REVIEW COMMENTS
-~' .-..;.
Received
Date
:rime
JJ,.-
~4.,
M E M 0 RAN DUM
/l7J1
t
July 27, 1983
TO: Betty Boroni
City Clerk
RE: Road Improvement Agreement -The City of Boynton Beach/Riteco
Development Corporation and Janet Knox Field
For your information and filing I have attached the original copy
of a fully executed agreement as identified above.
rYJ ~r:~~
Peter L. Cheney
City M~nager
PLC: jc
Attachment
cc: City Planner - w/attachments
City Engineer - "
City Attorney - "
I I,
'.,\
- ('
/
(
(
, /
>i:i/r> ,.(.:".
M E M 0 RAN DUM
July 27, 1983
TO: Betty Boroni
City Clerk
RE: Road Improvement Agreement -The City of Boynton Beach/Riteco
Development Corporation and Janet Knox Field
For your information and filing I have attached the original copy
of a fully executed agreement as identified above.
rYJ /(f4~
Peter L. Cheney
City M~nager
PLC: jc
Attachment
cc: City Planner - w/attachments
City Engineer - "
City Attorney - "
RECEIVED
,!~ r ?g 1988
PLANf'w..G DEPL
--
\
\
. 0/
. :r"'~
IrJ
(
, .J
(
~,
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREID1ENT, made this ~day of ~/1"n~
1983, by and between the CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, a municipal
corporation in the State of Florida, hereafter referred to as the
"CITY" and RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation,
hereafter referred to as "DEVELOPER," and' -JANET KNOX FIELD, as
Trustee for Martha Rowe Field a/k/a Marth~ Field (now Martha Field
Fite), and as Trustee for Janet Knox Field (now Janet Field Riley
a/k/a Janet Knox Field Riley), hereafter referred to as "TRUSTEE."
R E C I TAL S
WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered into an Agreement
for Roadway Improvements (hereafter referred to as the "Agreement"),
attached hereto as Exhibit "I"; and
WHEREAS, the parties have determined that a modification of
the Agreement would be mutually advantageous to all parties;
NOW ~.'THEREFORE, in consideration of the. -fiu tual promises made
to each other, the parties agree as follows:
I. DEVELOPER agrees to assume all obligations and responsi-
bilities of the TRUSTEE under the Agreement and the parties agree
that TRUSTEE shall be relieved from those duties and obligations
set forth in the Agreement.
2. The last sentence of Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is
amended to read as follows:
The County shall place the funds disbursed by the
ESCROW AGENT to the County in a specific, separate
line item account that will insure that these funds
will only be spent for design, right-of-way
acquisition, construction, four-Ianing and intersection
improvements on State Road 804 at and between Congress
Avenue and Military Trail.
3. Paragraph 6 of the Agreement is deleted. The CITY and
DEVELOPER agree that should the agreement attached hereto as
Exhibit "2" (or an agreement similar in effect) not be accepted by
Palm Beach County within 60 days of the execution of this Supplemental
Agreement, the Agreement and the Supplemental Agreement will, at
the option of either party, be null and void; notice of the exercise
of this option shall be provided in writing to the other party
within 70 days of the execution of this Supplemental Agreement or
;,
(
, '
. ,
{,
the Agreement and Supplemental Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect. In the event of the exercise of said option, the ESCROW
AGENT shall return all the funds in the escrow account referred to
in Paragraph Three of the Agreement to DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER will
retain those roadway obligations it had prior to entering into the
Agreement and Supplemental Agreement.
4. It is expressly agreed by the parties that this document
is supplemental to the Agreement for Roadway Improvements dated
February I, 1983, which is by reference made a part hereof, and
all the terms, conditions, and provisions thereof, unless specifically
modified herein, are to apply.
In the event of any conflict, incon-
.
sistency, or incongruity between the provisions of the Supplemental
Agreement and any of the provisions of the Agreement for Roadway
Improvements dated February 1, 1983, as heretofore amended, the
provisions of the Supplemental Agreement shall in all respects
govern and control.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands
and seal~/ on' the date above written.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
/~~
\ '.
. , I
, >'U:ORPOMTE SEAL)
,
By:f:a;J,~
lC!..e a...~ e r
RITECO
DEVELOP~NT ~~TION
ATTEST:
~-zfiit r;::(lb Mi-A..:zc
Secre tary
(CORPORATE SEAL)
JANET KNOX FIELD, TRUSTEE for
Martha Rowe Field a/k/a Martha
Field (now Martha Field Fite)
and TRUSTEE for Janet Knox Field
(now Janet Field Riley a/k/a
Janet Knox Field Riley)
By:
J
" .
) ;1"
.,
~,
(
AGREEMENT FOR ROADWAY It .{QVEMENTS
THIS AGREEMENT, made this /~
day of _~' 1983
BEACH, a municipal corporation
by and between the CITY OF BOYNTON
in the State of Florida, hereafter referred to as the "CITY" and
RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, and JANET
KNOX FIELD, as Trustee for Martha Rowe Field a/k/a Martha Field
(now Martha Field Fite), and as Trustee for Janet Knox Field (now
Janet Field Riley a/k/a Janet Knox Field Riley), hereafter referred
to collectively as "DEVELOPER".
R E C I TAL S
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER, in conjunction wit hits Congress Lakes
project, more particularly described in Exhibits A-I and A-2,
attached hereto, is obligated to the CITY to four-lane Congress
!l
Avenue from the north right-of-way line of Lake Worth Drainage
I
i
District Canal No. 20 south to the south right-of-way line of
Lake Worth Drainage Canal No. 21 or to pay for the cost of this
, - ,-
...r" ~
improvement if the four-laning is done by another party by the
time building permits for 600 units at Congress Lakes have been
issued: and
:,
WHEREAS, the CITY AND DEVELOPER have determined that a
modification of this obligation would be mutually advantageous to
both Parties:
I;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises made
to each other, the Parties agree as follows:
1. within thirty (30) days of the execution of this Agreement
DEVELOPER will pay Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) to be
deposited in escrow, pursuant to the terms of Paragraph Three of
this Agreement.
2. The CITY agrees that the payment of this Two Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($200,000) will relieve DEVELOPER of all of its
6bligations with respect to Congress Avenue arising from the
Congress Lakes project. The CITY also agrees that, with the
exception of DEVELOPER'S obligation for improving N.W. 22nd
Avenue and with the exception of those turning lanes yet to be
EXHIBIT "I"
Page 1
t' ,'"
\.
~
\,
built to serve the project, as set forth in the traffic study
prepared by Daniel N. Murray & Associates dated August 27, 1981,
payment of these monies will satisfy any and all traffic or other
impact development fee(s) with respect to the development of the
Congress Lakes project, by DEVELOPER, its successors, assigns, or
transferees, as presently proposed or as it may be amended, pro-
vided no increase in density results.
3. The monies referred to in Paragraph One of this Agreement
will be held in escrow by Moyle, Jones & Flanigan, P.A., hereafter
referred to as "ESCROW AGENT". The ESCROW AGENT may invest the
escrowed funds in securities of the united States or any agency
thereof, in savings or time deposits in institutions insured by an
age~cy of the United States. Any interest earned on the escrowed
funds shall go to DEVELOPER and may be disbursed as it is earned.
So long as the ESCROW AGENT hereunder is not guilty of will-
ful malfeasance, the Parties hereto shall indemnify and hold said
ESCROW AGENT harmless from all liability arising out of the
ESCROW AGENT'S actions and duties hereunder, as ESCROW AGENT. In
the event of a dispute as to the ESCROW AGENT'S duties hereunder,
the ESCROW AGENT may file an appropriate action for interpleader
in the Circuit Court for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for
Palm Beach Ccunty, Florida, with respect to the escrowed items and,
in that event, the ESCROW AGENT shall have no further duties or
liabilities hereunder. The party hereto determined not to be
entitled to said deposit shall pay all reasonable costs and
expenses of the ESCROW AGENT in connection therewith.
4. The Parties hereby direct the ESCROW AGENT to disburse
the Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) to Palm Beach County
(the "County") within seven days after bein9 furnished evidence
of the completion of all the following conditions:
Page 2
. '\ .'"
"
I:
I:
t
(
"
"
a. Execution of the contract for the four-laning of
Congress Avenue northward from the northerly "End of project"
station for County Project #80/81 - 4005-301R point to Hypoluxo
Road:
'I
b. The securing of a payment and performance bond insur-
ing said completion of the four-Iariing of that portion of Congress
Avenue described in subsection a. above: and
c. Commencement of construction under the contract re-
ferred to in subsection a. above.
The County shall place the funds disbursed by the ESCROW
i:
AGENT to the County in an escrow account that will insure that
these funds will only be spent for design, right-of-way acquisition
construction, four-Ianing and intersection improvements on State
Road 804 at and between Congress Avenue and Military Trail.
5. In the event the conditions set forth in Paragraph 4 a.-
-
c. are not met within one (I) year of the date of execution of this
I
.i
Agreement, the ESCROW AGENT is hereby authorized to disburse the
$200,000.00 to the DEVELOPER. The Parties agree that disbursement
of monies under this Paragraph will reimpose those roadway improve-
ment obligations on DEVELOPER that it had prior to entering into
this Agreement.
6. This Agreement is contingent on the acceptance by the
County of the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "B". Should
that agreement not be accepted by the County within 120 days of
the execution of this Agreement, this Agreement will be null and
void. In that event, the ESCROW AGENT shall return all the funds
in the escrow account referred to in Paragraph Three of this
Agreement to DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER will retain those roadway
obligations it had prior to entering into this Agreement.
7. The CITY agrees that it has no objection to the Agreement
attached as Exhibit "B".
8. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between
the Parties and may only be modified by subsequent, written in-
strument(s) signed by both parties.
I..
(
(
:1
9. Wherever herein the context so requires, the use of the
singular shall include the plural, the use of masculine shall
include the feminine or the neuter and the use of representative
shall include trustee, receiver, executor, etc.
. 10. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.
II. This instrument embodies the whole Agreement of the Partie
and there are no promises, terms, conditions or obligations other
than those herein contained. This Agreement shall supersede all
previous communications, discussions, representations, advertise-
ments, brochures, proposals or agreements, either verbal or written
,\
between the Parties hereto and not herein contained.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands
,j
and seals on the date above written.
CITY OF BOYNTON
ATTEST:
f"
t
0/
I
';,~
City Clerk
-~
M or
/ '
(corp. Seal)
ATTEST:
~~-''''':>~
.. I I T,
o .' ~ ' " ,/'~~f:zr
1 Secretary
RITECO DEVELOP~~ CORPORATION
, i
. I
By; I\.~\ ,~\\ \
(J
" (Corp. Seal)
'1
"
JANET KNOX FIELD, TRUSTEE for
Martha Rowe Field a/k/a Martha
Field (now Martha Field Fite)
and TRUSTEE for Janet Knox Field
(now Janet Field Riley a/k/a
Janet Kncx Field Riley)
By: ~ ~vL~~u:L:j~~l.t-___
JANET KNOX FIEtC
Page 4
. .
.
"
.
J
: ..... .~.. . ;
... ,~ ..... ~ ...~... - . ~. .-..' ...... "':- ". ........ ,_.._._........_....~-...... ......
'.,
,
"(
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The North 660 feet of the land in the Southeast quarter (SE1/4)
of Section 18, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, lying East of
the East line of property deeded by N.R. Field and wife to Sunny
South Estates, Inc., by deed recorded in Official Record Book
3206, Page 100, which line is described as follows:
&.
jCommencing at the East 1/4 corner of said Section 18, thence
South 89005'09~ West along the North line of the Southeast
one-quarter (SE1/4) of said Section 18, a distance of 1351.46
feet to the Point of Beginning; thence South 01044'21" West
along a line parallel with and 1350.0 feet (as measured at right
angles) Westerly of the East line of said section 18, a distance
of 1310.28 feet to the Southerl~ right-of-way of N.W. 22nd
Avenue; thence continue South 01044'21" West a distance of
1270.15 fe.et to a point- on the North 1 ine of Section 19, ,Town-
ship 45 South, Range 43 East, lying 1351.64 feet Westerly (as
m~asured along the North line of said Section 19) from the
Northeast corner of said Section 19; thence continue South
01044'21" ~est a distanci of 1253.52 feet more or less to the
North line of the Boynton Canal.
.
Subject to right-of-way of Congress Avenue and also subject to
all other rights-of-way an~~asements of record.
EXHIBIT "A-I"
"
. .
.
,.
-.(
. ..
(
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
"
....
Subject to right~of-way of Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd
Avenue. Also subject to all other Rights-of-Way easements of
record.
"
EXHIBIT IIA-2"
....
.
.... "-.._~"'~-J ,~--.-rt' ~-.'; ..- -.,..".--
..~. . .....,.. : ~... ._..~..~L:-~~q-~:';';--:-...~ ....~:-.-, .'. _..:...~ .
'-' ."
-(
.. ...:....{ .......#,- - .-- -~'----1'-_."'-~"-:"-
,'>' ',' -~'...,
AGREEMENT FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
"
day of
, 198,
THIS AGREEMENT, made this
by and between the COUNTY OF PALM BEACH through the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, hereafter referred to as the "COUNTY" and RITECO
-
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, hereafter referred
to as "DEVELOPER".
R E C I TAL S
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER, in conjunction with its Sandhill project,
more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, is
obligated to construct or pay for certain traffic improvements,
with the timing o~ said obligations based on certain levels of
traffic generated by the Sandhill project (hereafter referred to
'-
as the "traffic improvement obligations"); and
WHEREAS, the traffic improvement obligations are set forth in
,
Sections I through VI of an agreement between the Parties dated
August 1, 1978, as modified by agreement between the Parties dated
January 22, 1980, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits
B-1 and B-2 and incorporated herein: and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY AND DEVELOPER have determined that a
modification of these obligations would be mutually advantageous to
both Parties:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises made
to each other, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Within thirty (30) days of the execution of this Agreement,
DEVELOPER will pay Seventy Four Thousand Dollars ($74,000) to be
deposited in escrow, pursuant to the terms of Paragraph Three of
this Agreement.
2. The COUNTY agrees that the payment of this Seventy Four
Thousand Dollars ($74,000) will relieve DEVELOPER of all of its
traffic improvement obligations arising from the Sandhill project,
with the exceptions of those obligations set forth in Sections I,
.
II, III, except for the traffic signal at the intersection of Congress
EXHIBIT' "B"
,
.. . OJ.. ..
.
.....
\,
\
~venue and N.W. 22nd Avenue, and IV, of Exhibit B-1, as modified in
Exhibit B-2 (hereafter referred to as the "retained traffic improve-
ment obllgations~). The COUNTY also agrees that, with the exception
of the r,~ained traffic improvement obligations, which shall remain
as obligations of the DEVELOPER, payment of these monies will satisfy
any and a~l traffic or other impact development fee(s) with respect
to the development of the Sandhill project, by DEVELOPER, its
successors, assigns, or transferees, as presently proposed or as
it may be amended, provided no increase in density results.
3. The monies referred to in Paragraph One of this Agreement
will be held in escrow by Moyle, Jones & Flanigan, P.A., hereafter
referred to as "ESCROW AGENT". The ESCROW AGENT may invest the
.
escrowed funds in securi~ies of the United States or any agency
thereof, in savings or time deposits in institutions insured by an
~gency of the United States. Any interest earned on the escrowed
funds shall go to DEVELOPER and may be disbursed as it is earned.
So long as the ESCROW AGENT hereunder is not guilty of
willful malfeasance, the Parties hereto shall indemnify and hold
said ESCROW AGENT harmless from all liability arising out of the
ESCROW AGENT'S actions and duties hereunder, as ESCROW AGENT. In
the event of a dispute as to the ESCROW AGENT'S duties hereunder,
the ESCROW AGENT may file an appropriate action for interpleader
in the Circuit Court For the 15th Judicial'Circuit In And For Palm
Beach County, Florida, with respect to the escrowed items and, in
that event, the ESCROW AGENT shall have no further duties or
liabilities hereunder. The Party hereto determined not to be
entitled to said deposit shall pay all reasonable costs and expenses
of the ESCROW AGENT in connection therewith.
