CORRESPONDENCE
~I)ard of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T_ Marcus
Carol A_ Roberts
Warren H_ Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
COllllty Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
January 23, 1995
Mr. Michael Rumpf
Planning & Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR LAND USE AMENDMENTS
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
As per your request, I am providing the following traffic analysis information
for the 4 proposed land use amendments in the City of Boynton Beach.
Project: Windward DUD Size: 110
Existing Land Use: 5 du/ac
Dwelling Units: 550 single-family
Daily Trips: 5,500
Change in trips: 180 reduction
Project: Royal Manor Mobile Home Park
Existing Land Use: 8 du/ac
Dwelling Units: 684 multi-family
Daily Trips: 4,785
Change in trips: 438 reduction
Project: Lawrence Oaks Size: 42
Existing Land Use: 5 du/ac
Dwelling Units: 210 single-family
Daily Trips: 2,100
Change in trips: 68 reduction
Project: Carriage Gate Size: 9.7
Existing Land Use: 8 du/ac
Dwelling Units: 77 multi-family
Daily Trips: 539
Change in trips: 189 increase
Existing Traffic Volume on Old Boynton
Traffic Increase:
Total Traffic:
LOS 0: 29,400
acres
Proposed Land Use: 4.84 du/ac
Dwelling Units: 523 single-family
Daily Trips: 5,320
Size: 85.6 acres
Proposed Land Use: 7.26 du/ac
Dwelling Units: 621 multi-family
Daily Trips: 4,347
acres
Proposed Land Use: 4.84 du/ac
Dwellinq Units: 203 single-family
Daily Trips: 2,032
acres
Proposed Land Use: 10.8 du/ac
Dwelling Units: 104 multi-family
Daily Trips: 728
Road:
12,356
189
12,545
@ printed on focycJed paper
"An Equal Opportunity - A ffirlllill i\'L' Aclil1l1 EIllPloYl'"
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
January 23, 1995
Mr. Michael Rumpf
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR LAND USE AMENDMENTS
page two
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-
4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~., ~~f
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn35
Board of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department Planning, Zoning & Building
January 17, 1995
Mr. Michael Rumpf
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Re: County Planning Division Review of
City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Clearinghouse Ref. # BOY-2
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
Thank you for providing Palm Beach County with the opportunity to
review and comment on the proposed amendments to the City of
Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan. On behalf of Palm Beach
County, the Planning Division has completed an assessment of the
City's plan amendments pursuant to the requirements of Section
163.3184, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-11.008 (12) (c), Florida
Administrative Code.
We have not identified items of concern or objection in the
City's proposed amendments in terms of land use compatibility and
consistency with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. Once
again, thank you for the opportunity to review and comment.
Please be advised that the comments represent staff review and
not necessarily the position of the Board of Ccunty
Commissioners.
m rn @ rn u \Vi ~ rn'l
o l-ll~I..
I '1 : I !i d
! II ' ':
! ,\- I ... f
~
1"1
U~
David J. Kovacs, A.I.C.P.
Planning Director
I:\COMMON\PLANNING\DATA\BOY3LET
1
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ ptinted on '9Cycled pape'
100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (407) 233-5300
Board of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department Planning, Zoning & Building
January 13, 1995
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425'-0310
RE: VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF WINDWARD P. U. D., ROYAL MANOR MOBILE
HOME PARK, CARRIAGE GATE CONDOMINIUM AND LAWRENCE OAKS
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
Thank you for submitting notice of the City's intent to annex the
above referenced areas. On behalf of Palm Beach County, the
Planning Division has completed its assessment pursuant to our
"Interim Annexation Policy." For your information, I have enclosed
a briefing sheet on the review process.
The findings of our review are as follows:
1. Planninq Division: The proposed voluntary annexations are
consistent with the statutory requirements of Chapter 171,
Florida Statutes (F.S.) Our findings are as follows:
a. Windward P.U.D.: Although this area is reasonably
compact, it is not contiguous to the City's boundaries.
However, if Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates is annexed
prior to the Windward P. u. D., then the contiguity concern
would be satisfied.
b. Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates: Chapter 171, F. S.
precludes annexation of finger areas. Although this area
is finger-like in appearance, it is not contrary to the
compactness requirement of the statute because the
property itself is shaped like a finger.
c. Carriage Gate Condominium: The area is reasonably compact
and contiguous to City boundaries.
Boynton Beach Annexation
Page 1
Four Areas
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ p,inted on ,ecyc/(Jd paper
100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (407) 233-5300
d. Lawrence Oaks (a/k/a Manor Forest P.U.D.): The area is
reasonably compact and contiguous to City boundaries.
However, the City is not annexing the entire P.U.D. but
only that portion of the P. U. D. that is not fully
developed. Accessibility to that portion of the P.U.D.
may be a problem. Another problem pertains to the
administration of zoning and building codes while the
P. U. D. is being developed. These issues should be
resolved prior to annexation.
2. Enqineerinq Department: No comments offered.
3. Fire-Rescue Department: Persons residing in Windward, Royal
Manor, and Carriage Gate would receive approximately the same
response time in the City as they would in the County.
Persons residing in Lawrence Oaks could be better serviced by
Palm Beach County Station 43.
4.
Water Utilities Department (WUD): No comments, as
properties are outside the County Utility Service Area.
the
Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to the proposed
voluntary annexations. Please be advised that the comments
represent staff review and not the position of the Board of County
Commissioners.
Cordially,
C'. '_'J~~~ yjJ ~UQ~"-
David J. Kovacs, A.I.C.P.
Planning Director
p.c. :
External Distribution List
Honorable Warren H. Newell, District 3 Commissioner
Robert P. Banks, County Attorney's Office
Iva Barnett Grady, County Administration
Bevin Beaudet, P.E" Deputy County Administrator
Allan Ennis, Traffic Engineering Division
Don Grund, Parks and Recreation Department
Lawton McCall, Water Utilities Department
Diana Newcomer, Sheriff's Department
Kathy Owens, Fire-Rescue Department
PZ&B Distribution List
Kris K. Garrison, Executive Director, PZ&B
Beth McCall, Zoning Division
Earl Hahn, Planning Division
Boynton Beach Annexation
Page 2
Four Areas
BRIEFING SHEET - ANNEXATION REVIEW PROGRAM
Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy I-b provides that
"the County shall implement the County's Interim Annexation
Policy". The County's Interim Annexation Policy provides that "All
annexations will undergo a preliminary review by the Planning
Division according to the following threshold criteria to determine
the extent, if any, of statutory deficiencies and impacts on the
County" .
