AGENDA DOCUMENTS
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 4, 1997
(Application Denied by Planning & Development Board on August 26,
1997) ................... POSTPONED FROM 9/16/97 CITY COMMISSION
MEETING
At the applicant's request, this item was tabled until the December 2nd meeting.
2. Major Site Plan Modification (Sign Program) for Boynton Commons
pce
3. Community Design Plan Appeal (Colors) for Boynton Commons pce
4. Community Design Plan Appeal for Boynton Commons PCD - Roof
Illumination for Tony Roma's
E. Approval of Bills
F. Approve Records Disposition Requests Nos. 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346,
and 347 submitted by Utility Billing, Department of Development for the
Building Division, and the City Clerk's Department
G. Approve Refund on Crypt B-2, Chapel Building, Section H, Boynton Beach
Mausoleum purchased by Hilma E. Tantzen
H. Approve purchase of movable wall partitions for various offices in clean-up
and relocation from Wall Innovators, Tampa, Florida, in the amount of
$29,828
I. Approve estimate from Certified Insurance Services, Inc. (CIS) of Jensen
Beach, Florida, for repairs to Pioneer Park due to fire property loss -
Estimated Cost $27,899.78.
Item "I" was removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion.
J. Approve refund on Cemetery Lots 198 & 199, Block B, Boynton Beach
Memorial Park Addition #1 purchased by Mary Sue Johnston
K. Approve disinterment of remains of James Bell, and provide refund on
Crypt C-8, Devotion Building, Section D, Boynton Beach Mausoleum
L.
Authorize Ernst & Young to perform the yearly actuarial review of the City's
self-insured coverages: Workers' Compensation, general liability,
automobile liability, automobile physical damage and property damage. In
addition, they will perform a Risk Management Review. Estimated cost to
the City will be $10,000 for the Actuarial Study and $12,500 for the Risk
Management Study.
.
M. Authorize Ernst & Young to perform the annual arbitrage rebate
calculations on the Water and Sewer Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1990
and the Public Service Tax Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1993, for the
fiscal year 1996/97. Total cost will be $6,000 for all calculations
7
~-~~......;...-:._"-_-.:.--;-~-~_.:::..:...=~---------~~--~----
-
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
AUGUST 5,1997
F. Authorize sole source purchase of new computer and software from
Data Flow Systems, Inc. for the monitoring of the 148 Lift Stations
through Remote Terminal Units in the amount of $10,612
This item is explained in detail on the Agenda Item Request Form.
G. Approve request for refund on Cemetery Lots 71, 72 and 73, Block E,
Boynton Beach Memorial Park
Muriel E. and Robert Holzman submitted this request.
H. Approve request for refund on Cemetery Lot 162-A, Block S, Boynton
Beach Memorial Park, purchased by Mrs. Mary Carotanuto
This request was submitted by Elinor J. Marz on behalf of her mother, Mary Carotenuto.
A Statutory Health Care Power of Attorney designating Elinor J. Marz as Ms.
Carotenuto's health care attorney-in-fact was submitted.
I. Approve request for refund on Crypt #E-8, Devotion Building,
Section D, Boynton Beach Mausoleum, from Mr. Herbert E. Fereday
Herbert E. Fereday submitted this request.
J. Approve request for an Administrative Appeal for Boynton Commons
PCD, located at the southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and
Congress Avenue, to significantly modify the previously approved
building elevations of the Boynton Commons PCD Shopping Center.
This item was postponed until August 19, 1997 at the request of the applicant.
K. Approve request for Use Approval for the Shoppes of Woolbright
PCD, located at the north side of the intersection of Woolbright Road
and S.W. 8th Street, to amend the list of Shoppes of Woolbright
permitted uses to include vendor carts.
This item is explained in detail on the Agenda Item Request Form.
8
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELL. MENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 22,1997
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to approve the request of Polio Tropical at Shoppes of Boynton to
abandon a portion of a 15 foot wide utility easement. Vice Chairman Golden seconded
the motion. which carried 7-0.
8. Appeals
Administrative Appeal
Description:
Boynton Commons PCD
Joe Lelonek
Land Design South
Bill and Elsie Winchester
Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and
Congress Avenue
Request for an administrative appeal to
significantly modify the previously approved
building elevations of the Boynton Commons
PCD shopping center.
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Joe Lelonek and Mark Weiner, an architect, were present. Mr. Lelonek objected to the
one staff condition. He stated that this shopping center has been before this Board for
site plan approval. A couple of nationwide tenants have requested some modifications
to the front elevations of their buildings. In particular, Sports Authority, Old Navy. and
T any Romas have been selecting the fronts of the stores to be consistent with types of
elevations that they had throughout the country. They want somebody coming from the
north. the south, and other locations. to be able to recognize the fronts of their stores.
The elevations are slightly different from the first master plan approvals. There is use of
a little more glass on the front elevations. He requested approval of the elevations as
they exist now.
Mr. Weiner advised that this is the first review of Tony Romas. Tony Romas was not a
tenant at the time of the previous approval. He displayed elevations. The front
elevations are slightly different. The same amount of architectural detail has been
maintained on the rear elevations. At the time of the initial review, he did not have the
architectural input of these particular tenants. The leases were finalized after the initial
review. They have now opposed certain restrictions and elements that would more
closely link to their national image.
