REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-233
TO:
Mike Rumpf
Senior Planner
~~JfIM~~ Hukill,
l)A\1VJt!ngineer
July 12, 1995
CEDAR RIDGE PUD - PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS AGREEMENT
P.E.
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Presumably you have sent a copy of subject agreement to City
Attorney Cherof for review and approval, as the Department of
Development cannot provide that service.
We have scanned the document, however, and have the following
comments:
1. Exhibits A,B,C & D are missing.
2. The agreement is silent as to access to Parcel B by Cedar
Ridge Community Association, Inc, which has, by plat,
perpetual maintenance responsibility for Parcel B.
3. The agreement is silent as to Parcel C, thus perhaps
causing a drainage problem for the school..
4. Reference is made to the single family homes as a secure,
private community. Since I believe the streets are
public, I am not sure a secure (read "gated") community
can be attained.
One final thought, please.
agreement? Isn't access t
available to the school,
. we involved with this
Road a public street, already
.t t sufficient access?
~/1...t1(~h n ...... ,.J'
If~~~
~~~ 1t?~
~~~?
PLANNING ANO
ZONING OEPT.
WVH/ck
C:CEDARRDG.AGR
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
<<
~fv
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-233
TO:
Mike Rumpf
Senior Planner
~~J(pA~~ Hukill,
l5ft\tVJt!ngineer
July 12, 1995
P.E.
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
CEDAR RIDGE PUD - PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS AGREEMENT
Presumably you have sent a copy of subject agreement to City
Attorney Cherof for review and approval, as the Department of
Development cannot provide that service.
We have scanned the document, however, and have the following
comments:
1. Exhibits A,B,C & D are missing.
2. The agreement is silent as to access to Parcel B by Cedar
Ridge Community Association, Inc, which has, by plat,
perpetual maintenance responsibility for Parcel B.
3. The agreement is silent as to Parcel C, thus perhaps
causing a drainage problem for the school.
4. Reference is made to the single family homes as a secure,
private community. Since I believe the streets are
public, I am not sure a secure (read "gated") community
can be attained.
One final thought, please. Why are we involved with this
agreement? Isn't access to Forest Road, a public street, already
available to the school, and isn't that sufficient access?
WVH/ck
C:CEDARRDG.AGR
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
~~~renW~fi1\
n 15 ~. --. LS-. :;'-'';;--'.. \ 111\ : i
.\ \J
UH n i 3 \995 \ t:.J
~
PLANNING ANO
ZONING OE.PT.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-341
TO: Bill Hukill, Director of Development
FROM: Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner fYle.
DATE: July 11, 1995
SUBJECT: DRAFT ACCESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN
SCHOOL AND CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Attached please find the above-referenced document submitted as a
condition of the Lake Worth Christian School land use amendment/
rezoning request. Please review and forward any comments on this
document to this office prior to July 18th, at which time the City
Commission will consider the amendment and rezoning request on
Second Reading. An additional condition of the rezoning request is
an agreement between the same two parties to enable use of the
drainage area within the PUD by the School. Once received, this
document will also be forwarded to you for review.
If you have any questions please let me know.
Attachments
LWCSAADE.MEM
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-340
TO:
John Guidry, Director of utilities
Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner ;n~
FROM:
DATE:
July 11, 1995
SUBJECT:
DRAFT ACCESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN
SCHOOL AND CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Attached please find the above-referenced document submitted as a
condition of the Lake Worth Christian School land use amendment/
rezoning request. Please review and forward any comments on this
document to this office prior to July 18th, at which time the city
Commission will consider the amendment and rezoning request on
second Reading. An additional condition of the rezoning request is
an agreement between the same two parties to enable use of the
drainage area within the PUD by the School. Once received, this
document will also be forwarded to you for review.
If you have any questions please let me know.
Attachments
LWCSAAUT.MEM
~r . J ~e . L i
\)..,( J \" t:f.;,/f
V-
~c.-_
. (\4--"- " rf
1.:I}CJo l!-P~ 11- til ~
...._..__.__.__~__n.?~D ....~ -/3- rS
La.. Kc cJ 0('-11, C /,.r~-s ft..:'Q...tA. Sc-ho:::Jl. -....-..
-(j/' I'r. ~J'~o. O-~ o-zf2~ .--f> .r~c-~
- f4- vc... <ev (" c:..~ -fJ< ~,.. -fc no- nc c.
