The URL can be used to link to this page

AGENDA DOCUMENTS September 19, 1995 I. OPENINGS: aTYOFBOYNTONBEACH REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA A. Call to Order - Mayor Jerry Taylor B. Invocation - Rev. John Block, 81. Mark Catholic Church C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Vice Mayor Matt Bradley D. Agenda Approval: 1. Additions, Deletions, Corrections 2. Adoption II. ADMINISTRATIVE: 6:30 P.M. A. Accept resignation from Janine Nelson Hoffman from Recreation & Park Board B. Appointments to be made: APPOINTMENT TO BE MADE Mayor Taylor IV Matson II Bradley IV Matson II Bradley IV Matson II Bradley IV Matson IV Matson Mayor Taylor III Jaskiewicz IV Matson Mayor Taylor II Bradley III. CONSENT AGENDA BOARD Board of Adjustment Bldg Brd of Adj & Appeal Cemetery Board Children & Youth Adv Brd Library Board *Senior Advisory Brd Senior Advisory Brd Cemetery Board Comm Redev Adv Board Community Relations Board Code EnJorcement Board Code Enforcement Board Code Enforcement Board Recreation & Park Board LENGTH OF TERM EXPIRATION DATE Alt Term expires 4/97 Alt Term expires 4/96 Alt Term expires 4/96 Alt Term expires 4/96 All Term expires 4/96 Reg Term expires 4/96 Alt Term expires 4/96 Reg Term expires 4/97 Reg 1 yr Term to 4/96 Reg Term expires 4/96 Reg 3 yr Term to 9/98 Alt 1 yr Term to 9/96 Alt 1 yr Term to 9/96 Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED TABLED Matters in this Section of the Agenda are proposed and recommended by the City Manager for "Consent Agenda" approval of the action indicated in each item, with all of the accompanying material to become a part of the Public Record and. subject to staff comments. A. Minutes 1. Regular City Commission Meeting Minutes of September 5, 1995 2. City Commission Workshop Meeting Minutes of September 8, 1995 3. Joint City Commission/Chamber of Commerce Meeting Minutes of September 11, 1995 B. Bids - Recommend Approval - All expenditures are approved in the 1994-95 Adopted Budget 1 1. Award bid to Jones Chemicals, Inc. for the Annual Supply of Sulfuric Acid in the approximate amount of $37,000 2. Award bid to Laserturf Leveling for Golf Course Tee Renovation in the amount of $18,990.97 C. Resolutions 1. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of Renewal of Boat Club Park/Bait Shop Lease Agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and Kenneth Welch 2. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Request for certain action from the South Lake Worth Inlet District regarding the Boynton Beach Inlet jetty extension 3. Proposed Resolution No. R95- Lane RE: Rename N.W. 31st Terrace to Collins 4. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Ratification of South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board Action of August 31, 1995 the purchase of a new 1/2 ton pickup truck from Wallace Ford in the amount of $14,684.00 5. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of contract with Dr. James Denson Godwin, M.D. to serve as the City's Medical Director for Emergency Medical Services 6. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of agreement for Consultant Engineering Services with Mock Roos & Associates to construct a new water main along Gateway Boulevard, west of Lawrence Road 7. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of one year extension of annual bid for Concessionaire for the Great American Love Affair (G.A.L.A.) Art & Cultural Festival to San Francisco Puffs and Stuff 8. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of Florida Inland Navigation District Contract Extension to project agreement for downtown Mangrove Park 9. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Declaring the public necessity of acquiring four (4) parcels of proper!y for the expansion of a park facility in the City of Boynton Beach bounded by the C-16 Canal D. Approval of Bills E. Payment of Bills - August 1995 F. Disposal/donation of municipal property to Palm Beach Community College Criminal Justice Institute G. Approve Change Order No. 8 for American Standard Construction to change original specification to install modified roof system in lieu of the specified asphalt shingles at Wilson Center, in the amount of $1,350 H. Rejection of bids for Restaurant Concession at Boynton Beach Municipal Golf course and renewal of a lease for one additional year with Partners Plus International IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS & PRESENTATIONS: A. Announcements 2 1. First meeting in October will be held Thursday, October 5, 1995 due to the Jewish Holiday, Yom Kippur B. Presentations 1. Presentation by the Boynton Beach Little League in appreciation of the Sectional and State Tournaments hosted at Little League Park 2. Proclamation - Constitution Week - 9/17/95 to 9/23/95 V. BIDS: None VI. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 PM OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE AGENDA PERMITS A. Final Budget and Aggregate Millage Rate for Fiscal Year 1995/96 1. Citizen Comments 2. Proposed Resolution No. R95- 1995/96 RE: Adopt final millage rate for Fiscal Year 3. Proposed Resolution No. R95- 1995/96 RE: Adopt final Budget for Fiscal Year B. Abandonments necessary for Poinciana School 1. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 2. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: 3. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: C. Other Abandonments 1. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: N.W. 12th Avenue (Lincoln Avenue) Agustin Hernandez City of Boynton Beach N.W. 12th Avenue, West of Seacrest Boulevard ABANDONMENT - Request for abandonment of a portion of N.W. 12th Avenue, west of Seacrest Washington Avenue Agustin Hernandez City of Boynton Beach Washington Avenue, west of Seacrest Boulevard ABANDONMENT - Request for abandonment of an unimproved right-of-way between N.W. 12th Avenue and , N.W. 13th Avenue, west of Seacrest Boulevard Cherry Hills Plat, Lots 508 - 517 Agustin Hernandez Palm Beach County School Board Cherry Hills Subdivision, Lots 508 - 517 ABANDONMENT - Request for abandonment of a six foot wide utility easement Miner Road Richard Harris for Condor Investments of Palm Beach County City of Boynton Beach Miner Road between High Ridge Road and 1-95 ABANDONMENT - Request tor abandonment of a 54 toot wide portion of the Miner Road right-ot-way east ot High Ridge Road 3 2. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Forest Court Richard Harris for Condor Investments of Palm Beach County City of Boynton Beach Forest Court ABANDONMENT - Request for abandonment of the Forest Court right-of-way VII. PUBLIC AUDIENCE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 3 MINUTE PRESENTATIONS VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: A. PROJECT NAME: Papa Johns TABLED APPLICANT REQUESTED TO BE TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 17,1995 AGENT: Interplan Practice, Ltd. OWNER: Papa Johns USA LOCATION: Northeastcorner of N.W. 7th Court and Boynton Beach Boulevard DESCRIPTION: LANDSCAPE APPEAL: Request for a landscape code appeal to overhang a required landscape strip with bumpers of parked cars. B. PROJECT NAME: Papa Johns TABLED APPLICANT REQUESTED TO BE TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 17,1995 AGENT: Interplan Practice, Ltd. OWNER: Papa Johns USA LOCATION: Northeast corner of N.W. 7th Court and Boynton Beach Boulevard DESCRIPTION: NEW SITE PLAN: Request for site plan approval to construct a 1,142 square foot take-out pizza store on .22 acres. C. PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: AGENT: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: D. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: E. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: F. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: LOCATION: Clear Copy, Inc. Bob Feldman, Owner George C. Davis Southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street NEW SITE PLAN: Request for site plan approval to construct a 3,780 square feet, two (2) story building on a .225 acre parcel. Grove Plaza Chester W. DeSanti/Julian Bryan Dr. Walter H. Janke and Ms. Alice Fay Southeast corner ot Hypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road MASTER PLAN - Request for master plan approval to subdivide a commercially zoned parcel into six lots tor future development. Boynton Festive Center Jill Jarkesy Douglas McMillen Northwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton ROl='rt COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN APPEAL - Request tor a community design plan appeal to change the colors. materials and architectural features ot a previously approved outparcel to be used for a Hops Grill and Bar Restaurant. Packaging Concepts Jeff Lis 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard 4 c DESCRIPTION: G. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: H. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: I. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: J. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: USE APPROVAL - Request to amend the list of permitted uses tor the Quantum Park PID to allow research and development and the manufacture ot non-aerosol spray dispensing systems on industrially designated lots. Packaging Concepts Jeff Lis, The Catalfuno Companies P.J.M. and Associates LC 4925 Park Ridge Road SITE PLAN - Request for site plan approval to construct a 24,158 square foot manutacturing building on a portion of lots 47A and 47B (total of 1.48 acres), designated as industrial, within the Quantum Park PID. Boynton Estates f.k.a. Citrus Park Ramiro Rencurrell Next Boynton Homes Ltd. 8350 Lawrence Road SITE PLANS - Request for site plan approval to construct project entrance structure, signs and common area landscaping. Main Street Car Wash Jim Zengage Mary Fisher 201 East Boynton Beach Boulevard MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION - Request to amend the approved site plan to expand the car wash to include a canopy for automobile polishing and vacuuming, additional parking and a vehicle stacking area on a .23 acre parcel north of the existing car wash. Palm Walk a/k/a Boynton Belvedere Mark Fassey Trio Associates Limited North side of S.W. 19th Avenue, approximately 351 feet east of Congress Avenue TIME EXTENSIONS - Request for a one year time extension for conditional use approval and concurrency certification tor construction of a 48 bed adult congregate living faoillty (ACLF) fOJ Alzheimer's/dementia patients. K. Administrative appeal for Shoppes of Boynton for Ross Dress for Less DESCRIPTION: IX. NEW BUSINESS: A. Items for discussion requested by Mayor Jerry Taylor 1. Amend sign code for fast food drive-thru menu boards X. LEGAL: A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading - PUBLIC HEARING 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-28 RE: Land Use Amendment - Lake Worth Christian School (Required document not submitted as yet) TABLED 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-29 RE: Rezoning - Lake Worth Christian School (Required document not submitted as yet) T ABLEO 5 3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-31 RE: Expand membership of Board of Adjustment to add three regular members TABLED RECOMMEND TABLING UNTIL AFTER WORKSHOP MEETING 4. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-32 RE: Authorize amending Utility Deposits 5. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-33 RE: Land Use Amendment - 2404 S. Federal Highway (Gentleman Jims) 6. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-34 RE: Rezoning - 2404 S. Federal Highway (Gentleman Jims) 7. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-35 RE: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment - 2404 S. Federal Highway (Gentleman Jims) 8. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-36 RE: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment - Table #24 (revise table to show correct maximum density for special high density residential classification as 20 units/acre) B. Ordinances - 1 st Reading: None C. Resolutions 1. Proposed Resolution No. R95- Plan RE: Supporting the West Boynton Community TABLED 2. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Approve the pay rates tor 1995/96 Fiscal Year for certain municipal employees, non-union, classified and non-classified municipal employees 3. Proposed Resolution No. R95- and relocation agreement RE: Authorize execution of billboard removal D. Other 1. Legal opinion on Board of Adjustment duties and responsibilities TABLED 2. Entering into a stipulated agreement between the City of Boynton Beach v. Summit Associates, Ltd. , XI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: XII. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: XIII. OTHER: XIV. ADJOURNMENT: NOTICE IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES lHE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F.S.286.0105) THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE CONTACT JOYCE COSTELLO, (407) 375-6013 AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST. 6 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-497 Agenda Memorandum for September 19, 1995 city Commission Meeting FROM: Carrie Parker city Manager ~ Tambri J. Heyden ~'). ~~ Planning and Zoning Director TO: SUBJECT: september 14, 1995 clear Copy, Inc. - NWSP # 95-004 New Site Plan (reconsideration of 7/18/95 Commission action) DATE: Please place the above-referenced request on the September 19, 1995 Commission agenda under Development Plans. At the september 5, 1995 Commission meeting, the Commission voted to reconsider their July 18, 1995 action of denial of the above- referenced site plan on September 19, 1995. Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-352 and 325, previously transmitted to you for the July 18th meeting, are attached for reference regarding the specifics of the site plan. Upon your receipt of the attached July 20, 1995 letter from Dr. Roberts, the property owner adjacent to (east of) the subject property, you requested staff to research and respond to the five points in Dr. Roberts' letter in preparation for the September 19th reconsideration by the Commission. The following response is provided based on information I have gathered from the city attorney, the Engineering Division (see attached Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-333), the Public works Department and the applicant (see attached letter dated August 3, 1995 from Gecrge Davis): 1. Article II, Section 5.E of Chapter 7.5 regarding the landscape hedge and strip between the subject property and Dr. Roberts' property - Pursuant to the above section of the landscape code, a two and one-half foot wide landscape strip with hedge must be provided along int@rior property lines where vehicular use areas (driveways and parking lots) abut interior property lines. Clear Copy has not provided a landscape strip and hedge (and has no room to provide it without significantly altering their site plan) due to a code exemption that allows satisfaction of the landscape requirements where there is an existing hedge, provided the "hedqe meets all applicable standards of the landscape code". Dr. Roberts states that the code exemption cannot be applied to Clear Copy because although there is a hedge on Dr. Roberts' property, adjacent to Clear Copy, the strip is 10 inches short of the required 2 1/2 feet. Therefore, he states that neither Dr. Roberts', nor Clear Copy meet code, and that Clear Copy, by code, needs to provide a 10 inch wid~ landscape strip adjacent to Dr. Roberts' nonconforming strlp or Clear Copy must be granted a variance (appeal). Please note that Dr. Roberts cites a section which does not exist and therefore I cannot verify his first sentence. From BUilding Division records, the tie-in survey for Dr. Roberts' property that was prepared at time of inspection of the improvements on Dr. Roberts' property shows that Dr. Roberts' parking lot encroaches into his landscape strip and conflicts with ~he bUilding plans which show the necessary 2 1/2 feet. The lnspectlon was accepted and there is no TO: Carrie Parker -2- september 1, 1995 documentation noting whether this ever became an issue during inspections. Therefore, the city either knowingly, or unknowingly, accepted this "problem" as is. , Based on the above information, the city attorney states ~~~~hat the city shall not require Dr. Roberts to remedy this problem on his property and that Clear Copy, on their property, is not required to make up the difference in width of the landscape strip. 2. Article IV, section 10.T of Chapter 6 regarning sidewalk width - Pursuant to the above section, the width of the sidewalk Clear Copy is to provide is four feet wide (Dr. Roberts indicates five feet wide) since the sidewalks Clear Copy is to install are on local streets. The site plan submitted shows the sidewalk diminishing to a width of two feet at the intersection of N.W. 7th Street and N.W. 1st Avenue. According to the Engineering Division, there is no city standard detail for how sidewalks are to be designed at an intersection. In fact you will f\nd existing sidewalks at intersections designed in a couple of different ways. The existing sidewalk on the west side of the street is also desiqned with a diminished width at the intersection. The Engineering Division has indicated verbally that due to the way the eastbound turn lane on N.W. 7th Street is constructed, the applicant shall complete the sidewalk by taking up eXisting conditions and constructing it to the attached sketch that has been prepared by George Davis. This design would not reduce any area of the parking lot or the minimum five foot wide landscape strip required adjacent to rights-of-way. 3. Chapter 9, Section 11.3 regarding overhead doors - The above section states " Due to the high degree of visibility of bUildings located on Hypoluxo Road, Miner Road, congress Avenue, Lawrence Road, Gateway Boulevard, Quantum Lakes Drive, Old Boynton Road, Knuth Road, Woolbright Road, Boynton Beach Boulevard, Winchester Boulevard, High R~dge Road, Seacrest Boulevard, Golf Road, Ocean Avenue, Federal Highway, old Dixie Highway, N.E. 10th Avenue and S.E. 36th Avenue, most of which are considered entrances to the city, the following additional exterior design requirements apply: 1. Overhead doors shall not be located on a building facade(s) that faces a public or private street." The intent of this' section was - overhead doors shall not be located on a building facade(s) that faces one of the above public or private streets. To require that overhead doors not be located on a building facade that faces guy public or private street would render many bUildings nonconforming (particularly in industrj~l ?"'-:'~,_\ . " ..;,;;'."! ~~-,'" ~l!.O\'1 construction, without an appeal, of an industrial building having overhead doors on a small lot because lot size constraints would not enable flexibility to reorient a building and parking on a lot. However, the city attorney states that this amendment should be made to the community design plan and that Clear Copy's overhead door which Mould face N.W. 1st Avenue must be removed, even though N.W. 1st Avenue is not one of the streets listed above. ( As stated in G~orge Davis' August 3rd letter, the applicant agrees to replace the overhead doors with a pair of side- hinged swinging doors. TO: Carrie Parker -3- September 14, 1995 4. Chapter 23, Article II.H.3 regarding the distance driveways shall be from street right-of-way lines - The above section states that "Parking lot drivewways shall be constructed at least thirty (30) feet from the intersection of the right-of-way lines along local streets and one hundred eighty (180) feet along streets of a higher classification". Both N.W. 7th Street and N.W. 1st Avenue are local streets and Boynton Beach Boulevard is a street of "higher classification"; an arterial. Therefore, a driveway onto N.W. 7th Street, a local street, is required to be 30 feet, not the 180 feet stated by Dr. Roberts, from the intersecting right-of-way lines of N.W. 7th Street and Boynton Beach Boulevard. The Clear Copy site plan reflects a driveway distance of over 65 feet and therefore complies with code without a variance. Dr. Roberts adds that Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-156, dated May 15, 1995 states that a variance is needed. The attached Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-333, dated August 31, 1995 states that their May 15th memorandum incorrectly interpreted the code, therefore a variance is not needed. In addition, it was mentioned at the July 18th Commission meeting that the Texaco service station and Wendy's restaurant on Boynton Beach Boulevard, which are on corner lots and have driveways onto the side street they abut, were required to seek variances. Staff researched the approvals of these projects and neither one was required to obtain a variance for their driveways on side streets and the same code requirement was in place at the time of their project approvals. 5. Light pole in paved area obstructs back-up aisle - Dr. Roberts states one of the light pole locations does not permit the required, unobstructed back-up space of 27 feet, therefore he believes a variance is needed (or a parking space deleted which would cause the building to have to be ,reduced in size). George Davis addresses this in his August ,- -' 3rd letter and states that the error was not caught when revised plans were'submitted which flip-flopped the parking lot and the lighting plan was not correspondingly revised. He states that the light pole can be relocated to the west side of the parking lot to within the landscape strip, which is permissible. Therefore, no variance and no alteration to the parking lot deSign are needed. In addition to the above, there are three other issues that have unfolded since the July Commission meeting; building design, traffic concurrency and dumpster access. Building deSign - You will recall that there was a great deal of discussion at the July meeting relative to the design of the bUilding and additional landscaping. Things discussed were changing the building color to a shade of tan or orange rathe~ than pink (addressed in staff's July comments), lowerlng the height of the bUilding (the two stories proposed are allowed), putting shutters and raised stucco sills on, all windows, adding tile accents, installing a false ~hlmne~ or cupola on the roof (would require a height exc~ptlon, Slnce the proposed building height is at the m~xlmum allowed for the C-2 district), increaSing the roof pltch to 4:12 (since the bUilding height is at the maximum one story would have to be removed), providing an 18 inch' ov~rh~ng on all four sides of the bUilding (since the bUll~lng is at the minimum setback, a variance would be reqUIred) and raised stucco bands, reducing the sign size, TO: Carrie Parker -4- September 14, 1995 increasing the size of hedges and trees and adding more landscaping along the three street frontages. As indicated in his August 3rd letter, the applicant offers adding shutters to the south side of the building and adding arched windows. Trdffic concurrency - By the time of the July Commission meeting, Palm Beach county was not provided enough information to certify for concurrency (addressed in staff's July comments). Since this meeting, staff has received the attached August 16, 1995 letter regarding this issue wherein Palm Beach County states that although it appears as if the project meets the county's traffic ordinance, there was additional information that they needed to request of the I traffic engineer. Palm Beadh County has not contacting staff since this letter to notify us that the information has been submitted. Also, they indicate that a restricted covenant needs to be placed on the property limiting its use to a print shop (a new traffic study would be needed and must be approved for any other use in the future). Dumpster access - You will recall that there was a great deal of discussion at the July Commission meeting regarding whether access to the proposed dumpster was actually available. The Public Works Department has revisited this again and states that because of the landscape island south of the driveway onto N.W. 7th Street, their standard sanitation vehicles would not be able to maneuver their vehicles on site to access the dumpster. Based on additional information the Public Works Department obtained from the applicant regarding type and quantity of solid waste anticipated to be generated, can pick-up will be the method of solid waste disposal, except for recyclables which will be picked up by the recycling truck. The city's recycling trucks are smaller and will be able to maneuver on site. Recyclables and cans will be stored within the enclosure that was planned for the dumpster (same location). The applicant will be required to bring his cans out to curbside on pick up days. If the Commission determines that this site plan request is approvable, it is recom~ended that the approval be conditioned upon all staff comments transmitted in July and compliance with Palm Beach County's August 16th letter (as well as any forthcoming comments from the county) and the contents of George Davis' August 3rd letter. tjh Attachments xc: central File A:ClerCopy t .