The URL can be used to link to this page

AGENDA DOCUMENTS QTY OF BOYNTON BEACH REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA November 7, 1995 I. OPENINGS: A. Call to Order - Mayor Jerry Taylor B. Invocation - Pastor Robert Hahn, First United Methodist Church C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Commissioner Sid Rosen D. Agenda Approval: 1. Additions, Deletions, Corrections 2. Adoption II. ADMINISTRATIVE: A. Accept resignation from Pattie Hammer, Board of Adjustment B. Appointments to be made: APPOINTMENT TO BE MADE Mayor Taylor IV Matson II Bradley IV Matson II Bradley IV Matson IV Matson IV Matson Mayor Taylor. I Rosen II Bradley III Jaskiewicz IV Matson Mayor Taylor BOARD Board of Adjustment Bldg Brd of Adj & Appeal Cemetery Board Children & Youth Adv Brd Library Board Comm Redev Adv Board Code Enforcement Board Adv Brd Chi Idren & Youth Board of Adjustment Code Enforcement Board Board of Adjustment Education Advisory Board Children & Youth Adv Brd Recreation & Parks Brd LENGTH OF TERM EXPIRATION DATE Alt Term expires 4/97 Alt Term expires 4/96 Alt Term expires 4/96 Alt Term expires 4/96 Alt T arm expires 4/96 Reg 1 yr'Term to 4/96 Alt 1 yr Term to 9/96 Reg Term expires 4/97 Reg Term expires 4/96 Alt Term expires 9/96 Reg Term expires 4/98 Stu Term expires 4/96 Reg Term expires 4/97 Reg Term expires 4/97 6:30 P.M. TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED C. Authorization to proceed with advertising of RFP for consultant for the Historic Site Survey and Report III. CONSENT AGENDA Matters in this Section of the Agenda are proposed and recommended by the City Manager for "Consent Agenda" approval of the action indicated in each item, with all of the accompanying material to become a part of the Public Record and subject to staff comments. A. Mi nutes 1. Regular City Commission Meeting Minutes of October 17, 1995 2. City Commission Workshop Meeting Minutes of October 26,1995 '-' "W B. Bids - Recommend Approval - All expenditures are approved in the 1995-96 Adopted Budget 1 . Award bid to Corporate Express of Florida for Annual Contract for Office Supplies 2. Award bid to Graybar Electric Company for Purchase of Fiber Optic Cable Interconnect Centers and St Connectors for the Utilities Department 3. Award bid to Lake Worth Herald for the printing of "Funfare"! Magazine 4. Award bid to P.H.N. Equipment Inc. for the Vibratory Plate Compactor for the Utilities Department 5. Approve purchase (replacement) of a 1995 MACK MR690S front loading refuse vehicle from Steele Truck Center in the amount of $111,739. This purchase is from a City of Arcadia Bid, which is an extended bid 6. Approve purchase of new cold water meters/propeller-type, on a trial basis, piggy- backing Palm Beach County Bid for the Utilities DepartmentlWater Distribution Division in the amount of $16,475.25 7. Approve purchase of sewer cleaning truck from Southern Sewer Equipment Sales Inc., piggy-backing Broward County Bid for the Utilities Department/Sewer Collection Division in the amount of $69,575.00 8. Approve purchase of nine patrol vehicles for the Police Department, piggy-backing the Florida Sheriff's Association in the amount of $162,279.00 C. Resolutions 1. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Agreement for Water Service Outside of the City Limits - Antoinette Anselmo and Loretta O'Brien located at 3705 N. Federal Highway 2. Proposed Resolution No. R9S- RE: Acceptance of Maintenance Agreement and final plat for Four Waves at Sausalito 3. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Acceptance of replat for Plat No. 10 of Quantum Park for PJM at Quantum Park 4. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Support of Superfund Reform '95 5. Proposed Resolution No. R95- easement - Hypoluxo Road RE: Authorize execution of release of 6. Proposed Resolution No. R9S- RE: Authorize execution of Special Warranty Deeds for the City's In-Fill Construction Program 7. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Beautiful Palm Beaches County Grant Agreement for four medians on Congress Avenue from Summit Drive to SW 30th Avenue 8. Proposed Resolution No. R9S- RE: Authorize execution of Agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and Florida Atlantic University to conduct an Assembly to build community-wide consensus on critical concerns 9. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of Agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County Department of Housing and Community Development for the C.D.B.G. Phase III final landscaping - N.E. 12th and 13th Avenue between N.E. 1 st Street and Railroad Avenue 2 10. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Ratification of the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board actions of October 19, 1995 a. Approved to expend $2,600 from Repair and Replacement Fund to repair Effluent Controller b. Approved to expend $18,500 from Repair and Replacement Fund to replace Batch Polymer System with New Dyna Blend System c. Approved to expend $55,000 from Repair and Replacement Fund to purchase new 600 HP Effluent Pump Motor ($35,000) and repair existing 600 HP Effluent Pump Motor ($20,000) d. Approved the Third Amendment to Interlocal Agreement 11. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of a contract between the City of Boynton Beach Police Athletic League (P.A.L.) and Amusements of America to host its third annual carnival on December 7 - 10, 1995 at the K-Mart located on US1/Woolbright Road intersection 12. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of Interlocal Agreement between the City of Boynton Beach for the acquisition of the Rosemary Scrub ecosite and its management as a natural area D. Approval of Bills E. Recommendation to place Zuccala Wrecker Services on three month probation due to overcharging in error F. Authorize purchase of fire fighting gear from Safety Equipment Company, in the amount of $18,220.92 G. One per cent additional anniversary increase for employees below grade 35 for fiscal year 1995-96 H. Approve change orders #5 in the amount of $2,110.00 & #8 in the amount of a credit of $628.00 for Cassidy Air Conditioning for changes in the scope of work for the City Hall HV AC Project I. Retroactive approval of the sale of beer for a fundraiser for the Leather's playground project in conjunction with the November 3, 1995 barbecue IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS & PRESENTAnONS: A. Announcements 1. Set a date for City Commission Workshop to discuss the Marina Proposal B. Presentations 1. Employee of the Month - October 1995 2. Certificates of Appreciation for volunteer workers for the Centennial Celebration - presented by Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Matson, Centennial Chairman 3. Presentation of donation from Centennial to the 1913 School Project by Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Matson, Centennial Chairman 4. Proclamations a. Home Care Month - November 1995 b. National Hospice Month - November 1995 c. Veteran's Day - November 11, 1995 3 .. .., V. BIDS: VI. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 PM OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE AGENDA PERMITS A. PROJECT NAME: Miner Road TABLED AGENT: Richard Harris tor Condor Investments ot Palm Beach County OWNER: . City ot Boynton Beach LOCATION: Miner Road between High Ridge Road and 1-95 DESCRIPTION: ABANDONMENT - Request for abandonment ot a 54 foot wide portion ot the Miner Road right-ot-way east ot High Ridge Road VII. PUBLIC AUDIENCE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 3 MINUTE PRESENTATIONS VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: A. Consideration ot Agreement regarding billboard relocation to 1-95 B. PROJECT NAME: Papa Johns TABLED APPLICANT REQUESTED TO BE TABLED UNTIL NOVEMBER 21, 1995 AGENT: Interplan Practice, Ltd. OWNER: Papa Johns USA LOCATION: Northeast corner ot N.W. 7th Court and Boynton Beach Boulevard DESCRIPTION: LANDSCAPE APPEAL: Request tor a landscape code appeal to overhang a required landscape strip with bumpers of parked cars. C. PROJECT NAME: Papa Johns TABLED APPLICANT RE~UESTED TO BE TABLED UNTIL NOVEMBER 21, 1995 AGENT: Interplan Practice, Ltd. OWNER: Papa Johns USA LOCATION: Northeast corner of N.W. 7th Court and Boynton Beach Boulevard DESCRIPTION: NEW SITE PLAN: Request for site plan approval to construct a 1,142 square foot take-out pizza store on .22 acres D. PROJECT NAME: Tara Oaks PUD TABLED AGENT: Kilday and Associates OWNER: Bill Ray Winchester LOCATION: Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road extended DESCRIPTION: Request for approval to modify the previously approved master plan to change access points, recreational amenities, unit type from apartments to townhouses and use acreage IX. NEW BUSINESS: A. Items for discussion by Commissioner Sid Rosen 1. Joint workshop meeting with C.O.B.W.A.A. X. LEGAL: A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading - PUBLIC HEARING 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-28 RE: Land Use Amendment - Lake Worth Christian School TABLED UNTIL NOVEMBER 21,1995 RECOMMEND CITY COMMISSION DELETE FROM AGENDA 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-29 RE: Rezoning -. Lake Worth Christian School TABLED UNTIL NOVEMBER 21,1995 RECOMMEND CITY COMMISSION DELETE FROM AGENDA 3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-38 RE: Amending Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, Section 4-51 to comply with Florida statutes 4 4. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-39 RE: Amend Chapter 17, Peddlers & Solicitors, deleting fee requirements and providing for the limitation of duration of terms for solicitation permits B. Ordinances - 1 st Reading: 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095- RE: Amendments to Boynton Beach General Employees' Pension Plan regarding investment guidelines 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095- RE: Amendments to Boynton Beach Firefighter Pension Plan regarding investment guidelines 3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095- RE: Boynton Commons rezoning from C-~ to Planned Commercial Development C. Resolutions None D. Other 1 . Approval of Settlement Agreement with Summit Properties and Master Plan approval for Isles of Hunters Run XI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. Code amendment - regarding Psychic Readers TABLED XII. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: XIII. OTHER: XIV. ADJOURNMENT: NOTICE IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HEISHE.MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F.S.286.0105) THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE CONTACT JOYCE COSTELLO, (407) 375-6013 AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST. 5 X. LEGAL A. 1 & 2 cc: Planning, Utilities PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-641 Agenda Memorandum for November 7, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: .--:- I Tambri J. Heyden r}.{d- Planning and Zonin~ Director DATE: November 2, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Ordinances for Land Use Element Amendment & Rezoning The above-referenced item, originally advertised for Second Reading at the July 18, 1995 City Commission meeting, is on the table for ~he November 7, 1995 City Commission meeting. DESCRIPTION: As summarized in the previous memorandum for this item, at the July 5, 1995 City Commission meeting, first reading of the ordinances occurred to reclassify and rezone property acquired/ extracted by the Lake Worth Christian School from the adjacent Cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD). You will also recall that as a condition of these requests, the applicant is to submit to staff for review. and processing a Unity of Title form, an abandonment application to extinguish right-of-way existing within the PUD, an agreement between the School and the developer of the PUD to facilitate maintenance access through the PUD, and an agreement to approve the use by the School of a drainage area wi thin the PUD . Despite staff's frequent reminders to the applicant to submit this drainage agreement, this document has still not been received due to delay in its review by representatives of Cedar Ridge Estates. RECOMMENDATION: The city attorney has determined that readvertising is necessary since this item has been tabled multiple times and was last advertised for the July 5, 1995 meeting. Therefore, it is recommended that the Commission take this item off the table and delete it from the agenda. Once all documents have been received, it will be readvertised and reappear before the Commission as an agenda item. The applicant may have to start the process over again depending on how much longer it is before the outstanding items are received. TJH:dim MISCX:LWCTAB17.AGM PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-587 Agenda Memorandum for October 17, 1995 City comm1..1on Meeting DATE: carrie Parker City Manager Tambri J. Heyden '~J1- planning and Zoning Director october 12, 1995 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Lake Worth christian School - LUAR #95-002 Ordinances for Land Use Element Amendment & Rezoning The above-referenced item, originally advertised for Second Reading at the July 18, 1995 City Commission meeting, is on the table for the October 17, 1995 City Commission meeting. DESCRIPTION: As summarized in the previous memorandum for this item, at the July 5, 1995 City Commission meeting, first reading of the ordinances occurred to reclassify and rezone property acquired/ extracted by the Lake Worth Christian School from the adjacent cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD). You will also recall that as a condition of these requests, the applicant is to submit to staff for review and processing a Unity of Title form, an abandonment application to extinguish right-of-way existing within the PUD, an agreement between the School and the developer of the PUD to facilitate maintenance access through the PUD, and an agreement to approve the use by the School of a drainage area within the PUD. Despite staff's request for this drainage agreement by the September 19th City Commission meeting, this document has still not been received. Staff continues to contact the applicant regularly, and is assured by the applicant that a draft document has been generated, and that its processing has been delayed in its review by representatives of Cedar Ridge Estates. RECOMMENDATION: Staff contacted the applicant yesterday morning to find out a date certain ~hat the applicant would be able to provide the draft drainage agreement to the city. As of 1: 00 p.m. on the date of this memorandum, we have not yet heard from the applicant. There is concern that this item cannot be tabled without readvertising (readvertising to include a date certain for the public hearing necessary for second reading) which as a result of recent changes to state law is costly and should be a cost borne by the applicant~ If it is determined that readvertising is not necessary, it is recommended that this item be tabled again to the next meeting. Hopefully at the Commission meeting staff will be able to indicate when the applicant will have the necessary document for staff to review. TJH:mr Attachment Mt.e.'LWC~Aa17.ACM X LEGAL A. 1 & A.2 cc: Plan, Dev, Util PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAR' MEMORANDUM NO. 95-587 Agenda Memorandum for October 17, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager Tambri J. Heyden ~_I1- Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: October 12, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Ordinances for Land Use Element Amendment & Rezoning . The above-referenced item, originally advertised for Second Reading at the July 18, 1995 City Commission meeting, is on the table for the October 17, 1995 City Commission meeting. DESCRIPTION: As summarized in the previous memorandum for this item, at the July 5, 1995 City Commission meeting, first reading of the ordinances occurred to reclassify and rezone property acquired/ extracted by the Lake Worth Christian School from the adjacent Cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD). You will also recall that as a condition of these requests, the applicant is to submit to staff for review and processing a Unity of Title form, an abandonment application to extinguish right-of-way existing within the PUD, an agreement between the School and the developer of the PUD to facilitate maintenance access through the PUDI. and an agreement to approve the use by the School of a drainage area within the PUD. Despite staff's request for this drainage agreement by the September 19th City Commission meeting, this document has still not been received. Staff continues to contact the applicant regularly, and is assured by the applicant that a draft document has been generated, and that its processing has been delayed in its review by representatives of Cedar Ridge Estates. RECOMMENDATION: Staff contacted the applicant yesterday morning to find out a date certain that the applicant would be able to provide the draft drainage agreement to the city. As of 1:00 p.m. on the date of this memorandum, we have not yet heard from the applicant. There is concern that this item cannot be tabled without readvertising (readvertising to include a date certain for the public hearing necessary for second reading. which as a result of recent changes to state law is costly and shoul be a cost borne by the applicant. If it is determined that read rtising is not necessary, it is recommended that this item be tabled again to the next meeting. Hopefully at the Commission me ting staff will be able to indicate when the applicant will have he necessary document for staff to review. TJH:mr Attachment Mt.CZIL.C~A.17.AGM . ( I{ , c( VIl!. MY.:I ^ I)' Jf tr JV? /' JY" ~~ S1~tt V ~ IN' "" PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAR~KEN~ MEMORANDUM NO. 95-544 Agenda Memorandum for october 2, 1995 city Commission Meeting FROM: Carrie Parker City Manager Tambri J. Heyden ~~ Planning and zonin~15irector TO: DATE: September 26, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christia Ordinances for Land 002 nt & Rezoning ;,..' O:Jl ~YV... The above-referenced item, ori_ ___.~y aOvertised for Second Reading at the July 18, 1995 City Commission meeting, continues to be on the table for the October 2, 1995 City Commission meeting. DESCRIPTION: As summarized in the previous memorandum for this item, at the July 5, 1995 City Commission meeting, first reading of the ordinances occurred to reclassify and rezone property acquired/ extracted by the Lake Worth Christian School from the adjacent cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD). You will also recall that as a condition of these requests, the applicant is to submit to staff for review and processing a Unity of Title form, an abandonment application to extinguish right-of-way existing within the PUD, an agreement between the School and the developer of the PUD to facilitate maintenance access through the PUD, and an agreement to approve the use by the School of a drainage area within the PUD. Despite staff's request for this drainage agreement by the September 19th City Commission meeting, this document has still not been received. Staff continues to contact the applicant regularly, and is assured by the applicant that a draft document has been generated, and that its processing has been delayed in its review by representatives of Cedar Ridge Estates. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the belief that the applicant is continuing "in good faith" to generate this outstanding drainage agreement, staff recommends that final re~ding of the Ordinances remain tabled until the October 17th city Commission meeting. TJH:mr Attachment MISCZ:LWCTAB16,AGM PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-515 Agenda Memorandum for September 19, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden 79J.l. Planning and Zoning Director DATE: September 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian school - LUAR #95-002 Ordinances for Land Use Element Amendment & Rezoning The above-referenced item, originally advertised for Second Reading at the July 18, 1995 city Commission meetinq, continues to be on the table for the September 19, 1995 city Commission meeting. DESCRIPTION: As summarized in the previo~s memorandum for this item, at the July 5, 1995 City Commission meeting, first reading of the ordinances occurred to reclassify and rezone property acquired/ extracted by the Lake Worth Christian School from the adjacent cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD). You will also recall that as a condition of these requests, the applicant is to submit to staff for review and processing a Unity of Title form, an abandonment application to extinguish right-of-way existing within the PUD, an agreement between the School and the developer of the PUD to facilitate maintenance access through the PUD, and an agreement to approve the use by the School of a drainage area within the PUD. Despite staff's request for this drainage agreement by the September 19th City Commission meeting, this document has still not been received. staff continues to contact the applicant regularly, and is assured by the applicant that a draft document has been generated, and that its processing has been delayed in its review by representatives of cedar Ridge Estates. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the belief that the applicant is continuing "in good faith" to generate this outstanding drainage agreement, staff recommends that final reading of the Ordinances remain tabled until the october 3rd City Commission meeting. TJH:mr Attachment MISCZ:LWCTAB15,AGM x. LEGAL A.l & 2 cc: Planning Development PLANNING AND ZONING MBMORANDUM NO. 'l5-t.fb2, Agenda Memorandum for september 5, 1995 city Commission Meeting FROM: Carrie Parker city M~nageJ ~ . 7Jv.