AGENDA DOCUMENTS
- ~
LEGALI APPROVAL DOCUMENTS
~~'.
AGENDA DOCUMENTS
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City Manager's Office Meeting Dates in to City Manager's Office
IZI December 16, 1997 December 5, 1997 (noon) 0 February 17, 1998 February 6, 1998 (noon)
0 January 6, 1998 December 19, 1997 (noon) 0 March 3,1998 February 20, 1998 (noon)
0 January 20, 1998 January 9, 1998 (noon) 0 March 17, 1998 March 6,1998 (noon)
0 February 3, 1998 January 23, 1998 (noon) 0 April 7, 1998 March 20, 1998 (noon)
RECOMMENDATION: Please place the requests below on the December 16,1997 City Commission meeting agenda
under Legal: Ordinances-1st Reading. You will recall that this segment of Forest Court is the cul-de-sac on the property that
was separated from the Cedar Ridge PUD, and which is now to be reclassified and rezoned in preparation for eventual use by
the adjacent Lake Worth Christian School. For further details pertaining to this request, see Planning and Zoning
Memorandum No. 97-504.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT: Cedar Ridge PUD
AGENT: Joe Basile, Cedar Ridge Development, Inc.
OWNER: Condor Investments of Palm Beach County
LOCATION: 6.376 acres of property east of High Ridge Road, west of Interstate 95, approximately one-half (l/2) mile
south of Hypoluxo Road.
DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the future land use map of the comprehensive plan from Low Density Aesidential to
Public and Private Governmental! Institutional and rezone from Planned Unit Development to R-IAA,
Single Family Residential the northeast portion of the Cedar Ridge PUD which was formerly approved for
11 single-family lots.
PROGRAM IMP ACT: NA
FISCAL IMPACT: NA
ALTERNATIVES: NA
City Manager's Signature
Department Head's Signature
Development Services
Department Name
/' ~
~~)/U' ..~
Planning & zonin2ctor -
S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
J'd.3jec\
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-327
Agenda Memorandum for
June 18, 1996, City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden ~~/
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
June 13, 1996
SUBJECT:
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
New Site Plan - NWSP 96-002
Please place the above-referenced item on the June 18, 1996 City
Commission agenda under Development Orders.
DESCRIPTION: Paramount Engineering Group, Inc., agent for Condor
Investment the property owner, is requesting for site plan approval
to construct 110 single-family townhouses and a private recreation
facility on 18.88 acres within the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD, located
at the southeast corner of High Ridge Road and Cedar Ridge Road
(Parcel C and Parcel D of the Cedar Ridge Estates PUD) .
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-1
vote, recommended approval of this request for site plan approval,
subject to the comments in the attached Exhibit I'C" - Conditions
of Approval (see changes that Board is recommending to #27
regarding a sidewalk or walking path, #28 regarding width of garage
parking space and #24 regarding location of pool and meeting hall) .
TJH:dim
Attachments.
xc: Central File
a:CCAgNWSP.Ced
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #96-310
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
June 11, 1996
DESCRlPfION OF PROJECT
ProJect Name:
AppUcant:
Agent:
Location:
File No.:
Land Use Plan
Designation:
Zoning
Designation:
Type of Use:
Number of
Units:
Square
Footage:
Cedar Ridae Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Eltat. PUD
Cedar Ridge Development Corporation
Paramount Engineering Group, Inc.
Southeast corner of High Ridge Road and Cedar Ridge Road (Parcel
C nnd D of the Cedar Ridge and High Ridge Commerce Park
subdivision)
NWSP 96-002
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Multi-family residential (townhouses)
110
Site Area:
Building Area:
18.88 acres
137,064 square feet
Surrounding Land
Uses and Zoning
District: (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Existing Site
Characteristics:
North -
Single-family, residential portion of the Cedar Ridge
Estates PUD, zoned PUD (under construction);
South -
High Ridge Commerce Park PID, zoned PID, (partially
under construction);
East -
Seaboard Air Line Railroad right-of-way and farther
east is the Interstate 1-95 right-of-way;
west -
High Ridge Road right-of-way and farther west is a
horse stable in unincorporated Palm Beach County.
The site was boundary platted in 1983, but will need to be replatted
to subdivide the property into townhouse lots. The site also has an
active gopher tortoise burrow on it and a designated preserve area
(which is to be relocated, along with the gopher tortoise) resulting
from a disturbed environmentally sensitive ecosystem existing on the
southwest portion of the property. In addition, shortly after the PUD
and the PID to the south were platted and construction of
infrastructure was significantly completed the project was abandoned
/
Page 2
Site Plan Review Staff Report
:Memorandum #96-310
Cedar Ridge Townhomes, Parcel D
and fell into foreclosure until it was purchased by the current owner
from the government approximately two years ago. Hence there is a
partially completed storm water management area, referred to as Lake
Veronica, that lies on site and serves the entire PUD, as well as the
PID.
Proposed
Development:
The developer is proposing construction of 110 townhouse units
contained in seventeen (17) buildings, ranging from four (4) to eight
(8) units, and a private recreation area consisting of a swimming pool,
a club house, a jogging trail, a turf play field, a playground and a
passive park on 18.88 acres (see Exhibit "B" - Site Plan). Recreation
provided will serve the entire PUD; the 110 townhomes, as well as the
single-family homes immediately to the north.
