REVIEW COMMENTS
I
; "'r"" 0
'VI)I t=- 0
7
-"
( -1
l
I~)f-';; '{ /
10....,... ;' l ,<::'. "'''-.\
1\
Y/'P iL2 ;~'
1/, t I ~
/ v / ../ V ~/ " / ,/ " i-'/ L/
I'
~ r / / !r/) /" /"""
,IJ- C lJ C:= "t- / /- / j,:. / (-' / ") @
\---.2:::> '-.J ,< ~~-- I " -.../
!/ /
L '~ V" /... t. ~ /71 ~
~ --- :) I ' \ >( '/ I' /' '
(:P ( ~ I / 1/. )
~ ! '- ,,!'-!. -j
i'
jJ .IJ ,"
/ j' L"') L
-It- "
/' 1/;': ;J(
/;/1'" -4' /'/';' / ,-- /' j
/1 " 'V,.:~_ ,..' ~
c// ~j ? (>: /,
1-.,
D
,07 ,,'J/
,<.. F-
-
/
/1/ .-
.. .-'
\.......)
(r?::r I') '" /J (/;'0
IvD en l' II
, "'""\'""
~-- ;./-, '1 ,- \
I t"l '\,?r"
j '7 .J (,? ,;l I
/1/ _) PA'() if -
,LJ'l~" (
/ ~,,(, ( '-- l,(:},/ //<".~'A/,:,"
~
,,-. ~ F)':
'~/ ,~
',,> /"./
/'(6,
,."/ "
/() ~.>" I! /;." ' t.: II C (\ j
.:~- --..".".-
J/V C'.('r ~ :: _\
~ /1'1'(;.- :i~' l-~." l".I, .'f
-- ''-/ ~,
" ! -
Lf
I
,n (3 /fD
q(2~
,/ ,
t.~__~-<"vv<~\ (_/--,_ '('_'1.( r
~,' ~I/"-.. -
,,72
Ii (Y 0 0)
cc-
',,- /' :~~ "~_- i -P/~)! ,./,( r i-)_L
/
L AY~ IJ C ( c ~.\
l
"
,
101
'!
;./\
/u
d
{..J 7 I ( ,r'l ~ i< ':: /,';':--,/[/7i
r-...::>
,"::"
l ,.21. 'il"J:;. / (<:_{15"( "-',' i:r- [J
C_ / /....' , I~'~ ,.!J (" /.~-:- s.s':~ ,>"_ ,-" ,/) ';:! "''- 'r
'::...---
&
")
)"A) 6..., , LD, /V~
~,/.ij)t (
I~,-
....
p( 'i ( ':::-'<' {\JIi ('>' 7 L ( j)~ y1 ; \/ t~ f
, '
, /
, ,
~"J.\ j IV i ,:=;-"1'\1 iJ " I
il~:. A.-' 'S '-~- /r ~;' p_..'L- /-
/-:/:. ,"; 4-
/~/.(2 xl
/
N",/-) 4
) _,./11-.
n 1 - A'
) e,; 4-() }// ) il
/t/c") ,1-
/r-J /1 .
j')k)f2"
j <<J..1
.. r -....
....
..... },
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-105
DATE: April 14, 1995
TO: SUE KRUSE,
MIKE HAAG
MILT DUFF
PETE MAZZELLA
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 ~
SUBJECT: CITRUS PARK RECORDED PLAT COpy
Attached is your copy of the subject plat for your use.
~n~3 u W\@
\ \ n i APR I 4 :oq5 ~LJ i
; L~ !l; ~i
; PLANNING [IND i
ZON!NG DE-PT. ~
KRH/krh
plalcopy,oul
-1;- ~- (A- ~ ~
tu/-+'~ ~
/~A i4e--
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-059
RE:
TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS - LAWRENCE ROAD
TO:
\~~~rieamA. Parker, City Manager
V~~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
FROM:
DATE:
March 6, 1995
The 1994 average traffic count on Lawrence Road between NW 22nd
Avenue (Gateway) and Hypoluxo has been reported to us by the County
to be 7972 trips. The current FDOT Level of Service Manual defines
the threshold traffic level for LOS D for 2 lane undivided streets
as 13,400 trips.
Those two numbers are important in studying Lawrence Road traffic
because the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division has
informed Mr. Hall of this office that widening of two lane roads in
the County system is not seriously considered until LOS D is
reached. Lawrence Road is a County road.
