The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE ~=n Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, June 8, 2000 . 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Ms, Lusia Galav City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Division P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310 Re: Bethesda Memorial Hospital New Parking Area Ordinances 000-15 and 000-16 Dear Ms. Galav, In the interest of time, our client would like to submit for Building Division review on the above referenced project. With regard to the rezoning and land use change ordinances adopted June 6, 2000, we understand they shall not become effective until 31 days after said adoption, pursuant to State Statutes, Section 163.3187. We further acknowledge that a Certificate of Occupancy (e.O.) cannot be issued until such ordinances become effective, Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~~ Project Coordinator xc: Jim Bellucy, Bethesda Memorial Hospital Q:\04430 I OOO\Corresp\Galav .doc . TEL 561 645 0665 FAX 561 863 8175 06/08/00 THU 15:19 FAX 561 86J 6392 K1MLE\-HOR'I ~001 ~=~ Kimley.Horn and Associates, Inc. 401 Et:lbarCiCe.r.D . W nve eSIPalm8eactl FI . ~340J ' Onua TEL 56t Bll~ {)GEs FAX \61 iSa 8115 Fax Transmittal To; L'USIll 6a/(:'I/ FinnA.ocalion:.&.y/7 ~/J ., P ~2' From; ;i?bt::! Wedl;i~~/) Original coming by mail: Yes;./ 1'10;_ Fax No,; 74Z- ~t5' Job No,; Dale; t!J th/')t! Z~()D If you have any problems, please caIlS':i '!-845-0665 and ask for. Total number of pages. including CXNer ,i:ileel: 2' ~8~ Comments: LU5/Q'I.. . L~ #fa!'" 0:5.. ~1L/~ ~~ 1l:~/;.'I:./q4 )liV/ ~/I~ -<I/' tI":}/) .:;.;.I~#rr -#- e~L_~ Q//dc.J 1./".. 10 mdVt:. I' I.ft:1rd. ~ r r/ll$ ,._15 _ oM( 1<<... .ddro... ,'nted _ .nd ..., 00l1li111 iIIIormalioll /tyf is COI1I_'. u,.. or. not ... ..1Indtd ,..."." Of thI ....,.. or .gsnImp( 'I'll"'" I<< lIIIl'I" .., ... .6Ito..... ,.. '" halGby noIiIild I/Ial .n, .....w. diU_. 4-' Of ~ oIlhis comll'I,""'ion is .,ridI, ptOhibIIod. If )'CfI1II1'I ""ived IIlis l/lCSimfl " ItfC(, plNse itrwneIbfely nofIy us by Ie/lpholl', IIId (jlllnn ... of;gm.1 ',cslmile 10 lIS ., lhe address ./love ... the V,S. Posta' 5o<I'oee, rh."" you, };lA/sf' O(H)O '5 06/08/00 THe 15:20 FAX 561 86~ 6392 KIMLEY-HORN ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, June 8, 2000 Ms, Lusia Galav City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Division P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310 Re: Bethesda Memorial Hospil;'\l New Parking AIea Ordinances 000-15 and 000-16 Dear Ms. Galav, In the interest of time, our cli"nt would like to submit for Building Division review on the above refe,:I.';nced project With regard to the rezoning and qUId use change ordinances adopted June 6, 2000, we understand they shall not become effective until 31 days after said adoption, pursuant to State,::tatutes, Section 163.3187. We further acknowledge that a Certificate of (,;'CCupancy (CO.) cannot be issued until such ordinances become effecti ve, Sincerely, KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIA rES, INC. :;-:::;>./7~1 /. /,,, ~~ vVW1::?{ Rodney J. al , PSM Project Coordinator xc: Jim Bellney, Bethesda Men! orial Hospital Q:\044301 OOO\Corresp\Galav .doc . TEL 511 l4S 0665 FAX 561 663 8175 /'/wst ~002 . +\31 EmNfcederoOllve WosIPakni.odl,Florlda 334117 5)- 0')5 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX: (561) 742-6259 F .., _ acslml e TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION to: ~ /1~(/Y), k:~JelL-~ fax#: (~/) Br;,3 -811~ () / date: tOt;, - Ci K' -('Y) from: .Lu",,# 6lALAV I SEJVlof2.. IL~ re: !5f2f./..1.ndt- ~ r~;(j pages: i! " including cover sheet. 1/$ ck~, 0... ~ 'if-- 7t.. 6f~ t&: oclO;7ha:- 0/- ~~ ~/-cI./lNd:. &~?~ ~v It.. 1/ J2.i~ ce..::hC<-o % I'fu2.- /?Jd. . /)0 ,c!. Sf 0 , IA~ 3/ d~ ~ 06-0~-_(x) WM~ t;:O-<J fu .ddL 0/- dotM~ ar Yu- ~Ur>ce , ~t Iv~ ~r - 9fr em ~ fZ(J~c11 ,la<..>J c4L(j . ~2-v--lJ' t-!t'v ~oywL2f1?V, . Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Rorida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 Section 163,3187 Page 3 of 4 (3)(a) The state land planning agency shall not review or issue a notice of intent for small scale development amendments which satisfy the requirements of paragraph (l)(c). Any affected person may file a petition with the Division of Administrative Hearings pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 120,57 to request a hearing to challenge the compliance of a small scale development amendment with this act within 30 days following the local government's adoption of the amendment, shall serve a copy of the petition on the local government, and shall furnish a copy to the state land planning agency. An administrative law judge shall hold a hearing in the affected jurisdiction not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days following the filing of a petition and the assignment of an administrative law judge. The parties to a hearing held pursuant to this subsection shall be the petitioner, the local government, and any intervenor. In the proceeding, the local government's determination that the small scale development amendment is in compliance is presumed to be correct. The local government's determination shall be sustained unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the amendment is not in compliance with the requirements of this act. In any proceeding initiated pursuant to this subsection, the state land planning agency may intervene. (b) I. If the administrative law judge recommends that the small scale development amendment be found not in compliance, the administrative law judge shall submit the recommended order to the Administration Commission for final agency action. If the administrative law judge recommends that the small scale development amendment be found in compliance, the administrative law judge shall submit the recommended order to the state land planning agency. 2. If the state land planning agency determines that the plan amendment is not in compliance, the agency shall submit, within 30 days following its receipt, the recommended order to the Administration Commission for final agency action. If the state land planning agency determines that the plan amendment is in compliance, the agency shall enter a final order within 30 days following its receipt of the recommended order. --J7' (c) Small scale development amendments shall not become effective until 31 days after adoption. If challenged within 30 days after adoption, small scale development amendments shall not become effective until the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission, respectively, issues a final order determining the adopted small scale development amendment is in compliance. (4) Each governing body shall transmit to the state land planning agency a current copy of its comprehensive plan not later than December I, 1985. Each governing body shall also transmit copies of any amendments it adopts to its comprehensive plan so as to continually update the plans on file with the state land planning agency. (5) Nothing in this part is intended to prohibit or limit the authority oflocal governments to require that a person requesting an amendment pay some or all of the cost of public notice. (6)(a) No local government may amend its comprehensive plan after the date established by the state land planning agency for adoption of its evaluation and appraisal report unless it has submitted its report or addendum to the state land planning agency as prescribed by s. 163.3191, except for plan amendments described in paragraph (I )(b). (b) A local government may amend its comprehensive plan after it has submitted its adopted evaluation and appraisal report and for a period of I year after the initial determination of sufficiency regardless of whether the report has been determined to be insufficient. (c) A local government may not amend its comprehensive plan, except for plan amendments described in paragraph (l)(b), if the I-year period after the initial sufficiency determination of http://www.leg.state.fj.us/citizen/documents/statutes/1998/chOI63/SEC3187_.HTM 03/17/2000 /J(Jxf uJ-m3 ,,,e\NSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 06/08/2000 14:25 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5&1375&259 TEL 5&1375&2&0 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 0&/08 14:24 98&38175 00:01:18 02 OK STANDARD DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning &- Zoning Engineering Occupational License Community Redevelopment June 9, 2000 &~ - tM ~~ ~\tZrrj ~ ~CW-(,X('v )j~U;5P 00 - d53 Russell Morrison Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Re: Bethesda Memorial Hospital Parking Expansion NWSP 00-003 Dear Mr. Morrison: As the applicant for the above-referenced project, enclosed please find your rectified plan that was approved by the City Commission. It has been signed-off to confirm that it accurately represents the approved site plan and that all staff comments have been addressed. Please make sure that the person managing your permit applications is aware of any remaining Development Order conditions which were specified to be met at the time of permit review and that the documents pertaining to those conditions are submitted with your permit package, Your copy of the signed-off rectified plan is to be submitted as part of your permit package to the Building Division, Sincerely, ~/Z- tJ~ Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning MWR/bw J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHAREO\VVP\PROJECTS\Bethesda Memorillll Hospital Parking Expans/onIP&Z LETTERHEAD,doc America's Gateway to the Gulfslream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Bnynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6260 FAX: (561) 742-6259 06/08/00 THl' 15:20 FAX 561 8f". ~392 KIMLEY-HORN ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, June 8, 2000 Ms. Lusia Galav City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Division P.O. Box310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310 Re; Bethesda Memorial Hospild New Parking Area Ordinances 000-15 and 000-16 Dear Ms. Galav, In the interest of time, our cli"nt would like to submit for Building Division review on the above refe,":nced project With regard to the rezoning and I ~ll1d use change ordinances adopted June 6, 2000, we understand they shall riot become effective until 31 days after said adoption, pursuant to State ::itatutes, Section 163.3187. We further acknowledge that a Certificate of Cttupancy (C.O.) cannot be issued until such ordinances become effective, Sincerely, KlMLEY.HORN AND ASSOCIA rES, INC. ~~4/~i::~ ROdney;. 7fa..~ PSM Project Coordinator xc: Jim Bellucy, Bethesda Mew orial Hospital Q:\044301 OOO\Corrcsp\Galav .doc . IEL 511 a45 066, FAX 561 663 6f7S [@002 . 4431 EmtwcederoOrlve W"IPalm 6.o:h, Flcfld. 33407 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning May 19,2000 rAlD ~-!locXOIS8+&S CYs /2SjOO Building Planning & Zoning Engineering Occupational License Community Redeve/qpmen/ Russell Morrison Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Re; Bethesda Memorial Hospital-Parking Lot NWSP 00-003 Dear Mr, Morrison; The above-referenced project received a 3rd TR plus benefits charged by staff for this review w Planning and Zoning Department, Make check affniVie on April 12, 2000. The hourly rate $112.40. P ase remit this amount to the e "City of Boynton Beach". , Please contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have additional questi 'tL ~U to!. t(~-h lrc . ~~_*(A. r1c).tJ-la~ Sincerely, ~~dakv Lusia Galav, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning --- LGfn1 J\SHRDA T A\Plannin.ll\SHAREOIWP'PROJECTS\Delhesda Memorial Hospital Parking EXp.!InS;OI1\Invoic= Lener doc America's Gateway to tlte GulfS/ream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. 