The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS TO: FROM: DA TE: RE: rill ~ & ~ ,D W m"j t POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 97-0052 TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS ~, AUGlJST 21,1997 CLEAR COPY-MA.JOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION-1sT REVIEW PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. I have reviewed the above plans and have no comments/recommendations, 1-\:':"') '-'" r,':" r 0 i' 1 ',' " ' I \ "\ I n'l I ".ILl j I L ~ .-..-,........ ........ ~ "-J ~ll , .'. f'. 'I I , ( ~ , /1, ___--1 ;..,~_........._~ J DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 97-238 IW( I ~ @, :_;'iW: i rn PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Division FROM: Al Newbold, Deputy Director/Building Official /' .k"~>.(- ,- '.>,~).k m (.//" /.v ,,:.. f..._ - "r:_t#'. DATE: September 5, 1997 RE: CLEAR COpy - MA.JOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 1ST REVIEW We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments, Building Division (Michael Haag 561-375-6352) I, To propcrly revicw the rcquested major sitc plan modification the applicant shall identifY with notes and symbols on the drawings al1 existing and proposed new improvemcnts, Engineering Division (Kcn Hal1 561-375-6283 & Sebastian Puda 561-375-6280 No Comments MEH:SJP:KRH/ck xc: Michael Haag Sebastian Puda Ken Hal1 C:\My Docul11cnls\Ckar Copy, Major Sik Plan Mod, I sl.doc RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-395 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: John Wildner, Parks Superinten~ent ) ". ~. "I,. "-. I .J ...t' 7~. ..... t j_ / ~ Clear Copy ,//' /,- j / / RE: , , , ' DATE: August 20, 1997 There are no comments on this project. The project should continue in the normal review process. "-",,~_.,,,--.,,~_........- ....w...... "'.. {,', f-' I in I !. 'i-'''~.'::-'? JW:ad :Irllf,! l' -: 1 ';' ;j " RECREA TION & PARK MEMORANDUM ri-") Co! fil ~ P" ~ ~ \iOO ~ ~ C-1@i _J riD I' ,,: f'f. PI !H l. TO: Tambi Heyden, Planing and Zoning Director !,\-" tt / "l,,) , FROM: Kevin John Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Re: Clear Copy 1 sl Review-Major Site Plan Modification DATE: August 26,1997 The applicant should indieate any existing trees and landseaping that would be affeeted by the project. The landseape plans should indicate if the trees would be preserved in plaee, reloeated on site or removed and replaced with trees of equal value. [Environmental Chapter 7.5 Tree Preservation]. The project should continue in the normal review proeess. kjh PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 97-457 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Jerzy Lewicki Acting Senior Planner DATE: August 28, 1997 SUBJECT: Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review Project: Clear Copy Location: Southeast corner of Boynton Beach Blvd and SW 8th Street Agent: George Davis File No,: MSPM 97-002 The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments, If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, he should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement 1, Prior to Planning and Development Board meeting provide information regarding color code and manufacturer's name of all exterior finishes (wall paint, roof, window frames, etc). 2, Prior to Planning and Development Board meeting provide a color board containing elevations of the building and the sign. xc: Central File J :\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\CLEAR COPY\MSPM\1 st-review-staff comments. doc PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 97-457 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Jerzy Lewicki Acting Senior Planner DATE: August 28, 1997 SUBJECT: Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review Project: Clear Copy Location: Southeast corner of Boynton Beach Blvd and SW 8th Street Agent: George Davis File No.: MSPM 97-002 The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, he should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. 1. Prior to Planning and Development Board meeting provide information regarding color code and manufacturer's name of all exterior finishes (wall paint, roof, window frames, etc). 2. Prior to Planning and Development Board meeting provide a color board containing elevations of the building and the sign. xc: Central File J:\SHRDA TA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\CLEAR COPY\MSPM\ 1 st-review-staff comments.doc ~'88 fG) ~ ,J IT, . ~ \11 rn rn Board of Supervisors C, Stanley Weaver Kermit Dell John L Witworth III Secretary/Manager William G. Winters Assistant Manager Ronald L Crone Anorney Perry & Schone, PA LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~.A..J~,~^,._/,_J..---,'.~...Aj"'-./~"'...A,-~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 September 5, 1997 Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Director, Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach PO Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Subject: Technical Review Committee Agenda Dear Ms. Heyden: The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the following comments regarding the item(s) on the September 9, 1997 meeting agenda: Clear Copy - 660 West Boynton Beach Blvd, - This parcel does not fall within the LWDD Service Area. Should this site be platted, the District would appreciate the opportunity to be involved in that review process. As always, we thank you for being given the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~~ Chief Inspeetor SJW:kjr c: Ronald L. Crone, P.E., P.L.S., Assistant Manager, LWDD Delroy Beacll & !::3uca f-UlurI (561) 498-5363. Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach (561) 737.3835 . Fax (561) 495-9694 PHuJl::C'1' '!'l'!'LE: LJEtiCRIP'l'ION: '1lY PE : XX lJA'l'E REC I D : CLEAk ";OPY, INC. BUI~D NEW BUILDING NEW SITE PLAN 4/27/95 AMOUNT: FILE NL" ; NWSP 95-00J, AND PARKING LOT MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION $750.00 RECEIPT NO.: 0849 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'D: YES NO (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED 4/27/95 ---a.ENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'fER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DATE: DENIED DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DATE SENT: -~/1/ '1~ - RETURN DATE: ...')~ //S""/y"J --- MEMO NUMBER: 9J -- / y' +-M,,~ \LIb cex..(\ ,~,..:;.'t .$ 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED E~&l2. c;S;-ts(, ~11>1'fsQ. MEMO # / DA'I'E / "C" :' ,.~6 )- /, / ~ ~ Ji - ~;-L ~ :;:-S- / ;-::r '--", z --"".-",-" ..,' . 1-" ~ ' " -'/-~' ~ 'IEs ~ -.;b,.)- / ~//.t:: I'JZ;. t 'l'YPE OE' VARIANCE(S) DATE OF MEETING: S/~8/'IJ/" DA'I'E OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMM~NTS: -5 i90/fJ- . (Aesthetic Review APP., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out w/ comment. Utile P.W. Parks Fire Police PLANS L./o ~.<:.'~ ~ DO I) MiMO # / DATE / "C" rrs--/z-,' / s /,~/ C/ c,\>- - ._ ~ /'~// '- / ._ J _ , rO -,_......-' I ~!-.. / - ) rS- ~ ~i~ ~~ C2/ PLANS Planhinn Building Engineer Engineer Forester ~/ ,.2~4\ - DA'rE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: "/r/<j'J' (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) (, /cr/fj,' NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D: MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW. DA1'E SENT: f,//9/9J MEMO #:9\~~ , Utile P.w. Parks Fire Police PLANS v,.- . t:..:') YE,) I//J '!' ... YE~ RETURN DATE: ~tu/r;r I 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL MEMO It / DATE /"R/D" '1;;--,){) 'I /~/ c 9 S -/!J;2 / ' / c.-. AJaJ-'~ /',' / c/ 'IS' -;J~ I I,} / (' CjJ~ ONt? / t., h " / r PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/DII / I <J $-2./ t:. / t /.1t/vJ / G 9;..--;J 0;'- / ,/.2.,1;;) /~_ / ~ /--.. 9' S' -;]83 / b 1J. 9} J- / <:; Planning Building Engineer Engitie'er Forester YE~ )lE5 '}f:I" LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND PLACED AT 'I'HE PROPER'l'Y DATE SENT/SIGNS INS'I'ALLED: 7/1/ SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A: 'I'RACKING. Sf> LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS CC/CRA ') J) >? r'.:.' if oj . rn @ rn 0 Wi m fi DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ' i !'! [ ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-137 f'! "iNING AND , ''lie; flEPT. TO: James Cherof City Attorney MJ/'~Hukill, P.E. /Jfjf#fr of Development '; I ; . 1/ I' i, ~...' jI, '.:. FROM: ,,~ ; " , ' . , ,('; ~, ( !" 1.'>" ',( .' ./ \ ' DATE: April 16, 1996 III Jtj/' RE: CLEAR COPY Attached please find a copy of an April 16, 1996 letter misdirected to us from Roberts. Respond, or don't rcspond, at your pleasure. WVH/ck attachmcnt xc: Carric Parker, City Manager Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director C:CLCOPYI6 R.H.S. CORPORATION 850 West Boynton Beach Blvd. · Suit. 112 · Boynton Beach, FL 33426.(407) 736-1700 illv UJtJW~@n-i r 7 fli" n APR 1 6 1996 " I i April 16, 1996 f1~ f I ;:;: ; ~ " ;: ; :'; ....~ t I, , '~ I f r f '" ' " .._''''..r''...... 0 .,.,,~ ':_~~_ . :". I,.,~: ',,~.:... ._, __~'..~:""..__,.._~, Mr. William Huckill Director of Development City of Boynton Beach Building 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 RE: Clear Copy Project Dear Mr. Huckill: Department RHS Corporation inadvertently forgot to copy you on the additional appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals. You may obtain copies of these appeals from Ms. Tambri Heyden, Ms. Carrie Parker or the City Attorney. Continued development of the Clear Copy Project with pending appeals 1s clearly in violation of Land Development Regulations. Therefore, I request the City continue its legally issued stop order at the Clear Copy Project. SENT VIA FAX (375-6357) AND HAND DELIVERED xc: Reginald Stambaugh, Esquire James Cherof, City Attorney Carrie Parker, City Manager , " PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDID.f NO. 96 -168 TO: Jim Cherof City Attorney FROM: Tambri J. Heyden ~j-J~ Planning and Zoning Director DATE: March 28, 1996 SUBJECT: Proposed ordinance to clarify overhangs and eaves allowed to encroach setbacks I would like to take advantage of this opportunity when revising the code regarding the above, to also include other miscellaneous structures that the Planning and Zoning Department, as well as the Building Division, has encountered. These structures are either not addressed in our code, or are unclear, and need to be included as they are in other jurisdictions' codes. I have read Mr. Huki II's suggest ion to address the house eaves, and al though opt ion 3 will suffice, it would assist us all if we took the following approach: Under City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Part III - Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 4.J. OTHER STRUCTURES, add the new subsections 7 through 27 below _ 7. Arbors and trellises which may extend no more than five (5) feet from the side of the principal building or extend more than two (2) feet from the front or rear of the principal building, provided that there shall be maintained a minimum three (3) foot setback from property line. In addition there shall be a maximum height cf 8 feet. 8. Permanent or retractable awnings, canopies, marquees or covered walkways projecting from a building wall over a required yard setback not more than two and one-half (2~) feet, and having no supports other than provided by the wall or its integral part. 9. Chimneys proj ecting not more than three (3) feet into the required yard setback. 10. Fire escapes or unenclosed staircases, the riser of which shall be at least fifty (50) percent open, provided that the vertical proj ection downward onto a required yard setback shall not project more than five (5) feet into, and shall not exceed ten (10) percent of, the area of the required yard setback. 11. Flagpoles having only one structural ground member. 12. Fountains; provided that non-portable fountains shall not exceed nine (9) feet in height, shall be setback three (3) feet from side and rear property lines and shall occupy no more than 100 square feet. 13. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning units (including compressors and condensers) for single-family or duplex dwellings, provided the exhaust air from such units is directed vertically or away from the adjacent property line. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning units and intake and exhaust fans for non-residential uses shall be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from property line. ,- 2 - 14. Mailboxes. 15. Open terraces, including walkways, unenclosed decks and slabs and natural plant landscaping. 16. Open, uncovered stoops, steps and platforms for the principal building, but not to exceed three (3) feet in height. 17. Recreational equipment (of the type not requiring a permit) in the rear yard setback in residential districts. 18. Sculpture or other similar objects of art, provided they meet the same requirements above for fountains. 19. Signs, subject to the provisions of the sign code. 20. Trees, shrubbery or other objects of natural growth. 21. Wells. 22. Utility, cable and telephone transmission lines and associated structures, such as poles. 23. Basketball goals, provided there is a minimum three (3) feet setback from the rear and side interior property lines and a minimum fifteen (15) feet setback from front and side street property lines. 24. Light poles having only one (1) structural ground member. 25. Barbecue pits not to exceed six (6) feet by six (6) feet and provided they are set back three (3) feet from side and rear property lines. 26. Raised planters, provided they are set back three (3) feet from side and rear property lines and shall have a maximum height of six (6) feet. Lastly, add to existing subsection 3 the underlined words and delete the struck through words: 3. HouGe Eaves, cornices, gutters, facia boards, copinqs, soffits, downspouts, belt courses, window sills, widow and/or door trim. applied finish materials. roof and/or eauipment vents, sillcocks, fire hose connections, meters. liaht fixtures, hardware, shutters, bay windows, and ornamental architectural features shall not overhang or exceed the setback lines for more than two (2) three (3) feet. TJH:dim xc: Bill Hukill Carrie Parker Central File a:Eaves.mem BUILDING DIVISION r-:\ ~ ,- ." o 1-~-.JlL_!L.L.""",L ., i . I ' , In) " :' i '. ...~ I '"' . ,.. U i .,) I " "-. 'W I " ", .J .~,~--' PLA1~im!G A'!O ZONING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 96-091 March 13, 1996 To: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold Deputy Development Director Re: Clear Copy - Revised Site Plan Review The Building Division has reviewed the plans for the above project and have no comment other than our request to provide the Building Division with a copy of the final approved plans to be incorporated with the construction plans. AN:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Development Director C:I WPWIN601 WPDOCSIMISCMHICLRCOPY" WPD I' I .J DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOpr~IENT ENGINEERING DUVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-065 UIJ!_____ PI :" L,c."w,."~,"".',,::; .-' " FROM: Tambri Heyden, Planning &. Zoning Dir:.:ctor i\1,'rt1..lHukiI1, p, E" City' CIl12,inecr Vi i'~ ' '0 February 26, ) 996 , /J~ ,~J-/'- TO: l DATE: RE: CLEAR COpy - SITE PLAN REVIEW Applicant Feldman has submi:ted a s)i~htly modi fled site plan in response to a requcst for compliance ccnification from thi~, offkc, We havc no objections to the suggcsted minor modifications and recommenc that YOll wai v(; formal review as a Bowed under LDR Chapter 4, Section 2C with the following two conditions: I, The submission by the applicant of certification from a Florida registered Architcct or Engineer that the work complies with all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, etc, and will be constructed Ll1 conformance therewith, 2, Submission of a permanent casement or other property transfer document acceptable to thc City Attorncy for thc piece of sJ(lcwalk at the S W propcrty comer containing :~idewa)h pavement. With respect to the Haag comments rcgarding failurc ofthc adjacent property owncr to comply with buffer requircmcnts wherein his (the neighbor's) buffer is a few inches less than the rcquired width, please rcfer to the opinion of the City Attorncy (prescnted orally to the City Commission in public session) that this applicant is not responsible to correct his neighbor's error, and thercfore nced not prov,de the missing narrow strip, Please also recal1 that th~ site plan was approvcd by the City Commission subsequent to tint rcndcri:1g of opinion, but without a buffer condition. We will not allow sitcwork to proceed until our two conditions are met. WYH/ck xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager James Cherof, City Attorney ,/;.] Newbold, Deputy Director <)1' Dcvelopment C:CLCPYREV lJ" ~'AKT~T U~. DEVELUl"~'l' 100 Bas~ Boyn~on Beach Blvd. P. O. Box 310 Boyn~on Beach, Florida 33425-0310 February 26, 1996 ; \ nj r'.c \ f\ll :; II ! I: l, : L I I : i ;' I I Mr. Robert Feldman 1194 SW 27th Place Boynton Beach, Florida 33426 \ \I; ~ ( I: ':, r.:li) ! Re: Clear Copy - Minor Site Changes Dear Mr. Feldman: We have reviewed the proposed minor site modifications dated February 13, 1996, and marked "Proposed Parking, ete", sheet ST -I and have no objection to the new parking arrangement or the relocated driveway. Do not proceed with sitework, however, until you have complied with the fol1owing: 1 . All previous comments, 2. Submit a certification from a Florida Registered Architect or Engineer that al1 work wil1 comply with all rules, regulations, laws, ordinances, etc., and win be similarly constructed, 3. Transfer sufficient right-of-way at the southwest property comer to provide for the sidewalk, still maintaining required back-up distances and ROW buffering. 