4. The parties hereby direct the ESCROW AGENT to disburse
the Seventy Four Thousand Dollars ($74,000) to the COUNTY within
seven days after being furnished satisfactory evidence' of the
completion of all of the following conditions:
a. Execution of the contract for the four-laning of Congress
Aven:ue northward from the northerly "End of Project" station for
County Project #80/81 - 4005-30lR point to Hypoluxo Road:
-2---
. - ..-- _--: .-.' -- -:--:-~:-~-- "--"'--:~~~-~':---1:-"""""- .,,~,;~o;;-;..-:t-::".'
--..... - - .
.- . .. ~'. '. ~
"'- .--..
\
"
- .. -- "'!".. ~.'-.""".'
.. .'
,. '"
b. The securing of a payment and performance bond insuring
said completion of the four-lOlling of that portion of Congress
Avenue described in subsection a. above; and
c. Commencement of construction under the contract referred
to in subsection a. above.
-
The COUNTY shall place the funds disbursed by the ESCROW
AGENT to the COUNTY in an escrow account ,that will insure that
these funds will only be spent for design', right-of-way acquisition,
construction, four-Ianing and intersection improvements on State
Road 804 at and between Congress Avenue and Military Trail.
5. In the event the conditions set forth in Paragraph 4 a.-c.
are not met within one (1) year of the date of execution of this
agreement, the ESCROW AGENT is hereby authorized to disburse the
$74,000.00 to the DEVELOPER. The Parties agree that disbursement
...
of monies under this Paragraph will reimpose those roadway improve-
ment obligations on DEVELOPER that it had prior to entering into
thi~ agreement.
6. This Agreement is contingent on the acceptance by the
City of Boynton Beach (the "City") of the Agreement attached hereto
as Exhibit "C", (hereafter the "Boynton Beach agreement"). Should
this agreement not be accepted by the City within l20 days of the
execution of this Agreement, this Agreement will be null and void.
In that event, the ESCROW AGENT shall return all the funds in the
escrow account referred to in Paragraph Three of this Agreement to
DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER will retain those roadway obligations it had
prior to entering into this agreement.
7. The COUNTY agrees that it has no objection to the Boynton
Beach agreement. The COUNTY further agrees that any funds it
receives pursuant to the provisions of the Boynton Beach agreement
will be placed in an escrow account that will insure that these
funds will only be spent for design, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, four-laning and intersection improvements on State
Road 804 at and between Congress Avenue and Militery Trail.
8. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between
the Parties and may only be modified by subsequent, written
- instrument(s) signed by both Parti~~.
-3-
~'
, ..
-.. -.. ~"."':"-"':.. -... -.
,'" .
.~
(
~
(
9. Wherever herein the context so requires, the use of the
singular shall include the plural, the use of masculine shall
,
include the feminine or the neuter and the use of representative
shall include trustee, receiver, executor, etc.
It
10. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.
II. This instrument embodies the whole agreement of the
Parties and there are no promises, term~; conditions or obligations
other than those herein contained. This Agreement shall supersede
all previous communications, discussions, representations, adver-
tisements, brochures, proposals or agreements, either verbal or
written, between the Parties hereto and not herein contained.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, "the Parties hereto have set their hands
and seals on the date above written.
'-
ATTEST:
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
JOHN B. DUNKLE, CLERK
"
By:
By:
CHAlro-lAN
Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
By:
Secretary
PRESIDENT
(SEAL)
-4-
. ..'
(
LEGAL D~SCRIPTIOH
(
~ Tract of lnnd lying 1n portions of Sections 17 and 20, Town~h1p ~5 South.
Ronge 43 EaRt, Pal~:nench County, Florida, more particularly de6cribed as
follows: Commence ilt the Southwest corner of oi11d Section 17; thence N89000'19"E
nlong the South line of said Section 17 for 50.06 feet; .thence Nl o~~'39"E along
the Easterly right of way line of t.~gress Avenue that is ~O.OO feet East and
parallel to the West line of snid Section 17, for 2566.00 feet; thence N89008'~9"E
~along the Southerly right of way line of the Lake Worth Drainage District Canal
- t
r L-21 as recorded in Official Records Book 1732 at Page 612 of the Public Records
! of Palm Beach County, Florida ilnd its Easterly extension for 1364~21 feet to a
point on a .curve concave to the Southeast, bearing N81029'17"W from the radius
point of said curve; thence along the center' line of the Lake Worth Drainage
District Equalizing Canal E-4 'as recorded in Official Records Book 1732 ~t PAge
612 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida for the following four
(4) courses; (1) thence Northe~sterly along the arc of the last described
curve, having a r.,dills of 750.00 feet and a central "'angle of 4004'17" for 53.29
feet to a point of tangency; (2) thence N12035'00"E for 320.69 to a point of
curvature to a curve that is concave to the Northwest; (3) thence along the arc
of said curve, having a radius of 6500.00 feet and a central angle of 3028'30"
for 394.23 feet to a point of tangency; (4) thence N9006'30"E for 1979.10 feet;
thence N89016'39"E along the North line of said S'ection 17 for 1964.51 feet;
thence SOo02' 11 "E :llong the East line of the \Jest !s of the N. E. lz; of said
Section 17 for 2625.18 feet; thence N89008'49"E along the No~th line of the
Southeast ~ of said Section 17 for 368.96 feet to a point on the North right of
~ay line of NW 22nd Avenue as recorded in Official Records Book 1738 at Page
1686 of the Public"Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence S19027'31"E
for 59.00 feet to a point on the centerline of said m~ 22nd Avenue, said,point
being on a curve concave to the Southeast and bearing N19027'31"W from the
radius point of said curve; thence. along said centerline for the following two
(2) courses; (1) thence Northeasterly along the arc of the last described
curve, having a radius of 1637.02 feet and a central angle of 21013'59" for
606.66 feet to a point of tangency; (2) thence S880l3'32"E for 300.00 feet;
thence S0038'00"E along the East_~~ne of said Section 17 for 50.04 feet; thence
N88013'32"W for 45.04 feet; thence aloTlg the '~esterly right of 'Way line of High
Ridge Rcr<ld for the fl)l1O\dng two (2) ,tourses. said line lying 45.00 feet "'est
and parallel to the East lines of said Sections 17 and 20; (1) thence SO"38'00"E
for '2595.38 feet; (2) thence SOo49'21"E for 1318.56 feet; thence along the
North right of \'1ay line of the Boynton Canal C-16 as shown on a Central and
Southern Florida Flood Control District Right of Hay ~l.1p for the fol10\'1ing five
(5) courses; (1) thence t188050'04"W for 858.94 feet; (2) thence Sl009rS6"t~ for
25.00 feet; (3) thence N880S'O'04"W for 2358.50 feetj (4) thence N1009'56"E for
20.00 feet; (5) thence N88050'04"H for 276.77 feet; thence S83030'15"\J for
'175.04 feet; thence S88055.'53"W along a line that is 110.00 feet North and
parallel to th~ South line of the N~ of the N~ of said Sc~tion 20 for 1488.15
f<>etj tr.ence NOo12'55"t~ along the said Easterly right. of ....'ay line of Congress
Avenue, th8t is 50.00 feet East and parallel to the "'est line of said Section
20, for 1210.64 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said TrClct contains 584.2
Gross Acrc~ge more or less and is subject to casements and dedications of
record.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY: That the above descrihed legnl description is true and
correct b:lsed on survey by ?-lock, Roos and Scarcy. lnc.. Consul ting Engineers as
shoun 'on th('ir dr:1....ing No. 1~5-,~3-17-'2R. l~st revised date 4-23-73.
I
';
'.
: i
',. ,
.
"
,-11 . . ~ ' ,
::isJy-e~ \1.'(;7...~~~~
Herhert S. Skinner
Professional l.and Surveyor No. 2101
Sta te of. Florida
[f
I
1
.
Exhibit 'At
--
. '_-::.~~"~ _~~.,...~ _ M~.
.. '
", . .,.~
. - .
, · - l:" ....
. ~hLb
. i>r^ -
.~-~'...:.~/':.
(
_4 ""!. .10'.4
.~
.~_A_'.''''..,' ~.._ ____
(
AGREEf1ENT BET\~EEN
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
AND
RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
,
I
I
.
,
.
THIS AGREEMENT, m~de this 1st
day of AugUst
,1978,
by and between the COUNTY OF PALM BEACH through the BOA7~ OF COUNTY
COillHSSIONERS of said County hereinafter referred to as ., COUNTY"
and RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida corporati~~, hereinafte
referred to as "RITECOll.
RECITALS:
HHEREAS, RITECO is presently developing a sins:e and multi-
family subdivision known as Sandhill, more particularly ~escribed in
Exhibit 'A', attached hereto and made a part hereof; anc
WHE-REAS, the proposed development, when occupie~,' will
generate additional traffic in the area of the Sandhill ?~oject in
trips per day and
\~HEREAS, RITECO and the COUNTY wish to provide ::or the
additional traffic impact as it occurs.
NOi'l', THEREFORE, for good and valuable conside::::-c. "tion, receipt
of which is hereby a~knowledged, the parties hereto, in~ending to be
legally bound, agree as follows:
"
SECTION I
RIGHTS OF WAY
RITECO shall donate to the COUNTY th~ough pla~~ing rights
of way as indicated in the Palm Beach County thoroughfa~e plan as
follows:
Congress Avenue
N. W. 22nd Avenue
Niner Road
120 feet total
108 feet total
108 feet total
(60 feet ::rom centerlin
(54 feet ::rom centerlin
(54 feet ::~om centerlir.
provided, however, that where the development abuts on:y one side of
right of way, then only half of right of way is require~ to be donate
SECTION II
FOUR-LANING N. W. 22ND AVENUE
;
.
. !
~
It is understood and agreed that N. \~. 22nd A~enue should be
I
l
r ~
I
fcur-laned from the east project l:oundary to Congress _~-.'e!1ue and that
RITECO shall be responsible for the construction of the additional
two lanes, using Palm Beach County standards and speci::ications.
EXHIBIT "B-1"
.'
'.
l
f
f
!
I
!
, '
, (
(
.
This construction shall not be required before the occupation of
50% of the residential d~velopment or at such time as the combinatio
~
.
- i
,
,
.
of residential and commercial/professional traffic generation equals
the traffic generated by 50% of the residential development. Fifty
per c~nt of residential traffic generation shall be assumed to be
ll,199 trips per day.
The above obligation of RITECO_may be satisfied at RITECO'S
option by either the actual construction of the additional two lanes
as hereinabove set forth, or in lieu thereof payment to the COUNTY
in the sum of $600,000.00 due and payable at the time the four-lanin~
would be warranted.
SECTION III
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
RITECO shall bear the cost of the following traffic signals:
Congress Avenue at N. W. 22nd Avenue
Seacrest Boulevard at N. W. 22nd Avenue
Where warranted, all project roadways and
N. W. 22nd Avenue
In the case of the development roadways and N. W. 22nd AvenL
RITECO shall pay for the traffic signals when warranted by traffic
generated from within the Sandhill Development and installed.
In the case of Congress Avenue at N. W. 22nd Avenue and
Seacrest Eoulevard at N. W. 22nd Avenue, RITECO shall not be requirec
to pay for the signals before occupation of 25% of the residential
development, or a combination of residential and commercial/professic
development which equals the traffic generation of 25% of the resi-
dential development.
Twenty-five percent of the residential traffic generation
is assumed to be 5,600 trips per day.
If the traffic signals at Congress Avenue and N. W. 22nd
Avenue and at Seacrest-Boulevard and N. W. 22nd Avenue are installed
by the COUNTY prior to the project development traffic operation
equalling 25% of the residential development, then ~nd in that event.
RITECO shall reimburse the COUNTY for these traffic signals upon the
.
2~% residential traffic generation figure being reached.
~
- 2 -
,
f
I
t
l
r
I
I
I
'.,
(
(
In no event shall the total contribution from RITECO for
the traffic signals at Congress Avenue and N. W. 22nd Avenue and
at Seacrest Boulevard and N.'W. 22nd Avenue exceed $50,000.00.
,
a
,
,
,
.
SECTION IV
LEFT TURN LANES
N. W. 22nd Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard
RITECO shall pay to Palm Beach County, Florida, the sum
of $12,000.00 for construction of left -turn lanes on the east and
west approaches of N. W. 22nd Avenue to Seacrest Boulevard. This
payment shall not be due prior to the occupation of 25% of the
residential development, or a combination of residential and
commercial/professional development, which equals a traffic genera-
tion of 25% of the residential development.
Twenty-five percent of the residential traffic generation is
assumed to be 5,600 trips per day.
SECTION V
INTERSECTION OF CONGRESS AVENUE
AND N.. W;" 22ND AVENUE
RITECO shall construct to Palm Beach County standards the
'full intersection of Congress Avenue and N. W. 22nd Avenue for 500
feet riorth, south, and east. This construction shall not be required
prior to the occupation of 25% of the residential development or a
combination of residential and commercial(professional development,
which equals a traffic generation of 25% of the residential develop-
mente
RITECO may satisfy the obligation of this Section by per-
forming the actual construction of the intersection itself or in lieu
thereof by making payment to the COUNTY of $60,000.00 due when the
construction would be required. :
Twenty-five percent of the residential traffic generation
is assumed to be 5,600 trips p'er day.
SECTION VI
FOUR-LANING CONGRESS AVENUE
RITECO at its option shall either construct Congress Avenue
to a four lane roadway to Palm Beach County standards and specifica-
tions for the entire frontage of the RITECO property on Congress
.
-..
- 3 -
f
l
r
I
I
~
.
.
J
, .
\
Avenue or in lieu thereof RITECO shall make a cash contribution to
Palm Beach County of $131,090.00. This construction or cash contrib
tion shall not be required prior to the occupation of 25% ot the
-,
I
t
I
.
residential units or 25% of the commercial/professional square footac
whichever occurs first.
SECTION VII
ASSIGNMENT
It is agreed by the parties hereto that RITECO may freely
assign its obligations under this agreement to any subsequent develof
contractor or builder. Each such assignee shall also ma~ntain the sa
right to assign its obligations hereunder until such time as the
constructio~ and improvements required hereunder have been completed.
SECTION VIII
NOTICE TO PARTIES
All notices given pursuant to the terms of this Agreement
or which any par~may desire to give hereunder shall be in writing
,
an~delivered personally,tel~graphed, or sent registered or certifie<
'. mail, and shall be conclusively presumed to have been given by such
delivery. All notices shall be given to each of the following:
RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
169 East FI~gler Street
Miami, Florida 3313l
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Palm Beach County Court House
P. O. Box 1989
West Palm Beach, Florida 33402
SECTION IX
WORDS OF GENDER
Wherever herein the context so requires the use of the
singular shall include the plural, the use of the masculine shall
include the neuter and the use of representative shall include trustee
receiver, executor, etc.
SECTION X
INTEGRATION
This instrument clnbodies the whole Agreement of the parties
Q
and there ar~ no promises, terms, conditions or obligaticns other
than those herein contained. This Agreement shall supersede all
,
- 4 -
.'
. .,
r
I
I
. .'". ,..
..
(
(
previous communications, representation, advertisements, brochures,
proposals or agreements, eitver verbal or written, between the'
parties hereto and not herein contained.
,
i
f
,
.
SECTION XI"
SEVERABILITY
In the event that any part, term or provision of this
Agreement is by a court of competent jur:isdiction found to be
illegal, the validity of the remaining portions and provisions shall
not be "affected ~nd the rights and obligations of the parties shall
be construed dnd enforced as if this Agreement did not contain the
particular part, term or provision held to be so invalid.
SECTION XII
COUNTERPARTS"
This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two (2)
or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,
but all of which together, ~hall constitute one and the same instrumen1
SECTION XIII
CAPTIONS
Captions are included for convenience o~ly and shall be
given no legal effect whatsoever.
SECTION XIV
AMENDMENT
This Agreement between the parties shall not be amended
or modified in any manner except in writing executed by all parties.
SECTION xv
APPLICABLE LAW
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.
SECTION XVI
PARTIES
f
1
Except as herein and otherwise expressly provided, the
~
convenants, conditions and agreements contained in this Agreement
shal~ bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their
respective heirs, personal representatives', successors and assigns.
...
- 5 -
[\
l
I
I
.
.'
{
.:. .....
SECTION-XVII
EXCLUSIVE BENEFITS
,
a -
,
.
,
.
