Loading...
APPLICATION I' ,./ " CITY OF BOYlftON BBACH, FLORIDA PLANNING & ZONING DBPARTMBNT SITB PLAN REVIBW APPLICATION FOR NBW SITB PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO BXISTING SITB Application Acceptance Date: Fee Paid: Receipt NUllber: This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submitted as an original to the Planning and zoning Department. Twelve complete, sequentially numbered and assembled sets of plans including a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted with the application for the initial process of the Site Plan Review procedure. AD inco.plete submittal will not be processed. Please print legibly (in ink) or type all information. I . GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Project Name: PARKRIDGE 2. Applicant's name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made): De Graf, Inc. Address: 60 NE 4th Avenue Deerfield BeaCH, Fl 33441 (Zip Code) 428-4253 Phone: 4?R-42l)1 Fax: 3. Agent'. Name (person, if any, representing applicant): JOHN A. GRANT, JR., INC. W. Keith Grant, Vice President Address: 3333 North Federal Highway, Ste. 3 Boca Raton, Fl 33431 Phone: (407) 395-3333 (Zip Code) Fax: (407) 395-3315 4. property Ownerls (or Trustee's) Name: De Graf, Inc. Address: 60 NE 4th Avenue Phone: 428-4253 Fax: 33441 (Zip Code) 428-4253 Deerfield Beach, Fl 5. Correspondence to be mailed to:* John A. Grant, Jr., Inc. 3333 North Federal Highway Boca Raton, Fl 33431 * This 1s the address to which all agendas, letters and other materials will be mailed. PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - November 1991 A:SITEPLAN ( 2 ) .. 6. What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (OWner, buyer, lessee, builder, developer, contract purchaser, etc.) Owner I 7. Street address or location of sitel Northeast of Intersection of Northeast 4th Street and Northeast 20th Avenue. 8. Property Control II 08-4345-1503000-0280 Legal description of sitel See Attached - Exhibit A 9. Intended useCs) of sitel Multi Family(Residential) 10. Develaperai~ Builderl DeGraf. Inc. 11. Architects Brian McCarron 12. Landscape Architectl Kevin Holler 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Connissian far this property? No, 18. Bstimated construction coats of proposed improvements shown c this site planl $176.000.00 Site Planner I John A. Grant. Jr. . Inc. B.glneerl John A. Gran t, Jr. , Inc. Surveyor I Tohn A. ~r,qn t J Tr ) Tnr' Traffic Bngineerl John A. Gran t. Jr. . Inc. PLANNING' ZONING DEPARTMENT - November, 1991 A:SitePlan II. SITE DATA I 3 ), The following informat~on must be filled out below and must appear, where applicable, on all copies of the site plan. 1. Land Use Cateqory shown in the Comprehensive Plan Zoning District 2. 3. Area of Site '1.0'14 High Density R-3 acres sq. ft. ??Or1(;g .j. Land Use -- Acreage Breakdown a. b. o. d. e. f. g. h. Re.idential, inoluding surrounding lot area of grounds Reoreation Areas * (excluding water area) Water Area Commeroial Industrial Public/Institutional PUblio, private and canal rights-of-way Other (specify) DRY RETENTION AREA i. Other (specify) 1< () ^ n 1'1< t\CT j. Total area of site i ,)[)i aores , of sil! F,q o acres o , of sit o o , of sit aores o , of sk , of s1. aores o o o acres o o , of sit acres o acres , of sit o 0.77~ , of sit acres 15 0.779 16 , of si acres 5.054 100 , of si acres * including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft. by 50 ft. 5. Surface Cover a. Ground floor building 1.21 acres 24.0 , of Si area ("building footprint" ) b. Water area 0 acres 0 , of Si. c. Other impervious areas, including paved area of public , private streets, 'paved area of parking lots' driveways (ex- cluding, landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios, decks, and athletic courts. 1.05 acres 20.8 , of Si d. Total impervious area 2.26 acres 44.8 , of S:i e. Landscaped area ? O? acres 40.0 !Ii of si inside of parking lots (20 sq. ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of Landscape Code). PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - November, 1991 A : S \ t- 0. P 1111 g. other (specify) o sq. ft. h. Total floor area sq. ft. 7. Number of Residential Dwelling Units a. 8ingle-f-.ily detached Duple. sq. ft. sq. ft. b. c. Multi-P..ily 13 + attached dwelling units) (1) Bfficiency (2) 1 Bedroom (3) 2 Bedroom ( .. ) 3+ Bedroom 34 ok ;~ d. ~:lTn~~ta~{~~lU~~~ilY 34 dwelling units dwelling units dwelling units dwelling units dwelilng units e. ~otal number of dwelling units 34 8. Oross Density 6.73 dwelling units per acre 9. IIYJmwa ~ .tructure. on site 13.5 feet 1 star 10. Reggired off-street parking a. Calculation of required number of off-street parking spaces 68 b. Off-street parking space provided on site plan 68 PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - November, 199] ( 5') III. CBRTIFICATION (I) (We) understand that this .pplicati~n and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Soard. II) (We) hereby certify that the above statements and any statement. or Showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true 1 the best of (my) (our) knOWledge and belief. This applicatil will not be accepted unles8 signed according to the in truction. be w. '&'5 e 0 8 or Trustee, ) of thorlled Principal if property i. owned by a corporation or other bu.ine.s entity. 11-27 -15 Date IV. zed Agent J/ /tit5 / ate IWe) hereby designate the above signed person as (my) ) authorized agent in regard to this application. f:::;1/11C1 C' btz ~ PE&.c;, . or Trustee, J Principal if property i8 owned by a corporation or other busines8 entity. J/-- 27 - 95 Date SPACB BBLOW THIS LINB FOR OFFICB USB ONLY Review Schedule. ~hniaal Review Board Planning , Zoning Board Com.unity Appearance Board City cOIIIIIission StipUlations of Final Approval, Date Received Date, Date Date Date Other Government Agencies/Persons to be contacted. Additional Remarks. PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - November, 1991 A:SitePlan EXHIBIT A - LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL ~ A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 34.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 25 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 27; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 75.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ' Arm BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION, RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 229.35 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 201.4 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27 WHICH LIES 261.16 FEET WEST OF, MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 226.26 EAST TO A POINT 34.90 FEET WEST OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27; THENCE SOUTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 75 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 27; A DISTANCE OF 25 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF LOT 27, THENCE SOlrrHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 27 TO A POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL ~ LOT 28 OF SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. PARCEL J. LOT 29 OF SAM BROWN JR'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. ALSO DESCRIBED AS: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SAID LAND BEING A PORTION OF LOT 27 AND ALL OF LOTS 28 AND 29 OF SAM BROWN JR' S HYPOLUXO SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 81 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID LAND BBING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WBST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF S. 010 53' 21" E., ALONG THE WEST SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 809.71 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF N. 890 40' 02" B., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 29, A DISTANCE OF 607.77 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF S. 070 05' 57" W., ALONG THB EAST LINE OF SAID LOTS 27, 28 AND 29, A DISTANCE OF 497.09 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF S. 890 35' 25" W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27, A DISTANCE OF 229.80 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF ~. 010 53' 10" W., A DISTANCE OF 201.19 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF S. 890 39' 51" W., ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOTS 27 AND 28, A DISTANCE OF 300.28 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF N. 010 53' 21" W., ALONG THE WEST SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 15 AND ALSO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOTS 27, 28 AND 29, A DISTANCE OF 292.22 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 07/25/95 STORM SEWER SUMMARY REPORT PAGE 1 OF 1 FILE: PARKRIDG. STH RAINFALL FILE: PARKRIDG. RHD 3 YEAR DESIGN STORM I - 62.460/ ( Te + 1.2.290) ^ 0.710 LINE ID FLOW RATE INFO PIPE INFO HYDRAULIC IIfFO LINEI I DESCRIPTIOIf IINC ARIRUNOFPclINLTIMElllfLT IIIIfC CIAI IIfPUTO IUlfIFORMlsIZE/IINVERT IPIPE I NVAL I BGLSLOPE J BYD GRD I VEL DOWNLINEI I TOT AR I WEIGBTD I Te ITOTL llTOT CIA I TOT It.LO I PLOWCAP I TYPE I UP/DOWN I LEN IINVSLOPI JLC I UP/DOWN I UP/DOWN I (ae) C (ain) I (in/b) I (era) (era) (cr.) 1 (In) (rt) 1 (rt) 1 (rt/rt) I (rt/rt) I (rt) (rt/a) I 1 1 1 l1n. 1. 0.01 0.501 1.0.001 6.891 0.001 0.001 30DI s.rol 1021 0.01.31 0.0051 9.251 3.58 I DIfLN - 0 3.61 0.501 1.1.. 821 6.521 1.1.. 70 I 11.. 70 I 10.9 30DI 8.001 0.0011 1.00 8.751 5.33 I 1 2 I l1n. 2 0.6( 0.501 10.001 6.891 2.171 0.001 30DI $.8'01 401 0.0131 0.001.1 9.491 3.12 1 DNLN - 1. 3.61 0.501 11.. 621 6.561 1.1.. 77 I 1.1.. 771 1.0.9 30DI 5.601 0.0011 1..00 9.451 3.1.5 I I 3 I 11n. 3 0.61 0.501 10.001 6.891 2.1.41 0.001 18DI 8.811 1.531 0.01.31 0.0021 9.971 3.29 I DIILIl - 2 1..41 0.501 10.791 6.731 4.81.1 4.811 5.3 18DI 8.421 0.0031 1.00 9.651 3.11 I 4 I 11n. 4 0.41 0.501 10.001 6.891 1..41.1 0.001 18DI 9.001 751 0.0131 0.0001 10.171 1.87 I DNLN - 3 0.81 o.sol 10.391 6.811 2.761 2.761 5.3 18DI 8.811 0.0031 1.00 10.131 1.67 I 5 I 11n. 5 0.41 0.501 10.001 6.891 1..381 0.001 1.8DI 9.841 751 0.0131 0.0031 1.0.441 3.1.9 I DNLIf - 4 0.41 o.sol 1.0.001 6.891 1..381 1..381 1.1..1. 1.8DI 9.001 0.011.1 1..00 10.221 0.89 -I 6 I 11n. 6 0.31 0.501 10.001 6.891 1.. 