REVIEW COMMENTS
j71~jJ~ ~ ~ J7
/
#
J. $0 ) V
z. 111 ~ .-=z.-T 7/ . ..' /'
], ~~'t..J".;t;-. /l.e- /. ~,~ /'
4. j??~ ~ . ',I.~ ~ ~/ / ~r-
5. ~ -1 fUO . ~ . J ~ . ../
C~~~~' -f~ ../
;; t ~_. ~J~
t J. ~~..,.:H.... ~~-~./
~ ~--~ ) ,~
d ~ ~~~~~ ,~-r
q . _~;:r "1' ~. "";
c-,? 10 ~
j:()...
. ./
fJJtJ . I'.~ ~~-r.ro, ~ ~
~ ~ ~ .,/~- .....;:.. ~
J~ PIt- ~~~
~ <-<'~ J-~
pO
-;r .....-L*'
.:;1:, j~' -r'
J ~~~~.y
2'~
:::J t::.... '-( -
~~~ /U.{)
-1l'
_ ~.".-- ~t/~-
~Q t/~
~ V:~
-mr
/I~~
#
S;62-S'
,_ 3 ?L '7 / ~
#'1 J 3 :J 7
:;
;c
I q 6-()1 /6)'
I .
k,00666 ~~
-
/2) 988../0
-~-;::--
=----
~ ~
. 7" 3/ .].3") / ~
~S~
1I,/'15D, It.:,*~ .~.~ s,~
*~~~~~
~. _ jJ~ J~c-J-.
~/'-~~
-4
z..-3) 000
~Jl--9<- ~~~
~
C-J G\
~
~ /"
2J, oon ~
~
~~
1134.f9{. eJoo ~ Ii
.1:/ ~
"~
2.312--8.3 .,3'
~~~
~
~
~
/J~
jd-~
:JI~
II '
) .
~
c::::.o
/~ ,.,o~,;)~
~ /.4/6 AC
y~ on) 4&Slf'/ JJ B -f 7'3,
a....-.- .3 2) 8 0 r;, ..p
;/~ (8JJ 11$7'1/378
&00
-~~ - -
,ee..:r~
~
-----;;;-
-1----
41
.. oS I&'
-
7' 3 Soo ' I-
, ~ ::- 'Y, 6, 0
-;:36~9J,' '
I
_ .s7l 3? 8
.,::.--- -
3.z-ff06 -
-It
/7,66
~~
~
~ c~::::
Z. 3 . 2-S- ~...o c7'1
IJO/Z/7704
M~~
:::
I ) 0 I 2. J 170 X . s7 b - S- 2 Z. / ,sll9 .p
~~~
)vrl/~;o (.6'1) ( IJ OIl-) 770) -- ~98/811
~ I/,J...... '" II, 6G x .::>"2.-1-) ,s-8'1 I'lJ z.2A3, <;u-
6 9 B I &lll
q l28 tj2-'L
'l,'ll-7?3 ?,
x ' 00 6' b
661 lId ,oJ
MEMORANDU/ '-,
TO
City Attorney
OATE
August 11, 1982
FIL~
FROM
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
!lUIIJ~CT Proposed Homeowners documents
Accompanying this memo, you will find a copy of the proposed
Homeowners Association and Property Owners Association documents
for the proposed Cedar Ridge Estates PUD and High Ridge Commerce
Park PID. These documents are forwarded to you for your review
and comment consistent with Section 6C of Appendix B of the
Code of Ordinances. Please provide your comments prior to
these items being heard by the City Council for zoning purposes.
c ~S C- ..-<..0 -i::
Carmen S. Annunzia~
City Planner
CSA:mpc
Attachs.
CC: City Clerk w/encl.
... J
, "",
, -.V\EJ~.ORAND~N-
V'
TO
Carmen Annunziato
City planner
DATE
July 29th, 1982.
FILl!
FROM
Wm. D~ Cavanaugh,
Fire Inspector
gUBJ I!:CT
High Ridge Commerce Park
Cedar Ridge Estates
Reference: High Ridge Commerce Park
Water supply approved as shown.
Fire Hydrant location shall conform to
City Sub Division Ordinance section XVI
Reference: Cedar Ridge Estates
As shown Fire Lines have too many Dead Ends.
Consultation with Perry Cessna, Utilities Director
and this office should alleviate this problem.
Fire Hydrant location shall conform to City
Sub Division Ordinance section XVI.
~~
CC: Chief James Rhoden
Fire Dept.