Nothing in this' A~re~ment is intended t~ confer upon or
give any person, firm or corporation other than the parties hereto
and their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns
any right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Agreement. All
terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be for the sole and
exclusive benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and
assigns.
IN t'i'ITNE$S \vHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed in
multiple originals on the day and year first above written.
hT10ST:
1,.7 . J [,1.
_L'-.L..L1.u;! L'. t (.l- /L,.lA~{.~t(............./
Corporate Secretary
~.
, ............
r-: I" -~.
'Witness
, ......
I. '
~,'-J
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY
,? I ,--&~, RD OF COUNTY COI~M 155 I ON ERS
ATTEST: ~_ )
JOHN B. DUNKLE. Cl er.~ -----gy;_. --=::;::,-,-...,_. 4 6)t:?~
<:t-'.. , J..-//J /' " AUG. -'(-'9fa .. ( -' Cha i rman
8y:d~/l. ~
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND L'EGAL SUFFICIENCY
o .
, /) .'/,
..... .'.' '. .' 1/
/t-:l'~ oj :(.' " !,.: ~,{
County Attorney
:
..
j;
.
- 6 -
:
-;. .. -- -----=- --~----:::- .. .",;- '-.
.;. -,~. ."...;. . ~~~...:'..L;.. :..;. ,.
'..
.'
(
(
LEGAL ntscRIPTION
}. TrDct of ]nnd lying in portions of ~ections 17 ;and 20, Township 45 South,
Range ~3 EaRt, Palm,Cc:lch County, Florida, more particularly described ns
follows: Commence ~t the Southwest corner of B:1id Section 17; thence N89000'1911E
nlong the ~outh line of said Section n for 50.06 feet; .thence Nl 044' 39"E along
the Easterly right of way line of t~ngress Avenue that is ~O.OO feet E:1st and
. parallel to the ~est line of said Section 11, for 2566.00 feet; thence N89008'4911E
~along the Southerly right of way line of the Lake Worth Drainage nistrict Canal
: L..21 as recorded in Offic ial Records Book 1732 a t Page 612 of the Public Records
! oi Palm Beach County, Florida nnd its Easterly ext~n9ion for 1364:21 feet to a
point on a curve concave to the Southeast, bearing N81029'17"W from the radius
point of said cu~c; thence along the center line ~f the Lake Worth Drainage
District Equalizing Canal E-4 'as recorded in Official Records Book 1732 at PAge
612 of the Public Records of Palin Bench County, Florida for the following four
(4) courses; (1) thence Northe~sterly along the ar~'of the last described
curve, having a radius of 750.00 feet and a central angle of 4004'17" for 53.29
feet to a point of tangency; (2) thence N12035'00"E for 320.69 to a point of
curvature to a curve that is concave to the Northwest; (3) thence along the arc
of said curve, having a'radius of 6500.00 feet and a central angle of 3028'3011
for 39'..23 feet to a point of tangency; (4) thence N9006'30"E for 1979.10 feet;
thence N89016'39"E along the North line of said S'ection 17 for 1964.51 feet;
thence SOo02' 11 liE along the East line of the \~est ~ of the N. E. ~ of said
Section 17 for 2625.18 ,feet; thence N89008'49"E along ~he No~th line of the
Southeast ~ of said Section 17 for 368.96 feet to a point on the North right of
way line of m~ 22nd Avenue as recorded in Official Records Book 1738 at Page
1686 of the Public 'Recor~s C?f Palm Beach County, Florida; thence S19027' 31 "E
for 59.00 feet to a point on the centerline of said m~ 22nd Avenue, said point
being on a curve concave to the Southeast and bearing N19027'31"W from the
radius point of said curve; thence, along said centerline for the following two
(2) courses; (1) thence Northeasterly along the arc of the last described
curve, having a radius of 1637.02 feet and a central angle of 21013'59" for
606.66 feet to a point of tangency; (2) thence S88013'32"E for 300.00 feet;
thence S0038'OO"E along the East_~j.,ne at:, said Section 17 for 50.04 feet; thence
N88013'y2"W for 45.04 feet; thence' along the l~ester1y right 'of "..ay line of ,High
Ridg~ Ro~d for the following two (2) courses, said line lying 45.00 feet West
and pnrallel to the East lines of said Sections 17 and 20; (1) thence S0038'00"E
for '2595.38 feet; (2) thence S0049'21"E for 1318.56 feet; thence along the
North right of \,:ay line of the Boynton Canal C-16 as shown on a Central and
Southern Florida Flood Control District Right of Hay Hap for the follO\ving five
(5) courses; (1) thence t188050'04"W for 858.94 feet; (2) thence SI 009'56"\~for
25.00 feet; (3) thence N880S'0'04"W for 2358.50 feet; (4) thence tl1009'56"E for
20.00 feet; (S) thence N880S0'04"\~ for 276.77 feet; thence S83030'IS"\~ for
175.04 feet; thence S88055,' 53"W along a line that is 110.00 feet North and
'parallel to the South line of the N~ qf the N~ of said Se~tion 20 for 1488.15
f/?et; thence NOoI2'55"\~ along the said Easterly right of ....'ay line of Congress
Avenue, that is 50.00 feet East and parallel to the West 1tne of s~id Section
20, for 1210.64 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said Tract cont.1ins 584.2
Gross Acrcnge more or less and is subject to casements and dedications of
record.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY: That the nbove descrihed legnl description is true rind
correct b..~C'd on !;lIrvey by 1'lock, Roos :lOd SenTcy, Tnc., Consul ting Engineers as
s11o\.7O on thC"ir dr<l",ing No. 45~3-17-2Rt l<'lst revised drlte 4-23-73.
~
2dLJ-e~ \I'.~~:~;~
Herbert S. Skinner
Professional Land SlIt'veyor No. 2101
State of Florida
I
'I
, .
: ,
#,. r
.
r~
I
l
.
Exhibit 'A'
.....
" - . , -....
.- .- ~- .
. . . \
.
, ( .. :.
.
ADUiliDLM TO
AGGPJ:J1ENT BEll1EEN'
PAlM BEACH COUNT'i. FWRIM.
AND
RI1ECD DEVELePt.'JENf OJRPORATIrn
TIllS AGREf:l1ENT, made this 22nd
day or January
. 1980.
by and. between the CDl1NTY OF PAlM BEAQl through the BOARD OF mlJNIY .
(x)}-MISSlo..'lliRS of said Cotmty hereinafter ref~ed to as "mlJNTY'1
and RIJECD DEVELDPMENT CDRPORATION. a Florida Corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "RI'IEOJ".
RECITAlS
t.JHEREAS. RIlECD and OJUNTY previously entered into 'an
AgreaI'alt on the 1st day of August. 1978, pursuant to Resolution
No. R-78-934 pertaining to traffic impact in the Subdivision knCNJIl
as SANDHilL. arid
~
\\'HEREAS, MJIDROIA, n~c., a Delaware, corporation, is
desirous of purchasing approximately NINTY (90) Acres of the said
, ,
Sandhill Developnent for construction and use of an industrial plant~
an~
"
~
WHEREAS, the proposed develOl:xnent by t'DIDROLA, INC. when
occupied will generate approximately ,t~e identical aimunt of traffic
as would have been generated had the same 90 Acres been developed
under the Sandhill project, and
WHEREAS, the traffic generated by the proPosed develq:xnent
of }rnDROLA, INC. represents one-third (1/3) of all traffic generated
by the Sandhill project, and
\-;HEREAS, RIlECO and CDUNIY wish to amend the August 1, 1978
. Agreement to fairly reflect the obligation of RI~OO for traffic impact
after the sale to r,mDROIA, INC:
lU-l, TI1EREFDRE, for good and valuable consideration,
receipt of whi Lh i~; herC'by <lckno\oJlcJr,cd, the parties hereto intending
· t
l
r
I
I
to be legally bound ngree as follavs:
1. 111tlt any and all arrounts. due under the August 1, 1978
Agrearent payable by RITECD shall be reduced by one-third (1/3), and ~
RITECD shall be obligated to pay only two-thirds (2/3rds). any such
arrounts due for any itons under the contract.
EXHIB'IT "B- 2"
'i. .'
.
I
l
r .
I
I
.
. .. ...~
.,.,.....
. !
~-..
2.
The rnrounts payable by RITEOJ shall be paid one-half
(1/2) at CUl1oc'nccmcnt of instDll:ltion of the in~)rov(llll'nt and cme-half
.(1/2) upon canpletion.
3. The obligation of RITEOO tmder this Agreanent shall be
~ satis~action of and/or in lieu of any and all impact fees required
or to be req~ired by amrm including but not limited to COlIDty ir.lpnct
fee ordinances.
4. All other terms and conditions' of the agreement dated
August 1. 1978. 'vhich have not been amnended hereby shall remain in full
force ':md effect.
IN \.JllNESS v]HEREOF J this Agreanent has been executed in .
nultiple originals on the day and year first above \.;ritten.
RITEOJ DEVEWP~"Hrr mRPORt\TION
".
AITEST:
...
~/.
/ or
~h ';/ ~
~.ls~~retarY .
~\-h~ili'Lr 0- \.-r~.)icdL (J.~
f/h t~f)S~ '
By,. '....,'..,,1
President
. \
, .'
~ (0 ~ .,~,( . ....
\.
"
ATTEST:
~l OJUN1Y, n.D~' BY
.~ OF C~l~,~Jrf?:. :lit
{ Pl (j, "--.-..
--4>-- --
'-. ..
JOl IN B. DUNKJ J~ . Cl.ERK
,~ . 1
1.1 ,/J /' .,
By J:/.'t~/.t~ cj:~~ -x ~~
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO rom.1 AND
{' I\L SUFF eH.1'Lcj7
.C~~~
COUNTY AT.TORN... y:/
.
.
....
, 4
..
(
(
AGREEMENT FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 198 ,
by and between the COUNTY OF PALM BEACH through the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, hereafter referred to as the "COUNTY" and RITECO
DEVELOPM~NT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, hereafter referred
to as "DEVELOPER".
RECITALS.
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER, in conjunction with its Sandhill project,
more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, is
obligated to construct or pay for certain traffic improvements,
with the timing of said obligations based on certain levels of
traffic generated by the Sandhill project (hereafter referred to
as the "traffic improvement obligations"): and
WHEREAS, the traffic improvement obligations are set forth in
Sections I through VI of an agreement between the Parties dated
August I, 1978, as modified by ~greement between the Parties dated
January 22, 1980, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits
B-1 and B-2 and incorporated herein; and /
WHEREAS, the COUNTY AND DEVELOPER have determined that a
modification of these obligations would be mutually advantageous to
both Parties:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises made
to each other, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Within thirty (30) days of the execution of this Agreement,
DEVELOPER will pay Seventy Four Thousand Dollars ($74,000) to be
deposited in escrow, pursuant to the terms of Paragraph Three of
this Agreement.
2. The COUNTY agrees that the payment of this Seventy Four
Thousand Dollars ($74,000) will relieve DEVELOPER of all of its
traffic improvement obligations arising from the Sandhill project,
with the exceptions of those obligations set forth in Sections I,
II, III, except for the traffic signal at the intersection of Congress
EXHIBIT "2"
_ 4
"
(
(
Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue, and IV, of Exhibit B-1, as modified in
Exhibit B-2 (hereafter referred to as the "retained traffic improve-
ment obligations"). The COUNTY also agrees that, with the exception
of the retained traffic improvement obligations, which shall remain
as obligations of the DEVELOPER, payment of these monies will satisfy
any and all traffic or other impact development fee(s) with respect
to the development of the Sandhill project, by DEVELOPER, its'
successors, assigns, or transferrees, as presently proposed or as
it may be amended, provided no increase in density results. [Appropriate
credit to be given if Sandhill project developed for non-residential
use. ]
3. The monies referred to in Paragraph One of this Agreement
will be held in escrow by Moyle, Jones & Flanigan, P.A., hereafter
referred to as "ESCROW AGENT". The ESCROW AGENT may invest the
escrowed funds in 'securities of the United States or any agency
thereof, in savings or time deposits in institutions insured by an
agency of the United States. Any interest earned on the escrowed
funds shall go to DEVELOPER an<;1,-may be disbursed as it is earned.
So long as the ESCROW AGENT hereunder is not guilty of
willful malfeasance, the Parties hereto shall indemnify and hold
said ESCROW'AGENT harmless from all liability arising out of the
ESCROW AGENT'S actions and duties hereunder, as ESCROW AGENT. In
the event of a dispute as to the ESCROW AGENT'S duties hereunder,
the ESCROW AGENT may file an appropriate action for interpleader
in the Circuit Court For the 15th Judicial Circuit In and For Palm
Beach County, Florida, with respect to the escrowed items and, ln
that event, the ESCROW AGENT shall have no further duties or
liabilities hereunder. The Party hereto determined not to be
entitled to said deposit shall pay all reasonable costs and expenses
of the ESCROW AGENT in connection therewith.
4. The parties hereby direct the ESCROW AGENT to disburse
the Seventy Four Thousand Dollars ($74,000) to the COUNTY within
seven days after being furnished satisfactory evidence of the
completion of all of the following conditions:
a. Execution of the contract for the four-laning of Congress
Avenue northward from the northerly "End of Project" station for
County Project #80/81 - 4005-30lR point to Hypoluxo Road:
-2-
(
(
, .
b. The securing of a payment and performance bond insuring
said completion of the four-laning of that portion of Congress
Avenue described in subsection a. above: and
c. Commencement of construction under the contract referred
to in subsection a. above.
The COUNTY shall place the funds disbursed by the ESCROW
AGENT to the COUNTY in a specific, separate line item account that
will insure that these funds will only be spent for design, right-of-
way acquisition, construction, four-Ianing and intersection
improvements on State Road 804 at and between Congress Avenue and
Military Trail.
5. In the event the conditions set forth in Paragraph 4 a.-c.
are not met within one (1) year of the date of execution of this
agreement, the ESCROW AGENT is hereby authorized to disburse the
$74,000.00 to the DEVELOPER. The Parties agree that disbursement
of monies under this Paragraph will reimpose those roadway improve-
ment obligations on DEVELOPER that it had prior to entering into
this agreement. -
6. This Agreement is contingent on the acceptance by the
City of Boynton Beacl?-.~.(the "City") ,of the Agreement attacned hereto
as Exhibit "C", (hereafter the "Boynton Beach agreement"). Should
that agreement not be accepted by the City within l20 days of the
execution of this Agreement, this Agreement will be null and void.
In that event, the ESCROW AGENT shall return all the funds in the
escrow account referred to in Paragraph Three of this Agreement to
DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER will retain those roadway obligations it
had prior to entering into this agreement.
7. The COUNTY agrees that it has no objection to the Boynton
Beach agreement. The COUNTY further agrees that any funds it
receives pursuant to the-provisions of the Boynton Beach agreement
will be placed in the account identified in Paragraph 4 that will
insure that these funds will only be spent for design, right-of-way
acquisition, construction, four-laning and intersection improvements
on State Road 804 at and between Congress Avenue and Military Trail.
8. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between
the Parties and may only be modified by subsequent, written
instrument(s) signed by both Parties.
-3-
..'
.
(
t
9. Wherever herein the context so requires, the use of the
singular shall include the plural, the use of masculine shall
include the feminine or the neuter and the use of representative
shall include trustee, receiver, executor, etc.
ID. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
~ -
accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.
II. This instrument embodies the whole agreement of the '
Parties and there are no promises, terms, conditions or obligations
other than those herein contained. This Agreement shall supersede
all previous communications, discussions, representations, adver-
tisements, brochures, proposals or agreements, either verbal or
written, between the Parties hereto and not herein contained.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands
and seals on the date above written.
