APPLICATION
Board of County Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus, Chair
Carole Phillips, Vice Chair
Carol A. Roberts
Carol]. Elmquist
Mary McCarty
Ken Foster
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Jan \-Vinters
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
September 12, 1991
Mr. Chris Cutro
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: 2.0 ACRE C-l PARCEL, BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
Dear Mr. Cutro:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study
for the project entitled 2.0 Acre Parcel. Boynton Beach Boulevard pursuant to
the 1990 Traffic Performance Standards Code (Ord. No. 90-40). There is no set
plan of development of this parcel. To support the rezoning application, the
traffic study assumed the parcel will be developed with a 34,848 square foot
medical office, to be built-out in 1992. Based on this assumed development plan,
the Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the 1990 Traffic
Performance Standards Code of Palm Beach County.
If you have any questions regarding the determination of the County Traffic
Division, please feel free to contact Dan Weisberg at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~Q/)--:Jf~ ~~
Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E.
Acting Assistant County Engineer
RECEIVED
CRW:DW
cc. Ken Rogers, P.E.
File: TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
SEP 17
PLJ\NNING DEPT.
h:\traffic\diw\boyn6
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
Box: 21229 WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
."
'=':; rHlnred on (f!cycled paper
---.._-~._--~._..._--..~-----...
'":' ".> """." f . i
.......--
"
"
AF'r-IDA'JIT
, .
STATE Or'PLORIDA
>,
) ZS
)
COUUTY OF PALH CEACU
.~
DEFORE
HE
THIS
DA\'
PER!:::O!lAL.L ".
APPEAREIJ DEVRA NEWELT,
SWORn, DEPOSES AIm 5.1.\'5:
,
WHO BElllO DUL.Y
ThB~ ~he Bccompanying Proper~y Ovn&rs L~s~ ~e, ~o ~he
ben o:t: his/he-r k.nov~edge, ts COlll:p~e't.e- and En:::cura,1::c. l~s't.
o:t: B~~ prope-r't.y ovnere, mB~~~ng eddrescea end. property
con~ro~ numbers .as recorded ~n ~he lo't.es~ o:t::t:~c~e~ ~D~
rol~B in ~he Coun't.)~ Cour1:.house- :t:or Bl~ propert.).. vi1:.hin
five hundred (.:500> :t:ee't. o:t: 'the belo.... descr~bed parce~ c.d:
lend.
The property in ques1:.~on ~6 legally descr~bed as :t:olluvu~
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
legal Description for 2 acre parcel which is the subject of this
application.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
Sworn
A. D. ,
1:.0 end subscr~bed be:t:ore me- t.h~s
19S,L.
lLP'-l:h
day 0" ~
NOTARY ::::I::A1..
a't. Large
~~Ttt~~~~~~ ~t,k~~~FLORIDA. .
CONDED THRU NOTARY PU L' AR. 2. 199~
B fe UNDERWftll"""'D.!.-"
Hy Commission Expires:
-G-
Revised 10-3-91
f.~Jt~~~~:~j'.;~~? I:..~.,.~.~...:. ".~." '
/' .\
\:. ::
i'
Legal Description for 2 acre parcel which is the subject of this'application.
EXHIBIT "A'"
-,
; DESCRIPTlON
,'; ..
,A parcel of land lying in Section 29, Township 45 South,
Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, being more
particularly described a~ follows:
Beginning 'at the Northeast corner of lot 41, Block 2 of the
pl.t "Replat of First Section Palm Beach Leisureville" as
recarded in Plat Book 28 at Pages 201, 202, and 203 of the
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; Thence South
01012'55" East along the East line of' Lots 35-41 of Block 2
of said "Replat of First Section Palm Beach Leisureville", a
distance of 411.46 feet; Thence North 88024'52 East, a ,
distance .of 199.68 feet to a point of intersection with the
We.st line of the Plat of "Lal<e Boynton Estates Plat 4-A" as j'
recorded in Plat Book 14 at Page 69 of the Public Records of
Palm Beach County, Florida; Thence North 01035'08" West along
said West line , a distance of 464.67 feet to a point
of intersection with the South Right-of-Way line of that '
106.00 foot wide Right-of-Way for State Road 804 ('.Boynton
Beach Boulevard~) as shown on the State Road Department Map
SR-804 Section 93640-2175 and recorded in Road Plat Book 2 at
Page 220 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida;
Thence Westerly along said south Right-of-Way line along the
arc of a circular curve to:the left whose radius point bears
South 13058'39" East, having a radius of 1857.08 feet. a 1
central angle of 3058'45", an arc length of 128.97 feet to a '
point of tangency; Thence South 72002'36" West continuing
along said south Right-of-Way line, a distance of 75.11 feet
to the Point of Beginning.