10 1 0.001 18DI 9.001 651 0.0131 0.0041 9.931 4.52 I DNLN - 2 1.51 0.501 10.391 6.811 5.211 5.21.1 7.11 18DI 8.701 0.0051 1.. 00 9.651 4.44 I I" 7 I 11n. 7 1.21 0.501 10.001 6.891 4.171 0.001 18DI 9.211 751 0.0131 0.0031 10.471 2.92 I DNLN - 6 1..21 0.501 10.001 6.891 4.171 4.171 5.61 18DI 9.001 0.0031 1.00 10.251 2.65 @ . I ~, ; Qj ~ .j e,,\/ ,~ " V~ ~/'3\ (le.f}.S.IO L... I I'le.. 3 \:::Y \..~ ;., 0'':(2) ?,;;:" :(-r" '-' \-1) : .' '1) ~ "- -...\ ~,oo0 .'"',1 " ':.;: '" REVIE\VED AND APPROVED ~ k/z8/rS DAVID J. L TZMAN DA TE REGISTERED ENGINEER NO. 49055 STATE OF FLORIDA ,"B . Lj 'lJ " "- ~ ~r . qYJ. 0 l' "1 :;...:.. ,J . S 07/25/95 STORM SEWER SOMMARY RllPORT PAGE 1 OF FXLE: PARKRXDG.STM RAXHFALL FXLE: PARKRXDG.RJlD 3 YEAR DESXGH STORM X - 62.460/ Tc + 12.290) ^ 0.71 LXHE XD FLOW RATE XHFO PXPE XHFO HYDRAULXC XHFO LXHE#I DESCRXPTXOH ]XHC ARIRUHOFFCIXHLTXMElxHLT XIXHC CXAI XHPtJTO IUHXFORMlsXZE/lxKVERT IpXPE I HVAL I HGLSLOPE 1 KYD GRD I VEL DOWNLXHE# 1 TOT AR I WUGHTD 1 Tc ITOTL XITOT CXAI TOTALQ I FLOWCAP I TYPE I UP/DOWN ILEH 1 XHVSLOP I JLC I UP/DOWN I UP/DOWN 1 (ac) C (ain) I (in/b) 1 (crs) (cr.) (crs) I (in) (r1:) I (r1:) I (r1:/rt) I (r1:/f1:) 1 (rt) (rt/s) 1 1 line 1 0.01 0.501 10.001 6.891 0.001 0.001 30DI 8.fOI 1021 0.013 0.0051 9.251 3.58 DHLH - 0 3.61 0.501 11. 821 6.521 11. 70 1 11. 70 I 10.91 30DI g.ool 0.001 1.00 8.751 5.33 1 2 line 2 0.61 0.501 10.001 6.891 2.171 0.001 30DI 5.801 401 0.013 0.0011 9.491 3.12 DHLH - 1 3.61 0.501 11.621 6.561 11.771 11. 77 I 10.91 30DI 5.(,01 0.001 1.00 9.451 3.15 1 3 line 3 0.61 0.501 10.001 6.891 2.141 0.001 18DI 8.811 1531 0.013 0.0021 9.971 3.29 DHLH - 2 1.41 0.501 10.791 6.731 4.811 4.811 5.31 18DI 8.421 0.003 1.00 9.651 3.11 4 line 4 0.41 0.501 10.001 6.891 1.411 0.001 18DI 9.001 751 0.013 0.0001 10.171 1.87 DHLH - 3 0.81 0.501 10.391 6.811 2.761 2.761 5.31 18DI 8.811 0.003 1.00 10.131 1.67 5 1 line 5 0.41 0.501 10.001 6.891 1.381 0.001 18DI 9.841 751 0.013 0.0031 10.441 3.19 1 DHLH - 4 0.41 0.501 10.001 6.891 1.381 1.381 11.11 18DI 9.001 0.0111 1.00 10.221 0.89 -I 6 I line 6 0.31 0.501 10.001 6.891 1.101 0.001 18DI 9.001 651 0.0131 0.0041 9.931 4.52 1 DHLH - 2 1.51 0.501 10.391 6.811 5.211 5.211 7.11 18DI 8.701 0.005\ 1.00 9.651 4.44 I I. 7 1 line 7 1.21 0.501 10.001 6.891 4.171 0.001 18DI 9.211 751 0.0131 0.0031 10.471 2.92 1 DIfLH - 6 1.21 0.501 10.001 6.891 4.171 4.171 5.61 18DI 9.001 0.0031 1.00 10.251 2.65 @ . ~- V ~ -J ,~ . lJ; tV t::: .... ....J ~i . L-,,,e.. 3 e- \// ,,, - V ,~ ~,~)o ~i' ~.oo0 L1J ! '>:: .... REVIEWED AND APPROVED r;;,-()#~- 1Ij.?!?; /-DAVIDJ~ DATE REGISTERED ENGINEER NO. 49055 STATE OF FLORIDA -.....\ q,)~ · 0 I' QJ So;: .... ..., :;;'".;. --.J . .8 PARKRIOOE JG 100-7803 SHEET 1 OF 2 DESCRIPTION COST ESTIMATE UNIT QUANTITY GRADING, PAVING & DRAINAGE CLEARING GRADING, GRUBBING LS ASPHALTIC CONCRETE TYPE S-3 1W' SY 8" COMPACTED LIMEROCK BASE SY 1211 STABILIZED SUBGRADE SY FLUSH CONCRETE HEADER CURB LF STRIPING & SIGNAGE LS SEED & MULCH (RIGHT-OF-WAY & DRY RETENTION AREA) SY INLET TYPE C EA INLET TYPE E EA SAND CEMENT ENDWALL EA RCP - 1811 LF RCP - 30" LF 1 3,395 3,536 3,676 440 1 13,504 6 1 1 290 132 ,uvVEMBER 28, 1995 PRICE 37,000.00 3.00 6.00 1.00 10.00 500.00 .10 900.00 1,100.00 500.00 18.00 30.00 GRADING, PAVING & DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL WATER 8" DIP WATERMAIN 6" DIP WATERMAIN LF LF EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA TON 16" X 811 TAPPING TEE 8" TAPPING VALVE 8" RSGV 6" RSGV FIRE HYDRANT SAMPLE POINT SINGLE SERVICE DOUBLE SERVICE DIP FITTING WATER SUBTOTAL 1,110 440 2 2 4 4 3 3 10 12 1.6 14.00 12.00 2,000.00 800.00 500.00 400.00 1,200.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 3,200.00 COST 37,000.00 10,185.00 21,216.00 3,676.00 4,400.00 500.00 1,350.40 5,400.00 1,100.00 500.00 5,220.00 3.960.00 94.507.40 15,540.00 5,280.00 4,000.00 1,600.00 2,000.00 1,600.00 3,600.00 300.00 1,500.00 2,400.00 5.120.00 42.940.00 PARKRIDGE JG 100-7803 SHEET 2 OF 2 NOVEMBER 28, 1995 COST ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEWER MANHOLE SHALLOW 0'- 6' EA 4 800.00 3,200.00 MANHOLE DEEP 8'- 10' EA 1 1,200.00 1,200.00 MANHOLE DEEP 6'- 8 ' EA 2 1,000.00 2,000.00 8" PVC 0'- 6' LF 719 12.00 8,628.00 8" PVC 6'- 8' LF 463 16.00 7,408.00 8" PVC 8' - 10' LF 20 18.00 360.00 8" DIP 0'- 6' LF 40 16.00 640.00 WYES 8" x 6" EA 20 50.00 1,000.00 LATERAL 6" PVC LF 340 7.00 2.380.00 SEWER SUBTOTAL 26.816.00 GRADING, PAVING, GRADING, SEWER & WATER TOTAL ..... $164,263.40 PLUS 10% CONTIGENCY TOTAL $16,426.34 ------------ $180,689.74 PRELIMINARY DAVID J. HOLTZMAN, P.E. Professional Engineer No. 49055 State of Florida PARKRIDGE JG 100-7803 SHEET 1 OF 2 DESCRIPTION COST ESTIMATE UNIT QUANTITY GRADING, PAVING & DRAINAGE CLEARING GRADING, GRUBBING LS ASPHALTIC CONCRETE TYPE S-3 1W' SY 8" COMPACTED LIMEROCK BASE SY 12" STABILIZED SUBGRADE SY FLUSH CONCRETE HEADER CURB LF STRIPING & SIGNAGE LS SEED & MULCH (RIGHT-OF-WAY & DRY RETENTION AREA) SY INLET TYPE C EA INLET TYPE E EA SAND CEMENT ENDWALL EA RCP - 18" LF RCP - 30" LF 1 3,395 3,536 3,676 440 1 13,504 6 1 1 290 132 NOVEMBER 28, 1995 PRICE 37,000.00 3.00 6.00 1.00 10.00 500.00 .10 900.00 1,100.00 500.00 18.00 30.00 GRADING, PAVING & DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 8" DIP WATERMAIN 6" DIP WATERMAIN 16" X 8" TAPPING TEE LF LF EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA TON 8" TAPPING VALVE 8" RSGV 6" RSGV FIRE HYDRANT SAMPLE POINT SINGLE SERVICE DOUBLE SERVICE DIP FITTING WATER SUBTOTAL WATER 1,110 440 2 2 3 3 10 12 1.6 4 4 14.00 12.00 2,000.00 800.00 500.00 400.00 1,200.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 3,200.00 COST 37,000.00 10,185.00 21,216.00 3,676.00 4,400.00 500.00 1,350.40 5,400.00 1,100.00 500.00 5,220.00 3.960.00 94.507.40 15,540.00 5,280.00 4,000.00 1,600.00 2,000.00 1,600.00 3,600.00 300.00 1,500.00 2,400.00 5.120.00 42.940.00 PARKRIDGE JG 100-7803 SHEET 2 OF 2 NOVEMBER 28, 1995 COST ESTIMATE DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SBWBR MANHOLB SHALLOW 0'- 6' BA 4 800.00 3,200.00 MANHOLB DBBP 8'- 10' BA 1 1,200.00 1,200.00 MANHOLB DBBP 6'- 8' BA 2 1,000.00 2,000.00 8" PVC 0'- 6' LF 719 12.00 8,628.00 8" PVC 6'- 8' LF 463 16.00 7,408.00 8" PVC 81- 10' LF 20 18.00 360.00 8" DIP 0'- 6' LF 40 16.00 640.00 WYBS 8" x 6" BA 20 50.00 1,000.00 LATBRAL 6" PVC LF 340 7.00 2.380.00 SEWBR SUBTOTAL 26.816.00 GRADING, PAVING, GRADING, SBWBR & WATBR TOTAL ..... $164,263.40 TOTAL $16,426.34 ------------ $180,689.74 PLUS 10% CONTIGENCY PRELIMINARY DAVID J. HOLTZMAN, P.B. Professional Bngineer No. 49055 State of Florida r$I'3ltfG 'j'HJ\~KINt; Ll - ::>J'J'I~ PLAN H~V J I~W ::>lJ1:U"tj '-'AI. PHlJJl::C'l' 'l'l'l'LE: llE::>CkI1"l'lON: 'I'Y l' E : lJA'l'E REC I D: PARKRIDGE SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN NEW SITE PLAN AMOUNT: E'lLE NU.: SBMP 95-003 MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION kECEIP'r NO. : * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS RECID: (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCBPTED --aSNIED DATE: DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'l'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DA'I'E: DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWERIS NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DA'I'E SENT: d.f~ , RETURN DATE: CA/I~ MEMO NUMBER: I~.( nf\~,J... 3~ ~~ REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANS MEMO # / DATE / "C" PLANS MEMO # / DATE / "C" Util. / / Planninn / 1- P.W. q {, . 0S'<1 1 / Building . / 1- Parks 't 1 1J.5 1 c.,.... Engineer :3<.:. .0"4 \J" 1 :J fl.- I~ E'ire I 1 / Engineer '1"-0:;3, 1 ~(1 /.....:.-. Police OJ. of / ;l-S /c_ Forester 1 1_- , j. , ('. . ) 'l'YPE OE' VARIANCE(S) DATE OF MEETING: DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out w/ comment NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS O~ AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS RIC I D: MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW. DA'l'1 SENT: MEMO It: RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW RECONMENDATION/DBNIA~ PLANS NINO * / DATE /"R/D" PLANS NINO .. / DATI /"R/D" Utile I I Planning / / P.w. / / BUilding I / Parks / / Engineer / I Fire I / Engineer / 1__.. Police I / Forester 1 / LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS P LACED AT 'l'HE PROPER'l'V DATE SENT/SIGNS INS'l'ALLED: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA lJA'I'E APPROVAL LE'j"I'ER SEN'r: A: 'l'HAI ~I< I tll~ . :-; I' TO: , DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ; I ~ ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 9l UU L I:: it ~..l~i ~;] [~ . ~-I. ---,-,, I":' 'I I' '..Ii. i I, ,) .. l ,....'". FROM: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~UkiJI' P.E., City Engineer F(:bruary 2, ] 996 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPt DATE: RE: PARKRJDGE SITE PLAN - 3RD REVIEW We have reviewed our January 3, 19961V1emo (No. 96-007) regarding compliance with comments contained therein. We respond as fi)lIows: I . Revise documents to reflect all comments. 2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 3. Moot if property is a condominium. 4. Insufficient information to complete review. This is not a rezoning request, so dimensions must comply with R-3 zoning. Single family dwellings in R-3 districts must comply with R-I district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5, par.G2b, pg.2-21 5. Previously in compliance. 6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of an local and collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec. I I A, pg.6-3 7. Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than I foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.58, pg.6-8 & 6-9 8. Minimum cui-dc-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.lOD, pg.6-12 9. In compliance. 10. Previously in compliance. II. Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6. Art.JV, Sec.13. pg.6-16 12. Need SFWMD & L WDO acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII. Sec4B, pg.6-24 The following additional conditions have appeared with the revised submittal. A. Provide proof of unity of title. , B. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec. I I A, pg.6-3 C. Provide sidewalk locations & details. Chap.6, Art.IV. See.l OT, pg.6-14 D. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.5A. pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art. 1 IF, pg.23-8 A second street name should be provided for the portion of development south of Park Ridge Circle to the cui-dc-sac. We strongly rccomm4~nd valley curbs along roadways to improve drainage. WVH/ck C:PKRIDGE TO: FROM: DATE: REF: BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 5 FEBRUARY 96 PARK RIDGE - MASTER PLAN - 3rd REVIEW MEMO#0208 ,.' ~~~uw~ ~ , 1 .__,~; \~j.~~j PlM1NING P,N[) lot'IING D~_r1.. ,...._...._..,...............~.,..A.'..~.. ..~;.'........,......:.....~., ::. ....:o;,;...-::'~. I have reviewed the above plans and fin,d"ij:o:p{o61inl~;:ai thisJime. :.::.,:.>~..:..~"..t:~...:,h:;::.~..t,:..."..:..:. ~~ U 2/~. '; ...,) (6 Respectfully~ r \~\ '~:\; \t ~~I F,-. . ' ~ : i.,',..~,gt.i J1arlq~ H~~~ t:J 1..,1"....,.."",.....," u tl;:~:::;:~:~:.i' ~:] t;;::::::~:::::::::-::l .:~.;: Be [8~ ;~,.:~:'..~ l~ .0;....... ., l~t~-:l' \ i~,j...~ If 1/ II 1.--' ~ i!.:; \\ ~ ~ ( ...) ] .'~;'\ t \..., ;.........#.::::" .~~ ., {~:.. '." i.......o;.~ !/~~';'rj) \1 ("",...'t}\) ,~".;~ II ~1 :::;~"*' 0;.'... rmrrn @, ~:I~~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT . i..,_,._._~ ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-052 P!:'J!t~ltIG ~NO ~l;'~ING DEPT. TO: Tambri 1. Heyden ii/;,Iannin & Zoning Director . ukill, P .E. , . . gmeer L February 9, 1996 FROM: DATE: RE: P ARK RIDGE SITE PLAN - 4TH REVIEW Each time we receive additional documents, further comments are generated. In addition to our February 2 memo (96-044) we offer the following: E. Provide a 5' limited access easement on east side of parcel abutting railroad right- of-way, and construct buffer wall therein. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.3, pg. 6-2 F. Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate agencies. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3P, pg.3-5 Have recreational requirements been satisfied? WVH/ck C:PKRDGE4 "RACKIN - LOG - SI'l'E PLAN REVIEW SU Pl''l'AL PRUJl::C'l' 'l'l'l'LE: lJESCRlf''l'ION: 11'VPE: X DN1IE REC I D: PARKRIDGE NEW SITE PLAN N IW SITE PLAN /2 V95 AMOUNT: MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 1500.00 RIi:CIi:IP'l' NO.: 04026 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'O: 11/28/95 (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The Plannillg Dept. set will' be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) , * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ~ ACCEPTED 11/28/qf) DENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE: DATE UF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ (Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DATE SEN'l': 12/7/95 RETUHN DATE: 12/20/95 MEMO NUMBER: 95-690 1st REVIEW COMHEN'l'S RECEIVED PLANS MEMO .. / DATE / IICII PLANS MEMO .. / DA'l'E / IIC" c/Util. / / -;c;:- Planning ~s -736/ le-2D/~ p .w. 9s-d, Olf / d.j., /- Building .y <j..:r-'f'fl.,.. / 1d..-/Y'1r / V Parks Y Q5-56'S: /"f/~ t.JEngineer '( -~, I ~15-4G /~ Fire ~ <If;:'-3 ' -. (f / o/---11c... Engineer / I /- Police () (7;' / It?-.. / ~ Forester Y 1s-. - sO '1 / /;.(1'1/-1'; / ~ ~YPE OF VARIANCE(S) DATE OE' MEETING: DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review APP., dates of board mtgs. " checklist sent out w/ comment NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS RBC I D: MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PBRFORM 2nd REVIEW. DA'l'E SENT: MEMO It: RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW RECOMMBNDATION/DENIAL PLANS MEMO It / DATE /"R/D" PLANS MEMO .. / DATE /"R/D" Utile / / Planning / / P.W. / / BUilding / / Parks / / Engineer / / Fire / / Engineer / / Police / / Forster / / LETTER TO APPLICANT RSQARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DA'l'B APPROVAL LE'l'TER SENT: A: 'l'kACKINli . SP <> TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-736 Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director Jerzy Lewicki December 20, 1995 New Site Plan Project: Location: - 1st Review Park Ridge East side of the intersection of Northeast 20th Avenue and Northeast 4th Street. John Grant, Jr., Inc. NWSP 95-012 Agent: File No.: The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced proj ect. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. In the survey include NE 20th Avenue east of NE 4th Street - ~ ~~ Clarify topographical information on the enclosed survey and make a reference to it in the legend of the survey map. - o..M1~, Transfer information regarding existing structures from the Subdivision Master Plan submittal, Environmental Audit, page 3.1, to the survey enclosed in the Site Plan package . ~ "l-\--' On the Site Plan, sheet 1 of 1, make a reference in regard to use of proposed structures (e. g. : single family residence) On the Site Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the location and number of parking spaces provided, include relevant calculations. Provide sidewalks as required by the Code. If signs indicating name of the proposed development are planned to be erected show their location on the Site Plan. If the lighting of the private streets is proposed indicate the location of the lighting fixtures on the plan in order to eliminate possible conflicts between landscape, drainage structures and fire hydrants. Page 2 Memorandum 1st Review Park Ridge No. 95-736 - New Site Plan 8. On the architectural plans, sheet 3 of 3, indicate the height of the structures (T-O-Roof). 9. Provide a colored elevation drawing showing all elevations of a typical residence (see recommendation section of these comments). The drawing should include, but not be limited to, the color indication of: -stucco (exterior elevation) -roof material -fascia -gutters and downspouts -window frame -door frame and panel For all of these above provide selected color code and manufacturer's name. 10. Provide color samples of building materials indicated on the elevations. 11. On the Site Plan, sheet 1 of 1, amend the tabular summary of the project providing the following: -total site area by acreage -net buildable site area by: acreage square footage -total number of dwelling units -bedroom/bathroom characteristics -gross square footage of a typical unit (this information needs to be transferred from the architectural plans) -number and ratio of required and provided off- street parking spaces 12. Provide Palm Beach County evaluation of the traffic study. 13. Indicate ownership of streets and the drainage area. 14. If patio enclosures are planned provide information regarding these enclosures (dimension, material, color, etc) . 15. Clarify whether the 15' - 0" dimension between buildings is typical at all locations. 16. On Sheet 2 of 3 of the architectural set provide necessary dimensions in the garage to confirm that the water heater will not preclude meeting the minimum size _ 9 feet by 18 feet parking space requirement. 17. During the platting process eliminate existing in the southern portion of the site la-foot wide utility easement. 18. Relocate trees located within the utility easements. II RECOMMENDATIONS 19. Provide visitor's parking spaces and show their location and compliance with ADA. Page 3 Memorandum 1st Review Park Ridge No. 95-736 - New Site Plan 20. Provide different color schems for different sections of this development. Colored elevations should include all different color patterns. On the Site Plan, Sheet 1 of I, indicate sections of the development according to the scheme allocation. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, they shall incorporated into the working drawings required permits for the project. be for JL:dim xc: Central File a:SP-PR-l PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-204 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: New Site Plan - ParkridgePlaee DATE: December 8, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site. I'm' 0 r~m_@_~mo~:['f'-~-..,I! ! "1 ( I i.. 0.. ,! ( l' ., [.! il I · \ f'.----......~.--..' ..,'-.-.......-'.,- fil'i ! I' :.1 : ~ 11 ! I I BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT " ;\ii:',G i\Y[ Pi-n:c " ,,_..__._~'.......... '....,..'" ....... ...~.............,..,b..". ",~';"''''''-'',..., " TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 8 DECEMBER 95 P ARKRIDGE PL-M$- NEW SITE PLAN-l st REVIEW MEMO #0194 ..~'''''';'':''':''';O;'~;.:. I bave reviewed tbe above plans and fi9:~::!Jq;'p~obl,nf~:it t4.i~)j~e. ~..:..:......:,i,':"'.':,::',..~::.:.,..;,,:,:':.:::,"::" ffP-> U GP.. ..' <> <:'~ Respect (I~Jv/ //(.~ o ~L~~:lO 0 .....;.. r:i:~:::::~::::::Y [80 :^+~~....~.:~:;,:! {,,,.<''''''''''~ ~. ..: "% C::::::,l (?~~\ ~.,\ \ ~ ~,~;::::~~:) 183 .:.;.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.;.:.v.....,. /} ...... <"\<'''~'>. .~' ~ .~;-:.'<<>;.:...~ ?-,,/ (I II < ,> I t.~, .:""-=?. ">:.. .""" ""'" <" it:>:)!>' . :;.~ ~, ,.. .......,;:~ <;:;~~>(<:;::~~~:>:,::~'<,. ,;~~:;::~ t~~* *1 :~o; i ~ :;' ~ \ !; l.J. ~~. RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-583 TO: Tambri Heyden. Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist RE: Parkridge Place DATE: December 19. 1995 The applicant should complete the following items as part of the tree preservation/environmental requirements. 1. Submit a letter from the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission that there are no endangered/protected species on the site. 2. The tree survey indicates eighty-one existing desirable trees compared with sixty-two relocated into the area along NE 4th Street. There should be nine additional trees/plugs relocated to this area. 3. A tree management plan (document) should be submitted to address the proper care of trees in #2 above. before. during and after construction of the project. The project should continue on the normal review process. KH:ad FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-399 00 rn@rn~w~ m ~' 2Ig;'~ ".' .\} PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: January 2, 1996 RB: Park Ridge Place 2100 NE 4 St NWSP 95-012 SBMP 95-003 We have no objections to this project as shown. d~~L4~).~ William D. Cavanaugh, FPO I cc: Chief Jordan FPO II Campbell File FIRE PREVENTION I\.1EMORANDUM NO. 95-399 r. .' -"'-_..~.~_.-.- .-.---"....--. lOOn [~~.