80x 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (56l) 375.6260 FAX; (561) 375-6259 M/JSfl_ CO- 00:; 05/17/00 WED 09:23 FAX 561 863 --q2 RUtLEY-HORN I4i 001 .~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, ~;I</4 IT d~11 E....barCaCl!;'ro 0 W ~ (We e..1Palm Beach.,FIo" 33407 .,(1.1 --"'" rCl 56\ 84, 0665 'AX 561 863 6175 Fax Transmittal To:Y'A ~// FirmlLocalion: C"'!J' ~ .,~..""A~'" From: R.,.,I' )t./a//.,.,!!" FaxN~,: 74 Z- flZ45. Job No.: Dale: !$ / /~ Original coming by mail: Yes: _ No: ~ If you have any problems, please call fi,:1-84500665 and ask lor: )f t8()~ Total number of pages, including cover "heet: Z Comments: ~", or ~'f,:'/~e.-D"k .,tk dY'MI!'~t!!~,~ ,.,~~ I (r- ~) tl'U, :"~~ 7'2 ~ ylLJ /> /qe:- I",., 4'$ A'7tRrkq' 'P~I!:',t, A~&I ' ~/RA.s, ~;I::S ~~ /~ .t:~l~ $"~ ~ ~ ~ ,.Aet' ~e:-q/k" 11 t~: ;II') ,; / ~#i?e-~ $D M~f ,tAt!. Ae>k ~~// k If? ..Pq./,t D.,t1. ~ &.n? Je,i,-VVt::: 'h~,; "PJ/"'A 5 .5"ultJ".u-H~/ ~I" tll:t',. /~ .!'~::~ .,..P,....... "", ;" "" , Adet; 6~//>i I:: / tA//// /t' V;I S~ 'L')' ~urh erI- ~~ ~~/fJ.,~ ,,::'/vsl.. *qd'<('/, 4'c; eP~ et.l~~t!q. 4~.~ r ( Tills Qcsimlle is i1_ tlnIy lor 1M _.., ".._ /lOr... and may _taln inlormaliol1 thai is coNideIlriot U )'011 are noI/he in/ended tiqJient <K 1M ~ fN aQIIII '"11""- lor delivety 10 /he a_.... )'011 "" h<<eI>( 1lOI;r1ed !IIat any ,....w. _lion, fIiIt:ItJotn. Dr eopyittg d /his CO" municat... is .l1i<lfy ptOh/bIted. If """ III.. __ fI1is tacrimIIe ., -. pleas. immediately nolify U$ by lelop/Kl<l., and ,"!".;1In /he "';gin.1 l.csimlJo ro U$ althe .l1rI,... abo"" via the V,S. Pas,,! Service. Thank you 05/17/00 WED 09:24 FAX 56l 86~ -392 ;Pi' Both..da M~/lIorJal Hospltal- Parklne NWSI> Oo-OO3 E'ago 2 of3 K1MLEY-HORN "i,.. DEPARTMENTS CLUDE X S. Tho plans should IJldicaro which ,,{th. Sluh Pill" (14), ,:abaI Palms (3), Banyan (I) 8Jld Camphor (2) trees will be preserved. relOCllllld '"'' removodlreplaood olllbe ,i'.. There arc a tlll8J of twenty (20) e"lsUl1lllrco" whit;11 should be indicated on Ibe plen.l. PLANNING AND ZONJ.NG Cornmen1Jl: 6, On 1110 oitel:plM. Provide a dlmCll5lon Cor a typiaal peri(i':Ig slllll width, (City drawlnll !I'D-gOO 1%). x 7. Loeate and label tl1c site Ifian '" on the x 8, Provide a note on tho Lal:Idocape PI"" .!Ulng lhot . miflliJIIlUlD ol50" of..-.quirod lantins ull.terilll is native 0 vies, (COIll Plan POU'!l::.4.4$) x 9. x 10. C mulch is lIot _itte<l. Rovloo note on Lands"", e PJ.n Dotall shoot (\ of 7. x 1.1.. RlIPleu all or .""". oflbo Sl~ Pille 1l1:OI prOjlOlOo1 for,' '110 required perimeleo'lrc" X a10n S~""""t Blvd. S.B. 24" An, au.d S.Il, 2$. AVO.ri'lltlt. c !roe Live (8)(. 12, Whote foMlble, pl.cellle hedll. OD the outslde of !bet': "'I~lred buffer wall, 04jaCClJlt X to the resldmtial zonod 0 and I or construct AID",," dec<l1lllive buftisr wll.U. 1 J, Placo required J'Bplaccmeor trees along lll.lDolde of tbJI ll\ltl'er wll.U ..u_to X to U<i fixtures. 17, Ptov!<;le!r!!fflc ~B"' lit d1CIexlr(s) wI1lcb d/nlct vat'll. 'w...",d S.........t Boulevard and X ,_ tram tbe residentlalllBl Qmood. 18. In.11,Ide meuure. to mitigate myadvcno Impacts oftlll,,: silo II&btlni on the atijICent ,X res.ldetltial p such as timers and t .hkldo. ADDmONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDrnONS 16. 1'0 be determined, /41002 REJECT ~=~ Engineering Planning and Enwonmenlal Coosullan~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Transmittal Date: I!> MAy 00 Job No: To: t.LI~/A t$,ALAV. $'k!. PlANNE2' CI7y D~ 1)0 YNTD/V e,eACt-/ 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Flonda 33407 TEl 407 845 0665 FAX 407 863 8175 We are sending you i!l"A'ttached o Shop dlawings o o Under separate cover via o Prints/plans 0 Samples o Specifications Cqies Date No, Oescrip/ion C PtA , These are transmitted as checked below: 6'For your use [;((requested o Resubm~ o Submit o ApplllVed as submitted o Approved as noIed o Returned for corrections o Return o For review and comment Remarks \he toIIowing items: o Change order copies for approval copies for tlstribution corrected prints Copy to ./1/<- / _~M~~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning &: Zoning Engineering Occupational License Community Redevelopment May 9, 2000 Russell Morrisson 2815 S. Seacrest Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 Re: FileNo; Location; Bethesda Memorial Hospital (Parking Expansion) NWSP 00-003 Southeast comer of Seacrest Boulevard and 24th A venue and extending south to SE 25th Avenue Dear Mr. Morrison: Enclosed is the City of Boynton Beach Development Order for site plan approval granted on May 2, 2000. To continue this project through the development process, please submit to this office four (4) sets of rectified plans. A rectified plan is a site plan revised to incorporate all applicable conditions of approval, except those clearly specified to be met at time of permit review, A person managing your permit applications should be made aware of any such conditions and submit required documents with your permit package. Additional engineering plans or other pages which will be required for your permit package but were not part of the approved site plan set should not be submitted with the rectified site plan sets. Please note that a rectified plan must be signed off by all TRC members prior to submittingfor building permits. Our staff is committed to speedy and efficient completion of your site plan rectification process. However, failure to meet all applicable conditions in the first rectified plan submission will require further revisions and subsequent reviews by the TRC members and thus produce unnecessary delays. Feel free to contact any TRC member for additional clarification of comment( s). Your copy of the signed-off rectified plan is to be submitted as part of your permit plan package to the Building Division. America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 Eas. Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Bos 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259 Imoortant: If you plan to introduce any changes to your approved site plan over and above those required by conditions of approval, please contact our staff before submitting a rectified plan set, All modifications to the site plan must be evaluated by our staff and processed accordingly. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office at (561) 742-6260. Sincerely, -/1-<{/G- Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning MWRfnl l'\SHRDATA\PJanning\SHARED\wP\PR01ECTS\BethcsdaINWSP-PARKtNG\Startdard Development Otder Lettet2.doc DEVELOPME~ :JRDER OF THE CITY COMMISS. ~ Ot CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~:~-- ~ .. PROJECT NAME: BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (PARKING) : U ~ \ "-~ ;\Jut ~\AY - A' 1 ~ ~... -,-"" '-.....:~,'-~;:...... ........ / ;;;;,- - APPLICANT'S AGENT: Russell Morrison, Kimley~Horn & Associations .;-,~--. - ...--,..-.--....-..'. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 2815 Seacrest Boulevard ..-~-----..~. . DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: May 2,2000 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: New Site Plan LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Southeast corner of Seacrest Boulevard and SE 24th Avenue and extending south to SE 25th Avenue DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. X THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows: OR THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above, The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1, Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ~HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3, The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included". 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby ~ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced In paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5, This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6, All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7, Other \\\\\\\'dIl!IIIIII/1 ,,:-,, o'{ NT ON II/~ " -:) I) 'l ~ ~ ....~~OAA..~.. <"." % =: u /<JJ ;0'" (') ~ ::: >- '3 )" ;I: E = I- : = %"0 \.. "\ 9'2.0... ff ~. ..........,.,..~ ~ ~ " ... \0 ~ '0 '""leI?- ~....'\. '/11 \\'\ /1111/1/1111\\11\ ~~~~~A~_ . City Clerk J:\SHRDAT A\Plannlrlg\SHAREOIWP\PROJECTSIBettleSda\NVVSP.PARKING\OeveICP,Order CC 5-2-OO.doc DATED: -3;4/a7 EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Aooroval Project name: BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - PARKING LOT EXPANSION File number: NWSP 00-003 Reference: Revised 2nd review Comments New Site Plan. File # NWSP 00-003 with a Aorill!. 2000 Plannin!! and Zonin!! Deoartment date stamo markin!! DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: NONE X UTILITIES Comments: NONE X FIRE Comments: 1. The Fire Department will need to have emergency access to this gated parking facility X pursuant to ordinance No, 98-45, Section 9-15 which address security gates, POLICE Comments: 2, The Police Department will also need to have emergency access to this gated parking X facility. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 3, Specify on the Landscape Plan that the perimeter hedge abutting S.E. 24" Ave" X Seacrest Blvd. and S.B. 25" Ave. shall have a minimum height of four (4) feet within one year of maturity and shall be maintained at a minimum height of five (5) feet. (Ch, 7.5, Art, 11, Sec. 2 and Sec. 5 E) BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 4. Permits are required to construct the improvements that are shown on the approved X site plan. Permit application forms are available in the Building Division of the Development Department. A permit submittal checklist is available in the Building Division, The list identifies the basic documents that the Plans Analyst checks for when an applicant submits for permit review. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE X FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALlST Comments: Beth~sda Memorial Hospital- Parking NWSP 00-003 Page 2 00 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 5, The plans should indicate which of the Slash Pines (14), Sabal Palms (3), Banyan X (I) and Camphor (2) trees will be preserved, relocated or removed/replaced on the site. There are a total of twenty (20) existing trees, which should be indicated on the plans. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 6, On the site plan. Provide a dimension for a typical parking stall width. (City X drawing #B-90012), 7, Locate and label the site triangles on the landscape plan. (Ch, 7.5, Art. 11, Sec. 5.H) X 8, Provide a note on the Landscape Plan stating that a minimum of 50% of required X planting material is native species. (Comp, Plan, Policy 4.45) 9, Provide a note on the Landscape Plan indicating the type of irrigation and source of X water, City water is not pemitted, (Ch, 4, See, 7, C) 10. Cypress mulch is not pemitted. Revise note on Landscape Plan Detail sheet 6 of 7. X II. Replace all or some of the Slash Pine trees proposed for the required perimeter trees X along Seacrest Blvd" S,E. 24'" Ave, and S.E. 25'" Ave, with a canopy tree Live Oak. 12. Where feasible, place the hedge on the outside of the required buffer wall, adjacent X to the residential zoned property and I or construct a more decorative buffer wall. 13, Place required replacement trees along the inside of the buffer wall adjacent to X proposed lighting fixtures, 14, Label the required landscape buffer on the Landscape Plan sheet 5 of 7, X ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS IS, Amend comment # 3 to read: "Specity on the Landscape Plan that the perimeter X hedge abutting S.E. 24'" Ave., Seacrest Blvd. and S,E. 24'" Ave, shall have a height of four (4) feet within one year of maturity and shall be maintained at a height of four (4) feet, (Ch. 7.5, Art. 11, Sec. 2 and Sec. 5." 