The Traffic Division has also opined that about 1000 more units can
be occupied on Lawrence Road before LOS D is reached. Well over
1000 more units have been approved by either the City or County, as
follows:
t.. Lawrence Oaks 178 units
t.- Nautica I 177 units
(,... Nautica II 197 units
t. -t1e.:ldowwuod Gl.uvt::: ( dre Knollwoodlb""l.<:"::> 5 3 9 units
Fox Hollow (aka Manor Forest) 185 unbuilt units, est.
l- Sausalito Groves 164 unbuilt units, est.
i-- Jonathan's Grove 32 units
i.- Lawrence Grove 75 unbuilt units, est.
1- Citrus Glen 20 unbuilt units, est.
v Citrus Park 113 units
TOTAL
1680 unoccupied units
The figure 1680 is not propounded to be exact, because each of the
entries marked "unbuilt units" represents our estimate of how many
units remain to be occupied in uncompleted developments. Traffic
from occupied units appears in actual traffic counts totaling 7972
trips. We believe it is reasonable to predict that when all
unoccupied units in all listed developments are in place, the Level
of Service Standard will exceed LOS Standard E, which is 15,000
trips. LOS D will be reached when approximately 2/3 of the 1680
future units are occupied.
Engineering Division Memo No. 95-059
Traffic Observations - Lawrence Road
March 6, 1995
Page #2
We have been unable to obtain accurate estimates of revenue
collected from dwelling units now contributing to the 7972 trips on
Lawrence Road. If we assume 1600 dwelling units have generated
those trips, and the average traffic impact fee collected was $1500
per unit, the total fees generated to date exceed $2,400,000. The
total fees due from 1680 additional units will exceed $2,500,000,
representing a total at build-out of $5,000,000x generated by these
developments to be spent in the immediate area. These numbers are
estimates, of course, and should be adjusted for traffic impact
fees generated by other users who pay such fees (commercial, etc.)
and those who don't (schools).
Our conclusion is that it is time for the County to begin planning
for widening of Lawrence Road so that when LOS D is reached, action
can be immediately implemented to begin construction. A four lane
undivided road will support 23,520 trips at LOS D, which is
adequate for all completed and currently proposed development along
Lawrence Road.
WVH/ck
C:LAWRENCE.LOS
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner
TABLE lA
LEVEL or SERVICE D
Test 1 Alternate
Peak Hour AnT Telt 1
L05D LOoS D LO"D
F^CILITY 1'\'PII S'l'I\NDlI\RD ~TANDARJ) &'l'ANDMD
2 lanes undividel:! 1,220 13,400 1,030
3 lane. two-way 1,280 14 , 000 1,080
2 tamH' one-way 1,600 17,600 2,650
3 lanes o:\p,-way 2,460 27,000 4,000
4 14nes I.lndb'ldt:d. 2,140 23,520 1,770
4 J.aneu d i v ...dgcl 2,6'0 29,400 2,210
S lant!s divided 2,670 29,400 2,210
6 lancs divided 4,100 4S,000 3,330
8 lanes dlvided 5,070 55,800 4,170
4 1:1ne 8 8xpress.",a.y 6,070 68,900 3,450
6 lanes exprelui'....ay 9,100 103,400 5,170
e l~ne~ e~pre5~way 12,130 137,900 6,990
10 laneB ~~pro~~~~y 15,170 172,300 8,610
SOurce: ~DOT Level ot Service Manual, Generalized Daily Level of service
Maximum Volume., Group C and Croup 1, and Generalized Peak Hour/Poalt
Directlonal ~evel Of 5erv~ce Maximum volumes, Group A and Group 1 tor
~rbanl:ect areas (~prtl 1992~.
~or the Detailed Analysis for Alternate Teet One. L@vel of Service 0 shall be the
Sum of the Critical Volumes of onB thousand four hundred (1,400) in accordance
with the Planning Method in the 1985 Manual.
