CORRESPONDENCE
KATZ, BARRON, SQUITERO & FAUST, P. A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
RECEIVED
2599 SOUTH B....VSHORE DRIVE
SUITE 700....
1'011....1'011. FLORID.... 33133
""G 24 1987
PLANNli'~G DEPT.
August 21, 1987
O....OE(30S) 856-2444
BROW....RO (30S) 781-4720 . 522-3636
TELEX 51- 5017
TELECOPIER 285 - 9227
The Honorable Nick Cassandra
Mayor
Town of Boynton Beach
211 South Federal Highway
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: Boynton Lakes Plaza, Boynton Beach, FL
Dear Mayor Cassandra:
This law firm represents the developer of the above-refer-
enced project, Edge Equities Incorporated.
It has come to our attention that another developer, Sybar
Development Corporation, is to appear at a public hearing before
the Planning and Zoning Committee on September 8, 1987 and before
the City Commission on September 15, 1987, seeking site plan
approval for a project at Sybar Square formerly known as Savannah
Square, designed to include an eight-screen cinema. Because
there are already nine screens located at Congress Avenue and
Boynton Beach Boulevard, and our client's receipt some time ago
of site plan approval for the eight scroens under development at
Boynton Lakes Plaza, our client has requested that we advise you
of its vehement objection to the approval of any additional movie
screens in the area. We would agree with the views of certain
members of the Council who have expressed concern that the area
cannot support additional movie screens.
Our client has also requested that we write to you to advise
the status of the Boynton Lakes Plaza project, as certain
inaccurate rumors have come to its attention. Boynton Lakes
Plaza is very much underway, and as you know, has received all
requisite site plan approvals (which include approval for an
eight-screen cinema). Permi ts are not required to be pulled
until mid-1988. Additional approvals respecting the Health
Department, Department of Transportation, Water Management, Army
Corps of Engineers and others have been applied for and are
currently being processed. A land loan is in place, and a
construction package is currently being considered by the project
The Honorable Nick Cassandra
August 21, 1987
Page Two.
construction lender. Leasing, of course, is
plans and specifications for construction
(reflecting the eight screen cinema) are
complete. In short, Edge Equities is actively
Boynton Lakes Project, and looks forward to
timely completion.
underway, and the
of the project
approximately 75%
proceeding with the
its successful and
I f we may be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact Edge Equities Incorporated, 350 South U. S. Highway *1,
Jupiter, Florida 33477 (747-9177), or the undersigned.
We look forward to an equitable resolution of this matter,
and would like the opportunity to address the Planning and Zoning
Board and City Commission at their respective hearings.
Very truly yours,
KATZ,
BARRON, SQUITERO & FAUST, P.A.
~~
Howard L. triedberg
For the Firm
By:
HLF: jdk
HLFJ6
cc: Ralph Marchese, Vice-Mayor
Dee Zibelli, Commissioner
Leonard Mann, Commissioner
Ezell Hester, Jr., Commissioner
Carmen Anunziato, Planning Director
STAFF COMMENTS
SYBAR SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
SITE PLAN
Building Department
See attached memo
Engineering Department
See attached memo
Utilities Department
See attached memo.
Police Department
See attached memo
Planning Department
See attached memos (2)
Forester/Horticulturist
Memo to be distributed
at meeting
Public Works Department:
Contact Public Works
Department prior to
pouring dumpster pad
MEMORANDUL.
TO
CarIren Armunziato
Plarming Director
DATil:
October 7, 1987
I'ILE
""OM
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
SU.JRCT
Sybar Square - Site Plan
The following items pertain to the landscape plan for the above project:
I. Fifty percent of all tree species and quantities should be
native.
2. All interior parking lot trees nmst have a clear trunk of 51
at ti1re of planting. This ~uld require these trees to be larger
than 8' height.
3. I ~uld recannend the landscape plan include a larger variety of shade
trees in the parking lot areas. This is a very large ccmrercial
cooplex and perhaps the applicant should provide increased shading
in this area.
. ~~--<- ~- ilat Lfl~
Kevin J. all an ,L..
KJH:ad
MEMORANDU.' ,
TO
I'ItOM
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
DAT.
October 7, 1987
I"'L.
_U.JECT
Preliminary Plat and Site
Plan Approval:
Sybar Square
Don Jaeger
Building Department
12.
13..
14.
15.
As a condition of preliminary plat and site plan approval, the following
comments should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The light standards on the lighting intensity layout
match the location on sheet E-l, site lighting plan.
must be designed to withstand a 120 m.p.h. wind load
with Chapter 12, Standard Building Code.
Easements are required to be dedicated on the plat document for fire
hydrants and water services.
South Florida Water Management District approval is required.
Sidewalks must continue through turnouts and must be ramped for
handicapped accessibility.
Buffer walls must be stuccoed and painted to match the color scheme
of the shopping center.
Notes on the plat document prohibit the planting of shrubs and trees
in drainage easements. This occurs on the east side of Tract A.
Dumpster enclosures are required to maintain an inside dimension of
10 feet by.lO feet.
The theater is considered a threshold structure and must be permitted
and inspected as such, under state law.
The landscaped area between Tract B and Quantum Blvd. is required to
be 5 foot wide. The plans show a 3 foot bicycle path encroachment
and a two foot vehicle overhang encroachment into this area.
The buffer wall must be setback two feet from the property line for
maintenance and landscape purposes.
The site plan and the paving and drainage plans conflict as to the
location of handicapped access ramps. Submit details of the ramp
construction.
All swales in right-of-ways must be sodded.
The marquee sign must not exceed 10 percent of the theater face area.
Drainage easements must be provided on Plat 1 of Quantum Park to
accommodate the proposed off site construction for Sybar Square
drainage use.
Turnout permits must be secured from the County Highway Department.
sheet do not
Light standards
in accordance
10.
11.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure
a timely permitting process.
DoO~J~
RECEI'lED
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
OCT '( 1981
PLANNING D~r;r.
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 7, 1987
RECEf\TED
TO:
Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
OCT 7 1981
PLAN N Il'i G D EPT.
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Sybar Square, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan
Comments:
I. Cost estimate should include ~he cost for a traffic signal
at Quantum Blvd. and Congress Ave.
2. Street lights on Quantum Blvd. should be shown or a
reference to the Quantum Commercial Park lighting must be
made.
3. The plat should document the agreement that allows construc-
tion for "drainage etc. on a 2nd party's property. What is
the width for the seed mulch in Section "A-A". Seed and
mulch should be grass sod.
4. Swale shown in Section "B-B" should have grass sod.
5. Street lights by Florida Power & Light in Congress Ave.
should be shown or referenced by note and included in the
cost estimate.
6. Easements for the outfall storm sewers or reference to
documented agreements should be shown.
7. Update of drainage calculations is required.
8. Sheet #7 of development plans should show off-site elevations.
9. Storm drains and structures should not extend into the Lake
Worth Drainage District's right-af-way without a license from
said District.
10. A permit from the Lake Worth Drainage District is required.
11. The cross-section thru the lake should be shown graded to the
slope as required by the Water Management District. Seeding
and sodding should continue to the water's edge.
12. All utility easements should be shown on the plat with dimen~
sions and bearings.
con It. . . . .
. ,
To: Mr. Jim Golden
October 7, 1987
Re: Sybar Square, comments con1t.
Page 2
Comments:
13. A cross-section thru the landscaped areas to show the inlet
structures should be shown. Inlet structures should be
several inches above the swale bottom.
14. Sidewalks should extend thru the turnouts at driveways.
IS. Cost estimate to include improvements as per report from
Murray, Dudeck & Associates, including signalization at
north entrance to Congress.
16. Details for the existing outfall control structure should
be included.
17. Refer to Bill Flushing1s memo of October 5, 1987.
v;.... ,efJ-
Torn Clark
TAC:ck
attachment
MEMORA.NDUI
TO
Planning Dept.
Attn: J. Golden
OAT.
October 7, 1987
"ILIl'
I'ltOM
Lt. D. Thrasher
Po 1 i ce Dept.
SUaJI:CT
Sybar Square
As per the TRB meeting 6 October 1987, the following is recommended:
1. "Right turn only" sign, South exit onto Quantum Blvd.
2. "Stop" signs at median and side of traffic way, for
Northbound traffic exiting onto Quantum Blvd.
DT:as
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 7, 1987
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: SYBAR SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER-STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request for site plan
approval:
1. Developer to post a bond for a proportionate share of the
signalization of Quantum Boulevard and Congress Avenue
based on traffic impact, as determined by the County
Traffic Engineer, prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
2. Lighting along the northern property boundary to be
directed away from the abutting residential-zoned
district (Dos Lagos).
3. Roof top and ground mounted mechanical equipment to
have proper screening and noise mitigation.
4. The addition of coolers onto the rear of any building will
require a site plan modification.
5. The sidewalk adjacent to the northern right-of-way line
for N.W. 22nd Avenue should be continued to the eastern
boundary of the lake to be continuous with plat no. 1
of Quantum Park.
6. The engineering plans should conform to the site plan
with regard to the elimination of the parallel parking
spaces within the parcel located on the north side of
Quantum Boulevard, and with regard to the "paver area"
adjacent to the N.W. 22nd Avenue driveway within the
parcel located on the south side of Quantum Boulevard.
CCII - -~ _ JL ~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIA~
CSA:ro
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 6, 1987
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: SYBAR SQUARE-SHARED PARKING ALLOCATION
Section 11-H(13) of the Zoning Code contains the following
provision for shared parking:
13. Parking spaces required in this Ordinance for one use or
structure may be allocated in part or in whole for the
required parking spaces of another use or structure if
quantitative evidence is provided showing that parking
demand for the different uses or structures would occur on
different days of the week or at different hours.
Quantitative evidence shall include but not be limited to
the following:
(a) Field studies and traffic counts prepared by a traffic
consultant experienced in parking studies.
(b) Adjustments for seasonal variations.
(c) Estimates for peak parking demand based on statistical
data furnished by the Urban Land Institute or some
other recognized land planning and design organization.
All data furnished must be statistically valid. In
addition, a minimum buffer of 10% shall be provided to
ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are
available at times of peak hour use. Said buffer is to be
calculated based on the following formula:
Buffer = surplus shared parkingl 2 x 100%
on-site + shared parking provided
IShared parking spaces not required by the City of
Boynton Beach zoning regulations for the proposed
use.
2parking spaces required for the proposed use as per
the City of Boynton Beach zoning regulations.
Evidence for joint allocation of required space shall be
submitted to the Technical Review Board, and approval of joint
allocation of required parking spaces shall be made by the City
Commission, after review and recommendations by the Planning and
Zoning Board.
with respect to Section 11-H (13) of the Zoning Regulations,
Carlos Diaz of Matthews and Associates, agent for Sybar-Savannah
Square Joint Venture, is requesting approval of a shared parking
allocation in connection with a request for site plan approval
for the Sybar Square (formerly Savannah Square) shopping center.
The subject property is located at the northeast corner of North
Congress Avenue and Northwest 22nd Avenue, and is bisected by
Quantum Boulevard, which divides the overall parcel into two
smaller parcels. The parcel located on the north side of Quantum
Boulevard is 5.13 acres in size, while the parcel located on the
south side of Quantum Boulevard is 13.167 acres in size.