ATTEST:
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
JOHN B. DUNKLE, CLERK
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
CHAIRMAN
/-
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
By:
Secretary
PRESIDENT
(SEAL)
-4-
;
(
(
(
I.F.GAT. DESCR! PTION
A Tract of land lying in portions of Sections 17 ~nd 20, Town~11ip 45 South,
Range ~3 East, P~lm,ncach County, Florida, more particularly dcscribed as
follows: Commence ~t the Southwest corner of BClid Section 17; thence N89000'19"E
Along the c::outh line of said Scction 17 for 50.06 fect; .thence N1044'39"E along
the Easterly right of way line of C~ngresa Avenue that is 50.00 feet East and
parallel to the West line of said Section 17, for 2566.00 feet; thence N89008'49"E
~ along the Southerly right of way line of the Lake Worth Drainage District Canal
: L-21 as recorded in Official Records Book 1732 at Page 612 of the Public Records
: or Palm Beach County, Florida and its Easterly extension for 1364~21 feet to a
point on a cu.rve concave to the Southcast, bearing N81029'17"W from the radius
point of said curve; thence along the cente~, line of the Lake Worth Drainage
District Equalizing Canal E-4as recorded in Official Records Book 1732 at PAge
612 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida for the following four
(4) courses; (1) thence Northeasterly along the arc of the last described
curve, having a radi.us of 750.00 feet and a central angle of 4004'17" for 53.29
feet to a point of tangency; (2) thence N12035'00"E for 320.69 to a point of
curvature to a curve that is concave to the Northwest; (3) thence along the arc
of said curve, having a radius of 6500.00 feet and a central angle of 3028'30"
for 394.23 feet to a point of tangency; (4) thence N9006'30"E for 1979.10 feet;
thence 1~89016'39"E along the North line of said Section 17 for 1964.51 feet;
thence SOo02' 11 "E :110ng the East line of the '''est ~ of the N~ E. ~ of said
Section 17 for 2625.18 feet; thence N89008'49"E along the North line of the
Southeast ~ of said Section 17 for 368.96 feet to a point on the North right of
way line of NW 22nd Avenlle as recorded in Official Records Book 1738 at Page
1686 of the Public-Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence SI9027'31"E
for 50.00 feet to a point on the centerline of said m~ 22nd Avenue, said point
being. on a curve concave to the Southeast and bearing N19027'31"W from the
radius point of said curve; thence, along said centerline for the following two
(2) courses; (1) thence Northeasterly along the arc of the last described
curve, having a radius of 1637.02 feet and a central angle of 21013'59" for
606.66 feet to a point of tangency; (2) thence S88013'3211E for 300.00 feet;_
thence S0038'OO"E along the East_~~,ne of said Section 17 for 50.04 feet; thence
N88013'32"W for 45.04 feet; thence along the Westerly right of way line of High
Ridge RO<ld for the fryl1O\dng two (2) cQtr"rses, said line lying 45.00 feet West
and parallel to the East lines of said Sections 17 and 20; (1) thence S0038'00"E
for 2595.38 feet; (2) thence SOo49'21"E for 1318.56 feet; thence along the
Nortil right of \_ay line of the Boynton Canal C-16 as shown on a Central and
Southern Florida Flood Control District Right of Hay H<lp for the follo\Jing five
(5) courses; (1) thence N88050'04"W for 858.94 feet; (2) thence SI009'56"t" for
25.00 feet; (3) thence N8805'O'04"w for 2358.50 feet; (4) thence Nlo09'5611E for
20.00 feet; (5) thence N88050'04"W for 276.77 feet; thence S83030'15"t~ for
175.04 feet; thence S88D55.'53"W along a line that is 110.00 feet North and
parallel to the South line of the N~ of the N~ of said Se~tion 20 for 1488.15
fl?et; tnence NOo12'55"W along the said EClsterly right of ....'ay line of Congress
Avenue, that ~s 50.00 feet East and parallel to the West line of s~id Section
20, for 1210.64 feet to tl1C Point of Beginning. Said Tract contains 584.2
Gross Acrcnge more or less and is subject to cascments and dedications of
record.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CI:RTIFY: ThClt tl1e nbove Clescrihcd lcgnl description is truc and
correct b;;r;cd on ~\Irvey by Hock. Roos and Searcy, Tnc.. Consulting Engineers as
shmm on th('ir o'-,I....in:; No. /~5-!~3-17-2R, last revised date 4-23-73.
,f
,1Ju-e~~ \I"~#ljA~~~.J
Herhert S. Skinner
Professional Land Surveyor No. 2101
State of. florida
I
.:
.
i
, , ,
.
[(
'I
r
I
I
l
,
Exhibit 'A'
MEMORANDUM
TO
Peter Cheney
City Ma~ager
DATil
January 20, 1983
FIL.
FlltOM
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
SUBJ"CT
Appraisals/Congress Lakes
PUD
Attached to this memo, you will find copies of appraisals
submitted by James Branch, MAl, SREA for properties owned by
Riteco in the vicinity of NW 17th Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard.
These appraisals were prepared in connection with Riteco's
obligations for recreation and parks dedication which resulted
from the Congress Lakes PUD approval.
The properties appraised are a commercial building on
Seacrest Boulevard plus 13,080 square feet of land and
several residential lots located in close proximity to the
City's sewer plant. In total, the value arrived at in both
appraisals equals $ 187,000 which when added to the previous
proposal (the remaining Riteco holding at Seacrest and ~ 17th
Avenue) results in a value dedication of $ 582,000. The
value dedication required was $ 517,408.
I have mapped for your convenience the locations of
the various properties. Please advise if you require any
additional information.
/'
~~s
~/
'<Or
. - -
"'-,--.--' --. . ,-- -'
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
CSA:mpc
Attachs.
l1
r"'\
,....
r
( )
.-> ./
,-y
r
Peter Cheney
City Manager
REPLY MESSAGE
- FROM
I
TO
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
~
SUBJECT: Agreement for Roac1waY-'!~J?E<?vemen~_sL~on~~e:_~~___nA TE:~~_~~~92-19 83_
- ----LaKes
~OLD .
Attached to this memo, you will find copies of modified
roadway agreements related to transferring dollars to SR804 from
the Congress Lakes and Sandhill projects. These agreements have
been reviewed by Charles Walker and I and approval is recommended.
In order to approve the agreement between the City and Rjteco, it
will be necessary to relate approval to the zoning/annexation
action.
CSA:mpc
CC: Central File w/attach.
PLEASE REPLY TO
.
SIGNED
REPLY
DATE:
SIGNED
FOAM F269 Available from GAAYAAC CO" lNG" New Hartford, Conn, 06057
THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
lJ
/-
REPLY MESSAGE
FROM
--,
I~..~ t ..,,-
U &v1/~~.J"~ ~~~
I)J:~J
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner r'~;I~
r
TO
Peter Ch~ney
City Manager
SUBJECT: Roadway Agreements/Congress Avenue
DATE:Dec.10,1982
FOLD.
Attached to this memo you will find copies of draft
roadway agreements which, if endorsed, would transfer to
Palm Beach County $ 274,000. in lieu of Riteco four-Ianing
Congress Avenue. I intend to meet with Charles Walker some
time next week to discuss these drafts.
Please advise if you have any comments or concerns in
this regard.
CSA:mpc
Attach.
CC: Central File w/enc.
PLEASE FlEPL Y TO --'"-~ SIGNED c::::::~ Ji.., ~ ,',., ~
,..._...........w.., ....'~...'..h.'__ _ .... _..._._~'_~__"._~'_~_.__~_'~_._.,_'_~~_,..~_". ,'.____
REPL Y .Afu.
{VJ
",'~ i}'V
t C/I ../
, ..
r
l ,.,..
',)../
.,.r~
DATE:
SIGNED
FORM F269 Available from GRAY ARC CO INC, New Harllord Conn 06057
THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
.,_....._.n_.~__..~~~~L.="O-"'-.!LL!."'-U!.c,n c-"'..,.... U'UITC liNn Pl.NX r.()PI~S WITH r.lJ.RRONS INTACT
MEMORANDUM
TO
Peter Cheney
City Manager
DATE
November 22, 1982
FILl!
I:'RON
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
5UIIJ~CT
Congress Lakes PUD/Road
Construction
This date I met with representatives of the Riteco Corpora-
tion and Charles Walker of the Palm Beach County Engineering Depart-
ment to discuss the Riteco transfer of $ 274,000 to Palm Beach County
for roadway construction in connection with the approval of the
Congress Lakes P.U.D. and the Sandhill development. The thrust of
this meeting was to discuss the method of transfer of the funds.
After discussion, it was decided that two courses of action were
necessary as follows:
1. Mr. Sheehan of Moyle, Jones and Flanigan would prepare
a two party agreement (Riteco and Boynton Beach)which
would amend the Petition for Voluntary Annexation; and,
2. Mr. Sheehan would prepare an amendment to the Sandhill
agreement which must be endorsed by Riteco and Palm Beach
Coun ty .
With respect to each agreement, the transfer of dollars would be
first to an escrow account and thence to Palm Beach County after
the posting of a bond and the commencement of construction on
North Congress Avenue. It was also decided that each agreement
would refer~nGe___J:.lJ.~ _ other in the body of the text.
I will provide additional information in this regard as
it becomes available.
...
~ Jc~ -.~
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
CSA:mpc
CC: Central File
,.. J
0 J j
r
TO Peter Cheney
City Manager
)
,)
,-
)
)
REPLY MESSAGE
FROM
.~
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
SUBJECT: __Ri tecoLCon-9rel?s_Aven\!e C-9!lstruc_t.j._Q!1~ommi tn!~Dt_nATE:~Q_~;I._9J3.2_-
"OLD.
As requested, you will find'accompanying this memo,
a copy of the report submitted by the County Engineer to the
Boa~d of County Commissioners concerning payment by Riteco of
$ 274,000 in lieu of constructing improvements on Congress Avenue.
Please note that the report has been stamped approved.
CSA:mpc
f.ttach.
.
PLEASE REPLY TO
SIGN
REPLY
DATE:
SIGNED
FORM F269 Available from GRAYARC CO., INC" New HarHord, Conn, 06057
1__
THIS COpy FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
/m
Inter-Office Communication
PALM BEACH COUNTY
TO (1. a)tUhu
FROM
Fran Lackey, R.N.
DATE JO'"''''''~
FILE
RB
Mul ti Media First Aid
To comply with OSHA regulations regarding first aid, we are
beginning the Mul ti Media First Aid course for our employees. The
course takes one day and upon completion and final test, participants
will be qualified to administer basic first aid. Certificates will
be issued at a later date to all employees passing the course.
As all departments cannot be represented in each session, we
will notify you of future course dates that will include your
department.
Sessions will be LJ.Ju..uuv LfUU I f7i from
131/ Arr\ to ~ . It will be held in the trailer located
at the clinic. We request that you select two of your employees t9
attend. Have them report to the clinic a few minutes before '7?/C;A.
so we may begin on 'time. Please submit their names to me before '
"--fLui, / /rL
This course will be very beneficial to all employees and
departments. Thank you for your cooperation and participation.
SIGNED
d~---,~~~~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato,
July 24, 1982
RE: Congress Lakes
The f~llowing~e comments on the master plan-water and sewer. On both
water and sewer plans, they have recreation areas shown that will re-
quire both water and sewer facilities and do not show any method of
serving these sites.
WATER:
I. Water lines have been re-sized and re-routed to eliminate as many
dead end lines as possible.
2. Valves have been added.
3. The plans do not show the existing lOti water line serving Sunny
South. This water line is on the north side of N.W.22nd Avenue. We
have shown two (2) separate set taps onto this line~ in addition,
to the change taps on the 16" line on Congress Avenue.
4. Meter locations must be at the right of way line or easement.
5. Fire hydrant loaations may be required to be changed by the Fire
Department and if they are located as shown, they will be required
to provide protection by posts because of their vulnerability.
SEWER:
I. Lift station site must be 30t x 30', fenced and deeded to the City
with a Warranty ~eed.
2. The 12" force main serving the north section should be re-Ioaated
on the south side of N. W. 22nd Avenue where there is an existing
10" line for a lOti force main. This will prevent a conflict with
the existing 10" water line on the north side of N. W. 22nd Ave.
3. In both sections, they show some manholes in the dividers. These
must be located so they are accessible for sewer cleaning equipment.
4. The drawings indicate that parking areas are drained to the center
of the road in the same location as the sewer gravity lines. One
or the other must be moved to prevent infiltration through the man-
holes during storms.
5. No sewer gravity line shall be longer than 400r.
6. The gravity line connecting the south section to the north, crossing
N. W. 22nd Avenue shall be ductile iron pipe, polylined, between
manholes.
Page I of 2 Pages
Memorandum
To: Mr. Carmen Annunziato, c. P.
Re: Congress Lakes
July 26, 1982
---------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Bedding of the gravity lines shall be such as to prevent any
settlement vertically or shifting horizontally.
Compaction shall meet City standards, which is 95% of T~180
Proctor.
8. The City will require TV inspection for acceptance and reinspec-
tion after I-year at the developer's expense.
Q:~es~a~
Dir ector of utilities
apt
rf! 5.
j) R~J.)IAl6.5 ~ ~ TVI? IVI~ J)
vi /1rh~
Page 2 of 2 Pages
MASTER PLAN
A. Seven copies of the Master Plan of the proposed subdivision
must be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for place-
ment on the ~echnical Review Board-agenda.
t B. The developer shall retain the services of an engineer or
surveyor registered in Florida, to prepare the master-plan
of the subdivision and -sh~ll emp~oy a land planner, landscape
architect, architect or other technical or professional
services to assist in the physical- lotting patterns
and site plan. The Master Plan shall be coordinated with
the major utility suppliers involved with providing
~
services.
C.
The Master Plan, when submitted to the Office of the City
Engineer, shall contain the following:
I. Name of subdivision or identifying title which shall
.~ not duplicate or closely approximate the name of any
other subdivision in .incorporated or unincor~orateq
areas of Palm Beach County.
~
~
2. A vicinity sketch showing the location of the tract
in reference to other areas of the city or County.
3. North arrm-l, graphic scale, scale and date.
4. Name, address and telephone number of the developer,
.
along with the name and address of the engineer and
surveyor responsible for the plan, plat and support-
ing data.
5. The location and names of adjacent subdivision, if
any, and plat book and page reference.
6. - The tract boundary with bearings and distances along
I
.
with a written description.
7. Topographical conditions on the tract including all
the existing water courses, drainage ditches and
bodies of water, marshes and other significan~
features.
>>
C). idl eXl~tlng c',l.ree:ts dnd alleys on,or adjacent to the
tract inc~...-...in~ name, right of way- -...th. street or.,
pavement width and established centerline elevation.
Existing streets shall be dimensioned to the tract
boundary.
~. All existing property lines, easements and rights of
way, their purpose, and their effect on the property
to be subdivided.
10. The location and right of way width of all proposed
streets, alleys, rights of way, easements and their
purpose along with the proposed layout of the lots
and blocks.
11. The incorporation and compatible development of present
and future streets as shown on ,the Official City Map
when such present or future streets are affected by
the proposed subdivision.
12. Access points to collector and arterial stree~s show-
ing their compliance to the access requirements
established by this ordinance.
~
)
l
13. Ground elevations by contour line at intervals of not
more than one foot based on N.O.S. datum or as other-
wise determined by the City Engineer.
14. All existing drainage district facilities and their
ultimate right of way requirements as they affect the
property to be subdivided.
15.
~
Generalized statement of subsurface conditions on the
property, location and results of tests made to
ascertain subsurface soil conditions ~nd ground water
depth.
16. Zoning classification of the tract.
17. Utilities such as telephone, power, water, sewer, gas,
etc. on or adjacent to the tract "including existing
or proposed water treatment plants and sewerag~
tre<ltment plants. The 1>1aster Plan shall contain a
statement th~~t all utilities arc available ~mc1 h<.l\Te
been coordin~ted with 211 required utilJties.
18.
Sites proposed for parks, recreational areas, and
...
schools.
...
19. The locations of all temporary structures or permanent
structures having a temporary use. In addition, master
'plans or site plans showing permanent structures having
a temporary use shall contain a statement outlining
the temporary use.
Master plans or site plans showing temporary structures
or permanent structures having a temporary use shall be
reviewed by the city Building Official at least eighteen
(18) months from the last approval date.
Following approval of a master plan or site plan, such
structures may be erected prior to plat recordation.
~
All such permit. and construction requirements of the
Building Department, including but not limited to
.Chapters S and SA of the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances shall be satisfied.
D7 A subdivision that generates 3000 vehicle single directional
trips per day or 250 vehicle single directional trips in a
one hour period must submit along with the masterplan, a
)
traffic impact analysis. The tr~ffic impact analysis shall
be prepared by a Professional Engineer competent in Traffic
. ,Engineering and snaIl be- used to determine the number of lanes
and capacity of the street system.proposed or affected by the
development, and the phasing of improvements.