- ,&v< ~ ~<~fr~~e~-f~_.iJn-;"<^~
C~rI'Y\L""
&5~'-& ~ -~~~/)dJ)5- ..-
/25).~~Jl .5-ftefZ .- /?'?--h~ .~'..______..n.u___._
G ;)C kc-
~ v b J ~.s-t ,~ <:::~~~,,:-1s.
1-0
.sc ~ on J:2-.._
~ 1'- f A ~ c~ v?7~ f .- .~--.. -..--.
It.! 'd C cf"Y"\. 1"--- 41'-...15_. .____~
0c.JdJ ~'^- - /ho-f7C-L- _ . _.. n.._....
V ,-'Sc h'i" -S~cdV'--cO---.-
7-0
(~~O'f. ..:s. ~y~~" (. WV,..;y
'Rf,.. t,'c 'l v...." ~ j "'0 o~ ~~/i~
G1-0~ i.A- - >'Vt~ -r;;,v-..
13el.~( '( - Sc- c ~~
{; .- ( By: r'I.s 'f?"" ecQ.s ~",f, J
_.._.....,..._..~,........"""""'.......""._..,.,...,..,"'..,..,i';o_'.'!"~o.'...;:.,._""....~'"
jJe...;s ~ AD- B g"~ -= l ~~ Cy
'St-~1f +:\N1e ,,\. :.>=---> J. ~ ~
Ke -,,-.Q~<- 02.5: ...<..> c..9ue
6.6.95 ~ <{ (c~
Tambri-
RE: RE-ADVERTISEMENT OF L.W.C. SCHOOL:
JIM HAS ADVISED THAT ALTHOUGH THERE IS NO
ESTABLISHED GUIDELINE/LAW, WE SHOULD JUST
USE cmmCN SENSE OR LOGIC IN REALIZING
\~EN THE PlffiLIC SHOULD BE NOTIFIED AGAIN.
HE INDICATED THAT TO BE SAFF.. WE SHOULD
RE-ADVERTISE~EwsPAPER NOT ~\IL~)FOR
THE SECOND POSTPONEfofENT. HE CONCLUDED BY
SAYING SPEND MORE AND SLEEP BETTER AT
NIGHT.
,.,
gp.cb1lCll~
0,-4 ~ ~ ~ ~
~,,-4,,-4 wOU
o ~ ~ '"0
N+>O--CD
~NO~
'"0 .,-4 - c.o +>
~ ~......-----
cj~at>~
~ ~ b1l'~ ci
.,-4 ~ ~ Cll 0
~ 0'$',-4 ~'@
~ ~ a',-4 ~
.$ 0.. cj -:5 CD
0.. cj ~ .,-4 x
CD CD 0.. ~ CD
-:5~~as
~ CD +> '@ w
~ '"0 ~.,-4 Cll
.,-4 0 C,) +>
~ Cll CD Cll
o ~..-t '"0 CD
.,-4 0 ro ... ~
t) C,) Q.) '" 0"
cj~ 8:~ ~
~~cj'"O+>
.....~CD~~
H Cll ~ CD cj
~~+>~C,)
~ 0 ~ .,-4
o .,-4 ~ ca ~
Cll~O~~
~ .,-4 b1l Cll ta'
~g~]CD
50~d~
~ C,) CD ~
_____ ~~ a ~
~ ~ +> .,-4 Q.)
"t u ~ o~ ~
.,-4 Q.) 0 C,) ~
~~CllQ.)
+>~ ~'"O bO
~ . ro Cll .....
'~ '"0 '"0 ;;, .~
...... ~ ~ ~
+> ro'- ... ,,-4
.,-4 0 0 w.......
~..o~..815
~^d-r~~~
};flf~ fr~J
--Jh1. ~
~;;f
----~---- /~
Ju (yif\~' f11/lvL~
, r. V I - ~ I ..
--!~ IJtu
tP-~
f~
00
""'"
;jJ- -:
([)JI~
I \
l' . .
