())NC.
~(l)
a:
UJ I I
UJ I
~, ,
~ I : !
UJ . !.
~ I i'l
~ I ,I,'
~ II
. 'i
I. I"
I; iiI
..,-
\
......,
----~-'"
~
fiir:ll Iii
~ I~ h;1
1,1
.
! I
j ~
,I
I
,
I
.
I
I
Z
<t
-.J
a..
l.&J
~
<!
Z
<t
a::
o
o
Z
<!
~
~.
<!!
0..-
~
----
,
i
i
I
...
I!
"
\
I I~~. ! ?II
a ~ 1
~ ~ s
1111 I
!
I .
g ! II i I
/ ~ ~ il II
_ uc
~::';)~F<l.
.:........ .':
~ ~
.......
\ ;
:: ...:..:~:
\
.
.
"' ...... ....
.
."
.~
"
\
,
~i
,.. .... ....,,.,., ."...
..' :~"MOOIBtr2,
"'t..-',
t. -,
. :C.~:i:.::: .: ~ ,,_ t: . .
.'
't..;: ~i ;';':',.-:'
,1\1.130
39'JNl\1HJ ON\1 !)NIO\1!:l9 !)NI^\1d
1\1n1d3::lNOO
~.., ", Jl
~ () .~.:1::.:::.;: - -:.. ."4 I'::':
:: ;~~~~;~;~~~.~I~:;~
i ~ ~ ~a,~. f~ !i 1"lfill! ;, ~
r s .1 a!!il 'i II ,~:I~I; I~I I
it I ~ ~~~,~ (-i ij ila~J~J l ·
!I !I l!ii,i :I~ 'I_ .Aill;! I; fa
~;. i~ i~;i !Ij =.1 i!lrf~I' I;
I; f !! ~aa j~l 31I:1u~!.1 f
II I ,Iii I,ll! Iii I!i !illilili; :i' !
-~ 25 I w~ ll~ ."U ~~- ~-I.u .S III ~
h Ii i =zs, I iit !il i!~'~~li ~~~ i
II II '~al~!1 .~! ~~~ ~~~!iia; Ila 9
I ~! !i !I !illll !Ii !II !llll!!! ~il ~l
'J.
I ,~
i ....
. .
· ti
..,
!
! t,
(
I
t
f
'.
..
I
;It. .
~ I
. '
~f 0
r !
"
la,
. ~i
'0 "
...!!'.
n dOlSOI>I.t J: :1:: ~
~ 1. I Iq i
]~~. :
Kl ~
..
! I
ill ill I i I
: t: ~ I q
ql . JI._ . h
I ill 'i Ii ct]! t II
,I. tM
.J ! J!I I hill
~ ., Ii) .J t. ~j
I. ii ~ .I'f' II ~
i- Ii CI I :jl 1 ! I, Ii
i r.r~. I' S
..: .. I ~ ~ Ilial ~J ill h~
. ~
w. I~! ..
~ i' -.t
W W
a: .. I I ~ II"
~ iii I. J' II
w Ii if ~ n.(.
1:1 . Id. ,
r- '. = ..!
I
~
C
I
C
.
!,
..
a:
c
..
.J
~
'W
..
~
...
~
'"
i
i
a:
f
I
I~ ~
~
., i
., I..
d' I~/ ii,
I lit
#f~J{L.. ~
,~' "=U ::;
.... ,. .~~ 0
~I (fl.l..-.--..... w
..~ 2
.~...... ::I
.J
,\ ...
1\ ,
.'. '.....
Jlf~1 Z
'.M. ~ oJ
.~ ~ii; H :!
:.G:,r 1II l!l
.. if w
a:
:>
t;
:>
a:
~
III
.J
o
a:
~
u
. r
11 , .
"'1.1"~J'i ~ r-4'" t
tJ. hOJ" :~....~,..~.,,;~ ill
I t It ~. ..lolli' itA 11" I "'1"
! .!" 'C '-'1 . ~ ,I'I~., !iilM \-, t"
~ '1<'" · It m II i~ r,' -I~!
~ .i ~. .J .~~... ....
-.r- ..-.." +. .
...,-..-......
'.....__-: ..' lit)
.. oJ
~
l!l
~
~
i!1 illlll!1 Iii
ii; ,!ii!11ill!I' ;11
~Ie ,,11 ~.I
~ I iI II. I I I~
IiI IlIIII'illl i!1
!,~ ~III II~i -II
dt";111111 ~,I.
il , il!i!il i I1II
"'.. ..
It jl
II I"
~l J~:~l
nf::n-==::f~' )
~'-"-l' ! "
itffi~~ if i l;t
..,~,~1 ,
411---,
----
.
I
. 0
C'l-UI/1lr 3
. '
MOTOROLA DAY CARE CENTER
PERMIT SUMMARY SHEET
APPLICATION NUMBER: 930415-4
PERMIT MODIFICATION NO. 50-00931-S
LOCATION: PALM BEACH COUNTY, SI7/T45S/R43E
OWNER: MENDEL MARK
ENGINEER: METRIC ENGINEERING INC
PROJECT AREA:
1.86 ACRES DRAINAGE AREA:
1.86 ACRES
PROJECT USE: COMMERCIAL
FACILITIES:
1. PROPOSED: Proposed is the construction of a surface water management system
to serve a 1.86 acre day care center. The surface water management
system will consist of inlets, culverts, swales and exfiltration
trench. Overflow will be into the Motorola, Inc. master surface
water management system.
PROJECT LEVEL:
DRAINAGE BASIN: C-16
RECEIVING BODY: MASTER SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL:
ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY
The project site currently contains landscaped grasses. No wetlands or other
environmentally sensitive features exist on the site. Adverse impacts to
wetlands are not anticipated as a result of the proposed construction.
TOTAL ACRES
TOTAL
PROJECT
1.86
PREVIOUSLY
PERMlnED
THIS PHASE
1.86 acres
Exhibit tf
STAFF REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST
PROJECT: MOTOROLA DAY CARE CENTER
APPLICATION NUMBER: 930415-4
PERMIT MODIFICATION NUMBER: 50-00931-S
INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
Reviewer:
X Carlos A. de Rojas. P.E.
X VirQinia A. Sinn
X Anthony M. Waterhouse, P.E.
X Robert G. Robbins
T. Bates
X B. Colavecchio
M. Cruz
J. Giddings
J. Golden
F. Lund
R. Mireau
P. Rhoads
R. Rogers
M. Slayton
D. Thatcher
W. Van Voorhess
X P. Walker - Comp Plan Div
X K. Wallace
A. Waterhouse
X Area Engineer
X Day File
X Enforcement
X Field Representative
Office of Counsel
X Permit F i1 e
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
X Applicant:
MENDEL MARK
X Applicant's Consultant:
METRIC ENGINEERING INC
X Engineer, County of:
PALM BEACH
X Engineer, City of:
BOYNTON BEI'.':H
X Local Drainage District:
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
COUNTY
X Palm Beach -Building Division
-Environmental Res Mgmt.
-Health Dept.
-Land Development Div.
-Planning Div. Res & Analysis
-School Brd., Growth Mgt.
-Zoning Division,
(J . MacG i 11 is)
BUILDING AND ZONING
DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION OTHER
X West Palm Beach David Sinclair
Dept of Natural Resources (K.Alvarez)
Div of Recreation and Park - District 7
F.G.F.W.F.C.
Port St. Lucie Planning Division
S.W.F.R.P.C. - Glenn Heath
Sierra Club - Central Florida Group
EXHIBIT ~
ATTEN: APRILLE DAY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrstopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director .
FROM: Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~2i ~
DATE: 3-3-93
2ND
RE: Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Isi Review
Project: KIDSTOP II
I have no objections concerning the plans submitted for
the above referenced project.