4. Obtain a ruling from the Dircetor of Planning and Zoning that the proposed site changes are w;:,jvcd from the site plan review proccss as al10wcd in Land Development Regulations Chapter 4, Section 2C, page 4-2 (copy attached), When you are in ful1 compliance with codes, ordinances, rules and regulations you may proceed with permitted site work. Yery truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA #~~Igw:wr William Hukil1, P.E. Director of Development WYH/ck attachment xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager James Cherof, City Attorncy Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Al Newbold, Deputy Director of Development C:CLifh~~e: (407) 315-6280 FAX: 1407) 375-6357 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-044 00 ~ l'l ~ II Wilr~~I.'-'.! , " Ii; . J I; February 6, 1996 PLANNING AND ZONING OEPl TO: Dale Sugerman Human Resources Director FROM: (~ /.," Al Newbold ii'; I;/I'/}:J Deputy Director of Development ( '. \' . / ~ 1- 11.c ( ft RE: PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST ,'\ , { ('J ", I ,:' '/( ~ c '- . I. - . -(I Cl"- Attached is an amended request from Dr. Roberts (see Building Division memo 96-037). He is requesting a list of people who signed the plans during the review process for Clear Copy and eopies of their current DBPR licenses. My examination of the plans reveal that nine people reviewed them. They are: *Phil Sy *Warren DeLoaeh *Mike Jacobson Bill Cavanaugh Bob Eichorst Pete Mazzella Jim Du Vall Gary Lanker Sgt Marlon Harris Structural Plumbing & mechanical (A/C) Electrical Fire Public Works Utilities Engineering Site Poliee Others that Dr. Roberts requested are: *Bill Hukill an..d Tambri Heyden/ ' Only the people with asterisks by their names are Building Division employees and my understanding of FS 468,607 is that eertification is required for code administration and inspection personnel. I'm not certain what type of certification, if any, the other personnel on this list are required to have. One of the main reasons for identifying Building Division personnel is because of Personnel Memorandum 94- 197 (copy attached). There may be other laws governing personnel files that we are not aware of. Please comply with Dr. Roberts' request for information from personnel reeords within the scope of the law. AN:bg Attachments XC: Carrie Parker James Cherof William V, Hukill, P,E. CLEARC02 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORD INFORMATION Reques t submf tted by: ,17;1 if.. {/!}c7c.7S (~sc - 2 l~ i'}'t V'i Z t{, CU, , \ r7\ ) :7C ,/10/ LCL j;:c-r! ;'Y_.i{/ (Narne) (Address) /; (7/C{~/ ,/ Fe :? ~ V ?{. ,/ ';.~(.' I I{C (Phone I) Requested Infonnat1on: ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. MINUTES: Meetfng & Date (Complete Set) Meeting & Date (Excerpt Only) Verbatim Excerpt (Subject to hourly charge Recording Secretary's Wage): OTHER: . ( ( "(- l. / 4'.'- Uf- . f'ccf'{ t: tte (J ( C~';'-.; LuHO rr .rJ r j2kc/1 ElU ?'V 1\ .'vl s> C;( (, /lX- D J ~ J "l L 'j rL,/n \1'7 ~c-- v Ie, -' L( ( <z -ttL, ( ~,r"'I ny (LA o F-~ Lt;,IJ!./Zelt),' 'Dr K NOTICE: 1. You may fnspect the requested records wfthout charge unless the nature or volume requested requires extensive clerical or supervisory assistance in whfch case you will be advised of a special service charge. 2. Plafn paper copfes shall be furnfshed upon payment of 15c if the paper is copied on one side, and 20c if the paper 1s copied on both sfdes. 3. Copies of. microfiche shall be furnished upon payment of 25C per page (copy on one side of the paper only). 4. Certificatfon of documentations shall be charged at $1.00 per document. 5. Used cassette tapes shall be furnfshed at a charge of $1.00 each. :;/ G kG' Date of R quest Party Date Completed By Deparbment Employee " BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-037 February 1, 1996 TO: Dale Sugerman Human Resources Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Director of Development RE: PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST Attached is a request form from Dr. Mark Roberts of 650 W. Boynton Beach Blvd. His request is for personnel information from the files of City employees who signed the building permits for the Clear Copy project, a building being constructed next door to his office. His request is for the State lieense of everyone who signed Clear Copy permits and that is no one sinee only the contractor or his agent signs the permit. However, he did give the names of Bill Hukill, Jim Du Vall, Tambri Heyden, Bill Cavanaugh and Bob Eichorst to our clerk, Beverly Snyder and told her that he needed the information for his attorney's investigation. ~ AIN bold " AN:bg Attachment XC: James Cherofw/attachment William V. Hukill, P.E. w/attachment CLEARC02 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH REQUE~I FOR PUBLIC RECORD INFORMATION quest submi tted by: MIt7UL Ii5t4:--;27; (Name) "SO uJ. r'i?o7f1J/it,v~;d WtJ (Address) /hY/li'JA/ ~',Iff-. ""33<790 ? ~0 ~ IldZJ (Phone ') ~uested Informat1on: ORDINANCE HO. RESOLUTION HO. MINUTES: Meeting & Oate (Complete Set) Meeting & Oate (Excerpt Only) Verbatim Excerpt (Subject to hourly charge Record1ng Secretary's Wage): OTHER: '---" ICE: You may inspect the requested records without charge unless the nature or volume requested requires extensive clerical or supervisory asststance 1n which case you will be adv~sed of a spectal serv1ce charge. ' Plafn paper copfes shall be furnished upon payment of 15C 1f the paper 1s copied on one sfde, and 20C if the paper is copied on both sides. Copfes of mfcroftche shall be furnfshed upon payment of 25c per page (copy on one side of the paper only). Certfficatfon of documentat1ons shall be charged at $1.00 per document. Used cassette tapes shall be furnished at a charge of $1.00 each. fvJ frl'e-,L- bf?c:7&7Z;; of Request ' ftt~~-... By Oeoar~~n.;_~pl~~ee Completed /e.. 'f- .~ ~-VcLe ---- I, if.; , ';C-1 c:<. {/ :I -' L:7. .! "-' -'.~ ~, ~) ,~j~ ~, . ~ PERSONNEL MEMORANDUM 94-197 To: Chief Dettman Bill Hukill, Director of Development ,-:--...... ~ ~ ;Oy~~~t\ <:s Q~ \/ ~ Received ~ .::-:\j c::; :.;:. '~I NOV 1 7 12S4 ' I CI 0-': 0... ClTY lNGIN(:&" ~ ~o ~"o Iv 8EAC'f\. I . IV November 17, 1994 The Florida League recently amended the Public Records Law to exempt the home address and phone number of Code Inspectors and Code Enforcement Officers. The City Attorney's office advised the intent of the bill was to cover individuals issuing citations in the field. Based on this information any employee holding the following job classification titles will be covered by this exemption: I. Director of Development 2. Deputy Building Official 3. Building Compliance Administrator 4. Code Enforcement Administration 5, Building Inspector I and II 6. Plumbing and Mechanical Inspector I and II 7. Electrical Inspector I and II 8. Plan Check Inspector 9, Landscape Environmental Inspector 10, Engineering Aide I 11. Engineering Inspector I and II 12. Code and License Inspector I and II 13. Code and Rehabilitation Inspector Please advise your staff not to issue home addresses or phone number of any employees with a position title listed above, (]JQ William H Sullivan Personnel Director cc: City Manager City Attorney ~ \., : -- ,'C>=- . t'-~ ~ e ' · s~~ --I ~ ~A \J~~<C. } ~ ;" --~ "- '( ~ ( - ( , , "'''-~ ,oj / _I " ". , (' \ I. '- c' S. ~ ~ . ~:~ :> ,.; ~'. ~ 1.. '.,L do jI e. '_ 'H (so ~ -:r; ~ ,IJ - -- ~ ~ ~ -..-.j -=:i- a..- "' - \.).--J '- ~~ \:::, ~ ...\ ~ <3 ~ ~ ~ '(--; ~ ~j \01 t';. ~ '~ ~ '}J h: ~ -., S::' \I~ ~ ~ -< - "- ~" < l..J ~ ' :J ~ ~ ~ :>... ;' '-t \~ ~ ~' -J.1 t '? ;: m ~ . ~ .f\ ~ 'JJ :: ~ ~ i ~ r- \~ ~ -l.~ r r- ~ ~ (5 tr.- ~.:-.. ~ ~ .~ ~ ",-, >-- ~ a ~ ~ r-~ ~\fJ 'A, ~ " ,,'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'J' ........ c. l' ~~'__ \j '.,. '""'f;<r: . "" ~~ -- ~ "" ,..., ...; '- :t \-:. ,(S" ~ r:.J ':" ~ ~ ~ '-l '(J ,.u ~ {) :~~ <;l.' .......... 'C. t:) ')1 c," ' .. '<J ~ 'j.l ..... " \~ ,: I --.....;, ~ ~ V1J _ .:::::; ,~l/) "" .w ~ ~ ~ \-P ~ ~:~ ~ "Z ~ \J (. .~ '\; -- '- c..- T"L. ~ .J. :3 '4 , ~~ ~~ J ~ ::z~ <3 -$D :J 'I' ~\S 1-:2 ~< ~K. ~ I I ~- -.... "~ , " .. ' ~, '. "'-- < , ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f t .<., "<)- I ..~._~---""'., .~- ..q.,. ---<1'.1 .A.. ....- 1ffi: 1\ \ i ITTIIITll !\ I i 1 I .' j.. .--. I ~ D~ \1.j tt.'-3 '~ <': a' ~""~' ' 'l . '::~~', . ~~ ~ I I \ I \ \ I I %\ :EI ~\ \ ~\ , tmnTI1TI1]] r ~ (] j, I, I, f\i ....' ~ i"'-..-_) ell III '7 Ii 1 TRANSMITTAL OF PLANS TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT PROJECT ~AME: .ltLllv' &tt'~! " .' i, - ( . I, /) I! Type of Application: . j lil'v' ;Z.lV l6.,.tl/ planning and Zoning , I I' () (/" I~ ,,('j It" ,/,,--j}" ;;,(11..': :?r - i-No / Departmen t File No.: IJ W .Jr :) 'l~ --;-/ staff Report/comments/P & D Agenda (-::~) If Pages (+,comments Not previously submitted) control plans: ___In File '11 In Tube ~sheets Color Elevation Drawings: ___N/A ~In File Board of Adjustment Approval: Meeting Minutes planning and Development - Board APproval: 1- II-lf::. City commission APproval: ~/?/1~- Resolution No. : ordinance No. /CI7Y!1.f- Meeting Minutes Meeting Minutes .:Trns.lIttl.Blg PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-613 FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official Michael E. Haa~~~:<Y Zoning and Site D~m7nt Administrator Tambri J. Heyden ~~ Planning and Zoning Director TO: THRU: DATE: October 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Development Orders CLEAR COPY, INC. Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding development plans that have received final determination. 1. Project Name: Clear Copy, Inc. Type of Application: Planning and Zoning Department File No.: Comments: Control Plans: New Site Plan NWSP 95-004 3 sheets, not previously distributed 8 sheets MEH:TJH:arw Attachments .:Tr.BttPl.CLIt DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-333 n ) .mL.~.__U,,, Wl_~~ . 'I'," ,J ' I :: " I I 1 1 I ! ":) qi I 1. I i ~. .-~-"-~,.-~"..~.._...~,,,.._.-....--......__.....~.,..,) i't ft.; \_, !i'!G 1~.r'.iD lr" '.i,;(iL'I~ " "k:' TO: Carrie A. Parker, City Manager ~am Hukill, P.E., City Engineer August 31, 1995 FROM: DATE: RE: CLEAR COpy - ROBERTS' COMMENTS In the July 20, 1995 Roberts' letter to you, Item 4, implies to you that LDR Chapter 23, Article II, Section H3, page 23-8 requires 180 feet from the R-O-W line of Boynton Beach Boulevard to a driveway. That is an incorrect interpretation. What it actually says is "at least 30 feet from the intersection of the right-of-way lines along local streets and 180 feet along streets of a higher classification." N.W. 7th Street is a local street, not a street of higher classification. He also cited Engineering Division Memo 95-156 dated May 18, 1995 from Mr. Hall to Ms. Heyden which did, in fact, incorrectly interpret that portion of the code. However, that was corrected within a few days with the following notation on the memo: "waived, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1 access 30' to local streets. WVH. " That section reads "points of access to lots developed within a subdivision shall be located a minimum of thirty feet from intersecting right of way lines on local streets..." The Roberts' comment in Note 5 simply says a variance may be required for a light pole. If he is correct, the applicant will have to receive a variance to proceed. Either way, approval of the site plan can be conditioned on a possible variance. with respect to Note 2, the sidewalk issue raised can become a condition, and/or a variance if it is as Roberts states. WVH:ck xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director C:CLRCOPY,COM :4 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM # 95-410 TO: Jim Cherof City Attorney Tambri J. Heyden ~~ Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: August 8, 1995 SUBJECT: CLEAR COpy - NWSP # 95-004 Effect of Substandard Perimeter Landscape Strip on Adjacent Property Upon the Commission's July 18th, 1995 denial of the above- referenced site plan, the applicant's request for reconsideration and the City Manager's receipt of the attached letter from the adjacent property owner, Dr. Roberts, the City Manager has asked that I respond in writing to each of the points in Dr. Roberts' letter. With respect to Item 1 of Dr. Roberts' letter, I have obtained from Al Newbold (see attached BUilding Division Memo # 95-267) information regarding the circumstances behind the City having finaled an inspection for a landscape strip that is Ii feet wide, rather than the required 21 feet wide, on Dr. Roberts' property and adjacent to the Clear Copy site. I believe that although the tie- in survey showed that the pavement was too close to the property line to provide the reqUired 21 feet wide landscape strip, it was probably not thought to be of any consequence by the pavement inspector, since the same person that does landscape inspections does not check tie-in surveys. So, I don't believe the City caught the error and only now has it been brought to light (although it was Dr. Roberts himself that brought it to my attention). It, therefore, seems that the City cannot now expect Dr. Roberts to remedy the error. However, must Clear Copy make up the difference in width on the Clear Copy property? Page 7.5-16 of the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.E.2 - attached) says that an applicant does not have to comply with Section 5.E. (the requirement to install a 4-6 foot tall hedge in a 21 foot wide strip along a common lot line), if a hedge that meets Section 5. E. exists on the adj acent property. Since the City is "accepting" Dr. Roberts' hedge as meeting Code, it would seem that the City should not have Clear Copy make up the difference in width. As I will be on vacation the last two weeks of August, I only have until .AUgust 17th to provide to Carl~1e a response on all Or. Roberts' issues. Therefore, please call me as soon as pOSSible to discuss this. TJH:arw Attachment Cllle.o41D.t.jh DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-272 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director I I~~t~~~g~~~~~l' P.E. / i\ ; Au gu s t 2, 1 9 9 5 'I ill m j@; ffi ; ,:rn ill! I PLANNING AND ?9111NG OFPr FROM: L. DATE: RE: ROBERT'S MEDICAL BUILDING - LANDSCAPE BUFFER Mr. Newbold has completed the investigation you requested (Planning Memo 95-383) and the results are summarized in his attached Memo 95- 267 to me. It is self explanatory. WVH/ck C:ROBERTS xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Al Newbold, Deputy Bldg. Official Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-267 July 31, 1995 TO: William V. Hukill, P.E. Department of Development Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: DR. ROBERTS'S MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING - LANDSCAPING DISCREPANCY In order to assist you in your response to Tambri Heyden's memorandum 95-383, I researched the files and offer the following facts and comments: The Technical Review Board (TRB) plans were signed off by Don Jaeger during his tenure as the department's representative. The building plans were reviewed by Michael Haag and ultimately signed off by Warren DeLoach in Mr. Haag's absence in 1989. My review shows the building plans match the TRB plans and those that were reviewed by the Community Appearance Board. All plans show a 2~' setback for the extreme western section of the property adjacent to the parking lot. During this era, Mr. Jaeger then became Building Official and Mr. Haag was appointed in charge of site review which was handled by this department during that time. Site plan approval permit 88- 0873 was generated to track the site plan process for all site improvements and administered by the Site Development Division of the Building Department under Mr. Haag's supervision. The project has been completed and all paperwork is on microfilm. Therefore, all original documents are no longer available. Attached are copies of the site plan and the tie-in survey along with a print-out of the inspection history. From my observation of the tie-in survey, the paving appears to be 1.58' from the west property line and not 2~' as shown on the building plans. I would assume that the survey is correct in that it has a certification date showing August 23, 1989 and I found that the paving was approved August 18, 1989 by Roger Kuver, former Engineering Inspector who is now with the Utilities Department. From that same survey, it appears that the building is in the correct location and it would