REVIEW COMMENTS
-- j'tas-i ,,, . ",--,--- ~r R \m
~ u ,.to 1 rf.'~~I'\ ~ @ ~_~~,,;LJ-L nl
","0'- l. ,11/ . , d I rl-~---" I llll~\ ~
rtP' '\ , ! I I
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH.~..&"4\l~P1. ' tl, \\ ) \ ~," , 4 'i';Cjr ';i\-'\
, I ;
.,.",P ~~,___.J .
MEMORANDUM .iD
.,,'-,--.,.....~."'.,-
FROM:
Ken Hall, Plans Check Inspector
Michael J. Pawelczyk, Assistant City Attorney ?1~
May 12, 1997
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Cedar Ridge Estates P.U.D. Documents
. Townhomes H.O.A. Documents
. Community Association H.C.A. Documents
This is in response to Engineering Division Memorandum No. 97-083,
which was received by my office on May 12, 1997. In that memorandum, it was
requested that this office conduct a final review the H.O.A. Documents for Cedar
Ridge Townhomes, and for Cedar Ridge Community Association. I have
reviewed the sections that this office requested revisions for, and have
determined that the above-referenced documents are satisfactory as to legal
form.
I am returning with this memorandum bDund copies of the Cedar Ridge
Community Association, Inc. Documents and the Cedar Ridge Townhomes
Association, Inc, Documents. Should you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Encl(2).
cc: AI Newbold, Acting Director of Development
Mike Haag, Planning Coordinator
MJP:..
s:\wplOevelopmentlCedar Ridge\Hall memo 2
ENGINEERING MEMO # 97- 083
DATE: May 9,1997
N: MR. PAWELCZVK, ASST. CITY ATTORNEY
MR. LEWICKI, ASST. PLANNER
MR. HALLAHAN, CITY FORESTER
THRU: MR. NEWBOLD, ACT. DEV. DIR-P9.g 1ii~1..
FROM: MR. HALL, ENG. PLANS CHK/INSP.
SUBJECT: FINAL REVIEW OF CEDAR RIDGE HOMEOWNER'S DOCUMENTS;
1. CEDAR RIDGE TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION INC., AND
2." "COMMUNITY ASSOC. INC. (MASTER ASSOCIATION).
GENTLEMEN. PLEASE REVIEW THE PURPORTED "CLEAN" COPIES OF THE
SUBJECT DOCUMENTS TO ASSURE YOURSEL YES THAT YOUR COMMENTS HAVE
BEEN ADDRESSED AND THAT THEY ARE READY FOR RECORDING. YOU MAY
RET AIN THE DOCUMENTS FOR YOUR RECORDS.
ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE COPIES OF THE RECORDED HOMEOWNER'S
DOCUMENTS TITLED THE CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES P.O.A. INC. SHOULD YOU
DESIRE A COPY.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. WE LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR REPL YS.
KRH
CDRRDG
'fDJ IH! U \'II m rn1
I1/.l NAY I 2 /997 ~,
PLM~il.l!NG M~ .
ZO;"!'~\:G {l~ F<
~.........~.. ~ -
'--
----
OOrn@~ll\'
DE"
APR 3 0 . .
..'~-~'--~'-- ,..._--~._~j .
PLI',Ni~ING P'i)
ZQiJE~9"QEE.~_
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Ken Hall, Plans Check Inspector
Michael J. Pawelczyk, Assistant City Attorney l"t?r
April 28, 1997
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Cedar Ridge Estates P.U.D, Documents
. Townhomes H.O.A. Documents
. Community Association H.O.A. Documents
This is in response to Engineering Division Memorandum No. 97-067,
which was received by my office on April 24, 1997. In that memorandum, it was
requested that this office review the H.O,A. Documents for Cedar Ridge
Townhomes, and for Cedar Ridge Community Association. My comments with
respect to the two subject documents are as follows:
1. CEDAR RIDGE TOWNHOMES
In Section 14.2 of the Declaration on pages 54-55, the following phrase
should be added thereto, "Under no circumstances shall termination of the
Declaration result in increased maintenance responsibilities to a governmental
authority. J1
A subsection 15.5(E) should be added on page 57 to state as follows,
"Under no circumstances shall an amendment to the Declaration result in
increased maintenance responsibilities to a governmental authority."
2. CEDAR RIDGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION P.U.D.
In Section 14.2 of the Declaration on page 27, the following phrase
should be added thereto, "Under no circumstances shall termination of the
Declaration result in increased maintenance responsibilities to a governmental
authority. J1
A subsection 15.5(E) should be added on p. 30 to state as follows, "Under
no circumstances shall an amendment to the Declaration result in increased
maintenance responsibilities to a governmental authority. J1
3. CONCLUSION
The above entries are the only revisions I have for the above-referenced
Declarations, Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Please pass these
requested revisions on to the applicant so that the necessary changes can be
made, Should you have any questions with regard to this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me,
MJP:aa
cc: AI Newbold, Acting Director of Development
Mike Haag, Planning Coordinator
s:\wp\Development\Cedar Ridge\Hall memo
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO.9
00 ~ @ ~ U WI ~ @,
APR 2 . 1991 .