Said Lands situate in the City of Boynton 8each, Palm Beach
County, Florida. !
Containing 81,120 Square feet / 2.0000 Acres, more of less.
.
I
j,
i
,. ..
"
Subject to easements, restrictions, reservations, covenants,
and rightS-Of-way of record.
.
,
, "
Rev; sed 10- 3- 91
- -- .~'------. ----.-----
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
2.0 ACREi C-1 PARCEL
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
AUGUST 20,1991
Prepared By:
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
( FAX ) 9 6 9 - 9 7 1 7
'}.o
r?
ql
IV'
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2 EXISTING ROADWAY
CONDITIONS
FIGURE 3 DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
FIGURE 4 TOTAL TRAFFIC
FIGURE 5 MODIFIED TOTAL TRAFFIC
FIGURE 6 PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
ADOPTED THRESHOLD
VOLUMES
APPENDIX B
ONE PERCENT (1%) OF
THE ADOPTED THRESHOLD
VOLUMES
APPENDIX C
HISTORICAL GROWTH
CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX D
MAJOR PROJECT LIST
INTRODUCTION
This office has been retained to prepare a Traffic Impact
Analysis which has been prepared to accompany a Rezoning Petition
for a 2.0 acre parcel which is located on the south side of Boyn-
ton Beach Boulevard, west of Old Boynton Road, in Section 29,
Township 45 South, Range 43 East, in Boynton Beach, Florida.
This Analysis has been performed in order to determine the
volume of traffic expected to be added to the roadway system as a
resul t of the approval of this project, the effect that this
traffic will have on the capacity of the roadways in the area of
the project and what roadway improvements, if any, are necessary
as a result of the approval of this project. This Analysis has
also been performed in accordance with the standards and criteria
as established in the 1990 Traffic Performance Standards Code of
Palm Beach County, Ordinance #90-40.
Existing traffic counts, which were available from the
Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County
Traffic Division, were used when applicable and these counts were
augmented by twenty-four (24) hour machine counts and peak hour
hand counts performed for this office.
SITE INFORMATION
The subject petition is requesting that this parcel be
rezoned to Cl, Office and Professional Commercial District. This
district allows for a limited range of office and non-retail
commercial uses. This petition is requesting a change in zoning
classification which is not accompanied by a specific site plan
or planned use. This parcel of land was subject to a previously
unsuccessful petition to rezone this parcel to allow for a
drive-in convenience store and a farmer's market/garden center.
Access to this site will be via a single driveway entrance
onto Boynton Beach Boulevard. A median opening presently exists
on Boynton Beach Boulevard which directly aligns with the pro-
posed driveway entrance.
The site is located in relation to the major roadways in
Figure 1.
f.XISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
The major road serving as access to this site is Boynton
Beach Boulevard. In the immediate area of the site, Boynton
Beach Boulevard exists as a six lane median divided arter ial
roadway.
The existing roadway average annual daily volumes and the
existing roadway capacity in the project study area are shown in
Figure 2.
GENERATION
As stated, this petition is for a non-specific use. There-
fore, in order to address the expected traffic impact associated
with this petition, it will be necessary to address the most
traff ic intense land use. For the purposes of this report, it
shall be assumed that this property shall be used for a medi-
cal/dental office building. The C-l Zoning District allows for a
maximum of 40% floor area. Thus, for this 2.0 acre parcel, the
maximum building area allowed is 34 J 848 square feet. For the
purposes of this report, the most intensive use allowed for this
site is a 34,848 square foot medical/dental office.
