LEGAL APPROVAL
fJJie City of
$oynton $eacli
,/. ~
~' '; ",:
~...-
~~;.
"'~~/'
April 4, 1997
100 T.. tJJognton tJJeadi tJJoulevartl
P.O. tJJat310
tJJoynton tJJeach, :Fforitfa33425-0310
City!J{aff: (561) 375-6000
:F.9lX: (561) 375-6090
Kenneth H. Kruger, P .E.
4400 PGA Blvd., Suite 700
Palm Beach Gardens, 33410
Re:
File No.:
Location:
Crystal Key at Woolbright Place PUD
NWSP 97-002 - Buffer Landscaping
East side of S.W. 8th Street, approximately 2,200 feet north of Woolbright Road
Dear Mr. Kruger,
Enclosed is the City of Boynton Beach Development Order regarding Commission approval of your
request for site plan approval.
Should you have any question regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office at (561)
375-6260.
Sincerely,
/--
~. . '---.,.q / ,I
--l ,- (, ,
,/I;-rrvt'{,~( pic. ,/l~'7''-
Tambri J. Heyden: AICP .
Planning and Zoning Director
TJH:dar
Attachment
xc: Central File
Kennedy Homes
S:\PLANNING\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\CRYST ALK\NWSPLAND\DEVELORD.WPD
.:;tmem4's qateway to tfu quifstream
_.__._~-,-----_._----,-_.._------~----------"-----'--~-,'- .. ---
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
OF THE
CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
fD)rnr&rnnw~rn1
lJl1 MAR 2 0 1997 ~
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
APPLICANT: Kennedy Homes, Inc.. (Crystal Key at Woolbricht Place P.U.D.)
APPLICANT'S AGENT:
Kenneth H. Krucer. P.E.
EARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: March 18, 1997
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: ReQuest for site plan approval to install perimeter
buffer landscapinc. security cates and proiect sicnace for the 14.05 acre. 83 unit
sincle-family detached home residential development. zoned Planned Unit
Development (PUD).
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: on the east side of S.W. 8th Street approximately
2.200 feet north of Woolbriaht Road.
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of
Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission
having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the
applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner
consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
j' HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
The Applipmt's application for relief is hereby
~GRANTED subject to the conditions marked as "include" in
Exhibit "C" hereto.
3
DENIED
4. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
5. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with
the terms and conditions of this order.
,
6. Other: ~(; ~IjISG() ~~.N (' 3? ~ ~r fcttM I'"
/l.4NNII/~ ~'r, l'/ItP11tJ ~"1-o~, '1Ie/li7
.
DATED: March 18, 1997
~~J~~-<?'/
Cit Clerk
''''1111''''~
Dev Ord,Crystal Key - 0 ,...
3/18197 "'. -1r", ~
-;.to'. 0 ~
O~'" ..4 ~
'yo. ", --
......~ (0 ::.
r.; ~, ::
-. ,.. :::
-;. -. )0 .... -:~?
~ < I ..... .J:',"
~ 0 ....... ,c'
~lIyIDA \",,-
'11/1111111111\ \ \\\\\\
Page 2
Crystal Key POD 1
NWSP 97-002
DEPARTME'NTS INCLUDE REJECT
2. Revise both 10 foot and 25 foot buffer areas so that stormwater runoff shall be I
contained on site. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.5-1 and 5-2, pg.6-2 and Chap.6, Art.lV,
Sec. 58, pg.6-8.
3. A revised note should be placed on the plan regarding homeowners association J
maintenance of completed improvements which should occur only after such
improvements have been inspected and approved by the City
4. The tree locations along S.W. 8th Street shall be coordinated in the field, before V
planting, with the revised right-of-way landscape plan to be submitted by the
Shoppes of Woolbright developer.
5. All specified trees must be a minimum 8' high overall with minimum 2" caliper. V
6. Replacement of specified trees with sabal palms is unacceptable. J
7. Language on site plan referring to an FPL "requirement" for minimum setbacks j
and substitution of tree species should be removed from drawing. There is no
<:11,.." ". "
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
8. The applicant has completed the clearing of exotic vegetation from parcel 8
(undisturbed open area parcel of 1.47 acres, restricted to passive recreation j
use). Therefore, the City Commission approved north buffer (25' wide
landscape berm) must be constructed along the entire adjoining property line
between parcel 8 and the eastern residential property owners. I
9. The site plan should be amended to show the location of the landscape berm. v/
10. Landscaping on the berm must match the approved plans. .;
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
11. To clarify the proposed improvements within the subject request, it is J
recommended that notes 4 through 10 found in the Development Data chart on
the plan titled Site Plan be omitted. This information is not needed as part of the
request.
12. To clarify the proposed improvements within the subject request, it is j
recommended that notes 6 and 7 found in the General Notes on the plan titled
Site Plan be omitted. This information is not needed as part of the request.
13. To clarify the subject request, it is recommended that the Landscape Plant List
found on the plan titled Site Plan be omitted. The same information is more
appropriatelv found on the landscape olan included with the submittal.
Page 3
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. To clarify the subject request, it is recommended that notes 1 through 4 in the
General Landscape Planting Notes found on the plan titled Site Plan be omitted J
and notes 1 and 2 be added to the plan that depicts the landscape buffers, with
the exception that the spelling be corrected in notes 1 and 2.
15. It is recommended that following the omission of notes 6 and 7 from the General j
Notes and notes 1 through 4 from the General Landscape Planting Notes, that
a note 6 be added to General Notes. The new note 6 should state that the
project's homeowners association is responsible for the perpetual maintenance
of the approved improvements located within the easement titled Landscape
Buffer Easement.
16. Add to all section view drawings and plan view drawings included with the I
submittal the location, type and dimension of the easements of record as shown
on the plat including landscape buffer easements.
17. To clarify the purpose of each drawing, it is recommended that the plan that /
depicts the buffer landscaping be titled Buffer Landscape Plan.
18. Show 0:1 the sheet titled Site Plan and sheet SP-1 that the leading edge of the I
proposed monument wall sign is no less than 10 feet from the west property line
of the project. Also, show that the location of the wall sign complies with code
regulations regarding line-of-sight. [Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article III, Section
5. and section 4. E. of Chapter 2 - Zoning of the Land Development
Regulations]
19. To ensure that there is no conflict between the location of the sign and the
installation of the required buffer landscaping approved for the S.W. 8th street J
frontage of the project, add to the plot plan showing the monument sign found
on sheet SP-1 the location of the approved buffer landscaping and berm.
j ,.
20. It is recommended that the landscaping required for the south side of lot 1 and
the north side of lot 47, that is not shown on the submitted plans, be a
continuation of the S.W. 8th street required buffer landscaping. It is further
recommended that this landscaping be shown and identified on the plot plan
drawing found on sheet SP-1.
21. Show and dimension on the plot plan drawing found on sheet SP-1, the line-of- j
site triangles, including noting on the plan the unobstructed cross visibility space
required within the triangular areas where the project entrance road intersects
with S.W. 8th Street and the on-site private street. The line-of-site triangles shall
comply with Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5. H. and Section
4. E. of Chapter 2 - Zonina of the Land Development Reaulations.
Page 4
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
22. To properly reflect the city commission approved buffer along the west property
line of the project, add to the sheet titled Site Plan a typical section view drawing
"C - C" and add a plan view drawing of the "C - C" buffer to the drawing showing
the plan view drawings of the "A" and "B" buffer. The new section view drawing
and plan view drawing shall depict the landscape buffer required along the
entire west property line of the project. Also change the "A - A" section cutting
plane shown along S.W. 8th Street to "c -C" and add the "C-C" cutting plane to
the west side of the open space parcel. The section view drawing and plan
view drawing of the new "C - C" buffer shall include the following:
a. show and identify on the section view and plan view drawing the type
and size of easements, as shown on the plat, including the landscape
buffer easement; j
b. show and indicate the height of the berm on both drawings as no less
than 2.5 feet with a slope of 4:1;
c. title the section and plan view drawings, Section "c - C" (typical 25'
landscape easement west property line );
d. add to the plan that shows the plan view and elevation views of the "A -
A" and "B - B" landscape buffer planting, a typical 1 00 foot section and
elevation view drawing of the required west landscape buffer. The plan
view drawing and material specifications shall show and identify the
following:
i. trees; 12 foot tall native Green Buttonwood trees or other
native tree spaced 25 foot on center;
ii. hedge; 36 inch tall native Coco Plum, Silver Buttonwood or
Wax Myrtle plants spaced 2 foot on center to form a
continuous hedge atop the center of the berm;
iii. shrubs; 36 inch tall native Seagrape or Fakahatchee Grass
plants spaced 2 foot on center with a minimum of ten plants
per 42 lineal feet of buffer (Note: The shrub material shall be
placed to create a meandering landscape strip).
e. If there is a fence proposed along the west property line, identify on the
section view drawing and the plan drawing the location, height and type
of fence.
23. To clarify the location of the proposed fence, it is recommended that a
distinguishable symbol be added to the plan view drawing found on the sheet J
titled Site Plan and the plot plan drawing found on the sheettitled SP-1 that
delineates the location of the fence. It is further recommended that each
drawing identify the height and type of fence.
24. As already agreed to by the applicant, it is recommended that the proposed
chain link fence be black vinyl coated.
25. On sheet SP-1 indicate, with a note, within the recreation site, that the V
recreation area improvements are not part of this request and that a separate
site plan approval is required for the recreation site.
26. On sheet SP-1 show the sign copy. Also, identify the height and length of the /
lettering including the color of the lettering by color name, color code and
manufacture. Add a note to the typical wall elevation drawing of the sign
indicatina that the sian is not illuminated internallv or bv externalliahtina.
Page 5
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
~ARTMENTS
27. Add to the plot plan found on sheet SP-1 the location of the security gates.
Also, add the north/south and east/west horizontal control dimensions of the
project entry including showing and delineating curbing, landscape areas, width
of landscape islands, length of stacking area and width of turn-around area that
is shown in front of the entry gates.
It is recommended that the median area shown on the plot plan found on sheet
SP-1 include at least three (3), 12 foot tall Green Buttonwood trees or other
native trees with a 5 to 6 foot spread. The trees shall be located at the east end
of the median, so as not to interfere with line-of-site vision at the intersection of
S.W. 8th Street. It is further recommended that native evergreen groundcover,
green Liriope or a combination of flowering groundcover be planted in the east
end of the median and in the island where the gates are proposed. The
groundcover or Liriope shall be one (1) gallon and spaced twelve (12) inches
on center.
28.
29.
30.