,~ 067 PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
April 23, 1997
TO:
Mike Pawelczyk, Assistant City Attorney
Jerzy Lewicki, Assistant Planner
THRU:
Al Newbold, Acting Director of Development
FROM:
Ken Hall, Engineering Plan Check Inspector
RE:
THE PLAT OF CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES; A P.U.D.
FINAL REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING:
1) CEDAR RIDGE TOWNHOMES H.O.A. DOCUMENTS AND,
2) CEDAR RIDGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION (THE MASTER
ASSOCIATION) H.O.A. DOCUMENTS
Please review the two subject documents and provide Engineering with any additional comments
or corrections by May 2, 1997. Attached to the Master Association documents are the three
revised pages referencing the Preservation Area Management Plan (Plan included with memo to
Jerzy).
Mr. Basile desires to be on the May 20th agenda for the Cedar Ridge Estates Plat approval.
Please call me prior to May 2 as to any required revisions so that I can pass them on to the
applicant.
Please call for any clarifications. Thanks for your cooperation.
KH/ck
attachments
C:\My Documents\Cedar Ridge HOA Documents.doc
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-187
TO: AI Newbold
Acting Development Department Director
FROM: Tambri Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: April 25, 1997
SUBJECT: Plat and Development Plans - 3rd Review
Project: Cedar Ridge Estates
Location: Cedar Ridge PUD
Agent: Paramount Engineering.
File No.: PLAT 96-008
The following is a list of 3rd review comments regarding the subdivision plat for Cedar
Ridge.
COMMENTS
1. Complete recordation of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions
document prior to the City Commission approval of the plat.
2. Reinitiate rezoning process that served to extract from the PUD the platted lots
within the PUD that are no longer intended to be developed but are to become a
future expansion of the adjacent Lake Worth Christian School.
JL:bme
xc: Central File
J:ISHRDA TAIPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSICED-RIDG\cedar-ridge-est-PLA T.3rd.doc
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-157
THROUGH: Tambri Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
TO: AI Newbold
Acting Development Department Director
FROM: Jerzy Lewicki
Planning and Zoning
DATE: April 15, 1997
SUBJECT: Plat and Development Plans - 2nd Review
Project: Cedar Ridge Estates
Location: Cedar Ridge PUD
Agent: Paramount Engineering.
File No. : PLAT 96-008
The following is a list of 2nd review comments regarding the subdivision plat for Cedar
Ridge.
COMMENTS
1. In the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions document include a provision
describing the method to ensure enforcement of constant, unobstructed access
to the "T" turn-around at the western portion of the development.
2. Complete recordation of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions
document prior to the City Commission approval of the plat.
3. Reinitiate rezoning process that served to extract from the PUD the platted lots
within the PUD that are no longer intended to be developed but are to become a
future expansion of the adjacent Lake Worth Christian School.
JL:bme
xc: Central File
D:ISHAREIWPIPROJECTSICED-RIDGlPLA T.2N 0
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-020
TO: Al Newbold
Acting Development Department Director
THROUGH: Tambri Heyden, AICP1{;d
Planning and Zoning Dlrector
FROM:
Jerzy Lewicki ::J~
Planning and Zoning
DATE:
February 28, 1997
SUBJECT:
Plat and
Project:
Location:
Agent:
File No. :
Development Plans - 1st
Cedar Ridge Estates
Cedar Ridge PUD
Paramount Engineering.
PLAT 96-008
Review
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the
subdivision plat for Cedar Ridge.
COMMENTS .
1. In the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions document
include a provision describing the method to ensure
enforcement of constant, unobstructed access to the liT" turn-
around at the western portion of the development.
2. Complete recordation of the Declaration of Covenants and
Restrictions document prior to the City Commission approval of
the plat.
3. City approval of the drainage agreement between Lake Worth
Christian Church and School and Condor Investment is required
prior to plat approval.
4. Reinitiate rezoning process that served to extract from the
PUD the platted lots within the PUD that are no longer
intended to be developed but are to become a future expansion
of the adjacent Lake Worth Christian School.
JL:bme
xc: Central File
D:\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\CED-RIDG\PLAT,lST
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-020
TO: AI Newbold
Acting Development Department Director
THROUGH: Tambri Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Jerzy Lewicki
Planning and Zoning
DATE: February 28, 1997
SUBJECT: Plat and Development Plans - 1st Review
Project: Cedar Ridge Estates
Location: Cedar Ridge PUD
Agent: Paramount Engineering.