Concurrency:
a. Traffic
The proposed use is vested from traffic levels of service as the
site is located within a subdivision (Cedar Ridge a PUD, and
High Ridge Commerce Park, a PID) that was platted prior to
the effective date of the city's concurrency management
ordinance.
b. Drainage-
Insufficient drainage information has been submitted for the
Engineering Division to certify compliance with the City's
drainage levels of service at the time of site plan approval, as
required. The Engineering Division is recommending that this
be postponed to time of permit review.
Driveways:
Four, 22 foot wide driveways to the property are proposed as per the
approved master plan. The southwestern driveway, which is an
extension of Forest Road, is already in place to provide access to the
single-family homes and a sales office.
Parking
Facility:
The residential units contain either I-car, or 2-car garages.
Additional parking is provided within the individual driveways in
front of the garages. Recreational area parking is situated east of the
swimming pool.
Landscaping:
Site landscaping will meet code when the attached staff comments are
addressed at time of building permit.
BoUdinl and Site
Reguiadons:
Building and site regulations will be met when the attached staff
comments are addressed at time of building permit.
Community Design
Plan:
The proposed buildings are consistent in design with the single family
residential structures constructed, and being constructed, to the north
and west of this development. All buildings are 2-story with a
basement. The exterior walls will be finished with a combination of
brick and stucco. The pitched roof will be covered whh aspbplt
shingles. The developer proposes three (3) different color schemes for
the buildings:
1. light-yellow walls, white trims and forest green shutters/doors;
:2
Page 3
Site Plan Review Staff Report
Memorandum #96-310
Cedar Ridge Townhomes, Parcel D
2. peach walls and white trims and shutters/doors and;
3. lJaht arey waU., Iray trlllll and brown shutter/doors.
Slgnage:
No slgnage was submitted as a part of this request.
RECOMMRNDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request,
subject to the comments Included In Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval. The Technical
Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be
corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit.
JL:dim
xc: Central File
a:CEDRD-SP.Rep
3
E1C.H1.B1.'T
" 1\ "
~
L(
I'
LO~Ar'ON MJ:~F)
_Jl CEDA1'~'Dg~____--n_-JL .. II
_ _ p u ci \ --1IJ"~ -" \..--=. r / rT<= CE)ll~j)#1. \ lliillllillOL::I ~ J L t: \
LU ,~d~ ==-- (J ---1 ~ >= ,;\;\; -~ .. 1.\
"e lr~"ci~; == .11 T '1 ~fJ '- /~ Ii il1 \ tJ ?1~~ \:~
. ,-._ !~ B T -. ~ :.' 71-- III r(f;'w-,;; '] C "':~ ~,,'
~ _'\ 11 11"\ .---- '"..-/tf - 1::).:' '\
1', ~ T ,\ I -': .:: '1ft t::' . ,-II
.:J fJl ,I (f?'" " <;: ,. . diJiji'''~'' /s'" --.
, '" : 5:. ~.) ~y~~ .<~ ~, ,'f fU. \ ../r--
I: l I.... i / / ' \ .------- bLrC<- '. ,,, · ;.T"Y 7>- .r::r:: ~~ ".\
" '. \ .... \\ --=-::-= <=-_- . ===: -=-~.~. _ ~"-:. ~~.:,. ~. ,~.o >:a,t'tt t=E\\~ :
\': 'c : h.. . 1 ~~!O I '-', - - ~.: ~
" \) ---- LU .-.....
.' " ," __ T 11 - ..\1 T ~.. L,.:-I-'I-I-:'
_ l~ \_~ ~ \ \ \ ~ \ l' - 1-1- ~ - --\.. \-
\ '~: ---:-:. \ \DC\ ,_ ___, _ _ ..1- '---- tlll I'
. _lj ~~=:-. I' 1_. \ ] 'l ~ u, di- +ti 1;QJlIIf'-&lJlI
._ _ \ Fl1AA:=>>u,.,'''' .t~!o ,i:ammn::q \ ~
"\ ===\ v ~7,,17Kl/ '- R:3 K 111 cJ~. ~- I;~ 11TInll]l'.
. ' _ ,.._ ,l-til,rl- :}-..\-i' r- TJ ,~, ,T IT 11 r
. :,' ~ 1:lI- u..' t:t: ' ,...~. "1: '- .,' c . ~ c-ud ml' ) \ .
, , __ J. - ,I ~ rJ: : I. TTTl I - i
') .:-.-:- _ 0 -\: ," . tIlE l\,):~;I!;t; \ IJ b,
~ 111 if[~ " - \ . ~ - Ii I 'i\ll'r
(~,.y-'_o~ ~ ~ T \' ~'11 \-:~' If'\''
, : I I \ t=- : J ~ > ) , .' I I \ I \ I, d,
.'~:\ tR\l3ll-i )'1" Il;t: \!ill IT1= , %"t -=-_, LLllll.,ISN ~H11.~\"
~ ' \~(~li)\. u'n'-.!:" ': - .