-2-
The proposed site plan for the Sybar Square Shopping Center
consists essentially of two independent site plan requests for
the parcels located on the north and south sides of Quantum
Boulevard. The parcel located on the north side of Quantum
Boulevard consists of 58,100 square feet of floor space,
including 45,100 square feet of retail floor space and 13,000
square feet of office floor space. The parcel located on the
south side of Quantum Boulevard consists of 115,100 square feet
of floor space, including 66,600 square feet of retail floor
space, 13,000 square feet of office floor space, and a 35,500
square foot (2,288 seat) cinema consisting of eight screens.
The Shared Parking Study prepared by Murray-Dudek and Associates
for Rossi and Malavasi Engineers has been documented to provide
for two independent shared parking allocations for the parcels
located on the north and south sides of Quantum Boulevard. The
study assumes that due to the existence of Quantum Boulevard,
which forms a physical barrier between the north and south
parcels, no sharing will occur between these two parcels.
Rather, all sharing is to occur within each individual parcel.
The documentation prepared by Murray-Dudek for the parcel located
on the north side of Quantum Boulevard indicates that the peak
parking accumulation for this site would occur on weekdays at
approximately 2:00 P.M. and would require approximately 246 of
the 264 parking spaces provided (291 spaces would be required by
code). This projection of peak hour parking demand is based on
Urban Land Institute data which has been adjusted in part to
incorporate site-specific conditions. Of the 65 parking spaces
that would be required by code for the office building, 38 have
been provided on-site, with the remaining 27 parking spaces being
shared from the unoccupied parking available from the retail
development. The remaining 16 surplus parking spaces not
required by the retail development at the 2:00 weekday peak are
allocated toward the calculation of the required 10% buffer as
follows:
16
38 + 27
x
100% = 24.6%
Therefore, given the worst case scenario of total parking
accumulation (weekdays at 2:00 P.M.), the shared parking
allocation for the northern parcel would still allow for a
statistical surplus of twenty four (16) parking spaces.
The documentation prepared by Murray-Dudek for the parcel located
on the south side of Quantum Boulevard indicates that the peak
parking accumulation for the retail development, the office
building, and the cinema combined would occur on weekdays at
approximately 8:00 P.M. and would require approximately 648 of
the 798 parking spaces provided (970 spaces would be required by
code). This projection of peak hour parking demand is based on
Urban Land Institute data which has been adjusted in part to
incorporate site-specific conditions. Of the 572 parking spaces
that would be required by code for the cinema, 400 have been
provided on-site with the remaining 172 parking spaces being
shared from those parking spaces left unoccupied by the retail
and office developments. The remaining 144 surplus parking
spaces not required by the retail and office developments at the
8:00 P.M. weekday peak are allocated toward the calculation of
the required 10% buffer as follows:
144
400 + 172
x
100% = 25.2%
Therefore, given the worst case scenario of total parking
accumulation (weekdays at 8:00 P.M.), the shared parking
allocation for the southern parcel would still allow for a
statistical surplus of 144 parking spaces.
-3-
On Tuesday, October 6, 1987, the Technical Review Board met to
review the plans and documents submitted, at which time they
recommended approval of the Murray-Dudek Shared Parking Study as
submitted. It was the consensus of the Technical Review Board
that the proposed shared parking allocation was prepared and
documented in accordance with code requirements, and that
sufficient opportunity exists for shared parking to occur
on-site, given the mix of uses in the proposed shopping center.
~
Ca... . rJ.- ~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZ 0
JJG:ro
cc Central File
I1EJ'10RANDUJ'1
TCI:
Car~en Annunziato. Planning
DiredClr ~ _ ~.#J
Utilities r7
Fro~:
John A. Guidry. Director of
Date: October 6. 1987
Subject: TR8 Review - Sybar Square - Plat and site plan
We can approve this project subject to.the following conditions:
1) Specify the ~eter sizes for all ~eter5.
Z) Provide flow calculations for each ~eter bank having ~ore than
four ~eters on a single Z" line. Flow de~and per ~eter is to be
. based upon the architect's esti~ate. or the ~axi~u~ sustained flow
rate of t~e ~eter.
3) J'1cters are not to be located in walkways. parking spaces. or
areas used for vehicular traffic. Indicate the treat~ent and
specific location of each ~eter grouping on the site plan.
specifically stating what the ~eters are to be located in (e.g.
grassy area. asphalt paving. etc.)
4) Ease~ents ~ust be shown for all water services. ~eters. fire
hydrants. and sprinkler lines up to the post indicator valve.
5) Provide the latitude and longitude of the lift station serving
this plat.
6) Each building cluster separated by a 4-hour wall should have
its own feed line for the fire sprinkler syste".
7) Du~psters or du~pster pads ~ust npt be located in utility
ease~ents.
xc:
Peter J'1azzella
M
E
1_
M 0
R_
R
s_
A ~
D
u
M
october 5, 1987
Tu:
Tom Clark
From:
Bill Flushing
Re:
Plat of Sybar Square
Subject plat deficiencies are as follows:
1. No dimensions or bearings on utility easements
2.
Additional PRMs
chapter 177.091
are required
(7))
along the East
line
(See
3.
The tenth (10)
is incorrect,
course Distance in the
it should be 360.25.
legal
description
4. The same co~rse on the Plat is also shown incorrectly,
it should be 360.25.
Bi~~
MEMOR-ANDUA.
TO
CarIren Armunziato
PI arming Director
DATIf
August 31, 1987
RECEIV1IC
,.ILI'
""0"
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
5UeJllrCT
Sybar Square - Site Pl~OG 31 198'1
PLANNldG I;l!;P r~
1. Fifty percent of the tree species and quantity nmst be native.
2. Thirty percent of the shrubs and ground cover nmst be native.
3. Hedge material along road R.O.W's nmst be 36" in height at the
ti1re of planting.
4. 'Ihe type of sod should be specified.
5. The irrigation system should be detailed.
6. Ci ty water carmot be used for irrigating the landscaped areas.
7. Each out parcel nmst sutrni t a separate landscape plan for
approval.
-4.4': ~....;j~ J
Kevin J. lahan ).:..1
KJH:ad
MEMQRANDU'\.
TO
Canren Armunziato
Plarming Director
DATR
August 311 1987
RECENED
FILa
I'ltOM
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
5UBJI!CT
Sybar Square
AUG 31 ]981
PLANNING DEPT.
1. Sheet #4 (of 8) shows a water line being jack and bored across
Congress Avenue. Perhaps the City can coordinate with the develop-
er to provide irrigation to the grassed xredian for future landscape
irrproverrents.
2. A master landscape plan is required for the site. This should be
coordinated with the landscape plan sul:tnitted with the site plan.
.J;L~'5i.y)J~~
Kevin J. allahan
KJH:ad
M E M'O RAN DUM
September 3, 1987
TO: Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Sybar Square, Preliminary Plat and Site plan
Comments:-
I. update of drainage calculations is required.
2. Sheet #7 of development plans should show off-site elevations.
3. Storm drains and structures should not extend into the Lake
Worth Drainage District's right-of-way without a license from
said District.
4. A permit from the Lake Worth Drainage District is required.
5. The cross-section thru the lake should be shown graded to the
slope as required by the Water Management District. Seeding
and sodding should continue to the water's edge.
6. Utility easements should be shown on the plat.
7. A sidewalk should extend from N.W. 22nd Ave., at the main
entrance, to a point where pedestrians would cross the
traffic lanes when leaving the parking lot.
8. Ramps for handicapped persons should be shown.
9. A cross-section thru the landscaped areas to show the inlet
structures should be shown. Inlet structures should be
several inches above the swale bottom.
10. Sidewalks should extend thru the turnouts at driveways.
II. Lighting intensity in the area of the retail stores should be
shown. If lighting is to be provided from the Building
Security lighting, it should be so indicated.
12. Cost estimate to include improvements as per report from
Murray, Dudeck & Associates, including signalization at
north entrance to Congress.
13. Comments from Bill Flushing are included in the attached
memo, dated September I, 1987.
TAC/ck
attachment
~v~ d2t----.
Tom Clark
M E M 0 RAN DUM
September 2, 1987
TO: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMBERS
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: SYBAR SQUARE-STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request for site plan
approval:
I.
Section 5-141(g)(6) of the Parking Lot Regulations requires
a 100 foot "throat" for major shopping center driveways.
The main driveway onto N.W. 22nd Avenue does not meet
this requirement.
2.
A six foot high concrete block wall is required along the
northern property boundary adjacent to residential-zoned
property. The proposed pre-cast wall does not meet this
requirement.
3.
Site data information on the site plan must be revised to
indicate the proper parking calculations (see correct
parking calculations in shared parking study).
4.
There appears to be a conflict between the buffer wall
and drainage system along the northern property boundary.
J 1 i. !
. 7)-'It7--iO 1 i'
)):JrP i /It;..j ,;1,:-_,,4c-tn Y t' r:' , (f.,."" <7. 'yL ~ l-~
() F i-l;e SJ &teL (,/ 7' Life' (.L reJf a~."/""c f\o ':- ( ,.L, t'''
fo U J v(" S --' A (, (' 11 (.{ @ tL f (! .,. VI. 1-'-.... f.( ~ I ~ ~ c- f.
{,
fJ",
I~j.~
~ES J{i GOLDEN
JJG:ro
cc Central File
M EM,OR-AN D U · - :
TO
Planning Dept.
Attn: J. Golden
DATI:
September 1, 1987
,.ILI'
F"OM
Lt. D. Thrasher
Police Dept.
5UaJI'CT
Sybar Square
As per the TRB meeting of 1 September 1987, the following is recommended:
1. Pole mounted exterior lighting to be photo activated.
2. Right turn only signs on all egresses where needed.
3. Marking on the parking lots for traffic direction.
4. Recommend eliminating parrallel parking spaces if possible
5. Ingress/egress onto N.W. 22 Ave. difficult, not enough interior
access aisle, should be minimum of 100 feet.
6. Traffic pattern from rear of building (South plat) to N.W. 22 Ave.
and around the retail stores extremely hazardous. Intersection
at this location also dangerous. Traffic flow at the intersection
will increase as vehicles find they cannot make a left turn from
the rear service road.
Lt. D. Thrasher
Police Department
~..
DT:as
,_
TO --> I {'vL G-o L D L-?AJ
t>LfTNiU f N-(~ :\>~'1-
-,
FROM
L,Cr'lr> (~V t;<fAJ;f {j.-6~--If
Pi 12-b -()t::~PT
SUBJECT: _____:~~_=~_l__~~~:______.~_q---~J1=~1?::S~-----=--~--~-~.....___.DA TE:__._Z=~__~_~______
~OLD .
,) ,F--/f2b L--N-1J6-S /A/ t9-~D e:-~L-(~{F
z-) <a ( (;-1\) I~-C~. FDa- ;==112-5 L..f9-I\j e-s / IU ~,Vt-Tl{ Cti4-n-
3) (2DA--9 lVA,-( ~ ~ /):)/1, fc I ,0 C~ ~~A);J ( If t' 'f
/ FI ~'c- &-c/Jf- (( ;:Jb 72--19- Tl [."71.) ~
SIGNED ,0/;,' ~
/Iv?:/
REPLY~~~/~
/ ; /
\...-/.
PLEASE REPLY TO
.