File No,: PLAT 96-008
The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the subdivision plat for Cedar
Ridge.
COMMENTS
1. In the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions document include a provision
describing the method to ensure enforcement of constant, unobstructed access to
the "T" turn-around at the western portion of the development.
2, Complete recordation of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions document
prior to the City Commission approval of the plat.
3. City approval of the drainage agreement between Lake Worth Christian Church and
School and Condor Investment is required prior to plat approval.
4. Reinitiate rezoning process that served to extract from the PUD the platted lots
within the PUD that are no longer intended to be developed but are to become a
tuture expansion at the adjacent Lake Worth Christian School.
JL:bme
xc: Central File
D:\SHAREIWPIPROJECTSICED-RIDGIPLAT.1 ST
ENGINEERING MEMO # 96-352
DEe 3 0 1996
DATE: December 27, 1996
PLANNING AND
ZONING DfPT.
ill: MICHAEL PAWELCZYK., ASST. CITY ATTYe~.
// i
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. PLANS CHK/INSP. V
SUBJECT: CEDAR RIDGE TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNERS DOCUMENTS AND TRI-
P ARTY AGREEMENT CONCERNING MAINTENANCE/MANAGEMENT OF MASTER
DRAINAGE PLAN.
ATTACHED ARE THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS FOR YOUR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL AS THEY APPLY TO THE NEW, PROPOSED PLAT TITLED, "CEDAR
RIDGE ESTATES, A P.D.D.":
1. HOMEOWNER'S DOCUMENTS (DECLARATION, ARTICLES, AND BY-LAWS) FOR
THE CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES, P.U.D. PLAT ENTITLED CEDAR RIDGE TOWNHOMES.
2. MASTER DECLARATION, ARTICLES, AND BY-LAWS FOR THE MASTER
ASSOCIATION WHICH INCLUDES THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AND THE
PROPOSED CEDAR RIDGE TOWNHOMES.
3. ALSO A TT ACHED FOR REFERENCE IS A COpy OF THE RECORDED
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS PERTAINING TO THE SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCES.
4. ADDITIONALLY, WE ARE SUBMITTING FOR YOUR REVIEW A COpy OF THE TRI-
P ARTY AGREEMENT ENTITLED "AGREEMENT CONCERNING DRAINAGE" WHICH
PURPORTS TO IDENTIFY EACH PARTY'S RESPONSIBILITIES AS IT PERTAINS TO
THE DRAINAGE FOR THE WHOLE, ORIGINAL, DEVELOPMENT (CEDAR RIDGE, A
P.D.D. & HIGH RIDGE COMMERCE PARK, A P.U.D. - P.B. 46, PG. 58).
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL ME AT X-6283. THANKS.
KRH
C: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file (memo only) _ ... '
1\filct: IIMg (including set of docwnents) Jt:: ~ z y' L t= L0 t l k: I
Kevin Hallihan, memo only (these documents are on file in engineering if needed for a review).
Pete Mazzella, Asst. Uti!. Dir. (drainage agree. only - for any comments you or skip may have).
COOL CARE INC.
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
DRAINAGE REPORT
PREPARED BY: S.W.S. ENGINEERS INC.
MARCH 1997
1'rD1 ~ @ ~ 0 W ~ fn]1
! ~ 1 MAR? 4 1997 , ~ , I
L' \,..., " ""~' 1
,
.
, ,
~'''-- PI At.Tr:~:\!G J\NP .~" J.
_ ",_~_i.9N I Nt~Jl~P~L~ ,_____
'Pw q<.-<> c y
1. General Description
The proposed site is located just west ofthe CSX Railroad tract and just north of
Neptune Drive, adjacent to the south side of the L.WD.D. Canals L-29 and to the east
and west sides of the L.W.D.D. E-3-1/2-E Canal, in the city of Boynton Beach in Palm
Beach County, Florida.
The proposed project consist of a 4.42 ac. The total drainage area, excluding the
E-3-1/2-E canal right-of-way is 4.00ac.
The proposed project will be devided to two drainage basins. Drainage Basin No.
I, which is located west of the E-3-1/2-E Canal and consists of 1.18 ac. and Drainage
Basin No.2 which is located east and west of the E-3-1/2-E Canal and consists 01'2.82
ac. Each basin will have a separate outfall control structure into the E-3-1I2-E Canal. The
proposed project is located within the South Florida Water Management District C-16
canal dramage Basin boundaries and it will abide by the rules and design criteria for it.
2. Design Criteria.
The peak allowable discharge for the C-16 canal drainage basin during the 25
year 1 day storm event is 62.6 c.s.m.
3. Existing Conditions
The majority of the site consist of what's considered Coastal with a good ratio of soil
storage. The existing ground consists mainly oflocal sand. Based on a topographical
map, provided by Wallace Surveying Inc, the average existing ground elevation of the
site is 12.00.