- - -~~~ / MARK E. ROBERTS, D.D.S. 650 West Boynton Beach Blvd. - Suite #2 - Boynton Be.:h. FL 33426 -(407) 736-1700 July 20,1995 Hon. Carrie Parker City Manager City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach City Hall Boynton Beach, FL RE: Site Plan Application Clear Copy, Inc. - NWSP #95-004 Dear Ms. Parker: I am writing this letter in response to Mr. Gene Moore's letter ,to you dated July 19,1995. As a businessman and owner of the adjacent property to the project under consideration, I have serious concern that the project as it now stands is an inappropriate use of the site. On July 18, the application for site plan approval was denied. Several neighbors and myself attended the public hearing to voice concerns about the proposed parking, position and size of the building, and style of architecture (or lack of it). I believe that the commission has worked diligently the past few years to improve the appearance of the buildings within the city. The city coIlllllissioners also denied the application because the site plan does not comply with Land Development Regulations. When the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this project they were not aware that there was noncompliance of the required building codes. I believe that the denial qf the application was rightly based on this additional information. The petitioner However, I believe vaJ:'iance. in oxde:r Development Codes: 1. Article 7.5-16E. This article states that where parking and vehicular use abuts an existing hedge on an adjacent property that meets requirements of th~ 2 1/2 feet hedge buffer, the second property is said to also meet this requirement. It also states that if the site abuts a property with a non-conforming hedge buffer, the proposed site will have to make up the believes that all ordinances have been met. that there are five issu.. that require tor this project to comply with the Land difference and still meet the minimum combined 2 1/2 feet requirement. This proposed site abuts a non-conforming hedge buffer and should be required to add an additional 10 inches to the existing non- complying buffer hedge as required by code to become conforming. By providing this ten inches, this decreases the required 27 feet of backup space to 26 feet 2 inches for 12 parking spaces. Since this is not allowed by code because of a possible safety hazard, a variance should be required of the applicant to proceed with the project. Sealed surveys were presented to all city commissioners verifying this fact. 2. Article 4-10T. This states that sidewalks shall be 5 feet wide. At the southwest corner of the project, the site plan indicates a sidewalk that narrows down to almost 2 feet at the intersecting points of NW 7th Street and NW 1st Ave. If the sidewalk remains a continuous 5 feet wide as required by code, then not enough distance exists to allow for the closest parking space and/or 5 feet hedge buffer zone. Eliminating this parking space will leave this project with one too few parking spaces. 3. Article 9-11J. This states that buildings along Boynton Beach Blvd., due to their high degree of visibility, shall not have overhead doors on a building facade that faces a public or private street. This proposed building does have an overhead door that faces NW 1st Ave. and could easily be seen from NW 7th Street. This does not meet the required Land Development Regulations thus requiring a variance to build as submitted per requested plans. 4. Chapter 23 Article 2B3 states that parking lot driveways shall be constructed at least 180 feet from the intersection of the right of way lines along streets of higher classification. Since the proposed driveway is only approximately 65 feet from the intersection to Boynton Beach Blvd., to proceed would require a variance. The Engineering opinion from memo #95-156, dated May 15,1995 to the Planing a~ Zoning director, clearly states their position is that this property requires a variance. 5. The lighting design submitted for site plan approval will not permit the required backup space for one parking space. The light fixture pole locations are indicated on the engineering drawing, but are inadvertently left off the master site plan. Placing the poles at the indicated locations on the engineering drawing encroaches on the required 27 feet of unobstructed backup space for a parking space. Placing this light pole at the indicated position would require a variance because it eliminates the required backup space needed. Mr. Moore stated in hi. letter that hi. glient wa. denied the opportunity to speak at the public hearing. This i. just not accurate. I did not see his client at the public hearing. If he had attended the meeting, he could have taken the opportunity to address these issues as every one'else did. 2 ", ~..'~ . ~ cf:'. For the petitioner to threaten to file a law suit against the city for injunctive relief and compensatory damages without conforming to the required Land Development Regulations is nonproductive. Be should revise his site plan proposal and/or file variances where required. I would like Staff to review the aforementioned items that I feel are in non-compliance with the Building Regulations. If the city knowingly approves this project without requiring variances then the city may be leaving themselves open for a possible conflict. Si~liJM~ Mark E. Roberts, D.D.S. , , MER/am cc: Mayor Taylor City Commissioners James Cherof, City Attorney Tambri Heyden, P , Z Dir. y' ;. . 3 ~ ".. .{""..; ,.".. ..."....,..,....-...., .' .. '''. .- --~._-.".-' -...--- ,,,-;"-"." -',' . - rn@rnowr ill - it:' I 1995 DEVELOPMEft DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISIOH MEMORANDUM NO. 95-333 PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. TO: Carrie A. Parker, City Manager ~iam HUkill, P.E., City Engineer August 31, 1995 CLEAR COpy - ROBERTS' COMMENTS FROM: DATE: RE: In the July 20, 1995 Roberts' letter to you, Item 4, implies to you that LOR Chapter 23, Article II, Section H3, page 23-8 requires 180 feet from the R-O-W line of Boynton Beach Boulevard to a driveway. That is an incorrect interpretation. What it actually says is "at least 30 feet from the intersection of the right-of-way lines along local streets and 180 feet along streets of a higher classification." N.W. 7th Street is a local street, not a street of higher classification. He also cited Engineering Division Memo 95-156 dated May 18, 1995 from Mr. Hall to Ms. Heyden which did, in fact, incorrectly interpret that portion of the code. However, that was corrected within a few days with the following notation on the memo: "waived, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1 access 30' to local streets. WVH. .. That section reads "points of access to lots developed within a subdivision shall be located a minimum of thirty feet from intersecting right of way lines on local streets...- The Roberts' comment in Note 5 simply says a variance may be required for a light pole. If he is correct, the applicant will have to receive a variance to proceed. Either way, approval of the site plan can be conditioned on a possible variance. With respect to Note 2, the sidewalk i..ue rai.ed can becoma a condition, and/or a variance if it is as Roberts states. WVH:ck xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & zoning Director C:CLRCOPY.COM ,"'S," .-- "~"'lj" 'J'~., .' ~.." ,...._'..".,....~....,_...- _.-- G E 0 R G E C. 0 A V I 5 .7lrchitect MCll1b<, of Th~ "'\IlI~rj":lm Iu mtulc: of Al'..:hicc..:,s 1100 SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY. BOYNTON BEACII. FLORIDA 33H5 P. O. BOX 1000. Phone 732-6154 00 m@rnnwm fl.lll.i:j U~j;) 00 August 3, 1995 Bob Feldman Clear Copy, Inc. 211 South Federal Highway Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Dear Bob, Responding to your telephone call yesterday, here are my comments regarding Mark Roberts' letter to Carrie Parker: Item 1: The hedge buffer is nonconforming because it falls 10" short of the code specified width. The intent of the ordinance is to require an acceptable degree of density in a hedge between two parking lots. Item %: The sidewalk can be constructed to the required width without reducing the parking area. See attached sketch. Item 3: The overhead, doors may be replaced by a pair of side-hinged swinging doors. Item 4: The parking area, now with two driveways, was changed as recommend by the engineering department, from the original having only one entry/exit on N.W. 7th Street. In their comments to the planning and zoning board, engineering asks for clarification of the 180' dimension policy. Item 5: The light pole in question will be relocated to the green area at the south- west corner of the property and wilJ not intorforo with car parkins. The enaineflred plan that we submitted was made using the original parking lot layout with one entry/exit on N. W. 7th Street. ~."....:::~~ ',"'" . ~'.\"~"'!'\t;'1'f' " , '.. ..-...:," . As far as general appearances go, I believe the site is zoned C-2 where there is a twenty-five foot building height limit. The roof is shown as high as it is legal to build. Louvered shutters can be added on the south side. Arched windows may help a little, but because of the height restriction, they will still be of conventional t o~pfiions. I ) .1 Si crely, / ~ GCD/bad , , .. '~~""'''''',,"~.!f..., , !l'".. " l \~ ) ~ ;,~;.:~,,!~~,~,r;ia... ~i: .:. ~ '. i' f'" , ~ &. to- ~ ~ .-- ~~.-'".- ..... , , \ \ . ~t ..)! . ...... ..,,:,,;.:.,.8 AUG-16-199S 13:57 Board of County Commissioners Ken L Foster. Chainnan Burt Aaronson. Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus C~rol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCart:y Maude Ford Lee 22222222222222222 4~7 478 5770 -- P.~2/~2 County Aclmlnl.tr.tor Robert Weisman Department of Engineering A1'ld Public Wark. August 16, 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden. Director Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach) FL 33425-0310 RE: CLEAR COpy Dear Ms. Heyden: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division hasrQviewed the traffic impact study for the project entitled ctear Convt pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County land Development Code. The proposed project wi 11 cons; st of a 3, 7BO square foot pr1 nt shop I Tho traffi e study assumes a trip generation rate of 30.8 trip~ p&r 1,000 ~quarg feGt, based on a trip generation study of three print shop.. It appears that of can meet the r9quiremants of the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. Sefer; making a final determination. we will need the data from the trip generation study to verify the rate and the assumed build-out date for the project. It my understanding that the property 1s zoned for retlil uses. If the traffic is to he assQssed bas8d on a print shop, there will need to be a restricted covenant p1acQd on the property. I will contact you whon H. Burton Smith provides the required information. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding this determination, pleaSe! contact me at 694-4030. Sincerli1y) OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER =Sb:::~ Senior Registered Civil Engineer ce. William Hukill, P.E., Director Boynton Beach Department of Devc10pment , H. Burton Smith File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review g:\user\dwe1sber\wp50\tps\boyn49 'An EquQl Opporlllnitl. Mfirmiltive Action Employer" @ /JIiIl18d ~n tlfqlClfa ~ BOll 21229 West Palm BQ~h. F1D~da 3,.16-1229 (407) 6lK-tooo TOTAL P.02 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-352 Agenda Memorandum for July 18, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker city Manager Tambri J. HeYden--,ptJ- Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: July 10, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. - NWSP #95-004 New Site Plan please place the above-referenced request on the July 18, 1995 City Commission agenda under Development Plans. II DESCRIPTION: This is a request from George C. Davis, agent for Bob Feldman, property owner and owner of Clear Copy, Inc., for site plan approval to construct a 3,780 square foot, two-story, retail printing business on a .225 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th street (please refer to attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-325 for further details regarding the site plan). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 5-1 vote, recommended approval of this request, subject to staf f comments (Public Works Department Memorandum #95-102, utilities Department Memorandum #95-204, Police Memorandum #95-0148, Engineering Division Memorandum #95-205, Building Division #95-210 and Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-326. As a point of information, there was much discussion regarding the accessibility (turning radius of the approach) to the proposed dumpster location, the egress only deSign of the driveway onto N.W. 7th stl'eet (there was some concern as to whether motorists would obey this driveway de~ign as egress only) and the bUilding deSign (possible inappropriatene~s of the shutters and lack of additional deSign features). TJH:dim Attachment 1:.1 C':AY.,WIJII. C~ r PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-325 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION July 11,.1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: Clear Copy, Inc. Applicant: Bob Feldman, owner Agent: George C. Davis Location: Southeast cornel- of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street File No. : NWSP 95-004 Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercia~ (LRC) Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Type of Use: Copying service and print shop Number of Units: N/A Square Footage: Site: 9,788 square feet (.225 acres) Building: 3,780 square feet Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning: North - Boynton Beach Boulevard and farther north is Wendy's Restaurant, zoned C-2. South -, N. W. 1st Avenue and fal-ther south are single-family residences, zoned R-1A. East Medical office building, zoned C-2. West N.W. 7th Street and farther west is Gateway Center, zoned C-2. Existing Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with no vegetation. Proposed Development: The propos.~ retail printing bus1ne.. primarily serves countl"y clubs. Therefore, most of their business involves pick-up and delivery directly to the customer. They also serve walk-in printing needs of the geneL"al public. Concurrency: Traffic - Verification has not yet been received from Palm Beach County Traffic Division which indicates that the anticipated small increase in trips generated by the use complies with the city's traffic levels of service and Palm Beach \ Page 2 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 site Plan Review Staff Report Clear Copy, Inc. Driveways: Parking Facility: Landscaping: Building and site Regulations: Community Design Plan: signage: County's Traffic Performance standards Ordinance. The applicant will be responsible for any required improvements determined to be necessary as part of Palm Beach County's review of the traffic study. Drainage - Insufficient drainage information has been submitted for the Engineering Division to certify compliance with the City's drainage levels of service at ythe time of site plan approval, as required. The Engineering Division is recommending that this be postponed to time of permit review. TWo, one-way driveways to the parking lot proposed; a one-way ingresfi located on N. W. Avenue and a one-way egress located on N. W. street. are 1st 7th The proposed parking facility contains the required thirteen (13) parking spaces, including one (1) handicap space. The landscape plan submitted reflects all required landscaping. The proposed development meets the requirements of the building and site regulations. The total site area 1s 9,788 square feet with a building coverage of thirty-seven percent (37%). The building height is twenty-five (25) feet. , The proposed color of the two-story stucco building will be light pink with white trim, doors and window shutters. The roof will be brick colored s- tile. These colors are generally compatible with the colors of the neighboring structures which are predominantly of a Spanish/Mediterranean style. However, the shade of pink selected for the stucco does not appear to compliment the brick colored roof tile; a more orange shade of pink 1s recommended. A freestanding sign is proposed between Boynton Beach Boulevard and the front of the building. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS: Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding this request: DEPARTMENT ATTACHED MEMORANDUM Public Works utilities Fire Polic Engineering Division #95-102 #95-204 N/A #95-0148 #95-205 c~ .-----/ Page 3 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 site Plan Review staff Report Clear Copy, Inc. Building Division Parks & Recreation Forester/Environmentalist Planning and Zoning #95-210 N/A N/A #95-326 The above Departments' comments may be addressed on the permit set of drawings. The l'emaining departments did not have comments reoarding their review of the amended plans. RECOMMENDATION: The Plann~ng and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. DDC:dim xc: Central File .:.tff.-pt..::l. , , -~ \ \ ~ ~-. ~\ \ \ ~ .7:- . . r-~A~~ ~ t. ..---.:..'. --- _...~_... - ~ ~ . a\ t_ Jf'\) t ~ -it . - ....... -' - . '! .1. . . .... r:',""'~;:p:; ;::A'-;-~~': JU~' .-.. ~. . . IV' ...ne u-l ~~_.. .~, V pP N c;;. . I, I '. . . . ~ . ,\ o ~ ~ 'f1 ~ ~ ~f I I \ , . - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #9S-1 02 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Clear Copy, Inc. DA TE: , June 22, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the site plan for the above site and the plans can be forwarded to the Planning & Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory for consideration. , ~ bert Eichorst Public Works Director RE/cr , 5 ~...... '.>~ ." /J I~ -* , /.. .' '. , . i I : . ,Ii " , ./1 '._1 MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-204 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~~~ rflr- fuh~<A Guidry, Director of Utilities FROM: Date: June 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. A second fire hydrant may be required based on access evaluation by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department staff. 2. Plan shall show location of proposed water meter. (Sec. 26.16(c)). 3. A sanitary sewer cleanout shall be installed, the size qf1he lateral, at the property line. Please show on your plans. (Sec. 26.33(b)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella Steve Campbell, Fire Dept. File , ~) . BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT ~ . JtlL.[[. dJN 2 6 1995 TO: FROM: DATE: REF: T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNINO & ZONINO DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 9S CLEAR COpy - 2ND REVIEW MEMO #0148 I have reviewed the above site plan and. ~. N. t1lld~I~.th suggested changes. ~~,~~) -> U . . ~t%?"'~ (;;:'>-v ~ ~Z~fid~:~ . ~M~rlon Harris Police Department rev rev rES) n..o go go U c tbdlc d) @ffi o . clj , , of'. ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-205 DATE: June 26, 1995 Iili T AMRRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 ~UBJ~CT: CLEAR COpy INC., SECOND RE~IEW ~ The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review: I. The plan is subject to the parking lot regulations for paving, drainage, site lighting, curbing, landscaping, and irrigation permits. RECOMMENDATIONS I. Engineering recommends that the subject plan be forwarded to the P & D Board. 2. We also recommend a discussion with the Board regarding clarifying the location of driveways when a parcel abuts a looal road and ono ofa higher classification (Chap. 23, Art.2H3). If there is general agreement that the code needs revision, it should be done quickly. I One point that needs clarification is ... To what point on the driveway dJh~ 30' or 180' dimensions g01 - to the centerline ofthe D/W'l or to the outside edge oithe ingress/egress D/W1 The following modifications are also suggested: a) Chap. 23. Art.2H I: Change the maximum driveway width from 32' to 36'. Most driveways have three lanes - one in and two out, usually a right turn lane and one for crossing maneuvers. Usually these lanes arc 12' each: however, if the 36' dimension is acceptable. I would like to see the city specify that the two egress lanes be II' wide each and the Ingress lane, 14'. The purpose of this code requirement would be to allow a wider lane for vehicles coming in from a collector or arterial roadway to negotiate the turn as they decelerate. Having II' lanes for outgoing traffic is no hardship because they arc traveling at a low speed and then stopping at the stop sign. b) Chap 23, Art.2H2: Provide that the 25' driveway radii be a minimum dimension. For the same reason above, vehicles entering a shopping center, etc. from a 40 to SO mph spced (actual speed, not posted speed) should ha~e a larger, "forgiving" radius. , KRH/krh C: William Hukill. Dev. Dir. and to tile. ,-----, June 26, 1995 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-210 RE: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director Al Newbold Deputy Building Official' TRC COMMBNTS - 2nd SITH PLAN RBVIBN CLBAR COPY, INC. TO: FROM: The Building Division has reviewed the amended plans for the above project and offers the following comments: 1. Thirteen parking spaces are required; only 12 are shown. There is no handicap parking shown. 2. Handicap access from the right-of-way to the entrance of building is required. 3. Sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue is required. # The above comments can be met at time of , building permit; therefore, we recommend that the proj'ect be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. ~ Al"New~ol.d' .~. / / AN: bh Attachment/plans XC: William V. Hukill, P.E. , eLl.. C\ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-326 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: June 28, 1995 SUBJECT: site Plan Pl"oj ect: Location: I Appl icant: File No.: Review - 2nd Review - New Clear Copy, Inc 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Site Plan Boulevard The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comm~nts either from the first review or new comments as a result o~ the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the site and design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All COmmeJlts and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building Division for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Please show and identify 011 the plans all curbing, wheelstops and landscaped areas. Areas that must be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheelstops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adjacent to a parking stall' and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with City standards. 2. state on the plans that Boynton Beach Bouleval"d is the front of the property. 3. Provide a note adjacent to the dumpster location identifying the type of landscaping material that is required to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. 4. Add to the landscape plan/site plan all 8K1st1nQ and proposed easements. Identify the type of easement and dimension the width. Note: Some landscape material is not allowed to be planted with an easement and under overhead lines. 5. Show on the plan that the proposed landscaping adjacent to the il1ters~ction of N.W. 7th Street and N.W. 1st street does not violate line-of-site requirements for areas within twenty-five feet of the intersection. 6. Submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan by name, manufacturer and model or style number. \C) I Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-326 2nd Review, New Site Plan Clear Copy, Inc. File No.: NWSP 95-004 7. Although the use Is located within a C-2 district, print shops require environmental review. The applicant must obtain an environmental review permit prior to occupying the premises. 