Loading...
APPLICATION PRUJl::C'l' '1'1'1'1 lll::l:iCRIl>'l'lON ',"i Pi::: W\'l'E REC I D: 'J'RACKING ~G - SITE PLAN REVIEW SUB~ lTAL -?~\!'-'":> 1'0;4 ,9t v(:?c 7(/ '1b' 1" e( PARKRIDGE FILE NO.: SBMP 95-003 SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN NEW SITE PLAN MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 2 6 AMOUNT: 1 nnn nn kJ::C~IPT NO.: * * t * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 'rWii:l..VE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: 12/6/95 COLORED ELEVATIONS RECID: . - (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The Plann11lg Dept. set will. be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED 12/6/95 DENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIfYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT1'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE: DATE UF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I (Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMB~R OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DA'rE SEN'l': 1~/dJS- RETUkN DATE: /;;)//6-j;~ MEMO NUMBER: t..?~613 .st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANS MEMO It / / "c" PLANS MEMO ,. / / "C" utile q~-~ L/ / -.SL. Planning '1- 1"" / L~ . !J- .":a4. / P.w. q~-..:t,n1 I / ...G::::- · Building V <i's - I..f cf..3 / /~ Parks -r 95-565" / /- Engineer '1...)"- <t .-r ~ / / -1L.. , Fire <-16 dJ7q / /~/~ 0 I~ Engineer / /- Police ''i O!Q6 / I LIIJ /- i:~orester Y $J5.SF!S' / lahJ.. /~ , . 'rY P E; Oli' VARIANCE(S) DA'I'E OF MEETING: DA'l'E OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. u checklist sent out w/ comment:~ NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS RBC I D: MEMO SENT TO,!~C TO PBRFORM 2nd RBVIB~., n DA1'E SENT: ~I MBMO It:-r~c. U~~<'-' RETURN DATE: J:tpr /9;)" 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS HIMO ft I DATI IIIR/U" PLANS HEMO ft I DATI I"R/D" Utile I I Planning I I P.W. I / BUilding / / Parks / / Engineer / / Fire I I Engineer I / Police / / Forster / / LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DA'l'.!i: APPROVAL LS1'TER SENT: .".: 'l'kACK1NG. tiP MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95- 391 I'r~~~ ~ ~ ~~j.~~1<.~."..'(,;;'\~ L-.' dl dU .. _~~..._. t PLAimll\!G p,lIj[) 1CI1{ 1 ZONING DEPT. '~ TO: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director ~r ~ FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities Date: December 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Park Ridge Plat and Development Plans Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: I. Palm Beach Health Department permits will be required for water and sanitary sewer systems, (Sec. 26.12). 2. This department requests a meeting with the project engineer to discuss several additions and corrections on the proposed water and sanitary sewer plans and details. 3. A capacity reservation fee of$4,712.40 will be due within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval of the site plan or upon request for my signature on the permit applications to the Health Unit. (Sec. 26-34(E)) 4. The proposed development plans indicate several single family homes on a single parcel. It is currently unclear as to who will be responsible for maintenance of the water and sewer lines from the edge of the utilities easement to the building. Customarily, said maintenance is the responsibility of the homeowner who owns the property. In this case ownership is not clear. We have no objection to the plan proceeding through the review process if the question regarding type of development and maintenance recan be satisfactorily addressed. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404, sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File pkrig 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-207 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan - Park Ridge DATE: December 13, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site. REier ~~i , - \"~. ~ W, _la.., J)....---'1 \\\\\ \ ~ \S__ tJ' \~.. \\ , \' ~ ,--~\) ~ ~~m~~tH DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. \-,'\":M':-""-~J-',~~-, -~'-[l, ",- W ffi -m'\ 1 II It; , '_.'~--'l que'" . .1 . I II II ; , \. ! !. ' i , ~ 95-4731 . "Jfi'~"7It~'I'~'\D ='":JO · ~~,~_ k~L~'lbfri._,,\' /) t. TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~m Hukill, P.E., City Engineer December 13, 1995 FROM: DATE: RE: PARKRIDGE - MASTER PLAN We have reviewed the master plan for Parkridge (or is it Park Ridge?) sheet 1 of 1 and find as follows: 1. Revise documents to reflect all comments. 2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 3. This master plan is not required as a condition of zoning, but is required as a pre-requisite to platting. Since the land is to be subdivided into two or more lots or parcels either by plat or metes and bounds, it must be platted (Chapter 1, Article II, page 1-33 and Chapter 5, page 5-1). Since the subdivided lots are not shown on the master plan, the plan cannot proceed without certification from the applicant that the master plan and the plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, the Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations. 4. Insufficient information to complete review. This is not a rezoning request, so dimens'ions must comply with R-3 zoning. Single family dwellings in R-3 districts must comply with R-1 district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5, par.G2b, pg.2-21 5. Provide statement regarding subsurface conditions. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3M, pg.3-5 6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.1lA, pg.6-3 7. Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 & 6-9 8. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.lOD, pg.6-12 9. Provide street grades no steeper than 2J:i per cent. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.10I, pg.6-13 Dept. of Development, Engineering Div. Memo No. 95-473 Re: Parkridge - Master Plan December 13, 1995 Page #2 10. Provide street names as required in Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec.10Q, pg.6-14 11. Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.13, pg.6-16 12. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24 The package we received included sheets 1 thru 8 of infrastructure and L-1 thru L-3 of landscaping, all of which are due upon approval of the master plan. (Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4A, pg.6-19) We will retain them for review at that time. WVH/ck xc: Ken Hall A:PARKRDGE.MPR TO: FROM: DATE: REF: BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT , I' ' \ :'7 rc: . 'J I: ! I \/; I~; .j I : ---~.. '.". -', ( ": 'i po'. . UUL' ':,!':: ~ ._._...,_._.-..~_,J ptf"'f'l"IG I~'D . \1'-1 'J I. 1t,,~ I l!iJG nfPT. 2::' T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 11 DECEMBER 95 PARK RIDGE - SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN-I st REVIEW MEMO #0196 I have reviewed the above plans and fi!},4.:}Jq;'Pr,061~~i;iii t4.t~:JitPe. j:;)= {::,;?i:;::i:;;!;;,:;;,;;:;:;;;:::;"':":":\::" {",.,} (:::;::,~/:'::;i;:;;::::::;::' . :" :, <"~::,'"",','.'.~",:,',,:,,,;:,;;:,.:,.,'.:',,.;,:,'.:,~:',":,',':. :/:::"::'::::::J' " , r:::';/,..".""..i:l Respec fully~ fi' "JrriI U~0~ ~ 11~.~.:::.:.:::.;.:.::;::.~~;:..:::~; r...~~::;::;:;::::~.-:::::.. ! L.~,gt! ,Marlqq Hani,~, t,~ I.,f':.:.:..':':'.:.'..'.... Ci t.t;:;;::::::;~:::~,l rJ [8;: c:':::::::;:;;:;::> ~~~ \ ,.~..;....:....:-~:::: .r: '-~) lB~ UUu @~>> ':~;;;;::::>"'*' o::.~:~~' {' ~~~. <",<",. ~ .,..... ~\,,:::::. ~:::,,'," ~:~;:;~ .. " ~','~ ~,' \"il' ~ i \.,:i>::~~:~~~::l 1 l ~.....~ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 395-575 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environrnentalisl }-~\- Parkridge - Master Plan FROM: RE: DATE: December 12, 1995 The applicant should provide a 1) tree survey and 2) Tree Management Plan for the property. The applicant should receive written approval from the State Gave and Fresh Water Fish Commission that there are no gopher tortoises/scrub jays on the site. The plan should continue on the normal review process. KH:ad -----;:;":,'\ -.--- \"a r "~ "",~"'-'~ ~ ~ \" \ \ \.\"'.~"-"" \~ W~ ~*,,~_JL..~."",\, \ \\ \,\ "') \,....., . " 1 : \ \ ,.' '" ' ',; ': I .".\. .'. ;' ,.,," ,.. . ." \ n\ \ ' f I, ;, '\" I' ~ ~ . \ \. "f}"./,. I V ,?tyfi' i. - , PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-722 r~-I r{ i,UUl t ii !~ il: , ,\11 Hi, 'I TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director ! (;f)l-L/ FROM: Jerzy Lewicki DATE: December 15, 1995 SUBJECT: Subdivision Project: Location: Master Plan - 1st Review Park Ridge East side of the intersection of Northeast 20th Avenue and Northeast 4th Street Agent: File No.: John Grant, Jr., Inc. SBMP 95-003 The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the subdivision master plan review of the plans for the above- referenced proj ect . It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. Note: Our comments are made under the assumption that the ownership of the proposed development will not require further resubdivision of the tract as to create individual lots for the housing units. We have reviewed the conformance of this project with relevant zoning regulations assuming that the development contains one tract of land. Therefore, the perimeter setbacks, as proposed, were determined to be acceptable per bulk regulation of the R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling District. Our assumption of this development takinq place on one tract only needs to be reflected on the Plat submitted to the City for review. I. SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Identify clearly the property lines on both Master Plan and Survey Map. Include this identification in the legend. 2. Indicate in the attachment and on the Master Plan who will be responsible for the streets maintenance: the City or developer. 3 . Indicate in ownership of units. the the attachment the anticipated form of housing stock and proposed type of 1/'- i 4. \.. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate location of proposed sidewalks. ;;. , On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the dimension of the proposed cul-de-sac (diameter or radius) . "- 6 . On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide the minimum dimension of the rear yard. Page 2 Memorandum 1st Review Park Ridge No. 95-722 - Subdivision Master Plan 7. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide information in regard to land use and zoning of all adjacent properties. 8. In order to allow the City Staff to evaluate how the proposed development fits the adjacent land use and and its physical characteristics provide a map extending to: alley between Northside Condominium and the commercial development - to the North, trailer park, indicating the closest located units - to the South, Residential development across the street from the NE 4th Street, - to the West, area across the Rail Road indicating any development that occurs to the East within a reasonable distance. Within the extended perimeter area indicate all existing streets, sidewalks, footprints of the buildings, landscape elements, and other characteristic elements of the surrounding development. 9. In the site data, on sheet 1 of 1, replace the word "proposed" with the word "existing" in regard to zoning classification. 10. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the width of the N.E. 4th Street. 11. Provide traffic analysis concurrency requirements. for the evaluation of 12. The proposed Master Plan is in violation with the zoning regulations if the plat will be approved as submitted. 13. All information as specified in Chapter 3, Master Plan Review, should be included or referenced on the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1. 14. Indicate location and provide relevant calculation in respect to parking. 15. Provide Homeowners Association documents. A:SBMP-PRl TO: RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-56 @ ~:; ~ 8:0 ~ 00' Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superinrendent r Parkridge ~e ld30 ElNINOZ Otli\l DNINNVlcJ FROM: RE: DATE: December 8, 1995 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the new site plan for Parkridge Place. The following comments are submitted: I. Based on 34 single family homes, the recreation dedication requirement is calculated 34 d.u. X .018 acres = .612 acres 2. The plan gives no infonnation that the developer plans to apply for one-half credit for private recreation. The full dedication requirement is required as cash in lieu ofland. JW:ad BUILDING DIVISION ill I' '~"-~fl R rn o [l'~~,__.~,,:""IC:_~~~~, ~ , .~... I ' 'J I' . . _~._~.'~~.,~-~J .', ., '\"'" ""'[) ~ .. PI k:i~. 1"1,' r,' i "1/ Zf'J,::,;r: n~tP'TI'- It Yl-II\ . ~~~~~':::"';':"''''':'''''''~'4 ...1 ~~"""(".""". MEMORANDUM NO. 95-443 December 18, 1995 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Department of Development Director Re: Park Ridge Site Plan Please refer to Memorandum No. 95-442 for comments relative the Master Plan and Site Plan. (Copy Attached). ~~/ Al Ne old'--/ AN:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director PKRIDGE BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-442 December 18, 1995 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director Re: Park Ridge Master Plan After reviewing the plans for the above reference project, the Building Division cannot support this plan going forward because of so many unanswered questions that we cannot address without such information as type of multiple-family residential structures, i.e., apartments, cooperatives, condominiums or townhouses. If they are to be single-family dwellings, they should comply with R-I site regulations under LDR Section 5, Paragraph E-2 and should have platted lots to check setbacks and lot coverage. In addition to the above comments, the following should be shown on the plans: 1. Evaluation and floor plan unless they are single-family. 2. Distance between building to comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code. 3. Setbacks should be shown from Park Ridge Circle (See definition of lot frontage, LDR Page 1-23, Article II), also see Access for an understanding of where front setbacks are from. 4. Setbacks must be shown for pools, screen rooms, etc. 5. Sign details required for Site approval. - AN:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director PKRIDGE DEPAR'"dENT OF DEVELOPMEN'I' 100 Bas~ BOYD~on Beach Blvd. P. O. Box 310 Boyn~on aeach, Florida 33&25-0310 April 12, 1996 rill '-'- rn Ii;:; Ire- 1'; 'i n r;I ill I U) .!' " !;> '-- ~')-,-,;;!..."".:,_._. ,;1."" n APR121996 ,IU John A. Grant, Jr., Inc. 3333 N. Federal Highway Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Attention: W. Keith Grant, Vice President Dear Mr. Grant: :h ~ (~fire It-I/:;<- l{aeSk-r- ~~, Re: Park Ridge PUD We have reviewed your request for a ruling by our City Attorney on sidewalks and street rights- of-way. The request has been referred back to us for disposition, which is as follows: Sidewalks - LDR Chapter 6, Article III, Section II, Paragraph A, page 6-3 requires sidewalks on both sides of all local streets in platted or unplatted subdivisions. A procedure is outlined therein for substituting a bicycle path for the two sidewalks. Rights-of-Way - LDR Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 7, page 6-10 requires that all lots must have frontage on a street (or have permanent private access to a street) which has a minimum right-of-way of fifty feet. In order to deviate from either of these, or any' other subdivision requirement, the variance procedure outlined in LDR Chapter I, Article I, Section II, page 1-5 must be followed. The fee accompanying a variance request has been established by the City Commission as $400 for the first variance and $100 for each additional variance. I have enclosed for your convenience all three LDR quotations mentioned herein. Let us know if you need further assistance. Very truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA .g,~LZ//'t?;/~w/' William Hukill, P.E. Director of Development WVH/ck attachments xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager James Cherof, City Attorney Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director C:PKRDGV AR phone: <'07) 315-6280 FAX: <'07) 375-6357 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-114 ~""~''''''''_'.."......-~____-",...,~.''''~r_'_..._",.~_ : 1'""\ I? (ii:l r2 r, ,\11 ,? r in! LS U!J is li \~ Li;.1r I iJ 1 r------"'-.-.?' i 'nq -I i lid! - 'i996 q, ,I . ',." ~ ~ ';'~_ L._,__~__~_~__.J PlI\NNII'JG MJD lON!NC DFPT. "-"'~'-'-.="'~'''" '-'-"'--"""~"'''-~'''~''''''~_''r'_''''''' RE: PARK RIDGE -f~ PDA' (Z ft2t ~ MWul~ f(~ TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director ~dJtL< ~uki11, P.E. ~~gIneer FROM: DATE: March 29, 1996 Please review the attached March 23 letter from John Grant requesting several opinions from our City Attorney. Please also see the March 22 Pawe1czyk memo refusing to give an opinion, but referring questions to you. Please respond as you feel appropriate. WVH/ck attachments xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager James Cherof, City Attorney C:PARKRDG rn rn m m'D \VI rn fn)! I' ! I f ~ tv!,~i 2 5 1996 U 1 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ENGINEERING MEMORANOUH FROK: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director. 1(.) william HUkill, P.E., city Bnqineer 11/'}'. Michael J. Pawelozyk, Assistant city Attorney Park Ridg_ - Request tor opinion TO: RB: DATE: Marcb 22, 1996 I have reviewed the attached Bnqineering MemorenduD No. 96- 092, regarding the Park Ridge Development. The four (4) requests for opinion are not requests fo~ legal opinions. Such questions would be JIlore appropriately answereC1 by the Planning & Zoning Department and its capable staft. If any le9al questions do arise in answering these questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. xc: Carrie Parker, city Manager MJP/aa 900182 MEMO PARI<RIDG DEPARTMJ:NT O' DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. '6-092 FROM: James Cbcrof City Attorney kJ'~ukin, P.E. ~ginccr WR 18 j TO: DATE: March 14, 1996 RE: PARK RIDGE - REQUEST FOR OPINION We have today received a letter &om W. Keith Grant asking that we prescot 4 specific: requests to yoo for opinions (attached). Please review aDd respond to us A.S.A.P. WVHlek xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Tambri Hcyden.PlaDlling & Zoning Director W. Keith Grant, John A. Grant.. Jr., Inc. C;'KJUlGCA JOHN A. GRANT. JR.. INC. CONMTlN8 fN8IHEUS AIm WI) IUfMYOU mE :1333 N. F'IIDItIllAL H"NWAoY IIocl.. 1kraH. "'0MlIM a:M81 NIQtlWAYI AltO MOClU .TORN DltAlNAlK .ATOt SUPPl. 't LAHO OC'CLOPMEHT'~ tuaOl\ltllOHS T~HICSUINI:V' ltACH CR08IQN PHONIt 140'1' a">>:I:I FAA (407) .....>>.. March 13, 1996 Mr. Bill Hukill, P.S. Director Engineering Department City of Boynton Beach 100 Bast Boynton Beacn Blvd. Boynton Beach, PL 33435 Park Ridge Our Job No. Dear Mr. Hukill: RB: JG 100-7803 ENGI R'~. CONafl'UCnON aurwrta NOfmIAlIE IUJIIICTt ITllUCruRAL DC..... MNITAlh'~ NNlINAS C:ON.,."UCTIOH 'U"CJMIION INLlIHCI'O UNU Transmitted herewith is Exhibit "A-, a site plan for the proposed development ot Park Ridge. a Single Pamily Condominium. The SUbject property is presently ~oned Multi-family. We have previously submitted plans to the City for the TRC ~rocess. Based upon City comments and Subsequent meetings, the C1ty has' recommended that the property be rezoned from Multi-tamily to P.U.D. We have been advised that the recommended rezoning will allow for the development of a Single Family Condominium as indicated on the attached B~ibit "A". We request that you submit this letter and Exhibit "A" to the City Attorney for a written response or the City'S position of the fOllowing: 1) Is 24' Ingre8s/Bgress Basement a sutficient width to provide access for private road purposes tor the Single Family Condominium P.U.D.? . 2) Do the setbacks to the units and tvcical separation between units as indicated on Bxhibit .~A. meet City Code Requirements? 3) Is a i.U.D. buffer required in addition to the setbacks to units? 