~J..l..,... ~7,Jt..... r I H I I, , t! I ~"n...___._.:;l . ~ r.j'\! \: -, 11 I ' PLli'll'ili.b t\",f) '.......'/, i 1m-WiG DEPT. ".'J/1 L ......".,...R ......""< _ __......_--.._....., ~ TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: December 20, 1995 RE: Park Ridge Place 2100 NE 4 St vNWSP 95-012 SBMP 95-003 We have no objections to this project as shown. ( ~I cc: Chief Jordan FPO II Campbell File RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-56 Id3G flNINGZ (]r.iV 5NINNVld 00 SG61 8 ... ~rHI ffi ID ~ U ID @ ID TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks superintendentr Parkridge PJace ./ FROM: RE: DATE: December 8, 1995 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the new site plan for Parkridge Place. The following comments are submitted: 1. Based on 34 single family homes, the recreation dedication requirement is calculated 34 d.u. X .018 acres = .612 acres 2. The plan gives no infonnation that the developer plans to apply for one-half credit for private recreation. The full dedication requirement is required as cash in lieu of land. JW:ad December 18, 1995 fD) rn @ rn 0 Wl~m~fn) uO~.9!~ I~J PUll'!: ;iNG i\~f[) ,/I 0 Z ()!'1J1!Q1l E PI 1 v BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-442 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director Re: Park Ridge Master Plan After reviewing the plans for the above reference project, the Building Division cannot support this plan going forward because of so many unanswered questions that we cannot address without such information as type of multiple-family residential structures, i.e., apartments, cooperatives, condominiums or townhouses. If they are to be single-family dwellings, they should comply with R-l site regulations under LDR Section 5, Paragraph E-2 and should have platted lots to check setbacks and lot coverage. In addition to the above comments, the following should be shown on the plans: 1. Evaluation and floor plan unless they are single-family. 2. Distance between building to comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code. 3. Setbacks should be shown from Park Ridge Circle (See definition of lot frontage, LDR Page 1-23, Article II), also see Access for an understanding of where front setbacks are from. 4. Setbacks must be shown for pools, screen rooms, etc. 5. Sign details required for Site approval. AN:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director PKRlDGE JAN- >jo TUE j :58 FM BOYNTCN]EA':H UIlLlTlES FAX UO 407 375_J298 p , , MEMORANDUM UTIUTIES DEPT. NO. 96 - 001 TO! Tambri Heyden, Plannioa D' ,.. nOM: John A. Ouldry, Utilities Director- DATE: Jan 2. 1996 We offer the followma commentS on'tbis project: rtoJ fEU U - Wi JAN - 2 L . 7m SUBJECT; Puk Ridge - M-.r Plan/Sit. Plan 1) Plans shall show proposed unlity cu=mcnts. (Section 26-33(a)) 2) Trees. other than palm trees. are not permitted within utility casements. Shrubs are permittecl. (Section 7.S-18.1) 3) Permits for the water and sewer system installation will be required from the Palm Beach County Health Unit. Please coordinate the engineering plan approval through this office. (Section 26.12) 4) A minimum of IO-feet is required between water maim and any portion of a structure. This criteria is not met for the water main in the side easemem 810111 the south side: of the projcx:t. S) We have iDsuft'lcient information to detennine who will be the account-holder for each water services, and. also be respomible for maintenance of the serviee lines from the City's point of service to the bulld1Dgs. The applicant's repleKlntativc: has cxp~s~ his client's intention to sell the property under each building as part of the building structure. However, such an approach will pLace the meter and service Unes under the responsibility of the Homeowner.' or Condominium Association. which iI v.ry unusual for 8 aingle family structure. 6) This project's layout is sim1lar to that or a slngle.tam1ly P.U.D., but it is being proposed as a multi-family development with detached single family units. We therefore are not certain whether to apply the 500 gallon per nUnnte or the l~OO iallon per minute fire flow requirement. The applicant must th~fore advise us in writing how the site will eventually be subdivided. what the building separation will trUly be. and what type of construction will be perfonned, before we can make this determination. Although the Master Plan/Site Plan indicates a side setback of 20 feet, but thii does not correlate to the distance between bundings. Please advise as to the actual minimum distance between buildings, The nwnber and scope of unknowns on this project effectively prevent us from determining whether it does or does not meet code requirements. We therefore recommend it not proceed until these questions are satisfactorily addressed. Please refer any questions on this matter TO Peter Mazzella of this office. Attaehments IAG/PVM xc: Skip Milor File JOHN A. GRANT. JR.. INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS ill @ ~ IT \11 1~ 1 W 'At"~ -0.' I ~ ",..in I :j .~~;) ~ 3333 N, FEDERAL HIGHWAY BOCi\ RATON, FLoRIDA 33431 HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES STORM DRAINAGE WATER SUPPLY LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES SUBDIVISIONS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS BEACH EROSION PHONE (407) 395-3333 FAX (407) 395-3315 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS MORTGAGE SURVEYS STRUCTURAL DESIGN SANITARY SEWERS MARINAS CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION BULKHEAD LINES January 16, 1996 City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Attention: Tambri Heyden RE: PARK RIDGE Our Job NO. JG 100-7803 Dear Ms. Heyden: This is to inform you that we were conveyance issue in time to meet the January 12, 1996. We have since determined that the method of conveyance will be Condominium Association and we plan to resubmit pr10r to the next deadline for resubmittal. The support that you and other City Department's have given us on this project is appreciated. not able to resolve the resubmittal deadline of If you have any questions regarding same please contact David J. Holtzman at (407)395-3333. JAG/DJH/bw Enclosure cc: DeGraf, Inc. Very truly yours, RECREATION & MEMORANDUM #96-059 '~ l.J TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ..JvJ Park Ridge - 3rd Submittal (J FROM: RE: DATE: February 5, 1996 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the plan for Park Ridge. There are no outstanding recreation issues on this project. We recommend that the plan continue through the normal review process. JW:ad DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-007 i~ ~ f~ r~ ;" I ~ ~ r~>l-_.-".. UUL PLAi,~rH;'\l i',"W ZONING DEfT. t}~ !., DATE: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer January 3, 1996 TO: FROM: RE: P ARKRIDGE MASTER PLAN - SECOND REVIEW We have reviewed our December 13, 1995 Memo (No. 95-473) regarding compliance with comments contained therein. We respond as follows: 1. Revise documents to reflect all comments. 2. All plans submitted for specific pennits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following~ site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FOOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 3. This master plan is not required as a condition of zoning, but is required as a pre- requisite to platting. Since the land is to be subdivided into two or more lots or parcels either by plat or metes and bounds, it must be platted (Chapter 1, Article II, page 1-33 and Chapter 5, page 5-1). Since the subdivided lots are not shown on the master plan, the plan cannot proceed without certification from the applicant that the master plan and the plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, the Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations. 4. Insufficient information to complete review. This is not a rezoning request, so dimensions must comply with R-3 zoning. Single family dwellings in R-3 districts must comply with R-l district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5, par.G2b, pg.2-21 5. In compliance 6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6, Art.IlI, Sec. I lA, pg.6-3 7. Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, Art.IV, See.5B, pg.6-8 & 6-9 8. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.IOD, pg.6-12 9. Provide street grades no steeper than 2 1/2 per cent. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. 101, pg.6-13 10. In compliance 11. Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.I3, pg.6-16 12. Need SFWMD & L WDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, SecAB, pg.6-24 Dept. of Development. Engineering Div. Memo No. 96~007 Re: Parkridge Master Plan - Second Review January 3. 1 996 Page #2 Of these items. Numbers 1.2.7,9.11 & 12 can be brought into compliance on future documents prior to first Building permit and/or Land Development permit issuance. Numbers 3.4.6 & 8 are not in compliance. You did not receive these comments earlier because we only received the submittal on January 2. With respect to preliminary plat review comments contained in the December 19 letter to you received here on January 2. we will respond directly to the applicant. WVH/ck xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Ken Hall. Engineering C:PARKRDGE,2ND . -""-'-'::~~~",.dto,,-=;....~..':-::',~---'. .1/5"/'1<6, /?-.lE ~l.....\:)W-~/5"'(-CY ~.f"V"\~TS 5!?:' _ ~~ ~."'f:!s I ~~~-+ C~M "" G" nrr~ ,.~ (Y\\i~ H~~G ~la -'"Pl-~~. 'ft ~V{W~ -r:i, 'tJ ~ l/~\V f-t~L L r t- 1--- DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-007 tuK, TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director LiJili Hukill, P.E., City Engineer ~\ ~ '\ January 3, 1996 ~ FROM: DATE: RE: P ARKRIDGE MASTER PLAN - SECOND REVIEW We have reviewed our December 13, 1995 Memo (No. 95-473) regarding compliance with comments contained therein. We respond as follows: 1. Revise documents to reflect all comments. 