Based on the existing large native pine trees that are located near the north end
of the open space parcel area, it is recommended that the landscape buffer
required along S.W. 3rd Avenue, as part of the master plan approval, be
changed from the city commission approved north buffer plan to a buffer that
would match the west buffer plan. Ifthis recommendation is approved, add the
"C_C" cutting plane at the north side of the open space parcel. If the
recommendation is denied, add the "B_B" cutting plane at the north property line
of the open space parcel.
On the sheet that shows the "A _A" and liB _B" landscaping, remove the four (4)
asterisk (*) found in the chart titled Plant Materials and Specifications - liB"
Buffer. Remove the asterisk (*) found at the beginning of the first note in the
Notes section found at the bottom of the page. Remove the text (F.P.L. Rea'd
Setba~k). and found in the first note in the Notes section at the bottom of the
page and remove the last sentence found in the first note in the Notes section
at the bottom of the page or provide written verification frQm F. P. L that they will
not allow the material to be planted that is shown on the submitted plans.
As required by the master plan approval regarding the north buffer area, reword
the first note found in the Notes section at the bottom of the plan that shows the
landscape buffers as follows:
31.
In the north buffer at the rear of lots 8 and 9 where the utility easement
encroaches the buffer landscaping, the trees may be removed and replaced
with 12 toot tall Sabal Palms. The ratio of replacement shall be two Sabal
Palms for each tree.
INCLUDE
REJECT
J
j
J
)
)
Page 6
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
DEPARTMENTS
32.
Since the narrow landscape buffer area located between lots 31 and 32 is
occupied with two utility easements that cut through at least a 30 foot wide area
of the buffer and the utility department will allow only palm trees to be planted
in a utility easement, rather than the required native canopy trees approved for
this area, it is recommended that three groupings of three (3), 12 foot tall Sabal
Palms be planted on the approved berm within the utility easement area. It is
further recommended (to provide a dense visual buffer to limit the view of the
apartment complex) that the shrubs for this area be changed to Areca Palms
spaced five (5) foot on center and four (4) foot tall at time of planting. The 2.5
foot tall berm and Coco Plum hedge 36 inches tall, spaced 24 inches on center,
as shown on the submitted plans, shall run continuously through this area.
Add to the landscape plan a plan view detail of this recommended utility
easement planting.
To match the city commission approved buffer plan for the north buffer, change
the size and spacing of the Redtipped Coco Plum hedge planting specification,
identified on the submitted plan for the typical 100 lineal feet of Buffer "B", from
24" tall, #3 container to 24" to 36" tall containerized hedge plants installed 24"
on center along the top of the four foot tall berm to form a continuous hedge row
the entire length of the buffer. Also, change the Myrsine or Wax Myrtle shrub
planting specification, identified on the submitted plan for Buffer "B", from 24"-
30" tall, #3 container to 36 to 48 inch tall containerized shrubs, spaced 5 foot on
center installed in groups of 12, alternating on each side of the berm and at 25
foot intervals. Also, indicate in the plant specifications and the plan view
drawing, that the shrubs shall be placed in a manner to form a meandering
shape as viewed from plan view. Randie, Florida Privet, Wild Coffee and
Necklace Pod may also be used as the shrub material to form the meandering
accent. The four (4) foot tall berm shown on the submitted plans shall run
continuously along the north property of the project.
To match the city commission approved buffer plan for the north buffer
regarding trees, change the size of the three Slash Pines and two Red Cedar
trees identified on the submitted plan for the typical 100 lineal feet of Buffer "B"
from 6-8' tall to 12 foot tall.
33.
34.
35.
To match the city commission approved buffer plan for the north buffer, change
the size and quantity specifications for the Saw Palmetto palms identified on the
submitted plan for the typical 1 00 lineal feet of Buffer "B" as follows:
(24) 30 to 36 inch tall Saw Palmetto palms shall be planted around the
base of the three (3) Sabal Palms and the three Slash Pines. The
applicant is proposing 48 - #3 container palms; 24 to be installed at
each end of the 100 foot section of the buffer.
INCLUDE REJECT
J
j
J
I
Page 7
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
36. To match the city commission approved buffer plan for the south and east
buffer, change the size of the hedge planting specification identified on the
submitted plan for the typical 100 lineal feet of Buffer "A", from 24-30", #3
container, planted 24" on center to 36 inch tall containerized hedge plants
installed 24 inch on center at the peak of the berm to form a continuous hedge
row. Also, change the shrub planting specification, identified on the submitted
plan for buffer "A", from 24-30", #3 container, planted 48" on center to 36 inch J
tall containerized shrubs installed 24 inch on center with 10 plants per each 42
lineal feet of buffer. The 2.5 foot tall berm shown on the submitted plans shall
be continuous around the project with the exception of the entrance and the
approved location of the four (4) foot tall berm along the north property line of
the project.
37. Omit from the plan view drawings of the typical 100 lineal feet of landscape J
buffer all reference to quantities of landscape material. The plan view drawings
shall reference the location and type of plant species. The planting
specifications, including specific location standards, size specifications and
spacing requirements shall be identified in the plant list.
38. Modify all plan view drawings of the buffer areas to show the location and J
specie of landscape material in compliance with the city commission approved
planting scheme.
39. To be consistent with the previous city commission action regarding the buffer j
required for the east side of the open space parcel, place the "B-B" cutting plane
at the east side of the parcel.
40. Submit a copy of the city approved and recorded H.O.A. documents for the J
project, prior to the issuance of the building permits for the entry gates or
recreation site, whichever comes first. .
41. Specify on the plan the source of the irrigation required for each buffer area.
42. Show on the plan view drawings of the buffers the perimeter of the landscape
beds where the specified mulch will be located.
43. Submit a copy of the Palm Beach County Traffic Division approval of the
methodology used by the applicanfs traffic engineer for the modification to the V
original Woolbright Place PUD and Shoppes of Woolbright PCD traffic report
that allowed the change from a multi-family to single-family project. The traffic
generation for this project is part of a traffic report that includes the entire
development of Woolbright Place PUD and Shoppes of Woolbright PCD.
44. Submit a copy of the Lake Worth Drainage District permit prior to -/
commencement of construction.
45. If the project is approved, Planning and Zoning Department comments shall be
shown in compliance on the permit plans required to construct or install the
approved improvements.
46. If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working /
drawinas reauired for permits for the oroiect.
Page 8
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
47. As required by the notes identified on the plat, provide written verification from
the utility users of the utility easement shown along the north property line of the
project to indicate that the berm and landscaping (as shown on the approved I
plan) may be installed within the new ten (10) foot wide utility easement. If the
utility users will not approve the landscaping required for the north buffer, it is
recommended that the buffer easement, berm and approved landscaping be
moved southward into the site so as not to diminish the required buffer.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
47. A type of mulch other than cypress mulch shall be used.
48 No changes in the buffer proposed by the applicant shall be allowed. \!
49. Chain link fencing shall be provided on all four (4) sides of the project.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
50. To be determined. bvl$cP tON(), ",JI"( ~6
T JH:dim
d:\crystalk\nwspland\condappr. wpd
lent.. ItAAJNIAI~ ",tPnO ""'Of) I~
fj.
- r 11.1, I
.",1, ,llIIIII
Ii II
~ I 1I1{ I~.
!IfHtf JlHllUW.
IIII! IllfIT 'I~
f. rrrm
~_. _. t
PU 1- lfii
... t~fl[1
~ ;,'.ill
=. c' '... , ..
I ~ REI
'/' .
'/ :.
I 'f I.: Ira3~
II~ '~~::,o_"Ti~~an
LO~ATION M.\P
wmi :~ III T \..-A' ~~ BRt~I' - !.,,,
, - ~ ~'c' - J- 1_ - : II ,
. Q'". .<j · 'I~ ~ - - a: ~ . ! J1L
t::D ; ______~.- II- ,."Ifllll ID ~
6~A(.H 1'....'" c_ ~ ' I .
- -:J C-- -2J-" . . . . l " it:. iI I I" ( I ' t. ......
S{..!v~ : ~ \1, 7 ~- "111 II IT
.. . .>./': ~ -7"" I'll IIIIIIIT 111111..-9
R~" :. _~I::- ..' 1111'111111111' I '1 ~ ~
. ~~ . . 'I ,.. I 11111 ~.IIJ~ F1~ "- ~
:1 9! i.:..l.U.lJl ,>- I:l T """ 1,[' ~ I!l1iiI ~1I 'I fuu.. V,
...."..., ~~~ ~~I~C.:~ i; ~iJ;N ==
1);H I.... S /~ ~~IIII
'~..ll r~ - t ~ .'Tit!: "'......;. ~'~.url! 'II,
i ..o~~ I ~ ~;.;;; r;;...: ..-.-",1: jilin r rr
,t:;~ ~J ,;'.~:l!frWrn~' ~~~ c..
_ _ ~ I . 1)L1~ IJL i ( :q'/J
f- -4 ~I J'ti ' - ;~t;7 !; \ '.' -.
~ ~~~~. .'~~J;I'" !: \\ ~1
~-\ \~ " ".' . ~, {. t ,'". r-J U D
~ ~~I~..' :....... 0 ":,~'\ ~ ~.:i'[ I .-_
. /'" I! . ..... ".' ., ..... .I t' -- L.......~ ~-
~ /~:..: ..' '../'..~:?: "'w!: ~LB~i':;
'~./ y :?",~ . ..~~' {fj~I4~\~' 'LAce"
. . P' { ..~~~ a ..~ \~ . - ..-...
..... :c; ....,... L(~~\ \ ~ ~. ~
~'~,. ,', ,C", ~R 3: "'""t'~ \\::.. .. :: ,\
'fi c.......: 1 ~ ., \
_U l~rm . \ j ~ . . ~ I
. I~ I. ! f - .4 ~:~l i I
. ~ . J j 'r.i.~~~ .-.""'--',! I L.. ,/J
, ,.. .~, .o.~,........ ~.)>-'~ l---f ...._._ IIU(11
. 0 .. '--_,-........ I - -' . .. -'. "-I
;R3 .. lliii&1~ ~- :~
; IJ~ Cfla 1 ", .r~ "
/~ ,.... "~"""c' ",.1!t.1.6IritSNT <i:"!!~ ""t:. I- I C 3 ;J' ,
I I I 1'\ I I I I I IT I I- '- "
Iln . 1''-'- .11 I I' '
1'\ 1 . IIITT . JI [~0/L - :
~ III ~ r ~)L T fO ~ ~ [I; 7'
. ~~ .... . ;1t; ~} .~."
