APPLICATION
Vander Ploeg and Associates, Inc.
architects and planners
suite 100
1700 north dixie highway
boca raton, florida 33432 (407) 368-1403
April 24, 1989
Planning and Zoning Board
City of Boynton Beach
200 N. Seacrest Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Fl 33425-0310
RE: SITE PLAN APPROVAL
THE VILLAGE SHOPPES OF BOYNTON
Dear Board Members:
Please find enclosed the following:
1 Site Plan Approval Application
1 Check for $350.00 payable to the City of Boynton Beach
2 copies Traffic Impact Analysis Report
Shared Parking Study by Motorist Design Data Movement,
Inc.
2 sets Drainage Calculations by Rossi & Ma1avasi Engineers,
Inc.
2 sets Angor Boring Results by Testing Lab of the Palm
Beaches, Inc.
6 sets Plat of Village Shoppes of Boynton by Rossi & Malavasi
Engineers, Inc.
Planning and Zoning Board
April 24, 1989
Page 2
6 sets Paving & Drainage Plan
Drainage Area Map
Paving and Drainage Details
Traffic Control Plan
Existing Topo Plan
Dimension Control Plan by Rossi & Malavasi Engineers,
Inc.
6 sets Landscape Planting Plan, Details and Specs by Winston
Lee & Assoc., Inc.
6 sets Site Plan
Typical Floor Plan, Wall Types
Dumpster Detail
Theatre Floor Plan
Retail Elevations
Theatre Elevations
Site Photometries and Details
Sign Details
If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not
hesitate to call. 1
Sincerely, ~
Derek Vander Ploeg
President
._ '. t..
.
;' ~
'.::.lll...,~.... _
,.
, ,
, ~
.- -- ..-..~ .-
','
,"
, .
.10
" .
SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION
. ~.---
(" ,~ '." c.> t) /V1 "
i. .I' ~/-
City Qf Boynton Beach, Florida
, Planning and Zoning Board
./, ~ ,~, .t; ,
-;')1-...:"....1<
. .
This application must be filled out completely and accurately
ana submitted in .one (1) copy to the Planning Department. Incomplete
applications will.not be processed.
Please Print Legibly or Type all Information.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name: VILLAGE SHOPPES OF BOYNTON
2. Date this Application is Accepted :
(to be filled out by Planning Dept.)
3. Applicant's Name (person or business entity in whose name this
application is made) :
. FLORIDA MCS, INC., d/b/a SYMCOR PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA,
.'
.... ...
"Address:
.
100 N.E. 3rd Avenue, Ft. Lauderda~e, Florida 33301
,
Phone:
305/765-1045
4. Agent's Name (person, if representing applicant) : .
any, I
I
,
. .
Rrpph;:m; e L. Polk 5-c~ Js ()
Address: 100 N.li:. 3rd Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Phone:
'305/765-1045
5.
Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name: VSB Ltd., a Florida
Address:
'Limited Partnership
100N.E. 3rd Avenue, Ft; Lauderdale. Florida 3330t
Phone:
305/765...,1045
\
6.
cdrrespondence Address (if different than applicant or agent) *:
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters, and
other materials will be mailed.
"
Planning Dept', 10/82
,
I
.
.
1
~
,
,
,
~j
,
,
,
(
I
<
~
.
~
~
s
~
~
)
~
,
,
,
,
.
.
.
,
I
.
.
I
,
.
,
I
.
.
I
.
.
,
,
~
,
I
.
.
I
.
I
,
. "
rage 2
~
7. What'is applicant's interest in the premises affected?
Owner and Developer
-----
(Owner, Bu~e~, ~essee, Builder, Developer,
Contract puichaser, etc.)
8. Street Address or Loca tion of Site: ...l:L-h_CQrner of ...C'nn8Y""~~ AH'i;l~Q,.-
and 22nd Avenue, Boynton Beach, Florida
9. Legal Description of Site/property Control #:
See Attached "F.xhi hi T "A"
. .
10. Intended Use(s) of Site:
Commercial Shopping Center
-ll. Developer or Builder, Florida, MCS, Inc" d/b/a Symcor Properties of
Florida
12. Architect:
Derek Vander Ploeg, Vander Ploeg & Assoc., Inc.
13. Landscape Archi tect: Winston lee I; Assoc" Inc.
14. Site Planner:
Derek Vander Ploe~~ Vander P1OP.~ 1; Ar::.r::.r'1r> Incr
15. Engineer:
16. Surveyor:
Rossi 1; !'1=Jl.=m=l~~i
Richard L. Shephard & Assoc.
17. Traffic Engineer: Daniel N, Murray, LE, Motorist Desisn ll.=iTri MO"b>wnt:, Ine,
l~, Has a site plan been previously appr0v~d by the City Council
for this proper ty? _-.-Under.iLPi.f.f~~nt Qwner.__. .....______________...:-
19, Es tima ted cons truc tion co s t 0 f propo :;( '( 1 ili"[ll:ovem.;; 1"1 ts sho\vn on
lhis site plan: $15 Million Dollars exclu~~ng land costs
,
Planning ,Dept.. 10/,82
','
,10
Page 3
II. SITE DATA
The following information must be filled out below and must appear,
where applicable, on al~ six (6) copies of the site plan.
1. Land Use Category shown in
the Comprehensive Plan
2. Zoning District C-3
3. Area of Site 19.41 acres ,845.559 sq. ft. '
4 . Land Use -- Acreage Breakdown
a. Residential, including ac],:'es % of site
surrounding lot area or
grgunds
b. Recreation Areas * acres % of site
(excluding water area) I'
c. Water Area ' acres . % of site
d. Commercial 18.26 acres 94. % of site
e. Industrial acres % of site
f. Public/ln- ,acres % of site
stitutional
g. Public,Private, and Canal
Rights-of-Way 1.15 acres 6 % of site
h. Other (speci-fy) acres % of site
i. Other (specify)
acres
% of site
j. Total Area of Site
19,41
'00
% of site
* Including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and
having a minimum dimension of 50 ft. by 50 ft.
5.. Surface Cover
a. Ground Floor Building 175,618
Area (lIbuilding footprint")
sq. ft.
20.9
% of site
. ,
b. Water Area
. ".
24,500 ," sq.ft.
2.8
% of site
c. Other Impervious Areas,
including paved area of
pUblic & private streets,
paved area of parking
lots & driveways (ex-
cluding landscaped ,areas) ,
and sidewalks, patio~,
decks, and athletic
courts. 467,874' sq. ft.
..ss ~
% of site
I f
I I
. I
. I
,
,
I
I
I
I
, ,
I I
I
. I
, I
; :
, ;
d. Total Impe:rvious Area 667, qq? sq. ft.
-7 9... 0
% of site
e. Landscaped Area Inside
of Parking Lots
(20 ~q.ft. per interior
. parking space required--
see Sec. 7.S-35(g) of
Landscape Code) .
50,306
sq ..ft.
5 , 9 % 0 f site
Planning Dept. 10/82
-
'. ; . . ..... -.-.... ---
Page 4'
0;
f. ' .~ 127,261 '15,1 . : % of 'site
,Other Landscaped Areas, sq.ft.
excluding Water Area
g. Other Pervious Areas,
including Golf Courses,
Natural Areas, Yards, and
.Swales , but excluding 177,567
Water Areas sq.ft. 21.0 % of' site
h. Total Pervious Areas 845,559 sq. ft. 100.0 % of site
i. Total Area of Site ~q.ft. lOO % of site
6. Floor Area
a. Residential sq.ft.
b. Commercial/Office 175.618 sq. ft.
c. Industrial/Warehouse sq. ft.
d. Recreational sq. ft.
e. PublicI
Institutional sq.ft.
f. Other (specify) sq. ft.
g. Other (specify)
sq.ft.
h. Total Floor Area 175,618 sq. ft.
..
7. Number of Residential Dwelling Units
a. Single-Family Detached dwelling units
b. Duplex dwelling units
c. Multi-Family (3 +
attached dwelling units
(l) Efficiency dwelling units
(2) 1 Be.droom dwelling units
(3) 2 Bedroom dwelling units
(4) 3+ Bedroom dwelling units
d. Total Mul t.~-Family dwelling units
e. Total Number of Dwelling
Units
. "
8. Gross Density Dwelling Units per f\cre
9. Maximum Height of Structures on Site
10. Required Off-Street Parking -
35
feet
1
stories
a. Calculation of Required
Number of Off-Street
Parking Spaces
Theatre - 2000 Seats at
b. Off-Street Parking Spaces
Provided on Site Plan
Total Provided
1/4 Seats = 500 Spaces
1,141 - See Attached Trnrri~
Study for Concurent. non-
Retail - 145,798 Sq. Ft.
at 1/2.00 s.f. = 729 spaces
conc;.urent use ca1cu1nTi nns
Total = 1,299
....'........~...N non4-
, n I~?
't t"
Page 9
IV.' MISCE~ANEOUS
(Ch~l.
The following ~aterials must be submitted in one {l} copy:
A check, payable to the City of Boynton Beach, as per the
attached fee schedule.
~2.
For projects that generate at least three thousand (3,000)'
vehicle trips per day or two hundred and fifty (250) single
directional vehicle trips in a one (1) hour period, a traff~c
~,',,~\:.~t:. 'i:44'.~:J"':'':'':''; :7"~=-: ~~ =~~::~:.-:t.=.d.
3.
Any other engineering and/or technical data, as may be re-
quired by the Technical Review Board to determine compliance
with the provisions of the City's Code of Ordinances.
. V. CERTIFICATION
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and
plans submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records
of the Planning and zoning'Board. (I) (We) hereby certify that
the above statements and any statements or showings in any papers
or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of (my) (our)
knowledge and belief This application will not be accepted
unless igned a or ing to the instructions below~~
e of Owner(s) or Trustee, te
or~ orized Principal if property
is owned by a corporation or other
business entity.
VI.
..~
at
.
nate the above signed person as (my)
regard to this apPlica~
~.~
atur ,.of Owner(s) or Trustee, :e
or orized Principal if property
is owned by a corporation or other
business entity.
(I) (We) hereby
(our) authorized
SPACE BELOW THIS LINE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Review Schedule:
Date Received:
Technical Review Board
Planning & Zoning Board
Community Appearance Board
City Council
Stipulations of Final Approval:
Date
Date
Date
Date
Other Government Agencies/Persons to be contacted:
Addit~onal Remarks:
-.....
I
..
4J
~
~ ~
to
~ ,,'
~
(.. ~~
ni tt"
~ ~
~ "'
1\ .'
~~
()
\)
C\.()) ,'i::~
EXHIBIT "A"
~ZZ'
TRACT RAR
LEc.\L DESCRIPTION
",^ I'ARCH 01' LAND LYING IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 4' SOUTI1, RANGE 4)
EMT, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID LAND DEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIl\ED AS 'FOLLOWS:
COMMI:NCING AT THI:' ,WEST QI)ARTI:I~ CORNl:ll OF SI:CTlON 17, TOWNSI1IP "
SOUTlt, RANGE 4) EAST; THEN'::E,wlT!l A ilEA lUNG OF NORTH &9' 0&' 4'J" EAST,
ALONG TIlE EAST-WEST QUAR j ER LINE or SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF }O.O,
FEET TO A POINT ON THE EA:'T RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CONGRESS AVI!; THENCE
WIHI A BEARING OF SOI.:TH I" 44' )'./" WEST, ALONG'THE EAST RIGHT 01' WAY
LINE OF CONGRESS AVE. A D1".TANCE OF 70.07 FEET TO A !'OINT; THENCE WITtI
A BEARING OF NORTH &9' 0&' 4'./" EMT, ALONG A LINE LYING 70.00 FEET
scum or ANI) PARALLEL TO THr. EAST-WEST QUARTI!R L1N!:. OF S!:.CTION 17,.