4) Are sidewalks required adjacent to the private road access? Please advise at your earliest convenience 80 that we can proceed with our TRC process. If you have any questions regarding the above, please, call me at 395-3333. WKG/la Bnclosure cc: Gary Degraf C. II W P ~ · 0 . a :r .' :. ~ = :. CD - CD'" ~I'C r ~ ~ c.. .,. l:' t: 0 c. ~ (I ~II ; I ~~ ~ I' ~II ----- -- N~f"~A~t .,4.!~.. Sf~ .r,.." ~. ..,..-. FuRlOll tIlsr COIlS"!" eAlL~/!JIO --..--------------.---..---..--------.----..---..---......---...-- ~ ; i I ~ <- Z -!:::=> -/ I I II)' _...... - C I . I I i " ~ In e ~ rt'I ~ Z .... i .. i -c ~ I s lD ~ j " ~ i JOHN A. GRANT. JR.. INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3333 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY BocA RATON. FLORIDA 33431 ifDJ ~ & ~ II W ~ mil I1IJ ' " 5 /996 ill: E[{'H~l~R'NG I ---.."'......---., , March 23, 1996 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS MORTGAGE SURVEYS STRUCTURAL DESIGN SANITARY SEWERS MARINAS CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION BULKHEAD LINES HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES STORM DRAINAGE WATER SUPPLY LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES SUBDIVISIONS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS BEACH EROSION PHONE (407) 395-3333 FAX (407) 39!5-3315 Mr. Bill Hukill, P.E. Director Engineering Department City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE: Park Ridge Our Job No. JG 100-7803 Dear Mr. Hukill: In reference to our March 21" 1996 telecon regarding the above referenced project, we are amendin$ our March 13, 1996 request for a written response of the City'S posltion. Please void our March 13th request and advise accordingly of the following: Transmitted herewith is Exhibit "A", a site plan for the proposed development of Park Ridge, a Single Family Detached HOA PUD. The subject property is presently zoned Multi-family. We have previously submitted plans to the City for the TRC ~rocess. Based upon City comments and subsequent meetings, the Clty has recommended that the property be rezoned from Multi-family to P.U.D. We have been advised that the recommended rezoning will allow for the development of a Single Family Detached HOA PUD as indicated on the attached Exhibit "A". The individual units will be conveyed by metes and bounds legal description with the remaining land adjacent the units being common property and dedicated to the HOA. We request that you submit this letter and Exhibit Attorney for a written response of the City'S following: "A" to the City position of the 1) Is 24' Ingress/Egress Easement a sufficient width to provide access for private road purposes for the Single Family Detached HOA P.U.D.? Do the setbacks to the units and typical separation between units as indicated on Exhibit "A" meet City Code Requirements for the Single Family Detached HOA P.U.D.? Is a P.U.D. buffer required in addition to the setbacks to units? Are sidewalks required adjacent to the private road access? 2) 3) 4) Please advise at your earliest convenience so that we can proceed with our TRC process. ,. Page 2 City of Boynton Beach JG 100-7803 March 23, 1996 If you have any questions regarding the above, please call me at 395-3333. Very truly yours, WKG/la Enclosure cc: Gary Degraf Jennifer Morton WOO a ~ ;; /D ~ II /D :7 Q. ,CD .,': '< NORf~t~/J 4th. SfRftf -, ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20' M'" I SElBACK I I I I ... q )C ~ ~. g,~ i "T'I e- m 0 :T'I 1\ ~I~ " ~ 10 S:>" . ,,10 , ~I' lfo~ ~ ~f)~ .... 01 . ' I I I I I , , I , , J >.,>....... --------,,; DRAtlAGEJETENTION EASEMENT FLORIDA c ~fl~r COAsr RA I L ROllO -- -. - --- -- - .-- --- -. ---- -- - --- --- --- -- -- -- ~ C) rn i ~ fil ! ;! ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ c i I )> ~ ~ ~ (5 Z ..' ~ / / Z~ I i I (}I (}I (}I (}I ~ ." IT! o IT! :xl J> r J: ~ :-< ()I o 2 (I) C m ~. >< *: :J: ~I - ~. Pft 2, WW' IT! , - ~: (I)' g)~ )> ~I :xl. ;;l: -<" o :xl (I) lD o () J> :xl J> ~ o _2 ." r o :xl o J> MEMORANDUM ;,T:::~~ffi -,...~,~~. \ \ D L~ \.l9 s .--_.='~ \\ \\ \~ MAR 2 5 1006 \@\ . \ \ PL,\NN\NG tlNO \ L IONING Of-PI -) CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH FROM: Taabri Heyden, planning , Zoning Director. 11() William Hukill, P.B., city Engineer 11/1, ," MiChael J. Pawelozyk, Assistant city Attorney Park Ridge - Request tor Opinion TO: RB: DATE; March 22, 1996 I have reviewed the attached Bngineering MeDorandum No. 96- 092, regarding the Park Ridge Development. The four (4) requests for opinion are not requests for legal opinions. Such questions would be more appropriately answerec2 by the Planning Ie Zoning Department and its capable staff. If any legal questions do arise in answering thes. questions, please do not hesitate to oontact me. xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager MJP/aa 900182 MBMO PAR~IDG " ~ lL (~ ~10-e Me JOHN A. GRANT. JR., INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND lANE! SURVEYORS 3333 N, FEDERAL HIGHWAY BocA RATON. FLORmIL 33431 PLANr-lltG A~D ZONING DEPT. January 23, 1996 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS MORTGAGE SURVEYS STRUCTURAL DESIGN SANITARY SEWERS MARINAS CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION BULKHEAD LINES HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES STORM DRAINAGE WATER SUPPLY LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES SUBDIVISIONS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS BEACH EROSION PHONE (407) 395-3333 FAX (407) 395-3315 City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FI 33435 Attention: Tambri Heyden RE: PARK RIDGE File NO. NWSP 95-012 Our Job No. JG 100-7803 Dear Ms. Heyden: In accordance with your transmitted herewith is our referenced project. Per our January 16, 1996, letter, the proposed development will be a Condominium, and we have modified all ~roject documents accordingly. Also as you may recall, ln our initial discussions with the City of Boynton Beach, it was agreed that we would submit the project for your review based upon a 40' setback from both N.E. 4th Street and the FEC Railroad to the units and a 20' setback from both the North and South Property line to the units, with a minimum separation of IS' between units ( a sketch showing this was sent to Mr. Lewicki). letter of January resubmittal of 2, the 1996, above Included with our resubmittal are the following items: 1. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Plat. 2. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Site Plan. 3. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Master Plan. 4. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Survey. 5. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Grading, Paving, Drainage, Water and Sewer Plans. 6. Twelve (12) revised sets of the Landscape Plans. 7. Twelve (12) revised sets of the Architectural Plans. 8. One (1) copy of commitment letter from Southern Bell and Florida Power and Light. 9. One (1) copy of document describing the existing 10' wide utility easement in the southern portion of the site. 10. One (1) co~y of each of the three proposed color schemes for the bUlldings. 11. One (1) copy of each of the three proposed material color schemes. 12. One (1) 11" x 32" architectural rendering of the buildings. Page 2 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge Our response to Memorandum # 95-736 from Jerzy Lewicki of the Planning and Zoning Department is as follows: 1. The survey doesn't show N.E. 20th Avenue east of N.E. 4th Street because it is not platted. 2. Topographical elevations have been referenced in the survey legend. 3. Information on the existing structures has been added to the survey. 4. A note with regard to the use of proposed structures has been added to the Site Plan. 5. The location and number of parking spaces provided has been added. We plan to discuss the need for sidewalk with the appropriate agencies. 6. The location of proposed signs has been added to the Site Plan. 7. The location of proposed lighting has been added to the Site Plan. 8. Architectural Plans have been revised to show height of structures. 9. A colored elevation drawing is being provided with this submittal. 10. Color samples of building materials are included with this submittal. 11. Tabular summary of Site Plan has been revised to provide the requested information. 12. The traffic study was previously submitted. 13. Ownership of streets and drainage area is shown on the Site Plan. Homeowners will be given patio. They will also have 6' high wooden fence. 15. The 15'-0" dimension between buildings is typical and this has been clarified on the Site Plan. the option of having a the option of having a 14. 16. Dimension of garage is provided on Architectural Plan. Page 3 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge 17. The existing 10' wide utility easement in the southern portion of the site will be eliminated during the platting process. (See enclosed document that describes easement.) 18. All trees within utility easements will be relocated, except the palm trees and shrubs. 19. Since the intention of the development is to be similar to a t~ical single family community, no visitor parking wll1 be provided. 20. The intent is to use different color schemes throughout the development. Our response to Memorandum # 95-583 from Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist is as follows: 1. A letter from the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission stating there are no endangered/protected species on the site will be submitted. 2. On the tree survey, several multiple trunked oaks were identified with each trunk being an individual tree. The tree relocation/removal plan identifies each multi~le trunked oak tree as a single tree. The quantity dlfference is nine, as noted in the comment. 3. A Tree management plan to address the proper care of trees in Item #2 is included with this submission. Our response to Memorandum # 95-565 from John Wildner, Parks Superintendent, is as follows: 1. The required recreation fee based on the single family homes calculating factor will be paid when due at final platting. 