J I ~~'i'~';".. -'J 1/ ~..~
8 MEC ~ )11,>' t' ~ .:::-....
~'~_~~ ....~.. ,,;.,::i "DJI~n:(;;;)~ R
-
.,11..
~
R - .
E =.....
C == ~
. ~ ]ttm
! I&:,-
. C'" I i [
~
--
I
~
. ,
I- ll3I
II ml
:1 I
IT
, '~lJ JJ
U I
!I
.
I I
~
PU, ~"ING AND ZONING DEPAR1....ENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-093
Agenda Memorandum for
March 18, 1997 City Commission Meeting
TO: Kerry Willis
City Manager
---- .
FROM: Tambrj J. Heyden, AICP / ',,-.l!
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: March 13,1997
SUBJECT: Crystal Key at Woolbright Place PUD
NEW SITE PLAN (perimeter buffer landscaping, security gates and project
signage)
NWSP 97-002
~
Please place the above-referenced item on the March 18, 1997 City Commission agenda under
Development Plans.
DESCRIPTION: Kenneth H. Kruger, P.E., agent for Kennedy Homes., the owner of Crystal Key
at Woolbright Place PUD, is requesting a site plan approval to install perimeter buffer landscaping,
security gates and project signage for the 14.05 acre, 83 unit single-family detached home
residential development, zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property is located on the
east side of S.W. 8th Street approximately 2,200 feet north of Woolbright Road. For further details
pertaining to this request, please see attached site plan report (Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 97-076).
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7 - 0 vote, recommends
approval subject to all staff comments in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval and a new comment
that a mulch other than cypress mulch be used, that no changes in buffer be allowed and chain link
fence shall be provided on all four (4) sides of the project (see attached). In addition, the Board
is recommending three more conditions as follows (see also attached Exhibit "C"):
1. A type of mulch other than cypress mulch shall be used.
2. Chain link fencing shall be provided on all sides of the project. (The plans are unclear as
to where fencing is proposed. With respect to the north side of the project, the fencing
would need to be provided on the south side of the buffer.)
3. No changes in the buffer that was previously approved by the Commission shall be allowed.
(There was much discussion regarding this item and staff concurs with the Board's stance.
However, regarding comment 35, staff would support a size reduction in the Saw Palmetto
palms which are being used as a large ground cover. An argument can be made for and
against this size reduction because had the buffer been installed when originally required,
the plants would be larger than what is proposed. If the Commission determines that
availability of the larger Saw Palmetto is a hardship, the comment could be changed to:
35. The size and quantity specifications for the Saw Palmetto palms identified on the
submitted plan for the typical 1 00 lineal feet of Buffer "B" shall be (24) 22 inch tall and
planted around the base of the three (3) Sabal Palms and the three Slash Pine.
T JH:bme
Attachments
xc: Central File
C:\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\CRYSTALK\NWSPLANC\CCAGENCA.WPC
~ ...~, .
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
IX. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A
c: Dev., Plan., Util.
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
o Preliminary Draft D Revised Draft D
Final Submittal
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dales
o December 3.1996
o December l7. 1996
D January 7. 1997
D January 21. 1997
Dale Final Fonn Must be Turned
into City Manager's Office
November 25. 1996
January 15. 1997
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
D February 4. 1997
D February 18. 1997
D March 4, 1997
o March 18. 1997
Date Final Fonn Must be
Turned into City Manager's
January 29. 1997
December II. 1996
February 12. 1997
December 30. 1996
February 29. 1997
March 12. 1997
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
o Administration
o Bid
D Legal
D Consent D Presentation
D Public Hearing D New Business
D UnfInished Business []I Other
Development Plans
DESCRIPTION OF
AGENDA ITEM (attadlldditional sheets and supportina documcntalion ifnecessary)
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Crystal Key at Woolbright Place PUD
Kenneth H. Kruger, P.E.
Kennedy Homes
East side ofS.W. 8th Street, approximately 2,200 feet north of Woolbright Road
SITE PLAN - Request for site plan approval to install perimeter buffer
landscaping, security gates and project signage for the 14.05 acre, 83 unit single-
family detached home residential development.
Description:
RECOMMENDATION
The pIAnn.. ... Development Board, with a 7 - 0 vote, recommends approval subject to all staff
comments ill Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval and three additional comments regarding
type ofmulc~ the north landscape buffer and chain link fencing around the project (see attached
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 97-093).
/'
.-Jh~ .
Department
~ I.!.. ~ j.f ,,--,
City er's Signature
D:\SHARE\ WPl.PROJECTs\CRYST ALK\NWSPLAND\AGENDANW. WPD
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
OF THE
CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
i i;; ~~- --;~.
, j ..~ 1 r---.----:....
II fl ij
! f .I'.
,IUULI .-~'i
i
L~ < C------i:
- Pi&~L.:;~ :-:._~~-----1
-
! rn Ir\i
',In'.
APPLICANT: Kennedv Homes. Inc.. (Crystal Kev at Woolbrioht Place P.U.D.)
APPLICANT'S AGENT:
Kenneth H. Kruqer. P.E.
HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: April 15. 1997
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Request for site plan approval of a 32 acre
recreation area to include a pool. 160 square foot cabana and parkinq facilitv for
Crvstal Kev at Woolbrioht Place PUD. an 83 unit sinole-familv (detached homes).
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: on the east side of S.W. 8th Street aporoximatelv
2.200 feet north of Woolbrioht Road.
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO.
TH IS MA TIER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of
Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission
having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the
applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner
consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2.
The Applilant
:L HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
The App/cant's application for relief is hereby
)L GRANTED subject to the conditions marked as "include" in
Exhibit "D" hereto.
3
DENIED
4. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
5. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with
the terms and conditions of this order.
6. Other:
DATED: Aoril15. 1997
(lf~ra~~~k~~ ~
City erk
. PI.nnlnglCryalal Key OIlY Ord. . fee
4/151/97
LO'CATION MAP
I I I' I II 10 ,1.1---- ~~ ut.....- ! 'I I
( _ / ~ ~ "V I I n L . <::> ,~.... '-i::: , E
__ -If-' . () .... - I R r-
r1r -=f-~', !I ~~ ~ I' g ~ l!l.l!!.l
i::C ; - ~:.: ~. . fllfTd:a::-'m' ~~~ ~~ I"~ .., ~
. 'e",-~H --"\ ..... ' '0 II I' TL--
~;;;! (;...~~\T , ; 't~,j;~:' I ; If' m. _ ' +e.. ; f .j'
. ." o~, ~ - n ~I~
" '.... .,.. : -:-" I Ifnll III l,..l rml~
. . f~~ ' " ;~C ill! ~~ It/c;nn ~ ~ n. .:3-- .'- ,
:. : ,if.., 0 I _p L~ .c;~ [!JJift ~'11 I IT o'l:":'1 -1:"=1 r.~.
,""\,,,-,":,~' ~) :: . ~EC .H ~l~.., flILillJ 11II!illIJII"- /'1/11 j.P q b ~ I ,-mi'J
IU q1f;l"1 1TT ,1, - '. .!~~T ~ ~, I Htilfl' rrr - - I 1111
I) Cf ~ ~t.J J~ S - /.I~I"":J1I ~Il~l IT - - ~ -~ I~
~"..I. l ~ I! f-H- .,..e:....-~ '.J' ~-.Jt ' Ii, ~ I I 11..LL
~'-f ;1 J I
. I
- .
. 1tI. "-. ." J.j ( I1h lt~' ! 1\ VTlII
:. i~~ .~' ,. · (F -. [JJ]]J]
~ r1. \l ~ ~ . ~':r rl1" . I: ',\\ 111
~~ ~. """-..~ .;. 1
~. ~~~...~~ '., "" .:,~~~~ ~:;r; ~~UD ~ __ III ;,!IIm
~ ....~.... " i /.... "'wc OLS"':;' I . ,
.,J~/ . ;'0".~ . '''<..' ::~' "~.~t( A~~\. . :I LAC: E" .lIIllIEIII& I .' rrf
. .' "'f. 'u' ..\ l nl
,.,~' =.. '; "~'" . ~:.~ 1).' . . - ..-.. .oj 'I 1111 i" ~
. _. t' f.'I' DJI[[f{]
1~ . ' 0" I { R ::3 ~ '~'." l' ~ .
r RI;= ~- nrrT~r H 1) .~ P C9---r I 1- ~
~ I, IT ~.~ : ~w;r ': I ~ ~ fJ IL . .1=i[1
1-. J~ . I I 'I fr I
,:.r. :r I j I' . , '\.. r" -- . , L., Jj .
~.~ .. ~ 1,--_~p,~~L_'- r~JA ~ :1:. Il[
; ~:31 I ll~~~ ,I - .'~.~~... 11ft1 ..-:::~' -
~ , - -".. '. ~ - .]I Ll1J.L~~~ --
I
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Aoproval
Project name: Crystal Key - Recreation
File number: NWSP 97,:,003
Reference: The plans consist of 4 sheets identified as 1 st Review, New Site Plan. File #NWSP 97-003 with a Plannina
and Zonina Department Februarv 24. 1997, date stamp markina.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments:
1. The plans show 26 feet between parking spaces, code calls for a minimum of 27
feet. Amend plans accordingly.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Comments:
2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements
at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the
following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and I
traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FOOT,
PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your
permit request. Chap.1, Art.l, Sec.6, par.A, pg.1-3.
3. Provide certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with j
all City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.v, See. SA, pg. 6-7 and Chap.23,
Art.lfF, pg.23-8.
4. Provide drainage plan. ChapA, Sec. 7F, pg.4-6 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8. J
5. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc., j
must conform with City codes and standards. Chap.23, Art. II , pg.23-6.
6. Provide a satisfactory lighting plan including photometries and pole wind loading. J
Chap.23, Art.IIA, pg.23-6. ,
7. Concrete curb must conform to City standards. Chap.23, Art.llE, pg.23-7. J{
\J
8. Provide 27' backup area, all stalls. Chap.23, Art. II , 11, pg.23-9.
9. All parking lots shall meet or exceed State Handicap Code requirements and J
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
comply with the Standard Building Code and amendments thereto. Chap. 23, /
Art. II K, pg.23-9.
10. Provide continuation of sidewalks thru all driveways to mark pedestrian paths. /
Chap. 23, Art.lI, Sec.P, pg.23-10.
11. Paint handicap pavement symbols white. Sheet 9 of FOOT Index 17346.
12. As proposed, the 15' x 30' pool (which is the normal size structure for a single j
family home) is not appropriate to be represented as a "public" pool. This
development, when completed, will contain 83 units (200-220 persons).
Assuming a reasonable peak period, the pool area should accommodate about
20% of that population or about 40 persons.