C:FORSTER.IST
'fiv
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public works Director
Vince Finizio, Admin. Coordinator of Engineering
Richard staudinger, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill cavanaugh, Fire Prevention officer
Michael Kazunas, utilities Engineer
Lt. Don Thrasher, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE: March 2, 1993
RE: Kidstop II - Second Set of Amended Plans
A second set of amended plans for the Kidstop II have been
submitted. Attached are copies of the first submittal of amended
plans and the most recent submittal. Please review the reduced site
plan and if you have any comments on this plan, please forward them
to the planning and Zoning Director immediately.
A full size set of plans for the proj ect are available in the
Planning and Zoning Department for your review.
m
~ .'..-a'. ClO.) .OUI01;1 .H~IIOM IllY'
]I U::>.UIH::>l:IV
'V'd S3.LVI:>OSSV Ii nVddOn)l
.
~ i , .
l!lU It: ,...
'.' ~~ .1
I" ,. hi~ 1,:,1 .... ~
t.~ ~ .t .~ .
I I
w...o,~ ...:..... IICU.II"O.
_UY ._1 ....
._ YWlIO~_
J[ dOJ.SOI)l
mi' tllw j 1I, i!ll ~.!.
"Ji, ;Itl!! i 'Iii "h 1:1;
!!'i lQljl'1 11"i j,lll~!ii
!i'l', IIIW1!: ~I:l !1 !f! !Ill
I~, IIl.-" il I,ll ,hi' H'ji
II if ' rJ'
t!! lm~ I! Pj!1 , II~! ll~!
Ihl" !I'lir-.1H !I,II, I lIe,hil!!'1
: !jj~1 ,11.ht Ii 11r. I h bH I U
I' ,. j 1'1",'
;~ 11,
I~i Ii'
lulll
Ui ~i:
:i'1 jl_,
u lj:. iiM
!illlllli
".,11"1
""liI
11',111"
d 11111 i ~
I
d ~:~ it Jil!!
Ii ~iil I'l 11111
hJ :t;~ : m!l;
'l~ 11ltJi i! II! Ii
d lIt-! I iJ. I'
IiI il!I'1 ~i I;~.! ~
~I! 11':I~! t,! "I' "i
II'!, 'I, ii, Ill! UI
;lll!r~j I!!I /)! ,I:
I !P. I_~IJ '~I !' J :!1
I ai IIP-II_ !::! ;U!:::
I' '," "
..;
g~
I
;il
iii
>
<C
Q
Z
N
N
~I (
...
I . I
! :J: ~i ! !1 4i : jlls.
l ,I I': II ". i jih
I i" Iii ,1.1,'; i Ill;,
; If, ?. ,', 'I ' ijl!l
I .,. ~ i p~ 1, 1! ~lJl
,lll 1,1:';; l'j Ii i.j:H
. ~ !i~I~1 . l' d I
1 !l!, u I~'" il JI 'iifl
""I ",:I,i! 'I ,llll
l'ii' 'i"I'I: !,. II Iljjj
,111," II Nil II iil J III'~
nq:tl ! ~! ~ I !r. ! ~' . ~'I.,I
I I ! I I
i 1!!1' tit! IJ li.J' '~ . i~' .tln J
:1;1",' .}lj :1 : in l~hl I,~: ! J Ii ~::i ~i
I . ~! I 'II "/1'. ,I, I " ;Jjl: 'I
'''!l I' . 'jl'i/'!' II' "~I"~ i;.
~:lil I ! ';!l,~~ 111. I I Iii ,.1
!.~:! " j !111~d:l:lj 1:1 li~! Iii!
f.ilPi [,/ · I~ II',~ !~ill!!! Illl! ~
'Po:j'!,!: Il, Ir.!llll',i!,,!,If,1 IJ,; I~
~"i ! ~I I ',I' '\'1' Illl:, ~ ,il !llil "I
'1'~ l-' ! It jl" ,,"" i , ,
U!! ~,~j ll,i '111'~ ll!!~, I ii' 'I'jll; 1'1
.Iii ;.z hI II III hI [; dl~ 1} i :if I Ia:.u I ~JI
. j" I" " --, I' i
1~~
~
.
.~
,
WO_:MAWO uou ..0 ...
~~
~~
.... :0:0::0:0:1
-~.................... ......
..... N ...
.........,. ....
,. . . _.. - ::0.
i ....------!
~;,j;,!;,;,.~i;'5"
. . .
- - .
------
~--~
. .~.
! i _
:: t. ~ ~
~~~ ~ l =11
'~~!.~~~.i'
I I=tll!l.lj-I..
,I", t.....,,:I... ...
!klZlH :,
~ Hr~~"I~~!1
i -IH,;"ol '
~ htmmlg
c
..;
~ "
~~ :
"
f
~. ~ I ~~ ! i:
:81-- 'I-U- it
.:,~H~a:i'~ 1~
iW:~~!:~~: ~t
:i
;1
~~
~" ~
~~ ~L
,1-;:;, ~
~
I .~..~=:~~.~:
--
!t;
mi
~~i ;
H! 0,
,~, !~
~,- "!
w.,." ....
GI"... ..co
:i:~ ic!
filii
l~~ !,~
~ ~B <~
, .
. . .
i or ii :
u ~~ .!~ ;
ii i~ ~
r: ;!i
~. ., n .
!., !5 P ~
~nHHI
~~ n ~~ H
~~ li ~.~ ~5
~~ :t ~ ~~; ""
~1:.:a~.3.3 <.~
^~
~~ ~
J; -.f:
n
~~
31
tt
.i\~j
J f. ~ '7
~~; --8
z
01(
...I
Il.
W
Il.
01(
()
~ ;
~ ~
...I
H
f~
H
~ j~
z ~~
f
"'i J
..
j
d!
"
~
~
..
~
~
"
....
.
~
-
~
~
L
Cl
t
\'(
~~,F
"
.
~ ..._..I~"1 .' _,._......
)II U.:'WH:)IIY
"V"d S3J.VI:)()SSV . v-IVcIdOnll
. 'cIO.1SGllI
-..----
il>i iBt I~~I,I'"
1 '-' 'I '
u ~ ,I
~ I I ~ 1115
. & i i M ~
i~,' 'ii"'!I,I! .
j i ~ 1! i ~ r ~
IIIi II.~.. J I
Il!f it~!I ,
! !i!' ~~ J ~ ~
l~, c~ i
I&~ ~ r. I IlIlj
i~j:lfl~' ;I~n'!~
I I , I
~.~
j ~~
~im
~li
In, j!
I
~. i II Ii ;if I !;I~ijll I! I !
~lln~ I.~ ,I ~IIU I
!~!I; ~~ II! &~I!;I!iiI. ~
I' I' . I' . '1'." ,,,. I' I'
I ~
"'.
~!
~~
.; ~~ ~ . I
~ ~ l ~ "
I'~ ~ '" ~
l 8 \; ill
~J~g .:l
;t.... ;f
iii
>
C
G
Z
N
N
~I
...
~d ~
~h ;:
.. .
~~"I' .
Ii !
~I ~
! i! ~,
h~ !Z
-.," -!
~ ~l 2~
~i ~ :.
:::~~ ~,
~;~ ~~
... ,-
3~~ I.
oJ !'1~!
.~ ~u l!
w ~P!.
ffi i~;~]
Cl 3t. ~I
-! ..
i .:~
~~~!;;:~~ <i
"'.....,"'...z....... "
~!~~i~~" :~~
~~~~~,,~gb
4{ J
i
qiJll
I I.
~ ):;!
.',:
~'"
~~.:" ;
"'3'~.~' ,
~.;'
~..,:
~.,'
.t'
a,
"'.'
\I,
~
k
~,;,
~ ,I .
.~ !
:! ~
~'! ~ 8~'i!