A DISTANCE 01' 10.01 rEET Te:. THE POINT OF DEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE
WITI1 A IlEARING OF NORTH sq. OS' 49" EAST, ALONG A LINE LYING 70.00
rEET SOUTIl OF AND I'ARALLLL TO THE EAST-WEST QUARTER LINE or.SECTION
17; SAID UNI: ALSO BI:ING THr SOUTH UNI: 01' LAKE WORTU DRAINAGE DISTI{ICT
LATI:RAL CANAL NO. 11, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 17)2, PAGE 612 OF THE
runLIC RECORDS OF PALM DEAOI COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 71&.22
FEl:.T TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF SOUTH I" '4' )9" WEST, A
OISTANC::: OF )11.)& FI:ET TO A POINT; TIlENCE WITH A BEARiNG 01" SOUTH &'J'
0&' 49" WEST, A DISTANCE or 6'.12.06 I"EET; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF NORTH
"" ))' 16" WEST. A DISTANCE 01" )6.15 I"I:ET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGliT
or WAY LINE OF CONGRESS AVE; TIlENCE WITH A DEARING OF NORTH I' 44'
)9" I,MT, A DISTANCE OF 2&}.22 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF
DEGINNING. ".
CONTAINING '.121 ACRES MORE Oil LESS AND SUDJECT TO EASEMENTS AND
RIGliTS 91' ,WAY OF RECORD.
TRACT "0
LEGAL DESCRIPT,ON
A l'Anc.EL 01' LA"'1l LYIN(, IN ~CCTlON 17, TOWN:'IIII"4' SOUTH, I(AN(.1: '1
E^ST, I'ALM IIEAC:U COUNry, I LORIDA. SAID LAND QI:ING MOI{E I'AIO'ICI!LAIII.\
I)E~CIUIlED AS rOLLOw,,: . .
COMMENCING ^ T TliE WES, QlIAll TEll CORNl:ll OF SECTION 17. TOWN~llIl' ,~
SOUTH, RANGE ,) I!A~T; TI :ENCE WITH ^ UEARING 01' NOIlTIl K'I' OS' ,,')" [,\\T
ALONG nl!:. I:AST-WI:~T QlJ,\IlTEll LINE OF SECTION 17 A I)I.,rANCr:. OF ~II.I)) ,
rl:ET TO A POINT UN THE '!Asr IUGHT OF W^Y LINE 01' CONC;IlI;\" AVI:;
lHENCE WITH A UI:AIUNG ~'F ~ounl I" '" 39" WE5T, ALONG TltC l^~T IHC,III
OF WAY lINI: OF C:ONGRE\, AVr:. A DI~TANc:r: OF 70.07 I'I'.CT; TIIEN~:I: Willi .\
IIEAIUNG OF N(\ll Tli ~')' 0&' .']" EA!iT. ALONG A LINE L YINl; 10.'JO I:l:: r \1\10111
OF ^ND l'AII~LLEl To Tm, r:^"T.WE~T QI.:^RT(II LIN( or \E("T1l\N 17: ''':Il
LINt:. ALSO "CING TIlE SOU' H L1NI: OF L^KE WORTll I)IIAINAGE J)J~1Il!t:1
~ATI:II!,L CAN^L NI': 11, ^; lH:COllDl:l) IN 0.11. IIOCK 17)1, "AGr:. 611, (\" 1I11,
,IIIILlC Rt:COI10S 0" "^LM III;I\CII COUNTY, HOIlIlM A [)1~TANCI: (\1' \'1'"
r:EI:T TO A 1'01NT; T1II.NC:C WITH A IICAIUNG l"r '1\" r'lI I' "~' )'1" wr'l" ~
DI:ST^NCE OF 'II \.H I:EET HI THI! POINT or IlI!GINNING: TlII:NCI: '.'ITII ^'
IlE^llING OF NOI{Hl. ". 21.' "," EAST, ^ DISTANCl ell' )~.)) "I:ET; TIIlNC'L
WIT.1l A BE^RINC 01,' NOIUII 1'1' 0&' ''I'' EAST, A ""T ^NCr: or: I.'J'I )) FUT'
~liC~CE II:'lTIi ^ [1"MIN~ or: SOllT': I' W l'1" WI:\T, ^ r~isT^NC:f.' (\1' 7');. ;"
1t:I!T. r:'t~NCE ":J1'.l.A III:AIUNG OF SOUTH 1I'J' 0" )1" WI:H. ^ DI\T^NCT ""
(.'11.07 H~I;TI T1tL:NCIl WITll A III,^'UNG 01' NOIITlI .,. '" 2'," w[,r A 1\I~r^NI'
OF )(,.17 I'I:E TI TlII,NCE WIHI 1\ IICAllING 01: NO" TlI I' ~.' )'1" EA'i'T A I.
OIST^NCE or-. 7~6.)6 FI!ET Mc~H.E OR LESS TO THE "OINT OF t1ECINNI'I':c.;.
~OIGNHTT^SINOING I 1.0'1(. ^<~RE~ MOllE OIl LESS AND SlJUJI:CT TO EASI:MI:NT!i AND
" F ,,^Y 01" KI:CORO. . ,
, ~,:
.I.~
: (
. ~
~/~
t"-:
p.
b~
.,i
,I
;'i
:'~1
.~l
"
" .
. ., '.,
.....,
:~: "
.,
J,,.
;~~n
~1
',)
~
"
~,
\
\j
~
.~~
~'
~;
~ ~J
.. .
t 0
~j \::
I
i') \J
~:) :s:
~'{
~
I
I
I
.~
fa)
~
I
I
1
! to
!
I
~
If,
1 .
'. ,
:t. ~
j ,
"
'. . I. t
'{j )\ ~
I~ "-
r ~
I~
~
., ()
\, ~
t\.
"-
~' ,~
~ I "
~I ~
V) I' {^
QJ I V)
~f
\],
.~"
~,~
~
~
f\1
(}.
t,
~
"-
~
~ <b
.... "-
I. ~
\'~
~~
~\
\....
~',
.~ I
.*
c I
(}Q I
".
tv" f
(\ I
'. \.i I
'.....'
~
! ~"
~.~
IS
~
QO ~ Q: c:: Z ...l cr;: Lij C5 ~ \:" ,
UJ UJ 0 Q St UJ U ~,Q. ~,~_ ,_
' U UJ VI ~ L_ 0 ~ _ II') u.. ..;....>- _".,"
~ ..... r- Z.....' ~ 0 -, - l.U t='~. '.
>- t: ..../ c.. ~ ~O.... J ~O ~ ~:> ~ '.' "~
co...c(..... J:c( .....~LlJ'...., "
UJ ~ UJ ~ >-cn ... 0 >-0( ::> II') >- "< ~tt''''''\
~ 0 UJ ....J:' a ~ I- ~...,. ~ UJ VI ~ LlJ. ~ :;\ "
UJ Z Z oC z ::> c.. VI .... :> -I.>
:z: <: UJ u.. >- tL. UJ u.~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ .:5!5 .>'..,
-...JljO~o~ -VlVlZI-~ VI VI VI"
'~."."
.' l'
.~
..~. ".
.~.>J :.;' 'j"
>-
.....
0:
",,<
41'S
wu
~-
Z~
<<'.
Q:c..
~~~,
N~2'
'..J Q (J"
~ ~~
c..W
-lQ
~~ U
qti 1-0
.. ~ .-
.JiLl ~~
,,0, Z.
O..J Q~
'-< 1--
- <.7 U 0:0
~l&l W
,,-' II")~
Z~
Si ~i:
~ ZZ..
-::>11")
....0 >- 0 ilt
-'uo
O::c-'
ZU5
<<u.
...!I.IJ
&:..c:::lVl
o <
...!30
w<w
Uc..$
a: _~
<I-U
c..VIVI
<~~
t
QC
~~
)e.
j
a:
" <
""-'
.:J
wu,
~-
Z....
< Q:,
c:~
-&:J
::Co:
"'0
::l~
~<.7
"'z
...-
c.1:.I
-lQ
:ro
~~
1.:.1 .
"" u.>I:J. c:: <0 N
"'" 0 < ~ c: - ~ '""15 t1 u. 2
== g.. W /of:..J 0 ~ u. c:::l '.. :r..... " :r .:~ ~,~
~....u:a=a::Z~0<~5t8U~t; v1
; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 1:J:r;:; ~ IU&:J Sl&J Q ~.
OOI-Z WUZI-l!::w1l,.ta:&C1. \l.f
~ ~ B 8.~~ 0 :r :J i < :x: ~ ~ ::a: ~ ~ i"
.001 ~ Uta: .......J. IIJ
~ <~ <...~o N.<*> '
-I: 0 UI:.I':"u~~.... .~..
Z .... ~ a w c:::l I- Z . ~ · ' <f'
oo:-w ~ C::w,:," \:..<l,l._~ 0
-OZZI-Vl~~:r~~O 'O:x:a ~
tJZQ:;cr<~O-"'~<UJ~8"'CC ~.
~ ~ ... >- ii .:c.. ... .::....:i~ ~ IX i u. fd
'-lj~~o ~5~~~r:~~8 gi.a
Oz 1:.10 ~e:. JaOu./1!- ~;>
'ct"U.~~Z8~ \:..~oucto~o V)
L:J<O ~.J"VI<O. uuO e
Z~~""o<o~oU_<~~Z~1 <
" _:rCC2U I-Uo.: <<lCiZ
O<-'Q~(<~~....z N~~':J \,
U C:C::I:J) -w<&- .c.-!l.l&J
C:::\l.fl-~.Jul-~~.o~\l.fc:::l>-W
1:J!::~VlI-<:i~U.o.7.Z>-~<~.r. ~
~ilt<<,-~aZ~ I-.J<I- . 0
<~~\l.fO~2g~<~~iltb~O'-'~
::l U O'w <.7 < <: N -\:ill < \:.. 0 ::: ..... '"
O;?;....f=2:.J!#l.:J~t;:;!:..uO"'..I-~ ~6
I- ~ d? Zu r- ~ ~ c ~ O.J I- ~w ~,w :o;~
11").... ~.- Z _ Z < I:' U _...!. '0
~ -~ OOC::5~\l.fg..~"lj~~~IX :au
. I-Vl....WI- zu....-I.:J~<:r>-o ~llJ
1:.1 <! < ~ c:::l ~ ";0 z. ::::::.... c.. I- -' U IX
~Wl:JO O-U<"'<<I- o::\l.f <o.
... u. ~ I-~UJ-,VI -_ IX _
f"'\\l.fc..ow W!a. 0 <~<wo 00
~ ~ = < I- ~ t3z u 0 ...'< ~ W ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ >-
I:JI- Z < :r Ow c:< '<
ljljt)~o~~lE<~:r":=~Ol&J:;:; ::..
