AGENDA DOCUMENTS
~~-_. ..
~J
---
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 92-112
TO: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
FROM:
Michael E. Kazunas
City Engineer
.M8-
DATE: May 4, 1992
RE: Lawrence Lakes P.U.D.
Waiver of Notice of Surety
HISTORY
The above referenced project was approved for platting by City
Commission action, Resolution 89-PPP on November 24, 1989. At that
time sufficient surety was provided to complete the improvements.
Subsequent to this action, the developer defaulted and the Bank of
South Palm Beaches assumed the property. The Bank agreed to extend
the Letter of Credit and City Commission, on November 20, 1990,
granted an extension to the infrastructure improvements for one year,
until August 2l, 1992. The Bank of South Palm Beaches has since
defaulted leaving the City without adequate surety and resulting in
the Commission action of November 25, 1991 where the City gave notice
to all future buyers of the need for surety prior to development on
the property.
DESCRIPTION
The property has recently been purchased by Sonful Construction Corp.
Transflorida Bank is in the process of preparing the new Letter of
Credit in the amount of the work remaining plus 10%, as certified by
Rossi and Malavasi Engineers, Inc. ($185,500 x llO% = $204,050).
The Developer requests waiver of the surety notice allowing him to
begin work on the on site improvements while the Letter of Credit is
being arranged.
RECOMMENDATION
This department recommends that this developer be granted a waiver to
perform those on site improvements only. That the waiver be for a
period of 30 days upon which time work will be halted unless and until
the total bond has been received. Upon receipt of an acceptable surety
in the amount of $204,050, work will be allowed to continue and the
Letter of Credit will be reduced by that amount of work which the City,
by inspection, determines has been satisfactorily completed.
MEK/ck
attachments
cc: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
RECEIVED
HAY 5 1992
/ l{ t.... J L._
, /..~-
/ ' ,; ,('
Sonful
Construction Corp.
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Att: Mike Kazinas
Att: J. Scott Miller
-....--.---
April 13, 199 <S 1-' ~ ,", -'-,
--I.....-L,../ ,I .,-'"
'() o.QYNTo?;';' ,
,; ~ ~ 'y / \
~ &~. /,'
f: Received ~ ., \
- <=:s:- \
(.) I
APR 1 (I 13 Q2 ,) 1- I
tl) CJ<r: .1-, /
0.,1. CITY ENGINEER i!' !"'"
't-ll ",,0 < - .'
0"" SEAC\\'~ /< {
...,r... '
li-,"'-r-f'i' '. . "
- I I
Dear Mr. Kazinas;
In our recent telephone conversation, I advised you we have acquired title
to properties known as Lawrence Lakes, located in Boynton Beach, and were
being funded by Transflorida Bank, and that it was our intention to provide a
Letter of Credit, as surety for the completion of the on and off site
improvements.
In order to expedite the issuance of the Letter of Credit, I suggested you
contact a Mr. Wm. Himes of Transflorida Bank (305) 434-5111, as they will
require a letter from you concerning the reduction of the face amount of surety,
as the work is performed, and also, would like the bank to be named, in the
event of default, to complete site work themselves.
As this issue is on the agenda for your next council meeting, and since we
can not commence any site work on said property, until this Letter of Credit is
approved by the City, we respectfully request your co-operation, to facilitate
this procedure. Please advise me if you incur any problems, concerning the
above.
11288 Manatee T er.. Lake Worth. Florida (407) 791-1134
.... ~ 1 .
lJL.", UIJ .I.IIL U'ill.fH'i11 ", .I.--~""LJ.U 1
ORB 7041 P9 1 811
NOTICE OF SURETY
THIS NOTICE made by W. Richard Staudinger, City
Engineer of the City of Boynton Beach, a Florida municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant".
1. The property which is subject to this notice is
more specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated herewith.
2. Notice is hereby given to the public that prior to
the development of the subject property surety bonds will be
required.
3. Accordingly, any future owner or user of the
subject property should consult with the City Engineer prior
to planning or initiating any development activity.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned being the Declarant
~rein~ap hereunto set his hand and seal this ~~ day of
4'1J"fi}2J1L~ , 1991.
CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF BOYNTON
BE/~ rt7 )Z
f~ 9. ~ W~ff~=GER' ~--
Dew (11ft{~ 4tL tiyQu(Ptudtj
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) ss:
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an
officer duly authorized in the Stat and County aforesaid to
take acknowledgements, personally appeared W. RICHARD
STAUDINGER, to me known to be the person described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged
before me that he executed the same. ~~.'
Q\J r t}JCL~U ,jilA_i(~,('b"Ut1:&l
Notary Public " - , -
~t_'.;'1.-:/:'~'~".:.. \ .
My Commission Expires: "
Nct~ Public. Stilt. 0' Florida -,:,
My (r,mmission bp:res lug. 29, 1993" J-'. ,"
Not ice . Sur Iond.d rh,u r,07 fail' In...,.nu Inc.
11/20/91
"'-\\j
.~
This instrument was prepared by and return to:
Jay D. Mussman, Esq.
Assistant City Attorney
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
(407) 738-7405
\.
. .
" . .
ORB 7041 P9 1 8 1 2
~ .. ,
.LAWRENCE LAKE
lEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE EAST 313.50 FEET OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF (Ni) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER
(NWl) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NWI) OF. THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (SWI)t
OF SECTION 18. TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH. RANGE 43 EAST
AND
THE NORTH ONE-HALF (Ni) OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (SI) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER
(NWi) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NWi) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (SWi)
AND THE NORTH 495.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (NEl) OF THE NORTHWEST
ONE-QUARTER (NW1) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (SW1) AND THE NORTH 495.00 FEET
OF THE WEST 132.00 FEET OF THE NOR1HWEST ONE-QUARTER (NWi) OF THE NORTHEAST
ONE-QUARTER (NEl) Of THE SOUTHWEST O"E-QUARTER (SW1) 1" SECTION 18. TOWNSHIP
45 SOUTH. RANGE 43 EAST,
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT CANAL L-21 RIGHT
OF WAY ABUTTING THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SUBJECT PROPERTY
. INCLUDING THE l.21 CANAL RIGHT OF WAY LOtATED BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
AND LAWRENCE ROAD AND THAT PORTION OF LAWRENCE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ABUTTING THE
WEST PROPERTY LINE Of THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
All OF THE ABOVE BEING LOCATED IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, fLORlDA.
..
\\ ~ II
. ftECORo VERFED
PALM BEACH COUNTY. Fl.A.
JOHN B. DUNKLE
ClERK CIRCUIT COURT
-.... "'''.-,..-
flOSSI "'~D MALAVASI
ENG1NEER8, INC.
c;ONSUL.TING ENOINElER'
~t~
..f I"(.M+
~I~
no VlLLAClI BOUL.EVARD, 8UITI1.tO
WIST PALM I..CH, FI.OA'DA 3340801804
(407) ..a.o....
PAX: (40'1') 11..1101
LAWRENCE LAKE P.D.D.
. COST ESTIMATE tOR SITE IMPROVEMENT WORK REMAINING
TO BE DONE AS OF MARCH 31, 1992
WORK I TIM
..
OR SITE
_ -w~..
LAWRENCE
ROAD TOTAL
1Pl- ~ 'If"l'''l'''
SURVEYING
r ....
CONSTRUCTION STAKING
$4,908
$3,500
$7,50S
ENGINEERING
1'1' - - J7"" "
INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION
AND CERTIFICATION
3,50"
',000
9,500
RE-DESIGN LAWRENCE ROAD
-8-
5,008
5,900
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
I5f III po
STREET LIGHTING
-0- 3,000 3, "lH.I
6,000 4,908 19,seS
1,590 -0- 1,508
51,98" -0- Sl,0S"
12,01'" 1,000 13,099
18,000 -s - 18,900
CLEARING & PREPARATION OF SITE
GRADING
ROAD BASE (RE-GRADE & COMPACT)
PAVING BALANCE OF ROADWAY
SOD COMMON AREAS, LAKE BANKS
AND ROADWAY
LAWRENCE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS-
TURN LANES.....~ -,..- .-
- """""'\17
-8-
68,B88
68,900
A. REMOVAL OF !XISTING DRAINAGE
HEADWALLS , DRIVEWAYS
B. DRAINAGE (PIPE & STRUCTURES)
C. SOBGRAOE-BASE-SHOOLDERS
D. WEARING SURFACE & OV)RLAY
E. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
& SIDEWALK
F. TRAFFIC CONTROL
G. SEED & MULCH
H. STRIPING' SIGNAGE
'l'OTAr..