2. The developer does not plan to apply for one-half credit for private recreation. Our response to Memorandum # 95-442 from Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director, Buildings Department, is as follows: It has been decided that the development will be condominiums. 1. The floor plan has been submitted for evaluation. Page 4 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge 2. The distance between buildings is being proposed to be IS' minimum. 3. The required setbacks from the perimeter of the boundary are indicated as well as the setbacks from Park Ridge Circle. 4. Patio location is shown on the tyPical unit and on all units on the site plan but Unlt 17. Pools will not be constructed. 5. Sign details have been added. Our response to Memorandum # 96-001 from Utilities Director is as follows: 1. Utility easements are shown. 2. There will be no trees other than palm trees and shrubs in utility easements. Jack Guidry, 3. Permits for water & sewer will be obtained from the Palm Beach County Health Unit. 4. The patio (Unit 17) adjacent the water main in the side easement along the south side of the project has been eliminated. 5. The City will be res~onsible for maintaining the water line up to and lncluding the water meter. The Condominium unit owner will be responsible for the water service from the meter to the unit. The City will be responsible for maintaining the sewer lateral through the 6" diameter pipe adjacent the edge of pavement. The Condominium unit owner will be responsible for the lateral through the transition from 6" to 4" diameter up to the unit. 6. The development will be condominiums. The minimum distance between buildings will be 15'. Our response to Memorandum #96-007 from William Hukill, City Engineer, is as follows: 1. All documents will comments. be revised to reflect all 2. All plans will meet City code reguirements at time of application for requlred permlts. Page 5 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge 3. The Master Plan and the Plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules and regulations including, but not limited to the Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations. 4. Master Plan has been revised to comply with condominium requirements within R-3 zoning. 5. In compliance. 6. It is our understanding that sidewalks are not required in multifamily develo~ments. We will review this matter with Mr. Hukll1 to determine the exact requirements or recommendations. 7. Swale and detention area slopes will be no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet. 8. The pavement in the cuI de sac has a diameter of 861 which allows a proper turning radius for all vehicles. The ingress-egress easement is one foot from the pavement. 9. Street grade will be no greater than 2~ percent. 10. In compliance. Electrical service will be underground and accordance with Chapter 6, Article IV, Section Pages 6-16. 12. Approvals will be obtained from SFWMD and LWDD. 11. in 13, We submit the above to you for your review and approval. If you have any questions regarding same, please contact David J. Holtzman at (407) 395-3333. Very truly yours, cc: DeGraf, Inc. JAG/DJH/la Enclosures JOHN A. GRANT, JR., INC. CONSUlTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3333 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY BocA RATON. Fr..c:mmA 33431 HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES STORM DRAINAGE WATER SUPPLY LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES SUBDIVISIONS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS BEACH EROSION PHONE (407) 3915-3333 FAX (407) 39!5-331!5 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS MORTGAGE SURVEYS STRUCTURAL DESIGN SANITARY SEWERS MARINAS CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION BULKHEAD LINES January 24, 1996 City of Bovnton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach. FL 33435 Attention: Tambri Hevden RE: PARK RIDGE Our Job NO. JG 100-7803 Dear Ms. Heyden: In accordance with the remlest of Jerzv Lewicki transmitted herewith are the followina for the above referenced oroiect: 1. 2. Twentv-four (24) orints of the Survev. Twentv-four (24) orints of the Gradina. Plans (Sheets 1. 2. 3 & 8 of 8). pavina and Drainaae If yOU have any auestions reaardina same olease contact David J. Holtzman at (407)395-3333. We trust this is satisfactorv. Very truly Yours. ,TAG/D,TH Ihw Enclosure ~_ JOHN tJ\{;~~JiP .l-- ,Tohn A. GraJt:. ,~ yPresident\.,./ cc: DeGraf. Inc. ~ ~ li 7 ~.:) 3 --, BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS @ January 5, 1996 Room 501 326 Fern Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Wire Center: Boynton Beach Route: 1206 File # 240.0900 Mr. John Grant, Jr. John Grant, Jr., Inc. President 3333 N. Federal Highway Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Re: Park Ridge Your job # JG 100-7803 Dear Mr. Grant: In response to your request, this will confirm that BellSouth Telecommunications is the source of supply for telephone service to the above referenced project. Telephone facilities with adequate capacity can be provided for this project. It should be noted, however, that the owner will be required to provide BellSouth Telecommunications with recorded easements or conduit. In addition BellSouth Telecommunications may require exclusive easements for structures that house electronic switching,equipment (SLC-96 or substantially similar equipment). The recorded easements will be without restrictive conditions furnished in a reasonable time to meet service requirements at no cost, cleared of trees, tree stumps, paving and other obstructions. In addition each applicant shall cooperate with BellSouth Telecommunications to keep the cast of construction and installation of the underground telephone distribution system as low as possible. Where there are obstructions in the easement or road crossings, the contractor will provide conduit suitable to BellSouth Telecommunications. However, the company shall have no responsibility to provide service unless these conditions are met. If you have any questions please call me at (407) 582-5184. Yours truly, ~~4 Nancy M, Vinez Specialist - Outside Plant Engineering . F=PL Florida Power & light Company. 932~ Jlilitary T?,i11Bov.~ton. Fl33~6 Kf:*"/' ,I''''~~,'';'/ . . I, . , ,I :'- -" I ;. I January 12, 1996 John A. Grant, Jr. John A. Grant, Jr., Inc 3333 North Federal Highway Boca Raton, Florida 33431 RE: Park Ridge Subdivision - Boynton Beach Dear Mr. Grant: This is to inform that FPL at the present time has sufficient capacity to provide electrical service to the above mentioned property. This service will be furnished in accordance with applicable rates and FPL practices. It will be necessary for FPL to be provided with the final site plan, electrical load data, site survey and copy of deed as soon as possible so that the necessary engineering can begin. ' Please feel free to contact me at 369-2223 if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, J)-~ /GV4 David K. Weda Construction Services an FPL Group company ( :..1.0. Wr~ :-g,5thftC!: 752 ~ 11!3 t. . ~~ ~ ;~.-:-~ ~i3~1: ~ "'-~-~F ~.. f ! I t , ,~ .. -, " ,: j i , J / I I / :2.~ i;~ / .. Q .. ... .. / I / I I I / /' I it-'e tWil. ~. . . ::tE' i;'it' ..,l:! .~... .:t, ;~:~. . - .' :~~t1'~ ~ .' ~t :., / / I / / / / / / / I / / I / I / :~ .. ~ j lCC-~ '. :\ , ~'.~ ~ ~j If. :~ ~. .i ~ I' !.- ,11 t" [] f' A ,; ,., '2,/ I ~ , .......~- ,... ~ :_f~/ / / ~r~. (,," ~ . ~ '7J 0/0" ~ 14 .0 ~--- [):)W/lI'j,LJ(.s \(i w'a,:,ll. / /' ~ fbLE ,. I' .,.,J') I' '":; 1%." 11" 0 I~~ 1948 10 · I ,4?te<!.Zi.. /-A ~t/ ~ ~- ~ -T3~"~'t' ,,~ B1R=<- /-/1 5V8.l~ \,1" /<es7l{It::.TlIJNS IN ::::d7b O/! '\ rC~)~ ~< /003.) ~E ~/S ,~?I'>-'('_ ~ "~I ~ L /0' o 3; "- (J) .. (J) o "- a (/) /' Z~(;. ';!~ ..- . , ......-r i I I, I_.\.~.... I 1'"",/ !.: I .:.E:7.....'/C 0, 4 1'\) Yy ....1 \ \ ""c,"" (;~?--v I I~" "\, o 'I~ '" 2".5:' l)f) ,1;"/ tV ~ I~ , 7- It ~ l' , -----------------, -c!:/O'dE Pe.f? ~(5. 85'3.1 PG 7SZ: 2_ _ _ _ J 0:80----------___ ,1", I ! L o , t-- ,::> c? ~ W:JDv S:E ~--- -.::.. '> ~ " II ;',,- 78 JR. ,1.,- o ,1." 000,811 1&" t 'l, .' L @ 48" i--. 1 . ~ . ,... -..... 1\" , (-~ ~,' r ' . /.. A ; ~~ , fnd 4X 4"C I " poe lfjt1.i~~ ' , ~ I ~/W:JOD ; I 1/'1{h~' h L " , I I I !.- Il- .... 229.80' , tr.' ;j.,~,,.. "':WIC. r~z: S89-35'25"W . --" .r.. t,. / ~ y ,-2..0,/ ~ ,A,.......,. Ll./ TO: FROM: DATE: REF: BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT 1"". - -~- I. -', ,:: is , i; ) ~J . ' J I ,"---=- \1 nlll iUu 'ccC' [i \'.n R r q \11 lS ,- 11 " '~.' ,... L ~"::~~: i I' TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 11 DECEMBER 95 PARK RIDGE - SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN-1st REVIEW MEMO #0196 .".....,........"^"^-........, I !;;;~! L!::=~) t~ c:::;~::1 -.:..... tt c:::) ,'>'~'"~.....::... x,'',,.;;;, \1~~:~) ~~..............~....::. I have reviewed the above plans and fin '}){pmrnji:a..it~~~e. ~.i' _}...........~;~~:-; f :~ i~ .:~~~;~~) ;~..:-~ ..:. '.' .$......~...;,.. ~.;..,....~ ~o': f.~~ .;,.' ~ . {.:~,~:~.-~...;~:~&:r.. {."."l~ . li": ......./ ,,' ?'>' "- <( '''" '-,,~.., )- "'~';" it k'~ . r:;::~:.l ~' :~..........................'" ~ r"'~~,;,,;'" ) ~ .:.,"'w....,!.c: ~ C"V_~ '\ .~ ~ .. ~ L~::::::~.l rr 'S~~~M" arlJd~~' , ' ~ t..........~ l ~ ~ ~ r;....;.;.;o-..:-:>.....;O. ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~~ ~~t r--:: ~ ~ n i ~~_..l n =s.-.:o." ~x..~ ""...,.... 'X-.:>.....~"<'.~ ~ $~"">: LFfrn ....~. ~..,,~~ .{ -X;~~..,,~ &; ..~~/ .:~, \i:....~...."<<$.... .;.0;.';;;: ....."*>>h.>.. .. ::.;..~:~ .;:>..~~;.:-....~;>~:;::' \., 3:- I~~'" .-:' ~.. ......-:=" ), \ {S::~~:~:E;~ s......~. t/ ;J .' JOHN A. GRANT. JR.. INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3333 N. FEDERAl. HIGHWAY BocA RATON. ~ 33431 ~"""'" _,...x",__" \ \ JAN 2. 