ZZz ~< .1-.......~E....".O-'\l.fllJ .....
-<01- C::N -0.....1 ou.~u. Zu.
U c:: ..J c.J l:.l 0.... ,- VI Z c:l -I- Z 0
~ .<!:-l~:z:~doz\:..l.IJuU.oo '~r..~< -VI
~:I: -I- - 0 1-""" I-
~I-":.....O~:'::IXO~ ?:tJzd50z~~:r
~II")O OU Uljwz- 0" olj
8~~~~~g~e;~t:;2~u~~ uC2
~
"'::'''r
'.
" .
- J .
"'
I:J
t) c.J
\:..~.... <: ~ ~
"" c>:r lj\:..~ < ~ 41'
· " <2 _zo<wl-." .... ~.
~ W c::1-- c:(JVI~llJ_"" 41'_
~~~~ Z~!o~5~ut~~<~_L
v)~<Wl-o -:r .zc.Ju.z ~~o
Z~I-G~~l:J.JI-N<~~\:..O<':NZ~
~o~zw<~C::::::::~<.I-""W~~,OZ
~~COw -'~O-o--~uc~;za
.~<U:Z:~<C::~~ii~zlj~Z< ~~\:..~
.... I- <l:J~ <~~o
-:t . ~ I- t..) ::> ~ 0 :J Z \:.. .... ~ IW;
Z~~.~~5O-< i~30a~_5~~
,QozzwO\:...J....-'. _.ljW c.JO~-
I-ZO_...! <VI\:..C:>5l:Ju<~.\:..~2
~ u. ~.J < S -~ 0 d ~ c:: ~ .z ~ 0 l:J
VlOU)e~dt;:;'WZ:J~&:..I-t;:;~~~c:::l~
' llJ<VI....<I-Z-O_o~< -z \l.f
!:!: lj V) ~ w ,. L:..l "'l _ _ ,. ,.... :::... _.... < , .
o
Z
<
II")
I-
Z
t:J
~
llJ
VI
<
llJ
e
....
(,),
l:J
..,
....
1~'
~
,.
SHARED PARKING STUDY
FOR
THE VILLAGE SHOPPES OF BOYNTON
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Prepared By: ~~/~~
Daniel N. Murray, .E.
Apr i 1 24, 1989
MDDM Project *89-012
r:~7
Date
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trsff/c/Trsnsportstlon Engineering Consultsnts
INTRODUCTION
------------
------------
This study is designed to address and document the parking
requirements for shared uses at The Village Shoppes of Boynton,
a proposed mixed use commercial development at the northeast
corner of Congress Avenue and NW 22nd Avenue in the City of
Boynton Beach, Florida. Since Quantum Boulevard, which is a
4-lane divided highway, severs a portion of the retail from the
cinema, it was felt that significant shared parking was a viable
option for the development north and south of Quantum Boulevard.
Although the parking on the opposite side of the roadway is
reasonably convenient for patrons using any of the facilities, it
is important to provide positive traffic control regulations to
facilitate pedestrian traffic across Quantum Boulevard. Thus, a
parking area analysis was the method used in making a
determination as to the viability of shared parking usage.
Because of the varied parking usage within the development,
namely cinema and retail, on the north portion, and retail on the
south portion, it is believed that a shared parking usage study
would be appropriate.
Because of the varied requirements and usage of parking
spaces during different hours of the day, it is felt that this
study, using the interactions associated with shared parking
phenomenon as published by the Urban Land Institute CULl>, is
appropriate. The Urban Land Institute 1983 publication is the
methodology used in this report.
Additionally, the formula required by the Ordinance No. 86-8
of the City of Boynton Beach was calculated to ensure that the
proper buffer was maintained within this proposed proJect.
BACKGROUND
----------
----------
The Village Shoppes of Boynton is a mixed-use development
proposed for the northeast corner of Congress Avenue and NW 22nd
Avenue in the CIty of Boynton Beach, Florida. The land use
proposals for the proJect south and north of Quantum Boulevard
are outlined below:
-1-
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrllfflclTrllnsportlltlon Engineering Consultants
North of Quantum Boulevard
Retail
..... ........ ..........
3,200 Square Feet
r f62 = !) c2c2 1
/' p- 0 1; ~ !J-trL
;Z X~; Ji.:f f
Cinema
2,000 Seats
South of Quantum Boulevard
I Y-;(J 51ro
Retail...................... '143,278 Square Feet
The City of Boynton Beach requirements, taken separately,
would result in the parking requirements outlined below:
North of Quantum Boulevard
Cinema
(2,000 Seats x I parking space
per 4 seats) ....................... 500 spaces
Retai I
(3,200 Square Feet @ 5 spaces
per 1,000 Square Feet) ............. 16 spaces
Total Spaces Required ..............516 spaces
South of Quantum Boulevard
Reta i I ! t;2J 51 CC
(143,2r8 Square Feet @ 5 spaces
per 1,000 Square Feet) ............ ''71-1 spaces
713
The Urban Land Institute methodology allows for a
calculation and assumption of shared parking capacities which
would result in an overall site plan which would provide for more
efficient parking on the site. Therefore, it is this methodology
that is used in the compilation of this report in order to allow
a more efficient usage of parking area within the site based on
the proposed land use.
-2-
f:J-:V~ ~bf,~
_ '.'___., __."m_______.._.~____._________
MOTORIST DESIGN DA TA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trsfflcfl"rsnsportatlon Engineering Consultants
ULJ METHODOLOGY
---------------
---------------
The basis for the Urban Land Institute's research was to
define the characteristics of parking demands for single land
uses. Then, by analyzing parking accumulations at mixed use
centers, the shared parking concept was quantified.
The ULI recommends the following procedure be followed in
determining shared parking:
1. Initial ProJect Review: Knowledge of the site and the
intended land uses is very important in beginning the shared
parking analysis. Results from the initial review for The
Village Shoppes of Boynton has been presented in earlier sections
in terms of square footage and land uses proposed.
2. Adjustment for Peak Parking Factor: The parking
factors are those specified in the City of Boynton Beach Code as
detailed earlier in this report and indicate a need for~1'~
spaces, for the section of development south of Quantum
Boulevard and for 516 spaces, for the section of development
north of Quantum Boulevard.
3. Analysis of Hourly Accumulations: Parking accumulation
curves are selected by reviewing the ULI data and incorporating
site specific conditions.
4. Estimate of Shared Parking: The hourly parking demand
for each land use is merged to estimate overall shared parking
demand. This is simply the hour by hour addition of parking
demand for each use to estimate aggregate demand.
THE ANALYSIS
------------
-------------
Applying the ULI methodology to The Village Shoppes of
Boynton yielded the hourly parking accumulation curves for each
of the two land uses for weekday and Saturday conditions.
Figure - Retail Park i ng Accumulation - Weekday
Figure 2 - Cinema Parking Accumulation - Weekday
Figure 3 - Retail Park i ng Accumulation - Saturday
Figure 4 - Cinema Park i ng Accumulation - Saturday
-3-
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trafflc/Transportatlon Engineering Consultants
100
90
z 80
0
......
I-
<[
..J 70
::>
~
::>
u 60
u
<[
l:) 50
z
......
~
~
<[ 40
a..
~
<t 30
w
a..
u.. 20
0
I-
Z 10
w
u
~
w 0
a..
~
<t
C)
C)
J,
~
C)C)oggg~C)cC)C)C)C)C)oggg
~ggd~ruoggggggggO~N
~oo~___~ruMv~~~OO~___
HOUR OF THE DAY
RET AIL
WEEKDAY
_) I
-4-
FIGURE #1
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
rrs fflclTrsnsport.,lon Englne.rlng Consultsnls
TABLE 1
WEEKD1>.Y PARKING 1>.CCUMUL1>.TION
SOUTHERLY NORTHERLY
TIME RETAIL RETAIL CINEMA TOTAL
------------------------------------------------------------------
6:00 1>.M 0 0 0 0
7:00 57 1 0 58
8:00 129 3 0 132
9:00 136 3 0 139
10:00 208 5 0 213
11 :00 280 6 0 286
12:00 NOON 416 9 75 500
1 :00 PM 416 9 125 550
2:00 416 9 175 600
3:00 402 9 200 611
4:00 366 8 300 674
.......~ (95)
5:00 \ 337 8 350
~ )
6:00 215 5 400 620
7:00 136 3 450 589
8:00 108 2 500 610
9:00 57 1 500 558
10:00 43 1 500 544
11 : 00 0 0 400 400
12:00 MID. 0 0 350 350
--.---------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
100% PARKING
SPACES 717 16 500 1233
~
"
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Tra fflc/Transporta "on Engineering Consultant.
TABLE 2
SATURDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION
SOUTHERLY NORTHERLY
TIME RETAIL RETAIL CINEMA TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0
7:00 22 0 0 22
8:00 72 2 0 74
9:00 215 5 0 220
10:00 315 7 0 322
11:00 351 8 0 359
12:00 NOON 387 9 150 546
1:00 PM 416 9 250 675
2:00 380 8 350 ~~>
3:00 366 8 350 374
4:00 351 8 350 709
5:00 265 6 350 621
6:00 143 3 400 546
7:00 93 2 450 545
8:00 57 500 558
9:00 14 0 500 514
10:00 0 0 500 500
11 :00 0 0 400 400
12:00 HID. 0 0 350 350
--.---------------------------------------------------------------
-_._--------------------------------------------------------------
100% PARKING
SPlICES 717 16 500 1233
~
,.:'
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon EnglnBBrlng Consultants
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT
FOR
THE VILLAGE SHOPPES OF BOYNTON
LOCATED ON THE EASTSIDE OF CONGRESS AVENUE
JUST NORTH OF NW 22ND AVENUE
IN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Prepared By:
" ~" _ ./ " / -./7
v<,J ~~ # /'--7~
Dan!el N. Murray, fa-; .
0~7
Date
Apr i 1 24, 1989
MDDH ProJect #89-012
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-----------------
-----------------
Page
Introduction
...... .... .... I" ....... II II .... II ...... II ......
Planning Data
.. II ...... ...... ......... ... II.. .... .... ......
Site LocatIon Map -- Figure #1 .............................. 2
Existing 1988 Average Annual Daily Traffic -- Figure #2 ..... 3
Trip Generation and Distribution ............................ 4
Tr a f fie Ass i g nrne n t .....................,.................... 5
New Trip Distribution Percentages -- Figure #3 .............. 6
Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #4 ............ .......... 7
Existing + Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #5 ........... 8
Existing + Development + Background
Daily Traffic -- Figure #6 ............ ................... 9
Existing 1988 Peak Hour Seasonal Traffic -- Figure #7 ....... 11
PM Development Access Peak Hour Traffic -- Figure #8 ........ 12
Existing + New Development Peak Hour Traffic -- Figure #9 ... 13
Existing + New Development + Background
Traffic - Flgure *tI0 ..................................... 14
Highway Capacity Analysis ................................... 15
HIghway Link Capacity -- Figure #11 ......................... 16
TraffIC Performdnce Standards Category Evaluations .......... 17
Traffic Performance Standard Evaluation -- Figure #12 ....... 18
Fu) 1 Bu i 1 d --Ou 1 Fiev i ew ....................................... 19
Required Highway Improvements ............................... 19
L
AppendIX "A" -- HIghway CapaCIty AnalysIs
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrsfflclTrsnsportsllon Engineering Consultsnts
INTRODUCTION
------------
------------
A 6.28 acre parcel of property Just north of NW 22nd Avenue
located on the eastslde of Congress Avenue is being proposed as a
commerCIal shopping center. The development sIte plan has been
identifIed as "The Village Shoppes of Boynton". The project has
access onto Congress Avenue, NW 22nd Avenue, and Quantum
Boulevard. For additional background information and details of
the study site, reference should be made to the Site Location
Map -- FIgure #1.
