AGENDA DOCUMENTS
7B2
CONGRESS LAKES PUD
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
On Tuesday, February 6, 1990 the City Commission determined that
this request does not constitute a substantial change and is for-
warding this request to the Planning and Zoning Board for final
consideration.
,
/
~
PLANNING': DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90- 0 17
TO: ' J. Scott Miller
City Manager
THRU:
Timothy P. Cannon ~L
Interim Planning Director
DATE:
James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
January 19, 1990
FROM:
, 1.
'\
SUBJECT: AGENDA - Congress Lakes Planned Unit Development
Master Plan Modification - File No. 394
1'1" "
Jose Aguila, agent for American Development Corporation, property
owner, has requesteq a modification to the previously approved
master plan for the Congress Lakes Planned Unit Development
(PUD), as outlined in the attached correspondence. The
modification requested is to allow for the exclusion of a 13.179
acre parcel (owned by American Development Corporation) from the
Congress Lakes Planned Unit Development. The purpose for
requesting the remo\7al of this parcel from, the planned unit
development is to allow for the rezoning of this parcel to C-3,
Community commercial, for the development of a 140,000 square
foot shopping center.
Prior to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan on November 7, 1989,
the property owner petitioned the City Commission to change the
land use on the subject parcel from "High Density Residential" to
"Local Retail Commercial". The City Commission approved this
request and the c~ange was incorporated in the plan. The
approved 'change'to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan
has provided the basis for the submittal of this master plan
modification and the accompanying rezoning application from PUD
to C-3.
i.
)
r
The procedure for approving master plan modifications in planned
uni t developments is twofold. First, the City Commission must
make a determination as to whether or not the changes requested
are. substantial in nature. A determination of substantial change
on the part of the City Commission, which has sole discretion in
this matter, would. require a new application ,for PUD. On the
other hand, a determination of no substantial change allows the
forwarding of the request to the Planning and Zoning Board. The
Planning and Zoning Board then may approve the request. This
proced~re appears in Appendix B, Section 12 of the Code of
Ordinances.
II
i.
i
I
i
'! ~
I'
With respect to the change requested'by Mr. Aguila, the Technical
Review Board met on Thursday, January 18, 1990 to review the
plans and documents submitted and they are recommending that the
City Commission mq.ke a finding of substantial change for the
modification requested. The basis for this recommendation is
outlined below:
I'
. .
I
1. Removal o,f the 13.179 acre parcel from' the PUD will
result in. an increase of density for the remaining PUD
from 11.2 dwelling units per acre to 12.04 dwelling
units perl 'acre. The increase in density results from a
previous master plan modification which allocated only
.~ , 1
)
,
i
"
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-017
Jan. 19, 1990
59 dwelling units to the American Development
Corporation property (see staff report dated July 5,
1988 in Exhibit "A"). The current gross density of
only 4.48 dwelling units per acre on the American
Development Corporation property, when eliminated from
the PUD, results in the overall increase in density for
the remaining PUD. The original density for the
Congress Lakes PUD, at the time of annexation into the
Cicy, was 11.2 dwelling unit~ per acre. The increase
to 12 . 04 dwelling units per acre occurred after the
rezoning of the Catalina Centre hotel and shopping
center to C-3.
2. The removal and commercial rezoning of the 13.179 acre
parcel will create a potential land use conflict by
allowing the rear of the shopping center to be exposed
to the residential units in the PUD with little
separation between the two zoning districts (i~e.,
there will be no lake or road separating the two
properties).
3. Allowing the removal of the 13.179 acre parcel from the
PUD and the subsequent rezoning and development of a
140,000 ~quare foot shopping center will result in an
increase in water demand (see attached memorandum from
the Utilities Department in Exhibit liB"): '
If the City Commission makes a finding of no substantial change
for the modification requested, then this 'request should be
forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board for final
consideration.
If it is the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board to approve
this request, then approval should be contingent upon approval of
the accompanying application to rezone from PUD to C-3.
t-i AVi
dAMES . GOLDEN
-, . a;ij
JJG:frb
Encs
.J;~
cc: Jose Aguila
Congrlks
01/19/90
2
r:.
'l~:~ ~1;;}Jl?:~)#~
)1"11'Z;::;..Z:,J.
~,:,:,@~,<,
.,..Ii..,..j".,U'.'r.... ,1;J~I.'~"II.I.,.'.::
.~~t~~~~.~~(:\~~ ~.;:5;~0:):~::;.:,:'::~:::. .":"
:~i'@f :<,: '., :-'\i',~",,,,,....::;:,,,,
k!::;r.lj~:": ::;()t?,::5i:::':'
'/.{,~,,,,,,'f,')l ' " Q'~ < ., ,.. .... ..
