REVIEW COMMENTS
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-095
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
March 24, 1994
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
RE: Cedar Ridge/High Ridge PUO/PID
Meeting with Developer and Developer's Engineer
Actions Necessary for Attainment of Code Compliance
The City Engineer directed the undersigned to meet with you, the
utility Director's staff and the above referenced persons this
day relative to necessary actions rega.rding the re-activation of
the subject site. The following is a summary of discussions
which relate to our Departmental operations,as I understand our
utility Director will be forwarding his own memorandum regard-
ing Water Distribution and Sewage Collection matters.
1. The Developer's Engineer shall transmit a letter to this
office stating that he has been retained by the owner as the
Engineer of Record (Developer's Engineer).
2. The Owner shall submit a request to the City Commission
seeking a retroactive time extension to present including an
extension for completion of the required improvements and
necessary repairs to infrastructure reference the expired twenty-
one month construction interval for plats.
3. The Owner shall pay the City monies in the amount of Thirty-
nine thousand, four hundred fiftybro and 75/100 ($39,452.75)
dollars for Parks and Recreation fee pursuant to Appendix "C",
Subdivision and Platting Regulations.
4. The Developer's Engineer shall submit a conceptual "street
lighting plan" which via this office, will be reviewed by FPL
representatives. Pursuant to City Codes, the Developer shall
pay a fee in the form of monies made payable to the City in an
amount equal to one-hundred and twenty five (125%) percent of
the value of said street lights. The value of each street light
has been deteremined to be one-thousand two hundred ($1,200.00)
dollars. Note: The total fee will be based on the number of
street lights @ $1,200.00 each plus 25% based on a plan which shall
attain the approval of the City Engineer pursuant to Codes.
5. The Developer's Engineer shall perform his own investigation
of the in-place infrastructure and he shall file a report with the
City Engineer, detailing the condition of in-place improvements as
well as a line item "Engineer's Opinion of Cost" specifying the
value of necessary repairs and the value of improvements not yet
completed or constructed in accordance with approved plan(s) .
6. The Developer shall post surety in a form acceptable to the
City Attorney.& Finance Director in an amount approved by the
City Engineer in conjunction with the utility Director, based
on the Opinion of Cost verified as accurate by staff.
6. The Engineer of Record shall provide all test data, geo-
technical or otherwise, which was performed on the in-place
infrastructure to date. The Engineer or his designated Geotech-
nical Engineer shall perform nondestructive tests on the roadways
for apsphalt thickness, base, subgrade and stabilized shoulders
in order for a determination to be made as to whether or not the
roadways comply with minimum construction standards and specifi-
cations as set forth in Appendix "C".
page 1 of 2
MAR2'.
~t'J
"
Engineering Department Memorandum No. 94-095
March 24, 1994
cont'd
7. The in-place portions of the stormwater drainage system
shall be lamped and inspected by the Engineer of record for
system failures (breaks), debris, missing grates, tree root
system damage and contamination of sand etc. The system
after intial review by this office, will in all probability
need cleaning.
8. Plan deviations relative to retention/detention area con-
struction shall be corrected as determined by the City Engineer
after consultation with the Developer's Engineer. Plan modifi-
cations or compliance with original approved plans will be required
in any event and debris (if any) in the form of auto parts, autos,
trash and construction debris will have to be removed from the
lake.
9. It is recommended that should the City reactivate this
subdivision, that the City Forester inspect the sit~ for species
of trees or vegetation which is valuable enough to be saved, re-
located etc.
This memorandum is transmitted to your
purposes and may be revised as required
inspections or as directed by the City
tion with City Commission decisions.
office for informational
by the results of future
Administration in conjunc-
\ >+,6.-,
Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engine~r
~
James D. White,
City Engineer
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
James A. Cherof, City Attorney
TF NICAIJ REVIEW COMMIT'rEE HE] tANDUH
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public works Dlrector
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William cavanaugh, Fire Prevention officer
sgt. Mike Kirrman, police Department
John Wildner, Parks superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp.
Vince Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site plan Reviewer
DATE:
February 2, 1994
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Tuesday, February 8, 1994
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
Tuesday, February 8, 1994, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "ell (West
Wing) to discuss the following:
*************************************w**
PRELIMINARY PLAT:
(Re-Review)
Citrus Park, PUD - Enrico Rossi, P.E.
(Developer's Engineer).