4 ~ L J Pi~~I~W%tiJr~ j . CONSTRUCTION SURVE:YS MORTGAGE SURVEYS STRUCTURAL DESIGN SANITARY SEWERS MARINAS CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION BULKHEAD L1~1 ES HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES STORM DRAINAGE WATER SUPPLY LAND DEVELOPMENT STUOIES SrBDIVlSIONS T POGRAPHIC SURVEYS B CH EROSION PHONE 1..07) 395-3333 F'AX 14(7) 395-331 IS December 5, 1995 PARK RIDGE -- OUR JOB # 100-7803 MASTER ~ DESCRIPTION QE SITE CONDITION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The existing site is vacant property located adjacent to the Florida East Coast Railroad between Northeast 20th and 22nd Avenues along Northeast 4th Street. No covenants exist relating to the subject property. The property which is heavily overgrown with weeds and a few trees, is separated from six existing duplex units located to the southwest of the property by a 6' high:wooden fence. A legal description of the subject property is provided in the attached Environmental Report prepared by Empire Environmental, Inc. The proposed development is for construction of 34 detached multi-family residences, with the common grounds being maintained by the Park Ridge Homeowner's Association. The development will have a circulator road that connects into Northeast 4th Street, with a cul-de-sac at the Southeast corner of the development. Watermain and gravity sanitary sewer services for the development will be provided by the City of Boynton Beach, with connection to water and sanitary sewer lines on Page 2 Master Plan Park Ridge Northeast 4th Street, as shown on the attached Grading, Paving, Drainage, Water & Sewer Plans. The other required public utilities will be provided by the respective utility companies servicing the area. Curbside pickup is planned for refuse collection. The drainage plan for the development calls for roadside inlets to collect rainfall and direct it to a dry retention area to be located on the east side of the site. The site is designed to hold up to the 3 day/25 year storm with no runoff from the property. Building pads will be designed based on a 3 daY/100 year storm. No change is being made to the existing R-3 zoning. A detailed description of existing site conditions is provided in the attached Environmental Report. DJH/la JOHN A GRANT, JR., INC. ~zman Project Engineer A c--', '.' ,:) EMPIRE ENVIRONMENTAL PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT OF PROPERTY LOCA1ED ADJACENT TO THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY AND BETWEEN NORTHEAST 20TH AND 22ND AVENUES ALONG NORTHEAST 4TH STREET BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR MR. GARY DE GRAF PREPARED BY EMPmE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MAY 18, 1995 11150ulh Federal Highway 1U ite 124 ;tU<1rt. FL 34994 v Contaminatiun Asse,<:,<:ments, Environmental Audits, Permitting (4a7) 287-0529 (800) 344-1087 Fax: 220-6619 1.0 Introduction This report constitutes a Phase I Environmental Audit of a parcel of property in Boynton Beach Florida located in Section 15, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County (Figures I & 2) prepared in order to satisfy requirements for a commercial real estate transaction. 1.1 Purpose of a Phase I Enviromnental Audit A Phase I Environmental audit is a study, consisting mainly of background research, to assess environmental conditions of a site. It is based on information of present and historical land uses of the subject property (the Site) and research into off-site conditions which could have a potential adverse impact on the Site. Because the Phase I Audit is only designed to assess the probability of environmental impact, no sub-surface explorations or soil and water sampling and analysis were conducted. 1.2 SCODe of Services 1. Site Visit. 2. Title Search. 3. Review of site history including interviews with former land owners or others familiar with the property. 4. Review of historical aerial photographs. 5. Review of Agency Records. 6. Preparation of a Report. 2.0 Pronerty Descrintion and Adjacent Pronertv The Site is an approximate five acre parcel located between the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad tracks and N.E. 4th. St. and between N.E. 20th and 22nd Ave. in Boynton Beach, Florida. It is bounded on the north by Boynton Animal Clinic, VFW Post 5335, and Northside Condo; on the east by the FEC tracks and 387-01.01 1 '------- ~~~ ~.' rm_,. -. :~.---, I AgTHUR ~I ~i / P - I ' ! I L I I ~'! . _ 'm I I j . I '- ~:;;~ ~:;::: :i ~ wi I' I f s p~~ ..lOGE Ii. --i j ~ ~ t ~rh;? ~7Ttt_~ NE~ 13 ~ ~ ' / "7TH AVI NE c( z. ~ / I.. ~ WA. I- Z z/ 26TH A.V== /\/, " I W ~I c( o 0 m Z ~ ::!: Cl N (fJ c( Z <51J.., ~V~ . ~ <~ ~_ rn lq~- ~I !!' b., 2JRo ~E ;;- ~ >- - ~o A'-., ..~ l ESIOE HAfleoR ~ I -~ ~ ~ 21S l~'W=N1; PI _ t- o ;~I ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ; i~S~t~<:-4thSt e I f1~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ l') r. I e / 1~m. A.V : Mil r rn ~ ~./ C7'f- 21J ..- NE 19 H A.VEINE ....::i!.. _ _ \.Y1TH AVr:: 1\1I tE i 11I71;kv~..' -!tWin 31 17 'HAve NIN ~.-,~. -1t.~II:1 I ~+H CT !tW f / 1 drH CT Ne..J CI CLE c:::=::J~ 6 ~~ ~ "J, .?d'1. 16TH AVE NE' "" z 1 J.H A"J ~rv ~~ \':"'/.... r :t F f ( ~I.f. I ~ \ SEAV/EW I knldN -~. 1STH~~ ~ E"INLEr - "471< Ave}"" ~ A"" NO r I ~ ~W 13TH __ E 13TH f.lw 12.... ~E 1:2T1 .W11T1-t :t E11T1 \.> E10T!.f ~ 17 Ne 9l}.f~ I ~"W. '\ - ~ an l~_ ~crrn I ~ NEnH'\~I; ~ ~ ~~II I -"'"- I I I I 12 "oAV .N'~ 2 T AVE N'v'\i I I I I n Canal I Z :it I ~ ~ ~W8n I C 1993 Dcl~~~ >(oN 9T LEGEND , 0 State Route Population Center 1- Street. Road - Major Street/Road I_Interstate Highway I~ State Route f I ~ E 1 Asv--P 0 II l , I 2 f ~M ~ o (J) ~ MICk I 19 )T"Il;R "i - J~ r ~L..onh ~E . t: ~ -~ ~I I ~ ~ 11 r-- ~ ~ "1AN....- ,SlAND 1lfA.1:Io. i.. / ,; ~ ~ -- '-. f~QvE 'J r- -1 NE ST. ELe~ :g I \ / ~NLET CAY ) ~ US Highway -+-+-+- Railroad _ River Scale 1: 15,625 (at center) 1000 FAAt I N.E. 4th Street Mag 15.00 Fri May 19 10:47:28 1995 500 MetA~ CJ Open Water 1 . 1 ~ I I I } ~' . "';L.J /:.., ~ · - .4 f I :, -f"' :i .':i ~.., .', . 2 H'''' :,' ~ ,Light 'I - I I , ,. ."_ _ iL 01.L XO - - ... c,,~ il DY I , :' I i ~ ~ ~,~ "mO"-'hc~ '-,--r -'1'--11 ! . "r , ,r--':'" 11~:' p 1 'OJ , h~6r:J~~~:-:' ~~!:~~~f6_Ji__t J _", '~i'f =~~~,,~ .r<...::> / Il ", \ '" i,~ { . ~'-"r- '" ~f ~~=' '1 I II -~:....'::..-;:;;;::; J ;' ~ I .' ....... '-' I ...__.- t' I f=.~'''':zz=- '-. _,' ~ 011. ,I = ;". ? '- I.) ko, yrt:;n',c 1",lel ~.. iHH~, ',' 9"e ii' \:~: \ '.\ i\~ I, . I ;~ I II ?arkf.r A:;;,'" ,t. j" ,:. ,j,. , '/1- -r,',' ,/ ~, ' =~~, ---'" ..--... , -~' tIj ! .i :: /I" · i4> ;',:'.:';! ,: I 'Oe;ray '- II' .-." ,,0';:" I, ~.." \ J} .: '-'~.,~.~ ", .', ~===~~~~~~,~ "~ ~"T::.__:~ i I; ,:'-:"ji ~li \j' ;(~' i'. . rJ. . ~-==.4::...:.=-=':... . :=;::;-==--~' I ;......;. .:,'1 . ,..--' ,1",'1 .:.:,) .; ./1 . ~._.....=~_~. . ~~~a:=."1:. ..::",' ......-....... I I - .', { - '. ........ _~." light ;.-:-.: ....,~:: I ~.'. " ,'i 0:/ '. :\! \ .~.;;,. 1/'.:..:):.:5o=-: /- .:~:; It' '.' , ! ! 12",-,- ',- / .' /. . 1:- I" (f:: ,f:' . i II . ~;::-' ~~ /.., I : .::: " ... . /-,..' .' (;',! .... ~ f, // o.-~, ~ II ':....,.. I ,(-:" /''';, =t..-- . "-" / ~ .'. \'.:: '. ~: I" "n.i.;/ /~" . :': I (~( . .' \ 0, 12'2'; < '~':'i ~ /' ~'~. . \ '\\ ) '.. -: . e 'L ~ L' I'':..!' i J;! . ' "I ~ ~~:.;' '.~ t ...E' cean RicP. ~~CXk- :' ,',i II , ---.:.,_. . 11'= I ", " _--:..:~...,; I'~ ' " . Jlk G.J;...,. / I . 0) ~;' ~~.;.~M':';li f: r'.; .'/ '-. .I, !~; ===-i.~ I r:- ra3'...'" E ", .': ' /" (" !: ~,:j ~~~ ~f'{( ;... ) , '\. ",; --:"t I :.~<J .... ~ ........1\ (}' ~" J _', -.;;-.-r- ,..J "I .' . ' , ( ..~ ." ~ " r - I )' ( . - I' .:..' , " -'or " .j,.~ -.' I(~: pJ, :",', <~/.. ,/ ~ . .\,).. " ) \' ,; ;.'(J? : ,,'t i ~ .~ ,/I / ,.J' " I:/~ . i ""j I,i .1.,.; '//:;~ .. .s_ .l...." i ~ I I I " I I f .36 y I ~ I . I - -. " ,. ; . I I 2 I -' ' , , I , '>~/ ; hi ~ " 'll \ i {\\\~ ;} I,'"~ , ,',it /, . }':;t !i ~ I ~ ~. 9 f' I i I ~ I :;R~MI 3": \-t => :vi. >C"':::: :;" ~ =- ::~~:::: 5/~~.?5 SC~L::; ;CB ~o: ~'(""'UDC" ,.., , I..J '\ t- L EMPIRE ENVIRON}.fENT AL. INC. I U. S, CIJ .~,DR ,..l,j\J GL::: LAK L..C' WCR TH. FL_CPIDA 1111 S, "~der'Jl !-liqr> ,..a 'I, Suit~ 12.1 Stuart. F":orido 34994 (407) 287-0529 I 1 .2 u.s. Hwy 1; on the south by a trailer park and three single family residences; and on the west by N.E. 4th St., residences and N.E. 20th Ave. Across the tracks and U.s. Hwy 1 are Morey's Lounge and Water's Edge Condominium, and across N.E. 4th St. are residences. 2.1 Lelral Description PARCEL 1 A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27 A DISTANCE OF 34.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 25 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 27; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 75.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I I LOT 10, SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, LESS THE EXIST:J;NG RIGHT OF WAY FOR STATE ROAD 5 AND LESS THE FOLLOWING PARCEL OF LAND IN SAID LOT 10; FROM THE SW CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, RUN EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT FOR 153.67 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES FOR 50.95 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, PARALLEL TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF 91.94 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 59.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND LESS THE FOLLOWING PARCEL OF LAND WHICH LIES WITH 50 FEET WESTERLY OF AND WITHIN 44 FEET EASTERLY OF THE BASELINE OF SURVEY ACCORDING TO THE RIGHT OF WAY MAP OF SECTION 93010-2501, STATE ROAD 5, AS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 237, A PART OF SAID BASELINE BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I I I I BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF AND 274.86 FEET SOUTH 89025' 00" EAST OF THE SW CORNER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, RUN NORTH 08012'00" 387-01.01 2 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2625.64 FEET TO THE END OF THE BASELINE HEREIN DESCRIBED AND A POINT ON THE EAST-WEST 1/4 SECTION LINE OF AND 885.78 FEET SOUTH 89013'55" EAST OF THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15. PARCEL 2 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAM BROWN JR' S SUBDIVISION, RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 229.35 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 201.4 FEET MORE, OR LESS TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27 WHICH LIES 261.16 FEET WEST OF, MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 226.26 FEET TO A POINT 34.90 FEET WEST OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27; THENCE SOUTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 25 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF LOT 27; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 27 TO A POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3 LOT 28, SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81. PARCEL 4 LOT 29, SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81. 