10
-----~---~~-------------~-"----
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 22, 1997
The previously approved elevations for the shopping center were displayed, along with
the proposed elevations. Mr. Lewicki stated staff is concerned about the new design
element that was introduced (the glass, and the display of windows on the second
story). In addition. in the new building there is the same theme (the second story
fenestration) that was not present under the original approval. Originally, the shopping
center was designed in a very cohesive way. Because certain companies want their
corporate image. the concept has fallen apart. Staff would not exclude upper windows
from elevations: however. they would not like to dominate those new elements on the
upper story over the entire concept that was previously approved. Mr. Lewicki pointed
out that two or three weeks from now, they may come back with another major anchor
that would want some other elements that perhaps were not previously approved.
Mr. Rosenstock agreed that we should maintain a local design concept. He pointed out
major tenants in other cities have adopted to the design codes that the communities
wanted. He felt that to give in on a plan that was already approved and that looks to be
coherent in a design concept would be the wrong thing to do at this point.
Mr. Reed visited the Sports Authority and Old Navy stores in Deerfield and West Palm
Beach and none of them look like the stores that are being presented in the new
drawings. He circulated photographs of those stores which show no windows and no
second level. However, there were windows on the second level in one the Old Navy
stores. The other stores all matched with the rest of the stores that were in the
shopping centers and were compatible with the identity of the shopping centers. He felt
a corporation and a city should want its presentation along the streets to be consistent.
and he thinks what is being presented does not do that, whereas the previous concept
did.
Vice Chairman Golden agreed that the original elevations are much more desirable. He
was not comfortable with the staff comments for a compromise.
Mr. Aguila did not mind what is being proposed for Sports Authority; however, he
objected to what is being proposed for Old Navy because it is totally out of line with the
rest of the shopping center.
With regard to Sports Authority, Mr. Friedland asked if this is the new direction they are
going in as they build about the country. Mr. Weiner advised that since they do not
have a lot of store front because of the way they market on the inside of the store, it is
important to them that people know that the stores are open. The reason for the
additional glass is so that people can see lights from inside the store. This is the
approach they are taking on all their new stores.
11
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELuPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 22, 1997
Mr. Aguila pointed out that Old Navy is set back so far from Congress Avenue that all
that glass will not serve that purpose.
Mr. Lelonek stated that Old Navy's newer store in Pembroke Pines looks identical to
what is being proposed this evening. He stated that Old Navy sits right in the middle of
the site facing the other tenants. They want people to know they are there. The impact
on the surrounding roadways will be extremely minimal because it will be perpendicular
to those areas and is set far enough into the site that the only elevation and impact it is
going to have is to the people driving into the site. Therefore, the whole character of
the surrounding development. the landscape package, the views, the character that is
portrayed still remains the same. It is the internal mall effect that is being impacted.
To Vice Chairman Golden, the view from within the parking lot is just as important as
from the street.
Mr. Weiner stated that the initial design concept was to maintain some sort of
individuality for each store, tied together with common themes. They complied with the
color schemes, some of the column detailing, and the materials.
Mr. Aguila did not object to the changes proposed for Sports Authority and Tony
Romas. He saw a lot of elements from the rest of the shopping center incorporated in
them. However, he did not think Old Navy is an asset. Mr. Dube agreed with Mr.
Aguila. He felt it had too much glass.
Mr. Lelonek stated that Old Navy's lease is contingent on a certain architectural
elevation. If this request is denied, he will have to come back with a different lease. He
asked if he is going to be sitting with the same elevation for the original Old Navy when
he returns with that lease, or if there is going to be some leeway with regard to another
lessee for the site. He asked if he is going to have to come back to this Board and if he
can appeal this Board's decision.
Mr. Lewicki advised that this will go to the City Commission for ratification. Mr. Aguila
added that if he is going to make major changes to the approved site plan elevations
and staff does not want to approve them administratively, he will have to return to this
Board.
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to approve the proposed elevation for Sports Authority and Tony
Romas, but not Old Navy. Mr. Dube seconded the motion, which carried 6-1. Vice
Chairman Golden cast the dissenting vote.
12
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 22, 1997
Mr. Rosenstock advised that if the signs are all going to be different, he will not vote in
favor of them.
Community Design Plan Appeal
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
BGI at Quantum Park (Phenix Project)
Gonzalo Ravago
BGllndustries, Inc.
Northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and
Quantum Boulevard
Request to appeal the Community Design Plan
regulations to allow overhead doors on the
east elevation of the building facing Gateway
Boulevard.
This item was dispensed with earlier in the meeting.
C. Use Approval
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Shoppes of Woolbright peD
Robert N. Hochberg
Home Depot
North side of the intersection of Woolbright
Road and S.W. 8t/1 Street
Request to amend the list of Shoppes of
Woolbright PCD permitted uses to include
vendor carts.
Mr. Dube did not think the Planning Department can regulate the attire worn by the
vendor cart operators. He thinks an ordinance would have to be passed by the City
Commission. Attorney Pawelczyk advised that the reason for regulating the attire had
to do with public safety concerns. He would have to research this further; however, this
would not preclude the City from enacting an ordinance to make sure the safety of
those people visiting the Shoppes of Woolbright are not affected by the attire worn by
the cart operators.
Mr. Hochberg and Vito Pellerito were present. Mr. Hochberg advised that the applicant
has no objection to comment 18.