-L-. ~ r-' Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director TO: DATE: August 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian school - LUAR #95-002 Ordinances for Land Use Element Amendment & Rezoning The above-referenced item, originally advertised for Second Reading at the July 18, 1995 City Commission meeting, continues to be on the table for the September 5, 1995 City commission meeting. DESCRIPTION: As summarized in the previous memorandum for this item, at the July 5, 1995 City Commission meeting, first reading of the ordinances occurred to reclassify and rezone property acquiredl extracted by the Lake Worth Christian School from the adjacent Cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD). You will also recall that as a condition of these requests, the applicant is to submit to staff for review and processing a Unity of Title form, an abandonment application to extinguish right-of-way existing within the PUD, an agreement between the School and the developer of the PUD to facilitate maintenance access through the PUD, and an agreement to approve the use by the School of a drainage area within the PUD. To date, the drainage agreement still has not been submitted. You will also recall from our previous memorandum that the applicant agreed to submit for review this outstanding item by the September 19, 1995 City Commission meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Given that all above-described conditions have still not been met, staff recommends that final reading of the Ordinances remain tabled until the September 19th City Commission meeting. TJH:mr Attachment MISCZ:LWCTAB14.AGM I~Jr ~:NNlN:~::J~ i ZONING DEPI . _". PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-429 Agenda Memorandum for August 15, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker city Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden J Planning and Zoning Director~~ August 10, 1995 DATE: SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Ordinances for Land Use Element Amendment & Rezoning The above-referenced item, originally advertised for second Reading at the July 18, 1995 City Commission meeting, continues to be on the table for the August 15, 1995 City Commission meeting. DESCRIPTION: As summarized in the previous memorandum for this item, at the July 5, 1995 City Commission meeting, first reading of the ordinances occurred to reclassify and rezone property acquired/ extracted by the Lake Worth Christian School from the adjacent Cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD). You will also recall that as a condition of these requests, the applicant is to submit to staff for review and processing a Unity of Title form, an abandonment application to extinguish right-of-way existing within the PUD, an agreement between the School and the developer of the PUD to facilitate maintenance access through the PUD, and an agreement to approve the use by the School of a drainage area within the PUD. To date, the drainage agreement still has not been submitted. Staff has been informed that this process is progressing, and that an agreement should be submitted prior to the September 19, 1995 City Commission meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Given that all above-described conditions have still not been met, but since their is an active attempt to resolve this drainage issue, staff recommends that final reading of the Ordinances remain tabled until the September 19th City Commission meeting. TJH:mr Attachment KISCZ:LWCTAB1!.AGK PLANNING AND ZONING DBPARTMEN7 MEMORANDUM NO. 95-386 X. LEGAL A.2 & 3 cc: Planning Agenda Memorandum for August 1, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: #fv Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director DATE: July 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Ordinances for Land Use Element Amendment & Rezoning The above-referenced item, originally advertised for Second Reading at the July 18, 1995 City Commission meeting, is on the table for the August I, 1995 City Commission meeting. DESCRIPTION: As summarized in the previous memorandum for this item, at the July 5, 1995 City Commission meeting, first reading of the ordinances occurred to reclassify and rezone property acquired/ extracted by the Lake Worth Christian School from the adjacent Cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD). You will also recall that as a condition of these requests, the applicant is to submit to staff for review and processing a Unity of Title form, an abandonment application to extinguish right-of-way existing within the PUD, an agreement between the School and the developer of the PUD to facilitate maintenance access through the PUD, and an agreement to approve the use by the School of a drainage area within the PUD. To date, the drainage agreement still has not been submitted. RECOMMENDATION: Given that all above-described conditions have still not been met, staff recommends that final reading of the Ordinances for land use amendment and rezoning remain tabled until the outstanding item is submitted. I understand that the involved parties are actively attempting to develop this drainage agreement. TJH:mr Attachment MISCZ:LWCTABll.AGM x. LEGAL A.3&4 cc: Planning PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEl<<)RANDUM NO. 95-344 Agenda Memorandum for July 18, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: carrie Parker city Manager FROM: Tambri J. HeYden-,p-d planning and Zoning Director DATE: July 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Ordinances for Land Use Element Amendment & Rezoning The above-referenced item has been advertised for Second Reading at the July 18, 1995 city Commission meeting. DESCRIPI'ION: At the last city Commission meeting firs treading of the ordinances occurred to reclassify and rezone 6.4 acres of property acquired/extracted by the Lake Worth Christian School from the adjacent cedar Ridge Estates Planned unit Developnent (PUD). You will also recall that as a condition of these requests, the applicant is to submit to staff for review and processing a Unity of Title form, an abandonment application to extinguish right-of-way existing within the PUD, an agreement between the Scmol and the developer of the PUD to facilitate maintenance access through the PUD, and an agreement to approve the use by the School of a drainage area within the PUD. To date, all conditions have been met with the exception of submitting the drainage agreement. Staff requested that the required elements be submitted prior. to July 7th, to accommodate an ample review period in advance of final reading of the ordinances. RECOMMENDATION: Given that all above-described conditions have not been met, staff recommends that final reading of the Ordinances for land use amendment and rezoning be tabled until the outstanding item is submitted. I have been informed that this document is currently being drafted through the necessary negotiations between the affected parties. TJH:mr Attachment KI"CX: LftCSnaL.AGM ,\, . LEGAL B.3 & B.4 cc: Development Planning 95-313 Utilities PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. Agenda Memorandum for July 5, 1995 city Commission Meeting FROM: Carrie Parker City Manager ~ Tambri J. Heyden / Planning & Zoning irector TO: DATE: June 29, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School (LUAR 95-002) Ordinances for Future Land Use plan Amendment and Rezoning Please place the above-referenced items on the July 5, 1995 city Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, First Reading. DESCRIPTION: You will recall that 6.2 acres of the original Cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD) have been acquired by the Lake Worth Christian School, who is now requesting that this property be reclassified and rezoned to Public and Private Governmental/Institutional and R-1AA (Single Family Residential), respectively. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that these Ordinances be approved; however, based on the following conditions: 1) acceptance of an abandonment application for the right-of-way remaining (from the PUD) on the subject property; 2) submission of agreements between the School and the developer of the PUD which address use of the drainage area within the PUD and specifically reservation of capacity to serve the build-out needs of the PUD, and maintenance access through the PUD for servicing the recreation area; and 3) showing unity of title through appropriate documentation. The applicant has consented to these conditions, and to submitting the respective documentation to the Planning and Zoning Department by July 7, 1995. TJH:mr Attachments O!LL1:L~C!ORO!,AGK Memo No. 95-268 -2- June 9, 1995 Direction North J1.g SAL Railroad right-at-way Zonin2 N/A East SAL Railroad and 1-95 rights-of-way N/A South/Southwest Cedar Ridge Estates, planned single & multi-family units PUD West/Northwest Large-lot single family homes RS (County) ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO SEC. 9.C.7 OF CH. 2. LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS This section of the Land Development Regulations requires the evaluation of plan amendment/rezoning requests against criteria related to the impacts which would result from the approval of such requests. These criteria and an evaluation of the impacts which could result from development of the property are as follows: 7.a. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies.. .". Although the Future Land Use Plan is proposed to be amended, the request is generally consistent with comprehensive plan objectives and policies, in part, due to compatibility of the proposed land use classification with adjacent land uses. For example, Objective 1.17 below is typically referenced when residential uses are adjacent to, and potentially impacted by property proposed to be reclassified. Obiective 1.17 - "Minimize nuisances, hazards, and other adverse impacts. ..to residential environments by preventing or minimizing land use conflicts." In general, this proposed amendment represents the replacement of residentially classified property (for single family homes) located immediately adjacent to the S.A.L. Railroad right-of-way, with property classified as Public & Private Governmental/Institutional. The single family home portion of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD would become more protected from nuisances, hazards and negative impacts associated with adjacency to the railroad and I-95 rights-of-way by separation from these rights-of-way resulting from the school's recreation uses. Although several of these single family homes are on the periphery of revised PUD boundary, and as a consequence of the amendment, would now be adjacent to active recreation facilities rather than other single family homes, the overall effect is a net positive change given the increased distance between single family lots and the railroad and 1-95 corridors. Most recreation uses are generally compatible with residential uses, and any potential nuisances or hazards anticipated from the active recreation facilities (e.g. noise, lighting, traffic, etc.) would be addressed/mitigated during the site plan review process. Lastly, although there are no Comprehen,::i."o Pl.:or' =--I'\H,:,~"",:, that specifically promote the provision of recreation facilities within private schools, this proposed expansion of the school's recreation facilities is consistent with the overall goal of the Recreation & Open Space Element, which is partially shown below. Goal #5 - "provide adequate open space and recreational facilities and programs to meet the needs of present and future residents... .11 The folloWing additional objectives, policies, and issues addressed below are either typically referenced by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), or required by them to be analyzed in the review of proposed amendments: Memo No. 95-268 -4- June 9, 1995 extraction of the subject property from the PUD, making it available to the Lake Worth Christian School. 7.d. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities." Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 9J-l1 also requires that the availability of public facilities be analyzed in connection with a proposed amendment to a comprehensive plan, and that the maximum potential demand upon public facilities be determined. The fOllowing facilities were analyzed in order to ensure that capacity is available: Roads: Although Palm Beach County has not completed its review of the traffic analysis, it appears that the traffic impact analysis reviewed not only use of the subject property, but traffic impact anticipated from the School's proposed master plan (as a site-specific rezoning). Since the study references 382 additional trips per day to be generated by a 350 student expansion of an elementary and middle school, it is unclear whether the additional outdoor recreation facilities, additional school bUildings and auditorium were evaluated. The traffic analysis concluded that traffic to be generated from the master plan would not exceed established levels of service of impacted road segments, and would comply with requirements of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, traffic concurrency certification will be limited to an additional 382 trips per day and is subject to any comments from Palm Beach County. Water/Sewer: The City'S utility Department reviewed the proposed amendment and indicated that water and sewer capacities are available to serve the minimal demands of the proposed recreation uses. However, they recommend that a fire flow test be conducted in order to determine if the flow requirement for institutional uses, 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm), can be met. In comparison, the fire flow requirement for residential uses is 500 gpm; Solid Waste: The Solid Waste Authority reviewed this request and does not object to the proposed amendment as ample capacity exists to serve the future solid waste collection and disposal needs generated on this site; Drainage: The analysis of the proposed amendment by the Lake Worth Drainage District indicated that the subject area is not within the service area of the Lake Worth Drainage District; and Recreation: Not applicable/No impact. 7.f. "Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the eXisting zoning."; When the subject property was extracted from the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD, the property became undevelopable as zoned, since there no longer existed a corresponding master plan (planned unit development zoning requires a master plan for zoning approval). Furthermore, the subject property became land-locked by loss of direct access to High h~~~~ Road as a result of the separation from the PUD master plan, with the intent that access would be provided through the school property, once assembled with it. 7.g. "Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole." With respect to scale, the proposed amendment and use are consistent with the eXisting and future use of adjacent properties. Furthermore, given the confined location of this property, its pro*imity to the adjacent railroad and I-95 rights-of-way, and since it represents only a minimal 11 unit decrease in planned housing units, the proposed Memo No. 95-268 -6- June 9, 1995 6) Consideration shall be give to redesign of the area, or reorientation of the future elementary school in order to avoid the necessity for children to cross the parking area in accessing other recreation facilities; 7) The site plan is deficient of many details or criteria as required in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review. A few of the deficiencies indicated by staff include utility easement locations, bUilding elevations, indication of compliance with Handicap Code and fire separation requirements, and the lack of parking space counts and identification of parking facilities intended to serve all recreation elements, and particularly the pool and southern ball field; 8) That portion of the roadway that was dedicated to the pUblic with recordation of the 1983 plat of Cedar Ridge Estates, but now planned for school use shall be abandoned, and the unity of title process completed in order to properly assemble the existing school property with the subject property. These applications and documents shall be submitted prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 9) The agreements to be established between the developer of Cedar Ridge Estates and the Lake Worth Christian School, which address drainage (the use by the School of the retention area within the pun and determination that drainage capacity to serve the entire residential project will be maintained despite use of the retention area by the school) and maintenance access (for the school through Cedar Ridge Estates) shall be finalized for review by staff and the City Attorney prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 10) It is recommended that the subject property be replatted to vacate the blocks, lots, easements and public rights-of-way that were established by the 1983 Cedar Ridge Estates plat. At minimum, the abandonment of the public right-of-way referenced in comment 8 above shall be completed. 11) At time of site plan review, traffic shall be re-evaluated to determine whether additional traffic, above the 382 daily trips per day certified with this land use amendment and rezoning, will be generated based on the specifics of the site plan submittal. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that the applications submitted by J. Richard Harris and the Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc., be approved, based on the following: 1. The proposed amendment and zoning would be consistent with Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies; 2. The proposed amendment would not be contrary to the established land use pattern, nor would it create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, and nor would it constitute a grant of speCial privilege to an individual property owner; 3. The requested land use and zoning would be compatible with capacities of utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities; 4. The proposed land use and zoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties and, would not affect the property values of adjacent ~r nearby properties; ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION MAP ATTACHMENT liB" APPROVED, REVISED 1995 CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES PUD MASTER PLAN ATTACHMENT "C" PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SCHOOL MASTER PLAN PUBLIC HEARING B cc: Plan, Devel PLANNING AND ZONING DEPART MEMORANDUM NO. 95-271 Agenda Memorandum for June 20, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. HeYden~~ Planning and Zoning Director DATE: June 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning The above-referenced request has been tabled by the City Commission since April 18, 1995. It is ready to come off the table at the June 20, 1995 City Commission meeting as a public hearing item. DESCRIPTION: This is a request submitted by the Lake Worth Christian School to amend the future land use map of the comprehensive plan from Low Density Residential to Public and Governmental/Insti tutional and rezoning from ~Planned Unit Development (PUD) to R-1AA, Single Family Residential for 6.4 acres within the northeast corner of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD located on High Ridge Road. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote, recommended approval of this request subject to the recommendations stated in the attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-268 (compliance with any forthcoming traffic comments received from Palm Beach County; acceptance of an abandonment application; receipt of agreements concerning drainage, access and unity of title prior to formal adoption of ordinances and incorporation of the staff comments outlined in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-268 into the school's future site plan submittal). TJH:dim Attachment a:CCAllenMe.Chr Memo No. 95-268 -2- June 9, 1995 Direction North Use SAL Railroad right-of-way East SAL Railroad and I-95 rights-of-way Zoning; N/A N/A South/Southwest Cedar Ridge Estates, planned single & multi-family units PUD West/Northwest Large-lot single family homes RS (County) -rt:.. . ~ ~~Mi0/'~~ ANALYSIS ~ TO SEC. 9.C.7 OF CH. 2. LAND DEVELO~LATIONS This section of the Land Development Regulations requires the evaluation of plan amendment/rezoning requests against criteria related to the impacts which would result from the approval of such requests. These criteria and an evaluation of the impacts which could re~l~~~v~e~~lllt,property are as follows: --rCu--- p:.~.s~'whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies.. .". Although the Future Land Use Plan is proposed to be amended, the request is generally consistent with comprehensive plan objectives and policies, in part, due to compatibility of the proposed land use classification with adjacent land uses. For example, Objective 1.17 below is typically referenced when residential uses are adjacent to, and potentially impac~ed~~pert. proposed ~o be re~ied. Obiective 1.17~/~1nimize nuisance , ~a~d other adverse impacts. ..to residential environments by preventing or minimizing land use conflicts." In general, this proposed amendment represents the replacement of residentially classified property (for single family homes) located immediately adjacent to the S.A.L. Railroad right-of-way, with property classified as Public & Private Governmental/Institutional. ~ The single family home portion of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD would become more protected from nuisances, hazards and negative impacts associated with adjacency to the railroad and I-95 rights-of-way by separation from these rights-of-way resulting from the school's recreation uses. Although several of these single family homes are on the periphery of revised PUD boundary, and as a consequence of the amendment, would now be adjacent to active recreation facilities rather than other single family homes, the overall effect is a net positive change given the increased distance between single family lots and the railroad and I-95 corridors. Most recreation uses are generally compatible with residential uses, and any potential nuisances or hazards anticipated from the active recreation facilities ~- (e..g. nOise-t., lighting, traffic, etc.) would be addressed/mitigated _;.. ring f.~~iL..~it~ j)lan r:evi.ew process. (;J t . 