16, Explore the possibility of providing a second entrance for the parking lot on SE 25'" X A venue to provide for a better distribution of traffic flow on and off the site, 17. Provide traffic signs at the exit(s) which direct traffic toward Seacrest Boulevard and X away from the residential neighborhood. 18, Include measures to mitigate any adverse impacts of the site lighting on the adjacent X residential property such as timers and light shields. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 16. T6 b", d...t~lR :~""rl /lhNI!: V DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning May 19, 2000 Building Planning & Zoning Engineering Occupational License Contml/nity Redevelopment Russell Morrison Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 443 I Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Re: Bethesda Memorial Hospital-Parking Lot NWSP 00-003 Dear Mr. Morrison: The above-referenced project received a 3rd TRC staffreview on April 12,2000. The hourly rate plus benefits charged by staff for this review was $ I 12.40, Please remit this amount to the Planning and Zoning Department. Make checks payable to the "City of Boynton Beach". Please contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have additional questions. Sincerely, ~Y\d.J^v Lusia Galav, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Michael W, Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning LG/nl J:I.SHRDA T A\PlanningISHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Bethesda Memorial Ho~pital i>arking Expans.ion\Il1voice Lenerdoc America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259 /W/:,f- DO-OO'1 I! . ~rdD-- 3(J. ~v.. ---..--....-~ k.ev/fu if. iro~1rt!f, t1b ~dRu 8.1-5" L~ C,-zQrA/' 3(. 2 ~ yn\~ ?'1f 'S5. {p2., ~ /12, LJS?-- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-116 FROM: TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal / Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Officer Rob Riggle, Police Department Lusia Galav, Planning Division (hi.C @ ~ 11 03 - Michael W. Rumpf JB ~~L~V,>L2 ~ Planning and Zoninlfbirector TO: DATE: May 3,2000 RE: 3,d Review - New Site Plan Project - Bethesda Memorial Hospital Location - SE Corner of Seacrest & SE 24th Ave. & NE Corner of Seacrest & 25th Ave, Agent - Russell Morrison, Kimley -Horn & Assoc. File No. NWSP 00-003 Please document your review time and calculated cost based on your hourly rate plus benefits, for the 3,d review on the above reference project This project was reviewed at TRC on April 12, 2000. Please provide me with this documentation no later then Monday May 8, 2000, /'II; " f ~ Of>. rYJ3 , Williamson, Blythe Rumpf, Michael Wednesday, May 03,2000 12:51 PM Galav Lusla: Williamson Blythe FW: 3rd Review - New!:l't PI I e an (Bethesda Memorial Hospital NWSP 00-003 I copied both of you as I wasn't certain who should receive it. -~-Origlnal Message--~ From' H II h . Sent: a a an, KeVin To' . Wednesday, May 03, 200012:13 PM S . Rumpf, Michael ub)ect: RE' 3rd Review N ' , . ew Site Plan (Bethesda Memorial Hospital NWSP 00-003 3'd R . eVlew - New Site Plan . Project - Bethesda Memorial Hospital Location _ ~~e~orner of Seacrest & SE 24th Ave. & NE Corner of Seacrest & 25th From: Sent: To: Subject: RE: Fee calculation: Forester I Environmentalist: 1 hour' @ $36 79 ($27 25 I $9 54 ' , . ,p us ' benefits) 1 Iv-- 51.1\). ()O t From: Sent: To: Subject: Doroen, DOL) Wednesday, May 03, 2000 1:33 PM Williamson, Blythe RE: 3rd Review _ New Site Plan (Bethesda Memorial Hospital NWSP 00-003 Base fee of $35 per hour; review time of 15 minutes: $8.75. Bobby _____Original Message----- From: Williamson, Blythe Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 11 :39 AM To: Borden, Bob; Hallahan, Kevin; Riggle, Rob; Galav Lusia Subject: 3rd Review _ New Site Plan (Bethesda Memorial Hospital NWSP 00-003 <<Pile: 3rd Review Memo (TRCj.doc(Bethesda).doc>> Williamson, Blythe From: Sent: To: Subject: Borden, Bob Wednesday, May 03, 2000 1:33 PM Williamson, Blythe RE: 3rd Review - New Site Plan (Bethesda Memorial Hospital NWSP 00-003 Base fee of $35 per hour; review time of 15 minutes = $8.75. Bobby -----Original Message----- From: Williamson, Blythe Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 11:39 AM To: Borden, Bob; Hallahan, Kevin; Riggle, Rob; Galav Lusia Subject: 3rd Review - New Site Plan (Bethesda Memorial Hospital NWSP 00-003 <<File: 3rd Review Memo (TRC).doc(Bethesda).doc>> .0'&-th6 .:L: C-JWlitWlJOn 1 /V1.v5f-ev- co] DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Engineering Occupational License Communily Redevelopment March 16, 1999 Russell C. Morrison, P.E. Kimley-Hom & Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Re: Bethesda Parking Lot Expansion Results of Pre-Application Meeting of March 8, 1999 Dear Mr, Morrison: In response to your request, I have provided the following summary or documentation for the above-referenced meeting. With respect to the plans for the east side of the property, you will recall that staff recommended that owners of adjacent property be contacted to obtain information relative to support of, or opposition toward the desired expansion to the parking lot. It is the intent that this early contact facilitate possible negotiations to address needs of both parties. As for the west side expansion plan, including the rezoning of property, I must respond negatively. The rezoning of Lots 1-5 would represent an encroachment into this stable single family subdivision. This change would alter the current, continuous boundary that exists between the two zoning districts, establish precedence from which future changes to this boundary could be justified, and allow the impact of the hospital to penetrate into this single family neighborhood. For the reasons stated herein, city staff could not support the rezoning of parce1s1-5 for hospital parking. I trust I have adequately responded to your request; however, please contact me if you need additional information. Sincerely, 7VL- c.-:."2..- Michael W. Rumpf Planning and Zoning Manager MWR:kcw J :\SHRSDA T AIPLANNINGISHAREDI WPICORRESPONDENCEIBETHESDA IMORRISON,DOC 100 East lIaynton Beach Blvd.. P.Q.IIa. 310 Bnyntnn Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259 ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. m ~:\: :rW, ~ m PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT March 9,1999 Mr. Mike Rumpf Senior Planner City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Bethesda Parking Lot Expansion Dear Mr, Rumpf, Per our discussion at the pre-application meeting on March 8. our client, Bethesda Memorial Hospital is interested in expanding parking to the area of Lots 1-5, as indicated on the attached survey. Bethesda requests your opinion on this issue in order to decide on whether or not to proceed with the rezoning of these lots for future development of the parking area. Please provide a written opinion of this proposed development at your earliest convenience. Please call me at (561) 840-08 I 9 if you have any questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~C.~ Russell C. Morrison, P.E. Q:\MORRISON\BETHESDA lrumpfl ,LET.doc . TEl 561 845 0665 fA)( 561 863 8175 . 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach,Florida 33407 --- _._~ -~ r "',- I \ ~ \ \ \ \ 'i. \ \ ~r~":"'."~. </ A'?JP wI!. ~". t't'1J1l l ~ '!{ ~ ;:-btM/t/ . ~tJt</ 1<'t1t::? ,', /.s;-- :.( -<"d ~r............ "''''''' CMAIN I.-Ihlk. r:~t. (J4. 8/ L DI I ~ ill 32 . ~~ 3>4 b' 't> <i N I \ \ ~\ '\ 't\ , ~ \~ \ .~ \ llJ~ ~ ~ 6 · t;; II J \ L ~! <j 'ii.'<il. ~\ 7- ~ \ ~ ~ \ ~ t , w i I \~ '" \~ ;:t, h\ ~ ~\ ~\ \ \ \\ ~ ~ tl( ~ ~ ~ ( , " '=> '-l \ ,~ ". 4 \, \t) ~() ~ ,,' \ pJt/;'/O {'~/IIr:RtIA r/((/'; , ;Yt",;l/~Me,;f//, \ ,lJe~6' ~~---- " . ,OS.-:g5/00 09: 39 FAX 561 863 75 KI!lLEY B:ORN ~ RALE I GI/ IilJ003 DEPART~mNTOFDEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning May 19,2000 BldidJq """"inIl . Z<I,.". EIII/JI_r ~LI...... 0I_11/ty illdll'eIcp_ Russell Morrison Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 i ..~,,' i",-" 3 0 L oi~":;:--:-.'''- _"_., 1...1..l'1!~I\lil';C r'il.fD ..,.. tONING OE?r. Re: Bethesda Memorial Hospital-Parking Lot NWSP 00-003 Dear Mr. Morrison: The above-referenced project received a 3rc1 TRC staff review on Apri112, 2000. The homly rate plus benefits charged by staff for this review was $112.40. Please remit this amount to the Planning and Zoning Department. Make checks payable to the "City of Boynton Beach". Please contact me at (561) 742-6260 uyou have additional questions. Sincet'ely, d~@v Lusia Oalav, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Michael W. Rumpf, Director afPlancing and Zoning PA'( p;'\,{ Su rJ~ ? &? 0 ,A ~ -n:> I'-J<J '\ '17l: L A i,( p:( rz {l...-l II "'7 J S."-'\ I rr 11.. L LaIn! J:\.IHaD^TA"''-'i~W'N'IlOm,:T3\8''__w.ai&l.HalclkllPIlkiPIP.......U''''''L.:tNr.doa AmerU:4'3 a_flY 10 the Gulft_ JDii'fJi.Y.i"1Ioadl IDViL, P.o. Box 310 1Joy.....1leocII, _ JJol%U310 P...... (561) 37506160 ~ FAX: (561) 37U29 ~=n ~., t........," ,~ '~~~\ ".:;i Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, Uu][ ~. NAY - 4 2000 C .\J;-'II,\,!lr'~' , I, . 1.,.-" ~.. ' May 2, 2000 . 4431 Embarcadero Drive WeslPalmBeach,Florida 33407 Mr. Ken Hall City of Boynton Beach Engineering Department 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Re: Bethesda Memorial Hospital Proposed Parking Addition East of Seacrest Blvd., Between SE 24 and SE 25 Avenues Project No. 044301000 Dear Mr. Hall: We wish to inform you that the drainage calculations for the above referenced project have been revised as described below, improving (lowering) staging elevations, 1. The "Average" Water Table, previously shown as 5 feet NGVD, has been adjusted according to the geotechnical reports to 8 feet NGVD. This elevation actually reflects "historical high" water table. Because this elevation is lower than the 6 foot maximum from ground (8.8 NGVD) permissible by SFWMD, it has no bearing on the remainder of the calculations. The SCS Curve Number does not change. 2, The storm stages and discharges were recalculated based upon the design exfiltration trench section. The area of the design section is greater than the original presumed 5' x 5' section. This has lowered the staging elevations. The site grading was not adjusted providing an additional safety factor during the design storm events. The revised calculations are attached, Also attached is SFWMD Permit Approval for District Application 000419-13. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~T~wl h~1 . c/ aVid M. Boyer, ,E. FL PE No, 43226 Attachments Q:\044301000\Corresp\Calcs Ltr.doc . TEL 561 845 0665 FAX 561 863 8175 --.. - - . - - - ..- V:::~:~~:~1,~ ';-~~>. ~i~:,... ; ~~. ~Q.? r.' _.-to..... ~~'-~-_\'> SOUTH FlORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 3301 Cun Club Road, Wcs~ Pnlm Tkach, Fklrid.13.