$96,800
$89,590 $185,588
-a....
"....v 17'""" V"l~
z _Q_~_,____
_~a~.-S 'V ^ w .., 'W_ W
~~_.% e! ~ .......~.~_~~ rr-
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 20, 1990
Homeowners Associations end up owners of roads within the
developments. There are frequently complaints of traffic
violations. When the department tries to prosecute such a
case, if there is no agreement between the property owner
and the City, enforcement efforts are ineffective. Chief
Hillery would like to see this Agreement provided to each
"geo-politicalll subdivision in the City so the owners of the
private roads would agree to allow the City to enforce the
Florida State Statutes relating to "3-16 - Traffic
Enforcement. II
It was pointed out that under no circumstances would the
City be assuming responsibility for maintenance. The Mayor
felt this was something that could be handled administra-
tively after an Ordinance is passed. The City Manager could
negotiate what has to be done and the Mayor could sign.
There was agr
City ment Stipulation
had been prepared and was currently being reviewed by
Seppala & Aho's attorney, Mr. RobertC. Ross. Mr. Cherof
hoped to be able to bring the Agreement back to the
Commission in final form at the next Commission meeting.
It was noted that the City was in arbitration with Miller,
Meier, Kenyon & Cooper. Mr. Cherof had filed a Counterclaim
in arbitration, with the City seeking about $260,000 in
damages arising out of negligent design. Mr. Cherof
reported the City would face a filing fee in conjunction
with any Counterclaim. The fee would be about $2,000 and
would come out of the City Attorney's budget. Mr. Cherof
pointed out he had moved to have this "kicked outll of
arbitration and moved back into Court.
A motion was made and seconded to proaeed with the
Counterclaim. The motion carried 5-0.
4
,
. 17
..
LAW O'flCES
~
-t1 \t
-~
PERRY, SHAPIRO & MILLER, P.A.
.00 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE SOUTH
SUITE 300
WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33..01
F. MARTIN PERRY
ROSERT LEE SHAPIRO
JORDAN R, MILLER
JILL A. JARKESY
~y
TELEPHONE ...071 S33.....0..
FACSIMILE ...071 S33'32157
July 31, 1991
VIA CERTIFIED MAILI
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
... . , .. ~', \ ~, . 1\\ , \ , 1'" I \ \ \'
. ,
,
',",. , ~ f ( .... \ I, \ I H' i 1 h .. L f : .
- "
Mr. Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
( '\ ',' i \ I .
of Engineer~~g I ., . , . \"
, ~ , t \ ~ .
\ .\
\ ~.. I ~.I ,I . . j \
I
, , ,
, \.
\'1 1\
- .\ J
\
I, "r-~' I.,
. t ~ ,
,. i
: ~,
tl .. l
\ .... "" :. \
-,
(, : ,
\' -
I
r '.
Re:
Bank of the South Palm Beaches I ~~ ~.l.,~ \
Lawrence Lake PUD
File No. 3163.02 /', \, . / I .) 1'1 h "j t . V " \ \, t.\.\.) i I t.
Dear Mr. FiniZio:'L,,- "f" ',',;_:"': f q.' I' '\ I!., 1 "
~, ",',,1 . ,,~t, 1 "' t Ie:' \\ ", f'" ,-(( ..-. ~
This firm represents the Bank of the South Palm Beaches relative to \.
the Lawrence Lake Planned Unit Development, which is located in
Section 18, Township 45 South, Range 43 East in the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida. After reviewing the City's planning and
engineering files relative to Lawrence Lake PUD, it is clear that ((
many of the improvements required pursuant to the final plat ( \... u J ,_
approval have been completed. For your review, I am enclosing an t ~.1:l(
opinion of cost prepared by Enrico Rossi of Rossi & Malavasi
Engineers which sets forth the cost estimate summary of required
improvements which have yet to be completed.
.. I.
'. '--
. \ . .
\ i
:-.I' J,
The final plat for Lawrence Lake PUD was signed
the City Clerk embe 89.
m om this e to co ete all imp ovements requir
pursua to the final plat approval. This 21-month time period is
due to lapse on August 21, 1991. We are, therefore, respectfully
requesting a one year time extension with a six-month
administrative time extension in which to complete all the required
improvements. We hereby agree to post surety in the form of a
Letter of Credit in the amount of $176,560.50 as set forth in the
enclosed opinion of cost. We would greatly appreciate being placed
on the next available City of Boynton Beach City Commission Agenda
this time extension approval.
