APPLICATION
PRUJl::C'l' '1'1'1'1
lll::l:iCRIl>'l'lON
',"i Pi:::
W\'l'E REC I D:
'J'RACKING
~G - SITE PLAN REVIEW SUB~ lTAL
-?~\!'-'":> 1'0;4 ,9t v(:?c 7(/ '1b'
1" e(
PARKRIDGE FILE NO.: SBMP 95-003
SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN
NEW SITE PLAN MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
2 6 AMOUNT: 1 nnn nn kJ::C~IPT NO.:
* * t * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
'rWii:l..VE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: 12/6/95
COLORED ELEVATIONS RECID:
. -
(Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The Plann11lg Dept. set will. be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL:
DATE:
ACCEPTED
12/6/95
DENIED
DATE:
DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIfYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
2nd SUBMIT1'AL
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE:
DATE:
DATE UF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER:
REVIEWER'S NAME:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I
(Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMO NUMB~R OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW.
DA'rE SEN'l': 1~/dJS- RETUkN DATE: /;;)//6-j;~ MEMO NUMBER: t..?~613
.st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
PLANS MEMO It / / "c" PLANS MEMO ,. / / "C"
utile q~-~ L/ / -.SL. Planning '1- 1"" / L~
. !J- .":a4. /
P.w. q~-..:t,n1 I / ...G::::- · Building V <i's - I..f cf..3 / /~
Parks -r 95-565" / /- Engineer '1...)"- <t .-r ~ / / -1L..
, Fire <-16 dJ7q / /~/~ 0 I~ Engineer / /-
Police ''i O!Q6 / I LIIJ /- i:~orester Y $J5.SF!S' / lahJ.. /~
, .
'rY P E; Oli' VARIANCE(S) DA'I'E OF MEETING:
DA'l'E OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS:
(Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. u checklist sent out w/ comment:~
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORED ELEVATIONS RBC I D:
MEMO SENT TO,!~C TO PBRFORM 2nd RBVIB~., n
DA1'E SENT: ~I MBMO It:-r~c. U~~<'-'
RETURN DATE: J:tpr /9;)"
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
PLANS HIMO ft I DATI IIIR/U" PLANS HEMO ft I DATI I"R/D"
Utile I I Planning I I
P.W. I / BUilding / /
Parks / / Engineer / /
Fire I I Engineer I /
Police / / Forster / /
LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED:
SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DA'l'.!i: APPROVAL LS1'TER SENT:
.".: 'l'kACK1NG. tiP
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 95- 391
I'r~~~ ~ ~ ~~j.~~1<.~."..'(,;;'\~
L-.' dl
dU .. _~~..._. t
PLAimll\!G p,lIj[) 1CI1{ 1
ZONING DEPT. '~
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
~r
~
FROM:
John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
Date: December 14, 1995
SUBJECT: Park Ridge Plat and Development Plans
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
I. Palm Beach Health Department permits will be required for water and
sanitary sewer systems, (Sec. 26.12).
2. This department requests a meeting with the project engineer to discuss
several additions and corrections on the proposed water and sanitary
sewer plans and details.
3. A capacity reservation fee of$4,712.40 will be due within thirty (30) days of City
Commission approval of the site plan or upon request for my signature on the
permit applications to the Health Unit. (Sec. 26-34(E))
4. The proposed development plans indicate several single family homes on a single
parcel. It is currently unclear as to who will be responsible for maintenance of the
water and sewer lines from the edge of the utilities easement to the building.
Customarily, said maintenance is the responsibility of the homeowner who owns
the property. In this case ownership is not clear.
We have no objection to the plan proceeding through the review process if the question
regarding type of development and maintenance recan be satisfactorily addressed.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404,
sm
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
pkrig 1
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-207
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ:
Site Plan - Park Ridge
DATE:
December 13, 1995
The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site.
REier
~~i
, - \"~. ~ W, _la.., J)....---'1 \\\\\ \
~ \S__ tJ'
\~.. \\
, \' ~
,--~\)
~ ~~m~~tH
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO.
\-,'\":M':-""-~J-',~~-, -~'-[l, ",- W ffi -m'\ 1
II It; , '_.'~--'l
que'" .
.1 . I II
II ; , \. !
!. ' i
, ~
95-4731 . "Jfi'~"7It~'I'~'\D ='":JO
· ~~,~_ k~L~'lbfri._,,\' /) t.
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~m Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
December 13, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
PARKRIDGE - MASTER PLAN
We have reviewed the master plan for Parkridge (or is it Park
Ridge?) sheet 1 of 1 and find as follows:
1. Revise documents to reflect all comments.
2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the
City's code requirements at time of application. These
permits include, but are not limited to the following;
site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping,
irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required
from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other
permitting agency shall be included with your permit
request.
3. This master plan is not required as a condition of
zoning, but is required as a pre-requisite to platting.
Since the land is to be subdivided into two or more lots
or parcels either by plat or metes and bounds, it must be
platted (Chapter 1, Article II, page 1-33 and Chapter 5,
page 5-1). Since the subdivided lots are not shown on
the master plan, the plan cannot proceed without
certification from the applicant that the master plan and
the plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules
and regulations including, but not limited to, the
Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations.
4. Insufficient information to complete review. This is not
a rezoning request, so dimens'ions must comply with R-3
zoning. Single family dwellings in R-3 districts must
comply with R-1 district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5,
par.G2b, pg.2-21
5. Provide statement regarding subsurface conditions.
Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3M, pg.3-5
6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and
collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.1lA, pg.6-3
7. Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003
feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet.
Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 & 6-9
8. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap.6, Art.IV,
Sec.lOD, pg.6-12
9. Provide street grades no steeper than 2J:i per cent.
Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.10I, pg.6-13
Dept. of Development, Engineering Div. Memo No. 95-473
Re: Parkridge - Master Plan
December 13, 1995
Page #2
10. Provide street names as required in Chap. 6, Art. IV,
Sec.10Q, pg.6-14
11. Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6, Art.IV,
Sec.13, pg.6-16
12. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering
approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24
The package we received included sheets 1 thru 8 of infrastructure
and L-1 thru L-3 of landscaping, all of which are due upon approval
of the master plan. (Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4A, pg.6-19) We will
retain them for review at that time.
WVH/ck
xc: Ken Hall
A:PARKRDGE.MPR
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
, I' ' \ :'7 rc:
. 'J I: ! I \/; I~;
.j I : ---~.. '.". -',
( ":
'i po'. .
UUL' ':,!':: ~
._._...,_._.-..~_,J
ptf"'f'l"IG I~'D
. \1'-1 'J I. 1t,,~ I
l!iJG nfPT. 2::'
T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS
11 DECEMBER 95
PARK RIDGE - SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN-I st REVIEW MEMO #0196
I have reviewed the above plans and fi!},4.:}Jq;'Pr,061~~i;iii t4.t~:JitPe.
j:;)= {::,;?i:;::i:;;!;;,:;;,;;:;:;;;:::;"':":":\::" {",.,} (:::;::,~/:'::;i;:;;::::::;::'
. :" :, <"~::,'"",','.'.~",:,',,:,,,;:,;;:,.:,.,'.:',,.;,:,'.:,~:',":,',':.
:/:::"::'::::::J' " ,
r:::';/,..".""..i:l Respec fully~ fi' "JrriI
U~0~ ~
11~.~.:::.:.:::.;.:.::;::.~~;:..:::~; r...~~::;::;:;::::~.-:::::..
! L.~,gt! ,Marlqq Hani,~,
t,~ I.,f':.:.:..':':'.:.'..'.... Ci t.t;:;;::::::;~:::~,l rJ
[8;:
c:':::::::;:;;:;::>
~~~ \
,.~..;....:....:-~:::: .r:
'-~)
lB~
UUu
@~>>
':~;;;;::::>"'*'
o::.~:~~' {' ~~~.
<",<",. ~
.,..... ~\,,:::::. ~:::,,',"
~:~;:;~ .. "
~','~ ~,' \"il'
~ i \.,:i>::~~:~~~::l
1 l
~.....~
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 395-575
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environrnentalisl }-~\-
Parkridge - Master Plan
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
December 12, 1995
The applicant should provide a 1) tree survey and 2) Tree Management Plan for the property. The
applicant should receive written approval from the State Gave and Fresh Water Fish Commission that
there are no gopher tortoises/scrub jays on the site. The plan should continue on the normal review
process.
KH:ad
-----;:;":,'\
-.--- \"a r "~
"",~"'-'~ ~ ~ \" \ \
\.\"'.~"-"" \~ W~ ~*,,~_JL..~."",\, \ \\ \,\
"') \,....., . " 1
: \ \ ,.' '" ' ',; ': I
.".\. .'. ;' ,.,,"
,.. . ."
\ n\ \ ' f I,
;, '\" I'
~ ~ . \ \.
"f}"./,. I V
,?tyfi' i. - ,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-722
r~-I r{
i,UUl
t
ii !~
il:
,
,\11
Hi,
'I
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
!
(;f)l-L/
FROM:
Jerzy Lewicki
DATE:
December 15, 1995
SUBJECT:
Subdivision
Project:
Location:
Master Plan - 1st Review
Park Ridge
East side of the intersection of Northeast
20th Avenue and Northeast 4th Street
Agent:
File No.:
John Grant, Jr., Inc.
SBMP 95-003
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the
subdivision master plan review of the plans for the above-
referenced proj ect . It should be noted that the comments are
divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of
comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land
Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected
and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for
second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through
the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists
recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff
believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall
understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are
subject to additional comments. I recommend that the
applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the
comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code
deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review
schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me
regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal
deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement.
Note: Our comments are made under the assumption that the
ownership of the proposed development will not require further
resubdivision of the tract as to create individual lots for the
housing units. We have reviewed the conformance of this project
with relevant zoning regulations assuming that the development
contains one tract of land. Therefore, the perimeter setbacks, as
proposed, were determined to be acceptable per bulk regulation of
the R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling District. Our assumption of this
development takinq place on one tract only needs to be reflected on
the Plat submitted to the City for review.
I. SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Identify clearly the property lines on both Master Plan
and Survey Map. Include this identification in the
legend.
2. Indicate in the attachment and on the Master Plan who
will be responsible for the streets maintenance: the City
or developer.
3 .
Indicate in
ownership of
units.
the
the
attachment the anticipated form of
housing stock and proposed type of
1/'-
i 4.
\..
On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate location of
proposed sidewalks.
;;.
,
On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the dimension
of the proposed cul-de-sac (diameter or radius) .
"-
6 .
On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide the minimum
dimension of the rear yard.
Page 2
Memorandum
1st Review
Park Ridge
No. 95-722
- Subdivision Master Plan
7.
On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide information in
regard to land use and zoning of all adjacent properties.
8. In order to allow the City Staff to evaluate how the
proposed development fits the adjacent land use and
and its physical characteristics provide a map extending
to:
alley between Northside Condominium and the commercial
development - to the North,
trailer park, indicating the closest located units - to
the South,
Residential development across the street from the NE
4th Street, - to the West,
area across the Rail Road indicating any development that
occurs to the East within a reasonable distance.
Within the extended perimeter area indicate all existing
streets, sidewalks, footprints of the buildings,
landscape elements, and other characteristic elements of
the surrounding development.
9. In the site data, on sheet 1 of 1, replace the word
"proposed" with the word "existing" in regard to zoning
classification.
10. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the width of
the N.E. 4th Street.