8. state on the plans the hours that the loading zone will be utilized and that these hours have been coordinated with Public Works so as to not conflict with trash pick. 9. Any conditions of approval received by Palm Beach County Traffic Division after their review of the traffic statement, must be complied with at time of permitting. II. RECOMMENDATIONS 10. It 1s recommended that a recycliRg container be provided in compliance with the criteria specified by the Public Works Department. 11. It is recommended that a more orange shade of pink is selected for the building stucco to better compliment the color of the roof tile. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH:dim xc: Central File .:2nduo..Clr , ~ .. L(,CATION. MAI-l . -CLEAR COPY, INC. \: \2 ! I ~.I.~~, ~ ~r"':~~t~ _~:.' ~l ~I.J =~ -'-~.'.J J .~'I-'-"~' I \ \.t:~~~~;: RE ;-~ ~,:I~;I~'I-= ..... ~I= -= J J.' ''''I:'''.'~' , , '1-' - -I- -, r-" -I- .. t. .:l. ',', .. C :;_. I ,'.; - ,....f--. I f.; !P'::l.: . J': . \ \ ... : ~ ~. ~ r- - -- ~= : '~'n:"'.. J f / .... \'\\\\' -. ~ ::==~. ~ ~- -::-~I- = : II 1.IlUlI!' , " . =t= - p-- . ... .. " I l t I(;,~ ' ,. 1-' -. -. . '~, '~'\.} f- ~ '- lIl" ~= ~~ JfT\ ~ ~ ,'\1\, ~L..o 1_ llillJ - __ [.JJ E~;' R1 A A ... '! I I I III" ____: ~-:-r:- f-. '- rrn C ~ ! ,- ~- J!~ '. '-' -- Uill ~~ r-J I!. "'r_ ~ . i.C . t- IT I mrfff,fi jiTtTiffi;; : I :ii---"'Jt -- I ~~~: ': ::: U I I I L-1 - 'I ;::::'= : . [ I , . _ _ . I -" ~ _-J - -::- r- ~ - -' - oor---: ' . '~ - - I- -- . ~ L I ' . ,:; II - . ..- ...; .. , : :. :' L - I- ~ ~ - - ~. · "" "-, ~ 1'_ . a-![=-' _It~' -::::;1- I 'F."'" Ie 1-,","- ~ ~ : il=IH ~~'r .~.:,\. . ~1,1t- - f.-f-.--i II '::_ , i-' "-i I :t.tI....,.- .) n '-. __ I P .. "'rrr;=r'l~~' -. r ~-~ >\. -. -. .. __ .:: '" ... 1-----: U 1-: R 3 I . ... ~ - ~ I ' ~.- - .. = ._....: 71~:!l)J@F II / ~ . ..' .': ~ ~:''' ; ~ --c =-~ ~ .. ~ _ _ ._~-- '\ I I I I J j r~ II i )' -~ 8l _. -~ : I \ . R ~UII" ArT' I II _<~~) ~l ~_ 1.: I ~ I _ ,glli~. ir1(~e J . :;.~ II'~. ,~:'"~ , . .;"(' ~"'T.~~ . L-.. pee ' ~ lj '; i ......Cl r1 IUlilil~ ~ \\1 'I ~ fr;r~ ~O~ 'Tt'tV ,~!!A(~. ~'~Ulll n~~:u; t~ rl\~~i'r~m:~ ~ I~\ I l!IIll r.T";j'TT1' :I 7." ;t'"'' r '~r.' '1 ~ 'n u, r- :t~':::l~:: eC?- ~ \ ~ I \ M~; -I .\ 1=13 ,-'-'. it~ ~ ,!\,~I..r\ '\ (~11. '.'.1'~- =fh~-~:1(~'~1:1 ~!- \I))', Bel ~l . r I .( "\I-. . . ., .., 1L.]:8 ;:1' ... ~ . · - ;:>;I., ~ Il r-2l'r I . ~ II \'l~~l.~ITr~Ii,,: l_rTl~"4~".n"JOJj ~~~~~iil. l~ :l~'~- , J[ \I\! .--J. ...~,;. . f~. :~_.... M.__I,_:JLJ~ ~1~.....~:t:;J ,I.:, I \0) , REC J:~\\ .-;:- L" r~ .a.ry;) EIIIIIlIill T' ~~~7ji~ J~ \1' ".011 ---) dQ.i.)":~i[I~T:~u.1 oW/' ijJ c::J Ii !'.. ,':' - -j~ L' i'l~ "If _.. 't~1 ~ \~~.L- r- ;., I t ;? ...::. . . fl " 1 J., ~::':-l 'UJI1 lJ " l-. 11'111 r ' '. -. . 11(l;;. I ll.. . , -.. :.~, ..' -r.:' . /' .Lll T l' . \ ~1 ]?. r"~ . . .,,:' ';<'. .~, " "'-..... ',- '--:--"<~~~ (l~ ./ \ P~D [liJliJ , 1 y't. . ~ " ,'.'-. . '. r.... ", .- I LUl-6.0 ~- lITITI1 I '. \ ~ fi ."4ft. " '. .,~. ..::.. I U1illill I I I , I . I ... c, .o, 0 '" .'\..:,.... .. I. . ., ," . , - .-. "......... ~ o,'/,~' '. ", .....'. LACE ....._. ..!... ". '.{, .~ ~':ff " ",'. .,,(1 ~. \' '11I'lllr~ ~ '~J'" 1 . '. /)'.~~.., .,.('~ r~ ...~\ '.. \.....~. .~\'.,\. ~ . \ ~ . ..... )' " c ~ ~ . .~t . 'f.~ , \ I ,.. I ....... ,', l' ~ . . ", \ P u: . ~~., ~\ _'.UI Illt I .1~ Tp } -1'\ . . ~CEl-' r ~ J : ~ l~TP ~ ~"Ik! II: ~~ ~ c 11 r . . I.. -, : t ~, T. r l:.~ ~ l~ L._ J r I : ":":. t::l:.~ . T~d ~_... , V l_,:~ 1'1 ~ ~.I ,I' J j I r .... .+- G.,: ~ L.-.- ~. ~ q~"; '- I' ~;- ~~._- ~~"--_. - .t.-~I ~ 1l'Ji '.. . -, " - '~, .. '"' ...."'.'N' ~11~' . c.. '0 1/8 MILESV ~ I !'1-( f .r.~ .' ..... ..!l~III. #'~~r' Nt? ll" I " . . I... " ~ w Mf'~ ~~~I" . :il~,. <' -) ~ I . '0 .400 '800 FE~T ! :.:J; .:.. .111.:4 I ,-'- I-- /r ~);f'!( .... 1. \ .~ ~ . ". ""A'h,/O f)/5.Pr:. ~ -9S ' T ..'.';'r ' 1 (, ..., r- _ ff .' . , '<.. '.'.' \., ~ _~'.. . -~.. 11'../ I""F."- OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER TO: Tamb,; t1eyden Planning Director FROM: Carrie Parker City Manager cfJ DATE: July 25,1995 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. - Site Plan Application This item is rescheduled for September 5th. Please prepare review and comments on Dr. Robert's letter of July 20th. CP:jc Attachment cc: Jim Cherof , DEVELOPMEH~ DEPARTMEH~ BRGINEERIRG DIVISIOH MEMORANDUM NO. 95-272 :. TO: Tarnbri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director l~m Hukill, P.E. p\~ngineer August 2, 1995 FROM: DATE: RE: ROBBR~'S MEDICAL BUILDING - LANDSCAPE BUFFER Mr. Newbold has completed the investigation you requested (Planning Memo 95-383) and the results are summarized in his attached Memo 95- 267 to me. It is self explanatory. WVH/ck C:ROBERTS xc: Carrie Parker ,.' City Manager. Al Newbold, Deputy Bldg. Official Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator RECEIVED , AUG 4 t9~S CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE -- "- BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-267 July 31, 1995 TO: William V. Hukill, P.E. Department of Development Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official DR. ROBERTS'S MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING - LANDSCAPING DISCREPANCY RE: In order to assist you in your response to Tambri Heyden'S mem9randum 95-383, I researched the files and offer the following facts and comments: The Technical Review Board (TRB) plans were signed off by Don Jaeger during his tenure as the department's representative. The building plans were reviewed by Michael Haag and ultimately signed off by Warren DeLoach in Mr. Haag's absence in 1989. My review shows the building plans match the TRB plans and those that were reviewed by the Community Appearance Board. All plans show a 2~' setback for the extreme western section of the property adjacent to the parking lot. During this era, Mr. Jaeger then became Building Official and Mr. Haag was appointed in charge of site review which was handled by this department during that time. Site plan approval permit 88- 0873 was generated to track the site plan process for all site improvements and administered by the Site Development Division of the Building Department under Mr. Haag's supervision. The project has been completed and all paperwork is on microfilm. Therefore, all original documents are no longer available. Attached are copies of the site plan and the tie-in survey along with a print-out of the inspection history. From my observation of the tie-in survey, the paving appears to be 1.58' from the west property line and not 2~' as shown on the building plans. I would assume that the survey is correct in that it has a certification date showing August 23, 1989 and I found that the paving was approved August 18, 1989 by Roger Kuver, former Engineering Inspector who is now with the Utilities Department. From that same survey. it appears that the building is in the correct location and 1t would be fair to assume that the only problem is with the size of the paved area. I found no documentation in the file giving any explanation, etc. as to any resolution trom the narrow landscape strip or whether it ever became an issue. Building RE : Dr . July 31, Page Two Division Memo 95-267 to William V. Hukill, P.E. Roberts' Medical Office Building 1995 "" Our records do show that the CAB inspection was made by Med Kopczynski who was the former Deputy Building Official and appointed to handle CAB inspections by Mr. Jaeger when he became Building Official. That inspection was approved August 25, 1989. I can only assume that the proper position to take would have been to cut off the additional paving to comply with the 3011 landscape strip. It could have been assumed that it was not necessary since we did then, and do now, allow bumper stops to set back on paved areas less than the code requires so that the bumpers overhang the landscape strip. I see no reason why this would be an issue, especially as it relates to the adjacent property since our code also exempts landscaping on property that already has existing landscaping. My interpretation of the code is that the landscaping strip itself has a dimension requirement and the code specifies what must be located within that strip but not necessarily that the plantings must be as wide as the strip. It should be our position that the neighboring property owner should not be penalized for the paving on Dr. Roberts' property being closer to his property line than what was permitted. If any controversy arose during the construction of Dr. Roberts' permits, Mr. Haag could shed some light on it since he was involved in the site plan process and the final site approval was signed by him on November 19, 1991. AN: bh Attachments , 110...,.1 :. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPA MEMORANDUM NO. 95-352 VII. DEVELuftIDT PUlIS c. cc: Utilities plAnning DeveloJm81lt Agenda Memorandum for July 18, 1995 City Commis~ion Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. HeYden"77fJ- Planning and Zoning Director DATE: July 10, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear copy, Inc. - NWSP #95-004 New Site Plan Please place the above-referenced request on the July 18, 1995 City Commission agenda under Development Plans. DESCRIPTION: This is a request from George C. Davis, agent for Bob Feldman, property owner and owrter of Clear Copy, Inc., for site plan approval to construct a 3,780 square foot, two-story, retail printing business on a .225 acre parcel located at the southeast . corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N. W. 7th Street (please refer to attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-325 for further details regarding the site plan). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 5-1 vote, recommended approval of this request, subject to staff comments (PubliC Works Department Memorandum #95-102, Utilities Department Memorandum #95-204, Police Memorandum #95-0148, Engineering Division Memorandum #95-205, Building DiVision #95-210 and Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-326. As a poi~f information, there was much discussion regarding the accessib1.ty (turning radius of the approach) to the proposed dumpster Jbcation, the egress only design of the driveway onto N.W. 7th Streee (there was some concern as to whether motorists would obey this driveway design as egress only) and the building design (possible inappropriatene.. of the shutters ana lack of additional des1;n features). ,. TJH:dim Attachment .: C=A~H"'.. c: r PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-325 =- SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION PLANNING AND July 11, 1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: Clear Copy, Inc. Applicant: Bob Feldman, owner Agent: George C. Davis Location: Southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street F il e No.: NWSP 95-004 Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) ... Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Type of Use: Copying service and print shop Number of Units: N/A square Footage: Site: 9,788 square feet (.225 acres) Building: 3,780 square feet surround~L4Dd Uses and '1DV: .... North - Boynton Beach Boulevard and farther north is wendy's Restaurant, zoned C-2. South - , N. W. 1st Avenue and farther south are single-family residences, zoned R-1A. East Medical office building, zoned C-2. West N.W. 7th Street and farther west is Gateway Center, zoned C-2. EXisting Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with no vegetation. Proposed Development: Concurrency: The proposed retail printing business primarily SEU"VeS count1."y clubs. Thel'efore, most of their business iuvu~v-C:D p.l.\..k-ui- a.i~u. delivery directly to the customer. They also serve walk-in printing needs of the general public. Traffic - Verification has not yet been received from Palm Beach County Traffic Division which indicates that the anticipated small increase in trips generated by the use complies with the City's traffic levels of service and Palm Beach \ Page 2 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 Site Plan Review Staff Report Clear Copy, Inc:;.. Driveways: Parking Facility: Landscaping: Building and site RegulatioD.~ .. - ~t- .. ,.. Community Design Plan: Signage: County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The applicant will be responSible for any required improvements determined to be necessary as part of Palm Beach County's review of the traffic study. Drainage - Insufficient drainage information has been submitted for the Engineering Division to certify compliance with the City's drainage levels of service at ythe time of site plan approval, as required. The Engineet-ing Division is recommending that this be postponed to time of permit review. Two, one-way driveways to the parking lot are proposed; a one-way ingress located on N. W. 1st Avenue and a one-way egress located on N. W. 7 th Street. The proposed parking faCility contains the required thit-teen (13) parking spaces, including one (1) handicap space. The landscape plan submitted reflects all reqUiredl landscaping. :J The proposed development meets the requirements of the building and site regulations. The total site area is 9,788 square feet with a building coverage of thirty-seven percent (37\). The building height is twenty-five (25) feet. The proposed color of the two-story stucco building will 'be light pink with white trim, doors and window shutters. The roof will be brick colored S- tile. These colors are generally compatible with the colors of the neighboring structures which are predominantly of a Spanish/Mediterranean style. However, the shade of pink selected for the stucco does not appeal' to compliment the brick coloL'ed roof tile; a more orange shade of plnk is recommended. A freestanding sign is proposed between Boynton Beach Boulevard and the front of the building. REVIEW OF ~BPA'TM'.~Tl\L. .COMMENTS : Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding this request: DEPARTMENT ATTACHED MBMORANDUM Public Works Utilities Fire Polic Englneering Division #95-102 #95-204 N/A #95-0148 #95-205 ~ Page 3 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 Site Plan Review Staff RepoLt Clear Copy, Inc... Building Division Parks & Recreation FOLester/Environmentalist Planning and Zoning #95-210 N/A N/A #95-326 The above Departments' comments may be addLessed on the permit set of drawings. The remaining departments did not have comments Legarding their review of the amended plans. RECOMMENDATION: The Plann~ng and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. 4 DDC:dim xc: Central File .:.'ttrp~.Cl. I , ~ II I ' ~ .... ~-~ ! 1!l ~ l:- o '. I . " I o. i I I*- k ", . I'" 0 . ... ! JI I, I t, ~ ~ . al t. -~. , \) cr' t ~' ... ~ \\ Co t_m~30 I _____ I __ 1 _._. _' ..__.1....- - ...---.. : I I . .........- .- =- =- , i j ea. (;;) , J . ~: )'~t'>' I!~' ~It- ~-;~ -- ~ /Ci\ ,..'""'.. ~~~~.~ ,~ , 'dI, ~ a ~ ~ " I . - t ~ '.. - -.. '.. ... . ) I 0 ....J, _... ~ 0 ~'--- :...- I'. ~ ....... .....~~\ I ,.;... .~.. o~ ol.>'~- Z4 UOo > "K o. ~ ~'., . f 0 ~ . ,.: ~ f' 0 W .. '~~~~5':'00. ~: ..t~~ 0 ~< ~ ,Jlt1~~ 1'1 ..... \J . ~ ~, tl ~.~~ t... ~..:...o..'.. 1. '0..... 12,.,", ... Ilr~' ... ~ ~ "t. : ,I; , ~~~) 00 lZ1. I ~ _' ~ ...: . \0.. 0 '~ 0.. ~ C1 ,~I rt~ i"~, ~ L!',i: ,,' ~. < \ o . I t. ~ <: I ........ It~ / ~I. t - . ~ . - - . ~ll ("v~~l~'~' ~1 rF ~.",@-- ~-. , }\ ."A~J .. =- i 0 , ., r' : - _. ~ : ( ~ !i ~ .., .:. :' ,.1 . 1"\ ~ ~ ~ ~ '. ".1 .: ~ ~- ~ ~ I y , ~.: : r . 1ft . to ~ 0 < ~ ~ :7~ ., ~'" LDr 2 7 1m t · . ~ 1'- : ~ H I~ ,~I " .; -1-" I~ :~ A! I' .- ~ 0..' ~'. 'i "1 ~ ~ V c $ ~ ,.'<.:0.. ':~ . '.: " ; 0' . "'.. A ~ ~ r-: bl .:; 1 Iii : I )... >1-r- laL : .i r~ o. .1 ' ~.. 1- ~ ! . ,.- i . ~ .~ f 01 4S"':. j t o. , '1' j. _"J ~ :: 0.. ~l' ... ,J..~~ ,. ~ ~ r4" 'r!'. ~ ~ . .. .. ., I. __ ,. 0 .I~"_j; _..: ... ~ I ~./ ~ \ \ . -~ i"l -~ \\t\" -~\ ~-~~'~T'~' :: ~. I ~ '--. k . ,.," - J.. t --- . :!' Ii. _...-- It .._~t- - ...' I:.... : . '. r'.~'11 Jo. ~-- J~'r-'A. t ./; ~. J UE. . ~ 'OoN '~-I___o ~I V ~N IJJ ' , - - ~\ ". ". PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-102 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public W orks Dii"~tor SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Clear Copy, Inc. DA TE: I June 22, 1995 ~~ /J . .* I , , . t J / . The Public Works Department has no problems with the site plan for the above site and the plans can be forwarded to the Planning & Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory for consideration. .-. ~ bat Eichorst Public Works Director RElcr n~. . ... , s MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-204 :. TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~~ vC-- khnA Guid"ry:-' Director of Utilities FROM: Date: June 23, 1995 SuBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. Second Review Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. A second fire hydrant may be required based on access evaluation by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department staff: 2. Plan shall show location of proposed water meter, (Sec. 26. 16(c)). 3. A sanitary sewer cleanout shall be installed, the size qf the lateral, at the property line. Please show on your plans, (Sec. 26.33(b)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip. Milor Peter ~.7:7.eU. Steve ~, FlI'e Dept. File , - \0 .. ] BOYNTON BEACH POUCE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT JM 2 8 !19s TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRIHEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 95 CLEAR COpy - 2ND REVIEW MEMO #0148 I have reviewed the above site plan ~~:~~..^'.':1 d~l~ith suggested changes. /........:P'"' /. U .,r-...~,., ~ R<ospeclfully, ~ t.:;;:f'. ~ Ji:~~ Police Department f'B) fB). 0 fD) rJ gcgeU cl.6#c ~ (@J .~ c~lj ~n~\) . I. . -. ~~... . ~.'... , "\ ENGINEERJNG MEMO # 95-205 DATE: June 26.1995 m T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 SUBJECT: CLEAR COpy INC., SECOND REVIEW ~ The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review: I. The plan is subject to the parking lot regulations for paving. drainage. site lighting. curbing. landscaping. and irrigation pennits. RECOMMENDA nONS I. Engineering recommends that the subject plan be forwarded to the P & 0 Board. 2. We also recommend a discussion with the Board regarding clarifying the location of driveways when a parcel abuts a local road and one ofa higher classification (Chap. 23. Art.2H3). If there is general agreement that the code needs revision. it should be done quickly. One point that needs clarification is ... To what point on the driveway dclh~ 30' or 180' dimensions g01 - to the centerline of the DIW1 or to the outside edge or the ingress/egress D/W? The following modifications are also suggested: a) Chap. 23. Art.2H I: Change the maximum driveway width from 32' to 36'. Most driveways have three lanes - one in and two out. usually a right turn lane and one for crossing maneuvers. Usually these lanes arc 12' each; however. if the 36' dimension is acceptable. I would like to see the city specify that tbe two egress lanes be II' wide eacb a.d tbe Inlrea lane, 14'. The purpose of this code requirement would be to allow a wider lane for vehicles coming in from a collector or arterial roadway to negotiate the turn as they decelerate. Having I I' lanes for outgoing traffic is no hardship because they are traveling at a low speed and then stopping at the stop sign. . b) Chap 23. .L. Pmvide that the 2S' driveway nrdii be a minim... dimension. For the same reason ~licles entering a s~opping center. etc. from a 40 to SO mph speed (actual speed. not postcd'speed) should ha~e a larger. "forgiving" radius. , - KRHIkrh C: William Hukill. Dev. Dir. and to file. c::; BUILDDG DIVISIOlf MBMORANDUM NO. 95-210 June 26, 1995 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director Al Newbold Deputy Building Official FROM: RE: TRC CCM4BNTS - 2nd SITH PLAN RBVIBW CLBAR COPY, INC. . The Building Oivision has reviewed the amended plans for the above project and offers the following comments: 1. , Thirteen parking spaces are required; only 12 are shown. There is no handicap parking shown. Handicap access trom the right-ot-way to the entrance of building is required. Sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue is required. .. 2. 3. The above cOl1lll8nts can be met at time ot. building permi t ; therefore, we reconmend that the proj'ect be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. ~ .' .' "'. A1 . ewboJ,4 . I AN: bh Attachment/plans xc: William V. Hukill, P.B. .- ~;- ,.' , - cr.... ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-326 Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator June 28, 1995 site Plan Project: Location: , Applicant: File No. : Review - 2nd Review - New Cleal- Copy, Inc 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Site Plan Boulevard The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comm~nts either from the first review or new comments as a result or the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the site and design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The applicant must undel'stand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the BUilding Division for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE ~LAN REVIEW COMMENTS: . 1. .1.a8e show and identify on the plans all curbing, wll.elstops and landscaped areas. Al"eaS that must be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheelstops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adjacent to a parking stall and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with City standards. "l .. . State on the plans that Boynton Beach Boulevard is the front of the property. 3 . Provide a note adjacent to the dumpster location identifying the type of landscaping material that is required to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. 4. Add to the landscape plan/site plan all existing and proposed easements. Identify the type of easement and dimension the width. Note: Some landscape material is not :-'Illnwed to be planted with an easement and under overhead lines. 5. Show on the plan that the proposed landscaping adjacent to the intersection of N.W. 7th Street and N.W. 1st street does not violate line-of-site requirements for areas within twenty-five feet of the intersection. Submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan by name, manufacturer and model or style number. 6 . \0 Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-326 2nd Review, New Site Plan clear Copy, InG.. File No.: NWSY 95-004 7. Although the use is located within a C-2 district, print shops require environmental review. The applicant must obtain an environmental review pe4mit prior to occupying the premises. 8. State on the plans the hours that the loading zone will be utilized and that these hours have been coordinated \~ith Public Works so as to not conflict with trash pick. 9. Any conditions of approval rece1ved by Palm Beach County Traffic Division after their review of the traffic statement, must be complied with at time of permitting. II. RECOMMENDATIONS 10. It is recommended that a recycling container be provided in compliance with the criteria specified by the Public Works Department. . 11. It is recommended that a more orange shade of pink is selected for the building stucco to better compliment the color of the roof tile. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH:dim xc: . Central 1'11e .:Jndco..C:lr .. ~ ~~.~ - , "'" \..O(jA\ \UN \\J\At-' CLE.AR cOP" , \NC. , \ 'r' I nTfll .... :::~..u .' ~' , , ... ~"" I I \11 t-::1 \ .p r'l: ~'~ ~.'- _ ~-,;3, ,'1.," "3.~ .,. ~. ~ tJ', .... '. '-.)- _ :::: " ~ · ::::.f~J- / \ ,~~~' IS ,,:.-~ -- .P ...-'.., ~::-< .. r ,. · . ..' ., \ ,. . .- ._ \ . -r -- ... '\9). ~. ___; ::', \:::;::0; - c- - ,--' - '., ''0-.. ~ - ,,- -- l..+c= ,:" "" / . .~ _ Irla-:: . , i(>.. '- ....... ...... ,-,.. -..-- ,'v, 1...... <: L. n1' . '\ .,..:n' 1'" ~r 'I' ~ :c~ c. ' 1=''\ ~ ~ \ \....~ I\,-II'~ '- ,- " _ 'll::'\;l \ . rll.... -..,'- ~ ;;- ,.1 ,~ , . U'I. \ ,-I , · \ . " : .u ~' - ~- , . Ire .. "'" ' .:::: re" , ' n,""":.... -'- .. ' '_ . ," \ _ ...' .'. ~.~ n : . ...."- ..... .,. \.' T _ l.. I::.. _ 0'.' -' - ;.' 'IC' , '.,~Ir- ~ ~\k?-;:::,:-"<,l II L~~i\ c .-.::, ...... 8 \-i'r1 ~' ,,;-, ." :-' p I .G ' ' ...... \ \I~ ",'''' ."::' \- ~.....; U ~~'\ rl\f'i"fil~ 'U . ~'-:i/~ " ... ~ -;.}:: L.-- ,l: ~ '. ~ (q,( ..j~7'f ' ~'Z>.l::i, L.L" ,I'i '"' ~ ' '. ~,"" n~Jl1!