2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FOOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 3. This master plan is not required as a condition of zoning. but is required as a pre- requisite to platting. Since the land is to be subdivided into two or more lots or parcels either by plat or metes and bounds. it must be platted (Chapter 1, Article II, page 1-33 and Chapter 5. page 5-1). Since the subdivided lots are not shown on the master plan. the plan cannot proceed without certification from the applicant that the master plan and the plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, the Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations. 4. Insufficient information to complete review. This is not a rezoning request, so dimensions must comply with R-3 zoning. Single family dwellings in R-3 districts must comply with R-I district requirements. Chap.2. Sec.5. par.G2b. pg.2-2I 5. In compliance 6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6. Art.III, Sec. 1 I A, pg.6-3 7. Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, Art.IV, See.5B. pg.6-8 & 6-9 8. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Cbap.6, Art.IV, See.lOD, pg.6-12 9. Provide street grades no steeper than 2 1/2 per cent. Chap.6, Art.IV. See.lOI, pg.6-13 10. In compliance 11. Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.I3, pg.6-I6 12. Need SFWMD & L WDD acceptance prior to Engineering approvaL Chap.6, Art.VII, SecAB, pg.6-24 Dept. of Development. Engineering Div. Memo No. 96-007 Re: Parkridge Master Plan - Second Review ' January 3, 1996 Page #2 Of these items, Numbers 1,2,7,9,11 & 12 can be brought into compliance on future documents prior to first Building permit andlor Land Development permit issuance. Numbers 3,4,6 & 8 are not in compliance. You did not receive these comments earlier because we only received the submittal on January 2. With respect to preliminary plat review comments contained in the December 19 letter to you received here on January 2, we will respond directly to the applicant. WVHIck xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Ken Hall, Engineering C:PARKRDGE.2ND PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-041 TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp. Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist William Hukill, Director Department of Development Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~~~ FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: January 26, 1996 New Site Plan - 2nd Review Project: Park Ridge Location: East side of the Northeast 20th Avenue Street Agent: John Grant, Jr., Inc. File No.: NWSP 95-012 intersection of and Northeast 4th Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced project for your final review and recommendation. We would ask that you review this amended site plan submittal to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments previously made by your department. If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. If your comments have not been met, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. Finally, we would ask that you include in your memorandum a recommendation as to whether the project should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration. Please return your memorandum and the amended plans (Engineering Division shall keep their plans) to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5:00 P.M. on February 2, 1996. Per the Technical Review Committee (TRC) determination at the December 26, 1995 meeting, the previous submittal of the Site Plan was not discussed. Therefore, the current Site Plan submittal will be placed on the February 13, 1996 TRC meeting agenda. If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Jerzy Lewicki at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this project. cc: Carrie Parker, City Manager (Plans) (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan Charlie Frederick Tom Dettman John Guidry a:2ndRevwm.par HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES STORM DRAINAGE WATER SUPPLY LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES SUBDIVISIONS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS BEACH EROSION 3333 N, FEDERAL HIGHWAY BOCA RATON. F'IDmno. 33431 K~ ~ @ ~ n fl~..I.i wi .MNh. 1L.i! flANNINGAND i ZONING DEPI , JOHN A. GRANT, JR., INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND lAND SURVEYORS PHONE (407) 395-3333 FA)((407) 395-3315 Januar/ 23, 1996 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS MORTGAGE SURVEYS STRUCTURAL DESIGN SANITARY SEWERS MARINAS CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION BULKHEAD LINES City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FI 33435 Attention: Tambri Heyden RE: PARK RIDGE File NO. NWSP 95-012 Our Job No. JG 100-7803 Dear Ms. Heyden: In accordance with your letter of January 2, 1996, transmitted herewith is our resubmittal of the above referenced project. Per our January 16, 1996, letter, the proposed development will be a Condominium, and we have modified all ~roject documents accordingly. Also as you may recall, 1n our initial discussions with the City of Boynton Beach, it was agreed that we would submit the project for your review based upon a 40' setback from both N.E. 4th Street and the FEC Railroad to the units and a 20' setback from both the North and South Property line to the units, with a minimum separation of 15' between units ( a sketch showing this was sent to Mr. Lewicki). Included with our resubmittal are the following items: 1. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Plat. 2. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Site Plan. 3. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Master Plan. 4. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Survey. 5. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Grading, Paving, Drainage, Water and Sewer Plans. 6. Twelve (12) revised sets of the Landscape Plans. 7. Twelve (12) revised sets of the Architectural Plans. 8. One (1) copy of commitment letter from Southern Bell and Florida Power and Light. 9. One (1) copy of document describing the existing 10' wide utility easement in the southern portion of the site. 10. One (1) co~y of each of the three proposed color schemes for the bU1ldings. 11. One (1) copy of each of the three proposed material color schemes. 12. One (1) 11" x 32" architectural rendering of the buildings. Page 2 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge Our response to Memorandum # 95-736 from Jerzy Lewicki of the Planning and Zoning Department is as follows: 1. The survey doesn't show N.E. 20th Avenue east of N.E. 4th Street because it is not platted. 2. Topographical elevations have been referenced in the survey legend. 3. Information on the existing structures has been added to the survey. 4. A note with regard to the use of proposed structures has been added to the Site Plan. 5. The location and number of parking spaces provided has been added. We plan to discuss the need for sidewalk with the appropriate agencies. 6. The location of proposed signs has been added to the Site Plan. 7. The location of proposed lighting has been added to the Site Plan. 8. Architectural Plans have been revised to show height of structures. 9. A colored elevation drawing is being provided with this submittal. 10. Color samples of building materials are included with this submittal. 11. Tabular summary of Site Plan has been revised to provide the requested information. 12. The traffic study was previously submitted. 13. Ownership of streets and drainage area is shown on the Site Plan. 14. Homeowners will be given patio. They will also have 6' high wooden fence. 15. The 15'-Oll dimension between buildings is typical and this has been clarified on the Site Plan. the option of having a the option of having a 16. Dimension of garage is provided on Architectural Plan. Page 3 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge 17. The existing 10' wide utility easement in the southern portion of the site will be eliminated during the platting process. (See enclosed document that describes easement.) 18. All trees within utility easements will be relocated, except the palm trees and shrubs. 19. Since the intention of the development is to be similar to a t~ical single family community, no visitor parking wll1 be provided. 20. The intent is to use different color schemes throughout the development. Our response to Memorandum # 95-583 from Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist is as follows: 1. A letter from the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission stating there are no endangered/protected species on the site will be submitted. 2. On the tree survey, several multiple trunked oaks were identified with each trunk being an individual tree. The tree relocation/removal plan identifies each multi~le trunked oak tree as a single tree. The quantity dlfference is nine, as noted in the comment. 3. A Tree management plan to address the proper care of trees in Item #2 is included with this submission. Our response to Memorandum # 95-565 from John Wildner, Parks Superintendent, is as follows: 1. The required recreation fee based on the single family homes calculating factor will be paid when due at final platting. 2. The developer does not plan to apply for one-half credit for private recreation. Our response to Memorandum # 95-442 from Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director, Buildings Department, is as follows: It has been decided that the development will be condominiums. 1. The floor plan has been submitted for evaluation. Page 4 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge 2. The distance between buildings is being proposed to be 15' minimum. 3. The required setbacks from the perimeter of the boundary are indicated as well as the setbacks from Park Ridge Circle. 4. Patio location is shown on the trPical unit and on all units on the site plan but Unlt 17. Pools will not be constructed. 5. Sign details have been added. Our response to Memorandum # 96-001 from Utilities Director is as follows: Jack Guidry, 1. Utility easements are shown. 2. There will be no trees other than palm trees and shrubs in utility easements. 3. Permits for water & sewer will be obtained from the Palm Beach County Health Unit. 4. The patio (Unit 17) adjacent the water main in the side easement along the south side of the project has been eliminated. 