!cu0l</LCV- ;C
/6/f /fl
DATE: / SIGN
~
Item # F269 @ Wheeler Group Inc. 1979
THIS COP
MEMO.RANDUM
Camen Annunziato
Planning Director
DAn August 31, 1987
RECEIVED
I'lL.
1)111
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester /Horticulturist
SU."_CT
Sybar Square - Site PI~lJ6 31 1001
PLANNING Dl;ff,
1. Fifty percent of the tree species and quantity ImlSt be native.
2. 'n1irty percent of the shrubs and ground cover nmst be native.
3. Hedge material along road R.O.W' s must be 36" in height at the
tine of planting.
4. 'l11e type of sod should be specified.
5. 'l11e irrigation system should be detailed.
6. City water cannot be used for irrigating the landscaped areas.
7. Pach out parcel must sul:mit a separate landscape plan for
approval.
-&~_: ~'-IJ ~--rd
Kevin J. lahan
KJH: ad
.'
'0
;'110"
MEMrOR'ANDUM
RE,CEIVED
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
SEP 2 198r
September PCArt~fi{'G DE-Pl'.
DATE
"ILI
Don Jaeger
Building Department
5U.JECT
Site Plan Review:
Sybar Square
As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should
be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant:
1.
2.
All documents submitted for public record by a registered professional
in the state of Florida must be signed and sealed.
Indicate on the plans the proposed type of construction for each
building in accordance with Section 601.1.1, Standard Building Code,
1985 Edition. Indicate which buildings will be fully sprinkled.
All structures must comply with Table 400, Standard Building Code, for
allowable area and Table 600, Standard Building Code, for ratings on
exterior walls and percent of allowable openings. .
All proposed sidewalks adjacent to this site must be completed prior
to the certificate of occupancy being issued. Sidewalks should be
continued through all turnouts and must be ramped for handicapped
accessibility. In order to assure safe pedestrian access to the
site, we recommend that several sidewalks be included from the right-
of-way leading into the site.
The office building in the northwest section of the site must have a
side yard setback of 30 feet due to the site being adjacent to a
residentially zoned parcel. The Code considers two parcels adjacent
when they are separated only by a "right-of-way under ownership of....
a governmental agency".
Separate permits are required for all signage. Free standing signs
must comply with Section 21-15 E(3) of the Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances.
The proposed site lighting does not comply with the City's minimum
recommended light levels. All light poles must be engineered in
accordance with Section 1205, Standard Building Code for a fastest
mile of wind of 120 m.p.h.
The landscaping plan does not address the proposed treatment of
the 20 x 100 foot section of the property adjacent to and bordering
on the lake, at the east property line. All landscaping must be
100% irrigated by an automatic irrigation system which does not
utilize City water. The bank of the Lake Worth Drainage District
canal should be seeded and mulched as well as the lake bank adjacent
to the site.
Handicapped ramps should be provided along the fronts of the building
walkways, at a maximum of 100 foot intervals in accordance with the
State Handicapped Code. All handicapped parking stalls should have
access to the buildings within close proximity to the stalls, including
the stalls in the southeast corner of the south parking lot.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7 .
8.
9.
The following information is for the applicant's information:
In order to facilitate the permitting process, the following documents
should be submitted to the Building Department for review at the time
permits are desired:
Memo to Carmen Annunziato
RE: Site Plan Review: Sybar Square
September 2, 1987
Page Two
1. Copies of the South Florida Water Management District approval.
2. Signed and sealed energy forms in compliance with the State Energy
Code.
3. Soil borings with the soil engineer's recommendation for obtaining
the necessary soil bearing values.
4. Restaurants and food handling services require the approval of the
Palm Beach County Health Department.
5. Turnout permits from the County Highway Department are required for
the proposed driveways on N.W. 22nd Avenue and N. Congress Avenue.
6. Complete sets of construction documents and plans, signed and sealed
by the relevant design professionals, licensed in the state of Florida.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure
a timely permitting process.
~~9~
Don Jaege
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
MEMORANDUW-
o
Carman Annunziato
Plarming Director
DATE
October 7, 1987
I'ILE
ItOM
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
SU.JECT
Sybar Square - Site Plan
The following items pertain to the landscape plan for the above project:
1. Fifty percent of all tree species and quantities should be
native.
2. All interior parking lot trees nmst have a clear trunk of 5 I
at tirre of planting. This ~uld require these trees to be larger
than 8 I height.
3. I would reccmnend the landscape plan include a larger variety of shade
trees in the parking lot areas. This is a very large cc::rmercial
canplex and perhaps the applicant should provide increased shading
in this area.
. .JI-,_-J- ~- ~ L.// Lk-.;r
KevJ.n J. al an .....
., '
KJH:ad
\\
, .
"-
;
,
I
,
,
I
I:
II
I
I,
~t (kR 11 E)(.'
Ii
liT {I f ( 0 f1 f! /3 )/ 75 CV E Jt A- [);: ro!\ T /I F f R [5 {f /1 j.AI A-;C 1
t .
~ f l Jr r A-PI!( 0 VA-L Fo/< Q L{ A--NT L{ If />/I-)? k /JIIC L [;[ (;(3
J P (? ;V ;J J Jv tL 0 F A- 5" -f Cl )/ It- L .Jr r- c c A/ tA A !5 5_S A r/ .E )./u E
flk/Vi) Q uA-A/;u/1 f3 L [/ /J. .Jt-{[o;: fJ +J/~ Te roJi)
i l . Tfi E (+ r '( I'! * 'j )loT ItJt--V/3 j(' t3 Q G{.f ;e L: 1'J .s-v( ^ I- f7
It fc~ 1< llr- J S S'-{ (Z AI Jr-l Lu-f TE /1 g c 0 !~ Trf~u 1113J!C!) m______
I:
I'
i!
It
[: -i)l/ /<" ~ V r E ~/ f-kCc iJ.A-N )j [{A\f< ./t 7 '5 t r.:- TTf: R
i (oNe E r<Nl>VtL T P Jt-FF -I-C J/11::'f2{) VEA !::- A/T5 A-r
I ~7 't[)A-f~ S6(C{kf2~./ /tt: Ft-ELS T/t.-+r A- J}=rcA/A-C-
A-r frt-r? A-L5<D Vi: LC!cA-TfcJA/ /1A-i! A/oT [5/~
(E>f--S4-- {5'-- Lt:-j j)rAE To rite ,bf:S rk/vCE ?IJ-o/1
/'/(-[ l~ X +-<; J- j: )/ ~ s F cZ.-A/.1- L /1- r A( cv- G ex? 02 A/,D
Jr Vc (- + 1- [.:. /1 rz )
J 7-/rJ;1Jj: TtrJrT /Iv}: ;1I{3~D TO +,4IYEsTPCZA-TL
TIt!: ;tv () cl ("3: "
f~S. 'fUC( SltoU!-D *[50 TJrj:t~ k CtCJ5l: took
A-T -lTcJt ;IF 3 Of /J.A-)v~ cc:rr!3~
- ') (. " (
.' I~ v I,d P ~ 'f-- /' Cl VI. .. J-..
~ ({v" ,\.-
./~nc-f-
I~
" r .J I ('~
f L "'- (... (.. -L,S ~. cJ '<7 (,.[ , , t A-, / '-y,- C
/
/
MEMORANDUM
November 5, 1986
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato
planning Director
RE:
Quantum Park Preliminary Plat - Staff Comments
Please be advised of the Planning Department's cowments in
connection with the above-referenced request for Preliminary Plat
approval:
1. Notes on plans which read "centerline of entrance" at median
cuts do not predetermine driveway locations.
2. Cross section for N.W. 22nd Avenue must show the required
bike path (sheet no. 49 of 68).
3. Developer to submit a copy of the property owner1s documents
to the City for review and comment.
4. Developer to dedicate an access easement to the public to
provide access to the proposed public park.
5. Developer to document concurrence by Gould and Joa for
the abandonment of High Ridge Road.
6. On plat no. 4 clarify the use of tract G.
7. Construct a median cut/turn lane for'the future City
Park at the center point of frontage.
8. It is recommended that the developer post a bond for the
following improvements required in the Development Order:
a) Establishment of a vegetated littoral zone (item # 9).
Page Two.
flat
b) Establishment of a buffer zone of native upland edge
vegetation around wetland and deep water habitats which
are preserved or constructed on-site (item # 10).
c) Developer to provide signalization and turn lanes at
the intersection of Congress Avenue and the p~oject
access road (Savannah Square) and at all proj~ct
entrances on Northwest 22nd Avenue as necessary to
maintain service level "C" (item # 29).
('.-:L....-.- J c~~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZlia.: 0
(:~
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSUL T ANTS
September 17, 1987
t.)
{-;
L
Jim Golden, Planner
Planning Department
City of Boynton Beach
120 NE 2nd Avenue
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: Second Revision To Shared Parking Calculations
On The Northern Portion Of The Sybar Square Project
MDDM Project #87-0074
Dear Jim:
Due to the reduced parking on the northerly section of the
Sybar Square Project it was necessary to update the Shared
Parking computations. Specifically, the available parking was
reduced from 272 spaces down to 264 spaces.
The attached Ordinance No. 86-8 reflects the new 264 parking
spaces. With this reduction the buffer calculation is reduced
from 36.9% to 24.6%.
Additionally, it was indicated that you would need a graph
printout on the Anchor Retail Parking Accumulation Percents.
Originally you did indicate that the calculations would be
sufficient by attaching Exhibit #28 from the Urban Land
Institute's Shared Parking Publication. However, in compliance
with your request I am attaching the graph Figures #lA and #5A
for Anchor Retail for both weekday and Saturday activities.
We are attaching five (5) copies of this supplement to be
included in the previous report package. Please advise if there
are any additional information or clarifications needed.
Sincerely,
A~~~~
Daniel N. Murray, P.E.
E T:lrr
,.' 1".1>.1 r.',
'." oi- 1 ~ ." .
. "-...._l ~_.~,._.
."..."....,D'
'. J '.....
... ..:' '"
,-,',"
Atttachment
,..._M'
>I~'
:Cd7
DNM/kl
IF.' '.'
q-..'
" _" 'j'~w ..
cc: Carlos Diaz
Enrico Rossi
Sybar Square Development
MERRITT ISLAND OFFICE: 100 PARNELL STREET' MERRITT ISLAND, FLORIDA 32953' (305) "'59-2905
CORPORATE HDQTRS.: 7301-A' W. PALMETTO PARK ROAD' SUITE 302-A. BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33...33. (305) 391-MDDM
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSUL T ANTS
August 31, 1987
Jim Golden, Planner
Planning Department
City of Boynton Beach
120 NE 2nd Avenue
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: Revisions to Shared Parking Calculations
On The Northern Portion Of
The Sybar Square Project
MDDM Project #87-0074
Dear Jim:
As as result of our discussions, I
Retail portion on the northerly section
Project. Specifically, the 25,600 square
evaluated as an Anchor Retail.
have stratified the
of the Sybar Square
feet is now being
The parking accumulation percentages for Anchor Retail are
based on Exhibit 28 in the ULI Publication, (refer to attached
copy of Exhibit 28).