The city Engineer will be chairman for the meeting for the preliminary
plat review. please address all comments to the City Engineer. Return
the plans to the meeting.
******************************************
CEDAR RIDGE PUD - Appeal of Concurrency Determination.
This is a request to appeal the concurrency development order category
that was assigned to the project in 1991. Due to the fact that the
project's infrastructure is substantially complete, but was never
accepted (including the public streets) prior to abandonment of the
project and the bonds have expired, a C-l designation was assigned. The
new property owner contends that his project is an A-I3 category
development because all the required improvements are constructed and
complete and the City should have called the bonds if construction was
unacceptable (see attached letter from Richard Harris).
HIGH RIDGE COHMERCE PARK PID - Appeal of Concurrency Determination.
This is a request to appeal the concurrency development order category
that was assigned to the project in 1991. Due to the fact that the
project's infrastructure is substantially complete, but was never
accepted (including the public streets) prior to abandonment of the
project and the bonds have expired, a C-l designation was assigned. The
llew property owner contends that his project is an A-I3 category
development because all the required improvements are constructed and
complete and the City should have called the bonds if construction was
unacceptable (see attached letter from Richard Harris).
TE:>cllI1LCal R'~V1P\\T ('f lltte':?
F0bnlal"i :..:, 19<:)4
CONDITIONAL USE:
Praxis - An Adult congregate Living Facility located at
1613 S.W. 3rd street.
DISCUSSION:
1. Review of inter-departmental conflicts.
2. Praxis - Major Site Plan Modification
Applicant/owner: Carl Lindner
3. Land Development Regulation Amendment Process
(Discussion on this item should begin at approximately 9:45 a.m.)
See attached memorandum from Tambri Heyden.
Dorothy Moore
Zoning & Site
DM/jm
Att.
cc: MEMO ONLY
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
City Commission (5)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to utilities Director
Steve campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
James D. white, City Engineer
Ann Ford, Downtown Development Coordinator
Central File
Applicant
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
Mike Rumpf, senior Planner
Project File
Chronological F1le
A:TRCTUES.JH
~
SCOTT
ROYCE
ATTORNEYS AT lAW
Scan, ROYCE, HARRIS, BRYAN, BARRA & JORGENSEN, P.A.
December 20, 1993
Tambri J. Heyden
Acting Planning and Zoning
Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: Condor Investments of Palm Beach County. Inc.
Dear Ms. Heyden:
I represent Condor Investments of Palm Beach County, Inc. My clients are the
owners of all of the lots and parcels in Cedar Ridge, a P.U.D., and High Ridge Commerce
Park, a P.l.D., according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 46, at Page 58, of the
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
I am informed by my clients that the current status of concurrency assigned to this
property is C-l. However, the proper status of concurrency which should be assigned to
this property is A-13. This property meets the requirements of this concurrency status
because the property W:1S platted after January 13, 1978, subdivision improvements were
bonded, all required improvements have been constructed and accepted, and all of the lots
and parcels are still under single ownership.
I do request that the status of concurrency for the herein descnbed property be
changed from C-l to A-13. If you require anything further from me or have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
.-.
...
Q,~'
J. Richard Harris
cc: Condor Investments of Palm Beach County, Inc.
JRH\clI1\2858l1\HEYDEN. L m
RICHARD K. BARRA' IOHN L BRYAN. IR. . BARRY B. BYRD' MARK P. GAGNON
I RICllARD llARRIS . JOHN H 10RG~NSEN . DONNA A. NADEAU. RAnlOND W. ROYCE
ROBERT A. SCHAEFfER' ROBERT C. scorr (1925.1982)
~
\n~~~
li LJi
,,~'~..oJ U
PlANNING AND "" ;J\
ZONING DEPT.
-1--1-()() PG,\ B01'LE\",IRIl, Sl'ITE 900 . PAI.M 13,EACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33-1-10
(-1-07) b2-1--39()0 . FAX (407) b2-1-- 3533
!
i
./
M E M 0 RAN DUM
August 2, 1983
TO: Mr. Grady Swann,
Finance Director
FROM: Tom Clark,
City Engineer
Re : ~~s.PEa:tio~._.f.~e, Cedar Ridge a P. U . D. and
'High Ridge Commerce Park, a P.I.D.
Forwarded herewith is a surety bond in the amount of 110%
of the recreation impact fee for the subject project. Said
surety bond was posted in lieu of cash as provided for in
the subdivision ordinance.