4. General Information
Total site
Underground water table elevation
Impervious area
Paved areas
Building
Total impervious areas
Dry Retention Area ( elev. 9.50)
Basin 1
1.18ac.
+/- 8. lO
Basin 2
2.82ac.
+/- 8,10
0.28ac,
0.59ac.
0.87ac. (73,7%)
0.10ac.
1. 29ac
O.27ac
l.56ac. (55.3%)
0.60ac.
5. Stage I Storage Computations
Basin No.1
a. Vertical storage.
1. Dry retention - Will store water vertically from elev, 9.50 O.lOac.
b. Linear storage.
1. Dry retention - Will store water linearly from elev. 9,50 to elev. 13.00 0.21ac.
2. Paved areas & open space - will store water linearly from elev. 11.00 to
elev.ll.50 0.28ac.
STAGE VERT. UN. UN. TOTAL
AREA I AREA I AREA 2
9.50 0 0 0 0
10,50 0.10 0.03 0 0.13
11.00 0.15 0.07 0 0.22
11.50 0.20 0.12 0.03 0.35
1200 0.25 0.19 0.17 0.61
13.00 0.35 0.37 0.31 1.03
16.00 0.65 100 115 2.80
Basin No.2
a. Vertical storage.
I. Dry retention - Will store water vertically from elev. 9.50 0.60ac.
b. Linear storage.
I. Dry retention - Will store water linearly from elev. 9.50 to elev. 13.00 0.30ac.
2. Paved areas & open space - will store water linearly from elev, 11,50 to
elev.12.50 1.30ac.
3. Paved areas & open space - will store water linearly from elev. 14.00 to
elev.15.50 0.35ac.
STAGE VERT. UN. UN. UN, TOTAL
AREA 1 AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3
9.50 O. 0 0 0 0
10.50 0.60 0.04 0 0 0,64
11.50 1.20 0.17 0 0 1.37
12,50 1.80 0,32 0.65 0 2.77
13.00 2.10 0.53 1.30 0 3.93
14.00 2.70 0.83 2.60 0 6.13
15.00 3.30 1.13 3.90 0.12 8.45
15.50 3.60 1.28 4.65 0.26 9.79
16,00 3.90 1.43 5.20 0.44 10.97
6. Outfall Control Structure Sizing
a. Water Quality
prior to discharge, % of impervious area x 2.5" must be retained on site, Since we
use dry retention system, 75% ofthe above is required.
Basin NO.1 73.7% x 2.5"x 75% = 1.38"
Basin NO.2 55.3% x 2.5"x 75% = 1.04"
Basin NO.1 1.38"/12" x 1. 18ac. = 0.14 ac.ft. which corresponds to elev.
10.60
Basin No.2 1.04"/12" x 2.82ac. = 0.24 ac.ft. which corresponds to elev.
9.90
1/2 of the above can be discharged in 24 hr. Since the allowable discharge is so
small, we'll provide a 2.75" diameter bleeder at invert elevation 8.10 at both basins.
b. Ground Storage
S = 8.18" X 0.87 / 4.00 + 1.16" X 0.7/4.00 = 1.98"
7. Stage! Discharge Computations.
The formula to compute the discharge through the orifices is:
Q = A x cd x 2gh where:
Q = Discharge
, cd = Coefficient 0.61
g = 32.17
h = Height of water above bleeder center, elev. 8,21
A = Area of orifice, 0.0412 sq. ft.
STAGE DISCHARGE
8.10 0
9.50 0.23
11.00 0.34
11.50 0.37
12.00 0.39
12.50 0.42
13.00 0.44
14.00 0.49
Path: C:\OTEMP
File: TAPE7 .TXT
9,366 .a.. 3-22-97 20:20:30
Page 1
S C S
PRO G RAM
PROJECT NAME
REVIEWER
PROJECT AREA
GROUND STORAGE
TERMINATION DISCHARGE
DISTRIBUTION TYPE
RETURN FREQUENCY
RAINFALL DURATION
24-HOUR RAINFALL
REPORTING SEQUENCE
COOL CARE - BASIN NO. 1
S.W,
1.18 ACRES
1.98 INCHES
2.00 CFS
SFWMD
3.00 YEARS
I-DAY
6.25 INCHES
STANDARDIZED
STAGE
(FT)
9.50
10,50
11. 00
11.50
12.00
13.00
14.00
STORAGE
(AF)
.00
.13
.22
.35
.61
1.03
1. 62
DISCHARGE
(CFS)
.23
,31
.34
.37
.39
.44
.49
- - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (IN) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
.00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 9.50
4.00 .28 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .00
8.00 .86 .09 .1 ,0 .0 .0 .1 ,0 3.03
10.00 1.33 .30 .2 .0 .0 .0 .2 .1 7.13
11.00 1.68 .51 .3 .0 .0 .0 .2 .2 9.51
11.50 1. 99 .71 .5 .1 .0 .1 .2 .2 9.58
11.75 2.93 1.42 3.4 .1 .1 .0 .3 .2 9.85
12.00 4.10 2.41 4.7 .2 .2 .0 .3 .3 10.45
12.50 4.56 2.82 1.0 .3 .2 .1 .3 ,3 10.82
13.00 4.79 3.03 .5 .3 .2 .1 .3 .3 10.89
14.00 5.11 3.32 .3 .3 .2 .1 .3 .3 10.91
16.00 5.50 3.68 .2 .4 .2 .2 .3 .3 10.80
20.00 5.95 4.09 .1 .4 .1 .3 .3 .3 10.43
24.00 6.25 4,37 .1 .4 .1 .3 .3 .3 9.93
SUMMARY INFORMATION
MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 10.91 FEET AT 13.75 HOURS
MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS .3 CFS AT 13.75 HOURS
Pat:n: L.: \Ul~l'lt'
File: TAPE7 ,TXT
9,366 .a., 3-22-97 20:20:30
COOL CARE - BASIN NO. 1
S.W.