M ~,if~
Iv~ ~~ ~
rJftw I
o
Z
(:
51~
-
..~-
rUz~ Lw C
"
/
+fl'c- ~ _ ('
~- /~
-;4 CJ-- W31- ( ~
~ frr~ I~ 4:ffFft
~ ~ ~/JJ-
~~fvP
~friI~~-
b . ~{l}-
_ ~!.I'~. I ?r
)~ ~ ^'~~ -'7
fi~-
ks;;.f5 C~I"-<:.r-~
-'~~?- (c-~~ \c.-{~"",,+i~
6-. (<7"J.... )
(J~-F' e~~~c -r-~ ~~ ~~
<f ;rf 5/-r - / ~ /J v~ h,,^ or L"':"'"
lo..c ~ '7"'-v-- ~ f ...r",_ ~..~ ~f~
.z(.e .:)~v--\:s /!7' c (~e.. r'cK~."^-? {y
--k ( lr'<<- ~ -X/' (~ c;. ~ {is. ~/( :~'"-i
<'"~'....... c ---.... --{.c-., ..-( -~ 5....J.""' ~ "-r ~.~
~ 'f<:: ~ """ ~ '^ -t..s ~ J2 t;Q.. \ n..~ ~'S~<-.....:. ..
c:::l;..",(2 dt.~~.s lj
;.'
f
1
',I
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Professional Standards
-., ~
To:
Tambri Heyden / Dir7g~r ./
TRC Memo # 95-0133
)~ &5~( -
O..u~ .f- I k, f" /u: kc K ~ -r y7~....> *
'niS1
~
~f32-(,r2r .533 -S/~
If
.~c-tyC~,,'c,.;~-+t-~~ 7-/u~
~) -rRc 1'1ee. ..fij ~(...(!- rs-
Pl ~ (: '/VI in <:>-\ y /e ~ K.. (j.... -f t C1.. Kc. G...-1 or ~ c h r)"5 '-A' ~ '5 ',_)./?0 C./( ~
Cc.r-n c.c i +v <:>-- ( ("(0--5 -f-e..r r (CA.,^- '"
(VI/."':>?'" in] =- /(~ ~~ +- L h Y1 (~r f(.s)
!'~ ( (3/fJ)
;,(<r 7
r=,rc
~
~~J.
?(:r
e~_
Sc- ho,o ( rf~n~~m~^ -r of 43 kf? c<::-/(~-- So-c-
~ u..-z; fjc..~-A ~ 6 f) -f i f/~
Ac~ s s: -/.0 ,. -Sc..,.) L ~"'"' tk "..r.r..( f <;;::, 'C. ( ~ c- ~J- '" e.'[ "e,s, <.J ~
/ ..1/70:: <"\11 $'(.s -fc- t"LT
rnsur-n~~>f'..t cfl'-'If'r'fs~, ~'~~;<...~
S:- f c t 1'" - '1''- Co ~ ~ .-.: -fy- t f ~ c- i,.: r '- c."fu-~ v'.... f:.1 <!!- $c,. "t...... (
A C~ c-\ ~ ,..c~e.~s. ~.c...~ ~V'^-<.~ 'lle.v.f.::...C....S * ~(,,) -t-r...,<:~,>
. . S0...u(bL -n't ~.e{:r ~ <:::"'<'~ ,,",~q.-\O Cv-fi-. ""..,......+y ~ o-<<:c.~s:S __~.5C'- f{...,..
L~ ~~io"t p.n-- <t,~ ~"" ~'..l n:'.,,-. ~..-"',,-.
I~c'( (~Cc'-'-E':~.- (,q~ Lr;,,,,;r~..7" .~ d2(~l-<...r-..:~ (~c:.<<:ss)
cr~ Ie:.. I~(
1f.,.r (!' (/Y\~ -< J"-'- r - 'c "^" = ~ .
E ,..~~ .
"*' ~~..(~c'-'< .~.:- <:.>.f ~.5~. . \..~. l;...oac c..;{ s -;: &~ -.:...f. ." .:-j\.<....~ Q 0..:.. ."'. ~
Uft{~fle . - --t'= ,.V\.~-l..:."'-'~ <':'-'--<:.~SS.""'l+r, ~ <::'JoA.~-r-"'f '1\-.e:~9-s .~ .