To ensure that the traffic flow and safety issues are
properly addressed, the City of Boynton Beach requires that a
current traffic Impact analysis and report be undertaken to
address the traffIc generated by the proposed development and its
effect on the adJacent highway links and intersections. As a
result, Motorist Design Data Movement, Inc. (MDDMl, Traffic
Engineering Consultants have been retained by the developer to
investigate and determine the traffic impacts created by the
proposed commercial shopping center.
In conducting the traffic study, It was necessary to
evaluate the eXIsting highway network and their associated
traffic volumes. Then the development traffic had to be
determIned and assigned to the surrounding highways.
Consideration of adJacent trip attractIons and trip productions
was lmportant in examining the development trIp patterns.
Traffic data from Palm Beach County, and the Florida
Department of Transportation was utilIzed. Also, the amended
Boynton Beach Mall DRI and Quantum Park traffic report data were
referenced. Furthermore, an inventory of the adJacent highway
network was undertaken. The traffic data is shown in the
ExistIng 1988 Average Annual Dally TraffIC -- Figure #2.
PLANNING DATA
-------------
--------------
The TraffIC EngIneerIng Impact Analysis was based on the
sIte plan prepared by Vander Ploeg and Associates, Inc. Specifi-
cally the sIte plan reflects a proposed commerCIal shopping
center. The fol Jowlng data describes the site data:
-}-
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trafflc/Transportatlon Engineering Consultants
SITE LOCATION MAP
FIGURE # 1
H oluxo Road
"8 -ci
0
a:: >-
Q.) 1.0 as
0 O"l -
c: II)
Q.) I Q.)
~ ....... b
3:
0 0
cu
-' U')
Miner R
PROJECT
SITE
cJ
>
<t
I/)
I/)
<1>
b,
C
o
Old Bo nton Beach Blvd.
1.0
O"l
I
-
W. Bo ton Beoch Blvd.
o llOO 2400 4000
~
-2-
-d
>
as
.....
I/)
Q.)
~
o
o
cu
U')
N
MOTORIST DESIGN DA TA MOVEMENT, INC.
TraffJclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
EXISTING 1988 AFERAGE
ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC
FIGURE # 2
N
Rood
'25,422
"0
0 -0
0
a:: >
fU Lrl co
U O"'l Ii;
c:
fU I v
.... ...... h
~
0 0
-1 ~
Miner Roo
PROJECT 5.815
5,218\ SITE
N.W. 22
5,486
\
-0
5- .2:
Lrl co
11,752 c: O"'l -
0 I V)
Old Boynton Beach u fU
...... ....
Blvd. (.)
0
~
Blvd.
24,945---& '30,854 "
22,492 41.022
o 800 20400 4000
~ 3100 I
-3-
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Englnaerlng Consultants
South of Quantum Boulevard
Retail............................. 143,278 Square Feet
North of Quantum Boulevard
Re t a i I
3,200 Square Feet
2,000 Seats
C i nerna ...............................
Other pertinent data that was researched and evaluated
includes the inventory of the highway links adJacent to the site
and within the zone of influence. Likewise, the traffic activity
at the adJacent intersections within the zone of influence was
determIned from the recent DRI data.
TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
In determining the trip generatIon rate for the subJect
development, it was necessary to use the recently published
Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation -- Third
Edition Publication. Based on this data source the subsequent
computations were made:
::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::: ::::::::: :::::: :::::::: ::::::: ::::::
TYPE OF FACILITY
UNIT SIZE
TRIP RATE
DAILY TRIPS
North of Quantum
Boulevard
Retail
CInema
3,200 Sq. Ft.
2,000 Seats
67.16 trips/d.u.
1.762 trips/seat
215 trips/day
3,524 trips/day
South of Quantum
Boulevard
Retail
143.278 Sq. Ft. 67.16 trips/d.u. 9.623 trips/day
Total Trips =
13,362 trips/day
... II..... II. II.. ... II II II ..... II II II II ... II II II ...... II II II.. II II II II ..... II II II II II II....
.. II II II II.. II II II II.... II II II II ... II" II II.. II.. II.. ..... II II II II.. II" II II II.. II II II II.. II .....
TRIP DEDUCTIONS FOR CAPTURED RETAIL TRIPS
Captured Trips
2S't
x
215
=
54
2460 trips/day
25%
X 9623
= 2406
II II II II II II II II II . II . II II II II II II . II II II II II II II II II II . II II II . II II II II II II II II II II II II . II . . II II . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RESlILTING EXTERNAL TRIPS = 13,362
2,460 = 10,902 trIps/day
:::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::: :::
-4-
.
.
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Traff/clTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
To determIne a realIstIc traffic distribution pattern it is
essential to undertake a careful review and evaluation of the
surroundIng trIp production wIthin the zone of influence. ~lso,
the characterIstics of the hIghway links were revlewed to
estlmate the most logical route selection. Based on the
preVIously indicated factors, a compilation of trip percentages
was derived as displayed in the New Trip Distribution
Percentage -- FIgure #3.
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
------------------
------------------
By utilIZing the trip distribution percentages indicated in
Figure #2. the development traffIC for The VIllage Shoppes of
Boynton on each affected highway link within the area of
Influence can be determined. The computations are depicted in
the Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #4
So that the existing traffic conditions and the resulting
impacts due to the development can be properly evaluated, it is
necessary to determine the daily traffic levels on ALL HIGHWAY
LINKS withIn the zone of influence. The data IS depicted in the
Existlng + Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #5.
Slnce the developer has forecasted a one (1) year build-out
for the proJect. it is important to evaluate the estimated
background traffic. which are trips to be generated by other
approved proJects. Standard practice within Palm Beach County is
to use the historical growth rate for each highway link.
Recognizlng the signIfIcant increase due to the Regional Mall, it
is recommended that a growth rate of 15% be utilized. This data
IS deplcted In the EXlstlng + Development + Background Daily
TraffIC -- Figure #6.
-5-
. '
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Traffic/Transportation Engineering Consultants
NEW TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
FIGURE # 3
N
H oluxo 14% Road
2%- -4%
"0
0
0
a::
Q)
L)
c:
Q) 20%
~
0
-1
-d
>
as
L!") .-
(j) VI
I Q)
- --
L)
o
~
5%
i 4%
v f
2%
5%-
C1.i
~!1O%
r.n
Q)
5>
c:
o
Old Boynton Beach Blvd.
3%_
W. Bo nton Beach Blvd.
! - 3%
4%
L!")
(j)
I
-
-d
>-
as
]
~
Q)
(f)
o 800 2400 4000
~
-6-
. .
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Traffic/Transportation Engineering Consultants
DEVELOPMENT DAILY TRAFFIC
FIGURE #4
H Rood
218/; "- 436
"Q
0 1,090 -d
0
ex: ffi
llJ L.()
U en ..-
c: V)
llJ 545\ I GJ
!i ..... b
0
0 ~
-1
Miner R
PROJECT
545\ SITE
N.W. 22n
I /
545\ 2,726 1,635
-d
>
L.() as
11,752 en .....
In
1 GJ
..... b
Blvd. 0
GJ
tf)
Blvd.
327 ---~ '327 "'327
436
o 800 2400 4000
I J: l~ 32'00 I
-7-
N
. .
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Traff/clTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
EXISTING & DEVELOPMENT
DAILY TRAFFIC
FIGURE #5
"'8
o
a:::
Cl>
u
~
~
....J
-d
>
\l") co
en -
I ~
~ 9
Cl>
(f)
Rood
'25.858
6,03'
\
5.763~
PROJECT
SITE
",752
\l")
(j)
I
~
-0
ffi
Blvd.
~
b
o
~
Blvd.
25,272-----c<: ~31,'81
22,928
"'41,349
o 800 2400 4000
~
-8-
N
. ,
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Traffic/Transportation Engineering Consultants
EXISTING & DEVELOPMENT & BACKGROUND
DAILY TRAFFIC
FIGURE #6
N
Road
~29,671
"0
0 -d
0
a:: cB
CIJ ~
U -
c:: :a
CIJ I
~ ....... ~
0 ~
-.J
Miner Roo
PROJECT
6,546 SITE
" \
N.W. 22
6,854 11.2211
\
-d
~ l{") ~
13,515 c:: en -
0 I :a
u ....... b
Blvd. 0
CIJ
(/)
~47,502
o 800 2400 4000
~
-9-
. ~
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrefflclTransportetlon Engineering Consultants
In order to evaluate the development traffic impact at the
adJacent intersections, it is necessary to incorporate the
proJect PH peak traffic into the exisitng peak traffic, as shown
In Existing 1988 Peak Hour Seasonal Traffic -- Figure 17.
.......... .... '" '" '" ..... "'.. '" .... ........... ....... '" ...... '" ..............
.......... ..... "'.. ..... '" ...... ........... .................. ... ..........
PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS
FACILITY
UNIT
TRIP RATE
HOURLY TRAFFIC
North of Quantum
Boulevard
In
Out
Cinema
2,000 Seats
0.24
0.02
480 vph
40 vph
Retail
3,200 Sq. Ft.
2.66
2.76
9 vph
9 vph
489 vph
49 vph
-------
-------
------
------
South of Quantum
Boulevard
Retail
143,278 Sq. Ft.
2.66
2.76
381 vph
396 vph
381 vph 396 vph
------- -------
------- -------
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::
PASSER-BY TRIPS (PEAK HOUR RETAIL)
390 X 25%
=
98 vph
405 X 25%
=
101 vph
'" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" '" '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. '" '" .. '" .. .. ..
'" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" '" .. '" .. .. .. .. '" '" '" '" .. '" .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. '" '" .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. '" '" .. .. .. '" .. ..
NEW PEAK HOUR TRIPS
489 + 381
98
= 772 vprJ
49 + 396
101
= 344 vptJ
.. .. '" .. .. .. '" .. .. .. .. .. '" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The peak hour traffic at the proJect access is shown in the
PM Development Access Peak Hour Traffic -- Figure ~8. Likewise.
the existing and the development peak hour turning counts at the
adJacent intersections are lndicated in the ExistIng + New
Development PM Peak Hour Traffic -- Figure ~9, and the Existing +
New Development + Background PM Peak Hour Traffic -- Figure ~10.
-] 0-
..
. .
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trafflc/Transportatlon Engineering Consultants
EXISTING 1988 PEAK HOUR
SEASONAL TRAFFIC
FIGURE #7
N
"- 97
313 94 -129
,) ~ l , 30
372.J 1 t (
148- 416 68
74, 1,249
576 "-176
220 178 - 733
) ~ l r 353
214 J 1 t (
490- 310 246
124, 714
889 "- 33
106 518 -754
) ~ l ,378
257 J 1 t (
513- 365 150
128, 879
713 "-167
141 53 - 123
) i l r 88
106.J 1 t (
78 - 213 238
125 --, 1,129
1142 "- 0
99 0 - 0
) i l,O
186 J ') t (
o - 109 0
113 --, 1,601
0... I4l1O _
. . .