be fair to assume that the only problem is with the size of the paved area. I found no documentation in the file giving any explanation, etc. as to any resolution from the narrow landscape strip or whether it ever became an issue. Building Division Memo 95-267 to William V. Hukill, P.E. RE: Dr. Roberts' Medical Office Building J'uly 31, 1995 Page Two Our records do show that the CAB inspection was made by Med Kopczynski who was the former Deputy Building Official and appointed to handle CAB inspections by Mr. Jaeger when he became Building Official. That inspection was approved August 25, 1989. I can only assume that the proper position to take would have been to cut off the additional paving to comply with the 3D" landscape strip. It could have been assumed that it was not necessary since we did then, and do now, allow bumper stops to set back on paved areas less than the code requires so that the bumpers overhang the landscape strip. I see no reason why this would be an issue, especially as it relates to the adjacent property since our code also exempts landscaping on property that already has existing landscaping. My interpretation of the code is that the landscaping strip itself has a dimension requirement and the code specifies what must be located within that strip but not necessarily that the plantings must be as wide as the strip. It should be our position that the neighboring property owner should not be penalized for the paving on Dr. Roberts' property being closer to his property line than what was permitted. If any controversy arose during the construction of Dr. Roberts' permits, Mr. Haag could shed some light on it since he was involved in the site plan process and the final site approval was signed by him on November 19, 1991. AN: bh Attachments li:OBBRTS PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-383 TO: Wil11am Hukill Department of Development Director FROM: Tambri J. HeYden'~~J Planning and zoni~g Director DATE: July 27, 1995 SUBJECT: Dr. Roberts' Medical Office Building Discrepancy Regarding Width of Western Landscape Strip I would like to respectfully request research be conducted of whatever Building Division files are necessary to determine whether the permitted set of construction drawings for the above-referenced building, located on the south side of W. Boynton Beach Boulevard, reflect a 2} foot wide landscape strip along the western property line. Research is also needed to determine whether the inspection noted construction of a landscape strip that was less than 2} feet wide and, if so, whether there is any documentation indicating how the matter was resolved. As you know, this issue, among others, will be discussed by the Commission when they reconsider their denial of the Clear Copy site plan. In order for me to forward the results of your department's research to the City Attorney for his opinion, which will be included within my response to the Commission of all the issues that have been raised, I respectfully request notification to me of the results of this research by August 7, 1995. TJH:arw xc: Michael E. Haag c:95-J8J,tjh s ~J~~~ OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER TO: Tambri Heyden Planning Director ~ '.4- """'1":-', ~fn) rn @ ffi n w' :! ~~[~ .,-,---- ---' , J : J -_.__.....-'~. PLMH':,: jiJ _...--1QW,:~0"QUl_.:; - i : ~ i i : ; ; Ii i i') J FROM: Carrie Parker City Manager (~f) July 25, 1995 \ \, DATE: SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. - Site Plan Application This item is rescheduled tor September 5th, Please prepare review and comments on Dr. Robert's letter ot July 20th. CP:jc Attachment cc: Jim Cherat 2nd C....1 FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-281 woe TO: Planning Department ~. ~ ~6D W, ~ m ~.. .:~t 'MM~Wgfp~D FROM: Fire Department DATE: June 23, 1995 RE: NWSP 95-004 Clear Copy Inc. 660 W Boynton Beach Blvd We have no objections at this time. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-235 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning 9irector '! A ~ './-.1 a ~,:.--; Michael E. Haa0t "-.' Site and Zoning D~~opment Administrator May 3D, 1995 - FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Site Plan Project: Location: Applicant: File No.: Review - 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc. 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Boulevard The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced proj ect. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Place on the plans a typical maximum spacing dimension of forty (40) feet on center for the required trees along N.W. 7 Street, N.W. 1st Avenue and the southwest corner of the vehicle use area that is visible from Boynton Beach Boulevard (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0.1.). 2. Please show and identify on the plans all curbing and wheelstops at landscaping areas. Areas to be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheel stops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adjacent to a parking stall and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with City standards [Chapter 23, Article II, E] 3. Add to the landscape notes that one half of the total number of required trees and hedges shall be a native landscape material. [Comprehensive Plan policy 4.4.6] 4. Provide a note and symbol identifying the type of landscaping material that is required to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. [Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J.] 5. Add to the dumpster enclosure gates and note on the plans that a clear opening on ten (10'011) feet excluding all gate hardware is being provided. Also specify on the plans the exterior finish material and color of the enclosure walls and gate. Page 2 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc NWSP 95-004 Memorandum No. 95-235 6. Show and dimension on the plans a loading zone in compliance with Section 11. J. of Chapter 2 Zoning. 7. Add to the landscaping/site plan all eXisting and proposed easements, including the location of overhead utility lines. Identify the type of easement and dimension the width. Note: Some landscape material is not allowed to be planted with an easement and under overhead lines. [Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1] 8. Show and dimension on the plans the landscape code and zoning code line-of-sight triangles that are required on both sides of each ingress/egress and at the intersection of rights-of-way (N.W. 1st Avenue and N.W. 7th Street _ N. W. 7th Street and Boynton Beach Boulevard). Also, provide a typical note on the plan that indicates the size of the clear unobstructed cross visibility space that is required within the triangular areas. Amend the plans accordingly. [Chapter 2, Section 4. E. and Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5. H. 1, and 2.] 9. Submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan by name, manufacturer and model or style number. A color sample shall be submitted as an example. The sample shall match the color or product identified on the plans. [Chapter 9, Community Design Plan Section 5] Note: The sample will be used for the final site inspection to ensure that the correct product and color were used for the project. 10. Add to the submittal specifications showing style, colors, scale of lettering of all signage proposed for the building and site. The signage shall be shown in compliance with the specifications listed in the Sign Code and Community Design Plan. 11. The project is located within the C-2 neighborhood commercial district. The use of print shops is permitted provided an environmental review permit is secured in accordance with standards and procedures set forth in Chapter 2 Section 11.3. 12. You have indicated that you would like to use the existing hedge located on the adjacent property to the east for satisfying the vehicle use area screening required for your property. This is acceptable, however, the material is required to be field verified by the City's landscape inspector during construction of the project. If the existing material meets the minimum requirements it will be accepted, but if it does not meet minimum standards, you will have to provide the hedge material on your property. To request to use the eXisting hedge to satisfy your required screening place the following note on the landscape plan: The City landscape inspector will field verify the existing hedge that is identified in the landscape legend with an asterisk, meets the minimum vehicle use area screening requirements. If the existing material does not meet the minimum standards, the plans and site will be revised to show the proper vehicle use area screening in compliance with City standards. Page 3 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc NWSP 95-004 Memorandum No. 95-235 13. Specify on the plan no less than 18" as the height after planting for the proposed hedge material. II RECOMMENDATIONS 14. It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be specified on the plans. 15. It is recommended that you provide a recycling container in compliance with the regulations specified by the Public Works Department. MEH:dim a:latcommem.Cle.r/T~C TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-235 Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning 9irector ---tel ,"'1..1.. t 1 Michael E. Haag ,'<' - l Site and Zoning D ~opment Administrator May 30, 1995 Site Plan Project: Location: Applicant: File No.: Review - 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc. 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Boulevard The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced proj ect. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. '1 l_':, ),1,1 11'/ '! I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: I I ) 1. ('1 to ,- .' I. " Co:. . 2. , , IN "v..- - 3. '/'.J Lt. 4. ";)0' ,..H 1l"11' \L- 5 . " ".. /', , ~' , 'J Place on the plans a typical maximum spacing dimension of forty (40) feet on center for the required trees along N.W. 7 Street, N.W. 1st Avenue and the southwest corner of the vehicle use area that is visible from Boynton Beach Boulevard (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.1.). Please show and identify on the plans all curbing and wheelstops at landscaping areas. Areas to be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheel stops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adjacent to a parking stall and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with City standards [Chapter 23, Article II, E] Add to the landscape notes that one half of the total number of required trees and hedges shall be a native landscape material. [Comprehensive Plan policy 4.4.6) Provide a note and symbol identifying the type of landscaping material that is required to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. [Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J.) Add to the dumpster enclosure gates and note on the plans that a clear opening on ten (10'011) feet excluding all gate hardware is being provided. Also specify on the plans the exterior finish material and color of the enclosure walls and gate. Page 2 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc NWSP 95-004 Memorandum No. 95-235 I.'; OIL ,f';4 6,'.J I -' ~:'. ~ ( i" il " r~. L Ii' 7. (.n <>'~/ .") ( (, "'l~!0 ? '~i~V . (, Y. , ~ \ j t tlfr,;; r..J..- i 'I .II j" f , /. t;. :..-. - 9. ,,1./ 1;) '( :r; 10. . :...," ~ i ~ ,I.' ( ,.~ ,~. '" !'I_.",l".:"r o. {~,o!'""" . {l ~.tt' "' 1 Ia. /J r' 11. ~. (, o{.. . 1 2 . Show and dimension on the plans a loading zone compliance with Section 11. J. of Chapter 2 Zoning. in Add to the landscaping/site plan all exi~tin9L_~n4 proposed easements r:.... illClu~:lin~I. J!!~~~J~cat;i.on of oyerhead, ,utq,.i ty I l!ines, j Identify the type" of easement an"d dimension the"width . Note: Some landscape material is not allowed to be planted with an easement and under overhead lines. [Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1] 8 . Show and dimension on the plans the landscape code and zoning code line-of-sight triangles that are required on both sides of each ingress/egress and at the intersection of rights-of-way (N.W. 1st Avenue and N.W. 7th street _ N. W. 7th Street and Boynton Beach Boulevard). Also, provide a typical note on the plan that indicates the size of the clear unobstructed cross visibility space that is required within the triangular areas. Amend the plans accordingly. [Chapter 2, Section 4. E. and Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5. H. 1. and 2.] Submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan by name, manufacturer and model or sty.le number. A color sample shall be submitted as an example. The rsample shall match the color or product identified on the iplans. [Chapter 9, Community Design Plan Section 5] Note: The sample will be used for the final site inspection to ensure that the correct product and color were used for the project. ,I Add to the submittal specifications showing style, colors, scale of lettering of all signage proposed for the building and site. The s ignage shall be shown in compliance with the specifications listed in the Sign Code and Community Design Plan. The project is located within the C-2 neighborhood commercial district. The use of print shops is permitted provided an environmental review permit is secured in accordance with standards and procedures set forth in Chapter 2 Section 11.3. You have indicated that you would like to use the eXisting hedge located on the adjacent property to the east for satisfying the vehicle use area screening required for your property. This is acceptable, however, the material is required to be field verified by the Ci ty I S landscape inspector durinQ construction of the project. If the existing material meets the minimum requirements it Will be accepted, but if it does not meet minimum standards, you will have to provide the hedge material on your property. To request to use the eXisting hedge to satisfy your required screening place the following note on the landscape plan: The City landscape inspector will field verify the existing hedge that is identified in the landscape legend with an asterisk, meets the minimum vehicle use area screening requirements. If the existing material does not meet the minimum standards, the plans and site will be revised to show the proper vehicle use area screening in compliance with City standards. (,ljiJ ~'b( . . I, Page 3 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc NWSP 95-004 Memorandum No. 95-235 (Il- 13. Specify on the plan no less than 18" as the height after planting for the proposed hedge material. , ..-...- 14. Submit for review the traffic data required to determine whether the proposed project meets the traffic concur- rency standards. The traffic data is required and must be reviewed by Palm Beach County prior to site approval. II RECOMMENDATIONS '" (' ~ 14~ It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be specified on the plans. o c-' 15. It is recommended that you provide a recycling container in compliance with the regulations specified by the Public Works Department. MEH:dim .:16tcommo..Cle.r/T~C PI.MINIHG }\ND ZONING DEPARTHENT HEHi)R;~nmml no. 9 S -- 2 3 S TO: Ta;;;)lJ J, H~i'd'.?:n F J.. c'~ I,] I ::. 11 ~I 3. ;1:1 7,> n III <J L i 1>, , :.. ):'" fP.._,:,; ,.1 L ,~'t ': j 7:' E::I::'J i -: ~# ':~..J ;.,1 =. L .J. 1 i ~j ;1-- J i) .t'" .. ::. ,[. ;\ -j l"1 iLl;' i ~:', t L ":'l t t~, 1.- [;_..'T C ~ fLy 2~_ 1 _":; ..-: SlJS\] "SCr:'I: s~, t:- P: ':lll P ..: 'J J t~ C t : L c , ~l t J ~,L ; 1~'L)'::JJ..IC~;lt : i.:' i 1 (; N c , ; r,'o: ;j,:';\,; - 'I::"t ?eJi::\1 l_. J ::' :.l ;_~ l:. (J 1:) ~T < I ;"l to: . to. (n ~~~. 3 ~~.. j~ _'l " t.= i 1 t', i-~: 0 - i) L ~::J Fe 1 elm )11, CVh,d, l.J~.J~~F '~:,-- l(;l~ B ' u 1 ';~'j, d'd :'::_.':'.:_:::::'=':':..=::"':':: =.:.:.::.:..-:.=...::=:.:::=..=:..:: -=:=:==.::.:.=.--==--=-=::..:;.:::.=:==::.::.-=::.:..:.:..::~::::.=.:=..=..::..:=====---==~.::=::.:.:.==.:::.:==--=:.=.::.:~=.::::--- - _. -~. .----.-- Th", t"ll::,i-iinq L; d 1i.::::,'::: ',. 1st 1:.f:.J:'~;:'~~:;U1D',t:l,L~ re<;:fan~Lng tIlt:, ,;ite l-L,\i; l"::'J~,<.;;'; ::. tl'le p~:,L,:, 1:;:,1: tljt:~ 3bo'\J~-l':;f,=r::oJjc'?d prc:.J'?ct:. It ,l.,:o;.;1-: L'O-' L",t.:d tL,)~ tlJt:',:,Ld,\'~llLC, 3Ttc divided ':'l,t,j t\'.jo (2) ,.,:.: ,k,~ll::C TlJ:.: fir.:,t '::dt'3q':Jl-iL, d llst ",r ,.':,lliIH::i'it:::, tLo.'t id,:ntify j,~fi.ci,,::.~__l:.i.;=<: t.ll..j,t. 3.j.:~ l-t:::l~lil.-~\.J t(! ;).: c_)r-r:~'Fti:.~l .:l1.d ~'-.liC\,,'JTl ifl -:""-.l'L.l.l.l.':':,.L-..,...: ell t11L:: i~:l(_i.liS dL..:j ,:.l.- d;:-;:.llni=-'llt.~._:. ;:_lJJr.~itt..:~,J fDr ~:.;:.:c()n~.l (2nc1) ;e\'lt;~'1 L;'; c,l:ciel' fo,' ',:11", Pl:(,j,:ct :::"~ lltilH11-': thr,)ugh the ;;,.Lt.,,:, rlaii ,-,,'vT [.'1 ',_~,', T;',:, e,t:',:JL,:i ,..:t ,:,f :'~i:'mn'::Lti:" i lL"t;, l'>::-C,:J1l1rdl:::ncLlti,:,n" ,,' tl,' :;L~n;liil;. dLe' ::;,:lllL'J [C::f,:,rt-;ll,IH:t.,ff t,:,li::',:e '\I'LLLi ::nJ.::dl,::C' T.L,~ 1".' ,.~~.:~ cl.~:,/t."l\J.::~-li:.~ t. r.:L_: l"L-llc.3flt" ~"il,.J.ll l-lil=lt~:r,-;t~il:,~-: 1.-1'l,,'J!- ~il1 ~.'~),~UrLt:::l"J.'i~.S c-,ilJ l)l3.rL~> ~~-u.1JL~it:::r~.:.cl Ie.i- ::.:,ltf~ l)l,:tLI. ~:1r~ -=-:.'_l.t;j,_,..