TABLJi 19
LEVEL OF SERVICE E
teet 1 Alt8t'nate
Peale Hour Telt 1
LOS I!: LOS t LOD I!:
!"ACILI'1'Y 'l"'n'~ S'l'ANOM.D STANOI\RD S'l'ANOM.D
:2 l.afloiHI undi-Jided 1, 370 15,000 1,280
3 lanAs b"o-~/ay 1,450 15,700 1,340
2 lanes one-way 1,760 19,300 3,120
3 lanes one-way 2,660 29,JOO 4,610
4 lanen ~ndlv1.cte<1 2, ;"0 25,BOO 2,080
4 l.snell d ~v lded 2,930 32,200 ~,'OO
S lal'loo t"'Q-"a~ 2,930 32,200 2,600
6 l.!ney divid€d 4,440 48,800 3,890
e lanes di.vid~d 5,550 60,400 4,870
4 lan\!s expr~gsway 6,500 74,000 3,710
6 lan~B eXfres8way 9,780 111,200 5,560
0 lan~H exp:e35way l3,050 1"',200 ',410
10 ld~e~ expc:eeway 16,310 lQS,JOO 51,260
Source: FDOT Level of Service Manual, Generaliz~d Daily Level of Service
Ha;(imur" volumes, Group C and Group 1, and General1.~ed Pe~k Hour/Peak
D!.:-ecti.onal Level of Service Maximum Volumes, Group A and Group Itor
urb~ni~ad areas (April 1~~2J.
~~~ ~ho O~tal1gd AnalYQia for ~ltornatQ Teet Ona, Level of ServLce E shall be the
Sum of th~ Critical Volumas of one thousand five hundred (1,500) in aocordance
with the planning Method in the 1985 Manual.
The Level of Servioe Standar~s for Tes~ 2 are Level ot service S in Table la.
TOTAL P,02
Fair Share contribution for Road Improvement. Pee Table
Boynton Beach
Description
Road ,ee
,-------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------
Residential
Single F&mily Detached
Single Family Att. per unit
congr Living Facll, per unit
Hobile Home
Non-Residential
1,650.00
1,155.00
353.93
825.00
\
------------------------------
"General Office
10,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
50,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq.tt.
100,000 .q.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
150,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
200,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
300,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 8q.ft.
400,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 8q.tt.
500,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
600,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq. ft.
700,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
800,000 sq.ft.& over per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hedical Office per 1,000 sq:~~
..- ....... -- . -...-.-- - ..--. ..-
1,353.00
911.90
771.65
699.05
651.75
592.35
547.80
519.75
497.75
481.25
465.30
1,819.35
General Commercial Retail Examples
---------------------------------------------------
.
,
10;000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
50,000 sq.ft. per 1.000 sq.ft.
100,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
200,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 8q.ft.
300,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
400,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
500,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
600,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 sq. ft.
800,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq.ft.
1,000,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft.
1,200,000 8q.tt. per 1,000 aq.ft.
1,400,000 sq.tt. per 1,000 aq.ft.
1,600,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 aq.ft.
HiacellaneouB
.'
Hospital, per bed
Nursing Home, per bed
Warehouse per 1,000 sq. ft.
Mini-warehouse per 1,000 aq.tt
Gen. Recreation per parking space
General Indu8trial per 1,000 sq. ft.
Fast Food wI Drive Thru per 1,000 sq. ft.,
-Quality Restaurant per 1,000 sq. ft.
-High Turnover Sit Down Rest. per 1,000 sq. ft.
Drive-In Bank per 1,000 sq.ft.
Gas Station per station
Convenience Store per 1,000 eq.ft.
Hovie Theater per seat
Racquet Club per court
Church/Syna90gue per 1,000 sq.tt.
Day Care Center per 1,000 sq. ft.
New Car Sales per 1,000 sq. ft.
Carpet Stores per 1,000 sq. ft.
Veterinary Clinic per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hotel per room
Hotel per room
Elementary Schools per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hi9h Schools pe~ 1,eOO sq.tt.
r:) J.: L
M/-N'
~~'l]~
, 'lJ1i
5,069.60
2,822.82
2,215.50
1"; 7C)B .-53
1,648.37
1,479.10
1,403.00
1,359.49
1,360.28
1,359.01
1,384.12
1,398.19
1,431.93
.
647.35
143.00
268.40
143.55
165.00
383.35
12,168.31
4,511.84
9,600.58
7,876.74
8,639.40
11,162.10
96.80
2,359.50
512.60
3,923.37
2,638.35
5.95
1,804.00
560.45
418.50
589.60
599.50
\
Hk
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUN
AGENDA ITEM
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A.I
cc: Dev, Plan, Util
TO:
Honorable Mayor
* Hukill,
March 3, 1995
& City Commission
'~/ t"
, i! j ,i
; i t3 ,; !411.q 6
Development i
L
~;;':~~_..---._.