~ \ I ' -:-; ~O~ 1iI'~: '. \ ~ \ \ ~ ~cO l!:I . " ..' - -. ~ - ~ \ .......... ~ , -IJ f ,<" __.................'~.. \ I: · T nl \ \l! .' ,t ~':---- \ \\ 1\ \ I' -aii', i'~#'" . .. ..\ ~~;~ ~" \r~.~','J'" ':\'~ , .. I ..~~ .....,1 '~.. 1" L . .. .""". I. -.: r1l' . . '. '." : .--:r\ '" . -- " iT. :'1. \ I'. .'7 "" ,\ '''~ ~ --',;,.. , f .... r!' . t- r-" .'fl r '. \\ ' ./ '.\\ i .\\ ';.\ . ....~: l. '~'. . II l'':- ~.. >..0' ~~' · \ '. .,' ". ". II · : . ' .. . T . ~ t'-,. I" I -'.. . . ,\.- ......- ~ . . ~ \ ' . \ .< n ~I'~'\" ..~~\~~ iii\ '\ ,l""" 1, O;:~ ~,..:-~ i\ \ '" ""r" " 1.l ~ \I.;.;.j,;.~, :\' ,. - -lL '-"" y.'-';[.,.,,_D . . \ \ I \ . ~)". rID? ~~~~;~:\if~\'; ~ ~\I\ .\,..\t"'\\ \, ~ .' '1, _ .. --=-II~ ~~I I,,; I~:S~' :::lIT~ ~i='~~\A;~-"'" ~' "H'.J:\ ~gh "" > '.' -=- ~:' c-- \\::.... ,I" .; m r '1Tl \ I=t ;i ~ ~ C ~~'~l 'm t-=~i. ~~: ~~ illC-\\~\~B I\~~ ~ \ \\:3' ' ~ ' .' ::> :~..;IW " '^-~ \..-. if . I'" \ 'Il~< ~~~ ~:~. :"\" \,:i\ \' 1-1 ,:'" In" ....... ~ .~~ ~ ~, ~~).../,<1'1'" T, W '. ''\ Y' /\" l;.~ "u:\~"~~.'~~~' .". ~~~~::~~J},,~):: :,,\~ t>>~~o \-- ~ . I ;\ ,\," ~~ ,,~.r- \ .. \, Ie 'j, "~'i ...... . ~'r' \ \I . ,\.-' /; ". .:'. . ..... .,' >." ~l"d.u...,.P'G,","f \ .... .' ,.... X"" ,'" ' ".l;l!\'""" · . - .:.' ,,,,<,,.:' ,V" ,. \ ': ,:'~ > V/ ' -,;:........ ,7' '. '.,\-, \ \S . 'C" . 1~'. :, ,..', :. ;\~ . \ I:" ,Y.:.,.... .: ,~ ': ':. ' '(.."" \.D;"'~.\ \ \., \\1"'''<'';\1~~\\~1~1j .41 1l~ A\) ~~ · '\ \ /J \ . ~ '. -.I.T:' _ ~r .~" .\~ ~,~ :JW~- I \...-_1 : . ' ,.' k '..,.... .' ' i.. ~ 1'~ \ J..I ',~..::' I~c. \1l~\ ,'..11~~~/I\/~ \ \ &". '\ ~3' I.:::.-,--Jf?,if/c: ,~ ~e' ,,' I>'k .." .' . ,.". .,N' ,,~.(\,\ "'\(' . ~ 0 '\ 18 ",.IL __ -f ".T 7 T ,'V' irl'1'11T1T1 , \ I ''\ ,-.r} , Id' .J""~j' . \ \ . \r'-c- ~t .X",: \. ;,'-f-~: 'IF" \ \ \ \ ' . < l'\: ~:,( "'~ _ .w~' C-<:< J. \ . '0400 '800 fE ~:.: ~ /.(' . ~ 'I (f? .~; . ;;;. - ._601 I" T. ..' ,:l~1\ . ..s ~ Ce' I ~ ...-:' ,', \, \...:.~ - .- T. J I · .' . .J. ' . "'\' 1 ) \ \ eC " . . .' " · ..-r' · - .\"." '....' '. ,,:.,_'" I' ---------- ~ i\ \~ \ \ ~. - ~-I I II ~ ; , I. I ~ "\ .,.w -=- ~\. ir;n ~I t...UcB ~ kR ~ \ \ - ~~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPA. MEMORANDUM NO. 95-352 VII. DEVELOPHD1T PLABS c. cc: Utilities Planning Developaent Agenda Memorandum for July 18, 1995 city commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker city Manager Tambri J. Heyden ~ Planning and Zoning Director , DATE: July 10, 1995 "^ ~i. ./: . .IJ} :' ~ ~..".t; (/. v/ :1 ~ j~ ~ I i J l FROM: <' SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. - NWSP #95-004 New Site Plan . ./' ,.; "'!" \. ,',. ~: Please place the above-refetenced request on the July 18, 1995 City Commission agenda under Development Plans. DESCRIPTION: This is a request from George C. Davis, agent for Bob Feldman, property owner and owner of Clear Copy, Inc., for site plan approval to construct a 3,780 square foot, two-story, retail printing business on a .225 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street (please refer to attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-325 for further details regarding the site plan). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 5-1 vote, recommended approval of this request, subj ect to staff comments (Public Works Department Memorandum #95-102, utilities Department Memorandum #95-204, Police Memorandum #95-0148, Engineering Division Memorandum #95-205, Building Division #95-210 and Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-326. As a point of information, there was much discussion regarding the accessibility (turning radius of the approach) to the proposed dumpster location, the egress only design of the driveway onto N.W. 7th Street (there was some concern as to whether motorists would obey this driveway design as egress only) and the building design (possible inappropriateness of the shutters and lack of additional design features). - 1 .---/" ,j /: , I"" ~ I. \. t.~ . ....-' 'oJ,." ... ~{)/l J{ ~/ "f TJH:dim Attachment 1\ r /i ':C~AllN"SP,Clr ;: (//'/.. I r I \ , r ,; ,~i II f/ . . / /"1.. -.;.../ , \; Ii " I' /Il .( ~'1' ~ I ,.. / ~ '- ' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-325 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION July 11, 1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: project Name: Clear ~opy, Inc. Applicant: Bob Feldman, owner Agent: George C. Davis Location: southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th street File No. : NWSP 95-004 Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Type of Use: Copying service and print shop Number of Units: N/A square Footage: site: 9,788 square feet (.225 acres) Building: 3,780 square feet Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning: North - Boynton Beach Boulevard and farther north is Wendy's Restaurant, zoned C-2. South - N. W. 1st Avenue and farther south are single-family residences, zoned R-1A. East Medical office building, zoned C-2. West N.W. 7th Street and farther west is Gateway Center, zoned C-2. Existing site Characteristics: The site is vacant with no vegetation. Proposed Development: The proposed retail printing business :-....;"' ",-; 'n:' serves country clubs. Therefore, most of their business involves pick-up and delivery directly to the customer. They also serve walk-in printing needs of the general public. Concurrency: Traffic - Verification has not yet been received from Palm Beach County Traffic Division which indicates that the anticipated small increase in trips generated by the use complies with the City's traffic levels of service and Palm Beach \ Page 2 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 Site Plan Review Staff Report Clear Copy, Inc. Driveways: Parking Facility: Landscaping: Building and site Regulations: Community Design Plan: Signage: County's Traffic Performance standards Ordinance. The applicant will be responsible for any required improvements determined to be necessary as part of Palm Beach County's review of the traffic study. Drainage - Insufficient drainage information has been submitted for the Engineering Division to certify compliance with the City's drainage levels of service at ythe time of site plan approval, as required. The Engineering Division is recommending that this be postponed to time of permit review. Two, one-way driveways to proposed; a one-way ingress Avenue and a one-way egress Street. the parking lot located on N. W. located on N. W. are 1st 7th The proposed parking facility contains the required thirteen (13) parking spaces, including one (1) handicap space. The landscape plan submitted reflects all required landscaping. The proposed development meets the requirements of the bUilding and site regulations. The total site area is 9,788 square feet with a building coverage of thirty-seven percent (37%). The building height is twenty-five (25) feet. The proposed color of the two-story stucco building will be light pink with white trim, doors and window shutters. The roof will be brick colored s- tile. These colors are generally compatible with the colors of the neighboring structures which are predominantly of a Spanish/Mediterranean style. However, the shade of pink selected for the stucco does not appear to compliment the brick colored roof tile; a more orange shade of p1nk is recommended. A freestanding sign is proposed between Boynton Beach Boulevard and the front of the building. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS: Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding this request: DEPARTMENT ATTACHED MEMORANDUM Public Works Utilities Fire Polic Engineering Division #95-102 #95-204 N/A #95-0148 #95-205 ~ -- '-" 'W 'W 'WI .., page 3 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 Site Plan Review Staff Report clear copy, Inc. Building Division Parks & Recreation Forester/Environmentalist Planning and Zoning #95-210 N/A N/A #95-326 The above Departments' comments may be addressed on the permit set of drawings. The remaining departments did not have comments regarding their review of the amended plans. RECOMMENDATION: The Plann~ng and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the city of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. DDC:dim xc: central File .:.~tf,.p~.Cl. ~ \ \ I . ~ ..-. : \ ~-, \ 1Sl ~ t- . . \ . 4 ( ._ 0 . - - -.----- t c.. . ---....-. ---.--.---.. ~ m n 1\ I . I ~- .. ~ r} . at t Ji' \) ,. ~ ~ ~ . ..---.. o c ! ~ ~ -$-.. . I . . . ~\ \ - - -., ,. ." .., \IW .." PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-102 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Clear Copy, Inc. DATE: I June 22, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the site plan for the above site and the plans can be forwarded to the Planning & Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory for consideration. ~?' bert Eichorst Public Works Director RE/cr S" ~, }~. . . I" /' . ...J,.. . -- / . ~ I ... .. '/ i ;" . .I,; ... ,J i ....../ MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-204 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~~ trfu~ Guidry:' Director of Utilities FROM: Date: June 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. Second Review Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: I. A second fire hydrant may be required based on access evaluation by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department staff. 2. Plan shall show location of proposed water meter, (Sec. 26.16(c)). 3. A sanitary sewer cleanout shall be installed, the size Qf the lateral, at the property line. Please show on your plans, (Sec. 26.33(b)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella Steve Campbell, Fire Dept. File \0 .. '- ~ ..... ~.' ~ BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT W \JM 2 6 1995 TO: FROM: DATE: REF: T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 95 CLEAR COpy - 2ND REVIEW MEMO #0148 I have reviewed the above site plan ~.~t.~.~'ffl~ suggested cbanges. t....>>,..~ /?,.".... tr ~ Respectfully, ~ ~ . ~ .Jt~~ Police Department rB:>. rE. c5).' rt5) lOD go tQ)o U 0 C df @ o . clj '\ ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-205 DATE: June 26..1995 IQ;, T AMOKI HEYDEN, P&Z DIK. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 SUBJECT: CLEAR COpy INC., SECOND REVIEW ~ The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review: 1. The plan is subject to the parking lot regulations for paving, drainage, site lighting. curbing. landscaping. and irrigation pennits. RECOMMENDA nONS I. Engineering recommends that the subject plan be forwarded to the P & D Board. 2. We also recommend a discussion with the Board regarding clarifying the location of driveways when a parcel abuts a local road and one ofa higher classification (Chap. 23. Art.2H3). If there is general agreement that the code needs revision. it should be done quickly. One point that needs clarification is ... To what point on the driveway dJh~ 30' or 180' dimensions go? - to the centerline of the D/W" or to the outside edge ofthe ingress/egress D/W? The following modifications are also suggested: a) Chap. 23. Art.2H I: Change the maximum driveway width from 32' to 36'. Most driveways have three lanes - one in and two out. usually a right turn lane and one for crossing maneuvers. Usually these lanes are I~' each; however. if the 36' dimension is acceptable. I would likc to see the city specify that the two egress lanes be II' wide each and the ingress lane, 14'. The purpose of this code requirement would be to allow a wider lane for vehicles coming in from a collector or arterial roadway to negotiate the turn as they decelerate. Having II' lanes for outgoing traffic is no hardship because they arc traveling at a low speed and then stopping at the stop sign. b) Chap 23. Art.2H2: Provide that the 25' driveway radii be a minimum dimension. For the same reason a~ vehicles entering a shopping center. etc. from a 40 to 50 mph speed (actual speed. not posted speed) should ha~e a larger. "forgiving" radius. KRH/krh C: William Hukill. Dcv. Dir. and to tile. c-::::,. _ .", . .... .., .."" June 26, 1995 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-210 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMBNTS - 2nd SITE PLAN RBVIBIf CLEAR. COPY, IRC. . The Building Division has reviewed the amended plans for the above project and offers the following comments: 1. Thirteen parking spaces are required; only 12 are shown. There is no handicap parking shown. 2. Handicap access from the right-of-way to the entrance of building is required. 3. Sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue is required. The above comments can be met at time of-building permit; therefore, we recommend that the proj'ect be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. ~ AI" '~w~ol.d' ~. / AN: bh Attachment/plans XC: William V. Hukill, P.E. CLIAA ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-326 Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator June 28, 1995 site Plan Project: Location: j Applicant: File No.: Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan Clear Copy, Iuc 660 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comm~nts either from the first review or new comments as a result or the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the site and design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building Division for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 4. 1. Please show and identify on the plans all curbing, wheelstops and landscaped areas. Areas that must be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheelstops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adjacent to a parking stall and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with city standards. ") .. . State on the plans that Boynton Beach Boulevard is the front of the property. 3. Provide a note adjacent to the dumpster location identifying the type of landscaping material that is required to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. Add to the landscape plan/site plan all existing and proposed easements. Identify the type of easement and dimension the width. Note: Some landscape material is UVl... allowed to be planted with an easement and under overhead lines. 5 . Show on the plan that the proposed landscaping adjacent to the intersection of N. W. 7th Street and N. W. 1st Street does not violate line-of-site reqUirements for areas within twenty-five feet of the intersection. 6 . Submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan by name, manufacturer and model or style number. \G '" w .. ..., ..., .. .."" Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-326 2nd Review, New Site Plan clear copy, Inc. File No.: NWSP 95-004 7. Although the use is located within a C-2 district, print shops require environmental review. The applicant must obtain an environmental review permit prior to occupying the premises. 8. State on the plans the hours that the loading zone will be utilized and that these hours have been coordinated with Public Works so as to not conflict with trash pick. 9. Any conditions of approval received by Palm Beach County Traffic Division after their review of the traffic statement, must be complied with at time of permitting. II. RECOMMENDATIONS 10. It is recommended that a recycling container be provided in compliance with the criteria specified by the Public Works Department. 11. It is recommended that a more orange shade of pink is selected for the building stucco to better compliment the color of the roof tile. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH:dim xc: Central File .:2nclco".Clr '\'\. LOGATIQl\I MAp., ,CLEAR COPY, INC. ~ ;~- '11 1111- ,.., .111111111 ,';'1 III IIJ~ I I H I- _ r""'t.. , '" · '-, ~. .. - I- -, . -== :T: ... '_,...' R -~ f- ~ - ~ 1- I . - -...::::: -. . I , ~ . I \J~ "'I.- _ -. ... -- .. ~ I I _ I ,f- I- ' I-- I.. ~_ .J I I ~ l---', E : I- ... - _. -. .- ! = -- - I 'Y'\~- ,I-' -tf--. --p -..-'""- -- \ .\~)..'(X. jiiiiIi :.- '.~ 'I . : -~ . '- 'u' '11.'.1 ~__' - -__\__. ~ =-= - - - '. 'Y\"d - --- f-- ~ == =::-l=- = , 'iV'"J. '" ..1 :..::i:=. _ h 1 ~ lor 1 · \. \~ \..} -......... ~ '-;tr ~:::. ';:u=' , '~, I- \- , ':~II II I II "'...... - ~~ - :l-I~ ~.. ..... !l- 1-1- for- ~ TT .~ r '. --'- _ :1- l-I- I-- -= '- _ "TO .l- l-I- ~I-- I ' L --- - I _.-..; .- :_ 1-,...'1-- . - _ __ I ~_ ' ,_ 1-1- i-- . = _ - - ' : H"'.~ _'- -"'--1-- _-,' ,- ,. ~ - . - --" I . ~~..: - . - :.~ .. - : : :::::J -I- -'-' _ ~ :;.. - - ,_ . I rl ..1-1 " I :::; r ,,~:~ = ~ I .. I~',~ ~ ---~ I . i -j I---f-r -4.r. n".-l \: r ~. ~1 ~' -: J . ,..,~, ~ ......1.....1 II (j ~ ~ 1":1 _..c. -' =-.: ~.- - ~ ~ R 3 .r fTTT 1, I U . ~?...~ . ,-.-- :.. _.~, ....----' ~-jr~ tl .' c' .' . ,',-; -", ~ ; -=-c: "'-i k -~~ ~uT~ T.. \~J"ujf {~III t ')'~~~ ~~_Im:=o -:--1 [' . ~ " "~) c~ ::J . . .- J '. .......-:::.: "'J ~.lhl .~] : , .~ 1-~~6'"__,....../~";~ .........' MI ..,,", : Tl-, ,'" . Ir-,!n~~ .' .~-.J~. ~.. . '--.l- u" pee ' "~:i'; ;'.'-c'IMill~~ fr I ~OYJ , T()'" ~~.....( If " m'" j I . T T N; il r-- ~ \' , / 'l'~~!~- ~. ~ ~0'"~~~ ~ . H:~~~sl"': ~ ~ . ~:p .:..~ ~ I~\ I :J P.~..:..., - r ~ il .' .: Ill. . _ '~"-:n m ~"'T#m T 1f.-:") I"lI.l.l t,. ~l ~ ~. .l=- E, ~ r :1~' 'II 'L; r ....:.~~;f/ ~ ~,.l _ 1=13 '-14- :'-. ,jd I -. I:' -'-r": r-j,"A.'1' ~~ I)' :( ~\'l:t \:;:1. ~;;~'I tIt LJ" 'l~ :eJ~iL~~~~~m:' It)1 ,][ 11.1' II. ': '. i'-r-r _ ,-' , ..J ~. ,r-. M l I::': I ft, .I~~ ..-.' - ~ ~L.o.'.'... ..v.... R E C .". \ \ -::. L'" l ~ ~ nJ enIlIIIill T, .. ;-Tjr 1= 'r'dl! - - --in 1W:'" -~Jf~lf::!:EFn:..j}..j ~~: m CJ tt II.... T":'--t . ~" ~ -~ ~ .,- :l .' ~ ~ I \~l* .1 '; "" ~ ; . " , . ::- ~3 -~ R t~A: + --+- ~l "" . . ~ .- -- ,~ .' I I ..' · ~ I - - -- - --.... ... r; " ':..:.1 o'~' . ---tt' :. 1= =_ ~ ~'I.lh 'Imr ill ~ ~ t R E: C ~ J ;....:.~ -J~ -= ;-:: -; c- :3 ",1 : ..... ltl'(JJ. ; I~(~itl ift] iirlIl ~ ,(~, fI" i~ I' ~' -; I l-;l'r rr.I' 1:lJ.t.1 r OJ (~ ~'..,.'" ~ ' ,.1... II I' 1 \ - - -...!. ., . 'U" ;".1 t , ...' . h .) r. i III IT '1 - \.. ~I 1 ~ ~{\! , ~ .~. :: \. "'i . ~~ '\Ioi" ..... '- U f j: ..' , ~1.J.l"\. \\<~~., ~ .... ,,~-" i: p\ puc ,.' l t l. j .;....~~.l ".: "'" ,,'~~,~ '- '.~ ."'1 L.Ul:5.0 I j /...".. . ~.~ i .'.' . ~ ',.... ", 'I ,- '-.~ A. ' ,,,-..0 ~ .'~" ,'",..' iroo' CElt , I - ,.!,., .,~"-! ...... .,. ~ :p;" .... ,,:~ . p'~LA I -- . .' ..r . ~ ........ . . ''.: ~: .' \ I :~II't'.;;~~~~""'~~I(;."'~~' ~'." ,~\..~\\. \ II j ~,." ':If ~ I:' ...] ~J \~ .' 't'. \ ,I PI I,. r . -~~\ _T 1111 ..~ 1 ~1(1 ,;.\ ' . ~CS. II "'"" ... .2.~ ~ ...., -'. '-'t . ~ T : 41 l-:-TP R I :C ] , : I. ;..t... . 1.. r (\,' . i I ~ . l ... .. ~ r ~ - . J -'. ; l~ ~"-.:I;' tii ~___ I : -- L_ rn.JJ ~ . 'q; I · '. I R3 ,~- ......:.":'" ~C.J-.l.. -~-:- '~~17 ~._' -r"l .._:>',"" i~ '10,. -?,'!).j~ ^,'()..~a.'?,;Hr :~.I1~.l~~Jl II" ".0 1/8 MILESV~ ~ I, -r/"':"lnHJ" "'..r",,,, . '} I ' _ ~ = r ,J IN.... ~ . ~ :<. \ I ...., II ' - " . ~j~ , . "- -;r _ k ~ \J .'; 'ikrf~~ ," :t~)<'~Y -H' . II. I . !.":'''i,:_.;.;.l~~;1' ~ ~ I-~ " . ,.'~ ( ,. j.~ ;'0 .400. 'SOO FEET l:iL..:.;:,:~:qL '. ~ L !:fCE.ec ~':i"~;'<~ '.'~.\ ~).: 1 \...:.~~ ~ IfL . L..I' r~ -. _I ~ /10::: ~-9S f i I I ~~ t~ ~, ---f~ I , , , . , ~- t] [Q] IT l4a ~ ~ ~l :1 ~I ~L ~L r I R1AA ~.-I I - I I , , L--- 11'1 ~- I I , I '.--~ C",.',,.:: I I" , -: ( t' .'!iI". .:!l;::~:ffiI ~b ; m!:II"III;:Ij:~ cai I i!'!T"fiT] F ~ !!:: ... - - - P- U..., ;-- , I I I I I i " I ~-. ~rF; "~L mrm mf;- :ilIldi ~ -. ~mr.t :..,~~t~H~ r ~W:~I r~ ! J i i -t~ 1-. i ~I I I .1 I ; . t ~t- I I' fllr tl CElL Erilli H .~ . I: L c:)!) )1:<r::' I Lt;- 'The, City of tJ3oynton tJ3eacli ~,~ '~~\ fj;g.-= .~ ~,- . 100 'E. tIJoynton tIJeadi tIJoukvartf P.O. tIJoi(31O tIJoynton tIJeadi, ~foritia 33425-0310 City:Jfa[[: (407) 375-6000 ~!U: (407) 375-6090 July 10, 1995 George C. Davis 1100 S. Federal Hwy., Suite #3 Boynton Beach, FL 33935 Re: Clear Copy Property Location: Southwest corner of Boynton Beach Bovd. and N.W. 7th st. File No. NWSP # 95-004 Dear Mr. Davis: The attached package will be presented to the Planning and Development Board on July 11, 1995 (see attached agenda) and then to the City Commission the following week (July 18, 1995). The applicant must understand that the permit plans shall be amended to comply with the final determination of the request and that additional comments may be generated by staff following their review for technical compliance of permit documents that are required to be submitted for development of the project. For the applicant's convenience, attached is a list of documents required for permit submittal. Final dermination is made of the site plan by the City Commission and when appoved by the City Commission shall be valid for one (1) year, unless a building permit from the Building Department is secured. If the applicant fails to secure a building permit in that time, all previous approvals shall become null and void. Very t1;uly.y~,!rs, ~-~~~ ~7fchael ~. H:af- /~~anning and Zoning /----- / (~EH :pim I attachments "---zc': Central File .:P&DpkI11tr_clr Administrator 51mema's (jateway to tfu (julfstream BUI LL"ING OEPARTMEN T SUBMITlAL DOCUMENTS Congratulations on receiving Site Approval for your proposed construction within the City of Boynton Beach. We appreciate your choosing to build within our City. In order to ensure a timely permitting process, the follOWing docu.ent. are required to be submitted in two (2) sets. Each set IllUst be stapled tOlether to fol'll a dnale package. Incomplete sets can not be accepted. I. A signed and sealed survey (not over six (6) IIOnths old) by a reliBtered surveyor in the State of Florida indicating. A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. t. J. K. All property lines Horth arrow Existing structures and pavina Existing elevations Rights-of-way, with elevations Ease.-nts on or adjacent to the site Utilities on or adjacent to the site LeBal description Number of acres to the nearest one-hundredth (1100) of an acre Location sketch of property Surveyor's Certificate II. A site plan properly dimensioned and to scale showing: A. All proposed structures B. All existing structures that are to remain on site C. Setback lines for all structures drawn perpendicular from the property lines.