E. A master storm water management plan outlining the pr.imary
and secondary drainage and storm water treatment facilities
needed for the proper development of th~ subdivision, exclud-
ing tertiary facilities, which are required on construction
-
plans, shall be submitted along with the master plan.
master storm water management plan shall consist of qn
The
(/l-U ~~ (lJ3
- 29 -
~-...
DISCUSSION OF COMPARABLE SALES
THE THREE COMPARABLE SALES OF SMALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS DETAILED ON THE SALES CHART
ARE LOCATED IN THE WEST PALM BEACH AND RIVIERA BEACH AREA, WITHIN SIMILAR NEIGHBORHOODS
TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THE UNITS OF COMPARISON FOR THESE PROPERTIES ARE THE SALE PRICE PER SQUARE FOOT OF
BUILDING AREA, THE GROSS INCOME MULTIPLIER AND THE OVERALL RATE. THE BEST INDICATION
OF VALUE FOR THE SUBJECT IS CONSIDERED TO BE BY THE GROSS INCOME MULTIPLIER AND OVERALL
RATE RATIOS. THESE GIMs RANGE FROM A LOW OF 6.62'TO 9.02, AND THE OARs RANGE FROM
9.9% TO 11.1%. '
BASED ON THE ABOVE DATA, IT IS OUR OPINION THAT THE APPLICABLE GIM IS EQUAL TO 9.0 AND
THE APPLICABLE OVERALL RATE IS EQUAL TO 10%.
THE SUBJECT PROPE RTY HAS A GROSS LEASE INCOME OF $11.220. , WHICH IS BASICALLY NET,
HOWEVER, THE OWNER PAYS EXTERIOR BUILDI NG MAINTENANCE. THE STABILIZED ANNUAL NET
INCOME IS ESTIMATED AT $10,000. THEREFORE. THE INDICATED VALUES BY USING THE ABOVE
RATIOS ARE: GROSS INCOME = $11,220. X 9.0 GIM =$101,000. NET INCOME = $10,000. ..;.
.10 OAR IS EQUAL TO $100,000.
IT IS OUR OPINION THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS A CURRENT MARKET VALUE OF $100.000.
THIS ALSO RESULTS IN A PRICE PER SQUARE FOOT OF APPROXIMATELY $27. PER BUILDING SQUARE
FOOT, WHICH FALLS WITHIN THE RANGE OF THE ABOVE COMPARABLE SALES DATA.
-..
.
~
~
t-
u~
-+--
-t
I
-j
--+--
i W
L
i
+
~
. VACA,vI /2.-t.5.
-t
I-t--
~t
It:1
u~
c
.oJ
oJ! - i
t
- ----t
~ y~ I c;..o...,"'1.
-+
j-
I
I ~/~
J_
I
i
__ ou-U'rQJ
-.--J
-+
- - -+-
,
....- .
,--'
1
~'
14m
1
,,-~
'"
j N,W
) ~
,
'.
I" ~'H
A,[
A\'
CANAL
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PORTION OF TRACT "A" AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF ROLLING GREEN RIDGE FIRST ADDITION TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 24. PAGES 223 THROUGH 226 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRI BED AS FOLLOWS:
A TRACT OF LAND BEGINNING ON THE WESTERLY LI NE OF SEACREST BOULEVARD. 150 FEET
MEASURED ALONG SAID LINE SOUTHERLY OF A POINT WHERE THE SOUTH LINE OF NORTHEAST
19TH AVENUE EXTENDED WOULD INTERSECT THE WESTERLY OF SAID SEACREST BOULEVARD;
THENCE SOUTH 8902'27" WEST 145 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2056'16" EAST 90 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 8504'1" EAST TO THE WEST LINE OF SEACREST BOULEVARD; THENCE NORTH ALONG
SAID WEST LINE TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE IS INTENDED TO DESCRI BE A
TRACT OF LAND MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 90 FEET ALONG SEACREST BOULEVARD WITH A
DEPTH OF 145 FEET.
-...
,~
.
APPRAISAL REPORT
nSSOClfiTfD
t1PPR-A15fRS
309 South County Road, Pal m Beach, Florida
For.. WA.[)E,.R.,!l,-,E,V.,.,................,.., "..,..,..'
PHOTOGRAPH
Property Address:
1891-1901 SEACREST BOULEVARD
BOYNTON BEACH.. FLORIDA
GENERAL INFORMATION
DESCRIPTION OF LAND
SEE ATTACHED
Legal: Lot
Size
90
Block.
145
Subdivision
x
Street PavedYE~ ." .? Utilities
.........-.. .................. .................................... ............
YES
Remarks on site
A BOVE ROAD GRADE
..............................................................................................
SMALL COMMERCIAL FOOD MARKET/AUTO PARTS/GAME ROOM
Highest and Best Use" . .............,....,.. ..... ,.....,..... ...............,.......,..,.,..........................
Zoning C-2. ,NEI C;H B()R~.oO[), C()MM.ERc;IAl.:.,. C;I!~, oF., Boy t-j !(),N BE A~.H....." ........,..... ,.............. .......... ........,........, ........
PROPERTY, R.,I GtrT:!;, Ap~,~AI,SE[),:~,F.EE, S,IMPLETI!,LE...
...................................................... .............
ij'o Developed
80
NEIGHBORHOOD
HOMES
Average age~~~\l~~~rl<, NEW-Z5.yEA.R5....
AREA
Value Range HOMES
Trend of Neighborhood:
Upward
Stable
x
Downward '
From $..$O,Qoq,.....,.
To $....4,5.. ()().o,~,..,........ '
Remarks PREDOMINANTLYSINGLEFAMI~" RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHO()I)OF,~,ORTHERN BO'r',N,T,ON. BEACH.
THE SUBJECT COMMERCIAL FACILITY IS ONE OF TWO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USES WITHIN THIS AREA.
.. . ....... ..............
............ .................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..................
Is the property located near a cemetery, railroad, industrial plant or any other objectionable feature?
o Yes IX) No If Yes, Give Details ..' ...,. ................ ,...,.......,......,......,....,....,....,......,..,....,
DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING
Type
o Single family
o Two family
o Condo/PUD Unit
IX] If other, state kind
COMMERCIAL
Apparent Age
Effective Age
24
20
yrs.
,yrs.
OVery good
Condition ~ Good
o Fair
o Poor
Building Description: 1 STORY COMM ERCIAL - FO{)DMA,~K'::T <,FO,R,MER~'f, 7:-:-,1,1) AND ATTACHED COMMERCIAL
SPACE USED AS A CHURCH.
Details (Room Count, etc.)
.........~
FOOD MARKET - ,OPEN, SALES ,DISPL,AY AREA,' ONE BATHROOM WITH TOILET BJ. SIN~
CHURC~ ,- OPE~, ROOM. 1
BATHROOM WITH TOILET AND SINK.
Construction': Ext. Walls...,c:B.S.. ...........,.,......,.... "Roof~L,,!,:AR.~ GRAVEL
Int. Walls., ,~LAS-r.E~"", ...' ....' "..... ,.." ......' , Floors..~?~CR,~~~(VI~:~/.~~~RAZZO
Heat & Air Conditioning ....,~~~,~,~,NI,~..~~.~,~,~,~~~~~..~:.~;,~~,......,......,..,
....
Remarks on construction ~'(PI CAL.!5fv1 At,.t,. ,c:(),M..M. ~R<;:,I, "t,. ,~~I.I,-.'?!,~,~..... ,N1 ,I,~!.M. ~,~.. ",~.C::,f:I" !,~,C::.!~,~A.,':-.. ~!:Y.':-:~ ,." ,.','
.............
Assessed Valuation
* $, ~,9,() ,.,~!5~,~".".,' """."..""", ,,"
Real Estate Tax
For Year 19 82
City
$2..,()~,4~A~,
County
$ .4,.3.47,~,~?....
Total
$,~,~37} .88,
*INCLUDES 13 ACRES OF VACANT MULTI-FAMILY LAND.
"
VALUATION
fOST APPROACH r
LAND:
Pric.
Dat.
Size
Adjustments
Indicated V.lu. Subject
Sale 1 No COMMERCIAL LOT SALES WITHIN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. COMMERCIAL $
Sale 2 VACANT SALES FROM OTHER SIMILAR NEIGHBORHOODS INDICATES A VALUE $
Sale 3 OF $1.50 PER SQUARE FOOT.
Est. Land Value I}. 9,5.0. ,SQ.,~!. ~..~, ~}, ~ ,5.9...,
SAY
$
$ ~O ,ODD.
IMPROVEMENTS:
BUILDING
Jx~XP{~ Area
Garage and UtiI.
Squ.r. F.et
Cost P.r
Square Foot
Total Cost
3,645
$ 40.
$ 145.800.
PORCH WITH CANOPY
818
12.
9,816.
Estimated Replacement Cost Building (s)
$ 155,616.
Other Improvements:
Cott
Heat & Air Conditioning INCLUDED ABOVE
$
Walks, Drives, Patio & PAVI NG 8,000 s. F.
8,000
Landscape
"-
Estimated Cost of Other Improvements
Effective Age
20
years at 2.5 ,... % _
50
%
$ 8,000.
$ 163,616.
$ 81.808.
$ -0-
$ 81 ,808.
$ 102,000.
Total Estimated Cost of Buildings and other Improvements
less Depreciation:
Physical Depreciation
Other Depreciation
Total Depreciation ".
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .............,...
INDICATED VALUE BY COST APPROACH
Justification:
[MARKET APPROACH I
S.I. #
D.t.
S.t.
Price
Adjus'm.nts
Adjust.d
S.I.s Pric.
$
SEE ATTACHED
$
$
.
$
$
$
INDICATED VALUE BY MARKET APPROACH
$ 100,000.
IIN~OME APPROACH J
$935. /MO
Actual Rent
11 ,220. ANNUAL = $3.08/s.F., CC - 'DERED ECONOMIC RENT
Economic Rent
Lease Information TWO SEPARATE LEASES BOTH TERMINATING 7/84
2.605 S.F. @ $550. MO. = $2.53.sQ.FT. & 1.040 S.F. (a) $385. MO. = $4.44/sQ.FT
$
Per Month X 12 = $
Per Yr.
u
u
X 12 =' $
Per Yr.
u u X 12 _ $
Estimated Gross Income .....................,.....,......,......... $ 11,220.
Less Allowance For Vacancy..........,........,...,.....,...,.. -0-
Per Yr.
Effective Gross Income ..... ....................................., $ 11 ,220.
less Expenses:
R. E. Taxes
Insurance >
Management
$
N/ A. AS ABOVE RENT IS NET, EXCEPT EXTERIOR MAl NTENANCE.
Maintenance
1.220.
......................................................
......................................................
......................................................
.......................................................
TOT AL ESTIMATED EXPENSES
ESTIMATED NET INCOME "",.
................ ...............................
$ 1,220.
$10 .000.
...................................................
ANNUAL MORTGAGE REQUIREMENT ...............,....... .......... $
CASH FLOW.........." ..,....,..,...... ,..........,...,...............,...... $
Net Income
10
(GRM)= $ 101 ,000
( OAR) = $ 100,000.
A. $ 11,220.
B. $ 10.000.
Gross Income X
9
-..
C. (Use If Desired)
$
Cash Flow .
Equity Investment
$
Plus Avail. Mtg.
Ind. Value by C. $
COMMENTS
SEE DISCUSSION OF COMPARABLE SALES
INDICATED VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH
JUSTIFICATION OF CAPT. RATE AND RENTS
$
NOTE: If Elwood Analysis justified use comments section on back sheet.
. . ..
...... ~.
.....
CORRELATION & SUMMARY
THE INCOME APPROACH IS CONSIDERED THE BEST INDICATION OF VALUE FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS THE
PROPERTY IS INCOME PRODUCING.
THE MARKET FOR THIS TYPE PROPFRTV IS AN INVESTOR WHICH EQUATES
THE INCOME TO VALUE. THE COST APPROACH . ALTHOUGH LEAST RELIABLE AND THE MARKET APPROACH
(SALE PRICE PER BUILDING SQUARE FEET) CLOSELY SUPPORT THE FINAL VALUE ESTIMATE.
FINAL ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE
$ 100.000.
DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE:
Market Value is defined as the highest price estimated in terms of money which a property wi!
bring if exposed for sale in the open market, allGwing a reasonable time to find a purchaser who buy:
with knowledge of all uses to which it is adapted and for which it is capable of being used.
More simply stated, it is an estimate of the maximum selling price a property would bring, i
actively and properly offered for sale in the open market.
THE FAIR MARKET VALUE, SET FORTH IN THIS REPORT, IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
LIMITED CONDITIONS:
THE APPRAISER ASSUMES:
1. That the legal description furnished is correct.
2. That the title to the. property is good.
3, That there are no encumbrances or defects of title other than those mentioned in this report.
4. That the property is free and clear of all liens.
5, That all sizes, shapes and areas furnished are correct.
~1.~.,....
THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONTINGENT CONDITIONS:
1. No liability is assumed for the above assumptions.
2. No guarantee is made as to the correctness of estimates and opinions furnished by others and used in making thi:
appraisal.
3. No liability is assumed on account of inaccuracies or errors in such estimates.
4, No liability is asumed for matters of a legal character affecting the property.
5. The appraiser herein by reason of this report is not required to give testimony in court with reference to the propertJ
herein appraised. unless arrangements have been previously made therefore.
6, The physical conditions of the improvements described herein, if any. are based on visual inspection. No liability i!
assumed for the soundness of structural members as no engineering tests were made of same.
7. Possession of any copy of this report does not carry with it the right of publication nor may it be used for any pUrpOSE
by any but the applicant without the previous written consent of the appraiser or the applicant, and, in any event
only in its entirety.
-..
CERTIFICATION:
This is to certify that I (we) have personally inspected the property and have no present or conten
plated future interest in the property and that the appraisal fee is not contingent upon the value repartee
Date JANUARY 3. 1983
Signed
Appraiser
.
Appraiser
REVERSE .SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
,
LOOKING NORTH. LOTS 27 - 34. BLOCK 42
ON RIGHT SIDE OF NW 4TH STREET
LOOKING NORTH. LOTS 7 - 12. BLOCK 45
ON LEFT SIDE OF NW 4TH STREET
..-
. .- ,""\.-4:.........~' :'
'...
;..:
: . ' 1~ --:~ ."~ .:..-.'.....;,;'.~ ~.. ;.~ ..~:.:: ~.....:.__-,~
, I '.:~".
~........~...-:_.:..._Ir::..J .-s..... ..:..'.-.:.-..:;.:..:;..,.. .-/,-r.;..--:-"'f)'
, -
..<..~..;":;,-,:~~~~--;;-:--~-.,,.~,_., J ~~~~~~~~~~_~~::;;:.:.t:.;..~.~ ~~...~;
,
LOOKING NORTH FROM NW 5TH STREET
LOTS 18 - 21. BLOCK 44
LOOKING SOUTH FROM NW 5TH STREET
LOTS 5 - 8 t BLOCK 44
~
tJ
t'
"'-T:';;
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC CONSULTANT ENGINEERS
TRAFFIC STUDIES
TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT ANALYSIS
ACCIDENT EXPERT WITNESS
August 27, 1981
936 WEST TROPI(;AL WAY
PLANTATION. FLORIDA33317
(305) 584-0073
H.ossi and f"lalavasi
Engineers, Inc.
Land Development Engineering
Forum III - 4th Floor
1675 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
iJest Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Dear f'Ir. Rossi:
As a result of our meeting with Mr. Walker & Mr.
Annunziato on the Concress Lakes project, I have und.ertaken
a detailed revision of the oricinal traffic report \'!hich
l'lQS submitted on November 23, -; 980. 'rhe changes reflect the
current traffic & expected analysis by the Palm Beach County
Engineering. The findings of the report indicates that the
project is a CateGory IIA", \';hich mandates tha,t the develoI)er
build some road~ay to alleviate traffic congestion. It is
my opinion that the 4-lane improvements to Congress Avenue
recuired by Mr. Walker, displayc a fair share amount to this
one development.
Please advise if further information or clarifications
are necessary.
Sincerely yours,
of)~/I/./?;1~
Daniel N. Murray, P.=.