3.0 PhYSical Features of the Site A site investigation was conducted on May 3, 1995. The Site is undeveloped and consists of three separate lots (Figure 3). The portion of Lot 27 is the southeast part of the Site. There is a pile of trash and debris where N.E. 20th Ave. ends and meets the Site. The debris consists of chairs, lamps, concrete debris, plastic oil cans, paint cans, carpeting, tile and discarded fencing. The rest of Lot 27 is undeveloped scrub habitat with vegetation characterized by scrub oak with some Brazilian pepper. There is a discarded suitcase within a small copse of trees in the eastern part of the Site near the railroad tracks. Along the south fence line was a pump house in disrepair which contained a pressure tank and likely an old 387-01.01 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f- W w 0::: f- if) I f- ~ w Z FENCED AREA I CONCRETE PAC ~ PUMP HOUSE CRA.....N 3": \.1 ?,\A CHESKCJ 3Y: ~'" DATE 5/19/95 SC"'LE: :" - 100' JOB NO, FIGURE 3 SI TE PLAN DEGR.A.F PROPERTY BOYTON BEACH, FLORIDA 3.1 a <::{ o ~ -.J - <::{ 0::: c..J L..i , ...... EMPIRE ENVIRONMENTAL. INC. 1111 S. F' ederol Highway. Suit~ ~ 2.1 Stuart. Florida 34994 (407) 287-0529 I I I I I 4.0 I I 5.0 I I I I 387-01. 01 I well. There were also what appeared to be remnants of a driveway or a house foundation and ornamental plants which are not native to Florida such as Shefflera, asparagus fern, and ornamental cactus. The 1965 aerial photo shows a house which had a driveway access across the tracks from U.S. Hwy 1. Lots 28 and 29 are also scrub habitat with wooded vegetation ranging from scattered to dense throughout the Site. The scrub vegetation includes scrub oak, slash pine, sand pine, cabbage palm and snake plant. Household trash was observed along the south fence line of Lot 28 opposite the second of three houses which border this portion of the Site. There was a junk pile in the northeast corner of the Site in Lot 29 which contained lumber, a freezer, paint cans, household trash, ~Vc pipe, carpeting, fluorescent bulbs, and shelving. Further to the west was asphalt debris. The soil around the paint cans, oil cans and other containers of potentially hazardous compounds was inspected and showed no evidence of staining nor had any unusual petroleum, solvent or paint odor. Utilities The Site is presently not being served by water and sewer utilities. Soil According to the U.S. Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey for Palm Beach County (1979), the soil on the Site consists of St. Lucie sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes a nearly level to sloping, excessively drained, deep sandy soil with a water table below a depth of six feet. The surface layer is gray sand about five inches thick. Below this is white sand that extends to a depth of 80 inches or more. Permeability is very rapid. The available water capacity, organic matter content 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7.0 I I I 387-01. 01 I and natural fertility are low throughout. Natural vegetation is sand pine, scrub oak, saw palmetto, rosemary, cacti, reindeer moss, pineland three-awn and natalgrass. 6.0 Review of Historical Aerial PhotoID"auhs A review of the aerial photographs from 1965, 1968, 1971, 1973, 1977, 1984, 1989, and 1993 indicates there was a house on the southern part of the Site in 1965, but by 1968 it was gone. The house was acces sed from u. S . Hwy 1 acros s the railroad tracks. After 1968, the Site was vacant with little change in the physical appearance to the present time. The general area was sparsely developed to the north with a large cleared area north of N.E. 22nd Ave and a citrus grove beyond that. The first structures were the veterinary clinic building adjacent to the Site and several commercial buildings in the divided portion ~f N.E. 22nd Ave. The building now occupied by the Cumberland Farms convenience store at the southeast corner of N.E. 22nd Ave. and N.E. 4th St. was constructed between 1968 and 1971. By 1984, the condo and the VFW hall directly north of the Site and multifamily units in the formerly large cleared area were constructed by 1984. Also by thi~ time the strip mall on the south side of 22nd Ave. had been constructed, and the divided center of 22nd St. was limited to parking and one commercial building. The citrus grove was being residentially developed in 1989, and by 1993 all roads and multi-family buildings had been finished. The houses and trailer park south of the Site were present prior to 1965, and the area along the water east of u.S. Hwy 1 was developed, as well. Site History According to the Palm Beach County Property Appraisers Office, the Site is owned by Kirsch Holding Company (Parcels 1 & 2) and Irving B. & Clara Kirsch (Parcels 3 & 4). The Chain of title is as follows: 5 , I Parcel 1 (Lar2er part of Lot 27) I DATE INSTRUMENT GRANTOR GRANTEE I June 14, 1949 WD James E. & Maurice H. & Wanda C. Clara Howard Bradfield I December 19,1952 Lim. WD Maurice H. & Wanda Gardner F. & Wilma D. D. Bradfield Allen November 21, 1955 Lim. WD Gardner F. & Wilma Arthur K. Reading I D. Allen December 1,1961 WD Arthur K. & Edith S. Flying Cloud I Reading Enterprises, Inc. February 17, 1969 Ceri. of Title John B. Dunkle, Clerk Allstate Investment I of Circuit Court Corporation of Florida April 4, 1969 WD Allstate Investment Boynton Beach Inlet Corporation of View, Inc. I Florida February 25, 1972 WD Boynton Beach Inlet Melvin M. & Vera M. I View, Inc. Goldberg and Bernhart R. Snyder I August 18, 1977 WD Melvin M. & Vera M. KirschHolding Company Goldberg and Iris M. Snyder I August 4,1978 WD Stanley Kirsch RamblewoodAssociates, Inc. I Parcel 2 (Small corner of Lot 27) June 14, 1949 WD James E. & Clara Maurice H. & Wanda C. I Howard Bradfield June 1, 1954 SWD Maurice H. & Wanda C. Irma McGathen I Bradfield May 7, 1956 WD Irma McGathen Garrett N. & Wanda I June Songer May 19, 1958 Cert. of Title J. Alex Arnett, Clerk Irma McGathen of Circuit Court arma McGathen vs I Garrett M. Songer) I 387-01.01 8 I February 27, 1963 Article of Irma McGathen Elinor M. Beaudro Agreement July 29,1970 WD Elinor M. Beaudro, Tr. Boynton Beach Inlet & William G. Beaudro View, Inc. February 25,1972 WD Boynton Beach Inlet Meluin M. & Vera M. View, Inc. Goldberg and Bernhart R. Snyder August 18,1977 WD Meluin M. & Vera M. Kirsch Holding Company Goldberg and Iris M. Snyder August 4, 1978 WD Stanley Kirsch RamblewoodAssociates, Inc. Parcel 3 (Lot 28) January 4, 1908 WD James M. Carroll Frank w: Austin February 25, 1952 QCD Virgil Jenkins, one of Iroing B. & Clara Kirsch only 3 surviuing children of Naomi Austin Flora, deceased daughter of Frank w: Austin and Alice Austin & Seth Jenkins February 25, 1952 QCD Law-a WISe, daughter and Iroing B. Clara Kirsch heir at law of Frank w: Austin, deceased and Alice Austin, deceased & Marvin Wise March 1, 1952 QCD LuciIIe WiIIiamson one of Iroing B. & Clara Kirsch only 3 suroiuing children of Naomi Austin Flora, deceased daughter of Frank w: Austin and Alice Austin & Seth Jenkins March 1, 1952 QCD Delbert Flora, one of Iroing B. & Clara Kirsch only 3 suroiving children of Naomi Austin Flora, deceased daughter of Frank w: Austin and Alice Austin & Seth Jenkins 3117-01.01 7 I I March 6, 1952 QeD Charles A. Austin as I~Jing B. & Clara Kirsch Administrator of Frank I W Austin, deceased and Alice Austin, deceased I Parcel 4 (Lot 29) February 7, 1945 Murphy Deed State of Florida A. Wachsman October 9, 1945 WD A. & Ann Wachsman w:c. & Clara 1. Shepperd October 21, 1947 WD WC. & Clara L. Shepperd Dorothy Shepperd September 30,1957 WD Dorothy Shepperd Joseph C & Anna. E. Bates July 10,1959 WD Joseph C. & Anna E. Roger & Helen Nicholas Bates October 20, 1959 WD Roger & Helen Nicholas Charles & Iria Hynninen February 27, 1970 WD Charles & Irja Hynninen Iroing B. & Clara P. Kirsch 8.0 Adjacent and Nearbv ProDertv The surrounding area is mostly residential. There is a condo- minium complex to the north of the site along N.E. 4th St., and beyond that is a Cumberland Farms Convenience S~ore. There were no fuel facilities associated with the convenience store. North of the Site to the east was a veterinary clinic and a . VFW hall. There was an engine on the grounds of the veterinary clinic, but there was no evidence that maintenance activities of the engine had impacted the Site. Beyond the clinic and the VFW hall was a small shopping center on the south side of Gateway Blvd. (N.E. 22nd Ave.) which was occupied by a beauty shop, a Dollar Store, a dog groomer, and a small food store. Next to the strip center was Royal Coin Laundry which was abandoned. The laundry advertised dry cleaning, but there were no drums on the premises. It was likely a pick-up location. According to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Stationary Tanks Systems Inventory Database, 397-01.01 8 I I the following registered fuel facilities are within one-half mile of the Site. I FACIUTY FACILITY J.D. NO. DISTANCE FROM SITE I Highway 124-8 2508 N. Federal Hwy 508514238 1000 ft.(NE) I Texaco #24-021-1303 2360 N. Federal Hwy 508513840 500 (t.