:t:,'ll,':;4 \ ,
'I,tt,::<~\i ~\:::: ""
'1
""\'\'1
\~: ,.j:',
, ',!
'. ~
.......
. ..~..'_.
.~'''''''
,/
t:}
..... '. ,::i
,
. .. ....
"1.:
Currie
Schneider
Associates
AlA, PA
Architecti. Planner!>
& Interior Deiigners
January 4, 1990
25 Seabreeze
Delray Beach. FL
.33483
4071276.4951. 737-2279
305/429.1566
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Department
100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Re: Congress Lakes P.U.D. modification
Dear Sirs:
This will serve as a formal request to modify the Congress Lakes
P.U.D.. The purpose of this modification is to allow the exclusion
of the 13.179 acres known as American Development.'
It is the intent of the Deve lopers to submit to, the City for
rezoning to the C-3 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Zoning category
and follow up with a site plan which indicates approximately
130,000 S.F. of shopping and out parcels. This modification is
consistent with the <current master plan recently adopted by the
City. .
Should you require any additional information from this office,
please do not hesitate to contact us.
ASSOCIATES AlA, PA
.. ,J~
JA/eb
"
\
',:'
FAX: 4071243-8184
EXHIBIT "A"
,
. .ij
I.:
o ~
T~\
. .
"'.
".
..
I
"
A.G E NDA ME M 0 RAN D,~ M
July 5, 1988
) ,
TO: PETER L. CHENEY, CITY MANAGER I
" 1
FROM: CARMEN:S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTO~
RE: CONGRESS LAKESPUD MASTER PLAN MODIFIOATION
, ' J
Jess Sowards, agent for C&R Developers: Inc. and American
Development Corporation, is requesting a modification, to the
previously approved master plan for the Congress Lakes PUD.
Specifically, the applicant is requesting that the undeveloped
parcel south ~f N.W. 22nd Avenue be divided into two separate
parcels-consistent with the existing property ,ownership, and
that the 525 residential dwelling units appr6ved for the
property south of N.W. 22nd Avenue be realloqated with 466 units
being assigned to the parcel owned by C&R Dev.elopers, Inc. and
the remaining 59 units being assigned to the parcel owned by .
American Deve~opment Corporation. The 59 units assigned to the
property owned by American Development Corporation are proposed
in place of a private' recreation area that was shown on the
previous master plan.ij The applicant is also proposi6g to add a
second point of acces~ to N.W. 22nd Avenue near the western
boundary of the PUD to serve the parcel owned by C&R Developers,
Inc., and tO,provide separate access to the parcel. owned by
American Development Corporation. Access to the American
Development Company parcel would occur by way of the existing
dead-end col~ector road on the north side of the shopping center
and by connection of a roadway to N.W. 22ndAvenue which would
form a liT'. .intersection with the entrance to Mahogany Bay, which
is located on the north side of N.W. 22nd Avenue. For a further
clarification of this request, attached you will find a copy of
the letter.of request, legal consent from tho prc~erty owners, a
copy of a revised traffic report prepared by Kimley-Horn, and a
copy of the proposed master plan which outlines the unit
allocation and proposed access.
The'procedute for approving master plan modifications in planned
unit developments is twofold. First, the C~ty Commission must
make a determination as to whether or not tpe changes requested
are substantial in nature. A determination of substantial change
on the part 'of the City Commission, which has sole discretion in
this matter, would require a new application for pun. On the
other hand, 'a determination of no substantial change allows the
forwarding of the request to the Planning and Zoning Board. The
Planning and Zoning Board then may approve the request. This
procedure appears, in! Appendix B, Section 12 ('f th~ Code of
Ordinances. <
.-lll.
With "respect to the change requested by Mr. Sowards, the
Technical Review Board " met on Tuesday, July 5, 1988; to review
the plans and documents submitted, and they offer for y~ur
consideration, a recommendation that the City commission make a
finding of no substantial change for the requested modification,
conditionea ,upon the following:
J _
1) That the City Attorney review and approve the documentation
submitted by the property owners which provides for their
consent to enteitinto this application. '
2) That the applicant's, traffic engineer submit the
information necessary to determine if the new traffic
distribution pattern for this development will affect the
level of service at the N.W. 22nd Avenue/Congress Avenue
intersection at buildout of the project and the thoroughfare
plan.; ,
"
. __---.1.._
" ..'