=~ t<; c, ' " I r 1 ,:,11" 1 ~: ,:J.lL i, ;;:' :. t;:, , : 1 ':': C ':' J:lTi 'e.' L ':~L. L 'J t L:,:; p ~_' 1 :i ,,: ;::,;-, to' c\ CJ "'~ 1 j '~ ,:,1 j t:-,~ t .\," 1._-~. ;,~1Ll-J.'il-Jg C..:.l12.::tj.<)i:;:: l~;~l J.t=.:J t._, tbl^= ~-=)nln1~::~:ltS. If tl'it: ..:!r:i::lj.=~ailt. J...LC:;lt~1'diL0 to ,:.,)rrE('r, '~:'':'Jd", ch:fl,_l":,L'::.L~:.., th<.' ,:L:;ulc1 ,:,lilt:i,:,t iLl: ~.-;~,.j(:~~.c"l::i..r10 tl'l=' 1)r(o(~ed1.lr:-.:.~:, '':'1.1~r~,li.:'~:lti,='ji f:)l-ri~;:-', f~:",::,~=:, .:li'icl ;:>i.~L<djtt.(:Al :';clcJ'j,"i.c j,c,t:::,s f,_L' ,::'-,'.:l:,Lii<;J L':::lj':':I rrC'(,i th,,: .';,:;de l.'.:CJ;,!i.c'':'il,'?lji, J , ;':::7;:: FL~,l'l RE\TI2H C:'iE1ENT.3; [....(._..,~ IV.-..... , tf- ri>-lJi_'."'- ~-~I....~, '/ ....,. '( 1 c' :,,: <:: 1"... '-',......i,': ~ i-cl'=ll t if 1 c,n tl'H~ p:.:. dlL, /' t-M>=- l';l.~::l't.tlr.l f '~ 'f~c:, I 'l.Jelc:;,nc:; ,~. i:.:.(;Llc.:.J t'l~ees in th~ pl::rimet0r-' L:u,,:h;cape :> / , ,.~ / ': I",' ,".' ,J~-/7t; :~~.i k~::: 1iC~ ' ; ~'lC~II~::~ :")i~Lii~ l~j",~ql~,i/ ~'~;i ~;n:~1c,:;~j i,,~'~::,~~; ~,);, i ~ ~~'.~~~l /-!"l'~ ...., J"-:l-~ ~!.,:.~ :.' ~= ;.J':i.rJt.c~ I .~,. J.~l-tj_~~.ll=': II ~di'lC~;:: (".::.!IJ'=- (~oc~t:..' D. J . f' f"//~- ,.', ----~ ~,- ,...~ ,..,:....c. ... ?It:a,c~e pl.~cL:, ,ll:C ij,~ntifj)n the pl:ln;:; ."1,11 ,~urbil1'0 Clllel i~L<,( L:,t':'i:'~ :',t L1ncL:'~ilIpi1'10 ,:ll.2d~-" )\1.-":::1:: t/J be ;ljr:,tect,~c1 ~~; ;,:,:,j,~,::,cl C':illClilU':JllS clilbin'J ",I hll?el ~:,t,:,p~~, ill,lude all 1 ,jLC,;:, '_' :'L)~ d 1. :e, 1:,;'..:1::, l':L: ds ,:::ll::d10 delj,:~ C:t::'); t t ':' d pa j' k j, n 9 .; ccd 1 ,iLd 1 aLc~::, eli) i ng adj (II:: e.1 t t ,j C lll"! i 1 i ne a r elr i 'l ";;\'1'3. j S \dl'~l'.:: ':-1.,:,l'(l::;":11Li,,,,nt 1': liJ:.::dy l':1 <:leCLll', ':::nl'b d~,sj,~jjj sh:ill ':clr';I,l~'d~_tlJ ,:::j,t~, ,;tanc,::n'd.:. (Clufter 7,~, )',L'ticll~ II :'".JLCL,.l.31it: C':)J;:: S.:'ct:i_,:,r. 5) pCJTti:::ul.:u le',Iui1'emi=nt;:,. )\dd t:, :11.::: lands,::aj?e ncte3 tl13.t all required landscaping ':'ilall t.: :::ifty (~'i~:':,J n3.tiv,? il1ateri.:tl,. .1. PI'DV1,dE a note and a symbol identifying the type of 1 ailG,;,:=:.piljJ 'line used for a::.'cen t :::hrubs along the ;=:. cre~n \'lall{ F,-"L T"'1'-~ J><./,;./J ";.re;./2) r:: ..J . Provide a nCJt,;:: on the ::Jp0Ll.L0 ,)11 ten (10'0") tlL~ dumps tel' enclcJsure. plans that id'3ntifies a clear feet excluding all hardware for Add to the landscaping/site Pi:,)i.)os,:=:,d 82\Sem.:'!nt:::. IdEntify ,:1 il'iit:ll,: i,:;n t h:"" \1 i dt L , plan ilIll existinq and the type of easement and ..., ! , Prc'jids cl:1d t1.' ia;lgL<5.~l ~ 1 . , .;-" " . -', 11.- \... .1. i= .:.1 ....:'l1J.1_: E . ! (,J1'1'l." 7'];t J ' ~:"I f, ~ ; -E..~ ;"1/.. f.'~)t..'7"M!t--.I.'; c..~Lr.::AI! L~"~I( l-; ide n t i f y ') nth e p ]/3.11 "'; -: L '-': '0"''''',,' "tl: FCI,/j"'-i'" tl'.-.L'';:~I~_., 1: ~', " i <.',,:: :, 1'1 ',' "~ -, - ~ . ~ i", ,? i~ j /; I, lC( I : , line of SIght ( 3 ' c~ rl - G' 0 'I) //_.... ^ AU~ ~.~~ Pi r:/l (,-~ ...... " II > (;,' .. :",,/71f , , ( .. F 3.0::' ::2 1st Reveiw Clear Copy, 1ne IF'l S P ~;:' - (: 04 l'IE: rill) r aild!li1l No. 95 - 2 3 ':: C' ,! r ./ " _ I' f'; ::; . -~)t:.tbnt-=,t;,~"'€t+Icl J eel, t i fy ,::rl '"" a ell ]);J i 1 din 9 arclu tee t~ e 1 ev a t ion Cir :li^iiIl0 t Let Yv'::> o,f..-~:.::lLj:;~:.t~rL}.r,-f l..~,hbh, matel.:ial.and ~,E€t-te tl1,=, ,~,:!l:)r e,f thei matt':Ti il by ilali', 0:0 , i,icllFlfe,ctllJ.'c:01' aDd iH(ld,::.l (>1' ;C'L.:,'l,,,, 1,uJ\ber. A (:,:,1':1 s,:ilrlple shall be ::.ubmi ttec1 as an 2xample alc!ng I'li th the colcr or prcduct identified (Jll tlle plJ.l1::.. (Cbapter 9, Community Design Plan Section S ) Hote: The sample will be used for the final site inspecziontc en~ure that the correct product and color were used for the project. ( 9, ::.ubmi t all colored. elevati0n c1raVl:i~lgs Planning and Zoning Department by t~e deadline d,3.~9. I;r,' /') {Ii.', ,\ ':(;'(""'1/::1 !.;/~t1''''1 e,:,.,,,, "1,;' $B.emlt - with "t-iTe --&-i~j .:: /. b i ;n,.1 s pee i f l cat i C 11 S s 11 0\'1 i n g ~" ,: y 1 e / (; (l L, l' S , sea 1 e 0 fIe t t e l' i n 9 co 11 S is ten t 1i>J i t h the ~.:r"'"",-~d l.:uilclii-lgj?:._<(.",<,.:::,.,,; ~ I'Ll, (b',,""'" Il - Ie (,y ~,r.1~!.,>i and :::amples to the-- Site Pl~l approval', ) 10. T/ (', jn 11, Identify (,;1 tlh:~ DlaEs the i'-ro,,~ :..~;.:d lCication of all signs Pl')f>' " /0., ,and if :~;il:ll:::iJ.:;l,: the l'E,'qUil'2.::1 .::etbacJ:::,. , , Jf '1 J, .: ~') "-/' '12, The project is located \i>litl1in the ('-2 neighborh,)od cCJmL\ercial district and the l\Ee of pl'int .;lwps is p~nnitted pn,i'lided an enviL'onmental 1'2viel" penrlit iE, secured in accordance wit]l standards and procedures set forth in 3ection 11.3. :1 RECOIHJENDAT10NS .1':" 11(;ne at this time. HEH:dim ~ .J. .:.:..~_,~!~ l.':~, Cl to' "1TI '7p:. ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-156 <AMENDED) DATE: May 18. 1995 TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 e SUB.JECT: CLEAR COpy INC., FIRST REVIEW I. The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review: ^ I 1. The driveway is too c10sc to the right of way line ofB,B, Blvd, (OW' is required). Chap.23, Art,2H3, An application t{)r a variance will be requircd. 2. The plan is subject to mceting the parking lot rcgulations at time of pcrmitting for paving, drainage, sitc lighting, curbing, landscaping, and irrigation, 3. Provide a satisfactory drainagc dcsign including calculations indicating that the stormwater shall be retained on-site for the first hour of a threc year storm. Also, catch basins shall bc located in grassy arcas unless othcrwise approved by the Dircctor of Dcvelopmcnt Chap.23,Art. II F. RECOMMENDA TIONS I. Ifpossiblc, considcr making thc proposed driveway one way out and construct a onc way in driveway on N.W. 1st Avc. This will place the parking on the west sidc of the parking lot and more importantly, disallow a backup ofvchiclcs out towards the "Blvd." trying to cntcr the proposcd drivcway. The handicap stall may havc to be located northward sevcral fcet to provide a 27' backup. Thc dumpster could remain whcrc is or bc located to the wcst and facc southward for truck acccssibility. KRH/krh C: Wi11iam Huki11, Oev. OiL Robcrt Eichorst, P.W. OiL cI rcopy . I rv I\IJl fJWlJlfij i \\\ \ . \ 8 ' t~< \ \IL~ ' ~ PLt,J.lt1\rl\G r~~ ~ ~b, ; 7mllHG DEPT. , ,;......-.---~,,__'~'O-......_ T To: From: Re: BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-139 May 16, 1995 Tambri Heyden Milt Duff, Chief Plans Check Inspector 1st Review - New Site Plan Clear Copy, Inc. 660 West Boynton Beach Boulevard With reference to subject project, the Building Division offers the following comments: 1. '\C-2 Zoning minimum front yard 30 I Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 4, General Provisions, 0, Through Lots (Double Frontage) requires front yard shall be provided on each street. \, ./,'l ~ \~ ')jY t\'-Y \l6J 2 - ~/'J J\~ lY 3 . \r'-J ~ , 'I ,v~ :, ~&)4. Need sidewalk on N. W. 1st Avenue \~~Y'l)~ iF ~ . Need site lighting details \ '\0!he project can be forwarded to the Planning and \ )AJBOard, but Items 2 through 5 must be met at time , t ~:jJ " "1 \ \ 'f'\ . ". \1, J \. !\;' .Jo i":~ MD:mh This must be complied with during site plan review. Handicap access from right-of-way to entrance of building required Need sign details Development of permitting. ,~ . ~~, f1) j LY . if ~~~\, f; JV" <,x If ,~~ f' , ~ lY '~i:\, lv1) '~J I ) \ v 'J , I, \ i' ~ 1. \ " :.\ ' hJtv+ Milt Duff cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Developmen~ ;,' -;. I I H A:CLBARCOP.TRC . : Di1ector . ' ". t" \' , ! , t, ~ ~ l I .' "..,:~.,,~ ~ 11 ~ : b I \ I', ,: \ ! r P' ,I ' . '\ I' ff> : :' I MEMORANDUM TO : 1" A /It 6R ~ 1-1 {3. 't h ~,J rf (.,ArI ;vi tV 6 D t'tf ~G- td/Z FROM: ;5. of-{ rJ !N,'l" DIJ ~12 \ PAil- fc s s '1-1' r DATE: :j- / ~JI 7.5' Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans RE: Project: c Ce 4R C elf; After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration. amended plans for the above the f< t= Co It I~ k It 7;W ..j- f' AI? rr ~~ r'.J that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. (; \ n " : \\ "\; \; " --\ \;:, \, ~b C:AHEND1.ALD BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-139 May 16, 1995 To: Tambri Heyden From: Milt Duff, Chief Plans Check Inspector Re: 1st Review - New Site Plan Clear Copy, Inc. 660 West Boynton Beach Boulevard With reference to subject project, the Building Division offers the following comments: 1. C-2 Zoning minimum front yard 3D' Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 4, General Provisions, D, Through Lots (Double Frontage) requires front yard shall be provided on each street. This must be complied with during site plan review. 2. Handicap access from right-of-way to entrance of building required 3. Need sign details 4. Need sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue 5. Need site lighting details The project can be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board, but Items 2 through 5 must be met at time of permitting. ~"'+ . ).) Milt Duff MD :mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director A:CLBARCOP,TRC ft> RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-202 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist J<'J;I Clear Copy, Inc. RE: DATE: May 16, 1995 The applicant should indicate what plans wi11 be undertaken to protect all existing trees and landscaping. The project should continue on the nonnal review process. KH:ad 1m rn@rnnw~ ill ~lW I 6 -'~ I] I PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. .FlEE PREVENTl.OlJ IfHIGRAjJDU;1 t!iJ. 95-2,,:d WDC 'fe, P.l 3.nnin..;J Departn,ent rFDt! : Fl L'" DepaTtfileL t Dn.TL: hay 10, 19~)5 r E : IJW S P 9 ::: - U 0 4 .31te Plan Cl,?ar Copy InG. )C~(I W BOYllt')ll Bell Blvd Frovj~e dn dcceEsible fire hydrant near bUSlness entrance en H\rf 7 E t r 2 e t . / ! .(, WLLli.3.m D, cavanaugh, FPO RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-202 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist f<'~ II Clear Copy, Inc. FROM: RE: DATE: May 16,1995 The applicant should indicate what plans will be undertaken to protect all existing trees and landscaping. The project should continue on the normal review process, KH:ad - ~ I -') j. i: 1 I . ~ t !. f\ , -,' 'T' "'" ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-156 DATE: May 15, 1995 TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KIi:N HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-628:@. SUB.JECT: CLEAR COpy INC., FIRST REVIEW The following eomments/recommcndations arc submitted for your revicw: I, The driveway is too close to the right of way line of B,B. Blvd. (180' is required). Chap,23, Art.2H3. An application tor a variance will bc rcquired. 2. The plan is subjcct to meeting the parking lot rcgulations at time of permitting fQr paving, drainage, site lighting. curbing, landscaping, and irrigation, RECOMMENDA TIONS I, If possible, consider making the proposed driveway one way out and construet a one way in driveway on N,W. 1st Ave, This will placc thc parking on the west side of the parking lot and more importantly, disallow a backup of vchicles out towards thc "Blvd," trying to enter the proposed driveway. The handicap stall may have to be loeated northward several feet to provide a 27' backup. Thc dumpster could remain whcrc is or be locatcd to the wcst and face southward for truck acccssability, KRH/krh ".. '. ""v , ' '-\ ':1 (;, \; P W/ ~~\ "-.~-\\ if \' ,I \'-"~T,\\\\ \ " J ' C: William Hukill, Dcv. Dir, Robert Eichorst, P,W. Dir. c1 rcopy, I rv , ';':IS~ ~ c- l '....l'-~'.::' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-68 TO: Tambri J, Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: New Site Plan - Clear Copy, Inc, DATE: May 12, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site, ~-~~-,- " ( / )~-L1~7/7 ~bert Eichorst Public Works Director RE/cr !i..1... r+---> MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-159 FROM: John A Guidry, / Director ofUtilitie~ May 12, 1995 \J TO: Date: SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. New Site Plan, first Review Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Plan shan specify meter size, (26, 16(c)). 2. A Capacity Reservation Fee win be required within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval. The fee amount will be determined based upon meter size or expected demand, (Sec. 26-34[E]), 3, Please show location of existing or proposed fire hydrant Fire hydrants shall be within 200' of an points on every commercial building, (Appendix C, Art X, Sec. 16). 4, Plan shall show location of existing or proposed sanitary sewer lateral and c1eanout at property line, (Sec, 26, 16(a)), It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process, If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzena at 375-6404, sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella ..1-- File ~ BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: Tambri Heyden - Director . Sgt. Marlon Harris ,/.; fJ ,fJ - 11 May 95 Clear Copy, Inc. TRC Memo #95-0134 .,;.' , .......:. I have reviewed the plans and find no irUl1Je:Ph~te::proplems... ,'."""",. ..:;/::;;::.:..:~;:::::::~~::;~:\ .:\.:.. j~ W "::~::(;' f:':;:::;::::"'" ;::::'), ':::;:::.::::::::::.::.':.:::;;::;):::::::>""""'.' ::"""j "{::.../::;::::':.':~:::::::' '",:,' .~ ;.' ..:;/....<;;~~~~::. .~"':" ':" ,.<::., ..:....... ;::. . ";', ':<. .:::::?".'.:..:...... ......;:....::.,:::t' ',' ~~ ..;,,;...:,\'\. ~ .. ... .....:.,.i~; fJ ~:':::) \~,11 :;.'.........................:... :; ::.~.,..............;:.. ..;::. ~ L.:.,.,.,.,.,....::;~~(~: 1.,,!r;.;:.:..;;;'::;:l"::)r:!! t:;::::~::::;i1;\:.::!i ;~....:....:....:., ::: .~;.;....;.........-:;" ....:;.......~..:.. ~ ::.......'..............'...;..;... I r:;'::;'.;;:.;':;;:;:::;") ,',W :tJ ;.........................~...... :~ ::;.......;........:..:.: ..;::::. 1,:1 ')): :~.): t...::::::::::~:;:;::::::~~~...i. t:J fJlj-V ....:.:-;.. . /;;~::tl :r~ ~;:!::::i~:!::':;~~;/ {;:>.;~~.. ~/tj o (t:> 'V -.""'-~~"__IIIIIJ . ::r~@.O, \'7 Klrnl"n, Ii I r'~ I : I~ Pl"w: ' ;~,-j HI'"., .1 _BE;; , -d tI1-~i'-i~"'~ ' ---r:;, --- ' f! ,~ ---~. ~/~T /"o...t, ~ " l -9- Q ~ lJ'..' .. =-/ f ., , I -~.vA'-~: t "... '];.0- I I ,,-:. .>0 I ! ! f.l j I ~ , ;;0.0 , I I ,/ \ ! I 1 11 ! ! 1 ~ ~j / i I l - 1 _' ,'Jv/ C,' 'JJt ',C<., iJ.ii .).(" j)kii-1~j .~ ~v ~ ~ ~ ~ , ! !2~,:t- fj/1;15 f;'l0''Vl- J.kl'!~'Y- ~'- PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-360 TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. HeYde~d Planning and Zoning Director DATE: June 27, 1996 SUBJECT: Request for comments on Dr. Roberts' June 26, 1996 letter to Jim Cherof I am confused as to why I and Mr. Hukill are being asked to comment on the above- referenced letter. My reading of the June 26th letter is an issue that appears to be a legal one (not a technical one) that would be best reviewed by the City Attorney. The issue as I see it is - Does Chapter 1.5, which says the decisions of the Planning and Development Board are advisory to the Commission, overrule the conflict in Chapter 7.5, which says, in general, that at the local level, the Planning and Development Board has the fmal authority to make Landscape Code decisions? My position continues to be that we cannot rely on the code company editor to "fIx" all conflicts with editor's notes (because they involve interpretation) when we adopt an ordinance that changes one section of the code, without simultaneously changing confficting sections of the code. H you'd like my legal opinion, I would be more than happy to take the time to provide one, as I do have one, as most of us do. However, please understand that there are technical matters in my offIce that require my attention at this time that are important as well. tjh A:ClerCopy xc: Bill Hukill Jim Cherof Central fIle May 7, 1996 "='\ r;,) 11 \\17 l~ ill i r;\j / 1I 0 ~ UGr M:Y - 8 m3 "1 ~ PLANNING AN[) ZONING OEPT. BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-162 TO: Technical Review Committee Members Marshall Gage Bob Eichorst Charlie Frederick John Guidry Tambri Heyden Floyd Jordan Police Chief Public Works Director Recreation & Park Director Utilities Director Planning & Zoning Director Fire Chief FROM: Don Johnson, Building Compliance Administrator RE: ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Clear Copy 660 W. Boynton Beach Blvd. CiroGomec Inc. The above referenced project is nearing completion. Prior to the Building Division issuing the Certificate of Occupancy, I would like to ensure that you do not have any outstanding or pending conditions concerning this site that must be rectified (excluding issues that are covered entirely with a city approved surety) . If any outstanding conditions are related to permits issued by the Building Division, please provide this division a memorandum containing a description of the unresolved conditions. If the unresolved conditions are not permit related, please notify the owner or the owner's agent to ensure that the matters are rectified. Please respond to me, within ten (10) days in order that we may proceed in a timely manner to issue the Certificate of Occupancy. No response is necessary if your department is satisfied with the current state of the above referenced site. Thank you for your cooperation. d~ XC: Carrie Parker Kevin Hallahan Jim DuVall A:TRCMEMO June 27, 1996 ~ ~ @ ~ ~ w ~ I~ J1N .., 8 1996 ~ BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-248 PLANNiNG AND ZONING .DEP1 .J TO: James Cherof City Attorney ivJi'I1~. Hukill, P.E. ~ ~fDevelopment -, W (~\ -1 I:~ _ (\Qu~ ,7{0; L;/ tV k ,Sp My comment on subject letter is quite simple, and is in the form of a question. It is simply "Why are we (ineluding you) responding to material from a non attorney regarding a matter involving litigation with the author?" Your instructions to me were to send everything to you for eontact between legal representatives of the litigating parties. The Roberts' claim that landscaping is not part of site litigation appears to be nonsense. FROM: RE: ROBERTS'JUNE26LETTER By the way, the assertion that Mr. Hallahan is "of the City's building department" is also nonsensical for at least two valid reasons. Firstly, he works for the Recreation and Parks Department. Secondly, there is no Building Department. We have no comments since the letter appears to address legal issues. WVH:bg XC: Carrie Parker Tambri Heyden CLEAR, WPD //lL<..