A copy of the surety bond is forwarded with this memo to the
City Attorney for his approval.
~\/~~
Tom Clark
TAC:mb
Attach.
cc: City Attorney w/copy of bond
City Planner
City Clerk w/copy of bond
I .
~ \
~.~~~t.
SURETY BOND
t""~."l, \ _ . l
" ~..l:
(Recrea tional Impact) .. ...---.-.........--....y..--..--
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That
Boynton Development
Corporation
Address 4651 Sheridan Street, Suite 465, Hollywood, Florida
as Principals, and Union I~~ty In~r.c:nce Canpany of New York
a corporation existing under the laws of the State of'~~ Y~rk
'.
licensed to do business in the State of Florida, and on the list
of surety companies approved by the Treasurer of the United States,
as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida; a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter
Forty-three thousand, eight
called City, in the full and just sum of hwrlred nineteen and 36/100
(dollars) ($ 43, 819.36
), lawful money of the United States of
America, for which sum well and truly to be paid to said City the
said Principal and the said Surety do hereby bind themselves, their
heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns respectively,
as the case may be, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
day of
SEALED with our Seals, signed and delivered this
July
29th
, 1983.
WHEREAS, in accordance with the "Subdivision and Platting
Regulations of City of Boynton Beach, Florida," hereinafter called
Ordinance, the said Principal has applied to the City for approval
of a certain plat to be known as High Ridge Road Plat
and
WHEREAS, City requires that plats of residential land
shall be designed to provide for the park~, open space and
recreational needs of the future residents of the platted area; and
WHEREAS, the Ordinance provides that a Surety Bond may
be submitted as an adequate security to insure payment of the fees
established in said Ordinance, and as agreed by Principal and City
(see attached letter as Exhibit A); and
",
( 1)
(
(
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Engineer
~
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner
RE :
July 12, 1983
RECREATION AND PARKS DEDICATION FEE/CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES
DATE:
Accompanying this memo you will find documents as
follows:
1. A letter of transmittal from David Mankuta;
2. An appraisal prepared by Robert E. Transue, SRPA;
3. A li~t of qualification~ for Mr. Transue; and,
4. A Contract for Sale and Purchase.
These documents were submitted to me for the purpose of establishing
the fee to be paid at the time of final plat for recreation and parks
dedication purposes.
To that end, please be advised that the fee to be paid is $39,452.75
computed as follows:
, I
I~I:
value of land zoned PUD
acres of land zoned PUD
989,000 =
38.73
$25,535.76/
acre
--=r..,t...
.015 acres/unit x 152 M.F. Units = 2.28 AC - .;(.:L9
.018 acres/unit x 47 S.F. Units = .81 AC - . f 4-
-
Acres To Be Dedicated 3.09 ::: .a. I :;l..
1/2 Credit for private recreation 3.09 = 1.545 AC .!J. I ;J.. ";; 1,5(,
2 ;;.
III.
IV. Fee to be paid
$25,535.76
x 1.54
$39,452.75
$/Acre Land Value
Acres 'f. t. S ~
Fee to Be Paid -- 3't, ~ 3~.1 f
I/)e.rfcc.~ '0 -t 3;-.3.0.3
am requesting comment from the
and notifying Mr. Mankuta.
By copy of this memo, I
Director of Recreation and Parks
Co "--h JL ~
CARMEN S. ANN~ZIATO
/bks
cc:
Charles Frederick
David Mankuta
Central File
\/
f'~'J&~~~~ ·
~ ft&ur~
~,,~~.k~~vb
~;t. -~~~~
-',
~
~~~.~
A'~' ~
(f;jto/rt-- ~0~ ~~ ~ ~
~cfI~/IJ..:tL~ p ~ 1/ Sr
"~::r~~
"'Mr~ p 7#
1~~ ~rv
~ r UI"H /riL
~.~* "43)J79.M.
~ g>/;1./?3 ~
~ txvy. ~.
IJ:~ fl ?35. 71
/'57 I4F "'.., S~ /
~A/ rj;;f;
~
~
~~~
#
!~/Dl-!c;1- ~Pddf'/
fLI ~~~:~~~~
I?vf~,r' ~~~
~ fv;11/ Mr~~
I. ~,;lu--A- ~4L~~
~ 02-;1f::- ~ ~H~.
c;r-(O~ -I.IP / ~ (S~
Mff/t. ~ C.C 7 y~ (L~ ~.