Perry Cessna
Director of utilities
MEJ~,ORANDvM
TO
Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
DATE
July 29th, 1982.
FILE:
FROM
Wm. D. Cavanaugh,
Fire Inspector
SUBJECT
High Ridge Commerce Park
Cedar Ridge Estates
Reference: High Ridge Commerce Park
Water supply approved as shown.
Fire Hydrant location shall conform to
City Sub Division Ordinance Section XVI
Reference: Cedar Ridge Estates
As shown Fire Lines have too many Dead Ends.
Consultation with Perry Cessna, Utilities Director
and this office should alleviate this problem.
Fire Hydrant location shall conform to City
Sub Division Ordinance section XVI.
{)~/
CC: Chief James Rhoden
Fire Dept.
Perry Cessna
Director of utilities
Date.
Time
~.~
"MEJ~.ORAND~M --.
'"
TO
Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
DATE'
July 29th, 1982.
FIL!:
FROM
Wm. D. Cavanaugh,
Fire Inspector
SUBJ I!CT
High Ridge Commerce Park
Cedar Ridge Estates
Reference: High Ridge Commerce Park
Water supply approved as shown.
Fire Hydrant location shall conform to
City Sub Division Ordinance section XVI
Reference: Cedar Ridge Estates
"
As shown Fire Lines have too many Dead Ends.
Consultation with Perry Cessna, utilities Director
and this office should alleviate this problem.
Fire Hydrant location shall conform to City
Sub Division Ordinance section XVI.
..
f~
CC: Chief James Rhoden
Fire Dept.
Perry Cessna
Director of utilities
Comments:
TPC:mpc
July 2'-, 1982
MEMORANDUM
Master Plan, Cedar Ridge Estates P.U.D.
High Ridge Commerce Park - P.I.D.
1. Need to show all existing utilities and easements
on and adjacent to tract.
2. Need documents showing unified control; agreements
with city for completion of development according
to plan and restrictive covenants with regard
to same.
3. Need statement as to desirability of placing
parking garages with setback (30 ') along
south boundary of P.U.D.
4. Need statements of coordination with utilities.
MEMORANDUM
July 26, 1982
TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
RE: Cedar Ridge Estates, P.U.D. and High Ridge Congress Pk.P.I.D.
Following are my comments:
1. The water layout in the PUD is such that you have numerous
dead end lines which by consultation at this office, with
the engineer, could resolve these problems.
2. The sewerage collection system with a gravity line running
approximately 800' in-between buildings and in grassed
and landscaped recreation areas will present a very serious
maintenance problem for the City.
The reason being that to get sewer cleaning equipment into
this area, would be almost impossible unless there was an
actual road built through this area and I do not believe
the planners would consider such an intrusion on the open
area.
Again, this requires some discussion with the engineers to re-
solve the problems inherent in their design.
We are returning the set of plans with this memo.
~?~s~ b~
Director of Utilities
apt
Attachments:
"set of plans"
..
~ ..<~OJ;.c:.)
~~--_._"--
____ . -:J-. 6; z--"
/lh ~.. ~< ..~
.~
Time
~
~
M E M 0 RAN DUM
June 23, 1983
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council"
Re: Atrium Place
Attached, for your information, is a copy of the Traffic Impact
Review provided on Tuesday, June 21, 1983 and to which Carmen
Annunziato made reference in his presentation on the Atrium Place
Site Plan. This report should be added to the material that you
have already received relative to Atrium Place, which will be
discussed again at the July 5, 1983 City Council meeting.
{/!~ ? C/
Peter f?: Ch~ey
City Manager
PLC:mh
cc: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
I
I
Received
Date_
Time
11f/f1
'7-d ;;;3 .. - :
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
DATE: July 22, 1983
RE: Cedar Ridge Estates Recreation & Park Dedication Fee
Relative to the memorandum of July 12, 1983 on the Cedar Ridge
Estates Recreation and Park Dedication Fee, I am in agreement
and recommend a fee in lieu of land, however calculations are
incorrect.
Fee due should be $ 39,835.78 as reflected in the attachment.
~;,./ v&'
/" /L/" "'j
/~ <-t:-vG-,::t:.-;- , ~---
Charles C. Frederick
Recreation & Park Director
CCF:as
Attachment
CC:
John Wildner, Park Supt.
Tom A. Clark, City Engineer
.."
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Engineer
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner
RE:
July 12, 1983
RECREATION AND PARKS DEDICATION FEE/CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES
DATE:
Accompanying this memo you will find documents as
follows:
1.