Using the standard of 20 s. f. per person for pool and deck area in a public pool,
the minimum size pool should be 800 s.f. to provide adequate occupancy and a
reasonable amenity to the development. It is therefore recommended that the
minimum size pool for this area as proposed should be 20' x 40'.
In order to encourage the developer to provide this improved amenity, I would
further recommend that the parking requirement, which is generally based upon
pool size, be left as proposed which will adequately provide sufficient parking at
this peak period.
It is the consensus of the Technical Review Committee that since this
development is a P.U.D., normal code provisions can be preempted which is
recommended in this case.
PARKS AND RECREATION ,
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVI RONMENT ALlST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
13. To ensure that the location of the driveway leading to the recreation area meets J
~,O City standards, show on the plan titled Site Plan - Recreation Area, a dimension
of no less than 30 feet from the intersecting lines of both rights-of-way located
at the southwest comer of the site to the south edge of the proposed driveway.
[Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II, Section H. 3. of the Land Development
Regulations}
14. To the plan titled Site Plan - Recreation Area change, or add the following
information and horizontal control dimensions in compliance with City code: J
a.~ change the access aisle width from 26 feet to 27 feet [Chapter 23 _
Parking Lots, Article II, Section I. 1. of the Land Development
1\' Regulations and City standard drawing B-90013];
j-~'iI'~ show and dimension on the plan a 5 foot wide landscape strip along the
~c;\ west side of the parking area [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code,
Section 5. D. of the Land Development Regulations];
c. show with a distinguishable symbol and notes the location and type of
curbing required to protect the landscaping [Chapter 7.5, Article II _
1':- \nvtJl\VJ\7 -Ibm I'CI /\ ~~t~ 0tv'"
DEPARTMENTS
Landscape Code, Section 5. A. of the Land Development Regulations];
d. ,dimension the width of the handicapped access aisle and regular and
I} ~ handicapped parking spaces [Handicapped Accessibility Code and
[Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II, Section I. 1. of the Land
Development Regulations and city standard drawing B-90012 and B-
'~ 90013];
~. ~ .rj3 dimension the width of the on-site sidewalk leading to the pool deck
~ ( from the right-of-way and dimension the width of the sidewalk leading
k k:-\ to the pool deck from the parking lot [Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review,
~.l~' . Section 7. B. of the Land Development Regulations] ;
~ rf ( f.p ~ Identify the type of material proposed for the pool deck and sidewalks
~ i ~ [Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7. B. of the Land Development
Regulations];
',,~@> ~ show the location of the security fencing and gates required around the
pool area and specify the type of fence material, including height and
color [Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 11. E. of the Land Development
Regulations and Swimming Pool Ordinance);
show the location of the wheelstops [Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article
II, Section E. of the Land Development Regulations];
show the location of the pool equipment and the type of required
screening [Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10. C. of the
Land Development Regulations];
indicate the type of surface material proposed for the entire parking area
(note: grass parking is not allowed) [Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article I,
Section 5. B. of the Land Development Regulations) and
~k. ~ show the location of the site lighting poles required to illuminate the
parking area [Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article I, Section 5. B. and
Article II, Section A. of the Land Development Regulations).
~~
~
J~
l.:
';J
-$I
'1
.r
~ ::::--h
~ \:l- .
~
~
. i.~
!
0~-j.
\.
15.
.~ d.
~ G
~~~
~~., .
,o/t'
'~Jl
'/....
~~
~.~'" 1.
To the plan that depicts the site landscaping, change or add the following
information in compliance with city code:
a. show the location of the city standard curbing and wheelstops required
to protect the landscape areas [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape
Code, Section 5. A. of the Land Development Regulations];
show no less than a 5 foot wide landscape strip .along the west side of
the parking area [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5.
D. of the Land Development Regulations];
omit from the plans all reference to grass parking [Chapter 23 - Parking
Lots, Article I, Section 5. B. of the Land Development Regulations);
add the sidewalks leading to the pool deck as shown on the site plan;
extend the native Coco Plum hedge material, shown on the plan
abutting the north parking spaces, towards the east and west to show
a continuous hedge row around the perimeter of the vehicle use area.
The only interruption in the continuous hedge row (maximum spacing,
2 feetcentertoQ9flter) -sha1l_I:>~!)i~~~alks and/or drivewayp(Note _ as'
required by the code, show on the plantnefriedge--row-setback 3 feet
, from the edge of the sidew~lk: or driveway). 1 The hedge material is also
~rn5nequrfe(rwfierethe' footprint of the building screens the view of the
parking area from the abutting property line [Chapter 7.5, Article II _
Landscape Code, Section 5. C. 3., 5. D., 5. E. and 5. H. of the Land
Development Regulations);
change the Coco Plum height specification from #1 container, 12" -18"
to 18" minimum at time of planting, spaced 2 foot on center, to form a
continuous screen barrier [Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code,
Section 5. A. of the Land Development Regulations];
b.
c.
INCLUDE
REJ ECT
j
)
DEPARTMENTS
g. remove from the plant list and plan view drawing all reference to the
quantity of required hedge and tree material (Note - the quantity of
hedge and tree material will be identified by the spacing specification
and dimensions shown on the plan and plant list);
to avoid a conflict with site lighting poles and landscaping, show on the
plan the location of the site lighting poles; ti 6l7CY71 tn t-?
to delineate the location of the required hedge landscape material, it is
recommended that an asterisk be noted and placed on the plan view
drawing and plant list by the Coco Plum hedge material or any other
specie used to meet the required vehicle use area screening hedge
material;
place a typical maximum 40 foot on center spacing dimension between
the required trees shown along the south and west property line of the
vehicle use area (Note - if the Seagrapes specified on the plan are
being used to meet the required trees, change the overall height
specifications from #15 container, 6'.7' x 5'-6' and #7 container, 4'x4' to
a minimum of 8 feet tall with a 2 inch caliper trunk measured 4.5 feet
above grade [Chapter 7.5, Article" - Landscape Code, Section 5. A. of
the Land Development Regulations];
to delineate the location of the required tree landscape material, it is
recommended that a double asterisk be noted and placed on the plan
view drawing and plant list by the Brazilian Beauty/eaf tree and
::'eagrape tree or any other specie used to meet the required vehicle
use area screening regarding trees [Chapter 7.5, Article" - Landscape
Code, Section 5. D. 1. of the Land Development Regulations];
to identify the location and specie of the required pool equipment and
AlC unit screening, place a distinguishable symbol on the plan view
drawing and the plant list next to the required screening material
[Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10. C. of the Land
Development Regulations];
show computations that verify that the quantity of required trees and
hedges shown on the plan are in compliance with the quantity
specifications of the code [Chapter 7.5, Article" - Landscape Code,
Section 5. C. 3. and D. 1. of the Land Development Regulations];
show computations that verify that the quantity of required native trees
and hedges shown on the plan are in compliance with the fifty (50)
percent requirement of the code [Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.4.6];
show, label and dimension on the landscape plan the line-of-sight
triangular areas that are required on both sides of the driveway and at
the southwest comer of the site where the property comer is located at
the intersection of two rights-of-way and indicate in note form the size
of the unobstructed cross visibility space required within the line-of-
sight triangular areas [Chapter 7.5, Article " - Landscape Code,
Section 5. H. and Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 4. E. of the Land
Development Regulations] and
indicate that the mulch used will be non-cypress.
{)
J.
@
I.
m.
~A.
.f/
n.
/
@.
q.
16.
Add to the notes section of the landscape plan, text indicating that the landscape
material shall be installed in a sound, workman-like manner. [Chapter 7.5,
Article " - Landscape Code, Section 5. A. of the Land Development
Regulations]
On the notes section of the landscape plan, identify the source of the water
required for the automatic irrigation system. [Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review,
Section 7. C. of the Land Development Regulations]
17.
INCLUDE
REJECT
J
J
j
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
18. On the plant specifications found on the landscape plan, clearly delineate the j
height of the trees, the spread and caliper at 4.5 feet above grade. All planting
specifications shall be in compliance with the landscape code. [Chapter 7.5,
Article II - Landscape Code, Section 3. B. 5. of the Land Development
Regulations]
'@ On sheet A-1 identify the color name, color code and manufacturer of the
following exterior finish materials and where applicable, identify the type of
material:
a. textured stucco finish;
b. asphalt shingles; J
c. raised stucco band;
d. louvers;
e. screened louver;
f. wood fascia;
g. galvanized drip;
h. door frames;
i. door and door louver;
j. open patio support columns and
k. soffit at overhang and open patio area.
[Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7. D. and Chapter 9 - Community Design I
Plan, Section 5 of the Land Development Regulations]
@. On the sheet titled Site Plan - Recreation Area, add to the "Development Data" a J
note indicating the recreation amenities are not required by the city code.
~_: Jhe submittal includes two drawings titled site plan and only one is required. J
~'~ ~. Revise the submittal to include one site plan that identifies all required
(~ &1" ~ information in compliance with city codes.
V I
22. ; Submit a survey of the recreation tract.
23. J To avoid a conflict with regards to the location of trees within easements, show, J
identify and dimension the easements of record on the Landscape Plan.
(y. Submit a copy of the Lake Worth Drainage District permit prior to J
commencement of construction.
25. To clarify the improvements proposed with the subject request, it is
recommended that notes 6 and 10 found in the "Development Data" on the J
plan titled Site Plan - Recreation Area be omitted. This setback information is
not needed as part of the request. However, the following required recreation
area setback information shall be listed in the development data and shown
with symbols and notes on the site plan drawing: Recreation Area Setback - 20
feet for all buildings and amenities (Note: the pool deck and parking facilities
are exempt from the setback requirements). I
I
26. To clarify the improvements proposed with the subject request, it is J
recommended that notes 2, 3 and 5, found in the "General Notes" on the plan
titled Site Plan - Recreation Area, be omitted. This information is not needed
as part of the request.
27. To clarify the subject request, it is recommended that general note 1 found on J
the plan titled Site Plan - Recreation Area be revised by omitting all text
following the word "area". It is further recommended that general note 4 be
revised by omitting the word "units" and inserting the text "recreation area". It is ,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
also recommended that the text "private streets" be added to general note 6. /
28. To clarify the location of the recreation area, it is recommended that the names ~
of all of the streets shown on the plans be identified on all plan view drawings.
29. To clarify the location of the recreation area, it is recommended that the names 'J
of all of the streets shown on the plans be identified on all plan view drawings.
30. It is recommended that the title Landscape Plan - Recreation Area, be added j
to the sheet referenced as 1 of 1.