-2-
-ft'.IU: IilfP-"r...PHICS Jla..o
3^V
':::l
w
>
c(
3^'V
o
z
C\J
C'J
3:
z
OH
3~N3~MVl
llVHl
a
"-
"
k. s. rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fL
o
>
-1
co
z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
CD
OH 11'VV\I
o
-1
o
lS3H:JV3S
96-(
;;;'~
~I
:I:
U
c(
w
CD
SS3~8NO~
z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
CD
A~V llllv.!
LOCATION MAP
w
>
c(
:I:
l-
ll)
:;:
en
date
AUG 91
figure
1
.H~".l[ .EP.OG.......IC' ]11941)
~IO
~r coO
<DCII
C')O ~O
CIICII ~C')
~O
...C') lS3l:l:JV3S
3^'"
CIllO w
cnO >
~C\l <(
010
C\lC')
0
~ >
...J
CO
gS-1
010
w ~O
C')C\l
> cnO
<( ~C')
z
0
..... J: CIllO
"'10 z "'\0 U
"'0 >- "'0 <( ",0
C')C') 0 C')C') <DC')
C')<O C')<D W co <0
C')~ CD C')~ CD C\l~
3^'" SS3l:l8NO:J
cnlO
~O
OC')
"'<0
C')~
Ol:l llV~
0
...J
0
3:JN3l:lMVl
z
0
.....
Z
>-
0
CD
o
z
C\/
N
~
Z
Ol:l
a
k. s. rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fl.
lIVl:l.L
"
x
~IO
Lf)0
OJ I'-
Ol~
,;:;?;~,,~~';":':;l
,:,,:-:..;,...;.;.:.:, .
UJ
<010 ~
cnO
OC')
CII<O
C')~
^l::lV.Llll~
EXISTING ROAD CONDITIONS
J:
.....
Lf)
~
rJl
w
~
:;:)
...J
o
>
o
...J
o
UJ:
i:i:rJl
u.w
<(0:
0:J:
..........
C)O
Zw
o ;:: h:
z ~o
UJ x 0
<!J w <(
LU
...J
<DIO
cnO
OC')
CII<O
C')~
date
AUG 91
figure
2
The generation for this use shall be determined based upon a
generation rate obtained from "Trip Generation - Fifth Edition",
Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1991. The project genera-
tion can be calculated as:
34,848 sq.ft, @ 34.17 tpd/l000 sq.ft. = 1,191 tpd
As shown above, the total maximum additional average daily
traffic expected to be generated by this project based upon a
medical/dental land use at full buildout and 100% occupancy is
1.191 trips per day.
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
The traffic distribution for this project was prepared
according to an examination of land use and travel patterns in
the project study area. Based upon the preceding, the general-
ized traffic distribution for this project was calculated and is
shown below:
NORTH 23%
EAST 22%
SOUTH 23%
WEST 12%
The distributed traffic volumes for this project are shown
in Figure 3. In accordance with TABLE 2 of the Traffic Perform-
ance Standards Ordinance, the Maximum Radius of Development
Influence for this project has been determined to be two miles.
As such, the distributed traffic was brought two miles from the
site or until the distributed traffic was less than one percent
of the roadway's capacity.
-3-
lS3Cl~V3S
3^,\>'
W
>
<(
~IN
...0
0 N'"
~ >
..J
~I~ al U)I~
00
...... <>>...
.... ...
96-1
"'I'"
W 10(0
> ~~
<(
~fll.lIl( ftf"'UIGRAPMICS l1lQ."
3^V
Q
Z
N
N
~
z
GCl
3~N3ClMVl
llVCll
a
"
~
k. s. rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fl.
z
o
f-
Z
>-
o
al
:I:
o
<(
:Olg W
...~ al
Gel llV~
o
..J
o
';:?.,.:'"~::~::
...'......~-"'"
<>>1'" w
...(0 t:
(O~ C/)
<>>1'"
"(0
...~
SS3Cl~NO~
co I'"
"'(0
N~
z
o
f-
Z
>-
o
al
}.!:IV' 11 11 VII
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
I
f-
10
~
en
W
~
::>
..J
o
>
o
..J
o
O:I:
u:en
LLW
<(a:
a::I:
f-f-
f-O
OW
Clwf-
Z ..., a..