-;==::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~-_:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.-----.--.---------------------
._---.-----------------------~-
PROJECT: Lawrence Grove Plat 1
SURETY TYPE: Performance Bond
MONTHS ELAPSED: 41
ISSUE AMOUNT:
RELEASE AMOUNT:
BALAMes AVAILABLE:
1,284,228.00
955,478.00
328,150.00
ISSUE OATS: 05-23-88
RELEASE DATE: 04-04-89
DBFAULT DATE: Hone
CBRTIFICATION DATE:
TYPE or IMPROVEMENTS:
Sarthwork, {P},{D},{W},{S}, Survey, st. lignt., off-site Rd. Conn.
PRINCIPAL:
BOND CO.
K. Hovnanian
1800 S. Australian Ave, 1400
West Pall Beac
Firelanls Fund Ins. Co.
: Patrick Quinn
FIa
SURETY TYPE: Letter of Credit
MONTHS ELAPSID: 24
ISSUE AKOUHT:
RELEASE AMOUNT:
BALANCB AVAILABLE:
211/800.00
ISSUB DATB: 09-19-89
RELEASE DATE:
DBFAULT DATE: Sept. 19/ 1990
CERTIFICATION DATE:
217,800.00
TYPE or IMPROVEMENTS:
Bxcavation & Paving
PRINCIPAL:
BOND CO.
James R. Merola (Trustee)
907 Landings Blvd
West palll Beach
Bank of South Pall Beaches
200 Hyoluxo Rd.
Hypoluxo
Florida
Florida
33413
NOTES: Letter of Credit to be substituted as per Memo 90-277
PROJECT: Lawrence Lake
f ISSUE AMOUNT: 181,500.00
RELEASE AMOUNT:
BALANCE AVAILABLB: 181,500.00
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS:
{W}, {S}, {D}
, PRINCIPAL:
James R. Merola (Trustee)
901 Landings Blvd.
West Palm Beach Florida 33413
Nons:
SURETY TYPE: Performance Bond
MONTHS ELAPSED: 26
ISSUE DATE: 08-16-89
RELEASE DA'l'E:
DEFAULT DATB: None
CERTIFICATION DATB:
BOND CO.
Indiana Lumberman's Mutual
550 W. Touhy Ave., suite 400
Skokie Illinois 60071
33462
RESOLurION NO. 89- ppp
A RESOwrION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FlDRIDA,
APPROVIOO THE FINAL PLAT FOO A RE-PLAT OF 1 wr IN
LAWRENCE LAKE, A P.U.D. IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 45
SOtITH, RANGE 43 EAST
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 89-PP approved the final plat for Lawrence
Lake for which a Perfonnance Bond in the artOunt of $l8l,500.00, a letter of
Credit in the artOunt of $217,800.00, an Adrrdnistration Fee of $7,370.00 and a
Recreation Fee of $28,000.00 have been paid, and,
WHEREAS, the cost for the irrprovel1Ents have not changed for the
previously platted Lawrence Lake, and,
WHEREAS, an additional filing fee of $250.00 has been paid.
NCM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY CCM-1ISSION OF THE CITY
OF OOYNION BEACH, FLORIDA:
That the plat is hereby resolved to have received final plat
approval by the City Ccmnission in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, with all
conditions previously agreed upon and subject subdivision is hereby affirned
and adopted.
PASSED AND AlX)P!'ED '!HIS 01// day of dpe mber-
,1989.
I
'<:' /.--,
CITY OF ~YNroN B~7~; LORIDA
',. ./1./:1'
,/L~ // "/ --z
/ /7 / -______-
~:
/ Mayor
jc- ~. '~~_~-~
Vice Mayor .:;;j
b~ ;JJ~
'ssion Member
Conmission M:!mber
/
. -_.-:./. I' {' /.." ,'. '
,/ ~ .-Co '..L..-L"'-L,-,
Ccrrrnission Member
A'ITEST:
C~t~j~
(Corp Seal)
M E M 0 RAN DUM
November l7, 1987
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
.t'1{UiVl: CAKJ.vlEN S. Al...ji-iUHZ :LATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: REQUESTS FOR ANNEXATION, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
AMENDMENT AND REZONING SUBMITTED BY MICHAEL D. GORDON
FOR INTRACOASTAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. (LAWRENCE LAKE)
INTRODUCTION
Michael D. Gordon, agent for Intracoastal Development, Inc., is
proposing to annex into Boynton Beach a 13.54 acre tract of land
located at the southeast corner of the L.W.D.D. L-21 canal and
Lawrence Road (see Exhibit "A"). The property is currently
zoned AR (Agriculture Residential) and it is occupied by a vacant
one-story CBS building that was formerly used by RCA Global
Communications.