l .,L:' ~!y, ~~ I1Y G ':lr" h) ,,".... PJfS
""~!1;~l11,--~~\~
FROM:
P.E., Director of
DATE:
RE: ACCEPT~ MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND FINAL PLAT FOR
.".CITRUS PARK .;;
,/ -----
c--
PROJECT HISTORY
Citrus Park is located on the east side of Lawrence Road between
Citrus Cove Elementary School and the Citrus Glen Development. It
is to be marketed under the name Boynton Estates. This project,
when completed, will contain 113 single family units on the 28.34
acre site resulting in a density of 3.99 units per acre. Plat
documents prepared and submitted by CCL Consultants, Inc. for the
Developer have been reviewed by this writer. The final plat
resolution has been prepared by City Attorney James Cherof who has
indicated approval of dedication sheets and maintenance statements
and further indicated that the plat dedication sheet mirrors the
agreement between the City and Developer (HOA) and/or the HOA
documents, and that onsite/offsite landscaping agreements are
acceptable.
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
The Development Department recommends approval of the final plat of
Citrus Park as the Developer has substantially complied with the
provisions set forth in City Code of Ordinances, Appendix C,
Subdivision and Platting Regulations. Surety in the form of a
Letter of Credit in the amount of $855,917 has been posted by the
Developer and is being held by the Finance Director. The Finance
Director and City Attorney have reviewed the surety. The
expiration date on the Letter of Credit must be revised prior to
plat recording. All fees have been received, as have approval from
requisite governmental agencies. The Maintenance Agreement has
been reviewed and approved by both the City Attorney and the Parks
and Recreation Department.
RECOMMENDED CITY COMMISSION ACTION
The City Commission, if they deem it reasonable, should execute the
attached resolution authorizing approval of the submitted final
plat for Citrus Park; authorize acceptance of the Maintenance
Agreement; authorize the Honorable Mayor, City Engineer and City
Clerk to execute the plat document; and authorize recording of the
~ ~
Development Department Memo No. 95-014
Agenda Item/Citrus Park
March 3, 1995
Page #2
documents into Public Records of Palm Beach County Florida after
correction of the expiration date on the Letter of Credit. Upon
recording of the Commission approved plat, the Director of
Development will issue a Land Development Order authorizing the
construction of improvements listed within the Developer's Engineer
"Certified Opinion of Costs".
Should you require any additional information and/or assistance,
please contact the writer at ext. 6281
WVH/ck
C:CITRUSPK.AGN
attach: Final Plat of Citrus Park
Resolution approving Final Plat of Citrus Park
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A.I
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
AGENDA ITEM
cc: Dev" Plan" Util
,:...
FROM:
Honorable Mayor
* Hukill,
March 3, 1995
& City Commission
, ~"":::'~"""''''~~~-'~,c?-~::::-,
.~ :"'-......._~..."--............::~~~~..... "'
TO:
:" .
RE:
, -. l . " ! ~ -1 Co-
P. E., Director of Development' 0 " '
1-.___ i _.u
hi';'; !\jJ::f, ~,' ,IJJ' -~1 ~1>
,. '~'_,__ ?n,i\: :\:,"1'.-: r-1: l'
---.-- .... , Ill, , ,~OT
'-~-",'
ACCEPTANCE OF MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND FINAL PLAT FOR '"''''''
CITRUS PARK
DATE:
PROJECT HISTORY
Citrus Park is located on the east side of Lawrence Road between
Citrus Cove Elementary School and the Citrus Glen Development. It
is to be marketed under the name Boynton Estates. This project,
when completed, will contain 113 single family units on the 28.34
acre site resulting in a density of 3.99 units per acre. Plat
documents prepared and submitted by CCL Consultants, Inc. for the
Developer have been reviewed by this writer. The final plat
resolution has been prepared by City Attorney James Cherof who has
indicated approval of dedication sheets and maintenance statements
and further indicated that the plat dedication sheet mirrors the
agreement between the City and Developer (HOA) and/or the HOA
documents, and that onsite/offsite landscaping agreements are
acceptable.
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
The Development Department recommends approval of the final plat of
Citrus Park as the Developer has substantially complied with the
provisions set forth in City Code of Ordinances, Appendix C,
Subdivision and Platting Regulations. Surety in the form of a
Letter of Credit in the amount of $855,917 has been posted by the
Developer and is being held by the Finance Director. The Finance
Director and City Attorney have reviewed the surety. The
expiration date on the Letter of Credit must be revised prior to
plat recording. All fees have been received, as have approval from
requisite governmental agencies. The Maintenance Agreement has
been reviewed and approved by both the City Attorney and the Parks
and Recreation Department.