11. Provide traffic analysis
concurrency requirements.
for
the
evaluation
of
12. The proposed Master Plan is in violation with the
zoning regulations if the plat will be approved as
submitted.
13. All information as specified in Chapter 3, Master Plan
Review, should be included or referenced on the Master
Plan, sheet 1 of 1.
14. Indicate location and provide relevant calculation in
respect to parking.
15. Provide Homeowners Association documents.
A:SBMP-PRl
TO:
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-56 @ ~:; ~ 8:0 ~ 00'
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superinrendent r
Parkridge ~e
ld30 ElNINOZ
Otli\l DNINNVlcJ
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
December 8, 1995
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the new site plan for Parkridge Place. The
following comments are submitted:
I. Based on 34 single family homes, the recreation dedication requirement is calculated
34 d.u. X .018 acres = .612 acres
2. The plan gives no infonnation that the developer plans to apply for one-half credit for private
recreation. The full dedication requirement is required as cash in lieu ofland.
JW:ad
BUILDING DIVISION
ill I' '~"-~fl R rn
o [l'~~,__.~,,:""IC:_~~~~, ~ , .~...
I ' 'J I' .
. _~._~.'~~.,~-~J .',
., '\"'" ""'[) ~ ..
PI k:i~. 1"1,' r,' i "1/
Zf'J,::,;r: n~tP'TI'- It Yl-II\ .
~~~~~':::"';':"''''':'''''''~'4 ...1 ~~"""(".""".
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-443
December 18, 1995
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Department of Development Director
Re:
Park Ridge Site Plan
Please refer to Memorandum No. 95-442 for comments relative the Master Plan and Site Plan.
(Copy Attached).
~~/
Al Ne old'--/
AN:mh
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
PKRIDGE
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-442
December 18, 1995
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director
Re:
Park Ridge Master Plan
After reviewing the plans for the above reference project, the Building Division cannot support this plan going
forward because of so many unanswered questions that we cannot address without such information as type of
multiple-family residential structures, i.e., apartments, cooperatives, condominiums or townhouses.
If they are to be single-family dwellings, they should comply with R-I site regulations under LDR Section 5,
Paragraph E-2 and should have platted lots to check setbacks and lot coverage.
In addition to the above comments, the following should be shown on the plans:
1. Evaluation and floor plan unless they are single-family.
2. Distance between building to comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code.
3. Setbacks should be shown from Park Ridge Circle (See definition of lot frontage, LDR Page
1-23, Article II), also see Access for an understanding of where front setbacks are from.
4. Setbacks must be shown for pools, screen rooms, etc.
5. Sign details required for Site approval.
- AN:mh
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
PKRIDGE
DEPAR'"dENT OF DEVELOPMEN'I'
100 Bas~ BOYD~on Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boyn~on aeach, Florida 33&25-0310
April 12, 1996
rill
'-'-
rn Ii;:; Ire- 1'; 'i n r;I ill
I U) .!' " !;>
'-- ~')-,-,;;!..."".:,_._. ,;1."" n
APR121996 ,IU
John A. Grant, Jr., Inc.
3333 N. Federal Highway
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Attention: W. Keith Grant, Vice President
Dear Mr. Grant:
:h ~ (~fire It-I/:;<-
l{aeSk-r- ~~,
Re: Park Ridge PUD
We have reviewed your request for a ruling by our City Attorney on sidewalks and street rights-
of-way. The request has been referred back to us for disposition, which is as follows:
Sidewalks - LDR Chapter 6, Article III, Section II, Paragraph A, page 6-3 requires
sidewalks on both sides of all local streets in platted or unplatted subdivisions. A
procedure is outlined therein for substituting a bicycle path for the two sidewalks.
Rights-of-Way - LDR Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 7, page 6-10 requires that all lots
must have frontage on a street (or have permanent private access to a street) which has a
minimum right-of-way of fifty feet.
In order to deviate from either of these, or any' other subdivision requirement, the variance
procedure outlined in LDR Chapter I, Article I, Section II, page 1-5 must be followed. The fee
accompanying a variance request has been established by the City Commission as $400 for the
first variance and $100 for each additional variance.
I have enclosed for your convenience all three LDR quotations mentioned herein. Let us know if
you need further assistance.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
.g,~LZ//'t?;/~w/'
William Hukill, P.E.
Director of Development
WVH/ck
attachments
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
C:PKRDGV AR
phone: <'07) 315-6280
FAX: <'07) 375-6357
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-114
~""~''''''''_'.."......-~____-",...,~.''''~r_'_..._",.~_
: 1'""\ I? (ii:l r2 r, ,\11 ,? r
in! LS U!J is li \~ Li;.1r
I iJ 1 r------"'-.-.?' i
'nq -I i
lid! - 'i996 q,
,I . ',." ~ ~ ';'~_
L._,__~__~_~__.J
PlI\NNII'JG MJD
lON!NC DFPT.
"-"'~'-'-.="'~'''" '-'-"'--"""~"'''-~'''~''''''~_''r'_'''''''
RE:
PARK RIDGE
-f~
PDA' (Z ft2t ~
MWul~
f(~
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
~dJtL< ~uki11, P.E.
~~gIneer
FROM:
DATE:
March 29, 1996
Please review the attached March 23 letter from John Grant requesting several opinions from our
City Attorney. Please also see the March 22 Pawe1czyk memo refusing to give an opinion, but
referring questions to you. Please respond as you feel appropriate.
WVH/ck
attachments
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
C:PARKRDG
rn
rn m m'D \VI rn fn)!
I' ! I
f ~
tv!,~i 2 5 1996 U 1
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
ENGINEERING
MEMORANOUH
FROK:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director. 1(.)
william HUkill, P.E., city Bnqineer 11/'}'.
Michael J. Pawelozyk, Assistant city Attorney
Park Ridg_ - Request tor opinion
TO:
RB:
DATE:
Marcb 22, 1996
I have reviewed the attached Bnqineering MemorenduD No. 96-
092, regarding the Park Ridge Development. The four (4) requests
for opinion are not requests fo~ legal opinions. Such questions
would be JIlore appropriately answereC1 by the Planning & Zoning
Department and its capable staft.
If any le9al questions do arise in answering these questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
xc: Carrie Parker, city Manager
MJP/aa
900182
MEMO
PARI<RIDG
DEPARTMJ:NT O' DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. '6-092
FROM:
James Cbcrof
City Attorney
kJ'~ukin, P.E.
~ginccr
WR 18 j
TO:
DATE:
March 14, 1996
RE:
PARK RIDGE - REQUEST FOR OPINION
We have today received a letter &om W. Keith Grant asking that we prescot 4 specific: requests to
yoo for opinions (attached). Please review aDd respond to us A.S.A.P.
WVHlek
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
Tambri Hcyden.PlaDlling & Zoning Director
W. Keith Grant, John A. Grant.. Jr., Inc.
C;'KJUlGCA
JOHN A. GRANT. JR.. INC.
CONMTlN8 fN8IHEUS AIm WI) IUfMYOU
mE
:1333 N. F'IIDItIllAL H"NWAoY
IIocl.. 1kraH. "'0MlIM a:M81
NIQtlWAYI AltO MOClU
.TORN DltAlNAlK
.ATOt SUPPl. 't
LAHO OC'CLOPMEHT'~
tuaOl\ltllOHS
T~HICSUINI:V'
ltACH CR08IQN
PHONIt 140'1' a">>:I:I FAA (407) .....>>..
March 13, 1996
Mr. Bill Hukill, P.S.
Director Engineering Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 Bast Boynton Beacn Blvd.
Boynton Beach, PL 33435
Park Ridge
Our Job No.
Dear Mr. Hukill:
RB:
JG 100-7803
ENGI
R'~.
CONafl'UCnON aurwrta
NOfmIAlIE IUJIIICTt
ITllUCruRAL DC.....
MNITAlh'~
NNlINAS
C:ON.,."UCTIOH 'U"CJMIION
INLlIHCI'O UNU
Transmitted herewith is Exhibit "A-, a site plan for the proposed
development ot Park Ridge. a Single Pamily Condominium. The SUbject
property is presently ~oned Multi-family.
We have previously submitted plans to the City for the TRC ~rocess.
Based upon City comments and Subsequent meetings, the C1ty has'
recommended that the property be rezoned from Multi-tamily to P.U.D.
We have been advised that the recommended rezoning will allow for the
development of a Single Family Condominium as indicated on the
attached B~ibit "A".
We request that you submit this letter and Exhibit "A" to the City
Attorney for a written response or the City'S position of the
fOllowing:
1) Is 24' Ingre8s/Bgress Basement a sutficient width to provide
access for private road purposes tor the Single Family
Condominium P.U.D.? .
2) Do the setbacks to the units and tvcical separation between
units as indicated on Bxhibit .~A. meet City Code
Requirements?
3) Is a i.U.D. buffer required in addition to the setbacks to
units?
4) Are sidewalks required adjacent to the private road access?
Please advise at your earliest convenience 80 that we can proceed
with our TRC process.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please, call me at
395-3333.
WKG/la
Bnclosure
cc: Gary Degraf
C.
II W P ~
· 0 . a
:r .' :. ~
= :. CD
- CD'"
~I'C
r ~ ~
c.. .,. l:'
t: 0 c. ~
(I ~II ;
I ~~ ~
I' ~II
-----
--
N~f"~A~t .,4.!~.. Sf~
.r,.."
~. ..,..-.
FuRlOll tIlsr COIlS"!" eAlL~/!JIO
--..--------------.---..---..--------.----..---..---......---...--
~
;
i
I
~
<-
Z -!:::=>
-/
I
I
II)' _...... -
C I
.
I
I
i
"
~
In
e
~
rt'I
~
Z
....
i
..
i
-c
~
I
s
lD
~
j
"
~
i
JOHN A. GRANT. JR.. INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
3333 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY
BocA RATON. FLORIDA 33431
ifDJ ~ & ~ II W ~ mil
I1IJ ' " 5 /996 ill:
E[{'H~l~R'NG I
---.."'......---., ,
March 23, 1996
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS
MORTGAGE SURVEYS
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
SANITARY SEWERS
MARINAS
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION
BULKHEAD LINES
HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES
STORM DRAINAGE
WATER SUPPLY
LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
SUBDIVISIONS
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS
BEACH EROSION
PHONE (407) 395-3333 FAX (407) 39!5-3315
Mr. Bill Hukill, P.E.
Director Engineering Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: Park Ridge
Our Job No. JG 100-7803
Dear Mr. Hukill:
In reference to our March 21" 1996 telecon regarding the above
referenced project, we are amendin$ our March 13, 1996 request for a
written response of the City'S posltion. Please void our March 13th
request and advise accordingly of the following:
Transmitted herewith is Exhibit "A", a site plan for the proposed
development of Park Ridge, a Single Family Detached HOA PUD. The
subject property is presently zoned Multi-family.
We have previously submitted plans to the City for the TRC ~rocess.
Based upon City comments and subsequent meetings, the Clty has
recommended that the property be rezoned from Multi-family to P.U.D.
We have been advised that the recommended rezoning will allow for the
development of a Single Family Detached HOA PUD as indicated on the
attached Exhibit "A".
The individual units will be conveyed by metes and bounds legal
description with the remaining land adjacent the units being common
property and dedicated to the HOA.