Ms. Frazier inquired about the number of carts. Mr. Hochberg advised that there is only
one cart at each location. In response to Chairman Wische, he advised the operators
13
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Commission Meeting Dates in to City Manager's Office Meeting Dates in to City Manager's Office
0 May 6, 1997 April 25, 1997 (noon) 0 July I, 1997 June 20. 1997 (noon)
~1 May 20, 1997 May 9, 1997 (noon) 0 July 15, 1997 July 3.1997 (Thursday noon)
0 June 3, 1997 May 23, 1997 (noon) ~ August 5,1997 July 25, 1997 (noon)
0 June 17, 1997 June 6, 1997 (noon) 0 August 19,1997 August 8, 1997 (noon)
RECOMMENDATION: Please place the request below on the agenda for the August 5, 1997 City Commission meeting
under Consent. The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-1 vote, recommended approval subject to all staff comments
in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval (see attached), but with rewording of comment #1 to include Sports Authority's and
Tony Roma's revised elevations, as submitted, and to disallow Old Navy's revised elevations. For further details pertaining
to this request, see attached Planning and Zoning Memorandum No. 97-371.
The recently approved ordinance setting forth the procedure of Commission ratification of a Planning and Development
Board action requires ratification at the "next available" Commission meeting. However, the agent phoned asking for
postponement of the ratification until the August 19, 1997 Commission meeting (written postponement has not been received
as of the writing of this memorandum). It is the Commission's decision to determine whether postponement of the
ratification is warranted. According to the new ordinance, a land development request on the consent agenda cannot be
discussed until the next Commission meeting to give "proper" notice (the type of notice is not specified).
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT:
AGENT:
Boynton Commons PCD
Joe Lelonek
Land Design South
Bill and Elsie Winchester
Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress A venue
Request for an administrative appeal to significantly modify the previously approved building elevations
of the Boynton Commons PCD shopping center.
OWNER:
LOCA TION:
DESCRIPTION:
PROGRAM IMPACT:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
ALTERNATIVES:
N/A
Department Head's Signature
City Manager's Signature
Development Services
Department Name
J""---" .
-d'LnLi/k- ' .
Planning and Zoning irector
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\BOYCOMM\ADAP\Agenda Item Request 8-5.doc
DEVEL-,PMENT DEARTMENT SERvo JES
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-371
Staff Report
For
Planning and Development Board Meeting, and
City Commission Meeting
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
THROUGH: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Jerzy Lewicki ';"'J i\,/"
Acting Senior Planner -
DATE: July 22, 1997
SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD - ADAP 97-002
(changes in elevations)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Joe LE:!lonek of Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, contract purchaser
of the property located at the southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road (see
Exhibit "A" - Location Map), is requesting approval of an administrative appeal. In connection with
the permit process, the applicant has modified the elevations from what was approved at the time
of Boynton Commons site plan review.
Changes to the following buildings elevations are being appealed:
. Old Navy retail store
. Sports Authority retail store
. Tony Roma's restaurant (this is also a tenant change)
The changes in building elevations, as compared to the previously approved elevations, are as
follows:
A. The Old Navy store front elevation has been altered to include a large volume of glass in
the form of an arch-shaped "curtain wall" in the upper part of the facade above the store
entrance. The previously approved front elevation of this department store displayed a wall
finished with colored stucco above the store entrance, similar to other stores in the center.
I
Page 2
Memorandum No. 97-371
Boynton Commons PCD - elevations
ADAP 97-002
B. The Sports Authority store front elevation has been altered by the addition of an 8 feet high
by 50 feet long expanse of glass windows above the entrance canopy.
C. Tony Roma's restaurant is a new building that replaces Applebee's restaurant. Similar to
the afore-mentioned buildings, the architecture of this building also displays fenestration
within the center of the upper story which is designed as a belvedere.
The approved site plan and portions of store elevations as previously approved and proposed
alterations are shown in Exhibit "B".
BACKGROUND
On October 15, 1996, the site plan for the Boynton Commons PCD shopping center was
approved by the City Commission. Recently, Boynton Commons Corporation has proposed
numerous changes to the previously approved site plan. In general, changes are limited to
reconfiguration of structures, parking, driveways and the drainage retention area location.
However, no change in the approved total square footage of the shopping center is proposed. The
proposed changes were determined to qualify as a minor site plan modification and are being
reviewed by staff administratively.
As a part of the minor site plan submittal, the colored elevations of all proposed structures were
submitted for staff review. Planning and Zoning staff determined that certain elements of the store
front elevations of Old Navy, Sports Authority and Tony Roma's, significantly deviate from the
approved, unifying architectural scheme of the complex set at time of site plan approval. The
applicant stated that the contract tenants will not accept deviations from the proposed elevations
to match previously approved elevations and requested that the appeal be filed.
ANAL YSIS
One of the requirements of the PCD regulations, as well as the Community Design Plan is to
provide unifying architectural elements that are carried throughout a center to achieve visual
balance and group identity with adjacent structures. This was achieved with the previously
approved concept of Boynton Commons shopping center, but has been eroded with this proposal.
The need to retain corporate image was the specific reason given for the deviation.
The city's regulations reflect the community's desire for responsiveness to the local architectural
environment, cohesiveness of design and high quality architectural standards of all new
developments. It is not the intent to disallow the corporate image of companies. However, it
should not take precedence, over a city's vision and endeavors to create its own uniqueness and
visual standards separate from other communities.
~
Page 3
Memorandum No. 97-371
Boynton Commons PCD - elevations
ADAP 97-002
RECOMMENDATIONS
In order to maintain the approved architectural cohesiveness of the PCD, yet recognize that minor
alterations are unavoidable during the refinement stages of the permit process staff recommends
that the upper fenestration be limited to windows, simulated windows or glass decorative elements
in the amounts and shapes not dominating the front elevation of the building. The specific
conditions of approval are included in Exhibit "C".
xc: Central File
s :\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\BOYCOMM\ADAP\staff report-boyntcommons.doc
J. ..... _----------
-..:J___ _~_______
EXHIBIT "A"
4
-~---------
~--------
, i r~~~1 ~~ ~ .~ (~)' j~V"(; /'-- --1JJ.;~"~ \,,1-,'
11 [OJ )!~, i . 'x: m. ," ~l=C V ~,," \- - C.t
~, F=---~ g~ j' i l~\ PIC \:\-- ~t
Y11~~~ - ~ '11- ~ -.-- 2 c I~., 8d "MeTeReLA"~)' ==- ~:.,..:,-,
I o. L.t /~~I.' .", \ ~
. 1 I,J , , '.'~ / > _,....:
~,J " r ';on [ill ""l ~ ~ . . . : // ~"'::""'~'
1 [ITjJI[l[]:1 · ~l1c ~ / 71
~r llll1 JJ ~'.-, ~~,_d~'_~__.... "... _...< :/___ I ____.__~ 1 - __ I
1[-.,I~~I\n R.C~:{VL'~' ['1~\ r~:~~:;~
tifF-I:" - .~ '-- " , - 0: ..... ~
I: ! n":I\ \~l', ,,: 0 [~ ~ . f \ ~),l5 ....
.': LUI.~lll~ ,,~/ __' JF ~
I . '-I~ \ \1 H'IH~ ~l' .. . ~- "E:' ..,,..- I!) \ ['
II '.'-n III 'I \ . ~ IT ~
r1lU'I j" ~L \.~ ~
.~I"" I :~ .1 ":,:::~t
.. . ... ~ \;:\,m;g~N\\\WXi)\\, ,.\ . - 1-' ~
T 'I '-,- U"I :; """.':-O'''''''''''':'''''''.'rt;.. ~ v 11
I \r: t'?::':;"::;::'."~:"'~':::.t..::: - 1 1--1 fT I --=
: ~0 . .,'. ':. k~1tl\~<'C:::;:" . ~ ltb I~'
8liidf-" '(~'l' 11- \ It pee '
.-.". .' I? - '~I'IP
~'~T.~"- f-' ....3 ill " \,,( . 1.-:;,-g,,'1;1-ro"-/ -. 5[....(':". ~
, r-' _ ' · J-, .... "', J ( 1 tu.i'
! ~~ ____. :-<:1't- [J ". . ...j ,) "~ : f;;;
'rl~ ~ bN' ,e:JlI L l ~ qR~~'~"~ .ws6 f !0
I . I~~ II (f ./. " · " <Ji#a
!._ '.0\'\ \ \ \ 118, MILESrL/'I~T'~[J.~t~ ~r, J};';"I :\~.~~llr.~.' $~
( \. ~_ _ '1!~\ "~'/., 0,;
! '-- I 'TO I\" 1 to .\ fi ' r" '" ;-"~
\ ('0 400. 8QO FE~T .. --0'-- -- ii ~ i ..0.. ~ _ ,:>>.,,,,:f'.'/~ ."':'..'..'::-'~'<)
v1.A/lJN11Vr. n.....r,J/..q7 , ' . -::::..I Is~~-:--rrrr..(f # ' ," , ~. ,~ . , .'
,r ~.~..... \ .... - iJ I __ -,\'l: :.\ \ r ,.... _
-_.._-~'-- -,.._~.~._-----_.~-~------_.-
L JCATION MAP
BOYNTON COMMONS
EXHIBIT "B"
b __m____
.-'- ------"--
--.-".--.-....--.'" ---
~~
Q 'It
:l:lUlUi :JlU
U(}..J. 1:P-
~~;t ;r
1'$,,:03 ~o
.~-~~ 8~
l<l'l~'U~ n~
im~~:I: R~
~~~"'n :to
'<i~:ir ltll!'
lit ii~, (.~
:~~~U :~[.n
1~;It:i! "tlU~
~li""3 ~IU....
I ~lU~ w ., J 3
I Il ~ i ...~ J 'r. ;/ >L
~,'11 'I '"1' ~
IJ J~' '" i.:.a~.~
1li'U.WlJ~lllt""
Q-,Ill~~-1~ :I:
:t:t~e:;ll.:(~~
p-1_
~ ~ ~ ) ~ ~
"
"
I
I
nM
'"
~~
i~
n~
...
~
1
i
;~
" .,
, -
J
t
. '. PJ::;
I" ;, ". ; ;..... Q-~
I ~ L,
~ i~ ~ "-., '.
I ~III:';I '9] ~'
. I ~;:.::--:.l.i .
~I ~ ,;,.;;. ~:
',- ~ ->:. ~
. ;. I.:;. =1
.~. .,. ,'" :j
---c::k ' l< ... ~ '\ '.- ~".- ~
. I """"i ~.. c---,--
_~ - -t.. ~ ~ I ~<)~ ----.. .~-:r;\
= . -' . ~:;* ~ :::c:--IX- 3Q~ I t 4 I
- - - - ~ Q I ~>~, f.. :~4
- --' - --~ il - -- . I
- .- . 1_ --1--- _ _+
~'~:l;
~."
I'"
~..
t~~
Cl
jl
.\
'I
(1~
h \~':!
~ : \=
/
I
I
I
I
I
~n I
H I
~~ f-
~ I i
!
.....-
.~ -+
~ =-- J.'
, ,'~"ul2b~
6&~''*' -
i i..
3h~~n
~2,,"1il~~~
i~~h~~
:t~gL...:t~
~~S!U!~
~Ii~!~~~
~ ~ ~~nh
---
,
i
I i
I
I !
---
$!l,",2"4'''W 2&.''''
I i9 &:r:'"UJ .m.~~'
I ~I III tL
It. <J) <J) _ _
I-Ri-\-
115a
-1
.'" 19 '1-~ ~o_a __ _-=------
\
+
Q
.n
....
i~ 3
~~ ;., ~.
-It-1f- ~ ~~
n- -...
~ !'
/I .. 3;
-'
~~- -
U"
~~
~~ j
u"
I
c:
0-
--
oof--J
C'd
>- \ >
CD
~ -
LU
Z -c
0 ~ CD
>
..J 0
0 ~
a.
a.
<C
\.
~
\
(
\ \.~
(
\
(
\ \
1 'I
\
I
"
_ __K.. _~__-
~
>-~
t:; 11
ct 11/
O !iH,
'f_,t
~!I;
~,,"'IM
""Il
,:. \~,!'. \"1'
~T \ t,.
~':)';\\~\; \1\\ V~',()
~; '.:\-. , t " ... :"\'"
<It ' I \.,
- L "Ii\ t \ \ .'
c;...a.. ~-:'~"~;'_=-.;. " \' .
:.:,\1\ . '\
1.\,\ _~
.;\:\ \
(j) ';,,'\\ " "\;,
'.,. \ ,,{
\',1\ :..........
\--: .,\ '
N" .~~\
\.I- \.'
o \~,
0-',
en
r~
C,
o
.--
~
'>
Q)
\U
-0
Q)
,>
'0
\,..
0.
0..
.4:
",
\.
.
.r_-f"
...
'\
,,\
{
. .J
>-
\:::
./ ~
, 0
il. :I:
I \-:: I *'
~"
. '. ~
if)
r:.
I^". ".
.~
~\o.
\f6~
a,.
1.
.------
~.
-...---
--
--------
'"fA, A, ., ~~ ~ ~
"
I ol' 0(
.., 'rl 01 I
0 \) ~JI~~ 1 \~,"t
~ l' J n, ~0
fI ~~ D ,- \!). L.ft) '0
~ '" ,() 0(01;',1) .i - ~:O
u " ,,' 1)'1' .1 , ~,~
I" " l) l I~ -( .w \1')\'" .rl!Q
t) I ....). J Q 1= ?/: ;0
I cJ 0 CI , Lj ~l-;; ~:d
~dlJ 2'.J
ltr- .~: 'w ow
-'
i r
I 1
I .
I
0---.. .
L .-
.
8 .
t- B .'
Z 8.::. .-
. z
<C .' 0
-
a: I-
~
::::> of I > z
UJ
~ . -oJ ~ 0
UJ -
t-
en UJ <
C >
W - UJ
CJ') ..J
a: .... I? UJ .
~
:J:~ c:: .
~
(f) '" ~I . < ..;
..:.
- i .- - UJ <
- c:: ~
<( . ~ ~
-
~ .
0 .
a: .
>- .
Z
g .
.
. f
--8 .
-G
I
,
I
~!
U I
~,ir. ICt
___to ___.___________
0;.
, I
I' I
~ \. \
<- I
Iw
'"
/
\ \:
-' \
\
~
-. 'I
-0
I- z
Z 0
<( z -
~
ct 0
- >
::> ~ u.J
....I
~ Gj u.J
..J u.J
en u.J 0
....9 - \'
uJ z" fJ) ,
odJ 1-'
a: ~"I
o=:~ u.J {
en u,..Jl. -,y,
-
<C ' - '8 ~
~
r-'
0 @- I ,~ 1
,UI
a:
>- .. m
z . ~=
0 .~ .
l- .~ . .\
, / :~ ; ,.~
~
,/-,
1 '.t
~1
Q
"
,\
I ,
.....-..------------------------
<<'I (, ",
, 'd . \...J
~ ~
"
l)
I)
I
l t~
('
Li {~
, "
~', ,>
" I
, ..
I
~i
,1
Ll~i LI\(~
n' () ..
~\~ ~\".'
<(01:1 0'"
It' ~ ()'
ci; ~l ci \~,
.....u.:,J rl~
fj-6
",l't.
7.clI
i'\-
~I~
, \)
..,i.
2iJ
6
fI'
\)
<jl.
,,\9
(ya
~'9
- ~ I "
r~ J
".U
-6
~,I (~ U'H
~ V
-\.oL) 7 \
If' If"
,~,~ \.) t"
Q ~_l
~
__..__....____.___" ..~.u________~
EXHIBIT I'C"
~ ----
._~---_._--
---
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Boynton Commons PCD
File number: ADAP 97-002
Reference: Letter of reauest with a June 13. 1997 Plannino and Zonino Department date stamp
markino.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: N/A
UTILITIES
Comments: N/A
FIRE
Comments: N/A
POLICE
Comments: N/A
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: N/A
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: N/A
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: N/A
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: N/A
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. It is recommended that the upper fenestration of the front elevations
for Old Navy, Sports Authority and Tony Roma's be designed as
follows:
A. The height of the windows/glass elements shall not exceed 75
percent of the ground floor level storefront height.
B. Each window frame glass element shall be separated, rather
than combined in multi store fronts.
C. Main entrance storefront shall remain a predominant element of
the front elevation.
2. The previously approved Walgreen's elevations are not the subject
~~..~?
Page 2
Boynton Commons PCD
File No. ADAP 97-002
DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE REJECT
of this revision and will be constructed as approved.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
3. Reword comment #1 as follows:
a) The elevations for Tony Roma's shall be approved as submitted.
b) The elevations for Sports Authority shall be approved as
submitted
c) The Old Navy elevation changes shall not be approved.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
4. To be determined.
Ibme
s:\projects\cond of appr\
/4-
9.B.1
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
.. _..>---~._--------
DEVELOPl.tENT DEARTMENT SERVICE:'
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-371
Staff Report
For
Planning and Development Board Meeting, and
City Commission Meeting
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
THROUGH: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Jerzy Lewicki ~'J ~
Acting Senior Planner
DATE: July 22, 1997
SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD - ADAP 97-002
(changes in elevations)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Joe Lelonek of Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, contract purchaser
of the property located at the southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road (see
Exhibit "A" - Location Map), is requesting approval of an administrative appeal. In connection with
the permit process, the applicant has modified the elevations from what was approved at the time
of Boynton Commons site plan review.
Changes to the following buildings elevations are being appealed:
. Old Navy retail store
. Sports Authority retail store
. Tony Roma's restaurant (this is also a tenant change)
The changes in building elevations, as compared to the previously approved elevations, are as
follows:
A. The Old Navy store front elevation has been altered to include a large volume of glass in
the form of an arch-shaped "curtain wall" in the upper part of the facade above the store
entrance. The previously approved front elevation of this department store displayed a wall
finished with colored stucco above the store entrance, similar to other stores in the center.
I
-- ~ - ---~- --~,-----_....~
_________..________._____________.__m_______-...--
Page 2
Memorandum No. 97-371
Boynton Commons PCD - elevations
ADAP 97-002
B. The Sports Authority store front elevation has been altered by the addition of an 8 feet high
by 50 feet long expanse of glass windows above the entrance canopy.
C. Tony Roma's restaurant is a new building that replaces Applebee's restaurant. Similar to
the afore-mentioned buildings, the architecture of this building also displays fenestration
within the center of the upper story which is designed as a belvedere.
The approved site plan and portions of store elevations as previously approved and proposed
alterations are shown in Exhibit "B".
BACKGROUND
On October 15, 1996, the site plan for the Boynton Commons PCD shopping center was
approved by the City Commission. Recently, Boynton Commons Corporation has proposed
numerous changes to the previously approved site plan. In general, changes are limited to
reconfiguration of structures, parking, driveways and the drainage retention area location.
However, no change in the approved total square footage of the shopping center is proposed. The
proposed changes were determined to qualify as a minor site plan modification and are being
reviewed by staff administratively.
As a part of the minor site plan submittal, the colored elevations of all proposed structures were
submitted for staff review. Planning and Zoning staff determined that certain elements of the store
front elevations of Old Navy, Sports Authority and Tony Roma's, significantly deviate from the
approved, unifying architectural scheme of the complex set at time of site plan approval. The
applicant stated that the contract tenants will not accept deviations from the proposed elevations
to match previously approved elevations and requested that the appeal be filed.
ANALYSIS
One of the requirements of the PCD regulations, as well as the Community Design Plan is to
provide unifying architectural elements that are carried throughout a center to achieve visual
balance and group identity with adjacent structures. This was achieved with the previously
approved concept of Boynton Commons shopping center, but has been eroded with this proposal.
The need to retain corporate image was the specific reason given for the deviation.
The city's regulations reflect the community's desire for responsiveness to the local architectural
environment, cohesiveness of design and high quality architectural standards of all new
developments. It is not the intent to disallow the corporate image of companies. However, it
should not take precedence, over a city's vision and endeavors to create its own uniqueness and
visual standards separate from other communities.
~
--~. ._~_.._.",._-_..,-~-~--------
Page 3
Memorandum No. 97-371
Boynton Commons PCD - elevations
ADAP 97-002
RECOMMENDATIONS
In order to maintain the approved architectural cohesiveness of the PCD, yet recognize that minor
alterations are unavoidable during the refinement stages of the permit process staff recommends
that the upper fenestration be limited to windows, simulated windows or glass decorative elements
in the amounts and shapes not dominating the front elevation of the building. The specific
conditions of approval are included in Exhibit "e".
xc: Central File
S :\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\BOYCOMM\ADAP\staff report-boyntcommons.doc
3
EXHIBIT "A"
L(.
- ~ - ---------~ --~-
- - - ~ - -
LOC-l\ON MAP
BOYNTON COMMONS
\' \ ~ll -'~ d ~ (----. Vi);;(; (' -jr):.\~ ,,,!,.
_~;) /''''>,., \\\ \.. l/" ,,,' \~ - t .,t
~ '\' In " ---c'...- ,- " ,..".
. LJ J\ '" ~~II:% t~ PIC \- :'t.~
. .' ~ ..1 ", .= "1
'.,~~_ '- __- u.' -::: ' : - ~.
If ' ,~ . " I ~~ .. / ~,
J\mm~\ c-I y ~'~~ /1 /) ~
-\\11\1 ILl C. ,,"_ ~ =l~~~ ~__-_J:\~
. ~-,\~-ri-'n-J\~ -')\"'1 -J' 0:>" .,=--',\ \r-i).:H1\\l,
.:1".)1'\ Ii n ..6"/! \ : ~ ,\ B I TII (' "
\\ \~"fff\-C I/! Lr--, '~Q'~- :. U '-;:=~ ~\ ~t\,.'i~~
\ 1 ~"'~ \\ 1'1~ \1 ,.' i. ~ ' ~. C ..
\\ \ \ " \ \ \ (" .,. \ -' ~ '-- \~' ~~;
,I., " ..,J.4c\':::;:''=':' 'f' .. ~ " \ >. .... \," Yi~.
, ., ' \ ' . .', ~.
, I: GIT.I\\ 1_ . ~;,,J '. '1:1 J
\;:\r\.\\~\\I~\"\, \[:' . .~.. . -" "S~~rrl~\ \ \ \, ~>-'@' ~~-
'. \ ',\ i \ II r' ,.~ ' .
." ~ "....,~ .E8-' '
.~_., ~~7'- 'C..>......"......"".. ' 'n', "'Mr'- '
. ,p I' .......,........... ~3 1\ ,~" .
\L]:3 c \i;~;j!!ii!i(!iat!i'" . "WI;~ ;:..
~ /1 0 . L--- i\.g~1 . \I cD -,llYlT ,-" "
__' ..... A G ~1:1W;,~;t~::~1'!i \ l._ ('\ 1\ \ 1 l' '~~l
.,. )~8- '-~ ' ,:' (l ~II..' .~ 'of ~ '\~~\~
~~.. .. r;.'l \..\~. iT pcO . "
~::'T';;:::;"~' ~ 's :::J [ 1'(, L-'.\-"O."~ON " . !H/'o.(.~' ~,~~:,,".
1- l-" - ~ ~ W'~ -,~ "., )\. ,', ".
" \ :::;::...J \ \ P. q). r:I. \" '-'\'~~~:'-T- :').~ .'~ ~ \
c \I,'j' ~p 0' ,1.1 ' - '" / ; Ell. . ,
't' ,lt~ C-.l LI=t;3 /". .
\~' ~~i~ ~U '\ r,.j) j[' "'1$
~\ lWP~el. \U)\, \ ~Mt='~~,'.'~ .6, J~
\ 18 M\L~S(JI~ 1\ - \ ~-(" . ~llj);~
\, ..0 1 I i "1,..~r~''"'C i / ,~' 1'. (I/\l,;~~l<
\,\\ \\\\\ \ \ ' ,--L/ \WJQJ::" ,,' l~F~~?~~~~~
./ '0 400800 fEET . ...71. i -A. ; I.... Il\;/'7//~"'~~;j
.V',.,~O, , .' . = l}I"'Il~--'\1 fT" ....,' .. " ... .
I !,I" \ '1-,," ~/~\'\i ',\ ".. '-:) .
---~--~
EXHIBIT "B"
~
__m.__ ___~~ - ---~ ~ -~--------....-.
~ :'.
~~
~~
...
'~ NOl.NJ-Oa 010
"
"-
I
II:
:"\
\\!
..
~~
p
..~
...
. '
.\1
I,ll
.""
,\
,.1
: ~ \
~d
'\1
~~
O~ 'J~
::Z1lJ1IJ ~w
ug-' L.....
....:occ1 ~
i~1:;;3 ~o
l-;;~ 0"
!~~:!I~ ~~
''''0100: B~
,:n.....~ d\
>z'" a
1;;~1. ~j!!
lei' It I ()~
~~E~l) :~[.ri
l~*:;; ... !1l
;~ii"" ~31~
;u!f.~tl -\ =/.r
.I(';!f~i .~ ~~
\
lU \
'"
I \
.j}
'Il \
III t,
.." ,I L11 '\
l'".:~ayU:::'
Q..J ~~J"'J: I
~:t~;;d!i'i
I
I
I
I
I
------"
f
I) .
~ ..
, ,
" 1
1
:0:\
~:
'\
I'
I'.
\,
I.
\.
\;
"
_ \--
. -' ~
t- ~ 4'
'4~"Ill "i!>~."
&eo)"" v
~ i..
~u l:'!l@
I~;~i~~
Ilr~~~
!~;i1i~~
~l:6!.~lj~
i~l!~~t~
nl~~~t5~
~ ~l 3iil~ _
---
\
."
'1
\ i
, 1
6~Z'~I~E
()
'"
c
oc
--
~ 5&-ir'4."W 411$
I e~ i,r
~~ _ <J) ill
- l-iil- - - - -
~i~ I
+
0, '" ~'7 NO~":"O~- - - -
, --------
.--.---.---------.---
--
~~-
U"
~~
~3 .-//
4- 3~ [~ ~.
~ It- 2L ~~
-;. g~ .'