- I O'irn@rnuwrn ~p ENGINEERING . :.:.t ~, . . .1, . JOSIAS, GORIN, CHBROP; DOODY' IZROL, P.A. 30tt. I..t Co...~olal Boulevard , Suite aoo Por~ Lauderdal., 'lo~14. 3330. (t54) 771-4DOO paa.iaile No. (tI4) '71-.t23" PACSIKILI TRANSMISSION " -.. .; ... aBCIPIIHTS PAX HO. TO I : a1#/r ~ DA'lEI TDIE& ;)//%' / :,:''<;:,'i:;:;" ,- " ~::' : .~~..' ~ I. " .... :..irjl;'~1 \JfW1 {1'tc~ . :~.;" . ,;......, Tbla tran..1..1on contain. .:1:1.. unRRNCI. pag.. includin9" th1a oover. 'ILl NO. I COIIMINT8 s ..IJ~ 5,. , 77/1.1 /f-N'd &;dJ'1nt e?VT ~~~e; r~6,e; , lIIa '/?/tpv,?tr me- , ~/Pr ~ ~#r .r C~41 A;vy,!=h/ ".., . q~~ I ~{" , 'h. .nf.,.,.".. ""te',*, In tM. flOtl."t ...... MIl thl ,.... foUowlne .... .uemey r;'yflltltd end cMffdlntfa. ."fo....tton t"tended OI'IIV f.r th lilt of ttl. tl'ldlvlMI 01' ~tttv I'Iellltd .bove. I thl ,..., of tht. ...... I. not the Intended '.(pl"'t, you tt. h.,.tby notlffed th., any cll.....Ntlon, dlurUauttan or copy of thl. c.-unle.t'", I. Itrlc:tty prohIbited. 11 you ha.... rtcllvtd .t./'ll. ~OGIlU'Ilottfon In '1"01', pl.... 'Mldltt.lV ftOllly III .,., '.'''''one 1M t.tl.ll'n ,". orl,lNll ....... to... .t' the IbovI 1Ckt'... yr. tM u.s. ,oetllL "rvtoe. ThaN~. If any pro~l... ooour in receivlnq th1. ....ag8, pl.a.e call this otfice at (954) 771-4500. Thank y~u. ell \W\'ClM\.MFClM.1LQ ,.' I ! , j . ..---.-...-- I . I i I I MARK E. ROBERTS, D.D.S. 650 WEST BOYNTON BEACH BLVD., SUITE #2 BOVNTON BEACH. FLORIDA (407) 736-1 700 . " FAX TRANSMISSION '1'0: 'IL.- ~.J. I~I~OM: 'i 1t...tJ. ~~ i Itl': (lPu..... ~ >ftLAt.eb~ ~ . llA"rE: (....'~ h . tj. ~ NO. Of: PAG6S~ ~ filld"dlJll "'tl\'\:r 4,,,,\1) .,. '-1 i i I , i I I I I I I . , ____________________.__..___~ . I I r-.-------.. I I I I I ,~,"'i ,- , Inn.~ I I I , I .----------.- .i' , I I I I I I I J ~ ft, ^" , ",- Mark E. Roberts, D.D.S. Mn WIl. ...,.... ........... ..1M fl, ..,..... ......... IMH . (40'7) '>>-lfOI .Juno 2'. Ullt ~. .:1..0. Chero! City At~orney of 8oynt.oft ....eh J099 B..t C~.~~1al .~vd., .alt..200 .t.. L.uderd.~Q, FL 3330. Ref: ADD..l ee PIAnftina and ~l....nt ~...~n~ o..r Hr. Cb_I:O', Your June 25, 19" lett.r Ind1eae~ th.~. va. no d~l.lon of al'l! Adainl.tr.U,ve Offiai.l, thelr.to..., nil Ir.U.nc:. on ..ati.J.on 11 01 ebapt.~ 7.5 wa. ml.pl.eed end the City . nnt requirad to h..r ay appe.l aPl>eal1n9 t.he final lanes.cape approval. Obv.tou.ly, IOU are qO~ f..i1lar with t.. City'. Land DeveloPMent Regulation. ( OR) or you are unavere . deal.lon ".s ...de. Ch"l't..r 1, SlH::tton 2, Qf the LOR .tate the followlntt OU1CH1Ir., ."",,,t... ~ .......u. t. M.e 1n ~!. COcle en:: Regulatlaa. to aa, oltlD8~ o~af8nDY, .uab .. "clt.r aaa...r,. "tbe MraZ," 1ft'" oit.~ aJ.es1l," "p1aanlftl aM ....,.,los--nt ho.,.... all. .0 forth, .uoh Ir.f.~ .hall ~ eoftet~.. ~D ..an .~.h o"i..1t O~ ...ncy at the ei~y ana ahall lnGl~d. th. .ulT .u"ho~l." aubord1J\at._ Dr pe....ftae1 of ....h offleeC' or .,._y. ~r"" Mr. keyiD Hall.hen, of t.he Cit.y', buUdin; deDH'tll8nt. and ~h.r.for. 4n adalnietEatlve offiolal. In.p.o~ed and 94~. the ~ln.l lan~.o.,. approval 'or the Clear eopy P~oject on ~y 30, ltt& (I.. enclo.ur. at.t.ached) . Conf.1.rutlon of thl. "a. pt-...nt.tId to ilia from t.he Buildin9 nepart..nt .ft..~ I .ubel~~ed a publJc reeo~'. reque.t. This de.elopment decia10n 18 . requtr...nt of tne certifiea,. of oCO\Ipanc:y. In your letter, yo. .tat..,"Th. "fin.l laRes.aape approval' for the CI..r Copy project occurred wh.n t.bo C~t..lon .pp~oved _k. .It. plan OD September 1', 1995." The 'tnal landlcape .pproval .howe a ..tiefactory In.pection for c~lianc. of the tandac.,. Code and cannot be det.ralftcad Wit! 1 cOIIplM. f ft" of t h. 1'9'ti".l~.cI improv.ment.. Pl.... ..plain to me how ~~. Com.i..ton oould have approvecs till. 1>I'10~ to 1..~nce oe bullding perMU:" or c:onatI'Qc:'ivn be9inftln~. At beat, ~h.y could have only apprnv~ th. 1an480.p. plan. "1'0 apply your re..oAin; on. .tap lUEt.h.r, ,trace . certificate ot occucancy .h~1 . '.tl.factory lift.l in.pect1oft ot coapllance with LOR and building e04.. for the whol. pro'.c:~, doe, that .ean the C~l.a!oft .1.0 9ave a caE~lflc.~A of oc:cgpancy for Clo.2 eepv at that mco~!ft9' Th. Cl'ty CoeaJ.fJII1oft Uftut..., th. onlYir.n,able ~r.l\.c~.1pt of the Sept.-ber 1', l.fa City CamMi..1oft ...ting, .how t.lle Comml..ion COftd1tlonally apprftved ~h. el.a~ cop, .i~. pl.ft. Contrary ~o wha~ \, UIR '.1 Joar l.tter 8U99..ted, the Commi..lan did "at .pp~ove the "final and80ape .pp~oval~ .ince it i. not 1ft the .iRut... Chapter 7.5, Article If, Section '.A, of the LOR place the re.ponlib1lity on the de..lop.ent d~rtment tor Interpretation and a~pl!c.tlon of the Laadacap. Code. Theretore, ~he City COMmie.lon dO.. not h.ve the authorl~y p.r LOR to iaau. a final land.cap. approv.l. The Land Development. RegulatLon. .'toned .. the right t.o .uhalt this applicat.lon appealing the tinal landscape appraval. Regard1... wh.the~ 'he City beltev.s the Cl.ar Copy pro'ee~ m..t. the Laa L.n4acape COde, 1t atill haa the laga1 re,poft81bl11ty to h~ve th... appeal. ..aza. Although lrr.1~.nt to the i..u. of the appeal, your l.tt.~ at.t.. "Th. elecislol1 of the Plannin, and n.velOpllflllt aoard are aelvtaory to !:}\A City C,..1..J.oft, ChalJter 1.5, $eatlon ., Land Dev.lopment Code." v.taile in general 1:1\18 i. true, Chapter '1.5, Article II, Section 12 indicat.. Planning and Oevelopn8nt decislon. con.cernlng the Land.cape Cocle ..,11; final rev!." by writ of c:el'L.1urarJ. Your Jet.ter: .tate. tbat. a writ of certiorari w.. fl1~ addre..lng ~he .i~. plan .Pp~ov.l. While this may be true, it i. unrel.t84 to thi. landscape appeal. t have n.ver filed lit19.~jon reg4%dini the he.rift; of .y landscape app.al. All of the City offiCial. J gontacted, state I muat corr.lpond With your office, Ilnee there i. pendln9 l1t.iiatlon related to thla aatt.r. Your offIce infor-.d ma that all contact with the City cone.~~in9 the Clear Copy Mtt.r .hould be thl:ollgh the attorn~. &'epr",ntJnq each p.I.I'ty. Ple... b. informed that on this matter, the land.cape appeal, pur.uaft~ C~pt.c 7.5, Article JI, of the LeR, J have no attorney and all c:orre,pOndence 8hould be 1:0 _. 9ho\llcl litigation beoOMe nec'.sary, a d.ciaion will th.n b. ~4. whether to ..ak 189&1 crou.neel. :r{"" This let.t.ar includ.. ..ch paint YOU refIred t.o 1ft your le~~er covering the City'. 'U8tlf1cattoa why the Planning and Development Board will not h.ar my landscape appeal. The City'. decilion Dot to heer .Y .ppeal, ba.ad upon YOllr June 25, 1'" letter, 1. Dot jUltifled by law. The City 1. intentionally ~efu.1n9 to bear .V prop.~lr filed appeal., and thu. 1. v10latinq My ~ivll rl,hta. I a. COMmitted to having the City held aCCOuntable for it. action. or lack thereof. Should the City net. i.ediately change 1~'. POllltloft aDd hear the .~peal. it i. ., intent to file a cLv!l right. law suIt -gain.t the City for Y101Rtin9 my civil righ&.. 'lno.J:ely~ 7JMJvIYt "r~ R. Rgberta, D.D.S. IncUV1dual1y and Pre.ldeat 0' RffS Corporat.(o"i MIRe... enclosure. Eln.l land'cate approval and pqbltc ~eco~d reque.t S~ VIA PACRJMtLR ('5.) 111-4'33 aal Car~L. .ar~.r, Cl~y "-naver ~ 0 D . d ,.f""" , ~equ IS t I ubetll ttUd Dy, '. '.....'11 t'.'t' CITy ~ aaYNTOH llACH t.../ ""-A- , ' ''',.'' . , AIQUIS1' 'OW PUBLIC I.CCU INFOIMATIOtr II ,""" - 8UO~~ .r. .. BOYNtON 8I:!ACH. ~ IN21 -$/{;';/- ? ~(,,, /::;"...." c.~ (H.lmd1 (A4drUS) - ::~~uu tilt Inform.ltlOfU OACIMA.Htl NO. ~ESQl..UTION NO. MINUTES. (?hOnt I) J .HII' - .,: M'ltt~g & Date (e~l.e. Stt) MI.ting & O.t. "X,.", Onl~) Verbatim &~e.rpt (SUbJlct to hourJ1 Char;. Rlcor~f". S.~re'arll. Wl;l)r - .... OTHER: (! '. ^~ " ~,~T; ~~Z- r , # ' L. ' . ~. "I ~,~, , ,'_I , ~. / q~'I. '-I, i~)J ~J / J;C/.//(.(,.'. -,'I I . , "/~ /. "~.:~ : I ~ ...\...".~ " . .. .. .. . I ..... ..: ; ...., .. '. ," . , r ;. ~ . '..~ iC.... .' '. ~ ,,..~. :,~. , ray miy tft'Plci ah., rtq~..t.d rlGOrdl wttbout Chlr;.~"., the nltur, or volum. r.qu"lld "Qul,.. ..ttft.t~. .'.rlcal or .u,.rvIIOr.r ""Itlnc. In '!l''''''~ fch CIa. 10'1 wt 11 It. .d~J.I.cI " . 'Plct,t '.rvi c' ~hat1.. ~I.I" pap.r copl.S,lhl"'.. fUr'lsh'd Upon p~"t Of 1.. l' the ,Ip,r 11 ::phd on on. II~', .nd ZOC'tf tll, ,a~.,. U copted on both .fd',. ::~ f.. Of mlcrOflChl 1"111 Ot furdlshld lIpOft PI)llltftt Of 25. par Pig. (copy :., Olle std, 0' the p.~.r 0"11). ;,rtt"cltlon 0' COClftlntl"on, Ib.l' bl Ch''''d It"jl;6a per iOC~ftt. j~t~ eas..ct. tiP" Iftl'l b. futa'.bld at a cha,.. 0' '1.00 ..Ch. " 'J. ( oJ . .".. ,. I', ....'( .... ... I . l..:;~.. ~ ". ~ f. . , u'~_~ ); h.l~~t L. 't/ / '.. ..}., !tG""t",,., Of .hctu.. 1M n..., , " 0 n . ,J to.,..... . ~:.,-. not 1'1.0,"' nu.tJU\\i ':"i':4,nl~:::.l 'J?~~~~H() 93121'1 ):.:n"u'nUJ ,. . :r:' . I .,,1. ,. . '. . ..' i I" .~.'. , . ~" I....,I.~ :&"t: 1...., ;':,t : :':'::';~>t'4. 11>- l~ I 'f'Y 1'Wo' s:.U.,..'TUfi EtEACH Ii:"'~,ue.t FlIf :Cn!.\N:--r..11 v I) " :( rlt.ll>\~(, t ! CI n I.: l';.'t,er..... ~ ,. ....: . "0'1 . ,....'11"... ,. J ..' ... '., 'f ; .. , I 'r 'JJ.jI to_ ',' ". .\ :'. wt "".Ii:"OIr-;-"'''....Il\\;l'..~ ".'. II' i.. .,,. ,. t~ / 1;Or,;"1 1 . .'r',~'.r,1,.... 'lIldr'~~~ I '~". ~(H)~)..t'!, 4 ! "0 Co l)t)<~ CO""t'\Ji:~C:t '~'.. :;" n:L,L'U Kl .. .C':t.:."l:.~~ . C\.l"''l'" . L.~ ()O 1. "1"1 I:';C"'':':\"I''(1 "1.0 W (")\'''''1'0.' ~.~~Ar:; I It/",',' ""'0', It,.. \ in "'t.. 4"" ;'4';..1'0 I.::...l.,,(. "'l~I'I"'I'l-"I" ~"'l'~I,~'\'.~ .......1.,1;..... !)t".h't\ ..- -..- -.;- I \r' 'i: n., 'r~ 1 "",..c, t . 01\ DfltlM:r I" t , 0 n ~V~1:i./'.,t..... 1..ANDHe~'1.Nf.J j'!':J:NAI., , I n~a:.tn: 't c.\~ II:I J\. .1 : I I !' .',,""rlu I nUI"('t~" I',' h t" j, ~"'''l:~ ;Ha: c! I '--"- ._--_.. "r .-... -_. ~ - :'\0: ~~~....,. , :; --... ....-.-.. ...- \. -..-.--- ..... .--- " , gOO " d . . H-''iUi4tU u... t t:. 'f I 01(') t',;,- ~:u,'~.~. .~. 01) -'- 'l 1',1';1\:: ; ~\~,f";'?,'.,r":lt> '0 ~ 4ch: ~i":' ;..,. '"!;,,P)CI :.,~) , 10" ~!, ; r,)~! Rlllii'ol.\I, .~. f;a..~'l t;l.l'~'; r."" ';./ ;'.O,'YC. I!.., 4. ,r, ,il,. 1'" n)l J TO: FROM: DATE: /" m, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT i 1 ~ l ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-137 " James Cherof City Attorney /diJiHukill, P.E. (jjf#lir of Development April 16, 1996 RE: CLEAR COpy 00 /lOQ t 6 . PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. fk/~ ~~~ ;4 H5P -fz'~ Attached please find a copy of an April 16, 1996 letter misdirected to us from Roberts. Respond, or don't respond, at your pleasure. WYRIck attachment xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director C:CLCOPYI6 R.H.S. CORPORATION 850 Weat Bovnton Beacn Blvd. · Suite 12 . Boynton Beach. FL 33428.(407) 736-1700 April 16, 1996 roJrrn@rnU\VImfn) UO APR I 6 1996 I!~ I i L_.___~.." ,'"....,_... _. .. .__~ ' B! ! 1 t f) i f'~ n " -----...,-;:'.:;...:';.~~",..,""-:;...,.,-~,-.. ~ " Mr. William Huckill Director of Development City of Boynton Beach Building 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 RE: Clear Copy Project Dear Mr. Huck!ll: Department RHS Corporation inadvertently forgot to copy you on the additional appeal. to the Board of Zoning Appeals. You may obtain copies of these appeals from Ms. Tambri Heyden, Ms. Carrie Parker or the City Attorney. Continued development of the Clear Copy Project with pending appeals is clearly in violation of Land Development Regulations. Therefore, I request the City continue its legally iS8ued stop order at the Clear Copy Project. Mar SENT VIA FAX (375-6357) AND HAND DELIVERED xc: Reginald Stambaugh, Esquire James Cherof, City Attorney Carrie Parker, City Manager ~ ,. L""1' \c/', t - if, r · (t..{-1"'-' "/<.Jt /'0, ,', !]Ii~''''l , i. ,J!i")' /,' '.i'" ' \ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-168 TO: Jim Cherof City Attorney Tambri J. Heyden ~~ Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: March 28, 1996 SUBJECT: Proposed ordinance to clarify overhangs and eaves allowed to encroach setbacks I would like to take advantage of this opportunity when revising the code regarding the above, to also include other miscellaneous structures that the Planning and Zoning Department, as well as the Building Division, has encountered. These structures are either not addressed in our code, or are unclear, and need to be included as they are in other jurisdictions' codes. I have read Mr. Hukill's suggestion to address the house eaves, and although option 3 will suffice, it would assist us all if we took the following approach: Under City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Part III - Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 4.J. OTHER STRUCTURES, add the new subsections 7 through 27 below - 7. Arbors and trellises which may extend no more than five (5) feet from the side of the principal building or extend more than two (2) feet from the front or rear of the principal building, provided that there shall be maintained a minimum three (3) foot setback from property line. In addition there shall be a maximum height of 8 feet. 8. Permanent or retractable awnings, canopies, marquees or covered walkways proj ecting from a building wall over a required yard setback not more than two and one-half (2~) feet, and having no supports other than provided by the wall or its integral part. 9. Chimneys proj ecting not more than three (3) feet into the required yard setback. 10. Fire escapes or unenclosed staircases, the riser of which shall be at least fifty (50) percent open, provided that the vertical proj ection downward onto a required yard setback shall not project more than five (5) feet into, and shall not exceed ten (10) percent of, the area of the required yard setback. 11. Flagpoles having only one structural ground member. 12. Fountains i provided that non-portable fountains shall not exceed nine (9) feet in height, shall be setback three (3) feet from side and rear property lines and shall occupy no more than 100 square feet. 13. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning units (including compressors and condensers) for single-family or duplex dwellings, provided the exhaust air from such units is directed vertically or away from the adjacent property line. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning units and intake and exhaust fans for non-residential uses shall be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from property line. -- 2- 14. Mailboxes. 15. Open terraces, including walkways, unenclosed decks and slabs and natural plant landscaping. 16. Open, uncovered stoops, steps and platforms for the principal building, but not to exceed three (3) feet in height. 17. Recreational equipment (of the type not requiring a permit) in the rear yard setback in residential districts. 18. Sculpture or other similar objects of art, provided they meet the same requirements above for fountains. 19. Signs, subject to the provisions of the sign code. 20. Trees, shrubbery or other objects of natural growth. 21. Wells. 22. Utility, cable and telephone transmission lines and associated structures, such as poles. 23. Basketball goals, provided there is a minimum three (3) feet setback from the rear and side interior property lines and a minimum fifteen (15) feet setback from front and side street property lines. 24. Light poles having only one (1) structural ground member. 25. Barbecue pits not to exceed six (6) feet by six (6) feet and provided they are set back three (3) feet from side and rear property lines. 26. Raised planters, provided they are set back three (3) feet from side and rear property lines and shall have a maximum height of six (6) feet. Lastly, add to existing subsection 3 the underlined words and delete the struck through words: 3. HOUDe Eaves, cornices. qutters. facia boards, copinqs. soffits. downspouts. belt courses. window sills. widow and/or door trim. applied finish materials. roof and/or eauipment vents. sillcocks, fire hose connections, meters, liqht fixtures, hardware. shutters. bay windows. and ornamental architectural features shall not overhang or exceed the setback lines for more than t.,.'O (2) three (3) feet. TJH:dim xc: Bill Hukill Carrie Parker Central File a:Eaves,mem BUILDING DIVISION ~ '--'-, R ,p', ' .1 . mO p1L:L..'