The County agencies responsible for reviewing proposed annexations
and the review criteria are as follows:
* Planninq Division: reviews statutory requirements and impacts
on County.
* Enqineerinq Department: reviews to ensure that all rights-of-
way, as identified by the County Thoroughfare Right-of-Way
Identification Map (TIM), are protected.
* Fire-Rescue Department: reviews to protect level of service
provided to both the residents of the municipality and
unincorporated area, and prevent efficiency decreases in
service delivery.
* Water Utilities Department: reviews to ensure water and sewer
services are provided in a cost-effective manner, recognizing
the impact of service area dislocations.
I:\COMMON\PLANNING\DATA\ANNEX\BOYNTON\JAN13_95
rn ~@~DW~ r,:)
[---"'--'.~""..'. ..11 ii I
, t.1 I
R I,l:l
~ ; : !' ! ,
, " ; i '
.._----------,.~-~
:. f "II ( -,f.' -,11
1.1."y""IHI /'.!", , '.
7r)1,!ir'!I'" j'r:pf
. ._,_.._ ...~,.,....:.."~ ',,1 ,~i.' r,.__... .
Boynton Beach Annexation
Page 3
Four Areas
\-~' ... '
_. . _ I';l - - .'
" ' 11
\ .;_ t 1:~~
Ii .. I
\i~ ;;.a:- ~- i
_ ~......,~ _...J
\~ ~-
;-\
~\
,'I ' . ,
tf:-U J',
~. '1'-' "
--
..'
....
,......
L
~
...
I
\
~.
. . , \
...:~l' I,:,
~~~.~' ,
i~!:~:'
.-----:-';~ \,
,.
I . ,
,:~ --~::::.-
"..
--..:
~~::- ~
'j.
.;
L----
C:~
[-'-~' "
,.----:: .
.;;:;:;:--~~
'~;~ijN
,-:--;~s .':.'f.. \~..
:~-::d~ \~':
. .~__:_.. ~~",J.
-- -- ,,>
. _ .,..~~~'S*--..:.-.,_.=:-:
... ---""-----
....
.-"\
I
~~Il\~.):-"::'''''it'' ~~~.';. \ 1~\ 11'
1,~' ~': "~-~-'. .., . ,. -
.', . :. ....."., l.l'
_,' ..' _ :. ," 17'. s:> "
..,.-;v, - ,. ,. "Of
~~_.<\."......<.. - ,.~ .' (\. ,. ~
LOCATION MAl?
-. \ "~~fUJ~{,'~
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-11
January 13, 1995
FROM:
City Manager
TO:
Rescue
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTIES
WEST OF LAWRENCE ROAD
After a thorough review of the fire and emergency medical needs
of the properties west of Lawrence Road being considered for
annexation, and the fire and emergency medical capability of Fire
Station i3 which would serve the area versus the capability of
Palm Beach County Station i41 now serving the area, we have
concluded Boynton Beach Fire Station i3 provides superior
equipment, more personnel, and quicker response times.
To clarify the memorandum submitted to Michael Rumpf of the
Planning Department on August 18, 1994, the request for
additional equipment and personnel is not to provide basic fire
and emergency medical service, but to enhance our backup
capability without relying on backup from Stations i1 or *2
initially. Our present capability will result in a higher level
of service to those areas including Palm Shores, but an
improvement in our backup capability will reduce the possibility
of delays if all units are out on calls.
FJ/lmb
RECEIVED
~~rf\
~~~.
r,\tl:~~ \\\."'\::
. c \ ~\~ \.:;
~ ",/..,.{\ ,
" \V \0'-
1,.1 \ ':0
.~ -' : ,\,' '.<."f
.JAI~ 13 I~YS
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
CARL A. CASCIO, P.A.
FIRST FINANCIAL PLAZA
639 East Ocean Avenue
Suite 407
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Tel: (4 0 7 ) 73 6 - 7 743
Fax: (4 0 7 ) 73 6 - 7 743
Carl A. Cascio, Esq,
January 6, 1995
Mr. Mike Kumpf, Senior Planner
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.o. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
HE: Proposed Annexation of Winward PUD
My Clients: Individual Homeowners of Palm Shores at Gables
End Homeowners' Association
Dear Mr. Kumpf:
I had previously spoken with you on the telephone regarding
review of the file on the proposed annexation of Winward PUD and
have had the opportunity to review the documents in the file as
of January 3, 1995. As you may know I have been retained
collectively by the homeowners in the Palm Shores at Gables End
Homeowners' Association to prevent the proposed annexation of the
Winward PUD (which encompasses their property).
The city's proposed annexation should be submitted to the
registered voters of the area referred to as Winward PUD by
referendum. The City's attempt to "voluntarily" annex the
property under the guise of Florida Statute Annotated Section
171.044 is legally unenforceable on several grounds and will be
vehemently opposed by my clients.
The use of Paragraph 7 of the agreement dated March 20, 1994
between the City of Boynton Beach and Frank A. Flower does not
legally constitute a vpluntary petition for annexation by the
current property owners. The "annexation clause" of the
agreement is unenforceable as a matter of law for lack of
consideration. Additionally, the "annexation clause" does not
meet the definition of a petition for voluntary annexation as
required under Section 171.044 (1). The city also fails to meet
Mr. Mike Kumpf
January 6, 1995
Page Two
the requirements set forth in Section 171.044 (1) because of the
lack of contiguity between the city and the area proposed to be
annexed. Also, the signatures of all the property owners of this
area have not been obtained as required by Section 171.044 (2).
Furthermore, the attempt to annex an area without a vote by
referendum, unless by special act of the legislature, is
unconstitutional for lack of due process.
It is our belief that the city's attempts to force
unincorporated residents into the city is solely for the purpose
of expanding the tax base and fill the city coffers without any
consideration being given to the property owners and taxpayers.
Please be advised that I will be representing the homeowners
of Palm Shores at the Planning and Development Board on January
10, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. and if necessary at the hearing to be held
before the City Commission on January 17, 1995 at 7:00 p.m.
My clients have proposed to settle this matter if the city
fulfills the requirements of Section 171.0413 and other
requirements as set forth under Chapter 171.
Please direct all future correspondence to my attention.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact
this office.
Very truly yours,
~~.
