LEGAL APPROVAL
r
,---I
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
,
~"
v,
~;.
,
200 N. Seacrest Blvd.
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
(407) 738-7490
:.---~
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
.....
September 19, 1988
Mr. William Morrow, President
Board of Directors
Stonehaven Homeowners Association
P.O. Box 334:L .
Boynton Beach, FL 3~436
Re: Stonehaven (Banyan Creek)
Master Plan Modification
Our file No. 128
Dear Mr. Morrow:
Please be advised that on Tuesday, September 13, 1988 the
Planning and Zoning Board approved the referenced Master Plan,
subject to staff comments, copies of which are attached.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to con~act me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~5".
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO,
PLANNING DIRECTOR
~
CSA:ro
Attachments
cc City Manager
Technical Review Board
Central File
:
I'
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
~.,
,
~;.
,
~f)
...
200 N. Seacrest Blvd.
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
(407) 738-7490
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
I
.
August 25, 1988
William Morrow, Presi~ent
BQard of Directors
Stonehaven Homeowners Association
P.O. Box 3341
Boynton Beach, FL 33436
Re:
Stonehaven' (Banyan Creek)
Master Plan Modification
Our file #: 128
'.
'.
Dear Mr. Morrow:
Please be advised that on Tuesday, August 16, 1988, the City
Commission made a finding of no substantial change in connection ~
with the referen~ed request.
'.
This matter will now come before the Planning and Zoning Board on
Tuesday, September 13, 1989 for a final determination.
,If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~~~ ~ZIATO' AI
PLANNING DIRECTOR
CSA:ro
cc City Manager, Technical Review Board, Central File
~
I'
AGE N DAM E MaR AND U M
August 9, 1988
TO: PETER L. CHENEY, CITY MANAGER
FROM: CARMEN S, ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: STONEHAVEN (BANYAN CREEK)-MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
(RESUBMISSION)
William Morrow, president of the Stonehaven Homeowners'
Association, recently requested a modification to the previously
approved master plan for the Stonehaven planned Unit Development,
The modification requested was to amend the rear yard setback
from fifteen (15) feet to eight (8) feet for the purpose of
constructing screened enclosures with solid roofs, as outlined in
the attached correspondence, At the July 19th city commission
meeting, the City commission made the determination of no
substantial change for this request based on the Technical Review
Board recommendation and staff comments to allow the reduction in
rear setback only for those lots that abut lake areas,
The procedure for approving master plan modifications in planned
unit developments is twofold. First, the City Commission must
make a determination as to whether or not the changes requ~ted
are substantial in nature. A determination of subliitantial change
on the part of the City commission, which has sole'discretion in
this matter would require a new application for PUD. On the
other hand, a determination of no substantial change allows the
forwarding of the request to the planning and Zoning Board. The
Planning and Zoning Board then may approve the request. This
procedure appears in Appendix B, section 12 of the Code of
Orqinances,
Prior to forwarding this request to the planning and Zoning Board
for final disposition, the applicant met with staff to discuss
concerns that the applicant had with allowing the setback
reduction for lake units only. At this meeting, staff advised
the applicant to resubmit plans providing additional information
supporting his request to enable the Technical Review Board to
reevaluate the request. The applicant resubmitted the master
plan modification request for a rear setback decrease from
fifteen (15) feet to eight (8) feet where it was reevaluated at
the August 2, 1988 Technical Review Board meeting.
Based on the additional information provided, the Technical
Review Board offers for your consideration, a recommendation that
the City commission make a finding of no substantial change for
the requested modification, and that the planning and Zoning
Board approve this request subject to the attached comments from
the Building Department and the Planning Department. Briefly,
the staff comments recommend that the request be allowed for all
lots except those along Boynton Beach Boulevard where there is a
10 foot landscape easement (lots 1-12), those lots which abut a
Public usage district (lots 94-105), and lots 17 and 18 abutting
Knuth Road. The applicant, who was in attendance at the
Technical R~view Board meeting, has agreed to the exclusion of
the above-mentioned lots for this request.
c Q,-... .~"l ~ - :;;C
CARMEN S. ANNUNZ TO
CSA:ro
Attachments
cc Mr. Morrow, Mr. Driscoll, Central File
STAFF COMMENTS
'\A ~ STONEHAVEN (BANYAN CREEK)'
I t/...t.....(.IA.;
-~T~PLAN MODIFICATION (RESUBMISSION)
Building Department
See attached memo
Planning Department
See attached memo
.,,\
.
.
-
MEMORA;\~DUM
'.
Ca~men Annunziato
Planning Director
DAT'
Au;;u~t 3, 1988
'ILe
s",aJt:CT
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION:
STONEHAVEN P.U.D.
RESUBMISSION
'!lOW
Don Jaeger
Building Department
As a condition of master plan modification approval, the following
comment should be incorporated into the related documents by the
applicant:
In order for the Builcing Department to permit
screened rooms with canvas roofs, these roofs
must be engineered in compliance with section
1205 of the Standard Building Code.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comment will
insure a timely permitting process.
DJ:ld
XC: E. E, Howell
"
, ,'~,':f..f~.;.:Y~,,'
z@%',",
':I: '^
.'<(:07.;:"
.~/;:;;,;:
,li..t,tjA:,..
c.:.,~~~,.
$;1"0':
~"" ,
).. -,"
.<1' ;~:
,:l;5';,{
~;:~~~"
'.u~';':':.,
Y~~~'?
.",' '.'
'~,~f~~: "",
i0f::' ;
Xf" ~
~"::e.'
~i;,"'i-..
4{{%.:,\
>>;.z.." " '
".f.$ii~"
'~~i':.::I/
,,' ......
?'
'IW;,'
-; r~
'1.',',
. .
.. 'r
;p
,
->><;
t:
t
ft"
~'
1\;,
of;
,,-
"
,
~
f.
<,
'.~
.' ~ }
":
~ ' i~
:~
,
'j
i
,,~
. \'i':'
.~.
'Vf,
'"
",
~'
.
M E MaR AND U M
August 9, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: STONEHAVEN (BANYAN CREEK)-STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request for a master plan
modification resubmission:
The applicant is requesting an amendment to reduce the rear yard
setback from fifteen (15) feet to eight (8) feet to allow for the
addition of screened enclosures with solid roofs. At the August
2, 1988 Technical Review Board meeting, two issues were noted
with respect to this resubmission request:
(1) There is a ten (10) foot wide landscape
easement which abuts Boynton Beach
Boulevard that would preclude the '
reduction of the rear setback to eight
(8) feet for lots 1 through 12.
(2) Appendix B of the Planned Unit Development
Regulations, Section 9B-Internal Lots and
Frontage, requires that "peripheral yards
abutting other zoning districts shall be
the same as required in the abutting zone."
Lots 94 through 105 abutt a PU, Public
Usage, district which requires a 25 foot
rear setback. Therefore, the rear yard
setback for lots 94 through 105 would have
to maintain a 25 foot rear setback also.
(3) Lots 17 and 18 abut the Knuth Road right-of-
way with no common area ~uffer. On the original
master plan the rear setback requirement for
lots 17 and 18 is 25 feet rather than 15 feet
that is required for most other lots.
For these reasons the Technical Review Board recommends that
this request be approved for all lots, excluding lots 1-12,
94-105, and 17 and 18,
e.~- . -
CARMEN S.
"
) ( <- ;:;(;
ANNUNZ~O
CSA:ro
cc Mr. Morrow
Mr. Driscoll
Central File