Included in
Table 1A and 2A of
dated August 26,
Ordinance No. 86-8
attached.
the updated revisions is the
the previously submitted Shared
1987. Also, a reanalysis and
has been made. Copies of these
refiguring of
Parking Study
recomputing of
revisions are
Based on this reanalysis, there is adequate parking to serve
the needs of the Sybar Square Project and to meet the City of
Boynton Beach parking requirements.
Please advise if you have any further questions on this
matter. I appreciate your professional approach and cooperation
efforts in finalizing the Shared Parking Report on this Project.
Sincerely,
t1 ,/ // ~
fi~ /V',P'?/*'"
Daniel N. Murray, P .
DNM/kl
cc: Carlos Diaz
L Rick Rossi
Sybar Square Development
MERRITT ISLAND OFFICE: 100 PARNELL STREET. MERRITT ISLAND. FLORIDA 32953. (305) 459-2905
CORPORATE HDQTRS.: 7301-A. W. PALMETTO PARK ROAD' SUITE 302-A. BOCA RATON. FLORIDA 33433. (305) 391-MDDM
"r".....
,,~
-
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS
August 26, 1987
RECEIVED
,//
Tom Clark
City ~ngine
oynton Beach
120 NE 2nd Avenue
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
,/,.
Al 1(; 26 1987
PLANNL;JG DEPT.
Re: Traffic Statement Evaluation
Sybar Square Project
MDDM Project # 87-0074
Dear Tom:
At the request of Mr. Rossi, Murray-Dudeck & Associates,
P.A., undertook a Traffic Comparative Analysis of the Sybar
Square site pIan prepared by Matthews & Associates and the
previous site pIan which was entitled Savannah Square. The
primary evaluation consisted of reviewing the January 1985
Kimley-Horn Traffic Impact Analysis to determine if their
findings and recommendations would be consistent with the current
proposed Sybar Square project.
Based on our traffic analysis, the following comments are
offered:
1. The proposed shopping center square
from 186,400 square feet to 173,200 square
in a trip reduction of 341 trips per day
Beach County Trip Generation Rates for
The shopping center formula is indicated
Kimley-Horn Report.
footage was reduced
feet. This results
utilizing the Palm
shopping centers.
in page 4 of the
2. Utilizing the same methodology for determining Peak Hour
Traffic will result in a reduction of 15 ingress and 15 egress
trips during the PM Peak Hour. The methodology used in
determining the Peak Hour Trips is realistic.
-1-
MERRITT ISLAND OFFICE: 100 PARNELL STREET - MERRITT ISLAND. FLORIDA 32953 - (305) '459-2905
CORPORATE HDQTRS.: 7301-A - W. PALMETTO PARK ROAD' SUITE l02-A - BOCA RATON. FLORIDA 33<433- (lOS) 391-MDDM
-M/iJIr
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
3. In determining the actual external trips onto the
roadway system for a shopping center, it is very reasonable and
acceptable within the Traffic Engineering profession to reduce
the total trips by a minimum of 15% and a maximum of 25% for
captured trips. Captured trips being normal motorists that would
traverse Congress Avenue and on their way to another trip
destination would decide to make a side stop at the Sybar Square
Shopping Center. This phenomenon was indicated in the
Kimley-Horn Report on page 5, but no traffic reduction was
applied. In calculating the traffic impacts fees, I would
recommend that a 15% reduction of the daily traffic be applied.
In other words, rather than stating a total external trips of
10,413, it is our professional opinion the true external trips
should be 8,851 which is 85% of the total trips.
4. A review of the traffic distribution was made based on
the recognized trip attractions and existing and near future
highway network. The indicated percent distributions on page 5
of the Kimley-Horn Report are reasonable and acceptable.
5. A review of the 1986 Daily Traffic Figures published by
the Palm Beach County MPO indicates a slight increase on Congress
Avenue from the 1984 volumes indicated in the Kimley-Horn Report.
The amount of increase is not significant and would not change
the basic capacity analysis results.
6. A detailed review of the traffic figures indicated in
Figure #2 of the Kimley-Horn Report was made and a review of the
capacity analysis in the appendix was conducted. The traffic
figures and analysis are correct.
7. An evaluation of the proposed roadway improvements was
made based on the capacity analysis and the recognized need for
efficient traffic flow and safety at the project accesses. The
proposed highway geometric improvements are adequate and proper.
In fact, they will provide a sufficient level of safety to the
traveling public.
-2-
-Mii)r
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
8. The one concern in the recommended improvements as
depicted in the Savannah Square Roadway Requirements - Figure #3
is the future signal at the intersection of Congress Avenue and
the north project entrance. I would be very hesitant to consider
signalization at that access because of the limited spacing
between that intersection and the intersection of NW 22nd Avenue
and Congress. If in some future date it was critical to install
that signal, then positive coordination would be essential
between that signal and the NW 22nd Avenue signal. However, the
Sybar Square traffic does have access to NW 22nd Avenue which
provides alternative access to proceed southbound on Congress
Avenue.
In summary, the proposed Sybar Square project will not cause
any increased incremental impacts from the original project, as
outlined in the January 1985 Kimley-Horn Traffic Impact Analysis
Report. By mandating all indicated improvements in the 1985
Report with the possible exception of the signalization of the
north project access, then the traffic flow and safety at the
development accesses and on the highway system will be maintained
at a reasonable and acceptable level of service. There wil1 not
be any significant adverse impacts to the traveling public if
these recommendations are implemented.
Sincerely,
~~' '//:4/~
Daniel N. Murray, P.~ ~
DNM/kl
cc: Jim Golden
Matthews & Associates
Rick Rossi, P.E.
Sybar Development Company
-3-
r~
-MB)r
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
SHARED PARKING STUDY
FOR
SYBAR SQUARE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PREPARED FOR:
ROSSI & MALAVASI ENGINEERS
BY
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
.J~#/o/7 ~~/
Daniel N. Murray, P.E. Date
AUGUST 26, 1987
MDDM Project #87-0074
,... ~-
-MB)r
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
INTRODUCTION
------------
------------
This study is designed to address and document the parking
requirements for shared uses at the Sybar Square Plaza, a
proposed mixed use commercial development at the northeast corner
of Congress Avenue and NW 22nd Avenue in the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida. Since Quantum Boulevard which is a 4-lane
divided highway severs a portion of the retail/office from the
cinema it was felt that a separate shared parking analysis should
be conducted for the development north & south of Although the
parking on the opposite side of the roadway is reasonably
convenient for patrons using any of the facilities, it is more
desirable to not encourage pedestrian traffic across Quantum
Boulevard. Thus, independent parking area analysis was the method
used in making a determination as to the viability of shared
parking usage. Because of the varied make up of uses within the
development, namely, cinema, retail, restaurant & office on the
south portion and retail & office on the north portion, it is
believed that a shared parking usage study would be appropriate
for this proposed project.
Because of the varied requirements and usage of parking
spaces during different hours of the day, it is felt that this
study, using the interactions associated with shared parking
phenomenon as published by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), is
appropriate. The Urban Land Institute 1983 publication is the
methodology used in this report.
Additionally, the formula required by the Ordinance No. 86-8
of the City of Boynton Beach was calculated to ensure the proper
buffer was maintained within this proposed project.
BACKGROUND
----------
----------
Sybar Square is a mixed-use development proposed for the
Northeast corner of Congress Avenue and NW 22nd Avenue in the
City of Boynton Beach, Florida. The land use proposals for the
project are outlined below:
-1-
-.11'-
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
South of Quantum Boulevard
--------------------------
--------------------------
Of fi ce
=
Cinema
=
Retail
=
Restaurant =
North of Quantum Boulevard
--------------------------
--------------------------
Retail
=
Office
=
... .... .... ........ .... .... ........ ........ ........ .... .... ......
... .... ............ .... .... ........ ........ ............ .... ......
13,000 Square Feet
13,000 Square Feet
2,288 Seats
61,600 Square Feet
5,000 Square Feet
45,100 Square Feet
The City of Boynton Beach requirements, taken separately,
would result in the parking requirements outlined below:
South of Quantum Boulevard
--------------------------
--------------------------
Cinema
(2,288 Seats x 1 parking space
per 4 seats) =
Retail/0ffice
a. Retail
(61,600 Square Feet @ 5 spaces
per 1,000 Square Feet) =
b. Office
(13,000 Square Feet @ 5 spaces
per 1,000 Square Feet) =
c. Restaurant
(5,000 Square Feet @ 5 spaces
per 1,000 Square Feet) =
Total Spaces Required
572 Spaces
308 Spaces
65 Spaces
25 Spaces
... .... .... .... .... .... ................ .... ................ ......
........ ... .... .... .... ........ .... ..... ... ................ ......
970 Spaces
North of Quantum Boulevard
--------------------------
--------------------------
Retail/Office
a. Retail
(45,100 Square Feet @ 5 spaces
per 1,000 Square Feet) =
b. Office
(13,000 Square Feet @ 5 spaces
per 1,000 Square Feet) =
-2-
226 Spaces
65 Spaces
291 Spaces
. ..
-M/i)r
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
The Urban Land Institute methodology allows for a
calculation and assumption of shared parking capacities which
would result in an overall site plan which would provide for more
efficient parking on the site. Therefore, it is this methodology
that is used in the compilation of this report in order to allow
a more efficient usage of parking area within the site based on
the proposed land use.
ULI METHODOLOGY
--------------
---------------
The basis for the Urban Land Institute's research was to
define the characteristics of parking demands for single land
uses. Then, by analyzing parking accumulations at mixed use
centers, the shared parking concept was quantified.
The ULI recommends the following procedure be adherred to
in determining shared parking:
1. Initial Project Review: Knowledge of the site and the
intended land uses is very important in beginning the shared
parking analysis. Results from the initial review for Sybar
Square has been presented in earlier sections in terms of square
footage and land uses proposed.
2. Adjustment for Peak Parking Factor: The
factors are those specified in the City of Boynton Beach
detailed earlier in this report and indicate a need
spaces, for the section of development south of
Boulevard.
3. Analysis of Hourly Accumulations: Parking accumulation
curves are selected by reviewing the ULI data nd incorporating
site specific conditions.
4. Estimate of Shared Parking: The hourly parking demand
for each land use is merged to estimate overall shared parking
demand. This is simply the hour by hour addition of parking
demand for each use to estimate aggregate demand.
parking
Code as
for 984
Quantum
THE ANALYSIS
------------
------------
Applying the ULI methodology to Sybar Square yielded the
hourly parking accumulation curves for each of the four land
uses for weekday and Saturday conditions.
Figure 1 - Retail Parking Accumulation - Weekday
Figure 2 - Office Parking Accumulation - Weekday
Figure 3 - Restaurant Parking Accumulation - Weekday
Figure 4 - Cinema Parking Accumulation - Weekday
-3-
~
ooogoog~oooooooogoog
o 0 0 .' .. .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- .- -.
._ ." ." 0 .-t (\j _" __ .- .- -' .- .- .. 0 --' C\.I
~ro~_.-t.-t~C\.I~~m~~ro~.-t.-t.-t
HOUR OF THE DA't
REI AIL
\JEEKDAY
FIGURE # 1
c==MDJYr
tljRRAY-DUDECK . ASSOCIATES, PA
7301 \/. pA\.METTD PARK U. SUITE 208
BOCA RATON. f\.DRIDA
(305) 391-6336
------------~-
..--------
100
90
z 80
0
......