A letter of transmittal from David Mankutaj
2.
An appraisal prepared by Robert E. Transue, SRPA;
3 .
.
A list of qualifications for Mr. Transue; and,
4 .
A Contract for Sale and Purchase.
These documents were submitted to me for the purpose of establishing
the fee to be paid at the time of final plat for recreation and parks
dedication purposes.
To that end, please be advised that the fee to be paid is $39,452.75
computed as follows:
I. value of land zoned PUD
acres of land zoned PUD
989,000 =
38.73
$25,535.76/
acre
II.
.015 acres/unit x 152 M.F. Units = 2.28 AC
.018 acres/unit x 47 S.F. Units = .81 AC
Acres To Be Dedicated 3.09
1/2 Credit for private recreation 3.09 = 1.545 AC
-y-
III.
IV.
Fee to be paid
$25,535.76
x 1.54
$39,452.75
$/Acre Land Value
Acres
Fee to Be Paid
By copy of this memo, I am requesting comment from the
Director of Recreation and Parks and notifying Mr. Mankuta.
C Ol- _...... J L ~
CARMEN S. ANNr4MZIATO
/bks
cc:
Charles Frederick
David Mankuta
Central File
Chairman
Planning
MEMORANDUM
TO
"
andke . ers ,
.
and,Zon ng Board
DATE
July 16,1982
FILE
FROM
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
gUElJECT Application for Annexation,
Land Use Amendment and Rezoning/
Point Manalapan Corporation and
william E. Benjamin, II
Exhibit 'c'
Cost/Benefit Analysis
based on 81 valuations and comparable types of uses,
taxes could be expected as follows:
High Ridge Commerce Park
total valuation
$ 9,927,733.00
total tax
66,118.07
Cedar Ridge Estates *
Single Family
total valuation
$ 1,950,165.00
total tax
12,988.10
Multi Family
total valuation
$ 3,496,000.00
total tax
23,283.36
* does not include Homestead Exemptions
CSA:mpc
~
EXHIBIT "D"
STAFF COMMENTS
MEMORANDUM
TO
Chairman and Members,
Planning and Zoning Board
DATE
July 16, 1982
FILl:
FROM
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
5UBJIf'CT
Application for Annexation,
Land Use Amendment and Rezon-
ing/Point Manalapan Corporati
and William E. Benjamin,II
Introduction
The Point Manalapan Corporation and William E. Benjamin,II
(Point Manalapan) are proposing to annex into Boynton Beach a 65.8
acre tract of land located in the northeast corner of Miner Road
extended and High Ridge Road (See Exhibit 'A'). The property is
currently undeveloped and zoned RS (Single Family Residential) in
Palm Beach County. Also, accompanying this request are legal des-
criptions prepared by the City Staff which provide for the annex-
ation of intervening rights-of-way.
In connection with this request for annexation, the
owners are proposing that the land be zoned both Planned Unit
Development (PUD) and Planned Industrial Development (PID). The
PUD proposed provides for the construction of 197 units (45 single-
family detached and 152 multi-family) on 40.8 acres. This develop-
ment equates with a Land Use Intensity (LUI) of 5 and a gross
density of 4.83 units per acre. The PID consists of 20 industrial
lots plus required buffers on 25 acres of land. Both developments
are to be served with public utilities and streets.
Procedure
These applications for annexation, amendment to the
future land use element of the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning
are being processed consistent with state statutes, and Boynton
Beach codes, ordinances and resolutions as follows:
1. F.S. 163.3161: Local Government Comprehensive
Planning Act;
2. F.S. 166.041:
Ordinances and
3. F.S. 171.011:
traction Act;
4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A,
Section 3A5{e): Boundary and Zoning;
5. Boynton Beach Ordinance #79-24:
Adopting the Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan; and,
6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X:
Procedures for Annexation.
Procedures for Adoption of
ResolutionS";
Municipal Annexation or Con-
- 1 -
MEMORANDUM
TO
Chairman and Members,
Planning and Zoning Board
DATE
July 16, 1982
FILE
FROM
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
g'U BJ ECT
Application for Annexation
Land Use Amendment and Rezon-
ing/Point Manalapan Corporatior
and William E. Benjamin,II
- 2 -
These procedures have been tabulated for informational purposes
and for ease of processing as noted in the attached annexation
timetable {See Exhibit 'B'}. Paraphrasing the timetable, these
requests require review by the City Department Heads, newspaper
advertisements, public hearings with the Planning and Zoning Board
and the City Council and Council adoption of ordinances to annex,
amend the future land use element and rezone. Also included is a
consistency review by the Board of County Commissioners. These
procedures take approximately three months to complete.