Paralleling this request for annexation is a request to amend the
Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan to show
annexed land as Low Density Residential, and to rezone this
property to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use
Intensity=4 (PUD with LUI=4). The proposed PUD, to be named
"Lawrence Lake," provides for the construction of 33 fee simple,
single-family detached units with a gross density of 2.44
dwellings units per acre (see Exhibit "B").
PROCEDURE
These applications for annexation, amendment to the Future Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning are being
processed consistent with State Statutes, and Boynton Beach
Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions as follows:
1. F.S. 163.3161: Local Government Comprehensive Planning
and Land Development Regulation Act.
2. F.S. 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of Ordinances and
Resolutions.
3. F.S. 171.011: Municipal Annexation and Contraction Act.
4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Section 3A5(e):
Boundary and Zoning.
5. Boynton Beach Ordinance #79-24.
6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X: Procedures for Annexation~
7. Boynton Beach Ordinance #86-54: Comprehensive Plan Evaluation
and Appraisal Report.
These regulations have been listed for informational purposes.
Paraphrasing, these regulations require review by the City
Department Heads, newspaper advertisements, public hearings with
the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Commission and Commis-
sion adoption of ordinances to annex, amend the Future Land Use
Element and rezone.
-2-
CURRENT LAND USE AND ZONING
As previously discussed, this property is undeveloped and zoned
AR (Agriculture Residential). The land use and zoning in the
surrounding area varies and is presented for your information ih
the table which follows:
DIRECTION
JURISDICTION
ZONING
LAND USE
North
Palm Beach County
RS/SE (Special
Exception for
a public elemen-
tary school)
Undeveloped,
tree nursey'.;'
in commerc.:.a:
production
(Boynton Nt.:.:c-
series, Inc.)
to be
developed for
a public
elementary
school.
East
Palm Beach County
RS/SE
Sunny South
Estates-
Mobile Home
Park
South
Palm Beach County
RM/PUD
Sandpiper
Cove
West
Palm Beach County
RM/PUD
Orange groves
in commercial
production
(Knollwood
Groves) to be
developed as
Sausalito
Groves.
Northwest Palm Beach County
AR
Two single-
family homes
on large,
unplatted lots
which will
create a future
County pocket
upon annexation.
FUTURE LAND USE AND REZONING
Hypoluxo Road forms the northern limit of the City's Reserve
Annexation Area and the City's Utility Service Area. Lawrence
Road forms the western limit of the city's Reserve Annexation
Area, as set forth by the Commission's policy, which is reflected
in the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report. It is
contemplated that all lands between Lawrence Road and Congress,
Avenue and between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Hypoluxo Road will
at some time in the future be annexed. This proposal represents
a continuation of previous actions to close unincorporated
pockets in this portion of the reserve annexation area.
The land use category requested, Low Density Residential, is
lower than that which exists to the east, south, and west in Palm
Beach County, and is consistent with that which will exist to the
north in the City, upon concurrent annexation of the Palm Beach County
School Board property. As noted in the correspondence in Exhibit "C"
from the Palm Beach County Planning Department, the proposed land use
is consistent with the current development pattern and the future
plans for land use in Palm Beach County for this area.
-3-
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
There are three policies in the Comprehensive Plan which address
annexations as follows:
1. "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to
present municipal boundaries;"
2. "Annex proper ty 0nly af'c,;:;i:" ~~-..,;:. :i.=:i.-~paration of u. 3tudy
evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the
cost of providing service;" and
3. "Annex only properties which, are of sufficient size to pro-
vide efficient service and on which urban development is
anticipated."
In order to determine the consistency of the Intracoastal
Development Company request with the Comprehensive Plan Policies,
each of the three policies will be addressed individually.
Policy 1 - "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to
the present municipal boundaries."