~ . (561) (\Rti-8800 . FL W A.1'5 1-8OlJ..432-2045 - TOO (561) 697-2574 Mililing AddTNS: P.O. Box 24680. W~l Palm Bench. FL3341&-4680 . 'Ww~sfwmd.goy CON 24-06 District Application 000419-13 April 27, 2000 David M. Boyer, P.E, Kimley-Hom & Associates, Inc, 8('11 P_.:...~b.. P~.1",8__I~._..d, 8_:l_'" J..I.......iIIJ>. rb. Iliilli Dear Ms. Boyer: SUbjec:t: No Notice General Pennlt BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PARKING EXPANSION. Palm Beach County Section 33, Township 45 South, Renge 43 East District staff has given a cursory review of the information submitted on April 19, 2000 for the above referenced project. Pursuant to Rule 4OE-4oo.315, Flol1da Administrative Code (FAC), it appesl'S that your project qualifies for a "No Notice General Permit for Activities in Uplands." Any off-site impacts, changes In land use, or future modifications to the activities may require review by the District. . A copy of Rule 40E-400.315 is enclosed for your Information. Please use this in the determination of notification requirements for future projects. This does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining all necessary Federal. State. Local or special District authorizations prior to the start of any construction. If you have any questions or require further assistance. please contact Carlos DeRojas, P,E. at 5811682-8505. Sincerely, BllIt1 CoIII'IeCd lio Rellullltory Support Supervisor Regulatory Information Management DIvision Environmental Resource Reguletion BC/mw Endosures "- , c: Palm Beach County Engineer Mh::h..i CoUinl. (1nrirm." Midwf'l D. Minton. Vir., Chmrnlllrl Mit<hell W. IlorJter Vt."R M. CuM t;emrdo B. Fmlande2i P.trick J. Gleason Nicol./ls J. Cutiertcz.. It'. Harkl.y R. Thomlon 'n'udi](. Wil1iDtnlI EX!CU1'lVE OmCE mnk R. Pinch. P.E.. P;n<nlrl", DiJT."CIDf J.vnIL'I 6. Blount, CJrirfnfStllff GoVERNING BlJ.'.RD . , , I !'IO NOTICE "-"Il ,"onCED CESDlAI. E.""1Il0~'ME~7 4,L U:SlWllCE PEIQolTTS CIU.PTUtOE_ n_1 Subplr1 B: No Nollee ~neral EDVlrorunentlll Resouru Pennlts 4OE-400.315 No Notice General Permit for Activities ID VpIaDds. (I) A no notice general pennit Is hereby granted for the c:onslrllction or alteration 'of minor systems located enlRly within uplands, provided that r.he proposed system meels all ,of.' the following criteria; (a) the 10lal project aru is less than 10 acn:s; (b) the IOtal project area involves less r.han 2 acres of impervious surface; (c) no activities will impact wetlands or olher surfacc waters; (d) no ac:tivities arc conducted in. on, or over wctlands or olher surface waters; (e) drainage facilities shall not include pipes with diamete~ grealer Ihan 24 inches or t.'1c hydraulic: equivalenl and shalInol utilize: pumps in any manner; (0 the proj~t is nOI pan of a larger common plan of development or sale (2) A no notice general pennlt is ~ereby granted for the constrUction or alteration of surface water ltWlagemenl systems, providlfljl r.hat the surface waler managemenl system meets all of r.he conditions of subs~tion (a), below, and all r.hrc:sholds and conditions of at least one of the subsections (b), (c), or (d), below, (a) General Conditions I. The surface water management system design plans must be signed and scaled by a Florida Regislered Professional Engineer, if required by Chapter 471. F.S. 2. The surfaee water management syslem must meel Ihe criteria specified in Rule, 40E-4.301. F,A.C. and applic:able local requirements, 3. Except as allowed for in Rule 40E-40.04I(7), F.A.C., the project must not be located in natllral water bodies, viable wetlands habilal, waters of Ihe state, Dr a Florida Outstanding Waler as lisled in Rule 62-302,700, F.A,C. 4. The pennillee must have obtained a works of the District pennit pu~uanl to Chapler 4OE-6. F.A.C.. if Ihe projecl proposes to connec:t wir.h, place Structurcs in or across or otherwise make IIse of works of the District. (b) Thresholds and Additional Conditions Within Dade County. I. The project must have less than 40 acres toW land area with positive stormWalcr oUlfall or less than 320 ac:res tow land area and less than 160 aeres of impervious area with no positive stonnwater outfall. 2. The projecI and surface waler management system must have been approved by the Dade County Dc:panmenl of Environmental Resource Management or its successor agency subsequenl to October 2, 1977. (c) Thresholds and Addhional Conditions Within Palm Beach County. I. The projecl musI have less Ihan 40 acn:s lOW land uc:a. 2. The project and surface "'aler management system must have been approvcd by Palm Beaeh County subsequent 10 October 2, 1977. (d) Thresholds and Additional Conditions Within Collier County, I, The project must have less than 40 aeres total land uc:a, 2. The projecl and surface water ltWlagement system must have been approved by Collier Counly subsequent 10 Seplember 17, 1980, SplI:lfi< AUlhoriry 31l.o.w. 313.113. 313.118. 313,\71. ~3,813. 403.814 F.S, t..o"'lmpl.m.n,.d 31l.118, 31).4!3. )13,416.373.426. F,S, HJSloty--I'oI.W 1~).95, Bethesda Memorial Hospital Parking Expansion SFWMD Site Drainage CalcuI8tlonPfOOl1l",u~~IlIOO Given J, Swisher 4/26/00 Total 1,444 Ac Impervious Buildings o Ac , ... Other Impervious 1,14 Ac 79% Ponds Ac Pervious 0.304 Ac 21% FF Elev. o NGVD Roads 16 NGVD A, Quality 1 Compute nrst Inch of runoff 0,120 Ac-ft 2 Compute 2.5 Urnes the percentage of ImpelViousness a Site Area for water quality pervious!impervious b ImpeNlous Area for water quality peNiousJimpeNious c Percentage of ImpeNlousness d For 2.5 inches times percentage imperviousness e Compute Volume required tor Water quality detention = inches to be treated x (total sfte -lakes) 1.444 Acres 1.14 Acres 78.95 % 1.974 In 0.238 Ac-ft Q,238IAc-ft 3 Controlling Volume for Weter Quality De/en/ion 4 Pretreatment (If neeeiad) Is this site discharging directly to a sensitive receiving body? and is it more than 40% impervious? If so, it will have to provide at least 0.5 inches of dry detention pretreatment Pretreatment reqjulrements = 0,5 in, x (total site -lakes) Required lake volume = Total required detention - pretreatment Ac-ft a No b Ac-ft c B, SCS Curve Number 1 2 Average water table Lowest Finished Grade Highest Finished Grade Average Site Grade Average Depth to the Water Table (6' max) Assuming 25% Compaction and given Avg Depth to Water Table Enter in the inches of moisture that can be stored in the soil fram the soil storage table. Available Soil Storage = Storage Available x Impervious Areas Convert from available soil storage to site-wide moisture storage(S) S ;:: available soil storage onsite I site area SCS CUNe Number, CN CN = 1000 I (S+10) 8 NGVD 15,5 NGVD 16,5 NGVD 16 NGVD 6ft 3 4 5 6 14.45 In 0,366067 Ac-ft 3.04 in 7 76,71 = CN K:\Swisher\Four Comers\Stomuls 4126100 C. Project Surface Storage Assumptions: 1) Lake storage begins at a control elevation which is the given wet season water table elevation 2) Lake storage is vertical over the lake surface area. 3) Site Storage is linear starting at the Top of Bank (TOB) to the Finished Floor Elevation (FF E1.) AWT T INLET 2 Area of Developed SKe Grading = Total Area - (lakes + buildings) Stage Storage Chart 1.4 Ac Stage Trench (It-NGVD) (Ao-Ft) Site Grading (ao-It) Total (ao-It) 8 0 0 0 0 8.5 0 0 0 0.00 9.5 0.15 0 0 0.15 10,5 0,32 0 0 0.32 11,5 0,51 0 0 0.51 12.5 0,73 0 0 0.73 13,5 0,96 0 0 0.96 14.5 0,96 0 0 0.96 15.5 0.96 0 0 0,96 16 0.96 (( 1 11 )x 1.4 ac)x( 1 fII2)= 0,18 1,14 16.5 0.96 (( 1,0 11 )x 1.4 ac)x( 1.0 fII2)= 0,72 1,68 Spillover 16,5 AWT Average Water Table TOB Top of Bank Spillover Elev. Where water spills over onto street 8 15,5 16,5 D. Water Quality Storage 1 2 Volume required for Water Quality From the Stage-Storage Curve the elevation is at 0.238 Ao-It. 10,0INGVD E. 3 Year - 3 Day Event 1 Rainfall Amount a Rainfall amount for a 3-Year, 1 Day Event Rainfall amount for a 3-Year, 3 Day Event* . From City Comments ot 3/16/00 b Runolf(Q) in inches for the lD-Year, 3-Day Event c Runoff Volume 2 Zen>-Discharge (3-Yr-72Hr) stage corresponding to stage-storage curve is = 1 DAY'1,359 6,50 in 8,83 in 6,00 in 0,72 Ao-Ft 0,7 Ao-It /rom the 12,5 NGVD K:\Swisher\Four Comers\Stomucls 4/26/00 IV. A. 1 2 3 4 5 B. a b CHECK STORM STAGES AND DISCHARGES Minimum building floor elevations Rainfall of 1DO-year 3-day storm Inches of Runoff, Q (P-{0.2 x 5))" (P . (0.8 x 5)) Volume of Runoff (in, of runoff) x Project Area '-... From the Stag&-Storage CUlVe the Volume of runoff corresponds to an elevation Proposed minimum floor elevation Is the proposed minimum floor elevation acceptable? Minimum road elevation The minimum road grade must be at least 2 feet above controle'evation, Control Elevation = Water Table Mimimum Proposed Road Elevation Is the proposed minimum road elevation acceptable? K:\Swishel'lFour Comers\Storm.xls 16 in 12,85 in of Runoff 1.55 Ac-Ft 16.381NGVD o No 8 NGVD 15.5 NGVD Ves 412&100 o~ ~ ~ D :> on o - ;z " e ~ '" g f-< 5 " 0 * e '" 0 P'l 0 0:; .,.; ~ .=: ~ II '" "" " ~ 0 .\! ~ ~ ~ .., ~ ~ ] ..c " " ~ ~ f-< on 11 N :r: ~D 0 0 0 ;z u '" ! e " ~ " u g e " 'OJ '" ~ 0 ~ 0 0:; P'l .=: "" ~ ~ .!l ~ " I ..c -S1 .;; ~ ~ .., ..c " " " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ II 0 ~ :t' ~ -< Z N" ~ 0 ~ " on ..... 0 <;; ~ ..... ~ " 00 0 00 ~ 8 N .... :r: 0 r"'l 0 ~ 00 on on on on .... 0 on .... onoon '" ('!j ~ ~ .,.; M 00 <;; .... .,.; 0 0. ~ = 00 .;:, "l " N - - 0 ~ 00 ~ .;:, 0 Z + '" ~ '" 0. '" C3 ~ "l 'i' 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ N ~ o-l ..... :r: + ~ ~ ::r: N ~ f-< N+ ~ 0 ~ " ... ~ 0 -... 0 tI :;, Ii: N Ii: ::r: 6 0 iii 0 :r: 0 <(<( " 'i' - <=> ~ ~ " ~ :t' '" ~ :>:> " 0 0 .-l 0 N:;, o-l ~ '" :t' + ~ <If ::I:: 00 0 o-l on '" ~ " 'i' .... " a " "l 0. ~ 0 u :0 Ii: Ul 0 <;; ..... .~ N"" ~ ~ 0 f-< ~ ~ ~ N .c ~ :t' :r: bO ~ on -< ~ <is If .5 " N <;; Ii: ~ ~ " , ;:; ~ ~ u ti 11 " ~ " " o-l :> ~ ~ .;,,; 0 'il <(<( :~ Ii: .;- 5 :> :> 0 .~ ~ ..d'~::g " - 00 <:>:: " " U 11 11 bJl "- '" ~ " ..c .<;; '" ~ ~ ~ e e ...,g o.~f- f:: o-l o-l X '" ~ " ," 0 " ... " " " " "..c ~ ~ u:; 'OJ ..c ~ .soo - " .0 a ~ ~ 0 Ul = ~ " ..c 0 " ~ f-< "':>:> .;;U '" " ~ "Oi Ul ~ " ~ ,,0 ~ ~ " " " ~ <is .... " e e ~ .~ f-< 0 0 ::2 e ~ 0 0 'OJ,,, 11 11 0: 11 ~ " " '3 ~ " B .-l (!, 0- ::> " '" .... e ..c e e ..c E! f o-l o-l ..c '0 :> r"'l ~ " 0 " " ~ ..c - 0 0 " .-l ~ " " 0 " ~ Cd " -a :Jl a '5. "- " :> ~ Ol 0 '" g x 0 = 00 ~ ~ ~ " " ~ '" " .. " ~ ~ <:;) P'l f-< ~~ f-< J: ::>00 0 Ul :> Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, flORIDA 33425-0310 FAX: (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION to: +fer! )Uha//m/ fax #: SUJJ - .f~3 ~ P /1-S"" date: JfJ::1(/ J ia60b from: '. ) kifl re: pages: 6., including cover sheet. Fox: 742-6259 TRANSMISSION VERIFICAnm, REPORT TIME 04/13/2000 14:32 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 561375&259 TEL 561375&2&0 DATE, TIME FAX NO. /NAME DURATION PAGE(S} RESULT MODE 04/13 14: 31 98&38175 00:00:51 03 OV, STI,NDARD ;::::tI'" BLVD NORTH ....