UJ 00
C)a:Q
W a.. <(
-l
<>>1'"
....(0
(O~
dote
AUG 91
figure
3
EFFECT ON CAPACITY
The Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordi-
nance #90-40 delineates very specific criteria which must be met
prior to any Site Specific Development Order request being ap-
proved. The traffic performance standard for all major thorough-
fares in Palm Beach County consists of two tests. The first test
is the Link Buildout Test. This test requires that the project
not add traffic on any road link in the radius of development
influence which would cause the total traffic to exceed capacity
of the adopted threshold volumes at Level of Service "D", (shown
in Appendix A). The buildout period for this project has been
established as 1992 by the developer. Thus, to meet the Link
Buildout Test, the total traffic on all links in the radius of
development influence should not exceed capacity during the
buildout of the project (during 1992).
The total traffic is defined as the sum of the existing
average, annual, daily traffic, the project traffic, plus the
background traffic. The background traffic is further defined as
the sum of the historical growth, plus traffic generated by Major
Projects, which are in excess of 10% of the capacity of the
affected roadway link. The total traffic volumes are shown in
FLgure 4.
The 1992 projected traffic has been determined by taking the
sum of the 1990/91 MDT, plus the projected historical growth,
plus the traffic generated for Major Projects which are in excess
of 10% of the roadway's 1 ink capaci ty. The histor ical growth
calculations are shown in APPENDIX C. The major project traffic
volume calculations are shown in APPENDIX D.
-4-
IIIIfll..8lf RfPaOG,A"P"IC5 1'1'.~
3 A 'v'
w
>
<l:
l.S3~:::>'v'3S
o
>
...l
10
96-1
I
0(')01(')0
vl/')V (')0
(') v 0 eX) (')
l/') (') eX) (l)
v VV
I
I
(l) C\l l/') \ (') 0
l/') ...... l/') eX) 0
~Ol/')"" ......(')
C\l .... (') (l)
(') (')V
I
I
Vl/')(l)\l/')O
l/') 0) eX) (') 0
0) l/') (l)...... ___ n..'>
(J') or-"-('I') --'-
........
I
3AV
o
z
C\l
C\l
~
z
a~
3:::>N3l:lMVl
llV~l.
J1
~-
.
k s. rogers, consulting
engineer, Inc.
west palm beach fl
---~-~-_._---_._-- - -~----_.._-----
IW
(l) O)l/')\O 0 I-
l/')'-l/') C\l0-
o (l).... eX) (') (j)
C\l T'" (') (l)
(') (')V
I
z
o
~
z
>-
o
10
:I:
U
<t
W
CD
SS3l:l8NO:::>
al:l llV~
o
_J
o
z
o
~
z
>-
o
CD
Al:lV 1111~
TOT AL TRAFFIC
UJ
>
<l:
:I:
~
10
~
en
UJ
::E
:;)
...J
o
>
U 0
u.. ...J
u.. 0
uu<l: :I:
~~a: en
u..u..~uuJ
<l:<l:O~a:
a:a:zu..:I:
~~:;)<l:~
(!)~o~o
zua: uJ
-uJ(!)...J~
~...,::'::<l:o..
o ~ou ~O
Z xa:<tOO
UJ uJ 0.. CD ~ <t
(!)
UJ
...l
I
(l)0)1O\00
1O.-l/')C\l0
O(l)...eX)M
C\l ...M(l)
M MV
I
date
AUG 91
figure
4
The total traffic volumes for the buildout year of 1992 are
shO'..Jn with the roadway capacities in Figure 4. Reviewing the
total volumes and the roadway capacities in Figure 4, it is seen
that on the roadway links within the radius of development influ-
ence, the tota I traff ic does exceed capacity on the following
roadway link:
ROAD
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
LINK
1-95 to Old Boynton Road
Article V, Section 2(E) of Ordinance #90-40 states that 1-95
shall be addressed only if Net Trips on 1-95 are greater than one
percent (1%) of the Level of Service "0" MDT volume. As this
project does not generate more than 1% of 1-95 Level of Service
"0" MDT volume, 1-95 will not be analyzed as part of this re-
port.