31. If the project is approved, comments shall be addressed on the permit plans J
required to construct or install the approved improvements. ,
32. If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working J
drawings required for permits for the project. All improvements shall comply
with the applicable city codes.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
33. NONE.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
34. To be determined.
Ibme
s:\protectslCtystalklnwsplcondappr.wpc!
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS FROM CO?vMSSION MEETING
L N~
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
MINUTES )
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMr-- 'I" BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 8, 1997
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
No additions, deletions, or corrections were made to the minutes of the last meeting.
Motion
Mr. Rosenstock moved to approve the minutes of the March 11, 1997 meeting as
submitted. Mr. Aguila seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
5. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department
1. Final Disposition of Last Meeting's Agenda Items
Mr. Haag reported the following:
Boulevard Center - Land Use Plan Amendment/Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Text
Amendment - The City Commission remanded this item back to the Planning and
Development Board.
Crystal Key at Woolbright Place PUD - New Site Plan - The City Commission
unanimously approved this item subject to all staff comments plus the comments made
by the Planning and Development Board regarding the cypress mulch and the
perimeter fencing. Approval was also subject to there not being any changes in the
perimeter buffer from what was previously approved by the City Commission. However,
the City Commission allowed the applicant to reduce the size of the Saw Palmettos to
24 inches.
Polio Tropical at Shoppes of Boynton - Abandonment of a portion of a 15 foot wide
utility easement - This item is still tabled.
B. Filing of Quarterty Report for Site Plan Waivers and Minor Site Plan
Modifications
This report was provided to the members of the board for their perusal. Mr. Haag
answered some questions Mr. Aguila had regarding the freestanding sign for Polio
Tropical, the expansion of the non-conforming use for Showtime, and the reduction of
the required peripheral belt for Boynton Commerce.
2
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
OF THE
CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
~<-;. , ,y~(... '7 ~
'l~~
r. "tin LC: ,I \Ii ,~ '"
wr d -I~
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
APPLICANT: Kennedy Homes, Inc.. (Crystal Key at Woolbrioht Place P.U.D.)
APPLICANT'S AGENT:
Kenneth H. Kruoer, P.E.
EARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: March 18. 1997
TYPE OF RELIEF 10UGHT: ReQuest for site plan approval to install perimeter
buffer landscapino, security oates and proiect sionaoe for the 14.05 acre, 83 unit
sinole-family detached home residential development. zoned Planned Unit
Development (PUD).
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: on the east side of S.W. 8th Street approximatelv
2.200 feet north of Woolbrioht Road.
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of
Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission
having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the
applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner
consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
LHAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3
The Applipmt's application for relief is hereby
..Jt. GRANTED subject to the conditions marked as "include" in
Exhibit "C" hereto.
DENIED
4. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
5. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with
the terms and conditions of this order.
,
6. Other:~' ~VISG() ~WWI./IJ r 3? ~ ~r ft>,e1Jf IN
jJl./lNNIl'lr ~/r. "'fP1'I() tj?-O~, 3/16/fi7
.
DATED: March 18. 1997
~-",~/9# ~-<v.<
Cit Clerk
. , , "" """,.",
Dev.OrdCrystal Key . ()...~,
3/18/97... +)0 ~
..;t:,'.. 0 ~
O,?'" -t.- ~
'V. -
-~ '1J =-
r.'i ~r ~
, -.
,. ), ,.': -' .~
~ 0 .,'.J::
~ < 0 .......... :- .'
~".. !Y'DA .,:\,-.:::..-
"I/. \':\'
"""/111111 \ \\\\
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD - Buffer Landscaping
File number: NWSP 97-002
Reference: The clans consist of 3 sheets identified as 2nd Review. New Site Plan. File #NWSP 97-002 with a
January 31. 1996 Planning and Zonina Deoartment date stamo marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJFr.T
PUBLIC WORKS
C- . NnnA
UTI L1TI ES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments:
1. All roadways and security gate must accommodate specifications for the largest
vehicle anticipated for iJse in this project.
The minimum performance for all security gates should be as follows: /
a) All gates must have one security entry code (0911)
b) The gate must remain open until the Fire-Rescue units have completed
the call and have reentered 0911 while leaving.
c) Gates may be operable by telephone from our dispatch office. A phone
call from our dispatchers will open the gate and a second call will be
required to close the gate.
d) In case of power failure, the gate shall open automatically and remain
open.
e) An exception will be allowed if a 24-hour security guard is stationed at
the gate.
f) Authorized key security boxes (Le. Knox, NuTech, Supra) should be
located on all buildings where alarms and/or sprinkler systems are
located to assist in minimizing damage due to rapid forcible entry.
g) Authorized key security boxes may be used on gates, provided each
gate has one and it is well marked. A key security box on a gate shall
not be used in lieu of any of the department's requirements.
h) No other code numbers, operating methods or key systems will be kept
on file by the Fire Department.
i) In the event fire units are unable to gain rapid entry using the above
methods, the Fire Department will resort to using rapid forcible entry
methods to gain entry.
j) Information on where authorized key security boxes can be purchased
is available from Boynton Beach Fire-Rescue Fire Safety Division.
Chapter 9, Local Ordinance and NFPA #1.
POLICE
Comments: None
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Comments: .
Page 2
Crystal Key POD 1
NWSP 97-002
I DEPARTME'NTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
2. Revise both 10 foot and 25 foot buffer areas so that stormwater runoff shall be I
contained on site. Chap.6, Art.lIl, Sec.5-1 and 5-2, pg.6-2 and Chap.6, Art.IV,
Sec.58, pg.6-8.
3. A revised note should be placed on the plan regarding homeowners association
maintenance of completed improvements which should occur only after such
improvements have been inspected and approved by the City
4. The tree locations along S.W. 8th Street shall be coordinated in the field, before J
planting, with the revised right-of-way landscape plan to be submitted by the
Shoppes of Woolbright developer.
5. All specified trees must be a minimum 8' high overall with minimum 2" caliper. .;
6. Replacement of specified trees with sabal palms is unacceptable. J
7. Language on site plan referring to an FPL "requirement" for minimum setbacks /
and substitution of tree species should be removed from drawing. There is no
such" I
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
8. The applicant has completed the clearing of exotic vegetation from parcel 8
(undisturbed open area parcel of 1.47 acres, restricted to passive recreation j
use). Therefore, the City Commission approved north buffer (25' wide
landscape berm) must be constructed along the entire adjoining property line
between parcel 8 and the eastern residential property owners. I
9. The site plan should be amended to show the location of the landscape berm. VI
10. Landscaping on the berm must match the approved plans. J
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
11. To clarify the proposed improvements within the subject request, it is V
recommended that notes 4 through 10 found in the Development Data chart on
the plan titled Site Plan be omitted. This information is not needed as part of the
request.
12. To clarify the proposed improvements within the subject request, it is I
recommended that notes 6 and 7 found in the General Notes on the plan titled
Site Plan be omitted. This information is not needed as part of the request.
13. To clarify the subject request, it is recommended that the Landscape Plant List
found on the plan titled Site Plan be omitted. The same information is more
appropriatelv found on the landscape plan included with the submittal.
Page 3
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. To clarify the subject request, it is recommended that notes 1 through 4 in the
General Landscape Planting Notes found on the plan titled Site Plan be omitted J
and notes 1 and 2 be added to the plan that depicts the landscape buffers, with
the exception that the spelling be corrected in notes 1 and 2.
15. It is recommended that following the omission of notes 6 and 7 from the General j
Notes and notes 1 through 4 from the General Landscape Planting Notes, that
a note 6 be added to General Notes. The new note 6 should state that the
project's homeowners association is responsible for the perpetual maintenance
of the approved improvements located within the easement titled Landscape
Buffer Easement.
16. Add to all section view drawings and plan view drawings included with the /
f submittal the location, type and dimension of the easements of record as shown
on the plat including landscape buffer easements.
17. To clarify the purpose of each drawing, it is recommended that the plan that /
depicts the buffer landscaping be titled Buffer Landscape Plan.
18. Show C:1 the sheet titled Site Plan and sheet SP-1 that the leading edge of the I
proposed monument wall sign is no less than 10 feet from the west property line
of the project. Also, show that the location of the wall sign complies with code
regulations regarding line-of-sight. [Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article III, Section
5. and section 4. E. of Chapter 2 - Zoning of the Land Development
Regulations]
~ To ensure that there is no conflict between the location of the sign and the j
(, installation of the required buffer landscaping approved for the S.W. 8th street
frontage of the project, add to the plot plan showing the monument sign found
l on sheet SP-1 the location of the approved buffer landscaping and berm.
j "
20. It is recommended that the landscaping required for the south side of lot 1 and
the north side of lot 47, that is not shown on the submitted plans, be a
continuation of the S.W. 8th street required buffer landscaping. It is further
recommended that this landscaping be shown and identified on the plot plan
drawing found on sheet SP-1.
( 21. Show and dimension on the plot plan drawing found on sheet SP-1, the line-of- j
site triangles, including noting on the plan the unobstructed cross visibility space
~ required within the triangular areas where the project entrance road intersects
L with S.W. 8th Street and the on-site private street The line-of-site triangles shall
comply with Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5. H. and Section
4. E. of Chanter 2 - Zonina of the Land Develooment Reaulations.
Page 4
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
22. To properly reflect the city commission approved buffer along the west property
line of the project, add to the sheet titled Site Plan a typical section view drawing
"C - C" and add a plan view drawing of the "C - C" buffer to the drawing showing
the plan view drawings of the "A" and liB" buffer. The new section view drawing
and plan view drawing shall depict the landscape buffer required along the
entire west property line of the project. Also change the "A - A" section cutting
plane shown along S.W. 8th Street to "C -C" and add the "C-C" cutting plane to
the west side of the open space parcel. The section view drawing and plan
view drawing of the new "C - C" buffer shall include the following:
a. show and identify on the section view and plan view drawing the type
and size of easements, as shown on the plat, including the landscape
buffer easement; j
b. show and indicate the height of the berm on both drawings as no less
than 2.5 feet with a slope of 4:1;
c. title the section and plan view drawings, Section "C - C" (typical 25'
landscape easement west property line );
d. add to the plan that shows the plan view and elevation views of the "A -
A" and liB - B" landscape buffer planting, a typical 100 foot section and
elevation view drawing of the required west landscape buffer. The plan
view drawing and material specifications shall show and identify the
following:
i. trees; 12 foot tall native Green Buttonwood trees or other
native tree spaced 25 foot on center;
ii. hedge; 36 inch tall native Coco Plum, Silver Buttonwood or
Wax Myrtle plants spaced 2 foot on center to form a
continuous hedge atop the center of the berm;
iii. shrubs; ~ inch tall native Seagrape or Fakahatchee Grass
plants spaced 2 foot on center with a minimum of ten plants
per 42 lineal feet of buffer (Note: The shrub material shall be
placed to create a meandering land~cape strip).
e. If there is a fence proposed along the west property line, identify on the
section view drawing and the plan drawing the location, height and type
of fence.