RECOMMENDED CITY COMMISSION ACTION
The City Commission, if they deem it reasonable, should execute the
attached resolution authorizing approval of the submitted final
plat for Citrus Park; authorize acceptance of the Maintenance
Agreement; authorize the Honorable Mayor, City Engineer and City
Clerk to execute the plat document; and authorize recording of the
~~ ~~
Development Department Memo No. 95-014
Agenda Item/Citrus Park
March 3, 1995
Page *2
documents into Public Records of Palm Beach County Florida after
correction of the expiration date on the Letter of Credit. Upon
recording of the Commission approved plat, the Director of
Development will issue a Land Development Order authorizing the
construction of improvements listed within the Developer's Engineer
"Certified Opinion of Costs".
Should you require any additional information and/or assistance,
please contact the writer at ext. 6281
WVH/ck
C:CITRUSPK.AGN
attach: Final Plat of Citrus Park
Resolution approving Final Plat of Citrus Park
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-049
(];(:~ ~
~~7-
t p;~
TO:
Carrie A. Parker
City Manager
:WU-~, a Hukill,
fl11t!J Engineer
March 1, 1995
P.E.
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
LAWRENCE ROAD WIDENING
I believe it is time to officially request inclusion of a widening
program for the design phase of Lawrence Road from Hypoluxo Road to
Gateway Boulevard in the Palm Beach County FY 96 Road Program. The
construction phase should then be scheduled in FY 97.
If you agree, I will ask Ms. Heyden to accumulate back-up material
including new developments in the immediate area either already
complete; underway; or anticipated in the near future.
This widening is more important, in my opinion, than the widening
of Congress Avenue south of SW 23rd Avenue, and perhaps funding
could be obtained by rescheduling that project.
Concur
Do not concur
WVH/ck
C:LAWRENCE
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
. --:-1..2t- ~ fi Vi ~ ~
1 MAR 2 1995 \ \:
\ L 1 .
i PLANNING AND i
t ZONING OEPT. 3
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 95-021
TO:
Grady Swann, Finance Director
FROM:
DATE:
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director
January 23, 1995
SUBJECT: Reservation Fee Transmittal - Citrus Park P.U.D. (Next Boynton Homes,
LTD.)
Enclosed is check no. 1016 from Next Boynton Homes, LTD. in the amount of $15661.80
to serve as the reservation fee for a proposed 113 unit subdivision proposed within the City
Limits in the vicinity of Lawrence Road and Miner Road. Please deposit this check in the
appropriate account.
Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office. .
JAG/PVM
bc: Peter Mazzella
xc: Mike Haag
File
\D)m@lnlllm~
I1il .IAN 24 1995 ~
PLANNING ANO
ZONING OEPT.
PAY
TO
THE
ORDER
OF
1W ...
..."w
o
1016
NEXT BOYNTON HOMES. LTD.
901 PONCE DE LEON BLVD.
SUITE 600
CORAL GABLES. FL 33134
BARNETT BANK
MARGATE. FLORIDA 33073
63-1402-670
DATE
~~~~ liOJO/qS
~. - ,>O,h- ~
CHECK NO.
\O\b
CHECK AMOUNT
~l~~\,~~~
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~~A-1)~
11100.0 U;1I1 1:01;?0 .ltO 21;1:
:l8?2?OQS."
NEXT BOYNTON HOMES. LTD.
PERMITTING
, ,
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-015
TO:
Mike Haag
Zoning/Site Administrator
I~~am Hukill, P.E.
~{yt~ "Engineer
January 20, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
TRC MEETING AGENDA - JANUARY 24, 1995
Please consider this verification that discussion of three final
plats (Nautica, Citrus Park and Vinings) should be included on next
Tuesday's TRC agenda. Backup material has been distributed
already, so none is required with your meeting notice. .'
\
Ci trus Park may be removed from the agenda if your' comments
(Planning) are satisfied as everyone else has signed off. If you
are in fact satisfied, please come to the Engineering Division and
sign off.
The Vinings is ready for final review, and we will ask for sign-
off's at the meeting.
Nautica I & II is nearly ready, and we will also ask for sign-off's
for these plats at the meeting.
WVH/ck
C:1-24-95.TRC
xc: Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
00
rn @ maw ~ /;;,
~ ! :; ~ .
JAil 2
,
'.''''' ~
PLANNING Ai.jr. '~f?_Jl
zorW~G DEpr
1__-
TO:
i:' ~NING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT rrtEMORANDUM
Carrie Parker, City Manager
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Bill Hukill, Development Department
Al Newbold, Building Division
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Lt. Jim Cummings, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp.