We request that you submit this letter and Exhibit
Attorney for a written response of the City'S
following:
"A" to the City
position of the
1)
Is 24' Ingress/Egress Easement a sufficient width to provide
access for private road purposes for the Single Family
Detached HOA P.U.D.?
Do the setbacks to the units and typical separation between
units as indicated on Exhibit "A" meet City Code
Requirements for the Single Family Detached HOA P.U.D.?
Is a P.U.D. buffer required in addition to the setbacks to
units?
Are sidewalks required adjacent to the private road access?
2)
3)
4)
Please advise at your earliest convenience so that we can proceed
with our TRC process.
,.
Page 2
City of Boynton Beach
JG 100-7803
March 23, 1996
If you have any questions regarding the above, please call me at
395-3333.
Very truly yours,
WKG/la
Enclosure
cc: Gary Degraf
Jennifer Morton
WOO
a ~ ;;
/D ~ II
/D :7
Q.
,CD
.,': '<
NORf~t~/J 4th. SfRftf
-, ~
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
20' M'" I
SElBACK I
I
I
I
...
q
)C
~ ~.
g,~
i
"T'I e-
m 0 :T'I
1\ ~I~
" ~
10 S:>"
. ,,10
, ~I'
lfo~
~
~f)~
....
01
. '
I
I
I
I
I
, , I
, , J
>.,>.......
--------,,;
DRAtlAGEJETENTION
EASEMENT
FLORIDA c
~fl~r
COAsr RA
I L ROllO
--
-.
-
---
--
-
.--
---
-.
----
--
-
---
---
---
--
--
--
~
C)
rn
i
~
fil !
;!
~ ~
~ ~ i
~ c
i I
)> ~
~
~
(5
Z
..' ~
/ / Z~
I
i I
(}I
(}I
(}I
(}I
~
."
IT!
o
IT!
:xl
J>
r
J:
~
:-<
()I
o
2
(I)
C
m ~.
>< *:
:J: ~I
- ~.
Pft 2,
WW' IT! ,
- ~:
(I)'
g)~
)> ~I
:xl.
;;l:
-<"
o
:xl
(I)
lD
o
()
J>
:xl
J>
~
o
_2
."
r
o
:xl
o
J>
MEMORANDUM
;,T:::~~ffi -,...~,~~.
\ \ D L~ \.l9 s .--_.='~ \\ \\
\~ MAR 2 5 1006 \@\
. \
\ PL,\NN\NG tlNO \
L IONING Of-PI -)
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
FROM:
Taabri Heyden, planning , Zoning Director. 11()
William Hukill, P.B., city Engineer 11/1, ,"
MiChael J. Pawelozyk, Assistant city Attorney
Park Ridge - Request tor Opinion
TO:
RB:
DATE;
March 22, 1996
I have reviewed the attached Bngineering MeDorandum No. 96-
092, regarding the Park Ridge Development. The four (4) requests
for opinion are not requests for legal opinions. Such questions
would be more appropriately answerec2 by the Planning Ie Zoning
Department and its capable staff.
If any legal questions do arise in answering thes. questions,
please do not hesitate to oontact me.
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
MJP/aa
900182
MBMO
PAR~IDG
"
~ lL (~
~10-e
Me
JOHN A. GRANT. JR., INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND lANE! SURVEYORS
3333 N, FEDERAL HIGHWAY
BocA RATON. FLORmIL 33431
PLANr-lltG A~D
ZONING DEPT.
January 23, 1996
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS
MORTGAGE SURVEYS
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
SANITARY SEWERS
MARINAS
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION
BULKHEAD LINES
HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES
STORM DRAINAGE
WATER SUPPLY
LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
SUBDIVISIONS
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS
BEACH EROSION
PHONE (407) 395-3333 FAX (407) 395-3315
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FI 33435
Attention: Tambri Heyden
RE: PARK RIDGE
File NO. NWSP 95-012
Our Job No. JG 100-7803
Dear Ms. Heyden:
In accordance with your
transmitted herewith is our
referenced project.
Per our January 16, 1996, letter, the proposed development
will be a Condominium, and we have modified all ~roject
documents accordingly. Also as you may recall, ln our
initial discussions with the City of Boynton Beach, it was
agreed that we would submit the project for your review based
upon a 40' setback from both N.E. 4th Street and the FEC
Railroad to the units and a 20' setback from both the North
and South Property line to the units, with a minimum
separation of IS' between units ( a sketch showing this was
sent to Mr. Lewicki).
letter of January
resubmittal of
2,
the
1996,
above
Included with our resubmittal are the following items:
1. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Plat.
2. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Site Plan.
3. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Master Plan.
4. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Survey.
5. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Grading, Paving,
Drainage, Water and Sewer Plans.
6. Twelve (12) revised sets of the Landscape Plans.
7. Twelve (12) revised sets of the Architectural Plans.
8. One (1) copy of commitment letter from Southern Bell
and Florida Power and Light.
9. One (1) copy of document describing the existing 10'
wide utility easement in the southern portion of the
site.
10. One (1) co~y of each of the three proposed color schemes
for the bUlldings.
11. One (1) copy of each of the three proposed material
color schemes.
12. One (1) 11" x 32" architectural rendering of the
buildings.
Page 2
Letter to Tambri Heyden
RE: Park Ridge
Our response to Memorandum # 95-736 from Jerzy Lewicki of the
Planning and Zoning Department is as follows:
1. The survey doesn't show N.E. 20th Avenue east of
N.E. 4th Street because it is not platted.
2. Topographical elevations have been referenced in the
survey legend.
3. Information on the existing structures has been
added to the survey.
4. A note with regard to the use of proposed structures
has been added to the Site Plan.
5. The location and number of parking spaces provided
has been added. We plan to discuss the need for
sidewalk with the appropriate agencies.
6. The location of proposed signs has been added to the
Site Plan.
7. The location of proposed lighting has been added to
the Site Plan.
8. Architectural Plans have been revised to show height
of structures.
9. A colored elevation drawing is being provided with
this submittal.
10. Color samples of building materials are included
with this submittal.
11. Tabular summary of Site Plan has been revised to
provide the requested information.
12. The traffic study was previously submitted.
13. Ownership of streets and drainage area is shown on
the Site Plan.
Homeowners will be given
patio. They will also have
6' high wooden fence.
15. The 15'-0" dimension between buildings is typical
and this has been clarified on the Site Plan.
the option of having a
the option of having a
14.
16. Dimension of garage is provided on Architectural
Plan.
Page 3
Letter to Tambri Heyden
RE: Park Ridge
17. The existing 10' wide utility easement in the
southern portion of the site will be eliminated
during the platting process. (See enclosed document
that describes easement.)
18. All trees within utility easements will be
relocated, except the palm trees and shrubs.
19. Since the intention of the development is to be
similar to a t~ical single family community, no
visitor parking wll1 be provided.
20. The intent is to use different color schemes
throughout the development.
Our response to Memorandum # 95-583 from Kevin J. Hallahan,
Forester/Environmentalist is as follows:
1. A letter from the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission stating there are no endangered/protected
species on the site will be submitted.
2. On the tree survey, several multiple trunked oaks
were identified with each trunk being an individual
tree. The tree relocation/removal plan identifies
each multi~le trunked oak tree as a single tree. The
quantity dlfference is nine, as noted in the
comment.
3. A Tree management plan to address the proper care of
trees in Item #2 is included with this submission.
Our response to Memorandum # 95-565 from John Wildner, Parks
Superintendent, is as follows:
1. The required recreation fee based on the single
family homes calculating factor will be paid when
due at final platting.
2. The developer does not plan to apply for one-half
credit for private recreation.
Our response to Memorandum # 95-442 from Al Newbold, Deputy
Development Director, Buildings Department, is as follows:
It has been decided that the development will be
condominiums.
1. The floor plan has been submitted for evaluation.
Page 4
Letter to Tambri Heyden
RE: Park Ridge
2. The distance between buildings is being proposed to
be IS' minimum.
3. The required setbacks from the perimeter of the
boundary are indicated as well as the setbacks from
Park Ridge Circle.
4. Patio location is shown on the tyPical unit and on
all units on the site plan but Unlt 17. Pools will
not be constructed.
5. Sign details have been added.
Our response to Memorandum # 96-001 from
Utilities Director is as follows:
1. Utility easements are shown.
2. There will be no trees other than palm trees and
shrubs in utility easements.
Jack
Guidry,
3. Permits for water & sewer will be obtained from the
Palm Beach County Health Unit.
4. The patio (Unit 17) adjacent the water main in the
side easement along the south side of the project
has been eliminated.
5. The City will be res~onsible for maintaining the
water line up to and lncluding the water meter. The
Condominium unit owner will be responsible for the
water service from the meter to the unit. The City
will be responsible for maintaining the sewer
lateral through the 6" diameter pipe adjacent the
edge of pavement. The Condominium unit owner will be
responsible for the lateral through the transition
from 6" to 4" diameter up to the unit.
6. The development will be condominiums. The minimum
distance between buildings will be 15'.
Our response to Memorandum #96-007 from William Hukill, City
Engineer, is as follows:
1. All documents will
comments.
be revised to reflect all
2. All plans will meet City code reguirements at time
of application for requlred permlts.
Page 5
Letter to Tambri Heyden
RE: Park Ridge
3. The Master Plan and the Plat will conform with all
codes, ordinances, rules and regulations including,
but not limited to the Boynton Beach Land
Development Regulations.
4. Master Plan has been revised to comply with
condominium requirements within R-3 zoning.
5. In compliance.
6. It is our understanding that sidewalks are not
required in multifamily develo~ments. We will
review this matter with Mr. Hukll1 to determine the
exact requirements or recommendations.
7. Swale and detention area slopes will be no less than
.003 feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4
feet.
8. The pavement in the cuI de sac has a diameter of
861 which allows a proper turning radius for all
vehicles. The ingress-egress easement is one foot
from the pavement.
9. Street grade will be no greater than 2~ percent.
10. In compliance.
Electrical service will be underground and
accordance with Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
Pages 6-16.
12. Approvals will be obtained from SFWMD and LWDD.
11.
in
13,
We submit the above to you for your review and approval. If
you have any questions regarding same, please contact David
J. Holtzman at (407) 395-3333.
Very truly yours,
cc: DeGraf, Inc.
JAG/DJH/la
Enclosures
JOHN A. GRANT, JR., INC.
CONSUlTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
3333 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY
BocA RATON. Fr..c:mmA 33431
HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES
STORM DRAINAGE
WATER SUPPLY
LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
SUBDIVISIONS
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS
BEACH EROSION
PHONE (407) 3915-3333 FAX (407) 39!5-331!5
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS
MORTGAGE SURVEYS
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
SANITARY SEWERS
MARINAS
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION
BULKHEAD LINES
January 24, 1996
City of Bovnton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach. FL 33435
Attention:
Tambri Hevden
RE: PARK RIDGE
Our Job NO. JG 100-7803
Dear Ms. Heyden:
In accordance with the remlest of Jerzv Lewicki transmitted
herewith are the followina for the above referenced oroiect:
1.
2.
Twentv-four (24) orints of the Survev.
Twentv-four (24) orints of the Gradina.
Plans (Sheets 1. 2. 3 & 8 of 8).
pavina and Drainaae
If yOU have any auestions reaardina same olease contact David J.
Holtzman at (407)395-3333.
We trust this is satisfactorv.
Very truly Yours.