23. To clarify the location of the proposed fence, it is recommended that a
distinguishable symbol be added to the plan view drawing found on the sheet j
titled Site Plan and the plot plan drawing found on the sheet titled SP-1 that
delineates the location of the fence. It is further recommended that each
drawing identify the height and type of fence.
24. As already agreed to by the applicant, it is recommended that the proposed J
chain link fence be black vinyl coated.
~ On sheet SP-1 indicate, with a note, within the recreation site, that the V
recreation area improvements are not part of this request and that a separate
site plan approval is required for the recreation site.
X [:) On sheet SP-1 show the sign copy. Also, identify the height and length of the /
lettering including the color of the lettering by color name, color code and
manufacture. Add a note to the typical wall elevation drawing of the sign
indicatina that the sian is not illuminated internallv or bv externalliahtina.
Page 5
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
;OEPA~TMENTS
( . 27. ) Add to the plot plan found on sheet SP-1 the location of the security gates.
~ Also, add the north/south and east/west horizontal control dimensions of the
project entry including showing and delineating curbing, landscape areas, width
of landscape islands, length of stacking area and width of tum-around area that
is shown in front of the entry gates.
It is recommended that the median area shown on the plot plan found on sheet
SP-1 include at least three (3), 12 foot tall Green Buttonwood trees or other
native trees with a 5 to 6 foot spread. The trees shall be located at the east end
of the median, so as not to interfere with line-of-site vision at the intersection of
S. W. 8th Street. It is further recommended that native evergreen groundcover,
green Liriope or a combination of flowering groundcover be planted in the east
end of the median and in the island where the gates are proposed. The
groundcover or Liriope shall be one (1) gallon and spaced twelve (12) inches
on center.
tJ
{
29.
30.
31.
Based on the existing large native pine trees that are located near the north end
of the open space parcel area, it is recommended that the landscape buffer
required along S.W. 3rd Avenue, as part of the master plan approval, be
changed from the city commission approved north buffer plan to a buffer that
would match the west buffer plan. If this recommendation is approved, add the
"C-C" cutting plane at the north side of the open space parcel. If the
recommendation is denied, add the "B-B" cutting plane at the north property line
of the open space parcel.
On the sheet that shows the "A _A" and liB -B" landscaping, remove the four (4)
asterisk (*) found in the chart titled Plant Materials and Specifications - "B"
Buffer. Remove the asterisk (*) found at the beginning of the first note in the
Notes section found at the bottom of the page. Remove the text (F.P.L. Rea'd
Setba~k). and found in the first note in the Notes section at the bottom of the
page and remove the last sentence found in the first note in the Notes section
at the bottom of the page or provide written verification frQm F. P. L that they will
not allow the material to be planted that is shown on the submitted plans.
As required by the master plan approval regarding the north buffer area, reword
the first note found in the Notes section at the bottom of the plan that shows the
landscape buffers as follows:
In the north buffer at the rear of lots 8 and 9 where the utility easement
encroaches the buffer landscaping, the trees may be removed and replaced
with 12 foot tall Sabal Palms. The ratio of replacement shall be two Sabal
Palms for each tree.
INCLUDE
REJECT
J
j
J
)
J
Page 6
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
32. Since the narrow landscape buffer area located between lots 31 and 32 is
occupied with two utility easements that cut through at least a 30 foot wide area
of the buffer and the utility department will allow only palm trees to be planted
in a utility easement, rather than the required native canopy trees approved for
this area, it is recommended that three groupings of three (3), 12 foot tall Sabal J
Palms be planted on the approved berm within the utility easement area. It is
further recommended (to provide a dense visual buffer to limit the view of the
apartment complex) that the shrubs for this area be changed to Areca Palms
spaced five (5) foot on center and four (4) foot tall at time of planting. The 2.5
foot tall berm and Coco Plum hedge 36 inches tall, spaced 24 inches on center,
as shown on the submitted plans, shall run continuously through this area.
Add to the landscape plan a plan view detail of this recommended utility
easement planting.
33. To match the city commission approved buffer plan for the north buffer, change
the size and spacing of the Redtipped Coco Plum hedge planting specification,
identified on the submitted plan for the typical0. 00 lineal feet of Buffer "B0from
24" tall, #3 container t~" to 36" tall containerized hedae plants installed 24" j
on center along the ton n~ fnur foot tall berm to form a continuous heClOe row
the entire lenQlf1 of the buffe.!:.. Also, change the Myrsine orWaxl'Vfyrtle shrub
planting specification, identified on the submitted plan for Buffer "B", from 24"_
30" tall, #3 container to ~nch tall containerized shrubs, spaced 5 foot on
center installed in groups of 12, alternating on each side of the berm and at 25
foot interval~ Also, indicate in the plant specifications and the plan view
drawing, that the shrubs shall be placed in a manner to form a meandering
shape as viewed from plan view. (Randie, Florida Privet, Wild Coffee and
Necklace p~ay also be used as the shrub material to form the meandering
accent. Th four (4) foot tall berm shown on the submitted plans shall run
continuously along the north property of the project.
34. To match the city commission approved buffer plan for the north buffer J
regarding trees, change the size of the three ~ash Pines and two Red Cedar
trees identified on the sU~I~tted plan for the typical 100 lineal feet of Buffer "B"
from 6-8' tall to 12 foot tal.
f To match the city commission approved buffer plan for the north buffer, change
the size and quantity specifications for the Saw Palmetto palms identified on the I
submitted plan for the typical 1 00 lineal feet of Buffer "B" as follows:
(24) 30 to 36 inch tall Saw Palmetto palms shall be planted around the
base of the three (3) Saba I Palms and the three Slash Pines. The
applicant is proposing 48 - #3 container palms; 24 to be installed at
each end of the 1 00 foot section of the buffer.
Page 7
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
36. To match the city commission approved buffer plan for the south and east
buffer, change the size of the hedge planting specification identified on the
submitted plan for the typical 100 lineal feet of Buffer "A", from 24-30", #3
container, planted 24" on center to 36 inch tall containerized hedge plants
installed 24 inch on center at the peak of the berm to form a continuous hedge
row. Also, change the shrub planting specification, identified on the submitted
plan for buffer "A", from 24-30", #3 container, planted 48" on center to ~inch J
tall containerized shrubs installed~nch on center with 10 plants per each 42
lineal feet of buffer. The 2.5 foot tall berm shown on the submitted plans shall
be continuous around the project with the exception of the entrance and the
approved location of the four (4) foot tall berm along the north property line of
the project.
37. Omit from the plan view drawings of the typical 100 lineal feet of landscape J
buffer all reference to quantities of landscape material. The plan view drawings
shall reference the location and type of plant species. The planting
specifications, including specific location standards, size specifications and
spacing requirements shall be identified in the plant list.
38. Modify all plan view drawings of the buffer areas to show the location and v'
specie of landscape material in compliance with the city commission approved
planting scheme.
39. To be consistent with the previous city commission action regarding the buffer j
required for the east side of the open space parcel, place the "B-B" cutting plane
at the east side of the parcel.
40. Submit a copy of the city approved and recorded H.O.A. documents for the ~
project, prior to the issuance of the building permits for the entry gates or
recreation site, whichever comes first. ~
41. (Specify on the plan the source of the irrigation required for each buffer area. \!
'-" J
42. Show on the plan view drawings of the buffers the perimeter of the landscape
beds where the specified mulch will be located.
43. Submit a copy of the Palm Beach County Traffic Division approval of the
methodology used by the applicanfs traffic engineer for the modification to the V
original Woolbright Place PUD and Shoppes of Woolbright PCD traffic report
that allowed the change from a multi-family to single-family project. The traffic
generation for this project is part of a traffic report that includes the entire
development of Woolbright Place PUD and Shoppes of Woolbright PCD.
~ Submit a copy of the Lake Worth Drainage District permit prior to /
commencement of construction.
45. If the project is approved, Planning and Zoning Department comments shall be J
shown in compliance on the permit plans required to construct or install the
approved improvements.
46. If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working /
drawinos reauired for permits for the proiect.
Page 8
Crystal Key POD 1 at Woolbright Place PUD
Landscape Buffer
File No. NWSP 97-002
,/\
Il r j7~(j
, t::-'1( v~( / ( \Ji
{tI'vV ' /}/J'\'J
I
~EPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
t:J As required by the notes identified on the plat, provide ,writt.en verification from
the utility users of the utility easement shown along the north property line of the
project to indicate that the berm and landscaping (as shown on the approved J
plan) may be installed within the new ten (10) foot wida utility easement. If the
utility users will not approve the landscaping required for the north buffer, it is
recommended that the buffer easement, berm and approved landscaping be
moved southward into the site so as not to diminish the required buffer.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
47. A type of mulch other than cypress mulch shall be used. ../
48 No changes in the buffer proposed by the applicant shall be allowed. V
49. Chain link fencing shall be provided on all four (4) sides of the project.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
50. To be determined. IPI~ tolV()/ TlOlIV -36
TJH:dim
d:\crystalk\nwspland\condappr. wpd
/tnt liAAJIfIINb- 1lJ1!Pn() ?1-..0'~
. I I I J L I .1 -'. - .- ~
/ i..1!' "V I I I t ~ - I . , r,
II=J '1 1,-'- () Il.. 'C. - ~ 1_ - I I ·
- -::::r -. - ~ ~ 1 " !
r T r,' ~T""";' ~~ . '...:-=::;- --" _ ~~. ! Jr~
c:c ~ ~~. ill .:........ ." ... . I.
6~A.(H' - ~"\ t..... .
- -J ( --. -- " . . ., , . ~ ",,;; ill ·
~~~~~ : ~ ~' ~:. ~-- 1]11 f' . IIi'
. . . ~~ : _ - WI "'1111, I II. ~ J
RE3':, '", . :: - :-.: : ',. .Ijj~~'~' ';~[ . ~
., . ffil1~~(i .I~JI~ i:c I "'" .r1b~~~'~' n~ ;:: ~
..t.,.........~' . :. II..:..; .\ ,.. ~ 1! ' '.::1'L- i' 1III!lJHJII.... ,01TTTil b
o . CI .H ~ ... ._ 1 _ ~
... . ruIIP mmn IIHUl II
I... ~ ~ .,." 'I tI. U- .mr;: . IT:!:!] ITTtffT r
J~ -~ ~'I!'i.; S''''E.~ /~ I~A~,'::'
, 1.. ~ ; '!:I'tIfJUfmf J H \ (IL ,.