5. The City will be res~onsible for maintaining the water line up to and lncluding the water meter. The Condominium unit owner will be responsible for the water service from the meter to the unit. The City will be responsible for maintaining the sewer lateral through the 611 diameter pipe adjacent the edge of pavement. The Condominium unit owner will be responsible for the lateral through the transition from 6" to 411 diameter up to the unit. 6. The development will be condominiums. The minimum distance between buildings will be 15'. Our response to Memorandum #96-007 from William Hukill, City Engineer, is as follows: 1. All documents will comments. be revised to reflect all 2. All plans will meet City code reguirements at time of application for requlred permlts. Page 5 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge 3. The Master Plan and the Plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules and regulations including, but not limited to the Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations. 4. Master Plan has been revised to comply with condominium requirements within R-3 zoning. 5. In compliance. 6. It is our understanding that sidewalks are not required in multifamily develo~ments. We will review this matter with Mr. Huklll to determine the exact requirements or recommendations. 7. Swale and detention area slopes will be no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet. 8. The pavement in the cuI de sac has a diameter of 86' which allows a proper turning radius for all vehicles. The ingress-egress easement is one foot from the pavement. 9. Street grade will be no greater than 2~ percent. 10. In compliance. 11. Electrical service will be underground and accordance with Chapter 6, Article IV, Section Pages 6-16. 12. Approvals will be obtained from SFWMD and LWDD. in 13, We submit the above to you for your review and approval. If you have any questions regarding same, please contact David J. Holtzman at (407) 395-3333. Very truly yours, JAG/DJH/la Enclosures cc: DeGraf, Inc. January 22. 1996 KEVI N E. HOLLER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE P.O. Box 1 01 Booa Rilorfif"leJridM ~34 D '[;' lV l~ lL..';14dj) 3 I I ~ 2491) , 15 88 PARI: RIDGE - TREE IIAlfAG~1iT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. 1. Prior to construction. Contractor shall verify trees to remain. trees to be relocated. and trees to be removed. 2. Contractor shall determine access routes to trees that will least disturb existing vegetation. 3. Contractor shall relocate trees with an appropriate sized tree spade. All materials shall be planted at their original soil levels. of. Relocated trees shall be thoroughly watered-in immediately upon installation in their new locations to eliminate air pockets and enhance proper setting. Contractor shall provide relocated trees with a temporary irrigation system (including canopy sprays). Coordinate additional watering requirements with Owner. ~. All transplanted trees shall be pruned to remove vines, dead and broken branches, etc. Limb-up/thin as necessary to enhance tree shape and future growth. Clean trunks of relocated Sabal Palms. 6. Stake/brace relocated trees as necessary to assure stability, 7. Mulch relocated trees with min. 2" Melaleuca mulch or chipped vegetation. 8. Contractor shall replace any relocated plants that die due to his negligence {lack of water, physical damage. etcJ. Replacements shall be Live Oak. 10' ht., ~. spr. 9. During the land clearing and construction stages of development. Developer shall erect and maintain protective barriers (to the City Inspector's specifications consistent with good management practices) around all trees or groups of trees to be protected. Developer shall not allow the movement of equipment or the storage of equipment, materials, debris, or fill to be placed within the protective barrier(s). 10. During the construction stage of development, Developer shall not allow the cleaning of equipment or material nor allow the disposal of waste materials such as paint, oil, solvents, asphalt, concrete. mortar, etc. within the drip line of any tree or groups of trees to be protected. 11. No attachments or wires, other than those of a protective or supportive nature shall be attached to any tree. 12. Tree relocation and replacement activity permitted or required by the City of Boynton Beach shall be done in accordance with standard forestry practices and procedures. and all such plantings shall be reasonably maintained and attended to promote successful establishment and growth. 13. It shall be a responsibility of the homeowner's association / condominium association to provide continuing maintenance of the trees in the future. JOHN A. GRANT, JR., INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS lli ~ 3333 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY BocA RATON. FWRlDA 33431 PLANNING A~O ZONING DEPT... . January 23, 1996 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS MORTGAGE SURVEYS STRUCTURAL DESIGN SANITARY SEWERS MARINAS CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION BULKHEAD LINES HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES STORM DRAINAGE WATER SUPPLY LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES SUBDIVISIONS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS BEACH EROSION PHONE (407) 395-3333 FAX (407) 395-3315 City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FI 33435 Attention: Tambri Heyden RE: PARK RIDGE File NO. NWSP 95-012 Our Job No. JG 100-7803 Dear Ms. Heyden: In accordance with your letter of January 2, 1996, transmitted herewith is our resubmittal of the above referenced project. Per our January 16, 1996, letter, the proposed development will be a Condominium, and we have modified all ~roject documents accordingly. Also as you may recall, ln our initial discussions with the City of Boynton Beach, it was agreed that we would submit the project for your review based upon a 40' setback from both N.E. 4th Street and the FEC Railroad to the units and a 20' setback from both the North and South Property line to the units, with a minimum separation of 15' between units ( a sketch showing this was sent to Mr. Lewicki). Included with our resubmittal are the following items: 1. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Plat. 2. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Site Plan. 3. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Master Plan. 4. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Survey. 5. Twelve (12) revised prints of the Grading, Paving, Drainage, Water and Sewer Plans. 6. Twelve (12) revised sets of the Landscape Plans. 7. Twelve (12) revised sets of the Architectural Plans. 8. One (1) copy of commitment letter from Southern Bell and Florida Power and Light. 9. One (1) copy of document describing the existing 10' wide utility easement in the southern portion of the site. 10. One (1) co~y of each of the three proposed color schemes for the bUlldings. 11. One (1) copy of each of the three proposed material color schemes. 12. One (1) 11" x 32" architectural rendering of the buildings. Page 2 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge Our response to Memorandum # 95-736 from Jerzy Lewicki of the Planning and zoning Department is as follows: 1. The survey doesn't show N.E. 20th Avenue east of N.E. 4th Street because it is not platted. 2. Topographical elevations have been referenced in the survey legend. 3. Information on the existing structures has been added to the survey. 4. A note with regard to the use of proposed structures has been added to the Site Plan. 5. The location and number of parking spaces provided has been added. We plan to discuss the need for sidewalk with the appropriate agencies. 6. The location of proposed signs has been added to the Site Plan. 7. The location of proposed lighting has been added to the Site Plan. 8. Architectural Plans have been revised to show height of structures. 9. A colored elevation drawing is being provided with this submittal. 10. Color samples of building materials are included with this submittal. 11. Tabular summary of Site Plan has been revised to provide the requested information. 12. The traffic study was previously submitted. 13. Ownership of streets and drainage area is shown on the Site Plan. 14. Homeowners will be given the option of having a patio. They will also have the option of having a 6' high wooden fence. 15. The 15'-0" dimension between buildings is typical and this has been clarified on the Site Plan. 16. Dimension of garage is provided on Architectural Plan. Page 3 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge 17. The existing 10' wide utility easement in the southern portion of the site will be eliminated during the platting process. (See enclosed document that describes easement.) 18. All trees within utility easements will be relocated, except the palm trees and shrubs. 19. Since the intention of the development is to be similar to a t~ical single family community, no visitor parking wll1 be provided. 20. The intent is to use different color schemes throughout the development. Our response to Memorandum # 95-583 from Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist is as follows: 1. A letter from the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission stating there are no endangered/protected species on the site will be submitted. 2. On the tree survey, several multiple trunked oaks were identified with each trunk being an individual tree. The tree relocation/removal plan identifies each multi~le trunked oak tree as a single tree. The quantity dlfference is nine, as noted in the comment. 3. A Tree management plan to address the proper care of trees in Item #2 is included with this submission. Our response to Memorandum # 95-565 from John Wildner, Parks Superintendent, is as follows: 1. The required recreation fee based on the single family homes calculating factor will be paid when due at final platting. 2. The developer does not plan to apply for one-half credit for private recreation. Our response to Memorandum # 95-442 from Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director, Buildings Department, is as follows: It has been decided that the development will be condominiums. 1. The floor plan has been submitted for evaluation. Page 4 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge 2. The distance between buildings is being proposed to be 15' minimum. 