Page 2
PROJECT NAME
c REVIEWER
PROJECT AREA
GROUND STORAGE
TERMINATION DISCHARGE
DISTRIBUTION TYPE
RETURN FREQUENCY
RAINFALL DURATION
24-HOUR RAINFALL
REPORTING SEQUENCE
1.18 ACRES
1. 98 INCHES
2.00 CFS
SFWMD
25.00 YEARS
3-DAY
12.00 INCHES
STANDARDIZED
STAGE
(FT)
9,50
10.50
11. 00
11. 50
12.00
13.00
14.00
STORAGE
(AF)
.00
.13
.22
.35
,61
1. 03
1. 62
DISCHARGE
(CFS)
.23
.31
.34
.37
.39
.44
.49
- - - - - - R E S E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (IN) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
,00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 9.50
4.00 - .29 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .00
8,00 ,58 .02 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .57
12.00 .88 .09 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 1.25
16.00 1.17 .22 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ,0 1.72
20.00 1. 46 .37 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 2.06
24.00 1. 75 .55 .1 .1 .0 .1 .1 .1 2.32
28,00 2.18 .84 .1 .1 .0 .1 .1 ,1 3.77
32.00 2.60 1.16 .1 .1 .0 .1 .1 .1 4.06
36.00 3.03 1.50 ,1 ,1 .0 . 1 .1 .1 4.26
40.00 3.46 1.86 .1 .2 .0 .2 .1 .1 4.42
44,00 3.88 2.22 .1 .2 .0 .2 .1 .1 4.54
48.00 4.31 2.60 .1 .3 .0 .3 .1 .1 4.64
52.00 4.85 3.08 .2 .3 .0 .3 .2 .1 7.47
56.00 5.95 4.10 .4 .4 .0 ,4 .2 .2 9.67
58.00 6.86 4.95 .6 .5 .1 .4 .3 .3 9.98
59.00 7,54 5.59 .9 .5 ,1 .4 .3 .3 10.26
59.50 8.14 6.16 1.4 .6 .2 .4 .3 .3 10.54
59.75 9.94 7.90 8.3 .8 .3 .5 .3 .3 11.04
60.00 12.18 10.09 10.4 1.0 .5 .5 .4 .4 11. 63
60.50 13.06 10,95 2.0 1.1 .6 .5 .4 .4 11. 93
61. 00 13.51 11.40 1.1 1.1 .6 .5 .4 .4 12.00
62.00 14.12 12.00 .6 1.2 .6 .6 .4 .4 12.07
64.00 14.87 12.73 .4 1.3 .7 .6 .4 .4 12.09
68.00 15.73 13.58 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .4 .4 11. 99
72.00 16.31 14.15 .2 1.4 .5 .9 ,4 .4 11.85
SUMMARY INFORMATION
MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 12.09 FEET AT 64.00 HOURS
MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS .4 CFS AT 64.00 HOURS
Path: C: \Ul'EMt'
File: TAPE7 .TXT 9,366 .a, . 3-22-97 20:20:30 Page 3
S C S P R 0 G R A M
PROJECT NAME COOL CARE - BASIN NO. 1
REVIEWER S.W.
PROJECT AREA 1.18 ACRES
GROUND STORAGE 1.98 INCHES
TERMINATION DISCHARGE 2.00 CFS
DISTRIBUTION TYPE SFWMD
RETURN FREQUENCY 100.00 YEARS
RAINFALL DURATION 3-DAY
24-HOUR RAINFALL 16.00 INCHES
REPORTING SEQUENCE STANDARDIZED
STAGE STORAGE DISCHARGE
(FT) (AF) (CF"S)
9.50 .00 .00
10.50 .13 .00
11. 00 .22 ,00
11. 50 .35 .00
12.00 .61 .00
13.00 1.03 .00
14.00 1. 62 .00
16.00 2.80 .00
- - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) -(IN) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
,00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 -9.50
4.00 .39 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 9.50
8.00 .78 .06 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 9.54
12.00 1.17 .22 .1 .0 ,0 .0 .0 .0 9.66
16.00 1. 56 .43 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 9.82
20.00 1. 95 .68 .1 .1 .1 .0 ,0 .0 10.01
24.00 2.34 .96 .1 .1 .1 .0 .0 .0 10.22
28.00 2.90 1.40 .1 .1 .1 .0 .0 .0 10.54
32.00 3.47 1.87 .1 .2 .2 .0 .0 .0 10.79
36.00 4.04 2.36 .1 .2 .2 .0 .0 .0 11.04
40.00 4.61 2.87 .2 .3 .3 .0 .0 .0 11. 23
44.00 5.18 3.38 .2 .3 .3 .0 .0 .0 11.43
48.00 5.74 3.90 .2 .4 .4 .0 .0 .0 11. 56
52.00 6.46 4.58 .3 .4 .4 .0 .0 .0 11. 69
56.00 7.94 5.97 .5 .6 .6 .0 .0 .0 11. 95
58.00 9.15 7.14 .8 .7 ,7 .0 .0 .0 12.20
59.00 10.05 8.01 1.2 .8 .8 .0 .0 .0 12.39
59.50 10.85 8.79 1.9 .9 .9 .0 .0 ,0 12.56
59.75 13.25 11,14 11.2 1.1 1.1 .0 .0 .0 12.88
60.00 16.24 14.08 14.0 1.4 1.4 .0 .0 .0 13.36
60.50 17.41 15.24 2.7 1.5 1.5 .0 .0 ,0 13.75
61.00 18.02 15.84 1.4 1.6 1.6 .0 .0 .0 13,87
62.00 18.83 16.65 .9 1.6 1.6 .0 .0 .0 14.01
64.00 19.82 17.63 .6 1.7 1.7 .0 .0 .0 14.18
68.00 20.98 18.77 .3 1.8 1.8 .0 .0 .0 14.38
72.00 21.74 19.54 .2 1.9 1.9 .0 .0 .0 14.51
SUMMARY INFORMATION
MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 14.51 FEET AT 72.00 HOURS
MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS ,0 CFS AT .00 HOURS
Path: C:\OTEMP
File: COOLCB2 .TXT
9,335 .a.. 3-22-97 20:38:38
Page 1
S C S PRO G RAM
PROJECT NAME COOL CARE - BASIN 2
REVIEWER S.W.
PROJECT AREA 2.82 ACRES
GROUND STORAGE 1.98 INCHES
TERMINATION DISCHARGE 2.00 CFS
DISTRIBUTION TYPE SFWMD
PETURN FREQUENCY 3.00 YEARS
RAINFALL DURATION 1-DAY
24-HOUR RAINFALL 6.25 INCHES
REPORTING SEQUENCE STANDARDIZED
STAGE STORAGE DISCHARGE
(FT) (AF) (CFS)
8.10 .00 .00
9.50 .00 .23
10.50 .64 .31
11. 50 1. 37 .37
12.50 2.77 .42
,
13.00 3.93 .44
14.00 6.13 .49
- - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (IN) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
.00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 8.10
4,00 .28 .00 .0 .0 ,0 .0 .0 .0 8.10
8.00 .86 .09 .2 .0 .0 .0 .2 . 1 9.17
10.00 1. 33 .30 .4 .1 .0 .1 .2 .2 9.52
11. 00 1.68 .51 .7 .1 .0 .1 .2 .2 9.56
11. 50 1.99 .71 1.2 .2 .1 ,1 .2 .2 9.61
11.75 2.93 1.42 8.1 .3 .2 .1 .3 .2 9.75
12.00 4.10 2.41 11.3 .6 .5 .1 .3 .3 10.06
12.50 4.56 2.82 2.3 .7 .6 .1 .3 .3 10.33
13.00 4.79 3.03 1.2 .7 .6 .1 .3 .3 10.41
14.00 5.11 3.32 .7 .8 .6 .2 .3 .3 10.48
16.00 5.50 3.68 .5 .9 .7 .2 .3 .3 10.53
20.00 5.95 4.09 .3 1.0 .7 .3 .3 .3 10.53
24.00 6.25 4.37 .2 1.0 .6 .4 .3 .3 10.48
SUMMARY INFORMATION
MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 10.53 FEET AT 16.25 HOURS
MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS .3 CFS AT 16.25 HOURS
Path: C:\OTEMP
File: COOLCB2 .TXT
9,335 .a.. 3-22-97 20:38:38
Page 2
S C S PRO G R AM
PROJECT NAME COOL CARE - BASIN 2
REVIEWER S.W.