__.. I .f- a ------' N " Q E 20TH E <l: GJ 0 c: --- Ir-- lAVE) POINT ~ 0 en a: J: rt) ~ -.:t lIJ w CJ) en SE 23RO AVE HIGH POINT HIGH a 0:: rt) 24TH AV IT ~ -~l Ii; ~= _~ 25TH AVE !Xl 8 w z O' N ~ "' SE :;;; a: SE ~\ ST ~1 Z ON E. C J=~ co f- 9-~ "",~hi,"",,~~:'ff~~" : ""'''''-'ZOI\lE'B, '-,t. :,',,' ~>U! o n m )> Z en -t I~ '" '" o N Z o 0; -l COAST LINE G? :;-J Ilswr~ .. '" -l '" % 0 en -t SW 2N NW I~R~~r:JbJ KEY TO MAP SOa-Year Flood Boundary lOO-Year Flood Boundary Zone Oesignations* With Date of Identification q" 12/2/74 lOO-Year Flood Boundary SOO-Year Flood Boundary Base Flood Elevation Line With Elevation In Feet** 513 Base Flood Elevation in Feet Where Uniform Within Zone** IEL 9871 Elevation Reference Mark RM7X Zone 0 Boundary River Mile oMl,5 **Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 *EXPLANATlON OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS ZONE A EXPLANATION AD Areas of 1 aO-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. Areas of lOO-year shallow flooding where depths are between one (1) and three (3) feet; average depths of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard factors are determined. Areas of 100.year shallow flooding where depths are between one (1) and three (3) feet; base flood elevations are shown, but no flood hazard factors are determined. Areas of 1 aD-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. Areas of lOa-year flood to be protected by flood protection system under construction; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. Areas bet~een limits of the 100.year flood and 500- year flood; or certain areas subject to 1 aD-year flood- ing with average depths less than one (1) foot or where the contributing drainage area is less than one square mile; or areas protected by levees from the base flood. (Medium shading) Areas of minimal flooding. (No shading) Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards. Areas of lOa-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action); base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. Areas of lOa-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action); base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. AH A1.A30 A99 B c o V Vl-V3D NOTES TO USER Certain areas not in the special flood hazard areas {zones A and V} may be protected by flood control structures. This map is for flood insurance purposes only; it does not neces- sarily show all areas subject to flooding in the community or all planimetric features outside special flood hazard areas. For adjoining map panels, see separately printed Index To Map Panels. Coastal base flood elevations shown on this map include the effects of wave action. INITIAL IDENTIFICATION: MARCH a, 1974 FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISIONS: 'Il ~I~\' .,,,1 Ir !\I~ \\~~ ,," \\\~ '\\\\ , o o o N <0 N h \P CO - o - '- ~ c ~ '. \~ ..r;llP1~ ~~~:"'8~ ....:t:'8...~Q-~ ~~Z8. g...... \5_ I~ 5 '\ \~ ,\ I' '" ~ ~ :..f;\ \\a'~i\i1 \" vithl" ~ ~\~\\\~\\ \ ~ \\\~\\\i~ \ ~ r\i\~\\' \ ~~\ll\'\~ l i\\ ~~ 1% i \a. a \\ lln p .... "", . \ i ~i:;"';';' I .-- Ii t. i l r '1 \ (~:~:~ I l '" . . .;' . .",.,;;1 ~ \\ \\ \\\i~\\,,\ru~\\\~\\~~l\~ ,\ 'I \! .' .. ,\~, 'ri~'\'l ,\ \ l".~" \\~\~!\\h ,\H\Wl ~ ~ \il"\ ,hr'.1 " i \itrt ~H! . \ j~\ '!i 1 ~~\~ \""\ \ ~ ~U~\ .. ... \t'llll\. " " \ \~111\ Ht 1 1 i\ \\ ,\ 'H\ \ ~ '1\\\\ \\ > Ui\t,\.\\~\ \t\" " \in\i'i i\l'" .. 't .. I 0:: I ; i ... i , '. J\ '. ~~i ~t%~ ~~ ~~ 'i' .~~ s~.. ~~- %~ % 0,. .. \. .,. .... ... ...:lP'- "",..' ., ,n, ' \ '. ,,,'{I" .. ,,,,,., ~~il '1 \ 9 .l~, \~ \ '. \ e 11 \ ~ \ \ _ \ i, t=::::=..J - - - ~ \ \ '-" s ~I .. @ ~ ~ S !. ' \ i ~ ~ \r- ~ \~ ~ l~ . \ \ \ \-\-- \ \ \ ~ ., " \ I I '. \ \ \ \ I . \I E :::f .. '. '. \I 11 \ . s~ 0' '" 'C> ~ -' Cl- uJ c-- ..... ~ '-' 'is c-- ~ <::> '-' /' <::> o o N , 0' C .~ '" '- <0 ~ C) if> 't c-- uJ ~ --r: . I 9 . --: .- - I ..,~,....,\\ . ., _"".;"., ..,.,.) """"';u,\. i'" 1\ t \~ 9 ~!i . '~, \ '. '. ~ ~l 1 . ~ ~b ,i ,~~ JL __ _- ' ~J t\1?-'" i: ' - i \ \\~. II:" 1'\ l ; I I I I \ \1,- I - . < - - 9 -------------------~--------- - _ []. --c-.--- - ~=,~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, Memorandum . 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 TO: LUSIA GALA V, SENIOR PLANNER ~. FROM: ROD WALLEN, PRomCf MANAGER DATE: April 10, 2000 RE: BETIlESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PARKING EXPANSION t PLEASE BE ADVISED TIIA T THE ABOVE REFERENCED SITE PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED SINCE YOUR REVIEW AS FOLLOWS: A 6 FOOT HIGH ALUMINUM "PICKET STYLE" FENCE, WHITE IN COLOR, HAS BEEN ADDED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO THE STREET FRONTAGE. TInS IS TO PROVIDE SAFETY FOR THE HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES AND SECURITY FOR THEIR VEHICLES. THE LOT WILL BE ACCESSED BY AN ELECfRONICALL Y OPERATED GATE SYSTEM. THE LOT ENTRANCE HAS BEEN REVISED TO DEPICf TIllS. ADDmONALL Y MINOR ADWSTMENTS TO TIlE LOCATION OF LANDSCAPING MA Y HAVE BEEN NEEDED TO FIT THE FENCE LOCATION. THE LANDSCAPE ADWSTMENTS WERE NOT COMPLETED AT THE PREPARATION OF TInS ADVISORY. TIlEY ARE MOST LIKELY TO HAVE OCCURED AT EACH SIDE ENTRANCE DRIVE AND AT THE SOUTIIEAST CORNER OF THE SITE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR GUIDANCE REGARDING TIllS MATTER. II TEL 5618450665 FAX 561 863 8!75 ~=,~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, Bethesda Memorial Hospital Traffic Analysis for 2450 Sea crest Property 8 l'f It is proposed to construct a parking lot with approximatel~rking spaces on property located on the east side of Seacrest Boulevard between S.E. 24" Avenue and S.E. 25" Avenue in Boynton Beach, Florida, The parking lot would help to alleviate demand during peak periods at Bethesda Memorial Hospital, which is located south and west of the proposed parking lot. Construction of the parking lot is projected to occur in 2001. ' Two issues were addressed in consideration of the traffic impacts of this project. One is the additional traffic that will be generated by rezoning a portion of the property that is currently residential. The other issue is to analyze the operation of the intersection along Seacrest Boulevard that is to serve as the access point to the proposed parking lot. Trip Generation Comparison The parking lot is proposed to be built on approximately 1.45 acres of land that is currently divided into four smaller lots. The two lots with frontage on Seacrest Boulevard, which combined comprise approximately 0,95 acres, are currently zoned for commercial use and would not require rezoning in order to construct a parking facility for the hospital. The other two lots, which are on the south side of S,E. 24" Avenue, measure a combined total of approximately 0,5 acres and are currently zoned for residential use. These two lots would need to be rezoned for commercial use also in order to construct a portion of the parking lot on the two lots. To analyze the impact of this zoning change, trip generation was estimated for a likely use at the site, Although the site is proposed to be used only for a parking lot, trip generation was conducted for a medical office building assuming a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0,25. Medical office building was used for the trip generation comparison because it represents the highest trip generating land use that can reasonably be expected on the property, Parking lots do not have any inherent trip generation potential. The increase in traffic was determined by comparing the trip generation for the currently zoned uses with the trips that would be generated by the proposed rezoning of the two residential lots. This analysis is shown in attached Table I. The projected net daily increase in traffic is 162 trip ends per day. Driveway Analysis The parking lot is proposed to be constructed with one full-access driveway connecting the driveway to S.E. 24" A venue, To determine the impact caused by vehicles accessing the parking lot from this driveway, the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard & S.E. 24" Avenue was analyzed. P: 1044301000101 OO,doc ~=r~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, Kimley-Hom and Associates conducted an existing turning movement count at S.E. 24'h Avenue & Seacrest Boulevard during the a,m, and p,m, peak periods on December 21,1999, Intersection volumes were factored to peak season conditions using the peak season adjustment factor published by the Florida Department of Transportation, These peak season volumes were then projected for 2001 conditions by applying growth rate of 0.82 percent per year, compounded annually. The result was the 2001 peak season background traffic conditions, To provide a conservative analysis of traffic to and from the parking lot during the a.m. and p,m. peak periods, it was assumed that each parking space generates one trip during both of the peak periods. Based on a proposed capacity of eighty parking spaces, eighty trips into and out of the parking lot were evaluated during each of the peak periods, During the a,m. peak period, 90 percent of these eighty trips were calculated to be inbound trips and 10 percent were calculated to be outbound trips. The opposite was assumed for the trips during the p.m. peak period, All of the parking lot traffic was assigned to Seacrest Boulevard via S,E. 24" A venue in order to travel to and from the parking lot. An assignment to Seacrest Boulevard of 50 percent north and 50 percent south was used in the analysis. Turning movement volumes were developed for traffic to and from the parking lot. These volumes were then added to the 200 I peak season background volumes to determine the total 200 I traffic conditions at the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard & S,E, 24'h Avenue after construction of the parking lot. Using methodology from the 1987 Highway Capacity Manual, the total traffic conditions were analyzed at the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard & S.E. 24'h A venue in order to determine the Level of Service at the intersection. As shown in the attached analyses, the intersection is projected to operate acceptably in both the a.m. and p,m. future peak hours. Conclusions The construction of a parking lot on the property will not create adverse traffic conditions, The increase in potential trip generation caused by rezoning the two residential lots would potentially add a total of 162 trip ends per day, A peak hour analysis showed that, even with conservative assumptions regarding parking demand and turnover at the site, the intersection at Seacrest & S.E. 24'h Avenue will operate acceptably, P: \044301000\01 OO.doc ~=,~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, TABLE! BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: LAND USE CHANGE TRIP GENERATION Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Existinl! Zoned IJse Medical Office 10,475 s.f. 358 25 20 5 38 10 28 Single-Family 2 d.u. ZQ 2 1 1 1 2 1 Subtotal 378 27 21 6 41 12 29 Proposed Site Traffic Medical Office 15,800 '.f. ~ lJ! .lll E ~ U 11. Subtotal 540 38 30 8 56 15 41 Net New Trips 162 11 9 2 15 3 12 Notes: Trip Generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Medical Office [P,B.C.] = T = 34.17 trips per 1,000 s.f. Single Family Residential [P,B.C,] = T = 10 trips per dwelling unit A.M. Peak Hour Medical Office [ITE 720] = T = 2.43 trips per 1,000 s.f. (80% entering, 20% exiting) Single Family Residential [ITE 210J = T =. 