3. The required setbacks from the perimeter of the boundary are indicated as well as the setbacks from Park Ridge Circle. 4. Patio location is shown on the tyPical unit and on all units on the site plan but Unlt 17. Pools will not be constructed. 5. Sign details have been added. Our response to Memorandum # 96-001 from Utilities Director is as follows: Jack Guidry, 1. Utility easements are shown. 2. There will be no trees other than palm trees and shrubs in utility easements. 3. Permits for water & sewer will be obtained from the Palm Beach County Health Unit. 4. The patio (Unit 17) adjacent the water main in the side easement along the south side of the project has been eliminated. 5. The City will be res~onsible for maintaining the water line up to and lncluding the water meter. The Condominium unit owner will be responsible for the water service from the meter to the unit. The City will be responsible for maintaining the sewer lateral through the 6" diameter pipe adjacent the edge of pavement. The Condominium unit owner will be responsible for the lateral through the transition from 6" to 4" diameter up to the unit. 6. The development will be condominiums. The minimum distance between buildings will be 15' . Our response to Memorandum #96-007 from William Hukill, City Engineer, is as follows: 1. All documents will comments. be revised to reflect all 2. All plans will meet City code reguirements at time of application for requlred permlts. Page 5 Letter to Tambri Heyden RE: Park Ridge 3. The Master Plan and the Plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules and regulations including, but not limited to the Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations. 4. Master Plan has been revised to comply with condominium requirements within R-3 zoning. 5. In compliance. 6. It is our understanding that sidewalks are not required in multifamily develo~ments. We will review this matter with Mr. Huklll to determine the exact requirements or recommendations. 7. Swale and detention area slopes will be no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet. 8. The pavement in the cuI de sac has a diameter of 86' which allows a proper turning radius for all vehicles. The ingress-egress easement is one foot from the pavement. 9. Street grade will be no greater than 2~ percent. 10. In compliance. 11. Electrical service will be underground and accordance with Chapter 6, Article IV, Section Pages 6-16. 12. Approvals will be obtained from SFWMD and LWDD. in 13, We submit the above to you for your review and approval. If you have any questions regarding same, please contact David J. Holtzman at (407) 395-3333. Very truly yours, cc: DeGraf, Inc. JAG/DJH/la Enclosures JOHN A. GRANT, JR., INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3333 N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY BocA RATON, FLOffiDA 33431 HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES STORM DRAINAGE WATER SUPPLY LAND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES SUBDIVISIONS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS BEACH EROSION PHONE (407) 395-3333 FAX (407) 395-3315 January 24, 1996 City of Bovnton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Bovnton Beach, FL 33435 Attention: Tambri Hevden RE: PARK RIDGE Our Job NO. JG 100-7803 Dear Ms. Heyden: CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS MORTGAGE SURVEYS STRUCTURAL DESIGN SANITARY SEWERS MARINAS CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION BULKHEAD LINES In accordance with the reauest of Jerzv Lewicki transmitted herewith are the followina for the above referenced oroiect: 1. 2 . Twentv-four (24) orints of the Survey. Twentv-four (24) orints of the Gradina. Plans (Sheets 1. 2. 3 & 8 of 8). pavina and Drainaae If you have anv auestions reaardina same olease contact David J. Holtzman at (407)395-3333. We trust this is satisfactory. Very truly yours, ,TA~/DlTH/hw Enclosure JOHN A. GRANT, JR., VJ)~ C ,T:?hn. A. ~raJt. l~ ~yPresldent\..,7' cc: DeGraf. Inc. ~~.b:7go3 aJELLSOUTH TELECOAfAfUNICAnONS @ January 5, 1996 Room 501 326 Fern Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Wire Center: Boynton Beach Route: 1206 File # 240.0900 Mr. John Grant, Jr. John Grant, Jr., Inc. President 3333 N. Federal Highway Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Re: Park Ridge Your job # JG 100-7803 Dear Mr. Grant: In response to your request, this will confirm that BellSouth Telecommunications is the source of supply for telephone service to the above referenced project. Telephone facilities with adequate capacity can be provided for this project. It should be noted, however, that the owner will be required to provide BellSouth Telecommunications with recorded easements or conduit. In addition BellSouth Telecommunications may require exclusive easements for structures that house electronic switching equipment (SLC-96 or substantially similar equipment). The recorded easements will be without restrictive conditions furnished in a reasonable time to meet service requirements at no cost, cleared of trees, tree stumps, paving and other obstructions. In addition each applicant shall cooperate with BellSouth Telecommunications to keep the cost of construction and installation of the underground telephone distribution system as low as possible. Where there are obstructions in the easement or road crossings, the contractor will provide conduit suitable to BellSouth Telecommunications. However, the company shall have no responsibility to provide service unless these conditions are met. If you have any questions please call me at (407) 582-5184. Yours truly, ~Y/I~ Nancy M. Vinez Specialist - Outside Plant Engineering . I=PL Florida Power & Light Company, 9329 S. 1~"litary T?,i11Bo~n.ton, Fl33~6 r l i., <".....-" ,...~" K ,:, I ,.A ',':~" . . I.. t ' . t 1'-, I .:' January 12, 1996 John A. Grant, Jr. John A. Grant, Jr., Inc 3333 North Federal Highway Boca Raton, Florida 33431 RE: Park Ridge Subdivision - Boynton Beach Dear Mr. Grant: This is to inform that FPL at the present time has sufficient capacity to provide electrical service to the above mentioned property. This service will be furnished in accordance with applicable rates and FPL practices. It will be necessary for FPL to be provided with the final site plan, electrical load data, site survey and copy of deed as soon as possible so that the necessary engineering can begin. Please feel free to contact me at 369-2223 if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, J.9-~ JC:Yd David K. Weda Construction Services an FPl Group company ( : .,1.' ;rC"~'B.59:;1ta: 1~ .WnH8tir{'it1i~ ;"''''. ;I'......\:':~~~ .. .':.~:: .... ;.;.;:.'.~~~ ,,~ f i I \ ." 'j, ~_~. I i . ~ / I I I I I I I / / /' / , --I iI~~. ~. / / / J ' ' . ~:t..'d.' ii~ .. I" ., ....... I -go..... . - ..' . . ! . 4"l~ ,,:-.;..... : / I / / I I I I / .. .~,.~I ~ .'-~ .~.~. ), . / I / / I / / I / . 1 (L.S.I , (I..8..) i i;tat.8~tt;'" .. ,_ .' ~..,~ -.-..' .-~ .:.~r'_" 1~'1ai~~,,-.'t...::.:..: ~. "jf~~~~\ . ~!Clli"b~~'i.~Pi,~~~~lt.. ~~:~ Ii ~,;. . ~~~~'.",- ''':'.r~,~ ~ . ........ ~ '~~i9~~\.;~ """1'.... _ 11I(... "" ,"., '" ~.......... M._ ~ Co. , ' : : 1[[:-70:- i' :i j.~ 1 <:l I.~l I'~ .~ ....~. .f' ~ \~ / , -....~- ,....,r, L_/~/ " ~':i . ~ ~ ~ ,.t ~ , .0 ---lXJw/iI.;././jS 100 WOoll ./ ,r' ~ FbLE I' ,:::e. ...... . / /~ -,r" '-1/ '-.\.~" I !: I ...... o N ,'.I!.;Y:~D..-/~ ~ .., ~ !.E~7K/C ": I .F ,';'/ LV '\fl (," !..- ,1> ",. .' ,~ .~ I' ~ 3Z," ,~. <:::> I~~ Z~G. ~(, 6'48 10' 1,4'fte~ I-A ~~t / ~ -T~:~~~, /~ BlR=L /-4 S((8.I~ '(r ~7T{It::.TlONS IN D~4 01 rrr).'~ ~.< /tJ03,) A94E ~/S ,~?j).'('-;! ~I ~ L 0, 4 \'\) Yy ...., \ \ rt,\.ooo (: p..'?,V I -----------------, - ~/O't./.E pe~ 0If?~. 8S'3,} A:r 75Z 2__ _ _ J o:eo------------- ,:;;0 .? ."'" W:JC>c.- ,L.xe: ~-, ---.:.::.. 5L"-// F',~' /8 JR. ~I c.,oy 1.0/ ,~/ ,r .-'., ,... ........ - '", l..__l p , I' -.; , o ID" .' I~ It" 0 00 0'9" It" 't t / 1/ If> S89-35'25"W ll~' "" 1 ~/ Y o @ 41" 229.80' ~- I' -i c:J t1 t" I ~ c ,. C ~ /0' o ~ " It') .. It') o "- o C/) J 11," ~ I I i- ZS;l)t) lif" o 11,'1, ,/ q~ ' It' '" ~ \' , ' r , I ! L I '" t,,' -'"H~JN ":'A'I:: F~?:. : ' A 1;, H. ~ ~' I fOO 4X 4'" C : ,008 fi7 ~ I t,'WacD I Iwil' ,,~ ii I .' ! , . l'i ,/ L- ,-::.0,,/ ~ ,~..# - l~ TRACKIN( OG - SI'l'E PLAN REVIEW SUB r'I'AL PRUJBC'l' 'l'l'PLE: PARKRIDGE FILE NO.: NWSP 95-012 UE::iCRIP'l'lON: NEW SITE PLAN TYPE: X NEW SITE PLAN MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION DNl'E REC'D: 11/28/95 AMOUNT: 1500.00 RECBIP'f NO.: 04026 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D: 11/28/95 (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The Planniqg Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED 11/28/<1') DENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I (Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DATE SEN'l': 12/7 /95 RETUH.N DATE: 12/20/95 MEMO NUMBER: 95-690 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED 1"' util. ,\t- P. W . Parks E'ire Police P~NS l ''/ y J1EMO # / DJIE I "C" 'IS-co/ / (, /- q5'-d, 0(( / (~l r / (/ 1:;-5(..';::; / [)I']' I ('/" cl.':' ;..; ell;' / i ) ( 'I 0 /' ! '}/ ..J'4...J. I'"...../.^ ~ . r ~: i ~ t . I.' -:; ! ~' ,." VI I / l/ (: /~ PLANS v MBMO # I ~r:;; -7361 <1~-,'-f(.(<.,. I '16 -00'1 -__I / 7'" 56"2 / DA'l'E / "C" 12-.zD/~. I' ,.. "r I :'1 /" 10<..",1'/, ~ I:'" '7' '1;, I (, . I 1---- li7t~/'.':: / e./ Planning Building t'''Engineer '\~Engineer Forester -..; I y ~YPB OF VARIANCB(S) DATE OF MEETING: DA'l'E OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review APP., dates of board mtgs. ~ checklist sent out wi comments NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be aasembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REO 10: MEMO SENT TO DA1'E SENT: TRC ?to ,PERFORM 2nd REVIE;.ij} i.f I II~cr.J. 'I ~ MEMO #: !::i (CI ~ 0 RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS MEIiO # / DA;E I"R/D" PLANS MEMO # I DATE IUR/D" ~~~~. X q1_1,;~'I;f ~~l ~ r!: :~:~~~~~ y ~(p ,oy I ~ d Is: ~ C/' Parks J- .,OYO / \ J-G I v Engineer 96-04</ I .J..I.2 I e- Fire ~ ' I V'l,.- I c,....