J ~ A "".) s ~ c.l~7' -(~ l""~'"",-\,c..r-- 5~1..s' ,+-, {.,-,,>.&~ .~(
'< c, +-. ( ., =~s 1::- c::......t.(<(~
c.. 1Cc:::o, or '"-. ~""c.. .,<c t~....,.... (".u..-(~ l,....~
C~ (. ~, 1<Sc....-~ () ~ . . I l\
i(t:.-.,; ---r-I"'- &:..-" "7 c) . CL ,,,-J.~ IC~ "f'O""~
f J- fv.:--~' r o:JL\,,,-,.............., =(."._\(V-..c::..,,--~ ~~<......,..~(
'1
., '-pc., c :...,-. ~ ~
~~~~~f C_~'~'->-v~ 5,-~ ~~<-.\. .v<.~ ~~
, *- if
~ 5 ho..:; ~'Y"'- v'\.I'-C ~~ -''<" LA:"- U-n~
C~~ ~ ~C"~L-t.(f 1i"",s~ p--:--\ ~-s~~--~~ J2<-~v~-~ CTkC f
{Vlc ~'"' t..~
, ;.\~
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-134
DATE: April 28,1995
N;. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR.
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 CE-.
SUBJECT: LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL - CONCEPTUAL PLAN
The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review:
1. The plan shall be subject to S.F.W.M.D. approval and the adjacent H.O.A. (for their outfall
into their lake.
2. Will rezoning be required to change the land use from residential to public?
3. Formal plans submitted shall be subject to the city's land development regulations and in
particular, chapter 23, parking lots.
ff:)f-..... t
. (r1 ,...., n I'ry ie; ~-~ !
m.. ~ l"J. L~ !I \j t~~ :..'. n i 1
I ,i --,~~---,~",
I wI.', i' .
'UU; ..
j L~-
., pl. '.'.".'.""'.." . . ~~...
7;,;LOr'iJ'J~~'_," . jY.~
KRH/krh
c: William Hukill and to file
Iwchrist.cur
titf\(A.)~
."L
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 195-169
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Foreste:;/Environmentalist t<~ tf
Lake Worth Christian School
Preliminary Review Site Plan Modification
TO:
RE:
DATE:
April 21, 1995
The applicant should indicate on the landscape plan any existing
trees and what will occur with these trees as part of the project.
The project should continue on the normal review process.
KH : ad
r:::::;::--- .~ , c
\ (::\ ::
\ i l\ \ _c.
1 \ ~~,~, ':
'\ \ \ \
: Ij \;~~ ;
"-:1 r=~i.
,.. 1,,; ,
",I:
L-"flE.'i~;.:::~ ; ~> (.
L
. it?,->
b__.' .,"<f_
MEMORANDUM
TO:
1 A"., !.3 K',. Hfybt-,J I pLAI1nV1wG + -z.OIlJ/I\J(:,
~ .
..JCJHw WIL..h,v~ ,P1'f/l'ks S'-f{'r.
I
'i-~'i-1J
~ i~~c 1oA..,
FROM:
;
i
DATE:
i i
I.'
RE:
Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans
'-Art Wc:W111 ,C/ff- ''''~ T/ ~,...J ScHo7!. L
Project:
After reviewing the
referenced project
Department recommends
the Planning and
consideration.
amended tJ plans for the above
the u~(c.ATi?o~ + ~/f,(lk
that the project be forwarded to
Development Board for their
..
This department will not be required to sign-off the
permit documents associated with the subject project.
- --.--------.
C:AMEND1.ALD
~__-:-:_-;_.._u
.)
__ ~..-J~'___.'"".":"h'
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95 - 086
April 10, 1995
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
RE:
TRe COMMENTS
LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
PROPOSED SITE PLAN MODIFICATION &: ZONING REQUEST
The Building Division supports the rezoning request and offers
the following comments on the site plan:
1. Building elevations are needed.
2. Floor plan of one or more of the future buildings
should have bathrooms per code.
3. Show proof that the Handicap Code and Table 600 of the
Standard Building Code will be met.
~
AN:bh
XC: William V. Hukill, P.E.
SCHOOL
PRuJl::C'l' 'l'+'l'LE l
UESCRlf''l'ION: l.
'l'YPE: '
DA'l'E REC '10:
I
* * * * ~ *
'1"H-J\CK1.NG LUG - ::H'J'I~ PLAN Ht:Vl.~W ::iUtlMl'l"l'AI.
~E WORTH Ch__~STIAN . f'lLE NU,: LUAR 95-002
~ROPOSED SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
tNEW SITE PLAN XXX MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICA'l'ION
3/31/95 AMOUNT: $0.00 RECEIPT NO.: N/A
THIS IS A CURSORY TRC REVIEW
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED:
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D:
XXXX
No
(Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
* ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
THIS IS A CURSORY TRC REVIEW
APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL:
DATE:
~
--BEN I ED
DATE:
DATE OF LET'fER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
2nd SUBMIT'l'AL
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE:
DATE:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER:
REVIEWER'S NAME:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
THIS IS A CURSORY TRC REVIEW
(Label TRC Departments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW.