~
cc: Milton Geller, President
ill m : m : ,~"~ lill
~ ~,-",,,^".,~.etl
~'88
80aId of Supervisors
C. Slanley We8)ler
Kermit Dell
John I. WhllWOrth In
Secr8latylManager
William G. Winters
Assistant Manager
RIchard S. Wheelihan
Attorney
Perry & Schone, P,A,
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
13081 MILITARY TRAIL
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484
January 4, 1995
Mr. Michael W, Rumpf
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
Pldrlnit1g Dcpurtm~nt.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
Re: Availability of Drainage Facilities for Windward, P.U.O. (86-3700.01), Royal
Manor Mobile Home Park (L-21), Carriage Gate Condominium (L-24), Lawrence
Oaks (F.K.A. Manor Forest, 87-629D.01), Woolbright Professional Center (F.K.A.
Woolbright Office Center, 88-6690.01)
The above referenced projects are located within the service area of the Lake Worth
Drainage District and currently discharge into its system.
All have received drainage permits from this District with the exception of the Royal
Manor Mobile Home Park which existed prior to the establishment of formal permitting
by the L WOO and has a "grandfather" status.
Please feel free to contact this office if you have any further questions.
Sincereiy,
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
1!::i~~~
Chief Inspector
SJW/mfb
_.,..."..,.,,-""..-----_._~~....,................,.. -
\--;'\ ill ~__~ .\l. Vi ~_,,-
\ u< I .~ -
, ,
, I
l f'l'l
! il \;
jl."iUI
I
I.- PLANnING AND 'D~
ZON!tl.G DEPT. ::!:r- ,
cc: Patrick A. Martin, P,E., District Engineer, LWDD
C:'WPiDDOCS\MARV\lnTEft'MUMP.PfR
Delray Beach & Boca Raton 498-5363 . Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach 737.3835 . FAX (407) 495-9694
~,~
SWA
SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY
YOUR PARTNER FOR
SOLID WASTE SOLUTIONS
Michael Rumph, Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Land Use Amendment: Application # 1 - Windward PUD
December 22, 1994
Dear Mr. Rumph,
The Solid Waste Authority has reviewed the information supplied to
this office concerning the Windward PUD Annexation/ Land Use
Change/ Rezoning Application. Based on the information supplied to
this office regarding this land use amendment, the Authority does
not ob;ect to this proposal.
It is the Authority's understanding that this land use amendment
would change the land use of a 110.0 acre parcel of property from
R-5 (county designation), which allows for up to five dwelling
units per acre to Low Density Residential (city designation) which
allows for a maximum density of 4.84 dwelling units per acre and is
in fact part of an annexation process that will provide for
consistent, county to city land use designation.
Based on the Authority's calculations, this land usage change would
decrease the potential for solid waste generation by 35 tons per
year.
This land use change, in combination with the land use changes
contained in City of Boynton Beach Applications 2 -5 result in an
overall reduction in the potential for solid waste generation.
Because the net result of all of the land use changes contained in
Applications 1-5 of this annexation/land use change/rezoning
process is a reduction in the potential for solid waste generation,
the Authority can assure that there are solid waste facilities and
disposal capacity to serve the most intensive development scenarios
that may take place on these sites.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
v+::v:--
Marc C. Bruner
Director of Planning and
~
mLi~ ;,:~ ml@1
,
,
Environmental Programs
~~~~NgE1tf.D
7501 North Jog Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33412 (407) 640-4000 FAX 683-4067
-
fJ1ie City of
iBoynton iBeacli
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bea&. 'Boukvartf
P.O, 'Bo;c310
'Boynton 'B~ %>>itfa 33425'0310
City:Jfafl: (4fJ7) 375-6000
:F.9lX: (4fJ7) 375-6090
December 22, 1994
Mr. Dan Weisburg, P.E., Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
P.o. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229
RE: Availability of Traffic Facilities Analysis for
Windward PUD
Royal Manor Mobile Home Park
Carriage Gate Condominium
Lawrence Oaks
Dear Mr. Weisburg:
In addition to the Woolbright Professional Center amendment and
rezoning, this office is processing a land use amendment for each
of the above-referenced projects/developments which are to be
annexed to the City. Each project is described in the enclosed
public hearing notices and by the following:
The Windward PUD is currently under construction and once completed
will consist of 418 single-family dwelling units. The maximum
gross density allowed under the City's future land use designation
is 4.84 du/acre which is comparable to the County's 5 du/acre
limit;
The Royal Manor Mobile Home Park is a built community consisting of
437 mobile homes. If the property was redeveloped the City's
Comprehensive Plan would limit the density to 7.26 du/acre, which
is comparable to the County's 8 du/acre limit;
The Carriage Gate condominiums are also complete and consist of 88
multi-family units. The proposed land use classification is High
Density Residential, which has a maximum density of 10.8 du/acre,
and is slightly higher than the county's maximum of 8 du/acre; and
Development of Lawrence Oaks has recently commenced, and has
approval for 178 single family homes. Furthermore, the proposed
and existing maximum densities are comparable at 4.84 and 5
du/acre, respectively.
,'lmerica's gateway to tfi.e (julfstream
Mr. Weisburg
-2-
December 22, 1994
I respectively request a statement in writing which verifies that
there are traffic facilities available to serve the demands
generated by the most intensive development scenario permitted on
each individual site. Given that four (4) of the amendments would
represent a decrease in the maximum density allowed, your response
could be limited to that fact. However, since the Carriage Gate
application represents a slight increase in maximum density
allowed, please include in this response a description of current
capacity (on the adjacent roadway segment of Old Boynton Road), and
the resulting surplus or deficit after incorporating the potential
increase in traffic equivalent to the 2.80 dwelling unit per acre
increase. As you know, this information is required by the
Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for compliance review.
Furthermore, the state has a specific time frame within which this
information must be transmitted to them. Therefore, your response
would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience. If you
have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you.