,TAG/D,TH Ihw
Enclosure
~_ JOHN tJ\{;~~JiP
.l-- ,Tohn A. GraJt:. ,~
yPresident\.,./
cc: DeGraf. Inc.
~ ~ li 7 ~.:) 3
--, BELLSOUTH
TELECOMMUNICATIONS @
January 5, 1996
Room 501
326 Fern Street
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Wire Center: Boynton Beach
Route: 1206
File # 240.0900
Mr. John Grant, Jr.
John Grant, Jr., Inc.
President
3333 N. Federal Highway
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Re: Park Ridge
Your job # JG 100-7803
Dear Mr. Grant:
In response to your request, this will confirm that BellSouth Telecommunications is the
source of supply for telephone service to the above referenced project. Telephone
facilities with adequate capacity can be provided for this project. It should be noted,
however, that the owner will be required to provide BellSouth Telecommunications with
recorded easements or conduit. In addition BellSouth Telecommunications may require
exclusive easements for structures that house electronic switching,equipment (SLC-96 or
substantially similar equipment). The recorded easements will be without restrictive
conditions furnished in a reasonable time to meet service requirements at no cost, cleared
of trees, tree stumps, paving and other obstructions. In addition each applicant shall
cooperate with BellSouth Telecommunications to keep the cast of construction and
installation of the underground telephone distribution system as low as possible. Where
there are obstructions in the easement or road crossings, the contractor will provide
conduit suitable to BellSouth Telecommunications.
However, the company shall have no responsibility to provide service unless these
conditions are met.
If you have any questions please call me at (407) 582-5184.
Yours truly,
~~4
Nancy M, Vinez
Specialist -
Outside Plant Engineering
.
F=PL
Florida Power & light Company. 932~ Jlilitary T?,i11Bov.~ton. Fl33~6
Kf:*"/' ,I''''~~,'';'/ .
. I, .
, ,I :'- -"
I ;.
I
January 12, 1996
John A. Grant, Jr.
John A. Grant, Jr., Inc
3333 North Federal Highway
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
RE: Park Ridge Subdivision - Boynton Beach
Dear Mr. Grant:
This is to inform that FPL at the present time has sufficient capacity to provide
electrical service to the above mentioned property. This service will be furnished
in accordance with applicable rates and FPL practices.
It will be necessary for FPL to be provided with the final site plan, electrical load
data, site survey and copy of deed as soon as possible so that the necessary
engineering can begin. '
Please feel free to contact me at 369-2223 if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
J)-~ /GV4
David K. Weda
Construction Services
an FPL Group company
(
:..1.0.
Wr~ :-g,5thftC!: 752
~
11!3
t.
. ~~ ~
;~.-:-~
~i3~1: ~
"'-~-~F ~..
f
!
I
t
, ,~
.. -, "
,: j
i
,
J
/ I I
/ :2.~
i;~
/ .. Q
.. ...
..
/ I /
I
I
I
/
/'
I
it-'e tWil. ~.
. . ::tE' i;'it'
..,l:! .~...
.:t, ;~:~. . - .'
:~~t1'~ ~
.' ~t :.,
/
/
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
/
/
I
/
I
/
:~ ..
~
j
lCC-~
'.
:\
,
~'.~
~
~j
If.
:~
~.
.i
~
I'
!.-
,11
t"
[]
f'
A
,;
,.,
'2,/
I
~
, .......~- ,... ~
:_f~/ / / ~r~.
(,,"
~
.
~ '7J
0/0"
~
14
.0 ~--- [):)W/lI'j,LJ(.s
\(i w'a,:,ll. / /'
~ fbLE
,.
I'
.,.,J')
I' '":; 1%."
11" 0
I~~
1948
10 · I ,4?te<!.Zi.. /-A
~t/ ~
~- ~ -T3~"~'t' ,,~
B1R=<- /-/1 5V8.l~ \,1"
/<es7l{It::.TlIJNS IN ::::d7b O/! '\ rC~)~
~< /003.) ~E ~/S ,~?I'>-'('_ ~
"~I ~
L
/0'
o
3;
"-
(J)
..
(J)
o
"-
a
(/)
/'
Z~(;. ';!~
..-
.
, ......-r
i I I,
I_.\.~.... I
1'"",/
!.: I
.:.E:7.....'/C
0,
4 1'\)
Yy ....1 \
\ ""c,""
(;~?--v
I
I~" "\,
o 'I~
'"
2".5:' l)f)
,1;"/
tV
~
I~
,
7-
It
~
l'
,
-----------------,
-c!:/O'dE Pe.f? ~(5. 85'3.1 PG 7SZ: 2_ _ _ _ J
0:80----------___
,1",
I
!
L
o
,
t--
,::> c?
~ W:JDv S:E
~---
-.::.. '> ~ " II
;',,- 78 JR.
,1.,-
o
,1."
000,811
1&"
t
'l, .'
L
@ 48"
i--.
1 .
~ .
,... -.....
1\" ,
(-~
~,'
r ' .
/..
A ;
~~
, fnd 4X 4"C
I
" poe lfjt1.i~~
' ,
~ I ~/W:JOD ; I
1/'1{h~' h L
" , I
I I
!.-
Il-
....
229.80'
,
tr.' ;j.,~,,..
"':WIC. r~z:
S89-35'25"W
. --"
.r.. t,.
/
~
y
,-2..0,/
~
,A,.......,.
Ll./
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
1"". - -~-
I. -', ,:: is
, i; ) ~J
. ' J I ,"---=-
\1 nlll
iUu 'ccC'
[i \'.n R r
q \11 lS
,- 11
" '~.' ,...
L ~"::~~:
i
I'
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS
11 DECEMBER 95
PARK RIDGE - SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN-1st REVIEW MEMO #0196
.".....,........"^"^-........,
I !;;;~!
L!::=~) t~
c:::;~::1
-.:.....
tt
c:::)
,'>'~'"~.....::...
x,'',,.;;;,
\1~~:~)
~~..............~....::.
I have reviewed the above plans and fin '}){pmrnji:a..it~~~e.
~.i' _}...........~;~~:-; f :~ i~ .:~~~;~~)
;~..:-~ ..:. '.' .$......~...;,.. ~.;..,....~ ~o': f.~~
.;,.' ~ . {.:~,~:~.-~...;~:~&:r.. {."."l~ .
li": ......./ ,,'
?'>' "-
<( '''"
'-,,~.., )-
"'~';"
it k'~ .
r:;::~:.l
~'
:~..........................'"
~ r"'~~,;,,;'" )
~ .:.,"'w....,!.c:
~ C"V_~ '\
.~ ~ .. ~
L~::::::~.l
rr 'S~~~M" arlJd~~' , '
~ t..........~ l ~ ~
~ r;....;.;.;o-..:-:>.....;O. ~ ~ ~ i
~~ ~~ ~~t
r--:: ~ ~ n i ~~_..l n
=s.-.:o." ~x..~ ""...,.... 'X-.:>.....~"<'.~ ~
$~"">:
LFfrn
....~.
~..,,~~ .{
-X;~~..,,~ &; ..~~/
.:~, \i:....~...."<<$....
.;.0;.';;;: ....."*>>h.>.. ..
::.;..~:~ .;:>..~~;.:-....~;>~:;::' \., 3:-
I~~'" .-:' ~.. ......-:="
), \ {S::~~:~:E;~
s......~.
t/
;J
.'
JOHN A. GRANT. JR.. INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
3333 N. FEDERAl. HIGHWAY
BocA RATON. ~ 33431
~"""'" _,...x",__"
\
\ JAN 2. 4 ~
L J
Pi~~I~W%tiJr~ j .
CONSTRUCTION SURVE:YS
MORTGAGE SURVEYS
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
SANITARY SEWERS
MARINAS
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION
BULKHEAD L1~1 ES
HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES
STORM DRAINAGE
WATER SUPPLY
LAND DEVELOPMENT STUOIES
SrBDIVlSIONS
T POGRAPHIC SURVEYS
B CH EROSION
PHONE 1..07) 395-3333 F'AX 14(7) 395-331 IS
December 5, 1995
PARK RIDGE -- OUR JOB # 100-7803
MASTER ~
DESCRIPTION QE SITE CONDITION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The existing site is vacant property located adjacent
to the Florida East Coast Railroad between Northeast 20th and
22nd Avenues along Northeast 4th Street. No covenants exist
relating to the subject property.
The property which is heavily overgrown with weeds and a
few trees, is separated from six existing
duplex units
located to the southwest of the property by a 6' high:wooden
fence. A legal description
of the subject property is
provided in the attached Environmental Report prepared by
Empire Environmental, Inc.
The proposed development is for construction of 34
detached multi-family residences, with the common grounds
being maintained by the Park Ridge Homeowner's Association.
The development will have a circulator road that connects
into Northeast 4th Street, with a cul-de-sac at the Southeast
corner of the development.
Watermain and gravity sanitary sewer services for the
development will be provided by the City of Boynton Beach,
with connection to water and sanitary sewer lines on
Page 2
Master Plan
Park Ridge
Northeast 4th Street, as shown on the attached Grading,
Paving, Drainage, Water & Sewer Plans.
The other required
public utilities will be provided by the respective utility
companies servicing the area. Curbside pickup is planned for
refuse collection.
The drainage plan for the development calls for roadside
inlets to collect rainfall and direct it to a dry retention
area to be located on the east side of the site. The site is
designed to hold up to the 3 day/25 year storm with no runoff
from the property. Building pads will be designed based on a
3 daY/100 year storm.
No change is being made to the existing R-3 zoning.
A detailed description of existing site conditions is
provided in the attached Environmental Report.
DJH/la
JOHN A GRANT, JR., INC.
~zman
Project Engineer
A
c--', '.' ,:)
EMPIRE
ENVIRONMENTAL
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT
OF PROPERTY LOCA1ED ADJACENT TO THE
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY
AND BETWEEN NORTHEAST 20TH AND 22ND AVENUES
ALONG NORTHEAST 4TH STREET
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PREPARED FOR
MR. GARY DE GRAF
PREPARED BY
EMPmE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
MAY 18, 1995
11150ulh Federal Highway
1U ite 124
;tU<1rt. FL 34994
v
Contaminatiun Asse,<:,<:ments,
Environmental Audits, Permitting
(4a7) 287-0529
(800) 344-1087
Fax: 220-6619
1.0 Introduction
This report constitutes a Phase I Environmental Audit of a
parcel of property in Boynton Beach Florida located in Section
15, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County
(Figures I & 2) prepared in order to satisfy requirements for
a commercial real estate transaction.
1.1 Purpose of a Phase I Enviromnental Audit
A Phase I Environmental audit is a study, consisting
mainly of background research, to assess environmental
conditions of a site. It is based on information of
present and historical land uses of the subject property
(the Site) and research into off-site conditions which
could have a potential adverse impact on the Site.
Because the Phase I Audit is only designed to assess the
probability of environmental impact, no sub-surface
explorations or soil and water sampling and analysis were
conducted.
1.2 SCODe of Services
1. Site Visit.
2. Title Search.
3. Review of site history including interviews with
former land owners or others familiar with the
property.
4. Review of historical aerial photographs.
5. Review of Agency Records.
6. Preparation of a Report.
2.0 Pronerty Descrintion and Adjacent Pronertv
The Site is an approximate five acre parcel located between
the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad tracks and N.E. 4th. St.
and between N.E. 20th and 22nd Ave. in Boynton Beach, Florida.