't' ------~ ~ <0(- sPY/- .. Lastly, although there are no Comprehensive Plan policies that specifically promote the provision of recreation facilities within private schools, this proposed expansion of the school's recreation facilities is consistent with the overall goal of the Recreation & Open Space Element, which is partially shown below. Goal #5 - "Provide adequate open space and recreational facilities and programs to meet the needs of present and future residents... ." The following additional objectives, policies, and issues addressed below are either typically referenced by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), or required by them to be analyzed in the review of proposed amendments: Memo No. 95-268 -4- June 9, 1995 extraction of the subject property from the PUD, making it available to the Lake Worth Christian School. ~7.d. Itwhether the proposed rezoning would be compatihiibwith utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities.1I Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 9J-l1 also requires that the availability of public facilities be analyzed in connection with a proposed amendment to a comprehensive plan, and that the maximum potential demand upon public facilities be determined. The following facilities were analyzed in order to ensure that capacity is availabl_ . ~ ~tiu.~. &~r-.fa ~tUu~ Roads: Although Palm Beach countyrlras not completed its review of the traffic analysis, it appears that the traffic impact analysis reviewed not only use of the subject property, but traffic impact anticipated from the School's proposed master plan (as a site-speci~l1: rezoning). Since the study references 382 additional trips per da~EO be generated by a 350 student expansion of an elementary and middle schoo~ it is unclear whether the additional outdoor recreation ~ ~ities, additional school buildings and auditorium were evaluated. 110v~ j;he traffic analYSis concluded that traffic to be generated from the ~~ aster plan would not exceed establi,shed levels of service of impacted ~V~j road segments, and would comply with requirements of the Palm Beach ~~-~.ounty Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, traffic C~~ concurrency certification will be limited to an additional 382 trips ~~o 'per day and is subject to any comments from Palm Beach County. ~~~~water/sewer: The City's utility Department reviewed the proposed ~:~~~mendment and indicated that water and sewer capacities are availab~ ~ ~- to serve the minimal demands of the proposed recreation uses'~~i~ ~ However, they recommend that a fire flow test be conducted in order to determine if the flow requirement for institutional uses, 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm), can be met. In comparison, the fire flow ! requirement for residen~ial us~s is 500 ~pm; _I AlA A.... ~~ ~ )t!JjM; (-~e'~ ~ NY ~h~~L.l:~"-4_ wi ~ &)-"~ &>- r..---r-"',r-- " Solid Waste: The sblid ~ste Authority reviewed this request and does not object to the proposed amendment as ample capacity exists to serve the future solid waste collection and disposal needs generated on this site; Drainage: The analysis of the proposed amendment by the Lake Worth Drainage District indicated that the subject area is not within the service area of the Lake Worth Drainage District: and Recreation: Not applicable/No impact. 7.f. "Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning.lI; When the subject property was extracted from the cedar Ridge Estates PUD, the property became undevelopable as zoned, since there no longer existed a corresponding master plan (planned unit development zoning reqUires a master plan for zoning approval). Furthermore, the subject pron~l~rv became land-locked by loss of direct access to High Ridge Road as a result of the separation from the PUD master plan, with the intent that access would be provided through the school property, once assembled with it. 7.g. IIWhether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole. II With respect to scale, the proposed amendment and use are consistent with the existing and future use of adjacent properties. Furthermore, given the confined location of this property, its proximity to the adjacent railroad and I-95 rights-of-way, and since it represents only a minimal II unit decrease in planned housing units, the proposed .-3 ~.& [pv~ Memo No. 95-268 -6- ( ."/ f'l..J< S' ~ iVCz~ 1- ~fL~ UII'-.t (:I-LL.-!JA.~~ June 9, 1995 ~f ~~~/~. .~+~ ~ O--C~~,P~.. I 6) Consideration shall be giv#to redesign of the area, or ~ ,;,.., c~ reorientation of the future elementary school in order to avoid the necessity for children to cross the parking area in accessing other recreation facilities; 7) The site plan is deficient of many details or criteria as required in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review. A few of the deficiencies ind~cated by staff include utility easement locations, building elevations, indication of compliance with Handicap Code and fire separation requirements, and the lack of parking space counts and identification of parking facilities intended to serve all recreation elements, and particularly the pool and southern ball field; . tbJ~ _ 1o.~~JJ5:r"~..J:4-r~ ~) ~tion of the~dWay that~ dedicated to the publi~.4 with recordation of the 1983 plat of Cedar Ridge Estates, but now~ planned for school use shall be abandoned, and the ity of title ~~ process completed in order to properly assemble the . ting ~ school property with the subject property. These applica . ns and documents shall be submitted prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 9)~e agreements to be established between the develo~er of Cedar Ridge Estates and the Lake Worth Christian SchooljVwhich address drainage (the use by the School of the retention area within the PUD and determination that drainage capacity to serve the entire residential project will be maintained despite use of the retention area by the school) and maintenance access (for the school through Cedar Ridge Estates) shall be finalized for review by staff and the City Attorney prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 10) It is recommended that the subject property be replatted to vacate the blocks, lots, easements and public rights-of-way that were established by the 1983 Cedar Ridge Estates plat. At minimum, the abandonment of the public right-of-way referenced in comment 8 above shall be completed. 11) At time of site plan review, traffic shall be re-evaluated to determine whether additional traffic, above the 382 daily trips per day certified with this land use amendment and rezoning, will be generated based on the specifics of the site plan submittal. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that the applications submitted by J. Richard Harris and the Lake Worth Christian school Society, Inc., be approved, based on the OIIOWi)p~~ . 1. The proposed amendment and zoning woul be consiste~th~ Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies; 3. The proposed amendment would not be contrary to the established land use nNtrprn. nor would it create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, and nor would it constitute a grant of ~~:!~~;~~;lege to an individual property owner; -v,v~-1 4' .~ ~ ~- ~ The requested land use and zoning would be C$m~~b~ ~ ~:~.of utility systems, roadways, and other ~ if~ 2. 4. The proposed land use and zoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties and, would not affect the property values of adjacent or nearby properties; ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION MAP ATTACHMENT tlB" APPROVED, REVISED 1995 CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES PUD MASTER PLAN ,\. . LEGAL B.3 & B.4 cc: Development Planning 95-313 Utilities PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. Agenda Memorandum for July 5, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: carrie Parker City Manager ~ Tambri J. Heyden / Planning & Zoning irector FROM: DATE: June 29, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School (LUAR 95-002) ordinances for Future Land Use plan Amendment and Rezoning Please place the above-referenced items on the July 5, 1995 City Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, First Reading. DESCRIPTION: You will recall that 6.2 acres of the original Cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD) have been acquired by the Lake worth Christian school, who is now requesting that this property be reclassified and rezoned to Public and Private Governmental/Institutional and R-1AA (Single Family Residential), respectively. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that these Ordinances be approved; however, based on the following conditions: 1) acceptance of an abandonment application for the right-of-way remaining (from the PUD) on the subject property; 2) submission of agreements between the School and the developer of the PUD which address use of the drainage area within the PUD and specifically reservation of capacity to serve the build-out needs of the PUD, and maintenance access through the PUD for servicing the recreation area; and 3) showing unity of title through appropriate documentation. The applicant has consented to these conditions, and to submitting the respective documentation to the Planning and Zoning Department by July 7, 1995. TJH:mr Attachments OKLL1:LWCSOROI,AGM ~ .. " PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-268 TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Development Board' THRU: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director I)~ FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner DATE: June 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Request for Land Use Amendment/Rezoning INTRODUCTION J. Richard Harris, agent for the Lake Worth Christian school Society, Inc. is requesting that 6.4 acres of vacant property located adjacent to the south and east of the Lake Worth Christian School on High Ridge Road (see location map in Attachment "A") be rezoned and that the Future Land Use Plan designation be amended. The current land use and zoning on this property is Low Density Residential and PUD (Planned Unit Development), respectively. To prepare this property for use by the school, the applicant is requesting that the property be rezoned to R-1AA, Single Family Residential, and the Future Land Use Map designation be changed to Public & Private Governmental/Institutional. HISTORY In February of this year, a master plan modification was approved for the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD, located immediately south of the Lake Worth Christian School. Part of the master plan modification request included deletion of the subject property from the PUD (see approved master plan modification in Attachment liB"). Approval of the master plan modification was subject to rezoning of the subject property from PUD to an appropriate zoning district for assembling the property with the school property to the north for expansion of the school's facilities (see conceptual master plan for school expansion - Attachment "C"). The subject property was acquired at the beginning of the year by Condor Investments of Palm Beach County, Inc., owner of the school property and developer of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD and leased to Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc. This request will rezone and reclassify the SUbject property consistent with the remainder of the school property. LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Since this application meets the criteria necessary for processing as a small-scale amendment, the application will be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) follOWing the adoption of ordinances. This request will be transmitted to the DCA as an adopted comprehensive plan amendment, and will follow DCAls abbreviated review schedule. However, the amendment will not be official until approximately 15 days follOWing finding of compliance by the DCA. The entire review process (by DCA) will reqUire approximately five (5) months to complete. The follOWing analysis is provided pursuant to the city's code of ordinances (Part III-Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9), and FIc:-:.=.:. :;::; :.-:::. -::'~.l :;:-':;3P~Ct to the transmittal ana l-ev1ew of small-scale land use plan amendments. This analY8is will focus primarily on consistency with the City's comprehensive plan objectives, policies and text, and compatibility of the proposed amendment with adjacent properties. ADJACENT LAND USE AND ZONING The land use and zoning in the surrounding area varies and is presented in the table below (as the SUbject property is irregularly shaped, please refer to the location map for a thorough understanding of the location of the follOWing identified uses): Memo No. 95-268 -2- June 9, 1995 Direction North Use SAt Railroad right-of-way Zoning N/A East SAL Railroad and I-95 rights-of-way N/A South/Southwest Cedar Ridge Estates, planned single & multi-family units PUD West/Northwest Large-lot single family homes RS (County) ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO SEC. 9.C.7 OF CH. 2. LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS This section of the Land Development Regulations requires the evaluation of plan amendment/rezoning requests against criteria related to the impacts which would result from the approval of such requests. These criteria and an evaluation of the impacts which could result from development of the property are as follows: 7.a. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies.. .". Although the Future Land Use Plan is proposed to be amended, the request is generally consistent with comprehensive plan objectives and policies, in part, due to compatibility of the proposed land use classification with adjacent land uses. For example, Objective 1.17 below is typically referenced when residential uses are adjacent to, and potentially impacted by property proposed to be reclassified. Ob;ective 1.17 - "Minimize nuisances, hazards, and other adverse impacts. ..to residential environments by preventing or minimizing land use conflicts.1I In general, this proposed amendment represents the replacement of residentially classified property (for single family homes) located immediately adjacent to the S.A.L. Railroad right-of-way, with property classified as Public & Private Governmental/Institutional. The single family home portion of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD would become more protected from nuisances, hazards and negative impacts associated with adjacency to the railroad and I-95 rights-of-way by separation from these rights-of-way resulting from the school's recreation uses. Although several of these single family homes are on the periphery of revised pun boundary, and as a consequence of the amendment, would now be adjacent to active recreation facilities rather than other single family homes, the overall effect is a net positive change given the increased distance between single family lots and the railroad and 1-95 corridors. Most recreation uses are generally compatible with residential uses, and any potential nuisances or hazards anticipated from the active recreation facilities (e.g. noise, lighting, traffic, etc.) would be addressed/mitigated during the site plan review process. Lastly, although there are no Comprehen~i"Q l)'~1"\ =,,,,1i"'~e~ that specifically promote the provision of recreation facilities within private schools, this proposed expansion of the school's recreation facilities is consistent with the overall goal of the Recreation & Open Space Element, which is partially shown below. Goal #5 - "Provide adequate open space and recreational facilities and programs to meet the needs of present and future residents... ." The following additional objectives, policies, and issues addressed below are either typically referenced by the Florida DBpartment of Community Affairs (DCA), or required by them to be analyzed in the review of proposed amendments: . ~ ..., Memo No. 95-268 -3- June 9, 1995 Obiective 1.2 - "Coordinate future land uses with soil conditions so that urban land uses are prohibited in locations where it is not economical to remove or treat unsuitable soils.. ."; and Policv 1.2.1 - ".. .prohibit development of urban land uses where the removal or treatment of unsuitable soils would be uneconomical, provide that unstable soils shall be removed in all construction and land development sites where soils would affect the performance of infrastructure, drainage. ..". No extreme soil conditions are known to be characteristic of this property; however, this site is small and physically typical of adjacent, developed properties. Furthermore, policies such as those above will ensure the use of proper development techniques reviewed during the site plan process. Obiective 4.4 - "The City shall,.. .protect all remaining areas of substantial native upland and wetland vegetation and eliminate undesirable exotic tree species."; Policy 4.4.1 - ".. .the City shall require. ..a detailed flora and fauna survey on any "B or C" rated site...; and Policy 1.11.14 - ".. .provide for open space preservation by requiring the preservation of 25% of all "A", "B", and "C" rated sites...". These policies are not applicable as this property is not recognized by the comprehensive plan as having any environmentally sensitive characteristics preserved through application of comprehensive plan policies. Obiective 1.11 - ".. . future land uses shall include provisions for the protection of.. . archaeological resources and historic buildings...". The City's comprehensive plan requires that historical resources and archaeological sites be preserved and protected. However, the subject property is undeveloped and there are no archaeological amenities known to exist on this site. 7.b. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare; and 7.e. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent properties.". The proposed reclassification, rezoning, and use of the subject property would provide for the expansion of an eXisting use (the Lake Worth Christian School) which is consistent with the established land use pattern within the aTP~. ~~ wo" ~~ M~~~ the current and future uses of adjacent and nearby properties. Furthermore, in addition to being generally compatible with adjacent residential properties, the proposed use may be more preferable over residential use at this location, given the proximity of the property to .the S.A.L. Railroad and I-95 rights-of-way. 7.c. "Whether Changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable." If there are any changed conditions or circumstances which have motivated this request (and potentially make the reclassification and rezoning desirable or justified), they would include the modification to the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD master plan which included the Memo No. 95-268 -4- June 9, 1995 extraction of the subject property from the PUD, making it available to the Lake Worth Christian School. 7.d. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities." Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 9J-l1 also requires that the availability of public facilities be analyzed in connection with a proposed amendment to a comprehensive plan, and that the maximum potential demand upon public facilities be determined. The following facilities were analyzed in order to ensure that capacity is available: Roads: Although Palm Beach County has not completed its review of the traffic analysis, it appears that the traffic impact analysis reviewed not only use of the subject property, but traffic impact anticipated from the School's proposed master plan (as a site-specific rezoning). Since the study references 382 additional trips per day to be generated by a 350 student expansion of an elementary and middle school, it is unclear whether the additional outdoor recreation facilities, additional school buildings and auditorium were evaluated. The traffic analysis concluded that traffic to be generated from the master plan would not exceed established levels of service of impacted road segments, and would comply with requirements of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, traffic concurrency certification will be limited to an additional 382 trips per day and is subject to any comments from Palm Beach County. Water/Sewer: The.City's utility Department reviewed the proposed amendment and indicated that water and sewer capacities are available to serve the minimal demands of the proposed recreation uses. However, they recommend that a fire flow test be conducted in order to determine if the flow requirement for institutional uses, 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm), can be met. In comparison, the fire flow requirement for residential uses is 500 gpm; Solid Waste: The Solid Waste Authority reviewed this request and does not object to the proposed amendment as ample capacity exists to serve the future solid waste collection and disposal needs generated on this site; Drainage: The analysis of the proposed amendment by the Lake Worth Drainage District indicated that the subject area is not within the service area of the Lake Worth Drainage District; and Recreation: Not applicable/No impact. 7.f. "Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning."; When the subject property was extractetl from the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD, the property became undevelopable as zoned, since there no longer existed a corresponding master plan (planned unit development zoning reqUires a master plan for zoning approval). Furthermore, the subject property became land-locked by loss of direct access to High Ri~;~ Road as a result of the separation from the PUD master plan, with the intent that access would be prOVided through the school property, once assembled with it. 7.g. "Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole." With respect to scale, the proposed amendment and use are consistent with the existing and future use of adjacent properties. Furthermore, given the confined location of this property, its prox-imi ty to the adjacent railroad and 1-95 rights-of-way, and since it represents only a minimal 11 unit decrease in planned housing units, the proposed ~.., ~ ..., Memo No. 95-268 -5- June 9, 1995 amendment is arguably unrelated to the function of the city as a whole and the projected need for available housing units (since the amendment would reduce the land available for residential use). 