Sincerely,
~~.~
Michael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
Attachments
A'Alt22ROAD.LIl'l'
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Pete Mazzella, utilities Department
Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner ~~
FROM:
DATE:
December 16, 1994
SUBJECT: Analysis on the Availability of Utilities for
Windward PUD
Royal Manor Mobile Park
Carriage Gate Condominium
Lawrence Oaks
This office is processing a land use amendment for each of the above-
referenced annexations, and as you know, each submittal to the State for
compliance review must include an analysis on the availability of
facilities based on maximum development allowed under the proposed land
use classification. Each project is described in the attached public
hearing notices, and by the following:
The Windward PUD is currently under construction and once completed will
consist of 418 single-family dwelling units. The maximum gross density
allowed under the City's future land use designation is 4.84 du/acre and
is slightly less than the County's 5 du/acre limit;
The Royal Manor Mobile Home Park is a built community consisting of 437
mobile homes. If the property was redeveloped the City's Comprehensive
Plan would limit the density to 7.26 du/acre, which is also slightly
less than the County's 8 du/acre limit;
The Carriage Gate condominiums are also complete and consist of 88
multi-family units. The proposed land use classification is High
Density Residential, which has a maximum density of 10.8 du/acre, and is
slightly higher than the County's maximum density of 8 du/acre; and
Development of Lawrence Oaks has recently commenced, and has approval
for 178 single family homes. Furthermore, the proposed and existing
maximum densities are comparable at 4.84 and 5 du/acre, respectively;
Please prepare statements which verifies that there are water and
wastewater facilities available to serve the demands generated by the
most intensive development scenario permitted on these sites. Please
provide as specific a review as possible, including the projected number
of units and the capacity available, before and after project
development.
If you have any questions, please call me. Thank you.
A:AX22U'I'l:.1I:1l11:
%e City of
$oynton $eacfi
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boufevartf
P.O. 'B~310
'Boynton 'Betu:.Ii.,1WrUfa. 33425-0310
City 1fdI: (407) 375-6000
!J.9IX: (407) 375-6090
December 16, 1994
Mr. Pat Martin
Lake Worth Drainage District
13081 Military Trail
Delray Beach, Florida 33484
RE: Availability of Drainage Facilities Analysis for
Windward PUD
Royal Manor Mobile Home Park
Carriage Gate Condominium
Lawrence Oaks
Woolbright Professional Center
Dear Mr. Martin:
This office is processing a land use amendment for each of the
above-referenced projects/developments, and an application for
annexation for all but the Woolbright Professional Center. Each
project is described in the enclosed public hearing notices and by
the following:
The Windward PUD is currently under construction and once completed
will consist of 418 single-family dwelling units. The maximum
gross density allowed under the city's future land use designation
is 4.84 du/acre which is comparable to the County's 5 du/acre
limit;
The Royal Manor Mobile Home Park is a built community consisting of
437 mobile homes. If the property was redeveloped the City's
Comprehensive Plan would limit the density to 7.26 du/acre, which
is comparable to the County's 8 du/acre limit;
The Carriage Gate condominiums are also complete and consist of 88
multi-family units. The proposed land use classification is High
Density Residential, which has a maximum density of 10.8 du/acre,
and is slightly higher than the county's maximum of 8 du/acrei
Development of Lawrence Oaks has recently commenced, and has
approval for 178 single family homes. Furthermore, the proposed
and existing maximum densities are comparable at 4.84 and 5
du/acre, respectively; and
){merit.a s (jateway to tlie (julfstrt(1m
Mr. Pat Martin
-2-
December 16, 1994
The Woolbright Professional Center represents a change from office
Commercial land use to Local Retail Commercial land use to allow
for the development of a small neighborhood shopping center which
could consist of approximately 45,000 square feet. Whereas the
existing land use and zoning would allow a two-story office
building, the proposed land use and zoning would allow a two-story
office and retail project.
I respectively request a statement in writing which verifies that
there are drainage facilities available to serve the demands
generated by the most intensive development scenario permitted on
each individual site.
It is my understanding that as long as a given project is within
the LWDD boundaries and, is developed consistent with District
operational policies and guidelines, that drainage facilities would
be available; however, a statement from you which specifically
indicates the ability/inability to serve the anticipated demand
upon drainage facilities is required for transmission of this
amendment to the state for compliance review.
Furthermore, the state has a specific time frame within which this
information must be transmitted to them. Therefore, your response
would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience. If you
have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you.
Sincerely,
~ e:., 7'C--rt
Michael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
Attachments
A.A:l.22DIlAI. LI7
CZhe City of
$oynton $eacli
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boukvartf
P.O. 'B01(310
'Boynton 'Buufr., :JCorUfa 33425-0310
City:Jfa[[: (407) 375-6000
:JfU: (407) 375-6090
December 16, 1994
Mr. Marc Bruner
Director of Planning and Env. Programs
7501 North Jog Road
West Palm Beach, Florida 33412
RE: Availability of Solid Waste Facilities Analysis for
Windward PUD
Royal Manor Mobile Home Park
Carriage Gate Condominium
Lawrence Oaks
Woolbright Professional Center
Dear Mr. Bruner:
This office is processing a land use amendment for each of the
above-referenced projects/developments, and an application for
annexation for all but the Woolbright Professional Center. Each
project is described in the enclosed pUblic hearing notices and by
the following:
The Windward PUD is currently under construction and once completed
will consist of 418 single-family dwelling units. The maximum
gross density allowed under the City'S future land use designation
is 4.84 du/acre which is comparable to the County's 5 du/acre
limit;
The Royal Manor Mobile Home Park is a built community consisting of
437 mobile homes. If the property was redeveloped the City's
Comprehensive Plan would limit the density to 7.26 du/acre, which
is comparable to the County's 8 du/acre limit;
The Carriage Gate condominiums are also complete and consist of 88
multi-family units. The proposed land use classification is High
Density Residential, which has a maximum density of 10.8 du/acre,
and is slightly higher than the County's maximum of 8 du/acre;
Development of Lawrence Oaks has recently commenced, and has
approval for 178 single family homes. Furthermore, the proposed
and existing maximum densities are comparable at 4.84 and 5
du/acre, respectively; and
.9lmerica s (jateway to tfu (julfstTlam
Mr. Marc Bruner
-2-
December 16, 1994
The Woolbright Professional Center represents a change from Office
Commercial land use to Local Retail Commercial land use to allow
for the development of a small neighborhood shopping center which
could consist of approximately 45,000 square feet. Whereas the
existing land use and zoning would allow a two-story office
building, the proposed land use and zoning would allow a two-story
office and retail project.
I respectively request a statement in writing which verifies that
there are solid waste facilities available to serve the demands
generated by the most intensive development scenario permitted on
each individual site, Please include in each statement a
description of current capacity, the projected increase generated
from each project, and the resulting surplus or defecit. As you
know, this information is required by the Department of Community
Affairs (DCA) for compliance review.