- ~ ~ : . , a.~ ~ -- l.j mn '. (~. _ _
~ -t ~l If''4 -')~...J.r i I. ,\..
tl'~~~~~' .'~~ Ii \'1 ~1
~~~7) "~,. ~,<;l~t I~../', PUD
~.\ J~,/.! . '" ", ~.., .~~:. )Jr-- [L...~.
/ r . :V~' :'1\ ,..Ir ,-- -,,~ - '.~ --
. . . '" >w " " ." I .,. ".' ~ I
. . :.' I I , I
. I.. I I 4, ~~~! .
. ''"F . . -j ~\ h~ r-. .-- .; I L.! I, J' J
~ I' :... ~~~I ~~I
r. ,~ \ -__ ~~ --:.>-':::: ~ .... _'_ I
. . '---~ ~ -' ' . '-~
:R3 P~cf;-1-'" ,,',~
,~;... ..v.<'!."'~~' ...clt.l.l"'itS.v, Ai:"~ -r. l- · C:3 fJ'
, ,,, '\ "" 'H- :
, I I .11. I I '"'1..1 II' _: 'I'
1'\ j " II I I . 1 /< , T *" ~ ~ .
~ t r- iI' . ~ ~ ~ Y'J :,' '_._ I
.-< ,",,,,;L--z 1~-~ :.J" '~. Z~'
, ~ ~ .;. _V I : '
;<\.> ~ ~ -1 ___
~n~C~): .... j~i ~l,lm:t)~ R b),~'L~.:_.~ B~
L2CATION:v:AP
-
-
R ~
E ~ (
C = P
,
...
~'I.. .1.1
~
~
,
~
I
r-
. I
i
,
I I I
II -h
I rtsl
,.. .--
I
-
I
- ~ ~.Lu
""',llr1rnI
(]JIh;j !
ffi[jffiJ '"
, ,I
. . ..
rniHiffii) ~ I
J " III/ I 1/ m fIll 1m
:1 IIIII I IFfln 'Imlll!
, I III : I : ! I rre?f1ln}
PU 1_ Jf:i
-tJf1
~ ;.I'l
A. .'-~ C. ,JI.. "I.
V RE
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-093
Agenda Memorandum for
March 18, 1997 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Kerry Willis
City Manager
FROM:
-- '
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP ~/ '.,~l!
Planning and Zoning DireCtor
DATE:
March 13, 1997
SUBJECT:
Crystal Key at Woct'bright Place PUD
NEW SITE PLAN (perimeter buffer landscaping, security gates and project
signage)
NWSP 97-002
..
Please place the above-referenced item on the March 18, 1997 City Commission agenda under
Development Plans.
DESCRIPTION: Kenneth H. Kruger, P.E., agent for Kennedy Homes., the owner of Crystal Key
at Woolbright Place PUD, is requesting a site plan approval to install perimeter buffer landscaping,
security gates and project signage for the 14.05 acre, 83 unit single-family detached home
residential development, zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property is located on the
east side of S.W. 8th Street approximately 2,200 feet north of Woolbright Road. For further details
pertaining to this request, please see attached site pla'n report (Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 97-076).
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7 - 0 vote, recommends
approval subject to all staff comments in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval and a new comment
that a mulch other than cypress mulch be used, that no changes in buffer be allowed and chain link
fence shalf be provided on all four (4) sides of the project (see attached). In addition, the Board
is recommending three more conditions as follows (see also attached Exhibit "C"):
1. A type of mulch other than cypress mulch shall be used.
2. Chain fink fencing shall be provided on all sides of the project. (The plans are unclear as
to where fencing is proposed. With respect to the north side of the project, the fencing
would need to be provided on the south side of the buffer.)
3. No chang~s in the buffer that was previously approved by the Commission shall be allowed.
(There was much diScussion~rding this item and staff concurs with the Board's stance.
However, regarding commen 5, taff would support a size reduction in the Saw Palmetto
palms which are being used a a large ground cover. An argument can be made for and
against this size reduction because had the buffer been installed when originally required,
the plants would be larger than what is proposed. If the Commission determines that
0vailability of the larger Saw Palmetto is a hardship, the comment could be changed to:
35. The size and quantity specifications for the Saw Palmetto palms identified on t~e
submitted plan for the typical 100 lineal feet of Buffer "B" shall be (24) 22 inch tall and
--- planted around the base of the three (3) Sabal Palms and the three Slash Pine.
T JH:bme
Attachments
xc: Central File
D:\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\CRYST ALK\NWSPLANO\CCAGENDA, WPD
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MARCH 18, 1997
Mayor Taylor advised that Ken Montgomery, former Executive Director of the Private Industry
Council, which is now a work force council, will be focussing on getting people welfare recipients
into jobs. He recommended that Mr. Norfus speak with Mr. Montgomery to see how the City can
tie into that County project. He will provide Mr. Montgomery with Mr. Norfus' telephone number.
A gentleman from the audience advised that approximately six months ago, he received a notice
advising him that he had to replace grass and do other things to comply with the Code. He spent
$400 on grass, and $180 to paint his house. In travelling around the City, he noticed that the
parking lot ot a business on Seacrest Boulevard is horrible. He questioned why he must comply
with the Code, while the businesses do not have to comply. He also questioned why his neighbors
do not have to comply. He requested that the City Commission investigate this situation.
Mayor Taylor suggested that the gentleman provide an address ot the property so that Code
Enforcement can investigate.
Ken Hall reported that he would like to purchase a piece ot public right-ot-way trom the City. This
piece of right-ot-way is ot no use or value to the City. However, it could possibly be developed into
a buildable lot. He does not know the procedure to follow, and was not sure the City could consider
selling pieces ot public right-ot-way.
Mayor Taylor recommended that Mr. Hall submit a request to the City Manager's Office, and the
City Attorney will research the request. In addition, Attorney Cherot asked Mr. Hall to provide a
legal description in the request to the City Manager's Office.
Gary Fishman, resident of. Diane Drive, said he is putting an addition on his home and is
currently involved in the permitting processes. The records that were kept in the City on microfilm
are in very poor condition. Because of this, he will have to pay additional money for redesign. The
pristine blue prints were discarded back in the 1970s after they were microfilmed. That microfilm
is in poor condition, and is costing him money and delays. He requested assistance.
Commissioner Bradley said this is the second time today he has received complaints about
microfilm problems.
Mr. Fishman questioned whether or not the copy that is available can be darkened in to be made
usable.
Mayor Taylor advised that staff will look at this situation to see it it is possible to improve the
microfilm copy.
IX. DEVELOPMENT PLANS:
A. PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
Crystal Key at Woolbright Place PUD
Kenneth H. Kruger, P.E.
Kennedy Homes
East side of SW 8th Street, approximately 2,200 feet north of
Woolbright Road
9
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COM JSll. MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MARCH 18, 1997
DESCRIPTION:
SITE PLAN - Request for site plan approval to install perimeter
buffer landscaping, security gates and project signage for the 14.05
acre, 83 unit single-family detached home residential development.
Attorney Cherof administered the oath to all who would be testifying this evening. He
recommended that the developer's representative address only those issues which are not
acceptable.
Kenneth Kruger, Professional Engineer representing Kennedy Homes, advised that the only
condition in question is revised Condition #35 recommended by staff. The applicant concurs with
that condition and all others made by staff.
Tambri Heyden advised that Condition #35 has been reworded as noted in Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 97-093. This revised condition will allow a smaller type of Saw
Palmetto to be used as a ground cover in the buffer.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz questioned what the applicant plans to do in the passive area. Mr.
Kruger advised that landscaping will be planted, and there will be a 25' landscape berm along the
east side cf the passive area.
Motion
Commissioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve the site plan as requested to install perimeter buffer
landscaping, security gates, and project signage for the 14.05 acre, 83 unit single-family detached
home residential development subject to all staff comments and Comment #35 as revised.
Commissioner Bradley seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
X. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Items for discussion requested by Mayor Jerry Taylor
1. Implementation of a CURFEW ORDINANCE
Mayor Taylor reported that another community implemented this Ordinance and sent it to us for
review and possible implementation. Mayor Taylor brought this to the Commission for discussion
purposes only at this point.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz advised that she was involved in this issue about five years ago when public
workshops were conducted. At that time, the Police Chief felt it would not be enforceable and
thought it could be challenged. The criteria for the current Ordinance is very generic and not as
stringent as the one proposed five years ago. She does not feel there is anything contained in this
Ordinance that could hurt the City. At the time of the workshops, two-thirds of the people were in
favor of implementing a curfew.
Mayor Taylor reported that this is State Statute that authorizes a juvenile curfew and provides:
10
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MARCH 11, 1997
Mr. Aguila referred to the landscaping across the street from Racetrac and Cracker
Barrel, the outparcels, the landscaping that leads towards Home Depot, and the
landscaping around the lake and advised that it is not being maintained and some of it
has died.
Ms. Heyden advised that we have been trying to get the landscaping of the lake and of
the buffer that abuts Leisureville in for years. Mr. Morton put it in; however, he did not
get a permit to do it. So it has not been inspected and it has not been maintained. As
time goes on, Mr. Morton is selling off these parcels to other people and now they are
responsible for the landscaping.
Mr. Aguila stated that the landscaping at the Home Depot has died and has not been
replaced. Also, the trees within the right-of-way along 8th have no leaves. Ms. Heyden
advised that landscaping that is on a parcel that is not being maintained can be turned
over to Code Enforcement.
Mr. Aguila pointed out that there is no such thing as a temporary CO; however, there is
a conditional CO. Ms Heyden advised that no conditional COs will be issued.
6. OLD BUSINESS
None.
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Site Plans
New Site Plan
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Crystal Key at Woolbright Place PUD
Kenneth H. Kruger, P.E.
Kennedy Homes
East side of S.W. 8th Street, approximately 2,200 feet north of
Woolbright Road
Description: Request for site plan approval to install perimeter buffer
landscaping, security gates and project signage for the 14.05 acre, 83 unit
single-family detached home residential development.