!~.I ..I!!
J'-"'_."~-
~~ i l a:., 1.
~e'~'::""(!I ~1l":l
!~'j'!1:~!~.
".,~ IU-" .
i!ef~::i~;'; ]
~&&AHd8:~ ~
. j
~ 1
~ I
i&!~E.!~!~.. !;
1:lf~! .i~i; ~~
&3;:1~;8~88'';;~ :;
ii
H
lIO=:::'l'S~~~",;::~ ~~
... .
11
!~
.1
1 ~
lO ] ~ ]
. ~ t
I ~
: i' ~ . ~
~ i'~i:!
~ ~{~~;, ~
; i; 'a~.~ ;
~ E:iH !
oz. ;~ I!! 8
i'i -! .. ~ Z
::::1 ill ;:::5 ::: ~ ::
h :B F id
~;~~~!2~i.
g! .~ g! !t '!'
i!lsi:i!lI
o..eo'.il!B
l' !. &~ t3 ~~
~:!:~H;~;
~:! ~i ~B u-';
g,
~
~
"',
~'r ..'
-tlJ'
~...
.'
i!.:
!Zl
~3~
a .
ri~
_ e
Hi
!!!
':1
!_"
~ ]~~
z ~,
g:
I'Q."
: '.'::'{~~.
'. ". ',"
~;' ~
~
z
<
oJ
0..
W
0..
<
o
(I)
c
z
<
oJ
! ".'
TU:
FROM:
IJA'T'E:
HE:
pg
1
J
-'
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-211
PLANNING DEPAE'I't>1ENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
FEBRUARY 19; 199~
IvlOTOROLA - KIDS'I'OP II - SITE PLAN - SECOND REVIEW
THE PROPOSED EIRE HYDRP,NT LOCATiON is APPROPH.IATE.
~d:~A~~P&~ (
'tJJ..LLLAj'.~ D CA rANAUGH; FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
REceIVED
FEB 1 9 1993
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 93 - 090
TO:
Chris Cutro, Planning Director
FROM:
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director
~
h,-
r7c;
DATE: March 3, 1993
SUBJECT: Kidstop II - Revised Site Plan
Based upon the conceptual water and sewer plans received by this
Dept. yesterday, we have no objection to this project moving
forward in the approval process.
Please, however, be advised that permits will be required from the
Palm Beach County Health Unit for the water and sewer systems to
service this property. Engineering plans and permit applications
must first be approved by this office before being forwarded to the
Health Unit.
Please refer any further questions on this matter to Mike Kazunas
or Peter Mazzella of this office.
JAG/PVM
bc: Peter Mazzella
xc: Mike Kazunas
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Mike Haag, Planning Dept.
Don Jaeger, Building Official
File
.-.
RECEIVED.
MAR a ·
PLANNII~G DEPT~ '\
~--
-
..
, .'
ATTEN: APRILLE DAY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chrstopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
RE:
2-19-93
site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1~~ Review
DATE:
Project:
KIDSTOP II AT MOTOROLA
I have no objections concerning the plans submitted for
the above referenced project.
C:FORSTER.IST
RECEIVED
FEB 1 9 1993
,.
ATTEN: APRILLE DAY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chrstopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
DATE:
:; - J 6 .- 0; "1
RE:
.JfViJ
Si te Plan Review - New Site Plan - ~ Review
Project: *il)$"((lp 11' AT /}fl)fOIf()(,,,L}
,
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced project. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
(
RECEIVED
FEB 2 2 1993
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-040
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Site Plan Review - Kidstop II At Motorola
DATE: February 18, 1993
Having reviewed these plans for Kidstop II at Motorola Public Works
finds no concerns.
REier
MEMORANDUM
TO: Christopher cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE: February 9, 1993
RE:
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Applicant:
File No.:
Review - New Site Plan
Kidstop II at Motorola
NW 22nd Avenue, 1150 feet
Mark and Joan Mendel
718
east of Congress Avenue
The following comments are in response to the submittal of the site
plan for the above referenced project. The comments for the project
will be discussed at the February 11, 1993, Technical Review
Committee meeting. The site plan was reviewed for consistency with
the review standards specified in Section 8 of Chapter 4, Site Plan
Review, Part III, Land Development Regulations of the code of
Ordinances. The applicant shall amend the drawings and documents to
show compliance with the following comments:
1. What does Boynton Beach File #684 stand for? The correct
Planning and Zoning Department file number is #718.
2. Specify on the elevation view drawings the color of all
exterior finish materials.
3. Specify on the elevation view drawing the type of material and
color of the roofing material shown behind the entrance
facade.
4. Add the sidewalk that is located along N.W. 22nd Avenue to the
section drawing titled AA shown on Sheet C2 of 2.
5. Submit twelve (12) copies of a current survey of the day
school site. The survey shall match the property dimensions
shown on the site plan.
6. Add City of Boynton Beach to the substitution note #3 found on
page 3 of the landscape specifications.
7. Show on the Landscape Plan the continuous visual barrier hedge
required around the perimeter of the north, east and west
sides of the vehicle use area. Specify on the plan and
incorporate into the plant list the fOllowing material
specifications: spacing 24 inches on center, height 18 inches
at time of planting and type of specie. No less than fifty
(50) percent of the total number of required hedges shall be
a native specie.
8. Incorporate into the plant list a distinguishable symbol that
identifies the native specie material. Note: No less than
fifty (50) percent of the total number of required hedges
and/or trees shall be a native specie.
9. Show on the Landscape Plan the location of the fire hydrant
and drainage structures.
10. Specify on the site plan the overall setback distance from the
leading edge of the bUilding (overhang counts) to the north,
south, east and west property lines.
11. Amend the drawing to show and specify the required greenbelt
twenty-five (25) foot wide peripheral greenbelt. Forty (40)
foot is not applicable to this site. show on the Landscape
Plan with a distinguishable symbol a line that delineates the
location of the peripheral greenbelt landscaping from the
required site landscaping.
To: Christopher cutro
Re: Kidstop II at Motorola
Page Two
12. place a callout and dimension on the Landscape Plan that
specifies the maximum spacing of trees along N.W. 22nd Avenue
will not exceed forty (40) foot on center. This note is for
the trees directly north of the parking spaces, not the trees
that are part of the peripheral greenbelt.
13. Revise the site signage to comply with the design of the
existing Motorola signage or request a modification to the
Motorola PID signage standards. See attached Section 21-30 of
the Sign code.
14. Specify on the plan whether the facility is private to
Motorola employees or open for public enrollment.
15. Due to the fact that the day school is in line with the
antenna and pager test location site located at the south end
of the Motorola project. Provide for review documentation
regarding the effect that the pager test site (electromagnetic
radiation) will have on the day school site.
16. Prior to approval of the site Plan Review there shall be a
master plan modification approval for the proposed site and
use. The master plan modification will require Motorola to
submit for a proposed change to the DRI. contact Sally Black,
Review Coordinator, Treasure Coast Regional planning council,
(407) 221-4060 for further information.
-=::::::::-
~ 21-30
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
Sec. 21.30. Signs permitted in planned districts.
The following are the general requirements for signs in planned
districts (PUD, peD and PID), for specific allowable signage see
the regulations for each similar, regular zoning district.
(a) Purpose and intent. The purpose of this section is to en-
courage continuity for signage in the planned districts,
while allowing for flexibility with respect to type, color,
number, location (exclusive of setbacks) and design of signs.
The general requirements for each planned district can be
found in the similar corresponding regular zoning district
in this sign code. The approval of signs in planned districts
require the submission of a sign program for the entire
project as part of the site plan approval process. Prior to
issuance of permits, the sign program must be reviewed by
the community appearance board.