Furthermore, the state has a specific time frame within which this
information must be transmitted to them. Therefore, your response
would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience. If you
have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you.
Sincerely,
~2:~ ~
Michael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
Attachments
A'AltZZIVA.LBor
fJ1ie City of
$oynton $eacli
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bea& 'Boulevard
P.O. 'Bo~310
'Boynton 'Beadi, 1'Coritfa 33425-0310
City!Jfai{: (407) 375-6()()()
1'JU: (407) 375-6090
December 16, 1994
Mr. Dave Kovacs, Director
Palm Beach County Planning Division
100 Australian Ave.
West Palm Beach, Florida 33406
RE: Applications for Annexation and Land Use Amendment/Rezoning
Windward PUD
Royal Manor Mobile Home Park
Carriage Gate Condominium
Lawrence Oaks
Woolbright Professional Center
Dear Mr. Kovacs:
This office is processing a land use amendment for each of the
above-referenced proj ects/developments, and an application for
annexation for all but the Woolbright Professional Center. Each
project is described in the enclosed public hearing notices and by
the following:
The Windward PUD was approved in Palm Beach County, is currently
under construction, will consist of 418 single-family dwelling
units once constructed. The maximum gross density allowed under
the City'S future land use designation is 4.84 units per acre which
is comparable to the County's 5 units per acre limit;
The Royal Manor Mobile Home Park is a built community consisting of
437 mobile homes. If the property was redeveloped the City's
Comprehensive Plan would limit the density to 7.26 units per acre,
which is comparable to the County's 8 units per acre limit;
The Carriage Gate condominiums are also constructed and consist of
88 multi-family units. The proposed land use classification is
High Density Residential, which allows a maximum density of 10.8
units per acre and is slightly higher than the County's maximum of
8 units per acre;
;{metUa's ljateway to tIU quifstream
Mr. Dave Kovacs
-2-
December 16, 1994
Development of Lawrence Oaks has recently commenced, and has
approval for 178 single family homes. Furthermore, the proposed
and existing maximum densities are comparable at 4.84 units per
acre (City) and 5 units per acre (County), respectivelYi and
The Woolbright Professional Center represents a change from Office
Commercial land use to Local Retail Commercial land use to allow
for the development of a small neighborhood shopping center which
could consist of approximately 45,000 square feet. Whereas the
existing land use and zoning would allow a two-story office
building, the proposed land use and zoning would allow a two-story
office and retail project.
Please provide me with your comments relative to consistency with
the County's Comprehensive Plan. Since these requests will be
reviewed in January, your response would be appreciated at your
earliest possible convenience. If you have any questions, please
call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you.
Sincerely,
/n.:U e< ~
Michael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
Attachments
A,All2Z,aeO.LIl'l'
---...- -- -- JAi'-.I-;;-:O-" 95 FP I 09: 39 I D:
TEL NO:
i:t090 pal
rd 0/ Count)" Commlulonorll
CQunty AdmlnllJtratol'
Robert Weisman
McCarty, Chair
l. Foster, Vice Chairman
nT, Marcus
C 01 A. Roberts
W n H. Newell
B Aaronson
M ude Ford Lee
I
-- T
Department of Planning, Zoning at Building
ZunIng Di'Vdiort
PA~l BEACH COUNTY
PLANNING, ZOBXNG AND 5UILDING
ZONING RECEPTIONIST: (407) 233-5200
ZONING FAX NUMBER: (~07) 233-5165
rACSIMILE COVER SHEET
'1'0 THE ATTENTION OF: To..j\t\.~ \ ...J..
:rROH I
.J..-=:: V'fi5-""'b"~~
W e ~ J.-", ~
U~~-'
/ AN~ "L4-
DATE: Lf '7., t;./,,\ S TINEz q. ,f f(O ~M
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDE COVER SHEET): ~
~4bA~k- ~\) \~~.Jf'j C-
, I
~ Co ~ I ~ II '^-' cJ.,,_.. :!) C"r C r! ....J r;: "'-" (.J " l../.~ ~ ,.- '5 .
-- r h/~A.p~ P?L1:2-P
COMXilNTSz
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
~p.#rNon~~: 100 Austi;aHal1 Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (407) 2.33.SWfl fAX; (407) 233.5165
,
I
00
m n WI ~ rnJ,
Il
! '
_"199S .
I' 'I\fD tb
J~~-20-'95 FPI 09:40 ID:
TEL NO:
t:t090 P02
.
Ak't1CUl 6. ~ON1ATC DJ!nJUCTS
S~C 6,6 !~u.DnUnfhn.rtt'\~ R~t"tllttl^'n
8. Swinun;rur '>>9olg and screen enclosures,
A. PrincipI'I Md A~"Y w;e,
(1) Prmelpal \100. Any swimming pool, spa or GCreer\ endolOlure ovmed and
opbllltc.d &lit .it OQ~roial eutetpose existwg 8ingul.rly Or in
CQlUbinntion with other ooMm",rcial ~tion uses OIl th. same
p~y shall be c()n~id~red as a I'Moiral use subject to tbe properly
d(;'\.(;tQpm~t rcsulatioml of the "pplio&b1e distriot.
(Z) Acct::550TT il'ile. Any ~in:uning pool, l5pll or &CrtleJ:1 end03UfQ operated
by a mtcmal, 5OCilll, civic organi~ticn. msidentil'&l bomrownet3
association, or resident of a single-family dwt:l1in,g l;balJ lxl (;onsidered
as an accessory use and shall exist in c-Onjum:tion witb the principal U5e
on the same lot, subject to the Bt'-lback regulations stated herein,
b. Setbacks for iecessorv pools or' spas.
(1) Swimming pools Or upHS shall meet the following setbacks as measured
to the outside of the pool beam;
',,"<"'" ~: ;..:.",.:~,.: :,',:,
'.", :"" ':::.
.,,,,:::
Front 28 feet
Bide (interior) 10.5 f<<>t
Side (comer) 18 feet
Rear lQ.5 feel
(,
.. ",
'.,",'.".'.'
:,,'.,'.,.,'U~::t(iti;';,.:);
:.::.'~.;:+j~~'..ij#li!t:<;.:,,:\
) 3 feet
o lot line - 3 t'e.et
or QPpo~ikl lot
liac - 5 fea
13 feet
S feet
(2) Notwithstanding the ahove setback Iequirements, swiIIlDling pools or
r.pl:lS may be constructed witb a three (3) foot rear setback: for single
famHy or zero lot line dwelling units in planned developments provid~
the following oonditiollS are met;
(a)
The entire rcar property line i8 adjacent to open space (lake,
natural preserve or golf course) a minimum of one-hundred
(tOO) feet in depth; and
(b)
All construction and earthwork is complete.I within the
owner's lot.