Upon concurrent annexation of the Palm Beach County School Board
property, the Intracoastal Development Company property will be
contiguous with the corporate limits along its entire northern
property boundary (approximately 1,082 feet or 28.4% of its entire
boundary), and its western boundary is coterminous with Lawrence Road.
Annexing the subject property would create a county pocket comprised
of the two, existing, single-family homes located at the southeast
corner of Lawrence Road and the L.W.D.D. L-21 canal. In addition,
the subject property lies in the path of urban development.
Policy 2 - "Annex property only after the preparation of a study
evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the costs of
providing services."
In response to policy two, you will find in Exhibit "C", the cost
to the City of annexing this parcel and the dollars returned to
the City in taxes.
Policy 3 - "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to
provide efficient service and on which urban development is
anticipated."
As previously reported, the Intracoastal Development Company
tract is 13.54 acres in size. It is anticipated that this parcel will
experience urban development for the following reasons:
1. The availability of public utilities within the Lawrence
Road right-of-way;
2. The existence of this parcel as a County pocket in a
developing portion of the Reserve Annexation Area, as
outlined in the correspondence from the Palm Beach
County Planning Department in Exhibit "C";
3. The efficiency of services to be provided when analyzed
in connection with the existing property on Lawrence
Road currently in the City (Knollwood Groves), the
recent approval by the City Commission for the annexation
of the 53.6 acre Citrus Glen project and the 48.23 acre
Lawrence Groves project, the proposed annexations for the
19.23 acre Palm Beach County School Board and the 28.82
acre Phase II addition to Citrus Glen, and the proximity
to developing properties within Palm Beach County; and
-4-
4. Recent and proposed improvements to the surrounding road
system, including the four (4) laning of Hypoluxo Road, the
proposed six (6) laning of Boynton Beach Boulevard from
Congress Avenue to Military Trail, the proposed five (5)
laning of Old Boynton Road from Knuth Dairy Road to
Military Trail, and the proposed four (4) laning of
Military Trail from Old Boynton Road to Hypoluxo Road.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends that the applica.tions
submitted by Michael D. Gordon, for Intracoastal Development
Company Inc., trustee, be approved subject to the comments listed
in this memorandum as Exhibit "C". This recommendation is based
in part on the following:
I. The parcel, upon concurrent annexation of the Palm Beach
County School Board property, will be contiguous to
Corporate limits;
2. The parcel lies within a County pocket and it is in
the path of urban development;
3. The parcel is located within the City's municipal
service area;
4. The intensity of land use desired is appropriate
for the location;
5. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
policies for annexation;
6. The land use category requested must be considered as
a part of an overall strategy for annexation and it is
appropriate;
7. The zoning is consistent with the proposed use of the site;
8. The request will not impair the value or future use of
lands in the surrounding area and,
9. The costs to serve versus the benefits received indicate
a positive return for the City.
c~ r-.- j{ ~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIA~
CSA:ro
cc City Manager
Technical Review Board
Central File
MEMORANDUM
october 22, 1987
TO: TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Bob Eichorst, Public Works
Charles Frederick, Recreation and Parks Director
Ann Toney, Asst. to the City Manager
James Rhoden, Fire Chief
Bud Howell, Building Official
Lt. Dale Hammack, Police Department
Tom Clark, City Engineer
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
Don Jaeger, Chief Inspector, Building Dept.
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
Please be advised that on Thursday, November 12, 1987, at 9:00
a.m., there will be a special meeting of the Technical Review
Board to hold pre-hearing conferences for the following requests:
1.
citrus Glen Phase II Addition PUD
.'
2. Citrus Glen Phase I PUD Master Plan Modification (changes
to the original master plan to incorporate the addition
of Phase II).
L 3.
Lawrence Lake PUD
4. Via Lago PCD
All of the revised plans and supporting documents will either be
distributed prior to the meeting or will be available for
inspection at the time of the meeting.
~f~
J ' ES J .V GOLDEN
JJG:ro
Attachment
cc City Manager
John Wildner
William Cavanaugh
Davie Crockett
MEMORANDUM
October 12, 1987
TO: TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Bob Eichorst, Public Works
Charles Frederick, Recreation and Parks Director
Ann Toney, Asst. to the City Manager
James Rhoden, Fire Chief
Bud Howell, Building Official
Lt. Dale Hammack, Police Department
Tom Clark, City Engineer
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
Don Jaeger, Chief Inspector
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
Please be adviseq that on Thursday, October 22, 1987 at 9:00
a.m., there will be a special meeting of the Technical Review
Board to discuss the fOllowing master plans:
1. Citrus Glen Phase II Addition PUD.
2. Citrus Glen Phase I PUD Master Plan Modification (changes
to the original master plan to incorporate the addition
of Phase II).