\
.".
'\
-2-
3) That the County Engineer reviews and approves the proposed
design configuration for N.W. 22nd Avenue referenced in
Attachment "B" of the Kimley-Horn report dated 6/30/88.
.
4) That the 'deyeloper of the Gerulaitis multi-family project
(C&R Properties) provide a five (5) item recreation
package which meets the approval of the Parks and Recreation
Department for a 50\ credit to the Parks and Recreation
dedication fee, as per the previous master plan approval.
,
5) That the site plans submitted for the remainder of the pun
south of N.W. 22nd reflect conditions #1 through #4 above.
, # I
If it is the,~ecision of the City Commission to make a finding of
no substantial change in this matter, then it is recommended that
the planning and Zoning Board approve this request subject to
conditions #~ through #5 above.
~ s d- ~ ...::Z;;:
CARMEN S. ANNUNfftATO,
CSA:ro
cc Central File
~
i
\.
~,
"II
.
.
i
, (
t
!
, "
EXHIBIT "B"
,4
, )~~
..~J;~l
", <'1~~
"r), ':.
.... ~~:
;,.; ,.
';.",' "
. .... .;.
,':*,)
;~ >~i~<:::~
: '~,
? ,.,J
':,' ,;
j'fl'~
,,;,.,:::>'"
",;:~,>:~
:'.Ii :. .~':~~:'~l:
';r: . "J" v";..
~. -})~.::~;
MEMORANDUM
Utiiities #90-038
TO: Timothy Cannon
Acting Planning
FROM: John A. Guidry
Director of Utilities
DATE: January 22, 1990
SUBJECT: TRB Review - Congress Lakes - Amendment of P~U.D.
After reviewing the subject request for amending the P.U.D.
boundary and the subsequent rezoning to C-3 of the parcel owned
by American Development Corporation, we can make the following
determinations:
1. Development of the C-3 zoned parcel with 140,000 square feet
of rental area would yield an estimated water demand of
17,500 gallons per day (gpd). The same parcel is currently
planned for 59 residential units with an expected demand of
14,750 gpd, yielding a net increased demand of 2,750 gpd or
18.6%. We believe this to be a significant intensification
of usage.
,..1LU
i' .l
2. At this time, we have serious concerns about the avail-
ability of reserve potable water capacity to allow service
to the undeveloped parcels in this P.U.D. Any intensifi-
cation of usage would exacerbate this shortfall in capacity,
and should be discouraged.
dmt
bc: Peter Mazzella
cc.
:;. lot) 71 /Y1,' II~
,/':':-r-t"'r'O:--
., ,: ;'
r:~'::
"\::!":. ~
", :'~'.:~??::..
.. ,.."'::.,
'.'~ .~ .~~}i/:::':
.;;tl.......;;. .
"~..,"
hn,,'~ IIIIII!~ hJ:i:'!~i
I II IljiU i In. ..:I~
Ii;u=!;;;a;h IH:t~1
II-lid IUIU:S U:U'
I"
1= tiillliPli II!:!I'J ~ I
~.'
NORTH
· ,:'~~f>~';:';t+
, ,
. ......'
......'..
.............~ ....... . ..
; ;. :.:/_::::::'z/ ,;/f0,/1t:f;f1i
;"" ',' ",:.,:,:<,-.y(~'::'" ,~.f#~
,f, .;;(~,',;/;ij;?1
: ,.. :... ',~'f:,' I ,:' ,:,;'?4:;1?i:0,,1~:I/-:I/
.:~. :' '):. . ll-';~"Ji.,'lll :~.;.~~ ..::"(t~~/
~"" ;<.~.r.,7.'.,.I.~"~'~"'"
.ll:'r~i,;I~i
.:~~ ',"': (,~,:,,:"~:l-' '~" .J',
t. ..
'~
).
J
;:,'
.f'
...1
';'''r".
\
",
~'~~.
.'~'~
';!A
l:'
."..... .'
-.-..-..-
._.. __...._a__..-
, ~
,..- CMiWlL "..,t
~
~
.
b
< ~. J II
"I i~~
e.1S
~ ..~'
"- ,12
r.
'.
".
3dO~c
Od~O~
13^3C
, 1~3~'
i
J
!
I \ .
,I \'
If :
, ,I'
c..-J
'-1-00-1'
I ' \
.._1 1___1
! '
, . .,. ~
. ':~~J2i-'. )..'
(~~.
~ '
~ .
! I
I
"
,/
.
, '
---~