!~7<. P ~ rt;;r .
~~~~~~ -o~
.f ~ ~~ ( , ~ t1,;?;v
r u~~~~~
./2. ~(4 -fo ~~
~'"Jt /),______ ~ tfk~~~
Jffr~ ~~~ . 'MNKl/v{ LUL
~ \11 (V' - ~ q,t{) f~ CJ-- rJr- :r 'l~ ---
~ fJ~ -J; ~ -J
~ ~'vs. . &/-~
..~?p1?:J
. ,~~~. ~q
tv ~ 'f1
~l~ ~\p/
~.r
J uf;/.darr--
/1 II ! fI~ 8:~oa.u.t.
10: ~. [aJU"Pti tf~td13/A
~M : D?J1Jt1S p jQ;g/J&r, &Jet. (66+~ ')
SUBJ : C&-/!idq~ f?J!2..
W2:. ~tI ~ij d/aJ--1fbJ.JCL
~/E- r;:J L Ag301ld fA P'D.ft!'ap'~
aftqlicA 6 ~t4l ~ ~2- ta(:;s wit (t... ~.1'a-f/'.
S~~ ~ %~ ~ fJr'df,,E. t7Cw-8f&A.
iA w!tIIV-q de. v~:tJ c:J- ~ _a;c3" p
(t-,::.. If PUD .iots. ~ ta~ SpfUJV,rt!/
10 a>> -b if~ ~;5fituj 10- at/tz. f:;taltf'(
f}vrt-- f'PdP~1zt ~IA~S MZ- CttAA~r~
tJ.4j ua~ fit'&!).. ti&tMOJftK&J ~
-to "1tq~ %E. ~Ec#idAr ~/trds
~M %e q!!f;. vttpf d
(ost ~'V:^J:/L f;> b rr$i~fX;v-.
~~ %z. . (.E-
li A ~ aA~ ~. acqttA/b1. ~
(tAZ. /.;WC~) tV) ~ a4 ~tgl
dA'tMI\ a-wtpuJ> ~ ~iftc$. ~)
s ..-z,W &4 P (AbJ~ 31" G
';;r /J1J~5F ~ 81/Ac.E:- CVV'
J;,~uA.~ iJill.~v~UAfs -(o/fJiAvicE.
(tt1)z.. 3t.f pj~ (tAJ~ tfS.f~lvl'.~
?tAl; ~ Iir- t&lcl:.. I hZ:- ~ A.
b:i.- ~ P ~~C~ 5F~
"h-JIL
.L diSclIMlI. aLl i}-~5 ht'Ef~
WI /1A JtuJ. Jt;SL a1f'!!F 1: '~-rf-
kJt~. ? L&AAt.. t2!UA -Jtt-E ar f/Irtv';-
~ur 0J11 tlUP.'&a.c~ -,t> dfsrw.I
(jAJ>/
j/c2f71~ 9t1~~tt~JI~1 ;&ft~~
l' r~'~
~P:r'1~~
rf/ ff/rff>3
~b t1-- ~~
. -I-;-Ir~ ~J;;f:;~ Cr ~
7M'~'~ :;:d- ~~~
~~ tf-.4/ 11<1.2 (If) fr t'f/D w- ,~
~ ~~~~f?rJ~
/~~~~~~/.,,#
;,d;1 . ~tfr p'fr~~- ~
~
t);j . 1~ _1p~(JJ
CJ11 ~ ~ ~l rl~~
n~ ~~~4~~)~~d
Y' ~ ~ ');cJaut' ~~ A/1I
f'1!'~' -~
'Le-. / ~ . /~ pole...
'~JJ~' ~6.~
~hh-rf!$lf/~' /
tUU--~+ f.~--W~-:
~
~d/LL~"- ~ ~ ~~ IVY.
~~~~~~. ~
~.~tU/CJ--~' -
tfl~.~ OM- ~- ~ ~ c~
't ~'L~~i~~'
r
.~
p<2I/3 .~ ~~
oL/ 11~ ~.~ - ~~?
+j~ @..1- ?
I.d. ." ~~~
~ ~~ t!b-.~~
"l
~ ~~\A/ /<0' F ~tff'e frlJJ. -
If. ~~ (!~I ~ ~
.~ tJ;u{-?~ -IY
~ Gfpf.~ ~.. .~ .
~af~~
::;1v ~ /qq I