----r. . - r---'. - ) ,\ IS~ t.- .' \1 L ·
1\1- ill.~tl~\Lt _ ffi\I\\I\I\ll;\'I~JJhtI .11 \\I1i\lU:\;'
~ \ _ T n u \ c-'\~ '
F,LV. -,..,.': . ' w:i>'::.' '- ·
\ NOT \ i, -<.~}; H f!)r.r~ .
__, ' N
(. en"Y , ~~1(^lL[f.\ '1 ~' rflllf, II ~fl \ U
~r. -eJJ . 1 P- '. ~Ll 1111\ \ 1'.1 ~
, ''',,--'''h--' 1\ 0- _ ~,-,- ('--'--""_)~~~ - ~ r i":\'
/",' ~\ 1 \ ;( _ '. : . . ,:.2!- 1....?
. .........:;:.J \ : .+. - , I ~
1=1'1 ^ ^ "' ". · c1- i ~ -
~.' . .. ' ! : \__ A.l " ~f'v FI I \ii' _.
7- . , . _ )~\ ~==Y,I~L,~ ?~~~ ~~ t;- ~t,_ ,~,;I.i . .
)..' ___ '1" ,,- - - -..:I If'-
\"'~. '. _ _----.-. "11):1 (r l- - _l,' (f,
\~~'i-- ;: ! - - ", --' 0 H - -'1-: II ' . rL' : - j
( ;' / ('<4..L\ 1 ._ ; II 'j ~l "\ -' ..;11 I, r--' \ ~ ~
\" /1 L 11/ ~ II, .1 >" · ' /'l N
.~:f'" .1 - .'--11' I'J -,.- \ilL '0 1/8 MILESV'
::i:,k;~\~-" '~1f--- - 1M ~ Rdc -.\\ \ \ \ \ \ ' "--
, .fJ \ ) I---J ! If'/l:r 0 4~O. ~~~,,~.s~T V"":
~rUf'~ ~~~~~ ,r~~' i' ~. III 11I, [,21",-,....", . . ,....-; . ..,\, ~ fT"'''''''''<' \ \ I \J II I
E X H I BIT
"B"
.
b
. ,
-- ..-...~
-.-'"
::.::....... .
".
~
-,,--,-
1
'.
.'
"
--...
1
~
"
--
"
;0
9.
t~
\~\ ----
-\\\
\tit \ ~
\
\
I:.
~~~a:\l
.. ",I>
. . .
~~'4
:~g.;
"'.
J
,
a
S-
.
9-
l~
l~\
...\
la"";
\!t~t.
ll'i" II
V'!'..l~ ~
"',-
"tl '"'t.. ...
~ ~ ~
C ;~:
m ."
~ ~.
-e.~,. ..
;.~,!
~~~
::'i!.
i
.
"
~
'::
-----
~
&
I ,.,.-,.~::.;.
;IIIf~.""'\
\\\\\\\ ..\ \\~l\\tW~ ~
lliU \i t~, \\ ~
u\~ ~ ; , \~
., ;\ ,.. t ~ I
~ ~
o \
~ s,~~{ ~;:.t~
!~..~. ~~\ t
~~~~: J, :
::":- 4l ~
.. ;~:'... "'!.... ~
~~~-~ ~..l .
n~~i ~l\ ~
--~~~ \
In\:;:.
1. :tl ~ '\t'1
. . ".~
! ~ ; '"0
-- t; .--
- .. 7- ~,
t..~ . _
\ I ~ e
~ '" \ ~ ~
\:\ ~
\ :'
~.., i'~! ,
a ~ s~!\6il!\\H;;{\\~i\ ~
~\l\h~, ;\~'\ l:\i\~'l\a~ "
"t\i,~Q , r~ it oJ\S a
,i - ....\. II, ~ = t~.. _I
'rl~~N. \\~ t · \1 t.t
r,\,\~;~~ n~:: \ ~ \~
to. UJ . ~.t..~ ~ i
· 0 e"",'. t
I t,\li \
\ t,-..
~1ti:i .'.;
\ ~ 'i ~iv
\I. ,,('t>
, ': ;:: 1
~ ~ :~,
" e r-:'
t ~ ~~~
~~
\~
\r
\J~
\- \\
I\~ \~
E X H I BIT
"C"
,
~
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
File number: NWSP 9G-002
Reference:The Dl~ns consist of 34 sheets identified as 2nd RevieWa
New Site Plan. File # NWSP 96-002 with a Mav 10. 1996 Plannina an=
Zonina DeQartment date stamD marking.
I
I~EPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES:
Comments:
1. City water will not be supplied for
irrigation. Please clearly show water
source for irrigation, (City Compo
Plan, Policy 3C.3.4).
2. Only Palm trees will be permitted
within utility easements, (Sec.26.
33(a)}.
3. Sanitary sewer, as shown, does not
connect to the existing sewer system.
4. Show existing and proposed utility
easements (Sec.26.33(a)}.
5. Palm Beach Health Department permits
will be required for water and
sanitary sewer (Sec.26.12).
6. A Capacity Reservation Fee of
$15.246.00 is due within thirty (30)
days of Commission approval or upon
request for Director of Utilities
signature on HRS/DEP forms (Sec.20-34
(E) } .
I FIRE
Comments:
I POLICE
Comments:
ENGINEERING
Comments:
NONE
NONE
7. All plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's code
requirements at time of application.
These permits include, but are not
limited to the following; site
lighting, paving, drainage, curbing,
landscaping, irrigation and traffic
control devices. Permits required
from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC,
SFWMD and any other permitting agency
shall be included with your permit
request.
8. Revise documents to reflect all
comments.
9. Project shall have underground
facilities to residential units.
Chap.2.5,Sec.9E,pg.2.5-7
10. Provide relationship of development to
proposed LUI rating.
Chap.2.5,Sec.10A3,pg.2.5-8
cr
Page 2
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
11. Provide a statement that all utilities
are available and will be provided by
appropriate agencies. Chap.3,Art.IV,
Sec.3R, pg.3-S
12. Provide a master stormwater management
plan. Chap.3,Art.IV,Sec.3T,pg.3-6
13. Plat review and approval required.
Chap.S,Art.II,Sec.1,pg.S-1
14. Establish deed restrictions providing
for a property owners' association to
pay for the operation of a street
light system within the development.
Chap.6,Art.III,Sec.14,pg.6-4 and
Chap.S,Art.V,Sec.2A4,pg.5-9
15. Sidewalks are required on both sides
of all local and collector street.
Chap.6,Art.III,Sec.11A,pg.6-3
16. Provide certification by developer's
engineer that drainage plan complies
with all City codes & standards.
Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.5A,pg.6-7 and
Chap.23,Art.IIF, pg.23-8
17. Parking lot section must conform to
City code including, but not limited
to, parking spaces for each townhome.
Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.10F,pg.6-12
18. Minimum street right-of-way width for
a local street with 2 mountable curbs
is 50 feet; with swales minimum right-
of-way width is 60'. Chap.6,Art.IV,
Sec.10C,pg.6-11
19. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to
Engineering Division approval. Chap.6,
Art.VII, Sec.4B,pg.6-24
20. Photometries must be approved for both
pedestrian and parking lot lighting
before building permit can be issued.
Chap.23,Art.II,A1a,pg.23-6
21. Provide a satisfactory lighting plan.
Chap.23,Art.IIA,pg.23-6
22. Parking lot dimensions, striping,
aisles, stalls, radii, signs,
landscaping, etc. must conform with
City codes and standards. Chap.23,Art.
II,pg.23-6
23. Landscaped areas in parking lots must
be protected by wheel stops or curbs.
Chap.23,Art.IIE,pg.23-7
24. It is recommended to locate the
meeting hall as close as possible to
related parking facility and east of
proposed pool.
25. It is recommended to extend pedestrian
walkways for lefthand entrances out to
point accessible to driver.
jD
REJECT
Page 3
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
26. It is recommended that if Forest Road
(now a public road) becomes a private
road, a consent from Cedar Ridge PUD
to the north, including maintenance
r..pon.ibiliti.., .hall be granted.
27. It is recommended that for a safe
pedestrian circulation and access to
recreation area, consider a sidewalk
or jogging path at the following
locations:
a) . Behind building's 3 & 4
b} . North-south path between building
9,10,11 & 12,13,14
c} . East-west paths between buildings
9 & 10 & 10 &11
28. It is recommended that the two car
garage parking spaces should be 20'
wide.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
29. All signs and entry walls or fences
must be shown on the site plan in
compliance with the code.
30. Parking at the clubhouse or recreation
building shall comply with Chapter 2,
Section 22, E (12) of the Land
Development Regulations.
31. The Building Division reviewed the
plans for site review issues only.
Building review and comments will be
handled at the time of permit
application submittal.
I PARKS AND RECREATION I I I
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
32. It is recommended that the
preservation area site be moved from
south of the entrance road (Cedar
Ridge Road) to the southwest corner of
the property. This should be
indicated on the engineering and
landscape drawings submitted.
33. If the preservation area site is
moved, then remove all improvements
and utility easements from the newly
located preservation area. The
preserve area shall also have a
management plan for before, during and
after construction.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1/
Page 4
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
I DEPARTMENTS
34. Submission of a rectified master plan
showing compliance with the conditions
of approval for the project will be
required prior to applying for a
permit or replattingi whichever comes
first. The rectified master plan
shall be submitted in triplicate to
the Planning and Zoning Department.
35. One of the conditions of the master
plan approval is to submit a plat to
the Development Department of the area
to be developed. This plat shall
vacate any existing streets within the
PUD that are desired for private
ownership.
36. The submitted boundary survey does not
meet the requirements of Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4 -
Site Plan, Section 7.A. The survey
shall include, but not be limited to,
all easements that exist on the site.
The submitted survey contains a
surveyor note that the property was
not researched for the easements and
other restrictions. Provide a current
survey (within 6 months) showing all
easements and other restrictions. The
survey that includes locations of
existing trees on the site, Sheet 25
of 34, is dated January 19, 1995,
which does not meet city requirements.
37. To comply with the Land Development
Regulations, Chapter 4 - Site Plan,
Section 7.E, provide percentage
distributions for the site data. Also
break up the category, "paved areas",
into vehicular use area (parking and
driveways) and other paved areas
(sidewalks, etc).
38. On the site plan, sheet 2 of 34, draw
in all setbacks as shown on the
approved master plan.
39. Indicate on the site plan the method
of trash pick-up.
40. If colored elevations of the proposed
structures as required by Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4 -
Site Plan, Section D, are not
submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Department prior to the Planning and
Development Board meeting, it is
recommended that the elevations go
back before the Commission, at a
future site plan approval.
41. On the site plan, Sheet 2 of 34,
include the 27 foot dimension required
for the back-up space of the parking
spaces serving the recreational area.
I~
I INCLUDE I REJECT I
Page 5
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
I DEPARTMENTS
I INCLUDE I REJECT I
42. Amend the homeowners' association
document to include a provision
regarding unobstructed access to the
"T" turn-around at the western portion
of the development. Indicate a method
to ensure enforcement of constant
access to the "T" turn-around.
Provide amended homeowners'
association document for staff review.
43. Provide parking calculations for the
recreational facilities and include
information regarding:
a) square footage of the water area
of the swimming pool and
b) number of dwelling units located
within a five hundred to eight
hundred foot radius.
Include the calculation on the site
plan.
44. A drainage permit issued by South
Florida Drainage Management District
designates Veronica Lake as a dry-
retention area. Amend drawings to
comply with the district requirements.
If the retention is to be entirely
wet, provide an alternate location for
the required dry retention, and verify
approval from the South Florida Water
Management District.
45. Provide for review an agreement
between the developer and the Lake
Worth Christian School regarding the
use by the school of the retention
area located within the PUD. Provide
a statement by the registered engineer
that the drainage capacity is
sufficient to include the school area,
the PUD and the PID areas.
46. Provide for review an agreement
between the developer and the Lake
Worth Christian School regarding
access by the school through the Cedar
Ridge Estates development.
47. Eliminate discrepancies between the
Landscape Plan, Sheet 26 of 34, and
the site plan, sheet 2 of 34. Major
differences appear to exist
specifically in the common/recreation
areas.
48. On the landscape plan, Sheet 26 of 34,
draw in all utility easements. Remove
all trees from these easements or
provide an authorization from the
owner of the easement to allow
planting in these areas.
13
Page 6
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
49. City's Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 7.5 - Landscape Code, Article
II, Section 5.C sets forth minimum
standards for planting materials, such
as physical characteristics of the
trees and shrubs, height, spread, and
spacing. Amend the landscape
tabulations and include these
characteristics in the planting
material specification for every item
that is proposed.
50. For all sub-area drawings provide a
key map to allow identification of
these sub-areas in relation to the
entire site. Include same on the
landscape plan, Sheet 26 of 34.
51. On the landscape plan, Sheet 26 of 34,
amend the planting material tabular
summary to include a "landscape
material required by the code"
category. Also, provide relevant
calculations for this category.
Indicate with an identifiable symbol
all native species.
52. It is recommended that there be
different color schemes for the unit
clusters. On the site plan, Sheet 2
of 34, delineate housing clusters that
would have the same color designation,
and incorporated this into the working
drawings required for permits for the
project.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
CONDITIONS
1. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
1. To be determined.
TJH/dim
a: ComDept.CED
If
Page 4
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
34. Submission of a rectified master plan
showing compliance with the conditions
of approval for the project will be
required prior to applying for a
permit or replattingi whichever comes
first. The rectified master plan
shall be submitted in triplicate to
the Planning and Zoning Department.
35. One of the conditions of the master
plan approval is to submit a plat to
the Development Department of the area
to be developed. This plat shall
vacate any existing streets within the
pun that are desired for private
ownership.
36. The submitted boundary survey does not
meet the requirements of Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4 -
Site Plan, Section 7.A. The survey
shall include, but not be limited to,
all easements that exist on the site.
The submitted survey contains a
surveyor note that the property was
not researched for the easements and
other restrictions. Provide a current
survey (within 6 months) showing all
easements and other restrictions. The
survey that includes locations of
existing trees on the site, Sheet 25
of 34, is dated January 19, 1995,
which does not meet city requirements.
37. To comply with the Land Development
Regulations, Chapter 4 - Site Plan,
Section 7.E, provide percentage
distributions for the site data. Also
break up the category, "paved areas",
into vehicular use area (parking and
driveways) and other paved areas
(sidewalks, etc).
38. On the site plan, sheet 2 of 34, draw
in all setbacks as shown on the
approved master plan.
39. Indicate on the site plan the method
of trash pick-up.
40. If colored elevations of the proposed
structures as required by Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4 -
Site Plan, Section D, are not
submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Department prior to the Planning and
Development Board meeting, it is
recommended that the elevations go
back before the Commission, at a
future site plan approval.
41. On the site plan, Sheet 2 of 34,
include the 27 foot dimension required
for the back-up space of the parking
spaces serving the recreational area.
I~
REJECT
Page 5
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
42. Amend the homeowners' association
document to include a provision
regarding unobstructed access to the
"T" turn-around at the western portion
of the development. Indicate a method
to ensure enforcement of constant
access to the "T" turn-around.
Provide amended homeowners'
association document for staff review.
43. Provide parking calculations for the
recreational facilities and include
information regarding:
a) square footage of the water area
of the swimming pool and
b) number of dwelling units located
within a five hundred to eight
hundred foot radius.
Include the calculation on the site
plan.
44. A drainage permit issued by South
Florida Drainage Management District
designates Veronica Lake as a dry-
retention area. Amend drawings to
comply with the district requirements.
If the retention is to be entirely
wet, provide an alternate location for
the required dry retention, and verify
approval from the South Florida Water
Management District.
45. Provide for review an agreement
between the developer and the Lake
Worth Christian School regarding the
use by the school of the retention
area located within the PUD. Provide
a statement by the registered engineer
that the drainage capacity is
sufficient to include the school area,
the PUD and the PID areas.
46. Provide for review an agreement
between the developer and the Lake
Worth Christian School regarding
access by the school through the Cedar
Ridge Estates development.
47. Eliminate discrepancies between the
Landscape Plan, Sheet 26 of 34, and
the site plan, sheet 2 of 34. Major
differences appear to exist
specifically in the common/recreation
areas.
48. On the landscape plan, Sheet 26 of 34,
draw in all utility easements. Remove
all trees from these easements or
provide an authorization from the
owner of the easement to allow
planting in these areas.
13
REJECT
Page 6
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
49. City's Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 7.5 - Landscape Code, Article
II, Section 5.C sets forth minimum
standards for planting materials, such
as physical characteristics of the
trees and shrubs, height, spread, and
spacing. Amend the landscape
tabulations and include these
characteristics in the planting
material specification for every item
that is proposed.
50. For all sub-area drawings provide a
key map to allow identification of
these sub-areas in relation to the
entire site. Include same on the
landscape plan, Sheet 26 of 34.
51. On the landscape plan, Sheet 26 of 34,
amend the planting material tabular
summary to include a "landscape
material required by the code"
category. Also, provide relevant
calculations for this category.
Indicate with an identifiable sYmbol
all native species.
52. It is recommended that there be
different color schemes for the unit
clusters. On the site plan, Sheet 2
of 34, delineate housing clusters that
would have the same color designation,
and incorporated this into the working
drawings required for permits for the
project.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
CONDITIONS
1. Delete Comment 24.
2. Delete Comment 27.
3 . Reword Comment 28 to require 20 foot
wide driveways and 18' wide interior
garage dimensions for parking located
inside the garage.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
1. To be determined.
TJH/dim
a:ComDept.CED
7.C.l
NEW SITE PLAN
CEDAR RIDGE TOWNHOMES - CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES PUD
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #96-310
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
June 11, 1996
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Project Name:
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
Applicant:
Cedar Ridge Development Corporation
Agent:
Paramount Engineering Group, Inc.
Location:
Southeast corner of High Ridge Road and Cedar Ridge Road (Parcel
C and D of the Cedar Ridge and High Ridge Commerce Park
subdivision)
File No.:
NWSP 96-002
Land Use Plan
Designation:
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Zoning
Designation:
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Type of Use:
Multi-family residential (townhouses)
Number of
Units:
110
Square
Footage:
Site Area:
Building Area:
18.88 acres
137,064 square feet
Surrounding Land
Uses and Zoning
Disbict:
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
North -
Single-family, residential portion of the Cedar Ridge
Estates PUD, zoned PUD (under construction);
South -
High Ridge Commerce Park PID, zoned PID, (partially
under construction);
East -
Seaboard Air Line Railroad right-of-way and farther
east is the Interstate 1-95 right-of-way;
west -
High Ridge Road right-of-way and farther west is a
horse stable in unincorporated Palm Beach County.
Existing Site
Characteristics:
The site was boundary platted in 1983, but will need to be replatted
to subdivide the property into townhouse lots. The site also has an
active gopher tortoise burrow on it and a designated preserve area
(which is to be relocated, along with the gopher tortoise) resulting
from a disturbed environmentally sensitive ecosystem existing on the
southwest portion of the property. In addition, shortly after the PUD
and the PIn to the south were platted and construction of
infrastructure was significantly completed the project was abandoned
I
Page 2
Site Plan Review Staff Report
Memorandum #96-310
Cedar Ridge Townhomes, Parcel D
and fell into foreclosure until it was purchased by the current owner
from the government approximately two years ago. Hence there is a
partially completed storm water management area, referred to as Lake
Veronica, that lies on site and serves the entire PUD, as well as the
Pill.
Proposed
Development:
The developer is proposing construction of 110 townhouse units
contained in seventeen (17) buildings, ranging from four (4) to eight
(8) units, and a private recreation area consisting of a swimming pool,
a club house, a jogging trail, a turf play field, a playground and a
passive park on 18.88 acres (see Exhibit "B" - Site Plan). Recreation
provided will serve the entire PUD; the 110 townhomes, as well as the
single-family homes immediately to the north.
Concurrency:
a. Traffic
The proposed use is vested from traffic levels of service as the
site is located within a subdivision (Cedar Ridge a PUD, and
High Ridge Commerce Park, a PID) that was platted prior to
the effective date of the city's concurrency management
ordinance.
b. Drainage-
Insufficient drainage information has been submitted for the
Engineering Division to certify compliance with the City's
drainage levels of service at the time of site plan approval, as
required. The Engineering Division is recommending that this
be postponed to time of permit review.
Driveways:
Four, 22 foot wide driveways to the property are proposed as per the
approved master plan. The southwestern driveway, which is an
extension of Forest Road, is already in place to provide access to the
single-family homes and a sales office.
Parking
Facility:
The residential units contain either I-car, or 2-car garages.
Additional parking is provided within the individual driveways in
front of the garages. Recreational area parking is situated east of the
swimming pool.
Landscaping:
Site landscaping will meet code when the attached staff comments are
addressed at time of building permit.
Building and Site
Regulations:
Building and site regulations will be met when the attached staff
comments are addressed at time of building permit.
Community Design
Plan:
The proposed buildings are consistent in design with the single family
residential structures constructed, and being constructed, to the north
and west of this development. All buildings are 2-story with a
basement. The exterior walls will be finished with a combination of
brick and stucco. The pitched roof will be covered with asphalt
shingles. The developer proposes three (3) different color schemes for
the buildings:
1. light-yellow walls, white trims and forest green shutters/doors;
2
Page 3
Site Plan Review Staff Report
Memorandum #96-310
Cedar Ridge Townhomes, Parcel D
2. peach walls and white trims and shutters/doors and;
3. light grey walls, gray trims and brown shutter/doors.
Signage:
No signage was submitted as a part of this request.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request,
subject to the comments included in Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval. The Technical
Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be
corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit.
JL:dim
xc: Central File
a:CEDRD-SP.Rep
3
E X H I BIT
"AU
,
.'-1
A
"
,. ,
Ai
I
''I
NOT
IN
CITY
,--
~
r
\L ,-
/' -" "~V~.
~/ . '
r~7J1/'.> j
/- .-
j,. ,
,.~" ,-/"
" ./
'., ~'
." ~,/ /~
~~
{-~~~ .<Ii'
/-"1=1 10 ,;/' :.~
...,J I
---.
E X H I BIT
liB"
I
6
'. \
-.
----
-
-
--
--..:=--
-' ---::-.,..-
---
---
,
,
" \
----*'
--
--".
'~
II.
n
l~~
j;\~t"
~o g
'O~ ~
~;i"~ 'ill
"'~U ~
~\~'. -
~ ~':"6
":~o
"" .
;,~~
\t~
\
;.
II.
~~
!\\ ----
~"'''%
1t';.\;
\tit \ ~
...~~. .,
"~~~
~;'"
"";: -----
~~"
\~;
:2~
\
~
~
\
~
~
o
--
. II!
'.l:~lh "'
... \U~,\~ll!:-iil ~
..~: \\\\\\\ \ ~\\\f ~i ~
. ~.~\:'W~\~-\' ,~n~, ~ ~'\t
. si te\: n. ,H~. ".tj~~ ; ~ I:l
w~.is~e~'i'U\-~\:llJa~ ~ ..h q ~
\l\;III.\, "I.l'\, in~.,~ . l__
-' ;'!!~\' ~\Il \, 1\ .\ ~ ".- \WI
ihl", ,I l\~': \. Ii ..,,' n,,, ~!l .
a'-\ U\ ~ .,~~"& ~\ ~ ~';.~~';~: ~~:ll: "\1 ;
\ 0 ..,~. "'C::~"':'I> :::~: ~;f:. ;
~-.. ~ ~~- w ~i'
\ ..lI\ii '0:; - ~~~;;; ~i_ "
· . '.. '.1<1<.~ 1: ~ ~
\ ~ s :;~~ M~!~ ~
\\~~~1 t
~ ~ ~~~
" ~
~
v~
E1{1-l1.B1.'t
" C "
,
1J
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
File number: NWSP 96-002
Reference:The olans consist of 34 sheets identified as 2nd Review.
New Site Plan. File # NWSP 96-002 with a Mav 10. 1996 Planning and
Zoninq Deoartment date stamo marking
.
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
I PUBLIC WORKS I I I
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES:
Comments:
1. City water will not be supplied for
irrigation. Please clearly show water
source for irrigation, (City Comp.
Plan, Policy 3C. 3.4) .
2. Only Palm trees will be permitted
within utility easements, (Sec.26.
33(a)}.
3 . Sanitary sewer, as shown, does not
connect to the existing sewer system.
4. Show existing and proposed utility
easements (Sec. 26 .33 (a) } .
5. Palm Beach Health Department permits
will be required for water and
sanitary sewer (Sec. 26 .12) .
6 . A Capacity Reservation Fee of
$15.246.00 is due within thirty (30)
days of Commission approval or upon
request for Director of Utilities
signature on HRSjDEP forms (Sec.20-34
(E) } .
I FIRE I I I
Comments: NONE
I POLICE I I I
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING
Comments:
7. All plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's code
requirements at time of application.
These permits include, but are not
limited to the following; site
lighting, paving, drainage, curbing,
landscaping, irrigation and traffic
control devices. Permits required
from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC,
SFWMD and any other permitting agency
shall be included with your permit
request.
8. Revise documents to reflect all
comments.