It is bounded on the north by Boynton Animal Clinic, VFW Post
5335, and Northside Condo; on the east by the FEC tracks and
387-01.01
1
'------- ~~~ ~.' rm_,. -. :~.---, I
AgTHUR ~I ~i / P - I ' ! I
L I I ~'! . _ 'm I I j .
I '- ~:;;~ ~:;::: :i ~ wi I' I
f s p~~ ..lOGE Ii. --i j ~ ~
t ~rh;? ~7Ttt_~ NE~
13 ~ ~ ' / "7TH AVI NE c(
z. ~ / I..
~ WA. I- Z z/ 26TH A.V== /\/, "
I W ~I c(
o 0 m
Z ~ ::!: Cl
N (fJ c( Z
<51J.., ~V~ . ~
<~ ~_ rn
lq~- ~I
!!' b., 2JRo ~E ;;- ~
>- - ~o A'-., ..~ l ESIOE HAfleoR
~ I -~ ~
~ 21S l~'W=N1; PI _ t-
o ;~I ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ; i~S~t~<:-4thSt e
I f1~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ l') r. I e /
1~m. A.V : Mil r rn ~ ~./ C7'f- 21J ..- NE
19 H A.VEINE ....::i!.. _ _
\.Y1TH AVr:: 1\1I tE i
11I71;kv~..' -!tWin 31
17 'HAve NIN ~.-,~. -1t.~II:1
I ~+H CT !tW f / 1 drH CT Ne..J CI CLE c:::=::J~
6 ~~ ~ "J, .?d'1. 16TH AVE NE' "" z
1 J.H A"J ~rv ~~ \':"'/.... r :t
F f ( ~I.f. I ~ \ SEAV/EW
I knldN -~. 1STH~~ ~ E"INLEr
- "471< Ave}"" ~ A"" NO r I ~
~W 13TH __ E 13TH
f.lw 12.... ~E 1:2T1
.W11T1-t :t E11T1
\.> E10T!.f
~ 17 Ne 9l}.f~ I
~"W. '\ - ~ an
l~_ ~crrn
I ~ NEnH'\~I; ~
~ ~~II
I -"'"-
I
I
I
I
12 "oAV .N'~
2 T AVE N'v'\i
I
I
I
I n Canal
I
Z
:it
I ~
~ ~W8n
I C 1993 Dcl~~~
>(oN 9T
LEGEND
, 0 State Route
Population Center
1- Street. Road
- Major Street/Road
I_Interstate Highway
I~ State Route
f
I ~ E
1 Asv--P 0
II
l
,
I
2
f
~M
~
o
(J)
~
MICk I
19
)T"Il;R "i
-
J~
r
~L..onh
~E
. t:
~ -~
~I I ~ ~ 11
r-- ~
~
"1AN....-
,SlAND
1lfA.1:Io. i.. /
,;
~
~
-- '-.
f~QvE 'J r-
-1
NE ST. ELe~ :g
I
\ / ~NLET CAY
)
~ US Highway
-+-+-+- Railroad
_ River
Scale 1: 15,625 (at center)
1000 FAAt I
N.E. 4th Street
Mag 15.00
Fri May 19 10:47:28 1995
500 MetA~
CJ Open Water
1 . 1
~
I
I
I
}
~' . "';L.J
/:.., ~ · - .4 f
I :, -f"' :i .':i ~.., .', . 2
H'''' :,' ~ ,Light 'I - I I
, ,. ."_ _ iL 01.L XO - - ... c,,~ il DY I , :' I
i ~ ~ ~,~ "mO"-'hc~ '-,--r -'1'--11 ! . "r
, ,r--':'" 11~:' p 1 'OJ
, h~6r:J~~~:-:' ~~!:~~~f6_Ji__t J _", '~i'f
=~~~,,~ .r<...::> / Il ", \ '" i,~ { .
~'-"r- '" ~f ~~=' '1 I II -~:....'::..-;:;;;::; J ;' ~ I
.' ....... '-' I ...__.- t' I
f=.~'''':zz=- '-. _,' ~ 011. ,I
= ;". ? '- I.) ko, yrt:;n',c 1",lel ~.. iHH~, ',' 9"e ii' \:~: \ '.\ i\~ I,
. I ;~ I II ?arkf.r A:;;,'" ,t. j" ,:. ,j,.
, '/1- -r,',' ,/ ~, ' =~~, ---'" ..--... , -~' tIj ! .i :: /I" · i4> ;',:'.:';! ,: I
'Oe;ray '- II' .-." ,,0';:" I, ~.." \
J} .: '-'~.,~.~ ", .', ~===~~~~~~,~ "~ ~"T::.__:~ i I; ,:'-:"ji ~li \j' ;(~' i'.
. rJ. . ~-==.4::...:.=-=':... . :=;::;-==--~' I ;......;. .:,'1 . ,..--' ,1",'1 .:.:,) .; ./1
. ~._.....=~_~. . ~~~a:=."1:. ..::",' ......-....... I I - .', {
- '. ........ _~." light ;.-:-.: ....,~:: I ~.'. " ,'i 0:/ '. :\! \
.~.;;,. 1/'.:..:):.:5o=-: /- .:~:; It' '.' , ! !
12",-,- ',- / .' /. . 1:- I" (f:: ,f:' . i II
. ~;::-' ~~ /.., I : .::: " ... . /-,..' .' (;',! .... ~ f, //
o.-~, ~ II ':....,.. I ,(-:" /''';,
=t..-- . "-" / ~ .'. \'.:: '. ~: I" "n.i.;/ /~" . :': I (~(
. .' \ 0, 12'2'; < '~':'i ~ /' ~'~. . \ '\\
) '.. -: . e 'L ~ L' I'':..!' i J;!
. ' "I ~ ~~:.;' '.~ t ...E' cean RicP. ~~CXk- :' ,',i II
, ---.:.,_. . 11'= I ", "
_--:..:~...,; I'~ ' " . Jlk G.J;...,. / I .
0) ~;' ~~.;.~M':';li f: r'.; .'/ '-. .I, !~;
===-i.~ I r:- ra3'...'" E ", .': ' /" (" !:
~,:j ~~~ ~f'{( ;... ) , '\. ",;
--:"t I :.~<J .... ~ ........1\ (}'
~" J _', -.;;-.-r- ,..J "I .' . '
, ( ..~ ." ~ " r - I )' ( .
- I' .:..' , "
-'or " .j,.~ -.' I(~: pJ, :",', <~/.. ,/
~ . .\,).. " ) \' ,; ;.'(J?
: ,,'t
i ~ .~ ,/I /
,.J' " I:/~
. i ""j
I,i
.1.,.;
'//:;~
..
.s_
.l...."
i ~
I
I
I
"
I
I
f
.36
y
I
~
I
.
I
- -. " ,.
; .
I
I
2
I
-' '
,
,
I
,
'>~/
; hi ~ "
'll \ i
{\\\~ ;}
I,'"~ ,
,',it /,
. }':;t !i ~
I
~
~.
9
f'
I
i
I
~
I
:;R~MI 3": \-t => :vi.
>C"':::: :;" ~ =-
::~~:::: 5/~~.?5
SC~L::;
;CB ~o:
~'(""'UDC" ,..,
, I..J '\ t- L
EMPIRE
ENVIRON}.fENT AL. INC.
I
U. S, CIJ .~,DR ,..l,j\J GL:::
LAK L..C'
WCR TH. FL_CPIDA
1111 S, "~der'Jl !-liqr> ,..a 'I, Suit~ 12.1
Stuart. F":orido 34994
(407) 287-0529
I
1 .2
u.s. Hwy 1; on the south by a trailer park and three single
family residences; and on the west by N.E. 4th St., residences
and N.E. 20th Ave. Across the tracks and U.s. Hwy 1 are
Morey's Lounge and Water's Edge Condominium, and across N.E.
4th St. are residences.
2.1 Lelral Description
PARCEL 1 A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP
45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAM BROWN
JR'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH
COUNTY, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT
27 A DISTANCE OF 34.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, AT RIGHT
ANGLES TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 75
FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 25 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE
OF SAID LOT 27; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 75.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
I
I
LOT 10, SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81, PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, LESS THE EXIST:J;NG RIGHT
OF WAY FOR STATE ROAD 5 AND LESS THE FOLLOWING PARCEL OF
LAND IN SAID LOT 10;
FROM THE SW CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, RUN EASTERLY ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT FOR 153.67 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY
AT RIGHT ANGLES FOR 50.95 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, PARALLEL
TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF 91.94 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WEST
LINE OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST
LINE FOR 59.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AND LESS THE FOLLOWING PARCEL OF LAND WHICH LIES WITH 50
FEET WESTERLY OF AND WITHIN 44 FEET EASTERLY OF THE
BASELINE OF SURVEY ACCORDING TO THE RIGHT OF WAY MAP OF
SECTION 93010-2501, STATE ROAD 5, AS FILED IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 237, A PART OF SAID
BASELINE BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
I
I
I
I
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF AND 274.86 FEET
SOUTH 89025' 00" EAST OF THE SW CORNER OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, RUN NORTH 08012'00"
387-01.01
2
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2625.64 FEET TO THE END OF THE
BASELINE HEREIN DESCRIBED AND A POINT ON THE EAST-WEST
1/4 SECTION LINE OF AND 885.78 FEET SOUTH 89013'55" EAST
OF THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15.
PARCEL 2 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT
27 OF SAM BROWN JR' S SUBDIVISION, RUN WEST ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 229.35 FEET TO
A POINT; THENCE NORTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 201.4 FEET MORE,
OR LESS TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27 WHICH
LIES 261.16 FEET WEST OF, MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE,
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27; THENCE EAST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 226.26 FEET TO A
POINT 34.90 FEET WEST OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27;
THENCE SOUTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 27,
A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO
THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 25 FEET TO A
POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF LOT 27; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG
THE EAST LINE OF LOT 27 TO A POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 3 LOT 28, SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, IN
AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 1, PAGE 81.
PARCEL 4 LOT 29, SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, IN
AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 1, PAGE 81.
3.0 PhYSical Features of the Site
A site investigation was conducted on May 3, 1995. The Site is
undeveloped and consists of three separate lots (Figure 3).
The portion of Lot 27 is the southeast part of the Site. There
is a pile of trash and debris where N.E. 20th Ave. ends and
meets the Site. The debris consists of chairs, lamps, concrete
debris, plastic oil cans, paint cans, carpeting, tile and
discarded fencing. The rest of Lot 27 is undeveloped scrub
habitat with vegetation characterized by scrub oak with some
Brazilian pepper. There is a discarded suitcase within a small
copse of trees in the eastern part of the Site near the
railroad tracks. Along the south fence line was a pump house
in disrepair which contained a pressure tank and likely an old
387-01.01
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f-
W
w
0:::
f-
if)
I
f-
~
w
Z
FENCED AREA I
CONCRETE PAC
~
PUMP HOUSE
CRA.....N 3": \.1 ?,\A
CHESKCJ 3Y: ~'"
DATE 5/19/95
SC"'LE: :" - 100'
JOB NO,
FIGURE 3
SI TE PLAN
DEGR.A.F PROPERTY
BOYTON BEACH, FLORIDA
3.1
a
<::{
o
~
-.J
-
<::{
0:::
c..J
L..i
,
......