~
<t
-l 70
~
~
~
u 60
u
<I:
L1 50
z
t--<
~
~
<I: 40
Q..
~
<I: 30
w
0...
~ 20
0
l-
Z 10
w
u
~
w 0
0...
:L
<r
0
0
lJ)
*"
~
0000... 000
000000000000000000
9996~ru0999999996~ru
~m~~__~ruM~m~~m~_--
HOUR OF THE DAY
OFFICE
WEEKDAY
FIGURE #2
c=::=M~
MURRAY-DUDECk .. ASSOCIATES, PA
7301 V. PALMETTDPARK RD. SUITE 208
BOCA RA~ FLORIDA
(3C)S) 391-6336
100
90
z 80
0
.......
I-
<I:
--I 70
~
~
~
u 60
u
<I:
L:J 50
z
.......
~
~
<I: 40
CL
~
<[ 30
w
CL
u.. 20
0
I-
Z 10
w
U
0::
W 0
CL
L
<[
0
0
IJ)
..
L
ooOCL 000
000000000000000000
o 0 0 - __ -. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -. .. --
.. .. -- 0 ~ (\j 0 _.. -- -- -. -. -- -- -- 0 .-4 C\J
~ro~.-4__~NM~mlJ)~ro~---
HOUR OF THE DAY
RESTAURANT
\JEEKDAY
FIGURE #3
===M~
MURRAY-DUDECk It ASSDCIATES, PA
7301 V. PALMETTD PARK RD. SUITE 208
BOCA RAT~ FLORIDA
(305) 391-6336
100
90
z 80
0
.......
r-
<I:
-l 70
:::>
~
:::>
u 60
u
<I:
CJ 50
z
.......
::::.c
~
<I: 40
Q...
~
<I: 30
w
Q...
lL.. 20
0
~
z 10
w
u
~
w 0
Q...
::E
<[
0
0
\D
~
ooOCL 000
000000000000000000
~996~ru0999999q96~ru
~m~~~_~ruMv~\D~m~-~-
HOUR OF THE DAY
CINEMA
'WEEKDAY
FIGURE #4
=M~
MURRAY-DUDECk , ASSOCIATE$, PA
7301 V. PALMETTO PARK RD. SUITE 208
IDCA RATON, FLORIDA
(305) 391-6336
100
90
z 80
Cl
-
I--
<[ 70
..J
~
~
:::)
u 60
u
<[
l:J 50
z
.....
~
~ 40
<[
Q.
~
<[ 30
w
Q.
u.. 20
(J
I--
Z 10
w
u
~
w 0
0..
~
<[
0
g
\0
~
oooggg~ooooooccggg
coo-_-oocccoccc---
- - - 0 _ N - - - - - - - - c _ N
~m~___~NMv~\O~m~___
HOUR OF THE DAY
ANCHOR
\JEEKDAY
FIGURE itA
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
7301 'W. PALMETTO PARK RD. SUITE 208
BOCA RATON, FLORIDA
(305) 391-6336
-M/j)M-
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
Figure 5 - Retail Parking Accumulation - Saturday
Figure 6 - Office Parking Accumulation - Saturday
Figure 7 - Restaurant Parking Accumulation - Saturday
Figure 8 - Cinema Parking Accumulation - Saturday
Retail in Sybar Square is expected to be made up
mostly of small stores with some medium size stores that might
act as anchors, but are not anchor stores in the traditional
sense of a grocery store or large retail store. A wide
range of businesses could be tenants in these Retail stores.
These retail businesses do not exhibit the same parking
characteristics as the ULI data. These businesses also tend to
close sooner in the day than a traditional anchor.
The office complex will exhibit the normal traffic
characteristics of a professional office which includes a high
peaking effect during the morning hours and continued through the
noon time. The afternoon hours tend to be dispersed as a lot of
professionals are in fact on field trips or away from the office.
Figure #2 exhibits the parking accumulation activity during the
normal weekday office operation. The amount of parking activity
at an office after 6:00 p.m. substantially drops off.
Furthermore, the utilization of the office facility on Saturday
is significantly less than the weekday operation. Utilizing the
ULI data, there is a factor adjustment of 1/6 the parking demand
during Saturday as compared to weekday operations. This would
offer substantial shared parking capacity during the Saturday
time periods.
The restaurant facility will be a
which will generate the normal noon time
activity. Figure #3 reflects the normal
for this type of restaurant, which
parking needs are after 6:00 p.m.
substantially utilized during that time
quality type restaurant
activity and dinner hour
parking characteristics
reflects a predominant
This facility would be
period.
The cinema parking activities are different than the other
uses. Guided by the ULI data, conservative estimates of parking
accumulation were used. It was assumed that weekday matinees
would be offered and patronized. Furthermore, it was assumed that
each weekday evening would be a sellout at each of the screens.
This is a virtual impossibility, but these assumptions have been
used to present the worst case and to provide enough parking
during these times.
-4-
100
90
z 80
0
I-<
I-
<I:
-.J 70
:::>
~
:::>
u 60
u
<I:
CJ 50
z
I-<
~
~
<I: 40
Q....
~
<I: 30
w
Q....
L... 20
0
.....
z 10
w
u
~
w 0
(L
~
-<I:
0
0
~
~
~
000(L 000
000000000000000000
9996~ru099q999996~ru
" 0) Q'\ ....... _ _ ..::. (\J (Y) ~ If) ~ f'-. (X) (J'\ - ~... -
HOUR OF THE DAY
RET AIL
SATURDAY
rIGURE # 5
~
c==M~
MURRAY-DUDECk , ASSDCIA YEs, P.A.
7301 V. PALMETTO PARK RD. SUITE 208
BOCA RATON, F"LDRlDA
(3C)S) 391-6336
- ....
100
90
z 80
0
.....
t-
<[
--I 70
:J
~
:J
U 60
u
<I
L:J 50
z
-'
~
fr:
<[ 40
0..
~
<[ 30
w
0..
l1.. 20
0
~
z 10
w
U
Q:
W 0
(L
~
<I:
0
0
\,0
~
L
000(L 000
000000000000000000
o 0 0 -, _..- 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 - - -.
-. . - -- 0 ....... (\j 0 .. - .- -- .- -- .- -. 0 --' C\l
~ro~--,--,--,~ruM~m\'o~ro~--,--,--,
HOUR OF THE DAY
OFFICE
SATURDAY
FIGURE # 6
c=M~
MURRAY-DUDECk , ASSOCIATE$, PA
7301 W. PALMETTD PARK RD. SUITE 208
IDCA RAT~ F"LDRIDA
(305) 391-6336
",
100
90
z 80
0
t-l
~
<[
....J 70
:J
~
::>
u 60
u
<[
L:J 50
z
t-l
~
~
<[ 40
0-
~
<[ 30
w
0-
u... 20
0
t-
Z 10
w
u
~
w 0
CL
~
<[
0
0
\D
..
L
DODO- 000
000000000000000000
9996~ruD999999996~ru
~oo~___~ruM~m\D~OO~-__
HOUR Dr THE DAY
RESTAURANT
SATURDAY
c==:MfDJ::J-
MURRAY-DUDECk , ASSDCIA TE$, PA
7301 V. PALMETTD PARK RD. SUITE 208
BOCA RATON. n..DRIDA
(305) 391-6336
FIGURE # 7,
100
90
z 80
0
.......
I--
<[
-l 70
~
~
~
u 60
u
<r
l:J 50
z
I-l
~
fr:
<[ 40
0....
~
<[ 30
w
0....
L... 20
0
I-
Z 10
w
U
Q::'
W 0
CL
~
<r
C>
C>
\D
r
~
c>c>c>g~,g~c>c>c>oooc>c>g~g
000--"::"-- 00000000--"::"--
- -- -. 0 o-i ru 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- .- 0 .-l C\.I
~ro~o-i.-l.-l~ruM~m\D~ro~.-l.-l.-l
HOUR OF THE DAY
CINEMA
SATURDAY
FIGURE #8
===M~
tlJRRA Y -DUDECk , ASSDCIA TE$, P.A.
7301 V. PALMETTO PARK RD. SUITE 208
IDCA RAT~ FLORIDA
(305) 391-6336
-_____~m'_._.__~______.~___._,.__._.____~~._____
100
90
z 80
0
-
~
~
-I 70
::>
~
::>
u 60
u
~
l:) 50
z
-
~
0::
~ 40
0-
~
~ 30
w
a..
u.. 20
0
J-
Z 10
w
u
~
w 0'
Q..
~
<[
0
0
\0
~
oooggg~ooooooooggg
gggO~NoggggggggO~N
~m~___~NM~~~~m~-__
HOUR OF THE DAY
ANCHOR
SATURDAY
FIGURE tt5A
MURRAY-DUDECK Ie ASSOCIATES, P.A.
7301 'W. PALMETTO PARK RD. SUITE 208
BOCA RATON, FLORIDA
(305) 391-6336
..
-M~
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
Seasonal variations are addressed in the ULI report, and
the City of Boynton Beach Ordinance. In each case, the
variations would tend to decrease the parking demands during the
off-season.
Because the ULI data has been collected nationwide, seasonal
variations do not describe experiences in South Florida. It is
assumed in this report that the peak season for general retail
office, restaurant and cinema all occur at the same time, and
that no shared parking benefit can be derived from the relation
of different peak seasons. Once again, this assumption serves to
present the worst case, and supply the most parking.
Percentages for the parking accumulation curves have been
applied to peak hour demand for parking in each land use to
arrive at calculation of shared parking values. Table 1 & lA
shows the total parking demand for weekdays, and Table 2 & 2A for
Saturdays, for the southerly & northerly section of the
development respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
-----------
-----------
Weekday shared parking demands peak at 8:00 p.m. in the
evening, for the southerly portion, largely due to the cinema
use. The peak demand from the ULI methodology is 648 spaces. The
northerly portion parking peak demand occurs during 2:00 pm, with
a maximum of 195 spaces required.
Saturdays have a peak hour demand of 622 spaces, at 8:00 p.m
for the southerly portion and 142 spaces at 1:00 pm for the
northerly portion.
Since a greater aggregate peak hour demand occurs on
the weekday, it will be used for design purposes.
Boynton Beach requires a buffer of ten (10%) percent above
the ULI calculations to provide for natural turnover of parking
and unexpected fluctuating peaks. If this was provided at Sybar
Square, 713 spaces & 215 spaces for the southerly & northerly
sections respectively would be supplied.
The current site plan
272 spaces respectively for the
of the Sybar Square Development.
concept is applicable to this
allows
southerly
Therefore,
project.
for 798
& northerly
the shared
spaces &
sections
parking
-'
-5-
,..
-Mfj).t-
MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
TABLE 1
WEEKDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION
(Southerly Section Of The Development)
TIME OFFICE RETAIL CINEMA RESTAURANT TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6:00 a.m. 2 0 0 0 2
7:00 13 24 0 1 38
8:00 41 54 0 2 97
9:00 61 60 0 3 124
10:00 (~ 90 0 5 160
11:00 120 0 8 193
/ 18^~-')lld)85
12:00 noon 59 13 337
I ; ,.1:~ t :> II
1:00 p.m. 59 I ;)"--- 400
180 tALi' 143 18
2:00 63 180) 200 15 458
---...---'
3:00 61 172 229 15 477
4:00 50 157 343 13 563
5:00 31 145 400 18 594
6:00 15 91 458 23 587
7:00 5 60 514 eSI 604
-----'<-,
~ ' \ ....----,
76 1i\0l'?'~Y 8:00 (5' (572 \ l~ ' !