7.h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. There are several zoning districts that allow schools as a permitted use. However, this request is for expansion of an adjacent school and not location of a new school site. Therefore, selection of vacant property adjacent to the school that is suitable for expansion of the school facilities is the relevant issue. Schools are ideally located and are encouraged in residential areas. The suggestion that a new school location is necessary in order for the school to expand is contrary to the objective of locating schools within residential areas. REVIEW OF "CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN" The Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc. plans for expansion include addition of an elementary school, an auditorium, and renovation and addition of recreation facilities. The acquisition of the subject property has advanced their plans, which are now in a conceptual master plan form. The Society included a copy of this conceptual master plan with the subject application for courtesy review by staff to identify and address any problems early in the school's expansion process and to better analyze with this rezoning any potential impacts upon the adjacent, planned residential development. The plan was also used to evaluate traffic impacts associated with the request. The conceptual master plan was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee and Joe Basil, the developer of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD. The more significant comments relative to emergency service/access, circulation, location of utilities, and impact on the planned residential community are itemized below. Complete comments will be generated at time of formal site plan submittal: 1) The southern ball field is oriented with those areas of the ball field which tend to generate the most noise, light and activity immediately adjacent to the planned single family homes of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD (it should be noted that although staff would suggest that the ball field be reoriented to maximize the distances between the planned homes and the active areas of the ball fields, Mr. Basil has indicated that the buyers of the adjacent lots intentionally selected those locations for their proximity to the recreation areas of the school, and redesign of the recreation facilities may consequently place less desirable elements adjacent to the residential development, and redirect ball field lighting toward the planned single family homes); 2) The swimming pool should be relocated in close proximity to the existing or planned road system in order to facilitate efficient emergency access; 3) Properly engineered design techniques which are both aesthetic and safe for the adjacent resinAnt.R wi" hQ necessary between the south ball field and residential community to address the Significantly higher elevation of this portion of the planned unit development; 4) If the ball fields are to be fenced in,ut1lity lines should be placed outside of the fenced areas to maximize accessibility to utility lines for maintenance needs, and to avoid unnecessary damage to ball fields when the lines must be accessed; 5) If sanitary sewer lines remain within fenced areas, consideration should be given to the use of a mo~e durable material than clay; Memo No. 95-268 -6- June 9, 1995 6) Consideration shall be give to redesign of the area, or reorientation of the future elementary school in order to avoid the necessity for children to cross the parking area in accessing other recreation facilities; 7) The site plan is deficient of many details or criteria as required in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review. A few of the deficiencies indicated by staff include utility easement locations, building elevations, indication of compliance with Handicap Code and fire separation requirements, and the lack of parking space counts and identification of parking facilities intended to serve all recreation elements, and particularly the pool and southern ball field; 8) That portion of the roadway that was dedicated to the public with recordation of the 1983 plat of Cedar Ridge Estates, but now planned for school use shall be abandoned, and the unity of title process completed in order to properly assemble the existing school property with the subject property. These applications and documents shall be submitted prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 9) The agreements to be established between the developer of Cedar Ridge Estates and the Lake Worth Christian School, which address drainage (the use by the School of the retention area within the PUD and determination that drainage capacity to serve the entire residential project will be maintained despite use of the retention area by the school) and maintenance access (for the school through Cedar Ridge Estates) shall be finalized for review by staff and the city Attorney prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 10) It is recommended that the subject property be replatted to vacate the blocks, lots, easements and public rights-of-way that were established by the 1983 Cedar Ridge Estates plat. At minimum, the abandonment of the public right-of-way referenced in comment 8 above shall be completed. 11) At time of site plan review, traffic shall be re-evaluated to determine whether additional traffic, above the 382 daily trips per day certified with this land use amendment and rezoning, will be generated based on the specifics of the site plan submittal. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that the applications submitted by J. Richard Harris and the Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc., be approved, based on the following: 1. The proposed amendment and zoning would be consistent with Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies; 2, The proposed amendment would not be contrary to the established land use pattern, nor would it create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, and nor would it constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner; 3. The requested land use and zoning would be compatible with capacities of utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities; 4. The proposed land use and zoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties and, would not affect the property values of adjacent ~r nearby properties; ~ ..., Memo No. 95-268 -7- June 9, 1995 5. The proposed land use and zoning are of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a wholei and 6. The proposed land use and zoning are consistent with the classification and zoning currently in place on the eXisting school site. 7. The proposed land use and zoning satisfy the February 1995 conditions of the Cedar Ridge Estates master plan modification approval. staff recommends that approval of these requests be conditioned upon compliance with any comments received from Palm Beach County regarding the traffic study, acceptance of the abandonment application and receipt of all agreements referenced in the staff comments abov.e, prior to formal adoption of the rezoning ordinance and incorporation of the staff comments listed above in the school's future site plan submittal. Note: Due to the applicant's request for two months postponement of this request and insufficient notice given to staff to readvertise this request for June 13th and 20th public hearings before the Planning and Development Board and City Commission, respectively, the applicant assumes all risk of any claim of improper notification. MISCVIII:LWC..~EP ATTACHMENT "All LOCATION MAP I ~ "'" A TT ACH~lENT "A" LOCATION MAP I I II .1' 1111 '. '. '. '. :. '. ~I ~: ~: ::: ~ -.: ~ .:. '0" ] ::: ~ .:~~ r- ::: :::: .... .... ~:~: N .0'.' \\t 00:.:. - ...... _ ClHII8IWI8CHOOL / " I / l/ Rmm::2:::1:j:~: .:. ~ ; ~t\1~~;;::;~:~:l~\\\~!~\;\1\j ~ '" , I ;~;~;~;~::~:"~ ~::t:::I~:~ I----i '" - r S ':':':':':'I'~: 'r--... .. :.;.:.:.:.:: ...........;..... ~ .. i .:.:.:.:.:. ~.:. ~~..~.. ~~~ uu: If ~ u ~ II'i =~~~ - . l.-- L!I I lilt l- \[;QHm \I I I I H~ . LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL REZONING ATTACHMENT "B" APPROVED, REVISED 1995 CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES PUD MASTER PLAN .. " .(l ~ 'WI ..' .;1 , -tl--------.-----:l"'- , ---- . ;S - '1-- I ~I~~_~'::~~_ ~~ _ _ _ _}-I~__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._ _ _ . __ , ,- ~ IrT~- Ilf' I · r:\ . I I ~ . - - -~., - I I ': ! '), ~ 1::;\ I t;\ G I i~11 ~ <:) :~'::: - ,.' '1;1, I~ ! ~ I~, I........' ~!!'--.a. l[)~ <l~;: -:: : U, ~ ' ~f. G ,F' : ' I ~ Gll <9 .=t' ~~ -<:r - I '1', ft J- - .. _. " -~---~1 I ~- -. ,,1'-' ,; I ..... '" /- _ C- - J.t-- _ _.. .. -h\LG J, I, <<, G> ....,.,./ /;_-- _ :..A. I . -- -. \11-: -' 'L. .,1 ; .. ,.' '')- _'.;:;-- _-,-.-- I , (j) 'I~ .--. 8~ -:~~- I~:.~: :1': ~:' .: ~ <3'~': /,~~;~--~ -@)~,.~ '--: <3 "'. "1 1-.. . ,J. ~" ,II ~ " . .. / . I,.. r.-. I "" . , j . --"\ '-- 0 '. ~ dj"'''. '. ..:J" - " \!I I 'J. ' -'''-'' - ,,- - ,~' I .."- ---1 --d.c:::._;;::" .... 0 I . ' , "....."_',_' '.. .---- - ..-" ' .. L ~ .J _ _ _ _ , .. '-:E -~.O!l ....-:_- ~_...~~,...~ ,:" ,,- 1- - -. - - J" . " ..- I' ..",: . ~' , ......~........-.-.. . -"',' I I :l..l.: . . ,- """~'1f'-' --. ---- -I.. '....." ~ I I 1 I - \:__-7'1~ I~I:;1.~:;::r-.~-. .~ (t-- ~-U' i'" ~,~,,~ @I@I@:@,"I --.---~f~. ''');~..,:~..~=-~llrr;;f f. ~'. .rt"l:-U'~ . ;' .~ ..\\\ I I ,;_ ~ @', . " -.a.-sa"" -~ - .. "I !ll' p-" ":~!~i:: " "" 'l'~'--r- -~--.. ..J.__~~~, I tfJ(!t] 1- ,- -.t ,.....-. -- -I~ - Ir - :zJ'1'.'::-" . J;, _t== t:~..u:o::=:_:- .~ _.. 1 r. ~'~'~~~.: =~~~I~::: :p: . i~ '-,-hl' ''-li; : (=-!' ::--':=:==::..:::::::~./ ~I i ' ~ '- - -: ,~. --'1. ~ I' '. ::1" 'i',..- , ".'i; · ", r~, '. --.- :I: -r" , -.... ".' '11 6f .',:)\ l: ~ : ~ : ::-:. ". ~ -'~~:-:'::""iI :) ~: ~ I: (g ~ (y)@I<:1)i" I lSl~, ..~ t...: ==.:==-~m:i_~=_.. ! \ ~" I' I 1 t I: - ~Ii - - - :J ~~r.u-- =~':~'_ II "! I .. ~ .' -" · --. 1-'--- -- ~ -.~-.:t-"" JI' ..' _ __ _ . __ .. _ _ .. _ '. ~. I '--=-=--.,7 ~ --7 ;-. .,....,-- ., .,-..., ,.. ,', I i I ~ I ~ 'II 4// ,..:: [ I . d f;:S' /. ':/'G .~.~ ~~{~~.;:~: ~ '/1 \~O:~ ~~ (i> (~<w : I ~ 1'/ . I,! ' ~ '. ~l\ .. .. I I - ,- -, - - -"'- ,I 1 \tV II I " J. · (;It I [. '!~. - '. - f _ _ b · . ..y;:. - 'l- .' " 1 \ I . t _ :._~ ) or. .':l~ ., c "I, : , .' .. __ . __ .., _'. :..:.:..., ; - "- /lDi" /' .~:,~:-it..!...,,:-=.:Z; ,;;, " ,,' 'l , /'"' "' -- --. --~ -:; <ID ~ l' '1) r-" -..,... =, "'...,.... " _ ". I '/ '. .. I . " <~'''' 4',.,. , _. I , " .. ~, <i:. ~'..<'i..':;j~...-:"=;., i ___ ._...: . -'~! --;rJ.: .:. ~..;,." ,"," .~. :"/~7! ,~',it~~ tl~[ -.- , --. - -- ! 'D /' ~.. .' -' . - - " "~"'''' 'I III ~~ I : ..-- - - 'I' ."(. c;j 1 I I j:-':fF.~.'[i~ .:- , I .. ~!!'-,~...-~ I ' ' ~ .. ii' _ \. ., fliifll' ,- 18 . --- . _ . _ ..~ I '1.'.I.~ ~t . II' I t':1 ~,: ~ I ' I ... I : I , :Idl". 'D I ~ '. : , J ' J ~ ". ~" I'~'- ,. ",. . ft , }(l I I'''f\ t: k'i II IPI ~! / 11 . ' , . ; 11 "'1 II . n ~ , : 'Ii::' 'r~'~l' ,:',' 1 1" I'll /.'; _ ',! I :: ".. .. : I' 1.. l . ,,,. .' .. L I"'.' - '~""-""'''''''''',:~:::. ... ... . ___. "' ___. .___ _ __ _____.___ , ,: ~~; '~.~:~.: ~~;:, :~'...::.:.:. ':'- :.--.~.::, :.,~ -q?: ,f,- -- - -- ....."."-L....___ ,I · ..-90.0;:: -... '" ~- - "- i~~ '. - --l r ~~d :;- -- -.. __"""~ ___" _.. -1! . I, -~. ~ 1,1 !hhl/I'I I!" II. J I'I ;:,~!nli :Wi ,i jll1Ifl"lilh;!1 ~!!lffiIW'1111' , I ~ I; '. ;; ,... ....If ~. J f ll~ II] :t ~ :~ ! r f IIJ"~illf!ffl'I!IIllP,I!' II I. f S IS ~ "." p. ~I "51'1 .~, ~ iI. , 'f..,...... - " " r.' I I j' " ; I I' Il" '. . , } , ..L I ~ ,. " ll.... i ~ I " II jll i III l. I ~ ~JI!!.,1i"fii .... ."., · I . . =, . : ifl ,I liB ~ -II; ji4&t;: !...., I I, I : < 'I 1II1l1.."....1. , J lI!fP'1II I CEDAR RIDGE DE~2.f o in) ) III ill PREPARED FOR JOE BASILE SOUTH -a -:: ; E J ! f I I" ~ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH. flORIDA ~ __,~ ATTACHMENT "C" PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SCHOOL MASTER PLAN - .- - - -- - - -- - - - ~- - - - - - - :- - -- -- - .......", - - - -. - -. - - - - - - - - .- o~o~ a~OIC:i H~IH ----_._._--_._-------------~-_.-_._- ._--- .*:,. - r -- -~-_.- - -'-.-.~.---'--'~'-I-.-'-'-.-.-'T' i i ~ ~ i ! ; i ! Ii! ; i ! Ii! - ; i I I r' '-'-'-'-'-'-1 /' .... " . ~ i !! ,_i 1 , /' ..... . 0\ I !!;',,! ~ ~~ \. L.- __.-!..._,_,_.I_._,_,...L,.--II '~,_._._._I ~ '"",' ~- RBCWOOC COURT " i ~ !- /' "." 1 / !!!."" i j / / \/ :: \ '" I lOt n fill ~ \.... I t" "hi :\ ____~,., . -,/!.j'T.-.-'~.-,-,-,~.-.-.-.-.-._:_~ 1 1 ~ - - - - - .... ,,/"! ! ! i // i r-~U-- , \./ I I I 'i / I' , " , ' ' . . / \. ~\ '\ ~ ! ! ! ./ i \ \ "'-,! ! ! . _I.... ,/ i '\ ~_L_-'___'~EJ\ ! FEPPERWOOC COURT -, -' -' -'-t r:' I. o : I ~fiPI ~fJr'III'!-IITjf'~llr-<" i O I I 1-' -, .... I! ! I ' , In I J t :' .'",' ~ I I ~ z. , . ~"'] i (31 i!:ii · i EJd5J J!'j~ i! ".! ~:J Z i ~! il:H ~ j ;~:!~H:~ Ir:!. ill! ", ! 1)> 'iml ...aJJ 1.,.....1.....1,. ~'l ~ .~ " 1 I(J); ~H;-r'nl !\:. '~r- .. ,-~. r1'-'-'-'-'-'-'~/. ;111 If\ \I ! !-II !~I~i ~ H i!f U~ i1~j~' i ./! I \ 1 ~ III I " I d I fjif 1 f: i l n i / / i II rill 11 !: gi'l' ~H:j ~i 'i" L // ! J t> ~ ~ I i 10 · . -I IL'_'-'f'~-'~' ....'<\ i II l J> ' MAPL.EWOOC C~T -,-,_._,- I . ,. , - ;"'-'-'r'-'-'T'-'~ <' r ~!! ~'u ! ! 'T'.;' "', 0 ~~ ~~ !'I' I 113 I I I "" ,~~ ";-f 2Y n iC " , ~t= ~--LiJ1J: i,\ ~.>,_,L_,L__L__--i~::" ~!g ! I ~ <v> --cd ~-~ t~~ I i i ~ i IIII [I 'III T-r-------- -1 ". CWrp= _'_'_'_'_ .,) I!G I ;..d II' ! I' 1111 II- ~.JI ! ~!~II " I ~ -r-- '-'-'-'-'-'--'-'-' , '1 . I' -.. - - :, ~~ I -; n [1 I I PIJIUI ! , .1 I, ii' ~~_/ I - I I i ,i ~ ~ .I' j I "i / ~ 'Iil . I / l.. I J ! \;I I I I j - - .J ; ---_.,.. .__, I I L.-.Ji 1:1 I "I:----i-- I! ,',,0. / / J- '-- j.J ://'1' ~I' __ <// l~. _. ~. _~t_ ,_ ,_, ~~:::,:,~~~ ~_ ,_. _, ~', J_~1, _~;_,~: ~.~~'"'.,,_ ,_,_ ,_,_ Iii 1J ~ I I ~ r . ~ ~ I I I &.6ICII ~ ~ IGtoIO& " .. ~ ... p, " I I ., I Ii ~ Ii J .,.., WIdH .ICCIII"".~.~ ~ .. ~ .. I 00 "',,' "';~'~"""jo'.." J 0 ~ f ~ BRYAN;"; ASSiJ .' ES D .... IT. C .. , "L "..r:;I~T.I" C f __..u:_.__ -:-_I\~ J'. ...".. . . ~.:.... " t..,' " ;'., '~'~ 3:~:;~~:}1;:"'::,~' ,.' .' '. .:.:";.1., : . ._~.wM Ii .tii ....... ,; 1IJMZ .- "';"-: .~ .~:'1IJ~~.-=~ ~ ~. :........, _,..... IICT1III ..... :.~ .tf':~~~II.".., .' .. . ,.. PUBLIC HEARING B cc: Plan, Devel PLANNING AND ZONING DEPART MEMORANDUM NO. 95-271 Agenda Memorandum for June 20, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. HeYden~~ Planning and Zoning Director DATE: June 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning The above-referenced request has been tabled by the City Commission since April 18, 1995. It is ready to come off the table at the June 20, 1995 City Commission meeting as a public hearing item. DESCRIPTION: This is a request submitted by the Lake Worth Christian School to amend the future land use map of the comprehensive plan from Low Density Residential to Public and Governmental/Institutional and rezoning from ~Planned Unit Development (PUD) to R-1AA, Single Family Residential for 6.4 acres within the northeast corner of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD located on High Ridge Road. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote, recommended approval of this request subject to the recommendations stated in the attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-268 (compliance with any forthcoming traffic comments received from Palm Beach County; acceptance of an abandonment application; receipt of agreements concerning drainage, access and unity of title prior to formal adoption of ordinances and incorporation of the staff comments outlined in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-268 into the school's future site plan submittal). TJH:dim Attachment &:CC~lI.nM..Cllr ,.., 'WI PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-268 TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Development Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director II~ FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner DATE: June 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Request for Land Use Amendment/Rezoning INTRODUCTION J. Richard Harris, agent for the Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc. is requesting that 6.4 acres of vacant property located adjacent to the south and east of the Lake Worth Christian School on High Ridge Road see oc ~ zoned and that the Future Land Use Plan designation be amended. The curr land use and zoning on this property is Low Density Residential and PUD (Planned Unit".~~velopment), respectively. To prepare this property for use by the~nool, the applicant is requesting that the property e rezoned to R-1AA, Single Family Residential, and the Future Lan Use Map designation be changed to Public & Private Governmenta ~I~stitutional. tAJ.~ ~ G.4. ~4 ~I~ HISTORY ~ In February of this year, a master plan modification was approved for the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD, located immediately south of the Lake Worth Christian School. par~ ~;,~~~:m~~r plan modification request included deletion of the sub1gct~~~e~~f from the PUD (see approved master plan modification in Attachment "B"). Approval of the master plan modification was subject to rezoning of the subject property from PUD to an appropriate zoning district for assembling the property with the school property to the north for expansion of the school's facilities (see conceptual master plan for school expansion - Attachment "CII). The subject property was acquired at the beginning of the year by Condor Investments of Palm Beach County, Inc., owner of the school property and developer of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD and leased to Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc. This request will rezone and reclassify the subject property consistent with the remainder of the school property. LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Since this application meets the criteria necessary for processing as a small-scale amendment, the application will be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) following the adoption of ordinances. This request will be transmitted to the DCA as an adopted comprehensive plan amendment, and will follow DCA's abbreviated review schedule. However, the amendment will not be official until approximately 15 days following finding of compliance by the DCA. The entire review process (by DCA) will require approximately five (5) months to complete. The following analysis is provided pursuant to the city's code of ordinances (Part III-Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9), and Florida law with respect to the tran~~it~~~ ~~= ~2~i~~ of small-scale land use plan amendments. This analysis will focus primarily on consistency with the city's comprehensive plan objectives, policies and text, and compatibility of the proposed amendment with adjacent properties. ADJACENT LAND USE AND ZONING The land use and zoning in the surrounding area varies and is presented in the table below (as the subject property is irregularly shaped, please refer to the location map for a thorough understanding of the location of the following identified uses): Memo No. 95-268 -2- June 9, 1995 Direction North Use SAL Railroad right-of-way Zoning N/A East SAL Railroad and I-95 rights-of-way N/A South/Southwest Cedar Ridge Estates, planned single & multi-family units PUD West/Northwest Large-lot single family homes RS (County) ~. · ~ ~~~ii1II~~ ANALYSIS ~ TO SEC. 9.C.7 OF CH. 2. LAND DEVELO~LATIONS This section of the Land Development Regulations requires the evaluation of plan amendment/rezoning requests against criteria related to the impacts which would result from the approval of such requests. These criteria and an evaluation of the impacts which could re_~!~~~v~e~~}llt.property are as follows: -rk ~.s~'whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies.. .". Although the Future Land Use Plan is proposed to be amended, the request is generally consistent with comprehensive plan objectives and policies, in part, due to compatibility of the proposed land use classification with adjacent land uses. For example, Objective 1.17 below is typically referenced when residential uses are adjacent to, and potentially impact. ed 9,Y pro~~.rtl proposed to be r. e.cI~.