SUPPlEMENT!. EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 16,199]
PALM BEACIl COUNTY. FLORIDA
6-194
LAND flKvm.oPMli:NT COJ)E
I
JAtj-20-"35 FF~1 [19:40 ID:
TELhO:
0090 P[13
dJj77CLE 6: WNIf{G Dl!tTRIC1'S
.
S~C, 6. 6S/4J>nlMY'lItd!l/ IU,UlatiDlU
c.
SetblU"b for scret'Jl endoliure,; with or witbout accessorv ooc>>'*. Screen
e=lofoW"es with screen roofs with or without accessory swiIIUJ'ling pools shall be
subject to the followirlB setback requirements.
(1) ~reeu endomru for IlCcml:Ory li\wimming poOls sball meet the'
followinS setbllCb:
15 feet
7,5 feet
10 feet
o lot line - 0 feet
oppqiite lot line -
, 2 feel
10 feet
2 feel
::!,,:~~I~~~'
~ilil
Oft<<
o feet
Fronl
Side (interior)
z:j fee-t
7.5 feet
Sid~ (comer)
Rear
Q feet
o feet
(2) Notwidwtandlngthe above lOethaek requirements, screen enclosures may
~Ktend to a ~r() tot line subject to ilie followins requirements.
'"-,
(a)
If the roof of tbe ",nelo&:ule i~ not solid, there .mll.1I ba a five
(5) foot .,runimum height wall on the :r.ero lot line extending at
If>Ast to the rear e4gs ,~f the enolosu1"e, Such wan ~batl be of
D1lL3onry or oth6t" material acceptable to the Building DiviQion.
In addition, .. fllinimuI11 five (5) foot privaoy fen<:le shall be
provided fTOm .be pool or IJpa enclosure to the rear property
line.
(b) tf the roof of the enc.losure is solid, there :;hall ~ lm eight (8)
foot minimum height wall 00 lhe zero lot line extending at
least to the rear edge or the enclosure, Sucb wall shall ~ of
masonry or other malerialllcceptable to the Building DiVision.
The scJten enclosure sllall be atLlched to the masonry wallS,
The pool or spa enclosure shall be set back a tninimum of ten
(10) feet from the rear property line. In addition, a minilIlum
five (5) foot privacy fence shall be provided from the pool
euclosure to the rear property line.
(3)
Scre.en roof enclosures may be constructed with a zero (0) foot rear
setback for single family or zero lot line dwelling units provided the
following conditions arc met:
PALM BEACH COUNTY, PWRIlM
6,iJ5
lAND DEVELUl'MEN1' CODE
SUPPLEMENT i - BFF/!'C71VE FEBRUAR}' 16, 1993
I
,----.'
~iF:N-20-' 95 FF~ I 09: 41 j L';
TEL NO:
1:*090 P04
J.11ttl0U16; ZONUYQ D1STfUCTS
$"", f~~..,."'''tIt_,... R_kt""",,
(.)
Th(; entire rear property line ia adjl!lcW.t to open &pace (lake,
l1Atutal pre:3en'C Qr ;golf counle) a mininlum of 100 feet m
depth;
(b)
An appropriate c:asemellt is Je(:orded for the JIUlintcrumce l;)f
the screen eDClosure;
(t)
All constnlction and earthwork Is completed wlth1n the
owner's lot; IU1d
(d)
Roof eaves shall not overlwlg tbe rear property line or any
utility, drainage or lake maintenance easement.
d. Du.ilmtlZ cOTeraze, Swimming pools Qf spas located at finished grade shall not
h.3 cODsidered as building oo'\,.eta~e unless totally enclosed by 8 semi-opaque or
opaque obstruction.
e. FmQlli, screenilll an!i ac(,ess, Every,swimming pool Or f>-p& shaD be enclosed
by a barrier, retaining waH, fellcti Or other strocmre in accordance with Palm
Beat:h County Swimming Pool and Spa Code, as amended,
f. Scroon enclosuret, Screens enclosures, pools, and construction" of, private
structures, within common areas of residential developments shall meet the
following sLandards:
(1)
Tbe landowner Qf homeowner's association mUst be a joint applicant on
the buildi~ permit application;
(2)
The Slln1cture must comply with all :setback requirements measured
from the ou~eT boundary of the colliIiJlm area OJ' have 11 fifteen (15)
foot ll.eparation bet'.veeD primary Gtrw;:ture.i:, whichever i~ gR'later,
(3)
Townhouse quad desigrw ebll.l1 have pool getbACks a minimum of three
(3) feet from the property lirie, Sc,reen enclQsurll6 with IIUIJlB8.ro &0....0
roof8 may Q;Iltend to tho prOperty line in tl townhouse quad de6ign. A
minimum five (5) foot wal! llun'Ounding thc pool or IIpa ilS Tequired.
(4)
Only permitted residr'ntial l!CCes50ry U5t:S 5hllll be allov,;roi
(~)
No private structures may be erected in a required perimeter landscape
~;
(6)
The entire development must continue to meet open space
requirements;
LAND Dtn'ELONdENJ' CODE
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FWRIDA
SUPPLEMENT 1 - EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 16. 1993
~196
I
.----1'
, mt'~-20-"~5 mr 09:41 1D:
TEL NO:
1:1090 P05
dBIlC;;U; 6: z!}Nl/I!G.J)JS'ml~__~__u_
&c.. 6,6 Su"Dlem~ta,." R~~u'al1ot1J
(7)
The homeo\\-'D6rs' documents shall be amended to include provisions
that allow private use of the common area upon association approval;
and
(8)
Stmctures will not be pennitte<l in a common Rrea thRt is desiped as
a water manilement tract.
g. ~tl encloslln'S 3rtd pool; adi&l'.ent to ~ornmon a.~ pf l'eliittentiaJ
developments. Construction of private structures on property adjacent to the
wmmon Brea of a multi-family Of' planned development shall he mbject to all
of the fOUOwUlS tbquiremenli;,
(1) 1luJ. boawown.'1j: Ulilociation mUGt ~ a joint appliCQIt on the buildiaS
permit applioatiol1.