(b) Sign program. All requests for approval of a sign program
shall be filed as part of the original site plan approval
process or as a modification to the approved site plan. All
applications shall be filed by the sign owner or his agent,
with the appropriate fee and shall describe and set forth
the following:
(1) The type and number of signs or sign structures.
(2) The square foot area per sign and dimensions of struc-
tures.
(3) Three (3) sealed copies of the site plan showing sign
location, sign elevations and construction details, such
as materials, colors, wind resistance requirements and
structural details.
(4) In addition to the above, one (1) set of colored sign
elevations with all copy shown in the type style to be
used. (Ord. No. 91-1, ~ 1, 1-15-91)
Sec. 21.31. Special signs.
(a) Temporary project development signs. Large areas under
development shall be permitted two (2) signs not to exceed a com-
bined aggregate area of two hundred fifty (250) square feet. Such
signs shall be located in accordance with the requirements con-
Supp. No. 47
1504
~ 21.21
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
etic considerations which must be met and are therefore subjec.t'
to view by the community appearance board when require}l(
e scale of the sign must be consistent with the e of
the uilding on which it is to be placed or paint and the
neigH orhood in which it is located. Howev , in no case
shall it ceed the size provided for in other. ections of this
chapter.
(b) The overall e ect of the configurat' n or coloring of the
sign shall be co istent with the munity design guide-
lines. The configu tion and col s shall be complementary
with other signs al ady on e building and on adjacent
properties.
Where question arises regarding the inte retation of this
chapter he most restrictive interpretation shall revail.
I erpretations of this chapter shall be made by
lCial or designee. (Ord. No. 91-1, ~ 1, 1.15-91)
Sec. 21.23. Setbacks.
All signs must meet a minimum ten-foot setback measured
from the property line to the closest surface of the sign. 'Where a
building is closer than ten (10) feet from a property line, a free-
standing sign can have its leading edge one-halfway between the
property line and the building. Wall signs can be on the building
surface.
When an accessway intersects a public right-of-way or when
the subject property abuts the intersection of two (2) or more
public rights-of-way, all signage within the triangular areas de-
scribed below shall provide unobstructed cross-visibility at a level
Supp. No.4 7
1496
SIGNS
~ 21-24
between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet. The triangular areas
above referred to are:
(a) The areas of property on both sides of an accessway formed
by the intersection of each side of the accessway and the
public right-of-way line with two (2) sides of each triangle
being ten (10) feet in length (or more when determined to
be necessary by the building department), from the point of
intersection and the third side being a line connecting the
end of the other two (2) sides.
(b) The area of property located at a corner formed by the
intersection of two (2) or more public or private rights-of-
way, with two (2) sides of the triangular area being thirty-
five (35) feet in length along the abutting public right-
of-way lines, measured from their point of intersection and
the third side being a line connecting the ends of the other
two (2) lines. (Ord. No. 91-1, ~ 1, 1-15-91)
21-24. Signs permitted in residential zoning district
he following signs are permitted and regulated in resid ial
zonin districts:]
(a) One ) customary plaque not exceeding two (
In area.
(b) On plots co aining permitted nonresi tial structures or
uses, a flat 0 reestanding sign, nQ exceeding thirty-two
(32) square feet area will be pitted. A flat wall sign
must not be highe than ten ) feet, nor a freestanding
sign higher than six fee uch signs may advertise the
main use of the premise nly.
(c) Temporary real estat sign
(1) Single-family,' One (1) real state sign not exceeding
five (5) squ e feet in area an no taller than four (4)
feet is wed per street fronta
(2) Multi ily or commercial: One (1) al estate sign not
exc ding thirty-two (32) square feet' area and no
t er than six (6) feet is allowed per str t frontage.
ondominium or residential development may e ct single
aced name signs on each side of all entrances on Sl walls
sup!>. No. 47
1497
SIGNS
~ 21-28
not exceed ten (10) percent of the exterior wall face u n
which they are attached, Each entrance from the blic
Oght-of-way into the mall will be allowed ate-sided
fr standing sign not to exceed thirty-two (32 quare feet
in a ea per sign face. A freestanding sign compliance
with ction 21-26(b) will be permitted i ieu of the above
referen d entrance signs.
(c)
(b)
(d) Nonilluminate Identification s' s shall be permitted on
the rear door business establish ents, provided they are
limited to ree (3) square feet in a.
(e) One (1) al estate sign advertising "Fo
may e placed on the premises and s 11 not exceed
thi -two (32) square feet in area, nor six (6) et in height.
e (1) such sign is permitted for each stre frontage,
Ord. No. 91-1, ~ 1, 1-15-91)
Sec. 21.28. Signs permitted in industrial zoning districts.
[The following signs are permitted and regulated in industrial
zoning districts:]
(a) One (1) real estate sign advertising "For SalelRentlLease",
may be placed on the premises and shall not exceed
thirty-two (32) square feet in area, nor six (6) feet in height.
One (1) such sign is permitted for each street frontage.
(b) One (1) freestanding sign, not exceeding sixty-four (64)
square feet in area, advertising the use of the premises.
This sign shall be predicated on the basis of one-half square
foot of sign area for each one (1) linear foot of street frontage,
with a maximum height of twenty (20) feet.
(c) One (1) or more fIxed projecting or flat wall sign(s) which
advertises the use of the premises, provided that for the
Supp. No.4 7
1501
~ 21.28
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
projecting sign, the sign and its supports shall not extend
more than three (3) feet beyond the face of the wall, nor
shall either sign extend above the parapet of the building
or beyond the building corner. The maximum area for this
signage shall be predicated on the basis of one (1) square
foot of area for each one (1) foot of linear building frontage,
(d) Nonilluminated identification signs shall be permitted on
the rear door of business establishments, provided they are
limited to three (3) square feet in area.
(e) A directory sign, not exceeding eighteen (18) square feet in
area, is permitted, This directory sign can not exceed a
height of six (6) feet and must be placed within the building
setback area.
(f) Lots which have uses which front on 1-95 may be permitted
additional flat sign(s) subject to the limitations imposed in
section 21-28(c) if the building is designed to front on 1-95.
For purposes of clarification, fronting in this section means
that the building entrance faces 1.95 and no garage doors
are visible from the Interstate. Additionally, the area be-
tween the use and the interstate must be landscaped as if
it were fronting on a street.
(g) Directional signs, not exceeding four (4) square feet in area,
nor five (5) feet in height, with a limit of four (4) signs per
lot, located at points of parking lot ingress and egress.
(h) Temporary business identification signs shall be permitted
instead of other wall signs permitted in this section. One
(1) temporary sign for a maximum of thirty (30) days, can
be permitted when a certificate of occupancy has been is-
sued pending the approval of a sign application, if at the
time of the certificate of occupancy, an application for a
sign permit has been submitted to the building depart-
ment. (Ord. No. 91-1, ~ 1, 1-15-91)
S 21.29. Signs in the central business di~ttick-'---
[The 0 ing signs are permitted andy.egulated in the central
business distric D) subject to .appf'oved guidelines:]
~.
(a) One (1) real estat ..- dvertising "For SalelRentlLease",
may be plac n the preml d shall not exceed sixteen
(16) s e feet in area, nor six t in height.
Supp. No.'
1502
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME~T
MEMORANDUM #93-017
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Site Plan Review - KIDSTOP II
DATE: February I, 1993
The Public Works Department has no problem with the Site Plan
Review for KIDSTOP II at Motorola.
~~
Public Works Director
REier
..-.... ~O
':{ '~~ "i '
,,-.f'"".,... '\ -,. ."...
V ',,~~;....,} \....
. ~ 1 - ,~~~
~t.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-039
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: February II, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Kidstop II
The Engineering Department for the City of Boynton Beach has reviewed
the Kidstop II site plan and offer the following comments:
I) Traffic circulation is inadequate. The applicant shall modify
this site to separate day care traffic from Motorola's main drive-
way traffic.
