REVIEW COMMENTS
r o)JG: RL~s [--tE~:-> Jtf?!L
.._-~-.- ---.---
f. AfPkovJr-L co,JVr:rIJt:.G.Yj upo);f:-f(>oJt/:r}/~ Tv C-_s
-, .
12~"O()., I /;2,%?.w
[il. ~ daf-t
Nt? &11vC65 ~5 11LD Nf1v1 !O~M ;r'1.Otftie-
;tIY? f.1fU U7L~-C~Ff~. Li;J.:~
I-L tL (i V '/'jLJ )..;(-'A-L-4- a..~t~~~/ 1~ti-
11" 6111!"e'~ ~5l?tD AfPH ~..
5~4+ Jfft:{'1 ~ tl1ov<.
11;. -1'3 It e-
1. /5. + du/i?:
/qt.7- CtJngY-e~ ~~~ 1t<-D fvt P
--
t; & 1- C4i- I
p, c;~ f..AJ' Z
~J. ~ ()
-:J!!i1. '--r:O'''f7l&/~~ : ---------
I~ t~~ _
21 ~ ~ (V~ /hAIL
3~ 1',~#~'~
f.. f ~,~ 5t1l-1fP~~ I*:~
i - ~
,~
/0tlf-1
~I
J-~,ft.J1-
) 1 " Q L rl. \
~~
:>1 i n6{tt-le5
o 't-M fAr
13r7~ 0,0
~ ::;:/()~o4-4~
~ = 081 - 5~~~ = .l63
.~ P{f~~~f1.,G,
/,
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #90-038
TO: Timothy Cannon
Acting Planning
FROM: John A. Guidry
Director of Utilities
DATE: January 22, 1990
SUBJECT: TRB Review - Congress Lakes - Amendment of P.U.D.
After reviewing the subject request for amending the P.U,D.
boundary and the subsequent rezoning to C-3 of the parcel owned
by American Development Corporation, we can make the following
determinations:
1. Development of the C-3 zoned parcel with 140,000 square feet
of rental area would yield an estimated water demand of
17,500 gallons per day (gpd). The same parcel is currently
planned for 59 residential units with an expected demand of
14,750 gpd, yielding a net increased demand of 2,750 gpd or
18,6%, We believe this to be a significant intensification
of usage.
2, At this time, we have serious concerns about the avail-
ability of reserve potable water capacity to allow service
to the undeveloped parcels in this P.U.D. Any intensifi-
cation of usage would exacerbate this shortfall in capacity,
and should be discouraged.
dmt
bc: Peter Mazzella
cc
:;;, (, <,71 /Y1,' 11""-.
'.-,,~
VI. DEVELOPMENT PLAN..$;.,
C
cc: Bldg, Plan
Eng, Uti!
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-017
TO:
J. Scott Miller
City Manager
\l
Timothy P. Cannon <( [,
Interim Planning Director
THRU:
FROM: James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
DATE: January 19, 1990
SUBJECT: AGENDA - Congress Lakes Planned Unit Development
Master Plan Modification - File No. 394
Jose Aguila, agent for American Development corporation, property
owner, has requested a modification to the' previously approved
master plan for the Congress Lakes Planned Unit Development
(PUD) , as outlined in the attached correspondence. . The
modification requested is to allow for the exclusion of a 13.179
acre parcel (owned by American Development Corporation) from the
Congress Lakes Planned Unit Development. The purpose for
requesting the removal of this parcel from the planned unit
development is to allow for the rezoning of this parcel to C-3,
Conununity conunercial, for the development of a 140,000 square
foot shopping center.
Prior to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan on November 7, 1989,
the property owner petitioned the City Commission to change the
land use on the subject parcel from "High Density Residential" to
"Local Retail Commercial". The City Commission approved this
request and the change was incorporated in the plan. The
approved change to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan
has provided the basis for the submittal of this master plan
modification and the accompanying rezoning application from PUD
to C-3. f!<- 0 po5i3{J T+l'l~)j(
The procedure for approving master plan modifications in planned
unit developments is twofold. First, the City conunission must
make a determination as to whether or not the changes requested
are substantial in nature. A determination of substantial change
on the part of the City Commission, which has sole discretion in
this matter, would require a new application for PUD. On the
other hand, a determination of no substantial change allows the
forwarding of the request to the Planning and Zoning Board. The
Planning and Zoning Board then may approve the request. This
procedure appears in Appendix B, Section 12 of the Code of
Ordinances.
With respect to the change requested by Mr~,Aguila, the Technical
Review Board met on Thursday, January 18\ 1990 to review the
plans and documents submitted and they are recommending that the
City Commission make a finding of substantial change for the
modification requested. The basis for this recommendation is
outlined below:
1.