~!fied. Jk~4~.IJ~~PiA~'~ Obi ecti ve 1.17,..., "M~nimize nuisance'Sl? tiJzards, ~and other adverse impacts. ..to residential environments by preventing or minimizing land use conflicts." In general, this proposed amendment represents the replacement of residentially classified property (for single family homes) located immediately adjacent to the S.A.L. Railroad right-of-way, with property classified as Public & Private Governmental/Institutional. ~ The single family home portion of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD would become more protected from nuisances, hazards and negative impacts associated with adjacency to the railroad and I-95 rights-of-way by separation from these rights-of-way resulting from the school's recreation uses. Although several of these single family homes are on the periphery of revised PUD boundary, and as a consequence of the amendment, would now be adjacent to active recreation facilities rather than other single family homes, the overall effect is a net positive change given the increased distance between single family lots and the railroad and I-95 corridors. Most recreation uses are generally compatible with residential uses, and any potential nuisances or hazards anticipated from the active recreation facilities ~. . (e..g. nOisei:. lighting, traffic, etc.) would be addressed/mitigated ~. ring~~~~!.it~ ~lan ~ev~ew process. l>1' ~----~! ~~sPn-.. Lastly, although there are no Comprehensive Plan policies that specifically promote the provision of recreation facilities within private schools, this proposed expansion of the school's recreation facilities is consistent with the overall goal of the Recreation & Open Space Element, which is partially shown below. Goal #5 - "Provide adequate open space and recreational facilities and programs to meet the needs of present and future residents... ." The following additional objectives, policies, and issues addressed below are either typically referenced by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), or required by them to be analyzed in the review of proposed amendments: ~ ...", Memo No. 95-268 -3- June 9, 1995 Obiective 1.2 - "Coordinate future land uses with soil conditions so that urban land uses are prohibited in locations where it is not economical to remove or treat unsuitable soils.. ."; and policv 1.2.1 - ".. .prohibit development of urban land uses where the removal or treatment of unsuitable soils would be uneconomical, provide that unstable soils shall be removed in all construction and land development sites where soils would affect the performance of infrastructure, drainage. ..11. No extreme soil conditions are known to be characteristic of this property; however, this site is small and physically typical of adjacent, developed properties. Furthermore, policies such as those above will ensure the use of proper development techniques reviewed during the site plan process. Obiective 4.4 - "The city shall,.. .protect all remaining areas of substantial native upland and wetland vegetation and eliminate undesirable exotic tree species."; Policy 4.4.1 - ".. .the city shall require...a detailed flora and fauna survey on any liB or CII rated site...; and Policy 1.11.14 - ".. .provide for open space preservation by requiring the preservation of 25% of all IIAII, liB", and "CII rated sites. ..". These policies are not applicable as this property is not recognized by the comprehensive plan as having any environmentally sensitive characteristics preserved through application of comprehensive plan policies. Obiective 1.11 - ".. . future land uses shall include provisions for the protection of.. . archaeological resources and historic buildings...II. The city's comprehensive plan requires that historical resources and archaeological sites be preserved and protected. However, the subject property is undeveloped and there are no archaeological amenities known to exist on this site. /1:, \y 0 . e~~~'~. b. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the .\~- /yJ{\ established land use pattern, or would create an isolated L,~~r 6~1 v district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would n~~oJvl- constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property ~t owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare; and ~.. 7.e. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent properties.". ~ ;5 The proposed reclassifica~Oning, and use of the subject property would provide for the expansion of an existing use (the Lake Worth Christian School) which i-s cOl1o:sist~uL with 'tile Q&t.blished laBd- _t1c::e ElatLffn within the area, as well as with the current and fl.t~~;: uses of adjacent and nearby pro~~ties. Furthermore, in additio~ to being generally compatible with jacent residential properties~ the proposed use may be more preferable over residential use at this location, given the proximity of the property to the S.A.L. Railroad and I-95 rights-of-way. 7.c. IIWhether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable." If there are any changed conditions or circumstances which have motivated this request (and potentially make the reclassification and rezoning desirable or justified), they would include the modification to the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD master plan which included the Memo No. 95-268 -4- June 9, 1995 extraction of the subject property from the PUD, making it available to the Lake Worth Christian school. ~7.d. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatibiihwith utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities." Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 9J-11 also requires that the availability of public facilities be analyzed in connection with a proposed amendment to a comprehensive plan, and that the maximum potential demand upon public facilities be determined. The following facilities were analyzed in order to ensure that capacity is avail able,: , /J.. ....Hr. -.. t _ -.L.. ~~ fUO. ,/). ~ . ~ ~.Jj(IUlI.. 3e ~r- TV ~ Roads: Although Palm Beach countyHras not completed its review of the traffic analysis, it appears that the traffic impact analysis reviewed not only use of the subject property, but traffic impact anticipated from the School's proposed master plan (as a site-speci~}1: rezoning). Since the study references 382 additional trips per da~fO be generated by a 350 student expansion of an elementary and middle schoo~ it is unclear whether the additional outdoor recreation ~ ~ities, additional school buildings and auditorium were evaluated. 110Vr. j;he traffic analysis concluded that traffic to be generated from the ~~ aster plan would not exceed establi,shed levels of service of impacted ~V~j ~oad segments, and would comply with requirements of the Palm Beach ~~-~.ounty Traffic Performance Standards ordinance. Therefore, traffic C~~ concurrency certification will be limited to an additional 382 trips ~~Q ~per day and is subject to any comments from Palm Beach County. ~o~~~~water/sewer: The City's utility Department reviewed the proposed ~~~mendment and indicated that water and sewer capacities are availab~~ ~^~~- to serve the minimal demands of the proposed recreation uses. ~~~~ ~ However, they recommend that a fire flow test be conducted in order to determine if the flow requirement for institutional uses, 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm), can be met. In comparison, the fire flow I requirement for residen~ial us~s is 500 9pm;.1 A?AAL -~~ Zi~ l-~e.~ ll-V-... NY (~~~{'y^-4_ w/ ~ iY7--.vU.- &--- "---r-""~ v Solid Waste: The-s6lid ~ste Authority reviewed this request and does not object to the proposed amendment as ample capacity exists to serve the future solid waste collection and disposal needs generated on this site; Drainage: The analysis of the proposed amendment by the Lake Worth Drainage District indicated that the subject area is not within the service area of the Lake Worth Drainage District; and Recreation: Not applicable/No impact. 7.f. "Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning."; When the subject property was extracted from the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD, the property became undevelopable as zoned, since there no longer existed a corresponding master plan (planned unit development zoning requires a master plan for zoning approval). Furthermore, the subject oron~l-rv became land-locked by loss of direct access to High Ridge Road as a result of the separation from the PUD master plan, with the intent that access would be provided through the school property, once assembled with it. 7.g. "Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole." With respect to scale, the proposed amendment and use are consistent with the existing and future use of adjacent properties. Furthermore, given the confined location of this property, its proximity to the adjacent railroad and 1-95 rights-of-way, and since it represents only a minimal 11 unit decrease in planned housing units, the proposed W' "WI Memo No. 95-268 -5- June 9, 1995 amendment is arguably unrelated to the function of the city as a whole and the projected need for available housing units (since the amendment would reduce the land available for residential use). 7.h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. There are several zoning districts that allow schools as a permitted use. However, this request is for expansion of an adjacent school and not location of a new school site. Therefore, selection of vacant property adjacent to the school that is suitable for expansion of the school facilities is the relevant issue. Schools are ideally located and are encouraged in residential areas. The suggestion that a new school location is necessary in order for the school to expand is contrary to the objective of locating schools within residential :::::~ OE "CONCEPTUAl, MASnR ~l.AN" ~~ o/l /L ~~;:!: The Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc.6tl~;~sion ~~ . 1 include addition of an elementary school, an auditorium, and ~. ~~ renovation and addition of recreation facilities. The acquisition Of~ the subject property has advanced their plans, which are now in a ~~u conceptual master plan form. The Society included a copy of this ~~~ conceptual master plan with the subject application for courtesy ~~ review by staff to identify and address any problems early in the j, ~ school's expansion process and to better analyze with this rezoning ~ any potential impacts upon the adjacent, planned residential I( development. The plan was also used to evaluate traffic impacts ~ associated with the request. ~~ The conceptual master plan was reviewed by the Technical Review ~~ Committee and Joe Basil, the developer of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD. ~ The more significant comments relative to emergency service/access, circulation, location of utilities, and impact on the planned residential community are itemized below. Complete comments will be generated at time of formal site plan submittal: 1) The southern ball field is oriented with those areas of the ball field which tend to generate the most noise, light and activity immediately adjacent to the planned single family homes " ~ of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD (it should be noted that although ~ f staff would suggest that the ball field be reoriented to maximize r !~~,~ the distances between the planned homes and the active areas of ~~ ~ the ball fields, Mr. Basil has indicated that the buyers of the ~~~J .~adjacent lots intentionally selected those locations for their (~ .FI ~C~LI proximity to the recreation areas of the school, and redesign of ~ C \ the recreation facilities may consequently place less desirable _J~\~ ;t4 elements adjacent to the residential development, and redirect (~~~~ ~~ ball field lighting toward the planned single family homes); l ) 2) The sWimming pool should be relocated in close proximity to the existing or planned road system in order to facilitate efficient emergency access; (}r...L ~ 3) Properly engineered design techniques which are both .' ~~ aesthetic and safe for the adjacent residents will be necessary .~~ ~. between the south ball field and residential community to address ~~. the significantly higher elevation of this portion of the planned VJ: V->t:'~ unit development; ~~~~~ 4) If the ball fields are to be fenced in, utility lines should ~ ~ be placed outside of the fenced areas to maximize accessibility i A~ to utility lines for maintenance needs, and to avoid unnecessary ~v- ~JI~G)damage to ball fields when the lines must be accessed; A' ~ '.~ \tv _./~) If sanitary sewer lines remain wi thin fenced areas, I)j~ ~~{~ consideration should be given to the use of a more durable ~J~~an clay; ~ ' ~\Y- IS Memo No. 95-268 ,,,..If ,-,r& [p;~ -6- June 9, 1995 ( - 1 /V<' S' ~ iVCJ.~ 1- ~ft-l UFl'.....t CI"'L:tJA-,-<~ . / ()~ 6-X~ +~ ~. -J(~ ~ O-C~c.. /L., ' 6) consideration shall be 9iv#to redesign of the area, or~7'-'C~ reorientation of the future elementary school in order to avoid the necessity for children to cross the parking area in accessing other recreation facilitiesj 7) The site plan is deficient of many details or criteria as required in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review. A few of the deficiencies indicated by staff include utility easement locations, building elevations, indication of compliance with Handicap Code and fire separation requirements, and the lack of parking space counts and identification of parking facilities intended to serve all recreation elements, and particularly the pool and southern ball fieldj . ~~ _ -Io.~~J-:x,~~-r~ ~) ~tion of the~dWay that~ dedicated to the public ~ with recordation of the 1983 plat of Cedar Ridge Estates, but now~ planned for school use shall be abandoned, and the ity of title ~ process completed in order to properly assemble the . ting ~ school property with the subject property. These applica . ns .~_~ and documents shall be submitted prior to adoption of the 1 rezoning ordinance; 9)~e agreements to be established between the develo~er of Cedar Ridge Estates and the Lake Worth Christian schooljVwhich address drainage (the use by the School of the retention area within the PUD and determination that drainage capacity to serve the entire residential project will be maintained despite use of the retention area by the school) and maintenance access (for the school through Cedar Ridge Estates) shall be finalized for review by staff and the City Attorney prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 10) It is recommended that the subject property be replatted to vacate the blocks, lots, easements and public rights-of-way that were established by the 1983 Cedar Ridge Estates plat. At minimum, the abandonment of the public right-of-way referenced in comment 8 above shall be completed. 11) At time of site plan review, traffic shall be re-evaluated to determine whether additional traffic, above the 382 daily trips per day certified with this land use amendment and rezoning, will be generated based on the specifics of the site plan submittal. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that the applications submitted by J. Richard Harris and the Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc., be approved, based on the OIIOWi~~ 1. The proposed amendment and zoning woul be consiste~th~ Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies; 2. 3. 4 . The proposed amendment would not be contrary to the established land use n~rrprn. nor would it create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, and nor would it constitute a grant of ~~:!~~;~~;lege t9 an individual property owner; -VTV~4 4 .~ ~ ~ ~ The requested land use and zoning would be ~~b~ ~ ~~.Of utility systems, roadways, and other ~ v~ The proposed land use and zoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties and, would not affect the property values of adjacent or nearby propertiesj Wi "WI Memo No. 95-268 -7- June 9, 1995 5. The proposed land use and zoning are of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole; and 6. The proposed land use and zoning are consistent with the classification and zoning currently in place on the existing school site. --I'-L,-r;~)- #t.4;ft\'+- 7. The proposed land use and zoning satisf~the February 1995 conditions of the Cedar Ridge Estates maste.rrPfan modification approval.:~tr1r;L~ 1).f1~~'-:jb ~1_aff_:r..ir~l1dl::i t~ t approval of these requests be conditioned upon compliance with any comments received from Palm Beach County regarding the traffic study, acceptance of the abandonment application and receipt of all agreements referenced in the staff comments d5i.8, prior to formal adoptiou-,of t~e ~e~f~~q ordinance and incorporation of the staff comments l~~~~~~~ 1 he school's future site plan submittal. Note: Due to the applicant's request for two months postponement of this request and insufficient notice given to staff to readvertise this request for June 13th and 20th public hearings before the Planning and Development Board and City Commission, respectively, the applicant assumes all risk of any claim of improper notification. MISCVIII:LWCS,!EP ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION MAP I .. ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION MAP '11111 I I I :: '. .: :: .: '. .~ I '. .:: :C: .;: ~ :.: ~ .'. ::: ~ ::: '.' ~ ::: !iii .:. .:.: :::: .... :::" :~~\\ J~~l ...... waRl1f___lICHOCJ&. / " I 7 '\1/ :1,,:'::::~:m~lmil:~:~:~: : - (& ~ ;~;t;J~I~:;:~~;~;~~~;;;;; It , ! ':':':':':'::l;ll:...~ " '-- ~ ~ ::~::::.. ::::::::::::::::: 'r---:; .. ...........: ~ 'J .. 1 ::::::::=::.,:.:. .=:=:=:::=:::=:::: ..., uu: ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ,-. " '--- U 11 I II IT \- \[;g~ I I I 111 -H ~ LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL REZONING ATTACHMENT "B" APPROVED, REVISED 1995 CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES PUD MASTER PLAN .~t / .. ..., m I I ! I I r =", .... .. ..' 'ffl : !li~ r- ~ ~ r iil . / -;I 1 Ii -------.-----:1''''- . ' --~~ . --. ~... -.~ 'I =.-:-:- -=~'Go_~.~~_ ''''-->';:. ---,- - -r'~-- , _ , _ , _ , :- _ _ , -: 6' ~ :,::!';, -. : lo,i ! 'I,' G: G, G: IG:jJ.,.~__ (() = - - ~:' 1:= - - :., ~. ~1' 11. G' --- "I ~ ;I tr'\_ . - -:::tl: '-:: - - ~II:..,~ 11 .'~.~-. '. I I /~...~ \!I : IV - - . .=t.; -=- -Gf - I -1' 'II .,- - '- -: . ': . --~----L..-.Lf-:::. , " ----.-15 .::;' or - - I I I~. '.. ,. ~ _::==~_ -.:..) _ _ _ ,- .. '_)1U:~ 1'1..1. G "<"'. . /' /;';:..---::-- __ ~. I -- ..... --' ',. '. ". ..,. "'';;- -,-- I <i> 'I 10'- -' -=<. ,I: -- . ,~;,'; I . ~~ . ; . :<' .k-7- I I I' " I_ 'I;{ -:: : ~~:i 'S" ," : jj;3 I.,' (l ,.; //.> I @ I @ I 0 " :1 1 ---. .. 0 0 '-. ~ I '. , .'- - .. - .I @ I J . -...-.. .... 0 o' ;:::. '-I ... "'-:ij"i~;::.==__2;::::_ ..... I I , . ., - ;.. '-1' :f":._'''_1 .-.--.....~-...,.,.. L -f J ___ I: .. ,'~ --,' .',<-- ._-'~,.'" ~ ,- -- - -- - " ' .' .-~, .... ,<. '.'l:~.....-.-. , -=~" I, -_.._-~' .- ", r JhI · -.'~ '.~: ." , ..:.-... @ '. -a.--.'\.. ~: - .. .. 'II ! l!J ;... . . ":~!~i::, "'. 't.-- - +--.. -l.__~~~. I ~J I 1-.. -:iJ J'-=' -- -'IJi 1- /,' - :D'IJ'.':-', . J:, t=:E~=:_;- .~ _.. 1 ~ ~ij"~' - :.:ttiC:.~:: :10: , F. .' -Tit;':' - .: Iii '(=-,' ::::;=====:':..::_:::::.' ~'I I .- - --~ r-- - .J' : /:.... ,-.~)!,,!. . II i ' I. \0.' ..~ ' :! - - - - ~ '+-= - - L :1' .......: , J'~ . _ _ -:- _ , _ I I I'll '. --,- 0 :c ,:<I 0 -. '. 'I , , tif I'~~:.::::.;to', ~~:-:'''"' 'i $' ~ /' ~! <lll @I (:!l i" I l~. ..::;:; ','-,-~ ,*=_ I , L...-J", I " . ~ _:.Ii - - - ~ - "iii:-I"oitr-- =~~ ~'. II :' I I _ I .. lI( .' ~ L · --. ,....--...- -...... -.~-=t-~.: II . ..t 0 __ _ _ _0 . _ _ __ _ I ~'" '--j-:-7'; . fIC' - ~ j -- 7,-'-- .. " ,',' >~ _ ~"'..:' :...._ ,(.. I " ,II I 1111(,/ .'.:!~ I , ~ r;:s':' ':":~{~~':~~:-",I I~Gl.1 (j> ~ (~ I f ~ I /,.. - ,.:. -I -'....; 1..., '. G [::;) ~', S) ~ 'Ii · I · i 'I -. I I ~ ~..... __ _ .. ',' I ~. ,II ![, .! 01~", , .. -,1--. _~~=_~~_~ :~ '~. -.J. 1.. \\ 1,- :, -.J, , . -. . -. I -- --. -.. --.,." J I" " -.'- ""! ~ . ~:., ., '.::r..J, . _ . _ _ _ ..__--..." '-./ ' " -'.:: :...._~::-::.~:;-'; ~":..... 10 CJ' I C -.~ (i:i'\ ~ IS' f\.' -.,-. . =- ~.. -. :-.... - I I \QI I' · * r-'" '... c:.""o,~",,: "~'-'~. : _ I ~ ~ IU)~' 1[_ "] 'iJ ':"!'<~~;;;", ',~ ~ I~) ':9 I t!bo _ ~ ".~._. <' ,.. , , -"~'! '. <i. . '. ".~;7;~'~;,~~_ ~ -S~. ~~~ ~:: .. . _ _ --. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ "1 I'~ ---:----j ," ..:.. , I~._.~,~:._::. t.1'; '1:" I~ '~J"~~"~~.'\, '~ 'J :I'I~'~ I ',l,o -"" . '__''''. ".' , ! , i'''r'~'I[ilf ; ~.' ~- . - ,5', '"'(. CO ! , I mi~~lr.~- b l-:~~ H':-'~.-lN I i mJiji1l~ :g , ~ I" . V! ~~!\';~~" I'''' .p · ,I.. J ' >1 I f '.f~ r.:~ k Ii ~, ~PJ Ii' /!j , ' 0 " .1 0"1 II ' . ~ , : II'i:~: 'I ~1I~;' , ."',' 1 I r;l: II ./;/ .. . ,! ' l' I. , II:~.....:-.,,~..~~~~~.~,...~,,!,: :.;~:~~.: \~:: ::. . :. ~_L___ .~_ _ ___ _ __. __ _ _ _. ___ ____ " ' ,. ',...\.,:..,,,~ ..... ,.... . ----~. ,--- ,,:". ~"" ~~.~:. ~ -:r~"':" ..=- -.. -.~- ,. -. . ... ~ -_ _ _ __ _ _ ~~I:.tL:J'at: .. '.-. ..~,-. ""'--, r:.._50~q= ... q -... ..- - ,,,-., : I ~ - _ _ _ -:- n . : ' -, ~ tlt'l .: '__.. _. _ _.....'Sr.~___ ~_ _. It lId ,. ~''''. . .. _ __ _! -~. ~ if !frh"lI' ,!. r. i IllliJll ii-T Ulllit!. "llIMl ~tlf~itr'll': i i ; ~ I;.... .."I ~ If l;lp'l !~ ~ '-.~ , ~ I ~;fl~ll!hfkll!! IV !!I ,I I k u : I .., ~. III "11'1 .~I ~ Iii J T'I'---- - I ~., ,~ " !". '. I ~ II ", ~ 4:6 .u j' ' , : I., ~ lIt 'Iilb.. J i ~ 1 ! I 81'" i lit :i I ... · ...., loI, . -I . L J ~ II in ~ ..U-.. fl -.....- .. < , , , , ,.! mllf::~:::;li f . LAND.~ DESIGN ~ SOUTH ~ 1a~~/~ . I ~ ~II~I: . . It) I i: > en m CEDAR RIDGE '1J r > Z PREPARED FOR JOE BASILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOAIDA~ ATTACHMENT "C" PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SCHOOL MASTER PLAN - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - -------------------------.----- o~o~ w =~Ol~ H~IH ...., ---------..---.--.----------..-- . -r ---~ - -.-.-!-'-.-'~'_.-.-~-.~.-I-.-'-.-.-'-.T. I ! ! ! i ~ , I I I' 1 I . . . I . I ~ ! I I ~ _ . i I I I r'-'-'-'-'-'-I '" ..... ," . ~ i ! ! ~ ,..._i ~ o \ i ! ! !;, '" ~ ~ ~\~~_~~;,~~~~' '. t----l i. / / / :: \ """, ! ~ =l 'Ii -/ ~ \ !!! "" \ i I ~i ~ I Jel '- ~!' ~ '~I" ----~' , X'-'.T.-,-..,.-.-.-.t-'-'-'-'-'-'-:-1 1 D- - - --_ " i i i I' ./ I' ...... , /' . .' / r-.." , '\/ I I I . i ./ i I '\ ~\ \ ~. f f ! /./ i \ \ "'-,! ! ! . _1_ ./ i '. ~L.__l._._._I_.-/'<' i 1 PEPPERWOOO COURT '-. -. -' -.-1 I r: ,. I- i II ri~.l.fii'E~I'!I'ITi~I-~T-<' : . I . ?BJ I;-!' IE!I' IS' 1 I ; : I J; ;, - . I . J~ lie ~ z! " - i j 0'" i. d: H ~ i E .~U i~ !Ie ~ i! .'. ~ , I ! ,~, I. : e.. -:--11 I · l ~ I 1 I ' I I iV' Ifl,!'l !! J :j;,~~ h'~ iI..'ll ~I'" . " - . Iml ~JJ E.9.- .",1,. I~I &. .. ,-- I l(J)i ! H~;t'nll ~. 'lf1'-I~ ,-, 3 -+_.-.-._'_._._~ I 1-111 itlLI ~ if ~fi h~ ill ~ ~ i ./! .; . 8; ill ..,p t ..T.ii j! I . / I \ 'l'~! i r I~!: ~ (!'i:; r~ r / 1..12 iVl Ii i ~ 'I .Is :1'1 '~.' i / o ... !!"J I." 1.. / t J> ' ;" i = I. II ..L ' . / ~~; 10 ' ;.1 IL,_._.~._,~' -'<, II III I MAPLEWOOO COURT -'-'-'-', I i~ j . I . I . II I if".! !! ". ~ (llilliJlJ1lll1 ! ~p I 1 i: I!! I' r;:-'-J..--.L---J-----pr>l lJTTTTTlJTTTTT1: =1~~ 1 : ! i <r~ ~ -'! ~a (1lJ~:" t 1 1 r=l : i! i Iii fiT li T- 1.----- - - -- - -: '-. lJTltmu " " I U " I U _ _ _ _. _ .. i ) I !~II I c ~ --d ! S}. I II j ~ I i~~~I~ " Jl I ". i ~ \I! I ~...:-_.-I ~.. ~,I, Pi~!m i! I I J: i ~/ I - I I , .- !. .v ~ I '! I i ----t- Ilil " 1.... I J ! "" / I Ij I ~..~ . r - - -, ! I L..J. ' . I I -r---i-- I I - aa . , I n L-__J : ,I' ~l J 1/ I ~I I , iI ' I I I. ,: /' 'II ~ I G /;' : ~. _. ~. _ ~i _:J . _ ,l_.-:::. ~,~ ~ ~ ~ _, _ . _, ; " _llBJ!J. C-,-::-: ~ L ,__ _, _,:., {) HP -1 0 ~:1 -1 Z ~m 1> {) Q (p ~ 1) --I III 'r m 1) l>~~ Z 1> r ~~ ~.#l fJ ~ S III l I ~ . ~ , '!l l 1 i ~ tc:::HCCll. " .. (J) i I.oAICa ~ lG. >>'IE IIEICIm'TIIIl ~:;. -~: .:;;t~~1 ~:~. ::, " , ;:1 I .. , !:l S t , -0 ~ ~ I .,.., Io4IC1M -=-lWMD. ~_~, "-CllItl~ ., . ~ ~ ." , I ,..) ~ f I 08 ~ .~. .... ...~~~ '~.1to.iu.. , .. ~, . :.'.,~ " .....~ __ Ii .. iIInIuof Ii- ava: ... ~ I .. .. ...., .. ..... ... .....111 0 ~ BRYAN .... ASSO~~!ES -. ,.. . 'J! .._~___II~.. ..eM.'ee's I "........ . .t'"c~ >, :os......."..." -...... ...". ~ -..........-.-- --~~ ..~;~~'~~~. .. ,. . "". Memo No. 95-268 c0 June 9, 1995 6) Consideration shall be give to redesign of the area, or reorientation of the future elementary school in order to avoid the necessity for children to cross the parking area in accessing other recreation facilities; 7) The site plan is deficient of many details or criteria as required in the Land Development Requlations, Chapter 4, Site plan Review. A few of the deficiencies indicated by staff include utility easement locations, building elevations, indication of compliance with Handicap code and fire separation requirements, and the lack of parking space counts and identification of parking facilities intended to serve all recreation elements, and particularly the pool and southern ball field; 8) That portion of the roadway that was dedicated to the public with recordation of the 1983 plat of Cedar Ridge Estates, but now planned for school use shall be abandoned, and the unity of title process completed in order to properly assemble the existing school property with the subject property. These applications and documents shall be submitted prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 9) The agreements to be established between the developer of Cedar Ridge Estates and the Lake worth Christian School, which address drainage (the use by the School of the retention area " e PUD and determinat10n - e ca aC1t to ~p~ _the' ntia1.--...E.!'_~_j ect ~il be maintained despite 11!::P nf ~~~t~~tion area by the school) and mainten nce access (for the school through Cedar Ridge Estates) shall be inalized for review by staff and the city Attorney prior to adopti n of the rezoning ordinance; ~~~. 10) It is recommended that the subject property be replatted to vacate the blocks, lots, easements and public rights-of-way that were established by the 1983 Cedar Ridge Estates plat. At minimum, the abandonment of the public right-of-way referenced in comment 8 above shall be completed. 11) At time of site plan review, traffic shall be re-evaluated to determine whether additional traffic, above the 382 daily trips per day certified with this land use amendment and rezoning, will be generated based on the specifics of the site plan submittal. RECOMMENDATION The planning and Zoning Department recommends that the applications submitted by J. Richard Harris and the Lake worth Christian School Society, Inc., be approved, based on the following: 1. The proposed amendment and zoning would be consistent with comprehensive plan objectives and policies; 2. The proposed amendment would not be contrary to the established land use pattern, nor would it create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, and nor would it constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner; 3. The requested land use and zoning would be compatible with capacities of utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities; 4. The proposed land use and zoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties and, would not affect the property values of adjacent or nearby properties; ;,IQ-7 P,;e, .4>.: !E' 'hY_ ~(; (. C'-'3- .T~ '&.s: ( - o~c - ra.ttk, ~ lu: /::c,e' ~ -r Y't:...""'5 * _~2-{,r27 .533 ~S/~ /' ~...:.-Cy c~~~~~ 7-/u~ J-(_ (/~ rs- Ic~ K. <1-r -:--Rc 1'1eer/'j '~ (~ /-1 e ; fVl,n <:>-\ y C </Y1 c..<:: i f<.J <>- ( fYll-_~ ~;\-lJ ,.- Gt:J.. Kc GJor~ c.h r)5-h'~ S,-~CJC/{~: {'-""( 0- oS +e-~ 7 (0.. '^ '" /(~ Jt~ 'i-:]'; h ~ (~r I(s) (4; ( {31fJ-J .$c.. ho.o (- rt~. n.J741 m~^ i' of' D kf? cC-/(.Jl. - s O-C tJ.- t-Ji/t.; fJ c...~ -Ii ~ c P -f i f/~ Acc::::.c: s s +:, L~..s<:.."..) l ~"" ~., f ~ e-( .j;;- e ~J" I<' <=-'f (" E'_'$ (;: <.J ~ l.1/1c<-v1s(.s-f~t"l.-f .:rh.~ufR~~'f\.t dJ.<.Jlf't'fs~ ~~'*'-;ts ::i.-fc t r - 'rf<- Jc.; ;>-{ -+r- lS t \'c' c- i.~r k.<-'~ '.1'- ~(<e.. Sc:o k~( A c~ (-. -\ ~ ,.,c.~=""",,,s. ~ L_ ~V'^-<-~ "e.~f~(~s * <t>~ -Tr--";~5 .. Sl0"""'(Ot.~i ~~(y ~ <:::,.'..Q....--~<>-\()C~N\~..+y ~ o..::C""'$S --~~,-f{..-.. L~ ~~..~ Pcc-It.'T ~"",~..l n::,,-,..,..~""'"-, I~d (~c(,-'f~~ -. C>~ "-;-"",2;;-''''' r<)h- -f" .,s2,.,-~~_'P<' (~q<H) cr..-JJ. (<:... l~( ('" "fi..,y <:? Me::: 'J~ (' - . C"^"~, ~ - E Ie. .s.. .('cQ..".. , .. * t2~ lo!oc::.,-,<-\-:""" of ~ ~~,~. (;ll\~ 7 c::.~s:.&"" -:..-f .(;"'J\.<.."- Q <:~,,~ U ft {t -n e ,- ... --te , ,V\. ('.(,.;;v<. """', "-'C...~ 55 ,f.::, L if. ~ <=;...J.^.C-,..........".. "\:~~S:..s.. l' J -k. A "':) s ~ c.lcL..V' .(~ lc..~....:-\--c:..r-- S ic>-tJ' .+- f 1'-".''>-'-'' . !h.' I, ' ~ =~s -f::. c:.;..,t'".:. c.<'l.GC> cx-, ~.....",-+-.<..C' \~ \.,....--(<~ l._""" C. .. ' 16c::..........fi~ () . I _- l' ,(i;.kr/~./- - f~:' ~<:T('",- ,~':L:::,=<-~ :.:z:r~0<. '1 . y -Pc,~<~ ~~ f~'^-~~f c..~~~ .5~~ b.~~"Y'-"'~~5 ~J -- ') h",,-, E...._~... v,,--..c -~ -''< \--t.. (:T-t~ "- ~'-'- """""'..-.- - -'-'~'" ..:. "'" ,ill.. ~(_, ,'. ''\.' I r-;:;::::::;=:.I.,. ~-_, (_~,. ~ '~o:.:::.... ! - 6.A.1 Lake Worth Christian School Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-268 TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Development Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director/~~ FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner DATE: June 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR #95-002 Request for Land Use Amendment/Rezoning INTRODUCTION J. Richard Harris, agent for the Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc. is requesting that 6.4 acres of vacant property located adjacent to the south and east of the Lake Worth Christian School on High Ridge Road (see location map in Attachment "A") be rezoned and that the Future Land Use Plan designation be amended. The current land use and zoning on this property is Low Density Residential and PUD (Planned Unit Development), respectively. To prepare this property for use by the school, the applicant is requesting that the property be rezoned to R-1AA, Single Family Residential, and the Future Land Use Map designation be changed to Public & Private Governmental/Institutional. HISTORY In February of this year, a master plan modification was approved for the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD, located immediately south of the Lake Worth Christian School. Part of the master plan modification request included deletion of the subject property from the PUD (see approved master plan modification in Attachment "B"). Approval of the master plan modification was subject to rezoning of the subject property from PUD to an appropriate zoning district for assembling the property with the school property to the north for expansion of the school's facilities (see conceptual master plan for school expansion - Attachment "C"). The subject property was acquired at the beginning of the year by Condor Investments of Palm Beach County, Inc., owner of the school property and developer of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD and leased to Lake worth Christian School Society, Inc. This request will rezone and reclassify the subject property consistent with the remainder of the school property. LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Since this application meets the criteria necessary for processing as a small-scale amendment, the application will be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) following the adoption of ordinances. This request will be transmitted to the DCA as an adopted comprehensive plan amendment, and will follow DCA's abbreviated review schedule. However, the amendment will not be official until approximately 15 days following finding of compliance by the DCA. The entire review process (by DCA) will require approximately five (5) months to complete. The following analysis is provided pursuant to the city's code of ordinances (Part III-Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9), and Florida law with respect to the transmittal and review of small-scale land use plan amendments. This analysis will focus primarily on consistency with the City's comprehensive plan objectives, policies and text, and compatibility of the proposed amendment with adjacent properties. ADJACENT LAND USE AND ZONING The land use and zoning in the surrounding area varies and is presented in the table below (as the subject property is irregularly shaped, please refer to the location map for a thorough understanding of the location of the following identified uses) : Memo No. 95-268 -2- June 9, 1995 Direction North Use SAL Railroad right-of-way Zoning N/A East SAL Railroad and 1-95 rights-of-way N/A South/Southwest Cedar Ridge Estates, planned single & multi-family units PUD West/Northwest Large-lot single family homes RS (County) ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO SEC. 9.C.7 OF CH. 2. LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS This section of the Land Development Regulations requires the evaluation of plan amendment/rezoning requests against criteria related to the impacts which would result from the approval of such requests. These criteria and an evaluation of the impacts which could result from development of the property are as follows: 7.a. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies. ..". Although the Future Land Use Plan is proposed to be amended, the request is generally consistent with comprehensive plan objectives and policies, in part, due to compatibility of the proposed land use classification with adjacent land uses. For example, Objective 1.17 below is typically referenced when residential uses are adjacent to, and potentially impacted by property proposed to be reclassified. Obiective 1.17 - "Minimize nuisances, hazards, and other adverse impacts. ..to residential environments by preventing or minimizing land use conflicts." In general, this proposed amendment represents the replacement of residentially classified property (for single family homes) located immediately adjacent to the S.A.L. Railroad right-of-way, with property classified as Public & Private Governmental/Institutional. The single family home portion of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD would become more protected from nuisances, hazards and negative impacts associated with adjacency to the railroad and 1-95 rights-of-way by separation from these rights-of-way resulting from the school's recreation uses. Although several of these single family homes are on the periphery of revised PUD boundary, and as a consequence of the amendment, would now be adjacent to active recreation facilities rather than other single family homes, the overall effect is a net positive change given the increased distance between single family lots and the railroad and 1-95 corridors. Most recreation uses are generally compatible with residential uses, and any potential nuisances or hazards anticipated from the active recreation facilities (e.g. noise, lighting, traffic, etc.) would be addressed/mitigated during the site plan review process. Lastly, although there are no Comprehensive Plan policies that specifically promote the provision of recreation facilities within private schools, this proposed expansion of the school's recreation facilities is consistent with the overall goal of the Recreation & open space Element, which is partially shown below. Goal #5 - "Provide adequate open space and recreational facilities and programs to meet the needs of present and future residents... ." The following additional objectives, policies, and issues addressed below are either typically referenced by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), or required by them to be analyzed in the review of proposed amendments: Memo No. 95-268 -3- June 9, 1995 Obiective 1.2 - "Coordinate future land uses with soil conditions so that urban land uses are prohibited in locations where it is not economical to remove or treat unsuitable soils.. ."i and Policy 1.2.1 - ".. .prohibit development of urban land uses where the removal or treatment of unsuitable soils would be uneconomical, provide that unstable soils shall be removed in all construction and land development sites where soils would affect the performance of infrastructure, drainage. ..". No extreme soil conditions are known to be characteristic of this propertYi however, this site is small and physically typical of adjacent, developed properties. Furthermore, policies such as those above will ensure the use of proper development techniques reviewed during the site plan process. Obiective 4.4 - "The city shall,.. .protect all remaining areas of substantial native upland and wetland vegetation and eliminate undesirable exotic tree species."i Policy 4.4.1 - ".. .the city shall require...a detailed flora and fauna survey on any liB or C" rated site...i and Policy 1.11.14 - ".. .provide for open space preservation by requiring the preservation of 25% of all "A", "B", and "C" rated sites...". These policies are not applicable as this property is not recognized by the comprehensive plan as having any environmentally sensitive characteristics preserved through application of comprehensive plan policies. Obiective 1.11 - ".. . future land uses shall include provisions for the protection of.. . archaeological resources and historic buildings.. .". The city's comprehensive plan requires that historical resources and archaeological sites be preserved and protected. However, the subject property is undeveloped and there are no archaeological amenities known to exist on this site. 7.b. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfarei and 7.e. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent properties.". The proposed reclassification, rezoning, and use of the subject property would provide for the expansion of an existing use (the Lake worth christian School) which is consistent with the established land use pattern within the area, as well as with the current and future uses of adjacent and nearby properties. Furthermore, in addition to being generally compatible with adjacent residential properties, the proposed use may be more preferable over residential use at this location, given the proximity of the property to the S.A.L. Railroad and I-95 rights-of-way. 7.c. "Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable. II If there are any changed conditions or circumstances which have motivated this request (and potentially make the reclassification and rezoning desirable or justified), they would include the modification to the cedar Ridge Estates PUD master plan which included the Memo No. 95-268 -4- June 9, 1995 extraction of the subject property from the PUD, making it available to the Lake Worth Christian School. 7.d. "whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities." Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 9J-11 also requires that the availability of public facilities be analyzed in connection with a proposed amendment to a comprehensive plan, and that the maximum potential demand upon public facilities be determined. The following facilities were analyzed in order to ensure that capacity is available: Roads: Although Palm Beach County has not completed its review of the traffic analysis, it appears that the traffic impact analysis reviewed not only use of the subject property, but traffic impact anticipated from the School's proposed master plan (as a site-specific rezoning). Since the study references 382 additional trips per day to be generated by a 350 student expansion of an elementary and middle school, it is unclear whether the additional outdoor recreation facilities, additional school buildings and auditorium were evaluated. The traffic analysis concluded that traffic to be generated from the master plan would not exceed established levels of service of impacted road segments, and would comply with requirements of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards ordinance. Therefore, traffic concurrency certification will be limited to an additional 382 trips per day and is subject to any comments from Palm Beach County. water/Sewer: The City's utility Department reviewed the proposed amendment and indicated that water and sewer capacities are available to serve the minimal demands of the proposed recreation uses. However, they recommend that a fire flow test be conducted in order to determine if the flow requirement for institutional uses, 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm), can be met. In comparison, the fire flow requirement for residential uses is 500 gpm; Solid Waste: The Solid Waste Authority reviewed this request and does not object to the proposed amendment as ample capacity exists to serve the future solid waste collection and disposal needs generated on this site; Drainage: The analysis of the proposed amendment by the Lake Worth Drainage District indicated that the subject area is not within the service area of the Lake Worth Drainage District; and Recreation: Not applicable/No impact. 7.f. "Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning.lf; When the subject property was extracted from the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD, the property became undevelopable as zoned, since there no longer existed a corresponding master plan (planned unit development zoning requires a master plan for zoning approval). Furthermore, the subject property became land-locked by loss of direct access to High Ridge Road as a result of the separation from the PUD master plan, with the intent that access would be provided through the school property, once assembled with it. 7.g. "Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole." With respect to scale, the proposed amendment and use are consistent with the existing and future use of adjacent properties. Furthermore, given the confined location of this property, its proximity to the adjacent railroad and 1-95 rights-of-way, and since it represents only a minimal 11 unit decrease in planned housing units, the proposed Memo No. 95-268 -5- June 9, 1995 amendment is arguably unrelated to the function of the city as a whole and the projected need for available housing units (since the amendment would reduce the land available for residential use). 7.h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. There are several zoning districts that allow schools as a permitted use. However, this request is for expansion of an adjacent school and not location of a new school site. Therefore, selection of vacant property adjacent to the school that is suitable for expansion of the school facilities is the relevant issue. schools are ideally located and are encouraged in residential areas. The suggestion that a new school location is necessary in order for the school to expand is contrary to the objective of locating schools within residential areas. REVIEW OF "CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN" The Lake worth christian School Society, Inc. plans for expansion include addition of an elementary school, an auditorium, and renovation and addition of recreation facilities. The acquisition of the subject property has advanced their plans, which are now in a conceptual master plan form. The Society included a copy of this conceptual master plan with the subject application for courtesy review by staff to identify and address any problems early in the school's expansion process and to better analyze with this rezoning any potential impacts upon the adjacent, planned residential development. The plan was also used to evaluate traffic impacts associated with the request. The conceptual master plan was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee and Joe Basil, the developer of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD. The more significant comments relative to emergency service/access, circulation, location of utilities, and impact on the planned residential community are itemized below. Complete comments will be generated at time of formal site plan submittal: 1) The southern ball field is oriented with those areas of the ball field which tend to generate the most noise, light and activity immediately adjacent to the planned single family homes of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD (it should be noted that although staff would suggest that the ball field be reoriented to maximize the distances between the planned homes and the active areas of the ball fields, Mr. Basil has indicated that the buyers of the adjacent lots intentionally selected those locations for their proximity to the recreation areas of the school, and redesign of the recreation facilities may consequently place less desirable elements adjacent to the residential development, and redirect ball field lighting toward the planned single family homes); 2) The swimming pool should be relocated in close proximity to the existing or planned road system in order to facilitate efficient emergency access; 3) Properly engineered design techniques which are both aesthetic and safe for the adjacent residents will be necessary between the south ball field and residential community to address the significantly higher elevation of this portion of the planned unit development; 4) If the ball fields are to be fenced in, utility lines should be placed outside of the fenced areas to maximize accessibility to utility lines for maintenance needs, and to avoid unnecessary damage to ball fields when the lines must be accessed; 5) If sanitary sewer lines remain within fenced areas, consideration should be given to the use of a more durable material than clay; Memo No. 95-268 -6- June 9, 1995 6) Consideration shall be give to redesign of the area, or reorientation of the future elementary school in order to avoid the necessity for children to cross the parking area in accessing other recreation facilities; 7) The site plan is deficient of many details or criteria as required in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site plan Review. A few of the deficiencies indicated by staff include utility easement locations, building elevations, indication of compliance with Handicap Code and fire separation requirements, and the lack of parking space counts and identification of parking facilities intended to serve all recreation elements, and particularly the pool and southern ball field; 8) That portion of the roadway that was dedicated to the public with recordation of the 1983 plat of Cedar Ridge Estates, but now planned for school use shall be abandoned, and the unity of title process completed in order to properly assemble the existing school property with the subject property. These applications and documents shall be submitted prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 9) The agreements to be established between the developer of Cedar Ridge Estates and the Lake Worth Christian School, which address drainage (the use by the school of the retention area within the PUD and determination that drainage capacity to serve the entire residential project will be maintained despite use of the retention area by the school) and maintenance access (for the school through cedar Ridge Estates) shall be finalized for review by staff and the City Attorney prior to adoption of the rezoning ordinance; 10) It is recommended that the subject property be replatted to vacate the blocks, lots, easements and public rights-of-way that were established by the 1983 Cedar Ridge Estates plat. At minimum, the abandonment of the public right-of-way referenced in comment 8 above shall be completed. 