REVIEW COMMENTS
PARK RIDGE
PROCESSED AS EAST RIDGE PUD
SEE EAST RIDGE PUD
REZONING AND NEW SITE PLAN FILES
/... \
..... \. t ~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-093
TO: Bill Hukill
Director of Development
THROUGH: Tambri HeYden~fJ-
Planning and Zoning Director
~aOMI Jerzy Lewicki
Planning and Zoning
DATE: February 16, 1996
SUBJECT:
Plat and
Project:
Location:
Development Plans - 2nd Review
Park Ridge
East side of the intersection of
20th Avenue and N.E. 4th Street.
John Grant, Jr., Inc.
PLAT 95-011
N.E.
Agent:
File No. :
The following is a list of 2nd review comments regarding the
subdivision plat for Park Ridge. In the recently reviewed Master
Plan for this project, Planning and Zoning Department Staff has
determined that the development proposal, as presented, does not
meet City's zoning regulations and the petitioner has to do one of
the following:
1. Amend plans to comply with the current zoning requirements.
OR
2. Rezone the property to another zoning classification.
In case the petitioner would decide to amend his plans to comply
with the current zoning, another plat submittal reflecting this
compliance will need to be submitted.
Planning and Zoning Department staff has decided to review this
Plat proposal with an assumption that the petitioner will rezone
this property to PUD with an appropriate LUI classification. This
option was conveyed to the petitioner at a recent meeting between
the applicant and the City staff.
COMMENTS
1. Provide 40-foot setback east of existing duplexes located
south of the development, as required by the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The title certificate is incomplete - no signatures are
displayed on the copy delivered to our department.
3. Provide restrictive covenants for the subdivision to
clarify:
a) construction limitations regarding size of proposed
housing units and buidability of the common areas,
b) architectural controls, if applicable,
c) use and construction limitations of the drainage
area,
d) type and use ~~ water and sanitary facilities,
e) other land use controls as deemed necessary by
developers.
Also, reference these covenants on the sheet 1 of 1.
"Page 2
Memorandum No. 96-093
2nd Review - Park Ridge
File No.: PLAT 95-011
4. Provide Homeowner's Association documents.
5. Eliminate the 10 foot utility easement in the southern
portion of the parcel.
6. The pavement of the cul-de-sac is not designed to city
standards: the minimum diameter of pavement should be 90
feet.
7. The Land Development Regulations require sidewalks to be
installed regardless of form of ownership. The
petitioner may request a variance from this requirement.
RECOMMENDATION
8. For clarity of address system, rename Park Ridge Circle
beyond the south t-intersection.
NOTE:
If recommendations are approved, they shall
incorporated into the working drawings required
permits for the project.
be
for
JL:dim
xc: Central File
PL-PR-2.was
ENGINEERING MEMO #95-033
00
~@rno
FEe - 5 1996
rn
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
DATE: February 5,1996
TO: BILL CAVANAUGH, FIRE PREVo OFF.
ROBERT EICHORST, P.W. DIR.
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, P,D.
T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLAN. & ZONING DIR.
SKIP MILOR, UTIL. CHIEF FIELD INSP.
AL NEWBOLD, DEPUTY BLDG. OFF.
JOHN WILDNER, PARKS SUPER. & KEVIN HALLIHAN, FORESTER
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. PLANS CHECK/INSPECTOR 375-6283~
SUBJECT: T,R.C. 2ND REVIEW -PARK RIDGE PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
Please review the subject plat and the related infrastructure drawings to verify that your code
comments have been addressed. Ifthey have lleen complied, please sign off on the stamped set
which will be available at the February 13th TRC meeting. If they have not been met, note your
concerns in a written response to engineering by 5:00 PM February 16th. Thank you.
KRH/krh
C: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file
memotrc
DEPART ':!Nf OF DEVELOP!\mNT
ENGINEERING DMSlQN
(---k' .L
-.-..-......
- .- -_.._--_._~/)
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach,
Flori~a__..3.3~25~03-10, ....
'"\ G; fJ f2 Ii 'In IS Ij' \
I ~ ~ wl~'-JAN'"""""{.4li"',"c~~"1 i ~ ,I
UU ,f'o.
January 3, 1996
John A. Grant, Jr., Inc.
3333 N. Federal Hwy.
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Attention: John A. Grant, Jr.
PLANNING P.'IlO
ZON!NG DEPT.
Re: Park Ridge Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Comments
Oear Mr. Grant:
We have once more looked over the preliminary plat you have submitted for review, and are
unable to process it further until a determination is made as to whether it is a condominium, a
rental, (leasing) community under unity of title. a planned unit development. or a subdivision.
You previously indicated that you were not considering a condominiwn or rental community,
leaving the possibility of a planned unit development or simple subdivision. You also indicated
2:':ou intended to transfer property utilizing metes and bounds descriptions in lieu of plat
descriptions.
---=--
The method of property transfer is your decision. of course. but either way is suhdividing. The
Land Development Regulations of the City of Boynton Beach specifically define "subdivision" in
LOR Chapter I, Article 11. page 1-33 as follows:
"SUBDIVISION - The division of a parcel ofland into two (2) or more lots or
parcels, either by plat into lots and blocks or by metes and bounds description. for
the purpose of transfer of ownership or development or. if a new street is involved,
by division of a parcel ofland."
The LOR also defines when platting is required in general (LOR Chapter 5, Article II, Section 1.
page 5-1). and delineates those things which must be included on the plat. FS 177.091 requires
that" ...data shall be shown to positively describe the bound of every lot.." and that "all lots shall
be numbered."