~o the closest vertical wall of the structures D. Use of each structure (or uses within multiple occupancies) E. Use of adjacent properties including right-of-way lines for all streets and alleys, sidewalks, turn lanes and driveways F. Elevations of the lowest finisbed floor of all structures on the site G. Location of existing utility lines on or adjacent to the site II. Location of fire hydrants on or adjacent to the site I. Location of dumpster enclosure and details of construction Ill. A paving plan in conformance with the Parking Lot Code (Chapter 5, Article X of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances) indicating: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. Calculations for the number of required parking stalls (see Appendix A-Zoning, Section IlH) Cross sections indicating parking lot construction Raised curbing meeting City Standards Double striping meeting City Standards Conformance with the Sidewalk Ordinance (Chapter 22, Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances) Handicapped parking stalls in conformance with the State Ihmdicapped Code D~ensions for all parking stalls, back-up areas, driveways and traffic lanes Traffic control devices and signs IV. A drainage plan for the entire site including: A. Finish grade and pavement elevations B. Drainage calculations C. Details of the drainage system. If total site area exceeds 25,000 square feet, plans must be prepared by a Florida registered engineer and must be sealed D. Inlets IDUSt be placed in grassy swal. areas V. A landscape plan showing conformance with the Landscape Code (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances) showing: A. Complete final landscape construction drawings B. Automatic irrigation system plans with 100% coverage (no City water to be used) C. Plant material must be keyed according to species, size and quantity D. Site walls and fences must be indicated on the plans E. Location and contours of proposed berms VI. A lighting plan for the building exterior and site lighting including: Exterior security lighting and pedestrian lighting Lighting for drivewa1s and parking lots 1. Location of li~tiRl z. Fixture types 3. Lamp types and sizes ~. Photometric plan showina illumination levels in footcandles 5. Li&hting pol.s designed for wind load. in accordance with Chapter 12, Standard Building Code VII. Construction docUlll8nts (all docUIII8IIt. IllU8t. be signed, sealed and dated) A. B. A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. H. N. O. P. Floor plans for each proposed structure (indicate use of space) Elevations for each proposed structure (indicate exterior materials and colors) Soil tests Energy calculations plus one (1) cover sheet Foundation plan typical wall sections Electrical plan view drawings and riser diagram with calculations Plumbing riser diagraa and plan view drawings Air conditioninl plan truss layout Proposed finish floor elevation identified on the plan Board of Health Department stamp (where applicable) Copy of D.E.R. and/or D.E.R.H. permit and plans (where applicable) Copy of Army Corps of Engineers permit (wbere applicable) Copy of Lake Worth Drainage District permit (wbere applicable) Copy of South Florida Water Management District pe~it for surface water management or water use (where applicable) bh - 3/92 A: SU1IHITAL.OOC 7.D.2. CLEAR COPY, INC. New Site Plan PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-325 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION July II, 1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: clear Copy, Inc. Applicant: Bob Feldman, owner Agent: George C. Davis Location: Southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street File No. : NWSP 95-004 Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Type of Use: Copying service and print shop Number of Units: N/A Square Footage: site: 9,788 square feet (.225 acres) Building: 3,780 square feet Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning: North - Boynton Beach Boulevard and farther north is Wendy's Restaurant, zoned C-2. South - N. W. 1st Avenue and farther south are single-family residences, zoned R-IA. East Medical office building, zoned C-2. West N.W. 7th Street and farther west is Gateway Center, zoned C-2. Existing Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with no vegetation. Proposed Development: The proposed retail printing business primarily serves country clubs. Therefore, most of their business involves pick-up and delivery directly to the customer. They also serve walk-in printing needs of the general public. Concurrency: Traffic - Verification has not yet been received from Palm Beach County Traffic Division which indicates that the anticipated small increase in trips generated by the use complies with the City's traffic levels of service and Palm Beach \ Page 2 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 Site Plan Review staff Report Clear Copy, Inc. Driveways: Parking Facility: Landscaping: Building and Site Regulations: Community Design Plan: Signage: County's Traffic Performance standards Ordinance. The applicant will be responsible for any required improvements determined to be necessary as part of Palm Beach County's review of the traffic study. Drainage - Insufficient drainage information has been submitted for the Engineering Division to certify compliance with the City's drainage levels of service at ythe time of site plan approval, as required. The Engineering Division is recommending that this be postponed to time of permit review. Two, one-way driveways to the parking lot proposed; a one-way ingress located on N. W. Avenue and a one-way egress located on N. W. street. are 1st 7th The proposed parking facility contains the required thirteen (13) parking spaces, including one (1) handicap space. The landscape plan submitted reflects all required landscaping. The proposed development meets the requirements of the building and site regulations. The total site area is 9,788 square feet with a building coverage of thirty-seven percent (37%). The building height is twenty-five (25) feet. The proposed color of the two-story stucco building will be light pink with white trim, doors and window shutters. The roof will be brick colored s- tile. These colors are generally compatible with the colors of the neighboring structures which are predominantly of a Spanish/Mediterranean style. However, the shade of pink selected for the stucco does not appear to compliment the brick colored roof tile; a more orange shade of pink is recommended. A freestanding sign is proposed between Boynton Beach Boulevard and the front of the building. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS: Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding this request: DEPARTMENT ATTACHED MEMORANDUM Public Works utilities Fire polic Engineering Division #95-102 #95-204 N/A :;;:95-0148 jr95-205 ~ Page 3 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 Site Plan Review Staff Report Clear Copy, Inc. Building Division Parks & Recreation Forester/Environmentalist Planning and Zoning #95-210 N/A N/A #95-326 The above Departments' comments may be addressed on the permit set of drawings. The remaining departments did not have comments regarding their review of the amended plans. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. DDC:dim xc: central File ~:atffrpt.Cle ~ \ \ \ . ~ .4-. ~ \ tt\ \ ~~ ~ ~ t- ."_~. ~- ,'- _..__.~ \J . ~ z:.. . . \---~~~ ' :::-- I _._. _ ...==c- -. ._'-~~:....-:.=:.==- ----=-:-.. . I . ~ m n II I . \ ~ ,- ~ r} . a\ t_ ~\) ~ ~ .4 ~ - ,.,..' t -- -- . t ,,-L~~"-1.- - " \ lJ'.' .... r,.-.,l J"~'J~""'-'~." j. ~.. I U ~ ri -- . . rv ...Y\l .-- ---."" V ~ N "" l-'I . \.u. : . . ~ o c ~ ~ 'fi ~ ~ -$-if ~ - - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-102 ~...... ..,.,....,. . /t .- '.* / i ,. I ,'. / . i , i r " , l.J / ,; ; ,......./ TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Clear Copy, Inc. DATE: June 22, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the site plan for the above site and the plans can be forwarded to the Planning & Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory for consideration. ~ bert Eichorst Public Works Director RElcr s MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-204 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director tr~~ Director of Utilities FROM: Date: June 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. A second fire hydrant may be required based on access evaluation by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department staff. 2. Plan shall show location of proposed water meter, (Sec. 26. 16(c)). 3. A sanitary sewer cleanout shall be installed, the size of the lateral, at the property line. Please show on your plans, (Sec. 26.33(b)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella Steve Campbell, Fire Dept. File \v .. BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT w TO: FROM: DATE: REF: T AMBRl HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 95 CLEAR COpy - 2ND REVIEW MEMO #0148 W \AJN 2 6 1995 nANNING AND DEPT. \ \. ~~~...... I have reviewed the above site plan an4,.~:d;;;fi9d~nb pmbletp,~,,'X!th suggested changes. /? t:~"'d'> U ~~4;:-, i?' ~.... )';. .14. <.. /' ,v ~Rcspectful1l11Y' ~ ft <~~:> ~"</(0\.".. :::v.:.~'~...... -:~ ~. i"'~ '\ :e ...~........, t :} ~, J . < rr.""",~<} \,.' , {!. M , ,,J . ~., . 1. Marlon Harris ~ Pol ice Department f~,.~,,;..:~::.. ~.""..:;::.:i:.~>:..,~',~.'~...'~.'.;:'~..:...>."';',:,..:.,:~,..::.::..".~::.::..::~,.~~.,.,.::.:::, :'mw.w.,~.,.:" n~~))1 ~rT:::'~,.: >~~~~ !:J B!:J U 0 J;:di 0 {:....:...-:-..<>..~:::J '2~ i' fl ~N .~ A' f ~~ . ~'1r~ ,1? ":{ '. .,,\ ~.,;>;, ........1 .......:...0:0..- ~\ '::..'...~<>....~:-.... ~<<- q...... .-:-.....;:>. \, ~:;:. ,"'" l.(" ",,< l ~ l I :\''1 i'! ", ~ ::. of ~~ ~ l "- "'-:,'''':....-' ! ~ ,.,~~yo)... :.....-.0:. .:::'.':0,.. /Ffr;) -:\ DATE: June 26, 1995 TIl.;. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 SUBJECT: CLEAR COpy INC., SECOND REVIEW cP-- The following commentslrecommendations are submitted for your review: I. The plan is subject to the parking lot regulations for paving, drainage, site lighting, curbing, landscaping, and irrigation permits. RECOMMENDATIONS I. Engineering recommends that the subject plan be forwarded to the P & D Board. 2. We also recommend a discussion with the Board regarding clarifying the location of driveways when a parcel abuts a local road and one of a higher elassification (Chap. 23, Art.2H3). If there is general agreement that the code needs revision, it should be done quickly. One point that needs clarification is ... To what point on the driveway dJh~ 30' or 180' dimensions go? -- to the centerline ofthe D/W? or to the outside edge ofthe ingresslegress D/W? The following modifications are also suggested: a) Chap. 23, Art.2H I: Change the maximum driveway width from 32' to 36'. Most driveways have three lanes - one in and two out, usually a right turn lane and one for crossing maneuvers. Usually these lanes are 12' each; however, if the 36' dimension is acceptable, I would like to see the city specify that the two egress lanes be 11' wide each and the ingress lane, 14'. The purpose of this code requirement would be to allow a wider lane for vehicles coming in from a collector or arterial roadway to negotiate the turn as they decelerate. Having II' lanes for outgoing traffic is no hardship because they arc traveling at a low speed and then stopping at the stop sign. b) Chap 23, Art.2H2: Provide that the 25' driveway radii be a minimum dimension. For the same reason above, vehicles entering a s~opping center, etc. from a 40 to 50 mph speed (actual speed, not posted speed) should ha~e a larger, "forgiving" radius. KRH/krh C: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file. ~ June 26, 1995 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-210 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: TRe COMMENTS - 2nd SITE PLAN REVIEW CLEAR COPY, INC. The Building Division has reviewed the amended plans for the above project and offers the following comments: 1. Thirteen parking spaces are required; only 12 are shown. There is no handicap parking shown. 2 . Handicap access from the right-of-way to the entrance of building is required. 3 . Sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue is required. The above comments can be met at time of building permit; therefore, we recommend that the project be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. ~ " .' . . "/ // Al (, NewboJ..d cr / AN:bh Attachment/plans XC: William V. Hukill, P.E. CLBAR C\ Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-326 2nd Review, New Site Plan Clear Copy, Inc. File No.: NWSP 95-004 7. Although the use is located within a C-2 district, print shops require environmental review. The applicant must obtain an environmental review permit prior to occupying the premises. 8. State on the plans the hours that the loading zone will be utilized and that these hours have been coordinated with Public Works so as to not conflict with trash pick. 9. Any conditions of approval received by Palm Beach County Traffic Division after their review of the traffic statementr must be complied with at time of permitting. II. RECOMMENDATIONS 10. It is recommended that a recycling container be provided in compliance with the criteria specified by the Public Works Department. 11. It is recommended that a more orange shade of pink is selected for the building stucco to better compliment the color of the roof tile. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH:dim xc: Central File a:2ndcom.Clr "'" ....OCATION MAP . CLEAR COPY, INC. \:" \~ -- rI r I I ,~ ,,""'-...J I 1.11111, I} ,~I II IIJ~' '-I ~. . - . _ _, - ,~; -!':; .--,!ll!l.,_ __ \ - -,. R \ ~, - -~ :-- ~~: - - -' . \~ ~_ _I, :_\J to- I-~ ......":. --r- T l 'I-- l.--~" E : - - =~ - L_~ 1 =~ - l' ~ " '\ '- r-a :::: ~ '-- -, 'I. d_' -~ - -- =~l ~,..0 \ \ \~__: f- ~~=:.~=. .~ =r= .: \ If v , \,~ f- f--- ~- - ~ =~ =~ == : \ Ii ~tl _ .p= _ ' \, '~'>l f- '-..... f- - :;,;,. '-lw- ~;::: ;:D = ]m '\ ': I I I I I I " - 1\ I ;::: -= = - . c.JJ ! i - ~ rL)1 .- ~~ - - - ITll1 I I ~ -..- . !: "" il 111-71- - ~::I- - ;:ii - - .....-- ._ rrr :: q..... LJ - I I == : I " _ / i--- I-- .. ,_ _ ' : ! - .' I ~l!! r - - - I- --- _: ~ ~-: 1 :t ~-;t ~~.~ ;_! ,_ ;- ~- ~ ;-- ~ = TlI n~ " ; - r" ~\ - F - ","_':' ~ --~ I ,.. : :~ t::::r' I ,.- ;1 :':~_T~" ~r~~. ~ - - == --_ ,I I - ,- -. .- - -. ~JPJl/r!l · ~~.,- ~!' .: -~!. '. _ ~,.~~ -~l~\-b.lJr.l r, I ; {)''h\'''~ ~" ~'., UIJ'~ .,,- i t ,._.- : -JII- U _-' 'A~; . '00 I I.. I !' <:;(~)'C - - - , ~' : I f U.lli - -~- ~- .,'./ ~.2t1 1---- . 3 : -'fr-- . lr ~~ ""I... -..\, , I,~. ,,,: I ._~~ ._::::::-::::::. ~-.' .. ! : -- pee It - -, ~;i'; ;..IIJC.~:;;tIIl~ tTiD:>"1r'( I ~Oy) T()'" 4=A( It ' "m-II j' . IS:..' r-'~ \\ I _~.~ ,~.~~~~_ r \- ~ il:~~~~ 1~1 ~. IH~~:~sl~ ~ :+ ~ :'J-" ~ ~.~ ~ I~\ I .' :1 .~ , - ~ ~: . . ~ ~ II ~ r- ]~I r::1I !:,:;r;~~?/ "" I~~I - 1=13 ~ - .: ~1 ~ Cl 1 -. ~ '~. J r-j ~~ '1 B~ t) _j -"" -.....or "r,~,~l ru .... t: ....i.. '11~/! ';"1 -- JI .( n )'~ .. I :: I' .~: ~ L ,-;-.,l- ~-=o iP5l-: c..Wi., :;;;. I' )[ \~ iLl:!!r~\~I.: "TJ-t~~~t~E~=~ti til I ~) \ REe tJ\\~.-- '-;-:--,= ,. .... i+~~'!'~ J I '1"" \ - <"-'L l -- ~ ~ I ,'I . = ~ e.,. r - - ---10-) mW"'- -jl r::-\mr-:- ~rC:'\\ jLllil~' l1~1 CJ t; r" r+:".-i I I " ~ _ !' , !"'- ~ ~ ,Tlr:- ~ . {; . ~~. i U~, ~~~ ~:: -; -: -==- ~R;.jtA'='~ - .' I' "[-: \ t . (' I' ) ----' _ - -~ ~ __'!J ~ ..... ... R ,': R EC . :H~,dr:~ J '~., ~'..::. ':= '" c:: ~~,,-- .'m r . 1 ~ 3 1/ . t"-r;"r~ ~.~~,~~l~~t_ LfTTIfUnD, ~' _\,.......-. ->7'" ~.~.,:-~L~-r Ill' _d ~ -+ -_ .~ I II ~ ~IU r ......L.~..J.J.. I " ." t . ~ / 1 I T ..' .) ,. i fllTT t:: J, . \..cl 1 I ~ r r -t T .: \\ '" -. ~ ~ ~ --.ll.J "\ ~ .Q.r-1 _ ,\<('. 0. - ....-T ::, ,f \ PUD 1 ~ l' >\ .,.,. > ~ : "'" ,>,... ~,~~~ , . I ~ L U l: 5 .0 'I j ~ h . .f-~h ". , " ... \. ..0.... 1 ..' ..,,,.,~ .........,>. ,.,' ,'" d>>' __ -;:t;:;IJrt.'~. .,,,.,, ~~"'''.'' "-X>),../" .-'" 1'w OLBRIGHT L.~ . ^. 1 .^.JO V.'~" ."'~" . . u := _~...... ..~ ': ~>~ / ~~ ....::~ ._~ ~\~LACE - . .... r-~ . ~ '()1' (?,~~~ ,\ - -' '~~~<j~'.:i?~ ~R':; ~?~<: .~\'." \, :. r "0 ~.x'", \ \ ' I ~.~~:: I~ \\\ ~. \ .... ~ .-.l I .~. \ _~ - l,,. I' 1 -~ -. : ~ C~- T : :; rfrT :IIi=~: ]1...........1.1...:{~: . ... , II -, 0 r, . ~.=...'_1. .., I ' . :. ' \ r:-- IT --t~' ~ . J . __ .. I~" . .-=1- - -:; .p .' L j ..; I ! ~:.::--:- .:.. r 1t:11 ~r ~ ~ ,.' l I -- -, ~ Uzt ~ . ~AN:&.. '<.. : - - .-. ~. ~ .--,-... C::~--e~ ----. ~-:- .r~~~ q1 I I R3 i ~::=---r;- .' ,---1 ..r '-, 'h /,.h ";J', h~'8R.'N~ R~nQ}~'1I1 II~.'O 1/8 MILESV~ \ ' ~ _ ~~ -. ~J ~ .,~ ~ ~ r'~J ~ . .1111 I,.' . 'I .~ · . ~ ~'~ :i}'.~ '_ -1 L2T) \'~:!Ii':~:~~~lf: f~ \-~~~ 1.-> 1 .~;'O .400. '8~~ FE~T ,1.~L~l;g's - ~.,-..!_m )Ceec '~'~.~,\;.<~~': 1 \~~ I -rr:ilL..I ~71 :'~~AI~ /I~~~ :-95 .; , ! ~ f I~ Iq ~ ~ ~l "'I :, ~I at r I ~ ---~:. R1AA .-J rt~ \ \-- \ I , I ';~ r~ / C~I: I , L I , '1Iil';,T'I ~:l;:::':. IlIIIIff4ti14hIH1 .WI Ii, 1'1m ': !ITr.:'i"'II::iI:J[ C~.:. -- ~~Ji n_ ,- -- .- ._, p =, U -J ;-... , F I I ! I I I >J~ ~Fii :,~L :m~il;'-' CJI1':.' ..f'-- .... - ot . I i 'II, - , . . : I . ~ · i i ~ -+1-1. - i' ~I I , T . & ~ t I r 11r \t Lclh. ~ ~ ;[EffiEl \Ill] I' i. PL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-326 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: June 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Site Plan Project: Location: Applicant: File No.: Review - 2nd Review - New Clear Copy, Inc 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Site Plan Boulevard The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the site and design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building Division for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Please show and identify on the plans all curbing, wheelstops and landscaped areas. Areas that must be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheelstops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adjacent to a parking stall and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with City standards. 2. State on the plans that Boynton Beach Boulevard is the front of the property. 3. Provide a note adjacent to the dumpster location identifying the type of landscaping material that is required to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. 4. Add to the landscape plan/site plan all existing and proposed easements. Identify the type of easement and dimension the width. Note: Some landscape material is not allowed to be planted with an easement and under overhead lines. 5. Show on the plan that the proposed landscaping adjacent to the intersection of N. W. 7th Street and N. W. 1st Street does not violate line-of-site requirements for areas within twenty-five feet of the intersection. 6. Submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan by name, manufacturer and model or style number. \. r '"' MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-204 Date: June 23, 1995 110) ~lL~.JULll~l II~fll"n 7 '"'' 11.01 i~.."_~_,..._,.",,_.~_...---.J ! f''i ~ j'." " .'." t, iI t..~ '\ ' ..., .'" ,'",!,., '" U \'''>J ' .... . , ,",. " ~'fJ' ...._~__",~..L::.~:~LQEFl . TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~'rto/~ ~ 10hA ''A. Guidry, Director of Utilities FROM: SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. A second fire hydrant may be required based on access evaluation by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department staff. 2. Plan shall show location of proposed water meter, (Sec. 26. 16(c)). 3. A sanitaty sewer cleanout shall be installed, the size of the lateral, at the property line. Please show on your plans, (Sec. 26.33(b)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella Steve Campbell, Fire Dept. J File DATE: June 26, 1995 TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 SUBJECT: CLEAR COpy INC., SECOND REVIEW ~ The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review: ]. The plan is subject to the parking lot regulations for paving, drainage, site lighting, curbing, landscaping, and irrigation permits. RECOMMENDATIONS ]. Engineering recommends that the subject plan be forwarded to the P & D Board. 2. We also recommend a discussion with the Board regarding clarifying the location of driveways when a parcel abuts a local road and one ofa higher classification (Chap. 23, Art.2H3). If there is general agreement that the code needs revision, it should be done quickly. One point that needs clarification is... To what point on the driveway dJhe 30' or ]80' dimensions go? -- to the centerline of the D/W? or to the outside edge ofthe ingresslegress D/W? The following modifications are also suggested: a) Chap. 23, Art.2Hl: Change the maximum driveway width from 32' to 36'. Most driveways have three lanes - one in and two out, usually a right turn lane and one for crossing maneuvers. Usually these lanes are ]2' each; however, if the 36' dimension is acceptable, I would like to see the city specify that the two egress lanes be 11' wide each and the ingress lane, 14'. The purpose of this code requirement would be to allow a wider lane for vehicles coming in from a collector or arterial roadway to negotiate the turn as they decelerate. Having II' lanes for outgoing traffic is no hardship because they are traveling at a low speed and then stopping at the stop sign. b) Chap 23, Art.2H2: Provide that the 25' driveway radii be a minimum dimension. For the same reason above, vehicles entering a shopping center, etc. from a 40 to 50 mph speed (actual speed, not posted speed) should have a larger, "forgiving" radius. KRH/krh C: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to file. June 26, 1995 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-210 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMENTS - 2nd SITE PLAN REVIEW CLEAR COPY, INC. The Building Division has reviewed the amended plans for the above project and offers the following comments: 1. Thirteen parking spaces are required; only 12 are shown. There is no handicap parking shown. 2. Handicap access from the right-of-way to the entrance of building is required. 3. Sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue is required. The above comments can be met at time of building permit; therefore, we recommend that the project be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. ~ AI" Newbo'. " /' - .' / AN: bh Attachment/plans XC: William V. Hukill, P.E. CLBAR BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT - ~ m @ TO: FROM: DATE: REF: T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 95 CLEAR COpy - 2ND REVIEW MEMO #0148 I have reviewed the above site plan an?,,:~~;,.n~d':~p ,r.obl~fP.:,~.''Y~~h suggested changes. ../:'::>:'::~:::;;::;~~:~::~:"'::::\;:..:...:\:. f :~1 )? ;:;::t::>::::;:;::. ;::.:;:::.,..::;;::::::::...:;:::~:::{..::.. '.......:.~.: .:t'. i/ ""':~::' "" ~RespectfuJ:IIYJJ' y!b, :!':i'n . . . ::.........:..:.;..:~..:.:i .:: " " " " J - '. Lt......,....,.,../ . . Marlon Harris Police Department :C'::::::'::::'::::::::::;:,:'.'::' .......:....;../ J .~l:.:..:.:..:..,...::.. .-;.......;.., ~' .(:-"';:";::;~\ \;\:.. \~::\ "::"~.. /:: .........;...;..' .,:' ...:.....;.;.:...::.. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-102 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Clear Copy, Inc. DATE: June 22, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the site plan for the above site and the plans can be forwarded to the Planning & Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory for consideration. ~ .. bert Eichorst Public Works Director RElcr MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: 14",/3'1i Hirb,i~. f '-A;v.N...rC t Z 0.,,;':> L _,io'i'ec-rO''- FROM: -:r ol.JrJ \,V It..-~~~~, fMk.s- S w-pr. 0 ,,- tv/ ') f /9j-' Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans , N h ~tVCf[wUl RE: Project: tL~ L<1f7 After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration. amended plans for the above the f{ ft, l-If tt-JI< 1"[& "'" -\- ! /\7t' fe- that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project. C:AMEND1.ALD -~._-_._------ -------~~ ~- -- RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-283 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~ H Clear Copy, Inc. 00 rn I~" ~ ~~l rn ill FROM: RE: DATE: June 29, 1995 PLANNiNG AND u. L ZONING DEPT. c-'r"'? I have no additional comment. The project should continue on the normal review process. KH:ad 2nd Copy FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-281 WDC TO: Planning Department ffi] · U \YJ II fiil 001 .' - 6 /<l9'j ~, FROM: Fire Department DATE: June 23, 1995 ~'tM~~8E~~O RE: NWSP 95-004 Clear copy Inc. 660 W Boynton Beach Blvd We have no objections at this time. ~.~~j(AJC William D. C anaugh, FPO PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-352 Agenda Memorandum for July 18, 1995 City Commission Meeting 'fO: Carrie Parker city Manager Tambri J. HeYden-,p-;.J- Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: July 10, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. - NWSP #95-004 New Site Plan Please place the above-referenced request on the July 18, 1995 city Commission agenda under Development Plans. DESCRIPTION: This is a request from Georg~ C. Davis, agent for Bob Feldman, property ot-mer and owner of Clear Copy, Inc. I for si te plan approval to construct a 3,780 square foot, two-story, retail printing business on a .225 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and lLW. 7th Street (please refer to attached Planning and Zoning Depal-tment Memorandum No. 95-325 for further details regarding the site plan). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 5-1 vote, recommended approval of this request, subject to staf f comments (Public Wor}(s Department Memorandum #95-102, utilities D8pal-tment Nemorandum #95-204, Police Memorandum #95-0148, Engineering Division Memorandum #95-205, BUilding Division #95-210 and Planning and Zoning Memorandum t95-326. AS a point of information, there was much discussion regarding the accessibility (turning radius of the approach) to the proposed dumpster location, the egress only design of the driveway onto N.W. 7tll street (there was some concern as to whether motorlsts would obey this driveway design as egress only) and the bUilding design (possible iHappropriatene~s of the shutters and lack of additional design features). TJH:dim Attachment .:C=A..."wa..C~r PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-325 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION July 11,.1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: cleat- Copy, Inc. Applicant: Bob Feldman, owner Agent: George C. Davis Location: southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street File No.: NWSP 95-004 Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail commercia~ (LRC) Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Type of Use: Copying service and print shop Number of units: NIA Square Footage: Site: 9,788 square feet (.225 acres) Building: 3,780 square feet Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning: North - Boynton Beach Boulevard and farther north is W~ndy' s Restaurant, zoned C-2. South -, N.W. 1st Avenue and farther south are single-family residences, zoned R-1A. East Medical office building, zoned C-2. West N.W. 7th Street and farther west is Gateway Center, zoned C-2. Existing Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with no vegetation. Proposed Development: The proposed retail printing business primarily serves countl"y clubs. Therefore, most of their business involves pick-up and delivery directly to the customer. They also serve walk-in printing needs of the genel"al public. Concurrency: Traffic - Verification has not yet been received from Palm Beach County Traffic Division which indicates that the anticipated small increase in trips generated by the use complies with the City's traffic level s of service and Palm Beach \ Page 2 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 Site Plan Review staff Report Clear Copy, Inc. Driveways: Parking Facility: Landscaping: BUilding and site Regulations: Conunun i t Y Design Plan: 8ign8ge: County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The applicant will be responsible for any required improvements determined to be necessary as part of Palm Beach County's review of the traffic study. Drainage - Insufficient drainage information has been submitted for the Engineering Division to certify compliance with the City's drainage levels of service at ythe time of site plan approval, as required. The Engineering Division is recommending that this be postponed to time of permit review. Two, one-way driveways to the parking lot proposed; a one-way ingres~ located on N. W. Avenue and a one-\'lay egl-ess located on N. W. street. are 1st 7th The proposed parking facility contains the required thirteen (13) parking spaces, including one (1) handicap space. The landscape plan submitted reflects all required landscapilllj. The proposed development meets the requirements of the building and site regulations. The total site area is 9.788 square feet with a bUilding coverage of thirty-seven percent (37%). The building height is twenty-five (25) feet. , The proposed color of the two-story stucco building will be light pink with white trim, doors and window shutters. The roof will be brick colored s- tile. These colors are generally compatible with the colors of the neighboring structures which are predominantly of a Spanish/Mediterranean style. However, the shade of pink selected for the stucco does not appear to compl iment the brick colored roof tile; a more orange shade of pink is recommended. A freestanding sign is proposed between Boynton Beach Boulevard and the front of the building. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS: Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding this request: DEPARTMEN~ A~TACHED MEMORANDUM Public Works utilities Fire polie l::119ineering Division #95-102 #95-204 N/A #95-0148 #95-205 (. ~ ') Page 3 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 Site plan Review staff Report Clear Copy, Inc. Building Division Parks & Recreation Forester/Environmentalist Planning and Zoning #95-210 N/A N/A #95-326 The above Departments' comments may be addressed on the permit set of drawings. The remaining departments did not have comments regarding their review of the amended plans. RECOMMENDATION: The Plann~ng and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being ame:nded to show compliance with staff comments and the city of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. , DDC:dim xc: ce:ntral File a: aLtltl pl, .:1. --) --2) \ \ I . ~ "-. t\ ! \ l~ ~ t- r-~~'--"-~ ~ t.. 'V- . . ,..... ' -' -i \\ o ~ ~ ~ ~ -$- ] I I \ , . - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95.( 02 ~~.... ., , .' /J /: 0.*, , ( . i I .' . /.:1 II i ''4/ TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Clear Copy, Inc. DATE: , June 22, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the site plan for the above site and the plans can be forwarded to the Planning & Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory for consideration. ~ ~~ bert Eichorst Public Works Director REIer , s MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-204 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~~td?( ~ fui~~ A. Guidry, Director of Utilities FROM: Date: June 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. A second fire hydrant may be required based on access evaluation by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department staff 2. Plan shall show location of proposed water meter, (Sec. 26. 16(c)). 3. A sanitary sewer c1eanout shall be installed, the size Qf\he lateral, at the property line. Please show on your plans, (Sec. 26.33(b)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella Steve Campbell, Fire Dept. File , (c . BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRJ HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 95 CLEAR COpy - 2ND REVIEW MEMO #0148 .E ~ 0 W~ JJN 2 6 1995 ftANNING AND . . NG OEPT. '\ I have reviewed the above site plan a~~$t1~d'nL''''' F~~I~,~.w:~th suggested changes. / .1.,',"'. ...~,~>.> ~., A'~ ~.. ,.., .'", {. i' ":l~ Respectfully, ~ (5rP ,f < ~ ~-/-. J/J.~ Q .~~arlon Harris Police Dcparunent eC:l ;) 'II~ l. P ~ -[~~). ..=~~~ fJ >,:::::::;!/ 0 ~~ ---=J} 0 .....,..............} @>>~1 t--,,~~... lh c2.l . ...<'W""."" <;)-, ( ('"~.~~ t.) ) ~~::~) ,.. . ~',~ ~:;.}J ti'F/) 0 ~ ~ . \ PATE: .June 26, 1995 I.Q;. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. fROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 SUB,J~CT: CLEAR COpy INC., SECOND RE\;'IEW ~ The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review: I. The plan is subject to the parking lot regulations for paving. drainage, site lighting, curbing, landscaping, and irrigation permits. RECOMMENDATIONS I. Engineering recommends that the subject plan be forwarded to the P & D Board. 2. We also recommend a discussion with the Board regarding clarifying the location of driveways when Q parcel abuts n local rood nnd one ofa higher classification (Chap. 23. Art.2H3). lfthere is general agreement that the code needs revision. it should be done quickly. , One point that needs clarification is ... To what point on the driveway dd~~ 30' or 180' dimensions go? -- to the centerline of the D/W'/ or to the outside edge o{the ingrcsslegress D/W? The following modifications arc also suggested: a) Chap. 23, Art.2H I: Change the maximum driveway width from 32' to 3". Most driveways have three lanes - one in and two out, usually a right turn lane and one for crossing maneuvers. Usually these lanes arc 12' each~ however, if the 36' dimension is acceptable, I would like to see the city specify that the two egress lanes he II' wide each and the ingress lane, 14'. The purpose of this code requirement would be to allow a wider lane for vehicles coming in from a collector or arterial roadway to negotiate the turn as they decelerate. Having II' lanes for outgoing traffic is no hardship because they arc traveling at a low speed and then stopping at the stop sign. b) Chap 23, Art.2H2: Provide that the 25' driveway radii be a minimum dimension. For the same reason above, vehiclcs entcring a shopping center. ctc. from a 40 to 50 mph speed (actual speed, not posted specd) should hav.c a larger, "forgiving" radius. , KRHlkrh c: William Hukill, Dev. Dir. and to tilc. "'1 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-210 June 26, 1995 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMBNTS - 2nd SITH PLAN RBVIBW CLBAR COPY, INC. The Building Division has reviewed the amended plans for the above project and offers the following comments: 1. Thirteen parking spaces are required; only 12 are shown. There is no handicap parking shown. 2. Handicap access from the right-of-way to the entrance of building is required. 3. Sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue is required. , The above comments can be met at time of , building permit; therefore, we recommend that the proj'ect be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. ~ .' .' .' .0:.. .// AI'" Newbol.d /' / AN: bh Attachment/plans XC: William V. Hukill, P.E. , CLlaK C\ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO, 95-326 Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director Michael E, Haag site and Zoning Development Administrator June 28, 1995 Site Plan Project: Location: , Applicant: File No.: Review - 2nd Review - New Clear Copy, Iuc 660 W, Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Site Plan Boulevard The following is a list of comm~nts regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comm~nts either from the f11.'st review or new comments as a result of the second review. To show cumpliance with these comments will not substantially alter the cOllfiguration of the site and design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All commellts and recommendations can be r~ctified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The appl icant must understand that addi tional comments may be generated upon review of the docUlllents and working drawings submitted to the Building Division for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1 . Please show and identify on the plans all curbing, wheelstops and landscaped areas. Areas that must be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheelstops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adjacent to a parking stall' and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with city standards. ") .. . state on the plans that Boynton Beach Boulevard is the front of the property. 3. Provide a note adjacent to the dumpster location identifying the type of landscaping material that is required to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. 4 . Add to the landscape plan/site plan all existing and proposed easements. Identify the type of easement and dimension the width. Note: Some landscape material is not allowed to be planted with an easement and under overhead lines. 5 . Show on the plan that the proposed landscaping adjacent to the intersection of N. W. 7th Street and N. W, 1 st Street does not violate line-of-site requirements for areas within twenty-five feet of the intersection. 6. submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan by name, manufacturel' and model or style numbel-. \(, ') Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-326 2nd Review, New site Plan Clear Copy, Inc. File No.: NWSP 95-004 7. Although the use is located within a C-2 district, print shops require environmental review. The applicant must obtain an environmental review permit prior to occupying the premises. 8. State on the plans the hours that the loading zone will be utilized and that th8se hours have been coordinated with Public Works so as to not conflict with trash pick. 9. Any conditions of approval received by Palm Beach County Traffic Division after their review of the traffic statement, must be complied with at time of permitting. II. ~ECOMMENDATIONS 10. It 1s recommended that a recyclipg container be provided in compliance with the criteria specified by the Public Works Department. 11. It is recommended that a more orange shade of pink is selected for the building stucco to better compliment the color of the roof tile. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH:dim xc: Central File e::l.ndculI,Cll' \'\ LGCATION MAfJ CLEAR COPY, INC. \' \I~ I ,-r"'1- r--..~LJJ-L3U- ,~I III III~~ t- -.~... J. .""'1 ' ',..- ~f1: .. __ '- f""'..-:::_~~ ~_ _ t- ~ " . R '. . I.. '-1-' n.. ~ .. - T:'""r1- \' I~' :.-~ '-.... '1-. ..... - , I:'I~' / I~ -, 1- i- . - ,- I . V.--' , Jr- \\ '.t:-\~. E i:=.. t I =:=.. - .!~ ~- c= -=- :: f. "~I "I"I!!I:lC~' / \.. \\~--;~'~~<=~I;~ - ~~ ~ I /' I~:II:~!<.J " .~ Y'\. . l:..:t= . ... ~ I mm,l 11,1 I JPP . V\..~ ll. .- . · - =- . . L..:_ r.1lI11 Ill, ,I" \ '~ \.l 1- '- ~ . '- fN- :/- ;n =- al IFl IffiTT1"'I11lTmr \ 'Y',. ~ m ~ E ~!LJi.' R1 A A '\ 'it'lll I I" ,1- ~ ~::-=:= . ... c ~~: ,j i 1::: I ~ f: ~IG;;: rl ~ ~..:: ~::: :-:: !@I IISJ!: ::t= ; - U II I U .:. f- I I ;:= = 1 [ , :1- - - \I ~. -I-- -,-__. ..- . ':1- .' I ~tf!.}:l ~ .. _ .-. >-:- rr::--' I- - . - 7. ! 1 - '-.. r 1II f'1 : , ,I- . I _ - -'" _ _' [If If' ~ ">- . . .- _ .. I ': if.- rl' - :-'\r~ -'-~ JI r F ~ _c_ ~: I r~: :t= t::rJ1 ~)1 ~.1:~ . ~r~~. __: -.~ I=t 3 1 r 11"'Tl~":-Ipa.u ~~.~_ . ...':: .. -- r--'~ p- : 1'iJ i'1~1) j cmv I. 1/ < ,', h\ \:.~ I ~~ rnM ~='':- ~ ~ : U~"'" .. -..- ", I ~ h J t l I I i - --;, -. - f--! ' R '-1J 1[' 1 'J:'~ fT 1/;(0<1' - - ~.. : I I I E ~.lIU.' f .. -. ~/'< /,t''''.~) ~211 '-- 1 lie 'n';' I" lr-~m ~~;.). . "":,,, ~ _ .2::!.' !It.; '.~.' .,.... 1!'J'l. .'.~ . ..- ::=;;;::. I ~ - pee '>f'~:i; ;hiJC::' r~ itli:1~ \~(l ~n~~ -~o~ ;rtJ'" D~A(.H_ ~.:;' ~lll n~~:TrTTT:rr1:!!!~~Li"~ r-:::IC"::""" \\\ I lTIrnrF-;'Ip': , ~ ;~f ~~ U Ir~~'_~II" 'J'T [8J t ~,~~_ '\. ~jL I :I , .. - :.. rn ,~'J "I Ii ... . : :. ..... '1 r . I L - I , El1~ffil ' I I "( 11 ~t l'tlG" : ~'r ~.I :1 ~I' li__j ~u .f.1il~-Fri~ I' i5r~= ~~- I' ::~rL~ \ _ l , . ~[\Il! ~L~!Lr: f .' 1:~=~M._ t.::.JLJ~;.J ~~:!3~ I 1_ 'Y'Tr--- I. r&., \ R E C IJ\ ~\ . -' =- l.!.. lTTTll"lli!l ~.. ....-- I I . . . '.~."" I: <.- L" I' ~ iL'I"] L.lJllJ' r T' , ! ,: . 11 l" '. "11" '-ll.4~~i~1'~:i;.r~1.~~F;]:'~I'rf~: 'J1j~r;;~~~~!::,' ~ _ ~.., ~ II' ~ ~' JI. .. -. ._, -.- """' I,*"," " ) . - : " ~ l~ : :. =- --=.:: .. - ~~- iWr- H r T r. .. ..1 I DC.' ~.' . ~.:I . . .- . .~ '''-11'' ',l1lr III - :. r:l . ; RE'C ~~j /' -' ii-R- ~ -~:. -; :: ~ 'r' ,arl: ~ :3 "J .i . 6)~ ._ t,-= ti:) l;'~'!llirllhtr.lIn. l I Ii, L. ," \, l'i1lW,l . ,,~:~X~~'GIT ,(J{EB ': '\ 1111 CEIL:: j 'l~l'lf' . ,<~,.--,,-.___ -~cf& !', ,f\ PUD ~ I < Jlll~<;<<~~~'V" , "'~~". I, LUI:5.D 1- .filliilll -.-. A .. ,"]' "'" . ~.. .',.' . ~I" . - I-'", ..... ..~v..,..~ ~~.' ~ "... . <-:<, "~'~ I " LACE 'llI1lIr - ..... /.~ ..... '\ . - . . ..., . · , (( ~ I'. r . . -.. .. ... ..- ..". . : -. -, .\:.'. \ CB . ~<'~. ~J, _ '.1I1 II ~'1i, J I ~~ 1 .j i~\ -p cEi. Jl' ~ 1 : l~Tt'1 ~~ {-- nTfr~~ 1 i.I>I~' _ . i f ,\ n. : ~ : - .. -IE I.. L! ~ ~[~ ,\~ I L_ J 'j \ \ ...; .r t. j'-=- ~l _.~ - .I .I) l ~ -- -1.~ 'k1 ~ ~l, .J. I . ..-... _. r:~ ~ L- ._.' 1-- --- 'f'. ~.f1.,~ . 'q~i .. I' R';- '-. -. -- ~~ -- J.c..~I IIII Il-P . >.... /~.'" ...'. ~ \ 0/: ~.",,~ 11~ ,;N' RO.O:ill-\ ,c... V~ '" \ !t,-tr H-;~., 7"y ,.<!~~~(FaJ} lll" 1t, MI~ESI ," I .. 1 ~ II I .d I j ~~., (~.) ,II '0 400'8 I :i1. ,:. ;:r~ll . I~- l<r~ . P-~.' >.f1({,)..J~.' .............. :' . . 00 FE~T , , I .;.iI I ,nl II r-t r-....... ," V {.' "/'. . :~. " \.} ,'. P/..ANN/W /: iJ=VT. b -95' - ... · -, I' .. , , I I , J': = OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER TO: Tambri l'1eyden Planning Director FROM: Carrie Parker City Manager cfJ DATE: July 25, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. - Site Plan Application This item is rescheduled for September 5th. Please prepare review and comments on Dr. Robert's letter of July 20th. CP:jc Attachment cc: Jim Cherof , DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-272 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director I~m Hukill, P.E. p\Engineer August 2, 1995 FROM: DATE: RE: ROBERT'S MEDICAL BUILDING - LANDSCAPE BUFFER Mr. Newbold has completed the investigation you requested (Planning Memo 95-383) and the results are summarized in his attached Memo 95- 267 to me. It is self explanatory. WVH/ck C:ROBERTS xc: Carrie Parker,-City Manager. Al Newbold, Deputy Bldg. Official Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator RECEIVED , AUG " 19\j~ CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE ....4 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-267 July 31, 1995 TO: William V. Hukill, P.E. Department of Development Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: DR. ROBERTS'S MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING - LANDSCAPING DISCREPANCY In order to assist you in your response to Tambri Heyden's memorandum 95-383, I researched the files and offer the following facts and comments: The Technical Review Board (TRB) plans were signed off by Don Jaeger during his tenure as the department's representative. The building plans were reviewed by Michael Haag and ultimately signed off by Warren DeLoach in Mr. Haag's absence in 1989. My review shows the building plans match the TRB plans and those that were reviewed by the Community Appearance Board. All plans show a 2~' setback for the extreme western section of the property adjacent to the parking lot. During this era, Mr. Jaeger then became Building Official and Mr. Haag was appointed in charge of site review which was handled by this department during that time. Site plan approval permit 88- 0873 was generated to track the site plan process for all site improvements and administered by the Site Development Division of the Building Department under Mr. Haag's supervision. The project has been completed and all paperwork is on microfilm. Therefore, all original documents are no longer available. Attached are copies of the site plan and the tie-in survey along with a print-out of the inspection history. From my observation of the tie-in survey, the paving appears to be 1.58' from the west property line and not 2~' as shown on the building plans. I would assume that the survey is correct in that it has a certification date Showing August 23, 1989 and I found that the paving was approved August 18, 1989 by Roger Kuver, former Engineering Inspector who is now with the Utilities Department. From that same survey. it appears that the building is in the correct location and 1t would be fair to assume that the only problem is with the size of the paved area. I found no documentation in the file giving any explanation, etc. as to any resolution from the narrow landscape strip or whether it ever became an issue. Building Division Memo 95-267 to William V. Hukill, P.E. RE: Dr. Roberts' Medical Office Building July 31, 1995 Page Two Our records do show that the CAB inspection was made by Med Kopczynski who was the former Deputy Building Official and appointed to handle CAB inspections by Mr. Jaeger when he became Building Official. That inspection was approved August 25, 1989. I can only assume that the proper position to take would have been to cut off the additional paving to comply with the 30" landscape strip. It could have been assumed that it was not necessary since we did then, and do now, allow bumper stops to set back on paved areas less than the code requires so that the bumpers overhang the landscape strip. I see no reason why this would be an issue, especially as it relates to the adjacent property since our code also exempts landscaping on property that already has existing landscaping. My interpretation of the code is that the landscaping strip itself has a dimension requirement and the code specifies what must be located within that strip but not necessarily that the plantings must be as wide as the strip. It should be our position that the neighboring property owner should not be penalized for the paving on Dr. Roberts' property being closer to his property line than what was permitted. If any controversy arose during the construction of Dr. Roberts' permits, Mr. Haag could shed some light on it since he was involved in the site plan process and the final site approval was signed by him on November 19, 1991. AN: bh Attachments , \lo..aT. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPA MEMORANDUM NO. 95-352 VII. DEVE1.uf'MERT PLARS c. cc: Utilities Planning Developw!ut Agenda Memorandum for July 18, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden ~ Planning and Zoning Director DATE: July 10, 1995 SUBJECT: Clear copy, Inc. - NWSP #95-004 New Site Plan Please place the above-referenced request on the July 18, 1995 City Commission agenda under Development Plans. DESCRIPTION: This is a request from George C. Davis, agent for Bob Feldman, property owner and owner of Clear Copy, Inc., for site plan approval to construct a 3,780 square foot, two-story, retail printing business on a .225 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street (please refer to attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-325 for further details regarding the site plan). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 5-1 vote, recommended approval of this request, subject to staff comments (Public Works Department Memorandum #95-102, Utilities Department Memorandum #95-204, Police Memorandum #95-0148, Engineering Division Memorandum #95-205, Building Division #95-210 and Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-326. As a poi~f information, there was much discussion regarding the accessibi"ty (turning radius of the approach) to the proposed dumpster !be.tion, the egress only deSign of the driveway onto N.W. 7th Stre.~ (there was some concern as to whether motorists would obey this driveway design as egress only) and the bUilding design (possible inappropriateness of the shutters and lack of additional des ign features). ,- TJH:dim Attachment .:C:A;NVI' c:r PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM ~95-325 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION July 11, 1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: cl ti:!al- Copy, Inc. Applicant: Bob Feldman, owner Agent: George C. Davis Location: Southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street File No.: NWSP 95-004 Land Use Plan Designation: Local Rti:!tail Commercial (LRC) ,ji Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Type of Use: Copying service and print shop Number of Units: N/A square Footage: Site: 9,788 square feet (.225 acres) Building: 3,780 square feet Surroundi.. Land Uses and Y1ng: ...~ North - Boynton Beach Boulevard and farther north is Wendy's Restaurant, zoned C-2. South - , N. W. 1st Avenue and farther south are Single-family residences, zoned R-1A. East Medical office building, zoned C-2. West N.W. 7th Street and farther west is Gateway Center, zoned C-2. Existing Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with no vegetation. Proposed Development: The proposed retail printing business primarily serves countl"Y clubs. Therefore, most of theil" business iuvvLvc~ pl.;.k-ui-- QUY delivery directly to the customer. They also serve walk-in printing needs of the general public. Concurrency: Traffic - Vti:!rification has not yet been rti:!ceived from Palm Beach County Traffic Dlvision which lndicates that the anticipated small increase in trips gti:!nerated by the use complies with the City's traffic levels of service and Palm Beach \ Page 2 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 site Plan Review staff Report Clear Copy, In~. Driveways: Parking Facility: Landscaping: Building and Site RegulatioDs: -. .. - ~.r- ,. ,-" community Design plan: Siqnage: County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The applicant will be responsible for any required improvements determined to be necessary as part of Palm Beach county's review of the traffic study. Drainage - Insufficient drainage information has been submItted for the Engineering Division to certlfy compliance with the City's drainage levels of service at ythe time of site plan approval, as required. The Engineering Division is recommending that this be postponed to time of permit review. TWO, one-way driveways to proposed; a one-way ingress Avenue and a one-way egress street. the parking lot located on N. W. located on N. W. are 1st 7th The proposed parking facility contains the required thirteen (13) parking spaces, including one (1) handicap space. The landscape plan submitted reflects all reqUiredl landscaping. :J The proposed development meets the requirements of the building and site regulations. The total site area is 9,788 square feet with a building coverage of thirty-seven percent (37%). The building height is twenty-five (25) feet. The proposed color of the two-story stucco building , will be light pink with white trim, doors and window shutters, The roof will be brick colored s- tile. These colors are generally compatible with the colors of the neighboring structures which are predominantly of a Spanish/Mediterranean style. However, the shade of pink selected for the stucco does not appear to compl iment the br 1ck colol'ed roof tlle; a more orange shade of plnk is l.ecommended. A freestanding sign is proposed between Boynton Beach Boulevard and the front of the building. REVIEW OF DBPA.RTH~JoIT~L. . COMMENTS : Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding this request: DEPARTMENT ATTACHED MEMORANDUM Public works Utilities Fire Polic EngIneering Division #95-102 1;95-204 NjA ~95-0148 1i95-205 ~~ Page 3 Memorandum NWSP #95-004 Site Plan Review Staff Report Clear Copy, In~ Building Division Parks & Recreation Forester/Environmentalist Planning and Zoning #95-210 N/A N/A #95-326 The above Departments' comments may be addressed on the permit set of drawings. The remaining departments did not have comments regarding their review of the amended plans. RECOMMENDATION: The Plann~ng and Zoning Department recommends approval of th1s site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compl iance with staff comments and the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. DDC:dim xc: Central File I; IttfC"pt.. .:1. ,~;, . , ~ II I . ~ 0-. : \ fi, ! P ~ t. t- ..