2) Realign or eliminate south access inter-connection to Motorola's
parking lot from the day care center.
3) Provide an adequate drop off area on site, reference safety of
the children.
4) The applicant should consider providing a separate driveway inter-
secting with NW 22nd Avenue (Gateway Boulevard) or provide a four
lane entrance at existing driveway in order to separate traffic
flows.
~7 ~
IC~
Staudinger, P.E.
VAF:WRS/ck
xc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
RECEIVED
fEB 1 1 1993
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-032
February 10, 1993
THRU:
Chris Cutro
Planning Dtf'r ctor
Don Jaeger
Building 0 icial
TO:
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - KIDS'l'OP II AT MOTOROLA
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above
referenced project and submits the following comments:
I. The sign must comply with the 10 foot setback requirement of
Section 2l-23 of the Boynton Beach Sign Code.
2. Please advise the applicant of the requirements in Section
21-25(b) regarding the maximum square footage of the sign
and section 21-30(b)l, 2, 3 & 4 of the sign Code.
3. A handicapped accessible walkway from the main street to the
building entrance is required, per the Handicap Code.
#/~
Al New ld
738-7480
AN: bh
R~GEIVED
FEB ! n 1993
KIDSTOP
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO_ 93-207 WDC
'PO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~'ROM:
FIRE DEPARTMEN'I'
DATE:
FEBRUARY 3: 1993
H.E:
TRC - SITE PLAN
KIDSTOP II AT MOTOROLA
1300 NW 22 AVENUE
FIRE HYDRANT(S) TO CONFORM TO CITY SUB DIVISION REGULATIONS -
i.e. - NO PORTION OF ANY COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE OVER 200i
FROM A FIRE HYDRANT: SHALL BE PROVIDED.
4tz/t~ /{J&~~ Z
WILLIAM D CAVANAUGH: FPO I
BOYN'I'ON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
RECEIVED
FEB- 5 1993
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #93-040
TO: Christopher Cutro,
Planning & Zoning Di
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: February 3, 1993
SUBJECT: Kid Stop II at Motorola
File 718
Site Plan - First Review
Attached, for the applicant's use, are plans showing the water
and sewer facilities nearest and available to the project, The
developer has several options to obtain access to utilities:
1. A private water service and force main can be run to
the east side of Congress Avenue in an easement
obtained by the applicant from Motorola. Fire
protection must be addressed.
2. A water main can be constructed within the right of way
to the water main along the north side of NW 22nd
Avenue with dedication to the City. This will require
a jack and bore installation and permitting from Palm
Beach County Roads. The force main can be constructed
within the right of way to the force main on the west
side of Congress Avenue or to the gravity sewer in the
Shoppes of Boynton. If the Shoppes of Boynton
alignment is chosen, additional easement may need to be
obtained from the Shoppes of Boynton to maintain the
required separation of water and sewer. If the
Congress Avenue alignment is selected, than a permit
from the County is required.
3, Any combination of the above or another alignment can
be considered for approval.
Due to the complexity of these alignments and the possibility
these plans will include the extension of City maintained
utilities, we request the additional information enumerated in
Section 26-16, IlPrerequisites to approval of development permit",
(copy attached) be provided prior to second review. ll~<=]sI"JEI>
... fa 4 ......
PLANNING DEPT.:
.! '.
- ..__ _ -i~
Christopher Cutro
February 3. 1993
Page 2
Backflow prevention will be required on both the domestic water
and fire protection lines in accordance with City Ordinance
90-51.
Please inform the applicant to contact Mr. Mike Kazunas or Mr,
Peter Mazzella at 738-7460 to discuss the details regarding this
matter.
19b
Attachments
xc: Mike Kazunas
Peter Mazzella
Skip Milor
File
Utility Engineer - 4 hours
Admin. Assistant - .5 hour
S 26-15
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
approved by the municipal officers above indh"ated and it
shall be mandatory that any changes or alterations in said
proposed plans and specifications designated by said
officials be effected prior to issuance of subject permits.
(Code 1958, ~ 30B-l; Ord. No. 80-10, ~ 1, 4-1-80)
Sec. 26-16. Prerequisites to approval of development
permit.
In connection with review of any proposed plans or
specifications above described by the designated municipal
officials, the following shall be determined:
(a) That the size, location and design of the pipes,
pumps, lift stations or piping intended to serve the
area shall be sufficient to insure adequate flow and
pressure, based upon the size, height and density of
the subject development. In addition, it shall be
affirmatively determined that the off-site utilities are
sized to comply with the Master Comprehensive
Utilities Plan of the city; provided, however, that if
said compliance requires any oversizing of the pipes
or piping necessary to serve the subject development,
the developer (or developers) by joint written
agreement with the City shall finance the needed
areas' off-site utilities to a capacity necessary to serve
the property of the developer (or developers) in accord
with the master plan and; any oversizing of said
off-site utilities constructed in accord with the master
plan shall be initially financed by the developer (or
developers) unless, in response to the developer's
request, the city council agrees to fund the oversizing
costs in an amount equal to the oversizing costs plus
fifteen (15) percent administrative cost to be paid by
the developer (or developers); additionally provided
that the owner may pay the costs of such oversizing
with such costs to be accounted as a credit against the
owner's capital facilities charge pursuant to section
30B-4(G) hereof. In addition, the proposed system
shall provide adequate fire prevention needs and
adequate safeguards in the proposed system to
1788
"',
i'J
'.'"
'-:-. ".
Iff
...
WATER. SEWERS AND CITY UTILITIES
S 26-16
provide emergency service in the event of accidental
breakage and loss of pressure within said system as
determined by the city.
(b) That the proposed water system contain sufficient
provision for fire hydrants with relation to distance
between said hydrants and proximity to structures
within the proposed development. Further, that said
hydrants will be located at points within the
proposed development to enable ready and direct
access by mechanical apparatus of the municipal fire
department or if within the county, the appropriate
fire district.
(c) The size, type, number and method of installation of
any water meter or meters proposed to be installed or
added to the municipal water utility system in
connection with any building project as hereinabove
described, shall be determined and approved prior to
installation thereof by the municipal utilities di-
rector. In addition, all required water meters serving
the proposed development shall be placed at locations
which will enable municipal personnel to efficiently
service and read said meters and developer shall
grant permission and legal authority to the city for
the p(.:'pose of city personnel having access to said
meters.
(d) It is not the intent of this chapter to guarantee, for an
extended period of time, adequate capacity to serve the
developer's (or developers') property, however, the
written agreement to be executed with the city will
state the time period of the guarantee. The capital
facility charge will remain as it is at the time of the
execution of this agreement during the time period of
the guarantee and will thereafter be as from time to
time amended.
(e) The capital facility charge credits will be separately
accounted for in either the water portion or the sewer
portion of the city's utility fund, and will not be
1789
. 26-16
BOYNTON BEACH CODE
interchangable used toward the other's obliga-
tion. (Code 1958, ~ 30B-l; Ord. No. 80-10, ~ I, 4-1-80)
Sees. 26-17-26-26. Reserved.
DIVISION 2. CUMULATIVE PROVISIONS FOR
EXP ANSION OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS
Sec. 26.27. Scope.
The city has accepted the responsibility to provide water
and sewerage services within its "area" as a regional service
agency as designated by the Palm Beach County Area
Planning Board; roughly from the Atlantic Ocean and west
to the E-3 canal, and from Hypoluxo Road on the north,
south to the north city limits of Delray or as specifically
delineated by the area planning board. (Code 1958, i 30B-3;
Ord. No. 80-10, ~ 1, 4-1-80)
Sec. 26-28. Feasibility study.