Current Land Use and Zoning
The property which is the subject of this annexation
request is currently undeveloped and it is zoned RS {Single Family
Residential} in Palm Beach County. The land use and zoning of the
surrounding land varies and is presented for your information in
the following table:
Direction Jurisdiction Zoning Land Use
north Palm Beach County RS Lake Worth
Christian School
east Palm Beach County NA Seaboard Airline
Railroad
south Boynton Beach M-l 1 Rollyson Warehouse
2 Florida Pneumatic
3 vacant/undeveloped
southwest
Palm Beach County
RS
vacant/undeveloped
west
Palm Beach County
RS
estate single-fami:
northwest
Palm Beach County
RS
single-family de-
tached.
MEMORANDUM
TO
Chairman and Members,
Planning and Zoning Board
DATE
July 16, 1982
FILE
FROM
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
gUElJECT Application for Annexation,
Land Use Amendment and Rezon-
ing/Point Manalapan Corporation
and William E. Benjamin,II
- 3 -
Future Land Use and Zoning
High Ridge Road is an area in transition so far as
development is concerned. There are many items which cause an
area to change, but the primary causes of change in the High Ridge
Road corridor are availability of sewer and water facilities, loca-
tion with respect to 1-95, the proposed extension of High Ridge Road
southward to N.W. 22nd Avenue and the industrialization of the surround-
ing area.
The Point Manalapan tract lies approximately equidistant
between N.W. 22nd Avenue and Hypoluxo Road on the east side of High
Ridge, and as proposed will form the land use break point wherein
industrialization will be limited from expanding northward. In
fact, the purpose of the requested zoning catagories {PUD and PID} is
to provide on-site, sufficient land use controls via the planned dis-
tricts to insure that the residential property to the north is care-
fully and adequately buffered from the straight industrial zoned lands
to the south. This combination of planned zoning districts is con-
sistent in concept with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan
policies and thus is consistent with the policies of Boynton Beach.
With respect to all of the remaining land in the area, the
Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Classifcation is
Low to Medium Residential which permits a density range of 3 to 8
dwelling units per acre based on availability of infrastructure
capacity. There is no doubt that now that sewer and water facilities
are available and with the proposed extension of High Ridge Road south-
ward to N.W. 22nd Avenue, the lands in the High Ridge Road corridor
will redevelop at a higher density.
Based on the information provided above, land use classifi-
cations of Industrial and Low Density residential are appropriate and
zoning classifications of Planned Industrial Development and Planned
Unit Development with Land Use Intensity = 5 are recommended.
Comprehensive Plan policies
There are three policies in the Comprehensive Plan which
address annexations as follows:
MEMORANDUM
TO
Chairman and Members,
Planning and Zoning Board
DATE
July 16, 1982
FILE
FROM
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
SUBJECT
Application for Annexation,
Land Use Amendment and Rezon-
ing/Point Manalapan Corporation
and William E. Benjamin, II
- 5 -
Recommendation
The Planning Department recommends that the applications
submitted by William Benjamin and the Point Manalapan Corporation
for annexation and future land use amendment be approved as re-
quested and that the rezonings requested be approved subject to
the staff comments which accompany this memorandum as Exhibit 'D'.
These recommendations are based on the following:
1. the parcel is contiguous to the corporate limitsj
2. the parcel is in the path of urban development;
3. the request is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan policies for annexationj
4. the land use and zoning catagories requested are
consistent with the land use plans and policies of
both Palm Beach County and Boynton Beach;
5. the requested annexation and zoning will not impare
the surrounding properties in a manner that will in-
hibit future development; and,
6. the cost/benefit analysis of this request indicates
that the impact of this proposal on municipal staff
and programs will be substantial but that the taxes
realized will off-set the projected municipal expenses.
<4 "
~~~ s:'''~
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
CSA:mpc
I
I
I
j
M E M 0 RAN DUM
July 15, 1982
TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato,
City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark,
City Engineer
Re: Master Plan Material, Cedar Ridge Estates P.U.D.
and High Ridge Commerce Park P.I.D.
I do not have any negative comments concerning the subject
master plan.
The commitment for off~site road and traffic improvements
appears to be appropriate based on the traffic survey.
The drainage plans and calculations are comprehensive and
show that flooding situations have been adequately addressed.
-y~d~
Tom Clark
TAC:mb
. - ----~"_.-~.