11) At time of site plan review, traffic shall be re-evaluated to determine whether additional traffic, above the 382 daily trips per day certified with this land use amendment and rezoning, will be generated based on the specifics of the site plan submittal. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that the applications submitted by J. Richard Harris and the Lake Worth christian School Society, Inc., be approved, based on the following: 1. The proposed amendment and zoning would be consistent with Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies; 2. The proposed amendment would not be contrary to the established land use pattern, nor would it create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, and nor would it constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner; 3. The requested land use and zoning would be compatible with capacities of utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities; 4. The proposed land use and zoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties and, would not affect the property values of adjacent or nearby properties; Memo No. 95-268 -7- June 9, 1995 5. The proposed land use and zoning are of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole; and 6. The proposed land use and zoning are consistent with the classification and zoning currently in place on the existing school site. 7. The proposed land use and zoning satisfy the February 1995 conditions of the cedar Ridge Estates master plan modification approval. staff recommends that approval of these requests be conditioned upon compliance with any comments received from Palm Beach County regarding the traffic study, acceptance of the abandonment application and receipt of all agreements referenced in the staff comments above, prior to formal adoption of the rezoning ordinance and incorporation of the staff comments listed above in the school's future site plan submittal. Note: Due to the applicant's request for two months postponement of this request and insufficient notice given to staff to readvertise this request for June 13th and 20th public hearings before the Planning and Development Board and city Commission, respectively, the applicant assumes all risk of any claim of improper notification. MISCVIII:LWCS.REP ATTACHMENT "All LOCATION MAP ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION MAP .~' 11111 ..,.. I I I '. '. " ': " -1\\ I .:- ~: l:' ~ ~~ ~ :.: ~ '::: ::: :::: :::: ~l: :~:l l:~~. :.:.:. '-- waRl1f ctRSfWIlICHOCJ&. . / Y/ WI.::~:::: ~~__! ii i.~;;; ..~ )....::: l. :::::::::...':':.~:: I~~."'" -~~ I uu: r la ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ,,- """-- '--- U 1 I I Illl-- \[;g~ I I IIIF--I~ LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL REZONING ATTACHMENT liB" APPROVED, REVISED 1995 CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES PUD MASTER PLAN ~'~~lD1 fi:..HlnOS l N81S30 t ONVI ~ VlR~o', 'Havas NO!NAOS .0 A!IO 311SV8 30r t:fO=, 03HV d3t:fd 38all:J ~'v'a38 ~~alm!~uIIIUf I' ~ l ~ ~ d ; f ~,:l".'d. J l' I ID ".f;'" J ," Q " 1-.. ..... --u ~ I ttl Ii 7h ,U ,~i I ""! [ ~~-!l.~h 11 .." ... I ; l! . I l U~ lij. ~2i4 i 'I '1, -I ;,; 1,'_ .. I I _ --....... .. =-,_ I '" I II: j'lt, I' "3 .., \ ~ ~ I ,) Iii liJI IH,i1Nllil!i/il i '. ji ldl~ H ~11.~1t · "., i ! 1 ~" 'i ~ ~~ Inl' i i I "1,1 'fl'n I I:. .' I fIll. I ~ .' : llllldllliiili~ III1I dfJlIlli!!!, ~h' :I!!lld r U d i' ,1I11111!i II ~ ~-- ;--'- ....~._-, r,f "Ill - - -'\,-- - -........... ,.c......_ - - --.. - -:~~: ,ll~ .1 .. . ..: .. ,. .:I-- - - - - 1\ ,1: ___,..__ _., 31" _ ia" :!:T'ce-sCJ - -'\..- " .. _ . _w ... '1 I tel:r:-rr:,~,...,.,..., . - - - - -. , -tt _ .. .. ::-""_ _ _ _ .. ...o.:i. ~':"""; ...~. _' --- I --------,... ..... '.\.,...~" ','." 'I =r' ---- .'-- -- - - -- - -- - - -- - - .- --7- - ,.. .... ' .....t.- .."'.....,:;;,~~~.h....."'" ~..... ....'-:: I ... ',................. .. . a. ,~ I ~. . l' . . . I . ..., j' , I" ..' ,I p' ::,1' I .. .' ~ ,1 , '.' ' - ~ I . ;.' I Il:~ ~ ~ J. ~: i . ' ~ I~ " ~i Jl~~ H;:;: ~ I J ,,/ '" fl'lI!1j dl .L.l 9-: " r ".! U t...' ~ ~:j, ~ ~ii~:lf 1~4 'I " I G8:; i~~~jIJ:,i I i ..1 , J. "'h,,: ' · i'l ,. -- '-. . . 1 _, 'l..lm ' & h" --..~-;;, '.,~- , ,I . j .~I'U::t,~.tr I 51 . ........ ,~ '_. ~~.., ....~ I. I I f:J I ."~.,. I _' _'.' : ~~llll, . ....,~;. -.' . '-.'.~ ".r~ iGJ I l' 'I . , --_.~: I ,I ~ I'~ .-. ------.,-- - --)'i:!:~~j~:':l-%::~_~t~.., '. . ~~.' - '---:--J:--- r~J ,.- I I. ".,"...,.:~...:.~, I '" I I,~ ""~""h" I . I C. (i:il .f) :~ 'I 'f;:]"..,..;.,~-~.>::;.. II I\(nlll .. ::!' - .. - ! i ~~ ", '':-; ::;'-";:~~""~'::'~'~:;.. _., J ~uir.': :' !l!) " I , "''''''' '.._';;.~..,.:,~..~. ..I 1 "" --~ iI, . -.:--'- N;:;".", ,~. _.... ~, --. - _of I E::j'. - "" .~.; l'I,:"(.t-';v' I '1.' , . " \ I I I '\ · - "." '" I JII I . r i Iii\ -J t' I 'f2;:j~"'_ _ _ L _' -r ., / I I " I . .. '{v :!. . i', , , ,I (' I' fI : (f. (a\~ t- 'iii\ . ~ ';1-'. .... ,. . e ] .. " 'j I" J 'IS [J tV \l!l I -.... - .::..., , It. I I ~. .,,). I I (U>' 1;_,_ ~:::-=-~0.;t ~.; .' /, I l"!~: /, ," tI '" . ...': ~" /" I I " ,I '1..--=_:,._., ~,. ' · . ". '~' --'~-'-'."-f.r ". · : - - , -- -- - -- . .;. "'" :~~lt:~.- ~"'i7_, c:' ,'. ,I r: '. ~ ~ ~ i' I I , '~ \ ; --==t;;-~~..==:'== "~', c:" '1' Ijg . II I <1;)@ Ii!) ~::tl, I t!L-J ,'!' {,.: '--;;:~'-' 1 '.~';: ~f': = ~ ~ ~,(r,J ~9 l!! : I ~ )'1111 i~ ~ - ...l';J;(f: '" : /: pt, _~ _ ~~f : _ -,I "~_.._-~ !D, 7 I lID "":::=:~~____L_!_ :; ! ff- fl' - {'/ I. "'. _7~' ,iiIlu':- .- . ::~gl....= _ _ -J II, ' '" . -~, - ". - I o"l,.. ~,,-t I. : -- - ~/ ~-:=~5~-"=3.:=; ',;( - .' <,-lh,Q:, : j -, \~i~ =: - .~ JU:1ct: -. -!t ~ll' I . \, .L __1..___,. " , .-........ 't! 11. .iI.... ,~==-:---T" "--. "'~ . 'I.;.. .' __'/ II i .... - 'ilt'.: _....._..... '. . "@)/-:--'I , \\\\~~ . ~ . ~7.: '('~'.'.- '1 ~ ~ L_=---~'AA~~f" ~~jl---'-- I ' 1 Ii:' If' I Ifi\ ~\":. "". 7"! '" , c: . ."," , .,.>'t..f _:I;;jl ;1' , " Ii' ~ I V ~ :'\' ,~. . :-~'!....l.. I -t;--' ,'~:%' ..~ _, ...__-\ ~ 1 I " . \.",~ . "';-:" __ __'On:. =-= _:........\ "~.<-7 . __". ' / I 1 ,/ '~0.: -- " -- ':;;;~;;;;~.o;.; ...~l!. ;: ...."", . .' , "r I- 1 --" ., ,...~......:;::&:~.~_~ .', e _ Q.. 'r -- -- -- -- r -- -- - - , :', .,...: ""-.:!'__::::-. ,-,:;"., F'-~: _" ~ :. " I c:... : t::\ I 0 ..' /.~. /~. ~:: C--:-'-~~':' I-l"", P.'I -;t;"<~\J- .-~~::'"_: C "_,,._. ~, " G> I \!!I ~ I < /'''' /., (:')" , It~., , : _" -::J. ,;::. ~ .. :-8 III " I I I ~r~ . ..' -" : I I' I I _ _ 1"1 ';1::'" . I, @ , 1 ..-..-- ~"--~: t,:;'" Q;' '.,,; '. __ ~j~ -" ,_ -'0 I 'y-: -- ----=-==;-::"~ '.~' '.:..' E) '.>> '1'1 _ -':n~~C=.G> -G- 1- - -- -i( ~-~:=:::.::: . :...., -', , . '. ! U.. L r' 'l~rj= . ' ';., ,--- : ~ \...'---/../ I I, ~'.,' ~ ;~ffl..: ,ill , ::'IJ:; : 1:;=, _ . -\.).I L ~ I , I . .":-/' . e .. Hil~'h'~; .: ~ = =$ ':1= ~ ~ =(]) .... -""'11 :~! : e '~ : eJ '" ,', i "i,": - -. - :~~.- -11- ~ . I I a V . '-J 'flj" _--...-~ .- _,. :~ I I I ': _ , -L-tt ,:I~ll, "u _ _'" ~ -:::.':...:"=--" : IfLL+-L-_n,-;1::=-........1!!.__ r~ --4-1_.__..____. ._____ ; , - - - . ~ - - - - - - . --i>> ~~ ~ - :::T-OtS -1I~::;b-.:.~I~-11 - - -== ,_ r: . _ - . _t:. ----.--------1 - " f.. ~; . z < ..J Q. ~ (I) < 2 Ii! 'H ~ , ~"i ~ JI'. I" .'- IiI: I I I ; . I m , .... .1.'.... ,.. (It I i. '1 11 - . - I ~ "I . ,,<>' h /r ATTACHMENT "C" PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL SCHOOL MASTER PLAN "., .'. i,"..U~~~'''" ""(; ........ IlIIUJW\ ..... .H'.uau.IA....!': :-r'" - .. ..1DJ"DVt..~-....._,ilI'-~. .. :.......,..... '. ...-........ ~ .-...... '~.~ j..;,.,. ) 1W:r&AIJI~~,!!I'.~~:~.. ~., 4['.::"'~.~' . . . ':~'::::iT@~~~;!~~':..'. ..- . - ~ I _ I _. _. _ . _.. _. _. _. _. _ ':--''--''', ,_ I , _. _. _. -. - -, -. -' -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. - . - '7 . / ,/ -- I l! Lt=D II WI i / /,-,-'-'-'-'-'---1 ~ Iii I II ~i1 f-./ !~- IH ./" I I I I \ /~".... I I I I //" i ~~, I /. ' / r--' II.' " AIl'./ , ---!-----~.Il / Illill!l~i r -l // L - - r ./ ~-~-I I I"!, ~ 'If -"llIl!; I I I ;' ~.. Ii. ! ~~il~~gM! I ~t ~ ~- i ~~~ I.V I I I I' :,; 1--. I I ~ . '" L_____,__ ~-=0 ( ~mi ~ I : I~l~ : J ! .Yl! ~ - - -- I; "i i~ I i!u:e I ..~2 i '~ Q /LLwLliLll.flWum \ L_ --~, ~~-~-u - L - ill i i. : -31:=1~ i li~ ~. . I (^)i I I '\ ::jg!(lUJJLllllJJUlU II"',_~J,-,-,- - -I'-'-'-''''-'-'"j'-'-~'~ y?:=' ! lTlll- I 3~ 1lJm1JTITlTmTTTI \ i'", i i i - ..i: (1]1 i l:!j 1,- "'" I' i i i~ii~ ! L Ii I e5' r-I~"~---' I - '" . - . ~ i: I E::: () 'I 11.1 II II' " I ! ! If ~t i ! . f- 2 m I ! "" __ . i . ! ! !i 1- Iii ~ J L----li~-i--j III II L___.-t> :;,~;;L~~~~W;': I i <I 2 \ . = ll"a I! JIl1<t '" . 1\\ II \'__ ./'-';1'-'-')1 I' ~ .: ~ <(o'! I- II Jl [ I f~! . / . -r II! ; I ~ .. ~ "- ~ ~ I IU \ / - . ~ ,,'1 ,., i i ft". ,0 . a n , \ ,...:._ r----, t I // l ~;'z :it:~ . i!1 ~ A f i! Ili(l ! llll-d) lfj~. I .5. ~. , 10 , ,; I I .J J. , .Ir' 'III ~ i ~. I I, $ ~ 0.., II Q ~ Q. er. I 8 I ~ ~ / I' <" !!-...... 'f. U" ~ Il' I ' . -- I '~'. ' I IjJ5~~~ I ~ ./ . t-, ~ ~i;~ ~!i !1! h ~ ~-~ir.l! II-! I U III II;t . n' .' /' ,I f I ,c!.::iJD I~: ';I~"~. -r-H I ,d)1 I <[ ~ --I ~nl, I. 1 l'-:-'-'-'-'-'-'-'r~ -1:~:f-:'I~&T:: Ili.-titr. IW! . L L-~--'--' 1 Ii",,, i lri ~:i~1! i:~;;1~':~ ~ ~ ~i~i! :~I ! Zo r d)~~A~j)\l' L __.J 1- '''. i ~a ~~ii~ ~Hi:nl~l: gH! ilLl! ' " . "~ ta.1 oq;ti . il D ~ 'i f.1 ' , i'''. ! If it!1 Uiij !i: ~ i~ii! ,: i! U i "',_.J.: j..!;til!JI~~t~!iY I! i ~ ,.>~._..L'_'_"..l'_.- J:) I \! ~ I ~ . - . - ' - ._\ J.a=lnoo OOonta=l=d=== \ ; ! '> /'-l-'-.-'r - -'.~ \ ~ ! /' --1-' i i i """,\ \ \ ! ./ i i i i \ \ \ ~I 1 // i i i i \~. --n"'-~' I ~ // !' i i V! /'\" ",---- 'J I.' .' -" -" 1 ~~.-.-.-,-.-._t.-.-.-.I-.-.---L.r. ........ 'I~" i,i i '\ J;d u, l~~! "" i i i '> f'/" lul [~Il '" i i i / / J~ ' . I 1 . \ ()~ '\' !------i ::::- - - I .' I : 1 . I I ' ' -'=-=-__ -~'--,---,-7~1------: _-'0_ - __.:-_L ___l- ,=-=-_-=-L -_-=----=-),~ 1-41~1-4 RID~E ROAD J ! . I I l~pJ! ~~1 ro if .. . ~\(__..... __._I'w.""_ . ~ M."".I~'~.." '....... J -. II a J 1 J .. ~.. GD S3~y.R1?,~~~ ..~. N'Il' A~a: a ". ....{~.<f'f~ ...:-', .' '-..' . YCII~ ~~'CIW'C* MlCnI HtllH ZHL r" '-, ~ N'r!.I.eI>>lO ~ IDI'\I"'T ~ I ~ E i ~ II~ ~ !i! '!i! fl ~ ... liiid)l!j .." .l NIIlWIll:IS3II 31 va 'lIl $iCIlSIII3lI . i I ; \ I - / , . " z: il 1 It II: ~ &.. ~ I 'i li~ <..... ~ i ~ ~ .... d) x w III i -----.----.-.-.--.-------- ---------------------- VI. PUBLIC RF.ARIRG B cc: Dev, Plan, Util PLANNING AND ZONING DBPARIf: MBMORANDUM NO. 95-165 Agenda Memorandum for April 18, 1995 city Commission Meeting FROM: Carrie Parker City Manager Tam}:)ri J. Heyden ~d planning and Zonin~ Director April 12, 1995 TO: DATE: SUBJBCT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR 95-002 Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning Please place the above-referenced request on the April 18, 1995 City Commission agenda under public Hearings. Although the applicant requested postponement of this request at the planning and Development Board Meeting on April 11, 1995, the item must appear on the agenda as a continued item since a public hearing has already been advertised for the April 18th City Commission Meeting. TJH:dia Att.achment . : eeAlIeDlle. ehr B.A.1 LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL LAND USE ELEMENT AMtNDMENT/REZONING :~ i""~! :~~nl jRCYCF.: ---' -~_.._-_..._---- ._--~---_. Seer;, i-lG'I'':.;, H.-..:m~;, l3R',~:. B..u.:;>., e-!tmC;~I5E". ? A. ,.T1r.~"~<I~,.i .1.... AtcriJ 5, 1995 Ci,,, o~ Bu;n:cn Beac..'1 D~;:1rtnt',t ~f 'Plaunmg :,~..d ZCJr..L:i~ _:]0 ECla;. :k:;nL::\U Deac:t 3o....1c:v&:'d B;Jy'iltC'n Ii'::aCD, Fl':" AttenlioIL Mike R~ F;'lX#: 3-:~.ti090 De ar Mu.r.' :)n ~haJf of I...a.ke W(lJm G"hr'.:5ttl!n School, ! re=Iuett tbat the putol1c hear=.Jigs =~rre::t1? ~.;;he:1uled icr April 11 nj ,~ 18. 1995. be :et over to the date! ~acCuled ro~ p:.;:.::lc tle~.ngs In :\t.U-!: 1995. Acc;)rdir. :" our traffic enJiueers. David PI~e:r aDd ).s5Cluates, L:e re::,uired 1:raffic m..dy will LOt be ~~I.e in time :0 lil10W '-PFOprl8.t8 revu,w pri.o!' ~:l the 8ch~uled April heeringt'. ! am US".I4cd :hcre will be DC problem h3ving the ~I\lrj;' ill aiIlple time: to allow rev.ew prtIJf to '.be SCbe:1u1ed May meettngs. I !bti:lk ~..ou rOI j ::;r' c,)lJ1)eration. v~. cruIy yours. .~~ ~ .~ let1=:- 1,- . ~'"""<'~"v~ J. Ridtlrd Harre ~..I:':..~"-:'_....S,_ '.~\d;:"'l ~""Ef~: ~..~., ~'..4.'i::.j.~.:),~":: ;:".'J'il1tU ~~i"':: .::. e~... :~..r 6 .-..: i."':'. .~:":;'.;:~;" -------.--..-..----------.--- .....'.::..~.:~:'~ ~'.J".:t.-\. ,=-;.~:,.~. ...."'"...... t '1.....'7..;. J1~ .~.~:t r..:~'G~ . ~Ci..'..'~., ":'~;:;~t:'~~~;' ~" .'jl~~;~:~r~,\ ~ ~:';:':i.~ ~:~~;:2!~"i:,:. ~ri\,:'~r; ~ ~y.=- ~-. I I:; ,t;;) It U lV1 & ~." " r1, ,c '.!J U; ~ . l' ;} J r ~ i , ~~;; _ l!!l IJlJj ~~~- 3 PUBLIC HEARING A cc: Plan, Dev, Util PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTM MEMORANDUM NO. 95-215 Agenda Memorandum for May 16, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager -:-j Tambri J. Heyden fJi Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: April 12, 1995 SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School - LUAR 95-002 Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning Please place the above-referenced request on the May 16, 1995 City Commission agenda under Public Hearings. Although the applicant requested postponement of this request at the Planning and Development Board Meeting on April 11, 1995 and May 9, 1995, the item must appear on the agenda as a continued item since a public hearing was already advertised for the April 18th City Commission meeting and announced at that meeting as to be continued to the May 16, 1995 meeting. TJH:dim Attachment a:CCA;enMe:.Chr 6.A.l Lake Worth Christian School Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning ~ SCOTT ROYCE ""0""."". AT '"~W Seen, Rorel!, HARRIs, BRYAN, BARRA fJJ JOROENSEN, P.A. May S, 1995 City of BoyntOn Beach Department of Planning and Zoning 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL Attention: Mike Rumph Fax#: 375~6090 De3I Mike: On behalf of Lake Wortb Chmtian Schoo~ I request that the public hearingi currently scheduled for May, 1995, be !let over to the dates scheduled for public hearings in June, 1995. I am contacting our traffic engineers, David Plummer and Associates, to determine when the required traffic study will be available. I had thought it was ready for delivery. I thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, ~~ J. Richard Harria ~b ~ 1', S.ulIl.\ . }QH)/ "" SWAN, ;1. . IIAIllIY Do IlYllD . _ P. CoIC)lO)/ j, RlCllAiDllAWS' JOHN M. JORalNSiDI . DONN.l~ NADIiAI) 'llA.yMOtlIl v, IIOYCli ROllein' A, ~1'IACl'l'ml . KOIST C. KOrT (19.1_ ~4r()O PO", BOllLEVoUD. SUIT& 500 · 1'.llM B5ACH GAIUI~NIl. FLORIDA 33410 (01107) 62'-~900 . p~ ('01) 62'-"'0113 8.A.l LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING 1 , r~. r fj4.: H:: ;.1") iI J ~ FA'. H,7'324 J 2,;J;l scor~, ROYCE 4Jlln1.'(Jn'~ ~"i ... l I I i i~'CCTT I' , ~...._~... j [<Oyer:: I __..,_...__J fl, " "r C Ii \( XI);~ I..t A fl ,,~ _'.__M__'_~'____~.~'_..,.J.__~A..~_,~_~...~""__.._..~.....~ __.___ __~~___,~_.. .-..........4_~_....._.~.,.'~ S,,':ori., i..(O'i(:l~, f-L<\.RR,li.;, BfHAN, BAkPA ~'~,i(lRGE.';S:f:'1-', P .;\, AfG:i1 .5, 1995 ::.il" Of Ik';ntcn 1:lea(:~1 , . D':-l:',::t::tJi:Jei ': bE 'Plaltr\bJg :.;t.d ZCI.niJ.",g ,00 .I!;c:rmC:-\I1 Be&C~l Bm..J.Levf.lxd EkrptH.-'nEJca.ch, r:L.. Atttr~t!Oll; Mik,e Ru.r.f.lnb Fax#: J~S.6090 De arMikl';: <)n bd'l"..lf of L':1.k~. \:VoTt.h 01I'isti:~,n SChDd; I re.q,uest that the, plJ.t.:l~c hearings ':;UI'H:ntlv ~.,:;hed.u:e(j April 11 3.rrd .Apri' J.8, 199.5~ be'f:;t over to the dates sc.hecuJed he-tuings in 1995. A.cc:Jjclir:g to our treffi'; en~neer5. David Phl:1IlIJer 3.TId , . 1. L.... ,', "1 ... ., 1. I .. "1 i:;i~ !"{:Tmr::,C.l \YUJ/IC ilrnny 'Wll 1jC:: tle .~:"f.utaG.ie ill tn:ne to ~;'i ow ~ppropnate xe';./lf.;U' prier ':;) the :9c.h:.;Juled Ar,r:U ,be,er-lmy.G.> r am ~l,St)".;l.:;:cd ;h.:rc. wHl be no riJ:;Jb.lcm h:::jv111'''- -- ~~' r e the ;';!\ld, In .,ifJ][,J!.e ditH: to aiicr.;>:, i:'>:',\'.I;",''; to ti,e Hcheduled Ma}' rneerjngs, , 'v' I IT.1b.ak ~~ou 1'01 :' '.;1" c,)'Jperat,on, V::rr rm!y yours, \"'1:-"-"" ,..-ft''''''''' ~-" .. ~""', f".,__ _+--:or- I, ~:!!;i;'.~:.:',. II r,;'};~.,,_ '...~' .. \".i .... J. Richard Ea.rr.i~ J:~J-1Ji.m~\ , ;U'~i ~.,-.7~., i.';)::}'. ~ . .'~::':i'l \~':.":{Ir:;;T ,~. _.~.._.__.u__.~.~__..____,_~,_,_.,..._..._.,.'---~_,_._._., ._.._+'___..__"_,....__"___.._,,~~.._. ,'._____..n"_'"____.. ~,tC(,~ ?C_,;" Fl) ':~\'.u:n, ~~~,"i<rf i:':C, " :;','i,i.1 ~"_ 1_~T,.\::':E G,\.f.~':)l?"',~ GL(Hi:H)i\ .~,:;4".:~) "+:~!'. t~2.',',::9'Jf; . +J'7i 6~,;-~-3,:_:'1 fF=J--p "~)~m U Wi m ~"pj 1 iF1!: I~ lio ; r L .1 r~-.;'~~~'-~ d r/H .~. 1, .' ,.1 ,! .~,I j Uu l Affi 5 "~'i dj, I FLf,:.'7!T~~";~>-' ~l "" Z(;<; :.:.;.J , C I T Y 0 F PLANNING & BOY N TON B E A C H DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING AGE N D A DATE: Tuesday, April 11, 1995 TIME: 7:00 P.M. PLACE: Commission Chambers 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 1. Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Introduction of Mayor, Commissioners and Board Members. 3. Agenda Approval. 4. Approval of Minutes. 5. Communications and Announcements. A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department 1) Final disposition of last month's agenda items. B. Filing of Quarterly Report for Site Plan Waivers and Minor Site Plan Modifications. 6. Election of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson 7. old Business: A. PUBLIC HEARING LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING (continued from March 14, 1995 meeting) 1. PROJECT NAME: Mainstreet Car Wash AGENT: Jim Zengage OWNER: Forward Progress, Inc. LOCATION: Approximately 185 feet north of the northeast corner of N.E. 1st Street and Boynton Beach Boulevard. DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the future land use map of the comprehensive plan from Medium Density Residential to Local Retail Commercial and rezoning from R-2 (Single and Duplex Dwelling District) to C-3 (Community commerc-ial) . 8. New Business: A. PUBLIC HEARING LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING (to be continued to the May 9, 1995 meeting) 1. PROJECT NAME: Lake Worth Christian School AGENT: J. Richard Harris, Esquire OWNER: Condor Investments, Inc. Page 2 planning & Development Board Meeting Agenda for April 11, 1995 LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: REZONING East side of High Ridge Road, approximately one-half (1/2) mile south of High Ridge Road. Request to amend th~ future land use map of the comprehensive plan from Low Density Residential to Public and Governmental /Institutional and rezoning from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to R-1AA, Single Family Residential. 2. PROJECT NAME: Lots 9 and 10, Palm Beach Country Club Estates City of Boynton Beach AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: PARKING LOT VARIANCE City of Boynton Beach South side of N.E. 8th Avenue, approximately 100 feet west of N.E. 1st Street. Request for rezoning of Lots 9 and 10 of the Palm Beach Country Club Estates subdivision from PU, Public Usage, to R-2, Single and Two Family Residential. 3. PROJECT NAME: Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: B. SITE PLANS NEW SITE PLAN Joe Handley, Craven Thompson & Associates Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority East side of High Ridge Road and 460 feet north of Gateway Boulevard. Request for relief from Article X - Parking Lots, Section 5-142 (h)(7) Driveway, to construct four driveways onto a right-of-way. 1. PROJECT NAME: Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Joe Handley, Craven Thompson & Associates Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority East of High Ridge Road and 460 feet north of Gateway Boulevard Request for site plan approval to construct a 629 space parking facility and expanded platform for the Tri-County Commuter Rail station. MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 2 . PROJECT: AGENT: Palm Beach Leisureville Recreation I Michael P. Corbett page 3 Planning & Development Board Meeting Agenda for April 11, 1995 OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: C. APPEALS LANDSCAPE APPEAL Palm Beach Leisureville, Inc. 1007 Ocean Drive Request to amend the previously approved site plan to construct a 1,685 square foot office addition to the recreation building. 1. PROJECT NAME: Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Joe Handley, Craven Thompson & Associates Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority East side of High Ridge Road and 460 feet north of Gateway Boulevard. Request for relief from Article II - Landscape Code, Section 7.5-35 (e) to omit landscaping along an interior lot line used for vehicular use. COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN APPEAL 2. PROJECT NAME: Denny's Restaurant AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Louis Fenkell, Capital Signs Denny'S 2201 South Federal Highway Request for relief from Section 10.F.6 of the Community Design Plan regarding exterior lighting. 3. PROJECT NAME: Miami Subs OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: D. USE APPROVAL Joe Marouf 1920 South Federal Highway Request for relief from Section 10.F.6 of the Community Design Plan regarding exterior lighting. 