EMPIRE
ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
1111 S. F' ederol Highway. Suit~ ~ 2.1
Stuart. Florida 34994
(407) 287-0529
I
I
I
I
I
4.0
I
I
5.0
I
I
I
I
387-01. 01
I
well. There were also what appeared to be remnants of a
driveway or a house foundation and ornamental plants which are
not native to Florida such as Shefflera, asparagus fern, and
ornamental cactus. The 1965 aerial photo shows a house which
had a driveway access across the tracks from U.S. Hwy 1.
Lots 28 and 29 are also scrub habitat with wooded vegetation
ranging from scattered to dense throughout the Site. The scrub
vegetation includes scrub oak, slash pine, sand pine, cabbage
palm and snake plant. Household trash was observed along the
south fence line of Lot 28 opposite the second of three houses
which border this portion of the Site.
There was a junk pile in the northeast corner of the Site in
Lot 29 which contained lumber, a freezer, paint cans,
household trash, ~Vc pipe, carpeting, fluorescent bulbs, and
shelving. Further to the west was asphalt debris. The soil
around the paint cans, oil cans and other containers of
potentially hazardous compounds was inspected and showed no
evidence of staining nor had any unusual petroleum, solvent or
paint odor.
Utilities
The Site is presently not being served by water and sewer
utilities.
Soil
According to the U.S. Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey
for Palm Beach County (1979), the soil on the Site consists of
St. Lucie sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes a nearly level to
sloping, excessively drained, deep sandy soil with a water
table below a depth of six feet. The surface layer is gray
sand about five inches thick. Below this is white sand that
extends to a depth of 80 inches or more. Permeability is very
rapid. The available water capacity, organic matter content
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7.0
I
I
I
387-01. 01
I
and natural fertility are low throughout. Natural vegetation
is sand pine, scrub oak, saw palmetto, rosemary, cacti,
reindeer moss, pineland three-awn and natalgrass.
6.0
Review of Historical Aerial PhotoID"auhs
A review of the aerial photographs from 1965, 1968, 1971,
1973, 1977, 1984, 1989, and 1993 indicates there was a house
on the southern part of the Site in 1965, but by 1968 it was
gone. The house was acces sed from u. S . Hwy 1 acros s the
railroad tracks. After 1968, the Site was vacant with little
change in the physical appearance to the present time. The
general area was sparsely developed to the north with a large
cleared area north of N.E. 22nd Ave and a citrus grove beyond
that. The first structures were the veterinary clinic building
adjacent to the Site and several commercial buildings in the
divided portion ~f N.E. 22nd Ave. The building now occupied by
the Cumberland Farms convenience store at the southeast corner
of N.E. 22nd Ave. and N.E. 4th St. was constructed between
1968 and 1971. By 1984, the condo and the VFW hall directly
north of the Site and multifamily units in the formerly large
cleared area were constructed by 1984. Also by thi~ time the
strip mall on the south side of 22nd Ave. had been
constructed, and the divided center of 22nd St. was limited to
parking and one commercial building. The citrus grove was
being residentially developed in 1989, and by 1993 all roads
and multi-family buildings had been finished. The houses and
trailer park south of the Site were present prior to 1965, and
the area along the water east of u.S. Hwy 1 was developed, as
well.
Site History
According to the Palm Beach County Property Appraisers Office,
the Site is owned by Kirsch Holding Company (Parcels 1 & 2)
and Irving B. & Clara Kirsch (Parcels 3 & 4). The Chain of
title is as follows:
5
,
I
Parcel 1 (Lar2er part of Lot 27)
I DATE INSTRUMENT GRANTOR GRANTEE
I June 14, 1949 WD James E. & Maurice H. & Wanda C.
Clara Howard Bradfield
I December 19,1952 Lim. WD Maurice H. & Wanda Gardner F. & Wilma D.
D. Bradfield Allen
November 21, 1955 Lim. WD Gardner F. & Wilma Arthur K. Reading
I D. Allen
December 1,1961 WD Arthur K. & Edith S. Flying Cloud
I Reading Enterprises, Inc.
February 17, 1969 Ceri. of Title John B. Dunkle, Clerk Allstate Investment
I of Circuit Court Corporation of Florida
April 4, 1969 WD Allstate Investment Boynton Beach Inlet
Corporation of View, Inc.
I Florida
February 25, 1972 WD Boynton Beach Inlet Melvin M. & Vera M.
I View, Inc. Goldberg and Bernhart
R. Snyder
I August 18, 1977 WD Melvin M. & Vera M. KirschHolding Company
Goldberg and Iris
M. Snyder
I August 4,1978 WD Stanley Kirsch RamblewoodAssociates,
Inc.
I Parcel 2 (Small corner of Lot 27)
June 14, 1949 WD James E. & Clara Maurice H. & Wanda C.
I Howard Bradfield
June 1, 1954 SWD Maurice H. & Wanda C. Irma McGathen
I Bradfield
May 7, 1956 WD Irma McGathen Garrett N. & Wanda
I June Songer
May 19, 1958 Cert. of Title J. Alex Arnett, Clerk Irma McGathen
of Circuit Court arma McGathen vs
I Garrett M. Songer)
I 387-01.01 8
I
February 27, 1963 Article of Irma McGathen Elinor M. Beaudro
Agreement
July 29,1970 WD Elinor M. Beaudro, Tr. Boynton Beach Inlet
& William G. Beaudro View, Inc.
February 25,1972 WD Boynton Beach Inlet Meluin M. & Vera M.
View, Inc. Goldberg and Bernhart
R. Snyder
August 18,1977 WD Meluin M. & Vera M. Kirsch Holding Company
Goldberg and Iris M.
Snyder
August 4, 1978 WD Stanley Kirsch RamblewoodAssociates,
Inc.
Parcel 3 (Lot 28)
January 4, 1908 WD James M. Carroll Frank w: Austin
February 25, 1952 QCD Virgil Jenkins, one of Iroing B. & Clara Kirsch
only 3 surviuing children
of Naomi Austin Flora,
deceased daughter of Frank
w: Austin and Alice Austin
& Seth Jenkins
February 25, 1952 QCD Law-a WISe, daughter and Iroing B. Clara Kirsch
heir at law of Frank w:
Austin, deceased and Alice
Austin, deceased &
Marvin Wise
March 1, 1952 QCD LuciIIe WiIIiamson one of Iroing B. & Clara Kirsch
only 3 suroiuing children
of Naomi Austin Flora,
deceased daughter of Frank
w: Austin and Alice Austin
& Seth Jenkins
March 1, 1952 QCD Delbert Flora, one of Iroing B. & Clara Kirsch
only 3 suroiving children
of Naomi Austin Flora,
deceased daughter of Frank
w: Austin and Alice Austin
& Seth Jenkins
3117-01.01
7
I
I March 6, 1952 QeD Charles A. Austin as I~Jing B. & Clara Kirsch
Administrator of Frank
I W Austin, deceased
and Alice Austin,
deceased
I Parcel 4 (Lot 29)
February 7, 1945 Murphy Deed State of Florida A. Wachsman
October 9, 1945 WD A. & Ann Wachsman w:c. & Clara 1. Shepperd
October 21, 1947 WD WC. & Clara L. Shepperd Dorothy Shepperd
September 30,1957 WD Dorothy Shepperd Joseph C & Anna. E. Bates
July 10,1959 WD Joseph C. & Anna E. Roger & Helen Nicholas
Bates
October 20, 1959 WD Roger & Helen Nicholas Charles & Iria Hynninen
February 27, 1970 WD Charles & Irja Hynninen Iroing B. & Clara P.
Kirsch
8.0 Adjacent and Nearbv ProDertv
The surrounding area is mostly residential. There is a condo-
minium complex to the north of the site along N.E. 4th St.,
and beyond that is a Cumberland Farms Convenience S~ore. There
were no fuel facilities associated with the convenience store.
North of the Site to the east was a veterinary clinic and a .
VFW hall. There was an engine on the grounds of the veterinary
clinic, but there was no evidence that maintenance activities
of the engine had impacted the Site. Beyond the clinic and the
VFW hall was a small shopping center on the south side of
Gateway Blvd. (N.E. 22nd Ave.) which was occupied by a beauty
shop, a Dollar Store, a dog groomer, and a small food store.
Next to the strip center was Royal Coin Laundry which was
abandoned. The laundry advertised dry cleaning, but there were
no drums on the premises. It was likely a pick-up location.
According to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) Stationary Tanks Systems Inventory Database,
397-01.01
8
I
I
the following registered fuel facilities are within one-half
mile of the Site.
I
FACIUTY
FACILITY J.D. NO.
DISTANCE FROM SITE
I
Highway 124-8
2508 N. Federal Hwy
508514238
1000 ft.(NE)
I
Texaco #24-021-1303
2360 N. Federal Hwy
508513840
500 (t.(NE)
I
U-Haul Center
1319 N. Federal Hwy
508514807
112 mi. (S)
I
There are three (3) 12,000 gallon underground gasoline tanks
and one (1) 8,000 gallon underground diesel tank at the
Highway station. Groundwater and soil contamination were
discovered in July 1988, and the facility is in the state of
Florida Reimbursement Program, a state-funded program to
assess and remediate petroleum contaminated sites.
I
I
I
There are two (2) 10,000 gallon and one (1) 12,000 gallon
underground gasoline tanks and one (1) 550 gallon underground
waste oil tank at the Texaco station. Soil an~ groundwater
contamination were reported in August 1987, and the facility
is on the Reimbursement Program.
I
I
I
Five underground gasoline tanks were removed from the U-Haul
facility in March 1994. No problems were reported.
I
According to the EPA RCRA Notifiers list, the following
facility which handles hazardous waste is within one-half mile
of the Site:
-
I
I,
FACILITY
STATUS
DISTANCE FROM SITE
500 ft. (NE)
Texaco
2360 N. Federal Hwy
SQG
-
SQG - Small Quantity Generators
I
387-01.01
9
I
I
I
I
I
9.0
I
I
I
10.0
I
I
According to the EPA CERCLIS, WASTELAN and National Priorities
Lists, there are no Superfund or NPL sites within one mile of
the Site.
Soil and Water Samlllimz and Analvsis
There is no record that sub-surface soil and groundwater on
the Site has ever been sampled and analyzed for possible'
contamination. Empire Environmental, Inc. did not feel
collection of soil and/or water samples and chemical analysis
were ne.cessary in order to perform this evaluation for a
Phase I Environmental Audit.
Polychlorinated Billhenvls
There was one transformer on a power pole on the
property line in Lot 28. It was in good condition, and
was no evidence of leaking or soil staining.
south
there
11.0 Conclusions
I
I
I
1.
Present and past uses of the property have not resulted
in situations of environmental concern.
There is no evidence that the site has been impacted by
off-site sources.
2.
12.0 Recommendations
The trash and debris should be removed from the Site.
I
13.0
I
I
1-
I
I
387-01.01
I
Limitations
Empire Environmental, Inc. has undertaken this assignment
using their best professional effort consistent with generally
accepted environmental assessment practices. Empire
Environmental, Inc. evaluated all information provided by
regulatory agencies, site personnel, and other knowledgeable
parties during this Phase I Environmental Assessment, but
makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of such
information. Additional data subsequently provided may alter
10
I
I
I
any findings or conclusions made in the assessment report.
The findings presented in the report are based upon the site
conditions and information made available at the time of the
Phase I Environmental Assessment.
I
I
I
d4:~
Andrew Feinstein
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
387-01.01
11
I
?lie City of
'Boynton 'Beach
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boule:van!