When a developer and/or property owner requests in
writing utilities service from the city, a feasibility study, the
cost of which shall be borne entirely by the developer
and/or property owner, for the extension of utilities shall be
conducted by the city's engineers. 8aid feasibility study
shall include an analysis and estimate of:
(a) Projected operation costs;
(b) Projected maintenance costs;
(c) Projected revenue, related to this project.
The city council shall authorize such feasibility study
when the developer and/or property owner shall escrow with
the city monies sufficient, in the discretion of the city, to
conduct said feasibility study. (Code 1958, ~ 30B-4; Ord. No.
80-10, ~ 1, 4-1-80)
Sec. 26-29. Proposal and approvaL
(a) All projects submitted by the developer after a
feasibility study and/or property owner proposing any
1790
/'
M E M 0 RAN D 'J M
93-024
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning and Zoning Directo~
FROM: Donald I. Thrasher
Lieutenant
Community Relations Division
DATE: 2 February 93
SUBJECT: Site Plan Review - Kidstop II at Motorola
I have reviewed the above site plan and find all to be
satisfactory.
~~
,~
Donald I. Thrasher
Lieutenant
Community Relation Division
--
DIT/dmj
RECEfVED
FEB 2 - 1993
ATTEN: APRILLE DAY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chrstopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~
'-5-93 O'
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1st Review
Project:
tci fJ.stoF ff A -r lhtS{'Otfo L4
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced proj ect. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT, NO. 93 - 090
TO:
Chris Cutro, Planning Director
FROM:
John A. Guidry, utilities Director
~*,.'
I/. /.
,~ "-
r -'
-;-
DATE: March 3, 1993
SUBJECT: Kidstop II - Revised Site Plan
Based upon the conceptual water and sewer plans received by this
Dept. yesterday, we have no objection to this project moving
forward in the approval process,
Please, however, be advised that permits will be required from the
Palm Beach County Health Unit for the water and sewer systems to
service this property. Engineering plans and permit applications
must first be approved by this office before being forwarded to the
Health Unit.
Please refer any further questions on this matter to Mike Kazunas
or Peter Mazzella of this office.
JAG!PVM
b c : Peter Ma z z e II a
xc: Mike Kazunas
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Mike Haag, Planning Dept.
Don Jaeger, Building Official
File
RECEIVED.
~
""AR J ..
PLANNI..G o EPT'! \
- .
-11-
MEMORANDUM
Tu: Christopher cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE: March 2, 1993
RE.:
::;ite plan
Project:
Location:
Applicant:
File No.:
Review - New Site Plan
Kidstop II at Motorola
NW 22nd Avenue, 1150 feet
Mark and Joan Mendel
718
east of Congress Avenue
The amended plans for the above referenced project have been
submi tted and reviewed. The comments from the original set of
comments have been satisfactorily corrected on the amended plans.
The applicant shall submit working drawings for permit review that
depict the project in compliance with the city of Boynton Beach
code of ordinances and the following comments.
1, Amend the total number of parking spaces provided as stated
within the project data to match the total number of spaces
shown on the site plan.
2. Revise the site signage to comply with the design of the
existing Motorola signage or request and receive approval of
a modification to the Motorola PID signage standards,
3. On the Landscape Plan show the ten (10) foot line-of-sight
triangle required at both sides of south driveway that
connects the Kidstop site to the Motorola roadway system.
Place a note on the plan that describes the following:
landscape material located within the triangle areas shall be
installed and maintained at a height that will allow clear and
unobstructed visibil i ty between the space of thirty (30)
inches and six (6) feet above the elevation of the driveway.
4. Show on the Landscape Plan the continuous visual barrier hedge
required along the perimeter of the west side of the ~ west
vehicle use area. Specify on the plan and incorporate in~o the
plant list the following material specifications: spacing 24
inches on center, height 18 inches at time of planting and
type of specie. No less than fifty (50) percent of the total
number of required hedges shall be a native specie.
5. Show on the Landscape Plan the location of the drainage flumes
and relocate landscape material accordingly,
6. Submit for review and approval a cross-access agreement signed
by the appropriate parties.
7 . Prior to the proposed improvements being made to the new
Kidstop II site, Motorola shall submit for review and approval
plans depicting the proposed modifications to the existing
Motorola site,
~ 'r I
11 J,...},/'p ~
MiJ;nae 1 E. Haag
MEH:ald
C:KIDSTUP.2ND
,-{ -
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-064
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & zoning Director
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
DATE: March 1, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Kidstop II at Motorola
Second Set of Amended Plans
The City Engineer and I have reviewed the above referenced second
submission and herein provide your office with the following comments:
I) The southeast edge of pavement for the main service road shall
be aligned in such a fashion as to provide a 25' minimum separation
between the subject service road and the southwest edge of the
one-way entrance into the Kidstop II facility. This minimum
distance separation shall be accomplished by relocating the west
edge of pavement of the one-way drive 3' east, thereby providing
for a 12' wide one-way drive which will discourage two-way traffic.
The southwest corner radius of the one-way drive would then be
reduced to a 2' dimension.
2) A std. 1I0NE-WAY/DO NOT ENTERII sign shall be placed along the
right side of the travel lane at the southwest one-way drive,
opposite a similar sign depicted along the left edge of pavement.
3) North of the depicted flush concrete walkway, within the one-way
drive/parking lot area, the applicant shall provide for the
installation of two IINO EXITII signs, placed in such a manner as
to discourage vehicles using the main north parking facility from
entering into an area with opposing traffic movements.
4) Internal directional arrows depicted upon the plans, being situated
within the stamped concrete entryway, shall be relocated from this
area westward a sufficient distance to place the directional arrows
on asphaltic concrete surfaces.
~
~ ~. ~~~:...~
Vincent A. Finizio
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., City Engineer (as directed)
r"') -....... _.
r; .,"rOo' ..... ....-- ~
~ ,--" J
MAn 2 '~""J
.~';it - i:J~,J
c .-
- r')
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
March 1, 1993
Project Name: Kidstop II
Applicant: Mark and Joan Mendel
Agent: Robert E. Kuoppala, Architect
Location: Northeast corner of Motorola P.I.D. - south of N.W, 22nd
Avenue (Ga~eway Boulevard) and East of the E-4 canal
Land Use plan Designation: Industrial
zoning Designation: P.I.D. Planned Industrial Development
Type of Use: Day school facility
Number of Units: N/A
square Footage: site: 80,984 square feet (1.859 acres)
Building: 10,760 square feet
Description of Project: Mark and Joan Mendel, the applicants, are
presently under contract with Motorola to purchase the 1.859 acre
site to construct the Kidstop II dayschool facility. The site will
be subdivided from the Motorola project which is a planned
Industrial Development P.I,D, established in 1979. The dayschool
facili~y is open for public enrollment and will be designed for
approxImately 185 children and 26 employees. The building is
approximately 10,760 square feet in area with the front of the
building facing north along Gateway Boulevard (f, k. aN. W. 22nd
Avenue). The proposed structure is a single story building that is
divided into classrooms, offices and other dayschool facilities.
The site is located in the modern design district as specif~~d in
the Community Design plan. The design of the building complies with
the modern design theme as described in the Community Design Plan.
rhe color of the bUilding does not match the Motorola building,
however, the modern design theme does not have a list of specIfic
colors to chose from, Therefore, the city is left ~o determine if
the proposed colors are acceptable. The site is designed with the
parking and traffic circulation path located to the north and wes~
of the building. The Kidstop II site does not have a separate
entrance driveway leading to the site from Gateway Boulevard,
however, vehicles that enter the Kidstop site will share the
Mo~orola east driveway that is located on Gateway Boulevard, The
Motorola driveway entrance is attached to the on-site priva1:e
access aisle roadway system that leads to the Motorola facility.
The existing roadway system will be modified to accommodate the
Kidstop site. There are two driveway entrances leading to the
Kidstop site that branch off the Motorola internal roadway system.