(NE) I U-Haul Center 1319 N. Federal Hwy 508514807 112 mi. (S) I There are three (3) 12,000 gallon underground gasoline tanks and one (1) 8,000 gallon underground diesel tank at the Highway station. Groundwater and soil contamination were discovered in July 1988, and the facility is in the state of Florida Reimbursement Program, a state-funded program to assess and remediate petroleum contaminated sites. I I I There are two (2) 10,000 gallon and one (1) 12,000 gallon underground gasoline tanks and one (1) 550 gallon underground waste oil tank at the Texaco station. Soil an~ groundwater contamination were reported in August 1987, and the facility is on the Reimbursement Program. I I I Five underground gasoline tanks were removed from the U-Haul facility in March 1994. No problems were reported. I According to the EPA RCRA Notifiers list, the following facility which handles hazardous waste is within one-half mile of the Site: - I I, FACILITY STATUS DISTANCE FROM SITE 500 ft. (NE) Texaco 2360 N. Federal Hwy SQG - SQG - Small Quantity Generators I 387-01.01 9 I I I I I 9.0 I I I 10.0 I I According to the EPA CERCLIS, WASTELAN and National Priorities Lists, there are no Superfund or NPL sites within one mile of the Site. Soil and Water Samlllimz and Analvsis There is no record that sub-surface soil and groundwater on the Site has ever been sampled and analyzed for possible' contamination. Empire Environmental, Inc. did not feel collection of soil and/or water samples and chemical analysis were ne.cessary in order to perform this evaluation for a Phase I Environmental Audit. Polychlorinated Billhenvls There was one transformer on a power pole on the property line in Lot 28. It was in good condition, and was no evidence of leaking or soil staining. south there 11.0 Conclusions I I I 1. Present and past uses of the property have not resulted in situations of environmental concern. There is no evidence that the site has been impacted by off-site sources. 2. 12.0 Recommendations The trash and debris should be removed from the Site. I 13.0 I I 1- I I 387-01.01 I Limitations Empire Environmental, Inc. has undertaken this assignment using their best professional effort consistent with generally accepted environmental assessment practices. Empire Environmental, Inc. evaluated all information provided by regulatory agencies, site personnel, and other knowledgeable parties during this Phase I Environmental Assessment, but makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. Additional data subsequently provided may alter 10 I I I any findings or conclusions made in the assessment report. The findings presented in the report are based upon the site conditions and information made available at the time of the Phase I Environmental Assessment. I I I d4:~ Andrew Feinstein I I I I I I I I I I I I 387-01.01 11 I ?lie City of 'Boynton 'Beach 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boule:van! P.O. 'Boi(310 'Boynton 'Beadi, 110ritIa 33425-0310 City:Jfa[[: (407) 375-6000 :FJU: (407) 375-6090 December 18, 1995 Mr. Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works P.o. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-21229 Re: Traffic Statement: Park Ridge Northeast of intersection of N. E. 4th Street and N.E. 20th Avenue File No. NWSP 95-012 Dear Mr. Weisberg: The enclosed traffic impact study, dated December 14, 1995, prepared by Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. was received by the Planning and Zoning Department recently for the above- referenced application. Please review for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standard Ordinance. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (407) 375-6260, otherwise please send me your written comments/ approval to the above address, with a copy of your written response to Bill Hukill, Director of Development Department, also at the same address. Very truly yours, }oU,t;.. ~ ~ Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director TJH:dim cc: Bill Hukill w/attachment Central File ~merUa 's (jateway to tfu (julfstream TRAFFICIMPACf ANALYSIS PARK RIDGE Prepared for De Graf, Inc. Prepared by YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. 918 US HIGHWAY ONE LAKE PARK, FLORIDA 33403 (407) 842-0907 December 14, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 ASSURED CONSTRUCTION. . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 MAJOR PROJECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 TRIP GENERATION ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 TRIP DISTRIBUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. 6 Test One. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 Driveway Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 Test Two ...................................................................... 11 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11 APPENDIX A - GA TEW A Y TRAFFIC COUNT APPENDIX B - GROWTH RATE WORKSHEET i TABLE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LIST OF TABLES TITLE PAGE Existing (1995) Daily Traffic Conditions ....................................... 3 Existing (1995) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3 Trip Generation Rates .........................................,............ 5 Trip Generation ........................................................... 5 Future (1997) Daily Traffic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8 Future (1997) Peak Hour Traffic Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8 11 FIGURES 1 2 3 4 LIST OF FIGURES TITLE PAGE Site Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 Trip Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7 Future (1997) Daily Traffic Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9 Driveway Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10 111 INTRODUCTION Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. was retained to perform a Traffic Impact Analysis to assess the traffic impact of a proposed 34 single family project to be located along NE 4th Street south of Gateway Boulevard in the City of Boynton Beach as shown in Figure 1. Buildout is anticipated in 1997. EXISTING CONDITIONS The major roadway near the project is Gateway Boulevard, which is a two lane road and reflects a Level of Service (LOS) B. Table I shows the existing (1995) average daily traffic (ADT) conditions on the impact area roadways, Table 2 provides the peak hour traffic conditions at the same locations. The ADT volumes were obtained from the Palm Beach County 1995 Traffic Volumes Map, the peak hour volumes were determined by factoring the ADT volumes by 0.091. The Gateway Boulevard count was an off-peak 1995 count factored to ADT using the FDOT seasonal variation rates. Appendix A contains a copy of the count. ASSURED CONSTRUCTION The Palm Beach County and Florida Department of Transportation Five-Year Road Program does not include any roadway widening projects within the study area. 1 ~ GATEWAY BLVD. (N.W. 22 AVE.) o :::i lD l- (/) W ~ () <( w en N.E. 21 AVE. ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... .................... ..................... .................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ......... .......... ... ........... .. ........... .... ............ .... ............ YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING &. PlANNING "e us 1c:;1-MI." ONE l.Al<EFARI(,Fl~ 33<103 ("01j8ol2--09(J7 t-= en '<t u..i :i ~' F.E.C.R.R. i ~ ~ I C) I ..J <( 0:: W o W LL PARK RIDGE PROJECT LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 ~ N.T.S. LOCI) mm mm 0>0 ~....J CI) 0 mm mm ....J RQ 00 COO> ao 00 COO> COCO ",,"LO COCO ",,"LO >1- dd dd 3>i= dd dd <( <( 0::: 0::: LOI-a COCO COCO LO~O::: COCO 0>""" 0>0- 0>0> LOO> 0><(::> C\IC\I 1'-1'- o><(LL 0> 0> OC\l O>wo 1'-1'- C\I_~ T""" LL t-:"t-:" -.it-:" T"""o..::c T""" T""" <( 0::: T""" T""" I- = c.. 00 00 en ~ en = 00 00 ~<( 00 00 Z <(o~ C\IC\I 1'-1'- U """""" """""" w....J "t"t COCO c<ic<i a) a) 0 c.. T""" T""" NN en T""" T""" C\IC\I E Z 0 0 Z E lL.CI) 0 0 OW a CI) ,**,Z Z <( 00 Q LLW 00 0 ....J ...J ....J ....J ....J LL OZ ....J ....J ....J....J U C\IC\I """""" LL ,**,:5 C\IC\I """""" U <( wit wo::: 0 C\I<!:l1- 0 T"""<!l<( >- ~ wQo::: ~ > wOO::: ~ m ....Ja:::> ....J ::c m~o m ....Jocl- >- I m~~ ....J <( <(0::: I ....J >- 1-<( I-<(~ <( <(0:::- ~::c 1-<( ~::c 1-<(<( Cl)0::: wI- 0..<( Cl)0::: 0..0 """w 1-::> W """~ wI- - 0 <(0 0.. ~5 LO 0 Ww - 0 Ww 0> I- ZLL <!lCl) LO ZLL <!:lCl) 0> 0> l- T""" 0 0> - T""" 0 <!l > 0 - > 0 Z ....J ~ <!:l ....J ::i ?- m Z m en ?- m i= ?- m X CI) >- en CI) >- <( <( x <( <( W WI- I~ wI- I;: O:::CI) W ~ U""" I-w ~ 0::: en I-w 0 Ltiw 0:::1- 0 a",," 0:::1- 0<( Ltiw 0<( 0::: Z<!l 0::: LL Cl)Z LL Cl)Z Z<!:l 00 ~~ >> ....J ....J mm II 00 >- >->- ....J ....J ~~ <( <(<( <(<( >> ~ ~~ 0:::0::: ....J ....J mm II 0 WW ww ~ >- >->- ....J ....J <( 1-1- 00 LO<( <( <(<( <(<( 0 <(<( WW 0> CO ~ ~~ 0:::0::: 0::: <!:l<!:l LLLL uO Q) .. 0 ww ww O~ <( !;(!;( 00 I 0 WW ",,"T""" 0::: <!:l<!:l LL LL T""" ,... BACKGROUND TRAFFIC The Palm Beach County Urban Study Area Traffic Volume Growth Tables provided by the Palm Beach County Engineering Department, includes historical traffic count data for the roadways within the impact area of the project. The growth rates for the roadway were detennined from these tables, and then applied to the respective links to detennine background traffic growth to 1997. Since historical count data was not available along the Gateway Boulevard link within the projects' study area and along Federal Highway north of gateway Boulevard, data from count stations nearby were used to detennine an area growth rate. Appendix B contains a table with the growth rate calculations. MAJOR PROJECTS The Palm Beach County (PBC) Engineering Departments major project map and list were consulted to locate those projects needed to be reviewed for consideration in projecting background traffic. There are no major projects within the study area which would reflect traffic of 10 percent or more of the threshold LOS "D" service volume on the impact area roadway links within the projects buildout. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation was performed using the rates found in the Palm Beach County Impact Fee Ordinance, and the Institute of Transportation Engineers', Trip Generation, 5th Edition. Table 3 shows the trip generation rates used, Table 4 shows the trips generated by the proposed project. Trip generation results in 340 daily trips, 32 AM peak 4 l{) I- C') v X l- T"" I-W 00 X Z a.W w l{) a: 0 a: W <0 I- a: a: I"- W I- ::.r:: W C\l a. Z <( I- W W Z w a. W C\l ~ ...J l{) Il.. 0 a. <( T"" a: l- v + I- ...J X 0 ~ ~ Z I- <(00 ...J " wW 0 C\l a.