"-.-) ~/
9:00 2 24 572 ',25 623
10:00 2 19 \\:~!3) 23 621
11 : 00 0 0 458 18 476
12:00 mid. 0 0 400 13 413
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.\ 100% Parking
Spaces 65 308 572 25 970
~
MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
TABLE lA
WEEKDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION
(Northerly Section Of The Development)
ANCHOR
TIME OFFICE RETAIL RETAIL TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6:00 a.m. 2 0 0 2
7:00 13 11 8 32
8:00 41 24 18 83
9:00 61 54 19 134
,/ -
10:00 ,/65" 87 29 181
11:00 65 112 38 215
, /
-. (, -""
12:00 noon 59 125 .,5a 242
1:00 p.m. 59 G2~' 58 245
2:00 63 125 " 58 ( 2 z(6)
~. ~--/
3:00 61 122 56 239
4:00 50 112 51 213
5:00 31 102 47 180
6:00 15 105 29 149
7:00 5 114 20 139
8:00 5 112 15 132
9:00 2 78 8 88
10:00 2 41 7 50
11:00 0 17 0 17
12:00 mid. 0 0 0 0
------------------------------------------------,-----------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
100% Parking
Spaces 65 128 98 291
,..--. ...
,
-M~
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
TABLE 2
SATURDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION
(Southerly Section Of The Development)
TIME OFFICE RETAIL CINEMA RESTAURANT TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6:00 a.m. 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 3 10 0 1 14
8:00 7 30 0 1 38
9:00 11 91 0 2 104
10:00 11 136 0 2 149
11:00 11 151 0 3 165
12:00 noon 10 166 172 8 356
1:00 p.m. 10 180 285 11 486
2:00 11 161 400 11 583
3:00 11 157 400 11 579
4:00 9 151 400 11 571
5:00 6 115 400 18 539
6:00 3 61 458 23 545
7:00 1 40 514 24 579
8:00 1 24 572 25 622
9:00 0 6 572 25 603
10:00 0 0 572 24 596
11 : 00 0 0 458 21 479
12:00 mid. 0 0 400 18 418
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
100% Parking
Spaces 11* 308 572 25 970
*Note: Office Parking Adjusted for Saturday (1/6)
~
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
TABLE 2A
SATURDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION
(Northerly Section Of The Development)
TIME
OFFICE
ANCHOR
RETAIL
RETAIL
TOTAL
6:00 a.m.
o
o
o
o
7:00
3
7
4
4
11
8:00
13
10
30
9:00
11
39
29
79
10:00
11
58
44
113
11:00
12:00 noon
10
94
109
49
53
154
11
172
1:00 p.m.
10
128
58
196
2:00
11
125
52
188
3:00
11
122
51
184
4:00
9
112
49
170
5:00
6
102
37
145
6:00
3
105
20
128
7:00
1
114
13
128
8:00
1
112
8
121
9:00
o
78
3
81
10:00
o
41
o
41
11:00
o
17
o
17
12:00 mid.
o
o
o
o
------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
100% Parking
Spaces
11*
128
98
237
*Note: Office Parking Adjusted for Saturday (1/6)
,-_. .
-M6>r
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
ORD}NANCE NO. 86-8
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Using the formula specified in Ordinance 86-8, a buffer of
at least ten percent (10%) needs to be provided "to ensure a
sufficient number of parking spaces are available at times of
peak hour use."
surplus shared parking
Buff er =
on-site + shared parking provided
For Sybar Square Plaza (South of
"nG IJ- 'f-'r
Buffer =
x 100% =
Quantum Boulevard)
,;15'. ;Z ~
~%
400 + 172
This is further supported below:
Ro = Retail (includes office + restaurant) needs by
Ordinance
Ru = retail (includes office + resturant) needs by
ULI
Ra = retail available = Ro - Ru
Co = cinema needs by Ordinance
Total = provided on-site
At Sybar Square Plaza (South of Quantum Boulevard)
Total = 798 parking spaces
Ro = 398
Ru = 76
Co = 572
-6-
~'
...- ,
~~
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
The following calculations apply:
Ra
=
Ro - Ru
= 398 - 76 = 322
On-Site
=
Total - Ro
= 798 - 398 = 400
Shared Parking Provided
=
Co - On-Site = SPP
= 572 - 400 = 172
S, Buffer
= 150 x 100%
---------- = 26.0%
400 + In
Therefore, sufficient buffer exists to satisfy the City of
Boynton Beach shared parking ordinance.
-7-
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
ORDINANCE NO. 86-8
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Using the formula specified in Ordinance 86-8, a buffer of
at least ten percent (10%) needs to be provided "to ensure a
sufficient number of parking spaces are available at times of
peak hour use."
surplus shared parking
Buffer =
on-site + shared parking provided
For Sybar Square Plaza (North of Quantum Boulevard)
r'
16
Buffer
x 100%
24.6%
38 + 27
This is further supported below:
Ro Retail needs by Ordinance
Ru retail needs by ULI
Ra retail available = Ro - Ru
0 office needs by Ordinance
Total = provided on-site
At Sybar Square Plaza (North of Quantum Boulevard)
Total 264 parking spaces
Ro 226
Ru = 183
)
o
65
-8-
MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES
The following calculations apply:
Ra
=
Ro - Ru
226 - 183 = 43
On-Site
Total - Ro
264 - 226 = 38
Shared Parking Provided
o - On-Site = SPP
65 - 38 = 27
S, Buffer
16 x 100%
---------- = 24.6%
38 + 27
"
Therefore, sufficient buffer exists to satisfy the City of
Boynton Beach shared parking ordinance.
-9-
.)
.\r-
--
-
EXHIBIT 28
REPRESENTATIVE HOURLY ACCUMULATION BY
PERCENTAGE OF PEAK HOUR
Hot~'
R"I.dul1al RUldf'n. cO...t'....Cf COftv..
Offiu R.w! b'U\ltut ('UIf'1M faon CBb] h.aJ teBD) (iuUI Room lI:ut.',UUl Lounllt R.... lJoe Ana
, 1 _"0.. W..kdoy Salunloy 1lle.kdoy !ia1UlUy 1lleekdoy 5.aturUy Doily "'......eli, s"turd.ly Doldy Wrl"lld.) 5.1&011.0..)' \I.1rt'.~)' "lIU.4.)' Deily Deily
den 30. 100"" lOO".. 100"" 1(10.... OU"'I 20"" :01'"
6 00 am, "
20 200(1 BOb 3qfJ 20", '" 87 Q5 QS Sc 70 20 20
700 am, - "
':00 a m 63 60 18 10 5 3 70 SR 'l0 (>5 00 20 20 SOOn 50"u
\) 00 am. 03 80 42 30 10 6 73 81 87 55 cO 20 20 100 100
1000 a,m 100 80 68 45 20 8 cR 7.; 85 15 10 20 20 100 100
1100 a,m, 100 100 87 73 30 10 SQ 71 85 ,;5 35 30 30 100 100
IZOO Noon 90 100 97 85 50 30 30''., cO 71 ~5 30 30 50 30 100 100
1:00 p.m 90 80 100 95 70 45 70 50 70 85 30 30 70 45 100 100
Z:OO p,m 97 60 97 100 60 45 70 cO 71 85 35 35 60 45 100 100
3:00 pm, 93 40 95 100 60 45 70 61 73 85 33 40 55 45 100 100
.:00 p,m, ii 40 87 90 50 45 70 co 75 87 -15 50 50 45 100 100
5:00 pm, 47 20 79 75 70 60 70 " Sl 00 60 bO 70 60 100 100
6:00 pm, 23 20 82 65 90 90 80 8.5 85 92 70 70 00 90 ,100 100
7:00 p.m 7 20 !i9 60 . 100 95 90 o.j !i7 04 75 SO 100 95 100 100
8:00 pm, 7 20 87 55 100 100 100 '/6 92 Ob 00 00 100 100 100 100
9:00 p,m, 3 61 40 100 100 100 08 05 08 95 95 100 100 100 100
10:00 p,m, 3 32 38 90 95 100 09 9b 00 100 100 00 95 50 50
11 00 pm, 13 13 70 85 80 100 48 100 100 100 70 85
IZ:OO Mid, 50 70 70 lOO 100 100 100 100 50 70
night
. ~ ... \,..
J :5
:3..
'.::: .~
~::g
:--~
o--~
.:e~.
. t::e
e c.f
J:-S
:1>i
:1::.
:::e
ng
. .11
of
'in ~....
,1,
'5
involving office, regional retail, and residential facili-
ties (see exhibit 28)_ Nonroom-related hotel activities
and entertainment uses varied significantly, howe\Ter.
If site-specific data are not available for these two land
uses, survey results could be used.
Accumulation curves are then estimated for each
land use, based on the selected hourly values de-
scnbed in terms of the percent of maximum design-day
parking demand expected at every hour during the day,
The parking demand factor (step 2) multiplied by
quantity of land use (step 1) produces an estimate of
peak parking demand. This value multiplied by each
hourly percentage produces an estimate of parking
demand for every land use component by hour of day.
ITtP 4: ESTIMATE OF SHAlED 'AIkINC
The hourly parking demand for each land use is
merged to estimate overall shared parking demand for
a proposed project. This step is simply the hour-by-
hour addition of parking demand for each use to esti-
mate the aggregate accumulation. As noted previously,
the method described above should be used for week-
day and Saturday conditions to test for the controlling
value.
-
SAMPLE USE If THE METHODOLOGY
The following sample situation has been devised to
demonstrate the use of the recommended
methodology.
1. Objective: To estimate the peak parking require-
ments for a proposed mixed-use development.
2. Plan: The proposed development has the following
components:
· Office = 400.000 square feet GLA
· Retail = 300,000 square feet GLA
· Hotel = 500 rooms plus 5,000 square feet of
restaurant and conference facilities with 200-seat
capacity.
3. Location: The project will be located in the down-
town of a medium-size urban community whose
regional population is approximately 1.5 million.
4, Mode split:17 Based on surveys conducted at exist.
ing developments in the downtown, it is estimated
that 7S percent of employees and patrons and 50
percent of hotel guests will use autos. The number
of persons per auto is assumed to be typical (1.2 for
employees, 1.8 for patrons, 1.4 for hotel guests).
17"Mode split" refers to the percentage of people ata site who use a
particular mode of transportation. with the total of all modes
equaling 100 percent.
47
,
~. ,s t (f A /Z tJ c{l1J..;' j( E ,<; J [~ P{A-~
'f..-. _~'1 T t j);' T!r -i-)./ Fo R 11 Jr T+ o},/ 0/1 .{f n- porN
f!ff:[)5 TO /3 t f:.f3 v;r;5 ~ [) To T),;j)kJtIt: p;::.oPf5A)
PAl<. fc.j Nt:.. C/tuuL krro),/~
.2. )5 A- (uJo.P-c Tf:. JrFfJC .5 +(();!rL- )vEfPEP III
Ou, kJ.J T u. /{ tfL v Ok)J j) N2 u 51:: c T C J/ T!0lt Ai {. i::S ;;
-I f 5D J j),f \/-1- J fo)J () F f2t:5 /,0)J5 r!3 f- Lf r '( / fJoA/JJ+
~ . ;t f'/<. (:: c fu. T (o N c, L5 L /.:. wJ\-U Fs N' 0/,05 t: j) "+-{v/V~
rrfe ).10 f2 Tit r: R AI /'/2o/,;::/?Jr 1301) /ij[)Jr/< Y (';JoN J
~ .. por;~ WkLL JJvTEf<Ff;-j2E r;vFTlt p;<M))A6..r::--
. .5 T!< fA L T CA. R F 5 ;I- (.o)),{ }/ 0 ;< 1ft l;!< 0 f' r: R r'( lJ (/ u )/ lit!