A second major issue must also be resolved. You seem to have taken the position that simply
because your proposed single family dwellings are in a R-3 multi-family zone you must only
comply with multi-family setback requirements. That is clearly not the case. LOR Chapter 2,
Section 5, paragraph G2b, page 2-21 reads as follows:
"G. R-3 MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT.
2. Building and site regulations:
b. Single-family dwellings shall conform with R-l requirements
(Section 5, paragraph E-2)" page 2-19.
Phone: (407) 375-6280
FAX: (401) 315-6357
John A. Grant, Jr., Inc.
Re: Park Ridge Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Comments
January 3, 1996
Page #2
We will be able to proceed with a preliminary plat review when you have resolved these issues. A
final plat can be processed after the master plan is approved by the City Commission and other
application requirements are met.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
@~~1~
William Hukill, P .E.
City Engineer
WVH/ck
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Director of Development
Ken Hall, Eng. Plans Check Insp.lTechnician
C:PARKRDGE
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-728
TO: Bill Hukill
Director of Development
THROUGH: Tambri Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Jerzy Lewicki
Planning and Zoning
DATE: December 18, 1995
SUBJECT:
Plat and
Project:
Location:
Development Plans
Park Ridge
East side of
20th Avenue
John Grant,
PLAT 95-011
- 1st Review
Agent:
File No, :
the intersection of Northeast
and Northeast 4th Street.
Jr., Inc.
..
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the
subdivision plat for Park Ridge. In the recently reviewed Master
Plan for this project, Planning and Zoning Department Staff has
made an assumption that the ownership of the proposed development
will not require further resubdivision of the tract as to create
individual lots for the housing units. Further, we made a comment
that since the development is takinq place on one tract only, this
needs to be reflected on the Plat submitted for City review. The
submitted plat contradicts our assumptions creating five separate
tracts of land. Under this plat proposal we could not apply the
perimeter setback requirements on the Master Plan. Moreover, we
would have to enforce separate setbacks for each of these tracts
which would significantly reduce the buildable area of
residentially intended to be used tracts.
Planning and Zoning Department staff has decided to review this
Plat proposal in case the petitioner would decide to amend his
Master Plan to reflect changes as determined necessary by this
subdivision layout.
COMMENTS
1. On Sheet 3 of 3, clearly indicate ownership of Tract E,
however, the City cannot accept dedication of any Right-
of-Way unless it is at least 50 feet in width. The width
of this tract is only 24 feet, therefore it is considered
to be insufficient for dedication purposes.
2. The title certificate is incomplete - no signatures are
displayed.
3. On Sheet 3 of 3, provide names of all streets.
4. Provide restrictive covenants for the subdivision. Also,
reference these covenants on the Sheet 3 of 3.
5. Provide Homeowner's Association documents.
6. Tract C violates building and site regulations of the R-3
zoning classification.
7. Tract D does not abut the right-of-way.
9. Tract A has a very undesirable shape preventing future
logical use of land, especially in the area abutting the
cul-de-sac.
10. The cul-de-sac is not designed to city standards: the
minimum diameter of the right-of-way should be 100 feet,
the minimum diameter of the edge of the pavement should
be 90 feet.
'---
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-728
1st Review - Park Ridge
File No,: PLAT 95-011
11.
Reduce the length
necessary space for
current tract layout
on its south end.
of the cul-de-sac as to provide
the required right-of-way. The
precludes increase of right-of-way
12. The Land Development Regulations require sidewalks to be
installed regardless of form of ownership. The petitioner
may request a variance from this requirement.
13. Indicate the location of the N.E. 20th Avenue east of
N.E. 4th Street.
RECOMMENDATION
14. The Planning and Zoning Department staff recommends that
the property will be replatted as to reflect comments
indicated in the Master Plan review. The property should
remain as one tract of land with easements describing
access, utilities, and drainage facilities.
NOTE:
If recommendations are approved, they shall
incorporated into the working drawings required
permits for the project.
be
for
JL:dim
xc: Central File
PL-PR-l.was
BOYNTON .eACH POUCE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
[DJ~@~n'lfl~.r
IJ1) Gee - 5 j933 1 L
PLANNING A~D f __,
ZONING OEPT. ()'l""('J
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON IIARlUS
5 DECEMBER 9S
PARK RIDGE - PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS MEMO #0192
v
I have reviewed the above plans and fin~~ ~
~~u Zr"'~
~q ~s y
~J
.1 E)) 18. I~'}dar,. 16
~r-\'\ . n\ ~~
{ ~: ;, :::.} 0 ~ l 0 U 0 0
~ @J
~ ~((j
lJirou~~
ce' Q ,;.~ I /
. 1~ILL r-:-u;....:'--
/'iJ./7/15
ENGINEERING MEMO #95-462
ill rn@rnn w ~ !OOij
O:r:C - I. IQat::;.!
JL. ~ _h' ,
t'
j
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
-~-
DATE: December 4, 1995
TO: BILL CAVANAUGH, FIRE PREV, OFF.
ROBERT EICHORST, P.W, DIR,
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, P.D.
T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLAN. & ZONING DIR.
SKIP MILOR, UTIL. CHIEF FIELD INSP.
AL NEWBOLD, DEPUTY BLDG. OFF.
JOHN WILDNER, PARKS SUPER. & KEVIN HALLIHAN, FORESTER
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG, PLANS CHECK/INSPECTOR 375-6283 @
SUBJECT: T,R.C. REVIEW -PARK RIDGE PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
Please review the subject plat and the related paving, drainage, water & sewer plans for code
deficiencies/omissions and provide a written response to the engineering division by the end of
December 18, 1995. The comments will be sent to the developer's agent to modify the subject
documents and they will be resubmitted for final T .R.C. approval and ,sign-off once the master
. plan has been approveQ.
KRH/krh
C: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file
memotrc