DATE SENT: Lf/t /9'6--
RETURN DATE:
4/2'/95
MEMO NUMBER: TRC AGENDA
1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
MEMO # I DATE I "c"
/ /
/ /
/ 1../1,;;. i / --
/ J /
7~..-c;/3~/ 5/( I 0/
PLANS
~
=fE-
PlanninrT
Building
Engineer
Engineer
Forester
PLANS
}Jo
~~
1~~
MEMO # I
I
'1}".- C)~E-. /
9s--/ ~t/-/
., I
,
CJ.s-/b~ I
DATE / "C"
~ / /({l"~
.!fl f 9f7 ..t2-
l~
(,1ft! / ~
Util.
P.w.
Parks
Fire
Police
TYPE OF VARIANCE(S)
DATE OF MEETING:
DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS:
(Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out wI comments:
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLE'l'E SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC '0 :
MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW.
DA'l'E SENT: MEMO #:
RETURN DATE:
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
PLANS MEMO # I DATE I"R/D" PLANS MEMO # I DATE I"R/D"
Util. I / Planning / /
P.w. I I Building / /
Parks / / Engineer / /
Fire / / Engineer / /
Police / / Forester / I
LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INS'l~LLED:
SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT:
A: 'rRACKING. Sf'
^'--'.s
MEMORANDUM
TO:
1 An,I3t<t" Hfybt-pJ I PLAIV,vIWb + "2.01tJ1i-ve:.
:3'CJHw WI'L1..v~ ,P-4li'ks S4;or.
I
'j-').y-crJ
fJ i~~c 1o~
FROM:
jJ
- New Site Plan - Amended Plans
W~1(A ~ If;:; ,,,) rl A,IJ .sGl4o~ L-
DATE:
RE:
Site Plan Review
Project:
L-A ~t
After reviewinq the
referenced project
Department recommends
the Planninq and
consideration.
amended Of plans for the above
the &1<f04tl~~ '<I- f"/f'<;k
that the project be forwarded to
Development Board for their
..
This department will not be required to siqn-off the
permit documents associated with the subject project.
-.---r; r~\
j:~ ~.;:~~,
C:AHEND1.ALD
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Professional Standards
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Tambri Heyden / Dirr..~
Lt. James Cumming
28 April 1995
Lake Worth Christian School
TRC Memo # 95-0133
I have reviewed the plans and find th~to be lacking in thought regarding the parking situation. I
believe that the pool and ball field areas should have some type of direct parking access and not
be reliant on the staff parking area. I feel this just encourages people to drive onto the grass and
through play areas in an attempt to get to these recreation areas.
~;.':~--,"""""......-"..,...,.,.."",. ._~-._.~-" ."","...w-"._.",
!t, "'i I? (;"\ ".'".~--'"~
f-~ Ir'Ij f;:t 11:"' i,'=-~
~' ~l L!, t.l-) I _ \
! , I, .".,_.",~~.;.. 'w' i (\ I
,q n, ~ -"" ~ ~1 ~ ~_
" flU ~I '!
: ill i Ii
,'4 L~~.. .:/
PLJl/J:'t:,:,:;~r':.,., ....J
'+-.."'1'1" J.,',..,
'-~'-""\&",,,,~~:- . . ""
t \ ~\us.
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-134
DATE: April 28,1995
TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR.
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 CE.-.
SUBJECT: LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL - CONCEPTUAL PLAN
The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review:
1. The plan shall be subject to S.F.W.M.D. approval and the adjacent H.O.A. (for their outfall
into their lake.
2. Wi11 rezoning be required to change the land use from residential to public?
3. Formal plans submitted shall be subject to the city's land development regulations and in
particular, chapter 23, parking lots.
!.,.I~I.. fij].LDt.llr~..
~ lJJ I ' i I .~ l '!
f ~C;~~f-:'Ji";.~-~' ",. ~;
~ 7C::'.>!.j!~~; iY', ~
- ""''',--.-....'''.......,...'''.~.~.......~, ~,~.""