Removal of the 13.179 acre parcel from the PUD will
result in an increase of density for the remaining PUD
from 11.2 dwelling units per acre to 12.04 dwelling
units per acre. The increase in density results from a
previous master plan modification which allocated only
J J. Y
/2.0
1/.;;(
1
1-U
.'-F'!!.-i-,
i
(
I
I \
\ 1---1 ,---
I :'
:,,_.._1 i
v-_~I
1\
, 1\:'
I .
I
,\ 'I
I \ :
:'
,
1
I:'
~~q~L I
CORPO
PAOPE
.~'!'l~..- .~,_...-...
M~~
$!I'
d
&~
N~.
...-:/
'N
r
,.~,.,.",." 00JIa"' '
I ~ I.; ill I'~ '
, ~ IShIi.l II m ~~ ~ Ii
, ' II i ~ .ul'l M ~ ~ i j
, .~
-' - -' --- ---
-" .- --.---- --- ---
-~:'
~:
"
Un s:nuu u::-
!.'~:l:' "IW", i ::111.
~fl!llllm!i ,IIi i
~~lbllllmill iilihl
il
il:-
Iii
'j
~
.
;to
~
~
Hl.~ON
'~l'~,
..,'
,~
..,.;
f
l'f.
,9
";'''.'~
'(
;~.
l
<,; :t
). c~;.
1
.'
,>:
Y.
.;.
,; I
" I
>:\~~
'.....,t
<'
".
J
,..
. ,
,,(
",0;
/,'
",.
'eS;
";;.
-I:'
.;'1:
.~
,~
~/
~.
,,:
:~, .
"
'I.
:\,
"
.{
l~
,,,
.\'
:.
"
"~;
"I'
't
.'l
'..i '
,
,;:1' ;.
.,)
~~
,.:..'
.tt',.
~ --
~'I""~'._'
i:
'"
bgl~,ij hl:lh
I
11
. ,
iill! .ililil Itll~
I!HhIIU!enlli!(J~ '
i, ii, g ,1!1I1' I 11'1:1';'1
1III'ij Ihlllj I'~'il
"
'Ii.ll ,.'
-L..~[ ,
. .' .
"
~a
I.
l;
I ~/
r
.,..
'k
l
.
::ig
..
"
"
I I I
I I I. 1-'
I. II I f~" leG J I
,1 If
, I/I'j I
! I I I: J .-
"'i I' :
J II ." ,
, '1
I I )~
~~
LC'CA TION rv'::\R}
. CONGRESS ,LAK'ES 'PUID'
:.i.=~' II 1111 j I II \I I 1~t'/11111 "'\ \ } J:::\\~~mEBI , ~ ~ : ~...;! I
' i , -4.~~ m, ~1I1 III, II IIII ,
'-'" ,/ I .I,'~ ' , I 1 I , I I I I , 1III III ii' \". ' ~,' L. :~' . . ,'~
I~ I " c:: · q., 1
jJ-....'.:. .:.:..;.' -- rWffistl (:' :~.QL ~J (~lJD J":1 " ~::: .
.:'s \ '~~~1J '. 4c(ff~ .~~ ~I~ I,:
I P"'III ;.mil:'::,:. ~riti .~? Ii] d' :f~~ J "
Is I ~ ..... "~J, ~~~~ ,"- ~ r;,... - -
'.... .= L,UI~~"" ;;j \ ~i"?;0. ~ ~~I s.:~i~ _y'W7TJil1~,.,""~
L ~ == ~,,~ ~~ ~Y' . r;:;.r: ~.l' ;:; ..,
I, = ,m:: - "MELt: he ... '. / RTV" ~ ~ ~~-"..,-r.. .,
~ .. ~~ ' ~J.H~t:r l~. . .
- -- ' ", ~.\])- ;:?hJ[J; " ~\ ": /'
IIrr)...~" 1= , r:;1 - C "I~' 1= "-. "--- \--1
~ L:J ~ j - ':J4<( .......... I __. '
· )\ ,~' rJ1~~~r'~J' " .. ~/;
--: ':-~' j' ~ ~~L-;~-: '.'0' \~. .~ j:'
I l ~. :. ~ '\ \ . ~)\ . i
~,a I '..",..." too :3 :;.,~ Ii: .. \~ -< ·
if'.!, r '1 ~~ '" ,.. '~~ ~ ~. i ,,~.-<~..\ /~.:
Jl' l ~'\'"'' ,~,,~ ~ :: '; :. I \ ~t!-:' ~
t' , fi:J ,<;\ ..41" W :\..~ - JV''';VI '.. ..' I _J --=N~o' ',.'-J'(. :.:..1.