The projected volume as shown in Figure 4 for Boynton Beach
Boulevard does not accurately reflect the volume of traffic which
is expected to be on Boynton Beach Boulevard in 1992. There are
two on-going roadway improvements which will have a significant
impact on the volume of traffic on the section of Boynton Beach
Boulevard west of 1-95.
The first is the extension of Woolbright Road (S.W. 15th
lwenue) from Congress Avenue to Military Trail. According to a
traffic analysis prepared by the Palm Beach County Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO), an average of 3,000 trips per day
are expected to be diverted off of this section of Boynton Beach
Boulevard when this link of Woolbright Road is opened. This link
of Woolbright is expected to be open during 1991.
The second road project is the interchange on 1-95 with N.W.
22nd Avenue. This construction has recently commenced and is
expected to be finished by mid 1992.
-5-
Previous estimates made by this office concluded that an
average of approximately 5,000 trips per day will be diverted off
of Boynton Beach Boulevard once this interchange is opened. The
modified total traffic has been recalculated for this link and is
shown in Figure 5. Reviewing the modified total volume for
Boynton Beach Boulevard, it is concluded that there are no road-
way links within the radius of development influence where the
total traff ic exceeds capac i ty. Therefore I this project meets
the provisions of Test #1.
The second test a project must meet is the Model Test.
According to the Model Test, a project cannot be approved if the
total model traffic, which includes the project traffic, exceeds
the capacity or the adopted level of service of all the affected
roadway links within the project maximum radius of development
influence. According to TABLE 2B of Ordinance #90-40, the maxi-
mum radius of development influence for this project has been
determined to be one mile from the site. TABLE 2B further states
that, if a project has a maximum radius of development influence
beyond the directly accessed links, only those links beyond the
directly accessed links upon which the project adds more than 3%
of Test 2 network capacity need to be addressed,
This project's maximum radius of development influence does
go beyond the directly accessed link of Boynton Beach Boulevard.
However, from Figure 3, it is seen that this project does not
generate more than 1% of capacity on any roadway link. As such,
only the directly accessed link of Boynton Beach Boulevard from
Old Boynton Road to Congress Avenue needs to be addressed.
According to the most recent Model Test (Test 2) data addressed
in a memorandum from Allan A. Ennis, P.E., Palm Beach County
Traffic Division, dated July 19, 1991, this link of Boynton Beach
Bou I evard is not listed. Therefore, it is cone 1 uded that this
project meets the Model Test.
-6-
.4!{ '.tel f "t~lt()all.t~HICJ 1119A()
3^'<J
---1
....oj
w
>
<
3^'<J
a
z
(\J
(\J
3:
z
OtJ
3~N3tJMVl
l/'<JtJl
a
\..
~
k. s. rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fL
o
>
....J
CD
..... I
OMooIMO
VIt)VO MO
M v 0 0 co M
It) M co 0 (l)
v ___vv
I
z
o
f-
Z
>-
o
Q)
O!::l llVl^l
a
....J
o
lS3!::l~V3S
S6-1
'~:-":-)..:::::::"
-..............
UJ
l-
(/)
J:
U
<
w
Q)
SS3!::l8NO~
z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
CD
A!::lVlllll^l
MODIFIED TOTAL TRAFFIC
w
>
<
J:
I-
10
3:
If)
I-
Z
W
~
S2G
u..::J
u..""
uu<o
u:u:o:<
u..u..f-z
<<00
o:o:z-
1-1-::J0
C)f-0::J
~~ffi~
o 1-..., ~ If)
Z ~ouz
UJ xo:<o
C) wa.Q)U
UJ
.J
..... I
OMOOIMO
VlOvO MO
MvOO COM
10 M co 0 (l)
v ---vv
I
w
~
::J
u....J
_0
u..>
u..o
<....J
0:0
I-J:
....J1f)
<tw
1-0:
OJ:
1-1-
00
ww
!;1;b::
00
00
~<
date
AUG 91
figure
5
CO~1PARISON OF GENERATION
The existing zoning classification of this project, R1-AA
PUD, would allow for a maximum of 15 multi-family dwelling units.