KRH/krh
c: William Hukill and to file
Iwchrist.cur
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-086
April 10, 1995
1.'0 :
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
RE:
TRC COMMENTS
LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
PROPOSED SITE PLAN MODIFICATION & ZONING REQUEST
The Building Division supports the rezoning request and offers
the following comments on the site plan:
1. Building elevations are needed.
2. Floor plan of one or more of the future buildings
should have bathrooms per code.
3. Show proof that the Handicap Code and Table 600 of the
Standard Building Code will be met.
~
. ~
1 N Wb~d
AN:bh
XC: William V. Hukill, P.E.
:..
.)
SCHOOL
f L~ fA.):'S
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 195-169
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist r<~ 11
Lake Worth Christian School
Preliminary Review Site Plan Modification
TO:
RE:
DATE:
April 21, 1995
The applicant should indicate on the landscape plan any existing
trees and what will occur with these trees as part of the project.
The project should continue on the normal review process.
KH:ad
., ',IT~.J~
f; ~, L t ~
rr=:-;;- '" p ,
\\ n) ~!:.". .
t \ 1"
\\JU
i
\
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 95 - 101
DATE:
March 20, 1995
v
TO:
Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner ~
FROM:
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director
SUBJECT: Lake Worth Christian School Rezoning
We recommend that the applicant have a fire flow test conducted by a certified
person to determine adequacy of fire protection to the subject parcel. Under current
residential usage, the fire flow requirement is only 500 gallons per minute (gpm).
However, under institutional usage, the requirement is 1500 gpm. It is therefore
imperative that the applicant determine the available fire flow at this time, for the
change in usage will impose the much higher fire flow requirement on the property.
Any upgrading of the water system that will be required to meet the higher standard
must be performed at the owner's expense.
In all other respects, the existing utilities are sufficient to meet the land use change
that is proposed.
Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office.
JAG/PVM
bc: Peter Mazzella
xc: Skip Milor
File
t . ~~.::-.-.
If"'""\. - rt'. "
J I "'! I I
lit! If""
t j ~,~
t iii' f r
IlJi!! i!
fbl
i L--c:
t I
, !
~~
DRAINAGE REPORT
FOR
LAKE WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOLr
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER, 1994
Prepared by:
Michael B. Schorah and Associates, Inc.
1850 Forest Hill Blvd., Suite 206
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
i\IICHAEL B. SCHORAH & ASSOCIATES, INC
I. INTRODUCTION
The Lake Worth Christian School is proposing to construct additional classroom
buildings, an auditorium, and several ballflelds on the remainder of the existing school
site and on a recently acquired residential site located in the City of Boynton Beach.
The residential site will be Incorporated Into the school site and an approved drainage
system will be provided for the entire site.
II. EXISTING FACILITIES
The school site presently utilizes an approved drainage system which provides the
required on-site retention of the design storm. The proposed expansion of the
school's facilities will be constructed on the undeveloped portion of the existing site.
The drainage system which exists for the developed portion of the school site will
remain In place and will continue to provide the drainage for this portion of the site.
The residential site, as part of a South Florida Water Management District approved
P.U.D., presently discharges into the master drainage system for the entire
development. Therefore, the drainage from the anticipated developed lots has been
accounted for in the design of the existing drainage system. The developed lots and
roadway for this particular site would typically average 40% Impervious surfaces.
III. PROPOSED FACILITIES
The proposed drainage system will be designed to meet the requirements of the
South Florida Water Management District and the City of Boynton Beach. The
residential site will consist of nearly 1 00% pervious ballfields instead of 60% pervious
lots. The difference in the impervious area accounted for in the drainage system and
that to be constructed on this site will be credited to the proposed school site
Improvements.
(continued)
MICHAEL B. SCHORAH & ASSUUA TES, INC
Lake Worth Christian School
December 30, 1994
Page 2
The drainage system for the proposed expansion will discharge into the master
drainage system for the residential development. The proposed discharge will be
designed not to exceed the anticipated runoff from the developed lots. The
residential site will be included in the school site and excluded from the remainder of
the development by providing perimeter grading in accordance with the South Florida
Water Management District's rules which will prevent off-site overland flows for storm
events up to and including the design storm. Detailed plans of the proposed site
improvements will be submitted to the South Florida Water Management District and
the City of Boynton Beach for their review and approval prior to construction.
~~
Martha H. Carter, P.E.
J - J 0 . CJ~
Date