0.75 trips per dwelling unit (25% entering, 75% exiting) P.M. Peak Hour Medical Office [ITE 720] = Ln(T) = 0.921 if' Ln(X) + J 476 (27% entering, 73% exiting) Single Family Residential [ITE 210] = Ln(T) == 0.901 ... Ln(X) + 0.527 (64% entering, 36% exiting) p:\044301000\{tg_bethesda.xls}seacrest@24th (l driveway) t/11/oo 11:45 Kimley-Horn and Associates, c. 4431 Embarcadero Drive Location: SEACREST BLVD, & SE 24th ST, West Palm Beach, Florida File Name : SEACRE24 City: State: BOYNTON BEACH FL. 33407 Site Code: 12219901 Counter: RRC, BA Start Date: 12/21/1999 Day of week: TUES. Page No :1 Groups Printed- Unshifted Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left roug Right Left roug Right Left roug Right Left roug Right Int Total h h h h Be or 07:15 0 131 0 1 0 0 0 104 1 0 0 0 237 07:30 0 151 0 0 0 2 0 147 2 0 0 0 302 07:45 4 215 0 1 0 3 0 146 2 0 0 0 371 0 08:00 1 179 1 1 0 1 1 138 2 0 0 0 324 08:15 3 187 1 0 0 1 0 116 1 0 0 0 309 08:30 2 174 2 0 0 1 0 133 0 0 0 0 312 08:45 3 198 1 0 0 3 0 132 3 0 0 0 340 0 16:00 4 181 0 0 0 3 0 229 0 0 0 0 417 16:15 0 170 6 0 0 4 0 200 2 0 0 0 382 16:30 1 136 1 0 0 2 0 194 9 0 0 0 343 16:45 0 144 1 0 0 2 0 192 0 1 0 0 340 0 17:00 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 209 0 0 0 0 386 17:15 1 152 1 0 0 1 0 192 0 0 0 0 347 17:30 2 171 0 3 0 1 0 188 8 0 0 0 373 17:45 2 141 0 0 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 0 312 0 Grand Total 23 2608 151 6 0 241 1 2578 31/ 1 0 o,g I 5287 Apprch % 0,9 98,6 0.6 20.0 0,0 80,0 0,0 98,8 1.2 100.0 0,0 Total % 0.4 49.3 0,3 0,1 0,0 0,5 0.0 48,8 0.6 0,0 0.0 0.0 Start Time Left pp, Left pp. n Total Total Total ea our rom 0 Intersection 07:45 Volume 10 755 4 769 2 0 6 8 1 533 5 539 0 0 0 0 1316 Percent 1,3 98,2 0,5 25,0 0,0 75,0 0.2 98.9 0.9 0.0 0,0 0.0 Volume 10 755 4 769 2 0 6 8 1 533 5 539 0 0 0 0 1316 Volume 4 215 0 219 1 0 3 4 0 146 2 148 0 0 0 0 371 Peak Factor 0.887 High Int 07:45 07:45 07:45 6:45:00 AM Volume 4 215 0 219 1 0 3 4 0 146 2 148 Peak Factor 0,878 0,500 0,910 Peak Hour From 12:45 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 16:00 Volume 5 631 8 644 0 0 11 11 0 815 11 826 1 0 0 1482 Percent 0,8 98.0 1.2 0.0 0,0 100.0 0.0 98.7 1.3 100.0 0.0 0.0 Volume 5 631 8 644 0 0 11 11 0 815 11 826 1 0 0 1 1482 Volume 4 181 0 185 0 0 3 3 0 229 0 229 0 0 0 0 417 Peak Factor 0.888 High Int 16:00 16:15 16:00 16:45 Volume 4 181 0 185 0 0 4 4 0 229 0 229 1 0 0 1 Peak Factor 0,870 0,688 0.902 0,250 ~=,~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: LAND USE CHANGE SEACREST BOULEVARD fa! S.E. 24TH AVENUE Growth Rate = Peak Season = BuiJdout Year = Years == 0,82% 1.07 2001 2 A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volume Development Northhound South hound Easthound Westbound LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Existing Volume (12121/99 0 533 5 10 755 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 Peak Season Volume 0 570 5 II 808 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 200 I Background 0 580 5 II 821 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 New Project Traffic 0 0 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 Total 0 580 41 47 821 0 0 0 0 6 0 11 P.M. Peak Hour Inlersection Volume Development Northhound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Existing Volume (12/21/99 0 815 11 5 631 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Peak Season Volume 0 872 12 5 675 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 2001 Background 0 886 12 5 686 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Project Traffic 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 36 Total 0 886 16 9 686 0 0 0 0 36 0 48 p:\04430JOOO\[lg_bethesda.xls}seacrest@24th (1 drjvewa>~ 111110011:46 Res: Unsignali__j :ersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: KHA Intersection: Seacrest & 24th Avenue, Total Traffic Count Date: 12/21/99 Time period: 2001 A.M. Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: HFR: PHF, PHV: 580 611 0,95 0.02 41 43 0.95 0.02 47 49 0,95 0.02 821 864 0,95 0.02 6 6 0.95 0.02 11 12 0.95 0.02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: TWLTL o Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements Lane 1 L T R 1,2&3 approach: Lane 2 L T R L Lane 3 T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------------------------------------~---~---------------~---------------~-------~-------------- N Y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------~------------------------------------------------------------------ Y N Y N N N N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0,00 Lane usage for movements 10,11~~L Lane 1 L T R L proach: Lane 2 T R N N N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 L N N Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Length of study period, hrs: 1. 00 Northbound o o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t c,base 4.1 7.5 6,9 t c,hv 2,0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0,02 0.02 0,02 t c,g 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0,0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0,00 t c 1 stage 4.1 6.8 6,9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t f,base 2,2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.5 3,3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. 9 327 669 1. 00 669 0.98 4 654 929 1. 00 929 0.95 7 Lane 3 T R N 12 10 N Southbound o o 1700 1700 2 1 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement v (vph) Movement Capacity Shared Lane Capacity Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 v(vph) C m (vph) v/e 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 49 929 0.05 9,1 A 7 1---- -- I I 6 180 342 4 7 1- ----- I I 18 342 0,05 16,1 C 1163 188 1. 00 0.95 0.96 0,96 180 8 9 ______II II II 12 669 8 9 ______II II II 16.1 C 10 10 11 11 12 12 HCS: Unsignall__d :ersections Release 3.1b TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: KHA Intersection: Seacrest & 24th Avenue, Total Traffic Count Date: 12/21/99 Time Period: 2001 P.M. Peak Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 volume: HFR: PHF: PHV: 886 933 0.95 0.02 16 17 0,95 0.02 9 9 0.95 0.02 686 722 0.95 0.02 36 38 0,95 0.02 48 51 0.95 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: TWLTL o Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements Lane 1 L T R 1,2&3 approach: Lane 2 L T R L Lane 3 T R N y N N y y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R N y N N y N N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0,00 Lane usage for movements Lane 1 L T R 7, 8 &9 approach: Lane 2 L T R L Lane 3 T R y N y N N N N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,1 .2 Lane 1 L T R L proach: Lane 2 T R L Lane 3 T R N N N N N N N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: -------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Northbound o o 1700 1700 2 Southbound o o 1700 1700 2 Length of study period, hrs: 1. 00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 ---------------------------------------~------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 7,5 6.9 t c,hv 2,0 2.0 2.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 t C,9 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0,0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 t C 1 stage 4.1 6,8 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 3.5 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 t f 2.2 3.5 3.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ~-------------------------------------------~-------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 475 536 1. 00 536 0.91 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 --------------------------------------------------------.---------------.-------._------------- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 949 719 1. 00 719 0,99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement v (vph) Movement Capacity Shared Lane Capacity 7 1______ I I 38 147 251 1321 148 1. 00 0.99 0,99 0.99 147 8 9 10 11 12 ______II II II 51 536 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Movement 1 v(vphl C m(vph) v/e 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 9 719 0.01 10.1 B 4 7 1------ I I 88 251 0.35 27.1 D 8 9 ______II II II 27.1 D 10 11 12 04/07/00 FRI 10:58 FAX 561 863 6392 KIMLEY-HOR~ ~001 ~=~ Kimley'Hom and AsSoei3!eS, Inc, 44~1 ErttareademOrive 1'1.'1 Palm Baach, A.rlda 33401 \\~rl:G '~R - 0 \UU . , t~~- To ~VJ'.;? J/dllaluu) .,'lUSta' 6altJmv I FirmILocation: Li,.y 0./ A.yA~1") From: G!~ Wall&'! - TEL 561 8450665 fAX 5618636175 Fax Transmittal 74Z - ~r Job No,; Date: ? A~ Z~ Onginal coming by mal:: Yes: __ No: L If you have any problems, please call 561-845.0665 and ask for: Total number of pages, including cover sheet -4,..-- Xl}o9 Comments: ,&lID';' 01' I.)N~" NI/A /h/1dsc~ eX/~h~J5 CI? ad.lal/J'/J7 /o.,L~, Df1*1"" &>tJr dISCUr$n""". r/J~s aId,." 'yJl-!11 yl'N/" tJwLL_ ~,-k VlS,'/ 'SJ"tNld _ d"h1t!>/1 slpy-k t!!!~-It/),,<' ~e/'tU!.I1M~ 41~,. 51~ JVrd/~" /J"-H!~ d-l!.. ~V/~t./ . . ~t' odrll Pth7q/ ~,,-?,.4:> - -7-A4-Ak VdV - , ~Q.J J4/q/n/) - This facsimile ;s inlendfld omy Jal Ih9 addressse named herein and may contain information that is confidential. it you ate not the illl""rItd l8Cipifn/ or IIIe .mployee or ag..t responsiblo lor delivery 10 th. .ddr....., 1"" ar. nereby nctffi.d that any review, _i.s/ion, ,"selosure, or copying of Ih~ oommu.icstion is "rlClly prohibit.d. 1/ you hsve r.ceived this tacsiml. ill .rror. please immerlialely notily us by ta'.pl:one. snd return the origina' f...imile to "S 81 the ad~re" above via /1Ie U,S, Pooial S'IV/ce, Thsnk you. 04/07/00 FRI 10:08 FAX 56l 863 6392 KHlLEY.-HORN ~002 Notes April 4, 2000, 9:00 a.m, Re: Bethesda (PaIkiDg Expansion 2000) Technical Review Committee 2"" Review Project~0.044301000 Building Division Signed off - (Handicap Issues Resolved) Forester (Kevin Hallahan) 742-6267, along with Planner (Lusia) are concerned with screening from residential. They would prefer landscaping to be on exterior side of wall, and be allowed to grow freely (not sheared). But that's not required. My concern is maintenance. Lusia suggested that the wall be "decorative" and in keeping with "residential character". I drove the neighborhood immediately adjacent to site. There exists several residential styles, which make no particular neighborhood character statement (i.e" Colonial, Spanish, etc.). A majority of the homes are stucco finish with no distinguishing architectural elements to suggest a character, We need to look at pre-cast finish options (i.e,. split face, etc,) and be prepared to offer something pleasing to the residents, Also of concern was lighting overflow into residential properties, We will install deflector shields. I have field located existing adjoining landscape, 1bcre is a generous amount of existing vegetation and trees existing to offer shielding of the light and wall. Plus homes have a large rear yard (10' - 80' :!: deep), Be prepared to state hours of use for the lot imd for the lighting system, Kevin also preferred to see replacement trees be placed in buffer adjoining with residential uses on exterior of wall However, after my site visit, I den't think this is a concern, LusiaiKevin prefer canopy trees be used rather than slash pine along frontage, except where near power lines. (See FPL approved species list) they like the Live Oak trees used elsewhere. Landscape Plan has I slash pine in utility easement. We need to adjust location per original c.omments. Also, Banyon Tree is native and needs to 04/07/00 FRl 10:59 FAX 561 563 6392 KIllLEY -HORN ~003 be factored in replacement value, subject to Kevin's site visit (he wants to verify species), We must note landscape buffer on the Landscape Plan. Also, place note on Landscape Plan that Cypress Mulch is not allowed. April 25'" is Commission Meeting, The following Tuesday (May 2), the Board will review again. Bring 4 sets of "rectified" plans (not construction) and colored landscape plans, If approved, we can submit for building permit anytime thereafter. These notes do not supercede the written comments to be provided by the City. In Attendance: ~~~ . Rod Wallen Q:\04430IOOO\Corresp\Notes.doc !lORN KIIILEY & I \1 -----I- I \ I ----r- \ , , '- L-------J , '" ", \ \ I \ \ , \ ., ~ ,'. '" -tl ,,-.... '> ~ "- ::>. So. ~'* , ~ <~ ~ ~ 96 /w-S ~ <4 . ~=n Engmeering Plannmg and EnVIf(Jntnenta. ConSUltants f Kimley.Horn and Associates, Inc, 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 TEL 407 845 0665 FAX 407 863 6175 Transmittal Date: 3 A;O;2I' '00 Job No: /)44-30/.000 To: /.US/A GAI-AV Pfi;/)''}J ., ?O/)//)~ LJIV', _/. _ 0 BDV/) fo/) l3eQcn , 74Z-~Zr,..o We are sending you ~ttached o Shop drawil1\Js o o Under separalecover via the 1oiiowing items: o Change order o Prints/plans o Samples o Specifications Copies Date No, Description These are tlilnsmiffed as checked below: ~or your use 0 Approved as submitted !1'As requested 0 Approved as noted gfor review and comment 0 Returned for corrections o Resubmit o Submit o Return copies tor approval copies tor distribution corrected prints Remarks ~=n Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, --- ~- --------------- ~ ~ CapYlo ~. . ..