P.O. 'Boi(310
'Boynton 'Beadi, 110ritIa 33425-0310
City:Jfa[[: (407) 375-6000
:FJU: (407) 375-6090
December 18, 1995
Mr. Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
P.o. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-21229
Re: Traffic Statement: Park Ridge
Northeast of intersection of N. E. 4th
Street and N.E. 20th Avenue
File No. NWSP 95-012
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
The enclosed traffic impact study, dated December 14, 1995,
prepared by Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. was received by
the Planning and Zoning Department recently for the above-
referenced application. Please review for conformance with the
County's Traffic Performance Standard Ordinance.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at
(407) 375-6260, otherwise please send me your written comments/
approval to the above address, with a copy of your written response
to Bill Hukill, Director of Development Department, also at the
same address.
Very truly yours,
}oU,t;.. ~ ~
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
TJH:dim
cc: Bill Hukill
w/attachment
Central File
~merUa 's (jateway to tfu (julfstream
TRAFFICIMPACf ANALYSIS
PARK RIDGE
Prepared for
De Graf, Inc.
Prepared by
YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC.
918 US HIGHWAY ONE
LAKE PARK, FLORIDA 33403
(407) 842-0907
December 14, 1995
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
ASSURED CONSTRUCTION. . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
MAJOR PROJECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
TRIP GENERATION ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
TRIP DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. 6
Test One. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6
Driveway Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6
Test Two ...................................................................... 11
CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11
APPENDIX A - GA TEW A Y TRAFFIC COUNT
APPENDIX B - GROWTH RATE WORKSHEET
i
TABLE
1
2
3
4
5
6
LIST OF TABLES
TITLE PAGE
Existing (1995) Daily Traffic Conditions ....................................... 3
Existing (1995) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
Trip Generation Rates .........................................,............ 5
Trip Generation ........................................................... 5
Future (1997) Daily Traffic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8
Future (1997) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8
11
FIGURES
1
2
3
4
LIST OF FIGURES
TITLE
PAGE
Site Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
Trip Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7
Future (1997) Daily Traffic Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9
Driveway Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10
111
INTRODUCTION
Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. was retained to perform a Traffic Impact Analysis to assess the traffic
impact of a proposed 34 single family project to be located along NE 4th Street south of Gateway Boulevard in
the City of Boynton Beach as shown in Figure 1. Buildout is anticipated in 1997.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The major roadway near the project is Gateway Boulevard, which is a two lane road and reflects a Level of
Service (LOS) B. Table I shows the existing (1995) average daily traffic (ADT) conditions on the impact area
roadways, Table 2 provides the peak hour traffic conditions at the same locations. The ADT volumes were
obtained from the Palm Beach County 1995 Traffic Volumes Map, the peak hour volumes were determined by
factoring the ADT volumes by 0.091. The Gateway Boulevard count was an off-peak 1995 count factored to
ADT using the FDOT seasonal variation rates. Appendix A contains a copy of the count.
ASSURED CONSTRUCTION
The Palm Beach County and Florida Department of Transportation Five-Year Road Program does not include
any roadway widening projects within the study area.
1
~
GATEWAY BLVD. (N.W. 22 AVE.)
o
:::i
lD
l-
(/)
W
~
()
<(
w
en
N.E. 21 AVE.
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
....................
.....................
....................
.....................
....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
......... ..........
... ...........
.. ...........
.... ............
.... ............
YVONNE ZIEL
TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING &. PlANNING
"e us 1c:;1-MI." ONE l.Al<EFARI(,Fl~ 33<103 ("01j8ol2--09(J7
t-=
en
'<t
u..i
:i
~'
F.E.C.R.R. i
~
~
I
C)
I
..J
<(
0::
W
o
W
LL
PARK RIDGE
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 1
~
N.T.S.
LOCI) mm mm
0>0
~....J
CI)
0 mm mm
....J
RQ 00 COO> ao 00 COO>
COCO ",,"LO COCO ",,"LO
>1- dd dd 3>i= dd dd
<( <(
0::: 0:::
LOI-a COCO COCO LO~O::: COCO 0>"""
0>0- 0>0> LOO> 0><(::> C\IC\I 1'-1'-
o><(LL 0> 0> OC\l O>wo 1'-1'- C\I_~
T""" LL t-:"t-:" -.it-:" T"""o..::c T""" T"""
<(
0::: T""" T"""
I-
= c.. 00 00 en ~ en = 00 00
~<( 00 00 Z <(o~ C\IC\I 1'-1'-
U """""" """""" w....J "t"t COCO
c<ic<i a) a) 0 c.. T""" T""" NN
en T""" T""" C\IC\I E
Z 0
0 Z
E lL.CI) 0
0 OW a CI)
,**,Z
Z <( 00 Q LLW 00
0 ....J ...J ....J ....J ....J LL OZ ....J ....J ....J....J
U C\IC\I """""" LL ,**,:5 C\IC\I """"""
U <(
wit wo:::
0 C\I<!:l1- 0
T"""<!l<( >- ~ wQo::: ~ >
wOO::: ~ m ....Ja:::> ....J
::c m~o m
....Jocl- >- I
m~~ ....J <( <(0::: I ....J >-
1-<( I-<(~ <(
<(0:::- ~::c 1-<( ~::c
1-<(<( Cl)0::: wI- 0..<( Cl)0:::
0..0 """w 1-::> W """~ wI-
- 0 <(0 0.. ~5
LO 0 Ww - 0 Ww
0> I- ZLL <!lCl) LO ZLL <!:lCl)
0> 0> l-
T""" 0 0>
- T""" 0
<!l > 0 - > 0
Z ....J ~ <!:l ....J ::i
?- m Z m
en ?- m i= ?- m
X CI) >- en CI) >-
<( <( x <( <(
W WI- I~ wI- I;:
O:::CI) W
~ U""" I-w ~ 0::: en I-w
0 Ltiw 0:::1- 0 a",," 0:::1-
0<( Ltiw 0<(
0::: Z<!l 0:::
LL Cl)Z LL Cl)Z Z<!:l
00 ~~
>>
....J ....J
mm II
00 >- >->- ....J ....J
~~ <( <(<( <(<(
>> ~ ~~ 0:::0:::
....J ....J
mm II 0 WW ww
~ >- >->- ....J ....J <( 1-1- 00
LO<( <( <(<( <(<( 0 <(<( WW
0> CO ~ ~~ 0:::0::: 0::: <!:l<!:l LLLL
uO
Q) .. 0 ww ww
O~ <( !;(!;( 00
I 0 WW
",,"T""" 0::: <!:l<!:l LL LL
T""" ,...
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
The Palm Beach County Urban Study Area Traffic Volume Growth Tables provided by the Palm Beach County
Engineering Department, includes historical traffic count data for the roadways within the impact area of the
project. The growth rates for the roadway were detennined from these tables, and then applied to the respective
links to detennine background traffic growth to 1997. Since historical count data was not available along the
Gateway Boulevard link within the projects' study area and along Federal Highway north of gateway Boulevard,
data from count stations nearby were used to detennine an area growth rate. Appendix B contains a table with
the growth rate calculations.
MAJOR PROJECTS
The Palm Beach County (PBC) Engineering Departments major project map and list were consulted to locate
those projects needed to be reviewed for consideration in projecting background traffic. There are no major
projects within the study area which would reflect traffic of 10 percent or more of the threshold LOS "D" service
volume on the impact area roadway links within the projects buildout.
TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation was performed using the rates found in the Palm Beach County Impact Fee Ordinance, and the
Institute of Transportation Engineers', Trip Generation, 5th Edition. Table 3 shows the trip generation rates used,
Table 4 shows the trips generated by the proposed project. Trip generation results in 340 daily trips, 32 AM peak
4
l{)
I- C') v
X l- T""
I-W 00 X
Z a.W
w l{) a:
0 a:
W <0 I- a:
a: I"-
W I- ::.r:: W C\l
a. Z <( I-
W W Z
w a. W
C\l ~ ...J
l{)
Il.. 0 a. <( T""
a: l- v
+
I- ...J X 0
~ ~ Z I-
<(00 ...J
"
wW 0 C\l
a.~ I- 0
m
~a: Ii
a. I-
Z
....I
'<t
l- I"-
1->< I- C')
00 X C\l
ZW Z a.W
w 0 -a:
oa: <0
a:W C\J !::: I-a:
wI- 0 ::.r::w co
a.z w <(I-
00 W ::r: wZ
a.W
W co to ~...J
~ m
C') Z <(<( C\l
a: d Z b C')
Wz Il.. ~ 0 wO
C')elO a: ~ I-
....I Z '<tel~
wo- I- <( ....I
...JC:~ ~ I- " a: wQa:
I"- w
al::.r::a: <(00 0 <0 Z ...Ja:LU
<(a:w wW I- co W al~Z
I-<(z a.~ Ii el ~a:LU
a.LU I-
~ ~a: z Il.. <(el
<( ....I a: 0.0.
a. I- a:
c: en l-
I- 0
T"" a:
LU 0
00 LU '<t
C')
W Z I-
I-~ el 000
oa: z <(a.
<(a. w a:
Z I-
a: 0
I- ~
a:
0 0
,.... Il..
C\l 00 '<t
C')
W Z W
LUO <( !::::!
a: 00
1-0 I-
_0 u.
0
LU
I-
u. ::::>
I-
00 i= u.
I 00
...J 00
~ <( I
Z ...J
l{)<( W i= ~
9<0 00 Z W LU I-
uO :J W 0 00 z
Q) .. 0 :J W
o~ 0 a:
I .. Z 00 ::::> 0 0
VT"" <( LU 0 Z 00
T"" T"" ...J a: 00 <( LU
...J a:
trips and 41 PM peak trips. Based on the daily trips generated by the project, the radius of development influence
is half a mile.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Trip Distribution was based on current travel patterns and the FSUTMS model. Figure 2 shows the percent
project trips and the project volumes on the impact area roadways.
PERFORMANCE ST ANDARDS ANALYSIS
Test One
Table 5 shows the ADT capacity analysis with the project trips and background growth with the performance
standards analysis on those links with project impact greater than one percent of the LOS D capacity, Table 6
shows the same information for the peak hour. Figure 3 shows the above information on a map. Figure 4 provides
the project driveway volumes.
All of the roadway links within the impact area meet the Test One level of service standards.
Drivewav Analysis
Based on the peak hour driveway volumes shown on Figure 4, using the PBC turn lane standards, no turn lanes
are required at the projects' driveway along NE 4th Street.
6
o
~
!Xl
I-
CJ)
W
l:r:
()
~
CJ)
~
GATEWAY BLVD. (N.W. 22 AVE.)
LEGEND
32%
109
0.81
=
Percent of Project Trips on Link
Number of Project Trips on Link
Percent of LOS "0" Capacity
=
=
YVONNE ZIEL
TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING &; PLANNING
"1I us HC.........V 0NE.l.)t,j.(f p.-Rl(, FLOQIOA 3)01100 I~O~) &.t2-Q9Q1
~.....O)
&>N~
o
68%
231
1.73
32%
109
0.81
N.E. 21 AVE.
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.........................................
....................
.....................
....................
.....................
....................
.....................
......... ..........
... ...........
.. ...........
.... ............
.... ............
r:
(/)
'<t
ui
Z
,------"i
F.E.C.R.R. i
~
N.T.S.
~
~
I
~
I
....J
<{
~
W
o
W
LL
PARK RIDGE
PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE 2
(/)
2
o
i=
o
2
o
U
U
u::
u.