.. eo
-11-
. .
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflcfTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
PM DEVELOPMENT ACCESS
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
FIGURE #8
N
I
(45)
(11)
~
I
[253)
(10) (28)
(6) 281 '--37(6)[31
161 l ,40 (5)[35)
, fi76
60 (0)
(29) [176
[31]
/
1
44
(5)
(39)
LEGEND
XX Total Development T ratfic
(XX) Capfured Development T raffie
[XX) New Development Traffic
-12-
. .
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trsfflc/Trsnsportatlon Engineering Consultants
EXISTING & NEW DEVELOPMENT
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
FIGURE #9
N
903 '-34
116 528 -754
) ~ l ,378
267 J 1 I r
513- 3b5 150
128, 901
Road
605 '- 176
220 178 - 733
) ~ l , 382
214 J I , (
490 - 317 259
138 -, 727
888 '- 97
313 94 -129
) ~ l , 30
372-1 1 t (
148- 416 68
74 , 1,281
1176 '- 0
110 0 - 0
) I l ,0
196 J 1 t (
o - 109 0
113, 1,633
0_ _ _
. ..
... ..
-13-
, .
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Traffic/Transportation Engineering Consultants
EXISTING & NEW DEVELOPMENT
& BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
FIGURE #10 N
1036 '-39
132 606 -867
) I l ,435
306~ I t r
590- 420 173
147, 1,033
J
I
...J
1,016 '- 112
360 108 -148
) ! l r 35
428J 1 t r
170- 478 78
85 -. 1,468
691 '- 202
253 205 - 843
) ! l r 435
246 J 1 1 (
564 - 363 296
157 -. 834
PROJECT
SITE
828 '-259
181 79 -141
) I l r138
293 J 1 t (
1,117 - 245 302
144 "' 1,312
1347 '- 0
125 0 - 0
)!lrO
224 J 1 t r
o - 125 0
130, 1,873
o 100 !400 _
. . .
46o.. -"0
-14-
. tl
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransporlatlon Engineering Consultants
HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-------------------------
-------------------------
To determIne the level of service of the adJacent hIghway
links, which the sUbJect proJect wIll impact, it is essential to
examine the highway carrying capacity. Reasonable and acceptable
traffic movement can be achieved if the roadway sections are
operating at or above level of service "D". Based on Palm Beach
County Criteria, for a 2-lane undivIded highway a total of 15,800
vehicles per day result in "D" service, for a 4-lane divided
hIghway the figure is 36,000 vehicles per day, for a 6-lane
divided highway the figure is 55,800 vehIcles per day. Further-
more, to achieve the optimum expected traffic flow it requires
that all lInks operate at level of service "C" or better, which
is 13,100 vehicles per day for a 2-lane undivided highway, 30,000
vehicles per day for a 4-lane divided roadway, and 46,400
vehicles per day for a 6-lane divided highway.
A careful examination of the existing daily traffic figures
shown in Figure #2 was made so that the highway link capacities
could be determined. Under the existing traffic levels and
current highway geometries the impacted links are at acceptable
level of service, as depicted in the Highway Link Capacities --
Figure #11. The level of service with the new development
traffic added and with the background growth traffic included is
shown in Figure #11.
To determine the peak hour impacts, it is necessary to
evaluate the traffic movements at the critical adJacent
intersectIons within the zone of influence. The specific
intersections and corresponding traffic movements are shown in
Figure 17, #8, and 19. By utilizing the TransportatIon Research
CIrcular #212, the Critical Movement Analysis methodology, a
determinatIon of the actual level of services can be made. The
results of the analYSIS are shown in Appendix "A".
-]5-
. .
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DA TA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
HIGHWAY LINK CAPACITY
FIGURE # 11
N
B
(8)
H [C]~ Road
oluxo
A /; "-B
'0 (8) (8)
0 [8J B [CJ -d
0 ,.
a:: (8) CD
<IJ lJ")
g [C) Q) '" o 800 2400 4000
~ <IJ
<IJ .... I J: 1600 . I I
.... u
~ 0 3200
0 <IJ
.-J A (/)
Miner Roo
PROJECT (A)
A [A)
(A) SITE
[AJ \
N.W. 22nd Ave,
A A/
(A)
(A) \ (8) ...;
,.
[A] \ B 4:
(C) --... '" -d
'"
cu ,.
C [0] a, lJ") CD
~ c: Q) Vi
(C) 0 I
U cu
........ t>
[OJ Blvd. 0
cu
(/)
W. Bo nton Beach Blvd.
A ______ 'A "-C
(A) (
(A) (C)
(A] A [8] [0]
(4)
[A)
LEGEND
-
XX Level of Ser~ice Under Existing Traffic
(XX) Level of Service Under Existing & New
Development T raf fic .
[XX) Level of Service Under Existing & New
Development & Background Traffic.
-16-
.
f
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrsfflclTrsnsportstlon Engineering Consultsnts
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS CATEGORY EVALUATIONS
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
Since the CIty of Boynton Beach requires the traffic impact
analysis to be in conformance with the currently approved Palm
Beach County criteria, it is necessary to conduct a TRAFFIC
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS. As mandated by Palm Beach County, all
~,-, area of traffic impact have
re are critical traffic
y, when the existing daily
D" on any link and the
the traffic level, then the
3e, when the link total daily
)" and the development
level, then the proJect is a
fL-
D,,~'~
, .Ii ...J.-
/A.i .s u1 ~-
~
v/)
,he daily traffic on the
:one of influence was
ed in the Traffic Performance
Based on this evaluation the
~r
under the criteria in
___ ________ .inks, the results indicated
that the project is not flagged as a Categroy "A" project.
Therefore. thIs project DOES NOT have to commit to offsite
roadway Improvements before even being considered a viable
project submiSSIon.
J
#2 In reviewing the daily traffic under the criteria in
Category "B" on all affected links, the results indicated
that the project is a Category liB" proJect. The Palm Beach
County Performance Standard restrict new trips on Congress
Avenue between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Miner Road, based
on the fIndIngs depicted in Figure #11 and Figure #12. The
restriction for a 4-lane divided highway is 300 trips.
Since six (6) lanlng of Congress Avenue between NW 22nd
Avenue and W. Boynton Beach Boulevard is a committment of
the rpvlsed Boynton Beach Boulevard RegIonal Mall DRI and
Included in County PetItion #87-92, the outstanding
restrIctIon is Congress Avenue between Miner Road and NW
22nd Avenue.
-17-
. .
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION
NSI
\
FIGURE # 12
N
"0
o
o
a:::
Q)
u
fj
~
-.J
-0
>
U"") ~
cr :a
- ~
~
Road
"'- NSI
NSI\ cU
>
<t
U) -0
:a >
5> U"") as
c 0) -
I U)
Q)
- ~
Blvd. u
0
~
Blvd.
NSI ~~ 'NS1 'NSI
NSI
o 800 2400 4000
~ . J
4 1600 YlOO
LEGEND
SI Significant Impact
NSI No SiQnificant Impact
-18-
. .
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrsfflclTrsnspor1stlon Engineering Consultsnts
FULL BUILD-OUT REVIEW
---------------------
---------------------
A reVIew of the 2010 Palm Beach County data and of the
TraffIC Impact AnalysIs Table 8. from the WHK. Inc. 4/89 report,
verified that the traffic will be reasonably accomodated by the
roadway network. Therefore. the full build-out of the C-3 site
with The Village Shoppes of Boynton will not adversely impact the
roadway system.
REQUIRED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
To determine if any highway improvements are necessary to
maIntaIn a reasonable level of traffic flow and safety, detailed
link capacity analysis and critical lane intersectional analysis
were undertaken. Also, it is important to take into
consideration the 5-Year Work Program in Palm Beach County, since
maJor capacity improvements will be occurring within the zone of
influence of the proposed proJect. Recognizing all these issues,
the following improvements are valid:
A. SITE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS
1. A minimum of 100 feet of internal channelization at all
maJor driveways.
2. A separate right and left turn lane for main the access
onto Quantum Boulevard and onto NW 22nd Avenue.
3. Required signing and pavement markings shall conform with
the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
4. Compliance to sight triangle criteria.
5. Pedestrian signal + cross walk for the east approach at
the main access onto Quantum Boulevard.
B. DIRECT ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF
NW 22ND AVENUE AND CONGRESS AVENUE
1. Westbound rIght turn lane
2. Eastbound double left turn lane
3. Northbound right/thru lane
4. Southbound rIght/thru lane
5. Modifications to the SIgnal
-19-
. ,
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Traffic/Transportation Engineering Consultants
EXISTING & DEVELOPMENT & BACKGROUND
DAILY TRAFFIC
FIGURE #6
N
o 800 2400 4000
~
-9-
EXHIBIT "AtI
(d- ZZ'
--+
I
TRACT "A"
LEc.\L DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL 01' lAND lYING IN 51:( TION 17, TOWNSHIP ~5 SOUTIi, RANGE ~)
EI\ST, PALM BEI\CH COUNTY, I'LORIDA, SAID LAND DEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRJt\ED AS' FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING I\T THE" ,WEST QiJ^,HEI~ COIlNEIl OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP ~5
SOUTlt, RI\NGE H EI\ST; THI:N'::E'WITH A OEI\IlING OF NOltTH S9' OS' 49" EI\ST,
ALONG TIlE EI\ST-WEST QUAR j E.R LINE Or- SECTION 17 A DISTI\NCE OF 50.05
FEET TO A POINT ON THE EI\:'T RIGHT OF wl\Y LINE OF CONGIlESS AVI!. THENCE
WITI.. 1\ BEARING OF SOl:TH ,., 44' )'J" WEST, I\LONG" THE EI\ST RIGHT 01' WI\Y
LINE OF CONGRESS I\VE. 1\ DI.TI\NCE OF 70.07 FEET TO 1\ POINT; THENCE WITH
A BEI\RING OF NOR TIi S9' OS' 4'J" EI\ST, ALONG 1\ LINE LYING 70.00 FEET
SOUTIi or ^NI) P^R^LLEl TO THE E^ST-WEST QUARTER lINE OF SECTION 17..
A DISTANCE 01' 10.01 PEET Te, THE POINT OF DEGINNING. THENCE CONTINUE
WITH 1\ OEARING OF NORTH sq. OS' 49" EAST. ALONG 1\ lINE L VING 70.00
FEET SOUTH OF AND l'I\RAlLLl TO THE EI\ST-WEST QUARTER LINE Or-SECTION
17; SAID liNE ^LSO BEING THF SOUTH LINE OF LAKE WORTH DR^INAGE DISTI~ICT
lATERAL CI\NAl NO. 21, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 1732, PAGE 612 01" THE
rllBLlC RECORDS OF Pl\lM DEAOI COUNTY, FLORII)A, A DISTANCE 01" 71S.22
FEET TO A l'OINT; THENCE WITH ^ OEARING OF SOUTH I' 44' )'1" WEST, A
nJSTANC~ OF )II.)S FEET TO ^ rOINT; TItENCE WITH ^ DEARiNG OF SOUTH S9.