__1~' I .~ I I I , '. I 'I . I I o ~ ~ ~ ~ -$- --1 ~. -it ~. ~~t- - .... ~~., .... r.-~7j/"~-J$r-'AV'~^,U~ -. . TV 'OoYIL '.-1 --- ~I ~ ~ . Iu . '. ~\ ~ ~. , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-102 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Dir~tor SUBJ: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - Clear Copy, Inc. DATE: I June 22, 1995 :---~ /f . .* I , , . I / ' , The Public Works Department has no problems with the site plan for the above site and the plans can be forwarded to the Planning & Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory for consideration. ~>' beft Eichorst Public Works Director REier :.."!" - , s MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-204 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director 4Iifr;~ f.,r kiln A. Guidry:-' Director of Utilities FROM: Date: June 23, 1995 SuBJECT: Clear Copy, (nc. Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: I. A second fire hydrant may be required based on access evaluation by the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department staff 2. Plan shall show location of proposed water meter, (Sec. 26. 16(c)). 3. A sanitary sewer cleanout shall be installed, the size Qf the lateral, at the property line. Please show on your plans, (Sec. 26.33(b)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject. please contact Skip Milar at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milar Peter Mazzella Steve Campbell, Ftre Dept. File , "c BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 9S CLEAR COpy - 2ND REVIEW MEMO #0148 I have reviewed the above site plan ~~~:'~.'1~~I~.th suggested changes. ~-...' ..~..,.,...>~ U ~ ,~,.' V Respectfully, ~ (;;;? ~ Jc~~~ Police Department liS) liS) riS) ro lQ)olQ)ou oUdlo ~ @ .(Q) c~lj !iLrtJo~\) . ,-.t ':4-... '4. . , "\ ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-205 DATE: June 26. 1995 m T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 SUBJECT: CLEAR COpy INC., SECOND REVIEW cP-- Thc following comments/recommcndations are submitted for your revicw: I. The plan is sublcct to the parking lot regulations for paving. drainage. site lighting. curbing. landscaping. and irrigation permits. RECOMMENDATIONS I. Engineering recommends that the subject plan be forwarded to the P & ~ Board. 2. We also recommend a discussion with the Board regarding clarifying the location of driveways when a parcel abuts a local road and one of a higher classification (Chap. 23. Art.2H3). If there is. general agreement that the eode needs revision. it should be done quickly. One point that needs clarification is ... To what point on the driveway dch.~ 30' or I RO' dimensions go? - to the centerline of the DIW? or to the outside edge orthe ingress/egress D/W? The following modifications are also suggested: a) Chap. 23. Art.2H I: Change the maximum driveway width from 32' to 36'. Most driveways have threc lanes - one in and two out, usually a right turn lane and one for crossing maneuvers. Usually these lanes arc 12' each; however. if the 36' dimension is acceptable. I would like to see the city spccify that the two egress lanes be II' wide each alld the Inlresl lane, 14'. The purpose of this code requirement would be to allow a wider lane for vehicles coming in from a collector or arterial roadway to negotiate the turn as they decelerate. Having II' lanes for outgoing traffic is no hardship because they arc traveling at a low speed and then stopping at the stop sign. b) Chap 23. A L. Provide that the 25' driveway radii be a minimum dimension. For the same reason ~icles entering a snapping center. etc. from a 40 to 50 mph speed (actual speed. not posted speed) should hav.e a larger. "forgiving" radius. , - KRHIkrh C: William Hukill. Dcv. Dir. and to file. c::; BUILDING DIVISION MBMORANDUM NO. 95 - 210 June 26, 1995 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COIMBNT8 - 2nd 81TH PLAN RBVIBN CLBAR. COPY, INC. The Building Division has reviewed the amended plans for the above project and offers the following comments: l. Thirteen parking spaces are required; only 12 are shown. There is no handicap parking shown. 2. Handicap access from the right-of-way to the entrance of building is required. 3. Sidewalk on N.W. 1st Avenue is required. The above conments can be met at time of' building permit; therefore, we reconmend that the proj'ect be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. ~ Al ' ew~ol,.d . ",' / AN:bh Attachment/plans XC: William V. Hukill, P.R. ~F , - <:1..&1 C\ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-326 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Mlchael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: June 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Site Plan Project: Location: I Applicant: File No.: Revlew - 2nd Review - New clear Copy, Inc 660 W. Boynton Beach Bob Feldman, Owner NWSP 95-004 Site Plan Boulevard The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments ar8 divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comm~nts either from the first review o~ new comments as a result of the second review. To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the site and design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the BUilding Division for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. .1ease show and identify on the plans all curbing, wl1eelstops and landscaped areas. AL"eaS that must be protected by raised continuous curbing or wheelstops include all landscaped islands, landscaping adJacent to a parking stall and landscaping adjacent to curvilinear driveways where encroachment is likely to occur. Curb design shall comply with city standards. 2. State on the plans that Boynton Beach Boulevard is the front of the property. 3. Provide a note adjacent to the dumpster location identifying the type of landscaping material that is reqUired to screen three sides of the dumpster enclosure. 4. Add to the landscape plan/site plan all existing and proposed easements. Identify the type of easement and dimension the wldth. Note: Some landscape material is not ,"111 nwed to be planted wi th an easement and under overhead lines. 5. Show on the plan that the proposed landscaping adjacent to the intersection of N.W. 7th Street and N.W. 1st Street does not violate line-of-site requirements for areas within twenty-five feet of the intersection. 6. Submit and identify on the architectural elevation view drawings the color of all exterior materials depicted on the plan by name, manufacturer and model or style number. \~ Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-326 2nd Review, New Site Plan clear Copy, InG. File No.: NWS~ 95-004 7. Although the use is located within a C-2 district, print shops require environmental review. The applicant must obtain an environmental review permit prior to occupying the premises. 8. State on the plans the hours that the loading zone will be utilized and that th~se hours have been coordinated with Public Works so as to not conflict with trash pick. 9. Any conditions of approval rece1ved by Palm Beach County Traffic Division after their review of the traffic statement, must be complied with at time of permitting. II. RECOMMENDATIONS 10. It is recommended that a recycling container be provided in compliance with the criteria specified by the Public Works Department. 11. It is recommended that a more orange shade of pink is selected for the bUilding stucco to better compliment the color of the roof tile. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH:dim xc: - Central File .;ZndcQ..Clr ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~\ ~\ 'i\ (:)1. \J\ _A- - (- \ \ Lvv~1 ,UN \\f\J-\r . CLEAR coPy, \NC. ~ ',r. n nIT ,~ -....~. " '111'11 ."" 1M II'~ , ,__ r- ,.... ~~ " ',~_ ~,: R- ..;>-,.-::. --I-'\~-: -~. F-""'?1- / . .-' ~ ...-~' .... . , ,\.- ~" :1-"_-'''-'. =-. ' \\ ,,~t~. e : ;::. -:::. ..- .. =:::: --,.. ;;:: "" :: j I,', ,\', ,.- - ' ,I " .".. 'i-'\.-- ,-,-I . ~ -'--- '- \~~\~__' _ '~'-:"l->- l~ ;;::'\:: >-- - f- . .' ..- .--- / " .. d.:;:" , ~ , \. ''0>,,-, _ ~ ' :..' ,--!.or ~';g::::: . .~. _ i-- T' l:..... F''\A A .... \_,r" "I'.... ,'.- ~='- -- . I ~~ \C \ - 2:::-- ,..I i: t;, ill"" r\ - ,.. ~. _, I;Ji: :. ,i- Yl1' ..., -:' ' , ~.- '" . 'Iu .u7_.. "".. .. ,-;;:: -~, . .. " _ ._' .. _ ' L . . ., . i _ c- . ~~ '... ' ~ t: ': \" _ \::' L- .;\::_... ~ : I tl' h -\ '- ". ,___ ~" .- \_~" ~. ~ T 1\ ... II. ..~.~ 1_1-- - -~ ~ ,...- _ \. ~ .-1....-- -r . l'! 1- ~ J \ ' . [4' '. "..." -' . . ..... ...., <.. ..---< \ I .......~M.. I \ ...... \. I . - . . =" ' .___ ^ , ,1,1 ,.' tlL \ '. ',) -~ ...... \ _ 1(J-L1 ' I 'IJ. V 1\ 1 '/ ~Od~ I.. 'cP . .. ; ill. ..-;; . .1) ,..,..., 1 ,j (j . I . _ . ,_,,___A::.,./") . '-~... ~ . ' \ -.11" .' If ..!!' ;e::;~-~ 0,"" ~ " q ... , · ~ . ,___ pCO ' ~r-:\rr-C:-~M"a. '\ \ 1f'l4\ -aO"lJ .I.,.tii-J J!!.-'( J4 ~ . ~\ T' Tern" . ~ .... · . . .,.,,,;. ,~ ,~~;!. \~ . ~~:'__~I " .,', 't '.e'C · 01. '\;.1 ~\ ,\ " ~\ \ :\ ~;.n ,-1 ~ r\1 .' . : r - .~'-f\ ill ~ ~ 1\""/ ",.. · ~\ \ ~ .--' \ ll"'t.-:jl ~ ~.. y, ,lLi ~\ \ .}.~., .T':~"~~~-i~; I'~ \'~~J\ ~'t1~ ~"I _ r".;>o _'.. .,\....., \~\ ." . , · ....,.. '\'-11".\ \ -' \\' \( r.Ii "'I- '~.'.: '.', ~ L- ~. .l-.-'.- ~~ c~~;;.;;- \ : ....:,. \ 1l \~ \\aaI~"~\!t ~\ ~/'. " J--C 1. ?Jj vJfc:Bi 'i'i \ '::: '" r \ l \t t \ ~ C ... ,\, ." .." = · I.->V' ~ ~ ,.t l) . I .,J] , c..\' ';., .' \,-l'fj;:l~ ' _;:,r ~.-, ,,_ 'l\ _ _ ---1[1 bj'~'" _~I~'\@:r~'~l~r.~ m t::J l\ ,,,. ,."\ " .' ..... . _ ,.,If .. m . , ;').I':' '"\\.L. \ ~ l': _" ~; .-, :' '::; -::;::: F',IiA'l\--'- '- c~ /. .' . . . - -' --- .. - '" ". ". .. .' .' I .' l" _.:" : \:::: -:~'-::: "',1" .,,,,f 111 \ '. . ~ ~C .......~I J .....:. t -...::.: ':::\~. , ~ \ . I't ,~ ... ~ Ll' · ". .""'" \ . 3: ..' . r J . ,; : : '~n\ I \.l 1\ I JW \ ~ 1.-- \." . \ ,~ I \ ; ~ ,,;/""[90. m. ~ .. .' ., t.illLL P A ',V' ~.... ... ,,~ . rr :: '\ ..'I ~'~~~~;Z<:~'f;: ~':P~.'" ~ ~---/(~~- ,,:~ r,' PUO \. .' -; \. ,>-\ ",'~'...^ ..., ~ ',,' \..Ul;6.0 \ h'I.I.'..... ..' . ,. . . '. ,: '..:,' .... .... . ~ . '.' . .' y \._ ..~... .~..(, ~l ~~. . .: .. ~. 'W,-~ce .. . . ~~,,' ~ ......".'. \ ' l,t::. "1~". i.~.':' ~. ',' " .... " \ . "7. ~.' ...\. ' II 'l. \ ( . ~.r. .', 1\t\ \\\:\ \ \ \\ -~ 1 T \ \ :', ,.\ . ....C........ , ., -:'f'i. \lilt U _~ _, ~ . -r:"" ..,. T _ : . ,.T" ~it!!1"!1, ,I. A.n \ ,,:,. \ I , .1 LU ,..' "'.. ' , . ~' " . , ,.:-' c -# .' ,~ ,l..-' J 1 \ " '7,': ::.:...,,1." ,,~ \~~\ 1'/A _ .' ,. .'nl .,)'. -- ~- \./--~ -~~ ~ ,_ "'" ~ '\ ,__... =r ...~...-.c _. .. --' ---I t:< -- -::;....;r . ""\ I ~'\ '\ I". ,}~,7" .,...,,", .,0,0'"~: . \' \ -r t:''':' \ \' / c' ,\. ~ r 11TH' .'0 1/8 MILES ~r-i-\ ,t\'>~~~~\j .j ~:'f~.,}f~n';,~. ~'1t~, .\\\\\ \ \ . '..~ "1.1T'~ :. ,~\ \ I" ,.",.; \' ' \ '0 400.'800 r:EE' \ l.-....~'1 ,'- \:'\(e'1 "",,'/I?'. ,.........; - r ~ I ., ..' "\1 I \ \ .~ . .' .' .... .J--" . ~ .,...~~i,.. .....' . ec . ,'.: '. '. ~. ,','. .. . I orr · &oJ' r <, · . \ r- "_ ~-I II J I ~ - . ~ \It :~ c~ = , I. I ~ n\ ~ \ F L . ~ \-- \ \ \ \ ~ DEVELO"'nIlENT SERVICES DEPARTME:"'T PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM #97-467 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION September 23, 1997 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Name: Clear Copy, Inc. Applicant: Bob Feldman, property owner Agent: Bob Feldman location: Southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street (660 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard). File No.: MSPM 97-002 land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Type of Use: Copying service and print shop Number of Units: N/A Square Footage: Site Area: 13,700 square feet (0.3145 acres) Building Area: 3,780 square feet Surrounding land uses and Zoning District: Find attached Exhibit "A" - location map North - Boynton Beach Boulevard and farther north is Wendy's Restaurant, zoned C-2 South - N.W. 1st Avenue and farther south, are single family dwellings, zoned R-1 A Page 2 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #97-467 Clear Copy Existing and Proposed Characteristicsl Development: Concu rrency: a. Traffic- b. Drainage- Driveways: East - Medical office building, zoned C-2 West - N.W. 7th Street and farther west is Gateway Center, zoned C-2 On September 19, 1995, the City Commission approved, subject to comments, the site plan request for Clear Copy to allow a new print shop to be located at the southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street (660 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard). RHS Corporation subsequently filed a Notice of Administrative Appeal to appeal through the circuit court system the City's decision to approve Clear Copy's site plan. RHS owns and occupies the abutting property immediately east of Clear Copy's parcel. There is a medical/dental office building located on this abutting property. Subsequent to site plan approval, the applicant submitted a request to modify the previously approved site plan. The modified site plan was approved by the City Commission on March 19, 1996. Prior to the outcome of the RHS Corporation appeal, the applicant progressed through the permit and construction process and obtained a certificate of occupancy. The court subsequently determined that insufficient notice was given by the city to the adjacent property owners at the time of the initial approval and quashed the city's approval of the site plan. Therefore, the city required the applicant to resubmit and reprocess the site plan. This request is submitted in compliance with the court order. As requested by Palm Beach County Traffic Division, the applicant filed a restrictive covenant that limits the use of the structure to a print shop. A change in use can be requested in the future, but will require further review for traffic by the County. The Engineering Division has determined that the drainage plans meet the city code and drainage levels of service. Two, one-way driveways to the parking lot are reflected on the plans submitted. Both driveways are located on N.W. 7th Street. The south Page 3 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #97-467 Clear Copy Parking Facility: Landscaping: Building and Site Regulations: driveway is ingress only and the north driveway is egress only. The Engineering Division, Police Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department have determined that this design meets code and provides adequate access for emergency and sanitation vehicles. The parking facility illustrated on the plans submitted contains the required thirteen (13) parking spaces, including one (1) handicapped space. The landscape design reflected on the plans submitted meets the city code requirements. It is noted that the perimeter landscape requirements of Section 5.E of the city's landscape code do not apply to the parking area along Clear Copy's eastern property line. This is because there is an existing hedge on the adjacent property to the east. Although the width of the planting strip, within which the hedge is planted, tapers from 2 ~ feet to twenty inches, "said existing hedge may be used to satisfy the landscape requirements of this subsection provided that said existing hedge meets all applicable standards of this article", The standard for such a hedge is a height of not less than four feet. The existing hedge meets this standard. The plans submitted meet the requirements of the building and site regulations. The total site area is 13,700 square feet, the building coverage is thirty-seven percent (37%) and the building height is twenty-five (25) feet. Community Design Plan: The elevations submitted indicate the building to be two stories with brick colored tile roofing. The exterior walls are finished with a pink/peach stucco with white raised stucco bands. Windows are arched with bronze shutters. The building has a Spanishl Mediterranean style which complements the adjacent commercial buildings having the same style. Signage: A free-standing sign, between Boynton Beach Boulevard and the front of the building, is reflected on the plans submitted. The free-standing sign meets the sign code requirements (see Exhibit "C" - Signage). RECOMMENDA TION: Planning and Zoning recommends approval of this site plan request as submitted as all staff comments have been addressed (see Exhibit "0" - Conditions of Approval). /' ./, -------; Page 4 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #97-467 Clear Copy xc: Central File J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Clear Copy \MSPM\site plan staff report.doc EXHIBIT "A" LOCP:-lor,1 1V1AIJ CLEAR CO I:>Y , INC. \' ;I~ liT I I I _ :=i' ~ JlUP} '.;~ II IIJ ::... ::.... .. r./ " ,. '1 , '-1 >-11, , , _ . _ _ r-r"", -=I ~~ ' ~ - 'f I ,. - . , f-.:' r-t ~ _> _ -II-"~ - ,.. '1 :;.. " - ...r""tT, j"T'T"l"-o-" '. / . \ .-; , r-1 I " - _' -1-' --<. --<,;,;;..:;.; - - ' , . , , "r- ~~ :I~= -: E : = ~-' __1 :, -'.-3 ::.._ _ J '. I _ . _ -- =+ - -. - - -- fl., \ : - 1.-' . ~ ~..- .... " C : - ~ ~ -, - - I.. -- -- - ..:. ,-,' I " ,_ _ '- _ _ _ ~ -f- -- , .. - -- - -- .~ -=\:: ~ = -= :~rn\~ll / \.\~'-) =: '=:~".. ;~'~=; -: 1m .. ~ .. '\.(\. I III' ",1- n- ~ _I- ' r..Jj E ~~::: 1=i1 A A .. i I I I ,I .- ',-:-:- ,. - c: IUW"1I'1'1 "J I 1= '::::' ~ ,,)r-,..-Ie-: ~- ,- \!ill 1~lllnID~~ I '_ -'-< _ ):,.. ,LiIIIIl..LL-J - I~ I ' . ' ~111' : : - . U l ll' L-I '::' ~ - I _ ---l --: ~u~': . ,_ __ f- . ,-- _' I ; ! .- '1~.I~lfr~ -= - .. - IJ-' - -' =:= L-: ~ ';. I I = .,:: "..... Jl r1 i ' : . _ ~ f- .',.-' ' _ ~ -'" _ -' ~,~ . -I ~..-... I , : ::3 H 11 ~ \.. ~ ~ .~ ,-!. .' 11 _~ .- - .,-- - - ... - :>on-= '--I ~ " - -- ,,' -::; :,. -- : I=' R 3 r;'T~!: _/--' ~. I l- . '>,.',: - d_" --- --; U -, ~~,ll_T~_:'!) JG~ J f.: =-~ ~ ;: '., ~ ,T C-'\, I \ I \ I '_~_q JJ . If , ,) ~-< x ~- L-.' ; I- - -0 .,,' ",..: \ I IT r It' t {1 \ \ 'y -~\ _ - -c \' ! - R -4fl1J ' I ~J' '~L - , \ . /<~\ E~ , - - 1 \. I \ E - ~~~, If~~~i': i ,~~: '~Imi.~~\~~~ fr'T ~ :,i __b.oy/ , TO'" .d~""( ft_ -----.:;' \ !..\ 1\'\ t!;,.. ~~~Il ~:: II ~ \, illill_ rF~ilrr,r~ ~ .~r- J .",., 1\". . Tj ~I;;;-' ?\\k\I.1Iff '~j L -~", , - I ~Ii '. ' . ~: 'l r-{:-1 :~l1[ ,~~L?''''''' ~'~ \ II '~~"I.'l~~\ \1=13 ,"_'.: iLi\W~,,,,>IJ\~I\ ~:~J{,~~~t;.l.1 ~ \)1\ \ ~ P1\.._.......\W,,\_\ r 1\ 'i\'f "DC : ~r :\ \ U I_J' - ~ fInl-r.:r.i~ . i5E~~~ '~1 \' ,\ L.~~\J "~r III \\~I~~ I ~ ~ '\ : ,.1-'-':'~ H~'~ C;:;,J ~~-::~ I == 'lr""-'--- I I , : . -' 1l1. t! ~~ ~[~ ~, ,~l I ' ; ~ ~l : U,' . -, ~ :]..: ::1(:: 1=1 '~L....!- - i r..:. / 1 . f.: --J . # ~ 1~!rrQ: :: ::l::: .-- ~~-:rI ::JiL..- .r..: 1-. I i . ' , I ~'1 ~ '''';;.;u;~ ,- '~- ,p,W'", r '" iJL,;f~ J,t: '\I\U_-, l ~ ' \ \ I L j~ ~- {" .... '<"~&'-"""_--- -' !.', ,r~\ . ~~"I ; U' .' ~ ,,',.- I... . ". ':1-,... - --"'h.' 'I, . 1/8 MILES 1\ . \ ~ l' .' .~ <"'/~" < ,:-... _ .. .". ~.~ .0, . ~~~rrri~l~"""-'~~/'" "~ ..~",/,,: .~. ,~\~, w \ 11II \ I . '~.~_.. "O~flr"~' '., ~. , ;~~'))'~))f'~~ .' ~~,,-,"~::< '.: ',' _ . '0400. 'SOO FEET ~ ! .. ': ",: l . ,w; /'/ '- ),., 1 l '\. .' " n /' .; 5" j :.:n~~"'/",~~~"""'/"-,,,,,,~' "~ ~.\ \', \ rMNII./INti Pt=-pf.O-' I , ~"' .. . .,.~ . _.;< . _"" 1,' -\>0, '\.\ ' , " ~ j I I I III I II II . I \ \ . " \ I - EXHIBIT "B" / , , ,.- ---"-_'_-_"_-~---_'--'-,._--------_._..._,",..._._,--- -,-,.._-~. -..- - --~---~------_._----_.._.._- \ ~\~1 '.~~ \i \i. '1I~'; L.'i~ klll... \1 ~ t"W \~ \ ~ f:t1 it J . ~ G,\\;'.\ . ~ \"1.'" ,. ;, l \~\I \\ ", \\' \ \ ~ /~ ~ ~ <i ,Gl ~ \01 ~ \0 "" ''''l ... 'Jl<n '{;;(!l ~ .. n (1 ~ :!: q_ "'0 l:'- \ ;;:, t,<' \~ \ ~ ,S, , 00----- \ t1 \i., ~' ~. ~,., -'- i'<'\\: ~ ~:"..-'" ,','\ ",-~.---:!(I>I> .~~ , \~:;" ~ '1"" 'i~! c ~ II ..'" ..... ,_ ~ " . .n .~ ~ ".~,,~..r=-- ~" ' . , '..". ~ """., . .~ ~"" ~ ~;,~~~ ~ .::." ",J 'v \~".,"'. , G C ";. ,.., "~ ~ ~. ~.. .' .- ~ \? J ~ ~\ ~ ~ ~ t~ -; i ~ ~ : 0;" ;':- ~~,'l ~_ ;.. ".i;t, ~ N \~\~ ~?-\~ ~1 c. "1- ~ , ' ~~\f: tt~, %~ ,;\~';\S1 ~~\~ \<.~ \ i'i. ,_::I%- \;..- cI\ ~\"" . ,,,,",~''''''' ~~ - - ------~ \ : 1. O~ f';~'- ~ ~J" " \. ' . ) \' :. '" -,--,' ~ '- . ,) \ \\ . Q'i-:'.~~'::=='t,. ~~. ~ ..' c ,\11 \" \ ~ - " - ~~., ~ <. ,\'_ ii~i~ ' : ~\ q~ll~ \~ n ~_1;, ,l. Of, 7" ,~ \\ " l 1 " \ ~ _' ___1 ;. :f. ~ ~ ~. .::. .s, ,.... t \ \ \ \ , ,0 --._~---_.._-_. . \ .~ \ \ * \ \:::1..,. . ~.) \~ \ ,--r\ \\ \"''''\\ \ \, ~ ;;;. ,,n ~ F. ~ ~ ~ ,\- - \~ . \ .: ~ ~ ,9 \:' ~\ ~ r:. f. .... ,,_.~_...------------------ EXHIBIT "C" - I + :r - tt 0 T , \ ~ \1"\ ~ --- ::.LL "7l'lO~"2i 7?h1o.c1 7H1~J I,~I/~, SI3OV:f 'H)'~"J'. .., ..... I....,',... ,1tQ11'Vl_n "1II:')1l~""'.O ';Itf'I.)f't . ..,J,)I""". ","'.. .",1It "'QltW''''~ Q l~ ~\) J ~\-~ ~ ~ -J ~ ~)- D ~.~ ;r \\CL ~~ 2- )- -\- ~ j (L ~ t1l i~ ~ ~~ ,) ~ ::I ~S \1 -..) ~.2 :1 t-.) ~ >- ~} Hi; tl~ / \\) o Z ~;r<l <.:3: ?NO:!!lI. c::151\1~\l'lI\ ~ NO 1 ~ Y\ ':.t:L-.;1 'V"\lY'>'" V "Z. \ - "? 1V J.3W ;i(iI~'9? eJg.J.:Vril WV'\"11 d t':t NOrldl~~S3a ~-r 3 ~ N- ill "") ':I ~~~ \\ .- O;.f ':::J... ~-..4 --' l ~IJ~ .0 10~ :J~- -]\::1 4. ~) 2? .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ " . .. ~ .. .. .. "').- ~ , ~ '"2 .. .. ~ .. ...~ . G "'2 .. -j .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . e. .. .. f} .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. ~. , , ~...._.__._---,~--------~.__. ------------ EXHIBIT 11011 , .L- EXHIBIT "D" Conditions of Approval Project name: Clear Copy File number: MSPM 97-002 Reference: The plans consist of 11 sheets identified as I st Review. Maior Site Plan Modification. File # MSPM 97-002 with a August 18. 1997 Planning and Zoning date stamp marking. I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: None FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: None ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 1. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 2. To be determined. /bme s:\projects\cond of appr\ / DEVELOPMENT ORDER cln 0F BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: Clear Copy APPLICANT: Robert Feldman APPLICANT'S AGENT: Robert Feldman AGENT'S ADDRESS: 660 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: October 7, 1997 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Major Site Plan Modification LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 660 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "B" with notation "Included". 