Q II ~~ --.- '-.---_ N,W'IZ ',Li
at ~ ~I ~ L ~ ~ ~r' ,,- r ~' i\ t;.... Ii::
'-t'.l ~c? ~~~' ' · : j \ "........ ': ' - /.Jii) ~
:J:': ',~ I ~ ~ :I; : ;. :' ..J1A.ME RTt: J~ ~'! t.r.i
i,~~ I _ ~ , ~~ rfJi~C" DEVELOI'r~EN ,'1i.";i~
1l~~t:!J1~ _..:1. ~~ LJL_s. ~..g?~P~91 :~O fJ, rr~u~
II I IF,'- · - ",IJ 1.1\
.II ._-4 J. ::= ~~ 17":::: .,' t Ii: I
"MOTOROLA' I __ j~ i
- -~,--. i" i
l t;
,pi: I
~.-.;.:
:rr~: .
, .
..../........... .......................... . "~'" / I..... in
~X'X..",.... -... .-...-. '1 I. 1:/'
".. .... ...... l~.:\...~ .'
-- - '.. . ........ . ..... . 'i'" ....... ...n ..... .",. ..~
'",' 0' '.'. ,"~\ i...... i I" ',", ,'j', i-I"I,~' .:
"~,I I
, ,~ \ ::j , , , I I I .... ~r-..
:' '.... .,. .. . -., t-....,.;
~. \I:: :~ R !r:h~~ ~
I, "I- i-- 'E' r- ~.... - ,
t ')'Y-H'''~. : r-: ,.. :: 1
':.' V":l Y""~,C : ~ r-'AI
'. \ '~.\.'CX, ..'- ,..;"
, , .\\" l.'t' L ~
"Y')'~ - --
. .~.l.....
· . tor .n- .1
" 'if \ \..l f- ....
.. '",. ...- i--
'\ ; ': of" I I , ,,~
! i-.'--U. r-
:: I '" "TIT
· I <l!'"
. :; to- to- C - - ;
. :~ l : t
I - ~)! , ~.':
, ~(' :.~
t --/ ~.. 1'-
'- : ,'~,
:' !-rr' ~.~
. fI . .,t:; c. '~. ' ,
, ,~ Qt~;
R3' ". i 11 I I J ~~i
I- ',........ . 1
. l I It", r :1 ., , . ~~,
II I I" :~, J:jj I., I I 7)~~1
, (',~_..'l, ./tj; ~ .......',.1,.., ~
, ' Ijl
: :,~~
....;..-.J.A .
. .
\
~
"'--
---
... 3 ~':
.
~" L~
I
,
.
.
.
, ~
, I
~ .,
1 . ~
~
.
J II)
.. II)
\l
II'
R1AA ..
.. In-
,; JLL
l~ ....._ ,
II f _ I
'- ~
"acyl' TON aEACH
o · r-rr-r:-I' ~
'II , " / r
~ ;,,'.
'\. ! r
'I:. '
'd,
1/8
1/4
MILE S.
~ -,
.... .... ~
":, V ~
, ""
I. ~''i'
. , I
:0 .400, "800
I
1600 FEgT
_. . , I. "0' ..
-
......- --
-' /,.."
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-017
Jan. 19, 1990
59 dwelling units to the American Development
Corporation property (see staff report dated July 5,
1988 in Exhibit "A"). 'I'heCllrr""nt~s-i-ty-of-
on-~---L.4,a_dwe lling ,un-i-ts -pera:cre' u -oIi"-the----Ame1"-ican "
Deve lnpmen t ,~c'OrpGr_a-tionproperty, when eliminated from '
-t.hJLRY~J ,re-sults"inthe'oVera:ll increase in -density-for
t~--IeID~!ning PUD. The original density for the
Congress Lakes PUD, at the time of annexation into the
Ci ty, was 11.2 dwelling units per acre. The increase
to 12.04 dwelling units per acre occurred after the
rezoning of the Catalina Centre hotel and shopping
center to C-3.
2. The removal and commercial rezoning of the 13.179 acre
parcel will create a potential land use conflict by
allowing the rear of the shopping center to be exposed
to the residential units in the PUD with 1i.tt1e
separation between the two zoning districts (i.e.,
there will be no lake or road separating the two
properties).
3. Allowing the removal of the l3.179 acre parcel from the
PUD and the subsequent rezoning and development of a
140,000 square foot shopping center will result in an
increase in water demand (see attache~ memorandum from
the Utilities Department in Exhibit "B").
If the City Commission makes a finding of no
for the modification requested, then this
forwarded to the planning' and Zoning
consideration.
substantial change
request should be
Board for final
If it is the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board to approve
this request, then approval should be contingent upon approval of
the accompanying application to rezone from PUD to C-3.
')
~ / ~ " I
(/.,~-",- 1". /)~
~AMES/J. GOLDEN
\,. It'
JJG:frb
Encs
cc: Jose Aguila
Congrlks
01/19/90
!t
2