OS' 49" WEST, A DIST^NCE OF 692.06 FEET; THENCE WITH A DE^RING OF NORTH
44' ))' 16" WEST, A DIST^NCE OF 36.1' FEET TO A POINT ON THE E^ST RIGHT
OF WI\Y LINE OF CONGRESS AVE; THENCE WITH 1\ BEARING OF NORTH t. 44'
)'J" r:MT, ^ DISTI\NCE OF 2S5.22 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. ".
CONTI\INING 5.121 ACRES MORE OR LESS AND SUBJECT TO EASEMENrS AND
RICIHS 91" ,WAY OF RECORD.
TRACT "8
LECAL DESCI!.IPT!ON
A rARc.El 01' lA,..!) lYINC, IN ~!!C:TlON 17, TOWN~IIII"~' SOUTH, HAN(.E 4\
EMT, l'AlM IIEM':U COUNry, I LOIUDA, SAID lAND ~I:INC MI.\IlE 1'1\1~nCI!L^II'-'
I)E:'CIlII}ED AS 1'0llOW'\: '
COMMENCING AT Tlil! WI:S: QlIl\R Tl:R COIlN(1l 01' S(CTlON 17. TOWN\ltII' ~ ~
SOUTIl, RI\NGE ~) I!I\~T; TI:~NCE WITH ^ UEARING 01' NOnTlI lI'l' Oll' I,')" I:N,T,
^LONG TH~ !!I\ST.WIlH QlJ.\\{Tt:n llN~ OF SECTION 17 1\ Ill...rANCE OF VI.'I)
r-[~T TO 1\ !'OINT ON n,,: ~Mr ItlGHT or- W^Y LINlll'J' CONl;IlL'i'\ I\VE;
lHt:NCE WITH ^ U(;l\ltI~G 1.1F ~Ount ,. ~4' 39" WIlST. ALONG TIlE lA...T IIlt.1I1
OJ' W^Y LIN!: 01' C:ON(;REq ^vr:. A DI~TANC:r:. 01' 70.07 I'rCT; TlII:N~:E Willi ,\
IIEl\ltlNG OF Nllltni ~'I' OS' ~'I" 1:I\ST. ALONG 1\ LIN!! lYINl; 10.')0 1'l:T "'\'11111
or- ^ND 1'^'t~LLEL TO TIn, I!^'iT.W(ST QL:ARTEII liNE or 'i1;("TlllN 17; "':1\
L1Ne:.I\LSO I\EING TII( SOU' H LINE or- ll\KE WOlnll I>ltl\lNI\Gl D1~lR;C I
~I\Tlm.l\l C^NI\L Nil. 21, ^, ItI:CClltol::L> rN o.n. 1I0CK In1, "I\CE (,12, (\I' TIll,
,lIl1Lle RI:COltD'i 01' f'l\LM IIE/ICII COUNTY. I"L()ltllM 1\ ()ISTI\NCE or. If)'1I
1"(r:T TO 1\ l'OINT; TIII.NCE Wlnl 1\ II!:I\IUNG (\1" '0\\11 r~1 ," ~4' )'1" wr...,. ~
1.":STANCl: OF 'II ~.H "E1:T lU THr: POINT 01' B(GINNINC; TIII:Nn: "rrll i'"
O[^ltlNC OJ' NOIHH. ". u.' "," l:I\ST, 1\ DISl ANCl 1.)1' 3~.)) H~[T; TlIlNI'L
WIT." A Br:I\RING 0'" NOll TIt 1'/' 01' ''I" E^ST. 1\ IW,T I\NCE OJ' f,'1" )} I'I:I'T'
~H~~CE ~lTIt A lIEl\ltlN~ 01" SOl/T'; '" 4~' 1'/" W['iT. 1\ lli'iTI\NCr.' 01' 7'/).;"
I e:l:T, Ttt[NCl: Willi A IlEl\ltlNG 01' SOUTH 1'1' O~' )2" W[ST ^ Or'iTI\NIT \1'
(.'11.07 I'F.E~1 TIII!NC[ WITli A 1Ir,I\IUNG or- NOIHII .~" l~' '71':' wr:...-r 1\ 11I~I\NI'
OF )/,.17 FEE TI TtU:NCE WITIt ,\ ll(l\ltlNe; 01: NOI, TII I' t4' )'1" E"':T 1\ I.
DISTANCE OF, 746.)6 FEET Mllf.l.E OR lESS TO TH( 1'0lNT OF lIEGINNiro:G.
,CRONIC TT^INING I ).0'11. ^CRE~ MOltE Ol~ LESS ^ND Sl/UJIlCT TO [1\Sr:.M[NTS ^Nl)
H S OF WAY 01' KJ;CORI). . ,
"~
.1:
: (
. .
i.;
,/~
l~
~~
~
.'
~'i
,''.
:~..
~~~.
;.:.":.
':: "
~... "
:~.' I'
. ."~
,~:,
'.:.:
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
INTRODUCTION
------------
---_._-------
A 6.28 acre parcel of property Just north of NW 22nd Avenue
located on the eastslde of Congress Avenue is being proposed as a
commercIal shopping center. The development site plan has been
identified as "The VIllage Shoppes of Boynton". The proJect has
access onto Congress Avenue, NW 22nd Avenue, and Quantum
Boulevard. For additional background information and details of
the study site, reference should be made to the Site Location
Map -- FIgure #].
To ensure that the traffic flow and safety issues are
properly addressed, the City of Boynton Beach requires that a
current traffic impact analysis and report be undertaken to
address the traffIC generated by the proposed development and its
effect on the adJacent highway links and intersections. As a
result, Motorist Design Data Movement, Inc. (MDDM), Traffic
Englneering Consultants have been retained by the developer to
investigate and determine the traffic impacts created by the
proposed commercial shopping center.
In conducting the traffic study, It was necessary to
evaluate the eXIstIng highway network and their associated
traffic volumes. Then the development traffic had to be
determined and assigned to the surrounding highways.
Conslderation of adJacent trip attractions and trip productions
was lmportant In examlning the development trip patterns.
Traffic data from Palm Beach County, and the Florida
Department of Transportation was utillzed. Also. the amended
Boynton Beach Hall DRI and Quantum Park traffic report data were
referenced. Furthermore. an Inventory of the adJacent highway
network was undertaken. The traffic data is shown in the
EXlstlng ]988 Average Annual Dally TraffIC -- Figure #2.
PLANNING DATA
-------------
-------------
The TraffIC EngIneerIng Impact Analysis was based on the
slte plan prepared ~y Vander Ploeg and ASSOCIates, Inc. Specifi-
cally the sIte plan reflects a proposed commercial shopping
n-nter. The fol] 0'.11 n9 data descr ibes the si te data:
-}-
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TratfJclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
SITE LOCATION MAP
FIGURE # 1
H oluxo Rood
15 u
0
a:: >
CD
Q) U"')
u (j) -
c: II)
cu I cu
..... - b
~
0 0
..J cu
(J')
Miner R
PROJECT
SITE
cU
>
<(
II)
II)
Q)
5>
c:
l.C)
en
I
........
Old Bo nton Beach
Blvd.
W. Bo 10n Beach Blvd.
o 800 2400 4000
~'~I
400 1600 32'00
-2-
-d
>-
CD
......
lI)
Q)
b
o
Q)
(J')
N
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportat/on Engineering Consultants
ULI METHODOLOGY
---------------
---------------
The basis for the Urban Land Institute's research was to
define the characteristics of parking demands for single land
uses. Then, by analyzing parking accumulations at mixed use
centers, the shared parking concept was quantified.
The ULI recommends the following procedure be followed in
determining shared parking:
1. Initial Project Review: Knowledge of the site and the
intended land uses is very important in beginning the shared
parking analysis. Results from the initial review for The
Village Shoppes of Boynton has been presented in earlier sections
in terms of square footage and land uses proposed.
2. Adjustment for Peak Parking Factor: The parking
factors are those specified in the City of Boynton Beach Code as
detailed earlier in this report and indicate a need for~1\?/
spaces, for the section of development south of Quantum
Boulevard and for 516 spaces, for the section of development
north of Quantum Boulevard.
3. Analysis of Hourly Accumulations: Parking accumulation
curves are selected by reviewing the ULI data and incorporating
site specific conditions.
4. Estimate of Shared Parking: The hourly parking demand
for each land use is merged to estimate overall shared parking
demand. This is simply the hour by hour addition of parking
demand for each use to estimate aggregate demand.
THE ANALYSIS
------------
------------
Applying the ULI methodology to The Village Shoppes of
Boynton yielded the hourly parking accumulation curves for each
of the two land uses for weekday and Saturday conditions.
Figure - Retail Parking Accumulation - Weekday
Figure 2 - Cinema Parking Accumulation - Weekday
Figure 3 - Retail Park i ng Accumulation - Saturday
Figure 4 - Cinema Park i ng Accumulation - Saturday
-3-
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Traffic/Transportation Engineering Consultants
100
90
z 80
[J
0-1
I-
<t
....J 70
:)
4
:)
u 60
u
<t
L:J 50
z
-
~
~
<t 40
a..
~
<t 30
w
a..
l.&.. 20
0
I-
Z 10
w
u
~
w 0
Q..
~ ~
~oooggg~ooooooooggg
9~~~d~ruo9~~~~~~~o~ru
~~m~___~NMV~~~OO~___
HOUR OF THE DAY
RET AIL
WEEKDAY
-4-
FIGURE #1
Cl ·
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trsmc/Trsnsportstlon Engineering Consultsnts
C. DIRECT ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF
QUANTUM BOULEVARD AND CONGRESS AVENUE
1. Northbound right/thru lane
2. Southbound thru lane
3. Signalization when warranted
D. INDIRECT ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS
1. Construct one (1) southbound and one (1) northbound thru
lane on Congress Avenue between NW 22nd Avenue and Miner
Road.
With the aforementioned transportation improvements, the
traveling public will not be adversely affected by the traffic
generated by the subJect development. Furthermore, the traffic
impact fee should be applied toward any INDIRECT ACCESS IMPROVE-
MENTS, because they are mitigating transportation problems which
will substantially benefit non-development traffic.
-20-
e
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trsfflc/Trsnsportstlon Engineering Consultants
APPENDIX "A"
HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS
.