L,....-o......-"
3.
Lawrence Lake PUD.
4. Via Lago PCD (formerly Boynton Beach Village Center).
The above master plans accompanied the land use amendment
applications submitted to the Planning Department on the october
1, 1987 deadline. If approved by the City Commission, these
projects must be forwarded to the State for a consistency review
with the State's comprehensive plan.
o.
. Plans for the above requests accompany this memorandum, with the
exception of Via Lago, which will be distributed separately in
the near future.
All plans and supporting documents are available in the planning
Department for your review prior to the meeting.
l~~ t /)l'-l~L~
JAMES J. ,1 GOLDEN
v
JJG:ro
iIPP+ T+o/VS
LA-s fA--LJtJr-S rI;'-RrJr),fcI3S ?
PR-, L 0 V E-- fRo :J /5cT
...
--.
~~~ --
~...
~
MEMORANDUM
7 June 1988
TO:
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
RE:
Continuation of Public Hearings, properties on West
Side of US-l, Citrus Park, Elementary School P and
Lawrence Lakes
Please be advised that the economic analysis of the uses of land
along the US-I corridor has not been received from Walter H.
Keller and Associates within the time frame previously
anticipated. This has resulted in the need to continue the
public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Board for the
change in future land use and zoning for the properties along the
west side of US-I to July 12, 1988. Changing this schedule will
require that the City Commission continue its public hearings on
the above-mentioned topics to the Commission meeting of July 19,
1988 in order to allow for a complete submission to the State
Department of Community Affairs.
Therefore, when these items come up on the Commission's June 21st
agenda, please have the Mayor announce that th~ hearings on all
four projects have been continued to July 19, 1988 at 8:00 PM or
-as soon thereafter as the agenda permits at the City Commission
Chambers, 211 South Federal Highway, Boynton Beach, Florida.
C~ARMEN S~TO
/bks
(SEE
ATTACHED
ENGINEERS
REPORT )
Planning Dept. 4-86
** SEE ATI'AClIED ADDENDUM 'ill APPLICATION.
(SEE
ATI'AClIED
TRAFFIC
ENGINEERS
REroRT)
(SEE
ATI'ACHED
ENGINEERS
REFDRT )
zoning or development, and any particular uses that would be excluoea
__~_(3)** Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
x
(4) A ,comparison of traffic which would be generated under the
proposed zoning or development, with the traffic that would be
generated Ll'n;ier the current zoning; also, an analysis of traffic
movements at the intersections of driveways that would serve the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvements that would be
necessary to accomodate such traffic movements (in 1 copies). For
proposed developments which would generate three-thousand (3,000)
vehicle trips per day or more, or two-hundred fifty (250) or more
single-directional vehicle trips within a one (1) hour period, a
traffic impact analysis shall be required (in 1 copies). Said traffi(
impact analysis shall include projected trip generation for the
development, for all major roadways and intersections within one and
one-half (1.5) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic that
would utilize local streets through residential zoning districts.
Said traffic impact analysis shall compare traffic levels between the
existing zoning and the proposed zoning or development of the subject
parcel, and shall take into consideration all development that would
be possible under the current zoning within the City, adjacent ~ities,
and within the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within a
radius of five (5) miles. For those parcels lying in the
unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, which are not currently
zoned for urban land uses, the potential land uses according to the
Palm Beach Coun~y comprehensive plan shall be used. Where said
parcels are shown on the Palm Beach County comprehensive plan under
residential land use categories, the midpoint of the density range
shown on County comprehensive plan shall be used. Where a county-wide
study of traffic generation at build-out has been adopted or is
utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of traffic that are
projected by said study shall in all cases be used to project
background traffic in the traffic impact analysis submitted by the
applicant. The format and standards used in the traffic impact
analysis shall be the same as those which are required by Palm B~ach
.County, with the exception of the requirements listed above. Such
traffic impact analysis shall include recommendations for the
mitigation of traffic impacts~ consistent with the standards which
have been adopted by or are utilized by Palm Beach County.