DANIEL N, MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
THAFEIC I!'-jPACT ANAIJY8IS HEPOWr
ON COlTG~m's[) JJAKES A PLANNED URBAN DEVEIJOPr.1ENT
Loc~~.rr:2:D on TII2~ 1;IESTSIDE OFCOHGHESS AVENUE
IN THE VICIIUTY (oj<' fi.ld. 22ND. AVENUE
VJITHIN THE UlnUCORPORATED AREA
or P ALII BEitCH COUIT'l'Y
Prep3.red
by: ~~,v.~7 Pft~.P/
Daniel N. Murray,P.E.
D3.te
DANIEL N.MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
TABLE OF CONTElTir
Page
II'ITRODUCTIOIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....j
SITE LOCATION r,!AP -- FIGURE i/<...............................2
PLA!',Jl~IlTG DATA................................................?
TIUF GENEBNrIOlr AnD DISTHIBUTIUIJ............................. 4
T,'XTEi'R-'JAL T-JIP I)Ic'rf[1I)I1JUnIOI'j I"IGUDE'-' -//2 7
1.:., ~ 1, .b.. ,::) "I.. ..:..J 1 -- t j.l. /t. ......................
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIOH PEHCEN'TAG:;~S -- FIGURE iY2A... . . . .. . .. . .. .8
mR ~F1?IC AS<-='IGTC'T'E,'ITfT\ 0
-l.. 11. ....: .0 l.'~l.l 1~..l...........................................)
DAILY TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTlm~ -- =i'IGUHE ;l3.....................1 0
F.U.D. INTERNAL ROAm'iAY DAILY l'BAFFIC -- FIGURE /1-4-......... .11
DAILY TRAFFIC '.'lITrI DEVELOPI~Er;T AT rIIAXE~m1 CAPACITY --
FIGURE #5..........12
A.n. PEAK HOUR TUmUEG 'T:VUi'FIC EXISrrrNG, r,iQTOROJ-1A,
TRAILER PARK, & F.U.D.-:" FIGURE #6...........1L~
P .I'I. PEAK nOUR TUmUIJG THAFJi'IC -- EXISTING, l-lOTOROIJA,
TRAILER PARK, & P.U.D.-- FIGURE #7...........15
IJET\'!ORIZ TRAFFIC II.IF AC~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /16
HIGH\'JAY NE~rVJOHK THA VEL LANES -- Il'IGU RE /1-<3................... '17
OVEn-CAPACITY IIIGmJAyg IliPACfFED BY DEVELOPI:IElTT TRAFFIC --
FIGURE ;~9.......18
OVER-CAPACrry IIIGIHJAYS nlPAcrO]~:D BY BOYNTON BEACH FiALL,
110f[10nOLA, AND THE DEVELOPHEHl1 -- FIGURE 1;10.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '19
P:tOJECT ItOADT~'JAY REQUIREI.'lEITTS............................... .20
IlrrrEHSEC111ION VOLmm/CAP ACITY Uf~IITG CRlrrICAL IJANE
CAPACI'rY AlTALYSIS -- FIGUm~ i;~'l 'j . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 2~
P~tOJECT ROAD1.'JAY REqUIHEI-;ElTTS -- FIGURE /1'12..................22
TRAE'FIC PEHFOm.IANCE Sfl'ANDAHDS CATEGORY EVALUATIONS.......... 2L~
OTHER INFLUENCING RESIDEITTIAlJ DEVELOH.1EWrS........... .APPEKDIX I! .i"
TiVUTFIC GEiTERATION ATTHACTIONS....................... .APPEl'TDIX "B"
TRAFFIC PERFOm~AlTCE STAI,;DARDS Cp.rrEGORY EVALUATIONS... .A.PPI;:~DIX IlOIl
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
\r~
INTRODUCTION
A parcel of property with approximately 113 acres
is being developed as a multi-family rental residential
community. The site is located on both Congress Avenue
and N.W. 22nd. Avenue just west of the City of Boynton
Beach, within the unincorporated area of Palm Beach
County. The proposed residential site is ideal from
a transportation aspect, since two major trip attractions--
Boynton Beach Regional Mall & Motorola--are within easy
access resulting in a significant reduction of external
trips beyond these generators. Refer to the Site Location
Map--Figure #1 for further details.
~
Because of the ~aGnitude of the proposed residential
development, it was essential to initiate a full traffic
engineering impact assessment study to determine the
degree of traffic generation and its subsequent influence
on the transportation system. In undertaking this traffic
study certain data had to be collected and analyzed so
that the traffic flow & safety operational characteristics
could be scrutinized. The data published by Palm Beach Area
Planning Board as well as traffic counts & record plans
received from Palm Beach County and Florida Department of
Transportation were utilized. Also, traffic reports on the
Boynton Beach Recional r.lall & r"lotorola were used. Findings
and conclusions reached were based on the development at full
capaci ty, thus reflecting an ul tir1J.ate highway impact.
...,
-i-
'""
,- --,
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
PRojEC.t
SITe
/1VEAI'ue
Alw. ZZ n/
'-'
OLP
!30YA/?"'o/V
Nt: W" l3oY.Nrtut/ 1('clW
~ ~ .J
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
^ tl
~ \) \(\ \t
WCdL gJeIGHr ROAD
- - '- - -
oJ
-
~
(;OL..P- 7<oAi?
".,:\"'"'!l'"
~
-2-
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
PIJANNING DATA
The land use data for the proposod Planned Unit
Development (P.U.D.) -- Congress Lakes is based on facts
and figures shotm on the site plan prepared by Menendez &
Associates, Architects, Planners. The site will consist of
1260 rental units with the primary purpose of serving the
Motorola employee population. Access to the residential
facilities will be achieved with three direct accesses
onto Congress Avenue in compliance with Motorola's access
layout and one direct access onto N.VI. 22nd. Avenue.
The characteristics of the development are as follows:
multi-family rental units...................'1260 units
recreational facilities.....................11.1 acres
commercial -- 2.27 acres....................~1000 ft.2
Other pertinent data that \':as researched and collected
includes the inventory of the major highway links, the
transportation work program, existing traffic controls, and
existing traffic count data. As a result of the closeness
of the Motorola & Boynton Beach Regional f1all developments,
the impact of traffic ~!ill be significant, thus the traffic
data on these two projects were carefully reviewed & analyzed.
Also, other residential & commercial developments in the vicinity
\lere evaluated. rrhis data is indicated in Appendix lIAll --
Other Influencing Hesidential Developments & Appendi::: liB" --
Traffic Generation Attractions.
-3-
DANIEL N, MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
TRIP GENE.RATION AND DISrrRIBUTION
In determining the trip generation rate for the
proposed Congress Lakes project, it was necessary to use
the traffic generation rate data indicated in the 111981
Update Study Of Vehicular Traffic Generation Characteristics
Within Palm Beach Countylf and to reference to the Institute
of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation publication.
The traffic generation rates used are as follows:
multi-family rental units................7.5 trips/unit
commercial...............................100 trips/1000 ft.2
recreation facilities....................1 trip/unit
Based upon the traffic generation rate, the total daily
vehicular trips were calculated and summarized as such:
multi-family rental units.................9450 trips/day
commercial................................2100 trips/day
recreation facilities.....................1260 trips/day
total generated trips = 12810 trips/day
Since the ausiliary traffic generators--commercial &
recreation facilities within a P.U.D. are predominantly
serving the development, most of these trips will be internal
to internal. Therefore, the trip patterns reflecting this
characteristic are sho\:n as follows:
_1:._
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
Internal to internal trips
recreation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . /1 13L1- trips/day
commercinl...........................1050 ~rips/day
bicycle & pedestrian
to & from Motorola...............400 trips/day
to & from Boynton Beach
Regional Mall..........440 trips/day
total
=
302L1- trips/day
As a result the external to external trips are
summarized as follows:
E:cternal to external trips
residential..............9450 - 3024
=
6L1-26 triI1s/dc.;y
1050 trips/day
commercial...............2100 - 1050
=
recreation.............. .'1260 - 11.34
=
126 trips/d..1Y
resulting external total
=
7602 triDs/day
-5-
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
The traffic distribution percentages were
calculated by reviewing and evaluating the existing
and future development within the sphere of influence.
Additionally, the highway network that services the
area was scrutinized to determine what route selections
could be the driver's desired path. As a result the
overall percentages are depicted in the External Trip
Distribution -- Ficure ;l!2. Furthermore, the detailed
neti.'lork distributions \-,'ere computed and summari zed in
the Traffic Distribution Percentages -- Figure i!-2A.
External Trip Distribution Table
General Direction
Percent of '[1rips
Vehicles/Day
north 2270
south 28~:j
\'lest /] 57;
east 357j
1672
2129
1'140
266/]
total
=
7602
-6-
~
~
....'
~~..,. ...~
...J
c.: 1\ Ic:-k I V rrL-
/ 1<' /-'"
F/6vRE 'z
L/lNr/}N/I
J/YPoJ..UXO
~
ll:
~
1\
~
~
~
.....
-
:t
~
"::i
~
..1
....
~
t::
~
~
~
~
OL&>
!30Y.A/7'"tM/
N6"w'
BOy,v7"4A/
^
~
~
~
~
~
~
\l
WO"L gXIGHr
- -'~--
-.I
-
~
G (> L.,e::-
1<oAP.
r;
-(-
U/5- iR/dV / ION
RonD
~
~
Ron 0
/1I/EHQ~
ROAD
~
~
~
~
::>
~
N
SeAL
"
I = 300'
)..
~
~
~
\..
~
~
~
~
~
1t
~
~
\t.
I K/IFrIC ~' t ,;, /C I Jj' UI I 0 ,v I'l;~/c:.~ c e AI' 'T';'6' ~ f
4F: N
rl6uKG 2F1 1llo zJ
LIlNrnNJ? RonD
~-.; ~
A-- ,1,. 4S- ~670 ~3% i-
/7. ~
/JIo ~
17.
iI~o f ~
z~
JlYPo/..uxo Ro,q.o ~/h SCAli.
zZ 4- "
~ ~3'Z / :: 300c
l\ ,1b ~ ~ >...
It t\ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
'Cl 'S ~ ~
~ ~ '.l ~
f ;)
..J ~ t ,%
'"
- /870
:t
~ MINeR Rol'1P
~ z7., -- --z7o -./1;. ~ 170
tt
::t
f zZ 70 /10
5% 1
Atw. Z~ nt/. -- /7 VEH'ucr
'-' ~5% ~S2 ~
~ 3~ J
~ ~ PRoJ€C;r ~30Z t1.
~ ~ 5/T/3
~ ~ + .38 %
OLt:' !3oyA/7"oll/
- /7.
1%+ lo?.. ~Z8Z 1
Nt::,v BOY.Nr4N' !?o!U7 -iII>,3 ~3/,
~
--- ---/370 sf?,. ..
-- z% \.. t
170 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ +
/70 ~ s7u ~ ~ ,%
~ ~
^ Q ~
~ \l \4\
WCdL. gJeIGHr ROI4t:'
- - - - -
-J - -~~ ~z~ -+
- 1% J I IX
~
,/,. z7.
Gt>L.P-
"..~ /~ ..- ~/%
~
-,
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
TRAFFIC ASSIG:NlIENT
The traffic assigned to the highway network reflects
the proposed residential project traffic at its full capacity
of operation. The !lPvelopment traffic and the e~:istinc;
highway traffic are both distributed on Congress Avenue and
all major east--west connectors between Lantana Road &
Golf Road which will be impacted by the P.U.D. traffic.
The transportation facility needs for the development's
traffic and the existing traffic can be determined by
analyzing the traffic ShO\\ITl in the Daily Traffic
Distribution--Fic;ure ,:~3 and in the P.U .D. Internal
Roadway Daily Traffic--Ficure #4.
.' ~
Since the propose~ development 1S located in the
vicinity of two major traffic generators--Motorola &
Boynton Beach ReGional Mall--it is essential to evaluate
the traffic impact created by these developnents. Thus,
the traffic computatiors sho','r~1. in the Daily Traffic 1:1ith
Developments At f.1aximum Capacity--Figure ifi5 VIere Dade so
that a level of service analysis could be undertaken.
To compute the avero.c;e A.f.1. 8" P.I"1. peak hour traffic
within the developnent ares, the traffic peak hour
factors & directional splits indicated in the Institute
of Transportation Encineers' Trip Generation publication
were utilized. Additionally, count data taken in
Januar;y, 197E; at the ConGress Avenue--Boynton v!est Road
intersectio" vas used to examine traffic flo':,' trends
on Concress Avenue. As a result of this information and
personal knowledce of the area, the followinc; criteria
~'!as er:lployed:
....-~
-'.J'-
on/LY
830Z.
(76)
8378
-rR/Jrr/c P/..5/RIBU//o/V
rlGu~c ~.3
L/l/V T /IN /I
/Z zzz,
(988) -./
- /3 Z I 0
JlYPOLuxo
14 1076'1 \\.)
Q: (15Z) ~ Z(J()() tfS'1: ;:.
~ lo9J~ lit (J$z) ~
Q ~J ~
~ ~ ~
...j
""
.....
::t
~ /'r7//V/?'R
~
t:t /0000
::t (/~7z,..) X
II ~7 Z-
- I
Nw. CZ n/
18'39) ~
(7~
-! '1'1/S' ~
....
, T ~
~ ~
OLP
':SIB?
(7/)
'3Ztfo
N~
L370b
(7~)
:137~
---
^
~
\::
'1775
(152.)
"Z7
-
....j
--
10 100
(7~)
1()17~
Ge>t.F=-
~
Zo 31f
(7t)
Z 0 '170
N
ROI1D I
/5~93 -~ ,/ 1/82Z1
(+'56')J ~ L (ZZ8)
~5 1~? ~ /8lf'l1 61lf5o
-4 - (Ja'l)
617511
SCAL1
Ro,q 0 I
/285,/ j 1836'8 ^'
~ (76')
(Z 28) ~ 't
~
1308'7 ~ /8 II'!'! ::t
',J ~
::l
~
J '~ 300(
Rol'iP
PRoYEC.r
$/rE
!3oy.vro..v
1$"00
(7Ifo)
Z'Z~o
-
BOYN'rtJ/V'
13185'J t'1Z78 P" 1'816 l
(IS'Z) ~ l (IZI') L1(3B,6) ~
/3:177, ~ 'Z.!;,,'if ~ zo 19! ~
~ II 5'6~- I ,'.- ~
~ (608' 1-1 6ZI'l-0 ~
\) ~ ...- ('1st)
WOdL /3JeIGHr RotH) pZ.$"96
,. 179Z/
L- (76)
1799Z
-
J.J:6~,vP
10/00 - - /fFXIS'T'/Nt; P/1"lly -r,reltrFle
(711) -- 'Pevet..o prnl!..,Y 1'A/(Y 71!?1'1p.,r:"1t::
/0/71. -- 6.x/.1'T~N6 PllJt' 1>l!f'v~~(J?me'Kr .1>'!1/LY
..~-_._--,- ------ .._---~_._--.__.---~-~_.-------_._,---~---_._'-_.- - -
R61'1D
IZoo() ~
(7t)
IZ 076
---
~S/)D lISt.
(I$'Z) 3Yc6
~ '(3St>)
3786
---
Ra,qp
/z o8"Z
(16)
IZ/5B
- -.
/?VEH(.I~
6107D
(In.) \
~'ZZ2-
/06$0
, (z 881>
'-/3519
>......0,<;2 .D
18/110
(/)z)
18Z9Z
-
~
-J
~
~
~
~
II/S.f'
(76)
1/27/
H1!'A,eF'/ ('"
-10-
DAILY TRAHli'IC \oJITH DEVELOPf-1ENT AT f-1AXIMill'1 CAPACITY
Figure #5
Lilli/ T /hv /I ROI1D
12859
(228) ~
-1613-
*2214-* \
16914 ~
JlYPOLUXO Rol?O f :)CI:?L
II
10000 I =30,
C\ ~ (1672 ) Cl. A.
Q: t\ -2689- ~ ~
~ ~ ~ *5620* ~ ~
0 ~
~ ~ 19981 'oJ ~
J ~
..J ~
""4
.....
:t MINER /2'0190
~
10630
":::i.
t:t (2889)
:t. -5368-
*5560*
24447
Ni4I. 2'Z n/ /1VEH"~
~ 19278
(1216)
..1 ~ PRo'fEC.r -9719-
....