(1) The struoture must oomply with ttU setbll<lk requirement:! metl$ured
from tht> outer boundary of tbe commOn Clml Qr have:> a fift,eQn (1 $) fuot
/;IQparatlQII between primary 6tructur~. whie.hever is l];tC./lter.
(J) Townho\l5C- ~uad desigm; 15halll1ave pool setbacks a minimum of three
(3) ket from the propert}' line. Screen enclosures with mansard screen
roof8 may extend to tile propeny lino in a townhousa quad design. A
five (5) fOOl wall surrounding the pool Or spa is required.
(4; Only permitted roijdential accessory uses shall be aUowed;
(5) wt!: adjacent to a required perimeter landscape area may not use this
policy. Section 6,8. Flann&:} Development District Regulations.
provides that all setbacks shaH be measured from the inside edge of the
required buffer or periml"ter landscape area.
9, Accesson radio tower. A radio tower for nonc-Olnmercial electronic communication
purposes may be pennitted as an accessory use to a permitted principal school or bona
fide agricultural use. subject to the following supplementary regulations,
a,
Hdlilit, The radio tower shall not exceed one hundrt'"i1 (100) feel in height from
ground level.
b,
Setbar,ks. Setbacks measured from the base of the radio tower to the property
line shall equal a distance of not less than twenty (20) percent of the hei~ht of
the tower. In addition, the radio to-...vef shall be located in such 8 manner that it
will not fall on any power line.
PALM BEA.CH COUN1Y, FWR1DA.
LItl'/D DEVELOI'MEN1' COVB
SUPPLEMENT 1 - EFFJi.CnvE FEBRUARY Iii, 1993
6.197
I
.
t
. JHt~-2D-'':35 FF:I 89:42 !D:
TEL NO:
1:1090 Pl?6
MJ11I!!:!!,_~,:,J9Ml!'!J.. P!S77tJCTS
..
Sec. 0.11 $uppkrnCmQM If~J!U1anclU
10. Amateur radio. t,elevl:<ilon ant4':~ and sateJHte dh.. I1ntr-nnl1:!i,
a. Purpose and intent. The purpose aud intent of this seclion is to provide for th~
safe IIDd effective Installation and operation of amateur nldio, citizen/; band
r...dio, and .eJevision wIleona support StlUCml'ell and (be beam antennas installed
on lhose sUpport structures as wen BE sat61lire dish antennas, It is also the
pl1lpOSe and intent (,If th1s section to provi(le for a reasonable accommodation of
amateur radio communications, in accor~Cfl witb Parts 9:5 pqd 97 of Cllapter
L of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulatiops, while reflecting Palm Beach
County's legitimate interest of protecting and promoting tbe heath, safety,
welfare, neighborhood aesthetics, and morals of its citiZbn8. The standards in
this !>ection are intended to place reasonable safety and aesthetic precautions on
the installation and erection of such antennas and antenna support structures, and
to represent the minimum practicable regulation llecesSlU)' to proted and
promote the health, safety and wclfare of the public, The regulations are Dot,
however, intended to unduly restrict or preclude amateur radio communications.
b. Applicability, All amateur and citizens band radio and television transmission
and receiving l:\I1[eIInKS, including sa1elIit6 dish antennas but excluding satellite
e-arth statiollS. shall be governed by the standards of this section.
c. AOPl'O'fal of antennas and antenna sUllnort struct:ur(!$. All antenna support
structures ll.Ild the beam antenna installed OD those anteJlWl support structures,
shall he considered accessory uses. and <;ball romply with the provisions of this
&ection. and Sec. 5-23 (Airport Zones and Airspace Heij?ht Limitations) of the
Palm Beach County Code of Laws and Ordinances,
d. Conditional USI!, In additioc to the require.zne.ntSi of this s:eetiQIl.. all aotenIla
~'Uppori $ln1ctUreG .lid the beam antennas installed. on those support structures,
extending sreater thart seventy (70) feet above aNode level Of fifteen (15) feet
..hove building height, whi~hever i~ greater, ~hall be .. Cla~~ "B' Conditional
U&e.
e. E:yw..ptiOd.':l.
(1)
^llllfi~lI. lIUpport strudures .nd the b~m anwnt\alS in$tallt::d OD th~
support structures that do not extend greater than seventy (70) fcc:t
above grade, shall be exempt (rom conditional use approval.
(2)
AlIlilnte..'U1i support structures and tile beam antennas installed on these
support structures which have been CQIlstructed, installed, and are
opemtlooal as of February I, 1990 Shall be considered legal,
nonconfonning uses.
L.iND DEVELOPMENT CODE
I'M.M fJ&1CTi C()VN'I'Y. n.OtlllM.
SUPI'LElfRNTl - EPFECTIVE FEB/WARY It., J99~f
6-J98
I
"".:>'';:0 ~ _;::,
%e City of
'Boynton 'Beacli
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boukvartl
P.O. 'BOi{.310
'Boynton 'Beadi, 7Corufa 33425-0310
City:JfJJ[[: (407) 375-6000
7}U: (407) 375-6090
December 13, 1994
The IPARC Clearinghouse
c/o Town of Lantana
500 Greynolds Circle
Lantana, FL. 33462
RE: AMENDMENTS TO CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ANNEXATION PROGRAM APPS. #1 TO #4, PHASE 2, GROUP 2 (95-1)
AND PRIVATELY INITIATED AMENDMENT 95-S1
The City of Boynton Beach is processing five (5) amendments to
its Future Land Use Map. Attached are the five executive
summaries with a corresponding location map.
Should you have any questions or need additional information,
contact Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner at 375-6260.