~ I- 0 m ~a: Ii a. I- Z ....I '<t l- I"- 1->< I- C') 00 X C\l ZW Z a.W w 0 -a: oa: <0 a:W C\J !::: I-a: wI- 0 ::.r::w co a.z w <(I- 00 W ::r: wZ a.W W co to ~...J ~ m C') Z <(<( C\l a: d Z b C') Wz Il.. ~ 0 wO C')elO a: ~ I- ....I Z '<tel~ wo- I- <( ....I ...JC:~ ~ I- " a: wQa: I"- w al::.r::a: <(00 0 <0 Z ...Ja:LU <(a:w wW I- co W al~Z I-<(z a.~ Ii el ~a:LU a.LU I- ~ ~a: z Il.. <(el <( ....I a: 0.0. a. I- a: c: en l- I- 0 T"" a: LU 0 00 LU '<t C') W Z I- I-~ el 000 oa: z <(a. <(a. w a: Z I- a: 0 I- ~ a: 0 0 ,.... Il.. C\l 00 '<t C') W Z W LUO <( !::::! a: 00 1-0 I- _0 u. 0 LU I- u. ::::> I- 00 i= u. I 00 ...J 00 ~ <( I Z ...J l{)<( W i= ~ 9<0 00 Z W LU I- uO :J W 0 00 z Q) .. 0 :J W o~ 0 a: I .. Z 00 ::::> 0 0 VT"" <( LU 0 Z 00 T"" T"" ...J a: 00 <( LU ...J a: trips and 41 PM peak trips. Based on the daily trips generated by the project, the radius of development influence is half a mile. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Trip Distribution was based on current travel patterns and the FSUTMS model. Figure 2 shows the percent project trips and the project volumes on the impact area roadways. PERFORMANCE ST ANDARDS ANALYSIS Test One Table 5 shows the ADT capacity analysis with the project trips and background growth with the performance standards analysis on those links with project impact greater than one percent of the LOS D capacity, Table 6 shows the same information for the peak hour. Figure 3 shows the above information on a map. Figure 4 provides the project driveway volumes. All of the roadway links within the impact area meet the Test One level of service standards. Drivewav Analysis Based on the peak hour driveway volumes shown on Figure 4, using the PBC turn lane standards, no turn lanes are required at the projects' driveway along NE 4th Street. 6 o ~ !Xl I- CJ) W l:r: () ~ CJ) ~ GATEWAY BLVD. (N.W. 22 AVE.) LEGEND 32% 109 0.81 = Percent of Project Trips on Link Number of Project Trips on Link Percent of LOS "0" Capacity = = YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING &; PLANNING "1I us HC.........V 0NE.l.)t,j.(f p.-Rl(, FLOQIOA 3)01100 I~O~) &.t2-Q9Q1 ~.....O) &>N~ o 68% 231 1.73 32% 109 0.81 N.E. 21 AVE. ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ......................................... .................... ..................... .................... ..................... .................... ..................... ......... .......... ... ........... .. ........... .... ............ .... ............ r: (/) '<t ui Z ,------"i F.E.C.R.R. i ~ N.T.S. ~ ~ I ~ I ....J <{ ~ W o W LL PARK RIDGE PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 2 (/) 2 o i= o 2 o U U u:: u. <( Wa: lOC)I- WO>- ...Ja:::! CD~<( <(a:0 I-<(W 0..C) <( a: W > <( o W I- U W a a: 0.. I-I-u.>- 2UOl- WW - U"'"') U a:0 <( wa: 0.. 0..0.. <( U C')r- 1"--00 ~o 0l0l OC\l 00 (/) CD CD 0 CD CD ...J I"-- ...JU Ol <(- r-Ol Ol I-u. C')O r-OO r- co 10 ou. r- 0 Olv I- <( cOcO v" cO a: I- r- r- l- (/) U 0.. r-Ol 1"--10 W a: C')O C\lOO "'"') C\lr- 0 I- a: a.. I"--a: I 0lC) ~ C')C') ~r:::: ~~ coco vv U 0 000 <( a: r- CD C) IOI-U 0l0- 1"--1"-- 00 co 0l<(U. C')C') r- U. vv 100l <( 1"--- r-: OC\l a: ..f 1"--" I- ..... r- (/). a.. g!?(S 00 00 00 vv 00 vv MM a) a) r- r- C\IC\I ~ 100.. cpr- (JC') Q) .. o:! ~~ roO U.(/) OW ,**=2 ::5 ...J...J 00 C\IC\I ...J...J vv ~ 0 > ...J I CD ...J ~ ~~ 3:I vw WI- 0 wO !;;(::::> I- 2~ C)g 0 ~ 0 CD > I- ...J (/) CD <( ~ WI- ~ a:(/) I3: 0 ~v I-w a: a: I- WW 0<( U. (/)2 2eJ 0 0 > > >->- ...J ...J 3:3: CD CD >- >- ~ II <( 3: <( ...J ...J 3: 3: <(<( 0 a: a: <( W W WW I- !;;( 0 <( 00 a: (!) eJ ww u.u. (/) 2 o i= o 2 o U U u:: u. W<( coC)g: wQa: ...Ja:::::> CD~O <(a:I 1-<( o..~ <( W 0.. r:::- Ol Ol C (/) CD CD 0 CD CD ...J I"--...J a:u Ol<( I- I"--C\I C\IC\I Oll- u. vC') roO ~u. 1"--1"-- COCO I- <(<( C')_~ wa: r- r- 0..1- I- ooC') U C')O a:W C\lr- (/) r- I"'"') ~~ a.. a: 0..0.. I- I"--a:a: I ~I(!} ~ ~~ 000 r-~~ OOOl o..U 0 <( a: CD eJ ~~a: 1"--1"-- 0lL5::::> 1"--1"-- Olv r-0..0 COCO 1"--1"-- I C\I_ III r- r- ~ 00 <((/) C\IC\I 00 W O. C\IC\I 1"--1"-- o.....JP ..,..:~ COCO N C\I- (/) u.W 02 00 ,**=::5 ...J ...J C\IC\I ...J ...J vv W a: ::::> I- ::::> u. ~ 0 > ...J I CD ...J >- 1-<( <( (/)a: ~~ vW 0 wO 1-::::> I- 2~ <(0 C)(/) 0 > ...J 0 CD > I- ...J (/) CD L51- >- <( ~ a:(/) I3: 0 ~v I-w a: I- a: WW 0<( u. (/)2 ZeJ >- <( 3: o <( o a: 00 >> ...J...J CD CD >->- ~<( w3: I-W <(!;;( (!}eJ ~>- I~ ...J ...J <(<( a: a: ww 00 WW u.u. B 7,437 GATEWAY BLVD. (N.W. 22 AVE.) 463 231 8,131 B 7,437 463 109 8,009 N.E. 21 AVE. Q ~ CD I- CJ) UJ 0:: U US CJ) ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... .................... ..................... .................... ..................... .................... ..................... .................... .. ........... .. ........... .... ............ .... ............ ...: CI) '<t ~ Z ~! F.E.C.R.R. ! LEGEND B = LEVEL OF SERVICE 7,437 = FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 463 = BACKGROUND GROWTH AND MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC 231 = PROJECT TRAFFIC 8,131 = TOTAL TRAFFIC ~~ YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & PlANNING co ..... LO CO CO CD o. ~ ~ 0). '<t" '<t" ..... ..... ~I'- ~ CDNI'-LO'<t" r-: o. CO a:i ..... ..... ..... ~ 3: I ~ I -1 <( ~ UJ o W LL PARK RIDGE FUTURE 1997 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FIGURE 3 918 US >i(l'W...'I' oooe. ut.P<E PARI<. F.ORIOA 33400 l.ell) e.2_0907 ! N.T.S. - GATEWAY BLVD. (N.W. 22 AVE.) r4 ~ LEGEND (13) 340 Ll= 340 (13) 4 Total Daily Volume PM Peak Hour Volume AM Peak Hour Volume YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & PlANNING g,e us H(;Iio'o''''' QO.!E, tAKE PARI<, r~OQ'OA 334CI3 (il07jlW2-0907 ~ N.T.S. - (14) 4 N.E. 21 AVE. L :!!!:::::::::::::::m:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::=::::::::::::::::::= .................1.2..00......................... L .:!I::~I~:::::I~:::::::=::,:::I:::::,:::::::.:.:::::::::::,:,:::: ~ {@fi{,i:t:U::::t:f::f:::::il:11111111111111111111111111\: ui ;i PARK RIDGE PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY TURNING MOVEMENTS FIGURE 4 Test Two There are no Test Two impacted roadways within the project impact areas where project traffic exceeds three percent of the Test Two capacity; therefore the project meets the Test Two Standards. CONCLUSION This project meets the Palm Beach County-Wide Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and may be approved. 11 APPENDIX A GA TEW A Y TRAFFIC COUNT DEC-12-1995 10:09 ,- 22222222222222222 PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFTC 407 478 5770 P.01/01 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 ************~*******~*~*~*********~~*******************~*********~************ ~~~ FilR D060~001.PRN t. :, on 000000000471 J~nlification 000000000024 tart date . Jun 5. 95 t ,--:> / a ate . J un 6 9 5 1 r Town . ROBERT' ELLER o ation ; GATEWAY BL WEST OF U5-1 ~*****~*****~****************************~**********~*~********~****~~~.~~*~~** un 5/.luD 6 Ea~t.bound Volnme for Lanf! l' '...- ~ ,...... ..... Intt:!rval Start rimp. Stop time County 15 minutes 13: 1.5 1 J: 15 PR - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ::=_~~:~ 00 OJ 02 03 04 OS 06 07 08 ..' 09 10 11 15 30 45 ')0 r Total 12 5 .3 3 1 12 6 3 2 1 13 2 4 4 3 4 o o 1 5 8 o 4 1 :1 3 3 6 10 15 12 35 36 98 45 S6 85 81 267 57 43 47 57 20[~ 60 48 43 61 212 50 54 43 38 185 53 59 49 43 204 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 23 n Tim~ ~15 30 +5 00 12 57 56 46 58 , i r rotal 217 13 48 48 44 56 196 14 41 51 45 56 ]93 15 64 49 61 42 216 16 74 65 53 62 254 22 1 7 S3 60 59 62 234 18 61 52 72 53 238 19 52 32 67 39 190 20 31 40 39 33 149 21 39 27 27 29 122 22 23 23 12 10 68 8 13 13 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 41 1,4 JIOllr Total 3360 ~~ peak hour begins: 07:15 AM peak volum~: 279 Peak hour factor: 0.82 ,~ peak hour begins: 16:00 PM peak volume; 254 Peak hour factor: 0.86 *~********************~~***********~****************************************** uti Time 5/Jun 6 00 11 Eastbound Volum~ for Lane 2 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 30 45 00 r Total 8 11 1 1 21 01 19 02 4 4 6 .'j 18 03 4 6 3 5 04 1 1 o o 2 14 05 4 o 3 7 06 2 11 12 23 30 07 32 54 59 (d> 211 08 43 39 56 31 169 09 41 43 40 44 168 10 46 59 51 55 211 11 67 53 56 61 237 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 ,n Time 15 30 45 00 12 7lt 53 59 59 r Total 245 13 53 53 If 0 S9 205 14 6.5 65 64 49 243 15 63 63 54 59 219 1.6 79 82 76 77 314 17 98 80 74 82 334 4 6 3 15 76 J 9 68 51 44 22 185 20 41 39 42 14 136 21 50 44 34 39 1.67 22 27 23 10 14 74 12 8 12 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 43 18 7B 55 i.6 65 244 4 Hour Total 3590 rv-ppak hour begin~ : 11.:15 AM pcnk volume: 244 Peak hour factor: 0.32 ~ peak hour begin~ : 17:00 PM peak volump: 3J~ Peak hour factor: 0.85 ~~~~.~*~~*~*~*************~***~:**~~~~******~~*****~*~*~**~.******~~****~*.~~:~***~ TOTAL P. 01 APPENDIX B GROWTH RATE WORKSHEETS U) z o i= <( ....J ::::> wg (!)<( 00 o:w ~!;;: a: a: ~I I- 3: o a: CJ ~ LO<( ~C\J u"- Q) .. O::a: ...t~ ..- ..- IWO ~!;;:~ Oa:=> a: CJ IW ~~ Oa: a: CJ w ~ ::::> ....J o > a: <( w >- "-"- 00 ct)ct) a: a: a: a: ww LOLO 0) 0) 0) 0) ..- ..- w ~ => ...I o > a: <( w >- <(<( ZZ C\JC\J 0) 0) 0) 0) ..- ..- "-"-"-"- 0000 ct)ct)ct)ct) a:0)"-C\J a:~~~ WC')..-O) I '..- <DC\J..- O)OCO C\J..-LO r-.:'cOr-.:' ..- ..- ..- LOLOLOLO 0)0)0)0) 0)0)0)0) ~~~,- C')COO <(g8~ zoir-.:'c:i ..- ..- ..- C\JC\JC\JC\J 0)0)0)0) 0)0)0)0) ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... o o > > offi ffi a:1- >- Oen <( X<( 3:I3~ Wl-OO 1-=>0.<( <(o>-w CJenIU) o > ...10 lI:la: ~<( I3:Z I-W~ a:l-zLO 0<(<(0) zCJ....J...!. o >->->-> 3:3:3:....J IIIlI:l ....J....J....J>- <(<(<(<( a: a: a: 3: wwww 0001- www<( u..u..u..CJ o I- ~ I ....J 1-<( en a: ..qW o Ww Zu. ~ o a: u.. o ~ lI:l tn <( WI- a: en O..q L5w U)z >- <( 3: o <( o a: 00 >> ....J ....J lI:llI:l >->- <(<( 3:3: WW 1-1- <(<( CJCJ