Loading...
LEGAL APPROVAL ( (" DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA rn1rn@rnn \ill OCT 2 9 199f1 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. .~. APPLICANT: BOYNTON COMMONS PCD APPLICANT'S AGENT: Land Design South. Agent for Bill and Elsie Winchester DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: 10/15/96 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Requesting Site Plan Approval LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ~HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "0" with the notation "Included". 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby --A GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. ( (' - Page 7 Boynton Commons PCD NWSP 96-008 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 47. Change the design of the below listed building facades to be as attractive (with increased articulation and/or fenestration) as the front of the building; I. north, south and west sides of the Sports Authority outbuilding; II. east and north sides of the Bed, Bath & Beyond tenant space; III. west side of major tenant #4 and iv. add roof tile to the Video Ave out-parcel building / similar to the sloped roof entrance to the Old Navy tenant space )p. 7D or apply and receive approval of an appeal to the Community Design Plan for the following code section: LOR, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 11.1 To comply with this comment, it is recommended that the elevations of the buildings be changed to show additional detail such as the sloped tile roof that is shown on the fronts of the buildings. 48. Place a note on sheet OS-1, SP-1 and SP-4 indicating that when / the gates for the dumpster enclosures are open they will not reduce the access aisle below the minimum width. ( ( - Page 8 Boynton Commons PUO NWSP 96-008 DEPARTMENTS 49. For the below listed buildings, specify on sheet OS-1 and SP-1 through SP-4 the distance between the leading edge of the building and the property line. The setback distance shall comply with the PCO setback regulations. The leading edge of the building includes extensions from the walls of the building for covered walkways, awnings, canopies and other types of overhangs: i. Walgreens - east and north sides; ii. Video Ave. - east side; II. Bed, Bath & Beyond tenant building - north and west sides: iv. Sports Authority - south and west sides and v. Major #4 - west side [LOR, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 6.F.7.E] 50. Clarify drawing OS-1 and SP-4 regarding the area identified as loading area of 1,160 square feet. If this area is enclosed it shall be counted as gross leasable floor area and the plan shall be modified to show the 1,160 square feet included within the existing 21,237 square feet Petsmart or all documents associated shall be co rrected. 51. On drawings SP-1 through SP-4 ensure that the ten (10) foot wide peripheral greenbelt is labeled and dimensioned along the entire perimeter of the project. [LOR, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 6.F.7.F] 52. Identify on sheet OS-1 the number of interior parking spaces consistent with the regulations specified in the landscape code. Where applicable, modify the interior required landscape computations and landscape plans accordingly. [LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5.G] 53. Modify the plans to show the final determination of the parking lot variance, file number PKL V 96-005, regarding the distance an on- site access aisle is located from the right-of-way line at the west major access aisle on Old Boynton Road. Also indicate with a note on the site plan the file number, date of the final determination and a brief description of the variance. INCLUDE REJE~ J J J j / ( ( Page 9 Boynton Commons PCD NWSP 96-008 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 54. Provide a copy of the city approved and executed unified control ~ documents. 55. Modify the note on sheet OS-1 that indicates Palm Beach County's conditions of approval regarding the county's evaluation of the traffic impact analysis, to state 40 percent of project traffic is ~ allowed rather than 40 percent of the project is allowed. 56. To enhance the appearance of this planned commercial development (PCD), it is recommended that there be decorative pedestrian lights added to the front of each outbuilding and multi- tenant building. It is further recommended that the major east/west .--- and north/south access aisle have decorative site lighting poles line each side of the access aisle. These poles shall match the design of the pedestrian poles recommended for the fronts of the buildinas. ( ( Page 10 Boynton Commons PCD NWSP 96-008 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 57. For clarity of signage regulations and future tenants in the PCD, it is recommended that the sign program be laid out as a chart using text to delineate the subsection regulations required by Section 10.1 of the Community Design Plan. Considering that the sign program is not included with the site plan submittal, the elevation drawings included with the site plan review submittal for sign program shall show, with dimensions, the area on the facade of each building where all signage will be allowed. The drawing does not need to show the sign, just the area in which the sign may be placed with specific dimensions delineating the limits of the sign area with respect to the top and bottom of the wall or fascia. A note on the chart should indicate that the total area of the signage shall comply with the regulations stated in the sign code. For site signs, a site plan indicating their locations is required. The minimum freestanding sign setback of ten (10) feet shall be shown and dimensioned on the plan. Dimensioned elevation view drawings of the site signage are required and the drawings shall compliment the written portion of the sign program that specifies ~ the site signage. Adjacent to where the letter style is defined by name in the sign program, include a small sample drawing of the letter style. When specifying the color names in the sign program, include the color code and manufacturer and submit samples (2" by 2") of the four (4) proposed colors including black and white. Where non-word signage is proposed provide detail drawings identifying colors and sizes in compliance with the regulations. Also when specifying the name of the sign style in the sign program, include a small sample drawing of the sign style. 58. Clarify the discrepancy in the parking space computations found on / sheet OS-1 regarding number of parking spaces required and number provided. Show and identify on the plans no less than 1 parking space for each 200 square feet of gross leasable floor area. 59. To unify the design of the wall signage on Bed, Bath & Beyond and Sports Authority, it is recommended that the sign on the east side / of the Bed, Bath & Beyond tenant space be modified in shape and configuration to resemble the sign located on the east side of the Sport Authoritv outbuilding. ( Page 11 Boynton Commons PUD NWSP 96-008 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 60. On sheet OS-1 dimension the width of the handicapped parking J space access aisle. Also indicate that the five (5) foot wide access aisle is typical for all handicapped parking spaces. 61. On sheet SP-1 through SP-4 delineate with notes and dimensions J the location of the parking spaces that have a two foot overhang into an adjacent landscape area. Also identify the width of the landscape strip. 62. At the north driveway located on Winchester Park Boulevard, show j and dimension on both sides of the access aisle a 100 foot driveway access aisle. 63. On sheet SP-1 and LP-1 show and dimension the required line of J site triangles at the on-site median at the Congress Avenue driveway. 64. Where applicable, the data identified on the site plan review j application shall be modified to be compatible with the data and information that is shown and identified on the twelve (12) sets of plans that were amended to comply with staff comments for second review. 