-e~"-~ C"'"'"7 '4~ l?"., YSPned l:;cf JvQ~' ~~Jlt ~_ We mOan V"? ",,~I p.I", R~d,,, Off -"'lJl ""'kFJ, v, ~rlO 0",. 56, 8ea ""_.... 811s ............:....., / ------.....- ......... '- Bethesda Memorial Hospital Parking Expansion SFWMD Site Drainage J, Swisher 4I3lOO Given ~Programupd-.d.u1/O(l Total 1.444 Ac Impetvious Buildings o Ac other ImelVious 1,14 Ac 79% .f', Ponds q Ac Pervious 0.304 Ac 21% FF Elev, Roads A. ONGVD 16 NGVO Quality Compute fiTSt inch of runoff 0,120 Ao-ft 2 Compute 2.5 times the percentage of Imperviousness s Site Area for water quality perviousfl111pervious b Impervious Area for water quality p8rviouslimpervious c Percentage of Imperviousness d For 2.5 inches times percentage imperviousness e Compute Volume required for Water quality detention = inches to be treated x (total stte -lakes) 1.444 Acres 1.14 Acres 78.95 % 1,974 in 0.238 Ao-ft 3 Controlling Volume for Weter Quelity Detention 0,238IAO-ft 4 Pretreatment (if needed) a IS this site discharging directly to a sensitive receiving body? and is it more than 40% impervious? If so, it wm have to provide at least 0.5 inches of dry detention pretreatment b Pretreatment reqjuirements = 0.5 in, x (total site -lakes) c Required lake volume = Total required detention. pretreatment No Ao-ft Ao-ft B. SCS Curve Number 1 2 Average water table Lowest Finished-Grade Highest Finished Grade Average Site Grade Average Depth to the Water Table (6. maxI Assuming 25% Compaction and given Avg Depth to Water Table Enter in the inches of moisture that can be stored in the soil from the soil storage tab~. Available Soil Storage = Storage Available x Impervious Areas Convert from available soil storage to site-wide moisture storage(S) S = available soil storage onsite I site area SCS Curve Number, CN eN = 1000 I (S+10) 5 NGVD 15,5 NGVD 16.5 NGVD 16 NGVD 6ft 3 4 14.45 in 0,366067 Ac-ft 5 6 3.04 in 7 76.71 = CN K:\Swisher\Four Comers\Storm.xls 4I3lOO C, Project Surface Storage Assumptions: 1) Lake storage begins at a control elevation which is the given wet season water table elevation 2) Lake storage is vertical over the lake surface area. 3) S~e Storage is linear starting at the Top of Bank (TaB) to the Finished Floor Elevation (FF ELl 2 Area of Developed Site Grading = Total Area - (lakes + buildings) Slage Storage Chart 1.4 AI:; Slage Trench (It.NGVO) (Ac-Ft) Site Grading (ac-It) Total (ac-It) INLET 5 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0.00 10 0.18 0 0 0.18 11 0,38 0 0 0,38 12 0.54 0 0 0,54 13 0.72 0 0 0,72 14 0.91 0 0 0.91 15 0.91 0 0 0.91 15,5 0.91 0 0 0.91 16 0,91 (( 1 /1 )x 1,4 ac)x ( 1 llI2)= 0,18 1,09 16.5 0,91 (( 1.0 /1 )x 1.4 ac)x( 1.0 llI2)= 0,72 1,63 Awr T Spillover 16.5 Awr TaB Spillover Average Water Table Top of Bank Elev. Where water spills over onto street 5 15,5 16,5 D. Water Quality Storage 1 2 Volume required for Water Quality From the Stage-Storage Curve the elevation is at 0.238 Ac-It, 10,51NGVO E, 3 Year. 3 Day Event Rainfall Amount a Rainfall amount for a 3-Year, 1 Day Event Rainfall amount for a ~Year, 3 Day Event' - From City Comments of 3/16/00 b Runoff(Q) in inches for the la-Ye.r, 3-Day Event c Runoff Volume 2 Zero-Discharge (3- Yr-72Hr) stege correspondin9to stage-storage CUNe is = 1 DAY-1.359 6.50 in 8,83 in 6.00 in 0.7 Ac-Ft 0,7 Ac-fl from the 12.9 NGVO K:\Swisher'IFour Comers\5torm.xls 4I3lOO IV. A. 1 2 3 4 5 B. a b CHECK STORM STAGES AND DISCHARGES Minimum building floor elevations Rainfall of 10Q-year 3-day storm Inches of Runoff, Q (P-(0,2 x S})' I (P + (0.8 x S)) Volume of Runoff (in, of runoff) x Project Area From the Stage-Storage CUlV8 the Volume of runoff corresponds to an elevation Proposed minimum floor elevation Is the proposed minimum floor elevation acceptable? Minimum road elevation The minimum road grade must be at least 2 feet above control elevation. Control Elevation = Water Table Mlmimum Proposed Road elevation Is the proposed minimum road elevation acceptable? K:\Swisher\Four Comers\StorTn.xls 16 in 12,85 in of Runoff 1,55 Ac-Ft 16,431NGVO o No 5 NGVO 15,5 NGVO Ves 4/3100 o"'c .g\W. ~ t\ ~l~ .->,,,,,S' r,. ~. os: '1/ "" ~ L. ;.., ~ ~<f. ~ 0 r;; \~ & r;; ~ i \ 't "" 'Ei " e. t"'';i "'~ ~. t'" ~ ~~ e> ~ ~; ~'fl t'" 9- t~ ~ .", ? _ "::10 't. ~9 i~ :!l cJ -a~0 <1 . ';l:. ~ ~? r 'D'D t~ ....-J;ttz t'" " ~ ~.... ..,,? .."CQ ~~ ~ ~ .. "~ .. cJ ~ '" s" 0 ~ ? t" "? ~ ... -::: cJ ~ '" ~ ~ ... ~ -;:: ~ ~ '" ~ ~ t "$ ... ~ \ "'2 Co ~ " $. "0 ~ ;;0.0 ~ ;..; ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ '!a ~ ~ ,,;;..,O::lO'"<:l ,:.;..,;..,-j-j b,g '0 ~ > ",<l~\l~'" ~I'.';:<l %'l,'g'g&%9.,p.;..,> ;g.~~~~~%~~~ (l<;1;,~OS'a&'t;,';;!"'" %?~..., '1,0 0 l),t<1 "" "" \i, % :!l "" ~ " ~ ';:<l (j ~ p 0 ~..,.,' tI'1 ca ~ ~ ~ 0".' ~. "7' ::;" 5. ~'1 "" "0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ .;.. 1'< ::10 ~.c. ~ Q ~ ~ ;..; ~ o 'Z ~ ~ ~ :f'51'2 " ~ _ Z "",>>~~~ ",0'" - 'D ~ ~ 'f'o ~ I,J\ ~.....1 Vi :f \I 1 l\ ,.. '" " ~ ~ " ~ ~ 0; "" ~ "" '" ::10 ~ S ~ ~ I'. p. a ..-\ .z r,. '(; G O~ G G :f II ~ " l\ ". :.. "" ~ " € " ~ -; " 0 cr- " " \I <;> Oft Oft ." "" ::10 <=> ,;;;' ~ ~ '" " ~ I'. \ ..-\ r,. '@~ ~ Q ~ '" .c. '0 v. <::) ~~~'- Bethesda Memorial Hospital Parking Expansion SFWMD Site Drainage CalcuIIllonPrognlm~4I1JOO Given J, Swisher 4/3/00 Total 1,444 Ac Impervious Buildings o Ac other Imervious 1.14 Ac 79% /', Ponds ~ Ac Pervious 0,304 Ac 21% FF Elev, Roads A. o NGVD 16 NGVD Quality Compute first inch of runoff 0,120 Ac-ft 2 Compute 2,5 times the percentage of ImpeIViousness Site Area for water quality perviousJimpervious Impervious Area for water quality perviouslimpervious Percentage of Imperviousness For 2.5 inches times percentage imperviousness Compute Volume required for Water quality detention = inches to be treated x (total site -lakes) 0.238 Ac-ft a b c d e 1.444 Acres 1,14 Acres 78,95 % 1.974 in 3 Controlling Volume for Water Quality Detention 0,238IAc-ft 4 P19t19atment (if needed) Is this site discharging directly to a sensitive receiving body? and is it more than 40% impervious? If so, it will have to provide at least 0.5 inches of dry detention pretreatment Pretreatment reqjuirements = 0.5 in. x (total s~e -lakes) Required lake volume = Total required detention - pretreatment Ac-ft a No b Ac-ft c B, SCS Curve Number 1 2 Average water table Lowest Finished-Grade Hi9hest Finished Grade Average Site Grade Average Depth to the Water Table (6' max) Assuming 25% Compaction and given Avg Depth to Water Table Enter in the inches of moisture that can be stored in the soil from the soil storage tabl~. Available Soil Storage = Storage Available x Impervious Areas Convert from available soil storage to site-wide moisture storage(S) S = available soil storage onsite I site area SCS Curve Number, eN CN = 1000 I (S+10) 5 NGVD 15,5 NGVD 16,5 NGVD 16 NGVD 6ft 3 4 5 6 14,45 in 0,366067 Ac-ft 3.04 in 7 76,71 = CN K:\$wisher\Four Comers\Storm.xls 4J3JOO C. ProJect Surface Storage Assumptions: 1) Lake storage begins at a control elevation which is the given wet season water table elevation 2) Lake storage is vertical over the lake surface area. 3) Site Storage Is linear starting at the Top of Bank (TOB) to the Finished Floor Elevation (FF EI.) AWT T INLET 2 Area of Developed Sfte Grading = Total Area - (lakes + buildings) Stage Storage Chart l.4Ac Stage Trench (f1-NGVD) (Ac-Ft) Sne Grading (ac-f1) Total (ac-f1) 5 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0.00 10 0.18 0 0 0.18 11 0,36 0 0 0,36 12 0,54 0 0 0,54 13 o.n 0 0 0.72 14 0,91 0 0 0,91 15 0,91 0 0 0,91 15.5 0,91 0 0 0,91 16 0.91 (( 1 /1 )x 1.4 ac)x( 1 fII2)= 0,18 1.09 16,5 0.91 (( 1,0 /1 )x 1.4 ac)x ( 1,0 fII2)= o.n 1,63 Spillover 16,5 AWT Average Water Table TOB Top of Bank Spillover Elev. Where water spills over onto street 5 15,5 16,5 D. Water Quality Storage 1 2 Volume required for Water Quality From the Stage-Storage Curve the elevation is at 0,238 Ac-f1, 10.5INGVD E. 3 Year - 3 Day Event a Rainfall Amount Rainfall amount for a 3-Year, 1 Day Event Rainfall amount for a 3- Year. 3 Day Event' , From City Comments of 3/16/00 Runoff (Q) in Inches for the 10- Year, 3-Day Event Runoff Volume Zero-Discharge (3- Yr-72Hq stage correspondin9 to stage-storage'CYOIe is 12.9 NGVD = 1 DAY'I.359 6,50 in 8,83 in b c 6,00 in 0,7 Ac-FI 0.7 Ac-f1 from the 2 K:\Swisher\Four Comers\Stomuls 4I3lOO IV. A. 1 2 3 4 5 B. a b CHECK STORM STAGES AND DISCHARGES Minimum building floor elevations Rainfan of 100-year 3-day stonn Inches of Runoff, Q (P-(0,2 x S))2 I (P + (0,8 x S)) Volume of Runoff (in, of Nnoll) x Project Area From the Stage-Storage curve the Volume of runoff corresponds to an elevation Proposed minimum floor elevation Is the proposed minimum floor elevation acceptable? Minimum road elevation The minimum road grade must be at least 2 feet above control elevation. Control Elevation = Water Table Mimimum Proposed Road Elevation 15 the proposed minimum road elevation acceptable? K:\Swlsher\Four Comers\Stoml.xls 16 in 12.85 in of Runoff 1.55 Ac-Ft 16.431NGVD o No 5 NGVD 15,5 NGVD Yes 4I3lOO -j ~ \} '" S' eo i. ~ t"' ~ '" ~ ..c. .<',~ i \ ~ tr\ $Q o? l~ ~.,g"" ~~~~ .-'..;1 \t ~ ';l>' ';l> g ::. ~~ ~ a ,.",,~ ~ ~ '0 '" ~ s "0 If o '" 'i! " ~ "0 ~ o <;;~ t"' t"' ~ ~ 't:> :f o If ~ " ~ ",:f ~ 0 ~ + -;:: '" t1\ b ~ !:- ~ ... 'i(",C %\\ g %. ~ .,goa- % ~ 0 ~ S' " ..\- % ~ ~ ~ 'F ~ '" ~ ~ ~" ?> ...00 $"1P~ .". .,g.<',.<', ",0'" >&> ;.. ~ 9<>0 ~lftf;~V> E? \I .,g'"'d \~ ~k 1;" ti'I '"'''"' ~ t<l ~'?3, ~ " ~ ~ Z ..o:;~V'l9? ~ .,; ~ ~ l)? % !:\ .... ~ " 00 '" ';;' " o E? \I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;.;; ~ o 'Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ t-" ~ '4 ~ ~ o '" ~ p. 'Z. 0% ;ll-j-j-j'it.g -; ~ ~ (tl: ('\I ~ '=' ~ "'" ~ ~g.~'€l\}%?'~ &.,,~~o~~'"' ("I "2::: "... "... (Q ~ <.t ('l ~ .<', .<', '% ~ & !!., g j-' ~S,.'" -:. .... @'';)%%';)&ag ~,S'If1 ~ ~ ~.~ ~, ... ;... ~ ~ P "... ~ 't:. g '" ~ c " \I V> Q ~ ~ .,; ~ g .... tl Q~ '" -6' " @ '::;1 " 'i!, ,.. ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ 0- " '::;1 '" \\ "" > 0- ~ " "" '" ;; ~ ~ 0- " Q ~ t C\~ \;Jd - ~----~.-._-- ~ t"' ~? II ~ ~ t"'~ ~'Z ~.-'\ s'1'l ~ ".,g "2 a ~" () ;..';t.';t. "''''i!