1. PROJECT NAME: Boynton Commerce Center PID AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Peter Reed, MIG Management Services of Florida, Inc. Boynton Commerce Center, Ltd. South side of Woolbright Road, 100 feet west of I-95. Request to amend the list of permitted uses for the Boynton Commerce Center to allow wholesale distribution, retail, repair and assembly of lawn maintenance equipment. page 4 Planning & Development Board Meeting Agenda for April 11, 1995 9. Comments by members 10. Adjournment NOTICE ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F.S. 286.0105) THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE CONTACT JOYCE COSTELLO, (407) 375-6013 AT LEAST TWENTY (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLE ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST. xc: Central File a:aqp"d.tq..ll PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-101 TO: FROM: Pete Mazzella, Admin. Assistant to Director of utilities ~ Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner DATE: March 15, 1995 SUBJECT: LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL REZONING (DEPT.NO.-LUAR 95-002) APPLICATION FOR LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING ANALYSIS ON AVAILABILITY OF WATER/WASTEWATER FACILITIES Enclosed is information describing the above-referenced application. Pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Department of Community Affairs for compliance review, I am requesting that you provide me with specific information on the current availability or shortage of water and wastewater facilities necessary to serve the subject property, and a statement indicating that there is, or is not, adequate urban services available to serve the maximum demand that would be allowed by the proposed land use classification. To assist you with your review I have enclosed a portion of the application, and a public notice which includes a location map. Although I am unable to provide you with specific facility demands (i.e. traffic generation, change in potable, sanitary sewer, solid waste demand/generation, etc.) I hope that you are able to conduct the necessary analysis with the enclosed information. The State has a specific time frame within which this information must be transmitted to them. Therefore, your response would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you. Attachments MISC~:LWCSWBS.LET l.,;.l'.n: Ui" HOY'NTON BEACH, FLORIDA PLANNING & ZONING BOARD LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION This application must be filled out completely and accurately and submitted, together with the materials listed in Section II below, in two (2) copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete applications will not be processed. Please Print Legibly or Type All Information. I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Project Name: LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 2. Type of Application (check one) X a. Rezoning only b. Land Use Amendment Only x c. Land Use Amendment and Rezoning 3. Date this application is accepted (to be filled out by Planning Department): d/~ /9S- 4. Applicant's Name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made): LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY. INC. Address: 7592 HIGH RIDGE ROAD LANTANA, FLORIDA 33462 Phone: (407) 586-8216 (Zip Code) FAX: (407) 586-4382 5. Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant): J. RICHARD HARRIS, ESQUIRE Address: 4400 PGA BOULEVARD, SUITE 800 Phone: PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 (Zip Code) (407) 624-3900 FAX: (407) 624-1511 6. Property OWner's (or Trustee's) Name: CONDOR INVESTMENTS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, INC. Address: 430 NORTH "G" STREET LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA 33460 (Zip Code) (407) 588-3854 FAX:(407) 585-5574 PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991 A: LandUse ( 2) 7. Correspondence Address (if different than applicant or agent) : *This is the address to which all agendas, letters, and other materials will be mailed. 8. What is the applicant's interest in the subject parcel: (owner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder, Developer, Contract Purchaser, etc.) LESSEE 9. street Address or Location of Subj ect Parcel: EAST OF HIGH RIDGE ROAD, WEST OF INTERSTATE 95, SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT. 10. Legal Description of Subject Parcel: ON ATTACHED SHEET 11. Area of subject Parcel (to the nearest hundredth (1/100) of an acre): FIVE (5) ACRES 12. current Zoning District: PUD 13. proposed Zoning District: R1AA 14. Current Land Use Category: Lou De.....~~Ty'Rc.Sick~.Ic;.,( 15. proposed Land Use Category: t'uC.bc. ...7(;\k..fc &,\1+. (rhS.~-tuf'IO\l.....{ ~; ~ 16. Intended Use of Subject Parcel: ATHLETIC FIELDS, POSSIBLE SWIMMING POOL, AND FIELD HOUSE 17. Developer or Builder: INC. LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, SOC,IETY. 18. Architect: BRYAN AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS, INC. 19. Landscape Archi tect: BRYAN AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS, IN' 20. Site Planner: BRYAN AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS, INC. 21. Civil Engineer: MICHAEL B. SCHORAH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 22. Traffic Engineer: 23. Surveyor: LANDMARK SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC. PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991 A: LandUse NOT ICE 0 F Z 0 N I N G C H A N G E NOT ICE 0 F LAN D USE C H A N G E C I T Y 0 F BOY N TON B E A C H PUB L I C H EAR I N G S The city of Boynton Beach proposes to change the land use and zoning on the property indicated on the map below. Public hearings on these proposals will be held before the Planning and Development Board on April 11, 1995 and before the city Commission on April 18, 1995, both at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the agenda permits at city Hall in the Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida. LNCE waRl1f CtASTWt IlCHOOl. t!' 11111 :: I ~ ;:; ~ :.: i ~~ ~ ~:~ ~ ::: .', ~m .'. ::::: .... .'~.' :::::: ::::=: ....... .::~::. uu: ( lla II( u ~ I/) ! I i ~ COY lIMITS -;? ~ / " 1/ "1/ ~~~~~~lj~f:;;;:=~}~~ ~ >> ') ~ j~\~\~" ~... \ i :::::::fi~t::::::::::::::::: \~-l ~;,f4 )'o~\......... ,,, _ _ ........ .......... ~ =:;;:"",..... .:.:.:,:.:.:.' ":'::::~=~:~:~:~: V 1 '\.1 '/ ....... ,- l......- ~ ( 1 I 1\ II l--= \[;g~ 1 I 111t:i~ I CfU" 4'tl6E, It,. LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL REZONING PETITIONER: AGENT: INTENDED USE: LOCATION: Lake Worth Christian school Society, Inc. J. Richard Harris, Esquire Athletic\recreation purposes A 5-acre site adjacent south and east of school, east of High Ridge Rd. appx. 1\2 mile south of Hypoluxo Rd. Complete legal description on file in the Planning Department, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: REQUEST: AMEND FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: From - Low Density Residential To - Public & Private Governmental/Institutional REZONE: From - PUD Planned Unit Development To - R-1AA Single Family Residential REQUEST: ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE NOTIFIED TO APPEAR AT SAID HEARINGS IN PERSON OR BY ATTORNEY AND BE HEARD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OR CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THESE MEETINGS WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. PLEASE CALL (407) 375-6260 FOR ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ABOVE MATTERS. SUZANNE M. KRUSE CITY CLERK HISClf: LWCS. AD ~ MEMORANDUM 14 March 1989 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: Lake Worth Christian High School Gymnasium Addition Conditional Use Application Summary: Timothy P. Dale, agent for the Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc., is requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a 17,500 square foot gymnasium at the existing school, site. The existing school, which occupies a 10.08 acre parcel, is located on the east side of High Ridge Road, south of Hypoluxo Road. The school is zoned R-1AA, Single-Family Residential. Secondary schools are permitted subject to Conditional Use approval in the R-1AAA zoning district. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning: Abutting the subject parcel to the north is a single-family subdivision zoned RS, Single-Family Residential, in Palm Beach County. Abutting the subject parcel to the east is the right-of-way for the Seaboard Airline Railroad and Interstate 95. Abutting the subject parcel to the south are vacant single-family platted lots within the Cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development (PUD), with the exception of the lot adjacent to High Ridge Road which is zoned RS in Palm Beach County and is currently owned by the Lake Worth Christian School. Abutting the subject parcel to the west is the right-of-way for High Ridge Road. Further to the west across High Ridge Road, are single-family homes on large platted lots zoned RS in Palm Beach County. Proposed Use (see attached copy of site plan): The applicant is - proposing to construct a 17,500 square foot gymnasium to serve the existing high school. The existing parking lot is proposed to be renovated to meet the requirements of Article X, Parking Lots. A new parking lot addition is also proposed on the north side of the gymnasium. Included with this application is a request for approval of a shared parking allocation (see attached copy of the parking study). Standards for Evaluating Conditional Uses: Section 11.2.0 of the Zoning Regulations contains the following standards to which conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning Department's evaluation of the application as to whether it would comply with the particular standard: ......-::: The Planning and Zoning Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations, and, in conneotion therewith, may grant conditional u.e. absolutely or conditioned upon the faithful adherence to and of fulfillment of such restrictions and conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for streets, alleys, and recreation space, and sidewalks, as shall be necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizen's general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety, and welfare of the community, and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provision has been made ~oncerning the following standards, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Proposed access to the property would occur by way of the two existing driveways onto High Ridge Road. These two driveways provide sufficient access to the site. As required by the Parking Lot Regulations, the applicant has submitted a traffic control plan which provides for placement of traffic signs and pavement striping. A stabilized fire lane has been provided around the perimeter of the proposed gymnasium to allow for emergency vehicle access in case of fire or catastrophe. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection D.1 above, and the economic, glare, noise and odor effects the conditional use would have on adjacent nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The applicant has submitted a shared parking study which indicates that sufficient parking has been provided to meet the needs of the school when in operation and the gymnasium during major athletic events (see attached report on shared parking). It is not anticipated that the proposed use would create a nuisance for the existing residences located to the north and across High Ridge Road to the west, as the proposed gymnasium will be located in the south/central portion of the site, at least 200 feet from the nearest residence. 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection D.1 and D.2 above. A dumpster is proposed to be located at the east end of the new parking lot addition, north of the proposed gymnasium. The Acting Public Works Director has indicated that this ......-:: would be a suitable location for the dumpster. 4. Utilities with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. The existing utility systems and the proposed extensions are adequate to serve the proposed use. However, some additional fire hydrant protection will be required, as noted in the comments from the Utilities Director. 5. Screening, buffering, and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions and character. Some additional landscaping is required for the renovated parking lot and the new parking lot addition. The proposed landscaping meets the requirements of the landscape code. 6. Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. There are no additional signs proposed. With respect to lighting, the applicant has hired the Florida Power and Light Company to prepare a site lighting plan that meets the minimum requirements of the Parking Lot Regulations. The details of this plan will be reviewed by staff, prior to permitting. It is not anticipated that the proposed lighting plan will create a nuisance to surrounding land uses. 7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. The proposed setbacks for the new gymnasium exceed the requirements of the R-1AA zoning district regulations. 8. General compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the zoning district. The proposed gymnasium is consistent with the current use of the property and it is not anticipated that there will be any adverse impacts to adjacent properties. The closest existing residence is located over 200 feet to the north of the proposed gymnasium and the vacant single-family lots which were platted as part of the Cedar Ridge Estates Planned Unit Development lie over 70 feet to the south. 9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearly properties, and the City as a whole. The proposed building height is thirty and one-half feet. On February 21, 1989 the City Commission approved a height exception to allow for an additional six feet above the twenty five feet permitted under the R-1AA zoning district regulations. It is not anticipated that the proposed .....-:: building height would create a conflict with surrounding land uses. 10. Economic effects on adjacent properties and the City as a whole. It is not anticipated that the proposed gymnasium addition would have an adverse impact on property values in the vicinity or would, impair the developability of these properties. Comprehensive Plan Policies The following Comprehensive Plan policies are relevant to this Conditional Use application. "Provides a suitable living environment in all neighborhoods." (p.6) "Provide a range of land use types to accomodate a full range of services and activities." (p.7) "Eliminate existing and potential land use conflicts." (p.7) "Encourage the development of complementary land uses." (p.7) Conclusions/Recommendation The proposed use and development of the property would be compatible with the surrouding neighborhood and would be consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies, therefore, the Planning Department recommends that this Conditional Use application be approved subject to the attached staff comments. C'-~~~;~ CARMEN S. ANN IATO /yh MEMORANDUM 9 February 1989 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: Lake Worth Christian School Shared Parking Allocation Section 11-H(13) of Appendix A, Zoning, contains the following provision for shared parking: Parking spaces required in this ordinance for one use or structure may be allocated in part or in whole for the required parking spaces of another use or structure if quantitative evidence is provided showing that parking demand for the different uses or structures would occur on different days of the week or at different hours. Quantitative evidence shall include estimates for peak hour/peak season parking demand based on statistical data furnished by the Urban Land Institute or an equivalent traffic engineering or land planning and design organization. Quantitative evidence may also include, where appropriate, field studies and traffic counts prepared by a traffic consultant experienced in the preparation of parking studies. In addition, a minimum buffer of ten (10) percent shall be provided to ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at the peak hour/peak season of parking demand. Calculation of said buffer shall be based on the total number of parking spaces determined to be required at the peak hour/peak season of parking demand. Evidence for joint allocation of required parking space shall be submitted to the Technical Review Board, and approval of joint allocation of required parking spaces shall be made by the City Commission, after review and recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Board. With respect to the above, Timothy P. Dale of Dale Construction Corporation, agent for the Lake Worth Christian School Society, Inc., is requesting approval of a shared parking allocation in connection with Conditional Use approval to allow for the addition of a 17,500 square foot gymnasium. The school is located on the east side of High Ridge Road, south of Hypoluxo Road. The City's Parking Lot Regulations require that J'in the instance of a parking lot serving an existing building or group of buildings where said building or group of buildings is/are to be enlarged, the entire parking lot shall be modified to meet the requirements of this article." In connection with the request for approval of the gymnasium, the applicant is also requesting approval of a revised parking lot plan in order to meet the design and landscape requirements specified by the City's development regulations. Also included is a new addition at the east end of the parking lot. As indicated in the attached parking study, the City's zoning regulations would require 145 spaces for the existing school facilities and 48 spaces for the proposed gymnasium (193 spaces total). The proposed site plan would provide a total of 102 parking spaces. The peak hour parking demand for the school facilities occurs on Monday - Friday between 2:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. with a demand for 68 of the 102 parking spaces that would be provided. The peak hour parking demand for major events at the gymnasium would occur after 5:00 p.m. weekdays and on weekends when classes are not in session. The parking required for the gymnasium (48 spaces) plus the parking demand for after-school activities (20 spaces) would generate a combined demand for 68 of the 102 parking spaces provided. The buffer in either situation would be 68 + 7 = 75 parking spaces which allows for an additional surplus of 27 parking spaces beyond that required by Section 11-H(13) of the zoning regulations. The applicant is seeking to quantify, in this particular instance, that the "parking demand for different uses occurs on different days of the week or at different hours." On Thursday, February 2, 1989 the Technical Review Board met and recommended approval of the shared parking allocation based on the documentation submitted. It was the consensus of the Technical Review Board that there is sufficient on-site parking proposed to accomodate the school during the weekday morning and afternoon hours and the athletic events held in the gymnasium during the weekday evening hours and on weekends. C~/rt ~ CARMEN S. ANNUN ATO lake.bks t- ~., ."ill' .', I "i . .\i j~ I")'~Z' H..~Z ,t,,(J .Cc7S -51 ~ ~ *'1 -, , -, ~ ! '" ol' II ir L '" .. . -- ~ ~'! H tIl I~ -, ..! I . ~ L [ > .. t::: '-- 1- ----~"J r- -""" ...:t;- : I ) I ~ r ~, I . I : II ~ I .1 ..--.----- peoH .96P!~: tlR'l-! -- ...'. ~~ z--= \~~~J 1-# u- C I T Y 0 F BOY N TON TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGE N D A B E A C H MEETING TIME: 9:00 A.M. +/tujq ~ . '~..h,L. ~\ \. . \~ )~v~ ( v_ ,"'" &.1G' v ~ LA,,' \: i- . , \;-\~ ' '!~ ,- ~<..--, \'--" \.\'V' _ -r \ I C-~ ~\S- S \'\)\.:::.,~v llh..'- F.'"l ( \ V\...- '\ - \ - \"- '-' v !~" \ \\.,-,~ v- ~ ,~ ~\2-~ ~ ~~ G\-:- \ ..--,.....'-. (Z-. -( ../ < .. \ I t,\.~. \ \ ) '''-~ . ". L. L ,-"V' ~ . ': '~1-:\\ .( {D-yv \V, '-: c.:tJ; '" ( r i {J-(v _____- -- DATE: Tuesday, April 11, 1995 PLACE: Conference Room "C", 2nd Floor, 1. Introduction 2 . Old Business NONE 3. New Business A. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans) None B. REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS AND PLANS RECEIVED None 4. other Business PRELIMINARY REVIEW SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 1. PROJECT: Lake Worth Christian school LOCATION: East side of High approximately one-half south of Hypoluxo Road. Ridge (1/2) Road, mile DESCRIPTION: Cursory review of proposed site plan modification in connection with rezoning request in progress. Note: Please return plans, documents and written comments (on legal size paper) to the Planning and Zoning Department within eight (8) working days following the meeting (Friday, April 21, 1995 at 5:00 p.m.). 5. Comments by Members 6. Adjournment The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Joyce Costello, (407)375-6013 at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. II :TJ\CKKTG.U 1 VV\ \ I<.. ~ H C I T Y 0 F BOY N TON B E A C H TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, April 11, 1995 TIME: 9:00 A.M. PLACE: Conference Room "C", 2nd Floor, West Wing 1. Introduction 2. Old Business NONE 3. New Business A. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans) None B. REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS AND PLANS RECEIVED None 4. Other Business PRELIMINARY REVIEW SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 1. PROJECT: Lake Worth Christian School LOCATION: East side of High approximately one-half south of Hypoluxo Road. Ridge (1/2) Road, mile DESCRIPTION: Cursory review of proposed site plan modification in connection with rezoning request in progress. Note: Please return plans, documents and written comments (on legal size paper) to the Planning and Zoning Department within eight (8) working days following the meeting (Friday, April 21, 1995 at 5:00 p.m.). 5. Comments by Members 6. Adjournment The city shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Joyce costello, (407)375-6013 at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the program or activity in order for the city to reasonably accommodate your request. . 'TRCMMTG. U 1