65. The content of the permit plans are subject to compliance with all applicable city code of ordinances. It is the applicant's j responsibility to show compliance. Additional comments may be generated following the review of permit plans. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 66. Reword #1 as follows: Move the dumpster enclosure farther north and / shift the angle to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, to increase the back-up distance. / 67. Delete #7 J 68. Reword #8 as follows: The west building side of major number 6 and / the north building of major number 5 is not accessible. The applicant shall revise stand pipe locations to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. ( ( Page 12 Boynton Commons PUD NWSP 96-008 69. Reword #46 as follows: Modify the north elevation of the Walgreens building to comply with the community design plan regulations regarding percent of window openings for building facades that have a drive-up window. If the subject project is approved, the Walgreens out-parcel building will not receive a building permit until either the north building facade complies with the code or an appeal to the code J is granted by the City Commission. The deadline for applications for appeals to the community design plan is 15 working days prior to a Planning and Development Board meeting . [LDR, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 11.H 1 through 7]. Glass with darkened backing for security is acceptable, provided the total of all windows including those darkened, is 25% of the north elevation. 70. Reword #47 as follows: Change the design of the below listed building facades to be as attractive as the front of the building; I. north, south and west sides of the Sports Authority outbuilding; II. east and north sides of the Bed, Bath & Beyond j tenant space; III. west side of major tenant #4 and IV. add roof tile to the Video Ave out-parcel building similar to the sloped roof entrance to the Old Navy tenant space or apply and receive approval of an appeal to the Community Design Plan for the following code section: LDR, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 11.1 To comply with this comment, add a combination of additional fenestration/articulation and heavier buffering of trees of staggered location and height ranging from 8 feet to 14 feet. 71. Delete #56 .j 72. Delete #59 I 73. Extend hedge along the west side of building major 4. J 74. Extend wall and hedge approximately 60 feet to the south along the I west side of the Sports Authority truck well to the greatest extent possible in light of utility lines in the area. ( (- Page 13 Boynton Commons PUD NWSP 96-008 ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 75. To be determined J#' Jf(~ t/lCi1 MEH/dim c:COMMBOYC.WPD ( ( -- ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS FROM COMMISSION MEETING 1. 7JlJml>~~ !aAno,'v 1ff~G"lVc€7J /;.,) /?- 6.6 !doTd J'E~()) ~ 6~ llerF.it.rnNlIE?) /N ui'1PtlA!C/io,ll! IAIlm nIi /l#uU,NT~ v'~M'ce ~/(Jtf. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. L ( ( - DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other: DATED: October 15. 1996 ~~r"'~<~.~~ Ci Clerk Devord.Boynton Commons1 ParkingLot Var, 10115196 BOY.JTON COMf\:ONS ~~ ! I I ,', ,. l LJj\' ,'. ,~-~_.:...:~;.,~ ~I ,rl~~:' , l'15I!EEEfB[: , ":J r' ('ITT1LIJ]! , , I ITtIIHil0i1 "--H \1& 'rl I " ,. - (p . '" ' , . I30YN ~o'~'--' -- 'iv-.+"i.. 'c:'i~~' - -, ---. -' . 1L;:r;,T-j R&C · L / r::'-]- II j I I t I I I · J . --' ~ , . .. I L -- --' f;f' 3: ~ "''''-1- ~-', ' ~ , ,I; : I L J l' I j . ~ .: lq I C__..Jv- . L.., ~ ~ ----"IT.U:irllIJ; ~r-::~TO~BEACH 0 - : :, U.)I.~ JII--:: \, /~ U lff : I ; .,-i! i IlH-IH~ \ L ,r-/ fiR r- C( I 'lW1''I'1 111"j \ ' IT ~ ,lrlj.-tr... . I - . I Illl..~ C) ,:..~ll'''.' '~ J \J . I I '- O.ltl> - - ~ llJlll! ~~- (, .,1 ( i .. - u f..- p ------. ~'-I- .. ~s I fp ~d .._ 8'4' PIC I "MOTOROLA' I l ~ R1AA f r \ . . . . : : ...~. . .... ""-I A l- _ "T--r-- Nle: .:RS..,.,.. . :: : :@:':"I:;.,. :: ~ :. " . . "0 .' I' .:......,...... 2 . , ,~L :3 J --- /' _~0 ----- o 1/8 MILES Till 1 II . '0 400. '800 FEET . .. . '-__ r .......... ,- ,,,...... ( (' - EXHIBIT "0" Conditions of Approval Project name: Boynton Commons PCD File number: NWSP 96-008 Reference: The plans consist of 23 sheets identified as 2nd Review. New Site Plan. File #NWSP 96- 008 with a September 9. 1996 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS Comments: 1. Reposition the dumpster located on the west side of the Walgreens tenant space to allow the approach from the north rather than from the south side. Move the dumpster enclosure to the south, as far V-- as possible, to allow a longer stacking area behind the sanitation vehicle servicing the dumpster from the north. UTI L1TI ES Comments: 2. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required, plans are currently under review at the Utility Department, (Sec. 26- ~ 12). 3. Plan shall show location of all utility easements, existing and ~ proposed, (26-33(a)). 4. City water will not be supplied for irrigation, (City Compo Plan, Policy / 3C.3.4). 5. A capacity reservation fee will be required within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval, or upon request for Utility Department V Director signature on the HRS/DEP permit applications. The fee amount will be determined based upon meter size or expected demand, (Sec. 26-34[E]). 6. Only palm trees will be permitted in utility easements (Sec. 26.33(a)). / FIRE Comments: ( ( - Page 2 Boynton Commons PCD NWSP 96-008 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 7. Turn around in the service court is inadequate, a radius of 90' to 110' is required and a drive through will be necessary. ~ 8. The west building side of major number six (6) and the north building side of major number five (5) is not accessible. Fire hydrants shall be )f~ located so that no part of the building is over two hundred feet away. POLICE Comments: 9. Show on the plans traffic control signs and fire lane signs. ~ 10. It is recommended that the north parking lot aisle of Walgreens be westbound - one-way travel only. This will assist the drive-thru window traffic and prevent traffic from attempting U-turns in the north ~ parking lot aisle to enter the drive-thru window. To accomplish this, there needs to be two, "DO NOT ENTER" signs facing ingress traffic from Old Boynton Road. There also needs to be a "STOP SIGN", and stop bar for westbound traffic exiting the north parking lot aisle. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Comments: 11. Provide proof of unity of title and those requirements specified under ~ Chap.2,Sec.6F3,pg.2-53 and Sec.6F8,pg.2-56. 12. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required V from agencies such as the FOOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 13. County road entrance sign requires PSC approval and state road t/ entrance sign requires FOOT approval. 14. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent / structures having a temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be removed. Chap.3, Art. IV, Sec.3R,pg.3-5. (" ('- Page 3 Boynton Commons PUD NWSP 96-008 I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I 15. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap.3,Art.IV, vi Sec.3T, pg.3-6. 16. Provide a copy of approved agreement with LWDD for use of / drainage easements. Chap.5,Art.V,Sec.1 D6,pg.5-5. 17. Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. J Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A,pg.6-7. 18. Provide certification by developer's engineer that drainage plan J complies with all city codes and standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8. 19. Minimum 15" pipe must be used in storm sewer. Chap.6, Art. IV, / Sec.5A, pg.6-7. 20. Parking lot section must conform to city code. Chap.6, Art. IV, j Sec.10F, pg.6-12. 21. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes, catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e, pg.6-20. J 22. County and/or state permits required for construction in R.O.W. \/ Chap.6, Art. VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24. 23. Applicant's attention is directed to Chap.7, pg.7-1 regarding surety j req uirements. 24. Not more than two free-standing signs are allowed. However, project j signage will be review with sign submittal. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.3B, pg.21-17. 25. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, / landscaping, etc. must conform with city codes and standards. Chap.23, Art. II , pg.23-6. 26. Photometries must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot j lighting before permit can be issued. Chap.23, Art.IIA 1 a, pg.23-6. 27. No trees shall be planted so as to interfere with lighting fixtures. 7 Chap.23, Art.IIAb, pg.23-7. 28. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on J Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23, Art.IIB2, Pa.23-7. ( ( - Page 4 Boynton Commons PUD NWSP 96-008 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 29. Concrete curb must conform to city standards. Chap.23, Art. liE, J pg.23-7. 30. Provide continuation of sidewalks thru all driveways to mark f pedestrian paths. Chap.23, Art.lI, Sec.P, pg.23-10. 31. Install WIIA-2 pedestrian signs at all crosswalk locations. MUTCD 3B- J 18, pg.3B-23. . 32. Typical lake section shall indicate a 20' maintenance berm. Chap.6, J Art. IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-9. 33. Correct invert of structure, 1-10 sheet 4 of 6 Paving and Drainage. J Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e, pg.6-20. 34. Provide missing and unreadable catch basin grates and invert ) elevations. 35. At Walgreens drive-thru egress: 1. Post "Do Not Enter" signs to direct northbound traffic around I drive-thru. 2. Provide satisfactory pavement signage and markings to stop exiting drive-thru traffic before crossing over due to 6' screen wall. Chap.23, Art.IIB, pg.23-7. 36. Height of bottom edge of stop signs to be 5' to grade in non- J pedestrian locations, and 7' all other places. MUTCD 2A. 37. On sheet 2 of 6 of Paving and Drainage plan reverse colors of / handicap background and symbol (symbol to be white in color). Sheet 9 of FDOT Index 19346. 38. Provide a sidewalk along south Winchester Park Boulevard entrance I into Major #4 Building. 39. Place stop signs and stop bars throughout the development where there is a question of right-of-way. Examples: At east side of I Barnes/Noble for northbound traffic; in the center of the two Walgreens drive-thru lanes; at both ends of the two aisles between Video Ave and Walgreens for east and westbound traffic. MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMM... LON MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 21, 1998 3. Will it build good will and better friendships? 4. Will it be beneficial to all concerned? Mr. Kaleel presented the plaque in honor of the continued partnership and shared commitment to the improvement of quality life for the City of Boynton Beach. Mayor Taylor thanked the Rotary Club for giving back to the community. He urged the public to join the Rotary Club to become more involved in the community. 3. Comments about Boynton Commons Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz advised that she attended the Planning & Development Board meeting last week and spoke at Public Audience regarding the Boynton Commons shopping center. She is very proud of the work done by the developer and extremely proud of Ms. Heyden, the Planning staff and the TRC for this cohesive center. She remarked that the architecture and landscaping are beautiful and she feels this center will add to the City's tax rolls and to the aesthetics of the Congress Avenue corridor. IV. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Minutes: 1. Regular Meeting Minutes of April 7, 1998 Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve. Mayor Pro Tem Tillman seconded the motion that carried unanimously. Commissioner Denahan requested that Consent Agenda rtems rv.a.6 and rv.a.7 be removed'rom the Consent Agenda IbrdariRcation. B. Bids - Recommend Approval - All expenditures are approved in the 1997-98 Adopted Budget 1. "lWo-YEAR C.JNTRACT FOR ANNUAL INSPECTION & lES77NG OF FIRE ALARM AND DETECTION EQUIPMENT AND SYSlEMS*- BID #040-192- 98/0D - Award bid to M.R. Guild Enterprises d/b/a Alarm Guard of Riviera Beach, Rorida, in the amount of $5,658 for two (2) years 2. ')4NNUAL SUPPl Y OF SODIUM HYDROXIDE (LIQUID CAUS77C SODA)N- BID #048-401-98/00 - Award bid to Jones Chemicals, Inc. of Fort Lauderdale, Rorida, in the amount of $17,000 3. Approve Golf Course/Greens Maintenance purchase request for Taro Turf Sweeper/Self-propelled 5400hl - Model 44020 with thatching reel - Model 44031 off GSA CONTRACT #GS-07F-87220 from Century Equipment, 5 '&l ~ H' \l ll" s. ~a' ~"' r ,..., a p. \'!. W )>" ~ p. ",,0 p. "" · e ~ ig.g8 {<> \\~"-% ~ i% tlli ~ ~~i~~ ~~g~<.~'Jl:l 0 ~"",rt~ o~::);:s~o~i $~~~ ;~~~~z~~ ~ ~ 0 -<I' ,. <> II go" "" '" '" ....... ' 1 ..l>~ .g~.....~t<l~ <'wi ,.1 ~ '$'';~ g \l fg!\ r, W ,l "1!l~~ "-,,,p.,e~ """..\ ~g~O ~;)~ ~g ~ \ ~ \ ~"w8 0 ,~" ~ \ 1\ '" 0 ~ :g '" ".... 'iil' N'1"I" , ~ o~.g S' ~!! "'S ~ \.J'" q ..,. !l. 'i' '\' .. 0 .. g. , "" . \k i a ~ 8 ""'" ~ ~ g.,,%i8 ~ ~ ~~fi'\t\~i~ b~i\b'~ ~ ~\ '" '" ~ It ~ ",::;;I Q.;, '/;.. a n ><, l\ 'gg-F-~%.~~'~n~ p.~ ~ ." ~ ~\l (f> _ '(} S ~ s a ~ ~ ~ ""~,..~,.... ~' l go% ~p."~"WS ~ ,. / ~ ~ g. 't\'6l g-" ",1 fl, .;'$ -=-- ~v ,;'~' a ~. ~ ,~~ g.) ~ g ~ s ~ ~ s.' 'a G r" .. 'l'\ ,,'~ ~ . ~ -. eo \1,' · ~ '" 0 8 0 !l' g. I!- ... () \\ ~ " ...... . "" ..' .. ,,""" p... 0 .. ~ p. \. ~ .' ~~: U%'6'~ %;g.~'$' ~ l~~: tP .' l!.'" g ll,li ~ ~ g" ~1!l 1Il ~w" ~"."", .".,.. ~ \~ ' ~b'~~' ~'%~ ~~ % ~ 0 Ii; "" '" g. ... ~ li ~ (f> % ... & ~ i Iii;' ~'."" .I", - 8 ..... (f>'" ~ .,." "''' * " 0 " \i!i . p... .,.<> " W '" ",,, w 'l\ n "-" t.~.' ~ .....00 "s....o""'o.op..... 0 ',;;1 . ie-\!l 0 'i<a l.\ 1\ o"!l! ~ o'~ · -' ;l.< '., ,.~ .. ..... 0'" ,,~ ..."" ,,,,' ' ~ I!.~ f;.a.g~H. ~ ,...~>~:.w' .,.. p:~ ~g.2"~ ".~'p. i\\h~ ~.:-~...~..:.... rJJ p. 0 \'P .,.,il ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.. ...- " · ~~~~htg ",jf;' ~ ,~) ?- "",,"" p.... ''I; n ' , I.. ...J ""P~ ,::~'ll-g'~ !i' ~ } , r I ~~~ (R ~ ~ g ~ lJ) ~~ 0 'i,!:i.....\.... 'S. w '" a ~ '" "."'IS' >- "".. "" \l. n 'I >;' p. G n ~ ~ ~~%~ ~~~ ~%~ ~ ~i ~~s.g.~...s.'" 'g;;ltl>~~1 '-- ~ W!l W ':, ~g ~ n" '(}".~ 0 ~ Ii '5 'l'\ ~ Il',g "" p. '<l j:;.!\!J\" t - \1 ;:; \l. .. ~ 1\ " ",.,.,e. g~ ...l\ n ~ ,'.:..' t\' W '" ::: ~ ~ It .. "" '?.. '" p. 'Jr ' ~ ., '" )>" \;l n W \l;~ W \l 91.~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ g.g ~ cse.~ ~ k:...,'.f.... en g.~ % ~.a zP:~ ~ tl,$';l- ' l'~' ....I..r~~.I~~ '~.'.'... 'if ~g.j;'g.\l.'<l~l'n~~ 0 t 'fJ) ~ ~-% ~t. ':.,~~ ~~ ~ ~ "'.~.\ ~ 'a,1i ~ g' ~:7;a s.~*' ~~ \'.'. .....- ~i In .. "" a IS s g' a ~ \!\ 'iI''' "'1 .~.".'. . ~l!.. 0'" n ..p..W '1 'It.~ \!J ~ '; ~",t\ ;;l~'5 ~ ~ Q:- a g,~ !l g. <l> !l ~ ~ f::: .. 8' .. " ~~E ~..~p. 1\!;"gO ',' ~l1i p.'5~~~'l\\l.ell?i ,,' ~ " ~~.. b's.~ \?t""1i\"91\i" ~' ' t;' ~ tt.~ ~ 8 ~ \\ ~..::; ~~ ';1 ..' . ~ " \ ~ ~ ~. _~ ~ ..... ;:;0.... ~. lJ) ~..' , \ , _",a * ~ \!\ g. '" ,w ~ a;' <', ;n ~~~.s%~ \h"" ,,::H. ~h%% ..-U' i....: ~ ~.i. ~l!l ~.. .. g II El- ' ' ~ s ~l/ .. ~.t l!!l ~ ',,' , " , ' , . . \~\ ~ ." ~ (') Q) 0 0 ~ n e- N ,:$ o"ea- Q- {;~ ~" % , - ~ J0- e ;0 (j) o ~ ~ ~ ~ r- tv f:. .- lO lO -.1 ~ ;:: i3" i ~ :s:: to ~ ~ t ~ c. ~ t. . . r>:.;.:. ~,tt,i . :r. :z:)> L:\ , . ~" ~. "i. ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P" ~ ~ (/) I(i ~ - o z o / /~~ ! ' \ \ \ \ \, /' MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH~ FLORIDA NOVEMBER 12~ 1996 Motion Mr. Aguila moved to approve the minutes of the October 8, 1996 meeting. Vice Chairman Golden seconded the motion, which carried 7-0. 5. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department 1. Final Disposition of Last Meeting's Agenda It~!11s Ms. Heyden reported the following: · Boynton Festive Center Landscape Appeal - Approved by the City Commission subject to all staff comments. · Boynton Commons PCD Site Plan Approval - The Planning and Development Board recommended that several comments be removed or reworded and a couple be added regarding additional landscaping and screening. Prior to the City Commission meeting, the Fire Department reexamined their comments and deleted the one regarding the access to the rear of the Sports of Authority. With regard to the turning radius behind Bed, Bath and Beyond and the other tenants in that area. there was a typographical error in their memo. It was supposed to say, "diameter", not "radius". Therefore, the plans were acceptable as drawn. However, they still felt they needed rear access to that area. Therefore, the applicant agreed to locate the standpipes at the corner and screen them with shrubs. · Burger King Site Plan Approval - The City Commission approved this subject to all staff comments and recommendations, in addition to the following: · The design elements of the building will be the model for future outparcels in that shopping center. The City Commission wants the mansard extended all the way around the flat roof building. Therefore, we will expect that of Discount Auto Parts and the outparcel to the north of it, which was supposed to be Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart has backed out, so we do not know who that tenant will be. · Boynton Common PCD Parking Lot Variance - Postponed. The variance may not be needed. We are working out some one-way issues on how to get access. 2 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 15, 1996 Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve Agenda Item VIII-A, Boynton Festive Center, request for landscape appeal to omit a 2.5 foot wide landscape strip between a vehicle use area and a proposed abutting property line in connection with subdividing the shopping center subject to all staff comments. Commissioner Bradley seconded the motion which carried unanimously, B. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Boynton Commons PCD Land Design South Bill Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue SITE PLAN - Request for site plan approval to construct a 213,650 square foot retail center including five (5) leased outparcel buildings on 22.885 acres. Joe Lelanlc of Land Deslon South advised that all of the issues were ironed out with the Planning and Development Board, and he agrees with all of the revised conditions contained in the staff report. He brought forth the following two conditions for information purposes only: 1. One of the conditions that were modified at the last hearing regarded the Walgreen's building on the north side of the site. The condition was to increase the amount of glass area on the north side of the building to come up to the standards of the 25%. Mr. Lelanic displayed an illustration which showed how the applicant redesigned the plan to meet that condition. 2. The applicant originally had a clock tower in the middle of the site. In an effort to respond to comments that have been made at past meetings, the developer has started to work in some concepts on an outparcel (Video Avenue) to try to inClude a clock tower feature. It is somewhat scaled down compared to what was in the middle of the site, but it provides a visual focus. Ms. Heyden advised that, based on discussions with the Public Works Director and the Fire Department since the Planning and Development Board meeting, she is recommending that the Commission approve all the staff comments and Planning and Development Board recommendations with the exception of Comment #66. This comment relates to the redesign of the dumpsters. The reason for the recommendation to exclude Comment #66 from the approval is the fact that the parking lot variance is one of the items that was postponed this evening. The staff recommendation for the parking lot variance conflicts with Comment #66. It is premature to delete that comment until staff has an opportunity to see the parking lot variance which may impact the circulation in the area. The Commission will have another opportunity to see this again in the future. Mayor Taylor recalled a problem wittl-the standpipes. Ms. Heyden advised that Comments #7 and #8 became issues at the Planning and Development Board. Comment #7 deals with the turning radius. After speaking with the Fire Department, they have agreed to delete this comment. With regard to Comment #8, the Fire Department has reevaluated the site plan and determined that only 11 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 15, 1996 the north side of major #5 (Bed, Bath & Beyond) is not acceptable. They are requiring that the applicant work with them to relocate the ,standpipes. The Fire Department would agree to allow hedges in front of the standpipes to screen them. With regard to Comment #66, Mr. Lelanic advised that one of the reasons the applicant tried to resolve this issue at the last public hearing was to try to keep the dumpster opening from facing Old Boynton Road, and to allow the access of that to the south. On the plans, Mr. Lelanic showed the area which is to the west of Walgreen's. The site plan shows a one-way access off Old Boynton Road into the property. One of the changes Ms. Heyden proposed was postponing the variance to provide a one-way in and one-way out of the site to allow for better traffic flow in and around the site. Accessing this dumpster from the south is for aesthetic reasons. The applicant feels there will be a better look to the site if the dumpster is accessed from the south. In addition, flow around the site will be improved. Mr. Lelanic requested that the change recommended by the Planning and Development Board remain in effect. With regard to Comment #68, the applicant realizes there will be some issues which will have to be resolved with the Fire Department with regard to the standpipe locations. The applicant's concern is to keep the aesthetics as clean and neat as possible. Standpipes are not attractive in front of the building. The applicant will attempt to move them to the sides of the building or as close to the corners as possible. The applicant will work with the Fire Department. In response to Commissioner Bradley's request, Ms. Heyden indicated the dumpster area on the site plan and explained that the Planning and Development Board is recommending moving the dumpster enclosure farther north and shifting the angle to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department to increase the back-up distance. Mr. Lelanic explained that Comment #1 from Public Works requires the dumpster location to be repositioned to allow the approach from the north rather than from the south. In addition, they requested that the enclosure be moved as far to the south as possible. It was the applicant's intention not to negate the stacking distance. The applicant intended to move the dumpster location slightly to the north to allow it to be rotated further. This would allow more stacking distance. Commissioner Bradley questioned how the dumpster opening will be facing Old Boynton Road if it is located on the west side of the building. Mr. Lelanic explained that it is 450 off center. If the applicant responds to Comment #1, that opening would be 450 altered to the north. That dumpster opening could then be viewed from the road when travelling east on Old Boynton Road. Mr. Lelanic feels the wall and landscaping are better than concrete and gate enclosure. Ms. Heyden advised that if the dumpster enclosure and gates are visible from Old Boynton Road because of its location for this building, there will be very little distance where one will actually see the dumpster from Old Boynton Road. Mr. Lelanic is not opposed to dealing with this issue at the time of the variance; however, he requested that the applicant not be tied into Comment #1 at this point. In response to Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz' question, Mr. Lelanic advised that the applicant will submit for permit drawings as soon as these proceedings are completed. He anticipates that this will occur in the next two to three weeks. As soon as that process is completed, construction will commence. 12 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 15, 1996 Mr. Lelanic stated that the tenants are on a quick time frame. The applicant will get as many permits /' as possible for the buildings that a ready to go. r" Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz thanked Mr. Lelanic for the applicant's effort to include the clock tower, In response to Mayor Taylor's question, Mr. Lelanic advised that leases have been signed for the tenants. Motion Commissioner Tillman moved to approve Project B of the Development Plans, Boynton Commons PCD, request for site plan approval to construct a 213,650 square foot retail center including five (5) leased outparcel buildings on 22.885 acres, subject to staff comments and with regard to landscaping and dumpster which will come back to the Commission. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz seconded the motion. Mayor Taylor confirmed with Commissioner Tillman that his motion deletes Comment #66. Attorney Cherof clarified that this motion will be the rejection of both Comments #1 and 66, and we will substitute a new Commission condition as follows: "That the dumpster location is to be determined in conjunction with the variance hearing." Commissioner Tillman and Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz agreed to Attorney Cherot's additional language. Mayor Taylor also confirmed that the motion includes having the applicant work with the Fire Department to the satisfaction ,of our department. The motion carried unanimously. urger Kin estaurant - ShO.pe of Woolbright PCD rton Group, Ho rd Scharlin, stee North st corner of S 8th Street and Woo ight Road SITE P AN - Request fo site plan approval t cmstruct a 2,911 square f t restaurant with 'ye-through on .918 acres within the Shoppes 0 ,oolbright PCD ., Mark Ghezzi, of Edward M. Ghezzi, PA, Architects & Planners, 9595 North Kendall Drive, Miami, advised that Mr. Morton was not present. Mr. Ghezzi represents the franchisee for the Burger King. C. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Attorney Cherof administered the oath. Mr. Ghezzi has no objections to any of the comments or conditions. 13 'lINLTES PL.\:\:\T\G A:\fD DEVELOP"tE~T BOARD BOY~TO~ BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 leased to the two restaurants. In addition, the current owner of the overall shopping center will remain the underlying owner of the two retail parcels which are currently leased. So technically there is no change other than a 99 year lessee will become an owner. They are doing this purely for business and tax reasons. There is a very detailed operation and easement agreement of approximately 80 pages which has been recorded in the public records. The City Attorney has reviewed it and it will be part of the record as part of the subdivision. Mr. Haag asked if the 18 inch hedge will be installed on both sides of the access way. Ms. Jarkesy said. "No." The condition reads, "on either side". She has not analyzed it with the landscape architect yet. Therefore, it has not been determined which side would be the better side yet. She had some concerns with line of sight. In order to address safety issues, a hedge may not be appropriate the entire width of the landscape barriers. Therefore, this will have to be looked at closely. Mr. Haag informed the board that he has not yet received confirmation from the City Attorney that the 80 page document referred to by Ms. Jarkesy has been accepted. Motion Mr. Wische moved to approve the request for a landscape appeal to omit a 2.5 foot wide landscape strip between a vehicle use area and a proposed abutting property line in connection with subdividing the shopping center for Boynton Festive Center, subject to staff comments. Mr. Elsner seconded the motion. Chairman Dube asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against this issue; however, no one did. The motion carried 6-0. Mr. Aguila pointed out that Ms. Jarkesy made a valid point. If you hedge the entire length, there will be some visibility problems. Therefore, some latitude needs to be afforded. Mr. Haag stated that we will apply the standard line of sight regulations. B. New Site Plan 1 . Project: Agent: Owner: Boynton Commons pce Land Design South Bill Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester 5 \nNUTES PL-\;\f~[NG A:\TD DEVELOP'IE:\TT BOARD BOY~TON BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 Location: The southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue Description: Request for site plan approval to construct a 213,650 square foot retail center including five (5) leased out parcel buildings on 22.885 acres. Joe Lelonek with Land Design South requested a 30 day postponement on the parking lot variance so that he can clear up some issues and revise the entrance. With regard to the site plan, he addressed the conditions that he did not agree with. Comment 1,' Reposition the dumpster located on the west side of Walgreens to allow the approach from the north rather than from the south side. Move the dumpster enclosure to the south. as far as possible, to allow a longer stacking area behind the sanitation vehicle servicing the dumpster from the north. (This comment was made by Public Works.) Mr. Lelonek said the proposed tenants are all national tenants, and all of them have certain ways of arranging their sites and function on the site. Walgreens has a clearly defined way that they arrange their dumpsters and how they operate them. If we move it, then we start getting away from how they operate their stores. It seems like an insignificant item on paper, but when you get down to the actual operation of the store, etc., those changes and directions mean an awful lot. He requested that this comment be deleted. Mr. Aguila asked from which direction the loading zone will be accessed and how the truck will exit it. Mr. Lelonek advised that it will be accessed from the north, and the truck will pull directly out of the area. It seemed to Chairman Dube that if the dumpster is moved, it will be in the way. Mr. Lelonek spoke to Mark Weiner, the architect for this project, who said it might be possible to flip the location of the entry so that the truck can access it from the north, However, to move it farther to the south is impossible. Mr. Weiner said aside from Walgreens' concerns of easy access to the doors of the trash area, the orientation takes the opening of the doors away from the entrance off of Old Boynton Road. Aesthetically, it makes more sense to face it in that direction. He said he could try to talk Walgreens into turning the doors in the other direction; however, he cannot move it because it would interfere with the loading. 6 :\H~L'TES PL-\N~(~G A~D DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 Mr, Aguila felt aesthetics were more important. He pointed out that the truck can enter from the south and drive around the building. He did not want to see the dumpster gates from Old Boynton Road. He had no objections to the way the applicant has oriented it. Mr. Haag advised that it may require some modification in the angle. Mr. Weiner was willing to look at the angle, but he believes there is 60 feet behind it. Mr. Aguila asked if there is room to move the dumpster a little north and turn it a little more counterclockwise. Mr. Weiner had no problem moving it north. Comment 7: Turn around in the service court is inadequate. a radius of 90' to 110' is required and a drive through will be necessary. (This comment was made by Bill Cavanaugh of the Fire Department.) Mr. lelonek said typically in a right-of-way in a residential subdivision, cul-de-sacs are anywhere from a 45' radius to a 50' radius. He felt this request is excessive. There is an 80' radius, which gives you about 160 feet of pavement. He felt that is more than adequate. He suggested reducing it to a 45' to 50' radius, and felt this comment should be deleted. (See further discussion in the second paragraph under comment 8.) Comment 8: The west building side of major number six and the north building side of major number five is not accessible. Fire hydrants shall be located so that no part of the building is over two hundred feet away. (This comment was made by Bill Cavanaugh of the Fire Department.) Mr. lelonek advised that Major #6 is the Sports Authority. The reason we do not have access, pavement, or