Using a generation rate of 7.0 trips per day per dwelling unit,
the:: existing residential zoning for this 2.0 acre si te would
allow for a maximum average daily traffic generation of 105 trips
per day. The proposed maximum use, a medical/dental office
comp 1 ex J is expected to generate an average of 1, 191 tr ips per
day. Thus, the proposed maximum use allowed under the C-1 Zoning
Classification would generate up to an additional 1,086 trips per
da i',
PEAK HOUR
The peak hour volumes generated by this project were calcu-
lated in order to determine what site related improvements, if
any, will be required.
The peak hour volumes were determined by use of a formula as
published in "Trip Generation". A summary of the expected peak
hour generation is shown below:
P.M. PEAK HOUR GENERATION
Ln(T) = 1.069 Ln(X) + 1. 190
Where: T Total P.M. Peak Hour Volume
X = Floor Area in 1,000 Square Feet
The directional distribution has been observed to be:
40% ENTER
60% EXIT
P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUME
ENTER
EXIT
146 Trips
59 Trips
87 Trips
These peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 6. Based upon a
rev iew of these peak hour vol urnes shown in Figure 6, it is con-
cluded that no additional turn lanes are necessary as a result of
the approval of this Petition.
-7-
"Ell.....! ".I'aooA"'I'MtCI 31n40
l1
k. s. rogers, consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, fl.
RD
'-
'-'
is HJ.B MN
o
>
...J
lD
~~ ::~: -----l
( ~ I
~ en I
l_____-1
:x:
o
..s:
uJ
lD
z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
lD
PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
w
~
::l
...J
o
>
a:
::l
o
o :I:
Z :ll::
W ~
o Q..
W ~
.-oJ Q..
co
C\I
\.
date
AUG 91
figure
6
CONCLUSION
This report has been prepared to be submitted as part of a
request to rezone this site to C-l. No specific site plan has
been presented as part of this request. Thus, in order to deter-
mine the maximum impact of this request, it has been decided to
analyze the impact of the largest building allowed in this zoning
district combined with the most traffic intense use. For this
purpose, the traffic generated by a 34,848 square foot medical /
dental office building was analyzed. This possible use was found
to generate an average of 1,191 trips per day.
This project meets both the Link Buildout Test and the Model
Test of Ordinance #90-40. This project, therefore, can be ap-
proved in accordance wi th the 1990 Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Code (Ordinance #90-40).
-8-
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE
(AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
ROADWAY
Two Lane
Four Lane Divided
Five Lane Undivided
Six Lane Divided
Eight Lane Divided
Six Lane Freeway
TPD
13,700
30,200
30,200
46,300
60,000
110,700
APPENDIX B
ONE PERCENT (1%) OF THE
ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE
THQRPUGHFARE TYP~
MINIMUM VOLUME
(TRlPS_p.~j~__ DAXl
Two Lane
137
Four Lane (Divided)
302
Five Lane (Undivided)
302
Six Lane (Divided)
463
Eight Lane (Divided)
600
Six Lane (Expressway)
1107
APPENDIX C
HISTORICAL GROWTH CALCULATIONS
TWO ACRE C-l PARCEL
ANNUAL
GROWTH 1990/91 1992
ROAD I LINK RATE AADT AADT DIFFERENCE
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD:
1-95 to Old Boynton Road 4.47% 45,340 48.380 3,040
Old Boynton Road to Congress 2.61% 32,056 33,311 1, 155
OLD BOYNTON ROAD:
Boynton Bch Blvd to Congress 10.62% 9,954 11,540 1,586
APPENDIX D
MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC
2.0 ACRE; C-1 PROJECT
THERE WERE NO MAJOR PROJECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA
WHICH ARE EXPECTED TO ADD MORE THAN 10% OF THE ADOPTED THRESHOLD
CAPACITY ON ANY OF THE ROADWAY LINKS WITHIN THE PROJECT'S MAXIMUM
RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE.