LEGAL APPROVAL
%e City of
tJ3oynton tJ3eacli
100 'E. 'Boynton tJJeadi tJJoukvard
P.O. tJJOi(310
'Boynton tJJeadi, !fforitfa 33425-0310
City 9faII: (407) 375-(i()()()
!fJU: (407) 375-6090
April 25, 1994
Gator Engineering Services, Inc.
200 Knuth Road, Suite 214
Boynton Beach, Florida 33436
RE: Initial Review comments - Ridgeway plumbing, Inc. - Major Site
Plan Modification
File No. MSPM 94-003
Hr. Robert E. Fetrow:
The city of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the
documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are
comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial
review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and
documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90
days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not
submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.)
When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not
applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed
separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the
comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment
stating why the comment is not applicable and return the
explanation with the amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12)
complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and
zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been
submi tted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be
distributed to the reviewing departments for a second review and
the reviewers will recommend if the site plan will be placed on a
board meeting agenda for approval (see attached meeting schedule).
If there are major comments not addressed by new plans or the
reviewers recommend that the plan not be forwarded through the
approval schedule, this office will notify you of your alternatives
regarding the site plan as soon as possible.
~merica 's (jateway to the (julfstream
To: Mr. Robert E. Fetrow
Re: Initial Review comments, File No.: MSPM 94-003
Page 2 of 2
We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and
a checklist that contains information regarding the second
submission of the plans and documents for review.
If you should have any questions regarding the comments or on the
approval schedule, please feel free to call Michael E. Haag, who is
coordinating the review of your site plan for the planning and
Zoning Department.
Y;o;~'
~~ri J. Heyden
~n::: & Zoning Director
TJH/jm
Atts.
xc: central File
ehron. File
Project File
c:1STCOHMT.rdg
CHECKLIST
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that
the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for
review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will
enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the
Planning and Zoning Department.
Project Name:
Ridgeway plumbing, Inc.
1. Submit an amended Site plan Review/conditional Use application form that
reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans
and documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical
Review Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a
distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a
completed new form with the changes identified. If there are no changes
required to be documented on the application form, a letter from the
applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal.
2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents,
including surveys that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and
comments made by the Technical Review Committee. Two (2) of the sets
shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the
designer responsible for the drawing(s). Plans and documents shall be
assembled in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of
the project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet
numerically numbered such as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of
3.
3. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain
in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are
located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property.
The minimum size is 511 by 711. Each photograph shall be labeled to
identify the location of the existing structures with respect to the
location of the proposed project.
4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all
drawings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and
signage associated with the project. The colored elevation views shall
match the elevations shown in the documents that were submitted for site
plan review. The applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall
be colored with the color name and associated color reference number
identified. The type of exterior surface material shall be identified
next to the associated color. The colored elevation drawings shall have
compass direction or title of the side of the building identified. The
title block of the original drawing shall be shown. The maximum size is
2411 by 3611. Do no submit on board of any kind.
5. Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample
shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name and
numerical/letter code from an established color chart.
6. Submit a 8 1/211 x 1111 transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to
be used on an overhead projector at board meetings.