a driving lane around the west side of this building is because we are trying to provide landscaping. There is a truck well, so you can get all the way back to the mid point of the Sports Authority building. We also have the compactor, so you can get back just about to the mid point or the corner of that building. We feel that the area of landscaping between the back of that building and Winchester Parkway is going to be more beneficial to the City than more asphalt back there. If there is a problem, the road could still be accessed. You could get to the truck well on both sides. Staff also wanted access behind the Bed, Bath & Beyond building. However, we feel that closing the access off behind Bed, Bath & Beyond and just leaving the truck well there gives a better look along Old Boynton Road. He felt this comment should be deleted. With regard to comment 7, Mr. Haag advised that Mr. Cavanaugh informed him that a drive through will not be necessary and that a turnaround in the service court is inadequate. However, he still is firm about the radius of 90' and the 180' diameter. With regard to Major #6 and Major #5, the Fire Chief said that if all of the standpipe connections to the front of the building are removed, then that would be acceptable as a solution to the first part of comment 8. 7 :\1I:\l'TES PL\;\l:\'I:\IG AND DEVELOP:\IE:\IT BOARD BOY:\'TO:\' BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 Mr, Lelonek stated that it has been important to keep the aesthetic look of this as clean and neat as possible to create something that the City is going to enjoy. Moving the standpipe to the front of these buildings would be an eyesore. From an aesthetic standpoint, and with the amount of access being providing, this is not an agreeable solution to him, With regard to the 90' radius, he felt that the 160' is well in excess of the cul-de-sac radius that is currently being used in the City. He did not feel this is going to be a hindrance to the Fire Department and he asked that this comment should be deleted. Chairman Dube asked why the Fire Department needs a 90' radius. Mr. Haag assumed that the new aerial truck requires a larger radius than the other trucks. Mr. Aguila pointed out that the truck can make a three point turnaround and get out of there in a 65' radius. Mr. Wische did not agree with staff comments 7 and 8. He doubted that an aerial ladder is needed for a one-story building. Mr. Weiner will contact Mr. Cavanaugh and try to resolve the location of the standpipes. Comment 32: Typical lake section shall indicate a 20' maintenance berm. (This comment was made by the Department of Development.) Mr. Lelonek advised that the Engineering Department requested a 20' maintenance berm all the way around the lake. We are trying to provide a landscaping wall/lake arrangement to buffer the buildings from the back corner and allow view of the lake from the intersection as much as possible. If we have to provide a 20' maintenance berm all the way around this site, we are going to have to get rid of the wall or move the wall out to the right-of-way line so that we can provide access through the parking lot, etc. We have access through the landscape along Winchester Park Boulevard. We can provide areas every 50 or 100 feet. We also have access all the way along the south side of the lake and up to the start of the wall. He would like this condition deleted and he would like to work out some type of alternative with the Engineering Department so that he can keep the landscaping. Mr. Aguila asked who is maintaining the lake. Mr. Lelonek advised that the property owners will maintain it. Comment 46: Modify the north elevation of the Walgreens building to comply with the community design plan regulations regarding percent of window openings for building facades that have a drive- up window. If the subject project is approved, the Walgreens out-parcel building will not receive a building permit until either the north building facade complies with the code or an appeal to the code is granted by the City Commission. The deadline for applications for appeals to the Community Design Plan is 15 working days prior to a Planning and Development Board meeting. 8 'lI~UTES PL.\~~I~G .\~D DEYELOP"IE~T BOARD BOY~TO~ BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 Mr. Lelonek advised that comments 46 and 47 deal with architectural renderings and presentations on the site. Mr. Weiner displayed the north elevation that is in question. He stated that the ordinance requires a certain percentage of fenestration on all walls that face the public right-ot-way and/or are associated with the drive-thru teller. He assumed this ordinance was intended tor bank situations. Walgreens, as most of these national tenants, has fixtures all along their outside wall. We are providing the windows; however, they are not real windows. He was not sure they were exactly 10 percent, but they make sense tor the elevation. Mr. Aguila telt the elevation was appropriate, is to the proper scale, and balances well. He did not know if adding more fenestration, whether real or artificial, is going to make the elevation any better. In tact, it may make it busier and less attractive. Mr. Weiner thinks this comment was made because it is not transparent glass. Mr. Haag advised that it does not meet the percentage, which requires an appeal. You have to have 25 percent of the wall area in glass (store front). Then you are allowed a percentage of that to be simulated. The applicant has not met the 25 percent. Mr. Weiner said he probably could solve the 25 percent issue, but not the percentage of opaque glass. He said he could put transparent glass in, but you would see the back of a fixture. Mr. Haag recommended that Mr. Weiner meet the 25 percent requirement and work with staff on the other percentages. Ms. Heyden does not want 100 percent simulated glass. She would like to know the percentages. Mr. Aguila felt this regulation does not make sense for a store that has displays against all four walls. Mr. Weiner stated that even if we used real glass, Walgreens would probably put some sort of security device on them because they do not want any more openings than necessary. Mr. Aguila said we are trying to avoid having ugly, unornamented elevations. Mr. Weiner felt there are ways of dealing with that without putting in windows. Comment 47: Change the design of the below listed building facades to be as attractive (with increased articulation and/or fenestration) as the front of the building: i. north, south and west sides of the Sports Authority outbuilding; ii. east and south sides of the Bed. Bath & Beyond tenant space; iii. west side of major tenant #4 and iv, add roof tile to the Video Ave out-parcel building similar to the sloped roof entrance to the Old Navy tenant space or 9 "IIl~TTES PL.\:\'~I~G AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOY~TON BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8, 1996 apply and receive approval of an appeal to the Community Design Plan for the following code section: LOR. Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan. Section 11.1. To comply with this comment. it is recommended that the elevations of the buildings be changed to show additional detail such as the sloped tile roof that is shown on the fronts of the buildings. Mr, Lelonek stated that on the north side along Old Boynton Road, we are providing a continuous wall all the way around the loading, parking, and access areas, and all the way around the lake to the other side. We are also providing landscaping, berms, and a lot of vegetation there to try to block the views of the back of the building; from ground height up to 14 or 15 feet. A six foot high screened wall with landscaping with be installed in the back. There is going to be a substantial amount of vegetation. He felt this will help in terms of the architectural elevations. Mr. Lelonek said staff wants additional articulation and fenestration on the remainder of the building. He pointed out the amount of landscaping and buffering that we are dealing with. He said the south side of the other parcels back up to similar buffers and there are additional parcels between them and Boynton Beach Boulevard. Therefore, he did not believe this is an issue. Mr. Weiner said the elevations that are in question are along the east and north sides of Bed, Bath & Beyond. He referred to the east elevation and said we tried to articulate as much as we can on the 200 foot long blank wall. We tried to leave a fair amount of space between the curb line and the building so we could put a significant amount of landscaping there. There is a feature and articulation on the wall treatments. He can add more trim and do some more things with the wall treatments; however, the same situation exists as with Walgreens. They cannot put windows there. Some fake ones can be put there, but he did not think that is a requirement. On the north side, there is a truck well and loading doors. Our solution to that was the increased buffer area, the wall at the lower levels, so the only thing that you are seeing from the street is from 12 or 14 feet up. At that point, we are providing treatment on the wall. The same thing holds true for Sports Authority. We could probably deal with Major #4, although it faces an adjacent parcel, not the street. We are revising the elevations on Video Ave and will pick up the slope roof with tile. We are also introducing a clock tower element on that building. Chairman Dube asked if it is true that the wall will block most of it. Mr. Haag said his concern is not so much this portion of the building because that is back past the 180' 10 \lI~TTES PL\N:\I:SG AND DEVELOP\tENT BOARD BOY:\TO:\ BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 diameter turnaround. However, this portion is very close to Old Boynton Road. Mr. Weiner said he is concerned about it also, and that is why there is approximately 40 to 45 feet of landscape buffer with the wall. He had no problem trying to come up with some sort of additional treatment on the upper levels. Mr. Lelonek felt one of the possible solutions is to buffer it further by introducing more trees into that area; perhaps a double row of trees so that when it is installed, we have more of an instantaneous buffer which hides the lower portion where the loading doors, etc., are. Mr. Haag pointed out that our minimum height for trees is 8 feet. The height of the building is 24 feet. Mr. Lelanek said something a little more substantial (perhaps 12 feet in height) and perhaps a heartier visual buffer can be installed in specific locations, such as the areas behind Bed, Bath & Beyond. Comment 56: To enhance the appearance of this planned commercial development (peD). it is recommended that there be decorative pedestrian lights added to the front of each outbuilding and multi-tenant building. It is further recommended that the major east/west and north/south access aisle have decorative site lighting poles lines each side of the access aisle. These poles shall match the design of the pedestrian poles recommended for the fronts of the buildings, Mr. Lelonek stated that one of the problems with this comment is that we are trying to meet minimum lighting standards for a lot of these tenants. Their standards are more restrictive than a lot of the City Codes. To do that, we have to provide larger light features, etc. If we provide smaller decorative lighting, we are not going to have the amount of illumination that we need on this site. Although, there are some areas on the fronts of the buildings where we can do this, he would like to delete this condition because of the amount of light that has to be provided on this site. He advised that there are hefty landscape conditions, and to throw the accurate light, the taller lights are needed. Comment 59: To unify the design of the wall signage on Bed, Bath & Beyond and Sports Authority, it is recommended that the sign on the east side of the Bed, Bath & Beyond tenant space be modified in shape and configuration to resemble the sign located on the east side of the Sports Authority outbuilding. Mr. Lelonek pointed out that we are dealing with national tenants on this property. Each national tenant has their own requirements for signage. We are working up signage plans for the site and will try to come up with a complete package so that at a future time, we will be able to look at each one of those signs before it goes in for a permit. He requested that this comment be deleted and addressed as part of the signage program. 11 'II~LTES PL..\.~~I~G A~D DE\'ELOP'lE~T BOARD BOY:\TO~ BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 Mr. Haag advised that staff is against this sign. However, if it is allowed, it should have some configuration. Mr. Weiner also wants to see uniformity and compatibility among all these buildings as much as Mr, Haag does. However, he did not think you necessarily have to do that by making them all look exactly the same. He felt it was a question of compatible details. Comment 60: It is recommended that the Bed & Bath signage on the east facade of the tenant space be omitted. Mr. Lelonek stated that the Bed, Bath & Beyond signage on the east facade is some of their primary frontage on the property. It is an icon for their store. The signage is not your typical strip center sign. It is almost a logo in itself and a nice feature to have on the element. He requested that this comment be deleted. Chairman Dube asked Ms. Heyden if she wanted comments 59 and 60 handled now or when the sign package comes in. Ms. Heyden stated that it probably makes sense to have it done as part of the sign package. If deleted now, she reserved the right to add the comments back in when the sign program comes in. Mr. Rosenstock suggested facing the issue now so that the applicant knows the position of this board and the City Commission before he proceeds. Mr. Lelonek stated that the sign age for each one of the national tenants is one of the last things provided to the architect. He said staff requested that we provide installation documents for those signs; however, those documents will not be ready until we have the final permits. Mr. Rosenstock was concerned about the unanimity of signage. Mr. Weiner advised that sign designers have been hired to do a complete package on all the signage, including pylon signs and all the major tenant signs. Mr. Rosenstock pointed out that all the national franchises have their individual logos, colors, and designs. Mr. Weiner said we are going to unify the sign package as much as we can and present it at a future date. He did not want it to be part of the general site approval at this time. Mr. Aguila asked the applicant if, at whatever risk, he is willing to address all signage issues at a later date. Mr. Weiner answered affirmatively. Mr. Aguila asked Mr. Haag what the specific problem with comment 60 is. Mr. Haag did not know if the calculations have been completed to see if there is enough room for all the signage that is shown. Mr. Weiner said most of the signs shown are smaller. Ms. Frazier asked for clarification of this comment. Mr. Aguila explained that staff felt there should be no text in the signage area. The architect said he is within compliance of the allowable percentage of wall space and signage, so he would like to keep it. 12 \IINCTES PL.