~~~J, 'i I : .1 n I ' I ~ ~. f . {... ........ I U u I ".,., I 3""" j PLANNI~!G A"lD . ZONING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 96-091 March 13, 1996 To: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold Deputy Development Director Re: Clear Copy - Revised Site Plan Review The Building Division has reviewed the plans for the above project and have no comment other than our request to provide the Building Division with a copy of the final approved plans to be incorporated with the construction plans. ~4~ Al New old AN:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P .K, Development Director C:\ WPWIN60\ WPDOCS\MISCMH\CLRCOPY.WPD DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPl\''lENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-065 P[~, -~,.""""",;". Wj FEB 2 6 1996 i i ---- -.-J PLANNI~~G p.m ZONING lye , .--_.,..,.........,,,._.,"---~,,.,,,.----- - DATE: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ukill, P.E., Ci1y Engineer February 26, 1996 {;ft V TO: FROM: RE: CLEAR COpy - SITE PLAN REVIEW Applicant Feldman has submitted a slightly modified site plan in response to a request for compliance certification from this offic(:. We have no objections to the suggested minor modifications and recommend that you waive formal review as allowed under LDR Chapter 4, Seetion 2C with the following two conditions: 1. The submission by the applieant of certification from a Florida registered Architeet or Engineer that the work complies with all laws, ordinanc~s, rules, regulations, etc. and will be constructed in conformance therewith, 2. Submission of a permanent easement or other property transfer document acceptable to the City Attorney for the piece of sidewalk at the SW property eorner containing sidewalk pavement. With respect to the Haag comments regarding failure of the adjacent property owner to comply with buffer requirements wherein his (the neighbor's) buffer is a few inches less than the required width, please refer to the opinion of the City Attorney (presented orally to the City Commission in public session) that this applicant is not responsible to correct his neighbor's error, and therefore need not provide the missing narrow strip, Please also recall that the site plan was approved by the City Commission subsequent to that rendering of opinion, but without a buffer condition. We will not allow sitework to proceed until our two conditions are met. WVH/ck xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager James Cherof, City Attorney Al Newbold, Deputy Director of Development C:CLCPYREV D~ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT 100 .as~ BOyD~OD Beach Blvd. P. O. Box 310 BOYD~OD Beach, Florida 33t25-0310 February 26, 1996 \~ ~ F~B : ; : ~ ,mil , PLANNING AND } ~ ZONING DEPT. -- Mr. Robert Feldman 1194 SW 27th Place Boynton Beach, Florida 33426 Re: Clear Copy - Minor Site Changes Dear Mr. Feldman: We have reviewed the proposed minor site modifications dated February 13, 1996, and marked "Proposed Parking, etc", sheet ST-I and have no objection to the new parking arrangement or the relocated driveway. Do not proceed with sitework, however, until you have complied with the following: I. All previous comments. 2. Submit a eertification from a Florida Registered Architect or Engineer that all work will comply with all rules, regulations, laws, ordinances, etc., and will be similarly constructed. 3. Transfer sufficient right-of-way at the southwest property comer to provide for the sidewalk, still maintaining required back-up distances and ROW buffering. 4. Obtain a ruling from the Director of Planning and Zoning that the proposed site changes are wz.ived from the site plan review process as al10wed in Land Development Regulations Chapter 4, Section 2C, page 4-2 (copy attached). When you are in ful1 compliance with codes, ordinances, rules and regulations you may proceed with permitted site work. Vety truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~.dM#ih/ William Hukill, P.E. Director of Development WVH/ck attachment xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager James Cherof, City Attorney Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Al Newbold. Deputy Director of Development C:CLif&~~e: (407) 315-6280 FAX: (407) 375-6357 rn ~I ~I BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-044 ~~~~w~ FE8 -1- February 6, 1996 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Dale Sugerman Human Resources Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Director -f~ {'l ~~ -P~ RE: PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST Attached is an amended request from Dr. Roberts (see Building Division memo 96-037). He is requesting a list of people who signed the plans during the review process for Clear Copy and copies oftheir current DBPR licenses. My examination of the plans reveal that nine people reviewed them. They are: *Phil Sy *Warren DeLoach *Mike Jacobson Bill Cavanaugh Bob Eichorst Pete Mazzella Jim Du Vall Gary Lanker Sgt. Marlon Harris Struetural Plumbing & mechanical (AlC) Electrical Fire Public Works Utilities Engineering Site Poliee Others that Dr. Roberts requested are: /' "" -_._-~-....., . *Bill Hukill ~Tambri H~~~D_--,j '-,~--_._._.~--- ..- ....,,-~_.- Only the people with asterisks by their names are Building Division employees and my understanding of FS 468.607 is that eertification is required for code administration and inspection personnel. I'm not eertain what type of certification, if any, the other personnel on this list are required to have. One of the main reasons for identifying Building Division personnel is because of Personnel Memorandum 94- 197 (copy attached). There may be other laws governing personnel files that we are not aware of. Please comply with Dr. Roberts' request for information from personnel records within the seope of the law. AN:bg Attachments XC: Carrie Parker James Cherof William V. Hukill, P.E. CLEARC02 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORD INFORMATION Request submitted by: I11ltt~ &)0 ~2-- #0 y,vrtJdJ f/~t7C75 w. &0 YA/{7J~ ~ EJ/Gt-l Fe- /' -:::;;(, --I ?flu #c.tI jjt.i/l/ ~ ~C( 2(., (Name) (Address) (Phone ') Requested Infonmatlon: ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. MINUTES: Meeting & Date (Complete Set) Meet1ng & Date (Excerpt Only) Verbatim Excerpt (Subject to hourly charge Recording Secretary's Wage): OTHER: Lf S; ( CJF fUtN~ f-k-JlcW Lc.C~~e flE()fL~ fR OCSS wffO lTuJP (2KVl6()J#) /)rJ'j> <;(6 AJED (Dry o~ UJrRjZk7'Jr l:>f ~ NOTICE: 1. You may inspect the requested records w1thout charge unless the nature or volume requested requires extens1ve clerical or superv1sory assistance in which case you w1ll be adv1sed of a spec1al serv1ce charge. 2. Plain paper caples shall be furn1shed upon payment of 15e if the paper 1s copied on one side. and 20e 1f the paper 1s copied on both sldes. 3. Copies of. microfiche shall be furnished upon payment of 25e per page (copy on one side of the paper only). 4. Certification of documentatlons shall be charged at $1.00 per document. S. Used cassette tapes shall be furnished at a charge of $1.00 each. J!- r.- k (, Date of R quest ~. S1gn ure 0 equesting Party Date Completed By OeparOment Employee "- BUILDING DMSION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-037 February 1, 1996 TO: Dale Sugerman Human Resources Director FROM: AI Newbold Deputy Director of Development RE: PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST Attached is a request form from Dr. Mark Roberts of 650 W. Boynton Beach Blvd. His request is for personnel information from the files of City employees who signed the building permits for the Clear Copy project, a building being constructed next door to his office. His request is for the State license of everyone who signed Clear Copy permits and that is no one since only the contractor or his agent signs the permit. However, he did give the names of Bill Hukill, Jim Du Vall, Tambri Heyden, Bill Cavanaugh and Bob Eichorst to our clerk, Beverly Snyder and told her that he needed the information for his attorney's investigation. ~ Ai N bold AN:bg Attachment XC: James Cherofw/attachment William V. Hukill, P.E. w/attachment CLEARC02 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH REQUE~1 FOR PUBLIC RECORD INFORMATION quest subm1 tted by: Mfr1UL 1ik,-;J2:1; (Name) GSV uJ. ~7i'V/C}1J g;(f ~/) (Address) ,&rtfJA/ ~' lEi: ~~ 770 ~ 1Jt1Z? (Phone ') ~uested Information: ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. MINUTES: Meeting & Date (Complete Set) Meeting & Date (Excerpt Only) Verbatim Excerpt (Subject to hourly charge Recording Secretary's Wage): OTHER: ICE: You may inspect the requested records without charge unless the nature or volume requested requires extensive clerical or supervisory assistance in which case you will be advjsed of a special service charge. ' Plafn paper copies shalt be furnished upon payment of 15c if the paper 15 cop1ed on one stde, and 20C if the paper is copied on both sides. Coptes of mtcroftche shall be furnfshed upon payment of 25c per page (copy on one s1de of the paper only). Cert1ffcation of documentations shall be charged at $1.00 per document. Used cassette tapes shall be furnished at a charge of ,$1.00 each. !VJ frt'J::: ;2:0f?c-7&7Zj of Reques t ' Completed By Oeoar~ent Employee /e. 'I- / ~ ~_V~ 7: II .r-.g0tcG 1/ ,7- --'u ' --~~~ ~'(~j~ ~, ".. f I I I i PERSONNEL MEMORANDUM 94-197 November 17, 1994 To: Chief Dettman Bill Hukill, Director of Development ~.. ' " t9 ~ ~Oy~~~ (S ~\/ ~ Received ~ '~'\j t) ~ l' I NOV 1 7 ,g~~ ' t- el Q'r 0" C'TY ENGINUtll ~ 1).0 ~"o ~ 8EAC~' The Florida League recently amended the Public Records Law to exempt the home address and phone number of Code Inspectors and Code Enforcement Officers. The City Attorney's office advised the intent of the bill was to cover individuals issuing citations in the field. Based on this information any employee holding the following job classification titles will be covered by this exemption: 1. Director of Development 2, Deputy Building Official 3. Building Compliance Administrator 4, Code Enforcement Administration 5. Building Inspector I and II 6, Plumbing and Mechanical Inspector I and II 7, Electrical Inspector I and II 8, Plan Check Inspector 9. Landscape Environmental Inspector 10. Engineering Aide I 11 , Engineering Inspector I and II 12, Code and License Inspector I and II 13. Code and Rehabilitation Inspector Please advise your staff not to issue home addresses or phone number of any employees with a position title listed above. (lJf William H, Sullivan Personnel Director cc: City Manager City Attorney 'c \., : -- ,Ci= t'~~ a , · \J Q.. · I h~ ~~~~ '-J ~ ~~ - - \ t- } ~ -...L (;) ... - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ .j. \} ~ ~ ~~ \- %- .q ~'~ t \0 ~ d. " \)..1 ~ ~ ,,, \J ............ .' ~' \,'" J' ~ ,'-"'A-. ~Jl. .~...,. ~ 0. ~ .:-:::, ~ . "..'> r t""\. -t:: ' Y-. v--- ",--1 . (.\ (...~) ,j ) '" . ~ ~ ~ .L Cl 4' ~~ ~~ "J~ 3~' ~ ' :;j(j ...l 'i. ~~ 1'"2 ~~ ~K- ~ \ , \ --..) - -...,.., ----- -'C' " ,//').., C ~ -'. ",', r~'.-,. , (,:.'::;>1 ~:.c.:."" ~ (" ..' -'..-::", \ ~ ~ "'_ ~ 2:.:1- ~ . ~ ~ f ~ ,/"'\ , 4 .;...2- , ~, ,('~ '-.r'~ - ,...... -(' , .....\. -.:, :::.... L~ 'i. .-q e- el ~ 1- ...oL d. '~a -==- .1J - ~ ~~ !I I ~~ Uo,oi:, Jt-..l u..~ \ :. . ._..'_ i. ~. .._0 -. 1 ' \ , illITIIIJTIi1ID '~ <', ~.~ ," 'iIlI'~ ',...' ,~,' 1 ~ · ,.'.', , ~! .~.' 1 ,;",,'" I . l,',. ,'I, I.... ,., \u!. y \ I ! I \ I \ \ \ I . t\ ~\ \ ~! 1 \ I I (\ i ' \iSi'--- ) 0>.1 --- \Jl: 7' ~ /0/ 7--s/ 1-1' -- TRANSMITTAL OF PLANS TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NAME: In;v Pm.L Type of APp!iCation';'1;W 5J.t p~ Planning and Zoni~g, lIW Lf) q5 ~oj,f ______f}1PM.C fI ~ tf?7' Department F1le No.: ~ ~r ~_____ Staff Report/comments/P & D Agenda {::. -;;21/ Pages (+3comments Not previously Submitted) Control Plans: ___In File ~In Tube ~Sheets Color Elevation Drawings: ___N/A ~In File Board of Adjustment Approval: Meeting Minutes planning and Development , _ Board Approval :1,- !J - tfj City Commission Approval: ~?/?~- Resolution No. : Ordinance No. .''I'rnBlIttl,Blll Meeting Minutes Meeting Minutes PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-613 !) !' I ' "" .11 ,A'J l::;;' v'" I i I' I j / TO: Al Newbold Deputy Building FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Administrator THRU: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director DATE: October 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Development Orders CLEA~ COPY, INC. Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding development plans that have received final determination. 1. Project Name: Clear Copy, Inc. Type of Application: planning and Zoning Department File No.: Comments: Control Plans: New site Plan NWSP 95-004 3 sheets, not previously distributed 8 sheets MEH:TJH:arw Attachments .:'I'r..itPl.CLR ~~ = @ ~ 0 w ~ ~! !~U pUG: 11995 Il~J , DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-333 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. , b~ FROM: Carrie A. Parker, City Manager ~am Hukill, P.E., City Engineer August 31, 1995 TO: DATE: RE: CLEAR COPY - ROBERTS' COMMENTS In the July 20, 1995 Roberts' letter to you, Item 4, implies to you that LDR Chapter 23, Article II, Section H3, page 23-8 requires 180 feet from the R-O-W line of Boynton Beach Boulevard to a driveway. That is an incorrect interpretation. What it actually says is "at least 30 feet from the intersection of the right-of-way lines along local streets and 180 feet along streets of a higher classification." N.W. 7th Street is a local street, not a street of higher classification. He also cited Engineering Division Memo 95-156 dated May 18, 1995 from Mr. Hall to Ms. Heyden which did, in fact, incorrectly interpret that portion of the code. However, that was corrected within a few days with the following notation on the memo: "waived, Chapter 6, Article IV, section 1 access 30' to local streets. WVH. " That section reads "points of access to lots developed within a subdivision shall be located a minimum of thirty feet from intersecting right of way lines on local streets..." The Roberts' comment in Note 5 simply says a variance may be required for a light pole. If he is correct, the applicant will have to receive a variance to proceed. Either way, approval of the site plan can be conditioned on a possible variance. with respect to Note 2, the sidewalk issue raised can become a condition, and/or a variance if it is as Roberts states. WVH:ck xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director C:CLRCOPY.COM ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM # 95-410 TO: Jim Cherof City Attorney Tambri J. Heyden ~tL Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: August 8, 1995 SUBJECT: CLEAR COPY - NWSP # 95-004 Effect of Substandard Perimeter Landscape Strip on Adjacent Property Upon the Commission's July 18th, 1995 denial of the above- referenced site plan, the applicant's request for reconsideration and the City Manager's receipt of the attached letter from the adjacent property owner, Dr. Roberts, the City Manager has asked that I respond in writing to each of the points in Dr. Roberts' letter. With respect to Item 1 of Dr. Roberts' letter, I have obtained from Al Newbold (see attached BUilding Division Memo # 95-267) information regarding the circumstances behind the City having finaled an inspection for a landscape strip that is Ii feet wide, rather than the required 21 feet wide, on Dr. Roberts' property and adjacent to the Clear Copy site. I believe that although the tie- in survey showed that the pavement was too close to the property line to provide the required 2i feet wide landscape strip, it was probably not thought to be of any consequence by the pavement inspector, since the same person that does landscape inspections does not check tie-in surveys. So, I don't believe the City caught the error and only now has it been brought to light (although it was Dr. Roberts himself that brought it to my attention). It, therefore, seems that the City cannot now expect Dr. Roberts to remedy the error. However, must Clear Copy make up the difference in width on the Clear Copy property? Page 7.5-16 of the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.E.2 - attached) says that an applicant does not have to comply with Section S.E. (the requirement to install a 4-6 foot tall hedge in a 21 foot wide strip along a common lot line), if a hedge that meets Section 5. E. exists on the adj acent property. Since the City is "accepting" Dr. Roberts' hedge as meeting Code, it would seem that the City should not have Clear Copy make up the difference in width. As I will be on vacation the last two weeks of August, until .August 17th to provide to Carrie a response Roberts' issues. Therefore, please call me as soon as discuss this. I only have on all Dr. possible to TJH:arw Attachment CIII.1I0410,~:lh < ""-... DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-212 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director lw/~m ~ukill, P.E. P'\~nglneer August 2, 1995 !D)moom8wm~ ~J AlE _ 11995 l!J FROM: PLANNING AND ZONING DfPl DATE: RE: ROBERT'S MEDICAL BUILDING - LANDSCAPE BUFFER Mr. Newbold has completed the investigation