-\ \ \\\\:; --
MEMORANDU
TO
Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
DATE
June 24, 1982
FILlE
FROM
Kevin Hallahan
Urban Forester
9UBJECT
Point Manalapan property
I have inspected the tract of land designated above,
making note of the area which was once a Mango orchard. The
rTrees, planted at a fourteen foot (14') by fourteen foot (14')
spacing, are in healthy condition, but not producing any fruit
at this time. It appears that this orchard has not been
managed for quite a few years.
In accordance with the Tree Preservation ordinance
(#8l-2l) the developer should be aware of_ his responsibilities
in the following:
..
.
section 7-A-5: obtain a tree permit from the building
department,
section 7-A-7d: provide a tree survey of the Mango area,
section 7-A-12,13: work to remove as few trees as
possbible and replace all trees which
have to be removed as part of the con-
struction of roads and structures.
If you have any additional questions or need more information,
let me know. I will also work with the developer in preserving
the trees where possible.
KHimpC
MEMORANDU/v,
TO
Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
DATE
June 24, 1982
FILE
FROM
Kevin Hallahan
Urban Forester
5U BJ ECT
Point Manalapan property
I have inspected the tract of land designated above,
making note of the area which was once a Mango orchard. The
Trees, planted at a fourteen foot (14') by fourteen foot (14')
spacing, are in healthy condition, but not producing any fruit
at this time. It appears that this orchard has not been
managed for quite a few years.
In accordance with the Tree Preservation ordinance
(#8l-2l) the developer should be aware of his responsibilities
in the following:
section 7-A-5: obtain a tree permit from the building
department,
section 7-A-7d: provide a tree survey of the Mango area,
section 7-A-12,13: work to remove as few trees as
possbible and replace all trees which
have to be removed as part of the con-
struction of roads and structures.
If you have any additional questions or need more information,
let me know. I will also work with the developer in preserving
the trees where possible.
KHjmpc
.
r3
"r
TO
~_.
r ._..
o
)
()
o
o
o
REPLY MESSAGE
FROM- ,,--' - -- - ~ --_.
-,
.Ter~esa Padgett
City Clerk
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
"OLD.
-
SUBJECT: Point Mana1apan Annexation & Land Use Amendment DATE:
and Rezoning
June 24,198
Accompanying this memo, you will find the original
of an affidavit concerning the surrounding property owner's
1istf~r the abovementioned development.
This document is forwarded for Central File purposes.
CSA:mpc
Attach.
PLEASE REPLY TO
a
SIGNE
REPLY
DATE;
SIGNED
FOAM F269 Available from GAAYAAC CO., INC., New Hartford. Conn. 06057
THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
. ---....~.._.....;,....--.-........,_....-~.:,........ :;"'-"'~-'~~-"-'-
---_._-~ -'-.
.._,-~--_._---"---"'--"'- -_.. .
MEMORANDUM.
TO
Tereesa Padgett
City Clerk
DA.TE
June 22,1982
FILE
FROM
Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
!SUBJECT
Point Manalapan Rezoning
Accompanying this memo, you will find an original of a
rezoning request submitted by Ken Groves for the Point Manalapan
Corporation in connection with their proposed annexation. The
affadvait attesting to the property owner's list will follow
shortly.
If the City Council determines that this request is in
the public interest and forwards these materials to the P&Z
Board for public hearings, I would like to have the hearing
advertised for August 10th, 1982 at 7:30 P.M., at which time
the Board would also conduct a hearing on the annexation (doc-
uments previously transmitted) .
The technical plans and documents are retained in my
office for review by the staff and Board.
CSA:mpc
Attach.
~~----. ,rr .. -*
Carmen ~. Annunz~o
City Planner
BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION INFORMATION FORM
NOTE: This form must be filled out completely and accurately
and must accompany all applications submitted to the
Planning Dept.
PROJECT NAME:
Cedar Ridge Estates (residential):
High Ridge Ccmnerce Park (industrial)
AGENT'S NAME:
Kenneth L. Groves
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 3198
Lantana, Florida 33462
PHONE:
305/585-2515
OWNER'S NAME:
(or trustee's)
ADDRESS:
William E. Benjamin, II and Point Manalapan
Developnent Corp.
p.O. Box 3198
Lantana, Florida 33462
305/585-2515
PHONE
PROJECT LOCATION: Hiqh Ridqe Road, approximately 1 mile South of
(not legal description) Hypoluxo Rxrl
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:*
(if different than
agent or owner)
::'
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters and other
materials will be forwarded.