X (5) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of the water
demand for development under the proposed zoning or development with
water demand under the existing zoning. Water demand shall be
estimated using the standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health
Department for estimating such demand, unless different standards are
justified by a registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the water system shall also be included, where
existing facilities would be inadequate to serve development under thf
proposed zoning.
X (6) For parcels larger than one (1) acre~ a comparison of sewage
that would be generated under the proposed zoning or development
that which would be generated under the existing zoning. Sewage
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the Palm Beach
f I ow~
wi th'
f I ow~
page 5
County Health Departmen~ +or ~stlmatlng such flows, unless diffsrsnt
standards are justified by a registered engineer. Commitment to the
provision of improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be inadeguate to
serve development under the proposed zoning.
(SEE
ATrACllliD
ANALYSIS)
X (7) For pr6p~ed residential developments larger than one (1) acre, a
comparison of the projected population under the proposed zoning or
development with the projected population under the existing zoning.
Population projections according to age groups for the proposed
development shall be required, where more than fifty (50) dwellings,
or 50 sleeping rooms in the case of group housing, would be allowed
under the proposed zoning. Applications for rezoning to commercial or
industrial zoning districts which exceed one (1) acre in area shall'
also provide projections for the number of employees.
(8) At the request of the Planning Depa~tment, Planning and Zoning
Board, or City Council, the applicant shall also submit proposals for
minimizing land use conflicts with surrounding properties. The
applicant shall provide a summary of the nuisances and hazards
associated with development under the proposed zoning, as well as
proposals for mitigation such nuisances and hazards. Such summary
shall also include, where applicable, exclusion of particular uses,
limitations on hours of operation, proposed location of loading areas,
dumpsters, and mechanical equipment, screening of service areas and
mechanical equipment, location of driveways and service entrance, and
specifications for site lighting. Nuisances an hazards shall be
abated or mitigated so as to conform to the perfo~mance standards
contained in the City's zoning regulations and the standards containec
in the City's noise control ordinance. Also, statements concerning
the hei ght, ori entati on, and bul k of structures,. setbacks from
property lines, and measures for screening and buffering the proposed
development shall be provided. 'At the request of the Planning and
Zoning Board or City Council, the applicant shall also state the type
of construction and architectural styles that will be employed in the
proposed development.
(9) At the request of the Planning Department, Planning and Zoning
Board, or City Council, the applicant shall also submit the following
information:
(a) Official soil conservation service classification by soil
associations and all areas subject to inundation and high ground
water levels.
(b) Existing and proposed grade elevations.
(c) Existing or proposed water bodies.
_._lL(d>** Form of ownership and form of organization to maintain common
spaces and recreational facilities.
(e) A written commitment to the provision of all necessary
facilities for storm drainage, water supply, sewage collection anc
treatment, solid waste disposal, hazardous waste disposal, fire
Planning Dept. 4-86
** SEE ATrAaIED ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION.
page 6
:::;F'i4C~ 2ELC~:J THIS LItlE FO;::': OFF.LCE USE ONLY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review and Processing Schedule:
Date Accep:t.@d by Planning Department
Date Transmitted to City Clerk
Date Notifications Mailed to Surrounding Property Owners
Dates of Advertisement in Newspaper (rezoning and/or
land use amendment
Dates of Advertisement in Newspaper (annexation)
-
Date of Transmission of Departmental
to Department Heads
Review Forms
Date of Review by Technical Review Board
Date of Pre-Hearing Conference
Date of Public Hearing Before Planning and Zoning Board
Date of Public Hearing Before City Council
Date of Transmission of Prqposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to Florida Department of Community Affairs,
pursuant to Florida Statutes, s. 163.3184 (1) (a)
____________Date of Transmission of Proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to Other Governmental Agencies Requesting
NI:.1tification, pLlrsuant to Florida Statutes, s. 163.3184 (1) (b)
____________Date of Receipt of Notice from Florida Department
of Community Affairs regarding Comprehensive
Plan Amendment, pursuant to Florida Statutues,
s. 163.3184 (4)
____________Date of Hearing before Florida Division of
Administrative Hearings, pursuant to
Florida Statutes, s. 163.3184 (5) (b)
____________Date of Hearing before City Council on
Revised Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
pursuant to Florida StatLltes, s. 163.3184 (6) (a)
Planning Dept. 4-86
page 8