Sincerely, 1 /
J~~J.J'~~
Tambri J. H~ 71
Planning and Zoning Director
TH:mr
Enclosures
NXBCXZ:'ZGZXPRC.LBT
.llmerial's (jateway to the (julfstream
Page 1 of2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE Pl..AN AMENDMENTS
.....,
DATE: December 9, 1994
Reference #: 95-1 (APP. #1-P262)
General Information
Initiating Local Government: CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Contact Person: MICHAEL w. RUMPF, SENIOR PLANNER
Address: 100 EAST BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD, BOYNTON BEACH, FL jj4"::~
T elephonelF ax: 407/375-6260 407/375-6090
GITY OF BOYNtON BMcl-i
Applicant! Agent: ALL PROPERTY OilNER3 HITIIIN 'fIlE HINDWARD PUD
Telephone/Fax: -
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Textual Amendments
General Summary of Amendments:
- amendments relating to traffic circulation or the roadway networks
- amendments relating to affordable housing
Amendments related to the following elements:
X land use
-
- traffic circulation
- mass transit
- ports and aviation
- housing
- infrastructure sub-elements
- coastal management
- conservation
- recreation and open space
- intergovernmental coordination
- capital improvements
- other
Summary of addition (s) to adopted comprehensive plan: /\/0 T A PP'-I CPlfiLE
Page 2 of2
Summary of proposed change (s) to adopted comprehensive plan: AM r ~PPL1r,AALE
Proposed Amendments to the Future Land Use Map
Location of proposed map amendment (include a location map) 110 ACRES OF PROPERTY AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER MILITARY TRAIL AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD
Size of Area Proposed for Change (acres) 110 ACRES
Present Future Land Use Plan Designation (include a density/intensity definition)
RESIDENTIAL 5 (COUNTY)
Proposed Future Land Use Designation (include a density/intensity definition)
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (CITY) Jf.c:&4JJ/~(cRc
Present Zoning of Site (include a density/intensi~ definition) t:XCt;P'l'.l UN
RS-SE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTI L WITH SPt;C.lAL ~'U1{ .I:' LAI'H'I BD -
UN.l~ U~V~LU.I:'M~N~ (CI'rY)
Proposed Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition)
PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CITY)
Present Development of Site , ?F~F,J{Ja-AL , ?t:,>Z')
Proposed Development of the Site, ifknown (Number of Dwelling Units; Commercial Square Footage;
Industrial Square Footage; Other Proposed usage and intensity):
N/A
Is proposed change a Development of Regional Impact? NO
Comprehensive Plan Change Processing
Date/TimeJLocation Scheduled for Local Planning Agency Public Hearing 100
JANUARY 10, 1995/7:00 P.M./CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS, E. BOYNTON
BEACH BLVD., BUYNTON Ht:ACH, FL.
DateJTimeILocation Scheduled for Governing Body Public Hearing
JANUARY 17, 1995/7:00 P.M./CITY COMMISSION CH~lBER, 100 E. BOYNTON
BEACH BLVD., BOYNTON Ht;ACH, FL.
Scheduled Date for Transmittal to DCA JANUARY 20, 1995
'-._'........'_~..:lo-.\r; i
$~f~ I t:.
d'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO:
James Cherof
City Attorney
~ Ii <<
Tambr:. J. Heyden d~'VK. Q
Planning and Zoning Directo~
~~
FP.OM:
DATE: Oc~ober 26, 1994
SUBJECT: Lawrence Oaks - County permitting and inspections after
City annexation
As YQU will recall, at the annexation meeting held september 20,
2994 w:.th the City Manager, the Utilities Department, the City
Engineer, my department and yourself, the above-referenced issue
was discussed. As agreed at this meeting, I have approached Kris
Garriscn of Palm Beach County, regarding their interest in
en~e~lng into an in~erlocal agreement to have the County continue
permitting and ~nspections up to a period of five years for the
Law~e~ce Oaks projec~, currently under construction, and in
process for annexation. She stated that we needed to talk to
Bob Banks with their attorney's office, as she questioned whether
such an arrangement would be legal. At the september meeting,
you indicated that you would contact Bob Banks regarding this
issue. Please let me }:now the outcome of your discussions. This
a~ne}=ation will come before the Commission and Planning and
Development Board in December for public hearings. staff is
curren~ly working on determining an appropriate land use and
zoning for the property which could be affected by this
~';r.=ement: .
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
A:LOakIn~r
(PHOl\ieCALL)
FOR
TIME
.:..-- A.M.
P,M.
M
OF
PHONED
RETURNED
YOUR CALL
PLEASE CALL
WILL CALL
AGAIN
CAME TO
SEE YOU
WANTS TO
SEE YOU
FORM 4003
PHONE
(~('~4 fy Inib S h<::~ r5
"* G->1",62~& l=::> u~
~n--, s k c....
1\=<"=5 - ~:'-e I, b ci
Uni-ts - 2. '1-~L
Type.. -
Ct1Yt\bfn~ 6, i}/1S'~i?
I /0 "'(~.s
?(/j' dk-
-u-
: 3,g' ~/:-~
~.s.'l ty - i~.r7t.- !
LI:l+ (jiJ~/.J"'-('-H.... - &> 'f '., :_/IPY'?
Lc. + ~-:- - 6.-? /' 'ceo>"" __ ~... / 'f!U1>
$r~<!::.
U(\~ (.'~ -<<. -
Cc '-^-- +r- L~ LiSe.. - t<. c;
G, v"'-T1 2~~J - n. S /. ,r"
p-rt \"\c:. ~ iov--.. -p (~
~cs - W'f. -::1. ! ::0
U n ~ t-S r- I '11.
TYfC - ,Jr
Dc~s ~-ry- - 7, z- f
L... + (.;)'..,0 ~h1i.. -! I j )< 32./,'? :;''fj':L
L.. t- h.:::::c:- -J "',If c> I J 0 7z
UlrL'tt-~~;:-- - fr;"L/'2,"'3
C<.~ry ~ ~ - 'C. ';;,
Co~-fy 2~7 - k";l~E
5c ",1-
~
.
. 'l1ie City of
'Boynton 'Beacn
TO:
FAX NO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
100 'E. tlJoynton tlJeadi tlJoulevartf
P.O. f}Jo;{.310
tlJoynton tlJeadi, %>>Ufa 33425-0310
City:Hail: (407) 375-6()()()
1".9lX: (407) 375-6090
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
~5(.)r7 IYlvty-Yl
~ (;r7 &o-c.- t ~ V'V1- -tr 20y) 7' 'l)/",/'S}C7v,
e233 -s--/i:,s
MI ~ ;?c.. n-7 if
I
g
KC7c.Jc~1' ~ -Ie ~(,c::Cwc:../'(; j' un/A W/o1/e:O.
~ lie. (Jh/'rc.;:::;;- -rf,~r ?GlP (5t!!~ f1?7 tt::-Kc.~r'pr).
r/,drY'? i! V"W ..p- vCJur c:::L<;,S';S ~"nc::. c.. .
/ /
~~
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET ~
c: FAXTRANS . frb
5tmeri.c.as (jateway to tlie (julfstream