... !~
<>'
\
-------.--
c c:
0.- 0
.- .-
..... +J
II.".... .. co co
>- \ > >
~ Q) ./^ Q)
r - -
.~ LU LU
Z '''~
~ -C -0
0 Z Q) Q)
.~
..J 0 > (/)
0 y~ 0 0
.-~
~~ '- 0-
~ 0- 0
~ '-
a.
\.
\ 1
(
\ "'~
\
"-
~
\~
~ '\
\.
~ I
----,._~...._.----.-.~ ..-"
~
. ,-----------------------~
),-\
,\
r
\
-
- f.
yo //;
.... J/(I
:) fJ.'lflf:;. .' ').
~:l \ i' .I {. 1
I: !~t. f
liNr ~ ,_ j
-.;:!P : .!Il
~ !hi! !T,li.Y:1()
...J - "'I' . .
...... ;:; ;11\ (II !:I,
""'" r~j: 'i \: ( I
fJ i\\\\ n ':l
- \\\\~ t ': ) ~
I: \~\
II
) \\
L; \
f)
C1
o'
.-
+oJ
~
>
Q)
-
W
"C
Q)
>
o
L.
0.
0.
-<(
\
.
...r:.-"
t-.
\)
c:
o
.-
+oJ
as
>
Q)
-
W
"'C
Q)
(/)
o
C-
O
'-
a..
'1
<1
~~
,)
t I r~. ; fl
D ' '
i ~ J nil
-f -II ~ en
II i: (j"
() ~ I O~ I
I ~ I U
~
i
'0
~O
I()
In,"
1ft
A' J
. W
r-~
I
t- Et ~
z .. z
<C .' 0
-
a: to-
-<
::::> ~I >
LU
~ -oJ
. LU
(f) LU
0
W -
(J')
a: Q
to- .~
:J:"
~
(f) O~
-~
- e:::~
<C
~
0
a:
>-
z
~
---8
(0
;r~
~I{'lh
~';-~.
~ '\l :'i'\l
:I~~I'!
. . ~ .
Q,-i I'~
.-IW llJ
~
i
'0
~I.'
.r!IB
(}! ..
f-Cld
I
G::..__ .
8-
..
.
8::::-~ .
z
~ I 0
-
\ .~
>
LU
-oJ
LU
e:::
. -<w
.~- - LU~
. c::~
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
~!
~ir. ]ft
u.
() "I
I .,
I
I
,
'.11'11
" I
I. 11
I
.'
J
~r
(I ~)
~'.
n, "1
I ,l!
I
,~
'\
\ I \1
l).\'l
1111.\
\!l II
" I
l II
" "
~:u:l
\~' 'f
< ~I
1 1I
1 ;
-0
-0
....
Z
<C z
a: 0
::::> -
~
~ >
u..I
....
en u..I
W 1-9
Z;'
a: 4.l
o ~,
w
en 0:";
u..~
-
<C
~
0
a:
>- ..
Z
~ .
.
.
~
.
z
o
-
I-
.OIl(
;>
u..I
...J
u..I
u.J
o
-
'" \,
"
I-- .,
u. .,
u.J i
....I:rl
GJ
~-
.
m
!!:t'
.1
I
I
.
I
I '.
I
I
~"
:
I.~
~
!
~i
,I,
tilt:< ~11;i
~ ' \l -~
~I~ ~I'?
<~ 010
Q.I- Vl7
tii~, ~"j
I-IW t- iiJ
~
~I~
7-
~I~
. ()
.1 ".
~
Itl
o
~I'
Il <?
C\'Cl
~'2
:ilj
u ;U
~
'l_____
~
1
,)'
~.r' I LJ 'U
o IJ
1.,...:1 .T \'1
1Y1' Itl'
..{,~ () ("'I
D.: I \J
f)' . I"
. \,~ ~\j
." ~
Il'
\)
'l'
Ii
\. \)
n' '
41 ()
1:0
Ult II
.. I
I ..
..
EXHIBIT "C"
JJ
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Boynton Commons PCD
File number: ADAP 97-002
Reference: Letter of reouest with a June 13. 1997 Plannino and Zonina Department date stamp
markina.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: N/A
UTILITIES
Comments: N/A
FIRE
Comments: N/A
POLICE
Comments: N/A
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: N/A
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: N/A
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: N/A
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: N/A
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. It is recommended that the upper fenestration of the front elevations
for Old Navy, Sports Authority and Tony Roma's be designed as
follows:
A. The height of the windows/glass elements shall not exceed 75
percent of the ground floor level storefront height.
B. Each window frame glass element shall be separated, rather
than combined in multi store fronts.
C. Main entrance storefront shall remain a predominant element of
the front elevation.
2. The previously approved Walgreen's elevations are not the subject
f~
Page 2
Boynton Commons PCD
File No. ADAP 97-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
of this revision and will be constructed as approved.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
3. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
4. To be determined.
Ibme
s:\projects\cond of appr\
1'+
neVELOPMENT ORDER
CITY (. BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: Boynton Commons PCD
APPLICANT: Boynton Commons Corporation
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Joe Lelonek, Land Design South
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 1280 N. Congress Avenue, Suite 215,
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Request for an administrative appeal to alter the previously
approved building elevations of the Boynton Commons PCD
shopping center
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "B" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
\PROJECTS\BOYCOMM\ADAP\DEVELOPMENT ORDER-doc
, ~ ---~--------------