The playground area is located adjacent to the east, south and wes~
sides of the bUilding. The playground area is enclosed with a SIX
(6) foot high chain I ink fence. The remainder of the site IS
landscaped with a mixture of trees and shrubs, The landscaping is
conslstent with the specifications listed in the Landscape code. A
for~y (40) foot wide strip of land located along the perimeter of
the north and east sides of the Kidstop site is dedicated as ~he
peripheral greenbel~. ~ome of the landscape ma~erIal tha~ presen1:ly
occupIes the greenbelt area will be relocated to 1:he Mo~orola Sl~e
and, as no~ed on ~he plan, a majority of the eXIsting material will
remain In place and be llsed to meet the requirements of the
landscape code for the Kidstop Sl~e,
-/-
staff Report - Kidstop II
Page Two
Concurrent with the site plan approval is a request by the
applicant to have the City consider allowing the signage for the
Kidstop II project to become part of the Motorola P,I.D, signage
(see Exhibit "A", from R. Kuoppala, agent for the owner). The sign
code specifies that Planned Developments such as the Motorola
project implement a sign program that encourages continuity of
signage for the project while allowing for flexibility with respect
to type, color, design, number of and location of signs. The size
of the proposed freestanding sign is consistent with the
specification listed in the sign code. A colored elevation view
drawing of the proposed freestanding sign will be on display at the
meeting along with photographs of the existing Motorola signage,
The Motorola project has several directional signs placed
throughout the site and two business identification signs located
on the site, one installed along Congress Avenue and the other
located along Gateway Boulevard. The two business identification
signs are monument signs and the size of each sign is approximately
one-hundred and twenty (120) square feet each side. There are no
signs mounted on the Motorola building. The elevation view drawings
of the Kidstop II bUilding do not show signage located on the
building.
Approval of the sign request would create a sign program for the
two sites at the Motorola P. I. D. The following comment is in
response to the request for a sign program modification: The
applicant shall submit a reduced site plan drawing of the entire
P.I.D. site. The drawing shall depict the location (Setback
distance from property lines), size, color and type of material of
the existing permanent signs located on the Motorola and Kidstop
si tes , This comment may be corrected by submitting the above
drawings as supplemental drawings to the permit documents when the
applicant requests the Kidstop II freestanding sign.
Review of Departmental Comments: Please find attached the comments
from all reviewing departments. The Technical Review Committee
recommends the project proceed forward through the approval process
subj ect to the following comments: Engineering Department
Memorandum #93-064, Building Department Memorandum #93-039, p~lice
Department Memorandum #93-039, utilities Department MemorandUm
#93-090 and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum dated March
2, 1993.
Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that
the Planning and Development Board find the plans acceptable and
forward same to the city Commission with a recommendation to
approve, subject to the applicant submitting working drawings for
permit review that depict the project in compliance with the City
of Boynton Beach code of Ordinances and the attached staff
comments.
C:KIDSTOP.POlD
-1-
ATTEN: APRILLE DAY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chrstopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
RE:
2-19-93
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - l~~ Review
DATE:
Project:
KIDSTOP II AT MOTOROLA
I have no objections concerning the plans submitted for
the above referenced project.
C:FORSTER.1ST
RECEIVJ=r')
FEB 1 9 \993
~
~
"
)4-
-- J- f
r-
>-
~
(,0
o
>-
'V
m
~
>-
z
..
:::-; 2
~ i= .
i; !
Ji:
i! F
m
j~.~
~~ H H n H ~ 1~ ~H
~: 1~:~ ~~~~:;l Hi
~~ HUll ~i : ~~ m
! ~!.1~:- l! f:'i ~;i
_ _. __ r f . t_ 1..
i 'i ~. t= !~ : ,; ; ~~
; It!' f ;; ~ 'i ;, ~
! il!l! im~
: ~t <
, !;=
! ;!.'
!.
~
M
ii
..
., ...... I
I ;; _.%.. _
f = ...-........
j: i
l~
is
IJ: ~;!rj~~rl..rl I
_ I ~--I~ h
It ;; !:I! :;li! I
. i I' .. ..
i
IU
I!
J ~
.:'~I-r~.tl~ I
"( " 1""11 .
t- ; ."- . "
.. '11 . 1
! ,'i-I,.;lli
jfii!nHlll1
.:1;1.:1
ill :;
- ; I
.
I . -- ..,.. I
... -.... ..-:
.. _.. _e...
., .. . ~ .
i :
-.-------.. I
at! . .... . ..
... " ..., ...
.. ... -..
:: .-....... I
-- ::':'!~!""
-.. -....--........
.. -. ::::
...... .
. ..
. ,.. ~l t ! ~ :l
~ !i1~nql:1
. ~ .
. .
~
~ n
.
i ~~
~ " t
;j
.. ' n
". "
!j
ii
~;
II
f-,
(J-
~
r,OJ-'
..
" ;\
~ ~
. ,
~
~-=-==
.;:;-- ~
.. _ ..,... ..y.......
KIDSTOP.
....-... 11ft
..... .._ "n_
..YIIT_ HAC_. PLO_A
~I
,/ti i' '
:"'--' Ii : '
:.
~
I . ~~
. : I
~ !
i
~
!, .
--....
~;i~f
~~~tr
1;
\ ..
~~
---~
! ( '\1 ",
l.l \:\' ~ ".C:y "
'I: ~': .' ..,. .!:J 0
. - r-....,J
~.~..l ;
, :~\.
1[~! I€~~
,- i ' ,. \ J-.
i', ~- ~ .,.\ ('C--'
~~l, +'~
., 'iJ:
..L -,--' \~
!': ~;~~: ,4 ...)~
I '~J..~.-J.~
~~- .~!.~ .;
(': :I>~F.. ~i
'-. ..' -. /,
1 "'-.-->il.~....
o '.: iA"\
: ___ '. ',-. :t1.--1
. l / ~ I ". ..r-... --- ' ---./ ' I'
'l(. r:';<", ~ )
:\ . ,---r--j . ~--.-J
~,.::-' ~~""- I
.~-r
<.
.:"~..
irl'~~-,
:l..~.,., -: '.
.. ..~, ,- ,
i~1: .
~~
.~
,
. i~
" ~ ~
- r
.11 ... . -.1
ill ;,'lilI1l1i I ill'q ~re' ',;'1'
.'1 -" WI,IU Jillil _
'h IlIil I'i! 'l'l~ ~~llll!
nl !~I l~i .!ill~II'ililti I
~I 11:11 'i i II !f~ IiliJll" !
l!! 1~;t I t; ~ I HI: ~Ivll~ !
'!i I' I !II J " If.Ia il: i
lr :!I: "i IiI rujifll f
!l !:m !l'. :il'!j!lq, '
I "f' ;: I ~ ~. !r;l It f
I
'1 -
1~!lt'"
I"; 11
:~ I ~~!
"j Rlllil
III 't! r.r
r. ';i~
Jj1llill
it I~ ~In
I: .11,'1
II . !~i!
, I I
::; ill~ I ;.r "'9; i -t: I-
f:: !(ii .HIII:/'!I,' ill', "
.1-1 If :- tuft IF
:~:ifl il!I'miJ','i;1
."'!l' .,j ~I a,
'I' .! .h", !I,llt i!(
I f ~lr . I I .
Iii !11 ','!:Ulll Ii[
,[" I !'~l! f'l
I ri, t :t!t1 "
!'11I i !!!l1 'I
ji III i! ~;U ~
...
1Z
!~
N
;N
I z
Ie
I>
1<
,m
I.
~
I
\
I
i!
I
!
i flJlljP
i~;IW
i!ltif!:1
, ~1. I ..
j fl~! i~~i
ilil m
mm
'll F;
, .