'it ~ 5/rE *1945*
~ ~ 32158
OLO !3oy.vrtJY
Nc:W BOY.lVrtJM Rc4P
13185 11500 ~ \.. ~
(152) ( 380 ) ~ ~ ~
-6392- -2345- ~ ~ ~
* 1184* *2330* ~ ~ ~
),. 20913 tl \t
~ 16555 \l 'i
\:: WO"'L.I3KIGHr
- - -
-.l
-
~
GOL..,e:::- 1<oI'lP.
LEGEND
11500 Existing Daily Traffic
(380) P.U.D. Daily Traffic
-2345- Boynton Beach Regional r>lall Daily Traffic
*2330* Motorola Daily Traffic
16555 Total Daily frIo ffic -12-
----."-----.----.. - ---....-.--.. '-'--._'~_.
~
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
Peak Hour Factor
A.t-1.
P . I'-l .
Con~renG Avenue......................10%..........10%
C L k D.,". 1 ani 1 0('1
onc;ress a~es eve.:.opmenv........... jO.......... IV
Directional Split
Congress Avenue
southbound..................... .6096......... .q.096
northbound._. .. ................. .40;6....... .. .6076
Congress LakeD Development
. 80"" .,~,.,'
e ~::~ t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' ;;).......... :) ?>J
entrance........................20%....~.....670
Besides applyinc; the above factors, the traffic data
from the Motorola & Boynton Be3ch Regional Mall projects
were used. As a result of carefully evaluating these facts,
the dispersed peak hour traffic was assigned to the high\.:ay
net\'JOrk:. This data is reflected in the A.I'I. g:. p.r'I. Peak
Hour Turning Traffic -- Figures #6 & #7.
-13-
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
~ 1
NET',JORK THAJJliIC Ir"cP ACl1
Jince the proposed P. U ..D. 'dill ,_:enerate a certain
level of trcffic beyond the surroundinc development
roadway, it is essential to evaluate the traffic
attractions and the most desired. roadvmy to meet these
intents. By utilizinc the traffic distribution
J}ercentac;es sho\':n in Figure l~2A, traffic volumes \'Jere
calculated 0l.1 all hic;h':iay li:lks Vii thin the thorouGhfare
plan. By usinG the recently established level of
service ,IID" daily traffic voJ.ULles and applyinc; t'Lem
to the HiC;h';,Tc~,=r ITet\Jork Trave:~ LalleS--Fic;ure /~G, the
over--capacity hich~ay lil~S could be determined. The
"es'1.1[-s of t:~ir oP"J,T('l',-, l'r< "l"O"'-l'l ~'J'; -1--11e O'ler C"OD"'Cl..1-H
- '- J .....L U (.. l.U~ -v" U ~ ,;:) 1.).LJ.. H. ..L..J. V. _ - C4...J-'/C..l. vJ
Ib ('11"""TC TF...'I~,c-r-ea' ;)-,}- De-vel or"en-I- rT1T'r;"~-"l' C--'i'l' ':'ur"" ,';0
. -u.i ...v.J 1-' ---'11. c:.. v ~ .l:)u _ ..J_ i)"J. ....l; J___ o:.;...l.L 1.: 0 - t:;:,'./.
Ii'urthermore,
since the ~oynton Beach Mall
,
aEo.
I'lo-torola will directly irlpac~ -the same adjacellt ~li3~lway
net\'JOrl;:, an eV2.1uatioll of the traffic impact at Level of
Service "DII ",'as made. fLhe results sl1o':Jn in tbe Over-Capacity
~Iic;lnn1.Ys Im:p8.cted 3y 3oynto::L Beach 11a11, l~otoroL: and
s:'he Development--Fisure /t'10 depict the hiCh':,rays over
caps.city.
'[1hcrcforc, in ~1 [,[;er]:Jl " the I;l':! fric ihpO,C l; em Lhc
':iC1Hfi.</ [lei.;\,or~:, it is iUPOi.';,:J.Ylt ~o consider trIG \.~C:r0rce
of iLflu8lJ.C8 of this develo:) ,c~;t L'.nd other major :levelo~)JleEts.
The final impact fee hus to ~e determined by takins in
to accountL~eoc uattero.
,--
-16-
f!IG}/W/J Y IV EI' WoRK- 7RflllGL J.FfN'E.5
rIG:uRE d"S N
z'- W-
L/lNT/J/V/i ROI1,O
2L- ~'- :?L.- 'Ii.-
ZL.. Z/... . ZL ~ cSl- 1./1-
~
HYPoJ.uxo RonD SCALE
" '
Z'- ZL- Z'-- ZL J :: 3000
~ ~ C\ ~
Q: ~ Z" ~ l
~ 2L ~ ZL- ,'- ~ ~ '/L
~ 'S: \) ZL- ~
~ '..l
..J 2'- ;:)
""4 ~
....
::t MINeR Rol'1&> ZL-
~ Zl..- Z{... ZL-
'::::i.
~ Ii
21- Zl- ZL- I./L
All4/. z~nL /1 VE.N'ue
~ ZL- 2~
~
~ 2'- ~ PROJECt
~ ZL
~ Sire 6''- 'If..
~ t'--
~ ~ ZL
OLO !30YN'7"tM/
Zt.- ZL.
ZL ZL- Z'"
N5w' ,BOYN'r4N' Ro4P ilL JlL-
Z'- Z'- ZL. '1L- \..
~ ~ ~
~ l/L " 'It.
~ ~
~
Zl- ~ 2'- ~ ~
).. Q \t
\l 'i
~ WOd.L./3JeIGHr Ro~l/
- '- - - ~L ~L
-.l Lf.L-
-
~ ZL 21.- ill,
Gt>i..~ RoAP.
ZL ZL- Z'-
'~ ilL-
2L- ZL.
Lt~~,/t/p
ZL - -/WO IAlle v".J,'vIJeJ 1.,;J..W4Y -17-
I./L - Eo", ~ lAne.- eI,v/;Jed J.I;~ w~y
6"~ -- ~I~ Ii( It ~ d,'v"~l!'d t!'. >c p"'''HW''Y
-----
Mw. ZZ ntl /lVEHue
'"
~
~ ~ PRo:TEC;r
~ SITe 1./1-
~
~ ~
OLP J3oYUroA/
'IL
N8W' BOY.N'r4;V
If'- ~ ~ .j
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ 'IJ_
~ ~ ~
0 '{
^ \) \1\
~ WCdL, /3KIGHr Rol4P
- - - - -
..J
-
~ 'II..
GoL.P- RoAP.
"
4L- -18-
L&'6 c.#P
-=J= ~L. - 1?~(b~lfUiV L.A/V&.f
....
OVER - CRPFlCrTY
t!:.'6Hwny s
I/>1PRcrdL/
N
py PcV'crLOPP7F,v/' 7T~r/c...
F/Gu~c #9
L/lNr/JN/1 RonD
~
Q:
~
ilL
'1'- ~
~
SCAd
JlYPoJ..UXO Ro190 " I
'IL I :: ~oo
~ )...
t\ ~
~ ~ 'Ii- ~
~ 'S: ~
~
MIN&?'R Rol'1P
.....
~
~
~
~
~
'11-
OVE?.e- CRPFJc/7'"Y
BY pOY/ll'~OA/
;Q.N'.o ,;.Iv
- -
H'/G'#W.I9Ys
Ot.-:";e;CH m.l9~L
V~Vr:r~(),PP7~,
fMP/iCr&p
/?7oroRtJi.,4
N
/
,~
L/lNT/lN/I
RonD
.sF-
PI G.vU 10
~
~
SCALi.
JlYPOJ..VXO Ro190 II
I :: 3000
'fL- if'- :>...
~ ~ C:l.
It t\ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ it ~
~ ~ 'oJ ~
~ ::J
-..l tQ
~
::t IY7/NER Rol'1P
~
'::i
~
Mw. ZZnL /71/&"A/1I~
,t
~
~ ~ PRo:T!:c.r
~ ~ Sire
~ ~
OLP J3oYN'~t>A/
tJL
Nc:w Boy..vrcN'" }<o.qJ/
6'i- \.. -J
'Ii. ~ ~
~ l/'- 'It
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
I:) \t.
^ \) ~
~ WO"" pJeIGHr Rol4P
- - - - -
~
-
~
GOLP- J<oAP.
."
-19-
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
....
PHOJ:SC'J~ ROADUAY nE(UI~Er,mIT'I'S
The determination of the re~uired hiGhway G800etrics
and "traffic control J:easures lIas file..cle ;)zr evaluating
the previously indicated do.'ta. Included in the analysis
were capacity exa~inationat the critical intersections.
This da"ca is indicated in t:~e Intersection VolUl'JejCapacit;y--
FiGure ,,'/--:1, vihich is based 01 the Project Roadway
[?,equirements--Figure IJ12.
As 'a result of this traffic investigation report
the followinG findines and recommendations were reached:
...
1) The intersection of ConGress Avenue & N.J. 22nd.
Avenue Hill 80 major focal point for traffic c;enerated
by Motorola, Sand & Sea Village, Sandhill commercial,
as well as the proposed P.U.D. Therefore, besides a
four lane divided typical section on all approaches, necessary
left turn lanes & right turn lanes shall be provided on all
approaches as indicated in the Figure #12. -Additionally"
to efficiently & safely control the turninc maneuvers, it
lS mandatory to install a traffic signal.
2) To facilitate the overall traffic flow on
ConGross Avenue, the ric;ht turG deceleration lanes and
left turn storc:q:;e lo.nes ShO\'.'Il in FiGure /!12 at tho P. U . D. ' s
accesses is nf utmost importance. The intersectional
turning nover.lents '.'fill be eJ'fectivelJ defined [;~ controlled
and ali::.:;ned ';ii th the I'Iotorola, accesses, ,,.:hich 'dill DiniTilize
the tr[~Lfic conflicts clncl ve:licuL::.r cielays.
..
-20-
.,',
"
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
~
")) '1:11e intersection of N. ',oJ. 22ncJ.. AvenueK the
P.U.D. access will ~e actively utilized by residential
traffic 0:::1 both sides of I:~. ',;. 22nd. Avenue, iJ.S \'Jell as
residents of Sand [,~ Ben Villut;e cornrnutil'lG to g~ fron the
P.U.D. cOlmnerciul site. '-C'~lU3 the sUGc;ested lane
confiC}.l.rations S110\:1:,1 in Fi~)_'.:::.'e ;?12 '.'Jill enhance the
ove~211 traffic intersectional characteristics.
Ii-) l1:he internal roadway accei3S ';Jhich intersects
\iith Con3re::'~~3 AvemJ.e 2" N.U. 22nu. Avenue serves as
an effective collector & feeder route. To achieve
~aximum safety and 8nhance t~e traffic flow, it is
J:ecommen'ded that a four lane road',cay l;;ith a raised
center island I)e construc':;e6.. rThe only median openinGS
;,:ill be at the raaj or inte:esectiol'S f3hovm in Figure /!12.
r~:1ir.; ;,'lll as~m.re lillited sid e J'rictioYl and expeditous
"\iehicle Elovement :)o);\.:een tile re;::;idellCi&I--COLlraercial--8~:ternal
hiCln;ay net;'.Jorl::.
c:,) mIle ill" ': or- l' 1'1~' e'....n ~ 1 -i "'1+ e Y" s e' c ~-l' on co <, YOe de C' l' ,,":' e L-l
,./.l. CJ..u -v _,-.._ _._ oJ__I.. V -'- U, t_J c...1.. ...::J u~... '.\
to in.clude necessary turn l().~es if the traffic ele:,mnds.
11"lese recomLe:i:ldations 2.re indicated ill FiGure /:12.
~,) The internal residen cial linl::s can s3.fel~r D~
effectively handle the traffic with two l~rre undivided
~liGl:l\"2Y rjOC, :;:i.ons. 'rllese are poi11~ed out in FiGure }12.
';) To :';;e:'''IC tho t;hrul;r::ffic:eecls on Concre~j~) Avenue
~ N.~. 22nd. Avenue it lS necess3ry that these hiGhways
'.Je COilfjtructed to fov.r lane cl.ividc(1 sectiow".
m'. .
L1J.8 In
conjunctin' 1,'itl1 the previou:.ily mentioned. turn lanes will
establif3h ;~]: c~ccep'::;e.ble level of tr8.ffic flow G: safety.
H01.iOVer tl1is iuprovelllent; i'lill be beT:eficial to sever2.1
0-[:;;.18:::' traf lic Genera t;o:~s, thereby req,uirinc a mutual
SharinG in the fundinG of the improvements.
-27)-
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
TRAFJi'IC PEHFORHAlfCE STANDARDS CATEGORY EVALUATIONS
As mandated by Palm Beach County, all highway links
within the zone of influence have to be analyzed to
determine if there are critical capacity problems.
Specifically, existing links over level of service "Dl!;
links v.rhen impacted by development traffic over level of
service "D"; and links vlhen impacted by other development
traffic are over level of service "D"; have to be addressed
each if no 'one controls.
Thus a detailed examination of 20 affected links was
made. The findings indicated that links #3, #5, #6 do not
pass the Category "A" requirements. /rherefore, this project
is considered a Category "A" project, I'lhich can not be
built until some highway construction is committed. For
further information on the analysis refer to Appendix "C"
Traffic performance Standards Category Evaluations.
-24-
~
,
~
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX trAtr
OTHER INFLUENCING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPr,mNTS
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
...
,.........
OTHER INFLUENCING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Name
1) Meadows 300
2) Boynton Lakes
3) Sandhill
4) Sky Lake
5) Bass Creek II
6) Venitian Terrace Isles
7) Culver House
8) Country Club Trail
9) Cedar Glen
10) Woodside
11) Avondale Pines
12) Ridgewood Grove
13) Prides Crossing
14) Sportmans Club
15) Sand & Sea Village
if. units
1394
1050
2600
197
406
160
450
7032
196
147
170
97
81
874
1000
status
approved
approved
approved
approved
under constructior
under constructior
proposed
under constructior
approved
under constructior
under constructior
approved
proposed
under constructior
approved
O-rHE/? fNrJ..UtNC/HG 1< E .>/PL61/7/.4t- PEVELo'?P7E#'r
N
..... LIlNr/lNR RORD
@ ~
~
JlYPOI..UXO Ro190 SCALE
II '
CD 0 I :: 3/)00
c.. ~
~ ~
It @~ ~ 1
~ ~ ~ ~
:s: ~
tl( ~ '\j
:l
...j ~
~
'::t MINeR Rol'1P
~
~
tt
~
@
Alw. ?Z nL /1 vENue
~ @ PROJEC.t
--1 ~
....
~ ~ @ 51rc
t::: ~
Ol.P 13CJy.vroN"
0 @ 0)
NEw' BOYA'r4J!/ !<o4P
@ @ 0~ \-. ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
Q \t'.
^ \) @ \(\
~
\:: WOd.LgJeIGHr RoAI/
- - - - -
-.I
-
~
G(>L.~ RoAP.
.r
,~-..,
r'~'"
.~
.".--.
I
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX ItBIt
TRAFFIC GENERATION ATTRACTIONS
I /.:../'I r F- 1'- l.::;7&::IV.....-"- ,; 'i .,/,.. ,/ ' , ,.. /'-/ i... i ,J IV
.1 .3
.2 N
1f1 ./
.;? *3 ill 3
I -
~ - LIlNT/fN/I ROI1D ;.
CD @gj -3
@) ~z ~ -If 1./
-
~
}iYPO/..uxo Ro/'i-O @ SCAL
"
J :: ~oo
~ ~ -!f" ~ ).,.
It ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
Q ~
~ ~ '\l ~
:l
....& ~
"""
....
:t MIIII~R /<,OI'1P
~
~ 5
~
-
-6
.5 .If 6
-
"...... Mw. ZZ ntl. ~ vENue
~ /z -7
--1 -
~ PRo:TEC,r
....
~ ~ SITe -8
~ ~ [jJ
OLP !3oy,A/,oA/
lID .9 ./0
N6'w 13 0 Y.NrUV ?o4P
@l!l1 .11
\.. -i
.6 @J ~ ~
12 ~ ~ _13 ~
.Jl/ ~ ~ ~
.1).... ~ ~ ~
Q \{
\) \4\
~ 8
WOdL QJeJGHr -
- - - ~ 0
-..I -8 .''1
-
~
......