5 . \ ct!tc( ~ :Pv T F;< :(0/< [A )JlH{ M-' J Nt. - j2 I~);-j(
.1 -
~ (7 ( -r" ," ;') 1""" ;:1 ''I:;; () ,/ )j" 7 ') L [ r:=
Ij~. {t 0 . 11(..0 1'\ ( 1'" H,1 , 0 LV . ,\(;, ,,- -z Ai;) /1 v I/::
.5 jj3 /t/~ 54:' elA- /2!:- 5/f/rR {~j) fA--'A ;C.r)/ ~
;. It (It. 5 T I::: [-=- ;:- ;: /< [~)V L!: .5~ f'> /~- C ;;~ ;1-= :f C C1 L-{ j) 0 ( e,{ /\-~j{/
,It- )j l~ [t - Jr R IJ I;;:: f'> C{ (5 { -reA- r it 0 )/ j A/ ;2[= J'l C) /~ j-
;z, tWit t Af(!; t'A/~jc+)v~ /l-ce (,v't iAc--t r-.roA; (' u^, Vj35
~_C;ij--() w Iv ;=-cJ /~ _~'/\- r LA /~p,lf- 'f (Iv /-f-E)! It-l--~[tr:;s T
~1{ ( L{ J1 u (. It- r +0 AI OC'( 0 f2 s ()//;:-!-~;fj) AI S ?
r
3 ' tvlt y j) () fs TI1 i: P c/t- k P/t)2 /~':rA/~ he (<</'1&{ c A- r -fo Jl/
fc)!( T If E (/ FF j'{ /~ [j u;r [J}:r A/~ o~~{ rA/2 A- T
l.f'f-' (;} 0 /'> J1 Lv if E JV t f? f vIo U _5 /2 /3 j\;:J /C!-) --> 0j}.Jt:r r( ,L~L)
7(:) T If ~r S 0 F f ~rc E _T)} /) -r ( A-- r t~';) 71th / f /:.-::-: A-/c
!/+-f(k~rJj( hccu/[0{tkT 70/(; 101-\ S-TJ1+tA-/2
() /::/;:;jC E (J~5f~ (P/o [A{ L) /)L-A}~ ;f r ;tJ>I~RoX-J--/(A-jf~{,
I {) : 00 - 1/ ;'00 A-,Jt ?
Y S_0S: J>l fA ~______(' /,t if /<L~l) l~ /,f) J-- +=-1lI t.. ___
(1 )Jc-/(Jr-{colJ~J::: _5-7.2
-I~+[/OFf.FcE {co/);:J -_sr~-"31r
70 (/tL I2I--=Q CA+/~_I---=-/-\ - 170
J.!/ 74L- /'/'(0 v-Ft\SP == 7rct
fl /3/ Jr-/- L / 0 FJ~ +tE 0# _.5-1' r r:
(J)) L- J(A- 0); - 5 -r r E
3trJrRr:-P Jt-v).J[ A L';C[:: JrF r: 00
f3 F - ~ f; ,2 <6 '0 - f7,2 ~ / ~ / _ -~ '~([I n ~ / - j c!J ..3 /0-
.'5 {Ai /~Cf'.-.- =:: 0 _ ~;iP /'- <:./'-"/0 ~. /r:
too T / 7.2 0<.
- -Jlff
-
- too
-
- ;ZC(~
-
o /< / If-
.> ~ 100 -i 0200 = 2. 1/ 3f/t c f: 5 ,RI5Q C(+;2 ~-P
,1 7 ;( C; /).At: [-=.-5- f) ft:'> 0 v r- jJ I-~ /J
j r <,)l/l-CL-~~) /Ij/E /5 P j5fJ
Ii
,
~~
,
\ , t
'--'r
~
I
I
< 5' 'f OJr-f( _~ r1 rA *12- E ->+ T}~~ f~___
fl- Ec tJ 1'1 Jrl END [) f< I v E W' *7 {' 0 )/,)//~(..r ~p)l_ _ __._..._.._ ..
f
F -~~ --
pDJ 2 ~ [fJ ,~\j~F~/<- GvA-U AD j A-c~.)JT (v.;(Je g r j;--.lj(.D f)~ISL~Y'
I /Jl.j uNDA-f2 Y Jju ff:S .NoTAPli/"3.1f},? 10 /J L- .2t !~;;~L.
t f/< 0 ^ P (J 0 P 0((, Tee /10 0- #/)!-'IS X . -......-'... _.-
I
o ill) c l.(:~" , v /0 4' 0 f-~L!;j '?~u~P';.~.-l{'~.~-~~~I~'_-.-
! l f <' < 0 J f /,t c. .> '1M. ~ '" - ~- .tL~ '" - __'L tj2~-~A-71"o."l'1-- ,----
liB < . ~ [, , " c, "" L /"--~j -"-U.~_ A 'u~"Jf' J~ <(l-<2-Vl-- -
I, I, < fr < ''''r K. < r) aLJ-JL r -,",_",-,'",--c. '-'{._~.-~--~-..-...--_..- .
It.iC~o ~ ~ {)L t ~ <-_F{~ ~'_dE IAJ' r \vtJ~.j'-'j~":.t.'o._~_..1o, _-t-[.~___..____
i l _ "- /, - (, / /) '( tlf- i
if I ,5 5 H. f{Vt (~ <2 f- ^,-.jJ"1.1 L_~.I. I/LfP'C_v ..\AI1..'. .. L.._. ....-.----.------------..
! ~ v
@fl..0' J ~. L '(Y (~ ~(Jt" .~(~~ ~:~"-, = ;;-Zl- ~-~;=t:,:;=~--
!' to v~ 'PI:, ~L:r<--<>, "-""-';F- f '-Jt}:,~ .-A~L1'--~::::J---
I' v C s ,-1.. ... 1-, ~J::.o V' A- ~- ---------- -.-
- evl! k 00 l fer rl-~t~4=:1 ~~a_~~I~1_~ ~~~~Ji~
'r :(f:: ~e:< 't~~-[~~:L5C~:-~--~~~~-=
@ : Ie ~ : j ), ' r ~M. , f. LO" L ~ ~ J--,L~L~L=: ,~~l~;;-
. t ~ " r 1 , :r Lv,' tL"y-"'" '.e .nA 5- 'l~cTL,,- --,,-il-~ J,~-,
(Z)n [ f, ',t ": Jk ~~-~ 1 1<' deL, v" ".JCC-.f~-l';fyn---
G)!:p/"J' ',,,, (u :Jv~0/^r -;r~~[~!~l.F'lf .. 5' /~-
l('" ^ M C0 c UI "J( r d'? " '" ~ (' Ie < ~ ," _ ," 1 <'.VI
I Ji1. '0 'I- C .>' ::( <' # ~J</h1. ~tJ.A.u-- ) ~ g~
..
~ \~
"XL2001 XL2002
~+
~
~
XL2003
XL2004
Mounting Styles
Wattage
Lamp
Voltage
Color
Specification Example
XL21JOl . 4~ HPS ~ 11/ PC/F2 OBZ
A Mounting Style F Options
B Wattage PR Photo Receptacle only
C Lamp Type PC Photo Receptacle & Cell
MV Mercury Vapor HS 9{)0 House Shield
-... MH Metal Halide PS Polycarbonate Shield
HPS High Pressure Sodium F1 Single Fuse (120, 240, 271)
0 Voltage F2 Double Fuse (208, 480)
TM Tenon Top Mounting
120, 208, 240, 277, 480
MT (Multi-tap) G Color
E Light Distributions DBZ Duranodic Bronze (313)
DBK Duranodic Black
I, II, III, V NA Natural Anodized
(-
STANDARDS OPTIONS
. FINISH: ACRYLlC-"BZ", BRONZE OR FINISHES: DURANODIC BRONZE (313) -
"BK", BLACK - SPECIFY - "DBZ", DURANODIC BLACK - "DBK"
(STRAIGHT POLES ONLY) . BASE COVER - 2 PIECE
· POLE CAP: CAST ALUMINUM ALUMINUM - "BC"
. HANDHOLE WITH COVER . WEATHERPROOF RECEPTACLE -
. ANCHOR BOLTS, NUTS, WASHERS & "RECP"
TEMPLATE . HINGED BASE - "HB"
. PROTECTIVE WRAPPING FORSHIPMENT . TENON TOP - "TT", SPECIFY SIZE &
HEIGHT
. GROUND LUG - "GL"
(EPA: 80 MPH WIND)
SQUARE STRAIGHT ALUMINUM CATALOG NO. POLE SHAFT WALL BASE EPA APPROX.