, "
.1 I I I ,
1~1lliili;t~ i~l~:iul
III,., . if!! h ail! Ii III
';.'" :, i! ~ im <! ~w.
p,'llt I ~ "'I!l!l flJ I
ill'l .. ~ !;h~ ,:,!
~I~~ il il :j! HI !~Ii i
l!I l ;1 ~I'; i ~ .1 I
, f i, i .1' l~ f
~,ll I !':! Hl a: I
i'
~.
I . .1_1!.1 .,
I.~l'!i:" r.fl "II'a" Im/'
.!lll'i!! /! 11'11 H ~!ir!l i:iH i
Ifill ~ I' ,.~ 'I illh h
itlll!1 rill. Vr I' Ii ~~h:i ;lii
_ ! :,,', I' IlPill ;~~
f~ :,': ;'1::' ,lllli !Iii
I,',!" ~!/IIII, !Iii ,I i,~?, li!I
I, I !,nll "Ii
:1. !l~ t!: U:! ~iltr! !:~I
,i',! ,'I I'!: 'I' ,,' Iii i ::llij. i'l
I' . 'tllt 1"1
KUOPPALA a ASSOCIATES P.A.
ARCHITECTS I!
...... _oaTH. 'LORIO" (..." 41...... A
-I L)"'-
[mID
,-'-'\.IMI 1'--11 ~ IVlnl
KIDSTOP II
.
~
.... - r-ll ~----! '/ I ~.
C2I 'f@ .,7 P R I .1 -I n f') ~/~
~ ~ d~' 'f_.L ':..)(, I'
G r.r\;;;"''::: ,t] ..... IN (I
rj1~.J: 6'.1.. .:= I --; /: :rq/
L~~ '(v'l11 ',,-I ~ __ ,: Z
-"'...~... .-- --..--...
/
"-
~.~ c3: .. .. .: .\
\ '<~y-,- ~: \i~~;>~<<
':: \"\ -1J \ ~W~~
it GJ"SlTE \ - .J (.:. ..;' ( ~;
---l MK OF
\~ \ . UAN
--PIS -}JI - j , \
UMOTOROLA~J3>Q"L ~
~1 / - .-----
/ : is
I~' t
\-\/ ,~ f
,J
~~
-~
-~
::t::::.
=~
-==-
-
,;:::
.t:=
l:::
'g.....
~~
~... ,. \ ,\ ~ ,..---.......
'--"\' .~.,/ '
UMEL' -........~~TY'
('ell'! LIM\15
,
\
\
\
\~.~ ~
bt R.
~~-- --
.-,'J' w.
-~. \:.t
......
\ ~l :J
1\ =li~ ~
~-le=-~
I..r:r. ;;. I L- --.-
~W~.\\I-- ·
l ~ ~! ~
: : \ I"
UJh; \ ~
i, 1-;1 .
" ~ 1
1
~
i~ \': rill
t!) ~ ~ {~ ~
z~ \. , }.:-:l
o. (- 1\::-- C
!.1
.
~ \ '.
;
~; ..e7J!"~~LOYNf~'/' .' .,lr~J~~ c-I~ '~'\\~;~~R'I~.~:~l~~~I~~\
/ ,t-l ~~' '- I-~ ->-
.J \:\ .;-- r D- -'., [- /~ : ~-\t. E : _!t-~ f-t:
'\ ~ '-II : ~ )" \ \\: \~ :,:::. L-
~ ' ,,",\' --. ~ -
I Ii ... 3 :. \ ~ . "0,.~ >- -- -'-
. . . _, ~ '~ '--" "~\~, 1_ I ~l--
. I :- - ~ '. '0\ · ~ '-.... >-....
1(('\ .~\~'B';~TDf.~~ l _.:\ R, AA '\ '>-i,~:l~)f:'
1\ \_~ \ j"J ~ ~ J ~ ~'. ~ \>- >->-,:: c: -
<\ \
~ ~
1 ~ .
II ! .\ " \ ~ ': It:. r "c' :~
~ ~__ ()l.>> /30,,,,"'" iW. _ J L i .\:0 I:::l- I ~
R" p,' lipl: R 3 I I ., I r T LJ · ,.
'ff '.
g A.- G '-- ~\ n; \ ~1(9?~1 j.J: t '~I
... d - '" I IIIP!!! ~I
f} h ~~~ ~.~ ~ "Jj .~ 1 l/~/
0" 1/8 MIL~S 7~-: '; I;~\ ~.l t::, - ~I
.\. I' 'v I '" ~ . W 'i<,'t.,rON. 6'A'~ ~'. ~
. \ \ \ \ I. --1~. '-' ...-J.#~':~ '1 ~\VZ::\~
'0 400.800 FEET - - e . El '. ",] ~
PLANI\JIN /0 ..... _-; :3 _ ~ . _.~-__ I&. --- \ J ..... ~ ~ -' ~ ~ '1 1 .-4
_ r 1 _ -I' ~ ..;a ~" .
!": R.-. L)E~'AR'~'MEN':' loif..M()~ANUUM NC. ':!':'-.:: 11
...J.. ',,:, __
... - "
- ,..-" L .::. ~~ _~ R ~ >~ ~ ~. =
. . r. .'l - - .. ~ : ~
r ."-
[" t _ . L.. t"" _~ ... _ -.,
t- LL - )1 ~.~ 2~f;!\ - :.t._...~:,~~\ p_".':~-,{14
i'Hr. E-;:~lJ:~.d_ ~_~-.l :: lrcc.. rl': '-}:-:_~_!~ " ~..-..J:.:.~.l.' _ ~'~4 ~ .l;.FtJr1,~~,~"- i.-,.
&/k;--4--(~?' N~:~(?~j .
fIj . ._ L . .-~..l"_ ~.J C-_~.'"J J-.';~.'~ {--:::--. ~
/
\
..., ' - TCT'( '\." _....,-, .~.
n I.-' 1 _ 4 1 '~./;" J _ .l.... .-.... . ..
. , ~ ~
.' -
RECEIVED
FEB 1 9 1993
~
~
-IC: -
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-039
February 19, 1993
TO:
Chris Cutro
Planning Director
Don Jaeger ~~
Building o~cial
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - KIDSTOP II AT MOTOROLA
After reviewing the amended plans for the above referenced
project, the Building Department finds that a handicapped
accessible walkway from the main street to the building entrance
is still not indicated on the plans. Since this requirement is
mandated by the State Handicap Code, building permits for this
project cannot be issued without this sidewalk appearing on the
construction documents.
We recommend that the project be forwarded to the Planning and
Development Board since all code requirements will be determined
at permit review.
dfr<<A3?/
Al Ne old
AN: bh
Q
Q
KIDSTOP
-7-
M E M 0 RAN 0 U M
93-039
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Donald I. Thrasher
Lieutenant
Community Relations Division
DATE: 18 February 93
SUBJECT: New Site Plan-Kidstop II at Motorola
I have reviewed the above listed site plans and I recommend the
following:
1. North exit driveway be a right turn only sign.
(City Ordinance 5-l42C)
tfUl~
Donald I. Thrasher
Lieutenant
Community Relations Division
DIT/dmj
REcr:rVCD
FEB 1 8 1993
- /,1 ~
R~""'-'\ !
:::,\_,t:.. ,; ED
FEB 2 2 1993
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM *93-040
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Site Plan Review - Kidstop II At Motorola
DATE: February 18, 1993
Having reviewed these plans for Kidstop II at Motorola Public Works
finds no concerns.
REier
"
~.
-7---
A. .EN: APRILLE DAY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chrstopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
DATE:
,P - / 6 .' '-j '1
RE:
.,(1 ,IV ~J
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - ~ Review
Project: ,*",D$IC'P d AT ~~1c/f'oG~.!)
r
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced project. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
~
~
"
- /3 .-