PROJECT AREA 2.82 ACRES
GROUND STORAGE 1.98 INCHES
TERMINATION DISCHARGE 2.00 CFS
DISTRIBUTION TYPE SFWMD
RETURN FREQUENCY 25.00 YEARS
RAINFALL DURATION 3-DAY
24-HOUR RAINFALL 12.00 INCHES
REPORTING SEQUENCE STANDARDIZED
STAGE STORAGE DISCHARGE
(FT) (AF) (CFS)
8.10 .00 ,00
9.50 .00 .23
10.50 ,64 .31
11. 50 1.37 .37
12.50 2.77 .42
13.00 3.93 .44
14.00 6.13 .49
- - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (IN). (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
.00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 8.10
4.00 .29 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 8.10
8.00 .58 .02 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 8,30
12.00 .88 .09 .1 .0 .0 .0 .1 .1 8.54
16.00 1.17 .22 .1 .1 .0 .1 .1 .1 8.71
20.00 1.46 .37 .1 .1 .0 .1 .1 .1 8.83
24.00 1. 75 .55 .1 .1 .0 .1 .1 .1 8.92
28.00 2.18 .84 .2 ,2 .0 .2 .2 .2 9.43
32.00 2.60 1.16 .2 .3 .0 .3 .2 .2 9.50
36,00 3.03 1.50 .2 .4 .0 .4 .2 .2 9.51
40.00 3.46 1.86 .3 .4 .0 .4 .2 .2 9.52
44.00 3.88 2.22 .3 .5 .0 .5 .2 .2 9.53
48.00 4.31 2.60 .3 .6 .0 .6 .2 .2 9.55
52.00 4.85 3.08 .4 .7 .1 .6 .2 .2 9.60
56.00 5.95 4.10 1.0 1.0 .2 .8 .3 .2 9.84
58.00 6.86 4.95 1.4 1.2 .4 .8 .3 .3 10.08
59.00 7.54 5.59 2.1 1.3 ,5 .8 .3 .3 10.26
59.50 8.14 6.16 3.3 1.4 .6 .8 .3 .3 10.44
59.75 9.94 7.90 19.8 1.9 1.0 .9 ,3 .3 10.76
60.00 12.18 10.09 24.9 2.4 1.5 .9 .4 .3 11.38
60.50 13.06 10.95 4.9 2.6 1.7 .9 .4 .4 11.72
61. 00 13.51 11.40 2.5 2.7 1.8 .9 .4 .4 11. 80
62,00 14.12 12.00 1.5 2.8 1.9 .9 .4 .4 11.89
64.00 14.87 12.73 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 .4 .4 11.97
68.00 15.73 13.58 .6 3.2 2.1 1.1 .4 .4 12.02
72.00 16.31 14.15 .4 3.3 2.1 1.2 .4 .4 12.02
SUMMARY INFORMATION
MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 12.02 FEET AT 72.00 HOURS
MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS .4 CFS AT 72.00 HOURS
Path: C: \UTEMP
File: COOLCB2 .TXT 9,335 .a. . 3-22-97 20:38:38 Page 3
S C S PRO G R AM
PROJECT NAME COOL CARE - BASIN 2
REVIEWER S,W.