9 . Project shall have underground
facilities to residential units.
Chap.2.5,Sec.9E,pg.2.5-7
10. Provide relationship of development to
proposed LUI rating.
Chap.2.5,Sec.10A3,pg.2.5-8
cr
Page 2
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
11. Provide a statement that all utilities
are available and will be provided by
appropriate agencies. Chap. 3 , Art. IV,
Sec.3R, pg.3-5
12. Provide a master stormwater management
plan. Chap.3,Art.IV,Sec.3T,pg.3-6
13. Plat review and approval required.
Chap.5,Art.II,Sec.1,pg.5-1
14. Establish deed restrictions providing
for a property owners' association to
pay for the operation of a street
light system within the development.
Chap.6,Art.III,Sec.14,pg.6-4 and
Chap.5,Art.V,Sec.2A4,pg.5-9
15. Sidewalks are required on both sides
of all local and collector street.
Chap.6,Art.III,Sec.11A,pg.6-3
16. Provide certification by developer's
engineer that drainage plan complies
with all City codes & standards.
Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.5A,pg.6-7 and
Chap.23,Art.IIF, pg.23-8
17. Parking lot section must conform to
City code including, but not limited
to, parking spaces for each townhome.
Chap.6,Art.IV,Sec.10F,pg.6-12
18. Minimum street right-of-way width for
a local street with 2 mountable curbs
is 50 feet; with swales minimum right-
of-way width is 60' . Chap. 6 , Art. IV,
Sec.10C,pg.6-11
19. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to
Engineering Division approval. Chap.6,
Art. VI I , Sec.4B,pg.6-24
20. Photometries must be approved for both
pedestrian and parking lot lighting
before building permit can be issued.
Chap.23,Art.II,A1a,pg.23-6
21. Provide a satisfactory lighting plan.
Chap.23,Art.IIA,pg.23-6
22. Parking lot dimensions, striping,
aisles, stalls, radii, signs,
landscaping, etc. must conform with
City codes and standards. Chap. 23,Art.
II,pg.23-6
23. Landscaped areas in parking lots must
be protected by wheel stops or curbs.
Chap.23,Art.IIE,pg.23-7
24. It is recommended to locate the
meeting hall as close as possible to
related parking facility and east of
proposed pool.
25. It is recommended to extend pedestrian
walkways for lefthand entrances out to
point accessible to driver.
jD
Page 3
New Site Plan
Cedar Ridge Townhomes - Cedar Ridge Estates PUD
NWSP 96-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
26. It is recommended that if Forest Road
(now a public road) becomes a private
road, a consent from Cedar Ridge PUD
to the north, including maintenance
responsibilities, shall be granted.
27. It is recommended that for a safe
pedestrian circulation and access to
recreation area, consider a sidewalk
or jogging path at the following
locations:
a} Behind building's 3 & 4
b} . North-south path between building
9,10,11 & 12,13,14
c} . East-west paths between buildings
9 & 10 & 10 &11
28. It is recommended that the two car
garage parking spaces should be 20'
wide.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
29. All signs and entry walls or fences
must be shown on the site plan in
compliance with the code.
30. Parking at the clubhouse or recreation
building shall comply with Chapter 2,
Section 22, E (12) of the Land
Development Regulations.
31. The Building Division reviewed the
plans for site review issues only.
Building review and comments will be
handled at the time of permit
application submittal.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
32. It is recommended that the
preservation area site be moved from
south of the entrance road (Cedar
Ridge Road) to the southwest corner of
the property. This should be
indicated on the engineering and
landscape drawings submitted.
33. If the preservation area site is
moved, then remove all improvements
and utility easements from the newly
located preservation area. The
preserve area shall also have a
management plan for before, during and
after construction.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
/1
C I T Y 0 F BOY N TON B E A C H
APPLICANT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
AGENDA
DAT!:c
Tuesday, March 26, 1996
TIME:
9:00 A.M.
PLACE:
Conference Room, 2nd Floor, Mangrove Park School
1. Introduction
2. Old Business
NONE
3. New Business
A. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans)
None
B. REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
RECEIVED
New Site Plan
1.
PROJECT:
Nautica Sound (FKA Knollwood Groves PUD)
AGENT:
Karyn I. Janssen
Kilday and Associates, Inc.
OWNER:
Alan Fant,
GL Homes of Boynton Beach II Corporation
LOCATION:
Adjacent to Lawrence Road on the west, LWDD L-
19 canal to the south and Hypoluxo Road to the
north.
DESCRIPTION:
Request for site plan approval of private
recreation, common area' landscaping, and
project signage for a 424 unit, single-family
residential development.
2.
PROJECT:
Knuth Road PCD Service Station
AGENT:
Kieran Kilday
Kilday and Associates, Inc.
OWNER:
Bill Winchester
LOCATION:
Southwest corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Knuth Road
DESCRIPTION:
Request for site plan approval to construct a
convenience store with gasoline sales and car
wash on 1.13 acres.
3.
Estates PUD
PROJECT:
Cedar Ridge Townhomes at the Cedar Ridge
AGENT:
Peter M. Karekos
c/o Paramount Engineering Group, Inc.
OWNER:
Condor Investments, Inc.