<(
Wa:
lOC)I-
WO>-
...Ja:::!
CD~<(
<(a:0
I-<(W
0..C)
<(
a:
W
>
<(
o
W
I-
U
W
a
a:
0..
I-I-u.>-
2UOl-
WW -
U"'"') U
a:0 <(
wa: 0..
0..0.. <(
U
C')r-
1"--00
~o
0l0l
OC\l
00
(/) CD CD
0 CD CD
...J
I"-- ...JU
Ol <(- r-Ol
Ol I-u. C')O r-OO
r- co 10
ou. r- 0 Olv
I- <( cOcO v" cO
a:
I- r- r-
l- (/)
U 0.. r-Ol 1"--10
W a: C')O C\lOO
"'"') C\lr-
0 I-
a:
a..
I"--a: I
0lC) ~ C')C') ~r::::
~~ coco
vv
U 0 000
<( a: r-
CD C)
IOI-U
0l0- 1"--1"-- 00 co
0l<(U. C')C')
r- U. vv 100l
<( 1"--- r-: OC\l
a: ..f 1"--"
I- ..... r-
(/). a..
g!?(S 00 00
00
vv 00
vv
MM a) a)
r- r- C\IC\I
~
100..
cpr-
(JC')
Q) ..
o:!
~~
roO
U.(/)
OW
,**=2
::5 ...J...J 00
C\IC\I ...J...J
vv
~ 0
>
...J
I CD
...J ~
~~ 3:I
vw WI-
0 wO !;;(::::>
I- 2~ C)g
0
~ 0
CD >
I- ...J
(/) CD
<( ~
WI-
~ a:(/) I3:
0 ~v I-w
a: a: I-
WW 0<(
U. (/)2 2eJ
0 0
> > >->-
...J ...J 3:3:
CD CD
>- >- ~ II
<(
3: <( ...J ...J
3: 3: <(<(
0 a: a:
<( W W WW
I- !;;(
0 <( 00
a: (!) eJ ww
u.u.
(/)
2
o
i=
o
2
o
U
U
u::
u.
W<(
coC)g:
wQa:
...Ja:::::>
CD~O
<(a:I
1-<(
o..~
<(
W
0..
r:::-
Ol
Ol
C
(/) CD CD
0 CD CD
...J
I"--...J a:u
Ol<( I- I"--C\I C\IC\I
Oll- u. vC')
roO ~u. 1"--1"-- COCO
I- <(<( C')_~
wa: r- r-
0..1-
I- ooC')
U C')O
a:W C\lr-
(/) r-
I"'"')
~~ a..
a:
0..0.. I-
I"--a:a: I
~I(!} ~ ~~ 000
r-~~ OOOl
o..U 0
<( a:
CD eJ
~~a: 1"--1"--
0lL5::::> 1"--1"-- Olv
r-0..0 COCO 1"--1"--
I C\I_ III
r- r-
~ 00
<((/) C\IC\I 00
W O. C\IC\I 1"--1"--
o.....JP ..,..:~ COCO
N C\I-
(/)
u.W
02 00
,**=::5 ...J ...J
C\IC\I ...J ...J
vv
W
a:
::::>
I-
::::>
u.
~ 0
>
...J
I CD
...J >-
1-<( <(
(/)a: ~~
vW
0 wO 1-::::>
I- 2~ <(0
C)(/)
0
>
...J 0
CD >
I- ...J
(/) CD
L51- >-
<(
~ a:(/) I3:
0 ~v I-w
a: I-
a: WW 0<(
u. (/)2 ZeJ
>-
<(
3:
o
<(
o
a:
00
>>
...J...J
CD CD
>->-
~<(
w3:
I-W
<(!;;(
(!}eJ
~>-
I~
...J ...J
<(<(
a: a:
ww
00
WW
u.u.
B
7,437
GATEWAY BLVD. (N.W. 22 AVE.) 463
231
8,131
B
7,437
463
109
8,009
N.E. 21 AVE.
Q
~
CD
I-
CJ)
UJ
0::
U
US
CJ)
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
....................
.....................
....................
.....................
....................
.....................
....................
.....................
....................
.. ...........
.. ...........
.... ............
.... ............
...:
CI)
'<t
~
Z
~!
F.E.C.R.R. !
LEGEND
B = LEVEL OF SERVICE
7,437 = FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
463 = BACKGROUND GROWTH AND MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC
231 = PROJECT TRAFFIC
8,131 = TOTAL TRAFFIC
~~
YVONNE ZIEL
TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & PlANNING
co .....
LO CO CO
CD o. ~ ~ 0).
'<t" '<t"
..... .....
~I'- ~
CDNI'-LO'<t"
r-: o. CO a:i
..... ..... .....
~
3:
I
~
I
-1
<(
~
UJ
o
W
LL
PARK RIDGE
FUTURE 1997 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
FIGURE 3
918 US >i(l'W...'I' oooe. ut.P<E PARI<. F.ORIOA 33400 l.ell) e.2_0907
!
N.T.S.
-
GATEWAY BLVD. (N.W. 22 AVE.)
r4
~
LEGEND
(13) 340
Ll=
340
(13)
4
Total Daily Volume
PM Peak Hour Volume
AM Peak Hour Volume
YVONNE ZIEL
TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & PlANNING
g,e us H(;Iio'o''''' QO.!E, tAKE PARI<, r~OQ'OA 334CI3 (il07jlW2-0907
~
N.T.S.
-
(14)
4
N.E. 21 AVE.
L :!!!:::::::::::::::m:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::=::::::::::::::::::=
.................1.2..00.........................
L .:!I::~I~:::::I~:::::::=::,:::I:::::,:::::::.:.:::::::::::,:,::::
~ {@fi{,i:t:U::::t:f::f:::::il:11111111111111111111111111\:
ui
;i
PARK RIDGE
PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY TURNING MOVEMENTS
FIGURE 4
Test Two
There are no Test Two impacted roadways within the project impact areas where project traffic
exceeds three percent of the Test Two capacity; therefore the project meets the Test Two
Standards.
CONCLUSION
This project meets the Palm Beach County-Wide Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and may be
approved.
11
APPENDIX A
GA TEW A Y TRAFFIC COUNT
DEC-12-1995 10:09
,-
22222222222222222
PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFTC
407 478 5770 P.01/01
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1
************~*******~*~*~*********~~*******************~*********~************
~~~ FilR D060~001.PRN
t. :, on 000000000471
J~nlification 000000000024
tart date . Jun 5. 95
t ,--:> / a ate . J un 6 9 5
1 r Town . ROBERT' ELLER
o ation ; GATEWAY BL WEST OF U5-1
~*****~*****~****************************~**********~*~********~****~~~.~~*~~**
un 5/.luD 6 Ea~t.bound Volnme for Lanf! l' '...- ~ ,...... .....
Intt:!rval
Start rimp.
Stop time
County
15 minutes
13: 1.5
1 J: 15
PR
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
::=_~~:~ 00 OJ 02 03 04 OS 06 07 08 ..' 09 10 11
15
30
45
')0
r Total
12
5
.3
3
1
12
6
3
2
1
13
2
4
4
3
4
o
o
1
5
8
o
4
1
:1
3
3
6
10
15
12
35
36
98
45
S6
85
81
267
57
43
47
57
20[~
60
48
43
61
212
50
54
43
38
185
53
59
49
43
204
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23
n Tim~
~15
30
+5
00
12
57
56
46
58
,
i r rotal 217
13
48
48
44
56
196
14
41
51
45
56
]93
15
64
49
61
42
216
16
74
65
53
62
254
22
1 7
S3
60
59
62
234
18
61
52
72
53
238
19
52
32
67
39
190
20
31
40
39
33
149
21
39
27
27
29
122
22
23
23
12
10
68
8
13
13
7
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
41
1,4 JIOllr Total 3360
~~ peak hour begins: 07:15 AM peak volum~: 279 Peak hour factor: 0.82
,~ peak hour begins: 16:00 PM peak volume; 254 Peak hour factor: 0.86
*~********************~~***********~******************************************
uti Time
5/Jun 6
00
11
Eastbound Volum~ for Lane 2
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
15
30
45
00
r Total
8
11
1
1
21
01
19
02
4
4
6
.'j
18
03
4
6
3
5
04
1
1
o
o
2
14
05
4
o
3
7
06
2
11
12
23
30
07
32
54
59
(d>
211
08
43
39
56
31
169
09
41
43
40
44
168
10
46
59
51
55
211
11
67
53
56
61
237
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
23
,n Time
15
30
45
00
12
7lt
53
59
59
r Total 245
13
53
53
If 0
S9
205
14
6.5
65
64
49
243
15
63
63
54
59
219
1.6
79
82
76
77
314
17
98
80
74
82
334
4
6
3
15
76
J 9
68
51
44
22
185
20
41
39
42
14
136
21
50
44
34
39
1.67
22
27
23
10
14
74
12
8
12
11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
43
18
7B
55
i.6
65
244
4 Hour Total 3590
rv-ppak hour begin~ : 11.:15 AM pcnk volume: 244 Peak hour factor: 0.32
~ peak hour begin~ : 17:00 PM peak volump: 3J~ Peak hour factor: 0.85
~~~~.~*~~*~*~*************~***~:**~~~~******~~*****~*~*~**~.******~~****~*.~~:~***~
TOTAL P. 01
APPENDIX B
GROWTH RATE WORKSHEETS
U)
z
o
i=
<(
....J
::::>
wg
(!)<(
00
o:w
~!;;:
a: a:
~I
I-
3:
o
a:
CJ
~
LO<(
~C\J
u"-
Q) ..
O::a:
...t~
..- ..-
IWO
~!;;:~
Oa:=>
a:
CJ
IW
~~
Oa:
a:
CJ
w
~
::::>
....J
o
>
a:
<(
w
>-
"-"-
00
ct)ct)
a: a:
a: a:
ww
LOLO
0) 0)
0) 0)
..- ..-
w
~
=>
...I
o
>
a:
<(
w
>-
<(<(
ZZ
C\JC\J
0) 0)
0) 0)
..- ..-
"-"-"-"-
0000
ct)ct)ct)ct)
a:0)"-C\J
a:~~~
WC')..-O)
I '..-
<DC\J..-
O)OCO
C\J..-LO
r-.:'cOr-.:'
..- ..- ..-
LOLOLOLO
0)0)0)0)
0)0)0)0)
~~~,-
C')COO
<(g8~
zoir-.:'c:i
..- ..- ..-
C\JC\JC\JC\J
0)0)0)0)
0)0)0)0)
,.... ,.... ,.... ,....
o
o >
> offi
ffi a:1-
>- Oen
<( X<(
3:I3~
Wl-OO
1-=>0.<(
<(o>-w
CJenIU)
o
>
...10
lI:la:
~<(
I3:Z
I-W~
a:l-zLO
0<(<(0)
zCJ....J...!.
o
>->->->
3:3:3:....J
IIIlI:l
....J....J....J>-
<(<(<(<(
a: a: a: 3:
wwww
0001-
www<(
u..u..u..CJ
o
I-
~
I
....J
1-<(
en a:
..qW
o
Ww
Zu.
~
o
a:
u..
o
~
lI:l
tn
<(
WI-
a: en
O..q
L5w
U)z
>-
<(
3:
o
<(
o
a:
00
>>
....J ....J
lI:llI:l
>->-
<(<(
3:3:
WW
1-1-
<(<(
CJCJ