you requested (Planning Memo 95-383) and the results are summarized in his attached Memo 95- 267 to me. It is self explanatory. WVH/ck C:ROBERTS xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Al Newbold, Deputy Bldg. Official Mike Haag, zoning/Site Administrator BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-267 July 31, 1995 TO: William V. Hukill, P.E. Department of Development Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: DR. ROBERTS'S MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING - LANDSCAPING DISCREPANCY In order to assist you in your response to Tambri Heyden'S memorandum 95-383, I researched the files and offer the following facts and comments: The Technical Review Board (TRB) plans were signed off by Don Jaeger during his tenure as the department's representative. The building plans were reviewed by Michael Haag and ultimately signed off by Warren DeLoach in Mr. Haag's absence in 1989. My review shows the building plans match the TRB plans and those that were reviewed by the Community Appearance Board. All plans show a 2M' setback for the extreme western section of the property adjacent to the parking lot. During this era, Mr. Jaeger then became Building Official and Mr. Haag was appointed in charge of site review which was handled by this department during that time. Site plan approval permit 88- 0873 was generated to track the site plan process for all site improvements and administered by the Site Development Division of the Building Department under Mr. Haag's supervision. The project has been completed and all paperwork is on microfilm. Therefore, all original documents are no longer available. Attached are copies of the site plan and the tie-in survey along with a print-out of the inspection history. From my observation of the tie-in survey, the paving appears to be 1.58' from the west property line and not 2M' as shown on the building plans. I would assume that the survey is correct in that it has a certification date showing August 23, 1989 and I found that the paving was approved August 18, 1989 by Roger Kuver, former Engineering Inspector who is now with the Utilities Department. From that same survey, it appears that the building is in the correct location and it would be fair to assume that the only problem is with the size of the paved area. I found no documentation in the file giving any explanation, etc. as to any resolution from the narrow landscape strip or whether it ever became an issue. Building Division Memo 95-267 to William V. Hukill, P.B. RB: Dr. Roberts' Medical Office Building July 31, 1995 Page Two Our records do show that the CAB inspection was made by Med Kopczynski who was the former Deputy Building Official and appointed to handle CAB inspections by Mr. Jaeger when he became Building Official. That inspection was approved August 25, 1989. I can only assume that the proper position to take would have been to cut off the additional paving to comply with the 30" landscape strip. It could have been assumed that it was not necessary since we did then, and do now, allow bumper stops to set back on paved areas less than the code requires so that the bumpers overhang the landscape strip. I see no reason why this would be an issue, especially as it relates to the adjacent property since our code also exempts landscaping on property that already has existing landscaping. My interpretation of the code is that the landscaping strip itself has a dimension requirement and the code specifies what must be located within that strip but not necessarily that the plantings must be as wide as the strip. It should be our position that the neighboring property owner should not be penalized for the paving on Dr. Roberts' property being closer to his property line than what was permitted. If any controversy arose during the construction of Dr. Roberts' permits, Mr. Haag could shed some light on it since he was involved in the site plan process and the final site approval was signed by him on November 19, 1991. AN: bh Attachments !lOB KitTS l'..J I __ "., PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-383 TO: William Hukill Department of Development Director FROM: Tambri J. HeYden'7jf-J-. planning and Zoning Director DATE: July 27, 1995 SUBJECT: Dr. Roberts' Medical Office Building Discrepancy Regarding width of Western Landscape Strip I would like to respectfully request research be conducted of whatever Building Division files are necessary to determine whether the permitted set of construction drawings for the above-referenced building, located on the south side of W. Boynton Beach Boulevard, reflect a 2i foot wide landscape strip along the western property line. Research is also needed to determine whether the inspection noted construction of a landscape strip that was less than 2~ feet wide and, if so, whether there is any documentation indicating how the matter was resolved. As you know, this issue, among others, will be discussed by the Commission when they reconsider their denial of the Clear copy site plan. In order for me to forward the results of your department's research to the City Attorney for his opinion, which will be included within my response to the Commission of all the issues that have been raised, I respectfully request notification to me of the results of this research by August 7, 1995. TJH:arw xc: Michael E. Haag c,95-3B3.tjh S.. r,5~~ OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER FROM: Carrie Parker City Manager t{J July 25,1995 ~ rn@rnW(0'-,!p\ ~,-_..""'') l i I JJL 2 8' I ~ ..,..--3 PLANNING AND (l ZONING OEPT. ~? TO: Tambri Heyden Planning Director DATE: SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. - Site Plan Application This item is rescheduled tor September 5th. Please prepare review and comments on Dr. Robert's letter ot July 20th. CP:jc Attachment cc: Jim Cherot 2nd C~.J FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-281 WDC TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: June 23, 1995 RE: NWSP 95-004 Clear Copy Inc. 660 W Boynton Beach Blvd We have no objections at this time. ~t ~ ~6D ~" ,:\it :~.'4 PJAONNNING AND L' ING DEPI ';mm PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-288 FROM: Carrie Parker, City Manager Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, utility Dept. Chief Field Insp. Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist William Hukill, Director Department of Development Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director --lj;ji?J- C/ TO: DATE: June 19, 1995 SUBJECT: Site Plan Project: Location: Applicant: File No.: Review - 2nd Review Clear Copy, Inc. 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Boulevard Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced project for your final review and recommendation. We would ask that you review this amended site plan submittal to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments previously made by your department. If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. If your comments have not been met, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing. Finally, we would ask that you include in your memorandum a recommendation as to whether the project should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory for consideration. Please return your memorandum and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5:00 P.M. on June 26, 1995. If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Michael E. Haag at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this project. cc: (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan Charlie Frederick Torn Dettman John Guidry a:2ndR.evMem.Cle -r~~ - (cJu- CL' ~d~~ - 'sf krv}(JtL-L 1- ~ / .,"'~ }wtJ-, ~~~ ~~ ~~~i4~ &lL~;tr~ ~ .~ ,:;. ~\J ,i-AiV \" j'v' ,,*, I.... !"tc. . .1 " ~&.l A)O r() IN ~j'J ;,f.} rv TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-235 Tambri J. Heyden Planning and zoningJirector 6~~... Michael E. Haag-\' ( . (7 Site and Zoning 0 ve opment May 30, 1995 Administrator Site Plan Project: Location: Applicant: File No.: Review - 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc. 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Boulevard = The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the proj ect to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. slq( 'I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: (!)~l. c~,~, 'f.--3. l' Lt,. 4. ';:)' ~.H rflP ,,\&- 5. Place on the plans a typical maximum spacing dimension of forty (40) feet on center for the required trees along N.W. 7 Street, N.W. 1st Avenue and the southwest corner of the vehicle use area that is visible from Boynton Beach Boulevard (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0.1.). 2. Please show and identify on the plans all curbing and wheelstops at landscaping areas. Areas to be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheel stops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adjacent to a parking stall and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with City standards [Chapter 23, Article II, E] Add to the landscape notes that one half of the total number of required trees and hedges shall be a native landscape material. [Comprehensive Plan policy 4.4.6] Provide a note and symbol identifying the type of landscaping material that is required to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. [Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.3.] Add to the dumpster enclosure gates and note on the plans that a clear opening on ten (10'0") feet excluding all gate hardware is being provided. Also specify on the plans the exterior finish material and color of the enclosure walls and gate. Page 2 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc NWSP 95-004 Memorandum No. 95-235 t'G.~ It, ..zJ 6 & jA.'P'l' <t';(.J v NI)(' ~'ll tiQ '^ iIi\(ll ,t 1',,' ;?,j)~ ... t, 7. <;,' . f;,' ': .. "~I I", I- - ;', 'II ~ , . , ,-' , ' Ii i " '/ 7 ~ 8. el ' Il~ <tf;) tJ'- \\01'11" I ~ C tfbSf w:- I (J.t/". l"J .J L' b' ./' ---9. I" ; -v '0 (11 /10. ,;1 , Pi ) .' c)./" ,>l~' c~.f; 0- , J~ l (,pr<' "" r--c.(r' oJ 0"'''' 1 /11. f/' s,' O'f./12. {I Show and dimension on the plans a loading zone in compliance with Section 11. J. of Chapter 2 Zoning. Add to the landsca in site plan and ~~9s~~_ease~ents{-il~ ten ot over~ead/ ,u~ ( 1/ines) Identify the type of easemen cnra ~imension the--width. Note: Some landscape material is not allowed to be planted with an easement and under overhead lines. [Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1] Show and dimension on the plans the landscape code and zoning code line-of-sight triangles that are required on both sides of each ingress/egress and at the intersection of rights-of-way (N.W. 1st Avenue and N.W. 7th Street _ N.W. 7th Street and Boynton Beach Boulevard). Also, provide a typical note on the plan that indicates the size of the clear unobstructed cross visibility space that is required within the triangular areas. Amend the plans accordingly. [Chapter 2, Section 4. E. and Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5. H. 1. and 2.] Submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan:t:>yname, manufacturer and model or sty,lE;!numbe.r.. A cOl'or'-~A'mple shall be submitted as an eXc;ifllple. The Isample ~all match the color or product identified on the )plans., ,.' [Chapter 9, community Design Plan Section 5] Note: The sample will be used for the final site inspection to ensure that the correct product "..c.u~d color were used for the proj ect. "'-----. Add to the submittal specifications showing style, colors, scale of lettering of all signage proposed for the bUilding and site. The signage shall be shown in compliance with the specifications listed in the Sign Code and Community Design Plan. The project is located within the C-2 neighborhood commercial district. The use of print shops is permitted provided an environmental review permit is secured in accordance with standards and procedures set forth in Chapter 2 Section 11.3. You have indicated that you would like to use the existing hedge located on the adjacent property to the east for satisfying the vehicle use area screening required for your property. This is acceptable, however, the material is required to be field verified by the city's landscape inspector durinCjl construction of the project. If the existing material meets the minimum requirement. it will be accepted, but if it does not meet minimum standards, you will have to provide the hedge material on your property. To request to use the eXisting hedge to satisfy your reqUired screening place the following note on the landscape plan: The City landscape inspector will field verify the existing hedge that is identified in the landscape legend with an asterisk, meets the minimum vehicle use area screening requirements. If the existing material does not meet the minimum standards, the plans and site will be revised to show the proper vehicle use area screening in compliance with City standards. ..., Ii / f ,I) v l,....t, l.:.i" . J,,~ " .....,~)' {b'"' ,_ Page 3 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc NWSP 95-004 Memorandum No, 95-235 i'\, j ':' I r' of- 13. Specify on the plan no less than 18" as the height after planting for the proposed hedge material. I(" .-- 14. , ~ t; t-,. ~~C, Submit for review the traffic data required to determine whether the proposed project meets the traffic concur- rency standards. The traffic data is required and must be reviewed by Palm Beach County prior to site approval. II RECOMMENDATIONS Q"" /' 14t. ~,t,.. 15. MEH:dim .:lstco..ea.Cle.r/TRC It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be specified on the plans. It is recommended that you provide a recycling container in compliance with the regulations specified by the Public Works Department. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-235 FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and ZOning~rector q;,~ Michael E. Haa ~ Site and Zoning D ve opment May 30, 1995 Administrator TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Site Plan Project: Location: Applicant: File No.: Review - 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc. 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Boulevard The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code defic~encies, they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Place on the plans a typical maximum spacing dimension of forty (40) feet on center for the required trees along N.W. 7 street, N.W. 1st Avenue and the southwest corner of the vehicle use area that is visible from Boynton Beach Boulevard (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.1.). 2. Please show and identify on the plans all curbing and wheelstops at landscaping areas. Areas to be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheel stops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adjacent to a parking stall and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. curb design shall comply with City standards [Chapter 23, Article II, E] 3. Add to the landscape notes that one half of the total number of required trees and hedges shall be a native landscape material. [Comprehensive Plan policy 4.4.6] 4. Provide a note and symbol identifying the type of landscaping material that is required to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. [Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J.] 5. Add to the dumpster enclosure gates and note on the plans that a clear opening on ten (10'0") feet excluding all gate hardware is being provided. Also specify on the plans the exterior finish material and color of the enclosure walls and gate. Page 2 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc NWSP 95-004 Memorandum No. 95-235 6. Show and dimension on the plans a loading zone in compliance with Section 11. J. of Chapter 2 Zoning. 7. Add to the landscaping/site plan all existing and proposed easements, including the location of overhead utility lines. Identify the type of easement and dimension the width. Note: Some landscape material is not allowed to be planted with an easement and under overhead lines. [Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1] 8. Show and dimension on the plans the landscape code and zoning code line-of-sight triangles that are required on both sides of each ingress/egress and at the intersection of rights-of-way (N.W. 1st Avenue and N.W. 7th Street - N.W. 7th Street and Boynton Beach Boulevard). Also, provide a typical note on the plan that indicates the size of the clear unobstructed cross visibility space that is required within the triangular areas. Amend the plans accordingly. [Chapter 2, Section 4. E. and Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5. H. 1. and 2.] 9. Submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan by name, manufacturer and model or style number. A color sample shall be submitted as an example. The sample shall match the color or product identified on the plans. [Chapter 9, Community Design Plan Section 5] Note: The sample will be used for the final site inspection to ensure that the correct product and color were used for the project. 