~ Ci"Z '" c Q~ ~ .r ~ "0 ~ + -;:: '" t ~ !:- Bethesda Memorial Hospital Parking Expansion SFWMD Site Drainage J. Swisher 4I3lOO Given c.IouIallcm Pl'Ol;IrIm updated 411100 Impervious Buildings other Imervious ^ Ponds ~ Pervious Total FF Elev. Roads A. 1.444 Ac o Ac 1,14 Ac 79% Ac 0,304 Ac 21% o NGVD 16 NGVD Quality COmpute first inch of runoff 0,120 Ac-ft 2 COmpute 2,5 Vmes the percentage of ImpelViousness a Site Area for water quality perviouslimpervious b Impervious Area for water quality perviousJimpervious c Percentage of Imperviousness d For 2.5 inches times percentage imperviousness e COmpute Volume required for Water quality detention = inches to be treated x (total stte -lakes) 1,444 Acres 1,14 Acres 78.95 % 1,974 in 0,238 Ac-ft 3 COntrolling Volume for Weter Quelity Detention 0.238IAc-ft 4 Pretreetment (if needed) Is this site discharging directly to a sensitive receiving body? and is it more than 40% impervious? If so, it will have to provide at least 0.5 inches of dry detention pretreatment Pretreatment reqjuirements = 0,5 in, x (total stte -lakes) Required lake volume = Total required detention - pretreatment Ac-ft a No b Ac-ft c B. SCS Curve Number 1 2 Average water table Lowest Finished Grade Highest Finished Grade Average Stte Grade Average Depth to the Water Table (6' max) Assuming 25% Compaction and given Avg Depth to Water Table Enter in the inches of moisture that can be stored in the 50;1 from the soil storage table. Available Soil Storage = Storage Available x Impervious Areas Convert from available soil storage to site-wide moisture storage(S) S = available soil storage onsite I site area SCS Curve Number. CN CN = 1000 I (5+10) 5 NGVD 15,5 NGVD 16,5 NGVD 16 NGVD 6ft 3 4 5 6 14,45 in 0.366067 Ac-ft 3.04 in 7 76,71 = CN K:\Swisher\Four Comers\Stonn.xls 4I3lOO C. Project Surface Storage Assumptions: 1) Lake storage begins at a control elevation which is the given wet season water table elevation 2} Lake storage is vertical over the lake surface area. 3) Site Storage is linear starting at the Top of Bank (TOB) to the Finished Floor Elevation (FF EI.) 2 Area of Developed Site Grading = Total Area - (lakes + buildings) Stage Storage Chart 1,4 Ac Stage Trench (fl-NGVD) (Ac-Ft) Sile Grading (ac-fl) Total (ac-fl) AWT T 5 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0,00 10 0,18 0 0 0.18 11 0.36 0 0 0,36 12 0,54 0 0 0,54 13 0,72 0 0 0.72 14 0,91 0 0 0,91 15 0.91 0 0 0,91 15,5 0,91 0 0 0.91 16 0,91 (( 1 /1 )x 1.4 ac)x( 1 flI2)= 0,18 1,09 16.5 0.91 (( 1,0 /1 )x 1.4 ac)x( 1,0 fl/2) = 0.72 1,63 INLET Spillover 16.5 AWT Average Water Table TOB Top of Bank Spillover Elev. Where water spills over onto street 5 15.5 16,5 D. Water Quality Storage 1 2 Volume required for Water Quality From the Stage-Storage Curve the elevation is at 0,238 Ac-fl, 10,51NGVO E. 3 Year - 3 Day Event Rainfall Amount a Rainfall amount for a 3-Year, 1 Day Event Rainfall amount for a 3-Year, 3 Day Event* . From City Comments of 3/16/00 b Runoff (0) in inches for the 1o-Year, 3-Day Event c Runoff Volume 2 Zero-Discharge (3-Yr-72Hr) stage corresponding to stage-storageuu:ve is = 1 DAY' 1,359 6,50 in 8,83 in 6,00 in 0,7 Ac-Ft 0,7 Ac-fl from the 12,9 NGVO K:\Swisher\Four Comers\Storm.xls 4I3lOO IV. A. 1 2 3 4 5 B. a b CHECK STORM STAGES AND DISCHARGES Minimum building floor elevations Rainfall of 1 OO-year 3-day storm Inches of Runoff, Q (P-(0.2 x 5))" (P + (0.8 x 5)) Volume of Runoff (in. of runoff) x Project Area From the Stage-Storage curve the Volume of runoff corresponds to an elevation Proposed minimum floor elevation Is the proposed minimum floor elevation acceptable? Minimum road elevation The minimum road grade must be at least 2 feet above control elevation. Control Elevation = Water Table Mimimum Proposed Road Elevation Is the proposed minimum road elevation acceptable? K:\Swisher\Four Comers\Storm.xls 16 in 12.85 in of Runoff 1.55 Ac-Ft 16.431 NGVD o No 5 NGVD 15.5 NGVD Yes 413100 oj ~ &- '" S' e. ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ <~ i\ ~ "'~ ~\orl ot= ~~ ~~ i~ -~ ~ 2 ~t'g; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" a- ~ 1- 'i? b '" "i! +' IF o ~ ... ...'% \I "i! ... ~ ~ ..., IF 'i? o c. '" t ",IF ~ 0 ~ + ?- U> ~ . \ \:'\ ... ncl>C i'\ 1& " "%-';l~ s%..\ ~Cl?. W; ~ d :,.?'~ ~';!1?' " '" . ~ '" ~ ...ClCl $"'rp(: ... .-l.-l.-l.-l tl:l .!t~i~~%~ a~~~&-% ~",~l!IClO o ~..... ""'" R ...... ('>~<<"%- oj 'g P" g.. g,... $) g-';!1~~';!1& ~ $l ~ ~. :{i ~.~ ~ ~ ~ 1t "'"'", ? .". ~< < .-lQ~'" ~ 9 ~ ~ s.%.~~ ~~~~ go ~. ~ ~ ~ g ~ t:r1 ~ ~. '?;, ~. g'. 'Zl ~ f,. o :> e ... ~ '>>. 'C. ..,.\~ ..c ;... ~ 'i:. ~~ ~V'o-J"""...o \ Vl 0 \.It 1- \I "'"' i S ~ !!. II .-l 9:- aD '" ,;5' " a 1- II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 'Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t'" ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ Po z O~ v> ::l> '" " Ii crt ... "i! ~ II ~ ~ ...~ ~O ",,'Z. ~ct ...~~ ~~g ~Cl l:" b~ ';!1 C",~ t;I:. IF o ~ + ?- l..> ~ b ~ ~ .-l ~ ~~ d c II v> '0 'S % '" .;5' " @ '::? '" '5 ". '" '" ~ ~ '" ~ ~ <:r '" '::? '" 1'\ ". ,. <:r ~ '" ~ ;;; ~ ';:{ <:r ;;; o 3 ~ 0. 0z ;; ~ V' d 111'" -r" ....... - " Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. February 8, 2000 . 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 City of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Bethesda Parking Lot Expansion Dear Sir, Please be advised that the improvements as shown on the proposed site plan for a parking lot expansion will create impervious space. This impervious space will create surface water runoff, which will be contained in either a retention area or exfiltration trench. The containment volume created will meet both SFWMD requirements as well as any additional requirements imposed by the City of Boynton Beach. Please call me at (561) 840-0819 if you have any questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, ~Z;;;;:~TES'INC Russell C. Morrison, P .E. Q,IMORRlSONiBETHESDA Idrainage I.LET .doc . TEL 561 845 0665 FAX 561 B63 B175 ~=" Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. February 8, 2000 . 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach,Florida 33407 City of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Bethesda Parking Lot Expansion Dear Sir, Please be advised that the improvements as shown on the proposed site plan for a parking lot expansion will create impervious space. This impervious space will create surface water runoff, which will be contained in either a retention area or exfi1tration trench. The containment volume created will meet both SFWMD requirements as well as any additional requirements imposed by the City of Boynton Beach. Please call me at (561) 840-0819 if you have any questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, Q;;QZU;;:~TFS.INC Russell C. Morrison, P.E. Q:\MORRlSON\:BETHESDA \drainage l.LET .doc . TEL 561 845 0665 FAX 561 863 8175 ~=r' Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. February 8, 2000 . 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 City of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Bethesda Parking Lot Expansion Dear Sir, Please be advised that the improvements as shown on the proposed site plan for a parking lot expansion will create impervious space. This impervious space will create surface water runoff, which will be contained in either a retention area or exfiltration trench. The containment volume created will meet both SFWMD requirements as well as any additional requirements imposed by the City of Boynton Beach. Please call me at (561) 840-0819 if you have any questions regarding this issue. Sincerely, Q:i2C;;;:;:ATES, me Russell C. Morrison, P .E. Q:\MORRISON\BETHESDA \drainage I.LET .doc . TEL 561 845 0665 fAX 561 863 8175 ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Memorandum . 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 To: Lusia Galav, Senior Planner From: Rod Wallen, Project Manager Date: March 31, 2000 Re: First Review of Bethesda Memorial Hospital Parking Expansion Project No. 044301000 We have reviewed the comments, dated March 14, 2000 for the above referenced project. Revised plans are attached. Below is a summary of revisions/responses to said comments. The number correlates directly to the "Review Comments" for each commenting Department, which are attached for reference: UTILITIES: I) All known utility easements are shown. The Landscape Plan is reflective of the Department's concern with trees in/near utility easements. 2) The Landscape Plan utilizes water conserving designs to the extent practical. Upon design of the Irrigation Plan, we shall consider alternate water sources, if readily available. 3) We have attached written acknowledgement by the Engineer stating that the drainage design shall conform to all applicable requirements by the City and SFWMD. 4) Our drainage calculations conclude that we can meet said 3 day/72 hour event with 224 LF of 5' x 5' exfiltration trench. Additionally, a 100 year, 3 day storm event can be contained on site by grading the' exterior parameters of the parking at elevation 16.5 feet. Therefore, the proposed facility will not contribute to the flooding of surrounding buildings. Attached please find preliminary Drainage Plans for your review. . TEL 561 845 0665 FAX 561 863 8175 ~=n Kimley.Horn and Associates, Inc. Lusia Galav March 31, 2000 Page 2 of3 ENGINEERING: 5) The requested note has been added to the Site Plan. 6) Proposed locations for site lighting have been provided. 7) A Wall Locations Detail has been added to the Site Plan to better depict their location. 8) A note specifying "no signage" has been added to the Site Plan. This is intended to be exclusive of traffic control signs (i.e., Stop Sign) and minor signs by the Owner to post intended use (i.e., Employees Only) or towing policy. 9) A Landscape Plan has been provided. I 0) Drive aisle widths have been revised to meet referenced drawing. 11) See Items 3 and 4. 12) A 4' wide sidewalk, as noted, has been added to the Site Plan. 13) We acknowledge the Conceptual Plan submitted did not meet review standards. BUILDING DIVISION: 14) 15) The title has been changed to Site Plan. An additional plan sheet has been added entitled "Pedestrian Access Plan". This plan depicts the proposed parking expansion in relation to the Hospital Building. Handicap accessible entry doors have been indicated on this new plan sheet. Existing handicap accessible parking is depicted on the aforementioned "Pedestrian Access Plan', along with its disbursement. The number of existing handicap accessible parking spaces meets that required. The requirement for handicap spaces is met at the Hospital Building. The aforementioned "Pedestrian Access Plan" depicts the movement of pedestrians from proposed parking expansion to the Hospital Building. The proposed new construction will be designed to meet the requirements of the Florida Accessibility Code 4.1.5 and 4.1.6 up to the "existing facility" which, being in existence prior to October 1997, is not required to comply with said code, although accessible features are provided. 16) !?~ ~=n Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Lusia Galav March 31, 2000 Page3 of3 18) Proposed locations for site lighting have been added to the Site Plan, as well as notes sufficient to communicate that the Lighting Plan will comply with the code as sub-items a) through d) request. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST: 19) The Site Plan has been revised to indicate our intended action for each of the existing 20 trees on site. 20 Trees are depicted. PLANNING & ZONING: 20) Parking calculations, in tabular form, have been added to the Site Plan. Also see the aforementioned "Pedestrian Access Plan" which depicts the location of the existing handicap accessible parking. 21) See parking calculations as added. 22) Drive aisle widths have been revised to meet referenced drawing. 23) Landscape Plans have been added as part of this submission. 24) The parking stall width has been dimensioned as requested. Q:\044301000\Corresp\lst Rev.doc