- Engineer I I / Pol ice Y ~Np I '/;;'0; / C/ ForsterY ,,~- iJS'j I jJ'2- I C- LETTER TO APPLICANT RIGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND~MENT ~GNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: ;) /:lJqr, SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DATB APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A: 'l'kACKING.::if' MEMORANDUM Utilities # 96-044 if r~~ m_ ~ :ml~\ \1 L-"," PLf3'~:\~i;P'(" i , Zl.l,,\\,~!...! L..' :',,', ..:.~~.,~~.. ~ ',J.,-' __~ ;i._ TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Dir FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities Date: February 2, 1996 SUBJECT: Park Ridge, New Site Plan, Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. City water will not be supplied for irrigation. Please indicate on the plan your water source, (City Compo Plan, Policy 3C.3.4). 2. Plan shall show size and type of utility pipes. Your submittal suggests the water and sanitary sewer plans were included. Please provide for review and comment, (Sec. 26. 16(a)). 3. No trees, or overhang oflarge trees, are permitted within Utility Easements, (Sec. 7.5-18.1). It is our recommendation that the plan not proceed through the review process until items # 2 and # 3 above are addressed. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm;parkr2 xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella f/' File ~ ~ F~B ~ : :~ 00 PLANNING ANO ZONING DlfI,,-,....._- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-021 TO: /' Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: New Site Plan - 2nd Review - Park Ridge DATE: February 1, 1996 The CuI D Sac at the above location must be a minimum of 90' for sanitation and fire vehicles to be able to turn around. If you have any questions please give me a call at 375-6201. R ert Eichorst ublic Works Director RElcr ~_..., RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-04 00 rn @ rn 0 W ~~ II! I ..301996 !L01 ,\ ! ~ PLA,NNING AND j' ZONING DEPT. ~____~ TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director it. I John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ' ..I Park Ridge - New Site Plan - 2nd view FROM: RE: DATE: January 29, 1996 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the new site plan for Park Ridge. The following comments are submitted: 1. Recreation dedication requirement will be figured at the single family rate. Recreation and Park memo #95-565 remains in effect. 2. Recommend that the plan continue through the normal review process. JW:ad FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-399 TO: Planning Department rnmrnu ffi rn FEB - 5 1995 PLANNING ^ND ZONING DCPT. FROM: Fire Department DATE: January 2, 1996 RE: Park Ridge Place 2100 NE 4 St NWSP 95-012 SB:MP 95-003 We have no objections to this project as shown. ~ William D. Cavanaugh, FPO I ..~ y . cc: Chief Jordan FPO II Campbell File " TO: FROM: DATE: REF: BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT rD) rn@rn"w~ rn1 wL'~~~~ f!lP,N,'i;~~G /.ND lor\J!NC Q~:PT. T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 29 JANUARY 96 PARK RIDGE - 2nd REVIEW - SITE PLAN MEMO #0206 ,.;:;'~""""~:''';X''''':' I have reviewed the above plans and fin,p}J.q:'~obl,rrig':at' tm~.J@e. ~~p U Z~' ",/"""'~;~~:\' ;:(:,..4:l;....:...... Respectfull;l t'''<:~\ / / J\Yu ~-!ilkf IlJ~ U~~}f:lt~j w ~""Ji!:""".);j: ~ .. ,.t~ ...~..;~.::'"~.;....;.;..;...}:' ::~~ r..~;;:~;:;:;~:::~;~..;::~ I ~::::::::::::::::!:;;:1 . ., .. " :'$. .~.x.:".:.:-:.:>:;b. .i" .:....-:. ~:.;.:.;.;.:.,.:.,.;.:....."..~.. ~~:.:.;: t:::~::;:~:::::;:;;;.:::;) .~:. .::- r:::::::::::!) \Q) !Jh~ . -:. .:. ''';'';~:: ../,""";:' ::~~ wf)) (~;;>",:," .l?:;;":'''x:~~~~ ::::~:~ f?l ii~~# -~....::. BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-041 lli ~@~O\Ylffi 001 f8) .- i ! PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. February 5, 1996 TO: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Director of Development RE: TRC COMMENTS NEW SITE PLAN - 2nd REVIEW PARK RIDGE The Building Division has reviewed the amended site plan for the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. The swing of the garage door needs to be changed because the interior dimensions of the garage will not permit the door to swing into the garage. 2. No enclosures can be built on the patio because ofthe 15 foot required setback. We recommend that this project be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration. AN:bg XC: William V. Hukill, P.E. PARK lJ~P ARThIENT OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-0 w~ ~ n ell ,-, - FoB _:~i:J~ TO: Tambri 1. Heyden. Planning & Zoning Director ~ukill. P.E., City Engineer February 2. 1996 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. FROM: DATE: v?'/G/9S- }2P~~ ~/~AJA '-t-,~ '.i.J- We have reviewed our January 3, 1996 Memo (No. 96-007) regar ) · ~ u/~ contained therein. We respond as follows: -LJ I) _ _ ~/ I. Revise documents to reflect all comments. l ~ - t<--A~ 2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall m~~ ~ of application. These permits include. but are J lighting, paving, drainage. curbing, landscapin: ;t, /l/. \) L) Permits required from agencies such as the FI 0.J /- permi~ting agenc~ shall be in~l~ded with your "/ . I? ' } _ /J Moot if property lS a condommlUm. c::>f/Ul) I~.-rt../ ~ Insufficient information to complete review. dimensions must comply with R-3 zoning. Single family dwellings ill ~"-.J ___ must comply with R-I district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5, par.G2b. pg.2-21 Previously in compliance. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6. ArtJII, Sec.1 I A, pg.6-3 Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than I foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, ArtJV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 & 6-9 Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap.6. ArtJV, Sec. 100, pg.6-12 In compliance. Previously in compliance. Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.B, pg.6-16 Need SFWMD & L WOO acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec4B, pg.6-24 RE: P ARKRIDGE SITE PLAN - 3RD REVIEW 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. The following additional conditions have appeared with the revised submittal. A. Provide proof of unity of title. B. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6, ArtJII, Sec. I I A, pg.6-3 C. Provide sidewalk locations & details. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. lOT, pg.6-14 D. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.I IF, pg.23-8 A second street name should be provided for the portion of development south of Park Ridge Circle to the cul-de-sac. We strongly recommend valley curbs along roadways to improve drainage. WVH/ck C:PKRIDUE RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-055 rn rn @ rn 0 W rn ,~ fE82. ; -, PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~H- RE: Park Ridge - 2nd Review DATE: February 2, 1996 , 1. the lett~ of permit ftom the State Fresh Water Fish and Game Commission has not been received by my office. 2. The applicant should expound on item #13 ofthe Tree Management Plan to include specific landscape tasks to complete. These would involve: a. exotic vegetation control b. weed/grasses removal/control c. trash/debris removal/control d. trimming restrictions of preserve vegetation e. signage for area f. fencing for area g. other site specific items to protect and properly manage the preserve area while under ownership of the Homeowner Association (documents too). KH:ad KEVIN E. n~LLER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE -* P.O. Box 1015 Boca Raton, Florida 33429-1015 , .__ _ '" .' ..!"~,?!L39~'~6.8~_ i l~ !G~ !i: ;! \'1/ I' I "'II I' 'IJ.' Ir-.,"~ -.. ,. .. '.. -,,-_. 'n ;; : , , I ' .. r ,; , : i J' , . ." ,. "j,f.J() ; ..' PlN17J1Nl~ A?-JD .! '" ,__lg~!!;!I,LP.sPl. __,,~_, 1. Prior to construction. Contractor shall verify trees to remain. trees to be relocated. and trees to be removed. 2. Contractor shall determine access routes to trees that will least disturb existing vegetation. 3. Contractor shall relocate trees with an appropriate sized tree spade, AU materials shall be planted at their original soil levels. of. Relocated trees shall be thoroughly watered-in immediately upon installation in their new locations to eliminate air pockets and enhance proper setting. Contractor shall provide relocated trees with a temporary irrigation system <including canopy sprays). Coordinate additional watering requirements with Owner. 5. All transplanted trees shall be pruned to remove vines. dead and broken branches. etc. Limb-up/thin as necessary to enhance tree shape and future growth. Clean trunks of relocated Sabal Palms. ' 6. Stake/brace relocated trees as necessary to assure stability, 7. Mulch relocated trees with min. 2" Melaleuca mulch or chipped vegetation. 8. Contractor shaUreplace any relocated plants that die due to his negligence (lack of water, physical damage. etc,), Replacements shall be Live Oak. 10' ht., 5' spr. 9. During the land clearing and construction stages of development, Developer shall erect and maintain protective barriers (to the City Inspector's specifications consistent with good management practices) around all trees or groups of trees to be protected. Developer shaU not allow the movement of equipment or the storage of equipment, materials, debris. or fill to be placed within the protective barrier(s). 10. During the construction stage of development. Developer shall not allow the cleaning of equipment or material nor allow the disposal of waste materials such as paint. oil, solvents, asphalt, concrete. mortar. etc. within the drip line of any tree or groups of trees to be protected. 11. No attachments or wires. other than those of a protective or supportive nature shall be attached to any tree. 12. Tree relocation and replacement activity permitted or required by the City of Boynton Beach shall be done in accordance with standard forestry practices and procedures. and aU such plantings shall be reasonably maintained and attended to promote successful establishment and growth. 13. It shall be a responsibility of the homeowner's association / condominium association to provide continuing maintenance of the trees in the future. January 22. 19% PARI: RIDGE - TREE IIAliAGEJD:1iT