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director '~fi.
January 19, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Tuesday, January 24, 1995
Please be advised that the Technical Review Conunittee will meet on
Tuesday, January 24, 1995, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "C" (West
Wing) to discuss the following:
I. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans)
A. Preliminary/Final Plat
NOTE: The Engineering Division has previously distributed the
following three projects to the TRC members. Technical
conunents and questions should be directed to the Engineering
Division.
1.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
2.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
3.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
Citrus Park PUD
File # PLAT 95-001
East side of Lawrence Road, approximately
1,750 feet north of Gateway Boulevard (NW
22nd Avenue)
Vinings PUD
File # PRPL 94-003
East side of SW 8th Street, approximately
1,400 feet north of Woolbright Road
Nautica PUD I & II
File # PRPL 94-004 and PRPL 94-005
Northwest corner of Lawrence Road and the
LWDD L-21 canal
1.
B. Master Plan Modification
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Cedar Ridge PUD (resubmital of project)
File # MPMD 94-009
East side
approximately
Road.
of
900
High Ridge Road,
feet north of Miner
Request for modification to the
previously approved PUD master plan to
allow exclusion of 11 acres from the PUD,
a reduction in the number of units (197
to 148), change in type of multi family
units (garden apartments to townhouses)
and establishing setbacks for same,
phasing of the required improvements and
amended master landscape plan.
Page 2
Technical Review Committee
Tuesday, January 24, 1995
NOTE:
II.
Written comments (on legal sized paper) and plans/documents,
are to be returned to the Planning and Zoning Director by
Friday, January 27, 1995 at 5: 00 p.m. (three working days
following the TRC meeting).
REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
RECEIVED
/'
A. NEW SITE PLAN
1.
PROJECT:
.~
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
-----.----.-------.
'----------- "-----------.
Nautica PUD
File # NWSP 94-009
Northwest corner of Lawrence Road and
LWDD L-2l canal.
Request for site plan approval of the
private recreation area, perimeter
landscaping and entrance walls.
B. MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
1.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
2.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
C. TIME EXTENSION
1.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
~ -----.-.-..-
Christian Come Alive Deliverance &
Conference Center, Inc.
File # MSPM 94-009
3664 Old Dixie Highway
Request for approval to modify the
previously approved site plan to convert
a construction office to a church and
upgrade site improvements.
Outpatient Properties, Inc.
File # MSPM 95-001
Southwest corner of Seacrest Boulevard and
S.W. 23rd Avenue.
Request for approval to modify the
previously approved site plan for the
Ambulatory Surgical and Endoscopy Center
to incorporate the vacant parcel, at the
above-referenced location, to construct
additional parking.
Tara Oaks PUD
File # MPTE 94-003 and CNTE # 94-005
Northeast corner of Knuth Road extended
and Woolbright Road.
A request to grant an 18 month retroactive
extension and indefinite time extension
for PUD master plan approval and
concurrency exemption.
Page 3
Technical Review Committee
Tuesday, January 24, 1995
2.
PROJECT:
Knuth Road PCD
File # MPTE 94-002 and CNTE # 94-004
LOCATION:
Southwest corner of Knuth Road and Boynton
Beach Boulevard
DESCRIPTION:
A request to grant an 18 month retroactive
extension and indefinite time extension
for PCD master plan approval and
concurrency exemption.
3.
PROJECT:
Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Filed # MPTE 94-001 and CNTE # 94-003
LOCATION:
South side of the intersection of Boynton
Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park
Boulevard
DESCRIPTION:
A request to grant an 18 month retroactive
extension and indefinite time extension
for PCD master plan approval and
concurrency exemption.
NOTE:
Written comments (on legal sized paper) and plans/documents,
are to be returned to the Planning and Zoning Director by
Friday, January 27, 1995 at 5:00 p.m. (three working days
following the TRC meeting).
III. OTHER
A. TRC Schedule - Find attached the TRC schedule for the first
half of 1995. Please take note of the text
following the schedule.
NOTE: Please contact the planning and Zoning Department (375-6260)
if back-up plans and/or documents are missing.
cc: MEMO ONLY
City Commission (5)
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Larry Quinn, Public Works
Central File
Applicant
Tambri Heyden, Planning & zoning Director
Mike Haag, Zoning and site Development Administrator
Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner
Gary Lanker, Lanker Engineering
Project File
TRC File (Original)
Bulletin board
a:trcagnd.j24
3