..,
Gt>7~
-1
. /I .'0
ROAP.
[i)
.,3
q
(j)
fD
..L
LEGEA/O
eAN'K$
fHDPPIAlG ct?'/t/r~Rf
emPL.o y rnt;:-N'T C~Hn?/Z-
.,2
/0
-/
~J
.,
SCHC6i5
ty),;ou:,At- FI1CILITI€J
llGt:.el?nl1o/V' ;::.qc;/LI r/~J
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
----...,
.......;,
'~.':.~.
TRAFFIC GENERATION ATTRACTIONS
.""-.
I) Banks
CD Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Association--Branch
GD Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan Association--Branch
CD First State Bank of Lantana-~Branch
o Boynton Beach National Bank
CD United Federal Savings & Loan Association--Branch
GD Barnett Bank of Palm Beach County--Branch
CD First Federal SavinGs & Loan Association--Branch
CD .First Federal Savings & Loan Association
of Lake Worth--Branch
~ Florida National Bank of Palm Beach County--Branch
10 Sun First National Bank of Palm Beach County--Branch
11 Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Association
of West Palm Beach--Branch
~ Home Federal Savings & Loan Association
of Palm Beach--Branch
II)
Shopping Centers
[i] Lantana Shopping
[ill
(2)
(!J
~I
(E
CZl
[TII
em
Atlantis Plaza..............................63000
Center....................120000 ft.2
ft.2
ft.2
ft.2
ft.2
ft.2
2
Gulfstream Mall.............................71400 ft.
K-Mart Plaza--Boynton Beach Shopping Center..164475 ft.2
Boynton Beach Regional Mall...............1057000 ft.2
Boynton Plaza..............................100000
Lantana Village Square.....................150000
Causeway Square Shopping Center............119900
Sunshine Square Shopping Center............106000
'~
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
.-.,
<""..
III) Employment Center # employees
1 Mecca Farms, Inc............................300
2 Lantana Boatyard............................170
2 Rollyson Aluminum Products....................6
4 National Enquirer...........................334
2 Florida Pneumatic Manufacturing Corp.........80
6 Knollwood Groves.............................73
7 Quail Ridge, Limited........................308
8 Gulfstream Lumber Company...................125
9 Metal Products of Palm Beach.................80
10 ReI Inc. ITP Corp...........................186
11 .Grimes Division of Midland, Ross,
Florida Development Center...................56
12 Motorola...................................1606 (1981)
5420 (2000)
,.....,
IV) Schools
enrollment
. 1 Northern Private School...................110
. 2 Barton Elementary School..................664
. 3 Lantana Elementary School.................562
· 4 Lantana Community Junior High School......570
. 5 Lake Worth Christian School...............110
. 6 Rolling Green Elementary School...........648
- 7 Storybook Elementary.......................87
.8 Poinciana Elementary School...............813
.9 Galaxy Elementary School..................450
-10 Christian Academy of Boynton Beach.........80
.11 Boynton Beach Elementary School...........329
.12 Forest Park Elementary School.............483
.13 South Technical Training Center...........982
.14 St. Vincent De Paul Seminary...............66
~\
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
- ........
"'t:.'I'J
v) Medical Facilities
beds
* 1 John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital..........277
* 2 Atlantis Convalescent Center...............120
* 3 Finnish--American Rest Home................125
* 4 Bethesda Memorial Hospital.................300
* 5 Boulevard Manor............................110
VI) Recreation Facilities
. 1 Atlantis Country Club & Inn
-2 Atlantis Golf Club
.3 Osborne Park
."*"" .4 Cypress Creek Country Club
-5 Military Trail Golf & Tennis Club
.6 Pine Tree Golf Club, Inc.
-7 Indian Spring Country Club
.8 Qual Ridge Golf & Tennis Club
.9 Semi-Private Recreation Areas
.10 Country Club of Florida
. 11 Delray Dunes Golf & Country Club
.12 Hunter's Run Golf & Racquet Club
.13 Leisureville Golf Club
.14 Little League Park
,..--,
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "C"
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
CATEGORY EVALUATIONS
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
DESCRIPTION OF HIGHWAY LINKS
Link If
Highway
1
Congress Avenue
Congress Avenue
Congress Avenue
Congress Avenue
Congress Avenue
ConGress Avenue
Congress Avenue
N.W. 22nd. Avenue
Ivliner Road
Hypoluxo Road
IIypoluxo Road
Lantana Road
Lantana Hoad
Old Boynton Road
1'1e':[ Boynton Road
New Boynton Road
New Boynton Road
New Boynton Road
Woolbright Road
Lo.v:rence B.oad
2
:5
4
5
6
7
8
o
.J
'10
11
'i2
'13
'1 LI_
15
16
17
18
'19
20
Highway Section Limits
Project Site to Miner Road
Miner Road to Hypoluxo Road
IIypoluxo Road to Lantana Road
Project Site to Old Boynton Road
Old Boynton Road to New Boynton Road
New Boynton Road to Woolbright Road
Woolbright Road to Golf Road
Project Site to 1-95
Military Trail to 1-95
Congress Avenue to 1-95
ConGress Avenue to Military Trail
Congress Avenue to 1-95
Congress Avenue to r'1ili tary Tro.il
Congress Avenue to Lm':rence Road
Congress Avenue to 1-95
1-95 to Federal Highway
Congress Avenue to Lawrence Road
Lawrence Road to Military Trail
Congress Avenue to 1-95
'Old Boynton Road to He\'/ Boynton Road
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOC1A TES
PROJECT LOCATION Westside of Congress Avenue at N.W. 22nd. Avenue
PROJECT SIZE 1260 units
CATEGORY "A"
ITfl1 DESCRIPTION
Present AADT .................
Petition Traffic
.............
Present Laneage ............. 2L
Level of Service
"D" Capacity
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Level of Service
1) 2-1ane (5%) = 575
2) 4-lane (4%) =1104
3) 6-lane (3%) =1242
. . . . . . . .
Percentage of Assigned
Traffic Above Level of
Service "DII Capacity
. . . . . . .
Project.............
CHECK
1
10000
1672
11500
N/A
H/A
Approval
2
10000
1368
2L
'11500
N/A
N/A
Category "A"
Link #
"
~
12222
988
2L
11500
Yes
9~o
Denial
l~
10630
2889
2L
11 500
N/A
IT/A
DANIEL N, MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
PROJECT LOCATION \'Jestside of ConGress Avenue at H.\'!. 22nd. Avenue
PROJECT SIZE 1260 units
CATEGORY IIA"
CHECK
Link #
ITEl1 DESCRIPTION 2- 6 .2...- 8
Present AADT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11500 11500 12000 3406
Petition Traffic ............. 2'129 608 152 380
Present Laneage ............. 2L 2L 2L 2L
Level of Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . '11500 11 500 11500 11500
"D" Capacity
, Level of Service
1) 2-lane (5%) = 575 . . . . . . . . Yes Yes OK N/A
2) 4-lane (4%) =1104 . . . . . . . .
3) 6-lane (3%) =1242 . . . . . . . .
Percentage of Assigned
Traffic Above Level of ....... 19%
Service IID" Capacity
50/
/v
10f
/.J
If/A
Category "A"
Project.............
Approval
Denial
DANIEL N, MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
PROJECT LOCATION Viestside of Congress Avenue at N.v/. 22nd. Avenue
PROJECT SIZE 1260 units
CATEGORY II All CHECK
Link #
ITEI1 DESCRIPTION ..l 10 /1 1 ~
Present AADT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 12859 10764 15493
Petition Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 228 '152 456
Present Laneage . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2L 2L 2L 2L
Level of Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . '1"/500 11500 11500 11500
"D" Capacity
, Level of Service
1) 2-lane (5%) = 575 ........ N/A OK N/A OK
2) 4-lane (4%) =1104 ........
3) 6-lane (3%) =1242 ........
Percentage of Assigned N/A 21'/ N/A 496
Traffic Above Level of ....... 70
Service "D" Capacity
Category "A"
Project.............
Approval
Denial
DANIEL N. MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
PROJECT LOCATION Uestside of Congress Avenue at N.W. 22nd. Avenue
PROJECT. SIZE 1260 units
CATEGORY IIAII
ITD1 DESCRIPTION
Present AADT .................
Petition Traffic
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Present Laneage
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Level of Service
IIDII Capacity
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Level of Service
1) 2-lane (5%) = 575
2) 4-lane (4%) =1104
3) 6-lane (3%) =1242
. . . . . . . .
........
........
Percentage of Assigned
Traffic Above Level of
Service IIDII Capacity
. . . . . . .
Project.............
CHECK
...n
8302
76
2L
1 '1 500
N/A
N/A
'1 Lj.
1500
760
2L
11500
N/A
N/A
Link #
..-12.
19278
1216
4L
27600
N/A
N/A
Category IIA"
Approval
Denial
..1.2..
19816
380
4L
27600
N/A
N/A
DANIEL N, MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
PROJECT LOCATION
\'!estcide of Conc;resG Avenue at iT. VI. 22nd. Avenue
PROJECT SIZE
'1260 units
CATEGORY lIA"
ITD1 DESCRIPTION
Present AADT .................
Petition Traffic
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Present Laneage
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Level of Bervice
"D" Capacity
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Level of Service
1) 2-lane (5%) = 575
2) 4-lane (4%) =1104
3) 6-lane (3%) =1242
........
........
........
Percentage of Assigned
Traffic Above Level of
Service lIDlI Capacity
.......
Project.............
CHECK
17
13185
152
2L
'11 500
OK
"I )'~
18
9775
152
2L
11500
N/A
N/A
Link #
1<)
10218
304
4L
27600
N/A
N/A
Category "A"
Approval
Denial
20
3184
76
2L
11500
N/A
H/A
~~ ;
I....... '" ~ ..#.
_.':--~.;."".
-,."- .,;.
.. -..r. _.
.... -....01..
'.. ..
. .....,-6-~..;,::~i-l~-
41-.t-_-_"
.:::;~~;;...~ :-.: ~~;..,.
......-, ~'~.I~-,,:"
..-..~;.....,~ ";.--.~ -
""'".-."
" ~-
.. 't,___' .~
-~. .
. .... ~
"
'-
/
,
- i
J
~~;./..;-~:::. ~;--I ..~.;JF'
~/
.......-."'.',...:'-...~.........- ..
'-7 \SI ~..--~.'W>-~~~ ~ ~lIIV ~ 1f)oa..:~'5W-" ~
SE.Ca ,'~ ~[)1. ,~
__ L, _I I,. A Sl/f30IVISION LYIN6 IN TilE NJr. nOr SECTlc '
BOYNTON BeACH, PALM 8EACH COl/
N
:
\... - - - - -... -.- - -
~ N h /~ (It" cr,
--------
SUBJECT LOTS
U
AI..,..
"..#.,
I ~ ~~(,
~ ~~,
, w-l
\----i
l.OCA710;r MAP
4~_ ;'_'
~ASEN.FNr DEr.4/
N.JI ,,_ 'tI",/,
'.:..I ~ .':-!l-"
I' " ,-
, ."".,<, N"""'~ I t V
,., .",-"",." ~ I:
1 ~l.._____Jj . ~_:~b:
~
" ....,.,~~ ,-"...,.,..
----..- -- - ---
il---------- -l:-
J~ ~ ,
'1.v~; '"
~N-"~T' '~,--~-r--.
It :' ~~;:.:.:. .
~Jr, I~ ..
.;r .4(.~~;;,:._.. · ...,#
~;~I
~ ,;",....::.':~r ".,..
""..~..,'"
r.1t, _ tf1'#O'w1_$,.I,,-i_ _,,,.,,,,..; .,,1.1~.. .-.-. .
"./h,."'I!yI",,,,4,.,, /,.." .'Y~.I,...,..,.;;
,,,.,"".~-,,,,,.,,.,,., <iI/' ,.,.J.N- .,,tI,../....,__. .....
.If'... #~ .~""III1"~I?~,,.;~., tMA, "w.4.,~.. (,~,,;
"'.1''''''0'' ill' ,,;t)I" aY'-,',,,I'.,', II/' ;.",~., ...""
"'$.I'~"" ~,,IA, ""'NA~..J,.",." ,,..,' ,,",..-.
111',/,1'/'."
,..
,
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
.'
.
II,""'" "',." .,J.,..
!.,.- .!":.!.,.!.J _ _ _.
~'p'.",,#
...., ""'....wlt .,,, ..,.,.
lIlr '10.....
~
~~
"
"
~
~
',"
I)"
~~
l\\
>
Ii
~
~
~
I)
..
.;
'.
"
~
~
"-
1\
!\
\,
,~
,
II"
"
-,t;>iC T "
lie."" ~ -,... ~
"
.,. I ,
'~",. ',. ~...~
~,. 10':' ,.... "';0 r .I "'4'....D'~
.... ..", '.
.. ,,...."'''.:'~.4''
-:t=
\
.
t
~
~'
..
r..,
4. ..
f
#
I
t' , '" I
...-i 0
'"
1 I
,
, r rr
,
J
I
I
, I
, J
"
I
z
,~
"
: I
:'t:
,~ ',I ~~l ' :... ~. ..1!1
' '1' ~~(~'r:t~':cc:,
.... I ,I)?-J., ~, j ..r).
o f.'7-- ;;;.... I'v.'" I ~ ; 7 , ~
~ 1 ~ ~ , M-1 I , ~ .:~.' .
., --~I- ~I ::;I'~~~~~' 1'1,_,
I ~ ~ ~"'~U' ."...~.... ~
~" <> 0 I" ~ ,_:,i:'i ",
-.. _ 14., '\
' I ~ ::: I T''''T '--" .' . ,<'
>---1-- I f::!i r Ii. Jf~C ~..c >:..
I~a:, 1__ _'~
~fr~~ h ~ -
I~ :.1 ;. 'w'
I ~ ~ II ,_ I ~ ": Z = I " " & ~ ..
Ll- ~ ' ~ "_~" _ " _
,,,.. 1"',;>":- -~ .. ~ 'di; ~, E .~
' ~ V .~ I ~ :1' Thn 2. ". ~ ,~. f "~ I
1~1:~:.~:J. @I,T~!_;~TJJ '@): .. ~7.:;~:;
I ~ I,ll 19th AVE , ~~~
1 ~if'~ ~ 1'f;1oLLlN(( R EN~'D( E f.~"-.;o ~ ~ SAME
\ ~''S:. r.. I, (;'4 2.'3hn""21>6D ..' ~ '~rl--
\\ A ,'\...,,'.' .. ~ ,_ _. '.... _
-. Nl la'h ,AV["..:-" u, ....
\' .\. ..: .. r ' ... 'J f .. CO ;:: I Ii '': l& , - r f---,
' . ~:\' -rf7 .. --"'- 1-: u~.. u-t
' I .., .. H >-- co
\ ..........ao ,- ~" .r.. t:..-t y: ';"1---
~ _"-Y h[ 11,. CT ~._.......,-- y'" !!' ~1l=11'
~', '.. , .. \L, ',-",- ... -r.-r,... 1:..4..:. '----
'il
l
!j
A
II
/ j
I t
~
U
In
...
o
'"
.. 1 H.
....
O"
@
~
z
(~
',702')
-'
i
i
j
L_h_
...
'"
...
%
U
..
...
'"
>>SUBJECT~
r',3=I)
,....- .-.
TRACT A
307
CONDOS
...
'z
- It'l
IB
"
'if
l,
.'
o
l- I-
IL IL
0 0
If) If)
If'' 00
...,. -
-0 OC
C')
~ -
to
-
- l/")
I
\JJ
~
Cl
a:
0
I-
If)
C
...J
0
U
Cl
\JJ
-a: Q'\
<{ ~
If)
\JJ
...J
Cl
(f)
Z
\JJ
11.
0
." -..
00
:0 If''
I-
\JJ
...J ::t: If''
Z
0 iii
I-
\JJ
Z U \0
I1J Cl
11. 11. N
0 (f)
a2l
I-
I1J ::t:
...J z
0 If)
I-
I
Cl
I1J
a:
<{
~
Z >-
C 11.
...J ~
:J Cl
m 0
o
...,.
---,
l/")
00
>-
11.
0
Z
Cl
0
IL
C
0
0::
:I:
l- f
~
:I:
U
a:
0
a.
_I
If''
N
-
.