Location:
3
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVE~ PMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MARCH 11, 1997
Mr. Kruger wished to discuss comments 32, 33, 35, 36,43 and 47. He advised that the
applicant is presenting an alternative landscaping plan for the perimeter buffers. This
plan does not match what was previously approved. Along the entire north property
line of the Woolbright Place PUD, there is an interface with existing single-family
residences. This project forms part of that interface. To the east is Phase 2 of the
Trammel Crow multi-family project, which is also a part of the north interface. The
master plan, which included the Trammel Crow multi-family project and the proposed
single-family project, required a 25 foot wide landscape buffer along the north property
line to buffer the existing single-family residences from the new project. The revised
submittals of the landscaping is for the proposed project's portion of the 25 foot wide
landscape buffer. This is a single-family project, interfacing with single-family to the
north. He felt that the landscaping required or shown on the plan is more appropriate
and typical for a screening between single-family and multi-family. Even though less
intense, he felt the revised landscaping plan for this buffer is just as attractive and more
than ample to screen this single-family project from the existing homes to the north.
Mr. Kruger stated that when this originally came before this board and the City
Commission, the 25 foot wide buffer and the master plan contained a note that the
maximum height on the houses in the single-family area would be 30 feet tall.
However, Kennedy Homes is committed to building one-story, single-family houses.
In addition, most of the existing residences to the north have six foot tall wood shadow
box fences along the north property line. Also, some of them have landscaping and
some of them have natural vegetation. The grading of the proposed landscaping and
berm is the same. The berm will be 4 feet tall from the existing ground.
Comment 36 refers to part of the landscaping that is shown in the buffer between this
project and the Trammel Crow multi-family project.(the Vinings). The landscape
architect for this project is also the landscape architect for the Vinings and according to
him, the alternative plan that we have submitted is exactly what has been approved for
Trammel Crow. We want to put in exactly what Trammel Crow is putting in. We feel it
is more than sufficient screening and buffer between us and Trammel Crow. The
grading of the area between us and Trammel Crow is a two and a half foot tall berm
with the high point of that berm right on the property line between Trammel Crow and
us. We will each be landscaping our own side of that berm.
Comment 43 refers to Palm Beach County Traffic Division approval and the
methodology used by applicant's traffic engineer. Mr. Kruger thought this was already
addressed in the master plan stage. He was not aware of any problem with the traffic
study. He asked if this is the same issue that Ms. Heyden spoke of when she was
speaking about the Food Court.
4
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVcLOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MARCH 11, 1997
Comment 47 states that it is recommended that the buffer easement. berm and
approved landscaping be moved southward into the site so as not to diminish the
required buffer. Mr. Kruger was not sure what staff meant by this. He did not need to
or want to move that berm further south into the single-family lot area. He is going to
provide a 25 foot wide landscape buffer per the plat and master plan.
Mr. Kruger agreed to most of comment 32; however, he said it references comment 33.
Therefore, depending on how comment 33 turns out, comment 32 might have to be
changed.
Mr. Haag said Mr. Kruger is correct. The comments reflect what the City Commission
approved for the buffer. With regard to comment 29, he recommended one change
from what the City Commission approved. The Commission wanted the 4 foot berm
buffer along the east and north sides of the area titled "open parcel. He recommended
that the buffer for the north side of the open parcel be changed from the 4 foot berm to
the 2 % foot berm similar to the west side of the open parcel. Mr. Kruger agreed to this.
Chairman Dube pointed out that Mr. Morton has tried to change this 25 foot buffer
several times and an agreement was finally reached. Mr. Kruger referred to the note
about the 30 foot height for the buildings. He said Mr. Morton did not know who was
going to develop this parcel, and Kennedy Homes did not know what height buildings
they were going to build. He pointed out that Kennedy Homes is building one-story
houses, not two-story houses.
Mr. Haag advised that there is no change in reduction in quantity of material. The same
materials that were approved by the City Commission will be used. However, there is a
reduction in the size of the plant material.
Mr. Aguila inquired about the justification for the reduction in size of the plant material.
Mr. Kruger felt the required screening is over kill. In addition, the cost of the original
plan is astounding. It will cost close to $4,000 per lot just for the landscaping for the
rear property line. Mr. Kruger advised that Saw Palmetto is not available, and is very
expensive.
At this time, Chairman Dube recognized the presence of Commissioner Jamie Titcomb.
In response to a question posed by Mr. Aguila, Mr. Haag referred to comments 33 and
34. He pointed out where the Slash Pines and the two Red Cedar trees will be located
and said the applicant is requesting 6 to 8 foot tall trees instead of 12 foot tall trees.
Comment 33 refers to the hedge and shrub plant.
5
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVEr ~MENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MARCH 11,1997
Mr. Haag referred to the comment 43 and advised that this is the same issue that
Ms. Heyden brought up earlier in the meeting. The traffic for that project included the
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD and the PUD and we still have not received confirmation
from Palm Beach County.
With regard to comment 47, Mr. Haag advised that the master plan process is
somewhat conceptual, and the platting process is more definite and technical. During
the platting process, an additional easement was required along the north property line.
That easement overlaps into most of the 25 foot buffer easement. The trees that are
going to be planted need to be approved by the utility users. If the applicant does not
get that approval, staff recommends that the easement be moved back so that we can
get those things planted there so that we do not diminish the buffer.
Mr. Kruger did not anticipate any problem getting approval from Florida Power and
Light. He said it is typical for them to allow landscape planting in their easements.
Also, the toiletries will be kept to the south side of the 25 foot landscape buffer.
Mr. Aguila advised that there is a very specific list of materials that they allow.
Mr. Kruger stated that it is a recommended guideline. He is going to put all their
recommended guideline allowed species closer to their 10 foot utility easement.
With regard to comment 35, Mr. Haag had no objection to reducing the Saw Palmettos
to 22 inches, 7 gallon, rather than 15 gallon. He said it is more like a ground cover.
That type of plant is a very small plant and it is really not providing any of the buffering
like the hedge row and the other shrubs that are there.
Mr. Rosenstock inquired about the price of these homes and the total cost of the
landscaping per house. Frank Spirato, the Project Manager, advised that the prices of
the homes run between $89,900 and $99,000, and the landscaping will cost between
$1,700 and 2,000. In addition, each home will have a specific landscaping package.
Since the City Commission has already specified certain landscaping, Mr. Rosenstock
did not think it was within this board's prerogative to change it.
Mr. Aguila said the issue of availability is dealt with at the time of construction. The
availability of materials depends on the time of year, catastrophes, weather conditions.
etc. To him. this is more of a money issue than an availability issue. Because of the
history of the north buffer line, he was not in favor of this project if the north buffer is in
any way reduced in any fashion, shape or form. Mr. Rosenstock agreed.
Mr. Reed had no objection to replacing the Saw Palmettos with a slightly smaller plant
because it does not impact the buffer. In addition, plants that are less mature, but well
6
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MARCH 11, 1997
rooted, are more likely to survive than older ones. Mr. Rosenstock pointed out that if
the applicant is supposed to put in certain plants and they do not survive, he has to
replace them.
Mr. Haag referred to comment 35 and pointed out that the City Commission required 24
thirty to thirty-six inch tall Saw Palmettos, but the applicant is proposing 48 three gallon
Saw Palmettos, which are much smaller.
Mr. Spirato said the smaller plant is available. However, he is having a problem finding
the 15 gallon Saw Palmetto. Mr. Kruger reiterated that these are going to be single-
story houses, which is the basis of this request. In addition, the cost is an issue. You
are not going to see any change visually with regard to what was originally proposed
versus what the applicant is proposing. It is also a matter of overkill. He did not think
this request and the basis for his request should not be considered because of the
history of this parcel.
Mr. Rosenstock felt he was taking Mr. Aguila's comments out of context. He thinks
what Mr. Aguila was referring to is the fact that the people living on the other side of this
project have always sought protection. We want to be sure that the citizens on the
other side of this project have screening to suit their needs as specified.
Mr. Aguila stated that the fact that there were possibly going to be two-story buildings
there was not the driving force. It was merely one ingredient. Therefore, the fact that
you take that one element out does not necessarily mean that the people have a
different feeling or are interested in having less landscaping because they perceive the
impact to be less. In his opinion, you can never overdo landscaping. He understands
what was promised and assured, and he understands the comfort levels given to the
property owners year after year.
Chairman Dube pointed out that the buffer used to be 50 feet. He also pointed out that
there is no mention of the six foot chain link fence on the north side. Mr. Spirato said
that is a mistake. The black vinyl coated fence will also be on the north side.
Chairman Dube asked who will own the fence. Mr. Kruger advised that the
Homeowners' Association will own it. Chairman Dube asked where the common
ground is. He did not see any. He saw the fence being put on the individual lots, which
means the property owners own the fence. He asked how the applicant is going to
prevent the home owner from taking the fence down. He asked if the Homeowners'
Association is going to go on private property to repair the fence. He pointed out that if
the fence needs to be repaired on three lots, three permits will be needed. He pointed
out that the entry wall with the .sign is on Lot 1, which is not common ground. The
7
MINUTES
PLANNING AND OEVE lPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MARCH 11, 1997
homeowner is going to pay taxes on the land that is under the sign. If a car hits that
sign, the homeowner has to fix that sign. That sign is owned by that homeowner
because it is on his land. That has to be common ground, and you cannot sell that
land. Also, the fee to hire a service to maintain the landscaping is going to be
horrendous. He inquired about the estimated monthly maintenance fee. Mr. Spirato
estimated it to be $77. Chairman Dube pointed out that unless there is a guard at the
gate, you do not have a secured community because everybody knows that the gate
will open if you use 0911. If the people decide they want a guard service, the monthly
maintenance fee will be $200. Also, the easement runs through the northern cul-de-
sac. The site plan does not agree with the plat plan. There are 15 parking spaces at
the pool on the site plan, but there are only 10 on the plat plan.
Mr. Kruger advised that a separate site plan submittal for the rec area has been
submitted for staff's review. Chairman Dube advised that the applicant has to come up
with 15 parking spaces on the rec plan when it is submitted.
Mr. Aguila requested that no cypress mulch be used. Instead, he wanted organic,
Eucalyptus, or melaleuca chips used. Mr. Kruger agreed to this condition.
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to approve the request for site plan approval to install perimeter
buffer landscaping, security gates, and project signage for the 14.05 acre, 83 unit
single-family detached home residential development called Crystal Key at Woolbright
Place PUD subject to all staff comments and the following additional comment: No
cypress mulch to be used on this project, but organic wood chips, or Eucalyptus, or
melaleuca or some sort of wood chip be used for mulch, and that no reduction in size or
quantity from the previously approved buffer landscaping material be considered.
Mr. Wische seconded the motion, which carried 7-0.
For the record, Mr. Aguila stated that Mr. Spirato confirmed that there will be chain link
on all four sides of the property.
B. Other
Abandonment
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Polio Tropical at Shoppes of Boynton
David S. Drobner, Esq.
Draper and Kramer of Florida, Inc.
8