.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trafflc/Transportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & HYPOLUXO
EXISTING PM PHT
DATE OF COUNTS: 1988 PEAK SEASON
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE C
SATURATION 69
CRITICAL N/S VOL 551
CRITICAL E/W VOL 5 B 5
CRITICAL SUM 1 136
*************************************
LANE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E,l,STBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
5 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
6
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 310 178 214 353
THRU 714 576 490 733
RIGHT 246 220 124 176
TRUCKS (\1 LOC,l,L BUSES (_/HRl PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 5 0 .9
SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .9
EASTBOUND 5 0 .9
WESTBOUND 5 0 .9
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
:4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
:4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
1. 0 - 99 (_PEDS/HRJ
90 SECONDS
.5
.5
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
THIW -RIGHT 437 352 300
LEFT 198 114 137
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E,l,STBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 310 178 214
CAPACITY 254 116 97
NEED PHASE? N/,l, N/A N/A
WESTBOUND
448
226
WESTBOUND
353
340
N/A
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trsfflc/Trsnsportstlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & HYPOLUXO
EXISTING + DEVELOPHENT PH PHT
D~TE OF COUNTS: 1988 PE~K SE~SON
~********~*****~*******~~**~~*~~~~
LEVEL OF SERVICE C
S~TUR~TION 70
CRITIC~L N/S VOL 573
CRITIC~L E/W VOL 585
CRITIC~L SUH 1 158
~*~~*~*~***~**********************~**
L~NE GEOHETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E~STBOUND WESTBOUND
L~NE HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R.. 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
5 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
6
TRAFFIC VOLUHES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 317 178 214 382
THRU 727 60S 490 733
RIGHT 259 220 138 176
TRUCKS (\) LOC~L BUSES (t/HR) PE~K HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 5 0 .9
SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .9
E~STBOUND 5 0 .9
WESTBOUND 5 0 .9
PH~SING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
445
203
INPUT VOLUHE
C~P~CITY
NEED PH~SE?
NORTHBOUND
317
225
N/~
:4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
:4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
1. 0 - 99 (tPEDS/HRl
90 SECONDS
.5
.5
CRITIC~L L~NE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
370 300 448
114 137 245
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
178 214 382
103 97 340
N/~ N/A N/A
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & HYPOLUXO
EXIST. + DEVELOP. + B~CKGROUND PM PHT
D~TE OF COUNTS: 1988 PE~K SE~SON
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE [)
S~TUR~TION e 1
CRITIC~L N/S VOL 656
CRITIC~L E/W VOL 674
CRITICAL SUM 1 330
*************************************
L~NE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E~STBOUND WESTBOUND
L~NE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
5 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
6
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E~STBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 363 205 246 435
THRU 834 691 564 843
RIGHT 296 253 157 202
TRUCKS (\) LOCAL BUSES (t/HR) PE~K HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 5 0 .9
SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .9
E~STBOUND 5 0 .9
WESTBOUND 5 0 .9
PH~SING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRI~N ~CTIV]TY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
:4.
:4.
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERL~P)
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
o - 99 (tPEDS/HR)
1.
90 SECONDS
.5
.5
CRITIC~L L~NE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E~STBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 510 423 345
LEFT 233 131 158
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E~STBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 363 205 246
C~PACITY 139 0 0
NEE[) PHASE? N/A N/A N/A
WESTBOUND
516
279
WESTBOUND
435
266
NO.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trafflc/Transportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS f, NW 22ND AVE_
EXISTING F'M PHT
DATE or COUNTS: 1988 PE~ SEASON
..................................
LEVEL OF SERVICE C
SATUF,ATJON 74
CRITICAL NIS VOL 894
CRITICAL E/W VOL 323
CRITICAL SUM 121 7
.....................................
LANE
NORTHBOUN[,
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTH80UND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MDV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MDV WIDTH
1
2
RT.
T. .
L.. .
12.0
12.0
12.(1
RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0
T. . 12.(1 T. . 12.0
L. . 12.0 L. . 12.(1
R. .
T. .
L..
12.0
12.0
12.0
"
:;,
4
':'
E.
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
213
112'~
"'~.
._I:J
10E.
7c.
....
12':,
8.....
o
238
713
1111
12::::
1 E.7.
TRUCIS ('/.)
LOCAL BUSES (#/HRI
PEAl' HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUt~[1
SOUTHBOUN[I
EASTBOU~~D
WESTBOUr~['
~l
'5
~I
'5
t)
o
o
I)
.9
.~
.9
.9
PHASING NIS :4. BOTH TURNS F'ROTECTED (WITH DVERLAF' )
E/W :4. BOTH TURNS F'ROTECTE[' (WITH DVERLAF)
F'EDESTRIAN ACT I VITY 1 . 0 - '~'j lllF"EDS/HR)
CYCLE LENGTH "::'(1 SECmws
G/C - NE: ~ 58 THRU '"
. .'
Gle - H: t. WI, THRU c-
. .'
CF\l T I [Al LHN[ VOLUMES B\ MCNEM[NT
NORTHBOUN[I SOUTHE,OUIJ[, EASTF~OU!Jrl wr ~.H~OUN[I
THRU -RIGHT 830 ~,l E: 14<. 1'j4
LEFT 2(.(1 E,1l 12::< 1('7
LHT TURN [HE Cf
NOF,T HBOUN[I SOUTHDOUND EAS HIOLIt~rl W[5TBOlJl~D
lNF~T ~OLUt1( E: 1 :~ ",'. 11)(. Co.
.1"'-, )'.,'
A' [J Y 0 (I 71'7 7r:'CI
N[ Erl F'HAsr '; N/A NIP, N/A N/A
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & NW 22ND AVE.
EXISTING + DEVELOPMENT PM PHT
D^TE OF COUNTS: 1988 PE^K SE^SON
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~**
LEVEL OF SERVICE C
S^TUR^TION 75
CHITICAL N/S VOL 794
CHITICAL E/W VOL 450
CHITICAL SUM 1244
*~~~~*~~*~*****~****~~***~*~~~****~**
NOHTHBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH
1 RT. 12.0
2 T.. 12.0
3 T.. 12.0
4 L.. 12.0
5
6
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
HIGHT
213
1143
266
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
nSTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (\)
5
5
5
5
PH^SING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
592
260
INPUT VOLUME
C^P^CITY
NEED PHASE?
NORTHBOUND
213
o
N/A
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
RT. 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0
T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
71
721
160
277
100
125
125
123
234
LOCAL BUSES (./HR)
o
o
o
o
PE^K HOUR F^CTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
:4.
:4.
1.
90
.5
.5
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERL^P)
BOTH TUHNS PHOTECTED (WITH OVERL^P)
o - 99 (JPEDS/HRl
SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
SOUTHBOUND
534
86
EASTBOUND
145
177
WESTBOUND
273
153
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND
71
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
277
707
N/^
WESTBOUND
125
730
NO.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & NW 22ND AVE.
EXIST. + DEVELOP. + B~CKGROUND PH PHT
D~TE or COUNTS: 1988 PE~K SE~SON
****~~*~~~*~~*~*~*****************
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
S~TURATION 14S
CRITICAL N/S VOL 9 1 2
CRITICAL E/W VOL 1472
CRITICAL SUH 2384
****~********~*~************~********
LANE GEOHETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH
1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
5
6
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
245
1312
302
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (\)
5
5
5
5
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
TRAFFIC VOLUHES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
79
828
181
293
1117
144
138
141
259
LOCAL BUSES (./HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
:4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
:4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
1. 0 - 99 (~PEDS/HR)
90 SECONDS
.5
.5
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
678
300
INPUT VOLUME
CAPACITY
NEED PHASE?
NORTHBOUND
245
o
N/A
SOUTHBOUND
612
96
EASTBOUND
1303
187
WESTBOUND
302
169
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND
79
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
293
689
N/A
WESTBOUND
138
o
N/~
MOTORIST DESIGN DA TA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trafflc/Transportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & REGIONAL MALL ACCESS
EXISTING PM PHT
DATE OF COUNTS: 1988 PEAK SEASON
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE 13
SATURATION 6S
CRITICAL N/S VOL 933
CRITICAL E/W VOL 1 3 1
CRITICAL SUM 1 064,
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
T.. 12.0
T.. 12.0
L.. 12.0
R.. 12.0
T.. 12.0
T.. 12.0
R.. 12.0
L.. 12.0
L.. 12.0
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 109 0 186 0
THRU 1601 1142 0 0
RIGHT 0 99 113 0
TRUCKS (\l LOCAL BUSES <t/HRl PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 0 0 .9
SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .9
EASTBOUND 5 0 .9
WESTBOUND 5 0 .9
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
:2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
:2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
1. 0 - 99 (tPEDS/HRl
90 SECONDS
.5
.5
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 933 699 131 0
LEFT 127 0 119 0
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 109 0 186 0
CAPACITY 0 0 830 830
NEED PHASE? NO. NO NIA NO
^.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trafflc/Transportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & REGIONAL MALL ACCESS
EXISTING + DEVELOPMENT PM PHT
D~TE OF COUNTS: 1988 PE~K SE~SON
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE C
S~TUR~TION 66
CRITIC~L N/S VOL 952
CRITIC~L E/W VOL 131
CRITIC~L SUM 1083
*************************************
L~NE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
L~NE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
T.. 12.0
T.. 12.0
L.. 12.0
R.. 12.0
T.. 12.0
T.. 12.0
R.. 12.0
L.. 12.0
L.. 12.0
TRAFFI C VOLUMES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND E~STBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 109 0 196 0
THRU 1633 1176 0 0
RIGHT 0 110 113 0
TRUCKS ('J LOCAL BUSES (t/HRJ PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 0 0 .9
SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .9
EASTBOUND 5 0 .9
WESTBOUND 5 0 .9
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRI~N ~CTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
:2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
:2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
1. 0 - 99 (tPEDS/HRl
90 SECONDS
.5
.5
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 952 720 131 0
LEFT 127 0 125 0
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 109 0 196 0
CAPACITY 0 0 830 830
NEE[) PHASE-, NO. NO N/~ NO
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
CR I" I CAL MDVE''1EhIT ANAL VS IS
CONGRESS ~ REGIONAL MALL ACCESS
EX ] ~.1. oj [IE VEL[lF. -+ BA[IGr,Ollt~[1 PM F'HT
DATE OF COUNTS: 1~8S PEAl SEASON
..................................
LEVEL OF SERVICE ~I
SATURATION 7'~
CRlT ]CAL N/5 VOL 1 147
CRITICAL E/W VOL 151
CRJT leAL SUM 1 2'~8
.....................................
LANE
NOF.THBDUN[I
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
T. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
T. .
L. .
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
125
1873
o
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS <'tl
5
5
5
5
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
1]47
153
INPUT VOLUME
CAPACITY
NEED PHASE?
NORTHBOUND
125
o
N/A
LANE GEOMETf":','
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
R. .
T. .
T. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
R. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
L. .
L. .
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
o
1347
125
224
o
130
o
o
o
LOCAL BUSES (1/HRl
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
:2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
:2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED
1. 0 - 99 <IPEDS/HRl
90 SECONDS
.5
.5
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
SOUTHBOUND
825
o
EASTBOUND
151
143
WESTBOUND
o
o
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND
o
o
NO
WESTBOUND
o
830
NO
EASTBOUND
224
830
N/lI
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trafflc/Transportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
W. BOYNTON BEACH & CONGRESS
EXISTING + DEVELOPMENT PM PHT
DATE OF COUNTS: 1988 PEAK SEASON
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
SATURATION 9S
CRITICAL N/S VOL 890
CRITICAL EIW VOL 682
CRITICAL SUM 1 572
*************************************
LANE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 RT. 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
5 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
6
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
365
901
150
528
903
116
267
513
128
378
754
344
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS ('.\;)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (t/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
PHASING N/S
EIW
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
GIC - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
:4.
:4.