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby _ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other DATED: City Clerk J\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Palm Beach Realty\NWSP\DEVELOPMENT ORDER.doc ! /... -. (,.../ '''~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-143 Agenda Memorandum for March 19, 1996 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director DATE: March 15, 1996 SUBJECT: Clear Copy, Inc. - MMSP #96-03-003 (Minor site plan modification for parking lot and building design changes and request for overhang determination) Please place under Legal - Other, on the March 19, 1996 City Commission agenda, discussion of 1) a minor site plan modification that has been submitted for Clear Copy and 2) Commission legislative intent for commercial building overhangs as it relates to the pending RHS Corporation v. City of Boynton Beach case. INTRODUCTION On September 19, 1995, the City Commission approved, subject to comments, the site plan request for Clear Copy; a new print shop to be located at the southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street (660 W. Boynton Beach Boulevard) - see attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 96-142 - Exhibit A for location map. RHS Corporation subsequently filed a Notice of Administrative Appeal to appeal through the circuit court system the City's decision to approve Clear Copy's site plan. RHS owns and occupies the abutting property immediately east of Clear Copy's parcel. There is a medical/dental office building located on this abutting property. Since the September approval, the applicant has moved forward with construction permits and the building is currently under construction and nearing completion. On February 27, 1996, I received from the city engineer, William Hukill, a memorandum notifying the department that the applicant for Clear Copy had submitted, through permitting and in response to Mr. Hukill's request for a code compliance certification, a site plan drawing showing several modifications to the permit that had been previously approved for Clear Copy's site improvements. For expediency and simplification, all applicants are allowed to submit modifications directly through the permitting application process for determination of minor vs. major change or may submit modifications directly to the Planning and Zoning Department, with a letter describing the changes (although we have also allowed modification plans to be evaluated for determination by meeting with Planning and Zoning Department staff). Since the development is the subject of pending litigation, city policy requires staff to notify the legal department of any actions related to pending litigation. Such notification occurred and on March 4, 1996, the legal department advised staff of the following: a) that the City Commission be apprised, expeditiously (at their next available meeting), of the minor site plan modification that has been submitted; b) that the City Commission ratify staff's determination and c) that the RHS Corporation be notified that the modified site plan will be presented to the Commission at this meeting. As previously discussed with you, on March 8, 1996, the legal department filed a Motion for Extension of Time with the circuit court regarding the subject case. Reference in the motion was made TO: Carrie Parker -2- March 15, 1996 indicating that the modified site plan would come before the City Commission at their March 19, 1996 meeting. On or about March 5, 1996, the legal department notified the RHS Corporation that the minor site plan modification would be discussed at the March 19th Commission meeting. In addition, copies of this memorandum will be provided to the RHS Corporation, specifically Dr. Mark E. Roberts, today, after transmittal of this memorandum to you. It is the Planning and Zoning Department's responsibility to determine which departments review minor site plan modifications and to inform the applicant of the completeness of his submittal. After receipt of engineering plans to accompany the modified site plan received, staff distributed the submittal to the Technical Review Committee (TRC) for comments and placed the request on the agenda of the next available TRC meeting (March 12, 1996). It is noted that the standard method for obtaining comments from designated TRC members for minor site plan modifications is by telephone request to review plans held in the Building Division. However, the TRC meeting forum was used in this case due to the pending litigation and to more quickly and effectively assemble the attached materials for the March 19th Commission meeting. The modifications are described in the attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #96-142 and are illustrated in the attached copy of the modified site plan (Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #96 -142 Exhibi t B). After comparison with the September 1995 approved site plan (copy provided in attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #96-142 - Exhibit B), these modifications have been determined to be minor in nature and can, therefore, be approved administratively through the permit process. For clearer Commission understanding of the modifications requested, the original site plan staff report has been attached and revised to reflect the changes. Also attached in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 96-142 - Exhibit C is a list of all administrative comments that condition this minor site plan modification approval. For reference purposes, the applicable sections of the Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations (Part III of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances) used to determine the processing of a modification to an approved site plan are provided below. Following each criterion, staff's conclusion is included and appears in brackets: "Section 9. Modification of approved site plan. C. In making a minor/major modification determination, the planning and zoning director shall consider the following: 1. Does the modification increase the buildable square footage of the development by more than five (5) percent." [No change in the size of the building is requested.) 2. "Does the modification reduce the provided number of parking spaces below the required number of parking spaces." [No change in the number of parking spaces is requested.] 3. "Does the modification cause the development to be below the development standards for the zoning district in which it is located or other applicable standards in the Land Development Regulations." [The modification does not change, and continues to meet, the C-3 zoning district development standards (building and site regulations). In addition, compliance with the attached staff comments will ensure that all safety and technical concerns, as well as code requirements, have been addressed.) TO: Carrie Parker -3- March 15, 1996 4. "Does the modification have an adverse effect on adj acent or nearby property or reduce required physical buffers, such as fences, trees, or hedges." [The modifications include replacement of the N. W. 1st Avenue ingress only driveway for a N,W. 7th Street ingress only driveway, a flip-flop of the location of the row of parking spaces with the access aisle to the parking spaces, switching of the handicapped space location, addition of window sills to the building exterior. The building exterior modification does not lessen the appearance of the building. In fact, the change lends a more finished look to the building, making it more compatible with the exterior appearance of adjacent buildings. The driveway change meets code locational requirements and does not negatively affect adjacent properties. The parking lot "flip- flop" and handicapped space change are internal to the development and have no negative impact (virtually no impact at all) on adjacent properties; nor do they diminish the function of the parking lot. With regard to reduction of physical buffers, the modifications do not diminish the degree of buffering afforded by the september 1995 approved site plan. No change in the landscaping proposed as part of the original site plan approval for the area between the Clear Copy parking lot and Dr. Roberts' parking lot is requested, consistent with the September 19, 1995 city determination that this landscape buffer is acceptable.] 5. "Does the modification adversely affect the elevation design of the structure below the standards stated in the community design plan." [The modification to the elevation design of the structure meets the community design plan and as stated in criterion 4 above, the building exterior modification does not lessen the appearance of the building. In fact, the change lends a more finished look to the building, making it even more compatible with the exterior appearance of adjacent bui ldings . ] 6. "Does the modified development meet the concurrency requirements of the Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan. " [The modifications have no impact on the previously granted concurrency certification.] 7. "Does the modification alter the site layout so that the modified site plan does not resemble the approved site plan." [This criterion grants a certain degree of staff authority and requires application of judgement and common sense to assess the magnitude of change. Consistent application of this criterion is apparent through the quarterly reporting to the Commission of site plan waivers and minor modifications processed by the department. When magnitude of change and similarity, or lack thereof, is.evaluated between the approved site plan and the modification, the following comparisons are noted: a) no change in building location; TO: Carrie Parker -4- March 15, 1996 b) same building to parking relationship - building in front, parking in rear; c) no change in number of driveways or type of driveways (two-way va. one-way and ingress VB. egress); d) service areas are in same general location and method of refuse collection (curbside pick-up for trash and recyclables) is unchanged; e) degree, quality, quantity and location of landscaping is unchanged; f) type of parking spaces is unchanged; g) location of impervious lot, sidewalks and virtually unchanged. areas (parking structures) is h) building height, style, type and use are unchanged; and i) utility service modifications are to the extent that they have no effect on other site improvements. Therefore, based on the above evaluation, staff concluded that the changes requested constitute a minor site plan modification and meet the following definition of minor modification: II a non- impacting modification which will have no adverse effect on the approved site and development plan and no impact upon adjacent and nearby properties, and no adverse aesthetic impact when viewed from a public right -of -way as determined by the planning and zoning director II . In addition to ratification of staff's action on the modified site plan, the legal department advised that staff seek from the Commission a determination of their legislative intent when adopting the following section of the city's zoning code: Section 4. General Provisions. J. Other Structures. The following structures shall be permitted in front, rear or side setbacks as provided in this ordinance, in any zone, except where so noted; taking into consideration existing easements: 3. House eaves shall not overhang or exceed the setback lines for more than two (2) feet. Specifically the question is whether commercial buildings are allowed to overhang into setbacks, so long as the overhang does not exceed two feet. The Development Department states that historically overhangs of commercial buildings have been allowed, at time of inspection, to exceed the setback lines. These overhangs, which include building surface treatments, as well as window sills and cornices, have been reported to range from one inch to six inches. This determination is necessary because the tie-in survey submitted for the Clear Copy building indicates a 10 inch overhang into the front (north) and east side setbacks. Clear Copy's window sills, plaster, raised stucco bands and the cornice extend beyond the TO: Carrie Parker -5- March 15, 1996 setback by three inches, 1 1/4 inches and 10 inches respectively. The window sills were not part of the original approval and the cornice was extended a greater distance than originally planned in order to add roof ventilation; a design detail that is not considered until the construction drawing stage - after time of site plan approval. CONCLUSION In conclusion, two actions are requested by the Commission as follows: a) ratification of staff's action to process the submitted modifications as a minor site plan modification and b) a determination as to whether the Commission's action when approving the zoning code included various commercial building features to be treated as house eaves, thereby permitting such features on commercial buildings to extend into the setback by no more than two feet. tjh Attachments xc: Central File C:ClrCopy PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-l42 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR CITY COMMISSION March 22, 1996 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: Applicant: Agent: Location: File No.: Land Use Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Type of Use: Number of Units: Square Footage: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning District: Existing Site Characteristics: Proposed Modification: Clear Copy, Inc. Bob Feldman, Owner George C. Davis Southeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and N.W. 7th Street MMSP 96-03-003 Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Print shop N/A Site: 9,788 square feet (.225 acres) Building: 3,780 square feet Find attached Exhibit "A" - location map. North - Boynton Beach Boulevard and farther north commercial building, zoned C-2 South - N.W. 1st Avenue and farther south, single family dwellings, zoned R-1A Commercial building, zoned C-2 East West N. W. 7th Street and farther west commercial building, zoned C-2 The 3,780 square foot two-story building is under construction. The proposed request is to modify the previously approved parking lot to relocate one of two driveways and flip-flop a row of parking spaces with the access aisle location. Find attached Exhibit "B" - approved site plan and proposed modified site plan. The following are changes to the exterior elevations of the building that have been made or have been submitted for review since the September 19, 1995 City Commission approval of the site plan: Page 2 Memorandum No. 96-142 Site Plan Review Staff Clear Copy, Inc. File No. MMSP 96-03-003 Report i. change the color of the walls of the building from S-W BM 1-3 pink to Benjamin Moore base-2 OP-58 peach, change the shape of the windows by adding a radius top, ii. iii. added a horizontal stucco band mid height to the walls, iv. change the color of the roof tile from S- W BM 1-31 red to Adobe Copper Smooth, v. move the windows on the north elevation to the east approximately 6 feet, vi. ch:mge the swing of the door on the southeast corner of the building and vii. add decorative window sills Items i, 11, and iii where changes made as part of building permit rectification of the comments from City Commission approval of the site plan. Items iv, v and vi are changes that have been approved administratively through the permit process, as a waiver, and item vii is currently in permit review pending Commission determination of their legislative intent regarding house eaves. Concurrency: Traffic - As requested by Palm Beach County Traffic Division, the applicant filed a restrictive covenant that limits the use of the structure to a print shop, unless further reviewed for traffic by the County. Drainage - Drainage submitted Division. awaiting applicant code. information has been to the Engineering The city engineer is certification from the that the drainage meets Driveways I Two, one-way driveways to the parking lot are proposed. Both driveways are located on N.W. 7th Street. The south driveway is ingress only and the north driveway is egress only. Parking Facility: The proposed parking facility contains the required thirteen (13) parking spaces, including one (1) handicapped space. As previously approved, curb pick-up is the method refuse and recyclable material will be collected. Landscaping: Following compliance with staff comments, the proposed development will comply with the minimum landscaping required by code. The applicant has agreed to dedicate to the city area in the southwest corner of the site to construct the required sidewalk in the city right-of-way. Page 3 Memorandum No. 96-142 Site Plan Review Staff Report Clear Copy, Inc. File No. MMSP 96-03-003 Building and Site Regulations: The proposed development meets the requirements of the building and site regulations. Total site area is 9,788 square feet, building coverage is thirty- seven percent (37%) and the building height is twenty-five (25) feet. Community Design Plan: As a condition of site plan approval the proposed two-story stucco building will be a peach color with white trim. Signage: A free standing sign is proposed between Boynton Beach Boulevard and the front of the building. The free standing sign is under construction. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department has granted approval of this site plan modification request, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Administrative Conditions. Deficiencies identified in this exhibit shall be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit. Commission ratification of this action is recommended. MEH:dim xc: Central File a:STFFRPTMM.CLE E X H I BIT "A" LOC.\TION MAP CLEAR COpy, INC. \' :'rl I rr fn-;:: l=r--..:!=,l J-UJH~-:~L Il ~1J ~ ::.. -"J . . H _I" ... ~ _ - r" , ,~ =t!= - - " , ,~[...1' R 1 _. - - ~ 1-: - ... . I '-. - / . \l- _', II_d-_: - -,'0;-: "0', 1- r- '\ 'I-tV:, E :1- -- -- -:;:::: ::..- - - ;. / .\ ~.. .'-' ._, - - -r- - - t-:=.::: -- - ' t, 'U~ ,- - - - -' ; - --. r= - '} , 'V\~C: ,- '.-'-' -1-1 ,-- - .- -- I. .. '.~~ -- - r--. /=::-.::=-= - ,= =- --.. / '..~~ 1- - - -- -- - · (\..\~\l ,='~~.~_ ~:;~ ~~'~=:; ~ -:mJ ... '( 11 l "1_ ,,- UlliJ -::-~::= . -_ Lll ~J A A \ ! ~;:: Ii: r- .: r- ~ := ,- -- _ ~ ~ : . LIIIIIl.l_l-=. ':ii - -=:I -r, ::=:. I ~ ! . I . : UlT' t L.: - II : '\ ; \ - -" 'l.ilife{jl .~- - ~ ~'~. - ~ ~ rr--j : .~. ;! l~ · .g ~ ~ \i :J - ~ : 1'1 }l-i -. \ ;_ r'" _'~~~ )-If-I r ~.,. .: - .-.1 I . . : = J.=1- I ~T I.j ~ ~ ~, ' ,~ ' ~ i ~ I - '"'- _ . - ~ \ ~ )s "'i ,.... __ ........ ::... -- : 1""1 ,.., 3 lr rrTll~l'--'i.J T '~l:t. ~- ~: .. - ~ .:. -. ----~ '-U -. ~ ~_:.!J I' G~' 11 ('f--:-"~ ~ '., ~ : =,:, f-l, I T, iI, .~~\ ~ .. l' ,\ I 'J '::; \ -...: AV '-.' ~ :: . - 1 I r 1- ____ "I I I / ! J i y./ _x . - -, I F ~ \.. "Or ~ ~., I -r~j! if'- I J J: 'V - I \ " "~' ()) c. - - 1- ; , I E I ill -./.' /.f' "-, ~!2 _.',: . ( , ;;..,.;. l-r~rtI~~; -) . ""': ~ =-' .~!,: "": '.l..-:-1' '.." I, __!Tl-e.2 ~ ,- ~.;. v I~. ..--..,,- iT - pee . " ~~d'; i -i\JG.a 'f11]lu 't\~ ~ ~ \ ~nr.. I 8~'r()'" JJ~~("_I----;' '~]"" \l'-~T --Yl''l~'' ~~.Il' -:::IC';;'" \,\, ~.~~II~ -. -n ~~"... \~L \l~t~~~I"'I'I,L'ih ~I~I '1 ~i~ ~"I '\~~IL :I ~'\" ~'~ I -' I! rfl ,( ~ rj~fflf~l rr~IC?-'f \~\\\I II ~H'-I R3(_~'l- ~~~:'t~IJ\~\ li~Ii][;?fl@~;l\tl\)P 1 l1~r \ , !~ \ I \"'11" j'iN k ,1,"('U1f':rJ~ F~:';= tit \' ,\:~,t , JL ~tij \.....;,.~~:' (\.' \i~' -M _ H~.~L-J-;.J ~I_..:_B~IJ - 1f I 1 " I 0,) \ -1=1 e- C IJ \ ,\ ".-.- .. ,": l : ~ .I'I':1::lEIIlUlli!I n-:-:.J r ~ i; ~' i i , ''\I - i,(fi4~P;~,~'\\8It~~:r- ~~~~ ~ 101'1 " .. -':i 1;;'_',1 j,r C~j~~ff 1\ ~::"lli";m?'~ Lll ~ ; 1 R,Fe; ~.~r1/~;.--: .JiJ:i\I~!ll;f~~d\m\lh, \ r I tl' r " ' . I ~ f. : I ... ~r' !lJl. \ \ r. I ,I ' . ';, · - ' : I ~ I -:' "Jrihl' 4 \ II :\ f1 . U:'LL ] ~ I~ r ' , ' '.. ~ ~ '" '-.__ ' ", .{1 \ P U 0 ffi(] \ .i \ U' \. . ~ ;.',:- ,'<< ..'~ '.....~.... .....':,. _ ~ L.Ul:6.0 \-- .m-U\Ii I. ~ 'h . ",l~ '" ~-.~ , "~... 11 , ..'. ._, '- '. ., .. \. _~~~~' '~. ~"/.~( . ::.,:' ,_~' il>LAC IS " 'mill : . ~EC "'. ~ . ~ I ;1' f ~ I ~ ~ I '. ! : _', J -Hll::: .. '. ~ .' f- I L._ I I , · [IT . v - i- . .,. I ~ ,.' . ---, I ,14 ' ~ I l ,IJ I ,1=. ., . n~ . '.' f - J.-:- _ _a ,.,d~ t ~ '. ~, 1~~~~ . '... ~ ~ ~ L.- .- --- ~ ~CaJ"'. 'trti 11--7--- ~.;-- -- ~ ~'!-?- -. - - 'L~I I~ II . .l~" I~' ...4! ,O/~ ....tJ..~ 11t1 .:'" 'l'!o"t!l' -nl~~ . (/ J -'---'- ~l ~ ~:, / I TT'") . ~~J1~ II.' ~I ,0 1/8 MilES" )-c-_ _[ 1M ~ - _II: JW~}hi rrn ,:, -1.1111 'I' . ' ;fK?, "~' .; v'~,:~({J! . . '''-- ./ . :1" ::!L;U ,I t!_p I"~ ,P:? T(.~ (~qJ:' I'~ :' 0 400. 800 FE~T , I .) n, I. ~r-..-- \V . ','/ ",,1t~ I, \. ) " __ PLAf\/NI/II1t (JEPT". (;-9: ... '1'''. ",'r ~ \ 'J' . - - l L ~~-r::=rr '. ~\}~rj ~~t: ,mlffif.m.. 11~ffi1ffi1J.l~ . r '11]' . . I \ ............ J EJtUl.Bl.'t II B II \ \ " ~ 1-. \ll I ~ )> -0 -0 ]J ~ m o CJ) - -i m ""C ~ Z CO ........ ...L CO ........ CO 01 ~ t.. I ' .\:: I -.', ~. ltil '. '" '.. ~ ..t. ,- ~ . . , . r _. . \ a.o @ I ~ Iv" } ~ -$- . . 'C - - . .;.1. I ...'--t-i1=-:' ~ - .... .............. " .. '. ~...:..'I~ I..tl.~ J ,....J.t ~ ~^,I./ ~ L. . . IV .J ...,-u. -I ..... .tIIl V ,. ... , II I '. · . ...... ! , I t i I,,' I U wp i \~-' :';: 'i ( ! ~- ~ t) I3 :1' ~~ I . ! f -lU...eC'l1n~R f:liAnnST\J'D ; ~ ~ ~ . .. so. co ' u .._ ~ ~ l a' 'I ! '; ~ ; d ~ ~ I~' ~ c \8V e Ii ~ <> .... . ~ i T'. ~ · ~I i ~ i ~. :- '. 0 ' III .: < 'jU ,"!o:-'~ ,it&J' ,; P ) ti m I~ ~ nffll' ' -._t_,. I f ~. ~ ~~""" I'" ,. - I.; I i ,~~ l I~ ., I' ~ ! ~. ~ ' . lE !! i':t I"1I1fT c..cac, .' :~ ~ o~ ~ I \I ~ .I., CJ 6' -{~~- i~ : in I - ~ b' h,: - : = " ~,w, I~ "';!"'L fC,."r~i U ~i I I~I ~. !I ~I r a II ._-_.,,-.,~.,.....~. .....--... 1 1] J] o "tJ o en m o ~ - Z o J] CIJ - -I m -U ~ Z s: o o - -n - (1 ~ - o z :a ~ l'" ~ ~ ~ ~ :l ~ ~ Cq.o .. " ~ . o ~ l.. E X H I BIT .. C II EXHIBIT "C" Administrative Conditions Project name: Clear Copy, Inc. File number: MMSP 96-03-003 Reference: One (1) sheet. ST-1. prepared by Georae C. Davis. Architect (as revised March 5. 1996) and two (2) sheets Drepared b~ H. Burton Smith. P.E. sianed. sealed and dated 3/2/96 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: 1. As previously approved, Public Works has no concerns providing curbside service for the removal of solid waste and recycling UTILITIES Comments: 2. A mini manhole will be required in Clear Copy's north entrance placed over the City sanitary sewer cleanout near the property line per Utility Department criteria. I FIRE I I I Comments: NONE POLICE . Comments: 3 . Place bollards along the east edge of the handicap parking space safety zone and the north half of the east edge of the handicap space. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 4. Certification by the applicant's design professional that the work, when completed, will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and City Commission approvals. 5. Elimination of dimensional variations between Davis drawings and Smith drawings. 6. Restriping of NW 7th Street as directed. 7. Dedication of property occupied by small portion of sidewalk infringing on southwest corner of site. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 8. Provide Building Division with a copy of the final approved plans to be incorporated with the construction plans. I PARKS AND RECREATION I I I Comments: NONE DEPARTMENTS FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 9. Show, dimension and label on the site/landscape plan the line-of-site triangles required at the intersection of N.W. 1st Avenue and N.W. 7th Street, and both sides of each ingress/egress driveway located on N.W. 7th Street. Add a typical note to the plan that indicates the landscaping within the line-of-sight triangles between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet in height shall be maintained to allow an unobstructed cross visibility. Also, show on the site/landscape plan the zoning code visual obstruction safe sight corner. [LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 Hand Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 4 E] . 10. Identify on the site/landscape plan the location of the raised curb required to protect the landscaping. [LDR, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II, E]. 11. On the site/landscape plan identify the specie, spacing and height of the landscaping shown. All landscaping shall be identified consistent with the specifications of the landscape code. Note: One-half of the total number of trees and hedges shall be identified as a native specie. [LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 C, D, E, and Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.4.6]. 12. Specify on the site/landscape plan that the grade of the landscape material is Florida #1 or better, that the landscape material will be installed in a sound workmanlike manner and that the material will be irrigated with an automatic water supply system. [LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 A, B, C, and Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.4.6] . 13. Specify on the site/landscape plan the specie of lawn grass and the method of installation. [LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 C 6] . 14. Add to the site/landscape plan the existing lane striping within the N.W. 7th Street right-of-way directly west of the site. Page 2 of 3 INCLUDE REJECT DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 15. To conform to accepted practices, amend the configuration and horizontal control dimensions of the landscape strips and parking lot shown on the sheet identified Development Plan (prepared by H. Burton Smith, P .E.) to match sheet ST-l (Site/Landscape Plan - prepared by George Davis, Architect) . 16. Place a note on site/landscape plan that indicates the refuse and recyclable material generated at the site will be collected via curb pickup. Recommendation(s) : 17. It is recommended that the oversized parking space located directly west of the building be reduced to meet minimum standards. This change would allow the slope of the driveway to have a smoother transition from the right-of-way into the site. 18. To clarify the request, it is recommended that a distinguishable symbol (cloud) be used to identify the areas of the site/landscape plan that are being revised from the original permit plans #95-4541. TJH:dim a:ComDept.Cle Page 3 of 3