-\~~I~G AND DEVELOP\lE~T BOARD BOY~TO~ BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 Comment 65: It is recommended that the exterior colors of the walls and architectural features of the multi- tenant buildings be the same color scheme (different shades acceptable) rather than being a different color, as displayed on the colored elevation view drawings of the Bed Bath & Beyond tenant space and the remainder of the building as well as the different colors displayed on the south building. Considering the close proximity of Major #4 and the multi- tenant building directly to the east, it is recommended that the entire south building square footage be considered as one building for purposes of exterior color, Mr. Lelonek advised that the applicant purposefully came up with some different color schemes to add some zest to the large buildings so that the project does not look like a big monolithic structure. He requested the flexibility of going back to what was originally proposed. Mr. Haag circulated the color pallet and said when he made this comment, he did not have the color pallet, which does not show as much pink as shown on the building in the elevation. Therefore, he withdrew this comment. In light of the conversation about signage this evening, and as long as the applicant is willing to postpone the issue of signage, she felt it would be best to withdraw the comments about signage and have them reviewed and resubmitted with the sign program. Mr. Aguila referred to site plan sheet SP-3 and the six foot screen wall that is on the west side of Sports Authority. He asked if the applicant would consider moving that about 50 or 60 feet to the south and extending the hedge with it to screen off more of the drive. Mr. Lelonek said he will try to work around it as best he can; however, the engineer for the site told him that some storm drainage and gravity sewer lines may be running through there. Therefore, to the extend possible, he will run it down into that area. Mr. Aguila referred to the west side of Major #4 where there is sod, Palms, Oaks, etc., and asked if the applicant would consider putting a continuous hedge along that wall. Mr. Lelonek said that would not be a problem. With regard to comment 1, Mr. Aguila felt comfortable that the applicant is going to adjust the dumpster as needed for the truck. It may have to be shifted a little to the north. With regard to comment 7, he felt 90 feet and 100 feet were outrageous. He preferred to cut it back by another 20 feet and extend either more parking or the landscaped area. He opposed the Fire Department's condition of 90 feet, and supported leaving it the way it is on the site plan. With regard to comment 8 (relocating the fire hydrants), he felt that as long as those standpipes are accessible to the truck, comments 7 and 8 can be deleted. He stated that they are not going to approve the building permits unless they have access 13 :\II~TTES PLANNI:\fG AND DEVELOP:\fENT BOARD BOY:\TO:\f BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8, 1996 to those standpipes. He felt putting them in front of the building was crazy. It is not something he would want to see when he walks into an attractive building. He felt comment 32 can be deleted. He pointed out that the applicant is responsible for the maintenance and it is entirely up to the applicant whether he has 5 feet or 20 feet. With regard to comment 46 (the elevation ot Walgreens), he saw no reason why any of the glass has to be transparent. With regard to comment 47, he felt some articulation should be added to the back of the buildings, it possible, but not too much because it can get too busy, He suggested that the applicant add some more landscaping in the worse areas (the areas closer to the right-ot-way) and do some staggered heights (8, 10, 12, and 14 feet) at planting time. He did not want to drive down Old Boynton Road and look at the back of the building above the wall and trees and see air handler units. With regard to comment 56. he agreed with the applicant. He stated that most of these tenants have demands on lighting that are in excess of anything that we would want for decorative purposes, and to install them both is a waste of money. Ms. Frazier said tonight many questions were raised, and she felt the department heads should attend these meetings to answer them. Chairman Dube realizes the department heads cannot attend every meeting. He suggested that they be a little more specific about why they make a particular comment. Motion Commissioner Aguila moved to approve the request for site plan approval to construct a 213.650 square foot retail center including five leased out parcel buildings on 22.885 acres, Boynton Commons PCD located on the southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue, subject to all staff comments and the following clarifications: · Comment 1 - to be resolved between the applicant and the Public Works Department for access; · Comment 7 - to be deleted (leave it as shown on the site plan); · Comment 8 - ensure that the standpipe connections are accessible to the Fire Department; other comment 8 is deleted; · Comment 46 - ensure that they comply with the 25 percent minimum window openings for the building elevations on Walgreens, and that can be done by false glass; 14 \lI:\TTES PL.\~~I~G A~D DEVELOP;\:IE:"lT BOARD BOY~TO~ BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 Comment 47 - ensure that by adding additional landscaping that they provide ample coverage. provide landscaping to buffer the rear elevations of the building, a combination of landscaping and architectural articulation: . Comments 56.59, and 60 - delete; . As much as possible, extend the west decorative wall on the west side of Sports Authority approximately 60 feet to the south where not in conflict with ground structures, and extend the hedge along with it: and . Add a continuous hedge on the west side of Major #4. Mr. Elsner seconded the motion. With regard to comment 32, Chairman Dubs stated that the Code was probably written on the basis of the City maintaining the lake. However, the City is not maintaining the lake in this case. Ms. Heyden stated that this requirement is in our planing regulations for all lakes, whether they are maintained by the City or not. She felt if Mr. Lelonek might be able to work out something with the City Engineer. Mr. Lelonek asked if it was possible to delete this condition and deal with the code requirements and Engineering on this item. Mr. Aguila suggested leaving this condition in and that the applicant comply with whatever is worked out. The motion carried 6-0. 2. Project: Burger King Restaurant - Shoppes of Woolbright PCD Morton Group, Inc. Howard Scharlin, Trustee Northeast corner of S. W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road Request for site plan approval to construct a 2,911 square foot restaurant with drive-thru on .918 acres within the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD. Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Michael Morton discussed the following staff comments: Comment 9: Proposed ingress/egress road Hby othersH shall be substantially constructed before the site is utilized. Thereafter. access (haul road) shall be provided before construction of Burger King begins. 15 --~~-~-~--"._-----_.._-----_._.__.--_._._- ( ( Page 5 Boynton Commons PUD NWSP 96-008 I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE ! REJECT I 40. To discourage vehicles parking or standing in the fire lanes, stripe a V six foot wide, cross-hatched area parallel with the curbed sidewalks encompassing the words "Fire Lane" (facing oncoming traffic). PARKS AND RECREATION Cor II II~nts: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST - : NONE l ,UI IIII~ PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 41. Received unconditional sign-off by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) staff on the rectified master plan drawings / submitted to show compliance with the conditions of approval for the Boynton Commons rezoning (File number REZN 96-001). The plans shall receive unconditional sign-off by all TRC staff prior to plat approval. 42. To avoid a problem with the location of landscape material / conflicting with the location of fire hydrants, amend the landscape plans to show and label fire hydrants. The landscape plans depict trees occupying the same space as fire hydrants; amend the plans accordingly. 43. Indicate on the elevation view drawings the type of material j proposed for the dumpster enclosure (#22). Also identify the color of the gate material by color name, color code and manufacturer. It is recommended that the color of the gates match the color of the walls of the enclosure. 44. Prior to permits being issued for building and site signage for the J project, the applicant shall process a site plan review application for sign program approval. The sign program shall depict signage in compliance with the regulations specified in the sign code and community desiQn plan.