1-
90
.5
.5
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
o - 99 (tPEDS/HR)
SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 55] 553 219
LEFT 234 339 327
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 365 528 267
O.PlICITY 0 0 0
NEEIJ PHlISn N/lI N/II N/lI
WESTBOUND
342
463
WESTBOUND
378
317
N/A
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trafflc/Transportat/on Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
W. BOYNTON BEACH & CONGRESS
EXISTING PM PHT
DATE OF COUNTS: 1988 PEAK SEASON
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE ~
SATURATION 94
CRITICAL N/S VOL 870
CRITICAL E/W VOL 682
CRITICAL SUM 1 552
*************************************
LANE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH MOV \r/IDTH MOV \r/IDTH MOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 RT. 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
5 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
6
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 365 518 257 378
THRU 879 889 513 754
RIGHT 150 106 128 334
TRUCKS ('t) LOCAL BUSES (t/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 5 0 .9
SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .9
EASTBOUND 5 0 .9
WESTBOUND 5 0 .9
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
:4.
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (\r/ITH OVERLAP)
o - 99 (tPEDS/HR)
:4.
1.
90 SECONDS
.5
.5
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 538 544 219 339
LEFT 234 332 314 463
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 365 518 257 378
CAPACITY 0 0 0 317
NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A NO.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
Trsfflc/Trsnsportstlon Engineering Consultsnts
cn I T J CAl
MOVEMCN' At'IAL YB J S
CDNGRr-E,S f" OL La BCJYNTO''-I BEACH
[} 1ST ING F'M nn
[If.; Il or C[il"IlH S: 1 ~8::: F'E AI S[ASCiI~
.............. ....................
LEVEL or SERVICE EC
SATURATION 10'3
CRITICAL N/S VOL 121 q
CJ'.ITICAL E/W VOL ~~'30
CRITICAL SUM 1804
.....................................
LANE
NDJ'.:T HBOUt~['
MDV Wl[ITH
LANE GEOME1RY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WJDTH MOV WIDTH
I'T,
T, ,
L. .
12.0
12,0
12.0
F, T . 12,0 R. , 12.0
T. . 12.0 T.. 12,0
L.. 12.0 L.. 12,0
2
~,
.:"
4
.,
E,
NORTHE:OU(~[I
TRAcT I C VOLUl",E:',
SOUTH80UNU EAETBOUNU
':<4
372
14'::
74
411:0.
124':<
':.8
LEFT
THF>U
J'.lGriT
E:54
313
WESTBOUN['
MOV W 1[IT H
RT.
T. .
L, .
12,0
12.0
12,(1
WESTBOUt~rl
3i:'
12'~
'~7
I~O;:',THBDL.lN[1
SOUTHBDUN[I
EASTBOUIJ[t
W[~,H:DUWI
()
I)
(,
(J
FEAI HOUF FACTO"
, .~
,'~
.'74
, '~
TRuel!:C, '/.)
LOCAL BUSES 1#"HFl
F'F,:OTECTU' (WI1H Q\'ERLAF')
PROTECTED (WJTH QVERLAF)
'7171 (**F'[[IS /HR)
FHAS 1 NI:; !~:S :4. BDTH TUf;'NE,
E/W :4. 80TH TURtoJS
rHI[STFdAN ACT I VITY 1 . (I -
CYCLE LENC:'TH 'j(1 SEC DI'J[I~.
e;:, C - I~E' t sr, THRU " ,
G/C - n' t, WI THRU "
. -'
n lTIU\l lr~t~L veil LIMES E''\' MC'VFMUJf
tJDhl Hf';JUIJ[1
~,ni,ITHr:mltoJil
7(i~,
1 1 L~.
EAcc,TE~I]I~IIJI'
17i'
4 C",'C.
81>4
1 Hr, II - F, J(,H 1
lUT
~-,l) ~~
l F r"[ TI,Ir,IJ f.H[ ':.
l ':'=:.1 Hnl"llJII
snUlllln III1JII
':"11
'~CIf.."[ H['lIUI Jlt
llJ! 1.1"\ V( Il 1J11[ 4l(
U11,,' J1)' II
!JIll' fll(,'[" N/(,
:":;{
II
t .1}4
N, "
lJ ~1
l~rc,T t":"IIJIJ['
I "",C
-, .
3~~
wr'.T(:1.11I1J11
:';1 1
~.' .C~~'
tJ, {,
__.,._n __...__..__._.'u__...__._.__~_..__._____.,.____._______.
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & OLD BOYNTON BEACH
EXISTING. DEVELOPMENT PM PHT
DATE OF COUNTS: 1988 PEAl SEASON
............................".,..
LEVEL or SERVICE E
SATURATION 1 1 1
CR 11 I CAL N I S VOL 1 2:3 5
CR11ICAL E/W VOL 5'30
CRITICAL SUM 1 82~.
....,..............,....,............
LANE
NORTH80UND
MOV WWTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUN[I
MOV WIDTH
c'
RT.
T. .
L. .
12.1)
12.1)
12.1)
RT. 12.() R. . 12.')
T. . 12.0 T.. 12.1)
L. . 12.0 L. . 12.(1
RT.
T. .
L..-
12.1)
12.(1
12.(1
-.
;;,
'I
:'
t.
NORTHE:OUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
F: I GHT
'lit
12El
.,.'1
372
1'18
74
30
r."r.
Cle',:!
12'"
f,E
::IS
97
TRuel S (~;)
:.
LOCAL BUSES (#/HRI
I)
(I
I)
I)
PlAi HOUR FACTOR
NOf:THBOUN[1
SOUT HE'DUN[I
EA;T8DUf.,I[1
W[~.nDutJ[l
:.
."
:'
.'j
. 'j
.'j
00
.'
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G![ - NB t 5B THRU
G/[ - E8 ~ W8 THRU
:'1. 80TH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAr)
:4. BO'H TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAFI
1. I) - ~~ i'F[DS/HRI
'j(l SE C ONItS
00
. >_1
00
. .'
CR'I TICAL LANE VOL UMi: S. 8)' MO\IEMENI
I~ORIH80UN[1 ':,QUI Hr:OUI~r' EA~,T80UI~D WEQBOUN[I
, HI", '.! -R"IGHT t:E-'4 72E. 172 1-.00
~_l
L[f'T C:I()'~ 11 ':' IjtoC" 3~.
, ,
LEFI TURN CHE[I
NOF>THBOUN[, SOUTHBOUND E. AS HiOU,,"J[I W[ST80UND
INF'UI VlJL ur1r Ij It. '~'1 ::':7c' 3(J
lAr'AC" I I i (J (I E.(llj t.r:2
N{ r [I FHAS[ " N/A N/A N/A N/A
I
.. "'.,
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportstlon Engineering Consultants
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
w. BOYNTON BEACH & CONGRESS
EXIST. + DEVELOP. + BACKGROUND PM PHT
DATE OF COUNTS: 1988 PEAK SEASON
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
SATURATION 109
CRITICAL N/S VOL 1021
CRITICAL E/W VOL 784
CRITICAL SUM 1805
*************************************
LANE GEOMETRY
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 RT. 12.0
2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0
5 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0
6
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT 420 606 306 435
THRU 1033 1036 590 667
RIGHT 173 132 147 394
TRUCKS (\) LOCAL BUSES (t/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR
NORTHBOUND 5 0 .9
SOUTHBOUND 5 0 .9
EASTBOUND 5 0 .9
WESTBOUND 5 0 .9
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
G/C - NB & SB THRU
G/C - EB & WB THRU
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
632
269
INPUT VOLUME
CAPACITY
NEED PHASE?
NORTHBOUND
420
o
N/A
:4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
:4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
1. 0 - 99 <tPEDS/HR)
90 SECONDS
.5
.5
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
SOUTHBOUND
634
389
EASTBOUND
252
374
WESTBOUND
392
532
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND
606
o
NIA
EASTBOUND
306
o
NO,
WESTBOUND
435
240
NO.
~.
,...
MOTORIST DESIGN DATA MOVEMENT, INC.
TrafflclTransportatlon Engineering Consultants
CRI'ICAL MOVEMCN' ANALYSIS
CON(3J,C~;~; f/ 01 J I I~OYN, OI'-l HEACH
E.X I 5T, ~ [I[VE.LOF, +BACI GF,OLlN[1 F'M PHT
[I,c,n (Ii [(llIIH'.,: 1':'8~: FTAl ~,(A~,()N
............ .......... .... ........
LANE
NOr.THBXIt~[1
MCI"I W I liT H
2
RT,
T, ,
L, ,
12,(1
12,(1
12,0
r,
;;;,
4
~I
t,
Nor; T HBCILlI'J[i
LEFT
THF-'L1
F-IGHT
117t,
I11E,::;:
72
TF-UCI':, I~;'
NO~;T HBDUN['
50UTHBOut~rl
EAST BOUN[I
WE5TBOUt~rl
PHASING N!~
EiW
F'E[IE'; ThI AI. A:"T I ',T, y
CYCLE LPJf,TH
G/[ N8 ~ SP THRU
[1/[ - n ! Wf: THfl,i
THF,lI -F,IGHT
LETl
I,jlll. T.iH'-IIIIJ!1
:"1l-4
t:.: ,(
LEVEL OF SER'nCr.
SATURHTION
[finICAL N/S VOL
Cr.lTICA~ E/W VOL
U 11 I CAI. 51,IM
F':
127
1417
E:. 7 '7f
r.' (").~ f-:.
............. .... .... .... ... ...... ...
LAIJE E,EOM[TR',
':;l}UTH80Ut~[1
1'1(1\1 ~Il [,T H
E ~r:::,H:OUt4[1
M:':".' ~,I j [IT ,1
WES,BOU'EI
MelV W][I"fH
F-t 12 ,(, F . 1 E .(.
1 1 c' ,(l 1. 1 c' ,I)
L IE .(, L I C:,(I
F'T,
T, ,
L. ,
1 {', ,
IE,
lE,
TRAJ:"FIC VOLUMES
SOllTHE:OlINj, EA<:TBOUtJ[1
W[STE:OUNL'
11)8
1(11 E.
4....C'
c,:,
....e
~~I
17(1
14:::
lIE
~(,l)
C'.e
C, _I
LOCAL BUSES #!HF!
FEAI HOUR FACTOR
c
.':;
e,
. ?
':'
c.
..?
,'OJ
:4. BOhi TlIF..t~'; F'RIiTFLTrr, (l,!i i H (l'JU,l AF)
:4. E:inH lUF.tJ'.. F'R'[:TEC,rf' (~JI1H CI'VU'l"Hf I
j. (1 - .::;.~ i ~rTfi':,;Hr \
'~I,' ~,f r ('I~iIC,
c
. .'
Cf - ] T ] i. "l L A I n- ',I C Ii I 11'1 r [
r-F','t t~rtJ'
C,11111 Hi:i I,.II~',
f {..-T~,(llnJ:'
"Ii C,' I'lll .I1.1! ,
l' ,
1;("'
, '
, -,
1 ':,:",
1 ;,'
~,.'4
I II 1 lUI.t~ [HI [I
r~, Ii, 1 11 [: ':11..11 J II ':;,1111 Hi:, 111I~I' , r ,1 /:1 I' [I :11 l~f r 1 j:[I' II~:,
"
J I~F Ul VOL U11[ ~l ,/ ~ 1 ,,: .:j i '~ - ."
.'
r AI {,e I T Y ,", r.,-/,'. I '" ,I'j
Nf fll F'Hr,~,1 11 " I, I, I .~ i IJ H