HEIGHT SIZE THICKNESS TYPE WEIGHT
1 ~HAFT SSAB6308-5 8' 3" ,125 A 10,0 25
SIZE SSAB6408-5 8' 4" ,125 B 15,0 26
POLE CAP t8~'. ;j SSAB6310-5 10' 3" ,125 A 6,9 '28
SSAB6410-5 10' 4" ,125 B 12,0 31
SSAB6312-5 12' 3" ,125 A 5,0 29
~ ~ SSAB6412-5 12' 4" ,125 B 10,0 36
!.2 SSAB6412-0 12' 4" ,250 B 17.4 61
w 'li_
J: SSAB6314-5 14' 3" ,125 A 3,6 33
~ 7' BOLT CIRCLE SSAB6414-5 14' 4" ,125 B 8,0 41
HANOHOLE SSAB6414-0 14' 4" ,250 B 13,9 70
& COVER BASE TYPE" A" SSA B6416-5 16' 4" ,125 B 7,5 45
( SSA B641 6-0 16' 4" ,250 B 11,0 79
SSAB6418-5 18' 4" ,125 B 6,75 51
t:"W:j SSAB6418-0 18' 4" ,250 B 8,6 87
t10'~.~ SSAB6420-5 20' 4" ,125 B 5,0 56
SSAB6420-0 20' 4" ,250 B 7,0 96
~ SSAB6620-8 20' 6' ,188 C 17,0 123
~ SSAB6620-0 20' 6" ,250 C 20,0 155
SSAB6424-0 24' 4" ,250 C 3,0 114
SSAB6624-8 24' 6" ,188 C 15,0 135
SSAB6624-0 24' 6' ,250 C 18,0 182
SSAB6628-8 28' 6" ,188 C 10.0 155
87~. BOLT CIRCLE 12" BOLT CIRCLE SSAB6628-0 28' 6" ,250 C 16,0 209
SSAB6630-8 30' 6" ,188 C .8.0 165
BASE TYPE "B" BASE TYPE "C" SSAB6630-0 30' 6" ,250 C 13,0 237
SSAB6635-0 35' 6" ' ,250 C 8,0 271
l ROUND STRAIGHT ALUMINUM CATALOG NO, POLE SHAFT WALL BASE EPA APPRO X,
HEIGHT SIZE THICKNESS TYPE WEIGHT
~~h'=:j RSAB6308-5 8' 3" ,125 A 5,0 19
RSAB6310-5 10' 3" ,125 A 4,0 22
RSAB6410-5 10' 4" 125 B 7,0 32
~~ RSAB6312-5 12' 3" ,125 A 3,0 25
o BOLT CIRCLE RSAB6412-5 12' 4" ,125 B 6,0 36
A( - BASE TYPE "A" RSAB6314-5 14' 3" ,125 A 2,0 28
RSAB6414-5 14' 4" ,125 B 5,0 40
RSAB6416-5 16' 4" ,125 B 4,0 44
RSAB6418-0 18' 4" ,250 B 6,3 70
RSA 86418-5 18' 4" ,125 B 3,5 48
RSA86420-0 20' 4" ,250 8 5,3 77
RSAB6420-5 20' 4" ,125 B 3,0 52
RSAB6424-0 24' 4" ,250 B 3,0 91
RSAB6524-0 24' 5" .250 C 5,0 115
( ,
BASE TYPE "B" f1' BOLTClRCLE
6Vo" BOLT CIRCLE BASE TYPE "C"
4658 Old Peachtree Rd. D Norcross, GA 30071 D Toll Free 1-800-24143170 In Georgia 1-800-243-9393 or 404448-1972
-~- -- -
(i) TM XLG Series
TrlmbleHouse Area Lighter
(
(
Luminaire Dimensions
Watllge A B Mounting Arm f,P.A,
3S thru 175 16" SQ 8';," 2"x5"x6" Long 18
250 thru 400 20"SQ, 8'4" 2"x5"x6" Long 2,2
1000 24"SQ, 8'4" 2"x5"x6" Long 2,9
Mounting Styles Available
9 6 J20
XLG2001 XLG2002 XLG2003
(. ~ KJ ~
" XLC2005
XLS2fXJ4 XLG2007
Specification Features
Housing
One piece extruded aluminum side panel. Single corner welded and sealed_
Minimum wall thickness ,125. Press-formed aluminum top cover interlocks
with housing extrusion. Internally sealed for weather proofing with tubular
silicone gasket,
Lens Assembly
One piece heavy gauge ~xtruded aluminum door frame securely seals heat
tempered impact resistant glass lens_ Door internally sealed for weather
proofing with silicone gasket. Door frame hinged at one end and is com-
pletely removable for cleaning without the use of a single tool, Two spring
loaded stainless steel latches close and seal the optical chamber. Vandal
resistant Lexan shield can be mounted to the door frame as an option.
Optical Chamber
One piece hydro formed reflector is standard with Specular Alzak finish in
an IES type'" distribution_ Uniquely designed spun-faceted reflector avail-
able in type V square pattern. (Types I & II distributions available upon
request.)
Lamp Socket
Porcelain mogul base. Appropriate 4KV or 5KV pulse-rated socket provided
for High Pressure Sodium Lamps. Socket securely mounted to reffector
housing provided with quick disconnect fasteners.
Ballast Assembly
Ballasts are High Power Factor (90% or better) capable of providing reliable
lamp restarting down to -200 F/ -29'> C, Assemblies mounted on unitized
module for easy removal and to facilitate field wiring,
Mounting Bracket
Heavy gauge (.125) rectangular extruded aluminum arm is standard with
internal centering guides for ease and accuracy in mounting luminaire to
pole or wall. Two W steel mounting rods are standard. Optional yoke
bracket available for pole top mounting.
Finish
Architectural Crass I Duranodic (313) bronze is standard finish on housing_
Clear anodized a(uminum is standard on (ens frame, UL listed for wet
locations.
Ordering Information
,
Specification Guide
A Mounting Style
B Wallage
C Lamp Type
MV Mercury Vapor
---- MH Metal Halide
HPS High Pressure Sodium
o Voltage
120. 208, 240,277. 480
MT (Multi-tap)
f Light Distributions
1,/i,/fI. V
F Options
PR
PC
HS
PS
Fl
F2
TM
Photo Receptacle only
Photo Receptacle & Cell
90" House Shield
Polycarbonate Shield
Single Fuse (120. 240. 277)
Double Fuse (208. 480)
Tenon Top Mounting
G Color
OBI Duranodic Bronze (313)
OBK Ouranodic Black
NA Natural Anodized
Specification Example
I XLG2001 I 400 HPS
A I B lei 0 : f I
I PC/F2 I
DBZ
208
11/
4658 Old Peachtree Rtf. 0 Norcross. GA 30071 0 Toll Free 1-800-241-4317 D In Georgia 1-800-243-9393 or 404448-1972
c
OSpeclflcatlon Guide
I MIJd~ No. I WIttIge I limp
Specification Example
I THFt158 I 1(J() I MV
B 'c 0
Options
F1
A Model Number: THF2758
B Wattage: Maximum 150 watts
CLamp
IHC -Incandescent
MV - Mercury Vapor
----MH - Metal Halide
HPS - High Pressure Sodium
LPS - Low Pressure Sodium
(Maximum 35 watts, no
reflector required)
o Voltage: 120, 208. 240. 277
(100 watt MH and 18 watt LPS
available in 120 or 277 volts)
E Options
HS9 - 9(JJ House Shield
PE - Button Photo Cell
F1 - Single Fuse
F2 - Double Fuse (208 volts)
GFR - Ground Fault Receptacle
F Color
See Inside Back Cover
Vo/tIgI
CIJIor
FG
c'
o
120
Top C,p
Cast Louvers
Optic,' Assembty
L,mp Holder
B,I/,st Assembly
Posl Construction
8%. aD.
~B'se PI,te
~
;" ~'
Top Clp - One piece heavy gauge prec(slOli spun alum/flum(.l?5 wall)
retained by'.(3) W zinc electrOiJlated mternal sUPPOfJJ'rods. Sides are
straight and smooth with a maxlmum1J taper. No expoSiJiJ,hardware.
Cut l.ouvIrr - Decorative heavy gauge 'cast aluminum secured to top cap
and bottom post with (3) %"zlnc electro-plated support rods.
Post ConItructlIlll - One piece heavy gauge (.188 wall) extruded aluminum
secured to top by (3) %" threaded zinc electro-plated internal support rods
and to cast base by (4) flush mounted stainless steel set screws.
8m PI,t, - Heavy duty cast aluminum provided with (3) ~" x 12" zinc
electro-plated anchor bolts. nuts and washers, Ballast support structure is
welded to base for rigidity.
Optlell Ass,mbly - Precision formed upper collecting reflector is standard
with specular Alzak finish and designed for sharp cut-off.
limp Holder - Porcelain with nickel plated grip screw shell for l1Iedium base
lamps, Secured to ballast structure for lamp protection and ease of
relamping,
B,lIlSt Assembly - High power factor (90% or better) capable of providing
reliable lamp restarting down to -2f1IF/-z11C. Assemblies mounted on
"unitized module" for easy removal. Provided, with quick disconnect
fastener. ,.~.'!<,{,
!t:'i",o/'j'
Rnlsh. Trimcote'" hard-surfaced acrylic ena,m.. ei coating. Variety of colors.
,j~
ETL listed for wet IocItIIIIII 'J
Horizontallnitisl Footcandles
I5DWIR&. 35 W u.s. 100 W M.~ /IJIWU /50WH.P.1 Distance in Feet
6.0 10.3 9.0 18.2 34_3 ./ 3
1.8 3.1 2.7 5.5 10.3 V / ) j I I 6
V 1/ / / 1/ /
.63 1.1 .94 1.9 3.6 9
....- ,/ / /
.29 .49 .43 .85 1.6 ,./ / 1/ 12
.17 .30 .26 .53 1.0 - ,/ 15
.12 .46 V / /
.08 .14 _24 18
.05 .08 .07 .14 .27 V /' 21
V ....-
.02 .04 .03 _06 _11 24
3 6 9 12 15 18 21
Report based on 42" Bollard Height
" ;\;
", "
':.:^',
.:.,. ,
,:v'
CL 1602
MOUNTING STYLES
ORDER INFORMATION
CU60l
@"",,,
. ~",-:
',;,j,<,
I
A
MOUNTING
STYLES
B
MAXIMUM
WATTAGE
c
lAMP
CL1604
o
E
VOLTAGE
FINISH
A. Select mounting style from above chart
B. 250/MV, 250/MH, 150/HPS (maximum wattage available),
C. Mercury Vapor = MV, Metal Halide = MH,""--
High Pressure Sodium = HPS.
D. 120,208, 240, 277, 480, MT.
E. 313 Bronze acrylic enamel = BZ
Black acrylic enamel = BK
F. Gold Reflector = GT
Single Fuse = F1
Double Fuse (208, 480) = F2
900 Houseside cut-off = HS9
Asymmetric distribution = A
Button Photocell = PE
CL 1605
y~
NUMBER OF APPROXIMATE
LIGHTS WEIGHT I
E.P,A,
(SQ, FT.)
. }..~
F
1 29
2 68
3 102
4 136
WALL MOUNT 34
N)'A-'-Not Applicable
1,3
3,1
4,1
4,9
N/A
POLE ORDERING DATA
d
ROUND STRAIGHT
ALUMINUM
CATALOG NO,
HEIGHT
RSAB-{i410-5
10FT,
RSAB-{i412-5
12 FT,
RSAB-6414-5
14FT
EXAMPLE: lCL ~6021-11~01-lH~SI-12981-IB,ZI-~
, ABC 0 E F
<
RSAB-6416-5
16FT ,
See page 21 for additional pole data.
:j",,""
,
ROUND STRAIGHT ALUMINUM = RSAMB SERIES
With Ornamental Cast Base
Trimble House manufactures its ornamental posts from high grade extruded aluminum (alloy 6005-T61 in-
tegrally welded to heavy duty decorative bases. The shaft is 3 %" o.d. .125 minimum wall extruded
aluminum. A 3" o.d. by 4" high ,250 wall tenon is securely welded to the shaft. The decorative base is 30"
tall and has a wiring access hole with a cover plate. Cast aluminum anchor bolt nut covers are secured in
place with tamper proof screws. All poles are lightly sanded before they are cleaned to insure a superior
finish once our premium abrasion and fade resistant finish coat of acrylic enamel is applied. A 313 Bronze or
Black acrylic enamel is standard.
CATALOG POLE SHAFT WALL
NO. HEIGHT SIZE THICKNESS
RSAMB-8 8' 3~ .0.0. .125
RSAMB-10 10' 3*,'0.0. .125
RSAMB-12 12' 3~.0.0. .125
RSAMB-14 14' 3~.0.0. .125 (4) %H x 18" Bolts provided
STANDARD FEATURES (All Poles)
· Bronze or Black Acrylic Enamel finish
. Hand Hole with cover for wiring access
· Base cover or cast nut covers '.
. 3" o.d. tenon when required
· Anchor Bolts, nuts, washers and template
. Protective wrapping for shipment
OPTIONS (All Poles)
. Ouranodic 313 Bronze "OBZ"
· Ouranodic Black "OBK"
. \llkather proof Receptacle "Recp"
· Ground Lug "GL"