PROJECT AREA 2.82 ACRES
GROUND STORAGE 1.98 INCHES
TERMINATION DISCHARGE 2.00 CFS
DISTRIBUTION TYPE SFWMD
RETURN FREQUENCY 100.00 YEARS
RAINFALL DURATION 3-DAY
24-HOUR RAINFALL 16.00 INCHES
HEPORTING SEQUENCE STANDARDIZED
STAGE STORAGE DISCHARGE
(FT) (AF) (CFS)
.00 .00 .00
9.50 .00 .00
10.50 .64 .00
11. 50 1.37 .00
12.50 2.77 .00
13.00 3.93 .00
14.00 6.13 .00
- - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (IN) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
.00 .00 .00 .0 .0 ,0 .0 .0 .0 .00
4.00 .39 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 9.50
8.00 .78 .06 .1 .0 .0 ,0 .0 .0 9.52
12.00 1.17 .22 .1 .1 . 1 .0 .0 .0 9.58
16.00 1.56 .43 .2 .1 .1 .0 .0 .0 9.65
20.00 1. 95 .68 .2 .2 .2 .0 .0 .0 9.75
24.00 2.34 .96 .2 .2 .2 .0 .0 .0 9.85
28.00 2.90 1.40 .3 .3 .3 .0 .0 .0 10.01
32.00 3.47 1.87 .3 .4 .4 .0 .0 .0 10.18
36.00 4.04 2.36 ,4 .6 .6 .0 .0 .0 10.36
40.00 4.61 2.87 .4 .7 .7 .0 .0 .0 10.54
44.00 5.18 3.38 .4 .8 .8 .0 .0 .0 10.71
48.00 5.74 3.90 .4 .9 .9 .0 .0 .0 10.87
52.00 6.46 4.58 .6 1.1 1.1 .0 .0 .0 11. 09
56.00 7.94 5.97 1.3 1.4 1.4 .0 .0 .0 11.51
58.00 9.15 7.14 1.9 1.7 1.7 .0 .0 .0 11. 71
59.00 10.05 8.01 2,8 1.9 1.9 .0 .0 .0 11.84
59,50 10.85 8.79 4.4 2.1 2.1 .0 .0 .0 11. 96
59.75 13.25 11.14 26.7 2.6 2.6 .0 .0 .0 12.19
60.00 16.24 14.08 33.5 3.3 3.3 .0 .0 .0 12.58
60.50 17.41 15.24 6.6 3.6 3.6 .0 .0 .0 12.82
61. 00 18.02 15.84 3.4 3.7 3.7 .0 .0 .0 12.90
62.00 18.83 16.65 2.1 3.9 3.9 .0 .0 .0 12.98
64.00 19.82 17.63 1.4 4.1 4.1 .0 .0 .0 13.09
68.00 20.98 18.77 .8 4.4 4.4 .0 .0 .0 13.22
72.00 21.74 19.54 .5 4.6 4.6 .0 .0 .0 13.30
SUMMARY INFORMATION
MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 13.30 FEET AT 72.00 HOURS
MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS .0 CFS AT .00 HOURS
ENGINEERING MEMO #96-351
~~\ m ~ UJ m ,~
.. . \ ot=c 4t 1 1996 p._" '.
hU . ~ L ..
Pl~NN\NG AND
ZONING DE-PT.
DATE: December 27, 1996
TO: BILL CAVANAUGH, FIRE PREVo OFF. 735-0272
TONY OCCHIUZZO, BULID. PERMIT ADMIN. 6352
J. WILDNER, PKS SUPT. 6226 & K. HALLIHAN, FORESTER. 6227
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, P.D. 6163
MIKE HAAG, PLAN. COORD. 62~.g:':'::f::':'.
SKIP MIL OR, UTIL. CHIEF JlIE.~i:J.:NiJl:t.:....375-6407
LARRY QUINN, SANIT ATIol:iilllll::il!!Ifl6
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. PLAN~OR 6283~
SUBJECT: T.R.e. REVIEW - CED~::RIpG.E.,TQ~rtOMES - FINAL PLAT SUB.
.: .. . .:.:. '.:
. .. ..
PLEASE REVIEW THE SUBJECT PLf\T AND.PLANS fOR DISCUSSION AT THE 12/7/96
T.R.C. ADMIN. MEETING. IF YOU Hf.\VE NOCOM~+':Ff~i:::~IGN OFF ON THE
DOCUMENTS AT THE ENnOF':THE MEBHNtk::::W:;MoI1WJ::l}t HAVE COMMENTS
;:::::..::::::>:.;<.::::...-..... ....::::::::,... ,::"::;r:':::::::::::':':.:.;::::>:;:::::::.:::::::-:'::::::::::::::>':.:.'.:: '
PLEASE PROVIDE ENGm:~l~9:.I"~:li:i!::!?::~::.~~m~ ONE BUSINESS
::::.~l.~~~~~~~..J.%
...... . ":> :::?:> ~ :<:~'~'::::':::~:? ::;::::.:. :....:::>::::./:::;::::: ..... ... ............:..:.:.:.......:............ . .' '. .................'. ...... . - ............... .....
~~~.~~.1.~~~9
Robert Eichor~~, P. ~~::~ili:..:.:::::;;ii:::;:.:!i:::I!!::::!.,:l,::::ii!!::,II.:!!!!I.:!!I,!!!I.!!iilli!l.li:!I.:,lil!I!.!'.!'i!!i:.!ii.!..I:'.!li!!I.II.llli.I.:II.i!I~I!i.!'!I!II:.::.li!..!:::!.:::i:.:!llli!:i::r:lr::im:i:~::II:i..i;:;::::i::;;;:;:::
:~~::o~~~~~: 'B~ifd. ~~. .:.:::~:I!lill!!!:!llil~:!!III!!II!II:!I:!li!l!i!li.111111111!1!1!!!I!!!I!I!!!!!il!!!II!!!!I!!!!II!I!!!!!1111!!!!!!;IIII!I.!illl!.II!!i~II!!!I!II~I!~;;;::.
:::::;;::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::.::;::::::::::::::::::::.:::.;::::::::::::::;:::::::::;;::::::::::.:::::::::;:::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:;;::;:.
Thank You