10. Add to the submittal specifications showing style, colors, scale of lettering of all signage proposed for the building and site. The signage shall be shown in compliance with the specifications listed in the Sign Code and Community Design Plan. 11. The proj ect is located wi thin the C-2 neighborhood commercial district. The use of print shops is permitted provided an environmental review permit is secured in accordance with standards and procedures set forth in Chapter 2 Section 11.3. 12. You have indicated that you would like to use the existing hedge located on the adjacent property to the east for satisfying the vehicle use area screening required for your property. This is acceptable, however, the material is required to be field verified by the City's landscape inspector during construction of the proj ect. If the existing material meets the minimum requirements it will be accepted, but if it does not meet minimum standards, you will have to provide the hedge material on your property. To request to use the existing hedge to satisfy your required screening place the following note on the landscape plan: The City landscape inspector will field verify the existing hedge that is identified in the landscape legend with an asterisk, meets the minimum vehicle use area screening requirements. If the existing material does not meet the minimum standards, the plans and site will be revised to show the proper vehicle use area screening in compliance with City standards. Page 3 1st Review Clear Copy, Inc NWSP 95-004 Memorandum No. 95-235 13. Specify on the plan no less than 18" as the height after planting for the proposed hedge material. II RECOMMENDATIONS 14. It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be specified on the plans. 15. It is recommended that you provide a recycling container in compliance with the regulations specified by the Public Works Department. MEH:dim a:latcommem,Cl.ar/Tac PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-235 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: Hay 22, 1995 SUBJECT: Site Plan Project: Location: Applicant: File No.: Review - 1st Re'Jiew Clear Copy, Inc. 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Boulevard The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan n~vievv of the plans for the above-referenced proj ect. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories, The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant i~3 not intending to correct code deficiencies, they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: C,.'1't::fVi"..:"o,., I'c Tyj'IC'V.. 4.1N<;1,'~"" 1. Flease JP'l-~c.1:; ~ i-dl:;ut.tfy on the plansA't:-k'e llu,::iffit:im f';1>71';~ spacing '6-t~ rcquir~d tl~~S .i.lT-ttre-o--P4*~.i_m.e~---l-~ape!) 0,' " ~fl.':;/?..::<,~~ips (4C'O" O.~ maximul'l1EeCIu~E~c:lL.along N.W. 7 street, oo-<,/I.A:;..-v / -rJ. W. 1st Avenue and s. 'W~u side of Boynton Beach Boulevard ~I<!. ~J;' ~~ (Chapter 7,5, Article II Landscape Code t D. 1 . ) . rj?.:5;C) ~ ~ f',....O~ L. . Please pr~ de and identify on the plans all curbing and Hheelstops at landscaping areas. Areas to be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheel stops include all landscaped isla:1d8, landscaping adj acen t to a parking stall and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with City standards (Chapter 7.:, Article II Landscape Code Section 5) particular requirements. 3. Add to the landscape notes that all required landscaping shall b~ fifty (50%) native material. 4. Provide a note and a symbol identifying the type of landscaping vine used for accent shrubs along the screen wall {F0i'-TI'~ PL/?}-</' -;"re.12 ). 5. Provide a not;3 on the plans that identifies a clear openir:g on ten (10' 0") feet excluding all hardware for the dumpster enclosure. tl. Add to the landscaping/site plan all existing and proposed easements. Identify the type of easement and dimension the width. (j .v I' t~/~ .,,' , ,,< :.' t'~,,-r; ,(,', ';:. J, ' '---"-rt -r;..Jti / ._J,~r( 1:\ t(..,..,) .. u.. "--_,rv'o'1.V4,.-' <..I._L-:;;/J., VT"vr'f I' Provide and identify on the p~ns the line of sight (. ,,' r triangle~ a!'!'d provide a note for the three (3 I (I II - 6' 0") ("_____~ "Or' clearance~( 40',"") ',', <"', J. I\^[ ,e/),/1'..,\ '~,(r:JS' ~~W pi f1J& (1', I, -' r,! Do") ,"0",; , ~,~' I '_c, --' ~" _::~t-?<'" u,i'~.: .." . ."',' .} t, ("';/'/ ';_,11'<""0.'''' .l'1'v.J7tf)"i', (2 .J} -" "f/ ;/", .... ..... ..r 1.1 , ".n:,,' ,..... 1 __!&;;'I ", 'v-/' ',' f /,j I~::..r '~I > \I ',. {I-- .. 7. Page 2 1st Reveiw Clear Copy, Inc Nl.-lSP 95-004 Memorandum No. 95-235 '~ " ~> {t- ':f/' " - ~: 8. -S~bmi~d Jdentify on each building arclll tect~. elevation drawing the t~ of ~l). exteri nr f.inish----4ll~l_an.d s.~e the color of the I material by name, manuf acturer and model or style number. A color sample shall be submitted as an example along with the color or product identified on the plans. (Chapter 9, Community Design plan Section 5 ) Note: The sample will be used for the final site inspection 'to ensure that the correct product and color were used for the project. 10. Submi tall coloredr elevation dravlJ.2.l.gs and samples to tli~- Planning and Zonin~ Department by the Si teRLu1 approval""" deadline date. ' . '~) A1"0 '71) .,.."". <."C> ~"J'~t, ('".r~::::"''''/.I &~,I.A,"1i-' .....- .., ~..... ... ,......tJ IT Ii I ;,/" ."" ~~wi~1;ffe-iJitE :r:rt:"iH1s).sigrv\ specifications showing style l colors, scale of lettering consistent with the proPQ;;oed l:l1ildi:ng p:.....r'v;/;l~_,."'1' .~ Ai. ~... 11^, I c f...o/'. ~/J,f~1iv~~ v ( 9. 11 . Identify on the plans the i?l-~o;Jed location of all signs ;(/)P'"'::; ~r) e:~!/J{(D(.U.::" and if applicable the required setbacks. ' I ;'1J2 (.f-,s;...{J' ,~ 12. The project is located within the C-2 neighborhood commercial district and the use of print shops is permi tted provided an environmental review permit is secured in accordance with standards and procedures set forth in Section 11.3. II RECOMMENDATIONS 13. None at this time. MEH:dim e1: 16t.comItem.Clesrj'TP":: ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-156 (AMENDED) DATE: May 18. 1995 ~ T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 CB- SUBJECT: CLEAR COpy INC., FIRST REVIEW The fonowing comments/recommendations are submitted for your revicw: r( , ,J ~I) ~A~ , .t:' ( j~C ~l\. i ....' \r),~f t" \',' /{,? .I r' S' . II , v~ ~\~I } 0, 1. The driveway is too close to the right of way line of B.B. Blvd. (180' is required). Chap.23, Art.2H3. An application for a variance wil1 be required. 2. The plan is subject to meeting the parking lot regulations at time of permitting for paving, drainage, site lighting, curbing, landscaping, and irrigation. 3. Provide a satisfactory drainage design including calculations indicating that the stormwater shan be retained on-site for the first hour of a thrce year storm. Also, cateh basins shan be located in grassy areas unless otherwise approved by the Dircctor of Devclopment. Chap.23,Art. JIF. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. If possible, consider making the proposed driveway one way out and construct a one way in driveway on N,W. Ist Ave. This wi11 place the parking on the west side of the parking lot and more importantly, disal10w a backup of vehicles out towards the "Blvd." trying to enter the proposed driveway. The handicap stal1 may have to be located northward several feet to provide a 27' backup. The dumpster could remain where is or be locatcd to the west and face southward for truck accessibility. KRH/krh C: Wi11iam Huki11, Dev. Dir. Robert Eichorst, P. W. Dir. c1rcopy. 1 rv \f,~), ffi ~) nWj ~ \\~ ' I 8 , l~ r, , PL"'NNING m~o ZONING DEPT. .. --, BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-139 May 16, 1995 From: Tambri Heyden Milt Duff, Chief Plans Check Inspector 1st Review - New Site Plan Clear Copy, Inc. 660 West Boynton Beach Boulevard To: Re: With reference to subject project, the Building Division offers the fo~lowing comments: ,~C-2 Zoning minimum front yard 30' ,/ ,/ Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, ( ,// Section 4, General Provisions, D, Through Lots (Double /~--""" Frontage) requires front yard shall be provided on each street. ~,)~ r This must be complied with during site plan review. 2. Handicap access from right-of-way to entrance of ~~ A~ building required ~ -j~,./Y 3. Need sign details MJI #4. Need sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue \ \J'- 1" ~~ 5. Need site lighting details ; Lhe project can be forwarded to the Planning and Development ~~oard' but Items 2 through 5 must he met at time of permitting. <~ \., I i '\ n. \ 'i r",... I \ J ~ J ~ 'vJ\ nJtv+ Milt Duff MD:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.B., Department of Dev~lo~m~p~ Q~~C~bt ,,1, J;; 'i')-,!~,J_~=L_m"l', \1 \ ( ; ~ . ~, 5 ~ ~ . ,i Ii,,! : I' ! ,; ~ III !, J \ ~ ~.,-," ~:\:;!l:.~!rl~,~ /'.r';!) f .,j.:, I, :;; ! ~r r r. f~ A:CLBARCOP,TRC MEMORANDUM - TO: -rAjtc6R~ J-I{3.'tb~,J ff.,ArI;viN6 ~(~~G-ta~ FROM: ;:!. 0/"1 rJ l^}j'[" 1>1\1 ~ P \ P fl." fr S S l.f...{l r DATE: 5'/ -"3/?.s- RE: Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans Project: Co L-e 4R C tJi'( After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration. amended plans for the above the f(tEC.ltl~ktl7/M/ .f- f'AIN"~ ~;:::.P:r that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. ~~~n ~ r"\, ""',- ~ ~p ~$, \1; \S,'!' n,I\,,' l~ t; \" " II ~,--,.\", '" t; U) "~~..,,,,,- '\,' , ~, : n t""r;<cv..'~.."...., ~.~,-' ,- ; ~"i " \-, I, ,.,(, v 'I ') 3 '," \" L ",~:..,-,_..~..j C:AHEND1.ALD BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-139 May 16, 1995 From: Tambri Heyden Milt Duff, Chief Plans Check Inspector To: Re: 1st Review - New Site Plan Clear Copy, Inc. 660 West Boynton Beach Boulevard With reference to subject project, the Building Division offers the following comments: 1. C-2 Zoning minimum front yard 30' Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 4, General Provisions, D, Through Lots (Double Frontage) requires front yard shall be provided on each street. This must be complied with during site plan review. 2. Handicap access from right-of-way to entrance of building required 3. Need sign details 4. Need sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue 5. Need site lighting details The project can be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board, but Items 2 through 5 must be met at time of permitting. nJ-t))~ Milt Duff MD:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P. E., Department of Development?, ~if~c~~l- '. . ' .: ~ .~",::<>,r_~,J;?~,.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- A:CLI!ARCOP,TRC ~6 ft> RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-202 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J" Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist J<'~ # Clear Copy, Inc. RE: DATE: May 16, 1995 tt ,HJ ~ The applicant should indicate what plans will be undertaken to protect all existing trees and landscaping. The project should continue on the normal review process. .KH:ad 00 m@rnuw~ "'1'( I 6 ~'~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPl rn FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-261 WDC TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: May 16, 1995 RE: NWSP 95-004 Site plan Clear Copy Inc. 660 W Boynton Bch Blvd Provide an accessible fire hydrant near business entrance on NW 7 street. " ' (// / ~ f .. 7/1 - / /~tt/dt1A~ :fl(Zidi( #y' william D. / Cavanaugh, FPO 6 Fe i'40~ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-202 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist J<'~ # Clear Copy, Inc. RE: DATE: May 16, 1995 The applicant should indicate what plans will be undertaken to protect all existing trees and landscaping. The project should continue on the normal review process. KH:ad . ill l~LlR,J,J:IJIl r~ ~ n,HI Ir ,'tll ,.'''1 I 6 .,- ',1 ti I .,;" ~ ~":', L...J ~,.__,;,",__.,,~,..-.-J FLf'T1~i\D ,""1,'''\'''; ;CP'I' J .. 1,",: < ,_, ,. I... . '~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-=,,,,,,,,,,,.-'.,:.",,,,,,-'" . ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-156 DATE: May 15, 1995 TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-628~ SUBJECT: CLEAR COPY INC., FIRST REVIEW The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review: 1. The driveway is too close to the right of way line of B.B. Blvd. (180' is requircd). Chap.23, Art.2H3. An application for a variance will be required. 2. The plan is subject to meeting the parking lot regulations at time of permitting f9r paving, drainage, site lighting, curbing, landscaping, and irrigation. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. If possible, consider making the proposed driveway one way out and construct a one way in driveway on N.W. 1 st Ave. This will place the parking on the west side of the parking lot and morc importantly, disallow a backup of vehicles out towards the "Blvd." trying to enter the proposed driveway. The handicap stall may have to be locatcd northward several feet to provide a 27' backup. The dumpstcr could remain where is or be located to the west and face southward for truck accessability. C: William Hukill, Dcv. Dir. Robcrt Eichorst, P.W. Oir. clrcopy.lrv f,-..i", ~'-,ra eT~;w ~'U\, "l"l ~.) ~ \ 1 t!l ~;':,,"""~~. ~ i ' 1 dJ , " , \ : , ~ ; J " \ \ f\ ! , 5 'f1or= , , IJ II il\, l .V,~ f\-J, d 1; r ~: 6 ~ , "J I..' t \ L. , % l ~,t.l~,!""l'rt ,,' 1..J,..l"'\l rl'lj{) t H.!.":,,',',,,,, ')FP1 I Zuh~l':~~~'; , '-'<:"""'-'~'~._'- KRHlkrh TO: FROM: SUBJ: DATE: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-68 Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director New Site Plan - Clear Copy, Inc. May 12, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site. RE/cr bert Eichorst ublic Works Director 2 ~L ....1}.) ~ fPi. MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-159 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning \) FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities Date: May 12, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. New Site Plan, first Review Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: L Plan shall specify meter size, (26. 16(c)). 2. A Capacity Reservation Fee will be required within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval. The fee amount will be determined based upon meter size or expected demand, (Sec. 26-34[E]). 3. Please show location of existing or proposed fire hydrant. Fire hydrants shall be within 200' of all points on every commercial building, (Appendix C, Art. X, Sec. 16). 4. Plan shall show location of existing or proposed sanitary sewer lateral and c1eanout at property line, (Sec. 26. 16(a)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella ~ File D1.. ,-~,.~'''_.~ BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: Tambri Heyden - Director Sgt. Marlon Harris ...-/'"rr1 fl- II May 95 Clear Copy, Inc. TRC Memo #95-0134 I have reviewed the plans and find no~~~~~ejp'f~~~:~:.~./..,..<:.,..,.,. .,.:.:,~:::..::.,:,',.'~.":'::.:,,,:.:) :::~!::.;.:;.j.;~~;;.;:;::::;:::;::::;;:':":"">:' t...j' '::::::':~'i,l'~~i::;:;;::> ," .... . ..:/,.<;:::>. ...:~:V ../..... :':~'" . ":':"';" .:~<- "::~;::';':';';::"'" "::-":" }' ....:~ ..;...:...:'\ "';::.l' .. .. :tt \~\. ~~:.,;::.:":.'.::.,S.:I.'~:'~.:.".':'...,...::.,:~..l.:.;.J " . .' . ':.:.: .... \~::::,:,..:, .j::"i! "~, ::. .:::. r......................;..:...;.. _:: :::...............~.;:.. '::, :. :~ '-:. :.; ::; :~ .:: ;:' ~: :~.:.:-:.:>:.:-:....::~:.{: i~ :r..........~.:.;...:~~.:::~; .~ ~[i .J .~i t..:~~:;::::~:~:~::::~:~.i:. fJ (......'.............ot.:..:..;:.. ~ :::...................::.. ":. :. -': '.:. '.~ il ~:.::~.:.:.:.:<~:..) :. :.:......... ... . ~,.~,. ....:.f.: tJ: ::........................:....;..... olfJo dJ _;...:.0:"';';:..::.. \Q) lrlriJ <<.i.;.';.l.,.i.~ '::::;::~'" ." <~ if) QcY'0 ,':1 ~@rnDw~ill ;',-J f '.""1,. ~ "'~ ' , f! I - .;; t Ii' --- --'-- r ",j .'1, , PLANNI;" 6~ ZON:: i PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-186 FROM: Carrie Parker, City Manager Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Building Division Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp. Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Wil~am HUk1W&1 , Djrector of Department of Development ~.Q. R~ Tambri J.~ey n, Planning & Zoning Director TO: RE: May 2, 1995 SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES DATE: 1st Review - New Site Plan Project - Clear Copy, Inc. Location - 660 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard Applicant - Bob Feldman, Owner File No. - NWSP 95-004 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above- referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written conments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on May 15, 1995. Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the amended plans (2nd review). Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. page 2 of 2 To: TRC Members Re: Planning & Zoning Memo 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memo. Michael E. Haag will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the 1st review of the project. The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval. TJH:pab Attachment xc: (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Central File A:lstREV.CLR/TRC